中文 · EN

《道德真經集義(一)》Vol. 9

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 9 / 10 10,243 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集義(一)》 Vol. 9 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 20 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集義(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

道德眞經集義卷之九噐三     盱江危大有集    第六十四章 其安易持其未兆易謀其脆易破其微易散 爲之於未有治之於未亂  吕氏曰古之君天下者治必有亂對安必  有危對當其國家安靜則易爲維持及其  傾危則難於守禦故周書曰制治於未亂  保邦於未危蓋芽糵未堅則其脆易破悔  吝未著則幾微易散取之己也少壯身安  之時易於行持見功猶速蓋疾病未兆其  修煉則易謀而易成暨乎嗜慾過多神衰  精損疾病一作便逐逝波儻保養得宜神  氣沖和或染微痾亦易治也故曰其安易  持其未兆易謀其脆易破其微易散且未  疾之人易爲醫也未危之國易爲謀也若  預爲之防則未然之禍何由而萌若先爲  之計則未形之患何縁而超是以聖人不  畏多難而畏無難况禍福本相倚伏自其  胎基之未兆而慮之禍可轉而爲福任其  已然忽之福可移而爲禍不可救藥矣故  治身調心之道盍亦預防其情慾和適其  神氣而使之不亂也○李氏曰按上章之  義其安易持言作事謀始修眞志士正心  於思慮之先抑情於感物之前則心易正  情易絶茍治事於已亂遠禍於已萌不亦  難乎○林氏曰方其安時持之則易及至  危則難持矣事之未萌謀之則易見其形  見則難謀矣脆而未堅攻則易破及其已
Interpretation

This passage expounds the principle of preventing problems before they arise. When matters are still in a stable state, they are easiest to control; when issues show no signs of emerging, they are easiest to plan for; fragile things are most easily broken, and subtle problems are most readily dissolved. One must prepare before events occur and address disorder before it takes shape.

The ancient rulers who governed the world understood that within stability inevitably lurks chaos, and within peace inevitably hides crisis. A nation is easiest to maintain when at peace, but once overturned, it becomes nearly impossible to restore. As the Zhou Documents state: "Establish systems before disorder arises; stabilize the state before crises emerge." Tender sprouts are easiest to break when not yet hardened; faults are easiest to eliminate before becoming apparent. For people, cultivation is most effective during youthful vigor and physical health; attempting remedies when desires multiply, the spirit (Shen) declines, and illness strikes is as difficult as chasing receding waves. With proper daily maintenance, even minor ailments can be easily cured.

Those not yet ill are easiest to treat; nations not yet in crisis are easiest to plan for. With preventive measures, disasters find no opening; with advance preparation, hidden dangers cannot manifest. Thus, sages fear not numerous difficulties, but rather becoming lax when facing no challenges. Fortune and misfortune inherently transform into each other—by thorough consideration before calamity appears, misfortune can turn to fortune; through neglect, fortune may become irreversible disaster.

The same principles apply to self-cultivation: regulate one's mental state before desires arise, maintaining equilibrium to prevent confusion. Just as undertakings require planning at their inception, Dao practitioners must rectify their thoughts before distractions emerge and restrain desires before external temptations arise—this makes the heart-mind easier to correct and desires easier to sever. Is it not far more difficult to manage situations after chaos erupts or to evade disasters after they occur?

Affairs are easily grasped when stable but become uncontrollable when critical; matters are easily planned when latent but hard to address when manifest; fragility is easily broken, but solidity resists assault. All this emphasizes the crucial importance of timing—addressing problems promptly while still in their embryonic state.

 堅則難攻矣事必爲於未有之先治必謀  於未亂之始 合抱之木生於毫末九層之臺起於累土千 里之行始於足下  吕氏曰患不預防惡不杜漸其由植木乎  初生於毫末可拔而絶之甚易爲力矣及  其合抱青青百尋烏可伐哉又若築臺焉  超土於一畚可蹴而超之又何難哉及其  九層也聳百尺之勢烏可毁哉又若遠行  始於跬步可旋踵而返及其千里長涉渺  渺烏可還哉故曰合抱之木生於毫末九  層之臺起於累土千里之行始於足下○  李氏曰積小成大不可救也故易有履霜  堅冰之戒傳曰臣弑其君子弑其父非一  朝一夕之故其所由來漸矣由辯之不早  辯也○林氏曰合抱之木其生也必自毫  末而始九層之臺其築也必自一簣之土  而始千里之行必自發足而始凡此以上  皆言學道者必知幾 爲者敗之執者失之是以聖人無爲故無敗 無執故無失  吕氏曰有爲於分别則敗其自然有執於  欲利則失其精神未若安其所安守其所  守則治而不知其治爲而不見其爲矣聖  人察夫事之所敗超於有爲不爲則何敗  之有意之所失失有所執不執則何失之  有治身有爲則形勞神役心靈疲葡有執  則偏滯方隅不離衆有去道遠矣曾未嘗  無爲無執天眞純粹故亘萬劫而無敗無  象可執何失之有○何氏曰聖人作事謀
Interpretation

Firm things are hard to overcome; thus one must prepare before problems arise, and govern a nation before disorder takes root.

Just as a giant tree that takes both arms to encircle grows from a tiny sprout, a nine-tiered tower is built basket by basket of earth, and a thousand-mile journey begins with a single step. Master Lü (Lü Dongbin) explains: When calamities go unprevented and misdeeds unchecked, it's like planting trees—easy to uproot when just sprouting, but impossible to fell when grown into towering trunks. Similarly, a tower can be kicked down when just one basket of earth is laid, but becomes indestructible when nine tiers are complete. Or consider travel: turning back is simple at the first step, but unthinkable after a thousand miles. Thus all great things accumulate from small beginnings.

Master Li (Li Daochun) adds: This process of accumulation is irreversible, just as the Book of Changes warns "treading on frost means solid ice is coming," and the Zuo Commentary states that ministers assassinating rulers or sons killing fathers never happen suddenly—they stem from undetected early signs. Master Lin (Lin Lingsu) emphasizes: Dao cultivators must understand this principle of discerning the great within the small.

Forcing actions leads to failure; clinging tightly results in loss. Therefore, sages follow naturalness (ziran) and thus never fail, hold nothing tightly and thus lose nothing. Master Lü explains: Artificial distinctions disrupt natural harmony, while coveting gains depletes one's spirit (shen). Better to abide in one's original state—governing the world so subtly people feel ungoverned, acting so effortlessly it seems like non-action (wuwei). Sages know failure stems from forcing, hence they never act arbitrarily; they understand loss comes from clinging, hence they never grasp forcefully. In self-cultivation, deliberate effort exhausts body and mind, while attachment leads astray from the Dao. Sages eternally preserve their natural, pristine essence (jing), thus they never fail and have nothing to lose. Immortal He (He Xiangu) concludes: Sages always prepare while conditions are still favorable.

 始善始善終曾不敢輕於有爲執其所見  蓋懷微妙抱樸質不敢超天下之爭心循  理而舉事吾何爲因時而立功吾何執名  各自命事由自然吾何敗何失 民之從事常於幾成而敗之慎終如始則無 敗事  吕氏曰世人雖務於善事摩不有初鮮克  有終皆初勤而後惰始樂而終厭幾於成  而復敗之良由抱一不固則胎眞不凝丹  液漏泄故乃曰炁亡液漏非己形若夫至  人則用志不分始終如一萬神自正敦能  敗之○何氏曰凡民好爲者以因循爲無  能好執者以通變爲無守所以事敗於垂  成此言不能慎終如始而爲有初鮮終之  戒 是以聖人欲不欲不貴難得之貨學不學復 衆人之所過以輔萬物之自然而不敢爲  吕氏曰至人非無欲也欲人之所不欲不  以物易性則難得之貨又奚貴之有非無  學也學人之所不學不以摶溺爲心凡衆  人之所過吾得以復之故曰是以聖人欲  不欲不貴難得之貨學不學復衆人之所  過以至不益生不助長順物自然無容私  焉道可以爲親德可以爲友以道德輔佐  其體觸事莫非自然而然曷敢有所爲也  ○吴氏曰聖人之欲以不欲爲欲聖人之  學以不學爲學難得之貨人所欲者不貴  重之是不欲其所可欲也故曰欲不欲衆  人之所趨者我則不趨衆人掉臂過之而
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the behavioral principles and worldly attitudes that Daoist practitioners should uphold.

Those with true wisdom never act rashly from beginning to end, nor do they cling stubbornly to personal views. They harbor the subtle teachings of the Dao (the Way) within their hearts, maintain their original质朴本性 (simple nature), refrain from worldly contention, and act in accordance with the natural order. They neither deliberately pursue fame nor rigidly adhere to fixed methods, but instead follow the laws of nature—thus avoiding failure.

Ordinary people often fail at the brink of success. If they treated the conclusion with the same caution as the beginning, they wouldn't meet with failure. Though worldly people all seek good deeds, they frequently start strong but finish weak—diligent at first but lazy later, enthusiastic initially but weary eventually, succeeding within sight yet failing ultimately. This occurs because they cannot steadfastly maintain the Daoist mind, causing their Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) to dissipate, making it difficult to achieve Neidan (internal alchemy). In contrast, true adepts concentrate wholeheartedly and remain consistent from start to finish, naturally causing the myriad Shen (spirit) to return to their proper places—who could possibly cause them to fail?

Those who prefer following conventions view adaptability as incompetence, while those who cling to fixed opinions see flexibility as lack of resolve. Hence, they often fail when nearing success. This serves as a warning against failing to finish what one begins well.

Therefore, sages pursue what ordinary people do not, valuing no rare treasures. They learn what others neglect, correcting common mistakes while assisting all things in their natural development, never daring to interfere arbitrarily. Adepts of the Dao are not without desires—they simply desire what others disregard, never exchanging their innate nature for external things. What value could rare treasures hold for them? They do not refrain from learning—they simply study what others overlook, never indulging in worldly knowledge. Where the multitudes err, they can rectify.

Sages do not artificially prolong life nor forcibly alter the course of events, completely following natural laws without selfish interference. They regard the Dao as kin and De (Virtue) as friend, cultivating body and mind through these principles. Facing any circumstance, they act with natural spontaneity—how would they dare to interfere recklessly? The sage's desire takes "non-desire" as its object; the sage's learning takes "non-learning" as its study. What the masses chase as rare, sages disregard—this constitutes not pursuing what others pursue. Where crowds flock, sages do not follow.

 不願者我則遣反其處是不學衆人之所  學也故曰學不學凡此不欲不學者蓋以  萬物之理無爲而自然故吾亦無爲與萬  物同一自然如輔之以輪輻相依附而爲  一也○何氏曰此章先言爲之於未有中  言爲者敗之末又言不敢爲然則爲者是  乎不爲者是乎皆是也豈不曰爲無爲則  無不治○林氏曰衆人之所不欲者聖人  欲之衆人之所貴者聖人不貴之借喻語  也衆人之所不學者聖人學之衆人之所  過而不視者聖人反而視之復返也此亦  借喻語也聖人惟其如此於事事皆有不 敢爲之心而後可以輔萬物之自然    第六十五章 古之善爲道者非以明民將以愚之民之難 治以其智多  吕氏曰古之時善爲治化民者以道集虚  以性開天正心誠意欲導斯民於樸質之  地盛德容貌終日如愚使民終身由之而  莫之所以然善以道自治者非顯彰其光  耀以眩惑於世俗同乎無知抱樸而已○  吴氏曰上古無爲而治其民淳樸而無知  後世有爲而治其民澆偽而有之是以難  治也○林氏曰聰明道之累也聖人之教  人常欲使之晦其聰明不至於自累故曰  非以明民將以愚之智巧多則民愈難治  故以智治國者反爲國之害也○李氏曰  將以愚之者謂其政悶悶也民之難治以  其智多者謂其政察察故也
Interpretation

The truly wise rulers of antiquity who understood the great Dao (the fundamental laws of the cosmos) did not teach people to become clever and cunning, but guided them back to simplicity. The difficulty in governing people arises precisely from their excessive cleverness.

Master Lü explains: Ancient rulers skilled in educating the populace opened the righteous Qi (vital energy) of heaven and earth through the Dao (achieving emptiness by quieting the mind) and innate nature, using sincere intention to lead people back to their original state of simplicity. Though profoundly virtuous, they appeared dull and unassuming, allowing people to follow the natural way unconsciously. Those who truly cultivate themselves through the Dao don't dazzle the world with brilliance, but maintain a state of no-knowledge and no-desire, embracing their fundamental authenticity.

Master Wu adds: In the earliest times, governance through Wuwei (non-action) prevailed, and people remained pure and guileless. Later generations began acting with deliberate intention, making people hypocritical and cunning—hence the difficulty in governance. Master Lin observes: Cleverness and wisdom actually become burdens to the Dao. The sages' teachings always advise people to restrain their cleverness to avoid becoming encumbered by it. The more cleverness increases, the harder governance becomes—using cleverness to govern a nation may ultimately bring disaster to the state.

Master Li further explains: "Guiding back to simplicity" refers to implementing generous policies, while "the people being hard to govern" results from overly shrewd and harsh policies. Just as wheel spokes unite around the hub to form a whole, the sage—through an attitude of "daring not act recklessly"—can assist all things in their natural development. What ordinary people avoid doing, the sage does; what ordinary people disregard, the sage values. This counterintuitive thinking represents the sage's way of assisting nature.

故以智治國國之賊不以智治國國之福知 此兩者亦楷式常知楷式是謂玄德玄德深 矣遠矣與物反矣然後乃至於大順  林氏曰以智治國者反爲國之害蓋上下  相尋皆以智巧則亂之所由生故曰以智  治國國之賊不以智治國國之福兩者智  與不智也能知智之爲賊不智之爲福則  可爲天下法矣能知此法則可以謂之玄  妙之德深矣遠矣者歎美之辭也大順即  自然也○吕氏曰夫弓弩畢弋之智多則  禽亂於上矣鈎餌網罟之智多則魚亂於  水矣智詐漸毒頡滑堅白解垢同異之變  多則俗惑於辯矣夫上以智御下則下以  智應上故上下殽亂奸臣賊子侵權怙勢  何所不有此不謂之以智治國而何且古  之有國者結繩畫地其政悶悶其民淳淳  不治而自治所以開人之天曾未若開天  之天此不謂不以智治國而何若治身而  以智自役則神明不安烏得不盜其眞氣  乎生而不以智爲者謂之以智養恬也智  與恬交相養則百神平泰萬氣皆融非忘  形抱道者敦能此乎故曰以智治國國之  賊不以智治國國之福蓋用智者蠹政害  民不用智者善政養民兩者楷模而法式  之也既知楷式而不用其智致斯民於富  夀循天之理與天同德矣故曰知此兩者  亦楷式常知楷式是謂玄德夫玄德者深  不可測遠不可窺至幽至微不可察也然
Interpretation

To govern a state with cunning artifice is to bring calamity upon it. When both superiors and subordinates engage in mutual scheming and manipulation, this becomes the root of chaos. Thus, governing through cleverness is the state's disaster, while governing without such cleverness is its blessing. These two approaches—employing cunning or abstaining from it—if one understands the harm of the former and the benefit of the latter, can serve as the guiding principle for ordering the world.

One who comprehends this principle possesses "profound virtue" (xuande). This virtue is immensely deep and far-reaching, entirely contrary to worldly practices, yet ultimately leads to perfect harmony with nature.

Lin Xiyi explains: Just as overly intricate hunting tools throw birds into confusion and overly elaborate fishing gear brings calamity to aquatic creatures, an excess of sophistry in society bewilders the people. When superiors use cunning to control subordinates, the latter will respond with cunning of their own. This mutual scheming between high and low allows treacherous ministers and usurpers to seize power. The ancient sage-kings governed with simple knotted ropes for record-keeping—their governance appeared plain, yet the people remained simple and natural. This was the true practice of non-action (wuwei).

Lü Huiqing further elaborates: As with governing a state, so too with cultivating the self. If one drives oneself with cunning artifice, the spirit (shen) becomes unsettled and the vital energy (qi) dissipates. True cultivation lies in allowing cleverness and serenity to nourish each other, thereby pacifying the hundred spirits and harmonizing the breath. Only those who forget their physical form and unite with the Dao (Way) can achieve this. Therefore, governing with cunning harms the people while governing without it benefits them—these two form a striking contrast. Understanding this principle and then refraining from cunning artifice, allowing the people to naturally prosper and live long lives—this is following the heavenly Dao and sharing in its virtue.

"Profound virtue" is unfathomably deep and invisibly distant—the most subtle and mysterious state. Though it appears contrary to common sense, it leads to the greatest harmony.

 觀其用似與物違反究其理則與物同歸  入于自然之境而無所逆也至人者與世  俗萬事相反而復乎素樸同於大通大通  則無礙矣故曰玄德深矣遠矣與物反矣  然後乃至大順○何氏曰聖人不以智治  智與天下相尋於機巧法術之中而以愚  治智挽之歸簡易平直之道有由也哉故  曰上誠智而無道則天下大亂矣何以知  其然也夫弓弩畢弋機變之智多則鳥亂  於上矣網罟醫笱之智多則魚亂於水矣  智詐漸毒頡滑堅白解垢同異之智多則  人惑於辯矣故天下每每大亂罪在好智  自三代以下是矣以智治國則賊夫民不  以智治國乃福夫民知此兩者亦楷式乃  有國者之良法常守此良法則德玄且深  且遠矣故曰天地雖大其化均也萬物雖  多其治一也人卒雖多其主君也君原於  德而成於天故曰玄古之君天下者無爲  也天德而已矣與物反者彼以其智我以  其玄彼以其賊我以其福相反而不相入  也正言若反乃至大順順之至也豈在用  私用智與物相靡相刃而莫之能止也○  李氏曰無爲寬大治平天下民之福也有  爲謹嚴宰制下民國之賊也民之難治以  其多事是以聖人以無爲清靜治國使夫  知者不敢爲也雖與物相反反貫自然民  遂其生獲百倍之慶天下治平成大順之  化盡此道者是謂玄德    第六十六章
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core Daoist concept of "governing through non-action" (Wuwei). Superficially, the sage's approach may seem contrary to conventional wisdom, but upon deeper examination, it aligns perfectly with the natural order. Those who have truly attained the Dao (Zhiren) appear to act in opposition to worldly methods, yet in reality they return to the most fundamental nature, becoming one with the Great Dao and reaching a state of unimpeded harmony. This profound Virtue (Xuande) seems to oppose all things, yet paradoxically leads to supreme harmony.

The He commentary explains that sages don't govern the world through clever stratagems, for when rulers prize cunning, the world descends into scheming and power struggles. Just as overly ingenious bird traps frighten the birds, and overly complex fishing gear confuses the fish, when sophistry prevails, people become lost in disputes over right and wrong. Thus the root of chaos lies in excessive pursuit of cleverness—a pattern observable since the Three Dynasties of antiquity. Governing through cunning harms the people, while governing without it benefits them. Understanding this distinction constitutes a crucial principle of statecraft.

Though heaven and earth are vast, their transformative patterns are uniform; though the myriad things are numerous, the principles governing them are consistent. The ruler should emulate the ancient sage-kings by aligning with heavenly Virtue (Tiande) through non-action. Where others employ cleverness, I employ profound Virtue (Xuande); where others create calamity, I bring blessings. These seemingly opposite approaches actually constitute supreme harmony. True alignment means completely relinquishing selfish cleverness and not contending with the myriad things.

The Li commentary further elaborates: Governance through non-action and magnanimity brings blessings to the people, while harsh control only causes harm. The people become difficult to govern precisely because their rulers meddle excessively. Therefore, the sage governs through serene non-action, causing those who rely on petty cleverness to refrain from reckless actions. Though this appears contrary to worldly methods, it actually returns to nature, enabling the people to live in peace and prosperity, thereby achieving universal harmony. Those who can practice this way of governance possess profound Virtue (Xuande).

江海所以能爲百谷王者以其善下之也故 能爲百谷王  吕氏曰江海之王百谷者謙卑處下虚以  待之無爲爲求而百川自然來也由此觀  之卑損之爲道也大矣人身以臍間下丹  田爲氣海乃五臟六腑生氣之本一萬三  千五百息之源十二經脉之祖人能謹守  下丹田氣海守之不間則百關之氣自然  朝之○何氏曰江海不讓細流故能成其  大自有王百谷氣象然非强爲大也水無  分於東西而分於上下也海居下則百谷  斯朝宗矣經曰譬道之在天下猶川谷之  於江海此道何道也聖王知雄守雌也○  林氏曰百谷之水皆歸之於江海江海爲  百谷王之尊而乃居百谷之下此借物以  喻自卑者人高之之意 是以聖人欲上人必以言下之欲先人必以 身後之是以處上而民不重處前而民不害 是以樂推而不厭  吕氏曰聖人能體謙下之道將欲處人之  上故必先以其言下於人者知滿之必招  損也故言則謙柔名則孤寡以下於物而  盛德日崇大寳彌固自然爲物所推而居  於上矣將欲首出庶物必先身謙言遜退  在人後者蓋謹身順道不以先物故能爲  物所推而處於先矣故曰是以聖人欲上  人必以言下之欲先人必以身後之故能  處人之上而不以爲重其從之也輕處物  之前而不以爲害其利之也衆不重故不
Interpretation

Rivers and seas can become the sovereigns to whom all streams pay homage precisely because they excel at maintaining a lowly position. Master Lü (Lü Dongbin) explains that rivers and seas command the allegiance of countless waterways precisely through their humble stance below, embracing all things with a receptive emptiness. Without deliberate pursuit, they naturally attract the convergence of all streams. From this, we see how profoundly important the principle of humble condescension truly is.

Within the human body, the lower Dantian (energy center) beneath the navel—known in Daoist cultivation as the vital reservoir of Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy)—functions like the sea of Qi. It serves as the root from which the five viscera and six bowels generate primordial Qi, the source of the thirteen thousand five hundred breaths, and the origin point of the twelve meridians. If one can concentrate on preserving this sea of Qi in the lower Dantian without interruption, the Qi mechanisms of the entire body will naturally return to it. Immortal He Xiangu adds that rivers and seas never reject even the smallest brook, thus achieving their vastness and naturally embodying the capacity to command all waterways. Yet this is not achieved through forceful striving—just as water makes no distinction between east and west, only between high and low. When the ocean dwells in the lowest place, all rivers naturally flow toward it. The Dao De Jing states, "The Dao's presence in the world is like rivers and seas to mountain streams"—what principle does this illustrate? It reveals the sage-king's wisdom of knowing strength yet abiding in gentleness.

Master Lin further elucidates: All mountain streams ultimately flow into rivers and seas. Though rivers and seas reign as sovereigns over countless waterways, they willingly occupy the lowest position. This analogy illustrates how the humble are ultimately elevated by the multitude.

Therefore, when sages wish to stand above others, they first approach people with humble speech. When they seek to lead the multitude, they first place themselves behind. Thus when occupying superior positions, the people feel no oppression; when standing at the forefront, the people perceive no obstruction. Consequently, all gladly support them without resentment. Master Lü explains that sages practice the Dao of humble condescension—to stand above others, they first soften their speech. Understanding that complacency invites loss, they speak gently, referring to themselves with self-deprecating terms like "the solitary and unworthy" (ancient rulers' humble appellation). The more humble they become, the more their De (virtue) grows exalted; their positions grow more secure, and they are naturally elevated by public acclaim. To become the leader of all things, one must first demonstrate humility in word and deed, willingly standing behind others. Through cautious self-cultivation and alignment with celestial patterns, by not contending one naturally takes the lead. Thus sages use humble speech to win honored positions and yielding postures to gain leadership. They occupy high places without weighing heavily on others, stand at the front without causing obstruction, and therefore all people gladly follow.

 輕不利故不害利害輕重付之自爾其何  容心哉故天下共黄老清靜之化而無厭  者以其謙卑之德所至故天下樂推而不  厭上學之士天下自然欽敬上於人先於  人謙光而尊德之所致何厭之有○何氏  曰聖人心如太虚道如天地以柔靜待天  下又何欲焉欲上人欲先人示人以可則  可效順人情而言之也聖人何心哉人皆  取福己獨曲全故處民之上而彼不以爲  重而壓己自下者人高之也人皆取實己  獨取虚故處民之前而彼不以爲害而傷  身自後者人先之也托小包大志弱事强  常寬容於物不削於人常情所惡而忌者  變爲樂推無復厭斁○吴氏曰以言下之  謂卑屈其言而不尊高以身後之謂退却  其身而不前進然此皆聖人謙讓之盛德  非有心於欲上人欲先人讀者不以辭害  意可也○林氏曰聖人非欲上人先人而  後爲此也其意蓋謂雖聖人欲處人上人  先猶且如此况他人乎 以其不爭故天下莫能與之爭  吕氏曰聖人常以虚爲身以無爲心心形  既定物孰可爭書曰汝惟不矜天下莫與  汝爭能汝惟不伐天下莫與汝爭功此之  謂也夫至人者忘其耳目遺其肝膽消殞  萬縁泯絶身世和以天倪與物委蛇而天  下敦與爭乎○何氏曰人心天理可以道  感不可以力爭也以其不爭而天下莫能
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of "non-contention" (bu zheng). Laozi teaches that true sages (those who have attained the Dao) possess the emptiness of heaven and the inclusiveness of earth. They interact with others through humility and gentleness, never deliberately showcasing themselves.

The reason sages earn universal reverence lies precisely in their refusal to compete. When others scramble for blessings, sages willingly yield; when people contend for material gains, sages maintain serene detachment. They consistently place themselves behind others, yet ultimately find themselves elevated; they willingly occupy humble positions, yet receive the highest respect.

Master Lü Dongbin (Lü Shi) explains that sages regard their physical forms as emptiness and focus their minds on Wuwei (non-action, or following natural flow). As ancient texts state: "When you refrain from self-praise, none in the world can dispute your merits; when you avoid ostentation, none can rival your abilities." Those who truly embody the Dao forget even their sensory perceptions, transcend worldly entanglements, and harmonize with nature—how could anyone possibly contend with them?

He Shi further clarifies that the heavenly principle within human hearts can only be transformed through De (virtue), never seized by force. Precisely because sages don't contend, no one in the world can ultimately contend with them. As Wu Shi observes, the sage's humble speech and yielding conduct flow naturally from genuine virtue, never as calculated displays of superiority. Lin Shi emphasizes that this behavior reflects the sage's innate nature—if even sages maintain such humility, ordinary people should understand this principle all the more.

 嘗語文子曰聖人欲貴於人者先貴人欲  卑人者先自卑    第六十七章 天下皆謂我大似不肖夫惟大故似不肖若 肖乆矣其細  吕氏曰夫道曠然無形無名充遍萬物雖  有而若無其與物無一相似此其所以爲  大也若肖似於物道亦物爾而何足大哉  ○董氏曰若有所肖似則同於一物何足  爲大也○何氏曰聖人以玄德自持不欲  見貴於世宜其天下亦以爲博大無所肖  似夫惟大則混混冥冥人不可得而名如  有所肖似則細行之人爾肖似也○林氏  曰一本於謂我下添道字其細下添也夫  字皆誤也 我有三寳寳而持之一曰慈二曰儉三曰不 敢爲天下先  吕氏曰人能抱道持身有如持寳固當愛  護持守而不失也所履踐者有三體仁博  施愛育群生慈也節用厚人不耗於物儉  也不爲事始和而不倡不敢先也至人保  持三寳者廣度衆苦衣被萬物慈之至也  儉視聽則神不蕩儉言語則氣不耗儉嗜  欲則心不摇此養生之至寳也能後其身  謙光自隆故曰我有三寳保而持之一曰  慈二曰儉三曰不敢爲天下先○何氏曰  聖人不以珠玉爲寳而所寳惟道何道也  慈儉後三者之道也匹夫撫劍疾視是則  好勇者細人自逞之氣而我以慈爲寳小  器塞門反坫是則好廣者細人自侈之見
Interpretation

In Chapter 67 of the Daode Jing, Laozi states that the sage who wishes to be esteemed by others must first learn to respect them; to make others humble, one must first be humble oneself. All under heaven say the Dao (cosmic principle) is vast yet resembles no concrete thing—precisely because of its vastness, it cannot be likened to anything specific. If the Dao resembled any particular object, it would long have appeared insignificant.

Lü Huiqing (a Daoist scholar of the Song dynasty) explains: The great Dao is formless and boundless, permeating all things yet seeming both present and absent. Resembling no concrete thing is precisely what makes it great. If the Dao resembled any specific object, it would merely be ordinary—how could it then be called great?

Dong Sijing (a Yuan dynasty Daoist) adds: If the Dao had a concrete form, it would be no different from other things—how then could it be called vast? He Daoquan (a Ming dynasty Daoist) observes: The sage abides in profound virtue (De), not seeking worldly honors, and thus the people see it as boundless and incomparable. Precisely because of its vastness, it appears mysterious and unfathomable, beyond description in words. If the Dao had a definite form, it would only be a trivial thing.

Laozi then presents the "Three Treasures": first, compassion; second, frugality; and third, not daring to put oneself ahead of others. Lü Huiqing elaborates: One should uphold the Dao as if guarding precious jewels. These manifest as: extending benevolent love to all beings (compassion), moderating consumption without waste (frugality), and avoiding provocation while willingly yielding precedence (not daring to take the lead). Those who embody the Dao practice these three treasures, thereby aiding all beings and sheltering creation—this is the ultimate expression of compassion. Restraining sensory excess preserves the spirit (Shen), speaking little conserves vital energy (Qi), and curbing desires stabilizes the mind—these are essential techniques for nurturing life.

He Daoquan further clarifies: The sage values not jewels or jade, but only the Dao. This Dao is embodied in compassion, frugality, and yielding precedence. Ordinary people rashly draw swords—this is the bravery of brutes; whereas I treasure compassion. Petty minds crave extravagance and luxury, whereas I treasure frugality.

 而我以儉爲寳也名利都府衆人所馳是  則好先者細人自矜伐以爲能而我以不  先爲寳○吴氏曰持謂守之而不失慈謂  柔弱哀憫而不剛强儉謂寡小節約而不  侈肆不敢爲天下先謂謙讓退却而不锐  進持此三寳故雖大而似不肖也 夫慈故能勇儉故能廣不敢爲天下先故能 成器長今捨慈且勇捨儉且廣捨後且先死 矣  吕氏曰知謙和柔弱能勝剛强順化有情  曰慈遂可以言勇知節儉爲可貴用之不  可既曰儉遂可以言廣知先人後己可以  克己復禮惟仁是與遂可爲器用之長夫  剛强則易挫慈柔則不可敵慈也者不剛  而勇儉愛精氣神明不勞而我道彌廣未  嘗先人故樂推不厭遂成法器之主故曰  夫慈故能勇儉故能廣不爲天下先故能  成器長今世俗則不然捨棄慈仁將爲勇  義費氣輕生不能保嗇節用崇奢尚侈傷  財害民反招匱乏無謙退之心有剛强之  志好處物先耻居人後皆非長生大道之  術乃喪身之具爾故曰今捨慈且勇捨儉  且廣捨後且先死矣○林氏曰器形也成  器即成形也凡在地之成形者我皆爲之  長故曰成器長今人捨慈而用其勇捨儉  而用其廣捨後而用其先此非保身之道  也故曰死矣○吴氏曰捨謂不用不用慈  儉退後之寳而剛强以爲勇侈肆以爲廣
Interpretation

Laozi presents three treasured principles for navigating life: compassion, frugality, and humility. He compares these virtues to precious jewels, while ordinary people chase fame and profit, contending for supremacy.

Wu Cheng explains: "To hold" means to steadfastly maintain without loss. "Compassion" refers to treating others with gentle empathy, avoiding aggression and competition. "Frugality" means moderation and simplicity, rejecting extravagance and indulgence. "Daring not to be first in the world" signifies humility and yielding, never rushing ahead. Though these qualities may seem ordinary, those who truly uphold them can achieve great things.

Lü Huiqing elaborates further: Those who understand gentleness and softness can overcome the rigid and strong. Those who recognize the value of frugality find their resources inexhaustible. Those who willingly take a humble position become leaders whom people naturally follow. True courage arises from compassion, true abundance from frugality, and true leadership from humility.

Yet worldly people do the opposite: They abandon compassion to engage in fierce competition, discard frugality for lavish excess, and refuse humility in their eagerness to be first. These behaviors not only contradict the Dao of longevity but also lead to self-destruction. Lin Xiyi explains that "becoming the ruler of all things" means attaining mastery over existence. But modern people discard these fundamental virtues—compassion, frugality, and humility—making it difficult to preserve themselves.

Wu Cheng concludes: "To abandon" means to cast aside and neglect. Forsaking these three precious qualities in pursuit of superficial courage, luxury, and competition ultimately leads only to ruin.

 锐進以求爲先則將不能保其生皆死之  徒也 夫慈以戰則勝以守則固天將救之以慈衛 之  吕氏曰且慈兵入於敵境也則人知有所  庇矣不踐禾稼不穴丘墓不踐積聚不焚  屋室則人人悦之何必陳兵以戰野而後  勝重門擊柝以爲守固哉故天道福善禍  淫善人自天祐之開其心志使之無所不  慈無所不慈則物爲之衛矣至人能守慈  勇以戰世縁則萬邪不能入千魔不敢干  其道曰固蓋天道無親常與善人故曰夫  慈以戰則勝以守則固天將救之以慈衛  之○林氏曰戰交物而動也猶莊子曰與  接爲構曰與心鬬也守猶莊子純氣之守  也人能以慈爲主則外可勝物内可自守  前言三寳此舉其一能慈則二者在其中  ○吴氏曰慈者生之道仁之德爲三寳之  首故此以下專言慈之一寳而二寳在其  中矣慈者人人親之如父母豈有子而敵  其父母攻其父母者哉故以慈而戰則人  不忍敵是能勝也以慈而守則人不忍攻  是能固也縱有來敵來攻之寇人之助其  父母者多亦必能勝能固或人力不逮天  亦救助之而不令其敗且潰天之所以救  助之者以其能慈而救護之也○李氏曰  慈之一字戰則勝守則固仁者無敵眞勇  也  第六十八章 善爲士者不武善戰者不怒善勝者不爭善 用人者爲之下
Interpretation

This passage expounds on the power of "compassion" (ci) and its wisdom in navigating life. Laozi observes that those who flaunt their sharpness and scramble for advantage ultimately fail to preserve their lives, meeting inevitable downfall.

"Compassion" (referring to benevolence and caring) brings victory in battle and ensures steadfastness in defense. When heaven wishes to save someone, it protects them through compassion. Master Lü explains that entering hostile territory with compassionate intent naturally inspires submission—trampling no crops, desecrating no graves, plundering no possessions, and burning no homes. When the common people are thus won over heart and mind, what need is there for massive military campaigns? True defense lies not in high walls and deep moats, but in winning people through De (Virtue). The Dao of heaven invariably blesses the virtuous, broadening their hearts until compassion permeates their being. When one is filled with compassion, all things spontaneously protect them. Those who attain the Dao, by maintaining this state of "compassionate courage" (the realm where benevolence and bravery unite), can repel all demonic disturbances in the world.

Master Lin further elucidates: "Battle" may be understood as engagement with external matters, while "defense" refers to maintaining inner purity. Rooted in compassion, one resolves external conflicts while preserving internal integrity. Master Wu emphasizes that compassion is the Dao of life and the foremost expression of humaneness—like parental love for children. Who would attack parents who cherish them? Thus, waging war with compassion makes enemies reluctant to resist; defending with compassion makes foes hesitant to assault. Even against formidable adversaries, one receives assistance from the multitude or divine aid. Master Li concludes that true warriors don't rely on brute force, skilled combatants aren't driven by rage, perpetual victors don't engage in contention, and those adept at employing others maintain constant humility.

Chapter 68 continues this teaching: The truly wise never flaunt military might, skilled fighters remain unswayed by anger, perennial conquerors avoid strife, and master leaders preserve humble demeanor. All these manifest the wisdom and power of compassion.

 何氏曰公儀伯以力聞諸侯周宣王備禮  以聘之觀形懦夫也宣王曰爾之力何如  公儀伯曰臣之力能折春螽之股堪斷秋  蟬之翼王曰吾之力能裂犀角之革曳九  牛之尾猶憾其弱汝而力聞天下何也公  儀伯曰善哉王之問也臣之師有商丘子  者力無敵於天下而六親不知以其未嘗  用其力故也今臣之名聞於諸侯是臣違  師之教彰臣之能也然則臣之名不以負  其力者也以能用其力者也善爲下者不  武槩事見矣莊子市南儀僚弄丸而兩家  之難解孫叔敖甘寢秉羽而郢人投兵此  不怒者善戰不爭者善勝也韓信解廣武  君之縛東向師事之問燕齊之策此善用  人者爲下也古之善爲士者不怒而威於  斧鉞不戰而屈人兵則有道存故有人曰  我善爲陣我善爲戰大罪也國君好仁天  下無敵焉○吴氏曰古者車戰爲士謂甲  士三人在車上左執弓右執矛中御車掌  旗鼔皆欲其强武戰卒七十二人在車下  將戰必激發其勇與所敵爭雄而取勝慈  者之用兵則不以此爲善也士不欲其强  武戰不欲其奪怒勝敵不待與之較力兵  刃不施彼將自屈古之智能○林氏曰四  者之善皆不爭之用也 是謂不爭之德是謂用人之力是謂配天古 之極  何氏曰不爭之德仁不以勇也用人之力  群策屈群力也配天古之極天道不爭而
Interpretation

This story tells of Gongyi Bo, who was renowned among the feudal lords for his great strength. King Xuan of Zhou invited him with grand ceremony, only to find a frail-looking man upon meeting him. The king asked, "What exactly is your strength capable of?" Gongyi Bo replied, "I can break the legs of spring locusts and snap the wings of autumn cicadas." Unimpressed, the king scoffed, "I can tear apart rhinoceros hide and hold back nine oxen by their tails, yet still consider my strength insufficient. How could someone with your abilities become famous throughout the land?"

Gongyi Bo explained: "An excellent question! My master Shangqiu Zi possessed strength unmatched in the world, yet even his family didn't know—because he never displayed it. My current fame among the lords actually violates my master's teachings by revealing my capabilities. True reputation lies not in flaunting power, but in wielding it wisely."

The narrative then cites several historical examples: Zhuangzi records how Yiliao of Shinan defused a blood feud between two families while juggling pellets; Sunshu Ao made Chu soldiers lay down their weapons merely by sleeping peacefully while waving a feather fan—demonstrating that those who seldom anger understand warfare best, and those who avoid brute force achieve the greatest victories. When Han Xin released General Guangwu only to honor him as teacher and seek strategy for conquering Yan and Qi, this exemplified the humble wisdom of employing others' talents. Ancient true warriors commanded awe without anger, subduing enemies without combat. Those who boast "I excel at formations" or "I'm skilled in battle" fundamentally err. A truly benevolent ruler has no match under heaven.

The commentator Wu adds that in ancient chariot warfare, each vehicle carried three armored warriors (left archer, right spearman, and central driver holding the banner) supported by seventy-two infantry—all requiring fierce combat skills. Yet benevolent military strategy doesn't prioritize such methods, for true courage needs no ferocity, true battle requires no rage, true victory demands no struggle—sometimes enemies yield without fighting.

Lin's commentary concludes: What these master strategists share is their application of "non-contention" wisdom. What's called "the De (Virtue) of non-contention" values compassion over brute courage; "employing others' strength" means pooling collective wisdom; "matching heaven's ancient perfection" refers to the Dao's fundamental non-striving. This represents warfare's highest attainment.

 善勝自古以固存道合其極○林氏曰以  其不爭之德可以配天可以屈群力用天  下自古以來無加於此故曰古之極○李  氏曰不爭之德用人之力皆仁慈之謂故  曰配天以此修身則形存而夀永也○柴  氏曰惟善則合上古立極之道故曰配天  古之極    第六十九章 用兵有言吾不敢爲主而爲客不敢進寸而 退尺  何氏曰吾不敢爲主而爲客者是所謂應  兵也故曰救亂誅暴謂之義兵兵義者無  敵加於己不得已而超者謂之應兵兵應  者勝爭恨小故不忍憤怒者謂之憤兵兵  憤者敗利人土地貨寳者謂之貪兵兵貪  者破恃國家之大矜民人之衆欲見威於  敵者謂之驕兵兵驕者滅此五者老子嘗  以語文子今言不敢爲主而爲客者主先  而客應之非得已不敢進寸而退尺見可  而進知難而退慎之至也而非怯也臨事  而懼好謀而成也○吕氏曰古之有言兵  略者必以先舉爲主後應爲客也主造事  者也客應敵者也且聖人之兵沉機密用  雖有敵至我則坐觀其變隨變而應迫而  後起不得已而後動若輕動者所謂輕敵  也大抵有意於爭爭之未必勝無意於爭  爭之未必負機謀進止其亦有待焉至人  應世一視一聽一語一笑萬縁交接皆謂  之魔也戰勝之决不敢爲主之先倡儼然  若客常居靜定之中精神不亂進寸則有
Interpretation

This scripture passage primarily expounds on two core concepts: "the virtue of non-contention" (buzheng zhi de) and the art of warfare.

Regarding "the virtue of non-contention," several commentators regard it as the highest form of De (Virtue). Lin explains that this refusal to contend with others aligns with the Dao (the Way) of Heaven, and nothing surpasses this principle since antiquity. Li suggests that both non-contention and skillfully utilizing others' strengths are manifestations of benevolence—cultivating oneself with this attitude leads to health and longevity. Chai points out that only virtuous conduct can conform to the supreme standards established in ancient times, hence the phrase "matching the ancient ultimate of Heaven."

Chapter 69 discusses the art of warfare. He provides a detailed analysis of five military scenarios: the "righteous army" (yi bing), fighting for justice, is invincible; the "responsive army" (ying bing), engaging in battle out of necessity, can prevail; the "angry army" (fen bing), fighting in rage, is doomed to fail; the "greedy army" (tan bing), motivated by profit, will inevitably collapse; and the "arrogant army" (jiao bing), flaunting military might, is certain to be destroyed. Laozi's statement "dare not take the initiative but respond instead" emphasizes striking only after the enemy has moved—exercising caution in battle rather than cowardice. Lü further elaborates that the sage's approach to warfare involves observing the enemy's situation and adapting flexibly, responding passively rather than provoking conflict, as maintaining composure is key to victory.

Overall, this passage uses the principles of warfare to illustrate the Daoist wisdom of "overcoming hardness with softness" and "striking only after the enemy moves." It underscores the importance of avoiding aggressive contention and maintaining calm restraint in conduct.

 敵退尺則無爭故曰用兵有言吾不敢爲  主而爲客不敢進寸而退尺 是以行無行攘無臂扔無敵執無兵  何氏曰兵之常勢行有行陣攘有手臂扔  有對敵執有兵徒而乃一無有焉如無手  行拳又如枕席上過師不戰而屈人兵之  意所以然者重而不輕也扔引也如攘臂  而扔之扔扔古本並從才音同有揮敵意  河上公曰彼遂不正爲天下賊雖欲行誅  之不成行列也雖欲大怒若無臂可攘也  雖欲扔引之若無敵可扔也雖欲執持之  若無兵可持也○林氏曰此皆兵家示怯  示弱以誤敵之計扔引也引敵致師也如  此用兵方有能勝之道也輕敵而自矜自  眩則必至於喪敗○王弼本仍作扔 禍莫大於輕敵輕敵幾喪吾寳抗兵相加哀 者勝矣  何氏曰勿曰何害其患甚大此輕敵之戒  禍之大者聖人以慈爲寳而天將救之以  慈衛之今對敵而輕用其鋒以求勝於天  下則是先自喪其道之寳矣故兩兵相遇  哀矜者勝故曰視卒如愛子故可與俱死  以慈戰則勝一言而三軍如挾纊吮疽而  士卒父子爭死夫誰與敵此章言兵不可  輕用而不用爲之大用有出于兵之外○  吴氏曰行三軍者臨事而懼不敢輕敵也  輕敵則輕戰以致殺人而喪吾慈寳矣禍  莫大焉雖未進戰然一有輕敵之心則以  有殺人喪寳之漸故曰幾喪吾寳抗舉也
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the wisdom of "advancing by retreating" in the art of warfare. Laozi states that in military engagement, he dares not take the initiative to attack but prefers a defensive stance; he dares not advance an inch but would rather retreat a foot. This apparent yielding actually achieves the state of "marching without battle formations, striking without raising arms, engaging without visible foes, and wielding without physical weapons."

The commentator He explains that conventional warfare involves deploying troops, raising arms to attack, confronting enemies, and brandishing weapons—yet here all these are deliberately abandoned. It's like throwing a punch without using hands, mobilizing armies from one's pillow mat, or subduing enemies without combat. This is achievable through exercising caution instead of recklessness. The term "engaging" here refers to luring the enemy into battle.

Heshang Gong further clarifies that when enemies behave unjustly and become scourges to the world, though one may wish to subdue them, it appears as if there are no troops to deploy; though angered, as if having no arms to raise; though intending to provoke battle, as if facing no adversaries; though prepared to wield weapons, as if holding none. Scholar Lin interprets these as military strategems of feigning weakness to entice the enemy.

The scripture emphasizes that the gravest danger lies in underestimating the enemy, for such arrogance nearly causes us to lose our most precious treasure—the Dao of compassion. When armies clash, the side upholding benevolence often prevails. Just as a general who treats soldiers as his own children inspires their willingness to die for him, so does waging war with compassion lead to victory. Scholar Wu concludes that commanding armies requires reverent caution against underestimating foes, as contempt easily leads to indiscriminate slaughter and the loss of compassionate virtue—the ultimate calamity. Even before battle commences, the mere presence of contempt sets one on the path of bloodshed and forfeiture of this supreme treasure.

This passage reveals the Daoist military philosophy of "overcoming hardness with softness," highlighting that the highest achievement in warfare is victory without combat, rooted in maintaining compassionate awareness while avoiding underestimation of opponents.

 哀者慈心之見而天人助之勝也○蘇氏  曰兩敵舉兵相加而吾出於不得已則有  哀憫殺傷之心哀心見而有天人助順之  勝矣○林氏曰擊鼔其鏜踴躍用兵則非  哀者矣此章全是借戰事以喻道    第七十章 吾言甚易知甚易行天下莫能知莫能行  何氏曰道者何清靜是也簡易爲上耳道  本清也人自濁之道本靜也人自動之道  本簡也人自繁之道本易也人自難之玄  聖所言以我觀甚易知易行以人觀乃不  能知不能行術豈異哉蓋亦反其本矣且  言剛强則難言柔弱豈不易言華飾則難  言樸素豈不易而惟其易知反成不知惟  其易行反成不行爲其太近也列子善力  舉秋毫善聽聞雷霆知道之言也○李氏  曰前章云哀者勝謂仁慈無敵故次之以  甚易知易行世人莫能知莫能行者信不  及也間有信者又不能行力不及也○吴  氏曰老子之言教人柔弱謙下而已其言  甚易知其事甚易行也世降俗末天下之  人莫能知其言之可貴故莫有能行柔弱  謙下之事者 言有宗事有君夫惟無知是以不我知知我 者希則我貴矣  何氏曰老子兩語文子以言有宗事有君  而曰至言去言至爲去爲曰失其宗本伎  能雖多不如寡言此也秉要執本則得所  以知所以行所以易也無他泛知則難寡
Interpretation

This passage employs military metaphors to elucidate core Daoist principles. Master Su suggests that when armies must engage in unavoidable warfare, approaching battle with compassionate sorrow (aixin) paradoxically invites celestial assistance and victory. Master Lin further observes that troops who drum loudly and revel in martial bravado lack precisely this quality of merciful heart.

Chapter 70 reveals the profound truth that "the great Dao is supremely simple." The teachings I proclaim are actually easy to understand and practice, yet few in the world truly comprehend or implement them. Master He explains that the essence of Dao lies in clarity and Wuwei (non-action), where simplicity represents the highest attainment. The Dao itself is inherently pure—it is humans who complicate it; the Dao is fundamentally straightforward—it is people who make it difficult. What sages perceive as simple, ordinary folk find impossibly challenging.

Master Li connects this to the earlier principle of "compassion guaranteeing victory," noting how these teachings about "easy knowledge but difficult practice" share a common thread—people either disbelieve these truths or, believing them, lack the capacity to act accordingly. Master Wu observes that Laozi's teachings of softness and humility appear deceptively simple, yet in an age of moral decline, people fail to value such wisdom.

The passage concludes by emphasizing that "speech should have its ancestral source, affairs their sovereign principle." Quoting Wenzi, Master He notes that truly profound words often appear to say nothing, while genuine action resembles Wuwei (non-action). Rather than mastering numerous flashy techniques, one should grasp the fundamental essence. By holding to the core principle, understanding and practice naturally follow, and all matters become simple.

 者衆宗於此而知斯易矣泛行則難靜爲  躁君於此而行斯易矣然知道之說有三  甚易者近也莫能知者味也而惟無知者  忘也故道由易知而至於無知聖人事也  吾超然不識不知之境又誰得而測識之  關尹子能忘道乃能有道又曰有人問於  我我尚不知我將何爲我所此無言無事  内知而抱玄也吾尚不自知宜其人之不  吾知人之得以知其道亦何貴哉故得道  畏人知又先畏自知人己兩忘云爲俱泯  至貴者道大音希聲豈在求知哉而難易  之知又不足言矣○林氏曰衆言之中必  有至言故曰言有宗舉世之事道爲之主  故曰事有君世無知至言至道之人所以  莫有知我者故曰夫惟無知始不我知 是以聖人被褐懷玉  何氏曰列子居鄭圃四十年無識者國君  卿大夫視之猶衆庶也君子盛德容貌若  愚由是觀之聖人譬如被者褐懷者玉外  不自貴而中有至貴者存褐毛布賤者之  服故云褐寬博○吕氏曰聖人無名至人  無己神人無光雖衣弊履穿蒙以養正心  如玉石積蓄至寳韜藏光耀未嘗顯露默  養道胎故曰是以聖人被褐懷玉○林氏  曰聖人之道足於内而不形於外猶被褐  而懷玉故人不得見之也    第七十一章 知不知上不知知病夫惟病病是以不病聖 人不病以其病病是以不病
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist profound understanding of "knowing" and "not knowing." The truly wise recognize the limits of their knowledge—this represents the highest form of understanding. Those who believe they know everything, in fact, suffer from a fundamental cognitive flaw.

Guan Yinzi (a disciple of Laozi) was able to forget the very concept of the Dao (the Way), thereby truly embodying it. He said that when people asked him questions, he himself did not know how he would respond—this state of "not knowing" precisely reflects the profound wisdom within. The sage (one who has attained the Dao) does not deliberately display their knowledge, just as one might wear coarse clothing while holding a precious jade—plain in appearance yet inwardly invaluable.

The text cites the perspectives of several Daoist scholars:

  • Lin Shi remarked: Among countless words, there must be ultimate truths, and all things in the world are governed by the Dao. Yet ordinary people often fail to recognize the true Dao, and thus they also fail to understand those who have attained it.
  • He Shi gave the example of Liezi: Liezi lived in obscurity in the state of Zheng for forty years, unknown to others, with rulers and ministers treating him as an ordinary man. A true gentleman possesses deep virtue yet appears simple and unadorned.
  • Lü Shi observed: The sage has no empty reputation, the perfected person forgets the self, and the divine person does not display brilliance. Even if dressed in rags, their inner purity is like flawless jade, silently cultivating the root of the Dao.

The essence of Chapter 71 is this: Recognizing one's own ignorance is the highest wisdom, while pretending to know what one does not is a true flaw. Sages are free from cognitive defects precisely because they regard "pretending to know the unknown" as a genuine failing to be wary of. It is precisely this vigilance against cognitive bias that prevents them from ever truly falling into such errors.

 林氏曰於其至知而若不知此道之上也  於不可知之中而自以爲知此學道之病  也人能病其知之爲病則無此病矣聖人  之所以不病者蓋知此知爲病而病之所  以不病此一章文字最奇○李氏曰知不  知上接上章吾言甚易知聖人無所不知  不自以爲知眞知也世人無所知自以爲  知妄知也故曰病若知妄知爲病而病其  病則妄知之病瘥矣聖人所以不病者以  其病其多知是以不病也○吕氏曰至哉  妙道沖默淵奥不可以智知不可以識識  不可得而測度不可得而擬議知之外矣  不知内矣知之淺矣不知深矣聖人禀氣  沖粹天性高明内懷眞知萬事自悟始能  無知不以自矜是謂眞知眞識乃知不知  不識者也且世之人不知至道之精而知  事物之粗不知至道之極而知事物之末  方且爲緒使方且爲物駭内多機智徒事  誇大而實不知道弊精神役思慮以文滅  質以博溺心而强辯飾說以爲知之是德  之病也至士達道明眞得之固窮鉗口結  舌保而秘藏不敢宣泄常若不知而况不  知其道而乃肆高雄之辯辯者不善知者  不博博者不知也○何氏曰莊子聞以有  知知者矣未聞以無知知者也故深知而  不自以爲知於道爲上始於不可知之中  强自以爲能知於學爲病莊子太清問乎  無窮曰子知道乎曰吾不知也又問無爲
Interpretation

Lin Xiyi (Master Lin) remarks: When one attains the highest wisdom, it appears as if one knows nothing—this represents the supreme state of Dao cultivation. The common failing among practitioners is presuming knowledge in realms fundamentally beyond comprehension. Recognizing this very "presumption of knowing" as the ailment itself allows one to be free from it. The sages remain unafflicted precisely because they understand that "forced knowing" constitutes the true malady, thereby maintaining their flawless state. This passage conveys profound subtlety.

Li Yue (Master Li) explains: This section continues the previous chapter's theme of "my words are very easy to understand." The sages, though omniscient, never presume knowledge—this constitutes true knowing; ordinary people, actually ignorant, constantly presume understanding—this constitutes false knowing. Thus this "presumption of knowing" is pathological. Recognizing the sickness of false knowing and overcoming it cures the ailment. The sages remain unafflicted precisely because they guard against knowing too much.

Lü Huiqing (Master Lü) elaborates: The supremely mysterious Dao (the Way) is empty, tranquil, profoundly abstruse—it cannot be grasped through ordinary wisdom or conventional understanding. It defies measurement and verbal analogy. Superficial knowledge remains peripheral, while true unknowing resides within; shallow understanding merely scratches the surface, while unfathomable depth constitutes the core. The sages, with their pure Qi (vital energy) and luminous innate nature, embody true knowledge yet naturally comprehend all things, maintaining unknowing without self-display—this constitutes genuine insight. Ordinary people often miss the essence of the great Dao, perceiving only surface phenomena; they fail to grasp the Dao's ultimate reality, comprehending only trivial details. Driven by petty concerns, disturbed by external objects, their minds teem with clever schemes as they vainly pursue empty reputation, fundamentally ignorant of the Dao. This merely depletes their Shen (spirit), multiplies worries, obscures essence with ornamentation, and drowns original mind in erudition, all while arguing forcefully to feign understanding—these constitute the maladies of virtue cultivation. True Dao adepts who comprehend reality find it inexpressible even through exhaustive language, often maintaining silent reserve, much less daring to casually reveal celestial secrets, frequently appearing as if unknowing. How much more so those who discourse extensively without genuine Dao understanding? Eloquent speakers may lack true knowledge; seemingly erudite scholars may lack genuine wisdom.

He Yan (Master He) cites Zhuangzi: I've heard of knowing through knowing, but never of knowing through unknowing. Therefore profound knowledge without presumption of knowing represents the highest state in Dao cultivation; presuming to know what fundamentally cannot be known constitutes the failing in learning. Zhuangzi asks Wuxiong (the Boundless) in "Knowledge Wanders North": "Do you understand the Dao?" Wuxiong replies: "I don't know." He then asks Wuwei (Non-action)...

 曰吾知道問無始曰弗知深矣知之淺矣  弗知内矣知之外矣太清知而歎曰弗知  乃知乎知乃不知乎孰知不知之知    第七十二章 民不畏威大畏至矣  河上公曰威害也人不可不畏小害不畏  小害大害至矣○吕氏曰君子有三畏畏  天命畏大人畏聖人之言人能體常盡變  以全性命之理則内眞赫然充塞于外思  慮憂愁無自而入衆之所畏不可不畏世  愚不知天命樂高好大負威任勢矜尚賢  能南華經大愚者終身不靈大惑者終身  不解勿謂小惡無傷遂闊略而不知悔苟  積累之乆人威將不能加天威必至○何  氏曰昔人有言畏威如疾民之上也從懷  如流民之下也見懷思威民之中也是則  人心最不可無所畏孔子曰君子有三畏  畏天命畏大人畏聖人之言小人不知天  命而不畏也狎大人侮聖人之言大人者  君父之嚴及大德之人固可畏不可狎聖  人所言犯其告戒必不免其有身固可畏  不可侮而三畏之中又以畏天命爲先天  命者乃天所付與萬物當然之理畏之一  念一動一言天地鬼神臨之罔敢玩易道  者萬物共由得之者生失之者死民受天  地之中以生能者取福敗者取禍故君子  畏義小人畏刑皆畏天也不此威之畏則  威有大於此者易曰惡不積不足以滅身  小人以小惡爲無傷而弗去故惡積而不
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle of "reverential awe." Laozi states that when people cease to revere authority, greater calamities will befall them.

Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty Daoist scholar) explains that "authority" (威) signifies potential harm. People must maintain caution toward minor harms, for neglecting small misfortunes invites greater disasters. Master Lü (Lü Dongbin) teaches that noble persons cultivate three forms of reverence: awe toward the Mandate of Heaven, veneration for virtuous individuals, and respect for the words of sages. When one comprehends the constant Dao (常道) and fully apprehends the principles of transformation while embodying life's fundamental truths, their inner authentic nature (真性) manifests outwardly, rendering them impervious to worry and affliction.

The Nanhua Jing (Zhuangzi) warns: The most foolish remain unenlightened throughout their lives; the most confused never attain understanding. Never dismiss minor transgressions as harmless and persist unrepentant—when such behavior accumulates over time, human authority becomes insufficient to restrain it, and celestial retribution inevitably follows.

Scholar He (He Yan) cites ancient wisdom: Those who fear authority as they dread illness represent superior people; those who indulge desires like flowing water constitute inferior people; those who contemplate solemnity amidst comfort represent average people. The human mind cannot function without reverence. Confucius taught that noble persons maintain three fears: fear of Heaven's Mandate, fear of great persons, and fear of sages' words. Petty individuals, ignorant of Heaven's Mandate, show no reverence, disrespect the virtuous, and disparage sages' teachings.

The term "great persons" (大人) refers both to the authority of rulers and fathers, and to morally accomplished individuals—truly worthy of reverence, never to be treated lightly. Those who disregard sages' warnings inevitably face retribution. Among the three fears, awe toward Heaven's Mandate holds primacy. This Mandate constitutes Heaven's fundamental principle governing all things—a single reverential thought places one under the scrutiny of celestial and spiritual forces, preventing any irreverence.

The Dao represents the universal principle all beings follow: those aligned with it flourish, while those opposed perish. Humans receive the harmonious Qi (气) of Heaven and Earth at birth—good deeds bring blessings, evil actions invite misfortune. Thus noble persons revere moral principles while petty ones fear punishment, both essentially revering Heaven's law. Without such reverence, greater disasters emerge. The Yijing states: "Evil deeds unaccumulated won't bring personal destruction." Petty people, believing minor evils harmless, persist unrepentant until their transgressions become irreversible.

 可掩罪大而不可解荷校滅耳凶豈非不  畏威而來大威哉○林氏曰不畏刑者常  遭刑也 無狹其所居無厭其所生是以不厭  河上公曰謂心居神當寬柔不當急狹人  所以生者爲有精神若忽其道好其色是  謂伐本厭神夫惟獨不厭精神之人洗心  滌垢澹泊無欲則精神居之不厭也○何  氏曰人與道居則能居天下之廣居故欲  無狹所自居不則室無空虚婦姑勃磎矣  人以道生則能生天地之所生故欲無厭  所自生否則心無天遊六鑿相攘矣夫惟  樂遣而内不自厭則上不見厭於天下不  見厭於人是以皆不厭也○林氏曰居廣  居也生長生乆視之理也人皆自狹其所  居自厭其所生不能安於退而務於進不  能觀於無而惑於有是自狹也自厭也無  者戒飭之辭言不可如此也夫惟不厭者  而能乆安故曰是以不厭○董氏曰狹隘  也厭棄也無當作毋居者性之地居天下  之廣居則與太虚同體矣生者氣之聚含  太乙之至精則與造化同其用矣惟曲士  不可以語道苟不溺於小術而實諸所無  以自狹其居則必棄有著無而蔽於斷滅  以厭其所生矣是以告之以無狹無厭使  學者知夫性者氣之帥而其大無量當擴  而充之以全其大生者道之寓而其用不  窮當葆而養之以致其用則養氣全生盡
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how to cultivate one's nature and preserve the spirit. The main points convey:

Those who fear no punishment will ultimately face its retribution ("those unafraid of punishment often meet with it"). Practitioners of the Dao should maintain an expansive mind, neither confining their spiritual realm ("do not narrow your dwelling") nor despising their life's origin ("do not loathe your sustenance"). Heshang Gong explains that the heart-mind (Xin) should remain broad and gentle, for indulgence in sensual pleasures depletes one's foundation. Only through maintaining detachment and cleansing the mind can the spirit (Shen) dwell without exhaustion.

Master He further elaborates: Abiding with the Dao grants vast spiritual space, while its absence fills the heart with strife; aligning with celestial patterns brings longevity, whereas resistance fractures the mind with desires. Master Lin observes that people often confine their own spiritual realm ("narrow their dwelling by themselves") and reject life's essence ("loathe their sustenance by themselves"), chasing external things instead of resting in Wuwei (non-action).

Master Dong explains from the perspective of nature-life cultivation: Cultivating one's nature should resemble the vastness of the Great Void (cosmic origin), while vital energy (Qi) should contain the essence of the Primordial Unity (Taiji). Clinging to minor techniques or nihilistic views constrains one's nature and breeds aversion to life. Therefore, one must expand the heart-mind and nourish vital energy to fully manifest life's potential.

The core teaching guides Dao practitioners to broaden their minds and nurture the spirit—neither limiting their spiritual horizons nor rejecting life's essence—achieving mental tranquility through detachment, ultimately arriving at unity with the Dao.

 性至命而不生厭棄之心所以體無非强  無而無非頑也長生非貪生而生非下也  夫如是則生與道居而道亦未嘗厭棄於  人矣 是以聖人自知不自見自愛不自貴故去彼 取此  河上公曰自知者自見己之得失不自見  者不自顯露德美於外藏之於内也自愛  者自愛其身以保精氣不自貴者不自貴  高榮名於世也去彼者去彼自見自貴也  取此者取此自知自愛也○何氏曰聖人  自知則是非美惡不敢昩而自見則自足  之心生矣自愛則安危去就不敢輕而自  責則自驕之氣動矣此乃畏不畏之所以  分一彼一此何去何取可不
Interpretation

When human nature aligns with the Mandate of Heaven (referring to natural law), it harbors no weariness or aversion, thus this realization arises without compulsion. Though seemingly empty, it is not rigid; the pursuit of longevity is not mere clinging to life, nor is this state of existence inferior.

Achieving this, life coexists with the Dao (the Way), and the Dao never abandons humanity.

Therefore, the sage (one who has attained the Dao) possesses self-knowledge without self-display, and practices self-care without self-exaltation. Thus, one discards superficial displays and embraces this inward cultivation.

Heshang Gong (a renowned Daoist scholar of the Han dynasty) explains: "Self-knowledge means understanding one's gains and losses; not displaying oneself means not flaunting virtue outwardly but keeping De (Virtue/Power) hidden within. Self-care means nurturing the body to preserve Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy); not exalting oneself means not chasing empty worldly fame. What is discarded are acts of self-display and self-importance; what is chosen is this path of self-knowledge and self-care."

Master He (another commentator) adds: "The sage, possessing self-knowledge, does not confuse right and wrong, beauty and ugliness; if one displays oneself, arrogance arises. Practicing self-care, one does not act rashly in matters of safety and danger, gain and loss; if one exalts oneself, pride takes root. Herein lies the distinction between reverence and irreverence. Faced with these two opposing attitudes, should the choice of what to discard and what to embrace not be made with utmost care?"

知所擇哉 道德眞經集義卷之九

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0100); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 8 Vol. 10 →