中文 · EN

《道德真經廣聖義》Vol. 27

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 27 / 51 6,198 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經廣聖義》 Vol. 27 (Dongshen 洞神部, 51 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 12 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經廣聖義》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

道德眞經廣聖義卷之二十六景二     唐廣成先生杜光庭述    夫佳兵章第三十一(䟽前章明强兵/好還不可果其)    (矜伐此章明佳兵物惡不得已而用/之首則陳戒不祥明有道者不處次)    (云勝而不美示樂殺之爲非吉事下/舉喻以明結以喪禮處之所以表非)    (樂戰○義曰先戒人臣以道佐國不/以兵强今明佳兵乃是不祥之器以)    (兵佐國必果於矜伐果矜伐則必敗/亡所以直指佳兵物之所惡敵來侵)    (己不得已而用之有道之人不處於/此不以勝敵爲美而以正殺爲先此)    (戒其樂殺也處之以/喪禮非欲於戰也) 夫佳兵者不祥之器  疏佳好也兵者韜略之屬也祥善也器材  器也君子進德修業必慎厥初藏器於身  俟時而動當遊心道德之囿閲思墳誥之  林使光昭今古開濟成務  義曰韜六韜也齊太公姜子牙釣於磻溪  剖魚得玉璜中有此書一曰文韜經邦立  國不越天常二曰武韜剋定禍亂威伏八  方三曰龍韜燮理陰陽不逾時令四曰虎  韜善用爪牙群凶自挫五曰豹韜膺時戡  難智在權機六曰犬韜採聽至微或成奇  變韜者藏也兵機權變不可輕以示人故  以韜藏隱晦爲義略三略也三略者謂漢  留侯張子房於下邳圮橋遇黃石公授以  三略曰子得之可爲帝王之師亦機鈐用
Interpretation

Chapter Introduction (Chapter 31, “Fine Weapons”)

The previous chapter explained that relying on military force and flaunting one’s might will ultimately bring retribution. This chapter makes the point directly: fine weapons are inauspicious objects, to be used only when there is no other choice. The first part cautions that a person who follows the Dao should not make weapons a regular instrument. The middle says that even victory is not worth praising, showing that taking pleasure in killing is no good. The final part makes the point through metaphor: victory in war should be treated with the rites of mourning, showing that war is never something to celebrate.

Explanation: It first warns ministers to assist the ruler through the Dao, not to rely on arms and flaunt their strength. This chapter states plainly that fine weapons are inauspicious objects: using arms to support the state inevitably leads to boastful aggression, which in turn leads to defeat and ruin. It therefore says directly that fine weapons are loathed by all things. When enemies invade, one’s own side may have no choice but to use force. A person who follows the Dao does not put themselves in such a position, does not regard defeating the enemy as admirable, and gives priority to stopping killing by just means. This is a warning against taking pleasure in killing. To treat victory with the rites of mourning is not to relish warfare.


Scripture

Fine weapons are inauspicious objects.


Commentary (Brief Notes on Terms)

“Fine” means good or of superior quality. “Weapons” refers to military strategy and force. “Auspicious” means good or fortunate. “Objects” means implements or tools. A noble person must be careful at the outset when cultivating De (Virtue/Power) and developing their capacities. One should keep one’s abilities within oneself and wait for the right time to act. The mind should roam in the gardens of Dao and De, and reflect among the forests of ancient records and writings—the classic texts of the former kings—so that the light of De shines across past and present, and one can help bring great undertakings to completion.


Explanation (Extended)

Tao and lue: “Tao” refers to the Six Secret Teachings. According to legend, Jiang Ziya, the Grand Duke of Qi, was fishing at Panxi when he split open a fish and found a jade tablet containing this book. Its six parts are: the Civil Teaching, on governing and founding a state without departing from the constant patterns of Heaven; the Martial Teaching, on overcoming disorder, pacifying calamity, and subduing the eight directions through might; the Dragon Teaching, on harmonizing Yin-Yang without departing from the seasons; the Tiger Teaching, on skillfully employing one’s “claws and fangs” so that groups of villains defeat themselves; the Leopard Teaching, on answering the times and overcoming crises through strategic judgment; and the Dog Teaching, on gathering even the faintest intelligence, which can sometimes lead to unexpected change. “Tao” also means concealment: the mechanisms and shifts of military strategy must not be lightly revealed to others, so the term carries the sense of hiding and keeping things obscure.

“Lue” refers to the Three Strategies. According to tradition, Zhang Liang, the Marquis of Liu in the Han dynasty, met the Elder of the Yellow Stone at the ruined bridge in Xiapi, who gave him the Three Strategies and said: “If you obtain this, you can become a teacher to emperors and kings.” The work also teaches the use of strategic pivots—the crucial mechanisms of action.

 兵之術也子牙用之佐武王剋啇伐紂而  成王業子房用之佐漢祖滅項籍而有帝  圖進德者德冠五帝爲美行之一首修業  者業兼六藝爲習學之先故君子務本本  立而道生習學之業慎其初始習文儒道  德則爲君子習貪驕殘暴則爲小人昔孟  軻幼孤居近葬者乃學爲墓軻母賢見其  所習非美徙居避之又近陶匠之家軻又  學爲陶瓦之器母又徙居近儒學之家軻  乃學習墳典後爲大儒道亞周孔名高韓  墨昔孔子爲兒好以俎豆爲戲後爲禮樂  之祖道冠百王化融四海后稷爲兒好以  耕農爲戲後爲農正播植之業功濟天下  漢張湯爲兒時因鼠竊肉爲父所責湯薰  穴得鼠及所殘肉笞鼠訊鞫論報款占其  辭如老獄吏後仕漢爲法官詳定刑律垂  法著令所以習爲善者善功必著矣所慎  善惡之習在厥初爾厥其也初始也藏器  於身者易下繫曰公用射隼于高墉之上  獲之無不利子曰隼者禽也弓矢者器也  射之者人也君子藏器於身待時而動何  不利之有言君子得時即有成功不得其  時動有結閡之患故無功也註言公者無  私也高墉喻高位也隼在高墉則難射人  處高位即難除處高位而貪殘如隼將除  之者在得其時無不尅矣言君子有可大  之德可乆之業亦當得時而可動矣史記  云君子得其時則駕不得其時則蓬累而
Interpretation

A Plain-Language Interpretation

The way of employing troops: Jiang Ziya once assisted King Wu in attacking Zhou and establishing the Zhou dynasty. Zhang Liang once assisted Emperor Gaozu of Han in defeating Xiang Yu and laying the foundations of the imperial house. Those who cultivate De (Virtue/Power) place their conduct above that of the Five Emperors and lead in good deeds. Those who cultivate their learning master the Six Arts and take the first steps in scholarship. Thus, the noble person values fundamentals: once the foundation is firmly established, the Dao (the Way) can grow from it. In learning, what matters is to be careful at the outset. Those who study the Confucian arts and the way of virtue become noble people; those who learn greed, arrogance, and cruelty become petty people.

Long ago, Mencius lost his father in childhood. Living near a burial ground, he began imitating funeral rites. His mother was wise; seeing that what he was learning was improper, she moved away. They then lived near a potter’s home, and Mencius began imitating pottery-making. His mother moved once more, this time near a school, where Mencius began studying the ancient classics. He later became a great Confucian scholar, second in the Dao to Zhou and Confucius, and renowned alongside Han Fei and Mozi. As a child, Confucius enjoyed playing with zu-dou, the ritual vessels used in sacrifices. Later, he became the founder of ritual and music, his Dao surpassing that of a hundred kings, his teaching spreading throughout the world. As a child, Hou Ji enjoyed playing at farming. Later, as the official in charge of agriculture, he spread the benefits of planting and cultivation throughout the realm. When Zhang Tang of Han was a child, his father blamed him after a mouse stole some meat. Zhang Tang smoked the mouse out of its hole, caught it with the leftover meat, then whipped and interrogated it, drawing up a statement as if he were an experienced magistrate. Later, he served the Han as a judicial official, carefully establishing penal laws and leaving behind legal rules and statutes. So those who learn what is good will surely accomplish good deeds. Whether one learns good or evil depends on the care taken at the beginning. “Jue” means “its”; here it refers to the beginning.

Keep one’s capacities within oneself: The Commentary on the Appended Statements of the Book of Changes says: “The duke shoots a hawk on the top of a high wall and captures it. Nothing is unfavorable.” Confucius said: “The hawk is a bird; the bow and arrow are instruments; the one who shoots is a person. The noble person keeps instruments within himself and waits for the right time to act. What could be unfavorable?” This means that when the noble person acts at the right time, he succeeds. If he acts at the wrong time, he encounters obstruction and achieves nothing. One commentary explains: “Duke” means impartiality. The high wall represents high office. A hawk on a high wall is difficult to shoot; likewise, a person in high office is difficult to remove. If someone in high office is greedy and cruel like a hawk, those who would remove him need only wait for the right moment, and they will surely prevail. The point is that a noble person may possess great virtue and lasting accomplishments, but must also wait for the right time before acting. The Records of the Grand Historian says: “When the noble person finds his time, he rides in a carriage; when he does not, he goes along like a tangled mass of weeds.”


Note: This passage develops its reasoning in the style of the Guangshengyi, moving from the use of troops, learning, and care at the outset to the Book of Changes teaching to “keep one’s capacities within oneself and wait for the right time,” and the historical saying that one “rides when the time is right.” Its meaning is close to the Dao De Jing’s teaching about the noble person keeping his instruments within himself. The plain-language rendering aims to retain the tone of the original commentary, with brief explanations of specialized terms at their first appearance.

 行所謂邦有道危言危行邦無道危行言  遜得其時則功濟天下失其時則獨善其  身是明進退之度也遊心在乎道德閲思  在乎典墳囿園囿也典謨典也墳三皇之  書爲三墳也誥訓誥也如湯誥酒誥例也  林叢木爲林言書史之多也光大也昭明  也令善也乃能大明善美之名也開濟成  務者易上繫云夫易開物成務謂天下之  道如斯而已者也此言易道可以覆謂天  下開濟萬物亦如君子之德業光大昭明  爲世之範乃復遊心道德之園囿墳誥之  叢林美名揚顯成其大務也春秋宋穆公  屬其臣立殤公云先君以寡人爲能賢光  昭令名是也修道之士亦當慎其所習遊  心大道閲思無爲道可冀也若其滯是非  之境束言教之墟迷嗜翫之津窺浮誕之  牖其道彌遠矣人君理國習皇風帝道可  叶於昇平傚王業霸圖罕偕其清靜矣况  兵戰之術乎所宜戒也  䟽而乃有以兵謀韜略爲佳好者夫謀略  之設以正爲奇兵鈐之書先聲後實皆在  乎攻取殺伐故爲不善之材器爾  義曰謀圖度也奇變詐也攻擊也取言其  易也言此六韜三略之書金版玉鈐之術  皆圖度機謀之用非祥善之道兵法尚詐  故以正爲奇先其虚聲後其實用開張詭  譎非君子之所宜於國爲貪殘於身爲不  善於物爲憎惡豈可習而行諸且人之所
Interpretation

Advancing and Withdrawing with the Times

When a state’s government is clear-sighted, one should speak and act frankly. When the state is in disorder, one should still act uprightly, while speaking with humility and restraint.

Seize the right moment, and you can accomplish great deeds and benefit all under Heaven. Miss it, and you should seek only to preserve your own integrity. This is what it means to understand when to advance and when to withdraw.

Where the Mind Roams and What It Examines

The mind should roam in Dao and De. What it examines should be found in the classical records and admonitions.

“Garden” means a cultivated park. “Canons” refers to the classic teachings and models. “Tombs” refers to the books of the Three Sovereigns, together called the “Three Tombs.” “Proclamations” and “instructions” are admonitory writings such as the Proclamation of Tang and the Proclamation on Wine. A “forest” is a dense stand of trees, here a metaphor for the vast array of historical records and books. “Bright” means to make something shine forth; “illustrious” means to make it manifest; “good” means excellent and beautiful. In this way, one can greatly bring an excellent name to prominence.

Opening the Way and Accomplishing Affairs

The Appended Statements to the Book of Changes say that the Changes “open things up and accomplish affairs”: this, they explain, is the way of all under Heaven. Here, the meaning is that the Way of the Changes can encompass all under Heaven and open a path for the myriad things, just as a noble person’s virtue and work shine forth and serve as a model for the world. One should also let the mind roam in the garden of Dao and De and among the forest of records and admonitions, making a good name known and accomplishing great things.

The Spring and Autumn Annals records that Duke Mu of Song instructed his ministers to establish Duke Shang as ruler. He said that his predecessor believed he could make an excellent name shine forth and become manifest. This is an example of the same idea. Those who cultivate the Way should also be careful about what they study: let the mind roam in the Great Way and examine Wuwei (non-action), and the Way may then be within reach. If one becomes mired in the realm of right and wrong, constrained by the confines of verbal teachings, lost in the shallows of sensual pleasures, or peering through the window of frivolity and falsehood, one moves ever farther from the Way.

A ruler who governs by studying the ways of the ancient sage kings and emperors might attain peace and prosperity. One who models himself on the enterprises of kings and the schemes of hegemons can hardly be at one with stillness and clarity. How much more should the arts of warfare be guarded against!


On a Fondness for Military Schemes and Stratagems

Yet some people make a hobby of military schemes and stratagems. Such schemes turn what is ordinary into the unexpected through deception. The books of military command teach that one should make a show of force before revealing one’s true strength; they all concern attack, seizure, and killing. They are therefore tools of an unsound kind.

Explanation of the Meaning

“Scheme” means to plan and calculate; “the unexpected” means change and deception. “Attack” and “seize” mean to assault and take by force; “seize” can also suggest how easily something may be taken.

The Six Secret Teachings, the Three Strategies, and military texts such as the Golden Edition and the Jade Command all serve the purposes of planning and tactical calculation. They are not auspicious or benevolent ways. Military strategy prizes deception, turning what is ordinary into the unexpected: first comes an empty show of force, then the use of real strength. Such manipulative and deceptive conduct is unfit for a noble person. Toward the state it is greedy and cruel; toward oneself it is harmful; toward other beings it is hateful. How could one make a practice of studying and carrying it out?

 習務在有成業成而用用而求達習善器  者進則利物退則全身用則懋功顯則彰  德今習兵道以詭詐爲本欺譎爲能殺獲  爲功誅伐爲事譎詐則非信殺伐則非仁  佐於國則陷君爲征伐之主行於身則造  跡於詭妄之徒固爲不善之事矣老君說  經之時但有戰鬥之說則是版泉涿鹿丹  浦用兵未有六韜三略之書然用兵亦以  機討相□譎詐相傾得勝爲功殺人爲美  非爲道者所務故切戒之今引韜略之書  取近而證遠爾 物或惡之故有道者不處  注佳好也兵者謀略也凡人修辭立誠不  能以道德藏器而以兵謀韜略爲好謀略  之用只在於攻取殺伐故爲不善之材器  凡物尚或惡之是以有道之人不處身於  此爾  䟽畜德於身是爲能事既爲不祥之器是  以凡物尚或惡之况有道之君子焉肯處  身於此故云有道者不處  義曰有道之士以德潤身以善救物動資  簡正靜合虚無不萌殺伐之心肯尚兵謀  之事兵以殺伐爲用凡物望而惡之矣修  辭立誠者易乾九三之詞君子忠信所以  修德也修辭立其誠所以居業也 君子居則貴左用兵則貴右  注左陽也陽和則發生故平居所貴右陰  也陰凝則肅殺故用兵所貴也  䟽左陽也右陰也陽好生陰好殺好生故  平居所貴好殺故用兵所貴
Interpretation

Aiming for Success in One’s Undertakings, and Making Good Use of One’s Capacities

In practicing one’s undertakings, one should be able to achieve success. Once an undertaking is complete, put it to use—and in using it, seek to act with full understanding. Train yourself to become a “good instrument”: in advancing, benefit all things; in withdrawing, preserve yourself; in putting your abilities to work, accomplish great deeds; and in attaining prominence, make Virtue shine forth.

Yet people who study the way of military strategists now take deceit as their foundation and deception as their skill. They count killing and capturing as achievements, and campaigns and executions as their work. Deceit means a lack of trust; killing means a lack of humaneness. Those who assist a ruler in governing a state this way will turn him into a ruler devoted to warfare. Those who practice it themselves will become people given to falsehood and deceit. This is truly an unworthy pursuit.

When the Venerable Lord Lao (Laozi) spoke of the classic, the “battles” he mentioned referred only to ancient conflicts such as those at Banquan, Zhuolu, and Danpu. At that time, military texts such as the Six Secret Teachings and the Three Strategies had not yet appeared. Yet warfare ultimately depends on schemes and calculations, on mutual deception and ruthless rivalry, on treating victory as achievement and killing as a virtue. These are not pursuits for those who cultivate the Dao, so the classic issues a stern warning. The military strategies cited here are modern examples used to confirm a principle from ancient times.


“All things may abhor it; therefore, those who have the Dao do not dwell in it.”

Commentary: “Fine” means something one favors; “military” refers to strategy. Ordinary people may refine their words and establish sincerity, yet fail to cultivate Virtue as the foundation of their capacities, while favoring military schemes and strategies. Such strategies serve only to attack, seize, and kill, so they are instruments of ill omen. If all things abhor them, how much more will those who have the Dao refuse to place themselves in such work?

Further explanation: To store up Virtue within oneself is the true accomplishment. If one becomes an instrument of ill omen, all things will abhor it—how much more so will a noble person who has the Dao? That is why the classic says, “Those who have the Dao do not dwell in it.”

Meaning: A person of the Dao nourishes the self with Virtue and helps all things through goodness. In action, they are simple and upright; in stillness, they accord with emptiness. They do not give rise to a desire to kill or wage war, and refuse to exalt military strategy. Warfare is used to kill, and all things look upon it with abhorrence. The idea of refining one’s words and establishing sincerity comes from the Book of Changes, “Qian” hexagram, line nine in the third place: a noble person cultivates Virtue through loyalty and trustworthiness, and establishes their work by refining their words and making them sincere.


“In ordinary life, the noble person honors the left; in warfare, the right.”

Commentary: The left belongs to Yang. When Yang is harmonious, it brings forth life, so in ordinary life the left is honored. The right belongs to Yin. When Yin gathers, it brings severity and death, so in warfare the right is honored.

Further explanation: The left is Yang and the right is Yin. Yang favors life; Yin favors killing. Because one favors life, the left is honored in ordinary life; because one favors killing, the right is honored in warfare.

(This passage chiefly explains that everyday life and warfare hold opposite values: ordinary life honors life, while warfare honors killing. This follows the same thread as Laozi’s admonition against warfare and his abhorrence of it.)

 義曰帝出乎震物生於東春主發生夏爲  長養天道左旋所以左爲陽而順生成之  道也萬物肅殺於西秋主殺也藏伏於北  冬主藏也月配陰而主刑金居西而主兵  所以右爲陰而逆殺伐之道也君子體仁  以利物故平居則貴左用兵法義而尚刑  故貴右也 兵者不祥之器  注祥善也好兵者尚殺故爲不善之材器 非君子之器  注君子以道德爲材器不尚兵謀  疏上文云佳兵者不祥之器所以明用兵  則尚右而好殺有道者故不處之此云兵  者不祥之器對結上文明非君子之器君  子以道德爲材器故無利爾  義曰君子所習也稽十三皇五帝之道德  祖述唐虞夏殷之仁義憲章文武周孔之  禮樂將以經天下濟萬物垂後王祐來世  時之遇也則開物成務時之不也則卷而  懷之故無所不利矣上云佳兵爲不祥之  器有道者不處示其所習之初務在於道  德不在於兵謀而習兵謀者非君子所務  習之已成必將用之用兵之㫖明在下文 不得已而用之恬淡爲上  注戎狄來侵故不得已善勝不爭故恬淡  爲上  䟽夫文德者理伐之器兵謀者輔助之材  也故云文則經緯天地武則剋定禍亂雖  天生五材廢一不可而武功之用定節制  宜是知用之有本末行之有逆順在乎事  不得已然後應之謂四夷來侵王師薄伐
Interpretation

“Emperor” emerges from the position of Zhen, and all things are born in the east: spring governs growth and renewal, while summer governs flourishing and nurture. The Way of Heaven turns to the left; therefore the left is associated with Yang and follows the way of generation. In the west, all things are cut down; autumn governs killing and punishment. In the north, they lie hidden and stored away; winter governs closure and concealment. The moon corresponds to Yin and governs punishment, while Metal dwells in the west and governs warfare. Therefore the right is associated with Yin and follows the way of killing and punishment. The noble person embodies benevolence to benefit all things, so in ordinary times values the left. In warfare, one attends to punitive justice and upholds punishment, so in battle values the right.


“Weapons are instruments of ill omen.”

Commentary: “Omen” means good. Those who delight in weapons esteem killing, and so take up instruments of wrongdoing.

“They are not instruments of the noble person.”

Commentary: The noble person takes Dao and De as their instruments and does not esteem military stratagems.

Explanatory note: The earlier passage says, “Fine weapons are instruments of ill omen,” to make clear that warfare esteems the right and delights in killing; therefore a person who follows the Dao does not take part in it. Here, the statement “Weapons are instruments of ill omen,” read alongside the earlier passage, shows that they “are not instruments of the noble person.” The noble person takes Dao and De as their instruments and therefore has no use for military stratagems.

Interpretation: What the noble person studies is the Dao and De of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors, carrying forward the benevolence and righteousness of Tang, Yu, Xia, and Yin, and taking the rites and music of Kings Wen and Wu, the Zhou dynasty, and Confucius as models. Through these, they order Heaven and Earth, aid the people, and leave an example for later generations. When the times are favorable, they bring things to fruition and accomplish their work; when the times are unfavorable, they withdraw and keep their principles within. Thus nothing is beyond their capacity. The earlier passage says that fine weapons are instruments of ill omen and that those who follow the Dao do not take part in them. This shows that the noble person’s first concern in study is Dao and De, not military stratagems. Studying military stratagems is not the noble person’s aim. Once such study is complete, one will inevitably wish to put it to use; the purpose of using weapons is made clear in the passage below.

“When their use cannot be avoided, calm restraint is best.”

Commentary: The Rong and Di tribes have come to invade, so their use cannot be avoided. One who wins well does not contend, so calm restraint is best.

Explanatory note: Civil virtue is the means by which one orders Heaven and Earth and sets disorder right through principle; military strategy is an auxiliary means. Hence the saying: through civil means, one orders Heaven and Earth; through martial means, one overcomes and settles calamity and disorder. Though Heaven produced the Five Materials and none can be dispensed with, the use of military force must be governed by limits. We can see that its use has primary and secondary purposes, and that its exercise may follow or oppose the proper course: it is appropriate only when circumstances leave no alternative, and then one responds to them. The incursions of the Four Barbarians and the restrained punitive expeditions of the royal army express this principle.

 所當示之以恩惠綏之以道德既同蚊蚋  之螯故無憑怒之心推此而言是以恬淡  爲上  義曰聖人制法垂訓也隨時降殺與代污  降太上之君以道爲化其次以德其次以  仁道德既衰澆訛時扇故文武之道用焉  文訓之以禮樂仁義武訓之以奇正權謀  文經天地而武定禍亂文爲本而武爲末  文爲體而武爲用夫子云不教民戰是謂  棄民也有文事必有武備所以夾谷之會  宣武備而斬俳優齊侯畏之歸龜陰之田  成禮而退斯則武爲文之輔文爲武之主  也經緯天地者南北爲經東西爲緯窮鬼  神之情狀明造化之變通九流以清百度  以貞所謂觀乎人文以化成天下故文王  以爲謚焉尅定禍亂者謂凶暴及人曰禍  反德肆逆曰亂得㑺曰克所以黃帝誅蚩  尤舜誅三苗湯克桀周克紂秦殄六國漢  定三秦除暴害之政剪亂逆之根拯活生  靈非殺人以取勝也故武王以爲謚矣此  則明本末審逆順不得已而乃用之矣四  夷來侵者周宣之時犬戎數犯中國出師  禦之故詩稱伐殺獫狁是也天生五材五  者謂金木水火土也五行遞運帝王執而  用之若用材器爾故曰五材言其所用互  爲終始闕一不可也師禀帝王之命者謂  之王師師衆也在易爲師卦坤上坎下薄  伐者薄辭也言我伐於彼也凡曰王師有
Interpretation

A Plain-Language Interpretation

The general meaning of the scripture

One should show kindness through beneficence and bring people to peace through virtue. Treat it as lightly as a mosquito bite, so that no anger takes hold in the heart. From this, we can infer that calm detachment is the highest virtue.

Commentary (from the Guangsheng commentary)

When sages established laws and set out teachings, they adapted them to the changing times and went along with the changing conditions of the age. The highest rulers transformed people through the Dao (the Way); those below them used De (Virtue/Power); those below them used benevolence. When the Dao and De declined, shallow conduct and deceit became widespread, and the arts of civil and military rule came into use.

The civil arts taught through ritual, music, benevolence, and righteousness. The military arts taught through the use of the unexpected and the conventional, strategy, and expedience. Civil rule patterned itself on Heaven and ordered the Earth; military rule subdued calamity and disorder. Civil rule was fundamental, military rule secondary; civil rule was the basis, military rule its application. Confucius said, “To send the people to war without teaching them is to abandon them,” and also, “Whenever there are civil affairs, there must be military preparations.” Thus, at the meeting in Jiagu, Confucius displayed military preparedness and had dwarfs executed. The Marquis of Qi was frightened and returned the land of Guoyin; the rites were completed, and the meeting ended. This shows that military force supports civil rule, while civil rule directs military force.

“To pattern Heaven and order Earth”: north and south are the warp, east and west the weft. It means probing the workings of spirits and discerning the changes of creation. The schools of thought are purified, and the many institutions brought into proper order. As the saying goes, “Observe the patterns of human society and thereby transform the world.” This is why King Wen received “Wen” as his posthumous title.

“To subdue calamity and disorder”: violence inflicted on others is called calamity; turning against virtue and acting rebelliously is called disorder; victory is called subduing. Thus, when the Yellow Emperor executed Chiyou, when Shun put down the Sanmiao, when Tang defeated Jie, when the Zhou defeated Zhou, when Qin destroyed the Six States, and when the Han pacified the Three Qins, they were eliminating tyranny, cutting off the roots of disorder, and saving the people. They did not kill for the sake of victory. This is why King Wu received “Wu” as his posthumous title. From this, we can understand what is fundamental and what is secondary, and judge what goes against the proper order and what accords with it: force should be used only when there is no other choice.

When the Four Barbarians invaded: during the reign of King Xuan of Zhou, the Quanrong repeatedly invaded the Central States, so troops were sent to resist them. The Book of Songs therefore speaks of attacking the Xianyun. Heaven gave birth to the Five Materials—Metal, Wood, Water, Fire, and Earth. The Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water) circulate in turn, and emperors take them up and use them like tools or materials. Hence the name “Five Materials”: what is used passes from one to another in a cycle, and none can be omitted.

An army acting under an emperor’s command is called the royal army. “Army” means a multitude; in the Book of Changes, it is the Army hexagram, with Kun above and Kan below. “A measured campaign” is a modest way of speaking: it means that we are campaigning against them. Whenever the term “royal army” is used…

 鍾鼓曰伐無鍾鼓曰侵王師所征先示武  威取其畏伏兼示恩信使其懷來非逞志  於梟擒非肆怒於剪撲師出有名曰順無  名曰逆觀夫四夷侵斥類蚊蚋之□膚非  爲中國大患固無傷於道德所宜綏以恩  惠化以淳和無憑怒之心是恬澹爲上也  所以宜僚弄丸而解難叔敖安寢而投兵  不舉干戈坐以制勝此其上也 勝而不美而美之者是樂殺人  䟽夫不能以德懷來而用兵求戰勝故雖  尅勝猶慚德薄不以爲美夫勝必多殺故  以勝爲美者是樂殺人  義曰聖人之柔服四夷底平禍亂以文德  懷之使其化善不在用兵今既德之不逮  方以兵威取勝既勝於敵樂而美之無内  慚之德無惻隱之心是樂殺人也昔季札  觀大護之舞曰聖人之弘也猶有慚德聖  人之難也言湯之伐桀始用干戈故有慚  德論語曰武盡美矣未盡善也言以征伐  取天下故曰未盡善也 夫樂殺人者不可得志於天下  注制勝於敵必喪其人故不以爲美也夫  勝必多殺若以勝爲美者是樂多殺人也  樂多殺人人必不附欲求得志不亦難乎  䟽夫天地好生物皆含養仁人者當順天  德以全濟爲務焉可茍逞詐力以快貪殘  貪殘之人人必不附欲求得志不亦難乎  故好樂殺人則不可得志於天下矣  義曰夫仁者之心稱物平施順陽和以愛
Interpretation

Bells and drums are military instruments. “Waging war without bells and drums” means sending troops to fight without beating them; “invading the royal army” means attacking the forces of the royal house. When an army sets out, it must first display its might and authority so that the enemy fears and submits. At the same time, it must show benevolence and good faith, so that the enemy willingly comes over and pledges allegiance. This is not about seizing a formidable rival for the sake of a moment’s triumph, nor about slaughtering on a large scale to vent one’s anger.

A military campaign must have just cause; only then is it “in accord with the Way.” Without just cause, it is “contrary to the Way.” The raids of the surrounding frontier peoples are like mosquito bites on the skin: they are no grave calamity for the Central States and do not, in themselves, undermine the roots of virtue. They should be treated with kindness and transformed through generous De. One should harbor no anger, and regard calm detachment and peace as the highest good.

In ancient times, Yiliao played with pellets and a crisis was averted; Shuao slept peacefully and the enemy withdrew. To prevail without taking up arms—that is the highest strategy.

To win a battle and yet not regard victory as a good thing is one matter; to celebrate victory as something glorious is another. The latter is to take pleasure in killing.

When people cannot be transformed through De and brought to submit, but instead seek victory through force, then even after defeating the enemy they still feel their De is shallow and do not regard victory as something glorious. For victory necessarily means many deaths; to celebrate it as glorious is to take pleasure in killing.

The sage treats the peoples of the four frontiers with a policy of kindness, quells disorder, and transforms them through the civilizing influence of virtue, leading them toward goodness without resorting to force. Only when De is insufficient does one use military force to compel victory. To take pleasure in victory after defeating the enemy, without shame or compassion, is to take pleasure in killing. Long ago, when Jizha watched the dance of “The Great Martial,” he said, “Even when a sage does this, he still feels shame. It is truly difficult for a sage to act!” He meant that Tang’s campaign against Jie of Xia was the first use of arms, and so there was shame in it. The Analects says, “King Wu’s achievements were perfect, yet they did not attain the highest perfection.” This means that he gained all under Heaven through conquest, and so his actions could not be called wholly good.

One who takes pleasure in killing cannot fulfill their aspirations under Heaven.

Defeating an enemy inevitably costs lives, so victory should not be regarded as something glorious. Victory necessarily means many deaths; to celebrate it as glorious is to take pleasure in killing many people. Those who delight in killing many will surely find that people do not submit to them. How difficult, then, to fulfill one’s aspirations!

Heaven and Earth delight in the growth of all things and nurture them all. A benevolent person should follow the Way of Heaven, making preservation and relief their chief concerns. How can one casually resort to deceit and violence to satisfy greedy and cruel desires? The greedy and cruel will surely find that people do not submit to them. How difficult, then, to fulfill one’s aspirations! Thus, one who delights in slaughter cannot fulfill their aspirations under Heaven.

The heart of a benevolent person weighs things fairly and gives accordingly, following the warmth of Yang energy and cherishing others.

 育行慈惠以撫安其於物類也尚懷憫護  不欲一物失所禮云見其生不忍見其死  聞其聲不忍食其肉又弊蓋埋狗弊帷埋  馬弊車瘞牛陳安世暑月不行畏踐蟲蟻  殺伐草木若其時昆蟲未蟄不以火田此  皆仁憫之道也順天養物理在兹乎安肯  勦衆命而取功名樂殺人而圖富貴哉若  以伐殺之多爲美譎詐之勝爲能恣毒貪  殘必爲人之所畏人畏則孰敢親附之矣  既無親附之衆獨運暴横之心欲求得志  於天下信爲難矣東昏歸命昌邑高洋禍  敗滅亡足爲鑒戒 吉事尚左凶事尚右  䟽左陽而生則吉故吉事尚左右陰而殺  則凶故凶事尚右禮記檀弓曰夫子與門  人立栱而尚右二三子亦尚右夫子曰二  三子之嗜學也我則有姊之喪故也二三  子復尚左  義曰左爲陽德主生故居常則尚左今人  賔主之位及拱手之禮皆左爲上而尊也  右爲陰主死今人喪禮皆尚右夫子有姊  之喪拱而尚右弟子不知其故因而傚之  夫子言其好學也如此及知非吉故復尚  左檀弓禮記第四篇名也顔回習夫子之  道首冠諸生稱爲亞聖嘗問於夫子曰夫  子言回亦言夫子辯回亦辯夫子不言而  信不比而周無器而成回不知所以然而  然瞠視塵躅則不及矣弟子嗜好於學也  如此尚不能盡夫子之道况於不學乎 偏將軍處左上將軍處右
Interpretation

Plain-Language Interpretation

First section: Nurture all things through compassion and kindness

Cultivate compassion, benevolence, and generosity to comfort and care for all living beings. In treating all things, keep pity and concern in your heart, unwilling for anything to be left without a place or made to suffer.

The Book of Rites says: “When you see them alive, you cannot bear to see them killed; when you hear their cries, you cannot bear to eat their flesh.” It also records the custom of burying a dog under a torn umbrella, a horse under a worn curtain, and an ox beneath a broken cart—using whatever can shelter them to bury dead animals. Chen Anshi, a prominent Han official, would not go out casually in the summer heat, for fear of stepping on insects or ants. Trees and plants should be cut in their proper season; fields should not be burned while insects have yet to hibernate. These are all principles of benevolence and compassion. To follow the Dao of Heaven and nurture all things: that is the principle. How could one bear to slaughter many lives for the sake of fame, or take pleasure in killing to pursue wealth and status?

If one treats frequent killing as a virtue and winning through deceit as a skill, indulging in cruelty, greed, and tyranny, people will inevitably fear one. When people are afraid, who will dare draw near or pledge their support? Without the closeness and backing of the people, yet acting out one’s tyrannical impulses alone, it is very difficult to achieve one’s aims in the world. The ruin of the Marquis of Donghun (Xiao Baojuan), the deposition of the King of Changyi (Liu He), and the disastrous fall and death of Gao Yang (Emperor Wenxuan of Northern Qi) may all serve as warnings.

Second section: In auspicious matters, the left is honored; in inauspicious matters, the right is honored

The left belongs to Yang and governs growth and renewal, so the left is honored in auspicious matters. The right belongs to Yin and governs killing, so the right is honored in inauspicious matters.

The Book of Rites: Tan Gong records that Confucius and his disciples stood with hands clasped, facing to the right, as is customary in mourning rites, which honor the right. The disciples followed suit. Confucius said, “You are eager to learn! I stand to the right because I am mourning my elder sister.” Only then did the disciples switch back to honoring the left.

Explanation: The left is Yang De, which governs life; in ordinary settings and ceremonies, the left therefore takes precedence. Today, the positions of host and guest and the customary clasping of hands still place the left first and give it honor. The right is Yin and governs death, so in contemporary funeral rites the right is generally honored. Confucius clasped his hands with the right foremost because he was mourning his elder sister. His disciples did not know the reason and imitated him. When Confucius remarked on their eagerness to learn, they learned that this was not an auspicious rite and changed back to honoring the left. Tan Gong is the title of the fourth chapter of the Book of Rites.

Yan Hui studied the Dao of Confucius and held a place among the disciples second only to the sage. He once asked Confucius: “When you speak, Hui speaks too; when you debate, Hui debates too. When you say nothing, people trust you; when you do not seek to attach yourself to others, you are welcomed everywhere; without possessing any implements, you accomplish things. I do not know how you do this. I can only stare at the dusty road, unable to catch up with you.” If a disciple so devoted to learning could still not fully understand the Master’s Dao, how much less could someone who does not study?

Third section: The lieutenant general stands on the left; the supreme commander stands on the right

(In the received text of the Dao De Jing, this sentence follows “In auspicious matters, the left is honored; in inauspicious matters, the right is honored.” The Guang Sheng Yi may explain it in detail elsewhere. Read together with the preceding section, the ritual convention of the left as auspicious and the right as inauspicious is also reflected in military ceremony: the lieutenant general stands on the left, while the supreme commander stands on the right, honoring the right as a sign of killing and warfare.)

 注偏將軍卑而處左者不專殺也上將軍  尊而處右者主以兵謀也 言以喪禮處之  注喪禮尚右今上將軍居右者是以喪禮  處置之  䟽上將軍專殺則處右偏將軍爲副不專  殺故處左今左尊而右卑上將軍居右者  言用兵之道同於喪禮喪禮尚右今上將  軍居右是以喪禮處置之爾  義曰喪禮尚右死事屬陰上將軍專殺故  主死事國之出軍上將軍登壇天子齋戒  授以斧鉞蓋使其專殺也鑿凶門而出主  死事也故云兵者凶器又云兵者人之司  命也將有謀則死者反生將無謀則生者  反死況戰者危事投之死也豈非喪禮乎  偏將軍既不專殺居吉位而處左也 殺人衆多以悲哀泣之  注以生靈之貴而交戰殺之有惻隱心故  以悲哀傷泣之爾  䟽夫戰而求勝必殺人衆多勝而不美故  悲哀傷泣夫人惟邦本本固邦寧今交戰  殺之故仁心惻隱爲之哀泣不亦宜乎  義曰以戰而胜者則殺人衆多矣且人之  生也九天分氣十月孕神含陰吐陽法天  象地萬物之内人稱最靈國之得人猶魚  之有水故尚書五子之歌曰皇祖有訓民  可近不可下人惟邦本本固邦寧此言太  康尸位盤遊無度有窮後羿因民不忍拒  於河以其滅德民棄之而不固也所以民  弱則國危民聚則國霸今圖功名而好戰
Interpretation

A lower-ranking deputy general stands on the left because he does not wield the authority to kill on his own. The senior general, the commander in chief, holds a position of honor and stands on the right because he directs military strategy. The scripture says that military action should be treated according to the rites for mourning.

Another commentary says that mourning rites honor the right. Since the senior general stands on the right, warfare is being placed and regarded according to the rules of mourning.

The senior general holds the authority to order executions, so he stands on the right; the deputy general does not have sole authority to kill, so he stands on the left. In ordinary custom today, the left is honored and the right is lesser. The senior general’s place on the right therefore means that the way of using troops accords with mourning rites: those rites honor the right, and the senior general stands there, so warfare is treated as a funeral matter.

Mourning rites honor the right because death belongs to Yin. The senior general has sole authority to kill and is therefore responsible for matters of death. When the state sends out troops, the senior general ascends the platform, and the Son of Heaven fasts and hands him the axe and battle-axe, granting him authority to kill. The troops also leave through a gate opened for ill omens: he is responsible for matters of death. Hence the saying, “Weapons are instruments of ill omen,” and also, “Weapons are the instruments that govern life and death.” If a general has a plan, those who might have died can live; if he has no plan, those who might have lived will die. War is a perilous undertaking, casting people into death—how could it be anything other than a funeral matter? The deputy general does not have sole authority to kill, so he stands on the left, the auspicious side.

“When many people are killed, mourn and weep for them.”

The commentary says that human lives are supremely precious. To kill people in battle is unbearable, so one should grieve and weep.

The subcommentary says that seeking victory in battle inevitably means killing many people. Victory is no cause for celebration; one should therefore grieve and weep. The people are the foundation of the state: when that foundation is firm, the state is secure. Now that battle has killed people, compassion and pity make it fitting to grieve and weep for them.

Victory through warfare inevitably means killing many people. Human beings receive Qi from the Nine Heavens and form their Shen over ten months in the womb. They contain Yin and exhale Yang, taking Heaven and Earth as their model; among all things, humans are the most perceptive. When a state has capable people, it is like a fish in water. The Songs of the Five Sons in the Book of Documents says: “Our august ancestor gave this instruction: the people may be drawn close, but they must not be looked down upon. The people are the foundation of the state; when the foundation is firm, the state is secure.” This refers to Taikang, who occupied the throne without fulfilling its duties and indulged in hunting without restraint. Hou Yi of Youqiong, seeing that the people could no longer bear it, turned him back at the river. Taikang had destroyed his Virtue, so the people abandoned him, and his rule could not endure. Thus, when the people are weakened, the state is in danger; when they are united, the state becomes powerful. If one pursues fame and achievement through a love of war, how could one fail to exercise caution?

 貪土地而殺人驅彼生靈陷之死所有道  之士君子之人安得不哀傷之乎故下經  云抗兵相加哀者勝泣悲也 戰勝以喪禮處之  注勇士雄人戰而獲勝勝則受爵居於右  位尚右非吉是以喪禮處置之但以爲不  祥之器何必縞素爲質也  䟽夫戰而獲勝勝則受爵武功居右是非  吉位故云喪禮處之但以戰爲不祥之器  爾亦何必服縗扶杖然後稱之爲喪禮乎  諸注此義者皆云古有斯禮尋閲墳典既  無所據今所未安故不録也又引秦伯向  師而哭者此乃哀敗非戰勝也  義曰獲勝受爵者功高遷上將之位亦是  處以喪禮也兵爲不善之器戰爲殺伐之  資勝則殺彼敗則殺此皆吾民也安不痛  哉聖人以之悲傷君子以之惻憫故當處  之以喪禮也縗杖者喪服也但殺於人即  宜悲愍何必縗杖然後爲哀乎或者云古  者出師天子素服泣而送之禮經之中墳  典之内皆無此說以此無據疏特明之典  者五帝之五典也墳者三皇之三墳也秦  伯向師而哭者春秋僖三十二年秦伯伐  鄭秦大夫杞子戍鄭使告于秦曰鄭人使  我掌其北門之管籥若潜師而來國可得  也秦伯訪於大夫蹇叔蹇叔曰勞師以襲  遠非所聞也師勞力竭遠主備之無乃不  可乎師之所爲鄭必知之且行千里其誰  不知秦伯辭焉召孟明西乞白乙使出師
Interpretation

To covet land and kill people, driving living beings elsewhere into a place of death—how could a person of the Dao, or a gentleman, fail to grieve over this? That is why the lower section says, “When opposing armies meet, the mournful side prevails.” (“When two armies face one another, the side moved by compassion can prevail.”) This is what “grieving in tears” means here.

“Treat victory in war with the rites of mourning”

Commentary: When brave warriors and stalwart soldiers win a battle and receive titles and rewards, their rank is placed on the right. In ancient times, the right was esteemed. But military affairs are inauspicious, so this victory should be treated with the rites of mourning—as though it were merely an inauspicious instrument. This does not necessarily mean that one must wear white, dress in mourning, carry a mourning staff, and weep before it can count as “the rites of mourning.”

Explanatory note: To win a battle and receive a title, with military merit placing one in a position of honor, is still to “treat victory with the rites of mourning.” Although the right is esteemed, it is not an auspicious position in military affairs. That is why the text says to treat victory with the rites of mourning. It means simply to regard war as an inauspicious instrument. Why insist that one must wear mourning clothes and carry a mourning staff for it to count as mourning rites?

Commentators who explain this passage often say that such a ritual really existed in ancient times. But a search through the ancient historical texts—the Three Tombs and Five Canons, among others—turns up no evidence for it, so this claim remains unconvincing and is omitted here. Some cite the Duke of Qin “facing the army and weeping.” But he was mourning a defeated army, not celebrating a victory.

Interpretation: Winning a battle and receiving a title, then being promoted to the rank of senior general for outstanding service, is also one way of “treating it with the rites of mourning.” Weapons are inauspicious instruments, and war is a means of killing. In victory, the other side is killed; in defeat, one’s own side is killed. In either case, it is the people who die. How could this not cause sorrow? The sage grieves for this, and the gentleman feels compassion; therefore, victory should be treated with the attitude of mourning.

“Coarse mourning clothes and a staff” refers to mourning garments and the staff carried in mourning. Whenever people have been killed, one should feel compassion. Why insist that wearing mourning clothes and carrying a staff are the only ways to show grief?

Some also say that in ancient times, when the ruler sent out an army, the Son of Heaven wore plain clothes and wept as he saw it off. Yet neither the ritual classics nor the ancient historical texts support this account, so it is considered unfounded. The explanatory note specifically clarifies the terms “Canons” and “Tombs”: “Canons” refers to the Five Canons of the Five Emperors, and “Tombs” to the Three Tombs of the Three Sovereigns.

The Duke of Qin facing the army and weeping: This story appears in the thirty-second year of Duke Xi in the Spring and Autumn Annals. The Duke of Qin attacked Zheng. The Qin official Qizi was stationed in Zheng and sent word to Qin that the people of Zheng had put him in charge of the northern gate keys; if Qin sent troops secretly, they could seize the state. The Duke of Qin consulted the minister Jian Shu. Jian Shu said that he had never heard of exhausting an army by marching far to launch a surprise attack: the troops would be worn out, while the distant ruler would be prepared. The people of Zheng would surely learn of Qin’s movements; who could keep a thousand-mile march secret? The Duke of Qin ignored his advice and sent Meng Ming, Xi Qi, and Bai Yi to lead the army. They were later defeated at Xiao. The Duke of Qin faced the defeated troops and wept in grief for their loss; he was not celebrating a victory.

Background: This passage explains chapters of the Dao De Jing that say, “Weapons are inauspicious instruments” and “Treat victory in war with the rites of mourning.” Laozi opposes treating killing as an achievement or taking pleasure in war. Even in victory, one should not celebrate with feasts and drink, but respond with compassion and the attitude of mourning, because people die whether their side wins or loses. The commentaries also clarify that the “position on the right” and “rites of mourning” express a symbolic attitude and need not be taken to require mourning clothes. They further explain that the Duke of Qin’s weeping was grief after defeat, and should not be misrepresented as an ancient precedent for mourning after victory.

 于東門之外蹇叔哭之曰孟子吾見師之  出而不見其入也秦伯使人謂之曰爾何  知中壽爾墓之木拱矣蹇叔之子預於師  哭而送之曰晋人禦師必於崤崤有二陵  焉其南陵夏后皋之墓其北陵文王之所  避風雨必死是間余收爾骨焉秦師遂東  過周北門左右免冑而下超乘者三百乘  王孫滿尚幼觀之言于襄王曰秦師輕而  無禮必敗輕則寡謀無禮則脱入險而脱  又不能謀能無敗乎及滑鄭商人弦高將  市於周遇之以乘韋先牛十二犒師且使  遽告于鄭鄭穆公使視客館則束載厲兵  秣馬矣使之武子辭焉吾子淹冬於弊邑  唯是脯資餼牽竭矣爲吾子之將行也鄭  之有原圃猶秦之有具囿吾子取其麋鹿  以間弊邑若何杞子奔齊逢孫楊孫奔宋  孟明曰鄭有備矣不可冀也攻之不克圍  之不繼吾其還也滅滑而還晋原軫曰秦  違蹇叔而以貪勤民天奉我也奉不可失  敵不可縱縱敵患生違天不祥必伐秦師  欒枝曰未報秦施而伐其師其爲死君乎  先軫曰秦不哀吾喪而伐吾同姓秦則無  禮何施之有吾聞之一日縱敵數世之患  也謀及子孫可謂死君乎遂發命遽興姜  戎襄公墨縗梁弘御戎萊駒爲右夏四月  辛巳敗秦師于崤獲百里孟明視西乞術  白乙丙以歸遂墨以葬文公晋於是始墨  文嬴請三帥曰彼實搆吾二君寡君若得
Interpretation

This passage comes from the account of the Battle of Xiao in the Zuo Tradition (the Qin–Jin war) and was included or cited in works such as the Guangshengyi on the True Classic of the Dao and De. The following explains its general meaning in plain language.

Outside the eastern gate of the capital, Jian Shu wept and said, “My child, I see the army setting out, but I do not see it returning.”

The Earl of Qin (Duke Mu of Qin) sent someone to say to him, “What do you know? If you die before reaching a ripe old age, the trees on your grave will already have grown large enough for a person to clasp around.”

Jian Shu’s son was in the army. Weeping as he saw him off, Jian Shu said, “The people of Jin will intercept the Qin army, surely at Mount Xiao, a dangerous pass. Mount Xiao has two ridges: the southern ridge is the tomb of Gao, a ruler of the Xia dynasty; the northern ridge is where King Wen of Zhou once took shelter from wind and rain. You will die in that gorge. When the time comes, I will come to gather your bones.”

The Qin army continued east. As it passed the northern gate of the Zhou capital, the attendants on the chariots on one side and the other took off their helmets and dismounted to show respect according to ritual. But three hundred chariots’ worth of soldiers leapt onto their vehicles and raced for the road, behaving with disrespectful frivolity.

Wangsun Man was still a boy. After watching, he said to King Xiang of Zhou, “The Qin army is frivolous and discourteous. It is bound to be defeated. Frivolity means little foresight; discourtesy leads to laxity. They are entering dangerous terrain while lax and unable to plan. How could they avoid defeat?”

When they reached the land of Hua, the Zheng merchant Xian Gao was on his way to trade in Zhou territory. He encountered the Qin army and first presented them with a piece of cooked cowhide and twelve oxen as provisions. He then sent someone in haste to warn Zheng.

Duke Mu of Zheng sent people to inspect the guest quarters for foreign visitors. They found that the people of Zheng had already tied up their baggage, sharpened their weapons, and fed their horses, showing that they were prepared.

Zheng sent Wuzi (Gongsun Zhi) to decline the Qin army’s visit. He said, “You have spent the winter in our small state, and the dried meat, provisions, and fodder have all run out. As you are about to depart, Zheng has the Yuanpu hunting grounds, just as Qin has the Juyu grounds. Why not hunt some deer there, while allowing our small state a little breathing room? What do you say?”

(Zheng had already seen through the Qin army’s intentions.) Qizi fled to Qi, while Fengsun and Yangsun fled to Song.

Baili Mengming said, “Zheng is prepared, so we cannot count on a surprise attack. We cannot take it by force or besiege it. We should turn back.” So, after destroying the state of Hua, the army returned home.

Yuan Zhen of Jin said, “Qin ignored Jian Shu’s advice, coveted profit, and wore out its people. Heaven has handed us this opportunity. We must not let it slip away or let the enemy go free. To let an enemy go is to invite trouble; to defy Heaven is inauspicious. We must attack the Qin army.”

Luan Zhi said, “We have not yet repaid Qin for its kindness to our state. Would attacking its army mean betraying our former ruler?”

Xian Zhen replied, “Qin did not mourn our ruler’s death, but attacked a state that shares our clan name. Qin has already acted without courtesy, so what kindness are we talking about? I have heard that letting an enemy go for even one day brings calamity for generations. How can making plans for our descendants be called betraying our former ruler?” He then gave the order and urgently called on the Jiang Rong to join the campaign. Duke Xiang of Jin wore black mourning clothes, since his father had not yet been buried. Liang Hong drove his chariot, and Lai Ju rode as the right-hand warrior. On the xinsi day of the fourth lunar month, the Jin army defeated the Qin army at Mount Xiao, captured Baili Mengmingshi, Xiqi Shu, and Baiyi Bing, and brought them back to Jin. From then on, the people of Jin wore black during mourning; this was the beginning of the custom.

Wen Ying, wife of Duke Xiang and daughter of Duke Mu of Qin, pleaded for the three Qin commanders, saying, “They were really the ones who set our two rulers against each other…”

This event took place around 627 BCE. Duke Mu of Qin ignored the senior minister Jian Shu’s warning and attempted a surprise attack on Zheng. Xian Gao, a Zheng merchant, came upon the Qin army, pretended to provision it, and sent a warning to Zheng. As the Qin army retreated in defeat, Duke Xiang of Jin ambushed it at Mount Xiao. It was a famous battle of the Spring and Autumn period. The passage’s central lesson is that ignoring good counsel, relying on force and behaving discourteously, and greedily pressing ahead in pursuit of achievement lead to defeat. It is often discussed alongside Daoist ideas such as “knowing when to stop avoids danger” and caution in warfare.

 而食之不猒君何辱討焉使歸就戮于秦  以逞寡君之志若何公許之先軫問秦囚  公曰夫人請之吾舍之矣先軫怒曰武夫  力而拘諸原婦人暫而免諸國隳軍實而  長寇讎亡無日矣不顧而唾公使陽處父  追之及諸河則在舟中矣釋左驂以公命  贈孟明孟明稽首曰君之惠不以縲臣舋  鼓使歸就戮于秦寡君之以爲戮死且不  朽若從君惠而免之三年將拜君賜秦伯  素服郊次向師而哭曰孤違蹇叔以辱二  三子孤之罪也不替孟明孤之過也大夫  何罪且吾不以一眚掩大德蹇叔之哭知  其師必敗也秦伯之哭哀其師之敗也皆  非胜而哭之矣聖㫖制疏委曲明之恐後  人增飾其謬耳夫用兵好殺君子不爲大  道好生聖賢是則但戰之勝敗皆害於人  自可戒之而戢兵豈必殺之而後哭理身  者五欲内侵則五神疲散六情中盛則六  識交爭氣喪神疲將虞殞謝當固抑情斬  欲克保恬和亦猶理國之君不
Interpretation

The Broad Explanation of the True Scripture of the Dao and De, Volume 26 (excerpt), modern-language interpretation

(Continuing the account of the battle)… “I gave him food and supported him without growing weary. Why must you lower yourself to issue an order sending me back to Qin to be executed? That would also fulfill my ruler’s wish. What do you think?”

Duke Wen of Jin agreed. Xian Zhen came to ask about the Qin prisoners. Duke Wen said, “My wife, Lady Wen Ying, pleaded for them, so I released them.” Xian Zhen flew into a rage. “Our soldiers captured the enemy on the battlefield by force of arms, and one woman’s word has set them free. This destroys the strength of our army and emboldens our enemy. The fall of our state cannot be far off!” He spat toward Duke Wen without turning back.

Duke Wen sent Yang Chufu to pursue them. By the time Yang reached the Yellow River, the Qin men were already aboard their boat. Yang unhitched the horse on the left side of his chariot and, claiming to act on Duke Wen’s orders, offered it to Meng Ming. Meng Ming bowed to the ground and said, “Your ruler has shown kindness: he did not kill his captive, nor send me back as though I were already dead in a coffin and hearse. He has allowed me to return to Qin and face punishment. If my ruler puts me to death according to the law, I will die with my name preserved. If, through your ruler’s kindness, I am pardoned, in three years I will surely return to repay his favor.”

The Earl of Qin, Duke Mu, went out to the suburbs in plain mourning clothes to await the army. Facing the troops, he wept and said, “I failed to heed Jian Shu’s advice, and brought humiliation upon you. That was my fault. My failure to remove Meng Ming from office was also my fault. What crime have the other officers committed?” He also said, “I will not let one small mistake obscure his great virtues.”

(Editor’s note) Jian Shu wept when he saw the army off because he foresaw its defeat. The Earl of Qin wept later because he grieved over the army’s defeat. Neither was weeping after a victory. The sage’s intent in explaining this passage so carefully is to prevent later writers from embellishing it until it strays ever further from the truth.

On Warfare and Cultivating the Self

A person who wages war and delights in killing is no gentleman. The Great Dao cherishes life, and sages and worthies take this as their standard. Victory and defeat in battle both bring harm to people; they should serve as a warning to restrain the use of force. Why wait until people have been killed before weeping?

As for cultivating the self: when the five desires—such as desires for sights, sounds, scents, tastes, and touch—invade from within, the five spirits, the mental functions associated with the five organs, grow tired and scattered. When the six emotions—joy, anger, sorrow, pleasure, love, and aversion—become excessive in the heart, the six forms of perception arising from the eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind contend with one another. When Qi is depleted and Shen grows weary, death is near. One should strengthen the will, curb feelings and passions, restrain desires, and remain calm and even-tempered. This is like a ruler who governs the state without extolling the “skillful use of weapons.”

尚佳兵之  美也 道徳眞經廣聖義卷之二十六

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0114); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 26 Vol. 28 →