中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 95

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 95 / 104 3,704 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 95 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 7 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之九十七谷十     武林道士褚伯秀學    說劍第一 昔趙文王喜劍劍士夾門而客三千餘人日 夜相擊於前死傷者歲百餘人好之不厭三 年國衰諸侯謀之太子悝患之募左右曰孰 能說王之意止劍士者賜之千金左右曰莊 子當能太子乃使人以千金奉莊子莊子弗 受與使者俱見曰太子何以教周賜周千金 太子曰聞夫子明聖謹奉千金以幣從者夫 子弗受悝尚何敢言莊子曰聞太子用周者 欲絶王之喜好也使臣上說大王而逆王意 下不當太子則身刑而死周尚安所事金乎 使臣上說大王下當太子趙國何求而不得 也太子曰然吾王所見唯劍士也莊子曰諾 周善爲劍太子曰然吾王所見劍士皆蓬頭 突鬢垂冠曼胡之纓短後之衣瞋目而語難 王乃悦之今夫子儒服而見王事必大逆莊 子曰請治劍服治劍服三日太子乃與見王 王脫白刃待之莊子入殿門不趨見王不拜 王曰子欲何以教寡人使太子先曰臣聞大 王喜劍故以劍見王王曰子之劍何能禁制 曰臣之劍十步一人千里不留行王大悦之 曰天下無敵矣莊子曰夫爲劍者示之以虚 開之以利後之以發先之以至願得試之王 曰夫子休就舍待命令設戲請夫子王乃校 劍士七日死傷者六十餘人得五六人使奉
Interpretation

In the past, King Wen of Zhao was fond of swordsmanship and gathered more than three thousand swordsmen at his court. Day and night they crossed swords before him, and more than a hundred were killed or wounded each year. King Wen never tired of watching. After three years, the state of Zhao grew steadily weaker, and the other feudal lords began plotting to attack it.

The crown prince, Kui, King Wen’s heir, was deeply worried. He offered a reward to those around him, saying, “Whoever can persuade the king to stop his fondness for swordsmen will receive a thousand gold pieces.” His attendants said, “Zhuangzi should be able to do it.”

The crown prince sent someone to take a thousand gold pieces to Zhuangzi. Zhuangzi refused the gift and went with the messenger to see the crown prince. He said, “What do you wish to ask Zhou”—Zhou was Zhuangzi’s own name—“to do, Crown Prince? You send me a thousand gold pieces; what task do you want me to undertake?”

The crown prince replied, “I have heard that you are wise and discerning. I respectfully offer you a thousand gold pieces as a gift for you and your attendants. Since you refuse it, I dare not press the matter.”

Zhuangzi said, “I have heard that the crown prince sent for me because he wants to put an end to the king’s fondness for swordsmanship. If I advise the king and go against his wishes, then fail to satisfy yours, I will be put to death. How could I accept the thousand gold pieces then? But if I persuade the king and also satisfy you, what could I want in the state of Zhao that I could not obtain?”

The crown prince said, “That is true. But the only people the king sees are swordsmen.”

“Very well,” said Zhuangzi. “I am skilled with the sword.”

“That is so,” said the crown prince. “The swordsmen the king sees all have their hair hanging loose, their hats tilted, coarse cords tied around them, and short-tailed garments. They glare and speak in rough, booming voices, and the king likes them. If you go to see him dressed as a Confucian scholar, you are sure to fail.”

“Let me prepare an outfit worn by swordsmen,” said Zhuangzi.

Three days later, the crown prince took Zhuangzi to see King Wen of Zhao. The king was waiting with a sharp, unsheathed sword in his hand. Zhuangzi entered the palace gate without hurrying forward and did not bow when he met the king.

The king asked, “What do you wish to teach me?”

Zhuangzi let the crown prince answer first. “I have heard that Your Majesty is fond of swordsmanship, so I invited Zhuangzi to present himself to Your Majesty as a swordsman.”

The king asked Zhuangzi, “How can your swordsmanship prevail over others?”

“With my sword,” Zhuangzi replied, “I can kill a man within ten paces, and travel a thousand miles without meeting anyone who can stand against me.”

The king was delighted. “There is no one in the world who can match you!”

Zhuangzi said, “A swordsman must first reveal an opening and lure his opponent into striking. Then, after the opponent moves, he acts and arrives first. Allow me to demonstrate.”

The king said, “Go back to your lodging and await my summons. I will arrange a sword contest and have you take part.”

King Wen then selected swordsmen to compete. Over the next seven days, more than sixty were killed or wounded. At last, he chose five or six men and had them…

劍於殿下乃召莊子曰今日試使士敦劍莊 子曰望之乆矣王曰夫子所御杖長短如何 曰臣之所奉皆可然臣有三劍唯王所用請 先言而後試王曰願聞三劍曰有天子劍有 諸侯劍有庶人劍王曰天子之劍何如曰天 子之劍以燕谿石城爲鋒齊岱爲鍔晋魏爲 脊周宋爲鐔韓魏爲鋏包以四夷裏以四時 繞以渤海帶以常山制以五行論以刑德開 以陰陽持以春夏行以秋冬直之無前舉之 無上案之無下運之無旁上决浮雲下絶地 紀此劍一用匡諸侯天下服矣此天子之劍 也文王芒然自失曰諸侯之劍何如曰諸侯 之劍以知勇士爲鋒以清廉士爲鍔以賢良 士爲脊以忠聖士爲鐔以豪傑士爲鋏直之 亦無前舉之亦無上案之亦無下運之亦無 旁上法圓天以順三光下法方地以順四時 中知民意以安四鄉此劍一用如雷霆之震 四封之内無不賔服此諸侯之劍也王曰庶 人之劍何如曰庶人之劍蓬頭突鬢垂冠曼 胡之纓短後之衣瞋目而語難相擊於前上 斬頸領下决肝肺此庶人之劍無異於鬭雞 一旦命已絶矣無所用於國事今大王有天 子之位而好庶人之劍臣竊爲大王薄之王 乃牽而上殿宰人上食王三環之莊子曰大 王安坐定氣劍事已畢奏矣於是文王不出 宫三月劍士皆服斃其處也  郭註無聞
Interpretation

The swordsmen waited in the hall below, and King Wen summoned Zhuangzi and said, “Today I ask you to try having the swordsmen demonstrate their art.”

Zhuangzi said, “I have looked forward to this day for a long time.” The king asked, “Sir, as to the sword you use—what length do you prefer?” Zhuangzi replied, “The sword I use may be long or short as needed. However, I have three kinds of sword; let the great king choose among them. Please hear me first, then try the swords.” The king said, “I would like to hear about these three swords.” Zhuangzi said, “There are the sword of the Son of Heaven, the sword of the feudal lords, and the sword of common people.”

The king asked, “What is the sword of the Son of Heaven like?” Zhuangzi answered, “The sword of the Son of Heaven takes the mountain stone of Yanxi and Shicheng as its point, Mount Tai in Qi as its blade, Jin and Wei as its spine, Zhou and Song as its guard, and Han and Wei as its hilt. Its body embraces the four borderlands and holds within it the changes of the four seasons; it encircles the Bohai Sea and takes Mount Chang as its belt. It is balanced by the Five Phases, judged by punishments and virtue, unfolded through the interplay of yin and yang, moved by the qi of spring and summer, and applied in accord with the seasons of autumn and winter. Pointed forward, nothing blocks it; raised up, nothing reaches its height; pressed down, nothing matches its depth; in motion, nowhere is beyond its reach. Upward it can split drifting clouds; downward it can sever the roots of the earth. Once this sword is wielded, it can set the feudal lords right and bring the world to submission. This is the sword of the Son of Heaven.”

After hearing this, the king looked dazed, as if he had lost his spirit, and said, “What is the sword of the feudal lords like?” Zhuangzi answered, “The sword of the feudal lords takes men of wisdom and courage as its point, men of integrity as its blade, worthy men as its spine, loyal and enlightened men as its guard, and heroes as its hilt. Pointed forward, nothing blocks it; raised up, nothing reaches its height; pressed down, nothing matches its depth; in motion, nowhere is beyond its reach. Upward it takes the round heaven as its model, following the sun, moon, and stars; downward it takes the square earth as its model, following the four seasons; at the center it reads the hearts of the people and brings peace to the four directions. Once this sword is wielded, it is like thunder shaking the land—within the four borders, no one fails to submit. This is the sword of the feudal lords.”

The king asked, “What is the sword of common people like?” Zhuangzi answered, “The sword of common people is the sort used by men with unkempt hair and bristling temples, hats worn low, coarse hat cords, and short coat tails. They glare at each other, speak harshly, and slaughter one another face to face—cutting throats from above, piercing livers and lungs from below. This is the sword of common people; it differs little from cockfighting. Lives are ended in an instant, and it is of no use to the affairs of state. Now the great king occupies the position of Son of Heaven yet delights in the sword of common people—I venture to think this diminishes your dignity.”

The king then took Zhuangzi by the hand and led him up to the hall. The steward brought food, and the king walked three circuits around Zhuangzi. Zhuangzi said, “Great king, please sit calmly and settle your breath—the matter of swordsmanship has been fully explained.” Thereupon the king did not leave his palace for three months, and the swordsmen each took their own lives where they lodged.

 吕註莊子之制行願曳尾於塗中而不爲  太廟犧牲以悟危身殉物之俗則說劍實  所未聞盖借此以明道之所用無往而不  可耳能止其君之喜好而安其國之危則  其澤之所及亦豈小哉故有道者有時而  爲之許其事而辭其幣明君子之不可以  貨取服其服用其禮所以同其事然後言  可入也夫天子之劍以天下爲之所以言  天下神器不可爲也示之以虚開之以利  後之以發先之以至此所以用神器之道  以其不可爲而爲之者也能知其本末輕  重之所在與其所以論制之法持行之時  則用之而天下服矣自燕溪齊岱至渤海  恒山喻天子之劍以天下爲之自五行刑  德至下絶地紀喻神之無時無方也唯神  人可以御神器故匡諸侯而天下服此唐  虞三代已試之效也莊子之所以爲劍者  如此文王聞之芒然自失乃知己所好者  非眞劍也諸侯以一國爲劍故以士言士  者民之望也知勇居先故以爲鋒清廉居  次故以爲鍔賢良倚以爲幹者故爲脊忠  聖植以爲本者故爲鐔膏傑則吾所持而  行者故以爲鋏爲國者觀其所以爲鋒鍔  鐔鋏者合與否則器之利不利國之安危  可知也天下一國大小雖殊其所以用之  者在精神之運則一而已及問庶人之劍  則正指王之所好以救其失劍士皆服斃  其處明所以勝剛强者如此而已矣
Interpretation

When Lü Huiqing commented on the Zhuangzi, he said that Zhuangzi used the image of preferring to drag one’s tail through the mud rather than become a sacrificial victim in the ancestral temple to illustrate how people harm themselves for the sake of external things. As for Zhuangzi’s discussion of the “sword,” this interpretation is indeed rarely heard. Zhuangzi uses the sword to show that the Dao’s workings are everywhere, and that anything can be handled through the Dao.

How small could Zhuangzi’s beneficence have been, when he was able to curb a ruler’s predilections and steer the state from danger to safety? Thus, a person of the Dao sometimes steps forward and acts. Zhuangzi agreed to speak about swordsmanship, but declined the gifts offered to him. He put on the appropriate attire and observed the proper rites, matching the setting of his conversation with the ruler, and only then offered his counsel. The Son of Heaven’s sword is forged from the whole world as its material. Through this, Zhuangzi shows that the world is a great vessel and must not be handled arbitrarily. First, reveal the Dao of emptiness and stillness to the ruler, then guide him through what benefits him. Let him act in accord with circumstances, while preparing for those circumstances in advance. This is how one makes use of the great vessel that is the world: because the world cannot be forced into submission, one must govern by following its tendencies.

If one understands the relative importance of beginnings and ends, of what is weighty and what is slight, as well as the right time to formulate and carry out policies, then governing the world through the Dao will bring the world into accord. From the ravines of Yan and Mount Tai in Qi to the Bohai Sea and Mount Heng, these places illustrate that the Son of Heaven’s sword is forged from the whole world. From the Five Phases, punishments, and benevolent government to what reaches up to Heaven and down to the veins of the earth, these illustrate that the wondrous Dao is not limited by time, space, or direction. Only a sage who has attained the Dao can wield the great vessel that is the world. Thus Zhuangzi assisted the feudal lords and brought the world into accord. This was the way of governing that Tang Yao, Yu Shun, and the rulers of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties had practiced with success. This is what Zhuangzi meant by the “sword.”

After hearing this, King Wen of Zhou was bewildered and at a loss. Only then did he realize that what he had loved was not the true sword. A feudal lord takes his own state as his sword, so Zhuangzi turned to speak of the “scholar.” Scholars are the people in whom the common people place their hopes. Wisdom and courage come first, like the sword’s point; uprightness and integrity come next, like its edge. Worthy and good people rely on them, like the sword’s spine; loyal and enlightened people establish themselves upon them, like the guard at the base of the blade. Those of exceptional talent and insight are what a ruler depends on when wielding the sword—that is, its hilt. Anyone who governs a state can judge whether the state is strong and sharp, and whether its political order is stable, simply by examining whether these elements of the “sword” are properly in place.

The world and a single state differ in scale, but in both cases the key to putting them to use lies in directing the spirit and the way of governance. Later, when King Wen asked about the people’s sword, Zhuangzi pointed directly to the ruler’s predilections and used them to correct his errors. The swordsmen were all subdued and fell where they stood. This shows that the way to prevail over the strong and forceful lies precisely here.

 疑獨註人情之所篤好者物不能奪況居  人上勢高心侈言不可入道不可化者乎  故趙文王喜劍而莊子以劍士見因其所  好寓意於其間陳天人之道乃天子諸侯  庶人之事以感動之遂能止文王好劍之  弊言天子之劍必以鄰國與夫山海之險  爲之鋒鍔鐔鋏包裹而繞帶之制論以五  行刑德開持以陰陽四時故能逆之無前  運之無旁上决浮雲下絶地紀非天下至  神孰能與於此至論諸侯之劍則資治於  人故以知勇清廉忠聖豪傑爲鋒鍔鐔鋏  是以用之如雷霆之震無不賔服者矣又  問庶人之劍答以即日所好無異鬭雞氣  盡力憊而死言用小術不足以治國也與  齊宣王好勇孟子對以大勇義同王聞其  語心懷愧負繞食而不敢餐於是不出宫  三月劍士皆服斃其處謂聞莊子之言能  悔過也  碧虚註廟戰者帝神化者王廟戰法天地  神化法四時故政修於境内而遠方慕其  德制勝於未戰而諸侯服其威是以天下  爲劍豈直太阿干將比哉趙文王之喜劍  傲吏所以進說其㫖在乎神武而不殺者  也古有寳劍名曰含光視之不見觸之不  覺影無曲直響無清濁匣於廟堂之上則  威懾四夷用於敵國之際則一童子佩之  却三軍之衆若乃示之以中虚開之以外  漠運之以無形發之以無作進退而鸞舞
Interpretation

The commentary of Yidu (Yídú) says: If the things a person is most attached to and fond of cannot be taken away by external forces, how much less can one who holds high rank, wields great power, and has an arrogant and extravagant will be deaf to the guidance of the Dao (the Way) and unable to be transformed by it?

For this reason, King Wen of Zhao (that is, King Huiwen of Zhao) was fond of swordsmanship, and Zhuangzi presented himself to him as a swordsman. By following what the king loved, Zhuangzi conveyed his deeper meaning through it. He spoke of the principles of Tian Dao (the Way of Heaven) and Ren Dao (the Way of Humanity), and of the proper duties of the Son of Heaven, the feudal lords, and the common people. In the end he moved the king, who gave up his excessive love of swords.

Zhuangzi said that the sword of the Son of Heaven takes the strategic barriers of neighboring states and the mountains and seas as its edge. Its guard and hilt enclose it, and it is wrapped with a sash. Its making follows the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water) and the principles of punishment and virtue, and its use accords with the Yin-Yang (Yin-Yang) and the four seasons. Thus, when thrust forward, nothing can block it. When swung to the side, nothing can evade it. Raised upward, it can cut through the floating clouds, and driven downward, it can sever the great bonds of the earth. Unless one is a person of supreme spiritual power under heaven, who could accomplish such things?

As for the sword of the feudal lords, it relies on men capable of governing the state. Wisdom, courage, purity, integrity, loyalty, sagacity, and heroism serve as its edge and blade. When such a sword is wielded, it strikes like thunder, and none fail to submit and obey.

As for the sword of the common people, Zhuangzi replied that it is no different from the fighting cocks that people favor. Such men exhaust their strength and spirit and die. This shows that relying only on such minor skills is insufficient for governing a state.

This is similar to the matter of King Xuan of Qi and his fondness for courage. Mencius answered him with the notion of "great courage," and the principle is the same. When King Xuan heard this, he felt shame and self-reproach. He stopped eating and dared not take a meal, and for three months he did not leave the palace gates. The swordsmen, too, were convinced and submitted, and they each fell upon their swords where they stood. From this we can see that King Xuan was able to repent and renew himself only because he heeded Zhuangzi's words.

The commentary of Bixu (Bìxū) says: Those who win battles in the temple, that is, through strategy before any fighting, may be called emperors. Those whose power is divinely transformative may be called kings. Winning in the temple follows the pattern of Heaven and Earth, and divine transformation follows the four seasons. Therefore, when government is well ordered within the realm, people from distant lands also admire its virtue. When victory is secured before any battle is fought, the feudal lords submit to its authority. Hence, if one regards the whole world as a single sword, how could famous swords such as Taiá or Ganjiang be compared to it?

King Wen of Zhao loved swordsmanship, and Zhuangzi, speaking as a swordsman, aimed his counsel at honoring divine martial power that does not kill. In ancient times there was a precious sword called Hanguang (Hidden Radiance). When one looks at it, one cannot see it. When one touches it, one cannot feel it. Its shadow has no curve or straightness, and its echo has no clarity or murkiness. If it is kept in the ancestral hall, it can awe the barbarians of the four quarters. If it is used when fighting an enemy state, even a boy who carries it can make the three armies retreat. If it is displayed in a manner of emptiness within, opened in a manner of stillness without, employed in a manner of formlessness, and released in a manner of non-action, then its advance and retreat resemble phoenixes dancing. This is the Way of divine martial power. Without resorting to slaughter, it still brings all under heaven to submit.

 麟振屈伸而鳳騫龍躍又何事乎杖御長  短敦校遲速擊搏腰領斬斫死傷而弗休  止耶夫兵者不祥之器聖人不得已而用  之劍者一夫之勇象於鬭雞一旦命已殂  矣何用於萬乗之國哉  劉槩註天下事物之情莫不毁異而尊同  捐小而慕大以至違害就利往往皆然若  其不與己同雖利不從不見所利雖大不  慕也莊子論道是篇及於辭人說客之言  者盖寓至理於微眇必假言而後獲也物  情自貴而相賤自是而相非而欲以不同  蘄人之合則雖夫子之聖亦屈於盜跖之  暴矣以所同而勝人則莊子一言而絶趙  王終身之好者固其理也夫突鬢垂冠曼  胡短後瞋目而語難者趙王之所好非莊  子之情今且變其常情易其常服者彼將  尊其所說也上論天子次及諸侯下鄙庶  人者彼將慕其所大也大則服天下次則  賔四封下則斬頸領者彼將就其所利也  事物之情不過於此聖人調而應之物而  畜之則衆狙之服於朝四暮三之術豈無  其道哉若夫枉己未有能直人則莊子之  說劍似求合矣盖自盜跖漁父皆非己事  也其言之大意皆所以相攻而理固微矣  若按迹而求豈知言者哉  鬳齋云垂冠不高其冠如世所謂烈士巾  曼胡麤魯短後不襜也語難以語相詰難  示以虚開以利與其進也發後先至將擊
Interpretation

The qilin (a legendary auspicious beast) leaps and stretches; the phoenix soars high; the horned dragon bounds about. Why, then, cling to the length of weapons or the speed of thrusts and blows, competing and fighting, slashing waists and necks, and killing without end? Weapons are inauspicious things. The sage uses them only when there is no other choice. Swordsmanship is merely one person’s martial prowess, like cockfighting. Once a life is lost, nothing remains. What use is that to a king who commands ten thousand chariots?

Liu Gai’s commentary: In the affairs and principles of the world, people mostly disdain what is different and value what is the same; they discard what is small and admire what is great. They often act the same way when avoiding harm and seeking advantage. If something goes against their views, they will not accept it even when it benefits them. If they cannot see the benefit, they will not admire it, even when the benefit is great.

This chapter of the Zhuangzi speaks of persuaders and skilled rhetoricians, entrusting subtle principles to indirect words. Principles often need words to be understood. People’s ordinary inclination is to value themselves and look down on others, to think themselves right and criticize others. If you try to win someone over with a view different from theirs, even a sage like Confucius can be refuted by a violent outlaw like Robber Zhi. But if you begin from what you have in common and use that to prevail, a single sentence from Zhuangzi can put an end to King Zhao’s lifelong fondness for swordsmanship. This is simply in keeping with human nature.

King Zhao liked men with disheveled hair, tall caps, coarse clothes, short backs to their garments, and eyes wide as they argued. This was not Zhuangzi’s own nature. Now Zhuangzi changed King Zhao’s usual tastes and put on clothes unlike his customary dress, so the king would respect what he said. He spoke first of the Son of Heaven, then of the feudal lords, and finally disparaged the common people; the king would then admire the great figures Zhuangzi praised. A person in the highest position can make all under Heaven submit; next in rank, one can make the lords of the four quarters yield; as a commoner, one can only end up with head severed from body. King Zhao would choose the course that benefited him. This is, in broad terms, how things work. The sage responds to circumstances and brings them into harmony, making use of things in keeping with their own qualities. So how could there be no sense in the monkeys’ accepting the “three in the morning and four in the evening” scheme—first being told they would get three nuts in the morning and four at night, then being told they would get four in the morning and three at night, with the total unchanged but the monkeys delighted?

As for bending oneself out of shape, that does not necessarily make others behave properly. Zhuangzi’s discussion of swordsmanship may therefore seem to pander to King Zhao. Yet the stories of Robber Zhi, the Old Fisherman, and others are not things Zhuangzi experienced firsthand. Their speeches, in broad terms, consist of mutual attacks, but the principles within them are subtle. If you interpret them only by following the surface events, how can you claim to have truly understood the speaker?

Yanzhai’s commentary: “Drooping cap” refers to a low hat, like what people call a “martyr’s headcloth.” “Manhu” describes a rough, uncouth appearance. “Short-backed” means a garment with a short rear hem, unlike the formal style of dress. “Verbal contention” means challenging one another with words. Zhuangzi showed King Zhao the way of emptiness and stillness, then guided him by appealing to advantage. When King Zhao came forward to listen, Zhuangzi spoke from behind him, getting to the key point first, then was about to strike…

 以匿之勢敦斷也以劍相擊斷鐔劍刃鋏  劍把四時五行日月陰陽皆順造化自然  之意上决浮雲下絶地紀形容其所用廣  大三繞所食之地而不敢坐愧弗自安王  既感悟不用此戲劍士皆退服自斃於所   居之處也   褚氏統論南華立言明道高越九天深   窮九地闢闔造化鬼神莫測及其引事   物以爲喻則不出乎人間世之談而玄   機妙義隱然于中有足以覺人心救時   弊者說劍一篇辭雄㫖微鏗鍧千載豈   浪鳴哉漢書司馬氏在趙者以傳劍論   顯則劍術其來尚矣故漆園借此以發   胸中之奇或者泥於形似遂認爲說客   縱横之論經意一失指夜光爲魚目者   有之伯秀不揆淺陋竊考南華所以言   之㫖申爲說云趙國以喻一身文王喜   劍心牽於利欲之譬也太子悝患之猶   志有所覺而不能制心之失求莊子止   王所好喻推理以勝之也所陳三劍言   其理有優劣具眼决擇差等見矣十步   一人言其鋒莫當千里不留行言其用   捷速養神之全者似之天子以鄰國爲   固諸侯以賢士爲幹庶人恃匹夫之勇   耳以趙王之尊而好庶人之劍是昩德   性之至貴趨物欲之至卑日夜相擊於   前又惡保其無損鬭雞之喻卑之甚也   欲有以救其失而復其初非繩以至理   不可及其理勝欲消所存者正性則翻   毒刃爲神器亦無所事乎心矣此由失
Interpretation

The "Shuojian" (Discourse on the Sword) passage describes a style of swordsmanship: one conceals one's form and waits for the right moment, then strikes suddenly, with a blow powerful enough to split the sword's guard (tan, the ring-shaped guard), the blade, and the jia (the joint where hilt meets blade).

The hilt symbolizes the four seasons and the Five Phases, the sun and moon, and Yin and Yang, and the sword follows the pattern of zaohua (the transforming processes of creation and natural generation). Raised upward, it can cleave floating clouds; pointed downward, it can sever the bonds that order the earth. The sweep of the sword is vast, able to circle the body three times, and everything within its reach falls under its power. King Zhao was deeply moved and no longer indulged in this contest-game of swords. The swordsmen withdrew, submitting in heart and word, and some took their own lives in their lodgings out of shame.

Chu Shi's general commentary says that the Nanhua Jing (Scripture of Nanhua) establishes its teaching and illuminates the Dao (the Way), soaring above the nine heavens and probing the nine depths of the earth. It expounds the processes of creation so profoundly that ghosts and spirits cannot fathom it. Although it borrows human affairs as analogies, it does not go beyond the discourse of the human world, yet its subtle mysteries and wondrous meanings lie hidden within, enough to awaken the human mind and remedy the ills of the age. The "Shuojian" chapter is vigorous in style and subtle in meaning, resonant in sound, and after a thousand years it still echoes. Could this be an empty clamor? The Book of Han records that the Sima family won fame in Zhao by transmitting theories of swordsmanship, showing that such discourse on the sword has a long history. Zhuangzi used it to give voice to the marvelous ideas in his breast. Some, fixated on superficial resemblances, regard it as a persuader's argument of the Warring States diplomats. This misses the original intent, much like mistaking a night-shining pearl for a fish's eye.

Boxiu (Chu Boxiu, self-referring), not presuming on his shallow learning, privately examined the purpose of the Nanhua and offers the following exposition. Zhao stands for the whole human body, and King Wen of Zhao's fondness for swords stands for the shen (spirit) entangled in profit and desire. Crown Prince Kui was worried about this, as though he had already perceived it in his heart yet could not restrain the faults of his mind. So he asked Zhuangzi to stop the king's favorite pursuit and subdue him through reason. The three kinds of swords presented in the text differ in rank according to principle, and those with discerning eyes will naturally distinguish their grades. "One man in ten steps" speaks of a blade no one can withstand, and "not leaving a traveler behind for a thousand li" speaks of swiftness in using the sword. These resemble the state of nourishing the spirit and preserving one's original nature. The Son of Heaven takes neighboring states as screens, the feudal lords take worthy scholars as aides, and commoners rely merely on the courage of a common man. Yet King Zhao, of noble station, delights in the sword of commoners. This is being blind to the supreme nobility of De (Virtue) while inclining toward the utmost baseness of material desire. Day and night, clashing before one's eyes, how can one ensure one is not harmed oneself? The metaphor of cockfighting lowers such conduct even further.

If one wishes to remedy this error and return to the original beginning, one cannot do so without restraining it by the ultimate principle. But if principle prevails over desire, what is preserved is the pure original nature, and then transforming the poisonous blade into a divine instrument no longer requires scheming calculation. All of this comes from losing the original mind.

  以求復不免艱難而得之是謂勉强而   行成功一也所云天子諸侯庶人三劍   之等殊喻禀性之厚薄趨向之高下而   成功有優劣也古之君天下神武而不   殺者皆得此劍以神其用豈直太阿干   將比哉於是趙王繞食而不能餐禮義   悦心芻豢有不足美者使王安坐定氣   劍事已畢奏矣言心以動虧性由靜得   得性者復吾本來之眞亦由無所得也   趙王不出宫三月則能守之以靜養之   以虚成性存存而不變矣劍士皆服斃   其處以喻即時心死盖工技者去和技   者息回視所謂神器亦與之俱化又何   有天子庶人之別哉從太子之請而辭   其幣與魯仲連存邯鄲而不受千金義   同卒能止趙王之戲好而安其國兹又   寓治道於其中而不廢也盖南華痛憫   世人耽於物欲失性而不自知故創爲   是論以明復性者在乎中有所主防欲   如讐心纔有覺即推理以勝之不待乎   劍士夾門日夜相擊然後求夫善說者   以止之也此寓道於技以立言而解者   往往以外象求合使正大之理爲之乆   湮併陷至言於辯者之囿可爲太息兹   因鑽研至極遂悟反流歸源庶符立言   本意云子玄於是經得其心髓雄文奥  
Interpretation

When something is obtained only by force of outside means, it inevitably comes through hardship; even if successful, it is still a forced achievement. Though the three kinds of sword differ in rank, they are metaphors for people’s differing innate qualities and aspirations, and thus for the varying worth of their achievements. The rulers of old who governed all under Heaven with divine authority and martial might, yet did not kill recklessly, all knew how to wield this sword and bring its wondrous power to bear. How could it be compared merely with famous swords such as Tai’e and Ganjiang?

At this, the King of Zhao grew restless and could not even eat. The inward joy that comes from rites and righteousness made even the rarest delicacies seem tasteless. Zhuangzi asked the king to sit calmly and settle his spirit, saying, “The discussion of swords is finished.” This means that when thoughts stir, they injure one’s nature; only by returning to stillness can one preserve it. To preserve one’s nature is to recover one’s original true nature, and this does not come from deliberately seeking anything.

For three months, the King of Zhao did not leave the palace. In stillness, he guarded his original mind; in emptiness and quietude, he nurtured his nature, allowing it to endure unchanged. All the swordsmen were content to submit, as though they had died where they stood. This means that as cunning and skillful contrivances fade from the mind, the desire to prevail also subsides. Looking back, even the so-called wondrous swordsmanship dissolves with them. At this point, what distinction remains between the sword of the Son of Heaven and the sword of the commoner?

Zhuangzi accepted the Crown Prince’s request but declined the gifts offered to him. In this, he was like Lu Zhonglian, who stayed in Handan to save Zhao yet refused a thousand pieces of gold. In the end, Zhuangzi stopped the King of Zhao from becoming obsessed with swordplay and helped bring stability to Zhao. This story also conveys a way of governing the state; it is not merely about swordsmanship.

Zhuangzi deeply pitied people who become immersed in material desires and lose their nature without realizing it. He therefore wrote this discussion to show that recovering one’s nature depends on having an inner guide: desires must be guarded against as one would guard against an enemy, and as soon as a thought is noticed, reason should be used to restrain it. There is no need to wait until swordsmen are fighting day and night at the gate and then call on a skilled persuader to stop them.

Zhuangzi uses swordsmanship to clarify the Way. Later readers, however, have often forced interpretations onto the surface story alone. As a result, its broad and profound meaning has long remained obscured; some have even confined Zhuangzi’s highest teachings to verbal disputation. This is truly regrettable. After studying the passage repeatedly, I finally understood that its purpose is to lead people back to their roots and origins. I hope this accords with the intention behind Zhuangzi’s words.

When Guo Xiang, courtesy name Zixuan, interpreted the Nanhua Zhenjing, he grasped its essence. His writing was expansive and his arguments profound, worthy of standing alongside Zhuangzi. Yet for this chapter alone, he left not a single word, seemingly wishing readers to ponder it deeply and reach their own understanding. Fearing that this might leave some readers perplexed, I have had to offer this clarification.

Collected Subtle Commentaries on the Meaning of the Nanhua Zhenjing, Volume 97

 論與之並駕爭驅獨此篇不著一語使   人深造而自得之也恐或者於此乎致   疑故不得不辯 南華眞經義海纂微卷之九十七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 94 Vol. 96 →