中文 · EN

《南華真經循本》Vol. 20

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 20 / 30 3,454 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經循本》 Vol. 20 (Dongshen 洞神部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 7 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經循本》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經循本卷之二十禍十二   廬陵竹峯羅勉道述   門人彭祥點校  外篇    田子方 田子方侍坐於魏文侯數稱谿工文侯曰谿 工子之師邪子方曰非也無擇之里人也稱 道數當(去/聲)故無擇稱之文侯曰然則子無師 邪子方曰有曰子之師誰邪子方曰東郭順 子文侯曰然則夫子何故未嘗稱之子方曰 其爲人也眞人貌而天虚縁而葆眞清而容 物  三句文法一同雖人之貌而合乎自然之  天雖虚以順物而自葆其眞雖清而能容  物 物無道正容以悟之使人之意也消  橫逆之來惟正其在我以悟之而其意自  消釋 無擇何足以稱之子方出文侯儻然終日不 言召前立臣而語之曰遠矣全德之君子(指/順) (子)始吾以聖知之言仁義之行爲至矣吾聞 子方之師吾形解而不欲動口鉗而不欲言 吾所學者眞土梗耳夫魏眞爲我累耳 温伯雪子適齊舍於魯魯人有請見之者温 伯雪子曰不可吾聞中國之君子明乎禮義 而陋於知人心吾不欲見也至於齊反舍於 魯是人也又請見温伯雪子曰往也蘄見我 今也又蘄見我是必有以振(起發/也)我也出而 見客入而歎明日見客又入而歎其僕曰每 見之客也必入而歎何邪曰吾固告子矣中 國之民明乎禮義而陋乎知人心昔之見我
Interpretation

Tian Zifang was seated beside Marquis Wen of Wei and repeatedly praised Xigong. Marquis Wen asked, “Is Xigong your teacher?” Tian Zifang replied, “No. He is simply from my hometown. He speaks about the Dao so aptly that I praise him.” Marquis Wen asked again, “Then do you have no teacher?” Tian Zifang said, “I do. My teacher is Dongguo Shunzi.”

Marquis Wen was puzzled. “Then why have I never heard you mention this teacher?” Tian Zifang explained, “My teacher is a true person who has attained the Dao. Though ordinary in appearance, he follows his natural nature, moves with all things while keeping his original integrity, and is inwardly pure yet able to embrace everything. When he encounters something contrary to what is right, he simply straightens his bearing, prompting others to reflect; their bad thoughts then fade away on their own. How could I be worthy of praising him?”

After Tian Zifang left, Marquis Wen felt bereft and remained silent all day. Later, he said to the ministers around him, “How profound! This is what it means to be a gentleman of complete virtue. I once thought that the words of sages and the conduct of benevolence and righteousness were the highest attainment. But now, hearing of Zifang’s teacher, I feel as though my body has fallen apart and I have no wish to move, while my mouth seems clamped shut and cannot speak. Everything I learned before was as useless as clay or wooden figures. Even being ruler of Wei has become a burden to me.”

Another person who had attained the Dao, Wen Boxuezi, was traveling to Qi and stopped for the night in Lu. A man from Lu asked to meet him, but Wen Boxuezi refused. “I have heard that gentlemen of the Central States are well versed in ritual and righteousness but do not understand the human heart. I do not wish to meet him.”

On his return from Qi, Wen Boxuezi again stayed in Lu, and the man once more asked to meet him. Wen Boxuezi came out to receive the visitor, but afterward returned sighing repeatedly. The next day, after meeting the visitor again, he sighed once more. His attendant asked, “Why do you sigh every time you have met with him?” Wen Boxuezi said, “I told you before: people of the Central States may understand ritual and righteousness, but they do not understand the human heart. The people I met these past few days observed every ritual in their movements and manners, yet their bearing was as imposing and threatening as that of tigers and leopards. They use rules to admonish the young and empty ceremony to pacify the people. I cannot bear to look at such false ritual for long.”

者進退一成規一成矩從容一若龍一若虎 其諫我也似子其道(導/也)我也似父是以歎也 仲尼見之而不言子路曰吾子欲見温伯雪 子乆矣見之而不言何邪仲尼曰若夫人者 目擊而道存矣亦不可以容聲矣  目擊而道存者目一加而道即存不待詳  察也 顔淵問於仲尼曰夫子步亦步夫子趨亦趨 夫子馳亦馳夫子奔逸絶塵而回瞠若乎後 矣夫子曰回何謂邪曰夫子步亦步也夫子 言亦言也夫子趨亦趨也夫子辯亦辯也夫 子馳亦馳也夫子言道回亦言道也  以下句解上五句 及奔逸絶塵而回瞠若乎後者夫子不言而 信不比而周無器而民蹈乎前而不知其所 以然而已矣仲尼曰惡可不察與夫哀莫大 於心死而人死亦次之日出東方而入於西 極萬物莫不比方有目有趾者待是而後成 功是出則存是入則亡萬物亦然有待也而 死有待也而生吾一受其成形而不化以待 盡效物而動日夜無隙而不知其所終薰然 其成形知命不能規乎其前丘以是日徂吾 終身與女交一臂而失之可不哀與(哀顔/淵也)女 殆著乎吾所以著也彼已盡矣而女求之以 爲有是求爲於唐肆也吾服女也甚忘女服 吾也亦甚忘雖然女奚患焉雖忘乎故吾吾 有不忘者存  螳若乎後者直視而不能追及也無器而
Interpretation

This passage recounts dialogues between Confucius and his disciples, primarily discussing the realization of the Dao (the Way) and the teacher-disciple relationship.

When Confucius met Wenbo Xuezhi, he simply gazed at him silently without speaking, which puzzled Zilu. Confucius explained that with someone like Wenbo Xuezhi, one could perceive the Dao within him at a glance, rendering words unnecessary. This illustrates the meaning of "the Dao is present when eyes meet" (目击而道存) — the Dao can be sensed through a single look without detailed observation.

Yan Hui said to Confucius: "When you walk slowly, I follow slowly; when you quicken your pace, I match it; when you run, I run too. But when you dash ahead leaving only dust behind, I can only stare after you, unable to keep up." Confucius asked what he meant. Yan Hui explained this was an analogy for learning: "I echo your words and debate what you debate, but when you influence people without speaking or deliberate effort, I cannot attain such a state."

Confucius sighed and said: "The greatest sorrow isn't physical death, but the death of one's heart. Like the sun rising east and setting west, all things follow this principle. Once we receive our physical form, we cannot change it but must adapt to the transformations of all things, moving ceaselessly day and night without knowing our final destination. Though we spend mornings and evenings together, you've missed what truly matters by clinging to my external manifestations—those have already passed, yet you still try to grasp them, like shopping in an empty marketplace. My teachings will soon be forgotten, as will your learning of them. Yet fear not, for though you may forget my past self, something essential will always remain."

The phrase "staring after in vain" (瞠若乎后) depicts watching wide-eyed yet being unable to catch up. "Having no authority yet people follow spontaneously" (无器而民蹈乎前) describes influencing others without relying on formal power.

 民蹈乎前者無鼓動民之具而民自舞蹈 乎前也顔淵不知其所以然故仲尼曰惡 可不察與其所以不知者人惟執著死其 心故爾因以日爲喻萬物莫不視日之出 入而作息其有待而生死亦然仲尼不過 效物而動與之相爲不息任其成形亦不 論命但以此日往而已薰然者如氣之熏 烝而成也吾終身與汝猶吾無行而不與 二三子之與吾終身以此道示汝今以爲 不可及是猶不曾兩臂相交只交得一臂 而相失豈不可哀哉汝所言者時見吾之 可見者耳著見也彼夫子自彼也彼以淨 盡空虚矣而汝求之以爲有如求馬於唐 肆唐肆固賣馬之處而豈常有馬哉詩云 中唐有甓注中唐爲庭中路蓋賣馬之肆 庭中有路以便馬之出入也漢書建章宫 西有唐中數十里楊雄羽獵賦序云甘露 零其庭醴泉流其唐班固西都賦前唐中 而浚大液服佩服也吾佩服汝之言與汝 佩服吾之言皆當大忘之又恐顔淵患其 終不及雖然汝何患焉忘之中乃有不忘  者存所忘者執著也不忘者至眞也汝雖  把吾之舊說忘之若自有所得則有不忘  者存矣 孔子見老聃老聃新沐方將被髮而乾慹然 似非人孔子便而待之(待於/偏處)少焉見(去/聲)曰某 也眩與其信然與向者先生形體掘若槁木 似遺物離人而立於獨也老聃曰吾遊心於
Interpretation

The people danced spontaneously ahead, needing no drums or music as external motivators. Yan Hui failed to comprehend this principle, prompting Confucius to remark: "How could one not examine this carefully?" People's inability to understand stems from clinging to preconceptions that rigidify the mind.

Confucius used the sun as a metaphor: all things follow its rising and setting in their activities, just as they undergo birth and death in accordance with natural cycles. Confucius merely emulated the Dao (the Way) of nature in his actions, flowing continuously with all things, allowing them to take form naturally. He neither debated fate nor forced outcomes, simply moving like the sun itself. The term "xunran" (薰然) describes this natural process—like mist forming effortlessly from rising vapor.

To Yan Hui, Confucius said: "Throughout my life, I've taught you using this principle, yet now you deem it unattainable. This resembles two people meant to embrace with both arms, but releasing after clasping just one—is this not lamentable? What you perceive are merely my external manifestations. That elder Lao Dan (Laozi) has already attained the realm of serene emptiness, yet you seek concrete forms from him—like searching for a horse in a horse market. Though the market exists for trading horses, can one expect to find them present at every moment?"

(Quoting the Book of Songs and Han dynasty texts to clarify that "tangsi" [唐肆] refers to a horse market with passageways for steeds to enter and exit.)

Confucius continued: "I appreciate your insights, and you acknowledge my views—yet all these should be wholly relinquished. Though I worry you may never fully grasp this, why fret? Within forgetting itself, there remains an unforgettable 'authenticity.' Even if you forget my past teachings, should you arrive at understanding independently, this proves the 'authentic' already exists."

Another passage describes Confucius visiting Laozi, who had just washed his hair: Laozi stood with damp locks loose, his spirit so concentrated he seemed detached from the human realm. After waiting respectfully, Confucius approached: "Are my eyes deceived? Moments ago, your form appeared as still as withered wood, as if transcending all things to stand alone beyond the world." Laozi replied: "My shen (spirit) was journeying through..."

物之初孔子曰何謂邪曰心困焉而不能知 口辟焉  讀爲辟邪之辟必亦切口如被辟而不能  言也 而不能言嘗爲女議乎其將 將將然也試爲汝言其將然之初也 至陰肅肅至陽赫赫肅肅出乎天赫赫發乎 地兩者交通成和而物生焉或爲之紀而莫 見其形消息滿虚一晦一明日改月化日有 所爲而莫見其功生有所乎萌死有所乎歸 始終相反乎無端而莫知其所窮非是也且 孰爲之宗孔子曰請問遊是老聃曰夫得是 至美至樂也得至美而遊乎至樂謂之至人 孔子曰願聞其方曰草食之獸不疾(不惡/也)易 藪水生之蟲不疾易水行小變而不失其大 常也喜恕哀樂不入於胸次夫天下也者萬 物之所一也得其所一而同焉則四支百體 將爲塵垢而死生終始將爲晝夜而莫之能 滑而況得喪禍福之所介乎棄隸者苦棄泥 塗知身貴於隸也貴在於我而不失於變且 萬化而未始有極也夫孰足以患心己爲道 者解乎此  親自得道者方能曉比也 孔子曰夫子德配天地而猶假至言以脩心 古之君子孰能說焉  說音脱誰能免此也 老聃曰不然夫水之於汋也無爲而才自然 矣至人之於德也不脩而物不能離焉若天 之自高地之自厚日月之自明夫何脩焉孔 子出以告顔回曰丘之於道也其猶醯雞與
Interpretation

This dialogue records Confucius seeking Laozi's (Lao Dan) profound teachings about the Dao (the Way). Using vivid metaphors, Laozi explains to Confucius the state of the "perfected person" (zhiren).

Laozi begins by describing how when the human mind is bound by confusion, it becomes like a mouth blocked from speaking. He explains the fundamental principle of all creation—the extreme Yin (feminine cosmic force) brings cold and desolation, while extreme Yang (masculine cosmic force) brings scorching brightness. The harmonious interaction of these two energies gives birth to all things. This cyclical transformation has no end, with day and night alternating and life and death revolving as natural laws, yet no visible controller drives these processes.

When Confucius inquires how to realize this state, Laozi responds: those who reach the realm of ultimate beauty and joy are the "perfected persons" (the highest state of cultivation). Using examples of animals adapting to their environments, he illustrates: grass-eating beasts don't resent changing pastures, water-dwelling insects don't dislike shifting waters—because they grasp the fundamentals of existence. If humans can perceive the essence of all things, regarding their bodies as mere dust and viewing life and death as day and night alternating, they won't be troubled by gain and loss, fortune and misfortune. Like someone who casts off servitude, realizing their intrinsic worth surpasses any imposed status.

Laozi emphasizes: true De (Virtue/Power) flows naturally like water, requiring no forced cultivation. The perfected person's De is as naturally lofty as heaven, as inherently solid as earth, and as spontaneously luminous as the sun and moon. Hearing this, Confucius sighs to Yan Hui: his own understanding of the great Dao is as shallow as a gnat trapped in a wine jar. This dialogue reveals the core Daoist concept of "natural Wuwei (non-action)," demonstrating that true awakening must be personally realized.

微夫子之發吾覆也吾不知天地之大全也 莊子見魯哀公哀公曰魯多儒士少爲先生 方者(比/也)莊子曰魯少儒哀公曰舉魯國而儒 服何謂少乎莊子曰周聞之儒者冠圜冠者 知天時履句屨者知地形緩佩玦者事至而 斷君子有其道者未必爲其服也爲其服者 未必知其道也公固以爲不然何不號於國 中曰無此道而爲此服者其罪死於是哀公 號之五日而魯國無敢儒服者獨有一丈夫 儒服而立乎公門公即召而問以國事千轉 萬變而不窮莊子曰以魯國而儒者一人耳 可謂多乎 百里奚爵禄不入於心故飯牛而牛肥使秦 穆公忘其賤與之政也有虞氏死生不入於 心故足以動人 宋元君將畫圖衆史皆至受揖而立舐筆和 墨在外者半有一史後至者儃然不趨受揖 不立因之舍公使人視之則解衣槃礴臝君 曰可矣是眞畫者也 文王觀於臧見一丈夫釣而其釣莫釣  雖釣而不釣也 非持其釣有釣者也常釣也文王欲舉而授 之政而恐大臣父兄之弗安也欲終而釋之 而不忍百姓之無天也於是旦而屬之大夫 曰昔者寡大夢見良人黑色而𩑺乗駮馬而 偏朱蹄號曰寓而政於臧丈人庶幾乎民有 瘳乎諸大夫蹙然曰先君王也文王曰然則 卜之諸大夫曰先君之命王其無他又何卜
Interpretation

When Zhuangzi met Duke Ai of Lu, the duke said: "Our state of Lu has many Confucian scholars, but few study your Daoist teachings." Zhuangzi replied: "Lu actually has very few true Confucians." Puzzled, the duke asked: "The whole country wears Confucian robes—how can you say they're few?"

Zhuangzi explained: "I've heard that genuine Confucians—those wearing round hats understand celestial timing, those in square shoes know geography, and those wearing jade pendants can make decisive judgments. But a true gentleman's learning needn't match his attire, nor does Confucian dress guarantee real knowledge. If you doubt this, issue a decree: 'Those wearing Confucian robes without true learning will face capital punishment.'" When Duke Ai implemented this, within five days no one dared wear Confucian garments—except one robed man standing at the palace gate. Summoned for state affairs, his brilliant responses proved his worth. Zhuangzi then remarked: "With only one true Confucian in all Lu, can you call that many?"

Three parables then illustrate the power of focus: Baili Xi, indifferent to rank, nurtured such thriving cattle through single-minded care that Duke Mu of Qin promoted him; Emperor Shun (of the Youyu clan), transcending life and death, moved others effortlessly; when Song Yuanjun sought painters, he recognized the true master as the latecomer who worked bare-chested, unbound by etiquette.

Finally, King Wen of Zhou encountered an old fisherman in Zang who seemed to angle yet remained utterly detached. Though wishing to employ him, the king feared ministers' objections, so he claimed ancestral spirits had ordered "the old man of Zang" to govern through a dream. His officials replied: "If the former kings decreed it, why consult divination?"

These stories share one truth: genuine ability lies not in outward form but inner cultivation; those absorbed in selfless focus achieve greatness effortlessly; the wisest rulers follow nature's flow without forcing outcomes.

焉遂迎臧丈人而授之政典法無更偏令無 出三年文王觀於國則列士壞植散羣長官 者不成德斔(音/庾)斛不敢入於四竟列士壞植 散羣則尚同也長官者不成德則同務也斔 斛不敢入於四竟則諸侯無二心也文王於 是焉以爲大師北面而問曰政可以及天下 乎臧丈人昧然而不應泛然而辭朝令而夜 遁終身無聞  釣有釣者釣其有可釣者謂魚也常釣者  不釣而尋常垂釣也非是持其釣以釣有  可釣之魚乃無意於釣但常常垂此釣而  已先君王言所夢者文王之父也偏令無  出未嘗出一令也壞植自壞其所植立不  求異於人也此依傍吕望之事而又若别  爲一事者 顔淵問於仲尼曰文王其猶未邪又何以夢 爲乎仲尼曰默汝無言夫文王盡之也而又 何論刺音字焉彼直以循斯須也  斯須者指言我百與汝三焉 列御寇爲伯昏無人射引之盈貫措杯水其 肘上發之適矢復沓方矢復寓當是時猶象 人也伯昏無人曰是射之射非不射之射也 嘗與女登高山履危石臨百仞之淵若能射 乎於是无人遂登高山履危石臨百仞之淵 背逡巡足二分垂在外揖御寇而進之御寇 伏地汗流至踵伯昏無人曰夫至人者上闚 青天下潜黄泉揮斥八極神氣不變今女怵 然有恂目之志彌於中(去/聲)殆矣夫
Interpretation

The passage recounts several Daoist parables that primarily illustrate the principles of governing through Wuwei (non-action) and following the natural Dao (the Way).

When King Wen invited the fictional sage Zang the Elder to administer state affairs, during his three-year governance, Zang neither altered existing laws nor issued biased policies. As a result, scholars ceased forming cliques for personal gain, officials stopped boasting about individual achievements, even measurement vessels became standardized, and feudal lords pledged allegiance. When King Wen sought to inquire about statecraft, Zang silently departed. This resembles fishing—the true angler doesn't strive for fish but fishes naturally. It demonstrates that the highest form of governance follows nature's course without forced intervention.

When Yan Yuan asked Confucius why King Wen still sought sages through dreams, Confucius replied: King Wen had already achieved perfection, requiring no further discussion. Here "a brief moment" (斯须) signifies the instantaneous present, implying the sage's way lies in seizing the immediate moment.

The story of Lie Yukou (Liezi) archery carries deeper meaning. Shooting on level ground, he never missed, but when Bohun Wuren (an enlightened master) took him to a cliff edge, Liezi collapsed in terror. Bohun pointed out: The genuine perfected person (至人) observes the blue sky above and yellow springs below, remaining unshaken in any peril. This shows no skill surpasses natural mental composure—only by transcending fear of life and death can one attain the state of "shooting without shooting" (不射之射).

These parables collectively expound core Daoist philosophy: governance through Wuwei (non-action), self-cultivation through returning to nature, with the highest state being form-transcending unity with the Dao. Expressions like "shooting without shooting" and "fishing without fishing" serve as vivid metaphors for the principle that "through non-action, nothing is left undone" (无为而无不为).

 適矢復沓者矢去而復沓前矢也方矢復  寓者矢方發而後矢復寓於弦上也背逡  巡足二分垂在外者背淵面山背逡巡而  退垂二分足於外也 肩吾問於孫叔敖曰子三爲令尹而不榮華 三去之而無憂色吾始也疑子今視子之鼻 間栩栩然子之用心獨奈何孫叔敖曰吾何 以過人哉吾以其來不可却也其去不可止 也吾以爲得失之非我也而无憂色而已矣 我何以過人哉且不知其在彼乎其在我乎 其在彼邪亡乎我在我邪亡乎彼方將躊躇 方將四顧何暇至乎人貴人賤哉  栩栩然見其卧而鼻息安然也 仲尼聞之曰古之眞人知者不得說美人不 得濫盜人不得劫伏戲黄帝不得友死生亦 大矣而無變乎己況爵禄乎若然者其神經 乎大山而无介入乎淵泉而不濡處卑細而 不憊充滿天地既以與人己愈有  无介无間隔也 楚王與凡君坐少焉楚王左右曰凡亡者三 凡君曰凡之亡也不足以喪吾存夫凡之亡 不足以喪吾存則楚之存不足以存存由是 觀之則凡未始亡而楚未始存也 南華
Interpretation

This passage contains several allegorical stories illustrating the Daoist wisdom of "accepting gain and loss with equanimity."

The first story uses archery as a metaphor: arrows are shot one after another—as the first arrow leaves the bowstring, the next is already nocked. This mirrors life's natural rhythm of alternating gains and losses, coming and going effortlessly.

The second story features Sunshu Ao, the renowned prime minister of Chu, who neither boasted when appointed chancellor three times nor grieved when dismissed three times. He explained: "Gains and losses aren't determined by me—what comes cannot be stopped, what goes cannot be retained. Since these matters lie beyond my control, why should they trouble me?" The key lies in understanding what truly belongs to oneself.

When Confucius heard this, he marveled: "The perfected persons (zhenren) of antiquity couldn't be persuaded by wise men, seduced by beauties, or threatened by robbers. Even sage-kings like Fuxi and the Yellow Emperor couldn't make them seek favor. Matters as significant as life and death couldn't shake them—how much less official positions and salaries? Their spirit connects with mountains yet meets no obstruction, dives into deep waters yet remains dry, dwells in humble circumstances yet knows no hardship. Their vital essence fills heaven and earth. The more they give to others, the richer they become."

The dialogue between the King of Chu and the ruler of Fan State ultimately reveals the core teaching: Fan's destruction couldn't strip the Fan lord of inner fulfillment, just as Chu's existence couldn't grant the Chu king true contentment. From the fundamental perspective, Fan never truly perished, nor did Chu ever truly exist—this represents the Daoist supreme realization of "the unity of gain and loss."

眞經循本卷之二十

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0135); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 19 Vol. 21 →