中文 · EN

《莊子注》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 2 / 10 17,019 characters

About this page. The original text of 《莊子注》 Vol. 2 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 35 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《莊子注》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

欽定四庫全書  莊子注巻二       晉 郭象 注   養生主第三(夫生以養存則養生者理之極也若/乃養過其極以養傷生非養生之主)    (也/) 吾生也有涯(所稟之分/各有極也)而知也無涯(夫舉重攜輕而神/氣自若此力之所) (限也而尚名好勝者雖復絶膂猶未足以慊其願此知/之無涯也故知之為名生於失當而滅於𡨕極㝠極者) (任其至分而無毫銖之加是故雖負萬鈞茍當其所能/則忽然不知重之在身雖應萬機冺然不覺事之在己) (此養生之主/也○知音智)以有涯隨無涯殆己(以有限之性尋無極/之知安得而不困哉) 己而為知者殆而已矣(己困於知而不知止又為知以/救之斯養而傷之者真大殆也) 為善無近名為惡無近刑(忘善惡而居中任萬物之自/為悶然與至當為一故刑名) (逺己而全/理在身也)緣督以為經(順中以為常也○縁/順也督中也經常也)可以保身 可以全生可以養親(養親以適○/養羊尚反)可以盡年(茍得中而/㝠度則事) (事無不可也夫養生非求/過分盖全理盡年而已矣)庖丁為文惠君解牛手之所 解肩之所倚足之所履膝之所踦砉然嚮然奏刀騞然 莫不中音合於桑林之舞乃中經首之㑹(言其因便施/巧無不開解)
Interpretation

Human life has its limits (each person's innate endowments have their boundaries), while the pursuit of knowledge is endless (just as one's spirit and Qi naturally adjust when lifting heavy objects or carrying light ones—this reflects physical limitations; yet those who chase fame and compete for superiority exhaust their strength without satisfaction, demonstrating the mind's boundless craving). This relentless pursuit of knowledge stems from losing one's original authenticity, and only by returning to one's natural disposition can it cease (mingji refers to conforming to innate capacities without forcing what is beyond reach).

Consider someone capable of bearing immense weight—if they act within their means, they won't feel burdened; handling countless affairs becomes effortless when following the natural flow—this is the fundamental principle of nurturing life.

To chase infinite knowledge with finite life inevitably leads to exhaustion. Persisting in seeking wisdom despite recognizing this exhaustion only deepens the peril. Doing good need not court fame, and committing misdeeds should avoid inviting punishment (transcend notions of good and evil, maintain the Middle Way, let all things unfold naturally, and silently unite with the Dao—thus, punishment and reputation naturally fade while the complete heavenly principle endures within). Follow the Middle Way as the constant standard (yuan means to accord with; du refers to the central path)—this preserves the body, safeguards innate nature, honors one's parents (caring for them with just the right measure), and ultimately fulfills one's natural lifespan (by holding to the Middle Way and following nature, nothing remains unattainable. Nurturing life isn’t about excess but preserving heavenly principle and living out one’s years).

Take the example of Cook Ding butchering an ox for Lord Wenhui: his hand touches, shoulder leans, foot presses, and knee braces—every movement, along with the swishing sound of the blade, harmonizes perfectly, matching both the rhythm of the "Sanglin" dance and the melody of the "Jingshou" music (this shows how he applies skill according to circumstance, effortlessly dismantling the ox with natural precision).

(盡理之甚既適牛理又合音節○庖人丁其名也管子/有屠牛坦一朝解九牛刀可剃毛為于偽反文惠君梁) (惠王也砉音畫皮骨相離聲奏如字開也騞音近獲聲/大於砉也中丁仲反下皆同桑林宋舞樂名案即左𫝊) (舞師題以旌夏是也/經首咸池樂章也)文惠君曰譆善哉技盖至此乎庖 丁釋刀對曰臣之所好者道也進乎技矣(直寄道理於/技耳所好者) (非技也○譆/音熈歎聲也)始臣之解牛之時所見無非牛者(未能見/其理間) 三年之後未嘗見全牛也(但見其/理間也)方今之時臣以神遇 而不以目視(闇與理㑹○神遇向云/闇與理㑹謂之神遇)官知止而神欲行 (司察之官廢/縱心而順理)依乎天理(不横/截也)批大郤(有際之處因而批/之令離○批鋪迷) (反擊也/郤音郄)導大窽(節解窽空就導令殊/○窽苦管反空也)因其固然(刀不/妄加)技 經肯綮之未嘗(技之妙也常遊刃於空未嘗經槩於㣲/礙也○肯苦等反著骨肉也肯著也綮) (音啟猶/結處也)而況大軱乎(軱戾大骨衂刀肉也○/軱音孤軱戾大骨也)良庖歳更 刀割也(不中其理間也○歳/一易刀猶堪割也)族庖月更刀折也(中骨而/折刀也) (○族/衆也)今臣之刀十九年矣所解數千牛矣而刀刃若新
Interpretation

The Zhuangzi records the story of Cook Ding (a butcher named Ding) dissecting an ox for King Hui of Liang (also known as King Hui of Wei). As Cook Ding worked, the sound of flesh separating from bone followed a rhythm like music, his movements were as graceful as the Sanglin dance (a ceremonial dance from King Tang's era of the Shang dynasty), and his knife flowed as smoothly as the Jingshou melody (a musical piece from Emperor Yao's time). King Hui exclaimed in admiration: "How marvelous! How is it that your skill has reached such perfection?"

Putting down his knife, Cook Ding replied: "What I follow is the Dao (the natural order), which goes beyond mere technique. When I first began cutting oxen, all I saw was the whole animal. After three years, I could discern the gaps and spaces in its structure. Now, I perceive with my spirit rather than my eyes—my senses become still while my spirit moves naturally. By following the ox's inherent grain, I guide the blade through the natural hollows between bones and sinews, never forcing it where it doesn't belong. My knife doesn't even touch the connective tissues, let alone the large bones."

He then compared his method to others: "A good cook changes his knife once a year because he cuts through flesh; an average cook changes his every month because he hacks at bones. But this knife of mine has lasted nineteen years, dissected thousands of oxen, and its edge remains as sharp as when it was new." Here, the butchering of the ox serves as a metaphor for cultivating the Dao, illustrating the importance of aligning with the natural order (Dao). When one fully comprehends the patterns of things, one can "move the blade with room to spare"—navigating the complexities of life effortlessly while preserving one's original nature unharmed.

發於硎(硎砥石也○硎/音刑磨石也)彼節者有間而刀刃者無厚以 無厚入有間恢恢乎其於遊刃必有餘地矣是以十九 年而刀刃若新發於硎雖然每至於族吾見其難為(交/錯) (聚結/為族)怵然為戒視為止(不復屬目於他物也/○為于偽反下皆同)行為遲(徐/其) (手/也)動刀甚㣲謋然已解(得其宜則用力/少○謋化百反)如土委地(理解/而無) (刀迹若/聚土也)提刀而立為之四顧為之躊躇滿志(逸足容豫/自得之謂) (○躊直留反/躇直於反)善刀而藏之(拭刀而弢之也/善刀善猶拭也)文惠君曰善 哉吾聞庖丁之言得養生焉(以刀可養故/知生亦可養)公文軒見右 師而驚曰是何人也惡乎介也(介偏刖之名○公文姓/公文氏名軒宋人也右) (師宋人也介音戒/一音兀偏則也)天與其人與(知之所無奈何天/也犯其所知人也)曰天 也非人也天之生是使獨也(偏則曰獨夫師一家之知/而不能兩存其足則是知) (之無所奈何若以右師之知而必求兩全則/心神内困而形骸外敝矣豈直偏刖而已哉)人之貌有 與也(兩足共行曰有與有與/之貌未有疑其非命也)以是知其天也非人也(以/有)
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of Cook Ding carving an ox, using the method of knife work as a metaphor for the way of nurturing life. Cook Ding's blade remained as sharp as newly honed even after nineteen years of use because he understood the principle of "using the edgeless to enter the gaps"—applying the thickness-less blade to the natural spaces between the ox's joints, allowing it to move effortlessly. Whenever he encountered complex areas where tendons and bones intertwined, he proceeded with special care, slowing his movements. With a gentle motion of the knife, the ox would naturally separate, as effortlessly as crumbling earth.

Lord Wenhui, upon hearing this story, exclaimed: "Wonderful! From Cook Ding's words, I have grasped the principle of nurturing life." Just as one maintains a knife, life must also follow the natural order.

Later, the text describes how Gongwen Xuan was startled upon meeting the Right Master (a title), who had only one leg. Gongwen Xuan pondered: Was this congenital or the result of human action? In the end, he realized it was the mandate of heaven. Just as having two legs is the norm for humans, the Right Master's single leg was also a unique state bestowed by nature—there was no need to forcibly conform to the common standard. This teaches us to follow nature and accept life as it is, without striving against inherent tendencies. Like Cook Ding's knife technique, by discerning the natural patterns of things, one can move through life with ease and freedom.

(與者命也故知獨者亦非我也是以達生之情者不務/生之所無所為達命之情者不務命之所無奈何也全) (其自然/而已)澤雉十步一啄百步一飲不蘄畜乎樊中(蘄求/也樊) (所以籠雉也夫俯仰乎天地之間逍遥乎自得之場固/養生之妙處也又何求於入籠而服養哉○樊中藩也) (所以籠/雉也)神雖王不善也(夫始乎適而未嘗不適者忘適/也雖心神長王志氣盈豫而自) (放於清曠之地忽然不覺/善之為善也○王于況反)老⬤死秦失弔之三號而出 (人弔亦弔人號亦/號○老⬤老子也)弟子曰非夫子之友邪(怪其不倚户/觀化乃至三) (號/也)曰然然則弔焉若此可乎曰然(至人無情與衆號/耳故若斯可也)始 也吾以為其人也而今非也向吾入而弔焉有老者哭 之如哭其子少者哭之如哭其母彼其所以㑹之必有 不蘄言而言不蘄哭而哭者(嫌其先物施惠不在理/上住故致此甚愛也)是 遁天倍情忘其所受(天性所受各有本分/不可逃亦不可加)古者謂之遁 天之刑(感物太深不止於當遁天者也將馳騖於憂/樂之境雖楚戮未加而性情已困庸非刑哉)適 來夫子時也(時自/生也)適去夫子順也(理當/死也)安時而處順哀
Interpretation

This passage uses several allegorical stories to illustrate Zhuangzi's philosophy of conforming to nature and transcending worldly concerns.

The metaphor of the pheasant states: A marsh pheasant takes ten steps to peck once at its food and a hundred steps to drink once from the water, yet it does not seek to be caged and fed by humans (the "fan" refers to a birdcage). To roam freely between heaven and earth, to be carefree in self-contentment—this is the true essence of nurturing life. Why must one be confined in a cage and fed by others? Even if one's spirit is vigorous (here, "wang" is interchangeable with "flourishing"), it may not necessarily be a good thing. A truly liberated person is at ease from the beginning, yet unaware of this ease—this is the state of forgetting ease itself.

Another story recounts how, when Laozi passed away, Qin Shi (a person's name) went to mourn him but only cried three times before leaving. A disciple asked, "Was he not your friend?" Qin Shi replied, "He was." The disciple did not understand why he cried only three times. Qin Shi explained: A truly enlightened person is free from worldly emotions, so crying a few times along with others is enough. He observed that some mourned as if they had lost a son, others as if they had lost a mother—these were excessive expressions of grief that violated natural disposition ("duntian" means to go against nature). The ancients called such excessive sorrow the "punishment of defying heaven"—though the body is unharmed, the spirit is already shackled by grief and joy.

The passage concludes by clarifying: Laozi's birth was a timely arrival ("shilai"), and his death was a natural departure ("shiqu"). To rest content with fate and adapt to change means that emotions of sorrow and joy will not disturb the heart. This is what the ancients called "release from hanging" ("xianjie" refers to liberation from bondage).

樂不能入也(夫哀樂生於失得也今𤣥通合變之士無/時而不安無順而不處𡨕然與造化為一) (則無往而非我矣將何得何失孰死孰生/哉故任其所受而哀樂無所錯其間矣)古者謂是帝 之縣解(以有係者為縣則無係者縣解也縣解而性命/之情得矣此養生之要也○縣音𤣥解音蟹以) (生為縣以/死為解)指窮於為薪火傳也(窮盡也為薪猶前薪也/前薪以指指盡前薪之) (理故火傳而不滅心得納養之中故命續而不絶明夫/養生乃生之所以生也○為猶前也傳者相傳繼續也) 不知其盡也(夫時不再來今不一停故人之生也一息/一得耳向息非今息故納養而命續前火) (非後火故為薪而火傳火傳而命續由夫養得其極也/世豈知其盡而更生哉補此死生之喻也夫以薪熾火) (指薪而觀之則薪有窮盡之時而世間/之火自古及今傳而不絶未始有盡也)   人間世第四(與人羣者不得離人然人間之變故/世世異宜唯無心而不自用者為能)    (隨變所適而/不荷其累也) 顔回見仲尼請行曰奚之曰將之衛曰奚為焉曰囬聞 衛君其年壯其行獨(不與民/同欲也)輕用其國(夫君人者動必/乗人一怒則伏) (尸流血一喜則軒冕塞路故/君人者之用國不可輕也)而不見其過(莫敢/諫也)輕用民
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of transcending worldly emotions and harmonizing with natural transformations.

First, it states that those who have truly attained the Dao are never troubled by joy or sorrow. All emotional fluctuations stem from attachments to gain and loss, while practitioners who comprehend the profound mysteries maintain inner peace regardless of circumstances, living in spontaneous harmony with the cosmic processes of Heaven and Earth. In this state, distinctions between gain/loss and life/death dissolve—one flows with destiny's arrangements, naturally free from emotional disturbances. The ancients called this state "the celestial emperor's liberation," meaning freedom from worldly entanglements and return to one's authentic life essence, which constitutes the essence of life cultivation.

The text then employs the metaphor of "passing the flame from torch to torch": just as when one bundle of firewood burns out, the flame transfers to the next, never extinguishing. Human life follows this same principle—through proper cultivation methods, the vital essence continues its transmission. Ordinary people focus only on the consumed firewood (the physical body) while overlooking the eternal transmission of life's flame (the spiritual essence).

The narrative shifts to Yan Hui's intention to visit the ruler of Wei. The young monarch acts with impulsive arrogance (disconnected from his people), wielding state power arbitrarily (where a single royal whim could fill streets with corpses or flood courts with sycophants), yet remains blind to his faults (as none dare admonish him). This concrete example illustrates how rulers who fail to align with natural principles and understand popular sentiment inevitably create severe consequences.

Throughout, the text emphasizes transcending personal attachments and conforming to natural law. Whether in personal cultivation or state governance, maintaining a mindset of Wuwei (non-action) and tranquil receptivity leads to genuine liberation and enduring harmony.

死(輕用之/於死也)死者以國量乎澤若蕉(舉國而輸之死地不/可稱數視之若草芥) (也/)民其無如矣(無所/依歸)回嘗聞之夫子曰治國去之亂國 就之醫門多疾願以所聞思其則庶幾其國有瘳乎仲 尼曰譆若殆往而刑耳(其道不足/以救彼患)夫道不欲雜(宜正得/其人) 雜則多多則擾擾則憂憂而不救(若夫不得其人則雖/百醫守病適足致疑) (而不能/一愈也)古之至人先存諸己而後存諸人(有其具然後/可以接物也) 所存於己者未定何暇至於暴人之所行(不虛心以應/物而役思以) (犯難故知其所存於己者未定也夫唯外其知以養真/寄妙當於羣才功名歸物而患慮逺身然後可以至於) (暴人之/所行也)且若亦知夫徳之所蕩而知之所為出乎哉徳 蕩乎名知出乎爭(徳之所以流蕩者矜名故也知之所/以横出者爭善故也雖復桀跖其所) (矜惜無非/名善也)名也者相軋也知也者爭之器也二者凶器 非所以盡行也(夫名知者世之所用也而名起則相軋/知用則爭興故遺名知而後行可盡也) (○軋則列反/折也夭也)且徳厚信矼未達人氣名聞不爭未達人 心而彊以仁義繩墨之言述暴人之前者是以人惡有
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs a dialogic format to expound profound principles of governing a state and cultivating the self.

The text states that those who casually send common people to their deaths view human lives as lightly as marshland weeds. Consequently, the people lose their foundation. Yan Hui once heard Confucius say: "A well-governed state may be left behind, but a chaotic state should be entered—just as a doctor’s door is always crowded with the sick." Yan Hui wished to use what he had learned to heal this troubled state. But Confucius warned him: "If you go like this, you will likely face execution." This is because the Dao (the Way) cannot be fragmented—fragmentation leads to confusion, confusion brings distress, and in the end, there will be no remedy. It is like seeking treatment from a hundred mediocre physicians, which only worsens the illness.

The perfected ones (zhiren) of ancient times first refined themselves before assisting others. If one has not yet cultivated oneself, how can one presume to correct the actions of a tyrant? The passage further points out: "The corruption of De (Virtue/Power) arises from the pursuit of fame, and the emergence of cunning stems from contention." Fame incites mutual destruction, and cunning becomes a tool for strife—both are instruments of harm and cannot be used to perfect one’s character.

Even if a person possesses profound De and is utterly trustworthy, yet fails to understand the nature of others; even if he does not compete for fame or profit, yet cannot grasp the thoughts of others—if he stubbornly tries to admonish a tyrant with moral doctrines like benevolence and righteousness, it amounts to flaunting his own virtues by highlighting others’ flaws. This is called "harming others." Those who harm others will inevitably be harmed in turn—your approach is far too dangerous!

(Note: The term "矼" refers to steadfast reliability; "绳墨," originally a carpenter’s straightedge, here symbolizes moral standards.)

其美也(夫投人夜光鮮不按劍者未達故也今回之徳/信與其不争之名彼所未達也而強以仁義繩) (墨於彼彼將謂回欲毁人以自成也是故至人不役志/以經世而虛心以應物誠信著於天地不争揚於萬物) (然後萬物歸懐天地不逆故徳音發而天下嚮會景行/彰而六合俱應而後始可以經寒暑涉治亂而不與逆) (鱗迕也○矼/音控慤實貌)命之曰葘人葘人者人必反葘之(適不信/受則謂) (與己争名而反害之/○葘音災下皆同)若殆為人葘夫且茍為恱賢而惡 不肖惡用而求有以異(茍能恱賢惡愚聞義而服便為/明君也茍為明君則不苦無賢) (臣汝往亦不足復竒如其不爾往必受害故以有心而/往無往而可無心而應其應自來則無往而不可也) 若唯無詔王公必將乗人而鬭其捷(汝唯有寂然不言/耳言則王公必乘) (人以君人之勢而鬬其捷辨以距諫飾非也○詔絶句/王公必將乗人絶句而鬬其捷在接反崔讀若唯無詔) (王公絶句必將/乗人而鬬絶句)而目將熒之(其言辨捷/使人眼眩)而色將平之(不/能) (復自異/於彼也)口將營之(自救解/不暇)容將形之心且成之(乃且⬤/己以從) (彼也○容將形/之謂擎跽也)是以火救火以水救水名之曰益多(適/不)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi uses the story of Yan Hui (Confucius' disciple) to illustrate how forcibly preaching benevolence and morality to others may instead invite disaster.

The text explains that when admonishing others while flaunting one's virtue (De) and reputation, if the listener misunderstands your intentions, they may perceive it as belittling them to elevate yourself. Therefore, those who have truly attained the Dao never deliberately use morality to change the world, but maintain a tranquil and receptive mind to accord with all things. Their sincerity naturally manifests between heaven and earth, while their non-contention spontaneously becomes evident through all phenomena. Only then will all beings naturally submit, and neither heaven nor earth will oppose them.

If one rigidly imposes moral standards on others ("zai ren"), they will inevitably retaliate with harm. It's like rulers who ostensibly admire the worthy and despise the incompetent—yet deliberately displaying your uniqueness will only invite calamity. For the moment you offer admonitions, those lords and nobles will suppress you with their authority, refute you with sophistry, leaving you dazzled and pale-faced, until you're forced to comply against your will.

This resembles using fire to extinguish fire or water to control water—only exacerbating the problem. Zhuangzi advocates maintaining an attitude of "no-mind" (wuxin) and practicing non-action (wuwei), through which ideal results can be naturally achieved.

(能救乃更足/以成彼之盛)順始無窮(尋常守故/未肯變也)若殆以不信厚言必 死於暴人之前矣(未信而諌/雖厚為害)且昔者桀殺關龍逢紂殺 王子比干是皆修其身以下傴拊人之民以下拂其上 者也(居下而任上之憂比干非其事也○闗龍逢夏桀/之賢臣王子比干殷紂之叔父下遐嫁反傴紆甫) (反拊徐句音撫李云傴拊謂齊愛之也崔云猶/嘔呴謂養也拂符弗反崔云違也又勞弗反)故其君 因其修以擠之是好名者也(不欲令臣有勝君之名也/○擠徐子計反又子體反) (司馬云毒也亦云陷也方言云滅也/簡文云排也好呼報反令力呈反)昔者堯攻叢枝胥 敖禹攻有扈國為虛厲身為刑戮其用兵不止其求實 無已是皆求名實者也而獨不聞之乎(夫暴君非徒求/恣其欲乃復求) (名但所求者/非其道耳)名實者聖人之所不能勝也而況若乎(惜/名) (貪欲之君雖復堯為不能勝化也故與衆/攻之而汝乃欲空手而往化之以道哉)雖然若必有 以也嘗以語我來顔回曰端而虛(正其形而/虛其心也)勉而一(言/遜) (而不/貳也)則可乎曰惡惡可(言未可也○惡/惡皆音烏下同)夫以陽為充孔 揚(言衛君亢陽之性充張於内/而甚揚於外強禦之至也)采色不定(喜怒/無常)常人之
Interpretation

This passage recounts the tragic stories of loyal ministers who remonstrated with tyrants only to be executed, along with Zhuangzi's profound reflections on such behavior.

The tyrant King Jie of Xia executed his virtuous minister Guan Longfeng, while King Zhou of Shang killed his uncle Bi Gan. Both ministers had cultivated their De (Virtue) and sought to protect the people in their ministerial roles, thereby challenging the ruler's authority. The tyrants persecuted them precisely because of their virtue - rulers feared their ministers' reputations might eclipse their own.

Historically, Emperor Yao waged war against the Congzhi and Xu'ao tribes, and Yu the Great attacked the Youhu clan, reducing these states to ruins. The people became vengeful spirits, and the rulers themselves suffered violent ends. These conflicts all stemmed from the pursuit of empty fame and material gain. Zhuangzi points out that tyrants not only indulge their desires but also chase after reputations that violate Daoist principles.

Even sages struggle to overcome desires for fame and profit - how much more difficult for ordinary people? When Yan Hui (Confucius' disciple) asked whether presenting proper demeanor, maintaining humility, and being diligent might make remonstration effective, Zhuangzi categorically rejected this approach. The tyrant's heart brims with aggressive Qi (yang referring to hyperactive, agitated energy), his moods unpredictable - ordinary people simply cannot contend with such violent temperaments.

The text reveals several key insights: First, tyrants often persecute virtuous ministers out of jealousy. Second, wars and tyrannical governance frequently originate from greed for fame and profit. Third, mere moral cultivation cannot reform tyrants, whose twisted natures have become incomprehensible to ordinary people. Through these examples, Zhuangzi illustrates the difficulty of preserving both life and authentic nature in turbulent times.

所不違(莫之/敢逆)因案人之所感以求容與其心(夫頑強之/甚人以快) (事感己巳陵藉而乃抑挫之以/求從容自放而遂其侈心也)名之曰日漸之徳不成 而況大徳乎(言乃少多無/回降之勝也)將執而不化(故守其/本意也)外合而 内不訾其庸詎可乎(外合而内不訾即向之端虛/而勉一耳言此未足以化之)然則 我内直而外曲成而上比(顔回更說此三條也/○上時掌反下同)内直者 與天為徒與天為徒者知天子之與己皆天之所子而 獨以己言蘄乎而人善之蘄乎而人不善之邪(物無貴/賤得生) (一也故善與不善付之公當耳/一無所求於人也○蘄音祈)若然者人謂之童子是 之謂與天為徒(依乎天理推已性命/若嬰兒之直往也)外曲者與人之為 徒也擎跽曲拳人臣之禮也人皆為之吾敢不為邪為 人之所為者人亦無疵焉是之謂與人為徒(外形委曲/隨人事之) (所當為也○擎其驚反跽其/里反說文云長跪也拳音權)成而上比者與古為徒(成/於) (今而比/於古也)其言雖教讁之實也(雖是當教有/諷責之㫖)古之有也非 吾有也若然者雖直不為病(寄直於古故/無以病我也)是之謂與古 為徒若是則可乎仲尼曰惡惡可大多政法而不諜(當/理)
Interpretation

This passage discusses three approaches to interacting with others: inner integrity, outward adaptability, and emulating the ancients.

Inner integrity means aligning with the natural Dao (following Heaven's way). Understanding that both rulers and commoners are born of nature, one neither seeks praise nor avoids criticism, maintaining an infant's pure heart. Others will call you childlike in your innocence—this is following heavenly principle.

Outward adaptability means conforming to societal norms (following human ways). When seeing others perform ceremonial bows, join them; when observing common practices, follow suit to avoid censure. This represents adapting externally to worldly etiquette.

Emulating the ancients means aligning with the wisdom of sages (following ancient ways). When speaking, quote classical teachings—though seemingly critical, these words carry no offense as they originate from the ancients. Thus even blunt speech avoids misfortune.

Yan Hui asked Confucius if this approach was viable. The Master replied: No! Such rigid adherence creates excessive rules without practicality (too many regulations lack adaptability). While each method has merit, mechanical application sacrifices necessary flexibility.

(無二而張三條以/政之與事不𡨕也)雖固亦無罪(雖未𢎞大亦/且不見咎責)雖然止是 耳矣夫胡可以及化(罪則無矣/化則未也)猶師心者也(挾三術以/適彼非無) (心而付之/天下也)顔回曰吾無以進矣敢問其方仲尼曰齊吾 將語若有而為之其易邪(夫有其心而為之者誠未/易也○齊側皆反下同)易 之者曍天不宜(以有為為易未見其/宜也○曍天自然也)顔回曰回之家貧 唯不飲酒不茹葷者數月矣若此則可以為齊乎曰是 祭祀之齊非心齊也回曰敢問心齊仲尼曰若一志(去/異) (端而任/獨也)無聽之以耳而聽之以心無聽之以心而聽之 以氣聽止於耳心止於符氣也者虛而待物者也(遺耳/目去) (心意而符氣性之自/得此虛以待物者也)唯道集虛虚者心齊也(虛其心則/至道集於) (懷/也)顔回曰回之未始得使實自回也(未始心齊故有其/身○未始得使絶) (句/)得使之也未始有回也(既得心齊之/使則無其身)可謂虛乎夫子 曰盡矣吾語若若能入逰其樊而無感其名(放心自得/之場當於) (實而/止)入則鳴不入則止(譬之宮商應而無心故曰鳴也/夫無心而應者任彼耳不強應)
Interpretation

This dialogue recounts how Yan Hui sought Confucius' guidance on the practice of "heart-mind fasting" (xinzha), a method of inner purification. Yan Hui first mentioned he had abstained from wine and meat for months, asking if this constituted "fasting." Confucius replied that this was merely the external fasting for sacrificial rituals, not the true "heart-mind fasting."

Confucius explained the essence of heart-mind fasting: First, one must concentrate the spirit (yizhi, single-minded focus). Instead of listening with the ears, one should perceive with the heart-mind; going further, one should transcend even the heart-mind and perceive through qi (vital energy, a Daoist cultivation term referring to life force). This is because qi embodies the state of emptiness that can contain all things. When the inner self achieves complete emptiness and stillness, the Dao will naturally dwell within.

After comprehending this, Yan Hui remarked: Before mastering this method, he always felt the existence of "Yan Hui" as a real person; but upon truly entering this state, he no longer sensed "Yan Hui's" presence. Confucius praised this realization, affirming: Exactly! He then illustrated with a metaphor: Just as entering another's domain requires adapting to circumstances—engaging when there is resonance and withdrawing when there is none—all should follow natural flow without forcing anything.

The term "shixin" (obstinate mind) here refers to a state of rigid self-opinion, while "heart-mind fasting" represents the cultivation method of dissolving ego-attachment through emptiness and stillness. Through this teacher-disciple exchange, the dialogue vividly demonstrates the Daoist core philosophy of "emptying the self to respond to things."

(也/)無門無毒(使物自若無門者也付天下/之自安無毒者也毒治也)一宅而寓於 不得己(不得己者理之必然者也體至/一之宅而㑹乎必然之符也)則幾矣(理盡/於斯)絶 迹易無行地難(不行則易欲行而不踐地不可能也/無為則易欲為而不傷性不可得也)為 人使易以偽為天使難以偽(視聽之所得者粗故易欺/也至於自然之報細故難) (偽也則失真少者不全亦少失真多者不全亦多失得/之報未有不當其分者也而欲違天為偽不亦難乎) 聞以有翼飛者矣未聞以無翼飛者也聞以有知知者 矣未聞以無知知者也(言必有其具乃能其事今無至/虛之宅無由有化物之實也○) (知知上音智下/如字下句同)瞻彼闋者虛室生白(夫視有若無虛室/者也室虛而純白) (獨生矣○闋空也室比喻心/心能空虛則純白獨生也)吉祥止止(夫吉祥之所集/者至虛至靜也) 夫且不止是之謂坐馳(若夫不止於當不㑹於極此為/以應坐之日而馳鶩不息也故) (外敵未至而内已/困矣豈能化物哉)夫狥耳目内通而外於心知鬼神將 來舍而況人乎(夫使耳目閉而自然得者心知之用外/矣故將任性直通無往不𡨕尚無幽昧) (之責而況人間之累乎○狥辭閏反/徐辭倫反李云使也知音智註同)是萬物之化也禹
Interpretation

This passage presents Guo Xiang's commentary on the Zhuangzi, elucidating how spiritual practitioners should follow nature's course.

First, he explains the phrase "no gate, no governance" (wumen wudu): Practitioners should not establish artificial pathways (wumen) nor impose forceful control (wudu, where du means governance). Instead, they must allow all things to unfold naturally. One should dwell in the origin of the Dao (yizhai, "one abode") and comply with inevitable principles (bude yi), thus approaching truth.

Two analogies follow: Not walking at all is easy, but trying to walk without touching the ground is impossible. Similarly, wuwei (non-action) is easy, but attempting to act without harming one's innate nature is impossible. Being driven by others makes deception easy, but aligning with the Dao makes deception difficult, as natural laws are subtle and cannot be deceived.

Next, he states: Only with wings can one fly; only with wisdom can one perceive. Practitioners should be as pure as an empty room (symbolizing the mind)—"an empty chamber generates brightness" (xu shi sheng bai), and auspiciousness will naturally arrive. If the mind fails to maintain emptiness and stillness, it is like sitting yet running—the spirit (shen) will grow weary.

Finally, he concludes: When one closes off the senses (ermu nei tong, "ears and eyes turned inward") and abandons intellectual striving (wai yu xinzhi, "beyond heart-mind knowledge"), even spirits and deities will come to dwell within—how much more so will people? This is the mystery of all transformations and the realm attained by sages like Yu the Great.

舜之所紐也伏戲几蘧之所行終而況散焉者乎(言物/無貴) (賤未有不由心知耳目以自通者也故出之所謂知者/豈欲知而知哉所謂見者豈為見而見哉若夫知見可) (以欲為而得者則欲賢可以得賢為聖可以得聖乎固/不可矣而世不知知之自知因欲為知以知之不見見) (之自見因欲為見以見之不知生之自生又將為生以/生之故見目而求離婁之明見耳而責師曠之聰故心) (神奔馳於内耳目竭喪於外身處不適則與物不𡨕矣/不𡨕矣而能合乎人間之變應乎世世之節者未之有) (也○系而/行之曰紐)葉公子髙將使於齊問於仲尼曰王使諸梁 也甚重(重其使欲/有所求也)齊之待使者盖將甚敬而不急(恐直/空報) (其敬而不肯/急應其求也)匹夫猶未可動也而況諸侯乎吾甚慄之 子嘗語諸梁也曰凡事若小若大寡不道以懽成(夫事/無小) (大少有不言以成為懽者耳/此仲尼之所曽吿諸梁也)事若不成則必有人道之 患(夫以成為懽者不成則怒/矣此楚王之所不能免也)事若成則必有陰陽之患 (人患雖去然喜懼戰於胷/中固已結氷炭於五藏矣)若成若不成而後無患者唯 有徳者能之(成敗若任之於彼而莫足/以患心者唯有徳者乎)吾食也執粗而
Interpretation

The way of life followed by Emperor Shun was practiced throughout their lives even by sages like Fuxi and Ji Qu, let alone ordinary people like us. This passage teaches that all things are inherently equal in value - we perceive the world through the natural functions of mind and senses. True wisdom cannot be attained through forced striving, just as seeing with eyes and hearing with ears occur spontaneously. If sagehood could be achieved through deliberate effort, wouldn't everyone easily attain it? Sadly, most people misunderstand this principle.

People constantly strain to acquire Li Lou's legendary vision through forced "seeing," or seek to obtain Shi Kuang's musical discernment through artificial "listening." This creates inner agitation, exhausts the senses, causes physical discomfort, and alienates one from the natural world. In such a state, it becomes impossible to adapt to life's changes or respond to worldly uncertainties.

When Duke Ye Zigao of Chu was about to undertake a diplomatic mission to Qi, he consulted Confucius: "The King of Chu gives me this weighty responsibility, yet Qi may offer superficial courtesy while delaying substantive response. If commoners are hard to persuade, how much more so feudal lords? I'm deeply concerned." Confucius once advised him: "Few matters great or small reach satisfactory resolution without proper communication. Failure inevitably breeds interpersonal complications, while success brings emotional turmoil (Yin-Yang imbalance) from conflicting joy and anxiety. Only those of superior virtue (De) remain undisturbed by either outcome."

Regarding daily life, Confucius described himself as "eating plain food and drinking water" - illustrating how simple, unadorned living preserves mental tranquility (Shen). The core teaching here is to follow nature's flow (Dao), avoid forced striving (Wuwei), and maintain equanimity toward success or failure.

不臧㸑無欲清之人(對火而不思凉明其所饌儉薄也/○執衆家本並然簡文作熱粗音) (麤又才古反臧作郎反善也絶句一音才郎反句至㸑/字爨七亂反清七性反凉也之人言㸑火為食而不思) (清凉明火㣲/而食宜儉薄)今吾朝受命而夕飲氷我其内熱與(所饌/儉薄) (而内熱飲氷者誠憂事之難非/美食之為○食美食者必内熱)吾未至乎事之情而既 有陰陽之患矣事若不成必有人道之患是兩也(事未/成則) (恐懼結於内而/刑網羅於外也)為人臣者不足以任之子其有以語我 來仲尼曰天下有大戒二其一命也其一義也子之愛 親命也不可解於心(自然結固/不可解也)臣之事君義也無適而 非君也無所逃於天地之間(千人聚不以一人為主不/亂則散故多賢不可以多) (君無賢不可以無君此/天人之道必至之宜)是之謂大戒(若君可逃而親可/解則不足戒也) 是以夫事其親者不擇地而安之孝之至也夫事其君 者不擇事而安之忠之盛也自事其心者哀樂不易施 乎前知其不可奈何而安之若命徳之至也(知不可奈/何者命也) (而安之則無哀無樂何易施之有哉故㝠然以所遇為/命而不施心於其間冺然與至當為一而無休戚於其)
Interpretation

This passage expounds Zhuangzi's wisdom on navigating human existence. It begins by describing people who live with simplicity—they cook over fire yet do not crave cooling comforts, demonstrating their understanding of moderation. Like someone who receives a task in the morning and by evening drinks iced water to soothe anxiety, this actually reveals an excessively agitated mind.

Confucius spoke of two fundamental principles governing the world: the first is heavenly mandate (referring to innate natural relationships), such as a child's love for parents, which is engraved in one's bones; the second is moral duty, like a minister's service to the ruler, an inescapable responsibility woven into the fabric of existence. Just as a community requires leadership to maintain order, this reflects the natural way of things.

A truly filial person does not complain about circumstances but brings peace to their parents in any situation; a genuinely loyal official does not pick and choose tasks but fulfills duties in any position. Those who cultivate their inner nature maintain equanimity through joy and sorrow, accepting what cannot be changed—this represents the highest De (Virtue). To regard all experiences as manifestations of destiny, with a mind undisturbed like still water, merging with the Dao—this is the path beyond sorrow.

(中雖事凡人猶無往/而不適況君親乎)為人臣子者固有所不得己行事 之情而忘其身(事有必至理固常通故任之則事濟事/濟而身不存者未之有也又何容心於) (其身/哉)何暇至於恱生而惡死夫子其行可矣(理無不通/故當任所) (遇而直前耳若乃信道不篤而恱惡存懷不能/與至當俱往而謀生慮死未見能成其事者也)丘請復 以所聞凡交近則必相靡以信(近者得接故以其/信驗親相靡服也)逺則 必忠之以言(逺以言/傳意也)言必或傳之夫傳兩喜兩怒之言 天下之難者也(夫喜怒之言若過其實傳之/者宜使兩不失中故未易也)夫兩喜必 多溢美之言兩怒必多溢惡之言(溢過也喜怒之/言常過其當也)凡溢 之𩔖妄(嫌非彼言以/傳者妄作)妄則其信之也莫(莫然/疑之)莫則傳言 者殃(就傳過言似於誕妄受者有疑/則傳言者横以輕重為罪也)故法言曰傳其常 情無傳其溢言則幾乎全(雖聞臨時之過言而勿傳也/必稱其常情而要其誠至則) (近於/全也)且以巧鬭力者始乎陽(本共好戲/好呼報反)常卒乎陰(欲勝/情至) (潛興/害彼)泰至則多竒巧(不復循理/○泰音太)以禮飲酒者始乎治(尊/卑)
Interpretation

This passage elucidates principles for human conduct and verbal communication. For ministers and children, there are matters one cannot avoid undertaking, yet one should relinquish self-interested calculations. When acting in accordance with natural principles (Dao), affairs will be accomplished successfully without self-harm. Those who truly comprehend the Dao do not cling excessively to life or fear death.

In human interactions, close relationships should be cultivated through mutual influence with sincerity ("xiang mi yi xin" refers to building trust through genuine exchange), while distant communications require words to convey loyalty. Yet transmitting emotionally charged speech between parties is the most challenging task under heaven—words spoken in joy tend toward excessive praise, while words spoken in anger tend toward excessive disparagement. All exaggerated or untruthful words are unreliable, and those who transmit such speech invite misfortune. Thus the ancient teaching states: transmit only factual matters, not exaggerated words, for only thus can one preserve oneself.

Consider those who wrestle with technique: they begin with open fairness ("yang" denoting overt competition), but often end in covert trickery ("yin" denoting underhanded tactics). When carried to extremes, they employ every manner of artifice. Contrast this with those who drink ceremonially according to ritual: they begin observing proper hierarchy ("zhi" denoting protocol and decorum)... [Note: The parenthetical remarks contain Guo Xiang's commentary on the Zhuangzi, explaining concepts like "yang" and "yin." This passage uses the contrasting examples of wrestling and ceremonial drinking to illustrate how human interactions should maintain sincere moderation, avoiding extremes.]

(有别旅/酬有次)常卒乎亂(湛湎淫/液也)泰至則多竒樂(淫流縱横/無所不至)凡 事亦然始乎諒常卒乎鄙其作始也簡其將畢也必巨 (夫煩生於簡事起於/㣲此必至之勢也)言者風波也行者實喪也(夫言者/風波也) (故行之則/實喪矣)夫風波易以動實喪易以危(故遺風波而弗/行則實不喪矣) (夫事得其實則危/可安而蕩可定也)故忿設無由巧言偏辭(夫忿怒之作/無他由也常) (由巧言過實/偏辭失當)獸死不擇音氣息茀然於是並生心厲(譬/之) (野獸蹴之窮地意急情盡則和聲不至而/氣息不理茀然暴怒但生⬤疵以相對之)尅核太至則 必有不肖之心應之而不知其然也(夫寛以容物物必/歸焉尅核太精則) (鄙吝心生而不自覺也故大人蕩然放物於自得/之場不苦人之能不竭人之歡故四海之交可全)茍為 不知其然也孰知其所終(茍不自覺安能知/禍福之所齊詣也)故法言曰 無遷令(傳彼/實也)無勸成(任其/自成)過度益也(益則非/任實)遷令勸成 殆事(此事之/危殆)美成在久(美成者任其時化譬/之種植不可一朝成)惡成不及 改(彼之所惡而勸彊/成之則悔敗尋至)可不慎與且夫乗物以遊心(寄物/以為)
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle of knowing when to stop in human affairs. Just as every journey must reach its destination, excessive indulgence in pleasures ultimately leads to chaos (the phrase "泰至则多奇乐" refers to the over-pursuit of sensual enjoyment). All matters follow this pattern—what begins simply and purely often grows complex and uncontrollable by its conclusion ("其作始也简,其将毕也必巨").

Words are like wind and waves that easily stir up trouble ("言者风波也"), while actions may bring actual losses ("行者实丧也"). Anger often arises without particular cause, frequently triggered by honeyed words or extreme statements ("忿设无由,巧言偏辞"). Just as cornered beasts snarl desperately when facing death, humans too develop malicious thoughts in extreme circumstances ("兽死不择音").

Excessive harshness in demands ("克核太至") will instead provoke negative responses. The truly wise ("大人" denotes those of virtuous character) understand the importance of tolerant conduct—they refrain from forcing others beyond their capacities, thereby maintaining harmonious relationships. Those who fail to comprehend this principle will struggle to foresee outcomes.

Hence the ancient saying: Do not arbitrarily alter established commands ("无迁令"), nor forcibly push matters to completion ("无劝成"). Excessive interference ruins affairs, while genuine achievements require time to mature ("美成在久"). Rash actions produce regrettable consequences that allow no time for remedy ("恶成不及改"). The ideal state is to accommodate external circumstances while maintaining inner freedom ("乘物以游心").

(意/也)託不得己以養中至矣(任理之必然者中庸之/符全矣斯接物之至也)何作 為報也(當任齊所報之實何為/為齊作意於其間哉)莫若為致命此其難者 (直為致命最易而以/喜怒施心故難也)顔闔將傅衛靈公太子而問於蘧 伯玉曰有人於此其徳天殺與之為無方則危吾國與 之為有方則危吾身(夫小人之性引之軌制則憎已縱/其無度則亂邦○顔闔魯之賢人) (𨼆者衛靈公左傳云名元太子音泰司馬云蒯瞶也蘧/其居反伯玉名瑗衛賢大夫天殺如字謂如天殺物也) (徐所列反無方/李云方道也)其知適足以知人之過而不知其所以 過(不知民過之由已故罪責於/民而不自改○其知音智)若然者吾奈之何蘧伯 玉曰善哉問乎戒之慎之正女身哉(反覆與㑹俱/所以為正身)形莫 若就心莫若和(形不乖迕/和而不同)雖然之二者有患就不欲入 (就者形順入/者還與同)和不欲出(和者義濟出/者自顯伐)形就而入且為顛 為滅為崩為蹶(若還與同則是顛危而不扶持與彼俱/亡矣故當模格天地但不立小異耳) 心和而出且為聲為名為妖為孽(自顯和之且有含垢/之聲濟彼之名彼將) (惡其勝已妄生妖孽故當悶然若晦𤣥同光塵然後/不可得而親不可得而疎不可得而利不可得而害)彼
Interpretation

This passage recounts how Yan He (a recluse from the state of Lu), upon being appointed as tutor to the crown prince of Duke Ling of Wei, sought advice from Qu Boyu (a virtuous minister of Wei) on dealing with violent-tempered individuals.

Qu Boyu's counsel was: First rectify your own conduct ("正女身哉" - zheng nü shen zai), maintaining an outwardly approachable demeanor ("形莫若就" - xing mo ruo jiu) while preserving inner equanimity ("心莫若和" - xin mo ruo he). However, two principles must be observed: approachability shouldn't lead to moral compromise ("就不欲入" - jiu bu yu ru), and harmony shouldn't be ostentatiously displayed ("和不欲出" - he bu yu chu). If surface-level approachability overrides principles, one risks being dragged down; if inner harmony is conspicuously displayed, it invites jealousy and misfortune.

Qu Boyu described the crown prince Kuai Kui's violent temperament as "与天杀物" (yu tian sha wu - like heaven's destructive force), noting such people only perceive others' faults without understanding their root causes. When dealing with such difficult personalities, the optimal approach is responding naturally ("莫若为致命" - mo ruo wei zhi ming) without forcibly attempting to change them.

且為嬰兒亦與之為嬰兒彼且為無町畦亦與之為無 町畦彼且為無崖亦與之為無崖達之入於無疵(不小/立圭) (角以逆其鱗也○嬰兒喻無意也一云喻驕遊也/町徒頂反畦户圭反畔垺也無畔垺無威儀也)汝不 知夫螳螂乎怒其臂以當車轍不知其不勝任也是其 才之美者也(夫螳螂之怒臂非不美也以當車轍顧非/敵耳今知之所無奈何而欲彊當其任即) (螳螂之/怒臂也)戒之慎之積伐而美者以犯之幾矣(積汝之才/成汝之美) (以犯此人/危殆之道)汝不知夫養虎者乎不敢以生物與之為其 殺之之怒也(恐其因有殺/心而遂怒也)不敢以全物與之為其決之 之怒也(方使虎自齧分之/則因用力而怒矣)時其饑飽達其怒心(知其所/以怒而) (順/之)虎之與人異𩔖而媚養己者順也故其殺者逆也(順/理) (則異𩔖生愛逆/節則至親交兵)夫愛馬者以筐盛矢以蜄盛溺(矢溺至/賤而以) (寶器盛之愛馬之至也○矢/或作屎同蜄徐巿軫反蛤𩔖)適有蚉䖟僕縁(僕僕然/羣著馬)而 拊之不時(雖救其患而/備馬之不意)則缺銜毁首碎胷(掩其不備故/驚而至此) 意有所至而愛有所亡可不慎邪(意至除患率然拊之/以致毁碎失其所以)
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the principles of aligning with nature and maintaining proper measure in human affairs through vivid analogies.

First is the example of an infant: If others are as innocent as a baby, respond with equal sincerity; if they act without rigid boundaries, adapt to their manner; if they are unrestrained, follow suit with informality. The key is to achieve a state of seamless harmony, like fish scales naturally overlapping without resistance (the infant here symbolizes a state of no-mind, though some interpret it as representing unfettered freedom).

Next comes the allusion to the mantis blocking a chariot: The mantis angrily raises its forelegs to stop the wheels, unaware of its utter incapacity. While its courage is admirable (the mantis' defiant posture isn't without dignity), insisting on undertaking what exceeds one's capacity is as perilous as the mantis' gesture. Beware! The more one relies on personal ability to force confrontations, the closer one approaches disaster (accumulated talents become your advantage, but using them to force outcomes is the way of danger).

Then follows the wisdom of tiger-keeping: Experienced handlers never feed live prey lest it awaken the beast's killing instinct, nor offer whole carcasses that might provoke rage during tearing. They master the rhythms of its hunger and appease its anger. Though tigers differ from humans, they grow fond of caretakers who follow their nature, while those harmed by tigers invariably violate their instincts (following natural patterns creates affection across species; opposing inherent nature turns even kin into foes).

Finally, the cautionary tale of the horse-lover: He collects manure in precious baskets and urine in mother-of-pearl vessels (such extravagant containers for filth reveal his devotion). Yet when swarms bother the horse, sudden swatting (though meant to help) startles it into breaking its bit and injuring itself (well-intentioned harm causing unintended damage). Can one afford carelessness? (Destroying what one cherishes through rash action betrays the original good intention).

(愛矣故當世接物逆/順之際不可不慎也)匠石之齊至乎曲轅見櫟社樹其 大蔽牛絜之百圍其髙臨山千仞而後有枝其可以為 舟者旁十數觀者如市匠伯不顧遂行不輟弟子厭觀 之走及匠石曰自吾執斧斤以隨夫子未嘗見材如此 其美也先生不肯視行不輟何邪曰已矣勿言之矣散 木也以為舟則沈以為棺槨則⬤腐以為器則速毁以 為門户則液樠以為柱則蠧是不材之木也無所可用 故能若是之夀(不在可用之數故曰散木○曲轅道名/櫟力狄反木名百圍徑尺為圍盖十丈) (也十仞小爾雅云四尺曰仞案七尺曰仞或云八尺曰/仞旁十數旁旁枝也匠伯伯匠石字也樠亡言反液津) (液也樠謂脂/出樠樠然也)匠石歸櫟社見夢曰女將惡乎比予哉若 將比予於文木邪(凡可用之/木為文木)夫柤梨橘柚果蓏之屬實 熟則剝則辱大枝折小枝泄此以其能苦其生者也故 不終其天年而中道夭自掊擊於世俗者也物莫不若 是(物皆以自用傷○柤側/加反俗作查力果反)且予求無所可用久矣幾死 乃今得之(數有睥睨已者唯今匠石/明之耳○幾音機下同)為予大用(積無用/乃為濟) (生之/大用)使予也而有用且得有此大也邪(若有用/久見伐)且也若 與予也皆物也奈何哉其相物也而幾死之散人又惡
Interpretation

This story tells of Artisan Shi (named Shi the Craftsman) traveling to the state of Qi. Passing through Quyuan, he encountered a sacred oak tree worshipped as the village altar deity. The tree's canopy could shelter thousands of oxen, its trunk required a hundred men to encircle, and its crown pierced the clouds with branches beginning only after rising several hundred feet—dozens of which were large enough to build ships. Crowds gathered to admire it like at a marketplace, yet the craftsman walked past without a glance.

His apprentice, after gazing his fill, caught up and said: "Since following your instruction in carpentry, I've never seen such magnificent timber. Why didn't you even look at it, Master?" Artisan Shi replied: "Enough—don't mention that tree. It's 'scattered wood' (useless timber). Boats made from it would sink, coffins would rot quickly, tools would break, doors would ooze resin, and beams would be worm-eaten. Precisely because it's utterly useless has it lived so long."

That night, the oak appeared to him in a dream: "By what standard do you measure me? Would you compare me to 'patterned wood' (useful trees)? Fruit trees like pears, oranges, and pomelos—their ripe fruits get plucked, their branches broken. Their usefulness becomes their undoing, preventing them from reaching natural lifespans, cut down prematurely by worldly forces. All creatures meet this fate!"

The oak continued: "Long have I sought 'uselessness,' nearly being felled many times before finally achieving this aim today. My very 'uselessness' constitutes my 'great usefulness' (enduring value). Had I been useful, could I have grown so vast? In truth, you and I are both natural beings—why judge each other by 'useful' or 'useless' standards? You, clinging to worldly measures—how could you understand the realm of 'scattered wood'?"

Through the oak's words, this parable illuminates the Daoist concept of "the usefulness of the useless"—that which seems worthless may preserve itself and realize greater value. Artisan Shi represents worldly utilitarian standards, while the oak embodies survival wisdom that transcends utility and follows nature's course.

知散木(以戲/匠石)匠石覺而診其夢弟子曰趣取無用則為 社何邪(猶嫌其以為社自榮不趣取於/無用而已○診直信反占夢也)曰密若無言彼 亦直寄焉(社自來寄耳非此/木求之為社也)以為不知已者詬厲也(言/此) (木乃以社為不知已而見辱病也豈/榮之哉○詬乎豆反辱也厲病也)不為社者且幾有 翦乎(木自以無用為用則雖不為/社亦終不近於翦伐之禍)且也彼其所保與衆 異(彼以無保為保而/衆以有保為保)而以義譽之不亦逺乎(利人長物/禁民為非) (社之義也夫無用者泊然不為而羣才自適用者各得/其叙而不與焉此無用之所以全也汝以社譽之無縁) (近/也)南伯子綦遊乎商之丘見大木焉有異結駟千乘𨼆 將芘其所賴(其枝所陰可以𨼆芘千乘○南伯即南郭/也伯長也商之丘今梁國睢陽縣是也𨼆) (傷於熱也芘本亦作庇賴音/賴蔭也可以蔭芘千乘也)子綦曰此何木也哉此必 有異材夫仰而視其細枝則拳曲而不可以為棟梁俯 而視其大根則軸解而不可以為棺槨咶其葉則口爛 而為傷嗅之則使人狂醒三日而不已子綦曰此果不 材之木也以至於此其大也嗟乎神人以此不材(天王/不材)
Interpretation

Nanguo Ziqi (a fictional Daoist sage in the Zhuangzi) was wandering in Shangqiu (present-day Henan Province) when he came upon an extraordinary tree. Its canopy was so vast that a thousand chariots could find shade beneath it. Upon closer inspection, he noticed: its twisted branches were too crooked to serve as roof beams; its trunk's loose grain made it unsuitable for coffins; licking its leaves would blister one's mouth, and its scent could intoxicate a person for three days.

This tree's immense size resulted precisely from its "uselessness." The story parallels the earlier account of Carpenter Shi dreaming of a "worthless tree." When his disciples asked why such a useless tree became the sacred shrine tree for the Earth God, the carpenter replied, "Hush! It's merely by chance that the tree serves as the spirit's abode." The tree itself would consider such "honor" a disgrace, as it implies being exploited for utility. True self-preservation lies in emulating this tree's "purposelessness"—neither aspiring to be a pillar of state nor coveting the status of shrine tree, thereby avoiding the ax.

The perfected person (shenren) embodies this wisdom of "purposelessness." While ordinary people strive to demonstrate usefulness for survival, the Daoist sage preserves themselves through "having no utility." To judge this wisdom by worldly standards of usefulness would be as misguided as praising the great tree for its shrine tree status—a complete misunderstanding of its true value.

(於百官故百官御其事而明者為之視聰者為之聽知/者為之謀勇者為之扞夫何為哉𤣥黙而已而羣材不) (失其當則不材乃材之所至賴也故天下樂推而不厭/乘萬物而無害也○解如衣軸之直解也咶食紙反嗅) (許救/反)宋有荆氏者宜楸柏桑其拱把而上者求狙猴之 杙者斬之三圍四圍求髙名之麗者斬之七圍八圍貴 人富商之家求樿傍者斬之故未終其天年而中道之 夭於斧斤此材之患也(有材者未能無惜也○荆氏地/名一曰里名宜楸柏桑荆氏之) (地宜此三木兩手曰拱一手曰把杙以職反欲以栖戲/狙猴也麗音禮小船也又屋𨼆也樿木亦作擅音膳傍) (薄剛反樿傍棺也棺之/全一邊者謂之樿傍)故解之以牛之白顙者與豚之 亢鼻者與人有痔病者不可以適河(巫祝解除棄此三/者必妙選騂具然) (後敢/用)此皆巫祝以知之矣(巫祝於此亦/知不材者全)所以為不祥也 此乃神人之所以為大祥也(夫全生者天下之所謂祥/也巫祝以不材為不祥而) (弗用也彼乃以不祥全生乃大祥也神人者無/心而順物者也故天下之所謂大祥神人不逆)支離疏 者頤𨼆於臍肩髙於頂㑹撮指天五管在上兩髀為脅 挫鍼治繲足以餬口鼓筴播精足以食十人上徵武士
Interpretation

Zhuangzi employs vivid metaphors here to reveal the profound philosophy of "the usefulness of the useless." First, he depicts an ideal way of governance: those with sharp eyesight are assigned to observe, those with keen hearing to listen, the wise offer counsel, and the brave stand guard. The ruler need only maintain a state of emptiness and wuwei (non-action), allowing all talents to find their proper place—even those who appear useless can fulfill unique roles.

The text then illustrates how "usefulness" can invite misfortune through the fate of trees in the Jing clan's lands of Song: sturdy catalpas, cypresses, and mulberries are felled to make monkey posts, boat timber, or coffins, never living out their natural lifespans. Three more examples follow—a white-foreheaded ox, a high-nosed pig, and a man with hemorrhoids—all spared from sacrificial rites because shamans deemed them inauspicious. Precisely these "flaws" preserved their lives.

Finally, the deformed man Zhili Shu is described: his chin buried in his navel, shoulders towering above his head, topknot pointing skyward, internal organs visible through his skin, thighbones serving as ribs. Yet he supports himself by mending clothes and telling fortunes for ten family members, never conscripted into military service. These examples demonstrate that what the world views as defects and "uselessness" are, from the Daoist perspective, great wisdom for preserving life. The shenren (perfected beings) understand this truth, thus flowing with nature unperturbed by worldly concepts of fortune and misfortune.

則支離攘臂於其間(恃其無用故不自竄匿○支離疏/形體支離不全貌疏其名也言脊) (曲頸縮也㑹撮髻也古者髻在頂中脊曲頭低故髻指/天也管腧也五臟之腧皆在上也髀本又作脾僂人腹) (在髀裏也脊曲髀豎故與肩並也鍼執金反挫鍼縫衣/也繲佳賣反浣衣也鼓簸也小箕曰筴簡米曰精云鼓) (筴播精/言賣卜)上有大役則支離以有常疾不受功(不任作/役故)上 與病者粟則受三鍾與十束薪(役則不與賜則受/之○四斗曰鍾)夫支 離其形者猶足以養其身終其天年又況支離其徳者 乎(神人無用於物而物各得自用歸功名於羣才與物/𡨕而無迹故免人間之害處常美之實此支離其徳) (也/)孔子適楚楚狂接輿遊其門曰鳳兮鳳兮何如徳之 衰也(當順時直前盡乎㑹通之宜耳世/之衰盛蔑然不足覺故曰何如)來世不可待往 世不可追也(趣當盡臨/時之宜耳)天下有道聖人成焉天下無道 聖人生焉(付之自爾而理自生成生成非我也豈為治/亂易節哉治自求成故遺成而不敗亂自求) (生故亡生/而不死)方今之時僅免刑焉(不瞻前顧後而盡當今/之㑹𡨕然與時世為一) (而後妙當可/全刑名可免)福輕乎羽莫之知載(足能行而放之手能/執而任之聽耳之所)
Interpretation

This passage from the Zhuangzi uses the story of Zhili Shu (a fictional character with physical deformities) to illustrate the Daoist wisdom of appearing useless to preserve oneself. With his hunched back, retracted neck, and upward-pointing hair bun, Zhili Shu’s internal organs and acupoints were all exposed. Yet precisely because of his disabilities, he was exempted from forced labor and even received government relief grain and firewood. Zhuangzi thus demonstrates: if even a physically deformed person can live out his natural lifespan, how much more secure must those with "fractured De (Virtue/Power)"—meaning those who conceal their talents—be on the Daoist path?

The text then shifts to the allegory of Chu Kuang Jieyu (a recluse of Chu) satirizing Confucius, further elaborating Daoist philosophy of living. Using the "phoenix" as a metaphor for Confucius, Chu Kuang laments his moral decline (referring to Confucius’s travels promoting benevolence and righteousness). He reflects: the future cannot be anticipated, the past cannot be reclaimed—the sage harmonizes with circumstances. When the world follows the Dao, he accomplishes great deeds; when the world descends into chaos, he preserves his life. In these troubled times, merely avoiding punishment is fortunate enough. True blessings are light as feathers, yet no one knows how to bear them (referring to following nature); disasters weigh as heavy as the earth, yet no one knows how to avoid them (referring to resisting nature).

At its core, this passage embodies the Daoist concept of "the usefulness of the useless": seemingly flawed forms (like Zhili Shu) and seemingly passive attitudes (like Chu Kuang Jieyu) conceal profound wisdom for preserving life and aligning with the times. The phrase "fracturing one’s De" refers to deliberately obscuring virtue and ability, mirroring "fracturing one’s form"—both serve to avoid becoming tools for exploitation.

(聞視目之所見知止其所不知能止其所不能用其自/用為其自為恣其性内而無纖芥於分外此無為之至) (易也無為而性命不全者未之有也性命全而非福者/理未聞也故夫福者即嚮之所謂全耳非假物也豈有) (寄鴻毛之重哉率性而動動不過分天下之至易也舉/其自舉載其自載天下之至輕也然知以無涯傷性心) (以欲惡蕩真故乃釋此無為之至易而知彼有為之至/難棄夫自舉之至輕而取夫載彼之至重此世之常患) (也/)禍重乎地莫之知避(舉其性内則雖負萬鈞而不覺/其重也外物寄之雖重不盈錙) (銖有不勝任者矣為内福也故福至輕為外禍也/故禍至重禍至重而莫之知避此世之大迷也)已乎 已乎臨人以徳殆乎殆乎畫地而趨(夫畫地而使人循/之其迹不可掩矣) (有其已而臨物與物不𡨕矣故大人不明我以耀彼而/任彼之自明不徳我以臨人而付人之自得故能彌貫) (萬物而𤣥同彼我冺然與/天下為一而内外同福也)迷陽迷陽無傷吾行(迷陽猶/亡陽也) (亡陽任獨不蕩於外則吾行全矣天下皆全其吾/則凡稱吾者莫不皆全也○迷陽伏陽也言詐狂)吾行 郤曲無傷吾足(曲成其形/各自足矣)山木自寇也膏火自煎也桂 可食故伐之漆可用故割之人皆知有用之用而莫知
Interpretation

Let what the eyes see come naturally, knowing where to stop and stopping there; do not force what lies beyond one's capacity. Acting in accordance with one's innate nature, remaining inwardly at ease without being entangled by external trivialities—this is the highest state of Wuwei (non-action).

Those who truly embody Wuwei have no incomplete nature; and those whose nature is whole cannot fail to receive blessings. What we call blessings are simply the natural state of a fulfilled nature, requiring no external aid. Why insist on carrying something as light as a feather? To act in alignment with one's nature, never exceeding its bounds, is the easiest thing in the world; to let things manifest naturally is the most effortless state.

Yet people often harm their nature with endless intellectual pursuits, allowing greed to disturb their innate authenticity. They abandon the simplest method of Wuwei, instead chasing laborious, deliberate actions; they forsake the natural ease of "self-realization," shouldering the heavy burden of "carrying others"—this is the common mistake of the world.

Disaster is heavier than the earth, yet no one knows how to avoid it. Those who focus on inner cultivation bear ten thousand burdens without feeling their weight, while those entangled in external things collapse under even a feather's weight. Inner blessings are the lightest, yet worldly misfortunes are the heaviest. And still, people remain oblivious to the heaviest of calamities—what greater delusion could there be?

Enough! Enough! Those who impose moral standards on others—how perilous they are! It is like drawing lines on the ground and demanding others walk precisely upon them, the traces too obvious. To cling to one's own standards and impose them on the world is to stand in opposition to all things. Thus, the truly wise do not flaunt themselves to overshadow others but let each shine naturally; they do not bind others with morality but allow all to grow freely. Only then can they embrace all things, unite with heaven and earth, and attain true blessings both within and without.

Oh hidden light, do not obstruct my path. Concealing brilliance, maintaining independence, unmoved by external things—this is how my path remains whole. If all under heaven can be fully themselves, then every "I" will be complete. Trees on the mountain are felled for their usefulness; oil burns itself to provide light. The cassia is cut down for its edible bark, the lacquer tree wounded for its sap. People all know the usefulness of the "useful," but none understand the wonder of the "useless."

無用之用也(有用則與彼為功無用則自全其生夫割/肌膚以為天下者天下之所知也使百姓) (不失其自全而彼我俱適/者俛然不覺妙之在身也)   徳充符第五(徳充於内應物於外外内𤣥/合信若符命而遺其形骸也) 魯有兀者王駘從之遊者與仲尼相若(弟子多少敵孔/子○兀五忽反) (又音界刖足曰兀王/駘音臺人姓名也)常季問於仲尼曰王駘兀者也從 之逰者與夫子中分魯立不教坐不議虛而往實而歸 (各自得而足也○常/季或云孔子弟子)固有不言之教無形而心成者邪 (慳其形殘而心乃充足也夫心之全也遺/身形忘五藏忽然獨往而天下不能離)是何人也仲 尼曰夫子聖人也丘也直後而未往耳丘將以為師而 況不若丘者乎奚假魯國丘將引天下而與從之(夫神/全心) (具則體與物𡨕與物𡨕者天下之所不能逺奚但一國/而已哉○丘也直後而未往耳自在衆人後未得往師) (之/耳)常季曰彼兀者也而王先生其與庸亦逺矣若然者 其用心也獨若之何仲尼曰死生亦大矣(人雖曰變然/死生之變變) (之大也○王子況反勝也君長/也其與庸亦逺矣庸常人也)而不得與之變(彼與變/俱故生) (死不變/於彼)雖天地覆墜亦將不與之遺(斯順之也天地猶/不能變已況生死)
Interpretation

This passage discusses the story of Wang Tai, the footless man from the state of Lu in the Zhuangzi·De Chong Fu (The Sign of Virtue Complete), revealing the profound philosophy of "the usefulness of the useless."

What appears useless may in fact have great utility (while useful things serve others, the useless preserve themselves). Those who sacrifice themselves for the world earn people's praise, yet those who enable the masses to retain their instinct for self-preservation while allowing everyone to live comfortably and freely often go unnoticed in their subtle profundity.

"De Chong Fu" (The Sign of Virtue Complete) means that when inner virtue is fulfilled, one naturally resonates with all things externally. The mysterious correspondence between inner and outer realms fits as perfectly as matching tally tokens, making people forget even his physical deformities.

In the state of Lu, there was a footless man named Wang Tai whose followers were as numerous as Confucius's. Chang Ji (possibly a disciple of Confucius) asked Confucius: "Wang Tai is physically disabled, yet he shares Lu's disciples equally with you. He neither actively teaches nor sits discoursing on the Dao, yet his students come empty-handed and return fulfilled. Could there truly be teaching without words, spiritual growth achieved through formless means?" (This indicates that while Wang Tai's body was incomplete, his spirit was whole—this spiritual completeness made people forget physical forms and organs, suddenly transcending worldly attachments, becoming inseparable from all things under heaven.)

Confucius replied: "This gentleman is a sage! I merely haven't gone to follow him yet. I myself would take him as teacher, let alone those lesser than me. Not just Lu—I would lead all under heaven to follow him." (This shows that those with complete spiritual fulfillment merge body and all things mysteriously, naturally attracting people from everywhere, not just one state.)

Chang Ji further asked: "Though disabled, he surpasses you, Master, standing far above ordinary men. How does such a person employ his mind?" Confucius answered: "Life and death represent life's greatest transformation (though human existence is full of changes, none compare to life and death), yet they cannot affect him (because he has united with transformation itself—thus life and death hold no sway). Even if heaven collapsed and earth split, he would not perish with them (for he follows transformation—if even heaven and earth cannot change him, how much less life and death?)."

(也/)審乎無假(明性命/之固當)而不與物遷(任物之/自遷)命物之化(以/化) (為命而/無怪迕)而守其宗也(不離至/當之極)常季曰何謂也仲尼曰自 其異者視之肝膽楚越也(甜苦之性殊則/美惡之情背)自其同者視 之萬物皆一也(雖所美不同而同有所美各美其所美/則萬物一美也各是其所是則天下一) (是也夫以其所異而異之則天下莫不異而浩然大觀/者官天地府萬物知異之不足異故因其所同而同之) (則天下莫不皆同又知同之不足有故因其所無而無/之則是非美惡莫不皆無矣夫是我而非彼美已而惡) (人自中知以下至於昆蟲莫不皆然然此明乎我而不/明乎彼者爾若夫𤣥通冺合之士因天下以明天下天) (下無曰我非也即明天下之無非無曰彼是也即明天/下之無是無是無非混而為一故能乗變任化迕物而) (不/憎)夫若然者且不知耳目之所宜(宜生於不宜者也無/美無惡則無不宜無) (不宜故忘/其宜也)而逰心乎徳之和(都忘宜故無不任也都任/之而不得者未之有也無) (不得而不知者亦未聞也故放心於天/地之間蕩然無不當而曠然無不適也)物視其所一而 不見其所喪視喪其足猶遺土也(體夫極數之妙心故/能無物而不同無物)
Interpretation

In this dialogue between Confucius and Chang Ji, Zhuangzi reveals two fundamental perspectives for viewing things. From the perspective of difference, the liver and gallbladder, though adjacent, may seem as distant as the states of Chu and Yue; yet from the perspective of sameness, all things are essentially one. Those who truly comprehend the Dao do not stubbornly cling to distinctions of right and wrong, but rather embrace all phenomena with an inclusive mind.

This state manifests in three levels: first recognizing that superficial differences among things are insignificant, then understanding that pursuing sameness is equally meaningless, and finally attaining the absolute realm that transcends judgments of right/wrong and beauty/ugliness. Those who reach this state naturally transcend sensory preferences (no longer obsessing over what ears should hear or eyes should see), allowing their spirit to roam freely in the harmonious embodiment of De (the manifestation of Dao).

When such people behold the world, they perceive only the unified essence of all things, blind to so-called deficiencies. To them, losing a foot would be as inconsequential as losing a clod of earth. This is because their minds have merged with the Great Dao, embracing all things with the subtlest wisdom—neither resisting change nor despising external objects, forever maintaining a state of transcendent freedom.

(而不同則死生變化無往而非我矣故生為我時死為/我順時為我聚順為我散聚散雖異而我皆我之則生) (故我耳未始有得死亦我也未始有喪夫死生之變猶/以為一既觀其一則脫然無係𤣥同彼我以死生為寤) (寐以形骸為逆旅去生如脫屣斷足/如遺土吾未見足以纓茀其心也)常季曰彼為己以 其知(嫌王駘未能/忘知而自存)得其心以其心(嫌未能遺/心而自得)得其常心 物何為最之哉(夫得其常心平往者也嫌其不能平往/而與物過常故使物就之○最徂會反) (聚/也)仲尼曰人莫鑑於流水而鑑於止水(夫止水之致鑑/者非為止以求) (鑑也故王駘之聚衆衆/自歸之豈引物使從已)唯止能止衆止(動而為之則不/能居衆物之止) 受命於地唯松柏獨也在冬夏青青(夫松柏特稟自然/之鍾氣故能為衆) (木之傑耳非能/為而得之也)受命於天唯舜獨也正(言特受自然之/正氣者至希也) (下首則唯為松柏上首則唯有聖人故凡不正者皆來/求正耳若物皆有青全則無貴於松柏人各自正則無) (羨於大聖/而趣之)幸能正生以正衆生(幸自能正耳非/為正以正之)夫保始 之徵不懼之實勇士一人雄入於九軍將求名而能自
Interpretation

This passage presents Zhuangzi's profound insights on life and death, the self, and the relationship between all things.

First, it explains that the transformations of life and death are simply different states of the "self." Living is one mode of my existence, and death is my natural destination; gathering is my form, and dispersing is also my state. Though gathering and scattering differ, both are manifestations of the "self." Therefore, one need not rejoice in life nor grieve in death, for life and death are ultimately one. Understanding this principle allows one to transcend the constraints of life and death, attaining a state of unity between self and all things. Death becomes as effortless as removing shoes, and losing the body is as inconsequential as discarding dirt—neither troubles the mind.

Chang Ji (a fictional character in Zhuangzi) questions the enlightenment of Wang Tai (an accomplished Daoist), arguing that he has not yet fully forgotten knowledge and self. Confucius responds with an analogy: people do not use flowing water as a mirror but prefer still water. Wang Tai draws followers naturally, just as still water reflects all things effortlessly—it is not done deliberately. The pine and cypress remain evergreen through all seasons because they embody the essence of Heaven and Earth; Emperor Shun became a sage because he attained the natural, upright Qi (vital energy). These are all spontaneous achievements, not the result of forced striving.

Finally, it emphasizes that true courage does not seek fame but preserves one's original nature. Just as the pine and cypress stand tall naturally, inspiring emulation, the sage influences others simply by rectifying himself. Maintaining one's primal essence is the foundation of genuine fearlessness. A truly courageous warrior may charge alone into an army of thousands, but this bravery arises from inner cultivation, not external glory.

要者而猶若是(非能遺名而無不任○保始之徵徵成/也終始可保成也九軍天子六軍諸侯) (三軍通為九軍也兵書以攻/九天收九地故謂之九軍)而況官天地府萬物(𡨕然/無不) (體/也)直寓六骸(所謂逆旅○六/骸手足首身也)象耳目(人用耳目亦用/耳目非須耳目)一 知之所知而心未嘗死者乎(知與變化俱則無往而不/㝠此知之一者也心與死) (生順則無時而非生/此心之未嘗死也)彼且擇日而登假人則從是也(以/不) (失㑹為擇耳斯人無擇也任其天行而時動者也故假/借之人由此而最之耳補假音格至也大宗師章是知) (之能登假/於道也)彼且何肯以物為事乎(其恬漠/故全也)申徒嘉兀者 也而與鄭子產同師於伯昏無人子產謂申徒嘉曰我 先出則子止子先出則我止(羞與刖者並行○申徒氏/嘉名無人離篇作瞀人) 其明日又與合堂同席而坐子產謂申徒嘉曰我先出 則子止子先出則我止今我將出子可以止乎其未邪 (質而問之欲/使必不並已)且子見執政而不違子齊執政乎(常以執/政自多) (故直云子齊執政便/謂足以明其不遜)申徒嘉曰先生之門固有執政焉 如此哉(此論徳之處/非計位也)子而說子之執政而後人者也(⬤/其)
Interpretation

This passage conveys two main layers of meaning: first discussing the realm of Daoist cultivation, then presenting a parable.

The first part describes the state of accomplished Daoist practitioners: Those who have truly attained the Dao (the Way) remain detached even from important affairs (never forcing actions for fame). Such individuals maintain unwavering original intent (preserving their fundamental heart-mind from initial practice to ultimate realization). They perceive heaven and earth as a storehouse to manage, and regard all things as treasures in a repository (merging with all existence). They treat their bodies as temporary dwellings ("six skeletal parts" referring to head, torso and limbs), using eyes and ears without becoming enslaved by them (observing through senses yet remaining unbound by sensory limitations). Their wisdom flows with transformations (cognition synchronized with change), and their inner spirit (Shen) never perishes (the mind transcends life and death). Such practitioners can ascend to the supreme state at any moment ("ascending in transcendence" refers to reaching the realm of Dao), never preoccupied with worldly matters.

The second part recounts the story of Shentu Jia and Zichan: Shentu Jia, a man with amputated feet, studied under Bohun Wuren alongside Zichan, the prime minister of Zheng. Zichan disdainfully said, "If I go first, you stay behind; if you go first, I'll stay behind" (unwilling to walk alongside a disabled person). The next day during lessons, he repeated this and demanded, "Shouldn't you defer when meeting the chief administrator? Do you presume equality with the state minister?" Shentu Jia retorted, "What place has administrative rank in our master's presence? (This is a place for discussing Dao, not comparing official status) Your display of official prestige precisely reveals your lack of cultivation."

(Note: "Nine armies" is an ancient military term referring to comprehensive battlefield deployment; "ascending in transcendence" is a Daoist technical term denoting achieving the Dao and celestial ascension; "Bohun Wuren" is Zhuangzi's fictional name for an accomplished Daoist master)

(矜說在位欲處/物先○說音恱)聞之曰鑑明則塵垢不止止則不明也 久與賢人處則無過今子之所取大者先生也而猶出 言若是不亦過乎(事明師而鄙吝之心/猶未去乃真過也)子產曰子既若 是矣(若是/形殘)猶與堯争善計子之徳不足以自反邪(言不/自顧) (省而欲輕蔑在位與有徳者並計/子之徳故不足以補形殘之過)申徒嘉曰自狀其過 以不當亡者衆(多自陳其過狀以已/為不當亡者衆也)不狀其過以不當 存者寡(黙然為過自以/為應死者少也)知不可奈何而安之若命唯有 徳者能之遊於羿之彀中中央者中地也然而不中者 命也(羿古之善射者弓矢所及為彀中夫利害相攻則/天下皆羿也自不遺身忘知與物同波者皆逰於) (羿之彀中耳雖張毅之出單豹之處猶未免於中地則/中與不中唯在命耳而區區者各有其所遇而不知命) (之自爾故免乎弓矢之害者自以為巧欣然多已及至/不免則自恨其繆而志傷神辱斯未能達命之情者也) (夫我之生也非我之所生也則一生之内百年之中其/坐起行止動靜趣舍性情知能凡所有者凡所無者凡) (所為者凡所遇者皆非我也理自爾耳而横生休戚乎/其中斯又逆自然而失者也○中地丁仲反下不中註)
Interpretation

This dialogue between Zichan and Shentu Jia reveals profound Daoist insights into fate and self-awareness.

A mirror that is clear does not accumulate dust; if dust gathers, it loses its clarity. Likewise, one who associates long with sages will be free from faults. Zichan reproached Shentu Jia, saying: "The teacher you now follow is a great sage, yet you still speak in this manner—is this not a fault?" Shentu Jia was physically disabled, and Zichan believed he should reflect on whether his own virtue (De) was sufficient.

Shentu Jia replied: "People always justify themselves—many claim they do not deserve misfortune, while few silently accept fate and acknowledge they deserve their lot. Only those with true virtue (De) can understand that some things cannot be changed and thus calmly accept destiny. It is like standing within the range of the legendary archer Yi’s bow: to be struck is expected, while avoiding it is mere luck."

He elaborated further: "We do not choose to be born, nor can we fully control the circumstances, actions, or temperament of our lives—these all follow the natural order (Dao). To insist on joy or sorrow over such things is to defy the principles of nature. Those who gloat over narrowly escaping calamity or resentfully lament misfortune have not truly grasped the essence of fate."

(Note: Yi was a mythical archer of ancient legend, and "within the range of his bow" refers to the area where his arrows could strike. This dialogue embodies the Zhuangzi school’s philosophy of "resting content in the time and following along with things" (安时处顺), advocating acceptance of nature’s arrangements and harmony with fate.)

(中地中與/不中同)人以其全足笑吾不全足者衆矣(皆不知命/而有斯笑) 我怫然而怒(見其不知命而怒/斯又未知命也)而適先生之所則廢然 而反(見至人之知命遺形故/廢向者之怒而復常)不知先生之洗我以善邪 (不知先生洗我以善道故邪我/為能自反邪斯自忘形而遣累)吾與夫子遊十九年而 未嘗知吾兀者也(忘形/故也)今子與我逰於形骸之内而子 索我於形骸之外不亦過乎(形骸外矣其徳内也今子/與我徳逰耳非與我形交) (而索我外好豈不/過哉○索色百反)子產蹵然改容更貌曰子無乃稱(己/悟) (則厭其/多言也)魯有兀者叔山無趾踵見仲尼(踵頻也○叔山/字無足趾踵頻) (也故/踵行)仲尼曰子不謹前既犯患若是矣雖今來何及矣 無趾曰吾唯不知務而輕用吾身吾是以亡足(人之生/也理自) (生矣直莫之為而任其自生斯重其身而知務者也若/乃忘其自生謹而矜之斯輕用其身而不知務也故五) (藏相攻於内而手/足殘傷於外也)今吾來也猶有尊足者存(刖一足未/足以虧其) (徳明夫形骸/者逆旅也)吾是以務全之也(去其矜謹任其/自生斯務全也)夫天無 不覆地無不載(天不為覆故能常覆地不為載故能常/載使天地而為覆載則有時而息矣使)
Interpretation

This passage recounts Zhuangzi's use of a disabled man's story to expound the philosophy of "forgetting the physical form." There was a man named Shushan Wuzhi (Toeless) who lost his toes in youth due to neglecting his body, leaving him to walk on tiptoes. When he visited Confucius, the sage remarked, "Your earlier carelessness brought this misfortune—what use is seeking instruction now?"

Wuzhi replied, "I lost my toes precisely because I failed to value life properly and treated my body recklessly. Now I come because I understand there exists something more precious than toes (referring to human virtue/de [德])." He used heaven and earth as metaphors: Heaven doesn't deliberately cover all things yet shelters everything; Earth doesn't consciously bear all things yet supports them all. When one acts with deliberate intention, limitations arise.

The text also mentions how Zichan, a minister of Zheng, initially mocked the disabled man's appearance but later changed his attitude in shame after being enlightened. Through these dialogues, Zhuangzi illustrates that truly wise individuals (zhiren 至人) can see through fate and transcend physical limitations. People should release attachment to external form and cultivate inner virtue. The physical body is but a temporary lodging—not worth excessive concern—while maintaining life's authentic state (benxing 本真) remains essential.

(舟能沉而為人浮則有時而沒矣/故物為焉則未足以終其生也)吾以夫子為天地安 知夫子之猶若是也(責其不謹不/及天地也)孔子曰丘則陋矣夫 子胡不入乎請講以所聞無趾出(聞所聞而出/全其無為也)孔子曰 弟子勉之夫無趾兀者也猶務學以復補前行之惡而 況全徳之人乎(全徳者生/便忘生)無趾語老⬤曰孔丘之於至 人其未邪彼何賓賓以學子為(怪其方復/學於老⬤)彼且蘄以諔 詭幻怪之名聞不知至人之以是為己桎梏邪(夫無心/者人學) (亦學然古之學者為己今之學者為人其弊也遂至乎/為人之所為矣夫師人以自得者率其常然者也舍己) (效人而逐物於外者求乎非常之名者也夫非常之名/乃常之所生也故學者非為幻怪也幻怪之生必由於) (學禮者非為華薄也而華薄之興必由於禮斯/必然之理至人之所無奈何故以為己之桎梏)老⬤曰 胡不直使彼以死生為一條以可不可為一貫者解其 桎梏其可乎(欲以直理㝠/之冀其無迹)無趾曰天刑之安可解(今仲/尼非) (不㝠也顧自然之理行則影從言則嚮隨夫順物則名/迹斯立而順物者非為名也非為名則至矣而終不免) (乎名則孰能解之哉故名者影嚮也影嚮者形聲之桎/梏也明斯理也則名迹可遺名迹可遺則尚彼可絶尚)
Interpretation

This passage recounts the dialogue between Confucius and Wuzhi (a recluse who had his toes amputated), as well as Wuzhi's discussion with Lao Dan (Laozi), revealing the Daoist perspective on worldly learning versus the natural Dao.

Wuzhi criticizes Confucius for being overly constrained by conventional knowledge, likening it to a boat that can carry people but will eventually sink. He implies that Confucius's attachment to artificial learning prevents him from attaining the eternal naturalness of heaven and earth. Upon hearing this, Confucius humbly admits his own superficiality and invites Wuzhi inside for further discussion, but Wuzhi chooses to leave, maintaining his state of Wuwei (non-action).

Later, Confucius tells his disciples: "Even someone like Wuzhi, who suffers physical impairment, strives to learn and make amends for past mistakes—how much more should those with complete virtue?" Here, "those with complete virtue" refers to those who are naturally liberated from life and death, without deliberate pursuit.

Wuzhi says to Lao Dan: "Confucius has probably not yet attained the state of the Perfected Person. Why does he keep busily seeking instruction from you? He pursues these strange and empty reputations, unaware that they become shackles for the Perfected Person." Lao Dan suggests: "Why not directly tell him that life and death are one, that 'can' and 'cannot' are fundamentally indistinguishable, and thus free him from these bonds?" Wuzhi replies: "This is Heaven's punishment for him—it cannot be undone." The implication is that while Confucius understands the principles intellectually, his actions inevitably leave traces of reputation, just as form must cast a shadow and sound must produce an echo. These reputations become his fetters. Only by truly comprehending this truth can one break free from the shackles of fame.

(彼可絶則性/命可全矣)魯哀公問於仲尼曰衛有惡人焉曰哀駘 它(惡醜也○惡人惡貌醜駘音/殆它徒何反哀駘醜貌它名)丈夫與之處者思而不 能去也婦人見之請於父母曰與人為妻寧為夫子妾 者數十而未止也未嘗有聞其唱者也常和人而已矣 無君人之位以濟乎人之死(明物不由/權勢而往)無聚祿以望人之 腹(明非求/食而往)又以惡駭天下(明不以形/美故往)和而不唱(非招而/致之) 知不出乎四域(不役思/於分外)且而雌雄合乎前(夫神全者與/物無害故入) (獸不亂羣入鳥不亂行而為萬物/之靈○雌雄合乎前禽獸屬也)是必有異乎人者也 寡人召而觀之果以惡駭天下與寡人處不至以月數 而寡人有意乎其為人也(未經久已覺/其有逺處)不至乎期年而 寡人信之國無宰而寡人傳國焉(委之以/國政)悶然而後應 (寵辱不足/以驚其神)汜而若辭(人辭亦辭○汜/浮劍反不係也)寡人醜乎卒授之 國無幾何也去寡人而行寡人䘏焉若有亡也若無與 樂是國也是何人者也仲尼曰丘也嘗使於楚矣適見 ⬤子食於其死母者(食乳也○醜慙也崔/云醜也⬤又作豚)少焉㫬若皆 棄之而走不見己焉爾不得𩔖焉爾(夫生者以才徳為/𩔖死而才徳去矣)
Interpretation

Duke Ai of Lu once consulted Confucius, saying: "In the state of Wei there lives an extremely ugly man named Aitai Tuo. After spending time with him, men become so attached that they cannot bear to leave; women who meet him beg their parents saying 'Rather than being another man's principal wife, I'd prefer to be this man's concubine'—there are already dozens of such women. He never initiates anything, merely harmonizes with others in a natural way."

"This man holds no sovereign power to save people from mortal danger, nor does he possess vast wealth to feed the hungry. His appearance is shockingly ugly, yet crowds follow him. His wisdom doesn't exceed ordinary matters, yet even birds and beasts feel drawn to him. There must be something extraordinary about him."

When Duke Ai summoned him, he indeed found the man's appearance horrifying. But within a month of association, the Duke sensed his exceptional qualities; within a year, he placed complete trust in him, eventually entrusting him with state affairs. Aitai Tuo accepted this indifferently, as if under compulsion. When he later departed, Duke Ai felt profoundly bereft, as if the entire state had lost its flavor.

Confucius explained this phenomenon using the metaphor of piglets nursing: The piglets cluster around their mother while feeding, but scatter in terror upon discovering she's dead. This illustrates how all creatures are drawn by inner vitality (De/Virtue) rather than external form. Though Aitai Tuo was physically repulsive, the radiance of his inner De naturally attracted both people and creatures around him.

(故生者以失𩔖而走也故含徳之厚比於赤子無往而/不為之赤子也則天下莫之害斯得𩔖而明己故也情) (茍𩔖焉則雖形不與同而物無害心情𩔖茍亡則雖形/同母子而不足以固其志矣○㫬音舜驚貌目動也) 所愛其母者非愛其形也愛使其形者也(使形者/才徳也)戰而 死者其人之葬也不以翣資(翣者武所資也戰而死者/無武也翣將安施○翣所) (早反扇也武士/所造資送也)刖者之屨無為愛之(所愛屨者/為足故耳)皆無其 本矣(翣屨者以/足武為本)為天子之諸御不爪翦不穿耳(全其/形也)取 妻者止於外不得復使(恐傷/其形)形全猶足以為爾(採擇嬪/御及燕) (爾新婚本以形好為意者也故形之全/也可以降至尊之情回真女之操也)而況全徳之人 乎(徳全而物/愛之宜矣)今哀駘它未言而信無功而親使人授已 國唯恐其不受也是必才全而徳不形者也哀公曰何 謂才全仲尼曰死生存亡窮達貧富賢與不肖毁譽飢 渇寒暑是事之變命之行也(其理故當不可逃也故人/之生也非誤生也生之所) (有非妄有也天地雖大萬物雖多然吾之所遇適在於/是則雖天地神明國家聖賢絶力至知而弗能違也故)
Interpretation

This passage discusses the relationship between "form" (形) and "De" (德 Virtue/Power). Zhuangzi argues that what people truly love is not external physical form, but inner De. Just as an infant (赤子), due to its pure and abundant De, remains unharmed wherever it goes.

Several examples illustrate this: warriors who die in battle need no burial with their weapons (翣, the fan-shaped ceremonial implements of ancient warriors); those who have lost their feet no longer cherish shoes—because these objects have lost their fundamental purpose. Similarly, when selecting imperial consorts, the emperor values physical wholeness, and husbands prevent their wives from overexerting to preserve bodily integrity.

Yet Zhuangzi points out that physical wholeness is merely superficial; what truly matters is "De complete" (德全)—the perfection of inner Virtue. He cites the example of Aitai Tuo (a fictional figure): this man gained trust without speaking and won affection without merit, so much so that a ruler wished to entrust him with the state. This exemplifies "talent complete yet De unmanifest" (才全而德不形).

Confucius explains "talent complete" thus: Life and death, survival and ruin; poverty and wealth, honor and baseness; worthiness and incompetence; slander and praise, hunger and thirst; heat and cold—these are all natural patterns of Heaven's movement. Those with true De understand these changes are fated, thus maintaining inner peace undisturbed by external things. Though heaven and earth are vast, humans need only abide in what they encounter—not even divine sages can contravene this principle.

(凡所不遇弗能遇也其所遇弗能不遇也凡所弗/為弗能違也其所為弗能不為也付之而至當矣)日夜 相代乎前(夫命行事變不舍晝夜推之不去留/之不停故才全者隨所遇而任之)而知不 能規乎其始者也(夫始非知之所規而故非情之所留/是以知命之必行事之必變者豈於) (終規始在新戀故哉雖有至知而/弗能規也逝者之往吾柰之何哉)故不足以滑和(茍知性/命之固) (當則雖死生窮達千變萬化/淡然自若而和理在身矣)不可入於靈府(靈府者精/神之宅也) (夫至足者不以憂慮/經神若皮外而過去)使之和豫通而不失於兊(茍使和/性不滑) (靈府閒豫則雖涉乎至變/不失其兊然也○兊恱也)使日夜無郤(冺然常任之○/郤去逆反間也) 而與物為春(羣生之/所賴也)是接而生時於心者也(順四時/而俱化)是 之謂才全何謂徳不形曰平者水停之盛也(天下之平/者莫盛於) (停/水)其可以為法也(無情至平故/天下取正焉)内保之而外不蕩也(内/保) (其明外無情為𤣥鑒洞照與物/無私故能全其平而行其法也)徳者成和之修也(事得/以成) (物得以和/謂之徳也)徳不形者物不能離也(無事不成無物不和/此徳之不形也是以)
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist attitude of following nature's course and accepting one's destiny. The general meaning is:

All events encountered in human life are predestined—what is meant to come cannot be avoided, and what isn't meant to be cannot be forced. The alternation of day and night, the turning of fate, flows endlessly like running water. The truly wise do not obsess over tracing destiny's origins (as these lie beyond human power to alter), but instead maintain contentment wherever they find themselves.

Preserving inner peace is paramount. The so-called "spiritual abode" (referring to one's mental world) should remain as clear and undisturbed as still water. Even when facing major life changes involving life and death, poverty and prosperity, one maintains composure. With a peaceful and joyful heart undisturbed by external circumstances, one naturally harmonizes with all things, nourishing them as effortlessly as spring nurtures all beings.

Regarding the explanation of "complete talent" (fully developed capability): Just as still water provides the truest level surface that can serve as a standard, maintaining inner clarity (internal cultivation) while showing no outward fluctuations (external manifestation) constitutes perfect De (Virtue). Genuine De requires no deliberate display, yet all things naturally gravitate toward it, just as water naturally flows downward.

In this state of being, actions naturally succeed and harmony with all things arises spontaneously. This is the De that permeates everywhere without deliberate manifestation.

(天下樂推/而不厭)哀公異日以吿閔子曰始也吾以南面而君 天下執民之紀而憂其死吾自以為至通矣今吾聞至 人之言恐吾無其實輕用吾身而亡吾國吾與孔丘非 君臣也徳友而已矣(聞徳無形之風者雖復哀/公猶欲遺形骸忘貴賤也)闉跂支 離無脤說衛靈公靈公說之而視全人其脰肩肩甕㼜 大癭說齊桓公桓公說之而視全人其脰肩肩(偏情一/性則醜) (者更好而好者更醜也○闉音因⬤音企闉⬤支離言/脚常曲行體不正卷縮也無脤名也桓公說之音恱下) (說之同脰音豆頸也甕烏貌/送反㼜烏𦵏反甕㼜大癭)故徳有所長而形有所忘(其/徳) (長於順物忘其醜/長於逆物忘其好)人不忘其所忘而忘其所不忘此謂 誠忘(生則愛之死則棄之故徳者世之所不忘也形者/理之所不存也故夫忘形者非忘也不忘形而忘) (徳者乃/誠忘也)故聖人有所逰(逰於自得之塲放之而/無不至者才徳全也)而知為 孽約為膠徳為接工為商(此四者自然相生其理已具/○知音智知慧生妖孽約誓) (所以為膠固散徳以/接物工巧而商賈起)聖人不謀惡用知不斲惡用膠無 喪惡用徳不貨惡用商(自然已具故聖人/無所用其已也)四者天鬻也
Interpretation

Duke Ai of Lu once said to Min Ziqian: "Initially, as ruler of the state, I governed the people believing I had mastered the principles of administration. I concerned myself with the people's life and death, thinking I thoroughly understood statecraft. But now, having heard the words of those who have attained the Dao, I fear I possess no true capability—that my reckless exercise of authority might lead the state to ruin. My relationship with Confucius (Kong Qiu) is not that of ruler and minister, but of friends united by De (Virtue)."

(Here the text mentions "hearing the formless wind of De"—when one comprehends that Virtue is like an intangible breeze, even a ruler like Duke Ai comes to disregard physical form and forget distinctions of nobility.) A hunchbacked, crippled man with a twisted body went to persuade Duke Ling of Wei, who so delighted in him that afterward, normal people seemed to have overly slender necks. Another man with a massive goiter went to advise Duke Huan of Qi, who likewise took such pleasure in him that ordinary necks afterward appeared too thin. (This illustrates how when preferences become fixated, people mistake ugliness for beauty and beauty for ugliness.)

Thus when a person's De is remarkable, others forget their physical flaws; conversely, when De is lacking, people overlook their physical advantages. Ordinary people persistently remember what should be forgotten (like clinging to form) while forgetting what should be remembered (like Virtue)—this is true forgetfulness. The sages wander freely in the realm of the attained Dao because they perfectly unite talent with Virtue.

Wisdom may become calamity, oaths may become shackles, humaneness may become barter, and skill may become merchandise (these four all emerge naturally). But the sage needs no schemes—what use has he for wisdom? He carves no vessels—what need for glue? He suffers no loss—what call for charity? He trades no goods—what use for commerce? These four capacities (no scheming, no carving, no loss, no trade) are all natural endowments from Heaven.

(Note: The terms "hunchbacked cripple" and "gourd-necked goiter" describe the disabled persuaders. "Heavenly nurture" refers to innate endowments bestowed by nature.)

天鬻也者天食也(言自然而禀之○鬻/音育養也食音嗣)既受食於天又 惡用人(既禀之自然其理已足則雖沉思以免難或明/戒以避禍物無妄然皆天地之㑹至理之趣必) (自思之非我思也必自不思非我不思也或思而免之/或思而不免或不思而免之或不思而不免凡此皆非) (我也又奚為哉/任之而自至也)有人之形(視其形/貌若人)無人之情(掘若槁木/之枝○掘) (其物反槁/苦老反)有人之形故羣於人(𩔖聚羣分/自然之道)無人之情故 是非不得於身(無情故付/之於物也)眇乎小哉所以屬於人也(形/貌) (若人○眇亡小/反簡文云陋也)謷乎大哉獨成其天(無情故浩然無不/任無不任者有情) (之所未能也故無情而獨/成天也○謷五羔反放也)惠子謂莊子曰人故無情乎 莊子曰然惠子曰人而無情何以謂之人莊子曰道與 之貌天與之形惡得不謂之人(人之生也非情之所生/也生之所知豈情之所) (知哉故有情於為離曠而弗能也然離矌以無情而聰/明矣有情於為賢聖而弗能也然賢聖以無情而賢聖) (矣豈有賢聖絶逺而離矌難慕哉雖下愚聾瞽及雞鳴/狗吠豈有情於為之亦終不能也不問逺之與近雖去)
Interpretation

This passage expounds Zhuangzi's philosophical perspective on "being without emotions." Tianyu (natural nurturing) means being nourished by Heaven—since humans already receive sustenance from nature, why deliberately pursue artificial things?

Zhuangzi maintains that although humans possess human form and appearance, they should maintain a state of "emotionlessness"—like withered branches devoid of emotional fluctuations. Precisely because we have human form, we can dwell among people; precisely because we are without emotions, we avoid becoming entangled in disputes of right and wrong. Outwardly, humans appear insignificant, but from the perspective of spiritual attainment, maintaining emotionlessness allows one to merge with Heaven and Earth, achieving a realm of incomparable vastness.

Huizi asked Zhuangzi: "Can a person truly be without emotions?" Zhuangzi replied that it was possible. Huizi objected: "Without emotions, how can one still be called human?" Zhuangzi explained: Human form is bestowed by the Dao, and our physical bodies are fashioned by nature—is this not sufficient to be called human? He further clarified that individuals like Li Zhu (the legendary sharp-eyed archer) and Shi Kuang (the legendary musician) did not acquire their talents through deliberate pursuit, just as sages did not become sages by harboring aspirations to be sages. Like the deaf and blind, or like roosters crowing and dogs barking, these phenomena do not arise from emotional prompting. Zhuangzi advocates following nature's course without forced striving.

(已一分顔孔之際終莫之得也是以閱之萬物反取諸/身耳目不能以易任成功手足不能以代司致業故嬰) (兒之始生也不以目求乳不以耳向明不以足操物不/以手求行豈百骸無定司形貌無素主而專由情以制) (之/哉)惠子曰既謂之人惡得無情(未解形貌/之非情也)莊子曰是非 吾所謂情也(以是非為情則無是無非無好無惡/者雖有形貌直是人耳情將安寄)吾所 謂無情者言人之不以好惡内傷其身(任當而直前/者非情也)常 因自然而不益生也(止於/當也)惠子曰不益生何以有其身 (未明生之自/生理之自足)莊子曰道與之貌天與之形(生理已自足/於形貌之中) (但任之/則身存)不以好惡内傷其身(夫好惡之情非所以益生/祇足以傷身以其生之有) (分/也)今子外乎子之神勞乎子之精倚樹而吟據槁梧而 瞑(夫神不休於性分之内則外矣精不止於自生之極/則勞矣故行則倚樹而吟坐則據梧而睡言有情者) (之自困也補槁梧枯木/以為几據琴而睡也)天選子之形子以堅白鳴(言凡/子所) (為外神勞精倚樹據梧且吟且睡此世之所謂情也而/云天選明夫情者非情之所生而況他哉故雖萬物萬) (形云為趣舍皆在無情中/來又何用情於其間哉)  
Interpretation

This dialogue recounts a discussion between Zhuangzi and Huizi on the true meaning of "being without emotions" (无情). Huizi questions how a person could possibly lack emotions, to which Zhuangzi explains that his concept of "being without emotions" does not mean having no feelings at all, but rather not allowing personal likes and dislikes to harm one's inherent nature.

Zhuangzi argues that when infants are first born, their eyes do not consciously seek milk, their ears do not intentionally listen to sounds, and their hands and feet do not deliberately grasp objects—these instinctive actions are not controlled by emotions. The human form and life are bestowed by the Dao (the cosmic origin) and nature; one need only follow what is natural without adding artificial preferences that could damage one's innate being.

Huizi remains unconvinced and asks, if one does not consciously cultivate life, how can the body remain healthy? Zhuangzi replies that human form and life's essence are already complete; by following natural principles, the body will naturally thrive. Yet Huizi exhausts his spirit by reciting poetry while leaning against a tree trunk or dozing against a withered log—actions that stem from being troubled by worldly emotions.

In the end, Zhuangzi points out that Huizi's behaviors, though seemingly emotional, actually contradict innate nature. The transformations of all things follow natural laws—why impose artificial emotions? The so-called "heavenly chosen" (天选) form is disrupted by Huizi's use of concepts like "hardness and whiteness" (坚白, referring to Huizi's logical debates), which are mere human constructs.

         莊子注巻二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0138); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →