中文 · EN

《莊子注》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 10 13,677 characters

About this page. The original text of 《莊子注》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 28 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《莊子注》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

欽定四庫全書  莊子注巻三       晉 郭象 注   大宗師第六(雖天地之大萬物之當/其所宗而師者無心也) 知天之所為知人之所為者至矣(知天人之所為者皆/自然也則内放其身) (而外㝠於物與衆𤣥/同任之而無不至也)知天之所為者天而生也(天者自/然之謂) (也夫為為者不能為而為自為耳為知者不能知而知/自知耳自知耳不知也不知也則知出於不知矣自為) (耳不為也不為也則為出於不為矣為出於不為故以/不為為主知岀於不知故以不知為宗是故真人遺知) (而知不為而為自然而生坐忘/而得故知稱絶而為名去也)知人之所為者以其知 之所知以養其知之所不知終其天年而不中道夭者 是知之盛也(人之生也形雖七尺而五常必具故雖區/區之身乃舉天地以奉之故天地萬物凡) (所有者不可一日而相無也一物不具則生者無由得/生一理不至則天年無縁得終然身之所有者知或不) (知也理之所存者為或不為也故知之所知者寡而身/之所有者衆為之所為者少而理之所存者博在上者) (莫能器之而求其備焉人之所知不必同而所為不敢/異異則偽成矣偽成而真不喪者未之有也或好知不)
Interpretation

The third volume of the Commentary on Zhuangzi, authored by the Jin Dynasty scholar Guo Xiang, contains the following interpretation of the sixth section in the "Great Ancestral Teacher" chapter:

The highest wisdom lies in discerning what belongs to the workings of nature (tian) and what stems from human effort (ren). To understand nature's workings means recognizing that all things arise spontaneously ("tian" here denotes the self-so state of being). Deliberate striving often proves counterproductive, for true wisdom emerges from a state of non-intentional knowing. Thus, those who attain the Dao (zhenren, or "perfected person") appear to forget knowledge yet truly comprehend, seem inactive yet naturally accomplish. Through the cultivation of "sitting in forgetfulness" (zuowang, a meditative practice of dissolving worldly attachments to merge with nature), they reach the supreme state.

Understanding the limits of human effort means using acquired knowledge to nurture what remains unknown, thereby fulfilling one's natural lifespan without premature demise—this constitutes the pinnacle of wisdom. Though human life appears insignificant, it embodies the principles of heaven and earth in their entirety. The absence of any single thing or principle would render existence incomplete. Yet what humans truly know remains scant, and their capacity for action limited. To demand omniscience and omnipotence leads to artificiality. Once artificiality takes root, preserving one's authentic nature becomes difficult.

(Note: "Sitting in forgetfulness" [zuowang] refers to Zhuangzi's cultivation method of transcending physical form and abandoning cleverness to unite with the Dao; "perfected person" [zhenren] denotes one who has achieved the highest spiritual realization through Daoist practice.)

(倦以困其百體所好不過一枝而舉根俱弊斯以其所/知而害所不知也若夫知之盛也知人之所為者有分) (故任而不彊也知人之所知者有極故用而不蕩也故/所知不以無崖自困則一體之中知與不知闇相與㑹) (而俱全矣斯以其/所知養所不知也)雖然有患(雖知盛未若遺知/任天之無患也)夫知有 所待而後當(夫知者未能無可無不可故必有待/也若乃任天而生者則遇物而當也)其所 待者特未定也(有待則/無定也)庸詎知吾所謂天之非人乎所 謂人之非天乎(我生有崖天也必欲盛之人也然此人/之所謂耳物無非天也天也者自然也) (人皆自然則治亂成敗遇與/不遇非人為也皆自然耳)且有真人而後有真知(有/真) (人而後天下之知皆/得其真而不可亂也)何謂真人古之真人不逆寡(凡寡/皆不) (逆則所/順者衆)不雄成(不恃其成/而處物先)不謩士(縱心直前而羣士自/合非謀謩以致之○) (謩沒/乎反)若然者過而弗悔當而不自得也(直自全當而無/過耳非以得失) (經/心)若然者登髙不慄入水不濡入火不熱是知之能登 假於道也若此(言夫知之登至於道者若此之逺也理/固自全非畏死也故真人陸行而非避)
Interpretation

The passage discusses the realm and wisdom of "zhenren" (perfected persons who have attained the Dao). Truly wise individuals do not force themselves to pursue the limits of cognition, understanding that human capacity has its boundaries. Thus they follow nature's flow without compulsion. Knowledge resembles tree branches—what humans truly need is but a single twig. To forcibly grasp all knowledge would instead harm one's innate nature.

Genuine wisdom lies in using the known to nurture the unknown, rather than using the known to suppress the unknown. While this approach still has limitations, it surpasses completely abandoning cognition in favor of unchecked indulgence. Because cognition requires foundations to be appropriate, yet these very foundations remain uncertain. Who can confirm that what we call "heaven" isn't actually human artifice? Or that what we term "human" isn't heaven's intent? In truth, all things follow ziran (natural spontaneity)—order and chaos, success and failure all follow natural patterns beyond human compulsion.

Ancient perfected persons exhibited several characteristics: they didn't reject minority views (thus could harmonize with the majority), didn't boast of achievements, and didn't deliberately recruit talent. They acted with direct simplicity—regretting not when wrong, nor exulting when right. They feared not when ascending heights, remained dry when entering water, and felt no heat when walking through fire. This was because their wisdom had become one with the Dao. Such a state resembles walking on land not to avoid anything, but simply because it's the natural way.

(濡也逺火而非逃熱也無過而非措當也故雖不以熱/為熱而未嘗赴火不以濡為濡未嘗蹈水不以死為死) (未嘗喪生故夫生者豈生之而生哉成者豈成之而成/哉故任之而無不至者真人也豈有槩意於所遇哉) 古之真人其寢不夢(無意/想也)其覺無憂(當所遇/而安也)其食不甘 (理當/食耳)其息深深真人之息以踵(乃在根/本中來)衆人之息以喉 屈服者其嗌言若哇(氣不平暢/○嗌音益)其耆欲深者其天機淺 (深根寧極然/後反一無欲)古之真人不知說生不知惡死(與化為體/○說音恱) (惡烏/路反)其出不訢其入不距(泰然而任之○訢音欣欣/出則營生距入則惡死)翛 然而往翛然而來而已矣(寄之至理故往來/而不難○翛音蕭)不忘其所 始不求其所終(終始變化皆忘之矣豈宜逆/忘其生而猶復探求死意也)受而喜之 (不問所受者何物/遇之而無不適也)忘而復之(復之不由/於識乃至)是之謂不以心 捐道不以人助天是之謂真人(人生而靜天之性也感/物而動性之欲也物之) (感人無窮人之逐欲無節則天理滅矣真/人知用心則背道助天則傷生故不為也)若然者其心 志(所居而/安為志)其容寂(雖行而無/傷於静)其顙䪻(䪻太朴/之貌)凄然似秋
Interpretation

Ancient practitioners who attained the state of "Zhenren" (True Person) would dream no dreams while sleeping (as their minds were free from distracting thoughts), awaken without worries (facing all matters with equanimity), and eat without craving delicacies (viewing food merely as sustenance for life). Their breath was deep and prolonged, originating from the heels (a sign of profound foundational cultivation), whereas ordinary people's shallow breathing barely reached their throats. Those who grovel before others speak as if their throats are obstructed (their Qi flow is impeded); the heavier one's desires, the shallower their innate spiritual wisdom becomes (only by returning to the source and attaining ultimate stillness can one recover original purity).

Genuine cultivators neither cling to life nor loathe death (merging completely with nature's transformations). They neither rejoice excessively at birth nor resist the coming of death (accepting all with serenity). They come and go freely (moving without obstruction by aligning with the Dao's rhythms), neither obsessing over life's origins nor forcing predetermined outcomes (viewing all life changes as natural processes). They joyfully accept what comes (adapting calmly to all circumstances) and let go of what should be forgotten (this forgetting occurs spontaneously, not through forced effort).

This is called "not disturbing the Dao with human artifice, not opposing Heaven's mandate through human striving"—such is the mark of one who has truly attained the Way (human nature is originally tranquil; desires arise from external influences. Indulging unchecked desires leads to the loss of innate nature). Such individuals maintain inner stability (remaining peaceful in all situations), outer composure (acting without losing inner stillness), and countenances as simple as uncarved wood (preserving primal authenticity), their presence as clear and crisp as autumn's clarity.

(殺物非/為威也)煖然似春(生物非/為仁也)喜怒通四時(夫體道合變者/與寒暑同其温) (嚴而未嘗有心也然有温嚴之/貌生殺之節故寄名於喜怒)與物有宜而莫知其極 (無心於物故不奪物宜/無物不宜故莫知其極)故聖人之用兵也亡國而不失 人心利澤施乎萬世不為愛人(因人心之所欲亡而亡/之故不失人心也夫白) (日登天六合俱照非愛人而照之也故聖人之在天下/煖焉若陽春之自和故澤者不謝凄乎若秋霜之自降) (故彫落/者不怨)故樂通物非聖人也(夫聖人無樂也直/莫之塞而物自通)有親非 仁也(至仁無親任/理而自存)天時非賢也(時之者未若忘時/而自合之賢也)利害 不通非君子也(不能一是非之塗而就利/違害則傷徳而累當矣)行名失己非 士也(善為士者遺名而自得故/名當其實而福應其身)亡身不真非役人也(自/失) (其性而矯以從物受/役多矣安能役人)若狐不偕務光伯夷叔齊箕子胥 餘紀他申徒狄是役人之役適人之適而不自適其適 者也(斯皆舍己殉人殉彼傷我也○狐不偕古賢人也/務光黄帝時人耳長七寸箕子胥餘胥餘箕子名) (也見尸子箕子胥餘漆身為厲被髮⬤狂或云尸子云/比干也胥餘其名他徒何反申徒狄殷時人負石自沉)
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi elucidates the state of those who "embody the Dao" (tidaozhe) achieving perfect harmony with natural laws. The truly enlightened move with the effortless rhythm of the four seasons: their spring-like warmth isn't contrived benevolence, nor is their autumn-like austerity deliberate severity—their joys and sorrows flow as naturally as seasonal transitions.

The sage (referring to one who has attained the highest realization of Dao) may wage wars that dissolve nations yet never forfeit the people's trust; their blessings extend across generations without conscious effort to "love humanity." Like sunlight that nourishes all things without intention, or autumn frost that withers plants without incurring resentment, all unfolds through the spontaneous working of cosmic principles.

Genuine sages neither strain to commune with creation (for such unity is innate), nor proclaim their compassion (as supreme benevolence transcends distinctions), nor grasp at opportune moments (having merged with celestial timing). Those still troubled by gain and loss cannot be true noblemen; those chasing empty reputation at the cost of their essence forfeit authentic scholarship; those who abandon intrinsic nature to accommodate external things ultimately become enslaved by them.

The text cites historical figures like Huxie, Wuguang, Boyi, and Shuqi (renowned ancient recluses or worthies) as examples of those who lived by others' standards, sacrificing their innate nature to conform—thus losing true autonomy. Wuguang, a hermit from the Yellow Emperor's era, and Jizi Xuyu (a virtuous Shang dynasty minister) even lacquered their bodies, disfigured themselves, and feigned madness to escape societal demands—all violations of natural authenticity.

(於/河)古之真人其狀義而不朋(與物同宜/而非朋黨)若不足而不承 (浄虛無餘如若不足也下之而無不止/若不足而不承也○承迎也又音拯)與乎其觚而不 堅也(常逰於獨/而非固守)張乎其虛而不華也(矌然無懷/乃至於實)邴邴乎 其似喜乎(至人無喜暢然/和適故似喜也)崔乎其不得已乎(動靜行止/常居必然) (之/極)滀乎進我色也(不以物/傷己也)與乎止我徳也(無所/趨也)厲乎其 似世乎(至人無厲與世同行故若厲也/○厲本作廣云苞羅者廣也)謷乎其未可制 也(豪放而自得/○謷志逺貌)連乎其似好閉也(綿邈深逺/莫見其門)悗乎忘其 言也(不識不知而天機/自發故悗然也)以刑為體(刑者治之/體非我為)以禮為翼 (禮者世之所以/自行耳非我制)以知為時(知者時之/動非我唱)以徳為循(徳者自/彼所循) (非我/作)以刑為體者綽乎其殺也(任治之自殺/故雖殺而寛)以禮為翼 者所以行於世也(順世之所行/故無不行)以知為時者不得已於 事也(夫髙下相受不可逆之流也小大相羣不得已之/勢也曠然無情羣知之府也承百流之㑹居師人) (之極者奚為哉任時世之知/委必然之事付之天下而已)以徳為循者言其與有足
Interpretation

Those who attained the true Dao in ancient times (zhenren, "Perfected Persons") embodied this state of being: They harmonized with all things without forming factions (aligned with all yet not partisan), appearing seemingly deficient yet never deliberately currying favor with others (serenely empty and unburdened as if lacking, yielding to all without exception - appearing insufficient yet never ingratiating).

They maintained distinctive edges yet remained unyielding (constantly wandering in solitude without rigid adherence), expansive in mind yet free from ostentation (vast and unburdened, thus attaining genuineness). Their countenance radiated joy as if delighted (the perfected person knows no forced joy - naturally harmonious thus resembling happiness), while their movements seemed compelled by necessity alone (in motion or stillness, always abiding in inevitability).

Their gentle demeanor stemmed from an inner self unharmed by external matters (never allowing things to wound their core), their virtuous power (De) arising through non-striving (having nothing to pursue). Though appearing to conform with worldly ways (the perfected person knows no harshness, moving with the world thus seeming strict), they remained magnificently unrestrained and impossible to constrain (heroically unfettered in spontaneous attainment - soaring freely beyond confines). Seemingly withdrawn and inaccessible (remote and profound with no visible gateway), they actually embodied wordless wholeness (unknowing and unlearned yet celestial mechanisms arise spontaneously - thus appearing forgetful).

They regarded penal law as governance's foundation (punishment constitutes order's structure - not my personal making), ritual as society's self-regulating tool (rites represent how the world operates itself - not my contrivance), wisdom as timing's activation (knowledge responds to circumstance's movement - not my initiative), and virtue (De) as conduct's natural course (virtue follows what emerges from others). Specifically: Those taking punishment as foundation, though administering penalties, did so with leniency (entrusting order to self-correction - thus executing justice with mercy); those using ritual as supplement could follow worldly conventions (accommodating society's ways - thus encountering no obstruction); those applying wisdom to timing handled affairs only when compelled (as high and low mutually receive in irreversible flow, as great and small naturally cluster through inevitable tendency - vast and impartial as the repository of collective knowledge, receiving all currents' convergence while abiding as people's guide); those guided by virtue (De) moved like those with feet walking naturally (text fragmentary - conveying spontaneous accord with natural patterns).

者至於丘也(丘者所以本也以性言之則性之本也夫/物各有足足於本也付羣徳之自循斯與) (有足者至於本也/本至而理盡矣)而人真以為勤行者也(凡此皆自彼/而成成之不) (在已則雖處萬機之極而常閒暇自適忽然不覺事之/經身悗然不識言之在口而人之大迷真可為勤行者) (也/)故其好之也一其弗好之也一(常無心而順彼故好/與不好所善所惡與) (彼無/二也)其一也一其不一也一(其一也天徒也其不一也/人徒也夫真人同天人拘) (彼我不以其/一異乎不一)其一與天為徒(無有而不/一者天也)其不一與人為 徒(彼彼而我/我者人也)天與人不相勝也是之謂真人(夫真人同/天人齊萬) (致萬致不相非天人不相勝故曠然/無不一㝠然無不在而𤣥同彼我也)死生命也其有夜 旦之常天也(其有晝夜之常天之道也故知死生者/命之極非妄然也若夜旦耳奚所係哉)人 之有所不得與皆物之情也(夫真人在晝得晝在夜得/夜以死生為晝夜豈有所) (不得乎人之有所不得而憂/娯在懷皆物情耳非理也)彼特以天為父而身猶愛 之而況其卓乎(卓者獨化之謂也夫相因之功莫若獨/化之至也故人之所因者天也天之所)
Interpretation

This passage describes the state of being and worldly attitude of Daoist practitioners (zhenren, or "true persons"). It first points out that "qiu" (mound) symbolizes the root—just as all things possess their inherent nature, by following their spontaneous development, one can return to the original authentic state. People often assume that cultivating the Dao requires deliberate effort, yet genuine practitioners maintain inner tranquility and ease even while handling countless affairs. They don't even perceive themselves as acting, nor do they consciously ponder their words when speaking. This state of natural harmony represents true mastery.

The Daoist practitioner maintains equanimity toward external things, whether favorable or unfavorable (wuxin er shun wu, "without deliberate mind yet following things"). They neither forcibly seek conformity nor insist on difference. The aspect aligned with heavenly Dao is called "tian tu" (disciple of nature—one's innate nature), while the aspect engaging with worldly society is called "ren tu" (disciple of humanity—social attributes). A genuine realized person (zhenren) harmoniously embraces both states, allowing heavenly Dao and human affairs to coexist without suppressing one another.

Life and death are as natural as the alternation of day and night (tian zhi dao, "the Way of Heaven"). Understanding this eliminates attachment. Ordinary people often fret over unchangeable matters, which reflects being bound by external things. Daoist practitioners revere heavenly Dao as a father—how much more should they cherish the sublime state of "du hua" ("solitary transformation," referring to the mysterious self-generating and self-transforming nature of all things)? This realm, which operates spontaneously without reliance on external causes, is truly the most worthy pursuit.

(生者獨化也人皆以天為父故晝夜之變寒暑之節猶/不敢惡隨天安之況乎卓爾獨化至於𤣥𡨕之竟又安) (得而不任之哉既任之則/死生變化唯命之從也)人特以有君為愈乎已而身 猶死之而況其真乎(夫真者不假於物而自然也夫自/然之不可避豈直君命而己哉) 泉涸魚相與處於陸相呴以濕相濡以沫不如相忘於 江湖(與其不足而相愛/豈若有餘而相忘)而其譽堯而非桀也不如兩忘 而化其道(夫非譽皆生於不足故至足者忘善惡遺死/生與變化為一曠然無不適矣又安知堯桀) (之所/在邪)夫大塊載我以形勞我以生佚我以老息我以死 (夫形生老死皆我也故形為我載生為我勞老為我佚/死為我息四者雖變未始非我我奚惜哉○塊苦怪反) (又苦對反徐胡/罪反佚音逸)故善吾生者乃所以善吾死也(死與生/皆命也) (無善則己有善則生不獨善也故/若以吾生為善乎則吾死亦善也)夫藏舟於壑藏山於 澤謂之固矣(方言生死變化之不可逃故先舉固逃之/極然然後明之以必變之符將任化而無) (係/也)然而夜半有力者負之而走昧者不知也(夫無力之/力莫大於) (變化者也故乃掲天地以趍新負山岳以舍故故不暫/停忽已涉新則天地萬物無時而不移也世皆新矣而)
Interpretation

This passage is Guo Xiang's commentary on the Zhuangzi, primarily discussing the relationship between the transformations of life and death and the natural Dao (the Way).

Humans always regard Heaven as their father, so they obediently accept natural rhythms like the alternation of day and night and the cycle of seasons—how much more should they submit to the profound and independent workings of the mysterious creative force? Since we accept these natural patterns, the changes of life and death must also be left to fate. People believe that having a ruler is better than having none, yet even rulers cannot escape death—how much less can they defy the eternal Dao itself? The true Dao does not rely on external things; it operates spontaneously. The laws of nature are inescapable—is this not true not only of a ruler’s commands?

Consider fish stranded on dry land when the spring runs dry, gasping to moisten each other with their foam—moving as it may seem, it is far inferior to swimming freely in rivers and lakes, forgetting one another. Rather than clinging to one another in hardship, it is better to wander in contentment, each at ease. People praise Yao and Shun while condemning Jie and Zhou, but it would be better to forget such judgments of right and wrong and merge with the great Dao. All distinctions arise from the limitations of human understanding; the truly enlightened transcend good and evil, see through life and death, and move with transformation, free and unbound—why would they care about the difference between Yao and Jie?

The great cosmos (the "Great Clod") bestows upon me a form, burdening me with the toil of life, the leisure of old age, and finally the rest of death. My body, my life, my aging, and my death are all part of me—thus, my body is my vessel, my life is my labor, my old age is my ease, and my death is my repose. Though these four states transform, they are all me—why cling to any of them? Therefore, one who cherishes life can also face death with equanimity, for both are ordained by fate.

Hiding a boat in a valley or concealing a mountain in a lake may seem secure. Yet this shows that the changes of life and death are like these hidden things—inescapable, for what appears stable is always shifting. Then, in the depth of night, a great force (the power of creation) carries them all away, and the ignorant remain unaware. This transformative force is the most powerful in the world—it drives the ceaseless renewal of heaven and earth, shifting mountains and rivers. All things migrate and transform at every moment, and the world is forever new.

(日以為故舟日易矣而視之若舊山日更矣而視之若/前今交一臂而失之皆在㝠中去矣故向者之我非復) (今我也我與今俱往豈常守故哉而世莫/之覺遂謂今之所遇可係而在豈不昧哉)藏小大有宜 猶有所遯(不知與化為體而思藏之使不化則雖至深/至固各得其所宜而無以禁其日變也故夫) (藏而有之者不能止其遯也/無藏而任化者變不能變也)若夫藏天下於天下而不 得所遯是恒物之大情也(無所藏而都任之則與物無/不㝠與化無不一故無外無) (内無死無生體天地而合變化索所遯而/不得矣此乃常存之大情非一曲之小意)特犯人之形 而猶喜之若人之形者萬化而未始有極也(人形乃是/萬化之一) (遇耳未可喜也無極之中所遇者皆若人耳豈/特人形可喜而餘物無樂邪○樂音洛下同)其為樂 可勝計邪(本非人而化為人化為人失於故矣失故而/喜喜所遇也變化無窮何所不遇所遇而樂) (樂豈有/極乎)故聖人將逰於物之所不得遯而皆存(夫聖人/逰於變) (化之途放於日新之流萬物萬化亦與之萬化化者無/極亦與之無極誰得遯之哉夫於生為亡而於死為存) (於死為存則何/時而非存哉)善天善老善始善終人猶效之(此自均/於百年)
Interpretation

The sun is new each day, yet to our eyes it appears unchanged; the mountains transform daily, but we perceive them as constant. Like two strangers passing in the street, vanishing instantly into the vast cosmos—the "me" of yesterday is no longer today's "me," as both myself and the present moment flow ceaselessly onward. What in this world remains eternally unchanged? Yet people cling to the illusion that what lies before them can be preserved forever—is this not sheer delusion?

Humans hoard treasures, believing possession grants permanence. But no vault, however hidden or secure, can halt the daily transformations of all things. True wisdom lies in returning all things under heaven to heaven itself—like a drop of water merging with the ocean, where it can never be lost. When you relinquish attachment to ownership, you merge with the cosmic flux, attaining a state beyond life and death, without inside or outside.

By chance acquiring human form, one preens with pride, forgetting that in the endless transformations of existence, this shape is but one among millions. If becoming human brings joy, why not rejoice equally when becoming other forms? Where does true happiness find its limit? Thus, those who attain the Dao (the Way) flow with all transformations, seeing rebirth where things seem to perish, eternity within mortality. Like heaven and earth, they honor aging and the cycles of life and death. This is why all people emulate them.

(之内不善少而否老未能體變化齊/死生也然其平粹猶足以師人也)又况萬物之所係 而一化之所待乎(此𤣥同萬物而與化為體故其/為天下之所宗也不亦宜乎)夫道 有情有信無為無形(有無情之情故無為也/有常無之信故無形也)可傳而不 可受(古今傳而宅之/莫能受而有之)可得而不可見(咸得自容而/莫見其狀)自本 自根未有天地自古以固存(明無不待/有而無也)神鬼神帝生天 生地(無也豈能生神哉不神鬼帝而鬼帝自神斯乃不/神之神也不生天地而天地自生斯乃不生之生) (也故夫神之果不足以神而不神/則神矣功何足有事何足恃哉)在太極之先而不為 髙在六極之下而不為深先天地生而不為久長於上 古而不老(言道之無所不在也故在髙為無髙在深為/無深在久為無久在老為無老無所不在而) (所在皆無也且上下無不格者不得以髙卑稱也内外/無不至者不得以表裏名也與化俱移者不得言久也) (終始常無者/不可謂老也)豨韋氏得之以挈天地伏戲得之以襲氣 母維斗得之終古不忒日月得之終古不息堪坏得之 以襲崐崘馮夷得之以逰大川肩吾得之以處太山黄 帝得之以登雲天顓頊得之以處𤣥宫禺強得之立乎 北極西王母得之坐乎少廣莫知其始莫知其終彭祖
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the essential characteristics of the Dao (the Way) and its supreme position in the cosmos. It begins by noting that while ordinary people may not fully comprehend the mysteries of life and death, their peaceful and pure state of mind already serves as an example for others—how much more so the Dao that sustains all things and governs all transformations?

The Dao possesses a real existence yet is formless and without shape (it has feeling and truth yet does nothing and has no form). It can be transmitted but cannot be possessed (can be passed on but not received), can be realized but cannot be seen (can be attained but not perceived). The Dao is its own foundation, existing eternally even before heaven and earth came into being (self-rooted and self-originated, it has existed since ancient times). It does not directly create ghosts, deities, or heaven and earth, but rather allows them to manifest and function naturally (the phrase "makes ghosts and deities divine and gives birth to heaven and earth" means it enables their natural operation).

The Dao transcends concepts of space and time: it is not considered high above the Taiji (Supreme Ultimate, the cosmic origin), nor deep below the six directions (the four cardinal directions plus up and down); its existence prior to heaven and earth is not considered long, nor is its antiquity predating high antiquity considered old. This is because the Dao is omnipresent and thus cannot be measured by conventional standards of time and space.

The text lists the achievements of ancient Dao-realized beings: the Sovereign Xiwei mastered the heavenly Dao to govern heaven and earth, Fuxi (the cultural progenitor) harmonized primordial Qi (vital energy), the Northern Dipper stars revolve eternally, and the sun and moon never cease their motion. The mountain deity Kanhuai guards Mount Kunlun, the river god Fengyi roams the rivers, the mountain spirit Jianwu dwells on Mount Tai, the Yellow Emperor ascended to heaven riding a dragon, Zhuanxu (one of the Five Emperors) resides in the Mysterious Palace, the sea god Yuqiang stands at the North Pole, and the Queen Mother of the West (foremost of female immortals) abides at Mount Shaoguang. These Dao-realized beings all transcended the limitations of time and space (none know their beginnings or endings), just as the eight-hundred-year-old Pengzu surpassed ordinary human lifespan.

得之上及有虞下及五霸傅說得之相武丁奄有天下 乗東維騎箕尾而比於列星(道無能也此言得之於道/乃所以明其自得耳自得) (耳道不能使之得也我之未得又不能為得也然則凡/得之者外不資於道内不由於己掘然自得而獨化也) (夫生之難也猶獨化而自得之矣既得其生又何患於/生之不得而為之哉故為生果不足以全生以其生之) (不由於己為也而為之則傷其真生也○狶韋氏上古/帝王名挈要也得天地要也襲入也氣母元氣之母也) (維斗北斗所以為天之綱維終古終古久也鄭𤣥注周/禮云終古猶言常也堪坏神名人面獸形淮南作欽負) (崐崘山名馮夷清冷𫝊曰華陰僮鄉隄伯人也服八石/得水仙是為河伯一云以八月庚子浴於河而溺死一) (云渡河溺死大川河也肩吾山神不死黄帝得道而上/天也顓音專頊許玉反顓頊帝髙陽氏𤣥宮北方宫也) (月令曰其帝𩔖頊人面鳥身珥兩青蛇踐兩赤蛇名禺/強崔云大荒經曰北海之神名曰禺強靈龜為之使歸) (藏曰昔穆王子筮卦於禺強案海外經云北方禺強黒/身手足乘兩龍郭璞以為水神人面鳥身簡文云北海) (神也一名禺京是黄帝之孫也西王母山海經云狀如/人狗尾逢頭戴勝善哨居洵水之涯漢武内傳云西王)
Interpretation

This passage recounts the deeds of ancient Daoist adepts and the cultivation state of "spontaneous attainment" (zide) in Daoist practice.

Legend tells us that from the sage-kings of high antiquity like Emperor Shun to the Spring and Autumn period's Five Hegemons, virtuous ministers like Fu Yue attained the Dao (the Way) and thus could assist rulers like King Wuding in governing the realm. After death, their spirits ascended to heaven, transforming into stars—for example, the star Fu Yue is located between the constellations Ji and Wei in the eastern celestial region.

Daoism teaches that true "attainment of the Dao" is not achieved through forced effort. The Dao itself does not grant attainment, nor can one deliberately seek it. True adepts awaken to the Dao spontaneously, just as all things grow naturally. Life itself is a rare marvel of creation; having received it, one should not strive for what cannot be attained by force. Deliberate pursuit only harms the innate authenticity of life.

The text lists numerous mythical figures: Xiwei, an ancient ruler who grasped the essential principles of heaven and earth; Fengyi (the River Earl), a Yellow River deity said to have achieved immortality by ingesting eight minerals—though another legend claims he drowned while bathing in the Yellow River on the eighth day of the eighth month; Jianwu, a mountain spirit; the Yellow Emperor, who ascended to heaven after attaining the Dao; Zhuanxu (Gaoyang), the Northern Heavenly Emperor, depicted with a human face, bird body, green snakes hanging from his ears, and red snakes beneath his feet; Yuqiang, god of the North Sea, keeper of the sacred tortoise and said to be the Yellow Emperor’s grandson; and the Queen Mother of the West, described in the Classic of Mountains and Seas as having a human form with a dog’s tail, disheveled hair adorned with jade ornaments, skilled in long whistling, and dwelling by the Xun River.

These mythical figures embody the Daoist principle of "spontaneous attainment of the Dao." Whether mastering natural laws or communing with the primal Qi (vital energy) of heaven and earth, they exemplify the ideal of "self-transformation and spontaneous realization."

(母與上元夫人降帝美容貌神仙人也少廣山名或西/方空界之名彭祖解見逍遥篇夀七百歲或以為仙不) (死武丁至列星𫝊說殷相也武丁殷王髙宗也東維箕/斗之間天漢津之東維也星經曰一星在尾上言其乘) (東維騎箕尾之間也𫝊說死其精神乘/東維託龍角乃列宿今尾上有𫝊說星)南伯子葵問乎 女偊曰子之年長矣而色若孺子何也曰吾聞道矣(聞/道) (則任其自生故氣色全也○葵當作/綦聲之誤也偊音禹一云是婦人也)南伯子葵曰道可 得學邪曰惡惡可子非其人也夫卜梁倚有聖人之才 而無聖人之道我有聖人之道而無聖人之才吾欲以 教之庶幾其果為聖人乎不然以聖人之道吿聖人之 才亦易矣吾猶守而告之參日而後能外天下(外猶/遺也)已 外天下矣吾又守之七日而後外物(物者朝夕所/須切已難忘)已外 物矣吾又守之九日而後能外生(都遺/也)已外生矣而後 能朝徹(遺生則不惡死不惡死故所遇即/安豁然無滯見幾而作斯朝徹也)朝徹而後能 見獨(當所遇而安之忘先後/之所接斯見獨者也)見獨而後能無古今(與獨/俱往) 無古今而後能入於不死不生(夫係生故有死惡死故/有生是以無係無惡然) (後能無/死無生)殺生者不死生生者不生其為物無不將也(任/其)
Interpretation

This passage records a dialogue between Nanbo Zikui and the female Daoist adept Nü Yu regarding spiritual cultivation. Though advanced in years, Nü Yu maintained a childlike complexion, which Nanbo Zikui inquired about. Nü Yu revealed this was due to her realization of the Dao.

Nü Yu explained that the Dao cannot be attained casually. She illustrated this with an example: There was a man named Bu Liangyi who possessed the innate talent of a sage (shengren zhi cai) but lacked the cultivation methods of a sage (shengren zhi dao), while her own situation was precisely the opposite. She attempted to instruct Bu Liangyi, hoping perhaps to nurture a genuine sage.

Nü Yu then detailed the cultivation process: First, one must relinquish worldly attachments (wai tianxia), requiring three days; next, abandon material desires (wai wu), taking seven days; then transcend attachments to life and death (wai sheng), requiring nine days. Upon reaching this state, one achieves "dawn illumination" (zhao che)—a sudden spiritual awakening—followed by "perceiving the Absolute" (jian du), comprehending ultimate truth. This leads to transcending temporal concepts (wu gujin) and ultimately entering the eternal realm beyond life and death.

The text mentions "Shaoguang," possibly referring to a western immortal mountain or realm of emptiness; "Pengzu," the legendary sage said to have lived seven hundred years; and "Fu Yue," the virtuous minister of King Wuding of Shang who supposedly transformed into a star between the constellations Ji and Wei in the eastern celestial region after death. These allusions serve as metaphors for the transcendent state of Dao-realized beings.

(自將故/無不將)無不迎也(任其自迎/故無不迎)無不毁也(任其自毁/故無不毁)無不 成也(任其自成/故無不成)其名為攖寧(夫與物㝠者物縈亦/縈而未始不寧也)攖寧 也者攖而後成者也(物縈而獨不縈則敗矣故/縈而任之則莫不曲成矣)南伯子 葵曰子獨惡乎聞之曰聞諸副墨之子副墨之子聞諸 洛誦之孫洛誦之孫聞之瞻明瞻明聞之聶許聶許聞 之需役需役聞之於謳於謳聞之𤣥㝠(𤣥㝠者所以名/無而非無○副) (墨可以副二𤣥墨也此以下姓名或寓之耳無其人洛/誦誦通也苞洛無所不通也瞻明神明洞徹也聶許許) (與也攝而保之無所施與也需役懦弱為役也需待也/役亭毒也於音烏謳煦也欲化之貌𤣥㝠強名曰𤣥視) (之㝠然所名/無而非無也)𤣥㝠聞之參寥(夫階名以至無者必得無/於名表故雖𤣥㝠猶未極) (而又推寄於參寥亦𤣥之又𤣥/也○參髙也寥曠不可名也)參寥聞之疑始(夫自然/之理有) (積習而成者盖増近以至逺硏粗以至精故乃七重而/後無之名九重而後疑無是始也○疑始又疑無是始) (則始非/無名也)子杞子輿子犂子來四人相與語曰孰能以無 為首以生為脊以死為尻孰知死生存亡之一體者吾 與之友矣四人相視而笑莫逆於心遂相與為友俄而
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist core principle of "following nature's course" (顺其自然). It conveys that if one allows things to develop naturally without forceful interference, then nothing remains unguided (自将), nothing cannot be accommodated (无不迎), nothing remains unresolved (无不毁), and nothing cannot be accomplished (无不成). This state is called "yingning" (撄宁) - maintaining inner peace amidst chaos.

Nanguo Ziqi (a fictional character in Zhuangzi) traces the transmission of truth: he heard it from "Offspring of Secondary Ink" (副墨之子, representing written records), who in turn received it from "Grandchild of Luo's Recitation" (洛诵之孙, representing oral tradition). Through this layered transmission - passing stages like "Zhanming" (瞻明, clear observation), "Niexu" (聂许, silent assent), "Xuyi" (需役, patient waiting), and "Yu'ou" (于讴, chanting) - the teaching ultimately traces back to "Xuanming" (玄冥, the profound and unfathomable Dao). Xuanming originates from "Canliao" (参寥, boundless emptiness), which in turn stems from "Yishi" (疑始, questioning the origin of all things).

The text then recounts a dialogue between four recluses: Ziqi, Ziyu, Zili, and Zilai. They propose that true sages should regard "non-being" (无) as the head (source), "life" (生) as the spine (process), and "death" (死) as the tailbone (destination), understanding that life, death, existence and extinction are fundamentally one. The four men exchange knowing smiles, becoming kindred spirits. This conversation embodies the Daoist transcendent attitude of equating life and death.

子輿有病子把往問之曰偉哉夫造物者將以予為此 拘拘也曲僂發背上有五管頤𨼆於齊肩髙於頂句贅 指天陰陽之氣有沴(沴陵亂也○子把崔云淮南作子/水行年五十四而病傴僂尻苦羔) (反自說病狀也拘拘體拘攣不伸也句俱樹反/指天也句贅項推也其形似贅言其上向也)其心閒 而無事(不以為患/○閒音閑)跰⬤而鑑于井曰嗟乎夫造物者又 將以予為此拘拘也(夫任自然之變者無差也與物嗟/耳○跰步田反下悉田反病不能) (行故跰/⬤也)子把曰女惡之乎曰亡予何惡浸假而化予之 左臂以為雞予因以求時夜浸假而化予之右臂以為 彈予因以求鴞炙浸假而予之尻以為輪以神為馬予 因而乗之豈更駕哉(浸漸也夫體化合變則無/往而不因無因而不可也)且夫得 者時也(當所遇之時/世謂之得)失者順也(時不暫停順往/而去世謂之失)安時而 處順哀樂不能入也此古之所謂懸解也而不能自解 者物有結之(一不能自解則衆物共結之矣故能解則/無所不解則無所而解也○樂音洛縣音) (𤣥解音蟹下同/縣解無所係也)且夫物不勝天久矣吾又何惡焉(天不/能無) (晝夜我安能無/死生而惡之哉)俄而子來有病喘喘然將死其妻子環
Interpretation

Ziyu fell ill, and Zisi (a fictional character created by Zhuangzi) came to visit him. Gazing at his twisted form, Ziyu sighed: "How magnificent is the Creator, to have shaped me into such a contorted figure!" His body was hunched and curled, his spine bent as if folded in half, the acupoints of his five viscera protruding upward, his chin tucked into his navel, shoulders rising above his head, the topknot on his occiput pointing skyward—all manifestations of the disharmony between Yin and Yang Qi.

Yet despite this physical transformation, Ziyu remained serene in mind. Hobbling to a well to observe his reflection, he quipped: "Ah! The Creator is fashioning me into this peculiar shape again!" When Zisi asked if he resented his deformed body, Ziyu replied: "Why should I resent it? If the Creator turned my left arm into a rooster, I'd use it to herald the dawn. Should my right arm become a slingshot, I'd hunt turtledoves to roast. Were my buttocks transformed into wheels and my Shen (spirit) into a steed, I'd ride this carriage—what need would I have for other vehicles?"

Ziyu expounded further: What we call "attainment" is merely timely alignment, what we deem "loss" is simply following transformation. Those who rest content with circumstance and flow with change remain undisturbed by sorrow or joy—this is what the ancients called "suspended liberation" (a state of transcendent freedom). Those who cannot liberate themselves remain bound by external things. Since all beings must follow the patterns of Dao, why should I resent my present form?

Soon afterward, Zilai (another fictional figure) lay critically ill, his family weeping around him. Through Ziyu's parable, this passage illustrates Zhuangzi's philosophy of "resting content in the timing and abiding in the course"—advocating that humans should harmonize with natural transformations, transcend attachment to physical form, and attain spiritual freedom.

而泣之犂往問之曰叱避無怛化(夫死生猶寤寐耳於/理當寐耳於理當寐) (不願人驚之將化而叱無/為怛之也○喘喘川轉反)⬤其户與之語曰偉哉造化 又將奚以汝為將奚以汝適以汝為鼠肝乎以汝為蟲 臂乎子來曰父母於子東西南北唯命之從陰陽於人 不翅於父母(自古或有能違父母之命者未有能違陰/陽之變而距晝夜之節者也○鼠肝委棄) (土壤而已取/㣲滅至賤)彼近吾死而我不聽我則悍矣彼何罪焉 (死生猶晝夜耳未足為逺也時當死亦非所禁而横有/不聽之則適足悍逆於理以⬤其死矣速由於我悍非) (死之罪也彼謂死耳/在生故以死為彼)夫大塊載我以形勞我以生佚我 以老息我以死故善吾生者乃所以善吾死也(理常/俱也)今 大冶鑄金金踴躍曰我且必為鏌鋣大冶必以為不祥 之金今一犯人之形而曰人耳人耳夫造化者必以為 不祥之人(人耳人耳唯願為人也亦猶金之踴躍也皆/知金之不祥而不能任其自化夫變化之道) (靡所不遇今一遇人形豈故為哉生非故為時自生耳/然而有之不亦妄乎○鏌音莫鋣以嗟反鏌鋣劍名) 今一以天地為大鑪以造化為大冶惡乎往而不可哉 (今皆知金之有係為不祥故明已之無異/於金則所係之情可解可解則天地可也)成然寐蘧然
Interpretation

A man named Li went to visit his dying friend. Seeing the family weeping, he scolded them: "Be quiet! Don't disturb his imminent transformation." (Life and death are as natural as sleeping and waking - he deserves peaceful rest now.) Leaning against the doorframe, he said to the dying man: "How magnificent is the Creator! What will He transform you into next? Perhaps a rat's liver or an insect's antenna?"

The dying man replied: "Children must obey their parents, but humans must obey the transformations of Yin-Yang even more." (Since ancient times, some dared disobey their parents, but none can resist nature's cycles of day and night.) "Now death summons me - to resist would be defiance against Heaven's principle. What fault lies in death itself?"

"The earth bears my form, letting me experience life's toil, old age's leisure, until death finally grants me rest. Therefore, one who truly cherishes life must also cherish death." (Life and death share one unified Dao.) "When a blacksmith forges metal, if a piece should leap up crying 'I must become a sword!', the smith would surely deem it ominous. Now we who've chanced upon human form clamor 'We must remain human!' - the Creator would likewise consider us ill-omened creatures." (Just as metal resists the forge, so humans resist natural transformation.)

"Better to regard Heaven and Earth as the furnace and the Creator as the smith - thus whatever transformation comes may be peacefully accepted." Having spoken these words, he passed away as serenely as one awakening from sleep. (Death is but sudden awakening from a dream.)

覺(寐寤自若不/以死生累心)子桑户孟子反子琴張三人相與友曰 孰能相與於無相與相為於無相為(夫體天地㝠而化/者雖手足異任五) (藏殊管未嘗相與而百節同和斯相與於無相與也未/嘗相為而表裏俱濟斯相為於無相為也若乃役其心) (志以恤手足運其股肱以營五藏則相營愈篤而外/内愈困矣故以天下為一體者無愛為於其間也)孰 能登天逰霧撓挑無極(無所不任○撓而小反挑徒堯/反撓挑猶宛轉也宛轉𤣥曠之) (中循環/之名)相忘以生無所終窮(忘其生則無不忘矣故/能隨變任化無所窮竟)三 人相視而笑莫逆於心遂相與友(若然者豈友哉盖寄/明至親而無愛念之) (近情/也)莫然有間而子桑户死未葬孔子聞之使子貢往 待事焉或編曲或鼓琴相和而歌曰嗟來桑户乎嗟來 桑户乎而已反其真而我猶為人猗(人哭亦哭俗内之/迹也齊死生忘哀) (樂臨尸能歌方外之至也○莫然定也/有間有頃也曲蚕箔猗於直反辭也)子貢趨而進曰 敢問臨尸而歌禮乎二人相視而笑曰是惡知禮意(夫/知) (禮意者必逰外以經内守母以存子稱情而直往也若/乃矜乎名聲牽乎形制則孝不以誠慈不任實父子兄) (弟懷情相欺豈/禮之大意哉)子貢反以告孔子曰彼何人者邪修行
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of three enlightened individuals from Zhuangzi's writings. Zisang Hu, Mengzi Fan, and Ziqin Zhang—three close friends—were engaged in discussion: Who could achieve the state of seeming disconnection yet spiritual communion, appearing inactive yet naturally accomplishing (referring to aligning with the Dao without deliberate effort). They realized that those truly united with heaven and earth function like the natural coordination of the body's parts, achieving inner and outer harmony without forced cultivation.

The three exchanged knowing smiles, their hearts in perfect accord as they formed a profound friendship (one that transcended the constraints of worldly emotions). Later, when Zisang Hu passed away before his burial, Confucius sent Zigong to assist with funeral arrangements. Zigong witnessed the other two composing music and playing the qin, singing to the corpse: "Ah, Zisang Hu, you have returned to your original truth, while we still wander in the human realm." (This demonstrates a perspective that transcends conventional views of life and death.)

Zigong stepped forward to challenge them: "Is singing to a corpse in accordance with ritual propriety?" The two exchanged smiles and countered: "How could you understand the true meaning of ritual?" (They believed genuine ritual arises from one's essential nature, unconstrained by formalities.) When Zigong reported this to Confucius, the sage sighed: "These men have already transcended worldly conventions, wandering freely with the Creator." (Meaning they had attained unity with the Dao.)

Through this contrast between worldly rituals and the transcendent attitude of the enlightened, the passage illustrates Zhuangzi's philosophical concepts of "equating life and death" and "forgetting sorrow and joy." Those who embody the Dao see through the nature of existence, thus rising above the conventional forms of grief and celebration.

無有而外其形骸臨尸而歌顔色不變無以命之彼何 人者邪孔子曰彼逰方之外者也而丘逰方之内者也 (夫理有至極外内相𡨕未有極逰外之致而不𡨕於内/者也未有能㝠於内而不遊於外者也故聖人常逰外) (以私内無心以順有故雖終日揮形而神氣無變俯仰/萬機而淡然自若夫見形而不及神者天下之常累也) (是故觀其與羣物並行則莫能謂之遺物而離人矣觀/其體化而應務則莫能謂之坐忘而自得矣豈直謂聖) (人不然哉乃必謂至理之無此是故莊子將明流統之/所宗以釋天下之可悟若直就稱仲尼之如此或者将) (據所見以排之故超聖人之内迹而寄方外於數子宜/忘其所寄以尋述作之大意則夫逰外私内之道坦然) (自明而莊子之書故是涉俗盖/世之談矣無以命之命名也)外内不相及而丘使女 往弔之丘則陋矣(夫弔者方内之近事也/施之於方外則陋矣)彼方且與造 物者為人而逰乎天地之一氣(皆𡨕之/故無二)彼以生為附贅 縣疣(若疣之自縣贅之自附此氣之時/聚非所樂也○縣音𤣥疣音尤)以死為決⬤潰 癰(若⬤之自決癰之自潰此氣之自散/非所惜也○⬤胡虬反潰胡對反)夫若然者又惡 知死生先後之所在(死生代謝未始有極與之俱往則/無往不可故不知勝負之所在也)
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi uses the contrast between Confucius and the transcendental recluse to illustrate two distinct realms of human existence. The recluse (one who transcends worldly conventions) sings unperturbed before a corpse, having already surpassed the constraints of physical form. Confucius acknowledges himself as "one who wanders within boundaries" (adhering to societal norms), while the recluse is "one who wanders beyond boundaries."

The true sage harmonizes both inner and outer dimensions: outwardly engaging with worldly affairs (wandering without), while maintaining inner transcendence (unfathomable within). Though handling daily matters, their spirit remains unaffected. To observe only the sage's external conduct while neglecting their inner realm invites misunderstanding.

Zhuangzi employs this parable to reveal: life and death are like tumors naturally falling away or abscesses spontaneously bursting—mere transformations of Qi's (vital energy) condensation and dispersion. Those who attain the Dao (the Way) cling not to life or death's sequence, understanding the endless cycle where neither holds primacy. Roaming with transformation, they remain unbound by any circumstance.

Confucius sending disciples to offer condolences proves inappropriate, for mourning rites belong to worldly convention. The recluse, having befriended the Creator, soars amidst the primordial Qi (vital energy) of heaven and earth. They regard life as an superfluous wen and death as an abscess's rupture—indifferent to which comes first in the ceaseless dance of existence.

假於異物託於同體(假因也今死生聚散變化無方皆/異物也無異而不假故所假雖異) (而共成/一體也)忘其肝膽遺其耳目(任之於理/而𡨕往也)反覆終始不知 端倪(五藏猶忘何物足識哉未始有識故能放身於變/化之塗𤣥同於反覆之波而不知終始之所極也) 芒然彷徨乎塵垢之外逍遥乎無為之業(所謂無為之/業非拱黙而) (已所謂塵垢之外/非伏於山林也)彼又惡能憒憒然為世俗之禮以觀 衆人之耳目哉(其所以觀示於衆人者皆其/塵垢耳非方外之㝠物也)子貢曰然 則夫子何方之依(子貢不聞性與天道故見其所依而/不見其所以依也夫所以依者不依) (也世豈/覺之哉)曰丘天之戮民也(以方内為桎梏明所貴在方/外也夫逰外者依内離人者) (合俗故有天下者無以天下為也是以遺物而後能入/羣坐忘而後能應務愈遺之愈得之茍居斯極則雖欲) (釋之而理固自來斯乃/天人之所不赦者也)雖然吾與汝共之(雖為世所桎/梏但為與汝) (共之耳明已/但自在外也)子貢曰敢問其方(問所以逰外/而共内之意)孔子曰魚 相造乎水人相造乎道相造乎水者穿池而養給相造 乎道者無事而生定(所造雖異其於由無事以得事自/方外以共内然後養給而生定則)
Interpretation

This passage records a dialogue between Zhuangzi and his disciple Zigong concerning the realm of life, focusing on the transcendent state of carefree wandering beyond worldly constraints.

Zhuangzi begins with a metaphor: The cycle of life and death, gathering and parting, is like different things borrowing a single body (假于异物托于同体). Those who truly comprehend the Dao forget the existence of their internal organs (忘其肝胆), let go of sensory perceptions (遗其耳目), and move freely through the cycles of life and death without knowing their beginning or end (反复终始不知端倪). Such a state is like wandering in oblivion beyond the dust and grime of the world (芒然彷徨乎尘垢之外), roaming carefree in the realm of Wuwei (non-action) (逍遥乎无为之业). Here, "Wuwei" does not mean doing nothing, but rather following the natural flow; "beyond the dust and grime" does not imply retreating into the mountains, but rather a spiritual transcendence.

Zigong, unable to grasp this, asks Confucius what principles one should follow (何方之依). Confucius self-deprecatingly calls himself "one punished by Heaven" (天之戮民), for he understands that worldly rituals and norms are like shackles. True carefreeness requires both transcending the mundane (游外) and remaining engaged with reality (依内). The more one lets go of external things (遗物), the more one integrates with others; the more one forgets the self (坐忘), the better one navigates worldly affairs.

Finally, the metaphor of fish and water illustrates: Fish need water to survive, just as humans need the Dao to find peace. Yet those who seek the Dao need not strive deliberately—by simply following nature (无事而生定), they can maintain transcendence within the secular world (由无事以得事,自方外以共内). This embodies Zhuangzi's philosophy of "external transformation with internal non-transformation"—outwardly adapting to customs while inwardly preserving carefreeness.

(莫不皆然也俱不自/知耳故成無為也)故曰魚相忘乎江湖人相忘乎道 術(各自足而相忘者天下莫不/然也至人常足故常忘也)子貢曰敢問畸人(問向/之所) (謂方外而不耦於/俗者又安在也)曰畸人者畸於人而侔於天(夫與内/㝠者逰) (於外也獨能逰小以𡨕内任萬物之自然使天/性各足而帝王道成斯乃畸於人而侔於天也)故曰天 之小人人之君子人之君子天之小人也(以自然言之/則人無小大) (以人理言之則侔於/天者可謂君子矣)顔回問仲尼曰孟孫才其母死哭 泣無涕中心不慼居喪不哀無是三者以善喪盖魯國 固有無其實而得其名者乎回一怪之(魯國觀其禮而/顔回察其心○) (孟孫才三桓/後才其名也)仲尼曰夫孟孫氏盡之矣進於知矣(盡死/生之) (理應内外之宜者動而/以天行非知之匹也)唯簡之而不得(簡擇死生而不/得其異若春秋) (冬夏四/時行耳)夫已有所簡矣孟孫氏不知所以生不知所以 死(已簡而不得故無不安無不安故/不以生死槩意而付之自化也)不知就先不知就 後(所遇/而安)若化為物(不違/化也)以待其所不知之化已乎(死生/宛轉) (與化為一猶乃忘其所知於當/今豈待所未知而豫憂者哉)且方將化惡知不化哉
Interpretation

Fish swim freely in vast rivers and lakes, needing no deliberate remembrance of one another; people who dwell in the realm of the Dao (the Way) likewise naturally forget worldly calculations. (Here, "rivers and lakes" symbolize a state of natural freedom, while "Dao techniques" refer to the methods and realms of cultivation.)

Zigong (a disciple of Confucius) once asked: "May I ask what is meant by a 'transcendent person' (someone who rises above worldly norms)?" The reply came: A transcendent person is one who differs from ordinary people yet aligns with the heavenly Dao. Such a person inwardly communes with the profound mysteries of the Dao (inner illumination) and outwardly harmonizes with the natural flow of all things, allowing their innate nature to fully manifest, thereby attaining the supreme state of an enlightened ruler. ("Equal to heaven" refers to alignment with the Dao, while "inner illumination" signifies an abstruse inner realm.)

Thus, it is said: What the Dao deems petty, the human world may regard as noble; what people call noble, the Dao may see as petty. (This reveals the divergence between the natural Dao and human moral standards.)

Yan Hui (another disciple of Confucius) once asked Confucius: "When Mengsun Cai (a noble of Lu) lost his mother, he wept without tears, felt no sorrow in his heart, and observed mourning without grief. These three behaviors violate ritual propriety, yet he is renowned for his exemplary mourning. Could it be that Lu has such hypocrites?" ("The Three Huan" refers to the three powerful noble families of Lu.) Confucius replied: "Mengsun has actually reached the highest state. He has transcended ordinary understanding, viewing life and death as the natural cycle of spring and autumn. Though he may seem to distinguish between life and death, he knows they are ultimately inseparable. He neither clings to life nor fears death, accepting things as they come, like all things that transform naturally." ("Self-transformation" refers to the spontaneous unfolding of existence.)

He has already merged with the Creator (the force of transformation), having even forgotten his own knowledge—how could he then worry about unknown changes? Moreover, since transformation is already underway, how can one be certain of what remains unchanging? (This passage, through the story of mourning rites, illustrates Zhuangzi’s philosophy of "accepting the moment and following the flow" regarding life and death.)

方將不化惡知己化哉(已化而生焉知未生之時哉未/化而死焉知己死之後哉故無) (所避就而與/化俱往也)吾特與汝其夢未始覺者邪(夫死生猶覺/夢耳今夢自) (以為覺則無以明覺之非夢也茍無以明覺之非夢則/亦無以明生之非死矣死生覺夢未知所在當其所遇) (無不自得何為/在此而憂彼哉)且彼有駭形而無損心(以變化為形之/駭動耳故不以) (死生損/累其心)有旦宅而無情死(以形骸之變為旦宅之日新/耳其情不以為死○旦宅旦) (暮改易宅/是神居也)孟孫氏特覺人哭亦哭是自其所以乃(夫常/覺者) (無往而有逆也故人哭/亦哭正自是其所宜也)且也相與吾之耳矣(夫死生變/化吾皆吾) (之既皆是吾吾何失哉未始失吾吾何憂/哉無逆故人哭亦哭無憂故哭而不哀)庸詎知吾所 謂吾之乎(靡所不吾也故𤣥同外内彌貫古/今與化日新豈知吾之所在也)且汝夢為 鳥而厲乎天夢為魚而投於淵(言無往而/不自得也)不識今之言 者其覺者乎其夢者乎(夢之時自以為覺則焉知今者/之非夢邪亦焉知其非覺邪覺) (夢之化無往而不可則死/生之變無時而足惜也)造適不及笑獻笑不及排(所/造)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here explores the philosophical questions of life-death and waking-dreaming. He suggests that distinguishing life from death is as difficult as distinguishing waking from dreaming—when we dream, we always believe ourselves to be awake, so how can we be certain our present state isn't also a dream? Since we cannot prove that waking isn't dreaming, we likewise cannot prove that living isn't death. Life-death and waking-dreaming are fundamentally natural transformations, not matters for anxiety.

The truly enlightened person (Mengsun Shi) doesn't resist natural laws. When others weep, he weeps with them, but this is merely conformity to circumstance. Death is merely a transformation of bodily form ("startling transformation"), which cannot harm the original mind; the physical body is like daily changing lodging ("morning abode"), while the spirit remains eternally present.

Zhuangzi illustrates with metaphors: When you dream of becoming a bird soaring through the sky or a fish swimming freely in water, both feel completely natural. So how can the you speaking now determine whether you're awake or dreaming? True joy arriving doesn't necessarily produce laughter, and genuine smiles need no deliberate arrangement. All this demonstrates: by following natural transformations and walking with the Dao (the Way), one transcends distinctions between life-death and waking-dreaming to attain the realm of carefree wandering.

(Note: "Startling transformation" refers to physical metamorphosis, "morning abode" metaphorically describes the body as temporary lodging, and "Mengsun Shi" represents Zhuangzi's archetype of an enlightened person.)

(皆適則忘適矣故不及笑也排者推移之謂也夫禮哭/必哀獻笑必樂哀樂存懷則不能與適推移矣今孟孫) (常適故哭而不/哀與化俱往也)安排而去化乃入於寥天一(安於推移/而與化俱) (去故乃入於寂寥而與天為一也自此以上至於子杞/其致一也所執之喪異故歌哭不同○一本造敵不及) (笑獻芥不及⬤安排而造化不及眇眇不及/雄漂淰雄漂淰不及簟筮簟筮乃入於漻天)意而子見 許由許由曰堯何以資汝(資者給濟之謂○/意而子賢士也)意而子曰 堯謂我汝必躬服仁義而明言是非許由曰而奚來為 軹夫堯既已黥汝以仁義而劓汝以是非矣汝將何以 逰夫遥蕩恣睢轉徙之塗乎(言其將以形教自虧殘而/不能復逰夫自得之場無) (係之塗也軹者辭也李云是也黥其京反毁道徳/以為仁義不似黥乎破𤣥同以為是非不似劓乎)意而 子曰雖然吾願逰於其藩(不敢復求涉中道也且願/逰其藩傍而已○藩域也)許 由曰不然夫盲者無以與乎睂目顔色之好瞽者無以 與乎青黄黼黻之觀意而子曰夫無莊之失其美據梁 之失其力黄帝之亡其知皆在鑪捶之間耳(言天下之/物未必皆) (自成也自然之理亦有須治鍜而為器者耳故此之三/人亦皆聞道而後亡其所務也此皆寄言以遣云為之)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs several allegorical stories to expound the Daoist philosophy of following nature's course.

Mengsun Shi was someone who could harmonize with natural transformations. Thus, even when mourning and weeping at a funeral, his heart was not truly sorrowful. He understood that life and death are both part of nature’s rhythm, able to flow with change without attachment. A truly enlightened person can abide in transformation, wandering freely with the workings of creation, ultimately attaining unity with heaven and earth.

The next story tells of Yi'erzi meeting Xu You. Emperor Yao instructed Yi'erzi to practice benevolence and righteousness and to distinguish right from wrong, but Xu You considered such doctrines akin to tattooing a person’s face (a penal mark) or cutting off their nose—restrictions that bind human nature. True freedom lies in roaming unrestrained in a state of boundless ease.

Yi'erzi admitted that though he could not fully grasp the Dao, he was willing to learn at its periphery. Xu You used the analogy of a blind man unable to appreciate beauty or a deaf man unable to enjoy music to illustrate how those confined by worldly concepts cannot fathom the profundity of the Dao.

Finally, the text mentions Wuzhuang (a legendary beauty) ceasing to adorn herself, Juliang (a legendary strongman) no longer flaunting his strength, and the Yellow Emperor relinquishing cleverness—all examples of how, after being tempered in the "furnace of the Dao," they let go of their attachments. This shows that all things must undergo the refining of the Dao to return to their true nature. These stories use allegory to dismantle artificial contrivances.

(累○無莊據梁皆人名無莊無莊飾也據梁強梁也錘/䲭頭頗口句鐵以吹火也一云盧謂之瓮捶當作甀盧) (甀之間言/小處也)庸詎知夫造物者之不息我黥而補我劓使 我乗成以隨先生邪(夫率性直往者自然也往而傷性/性傷而能改者亦自然也庸詎知) (我之自然當不息黥補劓而乗可成之道以/隨夫子邪而欲棄而勿告恐非造物之至)許由曰噫 未可知也我為汝言其大畧吾師乎吾師乎⬤萬物而 不為義澤及萬世而不為仁(皆自然耳亦無愛為於其/間也安所寄其仁義○⬤) (子兮反/碎也)長於上古而不為老(日新也○/長丁文反)覆載天地刻雕 衆形而不為巧(自然故/非巧也)此所逰已(遊於不為而/師於無師也)顔回曰 回益矣(以損之/為益也)仲尼曰何謂也曰回忘仁義矣曰可矣 猶未也(仁者兼愛之迹義者成物之功愛之非仁仁迹/行焉成之非義義功見焉存夫仁義不足以知) (愛利之由無心故忘之可/也但忘功迹故猶未𤣥達)它日復見曰回益矣曰何謂 也曰回忘禮樂矣曰可矣猶未也(禮者形體之用樂者/樂生之具忘其具未) (若忘其所/以具也)它日復見曰回益矣曰何謂也曰回坐忘矣 仲尼蹵然曰何謂坐忘顔回曰墮枝體黜聰明離形去
Interpretation

This passage comes from Commentary on the Zhuangzi and primarily discusses the Daoist cultivation state of "forgetting." It mentions several key figures: Wuzhuang (one who does not deliberately adorn himself), Juliang (a rigid and strong individual), Xu You (an ancient hermit), and Yan Hui (a disciple of Confucius).

Xu You describes the characteristics of the "teacher" he follows (referring to the Dao): It shatters all things yet does not claim righteousness, bestows blessings for countless generations yet does not call itself benevolent, predates antiquity yet does not show signs of aging, and shapes all things yet does not flaunt skill. These are all manifestations of natural wuwei (non-action), illustrating that the true Dao transcends artificial contrivance.

Yan Hui reports to Confucius on his progress in cultivation: First, he forgot about benevolence and righteousness (social norms), but Confucius said this was not enough. Then, he forgot about rituals and music (behavioral codes), yet Confucius still deemed it insufficient. Finally, he attained the state of "sitting in forgetfulness" (zuowang)—forgetting the existence of his body, abandoning sensory perception, detaching from physical form, and discarding knowledge, thereby merging completely with the Dao. This state of utter selflessness represents the highest ideal of Daoist practice.

The text particularly emphasizes the importance of "naturalness" (ziran): Whether correcting faults or cultivating enlightenment, one should follow the natural disposition. Deliberately pursuing benevolence, righteousness, rituals, or music can instead harm one’s innate nature. Only through the practice of "forgetting" can one return to the most authentic state of being.

知同於大通此謂坐忘(夫坐忘者奚所不忘哉既忘其/迹又忘其所以迹者内不覺其) (一身外不識有天地然後曠/然與變化為體而無不通也)仲尼曰同則無好也(無物/不同) (則未嘗不適未嘗/不適何好何惡哉)化則無常也(同於化者唯化/所適故無常也)而果其 賢乎丘也請從而後也子輿與子桑友而霖雨十日子 輿曰子桑殆病矣裹飯而往食之(此二人相為於無相/為者也今裹飯而相) (食者乃任之天理而自爾非相為而/後往也○左傳云雨三日以往為霖)至子桑之門則若 歌若哭鼓琴曰父邪母邪天乎人乎有不任其聲而趨 舉其詩焉子輿入曰子之歌詩何故若是(嫌其有情所/以趨出逺理) (○不任其聲憊也趨/舉其詩無音曲也)曰吾思夫使我至此極者而弗得 也父母豈欲吾貧哉天無私覆地無私載天地豈私貧 我哉求其為之者而不得也然而至此極者命也(言物/皆自) (然無為/之者也)   應帝王第七(夫無心而任乎自/化者應為帝王也) 齧缺問於王倪四問而四不知齧缺因躍而大喜行以 告蒲衣子蒲衣子曰而乃今知之乎有虞氏不及泰氏 (夫有虞氏之與泰氏皆世事之迹耳非所以迹也所以/迹者無迹也世孰名之哉未之嘗名何勝負之有邪然)
Interpretation

This passage expounds Zhuangzi's philosophical concepts of "sitting in forgetfulness" (zuowang) and harmonizing with natural spontaneity.

First explaining "sitting in forgetfulness": this refers to a transcendent state cultivated practitioners attain, where one not only forgets external traces of action but also the internal causes producing them. In this state, individuals become unaware of their physical bodies and cease perceiving the existence of heaven and earth, completely merging with natural transformations to achieve omnipresent penetration. Confucius (Zhongni) remarks: "Being one with all things eliminates preferences (since all things are equal, nothing remains unadapted to, and when fully adapted, how can likes or dislikes exist?) Following transformations prevents stubbornness (those united with change simply flow with it, thus avoiding rigid persistence)."

The text recounts a story: Ziyu and Zisang were friends. After ten consecutive days of heavy rain, Ziyu worried Zisang might be starving or ill, so he prepared food and brought it to him. Approaching Zisang's door, he heard what sounded like both singing and weeping inside, accompanied by zither playing: "Was it my father? My mother? Heaven's will? Human effort?" The voice was so weak it lost all melody. Entering, Ziyu asked why he sang thus. Zisang explained he was contemplating why he'd become so destitute—his parents wouldn't wish poverty upon him, heaven and earth treat all things impartially—so what caused his extreme hardship? Ultimately he realized it was simply fate (ming), that all things spontaneously exist thus without deliberate arrangement.

Later, Nieque sought Wang Ni's instruction but received no answers after four attempts. Instead, he joyfully leaped up and ran to tell Puyizi. Puyizi said: "Now do you understand? Emperor Shun (the Youyu clan) cannot compare to Fu Xi (the Tai clan)." This means both Shun and Fu Xi were merely historical figures—what truly matters is the Dao behind them. This Dao leaves no traces—how could ordinary people judge who ranks higher?

Finally, the "Responding to Emperors" chapter concludes: "Only those who achieve no-mind (wuxin) while harmonizing with natural transformations are worthy to become true rulers."

(無迹者乘羣變履萬世世有夷險故迹有不及也蒲衣/子尸子云蒲衣八歲舜讓以天下即被衣王倪之師也) (淮南子曰齧缺問道於/被衣泰氏上古帝王也)有虞氏其猶藏仁以要人亦得 人矣而未始出於非人(夫以所好為是人所惡為非人/者唯以是非為域者也夫能出) (於非人之域者必入於無非人之竟矣故無得無失無/可無不可豈直藏仁而要人也○懷仁心以結人也) 泰氏其卧徐徐其覺于于一以已為馬一以已為牛(夫/如) (是又奚是人非人之有哉/斯可謂出於非人之域)其知情信(任其自知/故情信)其徳甚 真(任其自得/故無偽)而未始入於非人(不入乎是非之域所/以絶於有虞之世)肩 吾見狂接輿狂接輿曰日中始何以語女肩吾曰吿我 君人者以已出經式義度人孰敢不聽而化諸接輿曰 是欺徳也(以已制物則物失其真○日中始人姓名賢/者也出行也經常也式用也用仁義以法度) (人/也)其於治天下也猶涉海鑿河而使蚉負山也(夫寄當/於萬物) (則無事而自成以一身制天/下則功莫就而任不勝也)夫聖人之治也治外乎(全/其) (性分之/内而已)正而後行(各正/性命)⬤乎能其事者而已矣(不為其/所不能) 且鳥髙飛以避矰弋之害鼷鼠深穴乎神丘之下以避
Interpretation

This passage contrasts the governing approaches of ancient sage-kings, highlighting the Daoist ideal of "governing through non-action" (Wuwei).

The Youyu clan (Emperor Shun) sought to win people's hearts through benevolence and righteousness. While effective in gaining popular support, this approach remained confined within the framework of human judgment and moral distinctions. In stark contrast, the earlier Taishi (Fu Xi) embodied a higher state of being - resting in tranquil contentment when asleep, moving with effortless ease when awake, utterly indifferent whether people called him horse or ox. This transcendence beyond worldly judgments and complete alignment with natural spontaneity made his wisdom genuinely reliable and his virtue (De) authentically pure.

The dialogue between the madman Jieyu and Jianwu further develops this theme. When Jianwu cites Zhongshi's view that rulers should govern through laws and regulations, Jieyu condemns this as going against heaven's principle - as absurd as digging a canal to cross the ocean or asking mosquitoes to carry mountains. True sage-kings don't govern by imposing external rules, but by letting all beings follow their innate nature, each operating within their natural capacities. Just as birds instinctively fly high to avoid arrows, or field mice dig deep burrows to escape smoke, all creatures possess this natural wisdom of self-preservation.

This passage exemplifies the core Daoist political philosophy: the best governance doesn't enforce artificial norms, but follows the spontaneous way of all things, allowing natural development to unfold. The contrast between these rulers illustrates the fundamental difference between conventional moral governance and the Daoist ideal of non-interference that harmonizes with the self-so (ziran) movement of existence.

重鑿之患(禽獸猶各有以自存故帝/王任之而不為則自成也)而曾二蟲之無知 (言汝曾不如此二蟲/之各存而不待教乎)天根逰於殷陽至蓼水之上適遭 無名人而問焉曰請問為天下無名人曰去汝鄙人也 何問之不預也(問為天下則非起於大初止/於𤣥㝠也○天根人姓名也)予方將與 造物者為人(任人之/自為)厭則又乘夫莽眇之鳥以出六極 之外而逰無何有之鄉以處壙埌之野(莽眇羣碎之謂/耳乘羣碎馳萬) (物故能出處常通而無狹滯/之地埌音浪壙埌猶曠蕩也)汝又何帠以治天下感予 之心為(言皆放之自得之場則不治/而自治也○帠音藝法也)又復問無名人曰 汝逰心於淡(任其性而無所/飾焉則淡矣)合氣於漠(漠然静於/性而止)順物 自然而無容私焉而天下治矣(任情自生公也心欲益/之私也容私果不足以) (生生而順/公乃全也)陽子居見老⬤曰有人於此嚮疾彊梁物徹 疏明學道不勌如是者可比明王乎老⬤曰是於聖人 也胥易技係勞形怵心者也(言此功夫容身不得不足/以比聖王○陽子居名也) 且也虎豹之文來田猨狙之便執斄之狗來藉如是者 可比明王乎(此皆以其文章技能係累其身非涉虛以/御乎無方也○虎豹以皮有文章見獵也)
Interpretation

Tian Gen was wandering in the lands of Yin Yang when he came upon the Liao River and happened to meet the Nameless Adept. Presumptuously, Tian Gen asked, "May I inquire how to govern the world?" The Nameless Adept immediately rebuked him: "Begone! You vulgar fellow—how dare you pose such a question that violates the great Dao?" (The Nameless Adept considered the very notion of governing the world to contradict the natural Way.)

He continued: "I am about to merge with the Creator (Dao) myself. When weary, I ride upon the formless bird of emptiness, transcending the six directions to wander in the Land of Nothingness (the realm of Dao), dwelling in the vast wilderness without borders. Why must you disturb my heart-mind with this notion of governing the world?" (The adept pursues a transcendent state of unfettered wandering beyond worldly concerns.)

Undaunted, Tian Gen pressed his inquiry. Only then did the Nameless Adept offer guidance: "You must let your spirit wander in the realm of serene detachment (preserving original nature without adornment), allowing your Qi to return to emptiness and stillness (following heavenly nature in tranquil repose). Yield to the inherent nature of all things without imposing selfish desires, and the world will naturally attain peace." (True governance means allowing all beings to spontaneously achieve harmony.)

In another account, when Yang Ziju paid homage to Laozi (the progenitor of Daoism), he asked: "If a man were quick-witted in thought, decisive in action, insightful regarding all things, and diligent in studying the Dao—could such a person compare to an enlightened sovereign?" Laozi replied: "In the eyes of a sage, such a man is merely a commoner shackled by skills, exhausting his heart-mind and strength." (Attachment to external talents causes one to lose one's natural essence.)

Laozi extended the metaphor: "Consider how tigers and leopards are hunted for their beautiful stripes, how monkeys are tethered for their agility, how hounds are employed for their hunting prowess. Can creatures that display their talents compare to a truly enlightened ruler?" (A true sage-king should be like the Dao—formless and traceless, revealing nothing through external abilities.)

(田獵也斄音旄牛/也藉繩也繫也)陽子居蹵然曰敢問明王之治老⬤ 曰明王之治功盖天下而似不自已(天下若無明王則/莫能自得今之自) (得實明王之功也然功在無為而還任/天下天下皆得自任故似非明王之功)化貸萬物而民 弗恃(夫明王皆就足物性故人人皆云我自/爾而莫知恃賴於明王○賴吐代反)有莫舉名 使物自喜(雖有盖天下之功而不舉以為/己名故物皆自以為得而喜)立乎不測(居/變) (化之塗日/新而無方)而逰於無有者也(與萬物為體則所逰者虛/也不能㝠物則迕物不暇) (何暇逰/虛哉)鄭有神巫曰季咸知人之死生存亡禍福夀天 期以歳月旬日若神鄭人見之皆棄而走(不喜自聞/死日也)列 子見之而心醉歸以吿壺子曰始吾以夫子之道為至 矣則又有至焉者矣(謂季咸之至/又過於夫子)壺子曰吾與汝既其 文未既其實而固得道與衆雌而無雄而又奚卵焉(言/列) (子之未懷道也○既盡也言汝受訓/未熟故未成若衆雌無雄則無卵也)而以道與世亢必 信夫故使人得而相汝(未懷道則有心有心而亢其一/方以必信於世故可得而相之) 嘗試與來以予示之明日列子與之見壺子出而謂列 子曰嘻子之先生死矣弗活矣不以旬數矣吾見怪焉
Interpretation

Yang Ziju asked with reverent expression: "May I inquire how the sage ruler governs the world?"

Lao Dan (i.e., Laozi) replied: "The governance of a sage ruler covers all under heaven yet appears as if nothing were done by him (Without enlightened rulers, the people could not develop naturally. Now that the people develop naturally, it is actually the ruler's achievement through wuwei [non-action]). He transforms all things yet the people feel no dependence (The enlightened ruler follows the innate nature of all things, so everyone feels they are acting autonomously, unaware they actually rely on the ruler). Though his merit spans the ages, he claims no credit, allowing all beings to find their own joy (Though his merit covers the world, he doesn't attribute it to himself, so all things rejoice in what they feel they've gained). He stands in the unfathomable realm (abiding in constant transformation, renewing daily without fixed patterns) and wanders in the void of nothingness (united with all things, roaming where all is emptiness)."

In Zheng state there was a spirit medium named Ji Xian who could foresee life, death, fortune and misfortune, predicting dates with supernatural accuracy. When Zheng people saw him, they would avoid him (not wanting to hear their death foretold). When Liezi met him, he became utterly fascinated. Returning to his teacher Huizi, he said: "I used to think your Daoist arts were supreme, but now I've found someone even greater (meaning Ji Xian surpassed Huizi)."

Huizi said: "What I've taught you is merely superficial—I haven't transmitted the true substance, yet you presume to have attained the Dao? It's like having only hens without a rooster—how could eggs be produced? (Meaning Liezi hasn't truly comprehended the Great Dao). You contend with worldly people using half-understood arts, inevitably revealing yourself—that's why you've been seen through. Try bringing him to meet me."

The next day Liezi brought Ji Xian to see Huizi. After the meeting, Ji Xian told Liezi: "Alas! Your teacher won't live ten more days—I've seen the signs of approaching death."

見濕灰焉列子入泣涕沾襟以吿壺子壺子曰鄉吾示 之以地文萌乎不震不正(萌然不動亦不自正與枯木/同其不華濕灰均於寂魄此) (乃至人無感之時也夫至人其動也天其靜也地其行/也水流其止也淵黙淵黙之與水流天行之與地止其) (於不為而自爾一也今季咸見其尸居而外心即謂之/將死覩其神動而天隨因謂之有生誠應不以心而理) (自𤣥符與變化升降而以世為量然後足為物生而/順時無極故非相者所測耳此應帝王之大意也)是 殆見吾杜徳機也(徳機不發曰杜徳杜/徳機塞吾徳之機)嘗又與來明日 又與之見壺子出而謂列子曰幸矣子之先生遇我也 有瘳矣全然有生矣吾見其杜權矣(權機也今乃自覺/昨日之所見見其) (杜權故謂/之將死)列子入以吿壺子壺子曰鄉吾示之以天壤 (天壤之中覆載之功見矣比之/地文不猶卵乎此應感之容也)名實不入(任自然而覆/載則天機𤣥) (應而名利之/飾皆為棄物)而機發於踵(常在極/上起)是殆見吾善者機也 (機發而善於/彼彼乃見之)嘗又與來明日又與之見壺子出而謂列 子曰子之先生不齊吾無得而相焉試齊且復相之列 子入以吿壺子壺子曰吾鄉示之以大冲莫勝(居大冲/之極浩)
Interpretation

Liezi (a Daoist figure), upon seeing Huzi (an enlightened master) appearing as lifeless as damp ashes, tearfully reported this to him. Huzi explained: "What I just displayed was the 'Earthly Pattern' state (referring to a meditator's quiescent realm resembling the stillness of earth) - completely motionless like vegetation that doesn't sprout or ground that doesn't tremble. This is the state of the Perfected Person (one who has attained the Dao) who transcends sensory perception - they move like heaven's revolutions, rest like earth's bearing capacity, act like flowing water, and remain still like deep abyss. This natural state of Wuwei (non-action) was even mistaken by the divine diviner Jixian as a deathly appearance."

The next day when Jixian came again for physiognomy, he detected vitality in Huzi and joyfully told Liezi: "Your master can recover with my help! I perceive his blocked life force beginning to stir." Huzi later explained: "This time I manifested the 'Heaven-Earth' state (a vibrant realm resembling cosmic intercourse), revealing nature's functions without clinging to appearances, with vitality surging from the soles. This is what he saw as the 'Auspicious Mechanism' (the state of burgeoning vitality)."

During their third encounter, Jixian became utterly perplexed, telling Liezi: "Your master's Qi (vital energy) fluctuates unpredictably - I cannot read his signs." Huzi clarified: "This time I revealed the 'Supreme Equilibrium' state (the ultimate balance of Yin-Yang), like scales at perfect equipoise. This cultivation surpassing all appearances embodies the true principle of governing and self-cultivation discussed in the chapter 'Responding to Emperors' - the Perfected Person follows nature's transformations, their unfathomable realm being utterly beyond any diviner's comprehension."

(然泊心而𤣥同萬方故/勝負莫得措其間也)是殆見吾衡氣機也(無往不平/混然一之) (以管闚天者莫見/其涯故似不齊)鯢桓之審為淵止水之審為淵流水 之審為淵淵有九名此處三焉(淵者静黙之謂耳夫水/常無心委順外物故雖) (流之與止鯢桓之與龍躍常淵然自若未始失其静黙/也夫至人用之則行捨之則止行止雖異而𤣥黙一焉) (故畧舉三異以明之雖波流九變治亂紛如居其極者/常淡然自得泊乎忘為也鯢桓二魚名也一云鯢鯨魚) (也桓盤桓也審處也審為蟠蟠聚也回流所鍾之域也/淵有九名淮南子云有九琁之淵許慎註云至深也補) (列子九淵作鯢旋則桓當為盤/桓審作畨一作潘水之盤回也)嘗又與來明日又與之 見壺子立未定自失而走壺子曰追之列子追之不及 反以報壺子曰已滅矣已失矣吾弗及已壺子曰鄉吾 示之以未始出吾宗(雖變化無常/深根寧極也)吾與之虛而委蛇(無/心) (而隨物化○委於危反蛇/以支反委蛇至順之貌)不知其誰何(汎然無/所係也)因以為 弟靡因以為波流故逃也(變化頽靡世事波流無往而/不因也夫至人一耳然應世) (變而時動故相者無所措其目自失而走此明應帝王/者無方也○為第音頽文回反弟靡不窮之貌崔云猶)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here uses water as a metaphor to illustrate the state of those who have attained the Dao. Water maintains its tranquil nature regardless of its form—whether in the deep pools formed by circling whales, still ponds, or flowing streams. The text mentions three of the nine names for abysses, all demonstrating how water retains its inner stillness despite external variations.

The perfected person (one who has attained the Dao) resembles water—preserving inner serenity amid external changes. When needed, they act; when not, they rest. Though action and stillness appear different, their underlying mystical quietude remains constant. Even amidst external chaos, those rooted in the Dao's foundation maintain effortless composure, embodying Wuwei (non-action).

The term "whale's circling" refers both to two fish species and the movement of whales spiraling. "Stillness" here denotes water's gathering and returning flow. References like the "Nine Spiral Abyss" in Huainanzi and "Nine Abysses" in Liezi both signify ultimate depths.

Later, the text describes how the adept Huzi demonstrated to Jixian the state of "never departing from my ancestral root"—where despite endless external transformations, one remains anchored to the fundamental. Huzi's approach of empty responsiveness, adapting without attachment to phenomena, left Jixian utterly bewildered, fleeing in panic. This reveals the true imperial Dao (supreme attainment) as formless, following natural transformations so completely that observers find nothing fixed to grasp.

(遜伏/也)然後列子自以為未始學而歸三年不出為其妻 爨食豕如食人(忘貴賤也/○食音嗣)於事無與親(唯所/遇耳)雕琢復朴 (去華/取實)塊然獨以其形立(外飾/去也)紛而封哉(雖動而真/不散也)一以 是終(使物各/自終)無為名尸(因物則物各/自當其名也)無為謀府(使物各/自謀也) 無為事任(付物使/各自任)無為知主(無心則物各自主/其知也○知音智)體盡無 窮(因天下之自為故/馳萬物而無窮)而逰無朕(任物故/無迹)盡其所受乎天 (足則/止也)而無見得(見得則/不知止)亦虛而已(不虛則不/能任羣實)至人之用 心若鏡(鍳物而/無情)不將不逆應而不藏(來即應/去即止)故能勝物 而不傷(物來即鑒鑒不以心故雖/天下之廣而無勞神之苦)南海之帝為儵北海 之帝為忽中央之帝為渾沌儵與忽時相與遇於渾沌 之地渾沌待之甚善儵與忽謀報渾沌之徳曰人皆有 七竅以視聽食息此獨無有嘗試鑿之日鑿一竅七日 而渾沌死(為者敗之/○儵音叔)  
Interpretation

This passage describes Liezi's (a prominent Daoist figure) state of being after attaining enlightenment and the wisdom of living advocated by Daoism. After three years of cultivation, Liezi returned to primal simplicity. When cooking at home, he fed pigs as naturally as serving people, completely forgetting distinctions between noble and lowly. He acted without selfish intentions, responding to circumstances spontaneously like uncarved wood, maintaining his authentic self in solitude. Though the external world was tumultuous, his inner state remained constant.

The text presents four principles of Wuwei (non-action): don't pursue empty fame ("corpse of reputation"), don't constantly scheme ("repository of plots"), don't shoulder all responsibilities ("burden of affairs"), and don't presume cleverness ("master of knowledge"). One should follow the inherent nature of all things, reflecting objectively like a mirror—responding when things come, releasing when they depart. Only thus can one master all things without being depleted, akin to the parable of Emperor Shu (Swift) of the Southern Sea, Emperor Hu (Sudden) of the Northern Sea, and Emperor Hundun (Chaos) of the Center.

The passage concludes with the allegory of Hundun (representing the primordial, undifferentiated state): Emperors Shu (symbolizing agility) and Hu (symbolizing swiftness), wishing to repay Hundun's hospitality, drilled seven orifices (eyes, ears, mouth, etc.) into it. After seven days, Hundun died. This story warns that artificial interference destroys natural essence.

(Note: The term "perfect man" refers to one with supreme cultivation; "Shu" and "Hu" in classical Chinese both imply speed, contrasting with Hundun's state of undifferentiation.)

     莊子注巻三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0138); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →