中文 · EN

《南華真經註疏》Vol. 34

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 34 / 35 8,231 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經註疏》 Vol. 34 (Dongshen 洞神部, 35 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 16 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經註疏》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

南華眞經註䟽卷之三十四尺七     河南郭象註     唐西華法師成玄英䟽    雜篇列御寇第三十二 列御寇之齊中道而反遇伯昏瞀人  䟽伯昏楚之賢士號曰伯昏瞀人隱者之  徒也禦寇既師壺子又事伯昏方欲適齊  行於化道自驚行淺中路而還適逢瞀人  問其所以 伯昏瞀人曰奚方而反  䟽方道也奚何也汝行何道欲往何方問  其所由中塗反意也 曰吾驚焉  䟽自覺己非驚懼而反此略答前問意 曰惡乎驚  䟽重聞禦寇於何事迹而起驚心 曰吾嘗食於十漿  註賣漿之家 曰五漿先饋  註言其敬己  䟽饋遺也十漿謂有十家賣漿飲也列子  因行渴於逆旅十家賣飲而五家先遺覩  其容觀競起驚心未能冥混是以驚懼也 伯昏瞀人曰若是則汝何爲驚己  䟽更問驚由庶陳己失 曰夫内誠不解  註外自矜飾  䟽自覺内心實智未能懸解爲物所敬是  以驚而歸 形諜成光  註舉動便辟而成光儀也 以外鎮人心  註其内實不足以服物  䟽諜便僻貌也鎮服也儀容便僻動成光  華用此外形鎮服人物 使人輕乎貴老  註若鎮物由乎内實則使人貴老之情篤  也 而𩐎其所患  註言以美形動物則所患亂生也  䟽𩐎亂也未能混俗同塵而爲物標杓使  人敬貴於己而輕老人良恐禍患方亂生
Interpretation

Lie Yukou set out for the state of Qi but turned back halfway; on the way he met Bo Hun Muren. Bo Hun Muren was a worthy man of Chu and also a recluse. Lie Yukou had already taken Master Hu as his teacher and had sought instruction from Bo Hun Muren as well. On this occasion he had meant to travel to Qi, but on the road he turned back because he felt his own cultivation was still insufficient, and he happened to meet Bo Hun Muren.

Bo Hun Muren asked, “Why did you turn back halfway?”

Lie Yukou answered, “I was afraid.”

Bo Hun Muren asked, “What frightened you?”

Lie Yukou said, “I once drank at ten shops that sold beverages, and at five of them they brought the drink to me first.”

“Jiang” was an ancient beverage. The commentaries explain that Lie Yukou was thirsty on the road and passed ten establishments that sold drinks; at five of them, when they saw his bearing, they voluntarily offered him beverages. He noticed that others showed him respect, and for that reason he became afraid.

Bo Hun Muren said, “If that is so, why does it make you afraid?”

Lie Yukou said, “The sincerity and genuine wisdom within me have not yet fully permeated, yet I receive respect from others.”

The commentaries explain that Lie Yukou realized his inner cultivation was not yet sufficient to win people’s genuine trust; others might respect him only because of his outward appearance.

“Xing die cheng guang” means that one’s bearing and demeanor appear upright and refined, thus forming a splendid outward presence; “yi wai zhen ren xin” means relying on outward appearance to command others’ respect, while inwardly one is still inadequate to truly transform people.

What Bo Hun Muren feared was this: if a person wins respect merely through outward appearance, others may value him and slight those who are older; this can disturb the proper sentiment of honoring elders and may also invite misfortune. Lie Yukou had not yet achieved blending with the world and concealing himself, yet he had already become an object of public attention; therefore he worried that outward renown would bring disorder and trouble.

 矣 夫漿人特爲食羹之貨多餘之贏其爲利也 薄其爲權也輕而猶若是  註權輕利薄可無求於人 而況於萬乗之主乎  䟽特獨也贏利也夫賣漿之人獨有羹食  爲貨所盈之物蓋亦不多爲利既薄權亦  非重尚能敬己競走獻漿况在君王權高  利厚奔馳尊貴不亦宜乎 身勞於國而知盡於事彼將任我以事而效 我以功吾是以驚  䟽夫君人者位總萬機威跨四海故躬疲  倦於邦國心盡慮於世事則思賢若渴以  代己勞必將任我以物務而驗我以功績  徇外喪内逐偽忘眞驚之所由具陳如是  也 伯昏瞀人曰善哉觀乎  䟽汝能觀察己身審知得喪嘉其自覺故  歎善哉 汝處己人將保汝矣  註苟不遺形則所在見保保者聚守之謂  也  䟽保守也汝安處己身不能忘我猶顯形  德爲物所歸門人請益聚守之矣 無幾何而往則户外之屨滿矣  䟽無幾何謂無多時也俄頃之間伯昏往  禦寇之所適見脱屨户外跣足升堂請益  者多矣 伯昏瞀人北面而立敦杖蹙之乎頤立其間 不言而出  䟽敦竪也以枝柱頤聽其言說倚立間乆  忘言而歸也 賔者以告列子列子提屨跣而走暨乎門曰 先生既來曾不發藥乎  䟽賔者謂通賔客人也御寇聞師友立不  言而歸於是竦息慙惕不暇納屨跣足馳
Interpretation

The jelly seller merely makes a living by selling broth; the goods in his hands and his modest profits are not much. His gains are slight and his weight is light, yet he is still treated this way.

The commentary says: "权" (quan) refers to weight. The jelly seller's gains are meager and his weight is light; he originally need not seek others' favor. How much more so when he faces a lord who commands ten thousand chariots?

The exegesis says: "特" (te) means alone or merely, and "赢" (ying) means surplus profit. The jelly seller alone runs his broth business; his goods and surplus profits are not much. Since his gains are slight and his weight is not heavy, he can still make people respect him and rush to buy from him. How much more so when a king's authority is high and his benefits are substantial—should it not be natural for people to flock to him and honor him?

(Liezi said:) "The ruler toils for the state, exhausting his mind on governmental affairs. He will entrust affairs to me and examine me by my achievements. I therefore feel fearful."

The exegesis says: One who is a ruler oversees all state affairs, his authority covering the four seas. If he personally exhausts himself for state business, his mind consumed by worldly affairs, he will seek worthy talents as if thirsting for sweet springs, hoping they will share his burdens. He will certainly entrust affairs to me and test me by my achievements. In this way, I will pursue external things and lose my inner authenticity, chase the false and forget the true—this is precisely why I feel fearful. This is what he meant.

Boyin Mouren (Liezi's teacher) said: "Well said! You can observe yourself in this way."

The exegesis says: You can observe yourself, examine gains and losses, and thereby perceive problems, so I praise you, saying "well said."

Boyin Mouren also said: "If you abide in yourself, people will rally to you."

The commentary says: If you do not lose yourself, people will come to support you wherever you are. "保" (bao) means to gather and guard.

The exegesis says: "保" means to guard. You abide in yourself, yet still cannot forget the self, still revealing your virtue, and so people turn to you, disciples gathering to seek your instruction.

Before long, shoes filled the area outside Liezi's door.

The exegesis says: "Before long" means not much time passed. In a brief moment, Boyin Mouren arrived at Liezi's place and saw shoes piled up outside the door. Many people came barefoot into the hall, requesting further instruction from Liezi.

Boyin Mouren stood facing north, holding his staff upright against his chin. He stood among the crowd for a while without saying a word, then departed.

The exegesis says: "敦" (dun) means to stand upright. He held his staff against his chin, standing there listening to people speak. After a good while without speaking, he returned home.

The host told Liezi about this. Liezi picked up his shoes, ran out barefoot, and caught up at the gate, saying: "Since the master has come, why not give me some guidance?"

 走至門而反高人既來庶蒙鍼艾不嘗開  發藥石遺棄而還誠心欽渴有此固請也 曰已矣吾固告汝曰人將保汝果保汝矣  䟽已止也我已於先固告汝汝不能韜光  晦迹必爲物所歸依今果見汝門人滿室  吾昔語汝諒非虚言宜止所請無勞辭費 非汝能使人保汝而汝不能使人無保汝也  註任平而化則無感無求無感無求乃不  相保  䟽顯迹於外故爲人保之未能忘德故不  能無守也 而焉用之感豫出異也  註先物施惠惠不因彼豫出則異也  䟽而汝也焉何也夫物我兩忘亦何須物  來感已必有機來感而後應不勞預出異  端先物施惠 必且有感揺而本性又無謂也  註必將有感則與本性動也  䟽摇動也必固有感迫而後起率其本性  摇而應之滅迹匿端有何偁謂也 與汝遊者又莫汝告也彼所小言盡人毒也  註細巧入人爲小言  䟽共汝同游行解相類唯事浮辯細巧之  言佞媚於人盡爲鳩毒詎能用道以告汝  也 莫覺莫悟何相孰也  䟽孰誰也彼此迷塗無能覺悟何誰獨曉  以相告乎 巧者勞而知者憂無能者無所求飽食而遨 遊汎若不繫之舟虚而遨遊者也  註夫無其能者唯聖人耳過此以下至於  昆蟲未有自忘其能而任衆人者也  䟽夫物未嘗爲無用憂勞而必以智巧困
Interpretation

He walked to the door, then turned and came back, saying: “Since a person of lofty attainment (gaoren, one of deep moral and spiritual standing) has already come, I hoped to receive acupuncture (needling and moxibustion) treatment; I never expected that you would instead prescribe medicine and give me drugs, and then leave. My heart is sincere and full of admiration—that is why I have asked again and again.”

Commentary: “Yile” means “let it stop here.” I told you long ago: you cannot dim your light and hide your tracks—you will surely be sought out by the multitude. Now indeed your disciples crowd the room. My earlier words were no empty talk. You should cease these requests and not waste more words.

It is not that you can make others rely on you, but that you cannot keep others from relying on you.

Note: Follow what is natural and let things transform of themselves, and you will not invite responsive resonance, nor will there be any mind of seeking; without resonance and without seeking, there will be no mutual clinging.

Commentary: You display your tracks outward, so people come to rely on you; you have not yet forgotten your own virtue (de), so you cannot fail to guard and care for them.

“Then what need is there? Taking the initiative to resonate and bestowing favor beforehand are both ways of acting outside the norm.”

Note: To bestow favor before others, not in response to their need but by granting benefit in advance—that is what seems contrary to the ordinary.

Commentary: “Er” means “you”; “yan” means “what need.” I and external things are both forgotten—why must I wait for things to move me before I respond? Only when something shows a sign is there a response; why not refrain from acting in abnormal ways and giving favors ahead of time, before anything has happened?

“To act in this way is sure to bring about resonance and to shake one’s nature; yet what reputation can such a nature have?”

Note: Insisting on resonance will stir and disturb one’s nature (xing).

Commentary: “Yao” means to shake. If one must wait for a strong stimulus from outside before acting, that is to move along with one’s nature in response. If one wishes to erase one’s tracks and hide all traces, what fame is there to speak of?

“Among those who associate with you, there is none who can offer you true counsel. Their fine, clever words are altogether poisonous things that harm people.”

Note: Subtle, artful speech that can bore into the heart is called “small words” (xiaoyan).

Commentary: Those who keep company with you and share your views only answer with shallow cleverness and words that please others—all of that is harmful stuff. How could they use discourse that accords with the Dao to admonish you?

“They neither perceive nor awaken—who among them can inform one another?”

Commentary: “Shu” means “who.” All have lost their way; no one can perceive and wake up—who could understand alone and tell the other?

“Those with craft toil; the clever worry. The unskilled want nothing; when they have eaten their fill they wander at ease, like a boat with no mooring line, empty and free, drifting wherever they will.”

Note: Those who are truly without skill are only the sages. Apart from them, from human beings down to insects, none can forget their own capacities and wholly leave themselves to the arrangements of the multitude.

Commentary: Among the ten thousand things, not one is genuinely useless… Those who labor in worry must rely on cleverness and thereby fall into hardship…

(The closing sentence of the original is incomplete, so the sense here is likewise incomplete.)

 弊唯聖人汎然無係泊爾忘心譬彼虚舟  任運逍遥 鄭人緩也呻吟裘氏之地  註呻吟吟詠之謂 祇三年而緩爲儒  註祇適也  䟽呻吟詠讀也裘氏地名也祗適也鄭人  名緩於裘地學問適經三年而成儒道 河潤九里澤及三族使其弟墨  註三族謂父母妻族也能使弟成於墨教  也 儒墨相與辯其父助翟  註翟緩弟名  䟽翟緩弟名也儒則憲章文武祖述堯舜  甚固吝好多言墨乃遵於禹道勤儉好施  儒墨塗别志尚不同各執是非互相爭辯  父黨小兒遂助於翟矣 十年而緩自殺其父夢之曰使而子爲墨者 子也闔胡嘗視其良既爲秋栢之實矣  註緩怨其父之助弟故感激自殺死而見  夢謂己既能自化爲儒又化弟令墨弟由  己化而不能順己己以良師而便怨誠之  至故爲秋栢之實  䟽闔何也秋栢勁木也父既助翟而緩恨  之經由十年感激自殺仍見夢於父以申  怨言云使汝子爲墨者我之功力也何不  看視我爲賢良之師而更朋助弟我怨恨  之甚化爲異物秋栢子實生於墓上亦有  作垠字者垠冢也云汝何不看我冡上已  化爲秋栢之木而生實也 夫造物者之報人也不報其人而報其人之 天  註自此已下莊子辭也夫積習之功爲報  報其性不報其爲也然則學習之功成性  而已豈爲之哉
Interpretation

Sages can drift like a small boat upon the water, with no clinging and no place to moor, and without taking external things to heart; thus they can follow the current and live in free and easy wandering.

In the state of Zheng there was a man named Huan who chanted and studied at a place called Qiushi. The commentary explains that zhi means “just so, exactly”; the expository text says Qiushi is a place name, and that Huan studied there until, after exactly three years, he became a Confucian scholar.

His learning was like river water soaking the earth: its benefit reached nine li away, and it also affected his parents and his wife’s people, so that his younger brother Zhai came to follow Mohism. When Confucians and Mohists argued with each other, Huan’s father took Zhai’s side. The commentary notes that Zhai was Huan’s younger brother. The expository text adds: Confucians honor King Wen and King Wu of Zhou and look back to the way of Yao and Shun; they hold firm positions and also prize rhetoric. Mohists follow the way of Yu the Great, value thrift, and delight in giving. The two schools differ in path and purpose, each clinging to its view and disputing the other—and Huan’s father favored his younger son Zhai.

Ten years later, Huan killed himself. His father dreamed that Huan said: “That your son became a Mohist was my doing. Why do you not look upon me as the fine teacher I was? I have already become the fruit of an autumn cypress.”

The commentary explains that Huan resented his father’s partiality toward his brother, and in grief and anger took his own life; after death he spoke in the dream: his brother had become a Mohist through his teaching, yet he himself was the worthy teacher while his father turned to support the brother—hence his bitterness, and his transformation into autumn-cypress fruit. The expository text also notes that he means “why”; “autumn cypress” refers to hard cypress wood. Some texts read “fruit of the autumn cypress” as “the mound of the autumn cypress,” yin meaning a grave mound. On that reading, Huan is saying: “Why do you not look at my grave? I have already become the autumn cypress on the tomb, bearing fruit.”

The power that creates and transforms things does not repay a person for what he does; it repays the nature he has received. The commentary says: from here onward is Zhuangzi’s discussion—that what long study and accumulation finally shape acts upon one’s inborn disposition, not merely as repayment for some single deed; the work of learning forms one’s nature, yet this is not entirely a matter of human arrangement.

 䟽造物者自然之洪鑪也而造物者無物  也能造化萬物故謂之造物也夫物之智  能禀乎造化非由從師而學成也故假於  學習輔道自然報其天性不報人功也是  知翟有墨性不從緩得緩言我教不亦繆  乎 彼故使彼  註彼有彼性故使習彼  䟽彼翟先者有墨性故成墨若率性素無  學終不成也豈唯墨翟庶物皆然 夫人以己爲有以異於人以賤其親  註言緩自美其儒謂己能有積學之功不  知其性之自然也夫有功以賤物者不避  其親也無其身以平往者貴賤不失其倫  也  䟽言緩自恃於己有學植之功異於常人  故輕賤其親而汝於父也人之迷滯而至  於斯乎 齊人之井飲者相捽也故曰今之世皆緩也  註夫穿井所以通泉吟詠所以通性無泉  則無所穿無性則無所詠而世皆忘其泉  性之自然徒識穿詠之末功因欲矜而有  之不亦妄乎  䟽夫土下有泉人各有性天也穿之成井  學以成術者人也嗟乎世人迷妄之甚徒  知穿學之末事不悟泉性之自然而矜之  以爲己功者故世皆緩之流也齊人穿鑿  得井行李汲而飲之井主護水捽頭而休  莊生聞之故引爲諭 自是有德者以不知也而况有道者乎  註觀緩之謬以爲學父故能任其自爾而  知故無爲其間也  䟽觀緩之迷以爲己誠有德之人從是之
Interpretation

Commentary: “The Creator” is the great furnace of Nature. The Creator has no fixed form of its own, yet transforms and gives birth to the myriad things—hence the name “Creator.” Each thing’s capacities are endowed by creation itself; they are not acquired by following a teacher and learning. Therefore, study can only assist a person in accord with Nature; what is returned upon is innate nature, not human merit.

From this we know that Mo Di (Mozi) was by nature inclined toward Mohist learning—it was not because he followed “Huan” in study that he acquired that nature. Yet Huan said, “I taught him”—is that not also mistaken?

Classic: He was originally thus; so he was made to study what he was originally good at.

Note: He had such a nature; therefore, along with that nature, he was made to study what corresponded to it.

Commentary: Mo Di originally had Mohist nature and thus became a Mohist figure. But if a person’s nature lacks the corresponding bent, even without study they will never succeed. Mozi is not the only case—all things are alike.

Classic: People always think they have achieved something by their own effort, deem themselves different from others, and look down on their own kin.

Note: This means Huan thought himself superior to the Ru scholar, believing he had long-accumulated, diligently learned skill, without understanding that it was really nature being so of itself. Relying on merit to slight others, even disregarding family ties—if one does not cling to one’s own achievement and treats those one meets with an equal heart, one will not invert the order of senior and junior, close and distant.

Commentary: Huan trusted in the merit of study and thought himself unlike ordinary people, and so looked down on his kin—even his father. How far people can go in delusion and fixation!

Classic: In Qi there was a man who dug a well for water; when others came to the well to drink, he would wrestle with them. Hence it is said that people in the world today are all like Huan.

Note: Digging a well is to draw forth spring water; chanting and study are to penetrate innate nature. Without spring water there is nothing to dig for; without innate nature there is nothing to chant toward. Yet people all forget that spring water and innate nature were there from the start—they only know the surface work of digging wells and chanting, and still want to boast and claim it as their own. Is that not absurd?

Commentary: Below the earth there is spring water by nature; in people there is endowed nature by nature. Making a well by digging and mastering an art by study are human doing. Alas, people are utterly deluded: they only know digging wells and study as outward affairs, and do not understand that spring water and nature already exist of themselves—yet they boast of it as their own merit. Hence it is said that everyone in the world is like Huan. The story says: in Qi someone bored a well for water; passersby drew from the well to drink; the well-owner seized the traveler by the hair and made him stop. Zhuangzi heard of this and used it as a comparison.

Classic: Therefore, one who has De (virtue) does not even know it in himself—how much more so one who has the Dao!

Note: Seeing Huan’s absurdity—that he thought he had taught his father—one can understand: simply let things follow their natural course; if one understands this, one will not intervene with artificial doing.

Commentary: From Huan’s error we can see that he thought himself truly a person of De…

 後忘知任物不復自矜况體道之人豈視  其功邪 古者謂之遁天之刑  註仍自然之能以爲己功者逃天者也故  刑戮及之  䟽不知物性自爾矜爲己功者逃遁天然  之理也既乖造化故刑戮及之 聖人安其所安不安其所不安  註夫聖人無安無不安順百姓之心也  䟽安任也任羣生之性不引物從己性之  無者不强安之故所以爲聖人也 衆人安其所不安不安其所安  註所安相與異故所以爲衆人也  䟽學己所不能安其所不安也不安其素  分不安其所安也 莊子曰知道易勿言難  䟽玄道窈冥言像斯絶運知則易忘言實  難 知而不言所以之天也知而言之所以之人 也  䟽妙悟玄道無法可言故詣於自然之境  雖知至極而猶存言辯斯未離於人倫矣 古之人天而不人  註知而落天地未嘗開言以引物應其至  分而已  䟽復古眞人知道之士天然淳素無復人  情 朱泙漫學屠龍於支離益單千全之家三年 技成而無所用其巧  註事在於適無貴於遠功  䟽姓朱名泙漫姓支離名益殫盡也罄千  金之産學殺龍之術伏膺三歲其道方成  伎雖巧妙卒爲無用屠龍之事於世稍稀  欲明處涉人間貴在適中苟不當機雖大  無益也 聖人以必不必故無兵  註理雖必然猶不必之斯至順矣兵其安  有
Interpretation

When people forget knowledge and technique and surrender themselves to the natural transformations of all things, they no longer boast of their own abilities. How much more so for those who have awakened to the great Dao—they would never prize their own achievements.

The ancients called this situation “escaping heaven’s punishment.”

Note: Treating capacities given by nature as one’s own achievement is to go against the Dao of heaven; for that reason one incurs punishment.

Commentary: Not understanding that each thing has its own natural nature, yet boasting of ability as one’s own merit, is to flee from natural principle. That both violates the patterns of creation and invites punishment.

The sage rests in whatever state things already rest in, and does not try to settle what ought not to be settled.

Note: The sage has no fixed “at rest” or “not at rest”; he only follows the hearts of the people.

Commentary: “At rest” means letting things be as they are. The sage lets all living beings live according to their own natures, without dragging external things in to suit his own wishes; nor does he forcibly establish what was never there to begin with. This is why the sage is called a sage.

The multitude, by contrast, fix their minds on what they ought not to rest in, and are restless toward what they ought to rest in.

Note: What the multitude rests in differs from the sage; hence they are called the multitude.

Commentary: They study what they cannot naturally rest in, so they chase after what should not be chased; they are not content with their proper lot, so they are dissatisfied with what they should be content with.

Zhuangzi said: “To understand the great Dao is easy; not to speak of it is hard.”

Commentary: The mysterious great Dao is deep and hard to fathom; once it is put into words, distortion is hard to avoid. Grasping it is not difficult—the real difficulty is forgetting words.

To understand and not speak is to accord with nature; to understand and speak is to turn toward artificiality.

Commentary: If one subtly awakens to the profound Dao, one sees that it has no fixed rule that can be stated, and so one can return to the natural. Even if one has penetrated to the utmost, as long as one still clings to words and disputation, one has not yet left the ways of worldly human sentiment.

The true persons of old followed nature and were not swayed by artificial human feelings.

Note: Though they understood the principle, they never preached it in speech; they only followed each thing’s proper share and responded to what it required.

Commentary: The true persons and attained masters of old were plain and natural by nature, no longer ruled by worldly human sentiment.

Zhu Puman studied the art of dragon-slaying from Zhi Li Yi. He spent the entire family fortune; only after three years of study did he master it—yet in the end there was no occasion to use this skill.

Note: In action, what matters is fitting real need; pursuing grand achievements is not what is prized.

Commentary: Zhu Puman’s surname was Zhu and his given name Puman; Zhi Li Yi’s surname was Zhi and his given name Li Yi. “Dan” means to exhaust. Zhu Puman poured out a fortune in gold to learn the technique of killing dragons, studying with single-minded hardship for three years before he succeeded. Though the skill was ingenious, it finally had no use, because opportunities to slay dragons are rare in the world. The point is that in worldly conduct, appropriateness and balance are what count; if one cannot match reality, even the greatest ability is of no benefit.

The sage treats even what seems inevitable as if it might not be, and therefore does not resort to weapons.

Note: Even when a course of action looks necessary, the sage does not treat it as absolutely unalterable—that is what accords with nature. If one can be like this, how could there still be war?

 䟽達道之士隨逐物情理雖必然猶不固  執故無交爭也 衆人以不必必之故多兵  註理雖未必抑而必之各必其所見則乖  逆生也  䟽庸庶之類妄爲封執理不必爾而固必  之既忤物情則多乖矣 順於兵故行有求  註物各順性則足足則無求  䟽心有貪求故任於執固之情也 兵恃之則亡  註不得已而用之以恬淡爲上者未之亡  也  䟽不能大順羣命而好乖逆物情者則幾  亡吾寳矣 小夫之知不離苞苴竿牘  註苞苴以遺竿牘以問遺問之具小知所  殉  䟽小夫猶匹夫也苞苴香草也竿牘竹簡  也夫搴芳草以相贈折簡牘以相問者斯  蓋俗中細務固非丈夫之所忍爲 敝精神乎蹇淺  註昏於小務所得者淺  䟽好爲遺問徇於小務可謂勞精神於跛  蹇淺薄之事不能遊虚涉遠矣 而欲兼濟導物太一形虚若是者迷惑于宇 宙形累不知太初  註小夫之知而欲兼濟導物經虚涉遠志  大神敝形爲之累則迷惑而失致也  䟽以蹇淺之知而欲兼濟羣物導達羣生  望得虚空其形合太一之玄道者終不可  也此人迷於古今形累於六合何能照知  太初之妙理邪 彼至人者歸精神乎無始而甘瞑乎無何有 之鄉  䟽無始妙本也無何有之鄉道境也至德  之人動而常寂雖復兼濟道物而神凝無
Interpretation

Those who have attained the Great Dao act in accord with how things naturally unfold, yet they know that what holds in one case need not hold everywhere. They do not cling to fixed opinions, and so they do not contend with others.

Ordinary people do the opposite: they treat what is uncertain as if it were inevitable, each insisting that their own view is right. They go against one another and bring trouble on themselves.

Common folk are stubbornly opinionated. Even when they sense that things might not be as they claim, they still insist that they must be so. By violating the nature of things, they invite endless conflict.

When each being follows its own nature, it is content; in contentment, excessive wanting falls away. It is only when the heart is greedy that one clings to stubborn rivalry and the need to win.

Rely on armed force, and ruin follows. Use weapons only when there is no alternative, and take tranquillity—calm and non-contention—as the highest principle; then you are less likely to perish. Those who cannot honor the nature of each being, but delight in opposing the natural course of things, are close to losing what they value most.

Petty minds are caught up in small matters: gift herbs (baoju) and letters on bamboo slips (gaodu). Offering fragrant plants and exchanging polite notes are exactly what shallow cleverness fixates on. Pouring spirit into such trifles yields little, like a cripple forcing himself to walk: such people cannot wander in emptiness or reach what is deep.

People of narrow vision still want to take charge of all things, guide the multitude, and attain empty stillness and union with Taiyi (the supreme unity). If they wear down the spirit and let the body lead them astray, they lose themselves in the vastness of the cosmos and never grasp the way of Taichu (the primordial origin before differentiation).

The perfected person returns the spirit to what has no beginning—to a source that cannot be traced—and dwells at ease in the Village of No-Thing, the realm where nothing is fixed as “something.” In outward action they may still embrace all things and guide the living, but inwardly they remain gathered and still.

 始故能和光混俗而恒寢道鄉也 水流乎無形發泄乎大清  註泊然無爲而任其天行也  䟽無以順物如水流行隨時適變不守形  迹迹不離本故雖應動恒發泄於太清之  極也 悲哉乎汝爲知在毫毛  註爲知所得者細 而不知大寧  註任性大寧而至  䟽苞苴竿牘何異毫毛如斯運智深可悲  歎精神淺薄詎知乎至寂之道邪 宋人有曹商者爲宋王使秦其往也得車數 乗王悦之益車百乗  䟽姓曹名商宋人也爲宋偃王使秦應對  得所秦王愛之遂賜車百乗乗駟馬也 反於宋見莊子曰夫處窮閭阨巷困窘織屨 槁項黄馘者商之所短也一悟萬乗之主而 從車百乗者商之所長也  䟽窘急也言貧窮困急織屨以自供頸項  枯槁而顦顇頭面黄瘦而馘厲當爾之際  是商之所短也一使强秦遂使秦王驚悟  遺車百乗者是商之智數長也以此自多  矜夸莊子也 莊子曰秦王有病召醫破癰潰痤者得車一 乗舐痔者得車五乗所治愈下得車愈多子 豈治其痔邪何得車之多也子行矣  註夫事下然後功高功高然後禄重故高  遠恬淡者遺榮也  䟽癰痒熱毒腫也痔下漏病也莊生風神  俊悟志尚清遠既而縱此竒辯以挫曹商  故郭注云夫事下然後功高功高然後禄  重高遠恬淡者遺榮也
Interpretation

Thus one can gather in one’s light and blend with the ordinary world, yet always abide in the “homeland of the Dao.”

Water flows wherever it has no fixed shape, pouring and rushing into the vast, clear expanse.

Note: Be plain and without contrivance (Wuwei); follow the natural course of things.

Commentary: Do not deliberately resist what is outside you—like water in motion, adapt at every turn and do not cling to a fixed form. The form may shift with things, yet never leaves the root; so even when you respond and act, you still unfold within the utmost clarity.

Alas! The cleverness you use goes no further than tiny details.

Note: The cleverness you have is very limited, and you do not know what “great tranquility” (inner peace in accord with nature) really is.

Commentary: Using gifts, letters, and fine words to seek gain—how is that different from haggling over the smallest trifle? To use cleverness like this is truly lamentable. Those whose spirit is shallow—how could they understand the utterly still and silent Dao?

In Song there was a man named Cao Shang who went as envoy to Qin for the king of Song. On the mission he received several carriages; the king of Qin was pleased and gave him a hundred more.

Commentary: Cao Shang was from Song; his name was Shang. He served King Yan of Song as envoy to Qin. Skilled in repartee, he won the king of Qin’s favor and was given a hundred carriages, each drawn by four horses.

When Cao Shang returned to Song and met Zhuangzi, he said: “Living in a poor, narrow lane, in want and hardship, making a living weaving straw sandals, with a withered neck and a sallow, haggard face—in that I am not your match. But I made the ruler of a state of ten thousand chariots wake in a morning, and when I went out I had a hundred carriages following me—that is where I excel.”

Commentary: “Jiong” (窘) means pressed and in straits. Cao Shang said that in poverty he wove sandals to live, his neck thin and his face gaunt—those were his shortcomings; after his mission to powerful Qin, the king of Qin was moved and gave him a hundred carriages—that was his cleverness and his strong point. He boasted in this way and showed off before Zhuangzi.

Zhuangzi said: “When the king of Qin fell ill, he called for a doctor. Whoever lanced his carbuncle and drained the pus got one carriage; whoever licked his hemorrhoids got five carriages. The lower the place treated, the more carriages one received. Did you perhaps treat the king of Qin’s hemorrhoids—how else would you get so many carriages? Be off with you!”

Note: The baser the deed, the greater the merit seems; the greater the merit, the richer the reward. Therefore those of lofty aim and quiet detachment set glory and rank aside.

Commentary: A carbuncle (yong) is a hot, toxic swelling; hemorrhoids (zhi) are disease of the lower bowel. Zhuangzi, with refined spirit and keen insight, aim lofty and mind still, used this sharp paradox to put Cao Shang down. Guo Xiang’s commentary says: the baser the deed, the greater the merit appears; the greater the merit, the richer the stipend. Those of lofty aim and quiet detachment cast away glory and wealth.

魯哀公問乎顔闔曰吾以仲尼爲貞幹國其 有瘳乎  䟽言仲尼有忠貞幹濟之德欲命爲卿相  魯邦亂病庶瘳差矣 曰殆哉圾乎仲尼  註圾危也夫至人以民靜爲安今一爲貞  幹則遺高迹於萬世令飾競於仁義而畫  其毛彩百姓既危至人亦無以爲安也  䟽殆近也圾危也以貞幹迹率物物既失  性仲尼何以安也 方且飾羽而畫  註凡言方且皆謂後世從事飾晝非任眞  也  䟽方將貞幹輔相魯廷萬代奔逐修飾羽  儀喪其眞性也 從事華辭以支爲㫖  註將令後世之從事者無實而意趣横出  也  䟽聖迹既彰令從政任事情偽辭車析派  分流爲意㫖也 忍性以視民而不知不信  註後世人君將慕仲尼之遐軌而遂忍性  自矯僞以臨民上下相習遂不自知也  䟽後代人君慕仲尼遐軌安忍情性用之  臨人上下相習矯僞黔黎而不知已無信  實也以華僞之迹教示蒼生禀承心靈宰  割眞性用此居人之上何足稱哉 受乎心宰乎神夫何足以上民  註今以上民則後世百姓非直外形從之  而已乃以心神受而用之不能復自得於  心中也  䟽彼代百姓非直外形從之乃以心神受  用之不能復自得之性以此居民上何足  可安哉 彼宜汝與  註彼百姓也汝哀公也彼與汝各自有所  宜相效則失眞此即今之見驗
Interpretation

Duke Ai of Lu asked Yan He: “I wish to entrust Zhongni with the heavy responsibility of governing the state. Can the realm’s disorder be improved?”

Yan He said: “I fear it would be very dangerous indeed! Once Zhongni is held up as the model for governing the state, later ages will take his conduct as the standard, competing to adorn Ren and Yi (benevolence and righteousness) as one might paint patterns on feathers. The people will thereby be driven into hardship, and those who accord with nature—sages unbound by artificial norms—will no longer be able to live at ease in the world.”

“Afterward, people will busy themselves with polishing outward appearance, as if painting designs on feathers; they will also indulge in florid speech, taking branch tips and side streams for the main current. Once the sage’s deeds are widely celebrated, those who enter government may have words alone, each clinging to one side and giving rise to all manner of partial intentions.”

“Later rulers, admiring Zhongni’s lofty style, will suppress their native nature and deliberately reshape themselves, using this to govern the people. Above and below will imitate one another, and little by little all will lose what is genuine—yet without knowing it or trusting themselves. To make people accept these practices and carry them out in mind and spirit—how can one rule the people on that basis?”

“The people will not merely comply on the surface; they will accept and apply these norms inwardly, in mind and spirit, until they can no longer recover their original nature. To sit above the people in this way—how could one be at ease?”

“The people have the way of life that suits the people; you, Duke Ai, have what suits you. Copying one another and mutual imitation instead erodes what is authentic; the present situation already proves this.”

 䟽彼百姓也汝哀公也百姓與汝各有所  宜若將汝所宜與百姓不可也 予頤與  註效彼非所以養己也  䟽予我也頤養也我與百姓怡養不同譬  如魚鳥升沈各異若以汝所養衛物物我  俱失也 誤而可矣  註正不可也  䟽以貞幹之迹錯誤行之正不可也 今使民離實學僞非所以視民也爲後世慮 不若休之  註問不謂當時也  䟽離實性學僞法不可教示黎民慮後世  荒亂不如休止也 難治也  註治之則僞故聖人不治也  䟽捨己效物聖人不治也 施於人而不忘非天布也  註布而識之非芻狗萬物也  䟽二儀布生萬物豈貴恩也 商賈不齒  註况士君子乎  䟽夫能施求報商客尚不齒理况君子士  人乎 雖以事齒之神者弗齒  註要能施惠故於事不得不齒以其不忘  故心神忽之此百姓之大情也  䟽施而不忘未合天道能施恩惠於物事  不得不齒爲責求報心神輕忽不録百姓  之情也事之者性倩也 爲外刑者金與木也  註金謂刀鋸斧鉞木謂棰楚桎梏 爲内刑者動與過也  註靜而當則外内無刑 宵人之離外刑者金木訊之  䟽宵闇夜也離羅也訊問也闇惑之人罹  於憲網身遭枷杻斧鉞之刑也 離内刑者陰陽食之  註動而過分則性氣傷於内金木訊於外  也
Interpretation

The common people have ways of life that suit them, and you have what suits you. To impose on the people what you think fits yourself is inappropriate.

“Yu yi yu” means: “Do I need the same kind of nurturing as the common people?”

“Xiao bi” means imitating others—it cannot be used to nurture oneself. “Wo” means oneself; “yi” means nurturing. The way one nurtures oneself is not the same as the way one nurtures the common people, just as fish and birds differ—one is suited to diving and swimming, the other to flying. If you force on all things the nurturing you esteem, both those things and you yourself will lose what is fitting for each.

“Wu er ke yi” means: applying what is right in the wrong place naturally will not work.

Today, making the people abandon their nature to learn artificial, contrived rules is not a good way to teach them. Thinking ahead for later generations, rather than letting the age grow more chaotic, it is better to stop this practice.

The “question” in the text does not refer to conditions at that time. The people turning from true nature to learn false rules—these should not be used to instruct the people. If one considers later ages, letting the world fall into disorder is worse than putting an end to such ways.

Governing the people is difficult. If one governs with deliberate effort, falsity results instead; therefore the sage does not govern in that way. Abandoning one’s own nature to imitate external things—the sage will not do that.

Doing someone a favor while keeping that favor in mind does not accord with the natural way (Dao). Heaven and Earth generate and transform the myriad things—was it so that the myriad things would feel gratitude for their virtue (De)?

“Shang gu bu chi” means: merchants who do favors yet demand repayment are already despised; how much more so for scholars and gentlemen?

Even in terms of ritual and practical affairs, one who bestows favor deserves respect; but if after bestowing favor one cannot forget it, inwardly one will slight and effectively erase that kindness. This is ordinary human feeling among the people. To bestow favor without forgetting does not match the natural way; if one bestows favor on others yet treats it as grounds to demand return, inwardly one will look down on the other. “Shi” here means the usual patterns in human exchange.

External punishment is inflicted with metal and wooden implements. Metal implements include knives, saws, axes, and battle-axes; wooden implements include cudgels, fetters, and the like.

Internal punishment comes from misconduct and excess. If one can remain quiet, hold to constancy, and act appropriately, neither inside nor outside will bring punishment.

“Xiao ren” refers to the benighted; “li” means to suffer, “xun” means to interrogate. Benighted, ignorant people fall into the net of law, and their bodies suffer fetters, cudgels, axes, and battle-axes.

Those who suffer internal punishment harm body and mind through restless conduct and overstepping their place; external metal and wooden implements may also be used to examine and punish them.

 䟽若不止分則内結寒暑陰陽殘食之也 夫免乎外内之刑者唯眞人能之  註自非眞人未有能止其分者故必外内  受刑但不問大小耳  䟽心若死灰内不滑靈府形同槁木外不  挂桎梏唯眞人哉 孔子曰凡人心險於山川難於知天天猶有 春秋冬夏旦暮之期人者厚貌深倩  䟽人心難知甚於山川過於蒼昊厚深之  狀列在下文 故有貌願而益有畏若不肖  䟽願慤眞也不肖不似也人有形如慤眞  而心益虚浮也有心實長者形如不肖也 有順懷而遠  䟽懷急也形順躁急而心達理也 有堅而縵有緩而釬  註言人情貌之反有如此者  䟽縵緩也釬急也自有形如堅固而實散  縵亦有外形寬緩心内躁急也 故其就義若渴者其去義若熱  註但爲難知耳未爲殊無迹  䟽人有就仁義如渴思水捨仁義若熱逃  火雖復難知未爲無迹徵驗具列下文也 故君子遠使之而觀其忠近使之而觀其敬  䟽遠使忠佞斯彰咫步敬慢立明者也 煩使之而觀其能  䟽煩極任使察其彼能 卒然問焉而觀其知  䟽卒問近對觀其願智 急與之期而觀其信  䟽忽卒與期觀信契也 委之以財而觀其仁  䟽仁者不貪 告之以危而觀其節  䟽告危亡驗節操 醉之以酒而觀其則雜之以處而觀其色
Interpretation

If one does not halt this inward partitioning and fixed limits, cold and heat will arise from within the heart-mind, yin and yang will fall out of balance, and in the end one will be harmed.

Only one who has attained the status of a zhenren (a person whose cultivation has reached the true realm) can be spared both outer and inner forms of harm.

Note: Unless one is a zhenren, no one can fully stop this partitioning; therefore one will ultimately suffer inner and outer harm—only the degree differs.

Commentary: The heart-mind is like dead ashes; the spirit’s dwelling is not thrown into disorder by external things. The bodily form is like withered wood; outwardly one is not bound or confined. Only a zhenren can achieve this.

Confucius said: The human mind is harder to fathom than mountains and ravines, and harder to know than Heaven itself. Heaven at least has the shifts of spring, summer, autumn, and winter and the fixed times of dawn and dusk; yet people may look thick and honest while their inner depths are hard to measure.

Commentary: The human heart is harder to distinguish than mountains and harder to gauge than the azure sky. What follows lists many cases in which outward appearance and inner reality do not match.

Some look modest, sincere, even worthy of respect, yet inwardly they are hollow and unstable. Others do not look like people of deep loyalty, yet inwardly they are honest and reliable.

Commentary: “Yuan” means sincere and plain; “bu xiao” means not resembling what is expected or not fitting usual norms. Some appear sincere and genuine while their hearts are actually floating and insubstantial; some are truly upright and long-suffering within while their outward bearing does not show it.

Some seem compliant and urgent on the outside yet understand principle within.

Commentary: “Huai” carries a sense of haste. Some appear yielding and impatient outwardly while inwardly they can grasp the Way’s patterns.

Some are hard on the outside yet loose within; others look relaxed and slow outwardly yet are restless within.

Note: Human temperament often runs opposite to appearance; the cases are just like this.

Commentary: “Man” is slackness; “pan” is impatience. Some look solid but are scattered inside; others look easygoing outside yet are agitated within.

Thus some rush toward ren and yi (humaneness and righteousness) as if thirsty and seeking water, yet shun ren and yi as if fleeing scorching heat when they turn away.

Note: This only means the heart is hard to know—not that there are no signs at all.

Commentary: Some pursue ren and yi like someone parched and craving drink; when they abandon ren and yi, they act as if avoiding fire. Though the inner mind is hard to read, there are still traces to observe; what follows sets out concrete methods.

Therefore the noble person can send someone on distant business and observe whether he is loyal; keep him close at hand and observe whether he is respectful.

Commentary: Send him on a long errand and loyalty or treachery will show; keep him near and respect or neglect will soon appear.

Give him heavy, tangled tasks and observe his capacity.

Commentary: Hand him burdensome work and test whether he has real ability.

Question him suddenly and observe his wit.

Commentary: Put unexpected questions to him face to face and see whether he has wisdom.

Press him with a hasty appointment and observe whether he keeps faith.

Commentary: Fix a deadline on short notice and see whether he honors it.

Entrust wealth to him and observe whether he is generous and upright.

Commentary: A person of ren (humaneness) will not covet others’ property.

Tell him of danger and observe his integrity of character.

Commentary: Inform him of peril or ruin to test the firmness of his moral fiber.

Let him drink until drunk and observe whether he holds to his usual conduct; let him mix with all sorts of people and observe how he carries himself.

 䟽至人酒不能昏法則男女參居貞操不  易 九徵至不肖人得矣  䟽君子易觀不肖難明然視其所以觀其  所由察其所安搜之有塗亦可知也  䟽九事徵驗小人君子厚貌深情必無所  避 正考父一命而傴再命而僂三命而俯循墻 而走孰敢不軌  註言人不敢以不軌之事侮之  䟽考成也父大也有考成大德而履正道  故號正考父則孔子十代祖宋大夫也士  一命大夫二命卿三命也傴曲循墻並敬  容極恭卑退若此誰敢將不軌之事而侮  之也 如而夫者一命而吕鉅再命而於車上儛三 命而名諸父孰協唐許  註而夫謂凡夫也唐謂堯也許謂許由也  言而夫與考父者誰同於唐許之事也  䟽而夫鄙夫也諸父伯叔也凡夫篤競軒  冕一命則吕鉅夸華再命則援綏作舞三  命善識自高下呼伯叔之名然考夫謙夸  各異格量勝劣誰同唐堯許由無爲襌讓  之風哉 賊莫大乎德有心  註有心於爲德非眞德也夫眞德者忽然  自得而不知所以德也  䟽役智勞慮有心爲德此賊害之甚也 而心有眼  註率心爲德猶之可耳役心於眉睫之間  則僞已甚矣 及其有眼也而内視内視而敗矣  註乃欲探射幽隱以深爲事則心與事俱  敗矣  䟽率心爲役用心神於眼睫縁慮逐境不  知休止致危敗甚矣
Interpretation

A person of supreme attainment, even when drinking wine, does not thereby lose clarity; even when men and women mingle, their upright integrity does not waver. Through nine kinds of signs, one can recognize the thoroughly unworthy.

A gentleman is easy to see through; the unworthy are hard to discern. Yet if you observe why they act as they do, where they come from, and what puts their mind at ease, and follow the thread with careful inquiry, you can still know what sort of person they are. These nine matters can be used to examine people: petty men and gentlemen, however thick-skinned and deep-hearted they appear, cannot hide forever.

Zhengkaofu—the tenth-generation ancestor of Confucius and a minister of Song—when he first received appointment as a shi, walked with bowed waist; the second time, as daifu, he walked with curved back; the third time, as qing, he hugged the wall as he went. He was so reverent and self-lowering that who would dare offend him with improper conduct? “Kao” suggests accomplishment; “fu” suggests greatness. Zhengkaofu accomplished great virtue and walked the upright path, and thus received this name. Shi, daifu, and qing correspond to the first, second, and third appointments. Zhengkaofu’s bearing was extremely respectful and humble, so none dared offend him.

Ordinary people, by contrast, swagger when they first receive appointment; at the second they flourish their arms from their carriage; at the third they call their uncles and elders by name. How can such people be compared with Tang Yao and Xu You? “Erfu” refers to ordinary folk; “Tang” is Tang Yao and “Xu” is Xu You. Bo and shu are terms for paternal elders. Ordinary people are obsessed with rank and finery: with one appointment they boast and display luxury; with two they dance about in their carriage; with three they become self-important and call elders by name. Zhengkaofu’s conduct is utterly unlike theirs—how could they match the wuwei (non-action) and abdication in favor of others that characterize Tang Yao and Xu You?

The greatest harm is to treat virtue as something to pursue on purpose. Deliberately using the mind to perform virtue is not true virtue. One who truly has De possesses it naturally and does not know why.

If one only follows the heart’s inclination, that is still tolerable; but if the spirit is spent between the brows and lashes, calculating at every turn, that is already hypocrisy. When the mind grows as fine as the eye and turns inward to probe hidden things, making deep investigation its business, heart and deed corrupt together. If the spirit is endlessly applied to chasing the outer world without stopping, danger and failure follow.

凶德有五中德爲首  䟽謂心耳眼舌鼻也曰此五根禍因此德  謂凶德也五根禍主中德爲無心也 何謂中德中德也者有以自好也而吡其所 不爲者也  註吡訾也夫自是而非彼則攻之者非一  故爲凶首也若中無自好之倩則恣萬物  之所是所是各不自失則天下皆思奉之  矣  䟽吡訾也用心中所好者自以爲是不同  己爲者訾而非之以心中自是爲得故曰  中德 窮有八極達有三必形有六府  䟽八極三必窮達猶人身有六府也列下  文矣 美髯長大壯麗勇敢八者俱過人也因以是 窮  註窮於受役也然天下未曾窮於所短而  恒以所長自困  䟽美恣媚也髯髭鬢也長高也大粗大也  壯多力麗妍華勇猛敢果决也藴此八事  超過常人受役既多因以窮困也 縁循偃佒困畏不若人三者俱通達  註縁循杖物而行者也偃佒不能俯執者  也困畏怯弱者也此三者既不以事見任  乃將接佐之故必達也  䟽循順也縁物順他不能自立也偃佒仰  首不能俛執也困畏困苦怯懼也有此三事  不如恒人所在通達也 知慧外通  註通外則以無崖傷其内也  䟽自持智慧照物外通塵境也 勇動多怨  註怯而靜乃厚其身耳  䟽雄健躁擾必招讎隙 仁義多責  註天下皆望其愛然愛之則有不周矣故  多責
Interpretation

Among the vicious traits, there are five kinds, and “Zhongde” (central self-righteousness in the heart) ranks first.

Commentary: The “five” here are the five roots—the heart-mind, ears, eyes, tongue, and nose, the organs that take in the outer world. Trouble starts from these five roots, so they are called the roots of vicious traits. What leads among them, “Zhongde,” is when the heart has its own fixed view and insists that it alone is right.

What is “Zhongde”? It is when the heart favors certain things and mocks or disparages what it dislikes or refuses to do.

Note: “Pi” means to slander or ridicule. Once you take yourself as right and others as wrong, many people will turn against you; that is why it is the foremost root of vicious traits. If the heart holds no stubborn likes, you can go along with each thing’s own bent; when everything keeps to its nature and does not lose its place, people everywhere will naturally want to be close to you.

Commentary: If you use what your heart likes as the measure of right and wrong, you will mock and reject those who differ; because you believe your own mind is correct, this is called “Zhongde.”

There are eight extreme forms of distress, three situations in which success is almost inevitable, and the human body has six inner repositories (organs).

Commentary: What follows lists the eight extremes and the three paths to success; “distress” and “success,” like the body’s six repositories, each belong to their own category.

Beautiful looks, a full beard, tall height, a stocky frame, great strength, handsome features, courage, and decisiveness—these eight strengths that surpass ordinary people often become the very reason one falls into distress.

Note: Distress here means being put to service by others. The world does not usually trap a person because of his weaknesses; it often traps him because of his strengths.

Commentary: “Mei” is fine appearance, “ran” a full beard, “chang” tall stature, “da” a thick build, “zhuang” physical power, “li” handsome looks, “yong” bravery, “gan” resolve. These eight qualities exceed the norm, so one is often ordered about and driven into difficulty.

Being good at going along with things and with other people, holding the head high and refusing to bow into practical tasks, and being timid and fearful—these three conditions tend to bring success.

Note: “Yuanyun” is leaning on outer things and moving with them; “yanyang” is looking up and being unable to bow the head to take on affairs; “kunwei” is weakness and fear. Such people are not given heavy responsibility but are set to meet and assist others, and so they often get through.

Commentary: “Xun” is compliance. “Following things and others” means clinging to the outer world and yielding to others, unable to stand on one’s own; “yanyang” is raising the head and refusing to bow into work; “kunwei” is hardship and cowardice. These three seem inferior, yet they often open the way everywhere.

When cleverness and talent are displayed outward, the inner heart is easily harmed.

Note: When wit is turned entirely toward outer things, one may damage the inner heart by endlessly answering the world without limit.

Commentary: Relying on one’s own intelligence to observe things, the mind runs outward into the dusty realm of worldly affairs.

Boldness and restless activity easily draw resentment.

Note: Timidity and stillness, by contrast, can preserve the person.

Commentary: Being fierce and agitated inevitably invites enmity and quarrel.

Insisting on benevolence and righteousness easily draws reproach.

Note: Everyone hopes the humane and righteous person will care for them; yet once care is given, some will inevitably be left out, and blame follows.

Commentary: The world expects the practitioner of ren and yi to cherish others; when love is partial, gaps appear and criticism arises.

 䟽仁義則不周必有多責也 達生之情者傀  註傀然大恬解之貌也 達於知者肖  註肖釋散也  䟽注云消釋散也傀恬解也達悟之崖眞  性虚照傀然縣解無係戀也 達大命者隨  註泯然與化俱也  䟽大命大年假如彭祖壽考隨而順之亦  不厭其長乆以爲勞苦也 達小命者遭  註每在節上住乃悟也  䟽小命小年也遭遇也如殤子促齡所遇  斯適曾不介懷耳 人有見宋王者錫車十乗以其十乗驕穉莊 子  䟽錫與也穉後也宋襄王時有庸瑣之人  游宋妄說宋王錫車十乗用此驕炫排莊  周於己後自矜物先也 莊子曰河上有家貧恃緯蕭而食者其子没 於淵得千金之珠其父謂其子曰取石來鍛 之夫千金之珠必在九重之淵而驪龍頷下 子能得珠者必遭其睡也使驪龍而寤子尚 奚微之有哉  䟽葦蘆也蕭蒿也家貧織蘆蒿爲薄賣以  供食鍛椎也驪黑龍也頷下有千金之珠  也譬譏得車之人也 今宋國之深非直九重之淵也宋王之猛非 直驪龍也子能得車者必遭其睡也使宋王 而寤子爲𩐎粉夫  註夫取富貴必順乎民望也若挾竒說乗  天衢以嬰人主之心者明君之所不受也  故如有所譽必有所試於斯民不違僉曰  舉之以合萬夫之望者此三代所以直道  而行之也
Interpretation

Those who keep their distance from benevolence and righteousness find it hard to treat people and handle affairs with full fairness, and they inevitably invite a great deal of blame.

Those who penetrate the true feeling of life have a mind that opens wide and at ease.

Note: Here kui (傀) describes a state of calm, expansive ease, free of constraint.

Those who penetrate wisdom see idle thoughts melt away.

Note: Here xiao (肖) means to disperse and let go.

Commentary: The note says that xiao is to melt and vanish, and kui is to be calmly at ease and expansive. One who truly penetrates sees through to what is genuine. With the heart-mind empty-quiet yet clear, the inner world opens without being tied by cares and fixations.

Those who penetrate the great mandate of life follow nature as it is.

Note: Minran (泯然) means seamless and without trace—merging with change itself.

Commentary: The great mandate refers to long life. Even someone as long-lived as Peng Zu can follow life naturally and will not feel worn down simply because life lasts so long.

Those who penetrate the small mandate of life also go along with whatever they meet.

Note: When one reaches a turning point in life, one stops there in peace and understands from it.

Commentary: The small mandate means a short life; zao (遭) is what one encounters. A child who dies young, for example, has a brief life—what comes is simply what comes; one who penetrates does not take it to heart.

A man went to see the king of Song. The king rewarded him with ten carriages. He then used those ten carriages to show off before Zhuangzi, as if he stood above him.

Commentary: Xi (锡) is to bestow; zhi (穉) refers to a junior. In the time of King Xiang of Song, a shallow man won the king over and received ten carriages. He grew proud and flaunted them, thinking himself more valued than Zhuang Zhou.

Zhuangzi said: “By the river lived a poor household that made a living weaving curtains from reeds and wormwood. The son dove into deep water and brought up a pearl worth a thousand in gold. The father told his son: ‘Fetch a stone and smash the pearl. A pearl worth a thousand in gold must lie in a pool nine layers deep, under the chin of a black dragon. You could get it only because the black dragon was asleep. If the black dragon had been awake, could you have come back alive?’”

Commentary: Xiao (萧) is wormwood; the poor wove reeds and wormwood into curtains to sell for food. Duan (锻) is to strike; lilong (骊龙) is the black dragon. Under the black dragon’s chin lies a pearl worth a thousand in gold. The story mocks the man who won the carriages.

Today the depths and dangers of Song are more than a ninefold abyss; the fierceness of the king of Song is not only that of a black dragon. You could get those carriages only because the king of Song was asleep. If the king of Song had been awake, you would already have been ground to pulp.

Note: Seeking wealth and honor should align with what the people hope for. To rely on strange doctrines, seize the moment to approach the ruler and sway his heart—no wise ruler will accept that. Therefore, whenever someone is praised, it must be tested among the people: only if all lift him up together and he matches the common hope may he be employed. That is how the Xia, Shang, and Zhou followed the upright way in their conduct.

 䟽懷忠貞以感人主者必非常之賞而用  左道使其說佞媚君王僥倖於富貴者故  有驕穉之容亦何異遭驪龍睡得珠邪餘  詳注意 或聘於莊子  䟽寓言不明聘人姓氏族故言或也 莊子應其使曰子見夫犧牛乎  䟽犧養也君王預前三日養牛祭宗廟曰  犧也 衣以文繡食以芻菽及其牽而入於太廟雖 欲爲孤犢其可得乎  註樂生者畏犧而辭聘髑髏聞生而矉𥉷  此死生之情異而各自當也  䟽芻草也菽豆也犧養豐贍臨祭日求爲  孤犢不可得也况禄食之人例多夭折嘉  遁之士方足全生莊子清高笑彼名利 莊子將死弟子欲厚葬之莊子曰吾以天地 爲棺槨以日月爲連璧星辰爲珠璣萬物爲 齎送吾葬具豈不備邪何以加此  䟽莊子妙達玄道逆旅形骸故棺槨天地  鑪冶兩儀珠璣星辰變化三景資送備矣  門人厚葬深乖造物也 弟子曰吾恐烏鳶之食夫子也莊子曰在上 烏鳶食在下爲螻蟻食奪彼與此何其偏也  䟽鳶鷀也門人荷師主深恩也將欲厚葬  避其烏鳶豈知厚葬還遭螻蟻情好所奪  偏私之也 以不平平其平也不平  註以一家之平平萬物未若任萬物之自  平也  䟽無情與奪委任均平此眞平也若運情  慮均平萬物若欲起心已不平矣 以不徵徵其徵也不徵
Interpretation

Those who harbor loyalty and move their sovereign often receive extraordinary rewards and appointments. Those who rely on heterodox doctrines and flatter the ruler with sycophantic words to grasp wealth and rank by chance therefore show a proud, childish air. Is this not like taking a pearl from the Lili dragon while it sleeps? For the rest, see the commentary.

Perhaps someone came to invite Zhuangzi.

Commentary: The parable does not give the visitor’s surname, hence “perhaps” (或).

Zhuangzi answered the envoy: “Have you seen the ox prepared for sacrifice?”

Commentary: “犧” (xi) means to fatten for sacrifice. The ruler feeds the ox for three days before the rite; when it is led into the ancestral temple, it is called the “sacrificial ox” (xi).

“It is dressed in embroidered trappings and fed grass and beans. When the time comes to lead it into the Grand Temple for sacrifice, even if it wished to be a calf again, how could that be?”

Note: Those who delight in life fear becoming a sacrificial ox and therefore decline the invitation; when a skull (dulou) hears talk of living, it frowns in displeasure. This shows that feelings toward life and death differ from person to person, each resting in their own situation.

Commentary: “芻” (chu) is fodder grass; “菽” (shu) is beans. The sacrificial ox enjoys rich feeding, yet on the day of sacrifice it cannot become a calf again even if it wishes. Moreover, those who enjoy stipends often die young; those who withdraw and hold to simplicity more often preserve life. Zhuangzi, lofty and detached, used this to mock those who chase fame and gain.

When Zhuangzi was about to die, his disciples wanted to give him an elaborate burial. Zhuangzi said: “I take heaven and earth as my inner and outer coffins, the sun and moon as paired jade disks (lian bi), the stars as pearls and jade, and all things as funeral goods. Are my burial fittings not already complete? What could be better than this?”

Commentary: Zhuangzi penetrated the profound Dao and regarded the body as something lodged only briefly on a journey. Therefore he took heaven and earth as coffins, the two cosmic poles as a smelting furnace, and stars, sun, and moon as pearls and jade; the transformations of things and the brightness of heaven and earth could all serve as offerings for his send-off. The burial gear was already complete. If the disciples gave him a lavish burial, they would go against the workings of creation (zao hua).

The disciples said: “We fear crows and eagles will eat the Master’s body.” Zhuangzi said: “Left above ground, crows and eagles will eat it; buried underground, ants will eat it. You would rob the birds to give the body to the ants—why this partiality?”

Commentary: “鸢” (yuan) is a bird of the hawk kind. The disciples bore deep affection for their teacher and wished to bury him richly to keep off crows and eagles; they did not realize that after a lavish burial the body would still be eaten by ants. When emotion favors one side, bias appears.

To use one’s own partiality to decree how all things must be “fair” is to make what is called fair in truth unfair.

Note: Judging all things by the standard of one household is inferior to letting each thing find its own balance.

Commentary: Fairness that does not pick and choose by personal feeling, but lets each thing balance itself, is true fairness. Once you scheme how to make things balanced, that thought itself is already unfair.

To use external verification to prove how things inherently are is to make what is called proof unable truly to prove.

 註徵應也不因萬物之自應而欲以其所  見應之則必有不合矣  䟽聖人無心有感則應此眞應也若有心  應物不能應也徵應也 明者唯爲之使  註夫執其所見受使多矣安能使物哉  䟽自炫其明情應於務爲物驅使何能役  人也 神者徵之  註唯任神然後能至順故無往不應也  䟽神者無心寂然不動能無不應也 夫明之不勝神也乆矣  註明之所及不過於形骸也至順則無遠  近幽深皆各自得  䟽明則有心應務爲物驅役神乃無心應  感無方有心不及無心存應不及忘應格  量可知也 而愚者恃其所見入於人其功外也不亦悲 乎  註夫至順則用發於彼而以藏於物若恃  其所見執其自是雖欲入人其功外矣  䟽夫忘懷應物者爲而不恃功成不居愚  惑之徒自執其用叨人功績歸入己身雖  欲矜伐其功外矣
Interpretation

Zhuangzi said: “Zheng” (征) means response. Do not deliberately answer the natural resonances of the myriad things from what you yourself observe; if you insist on responding according to your own perceptions, you will inevitably miss what is fitting.

The sage has no fixed views. When something outside stirs him, he responds of itself—this is genuine response. Meet the myriad things with subjective intent, and you cannot respond as you should.

Those who see clearly are only pushed around by external things.

Cling to your own opinions and you are dragged about by countless affairs—how could you command external things? Fancy yourself clever and have to cope with everything, and you are led by external things instead—how could you rule over others?

One who has spirit-like responsiveness can let the myriad things receive response in their own way.

Only by following the spirit-like (the clear, unwilled awareness) can one reach the utmost ease; then whatever comes along, one can meet it.

“Spirit-like responsiveness” means no fixed intent, still and unmoving, yet answering everything without fail.

Clear seeing falls far short of spirit-like responsiveness—that has always been so.

Clear seeing only reaches form and surface; in utmost ease there is no far or near, shallow or deep—the myriad things each find their place.

Clear seeing is handling affairs with a set mind, so one is driven by things; spirit-like responsiveness is answering without mind, and resonance has no fixed bounds. Answering on purpose cannot match answering without purpose; guarding response cannot match forgetting that you need to respond and answering naturally. The gap between the two speaks for itself.

The foolish trust their own understanding and try to force their will on others; the merit they produce ends up outside them—is that not pitiful?

One who accords with nature: the push to act comes from things, but the work belongs to the myriad things. Rely on your views and stubbornly insist you are right—even if you want to sway others, merit will not truly be yours. The foolish and deluded cling to what they do and treat others’ achievements as their own; even when they want to boast, the merit is never theirs. To be lost to that degree is truly lamentable.

迷忘如此深可悲哉 南華眞經註䟽卷之三十四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0139); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 33 Vol. 35 →