中文 · 繁體 · EN · KO

《太上感應篇》Vol. 15

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 15 / 30 3,789 characters

About this page. The original text of 《太上感應篇》 Vol. 15 (Taiqing 太清部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 8 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《太上感應篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

太上感應篇卷之十五廉四     李昌齡傅鄭清之賛 侵人所愛  傳曰許真君在世日甞於南昌誅一蛇精  道侣願從者無慮千數真君止選素所知  者三百人與之偕行旣而夜宿山下又慮  其修行無力因向火取三百塊炭變爲三  百美人遣令試之及明驗視惟呉猛施道  一二人衣無炭跡餘二百九十八人皆是  與炭合者當其合時豈不人人視爲一美  婦人安知特一塊炭乎大抵皆慾習未斷  易至如是况不知修行者乎昔陶榖奉使  江南崖岸髙古風采凛然雖燕談未甞啓  齒韓熈載謂所親曰吾觀是人初非端士  其守可隳當令諸公一笑乃選名妓得秦  弱蘭者衣以弊衣使詐爲驛子之女旦暮  擁箒掃灑驛庭弱蘭有絶色陶爲之動遂  失謹獨之戒因作郵亭詞數闋使弱蘭歌  之後數日李主大張燕以巨鍾酌公公嚴  毅如初於是出弱蘭使歌所贈詞以侑之  榖乃大慚竟至醉吐茵席李主自此待之  薄矣及歸朝廷已知不復任用文潞公在  蜀頗多燕集有飛語聞適御史何聖從名  郯謁告歸蜀生因令宻訪其事郯將壓境  潞公爲之灈張少愚名俞白公曰聖從之  來亦不足慮前任漢州適同郡㑹有營妓  善舞聖從愛之至問之姓妓曰妾姓楊聖  從曰所謂楊臺柳也俞即取其項帕題詩  其上曰蜀國佳八號細腰東臺御史惜妖
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates the dangers of "encroaching upon what others cherish" through two stories, while emphasizing the importance of cultivators maintaining steadfastness.

The first story recounts how Xu Zhenjun (the renowned Daoist immortal Xu Xun) tested his disciples. Leading three hundred disciples to Nanchang to eliminate a serpent demon, he used Daoist magic at night to transform three hundred pieces of charcoal into beautiful women. Only Wu Meng and Shi Dao resisted temptation, while the other 298 succumbed to lust. This demonstrates that without severing desires, practitioners are easily led astray by external temptations.

The second story involves the Song dynasty official Tao Gu during a diplomatic mission to the Southern Tang. Though Tao projected an image of moral rectitude, Southern Tang minister Han Xizai saw through his facade. Han arranged for the famous courtesan Qin Ruolan to pose as an innkeeper's daughter and approach Tao. Tao fell for the ruse and composed romantic verses for her. Later, during a banquet hosted by the Southern Tang ruler, Qin publicly sang these verses, leaving Tao utterly humiliated. Upon returning to court, he was sidelined due to the scandal.

The text further recounts how Wen Yanbo (Duke Wen of Lu) in Sichuan was accused of frequent banqueting. Imperial censor He Tan (styled Shengcong) was sent to investigate. Zhang Yu (styled Shaoyu), one of Wen's advisors, knew He had once favored a camp courtesan named Yang. Cleverly, Zhang inscribed a verse on the courtesan's headscarf: "The fair maiden of Shu famed for her slender waist / The Eastern Censor once adored her enchanting grace." This hinted that He too had vulnerabilities. The story reinforces how encroaching upon others' cherished things invites retaliation.

These tales collectively warn: cultivation requires cutting off greed; governance demands upright conduct. Those who seize what others cherish or indulge selfish desires will ultimately reap the consequences.

 嬈從今喚作楊臺柳舞盡春風萬萬條因  命其妓作竹枝詩歌之聖從爲之大醉此  可以見其守也公曰姑宻之及聖從至果  自嚴重潞公宴之因迎其妓雜府妓中使  歌少愚之詩以侑之聖從亦爲之醉旣而  喧傳遂逹聖聽及歸不復引見潞公之謗  由是遂息嗚呼陶榖固無所守聖從素稱  方直奚亦爾耶大抵形之于言即是已動  于中矣豈非慾習未斷妄認幻軀自生愛  見而然耶    賛曰   人之愛己甚於璠璵人之愛子   亦如予乎推其所愛他莫不如   奚獨殘忍肆其侵漁羙人寳玉   幾覆漢車 助人爲非  傳曰一本云教人爲非大抵皆是成人之  惡不能導人以善不聞佛之言乎佛言說  法教化名爲法施能令衆生出於聞道以  是因縁於未來世得七種報一者衆生聞  法頓除嗔恚我於來世得成上色二者衆  生聞法慈心不殺我於來世得壽命長三  者衆生聞法不盗他財我於來世多饒財  寳四者衆生聞法開心樂施我於來世身  得大力五者衆生聞法癡措頓除我於來  世得無礙辯六者衆生聞法信心不惑我  於來世信心明了七者衆生聞法方便隨  順我於來世得菩提道然則導人以善豈  不愈於助人爲非乎請爲各舉一事庶皆  知戒元豐間李之純凡三任爲成都漕仁  民愛物蜀人安之按察之餘尤留意於掩
Interpretation

This scripture recounts several stories that reveal the moral dilemmas arising from human desires.

The first story describes how Duke Lu hosted a banquet for Sheng Cong, deliberately arranging courtesans to recite poetry as entertainment. Though Sheng Cong appeared solemn on the surface, he became intoxicated and lost his composure due to their beauty, leading the emperor to cease summoning him thereafter. This illustrates how even those who are usually upright can still succumb to temptation. Both Tao Gu and Sheng Cong failed to sever their inner desires, mistaking the illusory physical body for reality and becoming mired in attachment.

The second section employs verses to point out: people cherish themselves more than precious jade and love their children as dearly as themselves. Yet why do they cruelly exploit others? This mirrors the lesson from the Han Dynasty, which nearly collapsed due to conflicts over coveted jade.

The third part cites Buddhist teachings on the blessings of guiding others toward virtue: instructing people in goodness yields seven kinds of merit, such as dispelling anger to attain dignified features, practicing compassion and non-killing to gain longevity, and refraining from theft to obtain wealth. These far surpass the consequences of encouraging wrongdoing.

Finally, the text cites the example of Li Zhichun during the Yuanfeng era, who governed Chengdu with benevolence, bringing peace and prosperity to Sichuan. He paid special attention to burying unclaimed corpses, embodying true virtuous governance.

Through historical anecdotes and Buddhist doctrine, this passage admonishes people to restrain desires and guide others toward goodness, emphasizing that true blessings arise from compassionate and altruistic deeds.

 骼埋胔小吏徐熈本眉人頗知爲善之純  專以委之熈亦身任其責一日市西金花  街百姓有王彬者以病入冥司見朱紫數  官聚㕔而坐召熈前曰適天符下李之純  以𦵏枯骨有功更與知成都府一任汝以  主行文書有力賜汝一子及第汝爲誠慤  人必汝信歸可宣言庶皆知勸元祐三年  李之純果加寳文閣直學士知成都府徐  熈有子名適亦於其年李常寜牓下登第  此即助人爲善而亦獲其報者也政和間  有㫖大修西内時王璹爲轉運以科擾罷  職詔起徽猷宋昇爲都轉運俾主其事昇  用意太過大索牛骨灰用塗宫壁貴令光  潤然下令太峻民至殺牛馬發塜取骨以  應尚猶不足時孫貺韓容皆爲幕屬貺不  喜其事引疾罷去容獨建議請發城外五  代時十數叢塜以足用宣和間貺忽暴卒  至泰山所見一門牓曰清夷吏以鐡义逼  令供滅族狀貺曰某當𥘉正以此罷恐誤  耳俄見數鬼引出二囚皆大枷鐡杻各有  一鬼從傍以鐡扇揮擊扇皆鐡釘流血被  體視之乃璹昇也一辯乃伏貺臨出則容  亦追至吏復以鐡义逼令供滅族狀容曰  我固有罪父祖何辜若令舉族皆烕不亦  過乎俄聞殿上曰只令供房絶狀貺還言  之未幾容之一房果皆死盡此即助人爲  非而立獲其報者也然則助人爲非是可  爲乎    賛曰
Interpretation

This passage recounts two karmic tales illustrating the principle of retribution. The first tells of Xu Xi's virtuous reward: As a minor official in Meizhou responsible for burying unclaimed remains, Xu Xi diligently performed his duties. One day, a commoner named Wang Bin witnessed in the underworld several underworld officials in crimson and purple robes summoning Xu Xi. They declared that because Li Zhichun had meritoriously buried desiccated bones, he would be appointed prefect of Chengdu, while Xu Xi—due to his meticulous documentation work—would be granted a son who would pass the imperial examinations. Indeed, during the Yuanyou era's third year (1088), Li Zhichun was promoted to Academician of the Baowen Pavilion and concurrently Prefect of Chengdu, while Xu Xi's son Xu Shi passed the imperial examinations that same year.

The second story recounts evil retribution: During the Zhenghe era (1111-1118) when the Western Inner Palace was being constructed, Transport Commissioner Song Sheng, obsessed with achieving smooth palace walls, forcibly requisitioned ox bone ash. This led commoners to slaughter oxen and horses while grave robbers exhumed bones from tombs. Advisor Sun Kuang resigned in protest, whereas Han Rong suggested excavating ancient tombs outside the city for bones. Later, Sun Kuang witnessed in the underworld Song Sheng and Wang Shu suffering iron-fan torture, with Han Rong also being summoned for judgment. Ultimately, Han Rong's entire household perished as karmic retribution.

These contrasting tales demonstrate how assisting virtuous deeds brings blessings while abetting wickedness invites calamity. The passage concludes with a rhetorical question: Since aiding evil brings immediate retribution, how could one possibly engage in such acts?

  佐甕得甞佐鬬得傷善惡以類   人事之常助傑爲虐同底滅亡   抱薪于火沃沸以湯灼爛之禍   如劵取償 逞志作威  傳曰㓂萊公六悔銘曰官行私曲失時悔  冨不儉用貧時悔藝不少學過時悔見事  不學用時悔醉發狂言醒時悔安不將息  病時悔公之此言真寡悔之大法也愚愛  其言故特取之以爲逞志作威者戒逞志  作威後不悔乎昔何浹以録事參軍提舉  梓州路常平倉所至暴横捶撻吏民以立  威吏民畏威竄匿無地甚至氣陵提轉直  出其上毎牒州縣必云未得官司指揮其  提轉文牒不得施行運副李竦判官陳亢  與之議事不合輙叱罵之知州白事必下  馬於門外循廊而進徃徃已近座榻尚猶  不起又欲廢廣安軍衆議以旁去他郡甚  遠不可廢郡官有張辟方者得其父集賢  校理何渉所撰鼓角樓記其中具言不可  廢因以呈之浹曰凡事當從公議此何足  慿李竦等因奏其狀詔罷本任旣罷㳂路  奏竦等事無所不道及至京師下開封府  鞫問浹索𥿄萬幅以答狀府司如數與之  旣而毎幅但大劃一字竟坐上書不實有  四事皆屬妄誕獄具奪官當此之時浹不  悔乎惜其不知逞志作威天所不許昔杜  荀鶴未顯時夢一僧戒曰汝必得君若逞  志作威則必死矣及梁祖開國荀鶴乃怙  寵肆暴且謀殺素不恱者事未及行忽夢
Interpretation

This passage focuses on the disastrous consequences of throwing one’s weight around and abusing power. Through several historical stories, it shows how people who exploit their authority and oppress the common people ultimately bring ruin upon themselves.

It begins by quoting Kou Laigong’s “Six Regrets”: An official who bends the law for personal gain will regret it when he loses his position; one who fails to live frugally in times of plenty will regret it when poverty comes; one who neglects to learn a skill when young will regret it in old age; one who refuses to study when the opportunity arises will regret it when knowledge is needed; one who gets drunk and speaks recklessly will regret it when sober; and one who neglects to care for their health will regret it when illness strikes. These are important rules for avoiding regret.

The passage then tells the story of He Jie. While serving as a military administrative secretary, he threw his weight around, beating officials and ordinary people to make a show of his authority. He was also arrogant and disrespectful toward his superiors, and often berated and insulted his colleagues. When he wanted to abolish Guang’an Army, someone produced an essay written by his father showing that it should not be abolished. He replied, “Every matter should be settled through public discussion.” In the end, he was impeached and dismissed. At his hearing in the Kaifeng Prefecture, he tried to be clever, writing just one large character on each sheet of paper to evade the matter. He was convicted of submitting false statements and stripped of his official position. Could he not have regretted what he had done then?

Finally, the passage recounts the story of Du Xunhe. Before he became successful, he dreamed that a monk warned him, “If you throw your weight around and abuse your power, you will die.” Later, after winning the favor of Emperor Taizu of Liang, he began acting with reckless impunity and even planned to kill people he disliked. He died suddenly before he could carry out his plans.

These stories all make the same point: Heaven will not permit people to bully others by abusing their power. Those who throw their weight around will ultimately bring ruin upon themselves. It is like trying to put out a fire with firewood or stop boiling water by adding more hot water: the only result is greater calamity. Good and evil are inevitably repaid, just as a debt is certain to be collected when its holder presents the written bond.

 一神叱曰汝豈忘神僧之言乎帝將罪汝 未幾果卒    賛曰   威如之吉本於反身有威可畏   儀度是循望之儼然自可服人   嚴其在己非以虐民無有作威   書戒爾臣 辱人求勝  傳曰按藏教佛在世時人有以行車爲業  者家養二牛一牛生子其角長廣名曰長  角一牛生子秃頭無角名曰秃頭一日因  行車適與一行車者值因各誇其牛壯遂  請以牛賭上峻坡旣而秃頭進歩稍遲其  主怒罵曰秃頭畜生何不速行秃頭忿然  眼赤愈更放緩由是遂輸蓋忿具衆辱之  也嗚呼畜生尚爾况於人乎當知辱人求  勝誠不可也昔邵陵王綸鎮郢服呉䂓爲  之客適張纉出鎮湘東綸餞于郊䂓亦與  坐時纉方貴意頗輕䂓忽舉杯屬䂓曰呉  䂓奉慶汝今日得與此宴䂓大怒即起歸  其子翁孺聞而爲之氣結而卒䂓悼兒憤  纉俄亦不起其妻不勝忿怒尋亦殞命時  人爲之曰張纉一杯酒殺呉氏三人然則  人可辱乎徽州婺源縣有俞彦輔者平生  使氣凌轢郷里凡田宅有便於巳者必以  術吞之至老尚不知悔紹興壬戌忽大病  病中屢作馬嘶久之手足皆化爲蹄數日  遂死孰謂辱人求勝爲無害乎惜人錯見  但知以勝人爲强不知勝人非强而自勝  爲强不聞老子所謂勝人者有力自勝者  强之說乎    賛曰   人或受辱攘臂相睨匪臨以威
Interpretation

These stories illustrate how seeking victory through humiliating others ultimately brings retribution. The first tale tells of a cattle herder who mocked his own ox by calling it "baldy." The enraged ox deliberately slowed its pace, causing the man to lose his wager. Even animals retaliate when humiliated—how much more so humans?

Next comes the story of Xiao Lun, Prince of Shaoling during the Southern Dynasties. At a banquet, Zhang Zuan contemptuously told Wu Gui, "You should feel fortunate to attend this feast today." Wu Gui stormed out in fury. When his son heard of the insult, he died of rage on the spot. Overcome with grief, Wu Gui soon perished, followed by his wife who succumbed to anger as well. People said, "Zhang Zuan's single cup of wine killed three members of the Wu family."

There was also a man from Huizhou named Yu Yanfu who bullied neighbors and seized their farmland his whole life without repentance. On his deathbed, he suddenly developed a strange illness—his limbs transformed into horse-hoof shapes before he died days later.

The passage concludes by quoting the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue): "To conquer others is to have force; to conquer yourself is to be truly strong." These stories collectively warn that asserting dominance through humiliation inevitably invites calamity. As the commentary observes: When insulted, people naturally react with fury. Attempting to intimidate through further humiliation rather than dignified restraint only escalates conflict.

  則扼以勢怒不敢言蓋有所制   威去勢窮靡不反噬一能勝予   禹心惕厲 敗人苗稼  傳曰敗人苗稼此特田夫野䝤所爲固無  足道請以前輩務農重榖講究水利一二  美事言之庶㡬後之臨民者皆知則效髙  通議賦知唐州土曠人寡歴五代至本朝  領縣四戸六千百五十有五公至相視田  原知其可耕所不至者人力耳於是大募  兩河流民計口受田增戸一萬一千三百  八十有一給田三萬一千三百二十有八  乃至山林蓁莽之地悉變爲良田張學士  綸爲江淮發運副使䟽五渠導太湖以灌  民田復歳租米者六十萬斛許司封逖知  興元大修山河堰漑民田者四萬餘頃魯  冀州有開初知確山興廢陂以灌民田者  已數千頃程修撰師孟知石州凡汾晉諸  州山谷有水可以灌民田者悉相其地釃  而爲渠闢田凡一千餘頃許公䂓知丹陽  適大旱公冐禁决練湖以救民田嵗大穫  者一萬餘頃練湖冒決者死陳諌議省華  初知櫟陽邑有鄭白渠可以引水灌民田  久爲隣邑疆占公至陳本末申諸司由是  壅遏之弊一旦盡去水利均及灌民田者  一千餘頃王刑部濟初主龍溪簿縣有陂  塘綿亘數十里先爲大姓輸課而獨專其  利公至悉奪以灌民田由是一邑無愆亢  之患苗待制時中初主寜陵簿邑有古河
Interpretation

This passage records the achievements of several ancient officials who constructed water conservancy projects to benefit the people. At its core, it illustrates how irrigation works improved farmland, embodying a higher principle than simply "not destroying others' crops"—actively helping farmers increase their yields.

During the Tang Dynasty, when Gao Fu served as an official in Tangzhou, the region was sparsely populated. He recruited displaced people from the Yellow River and Huai River regions, allocating farmland according to household size, adding over 10,000 new families and reclaiming more than 30,000 mu of fertile land. Even barren mountains and wild hills were transformed into productive fields.

When Zhang Lun served as Deputy Transport Commissioner of Jianghuai, he dredged five waterways, diverting water from Lake Tai to irrigate farmland, reducing the annual tax burden by 600,000 hu of grain. In Xingyuan Prefecture, Xu Di oversaw the reconstruction of the Shanhe Weir, irrigating over 40,000 qing of farmland.

Lu Youkai restored abandoned reservoirs (artificial lakes) in Queshan County, irrigating thousands of qing of land. Cheng Shimeng surveyed the Fen River and Jin River basins in Shizhou, constructing canals wherever water was available in the valleys, opening up over 1,000 qing of fertile land.

When Xu Gui served as magistrate of Danyang during a severe drought, he defied the ban and opened the Lian Lake (violating the prohibition on breaching dikes, which was punishable by death) to provide emergency relief. That year, the harvest flourished across tens of thousands of qing of land. In Yueyang County, Chen Shenghua restored the Zheng-Bai Canal irrigation system, breaking the monopoly of powerful landowners and benefiting thousands of qing of farmland.

In Longxi County, Wang Ji reclaimed a reservoir spanning dozens of li that had been monopolized by wealthy families, making it available for irrigation across the entire county and eliminating the threat of drought. Miao Shizhong restored ancient waterways in Ningling County.

These officials all adhered to the higher principle of "not destroying others' crops"—ensuring agricultural productivity at its root through water conservancy projects. Whether by resettling displaced people to reclaim wasteland, restoring ancient canals, or dismantling the monopolies of local elites, they demonstrated through concrete actions the duty of officials to bring prosperity to the people under their governance.

 𡻕久湮廢公至請發卒䟽導以灌民田由  是一邑之田盡成沃壤    賛曰   不稼取禾詩諷其上地惟不食   昔人乃葬熟奪農時民無蓋藏   孰剥民力使不得養害及養人   天必降䘮 破人婚姻  傳曰禮曰有夫婦然後有父子然則婚姻  之道可謂大矣其可破乎或破之未合之  前或破之旣合之後皆爲破也恩愛殺人  甚於挺刄孰謂爲無害乎昔鄭和中少時  與王氏女結婚無何父卒家道漸㣲女家  遂有休親之意其兄王固爲萬州推官實  主其義然迫於公論不得已復令就婚生  一子偶不育因遂隔絶和中不復使歸王  氏數遺以衣服固輙罪具送者和中由是  益怨憤遂感心疾而卒王氏女一夕夢和  中吿曰吾已訴之隂司見已送衢州東嶽  追人根勘時王氏女已改嫁陸嵩爲妻嵩  時爲濟州教授月餘固死凡當時與奪親  之議者無不皆死惟王氏女實無背夫之  意故得獨存其後王固之子娶徐氏僅二  年亦爲女家所奪非其報歟恭倅楊紘怒  其婿姚拱不學無術遣之使歸拱求與妻  別亦不許女怨憤遂感疾而卒紘命殯于  僧舍婿至殯所門鎻自掣扇亦自開其母  聞之不勝感愴數日遂卒後十餘年紘至  殯所亦暴卒然則破人婚姻是可爲乎 ○○    賛曰   齊女不娶終以失國子哲委禽   㡬於漁色夫婦大倫相配以德
Interpretation

This passage recounts stories and principles about how interfering with others' marriages brings retribution.

The first story is about Zheng Hezhong: In his youth, he was betrothed to a daughter of the Wang family. Later, after his father passed away and his family fell into decline, the Wangs sought to break off the engagement. Though the marriage was eventually forced through, the couple's relationship soured, and Zheng died in despair. After death, he lodged a complaint in the underworld, and all those who had participated in the discussion to annul the engagement died one after another—only his original wife, Lady Wang, who had never harbored thoughts of betrayal, was spared. Later, the Wang family's son had his own marriage dissolved after two years—this was the retribution.

Another story tells of Yang Hong, who despised his son-in-law Yao Gong for lacking scholarly learning and forcibly dissolved their marriage. His daughter died in resentment, and during her funeral, supernatural phenomena occurred. Yang Hong himself later died suddenly before his daughter's spirit tablet.

The passage concludes: Marriage is a fundamental principle of Heaven and Earth, and should be based on matching virtue (De). The state of Qi perished because its rulers failed to take proper wives, and Zi Zhe (a figure from the Spring and Autumn period) nearly ruined his virtue by coveting beauty. Destroying another's marriage is like killing with a blade—it invites divine punishment. Whether breaking a premarital vow or forcibly separating a married couple, such acts violate the great Dao of human relations.

(Note: The "Eastern Peak of Quzhou" refers to the Great Emperor of the Eastern Peak (Dongyue Dadi) in Daoism, who oversees underworld judgment; "investigation of human roots" refers to the underworld's verification of sins. These stories illustrate the Daoist concept of "inherited accountability" (chengfu), where the consequences of good and evil deeds extend to those involved.)

  孰間其成胥讒作慝百世之祀   一語之賊 太上感
Interpretation

This passage discusses the karmic consequences of harmful speech. When a person habitually sows discord ("xuchan" refers to stirring up trouble) and secretly commits malicious acts ("zuonie" means doing evil), such behavior can sever the ancestral blessings that sustain a family's lineage for generations.

Even a single harmful utterance ("yiyu zhi zei" - one thieving phrase) can create profound negative karma. Daoist teachings emphasize that speech carries powerful causal power - malicious words not only damage others' virtue (De), but also invoke retribution from the celestial Dao. This aligns with the modern wisdom that "trouble comes from the mouth," reminding practitioners to cultivate careful speech and mindful action.

應篇卷之十五

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0001); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 14 Vol. 16 →