中文 · EN

《孫子註解》Vol. 13

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 13 / 13 9,170 characters

About this page. The original text of 《孫子註解》 Vol. 13 (Taiqing 太清部, 13 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 18 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《孫子註解》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

孫子註解卷之十三靜五    用間篇(曹操李筌曰戰者必用間諜/以知敵之情實也張預曰)    (欲素知敵情者非間不可也然用/間之道尤須微密故次火攻也) 孫子曰凡興師十萬出征千里百姓之費公 家之奉日費千金内外騷動怠於道路不得 操事者七十萬家  曹操曰古者八家為鄰一家從軍七家奉  之言十萬之師舉不事耕稼者七十萬家  〇李筌曰古者發一家之兵則鄰里三族  共資之是以不得耕作者七十萬家而資  十萬之衆矣〇杜牧曰古者一夫田一頃  夫九頃之地中心一頃鑿井樹廬八家居  之是為井田怠疲也言七十萬家奉十萬  之師轉輸疲於道路也〇梅堯臣曰輸糧  供用公私煩役疲於道路廢於耒耜也曹  説是也〇張預曰井田之法八家為鄰一  家從軍七家奉之興兵十萬則輟耕作者  七十萬家也或問曰重地則掠疲於道路  而轉輸何也曰非止運糧亦供器用也且  兵貴掠敵者謂深踐敵境則當備其乏故  須掠以繼食非專館穀於敵也亦有磧鹵  之地無糧可因得不餉乎 相守數年以争一日之勝而愛爵禄百金不 知敵之情者不仁之至也  李筌曰惜爵賞不與間諜令窺敵之動静  是為不仁之至也〇杜牧曰言不能以厚  利使間也〇梅堯臣曰相守數年則七十  萬家所費多矣而乃惜爵禄百金之微不
Interpretation

The thirteenth volume of Commentaries on Sunzi discusses the critical importance of espionage. Both Cao Cao and Li Quan emphasize that warfare necessitates the use of spies to gather intelligence on the enemy. Zhang Yu adds that to obtain accurate information about the adversary, espionage is indispensable—but the methods must remain utterly clandestine, which is why this section follows immediately after the tactics of fire attacks.

Sunzi states that mobilizing an army of 100,000 troops to march a thousand li imposes a daily burden on the people and state coffers amounting to a thousand pieces of gold. The upheaval affects both domestic and foreign affairs, as civilians are forced into labor, disrupting agricultural work. The number of households impacted reaches as many as 700,000. Cao Cao explains that in ancient times, eight households formed a neighborhood (lin). If one household sent a soldier to war, the other seven were responsible for logistical support. Thus, deploying an army of 100,000 meant 700,000 households could no longer tend their fields.

Li Quan elaborates: in antiquity, conscripting one household for military service required the support of three allied clans, so 700,000 households were needed to sustain an army of 100,000. Du Mu illustrates this with the jingtian (well-field) system: in nine qing of land, the central qing was reserved for wells and dwellings, shared by eight families—hence the name "well-field." The 700,000 households, tasked with transporting supplies for the 100,000 troops, were exhausted from endless travel. Mei Yaochen agrees with Cao Cao, noting that the transport of provisions and equipment imposed heavy corvée duties on both state and private sectors, leaving the people unable to farm. Zhang Yu further clarifies that when fighting in critical enemy territory, armies must not only transport grain but also weapons and gear. The key to military success lies in seizing enemy resources, as deep incursions risk supply shortages and must rely on confiscation—not merely plundering enemy granaries, for some desolate regions have no food to take. How, then, can armies avoid transporting their own provisions?

If two sides remain locked in stalemate for years, striving for victory in a single day, yet begrudge noble titles, stipends, and wealth to obtain enemy intelligence, this is the height of inhumanity. Li Quan remarks that withholding rewards and refusing to employ spies for reconnaissance is the gravest form of cruelty. Du Mu interprets this as reluctance to invest heavily in espionage. Mei Yaochen observes that after years of standoff, the burden on 700,000 households is already immense—yet they hesitate to spend trivial sums on titles and money, a grave lack of wisdom.

 以遺間釣情取勝是不仁之極也〇王皙  曰恡財賞不用間也〇張預曰相持且久  七十萬家財力一困不知恤此而反靳惜  爵賞之細不以啗間求索知敵情者不仁  之甚也 非人之將也  梅堯臣曰非將人成功者也 非主之佐也  一本作非仁之佐也〇梅堯臣曰非以仁  佐國者也 非勝之主也  梅堯臣曰非致勝主利者也〇張預曰不  可以將人不可以佐主不可以主勝勤勤  而言者嘆惜之也 故明君賢將所以動而勝人成功出於衆者 先知也  李筌曰為間也〇杜牧曰知敵情也〇梅  堯臣曰主不妄動動必勝人將不苟功功  必出衆所以者何也〇在預知敵情也王  皙曰先知敵情制勝如神也〇何氏曰周  官士師掌邦諜蓋異國間伺之謂也故兵  家之有四機二權曰事機曰智權皆善用  間諜者也故能敵人動静我預知矣韋孝  寬為驃騎大將軍鎮玉壁孝寬善於撫御  能得人心所遣間諜入齊者皆為盡力亦  有齊人得孝寬金貨遥通書疏故齊之動  静朝廷皆先知之時有主帥許盆孝寬委  以心膂令守一戍盆乃以城東入孝寬怒  遣諜取之俄而斬首而還其能致物情如  此又李達為都督義州弘農等二十一防  諸軍事每厚撫境外之人使為間諜敵中  動静必先知之至有事泄被誅戮者亦不
Interpretation

This commentary discusses the crucial importance of intelligence work in warfare and the severe consequences of being stingy with rewards and failing to properly utilize spies.

Wang Xi and Zhang Yu criticize generals who begrudge material resources and are unwilling to offer substantial rewards to recruit spies, considering this extremely inhumane conduct. Protracted warfare causes massive expenditures (mentioning how seven hundred thousand households become financially strained), and when commanders still withhold noble titles and rewards, refusing to use material incentives to gain enemy intelligence through spies, this reaches the height of inhumanity.

The commentators highlight from different perspectives that such generals are unfit to lead armies (Mei Yaochen states "this is not a commander capable of leading troops to victory"), unqualified as state advisors (another version says "those who don't assist the nation with virtue"), and certainly cannot become architects of victory. Zhang Yu concludes: such individuals can neither command troops nor assist their sovereign, much less determine victory. The commentators repeatedly emphasize these points to express profound regret.

Truly enlightened rulers and capable generals achieve certain victory and extraordinary accomplishments precisely because they obtain enemy intelligence beforehand. Commentators like Li Quan and Du Mu all stress the importance of spy work. Mei Yaochen points out: wise rulers never act rashly - when they move, victory is assured; excellent generals never recklessly pursue merit - when they achieve, their accomplishments stand out. All this stems from prior knowledge of enemy situations. Wang Xi adds that foreknowledge enables one to prevail with divine efficacy.

He Shi cites the Rites of Zhou to show how specialized intelligence officers existed since antiquity (the Shi Shi official managed state espionage), then provides two historical cases: Northern Zhou's Wei Xiaokuan excelled at using spies, even making Qi state operatives secretly transmit intelligence for him; Western Wei's Li Da generously treated border residents as spies, continuing espionage operations even when informants were executed for leaks. These cases demonstrate how outstanding commanders all valued intelligence work, using spies to anticipate enemy movements beforehand.

(Note: The term "jian" refers to spies; "Yubi" was a key Northern Zhou military stronghold; "Wei Xiaokuan" and "Li Da" were both renowned generals of the Northern and Southern Dynasties period.)

 以為悔其得人心也如此〇張預曰先知  敵情故動則勝人功業卓然超絶羣衆 先知者不可取於鬼神  張預曰視之不見聽之不聞不可以禱祀  而取 不可象於事  曹操曰不可以禱祀而求亦不可以事類  而求也〇李筌曰不可取於鬼神象類唯  間者能知敵之情〇杜牧曰象者類也言  不可以他事此類而求〇梅堯臣曰不可  以卜筮知也不可以象類求也〇張預曰  不可以事之相類者擬象而求 不可驗於度  曹操曰不可以事數度也〇李筌曰度數  也夫長短闊狹遠近小大即可驗之於度  數人之情僞度不能知也〇梅堯臣曰不  可以度數驗也言先知之難也〇張預曰  不可以度數推驗而知 必取於人知敵之情者也  曹操曰因人也〇李筌曰因間人也〇梅  堯臣曰鬼神之情可以卜筮知形氣之物  可以象類求天地之理可以度數驗唯敵  之情必由間者而後知也〇張預曰鬼神  象類度數皆不可以求先知必因人而後  知敵情也 故用間有五有因間有内間有反間有死間 有生間  梅堯臣曰五間之名也〇張預曰此五間  之名因間當為鄉間故下文云鄉間可得  而使 五間俱起莫知其道是謂神紀人君之寳也  曹操曰同時任用五間也〇李筌曰五間  者因五人用之〇杜牧曰五間俱起者敵
Interpretation

Zhang Yu explains that one must first understand the enemy's situation before taking action to secure victory, achieving accomplishments far surpassing ordinary people. This "foreknowledge" cannot be obtained by appealing to ghosts or deities, as spirits are formless and cannot provide intelligence through sacrifices or prayers.

Both Cao Cao and Li Quan emphasize that intelligence cannot be gained through sacrificial rituals or by drawing analogies from similar events. Du Mu points out that "analogy" (象) refers to comparisons—one cannot infer the enemy's situation from unrelated matters. Mei Yaochen adds that neither divination nor analogical reasoning can reveal the truth. Zhang Yu concludes that intelligence cannot be acquired by comparing unrelated phenomena.

Regarding the idea that "it cannot be verified by measurement" (不可验于度), Cao Cao states that conventional calculations are unreliable. Li Quan explains that "measurement" (度) refers to quantification—while physical distances can be measured, the true intentions of people cannot be gauged by any standard. Mei Yaochen argues that numerical verification is impossible, illustrating the difficulty of anticipating the enemy's moves. Zhang Yu notes that intelligence cannot be deduced through statistical projections.

Obtaining enemy intelligence ultimately depends on human effort. Cao Cao stresses the necessity of relying on human agents. Li Quan specifically highlights the use of spies. Mei Yaochen analyzes: while supernatural matters may be approached through divination, natural phenomena through analogy, and cosmic patterns through numerical verification, enemy intelligence can only be obtained through espionage. Zhang Yu summarizes: neither divine consultation, analogical reasoning, nor mathematical calculation can provide foreknowledge—only human intelligence can reveal the truth.

There are five types of spies: local spies (因间, utilizing natives), inside spies (内间, bribing enemy officials), double agents (反间, turning enemy spies), expendable spies (死间, delivering false intelligence), and surviving spies (生间, those who return alive). Mei Yaochen identifies these as the five categories of espionage. Zhang Yu clarifies that "因间" should be read as "乡间"—spies recruited from local populations.

When all five types of spies are deployed simultaneously, the enemy becomes unable to discern their methods. This constitutes the mystical art of espionage—a ruler's ultimate weapon for victory. Cao Cao advocates employing all five categories concurrently. Li Quan suggests tailoring each method to specific targets. Du Mu explains that "activating all five spies" (五间俱起) means confounding the enemy's ability to distinguish truth from deception.

 人不知其情泄形露之道乃神鬼之綱紀  人君之重寳也〇梅堯臣曰五間俱起以  間敵而莫知我用之之道是曰神妙之綱  紀人君之所貴也〇王皙曰五間俱起人  不之測是用兵神妙之大紀人主之重寳  也賈林曰紀理也〇言敵人但莫知我以  何道如通神理也〇張預曰五間循環而  用人莫能測其理兹乃神妙之綱紀人君  之重寳也 因間者因其鄉人而用之  杜牧曰因敵鄉國之人而厚撫之使為間  也晋豫州刺史祖逖之鎮雍丘愛人下士  雖疏交賤𨽻皆恩禮而遇之河上堡因先  有任子在胡者皆聽兩屬時遣游軍僞抄  之明其未附諸塢王感戴胡有異圖輒密  以聞前後尅獲蓋由於此西魏韋孝寬使  齊人斬許盆而來猶其義也〇賈林曰讀  因間為鄉間〇杜佑曰因敵鄉人知敵表  裏虚實之情故就而用之可使伺候也〇  梅堯臣曰因其國人利而使之〇何氏曰  如春秋時楚師伐宋九月不服將去宋楚  大夫申叔時曰築室反耕者宋必聽命楚  子從之宋人懼使華元夜入楚師登子反  之牀起之曰寡君使元以病告曰弊邑易  子而食析骸而爨雖然城下之盟有以國  斃不能從也去我三十里唯命是聽子反  懼與之盟而告楚子退三十里宋及楚平  〇張預曰因敵國人知其底裏就而用之  可使伺候也韋孝寬以金帛啗齊人而齊
Interpretation

This passage discusses the mysteries and methods of "using spies" (espionage activities) in ancient military strategy.

The core idea is that the true mastery of espionage lies in ensuring the enemy remains completely unaware of how intelligence is obtained—this unfathomable technique represents the highest state secret in governing and military affairs. When all five types of spies (local spies, inside spies, double agents, expendable spies, and living spies) operate simultaneously, the enemy cannot possibly discern their workings. This is what is called the "divine web of strategy"—the ruler's most treasured key to victory.

Specifically explaining the method of "local spies": this involves using native individuals from the enemy state as intelligence sources. The Tang dynasty commentator Du Mu cites examples such as the Jin dynasty general Zu Ti, who, while garrisoned at Yongqiu, treated local civilians kindly, earning him secret informants even from enemy-controlled regions. Another example is the Western Wei general Wei Xiaokuan, who bribed Northern Qi subjects to assassinate enemy commanders. Other commentators add that during the Spring and Autumn period, when Chu attacked Song, the Song minister Hua Yuan infiltrated the Chu command tent at night to threaten their general, ultimately forcing Chu to retreat thirty li—another classic case of leveraging enemy personnel.

The key to employing "local spies" lies in understanding the enemy's weaknesses through their own people and incentivizing them with benefits to serve one's own cause. Just as Wei Xiaokuan used gold and valuables to bribe Qi subjects for intelligence, these spies do not require specialized training from one's own side. Instead, they are sourced in situ—exploiting the enemy's internal personnel—making them far more covert and effective.

 人遥通書䟽是也 内間者因其官人而用之  李筌曰因敵人失職之官魏用許攸也  杜牧曰敵之官人有賢而失職者有過而  被刑者亦有寵嬖而貪財者有屈在下位  者有不得任使者有欲因敗喪以求展已  之材能者有翻覆變詐常持兩端之心者  如此之官皆可以潜通問遭厚貺金帛而  結之因求其國中之情察其謀我之事復  間其君臣使不和同也〇杜佑曰因在其  官失職者若刑戮之子孫與受罰之家也  因其有隙就而用之〇梅堯臣曰因其官  屬結而用之〇何氏曰如益州牧羅尚遣  將隗伯攻蜀賊李雄於郫城互有勝負雄  乃募武都人朴泰鞭之見血使譎羅尚欲  為内應以火為期尚信之悉出精兵遣隗  伯等率兵從泰擊雄雄將李驤於道設伏  泰以長梯倚城而舉火伯軍見火起而争  緣梯泰又以繩汲上尚軍百餘人皆斬之  雄因放兵内外擊之大破尚軍此用内間  之勢也又隋陰壽為幽州總管高寶寧舉  兵反壽討之寶寧奔于磧北壽班師留開  府成道昂鎮之寶寧遣其子僧伽率輕騎  掠城下而去尋引契丹靺鞨之衆來攻道  昂苦戰連月乃退壽患之於是重賄寶寧  又遣人陰間其所親任者趙世模王威等  月餘世模率其衆降寳寧復走契丹為其  麾下趙修羅所殺北邊遂安又唐太宗討
Interpretation

This passage discusses the ancient military strategy of employing "internal spies" (neijian). These are enemy officials used as collaborators. Several scenarios are described: officials who possess talent but have been demoted, those punished for mistakes, the corrupt and licentious, unrecognized talents, opportunists seeking to prove themselves during turmoil, or those with wavering loyalties. All such individuals can be bribed with substantial wealth to gather intelligence and sow discord between rulers and ministers.

Du You further elaborates that officials who have suffered punishments—along with their families—can be exploited by capitalizing on their grievances against those in power. Mei Yaochen emphasizes establishing covert connections with enemy officials. He Shi provides historical examples: Li Xiong used a self-injury ruse by sending Pu Tai to feign surrender to Luo Shang, setting fires within the city as a diversion to crush the enemy; during the Sui dynasty, Yin Shou bribed Gao Baoning's confidant Zhao Shimu with riches, ultimately causing Gao's defeat and death; Tang Taizong employed similar tactics against Dou Jiande. These are classic cases of successful internal espionage.

(Note: "North of the Desert" refers to regions beyond the Gobi; "Mohe" denotes ancient ethnic groups in Northeast China; "Kaifu" was a high-ranking military office title.)

 竇建德入武牢進薄其營多所傷殺凌敬  進說曰宜悉兵濟河攻取懷州河陽使重  將居守更率衆鳴鼓建旗踰太行入上黨  先聲後實傳檄而定漸趨壼口稍駭蒲津  收河東之地此策之上也行必有三利一  則入無人之境師有萬全二則拓土得兵  三則鄭圍自解建德將從之王世充之使  長孫安世陰齎金玉啗其諸將以亂其謀  衆咸進諫曰凌敬書生耳豈可與言戰乎  建德從之退而謝敬曰今衆心甚銳此天  賛我矣因此决戰必然大捷已依衆議不  得從公言也敬固争建德怒杖出焉於是  悉衆進逼武牢太宗按甲挫其銳建德中  槍竄於牛口渚車騎將軍白士讓楊武威  生獲之又王翦為秦將攻趙趙使李牧司  馬商禦之李牧數破走秦軍殺秦將桓齮  翦惡之乃多與趙王寵臣郭開等金使為  反間曰李牧司馬商欲與秦廢趙以多取  封於秦趙王疑之使趙葱及顔聚代將斬  李牧廢司馬商後三月翦因急擊趙大破  殺趙葱虜趙王遷及其將顔聚也〇張預  曰因其失意之官或刑戮之子弟凡有隙  者厚利使之晋任析公吴納子胥皆近之 反間者因其敵間而用之  李筌曰敵有間來窺我得失我厚賂之而  令反為我間也〇杜牧曰敵有間來窺我  我必先知之或厚賂誘之反為我用或佯  為不覺示以偽情而縱之則敵人之間反
Interpretation

Dou Jiande led his troops to storm the Hulao Pass, inflicting heavy casualties as they pressed toward the enemy camp. His strategist Ling Jing proposed a plan: the entire army should cross the Yellow River, first seize Huaizhou and Heyang, and station elite forces there; then, with great fanfare, march across the Taihang Mountains into the Shangdang region. By first intimidating the enemy with overwhelming momentum, then issuing proclamations to demand surrender, they could gradually take control of the Hukou Pass, threaten the Pujin crossing, and ultimately reclaim the Hedong region—this was the optimal strategy. The plan offered three advantages: first, advancing into undefended territory ensured military success; second, it would expand territory and replenish troops; third, it would naturally lift the siege on Zheng (Wang Shichong's state). Just as Dou Jiande was about to adopt the plan, Wang Shichong’s envoy Zhangsun Anshi secretly bribed Dou’s generals with gold to disrupt the decision-making. The generals protested in unison: "Ling Jing is just a scholar—what does he know of warfare?" Dou Jiande ultimately yielded to their counsel, telling Ling Jing: "Our soldiers’ morale is soaring—this is heaven’s aid. Following their advice to engage in decisive battle will surely bring victory; I cannot accept your proposal." When Ling Jing persisted, Dou angrily rebuked and caned him. The result? The entire army was crushed in a reckless assault on Hulao Pass by Li Shimin’s forces. Dou Jiande, wounded by a spear, fled to Niukouzhu, where Tang generals Bai Shirang and Yang Wuwei captured him alive.

Another example occurred when the Qin general Wang Jian attacked Zhao. The Zhao state deployed its renowned commander Li Mu and Sima Shang to resist. Li Mu repeatedly defeated Qin forces, even slaying the Qin general Huan Yi. Wang Jian then bribed Zhao’s favored minister Guo Kai and others to spread rumors: "Li Mu and Sima Shang plan to ally with Qin, overthrow the King of Zhao, and secure fiefs for themselves in Qin." The King of Zhao fell for the ruse, replacing Li Mu with Zhao Cong and Yan Ju, executing Li Mu, and dismissing Sima Shang. Three months later, Wang Jian seized the opportunity to launch a ferocious assault, annihilating the Zhao army, killing Zhao Cong, and capturing King Qian of Zhao and Yan Ju.

(Zhang Yu’s commentary notes:) Exploit disgraced officials or persecuted descendants—anyone at odds with those in power—by luring them with substantial bribes. Historical precedents include Jin’s use of Xi Gong and Wu’s acceptance of Wu Zixu, both employing similar stratagems of sowing discord.

(Li Quan adds:) When the enemy sends spies to scout our weaknesses, lavish them with riches to turn them into double agents.

(Du Mu elaborates:) For enemy spies, either bribe them heavily to defect or feign ignorance, deliberately feeding them false intelligence before releasing them—thus turning their own spies into instruments of our advantage.

 為我用也陳平初為漢王護軍尉項羽圍  於榮陽城漢王患之請割榮陽以西和項  王弗聽平曰顧楚有可亂者彼項王骨鯁  之臣亞父鍾離昩龍且周殷之屬不過數  人耳大王能出捐數萬斤金行反間間其  君臣以疑其心項王為人意忌信讒必内  相誅漢因舉兵而攻之破楚必矣漢王以  為然乃出黄金四萬斤與平恣所為不問  出入平既多以金縱反間於楚軍宣言諸  將鍾離昩等為項王將功多矣然終不得  列地而王欲與漢為一以滅項氏分王其  地項王果疑之使使至漢漢為太牢之具  舉進見楚使即陽驚曰吾以為亞父使乃  項王使也復持去以惡草具進楚使使歸  具以報項王果大疑亞父亞父欲急擊下  榮陽城項王不信不肯聽亞父亞父聞項  王疑之乃大怒疽發而死卒用陳平之計  滅楚也〇梅堯臣曰或以僞事紿之或以  厚利啗之〇王皙曰反間反為我間也或  留之使言其情又或示以詭形而遣之〇  何氏曰如燕昭王以樂毅為將破齊七十  餘城及惠王立與樂毅有隙齊將田單乃  縱反間於燕宣言曰齊王已死城之不拔  者二耳樂毅畏誅而不敢歸以伐齊為名  實欲連兵南面而王齊齊人未附故且緩  即墨以待其事齊人所懼唯恐他將之來  即墨殘矣燕王以為然使騎劫伐樂毅燕  人士卒離心單又縱反間曰吾懼燕人掘
Interpretation

The passage recounts how Chen Ping (a founding strategist of the Western Han dynasty) devised a stratagem of sowing discord for Liu Bang, the King of Han, to fracture Xiang Yu's camp.

At the time, Xiang Yu had besieged Liu Bang in the city of Yingyang. When Liu Bang offered to cede lands west of Yingyang for peace, Xiang Yu refused. Chen Ping analyzed the situation: Xiang Yu had only a handful of truly capable advisors—Fan Zeng (honored as "Second Father"), Zhongli Mo, Long Ju, and Zhou Yin. He proposed using tens of thousands of catties of gold to execute a counterintelligence scheme, driving a wedge between the ruler and his trusted men.

Liu Bang approved the plan, granting Chen Ping 40,000 catties of gold to deploy freely. Chen Ping spread rumors among the Chu forces, claiming that generals like Zhongli Mo, despite their great merits, had not been enfeoffed as kings and thus sought to ally with Han to overthrow Xiang Yu and divide his lands. Xiang Yu, as expected, grew suspicious and sent envoys to the Han camp. Liu Bang deliberately arranged a lavish banquet to receive them, but upon seeing the Chu envoys, he feigned surprise, saying, "I thought these were envoys from Second Father!" He then replaced the feast with meager rations. When the envoys reported this, Xiang Yu’s distrust of Fan Zeng deepened.

Fan Zeng urged an immediate assault on Yingyang, but Xiang Yu ignored him. Upon realizing he was under suspicion, Fan Zeng, consumed by resentment, developed a fatal abscess on his back and died. Ultimately, Liu Bang employed Chen Ping’s stratagem to destroy the Chu state.

Later commentators added insights: The counterintelligence strategy could involve misleading the enemy with false information (as noted by Mei Yaochen) or tempting them with substantial bribes (as Wang Xi suggested). He Shi cited the example of Tian Dan during King Zhao of Yan’s reign, who used a similar ruse to make King Hui of Yan doubt his general Yue Yi, leading to a disastrous change in command. These cases illustrate that the essence of the stratagem lies in fostering internal suspicion among adversaries.

 吾城外冢墓戮辱先人燕軍從之即墨人  激怒請戰大破燕師所亡七十餘城悉復  之又秦師圍趙閼與趙將趙奢救之去趙  國都三十里不進秦間來奢善食遣之間  以報秦將以為奢師怯弱而止不行奢墮  而卷甲趨秦師擊破之又范睢為秦昭王  相使左庶長王齕攻韓取上黨上黨民走  趙趙軍長平齕因攻趙趙使廉頗將廉頗  堅壁以待秦秦數挑戰趙兵不出趙王數  以為讓而睢使人行千金於趙為反間曰  秦之所惡獨畏趙括耳廉頗軍易與且降  矣趙王既怒廉頗軍多亡失數敗又反堅  壁不戰又聞秦反間之言因使括代頗秦  聞括將以白起為上將軍射殺括及坑降  卒四十萬〇張預曰敵有間來或重賂厚  禮以結之告以偽辭或佯為不知踈而慢  之示以虚事使之歸報則反為我利也趙  奢善食秦間漢軍佯驚楚使是也 死間者爲誑事於外令吾間知之而傳於敵  李筌曰情詐為不足信吾知之今吾動此  間而待之此筌以待字為非傳也〇杜牧  曰誑者詐也言吾間在敵未知事情我則  詐立事跡令吾間憑其詐迹以輸誠於敵  而得敵信也若吾進取與詐跡不同間者  不能脫則為敵所殺故曰死間也漢王使  酈生說齊下之齊罷守備韓信因而襲之  田横怒烹酈生此事相近〇杜佑曰作誑  詐之事於外佯漏泄之使吾間知之吾間
Interpretation

This passage recounts several classic cases of espionage and counterintelligence tactics employed in ancient warfare, presented here in modern language:

The first case occurred during the Warring States period when the Yan state attacked Qi. The Yan army desecrated the ancestral graves of Qi citizens outside the city walls, enraging the defenders of Jimo. Fueled by righteous anger, the Qi forces launched a fierce counterattack, crushing the Yan troops and recapturing over seventy lost cities.

Next is the story of Qin's siege against Zhao's Yanyu city. Zhao general Zhao She led reinforcements but deliberately halted his advance thirty li from the capital. When Qin spies came to investigate, Zhao She lavishly entertained them. The spies reported back that Zhao forces were cowardly, making the Qin commander lower his guard. Seizing this opportunity, Zhao She launched a surprise attack through forced march, decisively defeating the Qin army.

The most famous example is the counterintelligence plot at Changping. Qin chancellor Fan Ju dispatched agents to spread rumors in Zhao that their army particularly feared Zhao Kuo, while regarding Lian Po's forces as easily manageable. The Zhao king fell for this deception, replacing veteran general Lian Po with the bookish Zhao Kuo. Upon learning this, Qin secretly appointed their top general Bai Qi, who ultimately killed Zhao Kuo and executed four hundred thousand surrendered Zhao soldiers.

Zhang Yu's commentary notes: When discovering enemy spies, one should bribe them heavily to feed false information, or pretend unawareness while treating them coldly to let them carry back misleading intelligence. Zhao She's hospitality toward Qin spies and the Han army's feigned panic before Chu envoys exemplify such successful tactics.

Regarding "dead spies" (死间), these involve deliberately creating false scenarios known to one's own agents, who then transmit this misinformation to the enemy. Li Quan explains: When the enemy distrusts intelligence, we intentionally leak fabricated reports. Du Mu adds: Such spies often get executed when their false information contradicts reality - hence "dead" spies. For instance, after Han's Li Yiji convinced Qi to surrender, Han Xin's sudden attack led to Li being boiled alive by Qi's Tian Heng, illustrating this tactic.

Du You summarizes: First create false intelligence externally, deliberately let your own spies acquire it, then have them deliver it to the enemy. These cases demonstrate how intelligence warfare and psychological operations often proved decisive in ancient conflicts.

 至敵中為敵所得必以誑事諭敵敵從而  備之吾所行不然間則死矣又云敵間來  聞我誑事以持歸然皆非所圖也二間皆  不能知幽隱深密故曰死間也蕭世誠曰  所獲敵人及已叛亡軍士有重罪繫者故  為貸免相勑勿泄佯不祕密令敵間竊聞  之吾因縱之使亡亡必歸敵必信焉往必  死故曰死間〇梅堯臣曰以誑告敵事乖  必殺〇王皙曰詐而聞使敵得之間以吾  詐告敵事决必殺之也〇何氏曰如戰國  鄭武公欲伐胡先以其子妻胡因問羣臣  曰吾欲用兵誰可伐者大夫關思期曰胡  可武公怒而戮之曰胡兄弟之國子言伐  之何也胡君聞之以鄭為親已不備鄭襲  而取之此用死間之勢也又班超發于闐  諸國兵擊莎車龜兹二國揚言兵少不敵  罷散乃陰緩生口歸以告龜兹王喜而不  虞超即潜勒兵馳赴莎車大破降之斯亦  同死間之勢又李靖伐突厥頡利可汗以  唐儉先在突厥結和親突厥不備靖因掩  擊破之〇張預曰欲使敵人殺其賢能乃  令死士持虚僞以赴之吾間至敵為彼所  得彼以誑事為實必俱殺之我朝曹太尉  嘗貸人死使偽為僧吞蠟彈入西夏至則  為其所囚僧以彈告即下之開讀乃所遺  彼謀臣書也戎主怒誅其臣并殺間僧此  其義也然死間之事非一或使吾間詣敵  約和我反伐之則間者立死酈生烹於齊
Interpretation

This passage discusses the ancient military tactic of "death agents" (spies sent on suicidal missions). When a spy infiltrates enemy territory and is captured, they must feed the enemy false intelligence. If the enemy believes this misinformation and strengthens their defenses accordingly, while our forces actually take the opposite action, the exposed spy will inevitably be executed.

Xiao Shicheng proposed a method: deliberately release certain prisoners or defecting soldiers after allowing them to "accidentally" overhear false intelligence before escaping back to enemy lines. The enemy often trusts such "coincidentally" obtained information, while the messengers bearing false reports ultimately meet their doom.

Several historical examples illustrate this: Duke Wu of Zheng feigned executing his minister who advocated attacking the Hu State to lull them into complacency; Ban Chao spread misinformation about troop shortages during his campaign against the Shache Kingdom, letting captives carry this news to the Qiuci king; Li Jing exploited Tang Jian's peace mission to the Turks as cover for a surprise attack. In each case, those who delivered the false intelligence were eventually executed by the enemy.

Zhang Yu further notes that sometimes warriors would be sent carrying forged documents into enemy camps, intentionally allowing their interception. Upon discovering the contents, enemies would typically execute both the couriers and their own strategists. For instance, Song Dynasty's Marshal Cao once had a condemned prisoner pose as a monk to deliver a wax-sealed secret message to Western Xia, causing their ruler to mistakenly execute his own ministers.

Ultimately, the essence of "death agents" lies in using human lives to transmit false intelligence, with both spies and messengers knowingly fulfilling their fatal missions. Like when Li Yiji served as envoy to Qi—while he negotiated peace for Liu Bang, the Han forces launched an attack, resulting in Li being boiled alive by the Qi king. Such ruthless stratagems reveal the treacherous and merciless nature of ancient warfare.

 王唐儉殺於突厥是也 生間者反報也  李筌曰往來之使〇杜牧曰往來相通報  也生間者必取内明外愚形劣心壯趫揵  勁勇閑於鄙事能忍飢寒垢耻者為之〇  賈林曰身則公行心乃私覘往反報復常  無所害故曰生間〇杜佑曰擇己有賢材  智謀能自開通於敵之親貴察其動静知  其事計所為已知其實還以報我故曰  生間〇梅堯臣曰使智辨者徃覘其情而  以歸報也〇何氏曰如華元登子反之牀  而歸又如隋達奚武為東秦刺史時齊神  武趣沙苑太祖遣武覘之武從三騎皆衣  敵人衣服至日暮去營數百步下馬潜聽  得其軍號因上馬歷營若警夜者有不如  法者往往撻之具知敵之情狀以告太祖  太祖深嘉焉遂破之〇張預曰選智能之  士往視敵情歸以報我若婁敬知匈奴之  强以告高祖之類然生間之事亦衆或己  欲退告敵以戰或己欲戰告敵以退若秦  行人夜戒晋師曰來日請相見臾駢曰使  者目動而言肆懼我也秦果夜遁又吕延  攻乞伏乾歸大敗之乾歸乃遣間稱東奔  成紀延信而追之耿稚曰告者視高而色  動必有姦計延不從遂為所敗是也 故三軍之事莫親於間  杜牧曰受辭指蹤在於卧内〇杜佑曰若  不親撫重以禄賞則反為敵用洩我情實  〇梅堯臣曰入幄受詞最為親近〇王皙
Interpretation

This passage explains the application of "living spies" (shengjian) in ancient warfare, where military strategists illustrate key principles of espionage through concrete examples:

Li Quan notes that a living spy refers to an agent capable of traveling between enemy and friendly forces to relay intelligence. Du Mu elaborates that such spies require exceptional qualities: an ordinary appearance masking sharp wit, seemingly mediocre abilities concealing true courage, endurance of harsh conditions, and even willingness to bear humiliation.

Jia Lin mentions that skilled spies must seamlessly blend overt actions with covert reconnaissance, shuttling intelligence undetected. Du You emphasizes selecting intelligent individuals who can ingratiate themselves with enemy leaders to observe their movements, discern weaknesses, and report back. Mei Yaochen illustrates this with examples like deploying eloquent speakers to gather intelligence.

He Shi cites classic cases: During the Spring and Autumn period, Hua Yuan infiltrated enemy camps to obtain critical information; in the Sui dynasty, Da Xiwu disguised himself as an enemy soldier, sneaking into their camp at night to gather intelligence that ultimately helped Emperor Taizu achieve decisive victory. Zhang Yu adds that spies might also spread disinformation—like the Qin state deliberately leaking false reports to mislead the Jin army, enabling a successful night attack, while Lü Yan's defeat resulted from believing fabricated intelligence.

The passage concludes by stressing that among military affairs, espionage requires the commander's personal oversight. Du Mu states intelligence operations must be directed by the commander from his private tent. Du You warns that without generous treatment, spies may defect to the enemy. Both Mei Yaochen and Wang Xi agree that receiving intelligence reports constitutes the commander's most confidential duty.

Through these annotated examples, the text reveals the complexity and significance of ancient military intelligence work, highlighting both the specialized qualities required of spies and the absolute necessity of the commander's personal control over this most secretive operation.

 曰以腹心親結之〇張預曰三軍之士然  皆親撫獨於間者以腹心相委是最為親  密也 賞莫厚於間  杜佑曰以重賞賞之而賴其用〇梅堯臣  曰爵禄金帛我無愛焉〇王皙曰軍功之  賞莫厚於此〇張預曰非高爵厚利不能  使間陳平曰願出黄金四十萬斤間楚君  臣 事莫密於間  杜牧曰出口入耳也密一作審〇杜佑曰  間事不密則為已害〇梅堯臣曰幾事不  密則害成〇王皙曰獨將與謀〇張預曰  惟將與間得聞其事非密與 非聖智不能用間  杜牧曰先量間者之性誠實多智然後可  用之厚貌深情險於山川非聖人莫能知  〇梅堯臣曰知其情僞辨其邪正則能用  〇王皙曰聖通而先識智明於事〇張預  曰聖則事無不通智則洞照幾先然後能  為間事或曰聖智則能知人 非仁義不能使間  陳皥曰仁者有恩以及人義者得宜而制  事主將者既能仁結而義使則間者盡心  而覘察樂為我用也〇孟氏曰太公曰仁  義者則賢者歸之賢者歸之則其間可用  也〇梅堯臣曰撫之以仁示之以義則能  使〇王皙曰仁結其心義激其節仁義使  人有何不可〇張預曰仁則不愛爵賞義  則果決無疑既啗以厚利又待以至誠則  間者竭力 非微妙不能得間之實  杜牧曰間亦有利於財寶不得敵之實情
Interpretation

This passage discusses the wisdom of "using spies" (yongjian) in ancient warfare. Several military strategists emphasized that spies must be treated with exceptional closeness and trust, like one's own confidants. Rewards for spies should be extraordinarily generous, because the value of obtaining enemy intelligence far exceeds monetary costs—for instance, Chen Ping once proposed spending four hundred thousand jin of gold to bribe the officials of the Chu state.

Spy operations demand absolute secrecy; any leak could endanger one's own side. Only the general and the spy involved should know the details of the mission, as the saying goes: "From your mouth into my ears."

Employing spies requires supreme wisdom: First, one must assess whether the spy is honest and resourceful; second, one must cultivate benevolence and righteousness, winning their loyalty through kindness so they will serve wholeheartedly. Taigong (Jiang Ziya) said that practicing benevolence and righteousness attracts talented individuals to one's service—including potential spies. One must offer generous compensation while also treating them with genuine sincerity.

The text particularly notes that only meticulous discernment can verify the authenticity of intelligence. Since spies might provide false information for personal gain, extraordinary insight is needed to distinguish truth from deception. As the ancients said, "The human heart is more treacherous than mountains and rivers"—without sagely clarity, it is nearly impossible to see through such complexities.

 但將虚辭以赴我約此須用心淵妙乃能  酌其情僞虚實也〇杜佑曰用意密而不  漏〇梅堯臣曰防間反為敵所使思慮故  宜幾微臻妙〇王皙曰謂間者必性識微  妙乃能得所間之〇事實張預曰間以利  害來告須用心淵微精妙乃能察其真僞 微哉微哉無所不用間也  杜牧曰言每事皆須先知也〇梅堯臣曰  微之又微則何所不知〇王皙曰丁寜之  當事事知敵之情也〇張預曰密之又密  則事無巨細皆先知也 間事未發而先聞者間與所告者皆死  杜牧曰告者非誘間者則不得知間者之  情殺之可也〇陳皥曰間者未發其事有  人來告其聞者所告者亦與間者俱殺以  滅口無令敵人知之〇梅堯臣曰殺間者  惡其泄殺告者滅其言〇何氏曰兵謀大  事泄者當誅告人亦殺恐傳諸衆〇張預  曰間敵之事謀定而未發忽有聞者來告  必與間俱殺之一惡其泄一滅其口秦已  間趙不用廉頗秦乃以白起為將令軍中  曰有泄武安君將者斬此是已發其事尚  不欲泄況未發乎 凡軍之所欲擊城之所欲攻人之所欲殺必 先知其守將左右謁者門者舍人之姓名令 吾間必索知之  李筌曰知其姓名則易取也〇杜牧曰凡  欲攻戰先須知敵所用之人賢愚巧拙則  量材以應之漢王遣韓信曹參灌嬰擊魏
Interpretation

This passage discusses the importance of using spies ("jian") to gather intelligence and related precautions.

First, it emphasizes that employing spies requires extremely subtle discernment to verify the authenticity of intelligence. Du You states that one must maintain absolute secrecy without leaks, while Mei Yaochen warns against spies being turned by the enemy, requiring meticulous consideration. Wang Xi points out that exceptional spies must possess keen insight. Zhang Yu concludes that when spies bring reports involving advantages and disadvantages, only profound and subtle discernment can determine their veracity.

Several commentators then stress the paramount importance of secrecy in intelligence operations. Du Mu asserts that every matter must be known beforehand; Mei Yaochen claims the more covert the operation, the more comprehensive the knowledge gained; Wang Xi insists on repeated emphasis to ensure thorough understanding of enemy situations; and Zhang Yu states that greater secrecy enables advance knowledge of all matters, both major and minor.

The text then addresses confidentiality protocols: if a spy's mission is exposed before execution, both the spy and whoever leaked the information must be executed. Du Mu explains this is because those who leak information, unless intentionally luring spies, wouldn't otherwise know the details. Chen Hao, Mei Yaochen and others agree this prevents information breaches, while He Shi notes military secrets demand severe punishment for leaks. Zhang Yu cites the example of Qin forces using counterintelligence to make Zhao replace Lian Po—they strictly forbade leaking Bai Qi's appointment as commander, showing even executed operations require secrecy, let alone pending ones.

Finally, operational specifics: before attacking enemy troops, cities, or assassinating targets, spies must first identify the defending generals and key personnel (such as reception officers, gatekeepers, and aides). Li Quan states knowing names makes success easier. Du Mu adds that before battle, one must understand enemy personnel's capabilities to respond appropriately—just as Emperor Gaozu of Han deployed Han Xin, Cao Shen and Guan Ying against Wei after assessing their talents.

 豹問曰魏大將誰也對曰柏直漢王曰是  口尚乳臭不能當韓信騎將誰也曰馮敬  曰是秦將馬無擇子也雖賢不能當灌嬰  步卒將誰也曰項它曰是不能當曹參吾  無患矣〇陳皥曰此言敵人左右姓名必  須我先知之或敵使間來我當使間去若  不知其左右姓名則不能成間者之説漢  高伐秦至曉關張良曰吾聞其將賈堅爾  可以利啗之又曰其將雖曰欲和其軍士  未肯不如因其懈擊之〇乃進兵擊破之  又宋華元夜登子反之床以告宋病若非  素知門人舍人左右姓名先使間導之又  何由得登其床也〇杜佑曰守謂官守職  任者謁告也主告事者也門者守門者也  舍人守舍之人也必先知之為親舊有急  則呼之則不可不知亦因此知敵之情〇  梅堯臣曰凡敵之左右前後之姓名皆須  審省而令吾間先知則吾間可行矣〇王  皙曰不可臨事求也〇張預曰守將守官  任職之將也謁者典賓客之官也門者閽  吏也舍人守舍之人也凡欲擊其軍欲攻  其城欲殺其人必先知此左右之姓名則  可也欲潜入其軍則呼其姓名而往若華  元夜登子反之床以告宋病杜元凱註引  此文謂元用此術得以自通是也又漢高  祖入韓信卧内取其印亦近之 必索敵人之間來間我者因而利之導而舍 之  杜佑曰舍居止也令吾人遺以重利復遇
Interpretation

Wei Bao (a general of the Wei state during the Warring States period) once asked his subordinates, "Who is the chief general of Wei?" They replied it was Bai Zhi. Upon hearing this, Liu Bang, the King of Han, remarked, "This man is still a greenhorn who can't possibly stand against Han Xin. Who commands their cavalry?" The answer was Feng Jing. Liu Bang commented, "He's the son of Ma Wuze, a surrendered general from Qin. Though somewhat capable, he's no match for Guan Ying. What about their infantry commander?" When told it was Xiang Tuo, Liu Bang declared, "This man is even less of a challenge for Cao Shen. Now I can rest easy."

Chen Hao, a Tang dynasty military strategist, observed that this passage emphasizes the necessity of thoroughly understanding the enemy's key commanders in advance—either by turning enemy spies or actively dispatching one's own agents. Without knowledge of the opposing leaders, effective espionage strategies cannot be implemented. For instance, when Liu Bang (later Emperor Gaozu of Han) attacked the Qin forces at Xiaoguan, his advisor Zhang Liang suggested, "I've heard the defending general Jia Jian is greedy. We can bribe him with substantial riches." He added, "Even if the general wishes to negotiate peace, his troops may not comply. We should strike when their guard is down." Liu Bang followed this advice and achieved victory.

Another example from the Spring and Autumn period involves Hua Yuan, a senior official of Song, who managed to sneak into the tent of Chu general Zi Fan at night to report Song's dire situation precisely because he had beforehand familiarized himself with the Chu army's camp layout and personnel. Du You, a Tang dynasty historian, elaborated: One must gather intelligence on all levels of the enemy's hierarchy—the officers in charge of military affairs (守官), messengers (谒者), gatekeepers (门者), and quartermasters (舍人). Only with this prior knowledge can one adapt swiftly in emergencies.

Mei Yaochen, a Song dynasty commentator, stressed the importance of detailed investigations into the names and positions of every level of the enemy's personnel, ensuring one's own spies are well-prepared for smooth operations. Wang Xi, a Song scholar, emphasized that such intelligence must be gathered beforehand, not on the battlefield. Zhang Yu, another annotator, further explained: Whether for military assaults or covert infiltration, key figures like city defense commanders, protocol officers, guards, and internal administrators must be identified in advance. Just as Hua Yuan could visit Zi Fan at night, or Liu Bang could enter Han Xin's chamber to seize his military tally, success relied on prior intelligence.

Lastly, regarding enemy spies: one should identify and capture them, then use generous bribes to turn them into double agents before sending them back. Du You clarified that "舍" (sheltering) refers to harboring enemy spies with lavish incentives before redeploying them to serve one's own purposes.

 而舍之則可令詭其辭 故反間可得而用也  曹操曰舍居止也〇杜牧曰敵間之來必  誘以厚利而止舍之使為我反間也〇杜  佑曰故能取敵之間而用之〇梅堯臣曰  必探索知敵之來間者因而利誘之引而  舍止之然後可為我反間也〇王皙曰此  留敵間以詢其情者也必謹舍之曲為辯  說深致情愛然後啗以大利威以大刑自  非至忠於其君王者皆為我用矣〇張預  曰索求也求敵間之來窺我者因以厚利  誘導而館舍之使反為我間也言舍之者  謂稽留其使也淹延既久論事必多我因  得察敵之情下文言四間皆因反間而知  非久留其人極論其事則何以悉知 因是而知之故鄉間内間可得而使也  杜牧曰若敵間以利導之尚可使為我反  間因此乃知厚利亦可使鄉間内間也此  言使間非利不可故上文云相守數年争  一日之勝而愛爵禄百金不知敵情者不  仁之至也下文皆同其義也〇陳皥曰此  說踈也言敵使間來以利啗之誘令止舍  因得敵之情因間内間可使反間誘而使  之〇杜佑曰因反敵間而知敵情鄉間者  皆可得使梅堯臣曰其國人之〇可使者  其官人之可用者皆因反間而知之〇張  預曰因是反間知彼鄉人之貪利者官人  之有隙者誘而使之 因是而知之故死間爲誑事可使告敵
Interpretation

This passage explains the application of the "reverse spy" tactic in military strategy. Cao Cao interprets "舍" (sheltering) as establishing arrangements, while Du Mu adds that enemy spies should be lured with substantial benefits and settled to serve our purposes. Du You emphasizes the crucial point of converting enemy spies into our own agents.

Mei Yaochen notes that we must first detect the spies sent by the enemy, then entice them with benefits and properly settle them, thereby turning them into our reverse spies. Wang Xi stresses the need for careful handling of these spies, using clever rhetoric and deep emotional appeals to move them, supplemented by heavy bribes and the threat of punishment—unless they are exceptionally loyal, most will eventually serve our cause.

Zhang Yu further elaborates that we should actively seek out enemy spies sent to scout us, luring them with generous rewards and settling them in place. The term "sheltering" means detaining these spies for extended periods to extract more intelligence through prolonged conversations. The passage later mentions that the four types of spies (local spies, internal spies, reverse spies, and expendable spies) all depend on reverse spies to be effective. Without detaining these individuals for in-depth discussions, we cannot fully grasp the enemy's situation.

Du Mu adds that if we can use benefits to turn enemy spies into reverse spies, the same method can be employed to manipulate local spies (commoners from the enemy state) and internal spies (officials within the enemy's ranks). He underscores that using spies requires a willingness to spend generously—stinginess with titles, wealth, and rewards while refusing to gather enemy intelligence is the height of foolishness.

Chen Hao argues that the key lies in enticing enemy spies to stay through benefits, thereby extracting information and using reverse spies to guide local and internal spies. Both Du You and Mei Yaochen point out that reverse spies allow us to identify which commoners and officials in the enemy state can be exploited. Zhang Yu concludes that reverse spies reveal which individuals in the enemy state are greedy for profit and which officials harbor conflicts, making them susceptible to manipulation.

Finally, the passage discusses "expendable spies" (those who deliver false intelligence to the enemy), who can be used to feed the adversary misleading information. The core idea is this: we must skillfully exploit enemy spies, using both material incentives and emotional persuasion to convert them into intelligence assets, thereby gaining control over broader spy networks.

 張預曰因是反間知彼可誑之事使死間  往告之 因是而知之故生間可使如期  杜牧曰可使往來如期〇陳皥曰言五間  皆循環相因惟生間可使如期〇杜佑曰  因誑事而知敵情生間往返可使知其敵  之腹心所在〇梅堯臣曰令吾間以誑告  敵者須因反間而知敵之可誑也生間以  利害覘敵情須因反間而知其疏密則可  往得實而歸如期也〇張預曰因是反間  知彼之情故生間可往復如期也 五間之事主必知之  李筌曰孫子殷勤於五間主切知之 知之必在於反間故反間不可不厚也  杜牧曰鄉間内間死間生間四間者皆因  反間知敵情而能用之故反間最切不可  不厚也〇杜佑曰人主當知五間之用厚  其禄豐其財而反間者又五間之本事之  要也故當在厚待〇梅堯臣曰五間之始  皆因緣於反間故當厚遇之〇張預曰人  主當用五間以知敵情然五間皆因反間  而用則是反間者豈可不厚待之耶 昔殷之興也伊摯在夏  曹操曰伊摯伊尹也 周之興也吕牙在殷  曹操曰吕牙大公也〇梅堯臣曰伊尹吕  牙非叛於國也夏不能任而殷任之殷不  能用而周用之其成大功者為民也〇何  氏曰伊吕聖人之耦豈為人間哉今孫子  引之者言五間之用須上智之人如伊吕  之才智者可以用間蓋重之〇之辭耳張
Interpretation

This passage discusses the application of the "Five Spies" (wujian) in ancient military strategy. The most crucial is counterespionage (fanjian) — utilizing enemy spies to discern the opponent's strengths and weaknesses. Once this is achieved, living spies (shengjian) who shuttle back and forth can successfully complete their intelligence missions on schedule.

The ruler must thoroughly understand the operations of all five types of spies. Counterespionage holds paramount importance and must be rewarded generously, as the other four categories — local spies (xiangjian) who leverage native informants, internal spies (neijian) who subvert enemy officials, doomed spies (sijian) who deliberately deliver false intelligence at the risk of their lives, and living spies (shengjian) — all depend on intelligence provided by counterespionage to be effective.

Two historical examples are cited: the rise of the Shang dynasty was facilitated by Yi Yin (Yi Zhi), who had previously served the Xia court, and the Zhou dynasty's ascendancy relied on Jiang Ziya (Lü Ya), who once served the Shang. Neither betrayed their original states; rather, the Xia and Shang failed to employ these talents, allowing the Shang and Zhou to benefit from their wisdom. The text emphasizes that espionage requires individuals of extraordinary wisdom like Yi Yin and Jiang Ziya to be executed successfully.

The core principle is this: the art of espionage demands supreme intelligence, with counterespionage forming the foundation of any spy network and thus requiring special attention. Only by skillfully employing all five spies — particularly by generously rewarding counterespionage agents — can a ruler accurately grasp the enemy's situation.

 預曰伊尹夏臣也後歸于殷吕望殷臣也  後歸于周伊吕相湯武以兵定天下者順  乎天而應乎人也非同伯州犁之奔楚苗  賁皇之適晋狐庸之在吴士會之居秦也 故惟明君賢將能以上智爲間者必成大功 此兵之要三軍之所恃而動也  李筌曰孫子論兵始于計而終於間者蓋  不以攻為主為將者可不慎之哉〇杜牧  曰不知敵情軍不可動知敵之情非間不  可故曰三軍所恃而動李靖曰夫戰之取  勝此豈求於天地在乎因人以成之歷觀  古人之用間其妙非一即有間其君者有  間其親者有間其賢者有間其能者有間  其助者有間其鄰好者有間其左右者有  間其縱横者故子貢史廖陳軫蘇秦張儀  范睢等皆憑此而成功也且間之道有五  焉有因其邑人使潜伺察而致辭焉有因  其仕子故洩虚假令告示焉有因敵之使  矯其事而返之焉有審擇賢能使覘彼向  背虚實而歸說之焉有佯緩罪戾微漏我  偽情浮計使亡報之焉凡此五間皆須隱  祕重之以賞密之又密始可行焉若敵有  寵嬖任以腹心者我當使間遺其珍玩恣  其所欲順而旁誘之敵有重臣失勢不滿  其志者我則啗以厚利詭相親附採其情  實而致之敵有親貴左右多辭誇誕好論  利害者我則使間曲情尊奉厚遭珍寳揣  其所間而反間之敵若使聘於我我則稽
Interpretation

Yi Yin was originally a minister of the Xia dynasty before defecting to Shang, while Lü Wang (Jiang Ziya) served the Shang court before assisting the Zhou dynasty. These two figures respectively helped King Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou pacify the realm through military force—actions that aligned with the Mandate of Heaven and popular sentiment. Their cases differ entirely from mere defections like Bozhou Li fleeing to Chu, Miao Benhuang defecting to Jin, Hu Yong remaining in Wu, or Shi Hui staying in Qin. Only enlightened rulers and capable generals, those who can employ superior wisdom in espionage, can achieve great accomplishments. This is the crux of military strategy—the entire army's movements depend on intelligence gathered by spies.

Li Quan observes that Sun Tzu's Art of War begins with "Initial Estimations" and concludes with "Employing Spies," emphasizing that victory cannot rely solely on brute force—generals must be prudent in this regard. Du Mu further explains that without understanding the enemy's situation, one must not rashly deploy troops, and to obtain such intelligence, spies must be employed—hence the entire army's dependence on espionage. Li Jing maintains that military success comes not through prayers to heaven and earth, but through human ingenuity. Historical methods of espionage were manifold: some sowed discord between rulers, others between close advisors, between virtuous ministers, between capable officials, between allies, between neighboring states, between left and right attendants, or between vertical and horizontal strategists. Figures like Zigong, Shi Liao, Chen Zhen, Su Qin, Zhang Yi, and Fan Ju all achieved success through espionage.

There are five specific espionage techniques: First, employing locals to secretly observe and relay messages; second, using enemy officials to deliberately leak false information; third, manipulating enemy envoys to transmit misleading intelligence; fourth, carefully selecting agents to investigate enemy vulnerabilities; fifth, feigning criminal desertion to intentionally expose false plans to the enemy. All five methods require absolute secrecy and generous rewards—the more covert, the better. When dealing with a favored courtier in the enemy state, bribe them with treasures to satisfy their desires; when approaching a fallen minister, feign intimacy with substantial benefits to extract information; when encountering influential nobles fond of discussing gains and losses, send agents to flatter them and exploit their suspicions for counterintelligence; when receiving enemy envoys, deliberately delay receptions to observe their true intentions.

 留其使今人與之共處矯致慇懃僞相親  暱朝夕慰諭倍供珍味觀其辭色而察之  仍朝夕令使獨與已伴居我遣聦耳者潜  於複壁中聽之使既遲違恐彼怪責必是  竊論心事我知事計遣使用之且夫用間  間人人亦用間以間已已以密往人以密  來理須獨察於心參會於事則不失矣若  敵人來欲候我虚實察我動静覘知事計  而行其間者我當佯為不覺舍止而善飯  之微以我偽言誑事示以前却期會則我  之所須為彼之所失者因其有間而反間  之彼若將我虚以為實我即乘之而得志  矣夫水所以能濟舟亦有因水而覆没者  間所以能成功亦有憑間而傾敗者若束  髮事主當朝正色忠以盡節信以竭誠不  詭伏以自容不權宜以為利雖有善間其  可用乎〇陳皥曰晋伯州犁奔楚楚苗賁  皇奔晋及晋楚合戰於鄢陵苗賁皇在晋  侯之側伯州犁侍于楚王二人各言舊國  長短之情然則晋所以勝楚者楚所以敗  者其故何也二子則有優劣也是知用間  之道間敵之情得不慎擇其人深究其説  也故上文云非聖智莫能用間者夫聖智  知人人即附之賢者受知則戮力為效非  聖非智必猜必忌公道不啓仁義不施則  義士賢人因而銜憤此將上天不祐幽有  鬼神設無人事之變恐有陰誅之禍豈上  智之士為其用哉故上文云非仁義莫能
Interpretation

This passage discusses ancient strategies and precautions regarding espionage (using spies).

It first describes how to handle enemy envoys: outwardly receive them with warm hospitality, assign dedicated companions, while secretly arranging surveillance. When envoys stay too long and fear reprimand, they'll inevitably discuss confidential information privately—thus allowing valuable intelligence to be obtained. Espionage works both ways; since others will also employ spies against you, one must exercise careful judgment and comprehensive analysis to avoid miscalculations.

When enemies send spies to probe our actual situation, feign ignorance while treating them well, deliberately leaking false information—this enables counterintelligence manipulation. If the enemy misjudges our strength and weakness, we can seize victory. Just as water can both float and sink boats, espionage can succeed or fail.

The text then emphasizes the importance of loyalty: those truly devoted to their ruler act with integrity, avoiding underhanded schemes. Against such individuals, even the most skilled spies prove ineffective.

Finally, historical examples from the Spring and Autumn period are cited: When Bozhouli of Jin fled to Chu, and Miaobenhuang of Chu defected to Jin, both later advised their new states against their former homelands during the Yanling campaign. This illustrates how espionage requires meticulous talent selection and thorough intelligence analysis. Only sagacious rulers can effectively employ spies, for the virtuous willingly serve enlightened masters. If a ruler lacks benevolence and righteousness while suspecting capable advisors, even heaven won't bless them—let alone attract wise counselors. Hence the earlier assertions that "without sagely wisdom one cannot use spies" and "without humaneness and righteousness one cannot direct spies."

This content reveals the dialectical relationship between espionage and counterintelligence in ancient warfare, emphasizing that successful practitioners must cultivate wisdom, benevolence and other virtues to effectively wield this strategy without suffering countermeasures.

 使間然則湯武之聖伊吕宜用伊吕獲用  事宜必濟聖賢一會交泰時乘道合乾坤  功格寰宇當其耕夫於畎畆釣叟於渭濱  知我者誰能無念也〇賈林曰軍無五間  如人之無耳目也〇王皙曰未知敵情者  不可動也〇張預曰用師之本在知敵情  故曰此兵之要也未知敵情則軍不可舉  故曰三軍所恃而動也然處十三篇之末  者蓋用非兵之常也若計戰攻形勢虚實  之類兵動則用之至於火攻與間則有時  
Interpretation

The enlightened rulers like King Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou achieved their great accomplishments precisely because they excelled in employing virtuous talents like Yi Yin (founding minister of Shang) and Lü Shang (Jiang Ziya, military strategist of Zhou's founding). When wise sovereigns meet worthy ministers, their harmony resembles the perfect interaction between Heaven and Earth, enabling their achievements to benefit the entire realm. Yet initially, these men might have been mere farmers tilling fields or elderly fishermen by the Wei River—who could have predicted their future greatness?

Jia Lin commented: An army without an intelligence network (the "five types of spies" refers to five reconnaissance methods) is like a person deprived of ears and eyes—incapable of action. Wang Xi noted: Without understanding the enemy's situation, one must never act rashly. Zhang Yu emphasized: The foundation of military operations lies in comprehending the enemy's condition, hence this constitutes the crux of warfare. Without knowing the enemy's actual strength and weakness, troops cannot be deployed—therefore the entire army's movements depend on intelligence.

This passage appears at the end of The Art of War's thirteen chapters because espionage doesn't belong to conventional military methods. Strategies like calculation, attack formations, situational assessment, and assessing strengths/weaknesses are employed whenever troops are mobilized—whereas fire attacks and espionage require opportune moments for implementation.

(Supplementary note: The "five types of spies" in The Art of War include: local spies [using enemy country villagers], internal spies [bribing enemy officials], reverse spies [turning enemy agents], doomed spies [delivering false intelligence], and surviving spies [those who return alive].)

而為耳 孫子註解卷之十三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0014); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 12