中文 · EN

《抱朴子外篇》Vol. 28

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 28 / 51 804 characters

About this page. The original text of 《抱朴子外篇》 Vol. 28 (Taiqing 太清部, 51 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 2 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《抱朴子外篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

抱朴子外篇卷之二十八    百里 抱朴子曰三台九列坐而論道州牧郡守操 綱舉領其官益大其事愈優煩劇所鍾其唯 百里衆役於是乎出調求之所叢赴牧守雖 賢而令長不堪則國事不舉萬機有闕其損 敗豈徒止乎一境而已哉令長尤宜得才乃 急於臺省之官也用之不得其人其故无他 也在乎至公之情不行而任私之意不違也 或父兄貴重而子弟以聞望見選或高人屬 託而凡品以无能見叙或是所宿念或親戚 匪他知其不可而能用也等亦時有快者不 爲盡无所中也要於不精者率多矣其能自 獨立勉修清約夙夜在公以求衆譽懼風績 之不美恥知己之謬舉鮮矣庸猥之徒器小 志近冒于貨賄唯富是圖肆情恣慾元止无 足在所司官知其有足賴主人舉劾彈糺終 於當解慮其結怨反見中傷不敢犯觸而恣 其貪殘矣如此黎庶亦安得不困毒而離叛 離叛者衆則不得不屯聚而爲群盜矣夫百 尋之室焚於分寸之飈千丈之波潰於一蟻 之穴何可不深防乎何可不改張乎而秉斤 兩者或舍銓衡而任情掌柯斧者或曲繩墨 於附己選之者既不爲官擇人而求之者又 不自謂不任於是蒞政而政荒牧民而民散 或有穢濁驕奢而困百姓者矣或有苛虐酷 烈而多怨叛者矣或有闇塞退憒而庶事亂
Interpretation

In the 28th chapter of the Outer Chapters of Baopuzi, Ge Hong discusses the selection of local officials. He observes that although the imperial court has high-ranking officials in the Three Departments (Shangshutai, Yushitai, Yezhetai) and Nine Ministries deliberating on statecraft, and provincial governors wield significant authority, it is the county magistrates governing mere hundred-mile territories who directly interact with the common people. All corvée labor and taxes originate from these local units. When magistrates prove incompetent, not only does local administration collapse, but the entire nation's governance suffers.

The selection of county magistrates demands greater emphasis on capability than the appointment of central officials. Yet in practice, fairness and meritocracy often fail: some obtain office through familial influence, others through powerful recommendations despite being unqualified, while certain appointments stem purely from personal connections. Occasionally competent candidates emerge, but most are unfit. Truly incorruptible, self-disciplined officials devoted to public welfare remain vanishingly rare.

Mediocre and avaricious officials fixate solely on wealth, indulging their selfish desires. Superiors who recognize their misconduct fear retaliation and dare not impeach them. How can the people, suffering under such oppression, avoid fleeing in anguish? When enough refugees gather, they form bandit gangs. Just as a towering edifice may collapse from a spark, or a thousand-mile dike crumble from termite tunnels, how can we afford to neglect these grassroots vulnerabilities?

More gravely, selection committees abandon standards for personal favor—like carpenters discarding their compasses and marking lines. Offices aren't matched to qualified candidates, while office-seekers overestimate their abilities. Consequently, governance deteriorates and communities fracture. Some officials plunder and oppress through corruption and extravagance; others provoke resentment with harsh punishments; still others invite chaos through sheer incompetence. These phenomena all expose systemic flaws in local official appointments.

者矣或有潦倒疏緩而致弛壞者矣或有好 興不急而疲人力者矣或有藏養逋逃而行 淩暴者矣或有不曉法令而受欺弄者矣或 有以音聲酒色而致荒湎者矣或有圍碁樗 蒱而廢政務者矣或有田獵遊飲而忘庶事 者矣或有不省辭訟而刑獄亂者矣百姓不 堪起爲寇賊舋咎發聞寘于叢棘虧君上之 明益刑書之煩而民之荼毒亦已深矣夫用 非其人譬猶被木馬以繁纓何由騁迹於追 風以壤龍當雲雨安能耀景於天衢哉若秉 國之鈞出納王命者審良樂之顧盻不令跛 蹇厠騏騄冒昧苟得闇於自量者慮中道之 顛躓不以駑薾服鸞衡則何患庶績之不康 何憂四凶之不退三皇豈足四五帝豈難六 哉 抱朴子外篇卷之二
Interpretation

This passage discusses the various harms caused by improper personnel appointments in governing a state. Ge Hong enumerates eight manifestations of official dereliction: some are lazy and negligent, leading to neglected governance; some obsess over trivial matters, wasting human resources; some shelter fugitives and act tyrannically; some lack legal knowledge and are easily deceived; some indulge in music, dance, and sensual pleasures; some neglect official duties for chess and gambling; some forget their responsibilities in hunting and feasting; and some fail to adjudicate cases, causing judicial chaos.

These behaviors bring immense suffering to the people, ultimately driving them to rebellion. The court is then forced to resort to punishments, which not only tarnishes the ruler’s wisdom but also multiplies legal statutes, deepening the people’s misery. Ge Hong employs vivid analogies: appointing the wrong person is like adorning a wooden horse with splendid saddles—how could it ever gallop with the wind? Or like using a clay dragon to summon rain—how could it ever shine in the sky?

He emphasizes that the key to governance lies in selecting capable individuals. Those who wield state power and convey government decrees must discern with the sharp eye of Bole (the legendary horse connoisseur), ensuring that lame and inferior horses do not mix among fine steeds. If those in charge recognize their own limitations, prevent the cart from overturning midway, and never let inferior steeds drive the divine phoenix chariots (referring to the magnificent carriages of immortals), then why fear unfulfilled governance? Why worry about wickedness remaining unpunished? Governed this way, surpassing the achievements of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors would be effortless.

The "Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors" are the ancient sage-kings revered in Daoism, while "Bole" was a famed horse expert of the Spring and Autumn period, here symbolizing those skilled in recognizing talent. By contrasting the consequences of poor and proper personnel selection, Ge Hong underscores the critical importance of appointing the virtuous and capable for state stability and prosperity.

十八

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0021); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 27 Vol. 29 →