中文 · EN

《抱朴子外篇》Vol. 48

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 48 / 51 1,007 characters

About this page. The original text of 《抱朴子外篇》 Vol. 48 (Taiqing 太清部, 51 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 2 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《抱朴子外篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

抱朴子外篇卷之四十七    彈禰 抱朴子曰漢末有禰衡者年二十有三孔文 舉齒過知命身居九列文學冠羣少長稱譽 名位殊絶而友衡於布衣又表薦之於漢朝 以爲宜起家作臺郎云惟岳降神異人並出 目所一見輒誦於口耳所瞥聞不忘於心性 與道合思若有神其歎之如此衡游許下自 公卿國士以下衡初不稱其官皆名之云阿 某或以姓呼之爲某兒呼孔融爲大兒呼楊 脩爲小兒荀彧猶强可與語過此以往皆木 梗泥偶似人而無人氣皆酒瓮飯囊耳百官 大會衡時在坐忽顰蹙悽愴哀歎忼慨或譏 之曰英豪樂集非所歎也衡顧眄歷視稠衆 而答曰在此積尸列柩之間仁人安能不悲 乎曹公嘗切齒欲殺之然復無正有入法應 死之罪又惜有殺儒生之名乃謫作鼓吏衡 了無悔情恥色乃縛角於柱口就吹之乃有 異聲並摇𪔛擊鼓聞者不知其一人也而論 更劇無所顧忌尋亡走投荆州牧劉表表欲 作書與孫權討逆于時已全據江東帶甲百 萬欲結輔車之援共其距中國使諸文士立 草盡思而不得表意乃示衡衡省之曰但欲 使孫左右柱刀兒視之者此可用爾儻令張 子布見此大辱人也即摧壞投地表悵然有 怪色謂衡曰爲了不中芸鋤乎惜之也索紙 筆便更書之衆所作有十餘通衡凡一歷視
Interpretation

Chapter 47 of the Outer Chapters of the Master Who Embraces Simplicity recounts the story of Mi Heng, a renowned scholar during the late Eastern Han dynasty. Though merely twenty-three years old, his extraordinary talent earned him admiration even from Kong Rong (styled Wenju), a respected elder in his fifties who held high office. Kong Rong deliberately set aside his status to befriend Mi Heng as an equal and recommended him for the position of Court Gentleman.

Mi Heng possessed astonishing memory—retaining everything at a glance—and razor-sharp wit, as though touched by divine insight (shen). Yet his temperament was wildly unrestrained. In the capital Xu, he refused to address ministers by their official titles, calling them only by names or nicknames: Kong Rong became "Eldest Boy," Yang Xiu "Youngest Boy." Only Xun Yu barely earned his conversational respect—the rest he dismissed as lifeless puppets of clay and wood, mere "wine sacks and rice bags." Once, at an assembly of officials, he suddenly looked mournful. When asked why he sighed amid festivities, he retorted: "How can one not grieve in a mortuary?"—comparing the entire gathering to corpses.

Cao Cao despised him bitterly but, lacking grounds for execution and fearing infamy as a scholar-killer, demoted him to drummaster to humiliate him. Undaunted, Mi Heng mastered the drums with transcendent (shen) skill, producing the effect of multiple players. Later, he fled to Jing Province under Liu Biao's protection. When Liu sought to draft a letter allying with Sun Quan against the central plains, none of his scholars' drafts satisfied him. Mi Heng reviewed them and declared the letter fit only for Sun Quan's guards—presenting it to Zhang Zhao (styled Zibu) would be an insult—then tore it up. Though regretful, Liu had him compose anew. After perusing over a dozen drafts, Mi Heng produced a flawless version in one stroke.

This passage vividly portrays Mi Heng's arrogant brilliance and unyielding defiance, embodying his singular way of navigating the turbulent era.

之而已暗記書之畢以還表表以還主或有 録所作之本也以比校之無一字錯乃各大 驚表乃請衡更作衡則作成手不停輟表甚 以爲佳而施用焉衡驕傲轉甚一州人士莫 不憎恚而表亦不復堪欲殺之或諫以爲曹 公名爲嚴酷猶能容忍衡少有虛名若一朝 殺之則天下游士莫復擬足於荆楚者也表 遂遣之衡走到夏口依將軍黄祖祖待以上 賔祖大兒黄射與衡偕行過人墓下俱讀碑 銘一過而去久之射曰前所視碑文大佳恨 不寫也衡曰卿存之名耳我一覽尚記之即 爲暗書之末有一字右缺乃不分明衡與半 字曰疑此當作某字恐不審也射省可雖言 行輕人密顧榮顯是以高游鳳林不能幽翳 蒿萊然修己駮刺迷而不覺故開口見憎舉 足蹈禍齎如此之伎倆亦何理容於天下而 得其死哉猶梟鳴狐嚾人皆不喜音響不改 易處何益許下人物之海也文舉爲之主任 荷之足爲至到於此不安已可知矣猶必死 之病俞附越人所無如何朽木鈆鋌班輸歐 冶所不能匠也而復走投荆楚間終陷極害 此乃衡懵蔽之效也蓋欲之而不能得非能 得而弗用者矣於戲才士可勿戒哉嵇生曰 吾所惑者衡之虛名也子所論者衡之實病 也敢不寤寐於指南投杖於折中乎 抱朴子外篇卷之四
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of Mi Heng, a renowned scholar of the Three Kingdoms period. Possessing astonishing memorization skills—able to perfectly reproduce texts after a single reading—he once flawlessly transcribed a stele inscription for Liu Biao from memory, which only fueled his arrogance. The intellectuals of Jing Province all detested him, and even Liu Biao, pushed to his limit, contemplated executing him. However, considering that even someone as severe as Cao Cao had tolerated Mi Heng, Liu feared killing him would deter other scholars from coming to Jing Province, so he simply sent him away.

Mi Heng then sought refuge with Huang Zu. While traveling with Huang Zu's son Huang She, they encountered another stele inscription. Regretting not having copied it down, Huang She was astonished when Mi Heng reproduced it on the spot with only half a character uncertain. Despite his extraordinary talents, Mi Heng's insolent and provocative nature alienated everyone around him, ultimately leading to his demise in Jing Province. The author, Ge Hong (Daoist name Baopuzi), comments: Mi Heng was like an owl or fox whose cries annoy others yet refuse to change their nature; akin to a terminal illness that even the finest physicians cannot cure; or like rotten wood and rusted metal that the most skilled artisans cannot fashion into anything useful. Endowed with talent but devoid of wisdom in human relations, his downfall was ultimately self-inflicted.

The passage concludes by citing Ji Kang's observation: people are often misled by Mi Heng's superficial reputation, while Ge Hong exposes his true flaws. This serves as a cautionary tale for talented individuals to strike a balance between arrogance and excessive humility. References to legendary figures—"Yu Fu" (an ancient physician), "Ban Shu" (the master craftsman Lu Ban), and "Ou Ye" (a famed swordsmith)—illustrate that Mi Heng was beyond redemption. The text employs these allusions to underscore how even the greatest healers and artisans could do nothing for someone like Mi Heng.

十七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0021); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 47 Vol. 49 →