中文 · EN

《弘道錄》Vol. 16

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 16 / 41 7,250 characters

About this page. The original text of 《弘道錄》 Vol. 16 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 41 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 15 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《弘道錄》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

弘道録卷之二十三羅八  義   昆弟之義 萬章問曰敢問或曰放者何謂也曰象不得 有爲於其國天子使吏治其國而納其貢稅 焉故謂之放豈得暴彼民哉  録曰愚觀象之不善不至若後世之甚也  夫以管蔡監殷曹參相齊賈生相梁董子  相江都天子曷嘗不使吏治其國焉而能  已於暴者鮮矣可以見象之所欲惟在於  富貴得貢賦而遂已後世之所欲必主於  暴辭恣强大而益張然則雖有大舜之仁  至義盡亦焉得而善處之哉 太康尸位以逸豫滅厥德黎民咸貳乃盤遊 無度畋於有洛之表十旬弗反有窮后羿因 民弗忍距於河厥弟五人御其母以從徯於 洛之汭五子咸怨述大禹之戒以作歌其一 曰皇祖有訓民可近不可下民惟邦本本固 邦寧予視天下愚夫愚婦一能勝予一人三 失怨豈在明不見是圖予臨兆民懔乎若朽 索之馭六馬爲人上者奈何不敬其二曰訓 有之内作色荒外作禽荒甘酒嗜音峻宇雕 牆有一於此未或不亡其三曰惟彼陶唐有 此冀方今失厥道亂其紀綱乃㡳㓕亡其四 曰明明我祖萬邦之君有典有則貽厥子孫 關石和釣王府則有荒墜厥緒覆宗絶祀其 五曰嗚呼曷歸予懷之悲萬姓仇予予將疇 依欝陶乎予心顔厚有忸怩弗愼厥德雖悔 可追  録曰詳玩五歌其意切其情哀其詞含蓄
Interpretation

The Duty Between Brothers

Wan Zhang asked, “May I ask what it means when people say that Shun exiled Xiang?”

Mencius replied, “Xiang was unable to exercise authority within his own fief, so the Son of Heaven appointed officials to govern it and collect its tribute. That is why people say Shun exiled Xiang. Would Shun really have let Xiang harm the people?”

The Hongdao lu says: Looking closely at Xiang’s conduct, I do not think he was as wicked as the figures of later ages. Guan Shu and Cai Shu oversaw the lands of Yin; Cao Shen served as chancellor of Qi; Jia Yi served as chancellor of Liang; and Dong Zhongshu served as chancellor of Jiangdu. Did the Son of Heaven not also appoint officials to govern the fiefs where these men served? Yet few of them managed to avoid harming the people. This shows that Xiang wanted only wealth and status: once he received the tribute, he was content. People in later ages, by contrast, often sought power through cruelty, indulging their will and continually expanding their influence. Even a benevolent and dutiful ruler like the great Shun could hardly always know how best to handle such matters.

Taikang, ruler of the Xia dynasty, held office without doing his duty. He craved ease and pleasure, lost his Virtue, and was abandoned by the people. He spent his days in unrestrained revelry. He went hunting beyond the Luo River and stayed away for a hundred days. When the people could no longer endure his rule, Hou Yi, leader of the Youqiong clan, intercepted him at the Yellow River.

Taikang’s five younger brothers accompanied their mother as she followed him, and waited on the banks of the Luo River. Filled with resentment, the five brothers recounted the admonitions of the great Yu and composed five songs. The first said:

“Our ancestor left us this instruction: the people may be drawn close, but must not be treated with contempt. The people are the foundation of the state; when the foundation is firm, the state is at peace. When I look at the people of the realm, even the most ordinary men and women each have something in which they surpass me. When a ruler repeatedly does wrong, why would resentment wait until the truth is fully exposed to arise? We must be alert even to signs we cannot see. Facing the countless people, I am as wary as one driving six horses while holding reins on the verge of breaking. How can a ruler fail to be cautious?”

The second said:

“An ancient teaching says: to be consumed by women within the court, and by hunting beyond it; to drink to excess and become obsessed with music; to build lofty halls and adorn their walls—all these things lead to ruin. Anyone who indulges in even one of them is bound for destruction.”

The third said:

“Long ago, the Tao Tang clan—Yao, as tradition tells us—possessed the region around Ji. But now it has lost the right Way, thrown the governing order into confusion, and ended in ruin.”

The fourth said:

“How wise was our ancestor, once ruler of all the states! He left laws and standards for his descendants. The measures of weight and volume, and the standards of measurement, were rules by which the royal house governed the realm. If we abandon the work our ancestors left us, we will destroy our clan and bring our ancestral sacrifices to an end.”

The fifth said:

“Alas, where can we turn? Our hearts are filled with sorrow. The people all regard me as an enemy; on whom can I rely? Grief knots in my heart. My face is shameless, yet inwardly I am overcome with shame. If I do not carefully cultivate my Virtue, then even regret will come too late to undo the damage.”

The Hongdao lu says: Reading these five songs closely, one can feel the depth of their meaning and the sorrow of their feeling; their words are also restrained and richly suggestive.

 而不露眞所謂涕泣道之也夫益避禹之  子於箕山之陰天下之人曰吾君之子此  無他啓賢能敬故也羿距啓之子於大河  之北五子之歌曰萬姓仇予此無他弗愼  厥德故也然則雖其自取而實夷羿之所  因茍有殷伊尹寧知不可爲夏太甲而何  以距爲哉上有大禹與啓之業内有五子  偕母之賢羿之謀雖未敢遽逞而實不可  㧞矣故曰怨豈在明不見是圖嗚呼六馬  逸而邦本逋色禽荒而亡國續千古之下  而不爲之浩嘆者獨何心歟獨何心歟 㣲子若曰父師少師殷其弗或亂正四方我 祖底遂陳於上我用沈酗於酒用亂厥德於 下殷罔不小大好草竊姧宄卿士師師非度 凡有辜罪乃罔恒獲小民方興相爲敵讐今 殷其淪喪若涉大水其無津涯殷遂喪越至 於今曰父師少師我其發出狂吾家耄遜於 荒今爾顚隮若之何其父師若曰王子天毒 降災荒殷邦方興沈酗於酒乃罔畏畏咈其 耉長舊有位人今殷民乃攘竊神祗之犠牷 牲用以容將食無災降監殷民用乂讐歛召 敵讐不怠罪合於一多瘠罔詔商今其有災 我興受其敗商其淪喪我罔爲臣僕詔王子 出迪王子弗出我乃顚隮自靖人自獻於先 王我不顧行遯  録曰詳味此書其曰今爾無指告子顚隮  若之何其者㣲子欲决去就之幾也其曰
Interpretation

Since the people had offered themselves to the former kings, I, the Grand Tutor, will not consider fleeing. I have resolved to stay and do all I can to assist the Shang king. If I cannot save the situation, I am still willing to answer for it before the former kings. I will not look to my own safety and run away.

Yi yielded the throne to Yu’s son Qi and went to live north of Mount Ji. People throughout the realm said, “He did this because Qi was virtuous and respectful.” Yi drove Qi’s sons across the Yellow River. Qi’s five sons composed the “Song of the Five Sons,” saying, “The people all regard me as an enemy.” This was because they had not carefully cultivated their De (Virtue). In view of this, although they had brought disaster upon themselves, Yi merely seized the opportunity to intervene. If there had been someone like Yi Yin of the Shang to assist the Xia, who could say that the dynasty could not have supported Taijia? Why, then, shut Qi’s sons out?

Above them stood the legacy left by Yu the Great and Qi; within the palace were five worthy sons and their mother. Though Yi’s schemes could not yet be put into action, they had already become difficult to uproot. Thus it is said, “Does resentment and disaster arise only where they are plainly visible? One must be even more alert to the beginnings that cannot be seen.” Alas, when a ruler lets his horses run wild and neglects state affairs, the foundations of the state begin to totter. Indulging in women, hunting, and amusements will ultimately bring the state to ruin. A thousand years have passed, yet whoever reads this and does not sigh deeply—what kind of heart can such a person have? What kind of heart can such a person have?

Weizi said, “Grand Tutor and Junior Tutor, I fear the Shang can no longer bring order to the four quarters and govern the realm. Our ancestors once brought peace to the state, and their achievements shone above; but I have sunk into drunkenness and damaged my De, throwing government into disorder below. Officials throughout the Shang, high and low, delight in theft, rebellion, and lawlessness. The ministers imitate one another in breaking the laws, and those who commit crimes often go unpunished. Now the people are rising up everywhere and turning against one another. The Shang is in danger of collapse, like someone trying to ford a great river but unable to find either a crossing or a shore. The Shang is doomed. Now, Grand Tutor and Junior Tutor, I fear I have lost my mind: we old members of this family should flee to some distant wilderness. You too are about to face ruin—what should you do?”

The Grand Tutor said, “Prince, Heaven has sent down calamity, and the state of Yin is in disorder. The country is sunk in drunkenness; people no longer revere what should be revered, and they defy their elders and former officials. Now the people of Yin even steal the pure-colored animals offered in sacrifice to the spirits, and go so far as to eat the offerings, thinking no disaster will befall them. Heaven watches over the people of Yin and makes them govern and punish one another. Like enemies, they hoard wealth and bring calamity upon themselves, without end. Their crimes have accumulated, and the people are suffering greatly, yet no one admonishes the king. The Shang is certain to meet with disaster. If we rise to assist it, we too will share in its ruin. If the Shang falls, I do not wish to become another state’s servant. I urge the prince to leave and escape the calamity. If you refuse to go, I too will be caught up in the ruin. Each of us must decide for ourselves and answer to the former kings. I will not consider fleeing to save myself.”

The commentary in the Hongdao lu says, “Consider this passage carefully. In the words ‘You too are about to face ruin—what should you do?’ the ‘you’ refers to the Grand Tutor and Junior Tutor. Weizi speaks this way to urge them to decide whether to stay or leave. As for ‘Each of us must decide for ourselves and answer to the former kings. I will not consider fleeing to save myself,’ these words show the Grand Tutor’s resolve to stay.”

 詔王子出迪王子弗出我乃顚隮者箕子  告以當去之義也此二者一篇之綱領也  其曰自靖人自獻於先王我不顧行遯者  箕子自言在己當如是非謂㣲子自謀存  宗祀以獻於先王比干自謀死諌以獻於  先王箕子自謀佯狂以獻於先王盖箕子  紂諸父乃啇之宗長先王之所附屬也㣲  子紂庶兄乃殷之長嗣帝乙之所倚庇也  宗國雖有禍亂在宗長而去之則先王何  所望乎宗子若必䘮亡在長嗣而不去則  血脉何所存乎此箕子所以自靖人自獻  於先王初不顧其行與遯也若乃比干雖  紂諸父方之箕子則非長比之㣲子則非  嗣可死則死耳又何必謀之於先耶集註  疑比干獨無所言孔氏謂心同不復重言  嗚呼其言豈其言歟 周公若曰君𠁗弗弔天降喪於殷殷既墜厥 命我有周既受我不敢知曰厥基永孚於休 若天棐忱我亦不敢知曰其終出於不祥嗚 呼君已曰時我我亦不敢寧於上帝命弗衣 遠念天威越我民罔尤違我後嗣子孫大弗 克恭上下遏佚前人光在令子小子旦非克 有正迪惟前人光施於我冲子公曰君𠁗天 壽平格保又有殷有殷嗣天㓕威今汝永念 則有固命厥亂明我彰造邦今予小子旦若 遊大川予徃翼汝𠁗其濟嗚呼篤棐時二人 我式克至於今日休我咸成文王功於不怠 不冐海隅出日罔不率俾
Interpretation

“Tell the prince to leave. If the prince does not leave, I, Jizi, will suffer ruin.” These words mean: explain to the prince why he should depart; if he does not, I will be brought down by disaster. These two statements are the guiding principle of this chapter.

“Each person should settle his own course and offer himself to the former kings; I will not consider whether my conduct leads me into flight.” Here Jizi is saying what he himself should do. He is not saying that Weizi planned to preserve the ancestral temple and its sacrifices, offering himself to the former kings; that Bigan planned to remonstrate unto death, offering himself to the former kings; and that Jizi planned to feign madness, offering himself to the former kings. Jizi was King Zhou’s uncle and an elder of the Shang royal clan. The former kings’ relatives and dependents all looked to him. Weizi was King Zhou’s elder half-brother and the senior heir of Yin-Shang, entrusted to the care and protection of Emperor Yi.

Even if the ancestral state falls into turmoil, if the clan elder leaves, whom can the former kings rely on? If the heir to the ancestral line is destined to perish, and the senior heir does not leave, who will preserve the bloodline? This is why Jizi intended to “settle his own course and offer himself to the former kings.” At first, he did not consider whether his actions might bring the disaster of flight upon him. As for Bigan, although he too was King Zhou’s uncle, he was not a clan elder in the way Jizi was, nor was he an heir in the way Weizi was. If death was what he must face, then why plan for it in advance? The Collected Commentaries wonders why Bigan alone is left unexplained. Kong’s commentary says that the three men shared the same intention, so there was no need to explain it again. Alas, can that really count as an explanation?

The Duke of Zhou said: “Your Majesty, Heaven did not pity Yin, but brought down the calamity of its ruin. Yin has lost the Mandate of Heaven, and we Zhou have received it. I dare not claim that Yin’s foundations can remain secure for long and enjoy blessings forever; nor dare I claim that events must ultimately end in ill fortune. Alas, Your Majesty has already said, ‘This is my responsibility.’ I too dare not rest easy before the Mandate of Heaven, nor fail to remain in awe of Heaven’s might for all time. We, the people and ministers, have committed no offense and have not disobeyed Your Majesty. But if descendants in later generations fail to revere Heaven and Earth, they will cut off and lose the radiance of their forebears. Now I, Dan, alone can set this right, so that the radiance of our forebears may endure and be bestowed upon our young lord.

“Your Majesty, Heaven grants blessings and long life, allowing people to dwell in peace and harmony, and it also protected Shang. Yet the descendants of Shang caused Heaven’s might to fade. If you keep this in mind for a long time, you can secure the Mandate of Heaven, govern the realm, and bring our enterprise to prominence. Now I, Dan, am young, like someone who must cross a great river. If I go to assist you, Your Majesty, you will be able to make it through this crisis. Alas, it was because these two forebears, King Wen and King Wu, steadfastly supported us that we have arrived at the blessings we enjoy today. I will surely work diligently without slackening or becoming complacent, so that King Wen’s achievements may be brought to completion. From the farthest shores to the lands where the sun rises, there will be none who do not submit.”

 録曰愚觀君𠁗之書未嘗不起而三嘆且  以召爲弟也而曰君𠁗周爲兄也而曰子  小子二公雖老而敬不衰可以見其篤棐  之至矣夫周公留相召公告老非有一毫  之私心也是故以君則冲乎弗可弗念也  以業則泮乎弗可弗洽也以天則㝠乎弗  可弗諶也以命則赫乎弗可弗永也弗有  耉老尚有浮簿乎宋哲宗之時光公著爲  政大防純仁爲臣宣仁一旦崩棄至召惇  卞用之大亂天下宋業以殞天命以去今  讀者爲之流涕則讀君𠁗之書而不增嘆  也者幾希矣 蔡仲之命惟周公位冢宰正百工羣叔流言 乃致辟管叔於商囚蔡叔於郭鄰以車七乘 降霍叔爲庶人三年不齒蔡仲克庸祗德周 公以爲卿士叔卒乃命諸王邦之蔡王若曰 小子胡惟爾率德改行克愼厥猷肆予命爾 侯於東土徃即乃封敬哉爾尚盖前人之愆 惟忠惟孝爾乃邁迹自身克勤無怠以垂憲 乃後率乃祖文王之彜訓無若爾考之違王 命皇天無親惟德是輔民心無常惟惠之懷 爲善不同同𡚖於治爲惡不同同𡚖於亂尔 其戒哉惟厥初惟厥終終以不困不惟厥終 終以困窮懋乃攸績睦乃四鄰以蕃王室以 和兄弟康濟小民率自中無作聪明亂舊章 詳乃視聽罔以側言改厥度則予一人汝嘉  録曰周公之封蔡仲豈比於季友之後慶
Interpretation

Whenever I read “Lord Shi,” I cannot help rising to my feet and sighing deeply. The Duke of Shao was plainly the Duke of Zhou’s younger brother, yet the Duke of Zhou addressed him as “Lord Shi.” The Duke of Zhou was plainly the Duke of Shao’s elder brother, yet the Duke of Shao called him “young man.” Though both dukes were already advanced in years, their respect for each other never diminished. This shows how deep was their friendship: they supported one another and devoted themselves wholeheartedly to their shared responsibilities.

The Duke of Zhou remained at court to assist the king, while the Duke of Shao retired from office in his old age. Neither had the slightest selfish motive. Therefore, toward the ruler one should remain reverent and mindful at all times; toward the great affairs of state, one should strive to set them in order and attend to them with full care; in following Heaven’s will, one should understand its principles deeply and act with unwavering sincerity; and in regard to the Mandate of Heaven, one should recognize its clear and visible signs and do all one can to preserve it for the long term. Even when venerable ministers of great virtue hold office, state affairs may still become empty and careless.

During the reign of Emperor Zhezong of Song, Sima Guang and Gongzhu held power, while Fan Chunren served as a minister. After Empress Dowager Xuanren died, Zhezong recalled Zhang Dun and Cai Bian and appointed them to office. The empire fell into chaos, the fortunes of the Song dynasty declined, and the Mandate of Heaven departed. Readers will probably weep when they come to this passage; few, then, can read “Lord Shi” without feeling even greater sorrow.

“The Charge to Zhong of Cai” records that when the Duke of Zhou served as chief minister, directing the officials, his uncles spread rumors against him. The Duke of Zhou therefore punished Guan Shu according to the law and executed him in Shang; he imprisoned Cai Shu at Guolin and had him escorted there in a seven-carriage convoy; and he demoted Huo Shu to commoner status, refusing to employ him for three years. Later, Cai Zhong showed himself respectful and virtuous, so the Duke of Zhou appointed him as a high minister. Only after Cai Shu’s death did the Duke of Zhou instruct King Cheng of Zhou to enfeoff Cai Zhong in the state of Cai.

King Cheng said: “You, Hu, young man: you have renewed yourself, followed the Way of virtue, and acted with care. Therefore I command you to go east and receive your fief. Go and govern your state with reverence. Make amends for the faults of your predecessors. Be loyal and filial, begin with yourself, work diligently without slackening, and set an example for generations to come. Follow the established laws handed down by your grandfather, King Wen; do not, like your father, defy the king’s commands.

“Heaven does not favor anyone in particular; it assists only those who are virtuous. The people’s hearts have no fixed allegiance; they turn only toward those who show them kindness. Though the ways of doing good may differ, all lead to order; though the ways of doing evil may differ, all lead to disorder. Take this as a warning. Every undertaking needs a good beginning and a good ending. If you can bring it to a good conclusion, you will not fall into difficulty; if you disregard the outcome, you will eventually be reduced to hardship and destitution.

“Work diligently to achieve good results in your governance. Keep peace with neighboring states and serve as a shield for the royal house. Maintain harmony among your brothers, and comfort and aid the people. Govern by the balanced and upright Way. Do not presume to be clever and disrupt established practices. Observe carefully and listen to counsel; do not alter the laws because of biased opinions. If you can do these things, I will commend you.”

The Record of the Vast Way says: “When the Duke of Zhou enfeoffed Cai Zhong, how could he be compared with Qingfu, a descendant of Ji You…”

 父乎流言之辟止於口過而且脅於管故  囚之囚之其祀可絶與不惟不念舊惡而  且録爲卿士公之心天地日月矣此其所  以不崇朝而天下清明也 左傳魯莊公無適嗣築臺臨黨氏見孟任說 之生子般以愛欲立問於叔牙叔牙曰一繼 一及魯之常也慶父在君何憂退而問季友 季友曰臣以死奉般公曰叔牙奈何成季以 君命命僖叔待於鍼巫氏使鍼季酖之曰飲 此則有後於魯國不然死且無後飲之𡚖及 逹泉而卒立其子爲叔孫氏公薨季友立子 般慶父使殺子般於黨氏立開是爲閔公哀 姜與慶父謀殺閔公立慶父慶父使卜齮賊 公於武闈成季以閔公兄申適邾魯人不欲 慶父慶父懼如莒季友入立申是爲僖公以 賂求慶父于莒莒人歸之及密使公子魚請 不許哭而徃慶父曰奚斯之聲也乃縊其後 爲孟氏  録曰愚觀季友之事所謂坎有險求小得  未能明乎大義者也邾定公曰臣弑君凡  在官者殺無赦殺其人壞其室洿其宫而  赭焉夫邾小國也尚能斷斯獄豈有大國  而不聞者哉此義不明於是復有殺惡及  視之事無惑乎禍亂之相踵也故春秋書  慶父出奔而不明其死聖人之意見矣 宋公使邾文公用鄫子於次睢之杜欲以屬 東夷司馬子魚曰古者六畜不相爲用小事 不用大牲而况敢用人乎祭祀以爲人也民
Interpretation

His father, Duke Zhuang of Lu, believed slander and ordered the rumors suppressed. Later, when Guan Zhong was under duress, he imprisoned him. Did that mean the sacrifices to Guan Zhong should be discontinued? Duke Huan of Qi not only bore no grudge over the past, but appointed him as a high minister. His mind was as broad as Heaven and Earth, the sun and moon. It was for this reason that, in less than a day, order and clarity prevailed throughout the realm.

The Zuo Tradition records: Duke Zhuang of Lu had no legitimate son. He once built a terrace at the home of the Dang family, where he saw Meng Ren and fell in love with her. Meng Ren gave birth to Ziban, and Duke Zhuang wanted to make him his heir. He asked Shuya for advice. Shuya said, “Lu has always followed the succession custom in which a younger brother succeeds his elder brother. Qingfu is still here, so what is there for you to worry about?” After Shuya left, Duke Zhuang asked Jiyou. Jiyou said, “I am willing to give my life in support of Ziban.”

Duke Zhuang said to Jiyou, “What should be done about Shuya?” Jiyou then falsely claimed to be acting on the duke’s orders and sent someone to tell Shuya to wait at the home of Zhen Wushi. Jiyou next had Zhen Ji bring Shuya a cup of poisoned wine and say, “Drink this, and your descendants can remain in Lu. If you refuse, your line will end when you die.” Shuya drank the wine and died when he reached Daquan. His son was later established as the ancestor of the Shusun clan.

After Duke Zhuang died, Jiyou installed Ziban as ruler. Qingfu, however, sent someone to the Dang family home to kill Ziban, then installed Prince Kai, who became Duke Min of Lu. Ai Jiang and Qingfu conspired to kill Duke Min and wanted Qingfu to take the throne. Qingfu then sent Bu Yi to kill Duke Min at Wuwei. Jiyou fled with Duke Min’s elder brother, Shen, to the state of Zhu. The people of Lu refused to install Qingfu, who grew afraid and fled to Ju. Jiyou returned and installed Shen as Duke Xi of Lu, then offered gifts to Ju in exchange for Qingfu’s return. Ju sent Qingfu back to Lu. When Qingfu reached Mi, he sent Prince Yu to plead for him, but Duke Xi refused. Prince Yu left in tears. Hearing him cry, Qingfu said, “That is the voice of Xisi.” He then hanged himself. His descendants later became the Meng clan.

The Hongdao Lu says: “When I consider Jiyou’s actions, they seem to have been taken in a perilous situation. Even when he sought to achieve something, he could gain only a small advantage; he had not yet truly understood the greater right. Duke Ding of Zhu once said, ‘When a minister kills his ruler, every official serving in government should execute him without pardon. His house should also be demolished, his palace razed, and the place left bare.’ Though Zhu was a small state, it treated the crime of regicide with great severity. Could a great state like Lu really have been unaware of this principle? Because the greater right was not understood, people later killed Eji and Shi. It is no surprise that one upheaval followed another. Thus the Spring and Autumn Annals records only that Qingfu fled, without stating plainly how he died. The Sage had his reasons for this.”

The Duke of Song sent Duke Wen of Zhu to sacrifice the ruler of Zeng at the Du of Cixi, hoping thereby to bring the eastern Yi peoples under his allegiance. Sima Ziyu said, “In ancient times, people did not use one of the six domestic animals as a sacrifice to another. Minor rites did not call for a great sacrificial animal; how much less could anyone dare to sacrifice a human being? Sacrifice is meant to benefit people…”

神之主也用人其誰饗之齊桓公存三亡國 以屬諸侯義士猶曰薄德今一會而虐二國 之君又用諸淫昏之鬼將以求霸不亦難乎 得死爲幸 宋人圍曹子魚言於宋公曰文王聞崇德亂 而伐之軍三旬不降退脩教而復伐之因疊 而降詩曰刑于寡妻至于兄弟以御于家邦 今君德無乃猶有所闕而以伐人若之何盍 姑内省德乎無闕而後動  録曰春秋譏世卿子魚世爲左師其可少  哉啇之先也不忍飛鳥之羅而今乃以人  代畜大旱雲霓之望而今乃以威脅衆夫  子責宰我使民戰慄之言與伯益賛禹益  脩文德之化子魚之諌其諸聖賢之遺範  歟惜乎不足以語之也 宣十有七年冬十有一月壬午公弟叔盻卒 其曰公弟何賢之也其賢之何也宣弑而非 之也非之則胡爲不去也曰兄弟也何去而 之與之財則曰我足矣織屨而食終身不食 宣公之食君子以是爲通恩也是以取貴乎 春秋  録曰叔𦕎豈不誠亷士哉襄仲之弑君宣  公之篡立所與不共戴天之仇也𦕎茍有  季友之權去牙而立閔可也誅孟而事僖  亦可也既不能然徒以手足之親反爲㓂  仇之役亦將踐踏之而已矣斬艾之而已  矣聖人何取焉取非其義而不食也上無  避兄離母之嫌内有餘貴餘富之樂𦕎之  超於人數等矣豈於陵仲子之可及哉
Interpretation

“Spirits preside over sacrificial rites. If people like these are put in charge, who will come to partake of the offerings?” Duke Huan of Qi once preserved three states that had already fallen and restored them to their lords. Even so, men of principle considered his virtue shallow. Now, in a single covenanting meeting, he has brought harm upon the rulers of two states and appointed licentious, benighted spirits. Can he really hope to establish hegemony this way? It will be difficult indeed. To preserve his own life would already count as good fortune.

The people of Song laid siege to Cao. Ziyu, a senior official of Song, said to the Duke of Song: “When King Wen of Zhou heard that Chong had become corrupt, he sent out an army to punish it. After besieging the state for thirty days without securing its surrender, King Wen withdrew his troops, put his teachings in order, and then marched again. Only then was Chong destroyed. The Book of Songs says: ‘First bring your wife under the influence of ritual and law; then extend this to your brothers, and thereby govern your family and state.’ Your virtue, my lord, may still be deficient, yet you would punish others. How can this be right? Why not first examine your own conduct at home? Once you yourself are free of faults, then take action.”

The Hongdao lu comments: The Spring and Autumn Annals censures families that held high office across generations. Ziyu’s family had served as Left Counselors for generations—how could he be considered insignificant? His ancestor, the former lord of Shang, could not bear to catch birds in a net. Yet now people would use human beings in place of sacrificial animals. The people, suffering through a long drought, longed for clouds and rain as if their lives depended on them. Yet now they would use force to coerce the people. Confucius once rebuked Zai Wo for proposing words that would make the people tremble. When Boyi assisted Yu the Great, he made the cultivation of civil virtue and the spread of instruction his chief concern. Did Ziyu’s remonstrance perhaps carry on the legacy of the sages? It is a pity that his words could not persuade the Duke of Song to heed them.

In the winter of the seventeenth year of Duke Xuan’s reign, on the renwu day of the eleventh month, the duke’s younger brother Shuxi died. Why does the Spring and Autumn Annals call him “the duke’s brother”? Because it approves of him. Why does it approve of him? Because he opposed Duke Xuan’s murder of his ruler and seizure of the throne. If he opposed it, why did he not leave? Someone might say, “He was his brother. How could he leave?” Shuxi handed his possessions over to Duke Xuan and said, “I have enough already.” After that, he made his living by weaving straw sandals and never accepted a stipend from Duke Xuan. Gentlemen judged that he had honored family affection without accepting ill-gotten wealth, and had handled both kindness and duty with balance. That is why the Spring and Autumn Annals commends him.

The Hongdao lu comments: Was Shuxi not a man of integrity? Xiang Zhong murdered the ruler, and Duke Xuan seized the throne for himself; these men were his sworn enemies. Had Shuxi possessed power like Jiyou, he might have driven out Ya and installed Duke Min, or put the Meng clan to death and supported Duke Xi. But he did none of these things. Because of the bond between brothers, he was instead willing to serve his enemies, letting them trample upon and kill him. What, then, did the sage approve of in him? He approved that Shuxi took no ill-gotten possessions and ate no food gained by injustice. He had neither incurred suspicion of abandoning his elder brother and leaving his mother, nor failed inwardly to accept a poor life; he did not covet glory or wealth. Shuxi’s character was far beyond that of ordinary people. How could he be compared with Zhongzi of Yiling, renowned for his proud withdrawal from worldly life?

曹子臧名欣時宣公庶子也宣公會晋伐秦 卒於師曹人使公予負芻守使子臧逆公之 䘮負芻殺其太子而自立是爲成公諸侯皆 請討之子臧不義成公將出奔國人聞之相 率從子臧以行成公乃懼自告其罪且請留 焉於是子臧乃反而致其邑明年成公會諸 侯於戚晋侯執之以歸於周諸侯皆賢子臧 將見子臧於周而立之子臧辭曰前志有之 曰聖達節次守節下失節爲君非吾節也雖 不能聖敢失守乎遂迯奔宋三年曹人請於 晋於是晋侯謂曹人曰苟子臧反吾歸而君 子臧不得已乃復歸於曹以待晋命既而晋 人復請於周以反成公子臧於是盡致其邑 與身而終身不仕  録曰夫所謂之節者物既離散則當節止  之節所以次涣也故其象曰不出户庭知  通塞也負芻之罪上通于天下絶于人中  棄于同盟非若宣之弑立而國人無異心  諸侯無異詞者比也爲時者盍因國人之  同心諸侯之同罪請討於天子以報太子  之辜正在宫之罰使綱常墜而復振天地  晦而復明寧不謂之節乎不知此義徒守  區區之小信以成滔滔之顯惡於是天討  幾張而復閉人欲益肆而難收而後亂臣  賊子接跡於後世矣孟子不云仲子不義  與之齊國而不受人皆信之是舍簞食豆  羹之義也惜乎當時無以此義責之
Interpretation

Cao Zijang, whose personal name was Xinshi, was a concubine-born son of Duke Xuan of Lu. Duke Xuan had once joined forces with the state of Jin to attack Qin, and later died in the army. The people of Cao appointed Prince Fuchu to remain in the state and sent Zijang to meet Duke Xuan’s coffin. Fuchu killed the heir apparent and made himself ruler; this was Duke Cheng of Cao. The other feudal lords all called for him to be punished. Zijang considered Duke Cheng unjust and prepared to flee the state. When the people heard of this, many followed Zijang and left with him. Duke Cheng grew afraid, admitted his wrongdoing in person, and asked Zijang to stay. Only then did Zijang return, surrendering his fief to the state.

The following year, Duke Cheng met with the feudal lords in an alliance at Qi. The Marquis of Jin detained him and sent him to the Zhou royal court. The feudal lords all regarded Zijang as virtuous and planned to go to the Zhou court to recommend him as ruler. Zijang declined, saying, “An ancient book says: ‘The sage understands affairs and can adapt to the times; the next best person keeps to his proper place; the lowest loses his integrity.’ Becoming ruler is incompatible with the integrity I must uphold. Though I cannot be a sage, how could I dare abandon what I am bound to uphold?” He then fled to the state of Song.

Three years later, the people of Cao petitioned Jin. The Marquis of Jin told them, “If Zijang returns, I will send your ruler back to you.” With no choice, Zijang returned to Cao and awaited Jin’s decision. Before long, the people of Jin petitioned the Zhou court in turn, and Duke Cheng was allowed to return home. Zijang then surrendered his entire fief and relinquished all his positions of authority, never again taking office for the rest of his life.

The Record comments: What is meant by “Restraint” (jie)—moderation and stopping—is that when things have already fallen into disorder, one should seek to bring them to a halt and draw them back together. That is why the Restraint hexagram in the Book of Changes follows the Dispersion hexagram: “Dispersion” means things are scattered, while “Restraint” means gathering them back and stopping the scattering. The hexagram image says, “Do not go beyond the courtyard gate; know when the way is open and when it is blocked.” This means that without leaving the gate or courtyard, one can understand when the way is clear and when it is obstructed.

Fuchu’s crimes reached up to Heaven. He lost the people’s support and was spurned by the allied feudal lords. His situation was nothing like that of Duke Xuan, who took the throne by killing the heir apparent without drawing objection from the people or opposition from the feudal lords. Why did those who governed not act while the people were united and the feudal lords agreed that Fuchu was guilty, and ask the Son of Heaven to punish him for murdering the heir apparent? This would have punished crimes within the palace, restored ethical order from collapse, and brought the right way between Heaven and Earth back into the light. Would this not have been an act of Restraint?

Zijang did not understand this principle. He held only to his own small, personal sense of trustworthiness, and as a result allowed an obvious great evil to spread unchecked. Heaven’s punishment was on the verge of being carried out, yet was obstructed; human selfish desires grew more unrestrained and ever harder to control. From then on, rebellious ministers and treacherous sons appeared one after another in later generations. Did Mencius not say that Zhongzi considered the state of Qi unjust and would refuse it even if it were offered to him—and that everyone believed he would indeed do so? Yet this amounted only to his giving up a small measure of righteousness, like refusing a basket of food or a bowl of soup. It is a pity that no one at the time used this principle to rebuke Zijang.

季札吴王壽夢少子也壽夢子四人長諸樊 次餘祭次餘昧次季札札賢夢欲立之札讓 不可乃立諸樊攝行國事諸樊既除喪以父 命讓位於札謝曰曹宣公之卒諸侯與曹人 不義曹君將立子臧子臧去之以成曹君君 子曰能守節矣君義嗣也誰敢于君有國非 吾節也札雖不才願附子臧之義吴人固立 札札棄其室而耕乃舍之諸樊卒授弟餘祭 欲傳以次必致國於札而止以稱父意十七 年餘祭卒弟餘昧立餘昧卒又欲授札札迯 去於是吴人立餘昧之子僚爲王諸樊之子 光以爲吾父所以兄弟相傳者欲致位季子 也季子即不受國吾當立乃使人弑僚而自 立是爲闔廬季子使晋反曰苟先君無廢祀 民人無廢主社稷有奉國家無傾乃吾君也 吾誰敢怨哀死事生以待天命非我生亂立 者從之先人之道也復命哭墓復位而待  録曰季札之不受國豈比於曹子臧乎樊  無簒立之心其致國者以父命爲尊也故  札辭曰君義嗣也誰敢干君此以天倫爲  重也於是次餘祭次餘昧次季札夫誰曰  不可奈何王僚之不然也啓光之簒者僚  實爲之而吴之大夫國人亦不能無罪焉  或以札不受讓國所致則過矣抑壽夢之  欲傳位季札非若周之至德也夢始僣王  欲札而行王季文王之事此札之所深懼  但其意隱㣲而不露人皆不知而札獨知
Interpretation

Jizha was the youngest son of King Shoumeng of Wu. Shoumeng had four sons: the eldest, Zhufan, followed by Yujì and Yumei, with Jizha the youngest. Jizha was wise and capable, and Shoumeng wanted to make him king, but Jizha declined. Zhufan therefore succeeded to the throne and temporarily took charge of state affairs.

When Zhufan’s mourning period ended, he followed his father’s final instruction and offered the throne to Jizha. He explained, “When Duke Xuan of Cao died, the other lords and the people of Cao thought that the new ruler of Cao was unfit to rule. They wanted to install Zizang, but Zizang left Cao in order to uphold the ruler’s position. Confucius praised him for holding fast to duty and integrity. You are the rightful successor to the throne. Who would dare oppose you? If I keep this state for myself, I will fail in my own duty. Though I am not worthy, I hope to follow Zizang’s example.” The people of Wu insisted that Jizha take the throne, so he left home and went to farm. Only then did Zhufan give up.

After Zhufan died, Yujì succeeded him. He intended to pass the throne from brother to brother and, in the end, handed it to Jizha to fulfill their father’s wish. Yujì died after seventeen years on the throne, and his younger brother Yumei succeeded him. When Yumei died, he too wanted to give the throne to Jizha. But Jizha fled Wu, and the people of Wu made Liao, Yumei’s son, king.

Zhufan’s son Guang believed that his father had arranged for the brothers to succeed one another so that the throne would eventually pass to Jizha. Since Jizha refused to accept it, Guang thought he should take the throne himself. He sent men to kill Liao and proclaimed himself king. This was Helü. When Jizha returned from Jin, he said, “As long as the sacrifices to the former rulers continue, the people have not been left without a ruler, someone still performs the rites to the altars of state, and the country has not fallen, then that man is my ruler. Whom could I blame? I will mourn the dead, serve the one who now holds power, and await Heaven’s decree. I did not bring about this disorder. Following the customs of our forebears is the proper course.” He went to Liao’s tomb, wept and made his declaration, then returned to his former post and awaited what fate would bring.

The Hongdao Lu comments: “How can Jizha’s refusal of the throne be compared with Zizang of Cao? Zhufan had no intention of usurping the throne. He gave it up out of respect for his father’s command. When Jizha said, ‘You are the rightful successor to the throne. Who would dare oppose you?’ he was giving greater weight to the bonds of kinship between father and son, and between brothers. After that, Yujì and then Yumei succeeded in turn. Who could say this was improper? The problem was that King Liao refused to accept this arrangement. King Liao bears responsibility for provoking Guang to usurp the throne; the ministers and people of Wu cannot be said to be entirely blameless either. It is wrong to claim that Jizha’s refusal to accept the throne caused the later struggle over succession.”

Moreover, Shoumeng’s wish to pass the throne to Jizha did not arise from the supreme virtue seen in the Zhou dynasty. Shoumeng had initially assumed the title of king, yet wanted Jizha to follow the examples of the Duke of Zhou in assisting the royal house and King Wen in inheriting Heaven’s mandate. This was precisely what filled Jizha with deep apprehension. He kept his thoughts obscure and did not speak them aloud, so no one else understood them. Only Jizha himself knew.

 之寧不屢遁其跡乎吾夫子特賢季札其  意隱而不發者盖爲是也   (札死夫子書墓曰嗚呼此/延陵季子之墓意正如此) 晋邢侯與雍子急鄐田久而無成士景伯如 楚叔魚攝理韓宣子命斷舊獄罪在雍子雍 子納其女於叔魚蔽罪刑侯刑侯怒殺叔魚 與雍子於朝宣子問其罪於叔向叔向曰三 人同罪施生戮死可也雍子自知其罪而賂 以買直鮒也鬻獄邢侯專殺乃施邢侯而尸 雍子與叔魚於市仲尼曰叔向古之遺直也 制刑不隱於親三數叔魚之惡不爲末减其 義也夫  録曰昔叔向之諌其母母曰懼生龍蛇又  曰狼子野心何羊舌氏之不幸若此乎惟  狼故貪惟蛇故鷙而尚未誨其淫至雍子  之禍三者備矣盻雖欲减惡乎受其减哉 前漢書朱虛侯劉章以諸吕擅權用事忿劉 氏不得職嘗入待宴飮章自請曰臣將種也 請得以軍法行酒項之諸吕有一人醉亡酒 章㧞劍追斬之太后業已許其軍法無以罪 也自後諸吕憚朱虛侯劉氏爲益疆  録曰武侯悉誅唐宗室而吕后不殺朱虛  侯者以齊爲之殿也然則吕氏亦可謂無  䇿矣徒以女親人而不知所親非以女也  以兵强吕而不知所强非以兵也是故軍  可奪而章之志不可奪兵可恃而嬰之謀  不可恃吕氏至是亦無䇿矣 後漢書光武與兄劉縯威名益盛新市平林
Interpretation

How could he not repeatedly keep his intentions hidden? I believe Confucius valued Jizha so highly precisely because Jizha had a purpose in mind but did not speak of it.

(After Jizha died, Confucius inscribed his tombstone: “Alas, this is the tomb of Jizi of Yanling.” That was exactly what he meant.)

Xinghou of Jin and Yongzi had long disputed the fields of Chu, but the case had never been settled. After Shi Jingbo left for Chu, Shuyu took over the case. Han Xuanzi ordered him to hear the old dispute, and he ruled that Yongzi was at fault. Yongzi then offered his daughter to Shuyu, who took his side and assigned the blame to Xinghou. Enraged, Xinghou killed both Shuyu and Yongzi at court. Han Xuanzi asked Shuxiang to assess the guilt of the three men. Shuxiang said, “Their guilt is equal. It is acceptable to sentence one to death and the other two to posthumous punishment. Yongzi knew he was guilty yet bribed his way to a favorable judgment; Shuyu (whose given name was Fu) sold justice and perverted the law; Xinghou took a life on his own authority. Xinghou should be executed, and the bodies of Yongzi and Shuyu should be displayed in the marketplace.” Confucius said, “Shuxiang was an upright man of the old tradition. In administering punishment, he did not conceal the guilt of those close to him. Shuyu’s wrongdoing was so grave, and Shuxiang did not lessen the penalty in the slightest to spare anyone’s feelings. This was the very meaning of righteousness.”

The Hongdao lu comments: “In the past, when Shuxiang remonstrated with his mother, she said, ‘I fear I have given birth to a dragon or a snake,’ and also, ‘A wolf cub will have a wolf’s ambitions.’ How unfortunate the Yangshe clan was to have such descendants! The wolf is naturally greedy, and the snake naturally fierce. At the time, no one had yet taught Shuyu, so his wicked conduct went unchecked. By the time Yongzi brought disaster upon himself, all three kinds of evil were present. Even if Shuxiang had wanted to lessen their sentences, on what grounds could he have done so?”

The Former Book of Han records: Liu Zhang, Marquis of Zhuxu, grew angry when he saw the Lü clan monopolizing power and the Liu clan barred from office. Once, while attending a banquet in the palace, he volunteered, “I am the descendant of a military family. I ask permission to enforce the drinking rules according to military law.” One of the Lü clan members became drunk and tried to evade the rules. Liu Zhang drew his sword, pursued him, and killed him. Empress Lü had already given him permission to enforce military law, so she could not punish him. From then on, the Lü clan feared the Marquis of Zhuxu, while the Liu clan grew steadily stronger.

The Hongdao lu comments: “Empress Wu had the entire Tang imperial clan put to death, while Empress Lü did not kill the Marquis of Zhuxu because Qi could serve as a stronghold. Seen in this light, the Lü clan can be said to have had no strategy at all. They relied only on family ties to win people over, without realizing that those they sought to draw close were moved by something other than kinship. They relied only on military strength to bolster the Lü clan, without realizing that military strength alone could not make the clan secure. Thus, troops could be taken away, but Liu Zhang’s resolve could not; military force could be relied upon, but not Guan Ying’s plans. By then, the Lü clan had no way forward.”

The Later Book of Han records: As the reputations of Emperor Guangwu and his elder brother Liu Yan continued to rise, after the Xinshi and Pinglin rebel forces had been subdued…

諸將陰勸更始除之適部將劉稷聞更始立 怒曰本起圖大事者伯升兄弟也今更始何 爲者耶遂收稷將誅之縯固爭李軼宋鮪勸 更始因并執縯即日殺之官屬迎弔秀秀不 與交私語惟深引避而已又不敢爲縯服每 獨居輙不御酒肉枕席有泣涕處主簿馮異 獨寬譬之秀止之曰卿勿妄言異因進說曰 更始政亂百姓無所依戴夫人久飢渴易爲 充飽今公專命方面宣分遣官屬循行郡縣 宣布德澤秀深納之  録曰坎之初六曰習坎入於坎𥧹凶象曰  習坎入坎失道凶也縯好俠輕舉當宼攘  之世習坎者也叔雖同符高祖柔道未立  上無應援豈能出伯升於險其死固有以  也然其兆本曰坎有孚維心亨行有尚秀  既剛中之才異爲塞淵之輔尚徃有功是  以其言易入秀之深納亦有以也此所以  行險而不失其信卒之赤心效順大樹褒 功豈非維心之亨乎 劉紆者宣帝曾孫宣帝封子囂於楚是爲孝 王孝王生思王衍衍生王紆紆生般自囂至 般積累仁義世有名節而紆尤慈篤早失母 同產弟原郷侯平尚幼紆親自鞠養常與共 卧超飲食及成人未嘗離左右平病卒紆哭 泣嘔血數月亦殁後光武封般爲菑丘侯奉 孝王祀顯宗徴爲執金吾兼屯騎校尉肅宗 以爲長樂少府 宗正般在位數言政事其 收恤九族行義尤著時人稱之
Interpretation

Several generals privately urged Emperor Gengshi to get rid of Liu Yan. Around that time, Liu Ji, one of his officers, heard that Emperor Gengshi had taken the throne and said angrily, “It was the brothers Bosheng who first raised an army to pursue great plans. Who is this Emperor Gengshi supposed to be?” Emperor Gengshi arrested Liu Ji and prepared to execute him. Liu Yan argued fiercely on Liu Ji’s behalf, but Li Yi and Song Wei urged the emperor to use the occasion to arrest Liu Yan as well. Liu Yan was killed that very day.

Officials under Liu Xiu came to offer condolences, but he avoided speaking with them in private and kept his distance. He did not dare to mourn Liu Yan openly, either. Whenever he was alone, Liu Xiu refused wine and meat and would not lie down with his head on a pillow; he often wept and shed tears. Only Feng Yi, his chief clerk, tried to comfort him. Liu Xiu stopped him, saying, “Do not speak carelessly.” Feng Yi then advised him: “Emperor Gengshi’s government is in disarray, and the people have no one they can rely on or support. They have long been hungry and thirsty, and will readily accept whatever can satisfy them here and now. You now govern a region and can make decisions on its affairs. Send your officers to inspect the commanderies and counties, and proclaim your benevolence and virtue.” Liu Xiu took his advice deeply to heart.

The Record comments: The first six line of the Water hexagram in the Book of Changes says, “Repeatedly falling into pits, and sinking into a deep pit: danger.” The Image commentary explains: “Repeatedly falling into pits, and sinking into a deep pit is dangerous because the right path has been lost.” Liu Yan was fond of chivalrous deeds and acted rashly. Living in an age when rebellions and disorder were breaking out everywhere, he seemed continually to be falling into danger. Liu Xiu and Liu Yan both possessed the qualities of Han Gaozu, combining firmness with flexibility. Yet the way of gentle conduct had not been established, and there was no support from above. How could Liu Xiu possibly have rescued Bosheng from danger? Liu Yan’s death, then, had its causes from the outset.

Yet Liu Xiu’s signs also corresponded to another meaning of the first six line of the Water hexagram: “In danger, yet holding fast to sincerity; the heart is open. To continue forward brings a gain.” Liu Xiu had the ability to be resolute while keeping to the center, and Feng Yi was a thoughtful, steady counselor. By continuing forward, Liu Xiu would eventually accomplish great things. That is why Feng Yi’s advice was readily accepted, and why Liu Xiu took it deeply to heart. This was precisely what it meant to remain sincere while in danger. Later, Liu Xiu joined the Han house with wholehearted sincerity, eventually winning great merit and receiving honors. Was that not the result of an open heart?

Liu Yu was a great-grandson of Emperor Xuan of Han. Emperor Xuan enfeoffed his son Liu Xiao in the land of Chu, giving him the title of Filial Prince. The Filial Prince’s son was Prince Si, Liu Yan; Liu Yan’s son was Liu Yu, and Liu Yu’s son was Liu Ban. From Liu Xiao to Liu Ban, each generation built up a legacy of benevolence and righteousness, and was known for its good name and integrity. Liu Yu was especially kind and generous.

Liu Yu lost his mother at an early age. His younger brother by the same mother, Liu Ping, Marquis of Yuanxiang, was still a child, so Liu Yu raised him himself. They often slept in the same bed and shared their food, and Liu Yu never left his side until Liu Ping came of age. When Liu Ping died of illness, Liu Yu grieved and wept so bitterly that he vomited blood. He died several months later.

Later, Emperor Guangwu enfeoffed Liu Ban as Marquis of Ziqiu and appointed him to perform the ancestral rites for the Filial Prince. Emperor Ming of Han summoned Liu Ban to serve as Commandant of the Capital and concurrently as Colonel of the Garrison Cavalry. Emperor Zhang of Han later appointed him Lesser Treasurer of Changle and Minister of the Clan. During his service, Liu Ban repeatedly offered advice on state affairs. He took in and cared for relatives of the imperial clan, and was especially renowned for putting benevolence and righteousness into practice. People of the time praised him.

 録曰是時朝廷方厲謙讓之實友于之  行干本支達于天下欲不爲義人其舍  其視斗粟疋帛之謡遠矣録之 社林與弟成俱好學愽洽多聞時稱通儒王 莽末盜起客居河西隗囂聞林志節深相敬 待以爲持書平後因疾告去辭還禄食囂欲 令强起遂稱病篤意雖相望方務優容乃出 令曰杜伯林天子不能臣諸侯不能友盖伯 夷叔齊耻食周粟今且從師友之位須道開 通使順所志林雖拘於囂而不屈節後成物 故乃聼持喪東歸既遺而悔令刺客楊賢追 於路將遮殺之賢見林身推鹿車載致弟喪 嘆曰當今之世誰能行義我雖小人何忍殺 義士因亡去光武聞之徴拜爲侍御史引見 問以經書故舊及西州事甚悅之後皇太子 疆乞封東海王重選官屬以林爲王傅特受 賞賜卒爲大司空稱任職相 趙孝趙禮兄弟恭遜篤行遭天下亂人相食 禮爲賊所得將烹孝乃自縛詣賊推讓就烹 衆異之遂不害卿里服其義州群辟召皆不 應永平中顯宗聞其名詔拜諌議大夫遷侍 中長樂衛尉復徴弟禮亦爲御史中丞帝欲 寵異之詔禮十日一就衛尉府大官送供具 令兄弟相對盡歡數年禮卒令孝從官屬送 喪𡚖塟孝後無子拜禮兩子爲郞  録曰愚觀杜林始以賊亂致命於囂終以  賊剽遇賢於道至趙氏二子命在須臾當
Interpretation

Hongdao lu records that the court at the time strongly promoted humility and harmony among brothers. It held that these virtues should be cultivated within the clan and then spread throughout the realm. How could one fail to become a person who acts in accordance with what is right? Compared with this prevailing spirit, the stories of people fighting over a few dou of grain or a bolt of cloth seem far removed indeed. The accounts of Du Lin and the Zhao brothers were therefore recorded.

Du Lin and his younger brother Du Cheng (the original text gives his name simply as “Cheng”) both loved learning. They were widely read and had extensive knowledge of the world, and people of the time called them learned Confucian scholars. In the turmoil at the end of Wang Mang’s reign, when rebels and bandits were everywhere, Du Lin took refuge in Hexi. When Wei Xiao heard that Du Lin was resolute and steadfast in his principles, he greatly respected him and appointed him to an official post managing documents.

Later, once the realm had been pacified, Du Lin asked to resign on account of illness. He gave up his stipend and prepared to return home. Wei Xiao wanted to keep him by force, so Du Lin claimed that his illness was severe. Although Wei Xiao hoped he would stay, he tried to be as accommodating as he could. At last he issued an order: “A man like Du Bolin (Du Lin, whose courtesy name was Bolin) cannot be treated by the Son of Heaven as a subject, nor by a feudal lord as an ordinary friend. Bo Yi and Shu Qi were ashamed to eat the grain of the Zhou. For now, I shall place Du Lin among my teachers and friends. When the Way of right conduct is clear and the time is right, I will let him do as he wishes.”

Although Du Lin was under Wei Xiao’s control, he never submitted or compromised his integrity. Later, when a death in his family gave him reason to leave, he was permitted to return east. After letting him go, Wei Xiao regretted it and sent the assassin Yang Xian after him, intending to intercept and kill him on the road. Yang Xian saw Du Lin pushing a deer cart himself, carrying his younger brother’s coffin, and exclaimed, “Who in the world today could put what is right into practice like this? Though I am a petty man, how could I bring myself to kill a man of such integrity?” He then fled.

When Emperor Guangwu heard what had happened, he summoned Du Lin and appointed him Palace Attendant Censor. The emperor received him and asked about the classics, past events, and conditions in the western regions. He was very pleased with Du Lin’s answers. Later, when Crown Prince Liu Jiang asked to be enfeoffed as King of Donghai, the court selected new officials for his staff and appointed Du Lin as his tutor, granting him a special reward. Du Lin eventually became Grand Minister of Works and earned praise for his competence.

The brothers Zhao Xiao and Zhao Li were humble, affectionate toward one another, and steadfast in their conduct. During the great disorder, the terrible practice of cannibalism arose. Zhao Li was captured by bandits, who planned to boil and eat him. Zhao Xiao bound himself and presented himself to the bandits, asking to be boiled in his brother’s place. The bandits found this extraordinary and spared them both. Everyone in their community admired their devotion to what was right. The prefecture and commandery repeatedly summoned the brothers, but neither answered the summons.

During the Yongping era, Emperor Ming, Liu Zhuang, heard of Zhao Xiao’s reputation and issued an edict appointing him Grandee for Remonstrance. He was later promoted to Palace Attendant and Commandant of the Changle Guards. The court also summoned his younger brother Zhao Li and appointed him Chief Censor. The emperor wished to show them special favor, so he ordered Zhao Li to visit the Commandant’s office once every ten days. The court kitchens sent food for them, allowing the brothers to meet and enjoy themselves together. A few years later, Zhao Li died. The emperor ordered Zhao Xiao to accompany the funeral with his staff and arranged for him to be buried with due ceremony. Later, when Zhao Xiao had no sons, the court appointed Zhao Li’s two sons as gentlemen of the palace.

Hongdao lu says: “I believe that Du Lin was first retained by Wei Xiao because bandits were causing disorder, and later faced an attempted robbery and murder on the road—yet escaped through Yang Xian’s act of righteousness. As for the two Zhao brothers, when life and death hung in the balance…”

 是時豈知貴爲王傅爵齒公孤與夫人官  𣇄食耶陽之義彊之謙一時聞風興起雖  曰人之所信而實天之所助也不然彼刺  客餓莩者流寧肯甘心効義耶而卒以不  没此眞罕見其儔者矣 晋書右僕射鄧攸永嘉末没於石勒過泗水 攸以牛馬負妻子而迯又遇賊揀其牛馬步 走檐其兒及其弟子綏度不能兩全乃謂其 妻曰吾弟蚤亡唯有一息理不可絶止應自 弃我兒耳幸而得存我後當有子妻泣而從 之乃棄其子而去之卒以無嗣時人義而哀 之爲之語曰天道無知使鄧伯道無兒弟子 綏服攸喪三年  録曰攸之痛千古莫不以爲然也而史稱  攸預加纒繫絶其奔走豈慈父仁人之用  心哉勿謂天道無知乃有知矣愚以爲皆  非情實按攸爲石勒所獲濱死者再矣至  勒過泗水攸乃砍壞車以牛馬負妻子而  迯則必有追逐之兵物色之及以意度之  子大姪小子之識者多故繫之姪之識者  少故存之一則以緩追兵一則以絶物色  非但義而已矣至卒以無嗣或然之天數  亦君子之不幸與以是繩攸人莫肯爲義  矣此録之意也 庾衮明穆吕后伯父也少履勤儉篤學好問 咸寧中大疫二兄俱亡次兄毗復殆癘氣方 熾父母諸弟皆出於外衮獨留不去遂親自 扶持晝夜不眠其間復撫柩哀臨不輙如此
Interpretation

At the time, who could have imagined that Deng You, as Tutor to the Heir Apparent—a post responsible for instructing the crown prince—and a high-ranking official serving the ruler or crown prince, would act in this way, despite his age and eminent position? He was willing to give up his own son to save his nephew, thereby leaving himself without descendants. His righteous deed quickly became known, and many people followed his example. Although people were persuaded by his conduct, in truth Heaven was also helping bring this about. Otherwise, how could assassins and people starving to death, among others, have willingly followed such an act of righteousness? That Deng You remained without descendants all his life was indeed a rare occurrence.

The Book of Jin records: Deng You, Right Assistant Director, fell within the sphere of Shi Le’s power toward the end of the Yongjia era. At the time, he was fleeing with his wife and children, who rode on oxen and horses. They encountered bandits, who seized the animals, and so the family had to continue on foot. Deng carried his own son and also took along his younger brother’s son, Sui. Seeing that he could not save both children, he said to his wife, “My younger brother died young, and this is his only surviving bloodline. We must not let it end. We have no choice but to abandon my son. If we survive, I can have another child in the future.” His wife wept as she agreed. They set their own son down and left. In the end, Deng You had no descendants. People of the time respected and pitied him, and made up a saying: “Heaven’s Way is blind: it has left Deng Bodao without a son.” His younger brother’s son, Sui, mourned Deng You for three years.

The Hongdao lu comments: People have felt Deng You’s anguish for a thousand years. The histories say that he had tied the child to himself beforehand so the child could not run off. Could that truly have been the intention of a loving father and benevolent man? Rather than say Heaven’s Way is blind, we should say it is in fact aware. I believe this account may not reflect what really happened. After Deng You was captured by Shi Le, he twice came close to death. Later, when Shi Le passed through the Si River region, Deng You damaged his cart and escaped with his wife and children riding on oxen and horses. From this, we can infer that pursuers must have been close behind, searching for them. His own son was older and more aware, while his nephew was younger and less aware. Perhaps he left his nephew behind and took his own son with him in order to slow the pursuers and avoid being recognized by them. His action, then, was not motivated by a sense of duty alone. As for his having no descendants in the end, perhaps that was his allotted fate—a misfortune for a gentleman. If we condemn Deng You for it, people may no longer be willing to act righteously. This is precisely the point of this book.

Yu Gun was the paternal uncle of Empress Mingmu, née Lü. From childhood, he was diligent and frugal, devoted to study, and eager to seek instruction from others. During the great epidemic in the Xian’ning era, his two elder brothers died, and his second elder brother, Pi, also fell critically ill. With the epidemic raging, his parents and younger brothers left home to take shelter elsewhere; only Yu Gun stayed behind alone. He cared for the sick himself, going without sleep day and night. During this time, he also comforted the dead and kept vigil beside them in mourning, never once leaving.

十有餘旬疫勢既歇家人乃反毗病得痊衮 亦無恙衮諸父並貴盛惟父獨守貧約衮躬 親稼穡以給供養而執事勒恪與弟子樹籬 跪以授條或曰今在隱屏何恭之過曰幽顯 易操非君子之志也妻皆宦族及適衮棄華 麗共安貧苦母終服喪居於墓側或斬其墓 栢叩頭泣涕謝曰德之不脩不能庇先人之 樹父老咸爲之垂泣自後人莫之犯鄕黨州 郡交舉孝廉清白異行皆不降志號爲異行 齊王冏之唱義也張弘等肆掠於陽翟衮乃 率其同族及庶姓保於禹山時百姓安寧未 知戰守之事衮謀曰古人有言千人聚而不 以一人爲主不散則亂矣衆曰今日之主非 君而誰乃誓之曰無恃險無怙亂無暴鄰無 抽屋無樵採人所植無謀非德無犯非義戮 力一心同恤危難衆咸從之及賊至乃勒部 曲整行伍皆持滿勿發賊服其愼而畏其整 是以皆退時人語曰歲寒然後知松栢之後 凋又曰臨事而懼好謀而成其庾異行乎  録曰愚觀晋之摩俗而有衮之異行豈惟  明愧八王幽慚裴衛無亦生耻元規死羞  叔預者歟夫以一疾而知歲寒之松栢與  更八王而不識扳蕩之忠臣者何天淵也  衆皆貴盛父獨守貧與慾而無厭貪而無  止者何懸絶也臨事而懼好謀而成與輕  薄造難淺謀起釁者又何逕庭耶幽顯不  易執事勤恪與懷鴆相加凶逆自恣者又
Interpretation

After more than ten weeks—over a month—the epidemic had subsided, and the family returned. Pi recovered from his illness, and Gun remained unharmed. Several of Gun’s uncles were wealthy and prominent, while his father continued to live simply and frugally. Gun cultivated the fields himself to support his parents, and carried out his duties with care and diligence. When he and his disciples were building a fence, he would kneel to hand branches to them. Someone said, “Now that you live in a quiet, secluded place, why show such deference?” Gun replied, “Whether in seclusion or in a position of prominence, one should not change one’s principles. This is not what a gentleman strives for.”

Gun’s wives all came from official families, yet after marrying him they gave up a luxurious life and shared his poverty contentedly. When his mother died, Gun kept vigil beside her grave. Someone cut down a cypress tree near the tomb, and he bowed his head and wept, blaming himself: “I have not cultivated my Virtue well enough to protect the trees planted by my ancestors.” The elders and villagers wept for him. From then on, no one disturbed the graveyard. The local community and the prefecture repeatedly recommended him for posts such as Filial and Incorrupt (a Han-era recommendation category for people known for filial conduct and integrity), but he refused to yield or abandon his convictions. For this he was called a man of “exceptional conduct.”

When Prince of Qi Sima Jiong raised an army to suppress those who had seized control of the government, Zhang Hong and others plundered Yangdi. Gun led people from his own clan and other families to take refuge and hold their ground on Mount Yu. The people had lived peacefully for a long time and did not know how to fight or defend themselves. Gun said, “The ancients said that if a thousand people gather without anyone to lead them, their ranks will fall into disorder even if they do not scatter.” The people replied, “Who could lead us now, if not you?” Gun then made an agreement with them: “Do not use the terrain to bully others, or take advantage of the turmoil to cause trouble. Do not harass your neighbors or tear down their homes. Do not cut down trees planted by others. Let your plans accord with Virtue and your actions with what is right. Work together and we will get through this crisis.” They all followed his instructions.

When the raiders arrived, Gun organized his men and formed their ranks. He ordered everyone to draw their bows but not to shoot. Impressed by their restraint and intimidated by the order of their formation, the raiders withdrew. People of the time praised him, saying, “Only when the weather turns cold do we learn that the pines and cypresses are the last to shed their leaves.” They also said, “If one acts with care and plans well, one can bring things to completion. Is this not precisely what made Gun exceptional?”

The Hongdao Record comments: “I see that the customs of the Jin dynasty had fallen into decline, yet a man of such outstanding character as Gun emerged. Does his very presence not shame those who, in public, had cause to feel guilty before the Eight Princes, and, in private, before Pei and Wei? Does it not also leave those who were ashamed of Yuan Gui in life and of Shu Yu after death without a place to hide? Gun endured just one illness before revealing the hardiness of pines and cypresses in the cold. Yet some lived through the Rebellion of the Eight Princes and still failed to recognize the loyal ministers who could have rescued the crisis. The difference between them was greater than that between heaven and earth. Everyone else became wealthy and prominent, while only Gun’s father remained poor; what a gulf separates him from those whose desires were never satisfied and whose greed knew no end. Gun’s care and sound judgment in times of crisis enabled him to succeed. How different he was from those who rashly stirred up calamity, made shallow plans, and provoked conflict. Gun did not change his principles whether he lived in seclusion or in a position of prominence, and he carried out his duties with diligence and care. How different he was from those who plotted poisonously against one another, acted with malice and treachery, and gave themselves over to reckless excess…”

 何南北耶是知鬼魅離離而陽德丕顯汙  穢籍籍而昭明介爾不有叔褒何有晋之  日月乎 南史謝弘㣲童幼端審叔父混見而異之曰 此兒深中夙敏方成佳器年十歲出繼從叔 峻峻司空琰弟二子也於弘㣲本緦親素不 相識率意承接皆合禮衷義熙初襲峻爵建 昌侯弘㣲家素貧儉而所繼豊泰遺財禄秩 一不関與混風格高峻少所交納唯與族子 靈運瞻曜及弘㣲並以文義賞會嘗共宴處 居在烏衣巷故謂之爲衣之遊其外雖復高 流時譽莫敢造門瞻等才辭辯富弘㣲每以 約言服之混特所敬貴號曰㣲子後混以劉 毅黨誅妻晋陵公主詔謝氏絶婚改適琅琊 王以混家事委之混仍世宰輔一門兩封田 業十餘處僮僕千人唯有二女弘㣲經紀生 業事若在公一錢尺帛出入皆有文簿高祖 受命以公主執義守節聼還謝氏自混亡至 是九載而室宇修整倉庫充盈門徒業使不 異平日田疇墾闢有加於舊主嘆曰僕射平 生重此子可謂知人僕射爲不亡矣中外姻 親道俗義舊見公主之𡚖者入門莫不嘆息 或爲之涕流感弘㣲之義也  録曰愚觀烏衣巷之遊眞所謂芝蘭玉樹  焜燿當時若叔源之識鑒康樂之才美宣  遠之清悟宣明之傑濟然皆不得其死獨  㣲子無間然其故何耶易之小過曰弗遇
Interpretation

What need is there to distinguish between north and south? From this we can see that as ghosts and demons appear one after another, upright and noble virtue shines all the more clearly; as disgraceful deeds spread far and wide, bright and honest character stands out all the more distinctly. Without someone like Shubao, how could one speak of the sun and moon of the Jin dynasty? (The opening seems to continue a preceding passage, and the original meaning is incomplete; the identity of “Shubao” also needs to be determined from the earlier context.)

The History of the Southern Dynasties records that Xie Hongwei, who lived from the Eastern Jin into the Liu Song, was dignified and cautious from a young age. His uncle Xie Hun, whose courtesy name was Shuyuan, saw him and recognized that he was exceptional. “This child is deep-hearted and naturally intelligent,” he said. “He will surely amount to something.”

When Xie Hongwei was ten, he was adopted by his father’s younger cousin, Xie Jun, the second son of Sima Xie Yan. Though Xie Hongwei and Xie Jun were only distant relatives and had not known each other before, he immediately took up his place in the family, observing all that ritual and reason required. In the early years of the Yixi era, he inherited Xie Jun’s title and became Marquis of Jianchang County.

Xie Hongwei’s family had always lived modestly, but the estate and income he inherited after his adoption were substantial. He made no use of any of these resources for himself. Xie Hun was refined and aloof, and seldom associated with others. He kept company only with the younger members of the clan: Xie Lingyun, heir to the title Duke of Kangle; Xie Zhan; Xie Yao; and Xie Hongwei. Together they appreciated literature and discussed principle. They often gathered for feasts in Wuyi Lane, and their circle came to be known as “the gatherings of Wuyi.” Apart from them, even people of great renown did not dare to call on the family without invitation.

Xie Zhan and the others excelled in literature and spoke with quick wit, but Xie Hongwei often won them over with his concise words. Xie Hun especially respected him and called him “Master Wei.”

Later, Xie Hun was executed for having allied himself with Liu Yi. The court issued an edict severing Princess Jinling’s marriage ties with the Xie family and ordering her to marry into the Langya Wang family. It also entrusted the Xie household’s affairs to Xie Hongwei. For generations, the Xies had held the highest offices; two members of the clan had been ennobled. They owned more than ten estates and had as many as a thousand household servants. Xie Hun had only two daughters.

Xie Hongwei managed the family estate as carefully as he would conduct public business. Every income and expense, down to a single coin or a foot of cloth, was entered in the account books. After Gaozu, Liu Yu, ascended the throne, he allowed the princess to return to the Xie family, recognizing her steadfast loyalty and resolve. Nine years had passed since Xie Hun’s death. The Xie residence remained in good repair, its storehouses were full, its household retainers and workers were as numerous as before, and more land had been brought under cultivation than ever.

The princess sighed and said, “My husband, the Vice Director Xie, valued this child throughout his life. He truly knew how to recognize people. Though the Vice Director has passed away, it is as if he never left us.”

Relatives by blood or marriage, as well as old friends, whether monks or laypeople, could not help sighing when they saw the princess’s circumstances. Some even wept as they entered the house. They were all moved by Xie Hongwei’s devotion.

The Hongdao lu comments: “When I consider the circle that gathered in Wuyi Lane, they were truly like fragrant orchids and fine jade trees, shining brightly in their age. Shuyuan, Xie Hun, had discernment; Kangle, Xie Lingyun, had exceptional talent; Xuanyuan, Xie Zhan, was clear-minded and perceptive; Xuanming, Xie Yao, was outstanding and capable. Yet none of them met a good end. Only ‘Master Wei,’ Xie Hongwei, was without fault. Why was this? The Book of Changes, in the ‘Small Exceeding’ hexagram, says: ‘He does not meet…’”

 過之飛烏離之凶是謂災青諸子非不才  義豐辦然皆剛躁負氣恃才而持操不篤  違理過當是以凶也若㣲子性既嚴正行  復脩謹其事所後踰於所生誠敬内通神  明外憚言笑不妄廉耻寡爭正易所謂行  過乎恭喪過乎哀用過乎儉者也安徃而  不得哉
Interpretation

The various scholars of Qing were not lacking in talent. They were capable in their work, yet all were forceful and impatient, proud of their own vigor, reliant on their abilities, and insufficiently steadfast in their conduct. They violated reason and acted to excess, thereby bringing calamity upon themselves. This is what the text means by “a bird that flies beyond its mark meets with misfortune.”

If Weiwei (the name of a person referred to here) was upright by nature and careful in cultivating himself through his conduct, he served his stepmother with even greater devotion than he would have shown his birth mother. He was reverent within, in communion with the spirits; outwardly cautious, he did not laugh or speak lightly. He was incorruptible and keenly aware of shame, seldom quarreled with others, and kept his conduct proper. As the Analects says: “Excessive respectfulness, excessive grief at funerals, and excessive frugality in daily life.” How could someone like this fail to be treated well wherever he went?

Hongdao lu, juan 23

弘道録卷之二十三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0033); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 15 Vol. 17 →