中文 · EN

《弘道錄》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 3 / 41 10,190 characters

About this page. The original text of 《弘道錄》 Vol. 3 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 41 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 21 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《弘道錄》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

弘道録经三  仁   君臣之仁 唐書食貨志曰唐之始時授人以口分世業 田而取之以租庸調之法其用之也有節盖 其畜兵以府衛之制故兵雖多而無所損設 官有常員之數故官不濫而易禄雖不及三 代之盛時然亦可以爲經常之法也  録曰唐之太宗未可班於古之帝王也而  録之以賢者不能無遺憾也董仲舒常建  議曰秦用商鞅之法除井田民得買賣富  者田連阡陌貧者無立錐之地小民安得  不困苦井田之法雖難卒行宜少近古限  民名田以贍不足塞并兼之路時武帝方  興功利竟不能用哀帝時師丹復言累世  承平豪富吏民訾數鉅萬而貧弱愈困宜  畧爲限時貴近未便亦不行也乃俾王莽  假王田之名增亂長禍則何益哉普武平  吴之後雖有占田七十畆之制未幾五胡  之亂至魏孝文始納李安世之言行均田  之法齊周隋因之嗚呼敦憶大漢四百餘  年之間大賢建議屢言而不足而區區六  朝之際李安世一言而有餘逮扵有唐毅  然行之愚安能已扵躍然之喜耶 唐制度田以步其闊一步其長二百四十步 爲畆百畆爲頃凡民始生爲黄四歲爲小下 六爲中一十一爲丁六十爲老授田之制丁 及男年十八以上者人一頃其八十畆爲口 分二十畆爲永業老及篤疾廢疾者人四十
Interpretation

Volume Three of the Hongdao lu (Record of Expounding the Dao): Benevolence—Benevolence between Ruler and Minister

The Treatise on Food and Goods in the Book of Tang records that in the early Tang, the people were granted household allotment fields—land allocated according to population—and hereditary fields, which could be passed down through generations. Taxes were then collected under the rent, labor service, and tax system, which was based mainly on land rent, corvée labor, and other levies. The state exercised restraint in how it used this revenue. The army followed the garrison command system, in which military service was administered through institutions such as the Zhechong prefectures. Thus, even with a large number of soldiers, the system did not unduly burden the people. The number of officials was fixed, preventing the excessive creation of posts and making it easier for the state to provide salaries. Though the Tang economic system did not yet match the prosperous ages of the Three Dynasties, it could still serve as a system for long-term use.

The editor comments: Tang Taizong cannot yet be ranked alongside the sage rulers of antiquity, yet it is still regrettable to see him recorded as a worthy ruler. Dong Zhongshu repeatedly made the following proposal: The Qin adopted Shang Yang’s laws, abolished the well-field system, and allowed people to buy and sell land. The wealthy came to own vast, contiguous fields, while the poor had not even a patch of ground on which to set an awl. How could the people avoid hardship? Though it would be difficult to restore the well-field system immediately, the state should at least draw as close as possible to the ancient system: limit the amount of land held by each person, provide for the needs of the poor and vulnerable, and block the path to land consolidation. At the time, Emperor Wu of Han was intent on pursuing all manner of ambitious projects, and in the end he did not accept the proposal.

During the reign of Emperor Ai of Han, Shi Dan proposed that, after generations of peace under the state, powerful families, wealthy households, and officials had amassed fortunes worth tens of millions, while the poor and vulnerable were sinking into ever greater hardship. Their holdings should be subject to some limits. At the time, powerful nobles and close ministers considered this impractical, and the proposal was not put into effect. Later, Wang Mang introduced reforms in the name of “royal fields,” but instead intensified the turmoil and brought about even greater calamities. What good did that do?

After Emperor Wu of Jin pacified the state of Wu, he did establish a rule allowing each household to hold seventy mu of land. But before long, the upheaval of the Five Barbarians broke out. Only when Emperor Xiaowen of Northern Wei accepted Li Anshi’s proposal was the equal-field system introduced, allocating land to the people according to prescribed rules. Northern Qi, Northern Zhou, and the Sui all continued this system. Alas, when I recall how, over the more than four hundred years of the Han dynasty, great worthies repeatedly put forward proposals that were never implemented, while during the Six Dynasties a single proposal from Li Anshi was put into effect—and how the Tang then firmly maintained this system—how can I not rejoice?

The Tang land system measured fields in paces: a plot one pace wide and 240 paces long made one mu, and 100 mu made one qing. The people were classified by age: from birth they were called “yellow”; at four, “young”; at six, “middle”; at eleven, “adult”; and at sixty, “old.”

The rules for granting land were as follows: each adult man, and each man who had reached the age of eighteen, was granted one qing, of which eighty mu were household allotment fields and twenty mu were hereditary fields that could be passed down through generations. Elderly people and those with serious illnesses or disabilities were each granted forty mu…

畆寡妻妾三十畆當户者增二十畆皆以二 十畆爲永業其餘爲口分永業之田樹榆棗 桑及所宜之木皆有數田多可以足其人者 爲寬鄉少者爲狹鄉狹鄉授田减寬鄉之半 其地有薄厚歲一易者倍授之寬鄉三易者 不倍授工商者寬鄉减半狹鄉不給凡庶人 徙鄉及貧無以葬者得賣世業田自狹鄉而 徙寬鄉者得并賣口分田已賣者不復授死 者收之以授無田者凡收授皆以歲十月授 田先貧及有課役者凡鄉田有以給比鄉 縣有餘以給比縣州有餘以給近州 録曰此唐授田之法也蓋自五胡雲擾之 後民之耕農者無幾後魏因之各以露田 授民露田者荒田無主不栽樹者也諸桑 田不在所授之限桑田者民之永業所常 治者也唐世因之遂有世業口分之分意 者其初亦非公收在官而授無田之民祗 因桑田不在所授之限者而名爲世業因 露田原授扵民者而限爲口分不然若世 業既官爲樹以桑棗所宜之木何以仍得 買賣口分既随其老幼之差殊口力之衆 寡鄉田之寬狹而官爲收授之然則但令 食其所出不令擅其所有何以又得並賣 之乎古之立法最禁徙鬻王制曰井里不 鬻孟子曰死徒無出鄉今令庶人各地遷 移自狹鄉徒寬鄉又得並賣其口分田惟 死者收之以授無田者如此則民安得不
Interpretation

A person with one wife and no concubines was granted thirty mu of land. If an adult man in the household performed the taxes and labor services, another twenty mu were added. In either case, twenty mu belonged to the hereditary estate land, land that could be cultivated over the long term and passed down to descendants. The remainder was household allotment land, assigned according to the number of people in the household. On hereditary estate land, people could plant elms, jujube trees, mulberry trees, and other trees suited to the local area, and the number of trees to be planted was also regulated.

Places with abundant land were called “broad districts”; places with insufficient land were called “narrow districts.” In narrow districts, land was granted at half the rate used in broad districts. Land varied in fertility; where fields were cultivated in rotation each year, the allotted acreage was doubled. In broad districts, however, land allotments were not doubled even when fields were rotated on a three-year cycle. In broad districts, merchants and artisans received half the usual allotment; in narrow districts, they received no land.

People could sell hereditary estate land if they moved to another region or were too poor to afford a family burial. Those who moved from a narrow district to a broad one could also sell their household allotment land along with it. Land that had been sold was not granted again. When someone died, the authorities reclaimed the person’s land and granted it to someone who had none. Each year in the tenth month, the authorities reclaimed and allotted land, giving priority to the poor and to those who owed taxes and labor service. Land left over in one township was first assigned to neighboring townships; surplus land in a county went to neighboring counties; and any surplus in a prefecture went to nearby prefectures.

The Hongdao lu comments: This was the Tang dynasty’s system of land allotment. During the era of the Sixteen Kingdoms of the Five Barbarians, warfare was frequent, and few people remained to farm. The Northern Wei adopted this system, granting wasteland to the people and calling it “exposed fields.” Exposed fields were ownerless wasteland on which no trees had yet been planted. Mulberry fields were excluded from the land allotment system because they were cultivated by the people over the long term and passed down through generations. The Tang inherited this system, establishing the distinction between hereditary estate land and household allotment land.

Perhaps these two kinds of land were not originally both reclaimed by the authorities and then reassigned to people without land. Mulberry fields were excluded from the allotment system, so they were called hereditary estate land; exposed fields were originally granted to the people, so they were subject to the household allotment system. Otherwise, if the authorities required people to plant mulberry, jujube, and other trees on hereditary estate land, why were they allowed to sell it? And if household allotment land was reclaimed and reassigned according to a person’s age, labor capacity, and the availability of land in the township, why were people allowed to sell it along with their other land?

In ancient times, regulations generally imposed strict limits on moving and selling land. The “Royal Regulations” chapter of the Book of Rites says that the fields of the well-field system and the settlements of the li system could not be bought or sold. Mencius says that those who left their homeland because of death or migration should not go beyond their township. The current regulations, however, allow people to move and permit those relocating from narrow districts to broad districts to sell their household allotment land as well. Only after someone dies is the land reclaimed and granted to someone without land. In such circumstances, how could the people ever settle securely?

徒之又安得不亡之又安得所收之田而 以授人乎此皆施行矛盾不知作史者之 悮耶抑爲政之悮耶夫自秦而下千四百 有餘年之間而能行授田之法者自唐伊  始固足以見其難矣而其制不能無可疑  至永徽以後始禁民不得買賣買者還地  而罰之抑後矣無惑乎魚并之如故也 凡授田者丁歲輸䌚二斛稻三斛謂之租丁 随鄉所出歲輸絹二匹綾絁二丈布加五之 一綿三兩麻三斤非蠶鄉則輸銀十四兩謂 之調用人之力歲二十日閏加二日不役者 日爲絹三尺謂之庸有事而加役二十五日 者免調三十日者租調皆免通正役不過五 十日  録曰此唐徵科之數也所以謂租庸調者  以人丁爲本而調之云者猶其曰調停之  調盖以土産各有所宜如絹綾絁隨宜賦  其一丈非謂各二丈爲六丈也布麻亦然  今志歲輸絹二疋綾䊶各二丈布加五之  一綿三兩麻三斤非桑鄉則輸銀十四兩  疑此反重扵常筭矣觀者要當以通典及  會要所載爲正會要丁隨鄉所出歲輸絹  綾綾各二丈布加五之一綿二兩輸市者  麻三斤以爲調 自王公以下皆有永業田太皇太后皇太后 皇后緦麻以上親内命婦一品以上親郡王 及五品以上祖父兄弟職事勳官三品以上 有封者若縣男父子國子太學四門學生愽
Interpretation

How could these fields not be reclaimed? And once reclaimed, how could they be allotted to someone else? These practices contradict one another. Did the historians get it wrong, or was the policy itself flawed? In the more than 1,400 years between the Qin dynasty and the Tang, the Tang were the first to genuinely implement the land-allotment system. This alone shows how difficult the system was to put into practice. Yet the Tang system itself is open to question. It was not until after the Yonghui era (the reign period of Emperor Gaozong of Tang) that the buying and selling of land by commoners began to be prohibited. Those who had bought land were required to return it and were punished. The ban came too late, so it is hardly surprising that land concentration continued as before.

Anyone allotted land paid two hu of millet or three hu of rice each year. This was called “rent.” Adult men also had to pay, according to the local produce, two zhang of one kind of silk or other woven cloth, such as juan, ling, or xie. Alternatively, they could pay cloth, in an amount increased by one fifth, along with three liang of cotton and three jin of hemp. This was called “tax.” Villages that did not produce silk paid fourteen liang of silver instead. The state requisitioned labor for twenty days each year, with two extra days in leap years. Those who did not serve paid three chi of silk for each day. This was called “service.” If official duties extended the labor term, an additional twenty-five days of service exempted a person from the “tax”; an additional thirty days exempted them from both “rent” and “tax.” Including the regular term, total service could not exceed fifty days.

Commentary in the Hongdao lu: The amounts above were the taxes collected under the Tang. “Rent, service, and tax” were levied on the basis of adult men. “Tax” probably meant that payments were adjusted to local produce: since different regions were suited to different products, each was to pay one kind of woven cloth, such as juan, ling, or xie, according to local conditions—not two zhang of every kind. Cloth and hemp should be understood in the same way.

Historical records now state that each year people paid two bolts of juan, two zhang each of ling and xie, cloth in an amount increased by one fifth, three liang of cotton, and three jin of hemp; villages that did not raise silkworms paid fourteen liang of silver. The commentary considers these figures likely to be heavier than the usual rates. Readers should follow the accounts in the Tongdian and the Huiyao. The Huiyao says that adult men paid either juan or ling, according to local produce, in the amount of two zhang; cloth payments were increased by one fifth. The cotton levy was two liang, while those making payment in its equivalent paid three jin of hemp. These payments constituted the “tax.”

From princes and nobles downward, people of every rank could hold “hereditary land”—land that, by law, could be retained by successive generations. Those entitled to hold such land included the Grand Empress Dowager, Empress Dowager, and Empress; imperial relatives within the mourning degrees of mourning hemp or closer; relatives of palace women officials of the first rank or above; the grandfathers and brothers of commandery princes and officials of the fifth rank or above; holders of hereditary titles of the third rank or above; the fathers and sons of county barons; and students at the Imperial Academy, the National University, and the Four Gates School…

士孝子順孫義夫節婦同籍者皆免稅課役 凡主户内有課口者爲課户若老及男廢疾 篤疾寡妻妾部曲客女奴婢及視九品以上 官不課凡里有手實歲終具民之年與地闊 □爲鄉帳鄉成扵縣縣成扵州州成扵户部 又有計帳具來歲課役以報度支國有所須 先奏而歛之數書于縣門村坊與衆知之水 旱霜蝗耗十四者免其租桑麻盡者免其調 田耗十之六者免租調耗亡者諸役皆免  録曰此唐蠲復之政也自王公以至扵庶  人皆有品節限量使其子孫能世守之何  以不能久致太平乎奈何不旋踵而失之  也故愚嘗謂漢子孫能守三十稅一之法  而其祖宗不能創什一中正之規唐祖宗  能設科條禁令之目而其子孫不能存節  用愛民之心均之無能及扵三代也 太宗方銳意扵治官吏考課以鰥寡少者進 考如增户法失勸道者以减户論配  録曰此唐殿最之法也使京官五品以上  各舉守令一人是重之扵始也考課以鰥  寡少者進失勸導者退是重之扵終也究  其着實舉行莫者諸州刺史奈何自貞觀  以來重内官而輕州縣刺史多用武臣或  京官不稱職始補外任帝雖銳意扵治其  能身率天下乎此唐之良吏所以不若漢  世之多也 租以歛獲早晩險易遠近爲差用調輸以八 月發以九月同時輸者先遠民皆自槩量州
Interpretation

Scholars, filial sons, dutiful grandsons, righteous husbands, and chaste wives were all exempt from taxes and corvée labor, provided they were registered in the same household.

A household with members liable for taxes was called a “taxable household.” The elderly; disabled or seriously ill adult men; widows and their concubines; retainers; guests; women and enslaved people; and officials of the ninth rank or higher were excluded from the taxable population.

At the end of each year, every village had to verify and register the ages of its people and the size of their fields, then compile a village register. These registers were consolidated at the county level, the county accounts at the prefectural level, and the prefectural accounts were then submitted to the Ministry of Revenue. A separate fiscal account was also prepared, listing taxes and corvée labor for the coming year, and submitted to the Department of Finance. Whenever the state required supplies, it had to report this to the throne before making collections. The amounts to be collected had to be posted at county offices and in village wards so that everyone would know.

When floods, droughts, frost, or locusts caused crop losses of one-tenth or more, land-rent tax was remitted. If mulberry trees or hemp crops were entirely destroyed, the tribute tax was remitted. When harvest losses reached six-tenths, both land-rent and tribute taxes were remitted. If the entire harvest failed, all forms of corvée labor were remitted as well.

The Hongdao lu says: These were Tang decrees for reducing or remitting land-rent taxes and exempting people from corvée labor. From princes and nobles down to the common people, ranks and limits were specified so that their descendants could observe them from generation to generation. In principle, how could lasting peace have been impossible? Yet why were these institutions lost so quickly? I have therefore said that the Han dynasty’s descendants managed to preserve the one-in-thirty tax rate, but its founders failed to establish the fair and reasonable rate of one-tenth; the Tang dynasty’s founders were able to institute various laws and prohibitions, but their descendants failed to retain their commitment to frugal spending and care for the people. Neither matched the governance of the Three Dynasties.

At the time, Emperor Taizong of Tang was wholly intent on good governance. When officials were assessed, their ratings were raised if the numbers of widowers, widows, and young children in their jurisdictions had declined. If officials had failed in their duty to guide the people, they were assessed and penalized according to the decline in household numbers.

The Hongdao lu says: This was the Tang method for assessing the merits of officials. Requiring court officials of the fifth rank and above each to recommend one local official showed care in selecting people at the outset of their appointment. During assessments, using a decline in the numbers of widowers, widows, and young children as grounds for promotion, and a failure to guide the people as grounds for demotion, showed continued attention to them after their appointment. But if we examine what happened in practice, how many prefectural governors across the realm truly fulfilled these duties? From the Zhenguan era onward, the court valued central officials and neglected county and prefectural officials. Prefectural governors were often military officers, or central officials deemed unfit for their posts and sent out to serve in the provinces. Although Taizong was wholly intent on good governance, could he also personally set an example for all officials throughout the realm to follow? This is why the Tang had fewer good officials than the Han.

The collection of land-rent taxes was to be graded according to when the harvest ripened, how difficult the terrain was, and how far people had to travel. Tribute tax was paid in goods: people set out in the eighth month and arrived in the ninth. If both taxes were to be paid at the same time, those living farther away were to pay first, and the people themselves were to estimate and calculate the amounts. The prefecture …

府歲市土所出爲貢其價視絹之上下無過 五十疋異物滋味狗馬鷹犬非有詔不獻有 加配則以代租賦  録曰此唐轉輸之政也至兩稅而後夏輸  六月秋輸十一月此政廢矣是時太宗方  銳意扵民絶嗜禁慾黜所玩好且未舉封  禪征伐之事故州府歲市所貢視絹之上  下無過五十疋有加配則以代租賦此何  等氣象也貞觀以後漸不如矣 其凶荒則有社倉賑給不足則徒民就食諸 州尚書左丞戴胄建議自王公以下計墾田 秋熟所在爲義倉歲凶以給民太宗善之乃 詔畆稅二升粟麥秔稻隨土地所宜寬鄉歛 以所種狹鄉㩀青苗薄而督之田耗十四者 免其半耗十七者皆免之商賈無田者以其 户爲九等出粟自五石至扵五斗爲差下下 户及夷獠不取焉歲不登則以賑民或貨爲 種子則至秋而償其後洛相幽徐齊并秦蒲 州又置常平倉粟藏九年米藏五年下濕之 地粟藏五年米藏三年皆著于令  録曰此唐救荒之政也太宗方重守令之  選刺史縣令皆得其人故以社倉則足以  賑以義倉則足以給以常平倉則足以儲  無守令之賢欲自王公以下計墾田而歛  之則增一禁厲矣此又爲上者所當知也 貞觀初户不及三百萬絹一疋易米一斗至 四年米斗四五錢外户不閉者歲月馬牛被 野人行數千里不賫粮民物蕃息四夷降附
Interpretation

Each prefecture purchased local products each year as tribute. Their value was set according to the price of silk, and could not exceed fifty bolts. Rare treasures, delicacies, dogs and horses, and falcons and hounds were not to be presented unless the emperor issued an edict requesting them. Any tribute levied beyond the prescribed amount was credited against rent and taxes.

The Hongdao lu comments: This was the Tang system for transporting and delivering goods. After the two-tax system was introduced, payments were made in the sixth month of summer and the eleventh month of autumn, and this system was abolished. At the time, Taizong was intent on easing the people’s burdens, restraining his own desires, and giving up objects of amusement. He had not yet held the fengshan sacrifices or launched military campaigns. Thus, the goods purchased and presented each year by the prefectures and commanderies were limited to fifty bolts, according to the price of silk; any extra levies were credited against rent and taxes. What a model of governance this was! After the Zhenguan era, things gradually fell short of what they had been.

When famine struck, the court used the community granaries—local stores of grain set aside for relief—to aid the people. If the grain was still insufficient, people were relocated to places where food was available. Dai Zhou, the Left Vice Director of the Shangshu, proposed that after the autumn harvest, granaries for public relief be established locally, with contributions assessed according to the land held by each person, from princes and nobles downward. In years of famine, the grain would be used to relieve the people. Taizong approved the proposal and issued an edict: two sheng of millet, wheat, non-glutinous rice, or rice were to be collected per mu, with the type determined by which crops were suited to the locality. In regions with extensive land and sparse populations, contributions were assessed according to the crops grown. In regions with little land and dense populations, they were assessed according to the growth of the seedlings, and collected with leniency. Where harvests had fallen by two-fifths, half the grain due was remitted; where they had fallen by seven-tenths, the full amount was remitted. Merchants without land were divided into nine household classes and assessed grain according to their class, in amounts ranging from five shi to five dou. The poorest households in the lowest class, as well as minority groups such as the Yi and Liao, paid no grain. In years of poor harvest, grain from the granaries was used to aid the people. If grain was lent to them as seed, it was repaid after the autumn harvest.

Later, ever-normal granaries—stores of grain kept for famine relief and to stabilize prices—were also established in Luozhou, Xiangzhou, Youzhou, Xuzhou, Qizhou, Bingzhou, Qinzhou, and Puzhou. Millet could be stored for nine years and rice for five; in low-lying, damp places, millet could be stored for five years and rice for three. These regulations were all entered into law.

The Hongdao lu comments: This was the Tang system for famine relief. Taizong took care in selecting local officials, and the prefects and county magistrates were capable in their posts. As a result, the community granaries could relieve famine victims, the public relief granaries could provide for the people, and the ever-normal granaries could hold reserves of grain. Without capable local officials, however, trying to collect grain by acreage from princes and nobles downward would only add another harsh restriction. This, too, is a principle that those in government should understand.

At the beginning of the Zhenguan era, there were fewer than three million households. At that time, one bolt of silk could buy one dou of rice. By the fourth year of Zhenguan, a dou of rice cost only four or five cash. People left their doors unbarred at night, and cattle and horses filled the fields. Those traveling thousands of li did not need to carry provisions. The people and their goods grew steadily more prosperous, and the peoples of the four directions increasingly submitted to the court.

者百二十萬人是歲天下斷獄死罪者二十 九人號稱太平  上之即位也常與群臣語及教化曰今承  大亂之後恐斯民未易化也魏徵對曰不  然久安之民驕佚驕佚則難教經亂之民  愁苦愁苦則易化譬猶飢者易爲食渴者  易爲飲也上深然之封德彜不以爲然上  卒從徵言是歲天下大稔流散者咸歸鄉  里斗米不過三四錢東至于海南至五嶺  皆外户不閉行旅不賫粮取給于道路焉  帝謂君臣曰此魏徵勸我行仁義既效矣  惜不令封德彜見之  録曰易之大過曰揀撓利有攸徃亨九二  曰枯楊生梯老夫得其女妻無不利夫太  宗眞有大過人之資而鮮天德王道以爲  之本棟之撓也楊之枯也幸而貞觀之治  又得房杜王魏諸賢以爲之輔老夫得其  女妻也故雖有楝撓枯楊之象而亦有亨  道焉有利道焉君子故不之拒也 宋紀仁宗體天法道極功全德神文聖武睿 哲明孝皇帝天性仁孝寬裕喜愠不形扵色 初封壽春郡王講學于資善堂天禧元年兼 中書令明年進封昇王九月丁卯册爲皇太 子  録曰自史册以來數千百年未有直謚爲  仁者帝可謂僅見矣故以徽號存其大畧  將以爲君人者致意焉夫蒙以養正聖功  也方是時帝之至性渾然正人皆可以爲  堯舜之時開資善堂以講學養之扵正不
Interpretation

That year, the population of the realm was 1.2 million. Only twenty-nine criminals across the country were sentenced to death, and people called it a year of peace throughout the realm.

After ascending the throne, the emperor often spoke with his ministers about how to educate the people. He said, “The country has only just emerged from great turmoil, and I worry that the people will be difficult to teach.” Wei Zheng replied, “That is not so. People who have enjoyed long peace are easily led into pride and indulgence, and once they become arrogant, they are hard to teach. People who have endured war are troubled and distressed; in their hardship, they are more receptive to instruction. It is like hungry people readily accepting food and thirsty people readily accepting water.” The emperor strongly agreed with Wei Zheng. Feng Deyi disagreed, but in the end the emperor followed Wei Zheng’s advice.

That year brought an abundant harvest, and all those displaced from their homes returned. A dou of rice cost no more than three or four coins. From the Eastern Sea to Hainan, and from the south to the region of the Five Ridges, households left their doors unlocked at night. Travelers did not need to carry provisions, as they could obtain food along the way. The emperor said to his ministers, “This is the result of Wei Zheng urging me to practice benevolence and righteousness. It is a pity Feng Deyi did not live to see it.”

The Record comments: The Book of Changes, in the Great Exceeding hexagram, says that a ridgepole bends, yet going forward can still lead to success. The Nine in the Second Place says that a withered poplar puts forth new shoots, and an older man takes a young woman as his wife; nothing is unfavorable. Tang Taizong truly had exceptional gifts, but he lacked a foundation for governing rooted in Heaven’s De and the kingly Way. This was like a bent ridgepole and a withered poplar. Fortunately, the Zhenguan era of good governance came to pass, with worthy ministers such as Fang Xuanling, Du Ruhui, Wang Gui, and Wei Zheng to assist him. This was like an older man taking a young wife. Thus, although there were signs of a bent ridgepole and a withered poplar, there was still a path to success and good fortune. For this reason, the noble person does not reject such a situation.

The Song Chronicle: Emperor Renzong, whose full posthumous title was “Emperor Who Embodied Heaven and Followed the Dao, of Utmost Achievement and Complete De, Divine in Literary and Martial Virtues, Sagacious, Wise, and Filial,” was by nature benevolent and dutiful, generous and open-hearted, and did not show his anger or joy on his face. At first, he was made Prince of Shouchun and studied at the Zishan Hall, where imperial princes read and received instruction. In the first year of the Tianxi era, he concurrently held the office of Chancellor of the Secretariat; the following year, he was promoted to Prince of Sheng. On the Dingmao day of the ninth month, he was formally appointed Crown Prince.

The Record comments: In the thousands of years covered by historical records, emperors directly given “Benevolent” as their posthumous title have been exceedingly rare. Renzong can be counted among the few. For that reason, this account uses his honorific title and summarizes the main events of his life, so that those who rule may take note. Cultivating upright character in times of ignorance is a path to attaining sage virtue. Renzong was then pure by nature and appointed upright men; everyone could become a subject of the age of Yao and Shun. He also established the Zishan Hall for instruction, using the Way of uprightness to cultivate himself.

 以私冒干之乃作聖之功用而宋朝家法  過漢唐者也 以參知政事李迪爲太子賔客  遵堯録曰李迪等常侍燕東宫見帝容止  端莊雖優戲在前亦不甚顧他日因奏事  言之眞宗曰平時居内中亦未嘗妄言笑  也  録曰迪之風烈頗聞而辭太傅不已過乎  夫公孤以輔佐天子師保以儲養東宫亘  古以來之成法初不因太宗之時立而有  不立而無也自宋專任宰相天子無公孤  以詔左右則太子無師保以相前後矣此  其立法不如成周者也 四年詔太傅監國五日一開資善堂太子秉 笏南面立輔臣叅决諸司事聴其議論謂之 曰但盡公道則善矣  録曰帝之扵己也不妄言笑扵人也務盡  公道此何等粹白也蒙之九五曰童蒙吉  其斯帝之謂乎 乾興元年二月戊午遺詔太子即皇帝位  録曰是時帝年十三如龍之方蛻未就雲  雨也如麟之方趾未就踐履也故易曰山  下出泉蒙君子以果行育德豈非以其施  之未達性之未固哉苟有如伊尹周公以  輔之扵外太姒邑姜以成之扵内則太甲  成王尚有慙德不足媲矣惜乎劉后專制  于内丁謂之徒交結于外苟不得王曾正  色立朝倚以爲重烏能成九二志應之功  哉觀聖人作易之意則知仁宗初政之所  以分矣 明道元年詔曰朕猥以眇躬纂扵洪緒既絶
Interpretation

Some people used personal connections to bypass the usual channels and seek an audience. This was originally one way to establish enlightened government, and it was one respect in which the Song dynasty’s family regulations surpassed those of the Han and Tang.

The court appointed Li Di, Vice Grand Councilor, as tutor to the Crown Prince.

The Zunyao lu records: Li Di and the others often attended the Crown Prince in the Eastern Palace. Once, they saw that the Crown Prince’s bearing and conduct were composed. Even when people played around in front of him, he paid them little attention. Later, when Li Di brought this up while presenting a memorial, Emperor Zhenzong said, “When the Crown Prince is staying in the inner palace, he never jokes or laughs carelessly either.”

The Record comments: Li Di’s integrity and reputation were widely known, but he refused the post of Grand Tutor and would not desist from doing so. Was this perhaps going too far?

The high ministers known as the Dukes and Solitaries, who assisted the Son of Heaven, and the Masters and Guardians, who instructed and cared for the Crown Prince, had been established offices since antiquity. They were not created only under Emperor Taizong, though at times they were appointed and at times they were not. In the Song dynasty, the Grand Councilor served alone, and no Dukes or Solitaries assisted the emperor. As a result, no Masters or Guardians instructed the Crown Prince. This was where the Song system fell short of the Zhou system.

In the fourth year, an edict ordered the Grand Tutor to oversee the state. Every five days, a session was to be held at Zishan Hall, where the Eastern Palace conducted lectures and discussions. The Crown Prince stood facing south with tablet in hand, while the assistant ministers discussed the affairs of the various departments together, and the Crown Prince listened to their deliberations. Zhenzong admonished him: “As long as you devote yourself to upholding what is fair, that is enough.”

The Record comments: Zhenzong himself never joked or laughed carelessly, and in dealing with others he strove to uphold what was fair. How pure and flawless he was! The Ninth Nine in the Meng hexagram says, “Good fortune for the inexperienced young.” Was this not speaking of this Crown Prince?

On the Wuwu day of the second month of the first year of the Qianxing era, Zhenzong’s testamentary edict ordered the Crown Prince to ascend the throne as emperor.

The Record comments: At the time, Renzong was only thirteen years old, like a dragon that had just shed its skin but could not yet summon clouds and rain, or a qilin that had just grown its legs but could not yet walk. Thus the Book of Changes says: “A spring emerges beneath the mountain: Inexperience. The noble person acts with resolve and nurtures De.” Perhaps this was because his abilities had not yet been brought into play and his natural disposition had not yet been firmly established. Had there been men like Yi Yin and the Duke of Zhou to assist him beyond the palace, and women like Tai Si and Yi Jiang to instruct him within it, then even the shortcomings in the De of Taijia and King Cheng would have been absent in him. Sadly, Empress Dowager Liu seized power within, while Ding Wei and his faction formed a clique without. If Wang Zeng had not stood in court with such upright solemnity, relying on his authority, how could he have fulfilled the purpose and achieved the harmony described by the Ninth Two line of the Book of Changes? Examining the sages’ original intent in composing the Changes makes clear why political divisions arose in the early years of Renzong’s reign.

In the first year of the Mingdao era, an edict declared: “I, of humble origins, inherited the imperial throne; now the line has come to an end…”

畋遊之好又無臺榭之營十載于兹未嘗暇 敢不意掖庭之内火禁非嚴一夕延燔徧於 八殿緬思降儆逸怠省循其今内外臣僚直 言朝廷闕失毋有所隱副朕意焉  録曰帝時春秋𣇄盛未有失德而所稱絶  遊畋之好乏臺榭之營又非空言則天灾  何由致乎夫掖庭房闥之地八殿老陰之  數章獻之稱制將謝矣此其除舊布新之  先見者歟 一年三月帝始親政罷脩創寺觀裁抑僥倖 召宋綬范仲淹而黜内侍羅崇勳等中外大 悅  録曰仁之親政與哲之親政大不倖也仁  之親政罷脩寺觀哲之親政創脩新法仁  之親政裁抑僥倖哲之親政召用凶邪故  一則中外大悅一則忠良䘮氣得失之分  較然見矣 先是皇太后劉氏稱制晚年任宦者羅崇勳 江德明等訪外事崇勳由此勢傾中外  録曰以母后臨朝而宦官竊勢此何等時  也范祖禹所謂宋室隆替之本社稷安危  之機生民休戚之端君子小人進退消長  之際天命人心去就離合之時帝之盛德  可少訾哉鳴呼一黜羅崇勳而中外拭目  咸瞻盛德一召劉瑗等而人情汹汹已蹈  覆亡萬世之下初政之君不可以不察也 帝見章聖東封西祀及脩玉清昭應景靈土 木之役極天下之巧過爲奢侈謂輔臣曰此 雖太平盛事然亦過度當時執政大臣不得
Interpretation

He had no liking for hunting or recreation, and had built no towers, terraces, pavilions, or halls. For ten years he had been too occupied to attend to such matters. Yet the fire-prevention rules within the palace were not strictly enforced. In a single night, the flames spread and consumed eight halls. Thinking that this disaster might be a warning, he examined his own failings and put an end to his negligence. He then ordered officials inside and outside the court to speak candidly about the government’s shortcomings, withholding nothing, in keeping with his wishes.

The Hongdao Lu comments: The emperor was still young at the time and had committed no serious breach of virtue. Nor were the histories’ accounts that he enjoyed hunting and had built no towers and terraces empty claims. If so, why did a natural disaster still occur? The “outer palace apartments” referred to the women’s quarters within the palace, while “inner chambers” meant the palace residences; the “eight halls” corresponded to the number of Old Yin. Empress Dowager Zhangxian’s period of ruling from court and exercising imperial authority was nearing its end. Perhaps this fire foretold that the old order was about to conclude and a new one begin.

In the third month of Jingyou’s first year, the emperor began to govern in person. He ordered construction of Buddhist temples and Daoist monasteries to stop, curbed those who had gained favor through fortune, summoned Song Shou and Fan Zhongyan to serve, and dismissed the eunuch Luo Chongxun and others. Officials inside and outside the court were greatly pleased.

The Hongdao Lu comments: Renzong’s assumption of personal rule and Zhezong’s were very different. After Renzong took personal rule, he halted construction of temples and monasteries; after Zhezong did so, he launched the New Policies. Renzong restrained those who had gained favor through fortune, while Zhezong summoned wicked and treacherous men. Thus one brought joy throughout the court, while the other left loyal and worthy scholars disheartened. The difference between gain and loss was plain.

Earlier, Empress Dowager Liu had ruled from court and exercised imperial authority. In her later years, she appointed the eunuchs Luo Chongxun, Jiang Deming, and others to keep watch on affairs outside the palace. Luo Chongxun consequently gained great influence, which extended throughout the court.

The Hongdao Lu comments: When the empress dowager ruled from court, the eunuchs seized the opportunity to steal power. What a state of affairs! Fan Zuyu once said that the foundations of the Song dynasty’s rise and decline, the key to the state’s security or danger, and the source of the people’s hardship or well-being all lay in the advance and retreat of the virtuous and the petty. This was also the turning point at which Heaven’s mandate and the people’s hearts gathered or scattered, united or separated. How much blame, then, could Renzong’s abundant virtue truly merit? Alas, dismissing one Luo Chongxun was enough to rouse the court inside and out, and to make everyone look toward a government of flourishing virtue. Summoning Liu Yuan and the others immediately unsettled the people’s hearts and set the state on the road to ruin. Rulers newly come to the throne in later generations must take this lesson to heart.

The emperor saw that Empress Dowager Zhangsheng had made offerings at the eastern and western sacred sites, built palace-temples such as the Jade Clarity Palace of Responsive Blessings and the Palace of Inspired Blessings, and expended vast amounts of labor and resources, exhausting the skill of artisans from across the realm. The extravagance had gone too far. He said to his senior ministers, “Though these undertakings may be counted among the grand projects of a peaceful and prosperous age, they were carried too far.” At the time, the chief ministers in office were unable to…

不任其責吕夷簡曰府庫一空至今不充實 者職此之由帝曰如此之事朕當戒之  録曰此帝之所以罷脩建也孔子曰三年  無改扵父之道釋之者曰三年無改亦謂  在扵當改而可以未改者耳先儒恐其失  㫖而以有過之舉既徃之愆爲咎故剖折  而言夫東封西祀土木興作不過廢天下  之財若乃青苗免役剖尅歛怨將以失天  下之心諉扵安石猶可言也篤扵君親不  可言也其知者以爲繼還不知者以爲擅  改然不知衹皆彰親之過而與克盖前愆  者大不侔矣嗚呼此宣仁祀飯之頃異扵  章獻撤簾之日也歟 初太平日久仕進者皆依托權要以希進用 奔競成風仁宗嘗謂輔臣曰比來臣寮請對 其欲進者多求退者少何也王曾曰七人食 兼繫時之用舍惟朝廷抑奔競崇靜退則庶 幾有難進之風帝然之  録曰此帝之所以抑僥倖也夫僥倖之人  行險者也其始也依阿取容讒謟面諛無  所不爲其終也吮癰舐痔逢君之惡同所  不至故人君必深惡而痛絶之然非至公  以存心至明以燭物未有不以小廉信其  大節而假以欲退之意遂其躁進之心故  曰清心知人又曰知人則哲闕一不可 景祐二年王曾同平章事曾性資端厚在朝 廷進止皆有常䖏平居寡言笑人不敢干以 私進退十人莫有知者范仲淹常問曰明揚
Interpretation

He refused to take responsibility. Lü Yijian said, “The state treasuries have been empty, and they have still not been replenished. That is the reason.” The emperor said, “I should take this matter as a warning.”

The Hongdao lu comments: This is why the emperor halted construction projects. Confucius said, “For three years, do not alter your father’s way.” (This means that for three years after a father’s death, one should not lightly change the policies he put in place.) Those who explain this saying hold that “not altering it for three years” refers to matters that ought to be changed but can, for the time being, remain as they are. Earlier Confucian scholars, concerned that people might misunderstand Confucius’s intent, examined and discussed policies that were mistaken and errors that had already occurred.

The eastern and western imperial sacrifices and construction projects did no more than drain the resources of the realm. As for policies such as the Green Sprouts Law and the Exemption from Labor Service Law, if their harsh exploitation provoked resentment and ultimately lost the people’s confidence, it might be reasonable to shift the blame onto Wang Anshi. But to claim that they arose from reverence for one’s father and sovereign makes no sense. The discerning called this inheritance; the foolish called it presumptuous alteration. Yet they did not understand that such actions only exposed the father’s faults. They were quite different from concealing those faults and making amends for past mistakes. Alas, perhaps this is the difference between Empress Dowager Xuanren at the “rice offering” (the text reads this way; the character may be corrupt) and Empress Dowager Zhangxian when she withdrew the curtains.

In the beginning, peace had lasted for a long time. Those seeking advancement in official life attached themselves to the powerful, hoping to be promoted, and currying favor became common practice. Emperor Renzong once said to his senior ministers, “Recently, many officials have asked to meet me privately in hopes of promotion, while few have volunteered to step aside. Why is this?” Wang Zeng replied, “This concerns the court’s appointments and dismissals. If the court suppresses the practice of currying favor and promotes a quiet, modest willingness to yield, perhaps a climate in which people do not lightly seek advancement will take shape.” Renzong agreed.

The Hongdao lu comments: This is why Renzong curbed advancement sought through sheer opportunism. Those who pursue advancement by such means often stop at nothing. At first, they attach themselves to the powerful and flatter them, sow discord and offer insincere praise to their faces; they will do anything. Later, they even fawn on the powerful and accommodate the ruler’s mistakes; there is nothing they will not do. A ruler must therefore detest this practice and stamp it out decisively.

Yet if a ruler cannot treat people impartially or discern their character with clear judgment, he may mistake minor honesty for great integrity, or take a show of willingness to step down for genuine modesty, thereby granting the wishes of those eager to advance. Hence the advice to purify one’s own heart and distinguish worthy people; and the saying that only those who can recognize people may be called wise. Neither can be dispensed with.

In the second year of Jingyou (1035), Wang Zeng held the chancellorship, with the title Tongpingzhangshi. By nature, he was upright and honest, and his words and conduct at court were always measured. He rarely joked, and no one dared approach him with private requests. When he appointed or dismissed officials, fewer than one in ten knew his decisions in advance. Fan Zhongyan once asked him, “When it comes to openly recommending worthy people...”

士類宰相之任公之盛德獨少此耳徐應之 曰夫執政而欲使恩歸己怨將誰歸仲淹服 其言帝之初即位也太后將有專制之患曾 正色危言以立于朝由是宦官近習不敢窺 覦而帝德日就太后亦全令名  録曰自此以後可以見當時君臣之氣象  矣夫曾褒然稱許爲大臣者也則其扵士  不猶造化之扵物乎其心必欲人人而盡  其才然亦有或不能盡者惟反之至公至  誠在我無愧而已若孜孜以效用爲恩舍  置爲怨則大臣者日益不足哉故曰斷斷  兮無他技若吕許公未免有慊扵此此其  收恩避怨與危言正色之所以不同也 慶曆元年冬十一月有事扵南郊大赦自西 方用師帝爲肝食知諫院張方平言曰陛下 猶天地父母也豈與大豕豺狼較乎願因郊 赦引咎示信開其自新之路帝喜曰是吾心 也命方平以䟽付中書吕夷簡讀之拱手曰 公言及此社稷之福也  録曰蒙正亟稱夷簡有宰相之材其此之  謂乎夫仁者必有勇此西事之當競也然  而君子不之競者豈徒廣人自新之路哉  出則無敵國外患國恒亡其諸引咎示信  之微意歟 時章得象晏殊賈昌朝韓琦范仲淹富弼杜 衍同時執政歐陽脩余靖王素蔡襄並爲諫 官夏竦既罷石介喜曰此盛德事也歌頌吾 職其可已乎作慶曆聖德詩曰扵惟慶曆三
Interpretation

Among scholars, many have served as chief ministers, but few have possessed virtue as outstanding as Master Zeng’s. Xu Yingzhi said, “When someone holds the highest governing office, if he wants every kindness to be credited to himself, then to whom will the blame and resentment fall?” Fan Zhongyan accepted his advice.

When the emperor had just taken the throne, there was a danger that the Empress Dowager would monopolize the government. Master Zeng stood firm in court, solemn in appearance and forthright in remonstrance. From then on, the eunuchs and favored attendants dared not harbor ambition, the emperor’s virtue steadily grew, and the Empress Dowager ultimately preserved her good name.

The Hongdao lu says: This gives us a glimpse of the character of ruler and ministers at the time. Master Zeng received such praise and was regarded as an outstanding minister. Was he not, in his dealings with scholars, like the creative power of Heaven and Earth in its dealings with the myriad things? He must have wished for everyone to make full use of their abilities. Yet sometimes not everyone can fully realize their potential. It is enough to act with the utmost fairness and sincerity, and to have a clear conscience. If one works diligently at everything only to bestow favors on others, and then, whenever one does not appoint someone, worries about incurring resentment, would a minister’s capacity not grow ever smaller? That is why the ancients said, “Sincerity and single-mindedness—nothing more.” Lü Xugong may have fallen somewhat short in this regard. His way of gathering credit for favors and avoiding resentment was quite unlike Master Zeng’s forthright, principled manner.

In the eleventh month of winter in the first year of Qingli (1041), the court held the great sacrifice to Heaven at the Southern Suburb and proclaimed a general amnesty. At the time, fighting on the western frontier was intense, and the emperor was so worried that it was as if his liver were afflicted. Zhang Fangping, Director of the Bureau of Remonstrance, advised him: “Your Majesty should be as generous as Heaven and Earth and as a parent. Why contend with pigs, dogs, and wolves? I hope Your Majesty will use the occasion of the suburban sacrifice and amnesty to acknowledge past errors, show sincerity, and open a path for them to reform and begin anew.” The emperor said with delight, “That is exactly what I have in mind.” He then ordered Zhang Fangping to submit the memorial to the Central Secretariat. After reading it, Lü Yijian clasped his hands and said, “For you to speak of this is a blessing for the state.”

The Hongdao lu says: Lü Mengzheng often praised Lü Yijian as possessing the abilities of a chief minister; this was probably what he had in mind. A benevolent person must also have courage. The fighting on the western frontier was of great consequence and should naturally have been met with determined effort. Yet the noble person does not contend with others. Was this merely to leave the opposing side a path to reform and begin anew? An old saying goes, “Without enemy states and external troubles, a state often perishes.” Perhaps this, too, carries the deeper meaning of acknowledging past errors and showing sincerity.

At the time, Zhang Dezhang, Yan Shu, Jia Changchao, Han Qi, Fan Zhongyan, Fu Bi, and Du Yan were all serving in the government. Ouyang Xiu, Yu Jing, Wang Su, and Cai Xiang all served as remonstrance officials. After Xia Song was dismissed, Shi Jie said with delight, “This is a great event that displays illustrious virtue. It is my duty to sing its praises—how could I stop?” He then composed the “Poem on the Sagely Virtue of the Qingli Era,” which begins: “Ah, the years of Qingli…”

年三月皇帝龍興徐出門闥大聲渢渢震摇 六合如乾之動如雷之發初聞皇帝蹙然言 曰子祖予父付予大業子恐失墜實賴輔弼 汝得象殊重愼㣲密君相予久予嘉君伐昌 朝儒者學問該洽與予論政傳以經術惟汝 仲淹汝誠予察爲予司諫正予門闑爲予京 兆堲予纔說賊叛予夏徃予式遏六月酷日 大冬積雪汝寒汝暑汝不告乏予晚得弼予 心弼悅以道輔予弼言深切予不堯舜弼自 笞罰諫官一年踈奏滿篋契丹忘義敢侮大 國弼將予命不畏不怯沙磧萬里死生一節 視弼之膚霜剥風裂觀弼之心鍊金鍜鐵惟 仲淹弼一夔一契曰衍汝來汝予黄髮事予 二紀毛秃齒豁心如一兮率履弗越遂長樞 府兵政無蹶予不識琦琦有奇骨其噐魁落 其人渾樸可屬大事敦厚如鼓以汝副衍知 人予哲惟脩惟靖立朝䡾䡾言論磥砢忠誠 特達萬里歸來剛氣不折素相之後含忠履 潔昔爲御史幾叩予榻襄雖小官名聞予徹 亦嘗獻言箴予之失剛守粹慤與脩儔疋皇 帝聖明忠邪辨别舉擢俊良掃除妖魅衆賢 之進如茅斯㧞大姦之去如距斯脫  録曰當時有傳慶曆盛德詩扵蜀中者其  人欲識之雖然豈惟當時今人誰不欲識  之哉執政諫官國之元氣朝之命脉也帝  有包荒之德而諸賢又能奮其剛斷之勇
Interpretation

In the third month, the emperor emerged from the palace with imposing authority. His resonant voice shook the four quarters, like the movement of Heaven’s Way and the first rumble of thunder. With a grave expression, he said:

“My ancestors and my father entrusted their great enterprise to me. I fear I may be unable to preserve it, and truly depend on the ministers who assist me. You bear heavy responsibilities; you must be painstakingly careful. You have served beside me for many years, and I commend your achievements.

“The Confucian scholars at court are learned and broadly read. They can discuss affairs of state with me and use the meaning of the Classics to guide me. Zhongyan (Fan Zhongyan), I know you well. That is why I appointed you as Remonstrance Admonisher, responsible for correcting the court’s conduct. As soon as you heard of a rebellion, you hurried to Xiazhou to put it down. You did not avoid the blazing heat of June or the bitter snow of midwinter, and you never complained. I received Bi (Fu Bi) only in my later years, and I am deeply grateful for the way he has assisted me. His remonstrances are profound and forthright. If I cannot become a ruler like Yao or Shun, he is even willing to be beaten in order to urge me to do all I can to improve.

“During his year as a remonstrance official, Bi accumulated a whole chest of memorials. The Khitan broke their pledge and dared to slight a great state. Acting on my command, Bi went on an embassy. Faced with a desert stretching ten thousand li, he neither feared nor retreated, setting his life and death aside. Look at his skin, battered by wind and frost; look at his resolve, like gold and iron tempered in the forge. Only Zhongyan and Bi can be compared with worthy ministers such as Kui and Qi.

“Yan, you were already old when you came to assist me. You have served me for more than twenty years. Your hair has thinned and your teeth have fallen out, yet your resolve has never wavered. You have kept faithfully to the law and never overstepped its bounds. That is why I put you in charge of the Privy Council and entrusted you with military affairs; there have been no errors in military administration.

“Before I knew Qi (Han Qi), he had already shown himself to be extraordinary: broad-minded, honest, and unpretentious, a man to whom great affairs could be entrusted. I assigned you to assist Yan because I am good at recognizing people.

“As for Xiu (Ouyang Xiu) and Jing, the minister named in the original text, they stand out at court, their speech upright and forceful, their loyalty open and sincere. They returned from far beyond ten thousand li, their integrity undiminished. After the death of Su, they too upheld their loyalty and kept their conduct pure. When they served as Censors, they repeatedly remonstrated with me at my bedside. Though Xiang held no high office, his reputation reached me, and he too once urged me to correct my faults. Upright, principled, and sincere, he is worthy to stand alongside Xiu.”

The emperor was wise and able to distinguish loyal ministers from treacherous men. He promoted the worthy and rid the court of the wicked. The advancement of the worthy ministers was like pulling up grass by its roots; the departure of the great traitor was like taking off shackles from one’s feet.

The Record of Vast Principles (Hongdao Lu) states: “At the time, people in Shu copied the Poem on the Flourishing Virtue of the Qingli Era, and it was said that everyone wanted to see the person who wrote it.” In truth, who at that time would not have wanted to see them? And who today would not wish to see them? The chief ministers and remonstrance officials are the vital energy of the state and the lifeblood of the court. The emperor possessed a generous and tolerant virtue, while the worthy ministers were vigorous and resolute, willing to shoulder responsibility.

 此正泰之天地交而萬物通上下交而其  志同者宜乎衆賢之進如茅斯㧞大姦之  去如距斯脫矣然所謂朋亡者何也夫君  子之同道美矣小人豈能忘情既已交章  論罷而又形之詩章亦已甚矣故有石介  之頌而必有女奴之書有如茅之作而必  有似葉之嘆此介禍之所由始亦黨論之  所由興也聖人之垂戒深哉 五月戊子兩輔臣稱賀帝曰天久不雨將害 民田朕每焚香上禱扵天昨夕寢殿中忽聞 㣲雷遽起冠帶露立殿下須臾雨至衣皆沾 濕移刻兩霽再拜以謝方敢升階自此尚冀 稿苗可救也比欲下詔罪己徹樂减膳又恐 近扵崇餙虚文不若夙夜精心密禱爲佳爾  録曰夫祈禱古人之所不廢至有以身代  犠牲者以蝗吞口中者何以槩乎未之録  也曰此崇飾虚文之謂也古者一德格天  而後有六事自責苟無其實而下詔罪己  徹樂减膳則亦徒然而已此帝所以不若  精心密禱之爲佳也 范仲淹參知政事帝方銳意太平數問當世 事又爲之開天章閤引輔臣入對給以筆禮 俾條陳其所欲爲者仲淹惶恐退而上十事 曰明黜陟抑僥倖精貢舉擇長官均公田厚 農桑脩武備推恩信重命令减徭役天子方 信向仲淹悉用之  録曰文正之立心以老成忠厚爲主先憂  後樂爲事此其人品之高如青天白日不
Interpretation

This is the meaning of the Tai Hexagram: the Qi of Heaven and Earth mingle, allowing the myriad things to flourish and communicate; those above and below connect and share the same intentions. Worthy and capable people can be promoted as smoothly as pulling up a clump of thatch by its roots. Treacherous people can be removed just as easily as taking off one’s shoes.

But what does “friends perish” mean? It is good for gentlemen to share the same aims, yet petty people find it hard to let go of factional strife. Once they have argued in memorials over dismissing someone, then written about these matters in poems and prose, they have gone too far. Thus, when Shi Jie, a civil official of the Northern Song, wrote a panegyric, someone was bound to write a letter from a female servant; when one work praised “like thatch,” someone was bound to sigh in words like “leaves.” This was the beginning of the calamity that befell Shi Jie, and the cause of factional strife. The warnings left by the sages reach far into the future.

On the wuzi day of the fifth month, two senior ministers came to offer their congratulations. The emperor said, “It has not rained for a long time, and I fear this will damage the people’s crops. I often burn incense and pray to Heaven. Last night, in my bedchamber, I suddenly heard a faint rumble of thunder. I immediately dressed and stood in the open beneath the hall, waiting. Before long, rain began to fall, soaking my clothes. After a while it stopped. I bowed again to thank Heaven, and only then dared to climb the steps. From now on, I still hope we can save the withered grain. I had meant to issue an edict censuring myself, suspend music, and reduce my meals. But I worried these might be empty gestures, close to affectation. It seems better to pray sincerely in private, day and night.”

The Hongdao Lu comments: “Prayer was a practice that even the ancients did not abandon. Some were even willing to offer themselves in place of sacrificial victims, while others put locusts in their mouths and swallowed them. How should such acts be understood? I have not recorded them here.” It also says: “What the emperor said was precisely that he did not want empty formalities. The ancients first moved Heaven through their De; only afterward did they adopt the practice of listing six matters for self-examination and reproach. Without genuine repentance, issuing an edict censuring oneself, suspending music, and reducing meals are merely outward forms. That is why the emperor believed sincere prayer was better.”

When Fan Zhongyan served as vice grand councillor, the emperor earnestly hoped to bring peace to the realm and often asked him about government affairs. He specially opened the Tianzhang Pavilion, a place in the palace for storing books and discussing policy, summoned the senior ministers to answer questions there, and gave them writing brushes so they could set out, item by item, what they hoped to accomplish. Fan Zhongyan withdrew in trepidation and submitted ten proposals: clarify the standards for promoting, demoting, rewarding, and punishing officials; curb advancement sought through mere good fortune; tighten the selection of candidates for the civil service examinations; choose local administrators carefully; distribute public fields fairly; give due importance to agriculture and sericulture; repair the defenses; extend favors widely and keep faith; issue decrees with care; and reduce compulsory labor. The emperor trusted and agreed with Fan Zhongyan at the time, and adopted all of these proposals.

The Hongdao Lu comments: “Lord Wen Zheng—Fan Zhongyan’s posthumous title—made steadiness, maturity, loyalty, and generosity the foundation of his conduct. His guiding principle was to be the first to worry about the realm’s troubles and the last to enjoy its pleasures. His character was as pure as the clear sky and bright sun…”

 可掩也仁宗之銳意以得賢安民爲寳禎  祥朕兆爲末此其治化之盛如日升月恒  不可量也夫漢文一問天下錢穀决獄幾  何平勃不能答而遂已而况開天章閤以  延之入給筆劄以誘之言乎如此而不皇  恐者鮮矣然而不如古者臯陶曰允迪厥  德謨明弼諧帝之延問有餘而言蹈不足  是以謨雖訏而命未定意雖銳而功未成  比後世之恒患而堯舜終不可及也 時二府合班奏事韓琦爲樞密副使雖事屬 中書亦必盡言或指其過失同列不悅帝獨 識之曰韓琦性直琦條所宜先行者七事曰 清政本念邊計擢材賢備河北固河東收民 心營洛邑繼又陳救弊八事曰選將帥明按 察豊財利遏僥倖進能吏退不才謹入官去 宄食帝嘉納之又陳四策以爲今當以和好 爲權宜戰守爲實務請繕甲厲兵營修洛都 蜜定討伐之計  録曰傳稱惟仁者能受盡言琦不遇帝安  能獨識之哉是故治平之末琦嘗盡言矣  神宗漫然不應熙寧之初亦嘗盡言矣非  惟終以爲疑至條折其不然刋石訟之天  下嗚呼同是一琦也前無侵官賣直之名  後有彰播流傳之責豈其陳力之不同哉  受與不受之間而已矣故觀神宗之過可  以知仁宗之仁也 皇祐二年夏六月詔州郡自今勿得獻瑞物 知無爲軍茹孝標獻芝草三百五十本帝曰
Interpretation

Emperor Renzong of Song devoted himself to seeking worthy men and bringing stability to the people, regarding these as the most precious things. He treated auspicious omens as secondary. The flourishing of his governance and moral instruction was like the rising and movement of the sun and moon—beyond measure.

Emperor Wen of Han once asked about the empire’s finances and the state of judicial cases. Zhou Bo and Chen Ping could not answer, and the matter was dropped. How much more remarkable, then, that Emperor Renzong opened the Tianzhang Pavilion, a palace library and council hall, invited his ministers inside, and gave them brushes and paper, urging them to speak their minds fully. In such circumstances, few could have failed to feel awe and speak freely. Yet Emperor Renzong still fell short of the sage rulers of antiquity. Gao Yao once said, “Only when Virtue is truly put into practice can plans be made with clarity and assistance be harmonious.” When Emperor Yao sought advice from his ministers, he did not merely listen to their words; he also required their actions to match them. Emperor Renzong’s plans were ambitious, but he did not establish concrete measures. He was eager to bring good government, yet his work remained unfinished. Compared with the common failings of later rulers, he was already exceptional, but in the end he could not attain the level of Yao and Shun.

At that time, officials of the Secretariat and the Privy Council attended court together to present memorials. Han Qi served as vice commissioner of the Privy Council. Even when a matter fell under the Secretariat’s jurisdiction, he made a point of speaking frankly. At times he pointed out the failings of his colleagues, which displeased those who served alongside him. Emperor Renzong, however, valued his character and said, “Han Qi is forthright by nature.”

Han Qi set out seven matters that should be given priority: putting the foundations of government in order, attending to border planning, promoting worthy and capable men, strengthening defenses in Hebei, securing the defenses of Hedong, winning the people’s support, and establishing a capital at Luoyang. Later, he proposed eight measures to remedy the ills of the time: selecting military commanders, clarifying inspections and evaluations, increasing revenue, curbing advancement through undue favor, promoting capable officials, dismissing the incompetent, exercising care in appointments, and removing the corrupt and treacherous.

Emperor Renzong praised and adopted his proposals. Han Qi then offered four strategies, arguing that peace should be treated as a temporary expedient, while preparing to fight and defend should be the real course of action. He called for repairing weapons and armor, training the troops, building up and repairing Luoyang’s city defenses, and secretly drawing up plans for a campaign.

The Hongdao lu records: An ancient book says that only a benevolent person can bear to hear frank words spoken without reserve. If Han Qi had not encountered Emperor Renzong, how could the emperor alone have recognized his worth? At the end of the Zhiping era, Han Qi had spoken out forcefully, but Emperor Shenzong remained indifferent and gave no response. In the early years of Xining, Han Qi again made every effort to offer advice. Emperor Shenzong not only continued to harbor doubts but rebutted his proposals point by point and had his objections carved in stone and made public throughout the realm. Alas, the same Han Qi had earlier avoided any reputation for overstepping his authority or seeking fame through frank speech, yet later faced public censure. Was his ability to present matters of government different at the two times? The key lay only in whether the ruler would heed his advice. Thus, by observing Emperor Shenzong’s failings, we can understand Emperor Renzong’s benevolence.

In the sixth month of the summer of the second year of Huangyou, Emperor Renzong issued an edict stating that from then on, no prefecture or commandery was to present auspicious objects. Ru Xiaobiao, the prefectural official in charge of Wuwei Commandery, presented 350 stalks of lingzhi fungus. Emperor Renzong said: [The original text ends here.]

朕以豐年爲瑞賢臣爲寳至於草木蟲魚之 異保足尚哉免孝標罪戒天下勿獻  録曰漢文帝宋仁宗未可以優劣也何以  進坦平免孝標之不同也孔子謂善人雖  不必踐舊迹而自不爲惡然皆未能入聖  人之室者是故漢文帝却之却之留扵他  岐然而不爲也非不能也宋仁宗思之思  之殆于不勉然而不能也非不爲也此  君之所以分也 三司使王拱辰請榷河北鹽既立法矣猶未 下翰林學士張方平言扵帝曰河北再榷𥂭 何也帝驚曰始立法非再也方平曰周世宗 榷河北𥂁犯輙䖏死世宗北伐父老遮道泣 訴願以𥂁課均之兩稅鹽錢是也豈非再榷 乎帝大悟曰卿語宰相立罷之方平曰詔雖 未下民已知之當直以手詔罷不可自有司 出也帝大喜命方平密撰手詔罷之河朔父 老相率拜逆於澶州爲佛老會者七日以報 上恩且刻詔書北京過其下者稽首流涕  録曰仁宗之世所以事必可稱者以德意  存乎其間也故一聞人之議始而驚中而  悟終乃立罷而後已焉視彼說而不繹從  不改者相去何天淵乎此其德足以感動  人心而報之者無所不用其極也 王拱辰言扵上曰富弼亦何功之有但能添 金帛之數厚夷狄而弊中國爾仁宗曰不然 朕所愛者土宇人民財非所惜也拱辰曰財 非出扵民邪仁宗曰國家經費取之非一日
Interpretation

I believe a year of abundant harvest is an auspicious sign, and worthy ministers are treasures. But what is there to value in unusual plants, trees, insects, or fish? So pardon Xiao Biao for his offense, and warn the people throughout the realm not to offer such things again.

The Hongdao Lu comments: Emperor Wen of Han and Emperor Renzong of Song cannot simply be ranked above or below one another. Why did they act differently in appointing Tan Ping and in pardoning Xiao Biao? Confucius said that a good person need not always follow the tracks of those who came before, but will naturally avoid doing evil. Even so, neither emperor had yet reached the realm of a sage.

After Emperor Wen refused, he set the matter aside and paid it no further heed. It was not that he could not do it; he chose not to. Emperor Renzong, by contrast, considered it repeatedly, almost to the point of being able to act without forcing himself, but in the end he could not. It was not that he did not want to; he was unable to. This was the difference between the two rulers.

Wang Gongchen, the official in charge of the Three Departments of Finance, requested that the salt monopoly be reinstated in Hebei. The decree had been drafted but not yet issued. Zhang Fangping, an academician in the Hanlin Academy, said to the emperor, “Why are we reinstating the salt monopoly in Hebei?” The emperor said in surprise, “This decree was only just drawn up. Why do you say it is being reinstated?” Zhang Fangping replied, “Emperor Shizong of the Later Zhou once imposed a salt monopoly in Hebei, and violators were routinely put to death. When Shizong campaigned north, local elders blocked his way and wept, asking that the salt tax be spread evenly across the two taxes. What is called the ‘salt money’ is that very tax. Does this not count as reinstating the salt monopoly?”

The emperor suddenly understood and said, “Go and tell the chief ministers to abolish this decree at once.” Zhang Fangping said, “Though the edict has not yet been issued, the people already know about it. It should be abolished directly by an imperial handwritten edict, rather than having the order come from the responsible bureau.” The emperor was delighted. He ordered Zhang Fangping to draft the handwritten edict in secret, abolishing the salt monopoly. Elders from across Hebei traveled together to Chan Prefecture to welcome the edict. They held Buddhist and Daoist rites for seven days in gratitude for the emperor’s benevolence, and had the edict engraved in stone. Later, when someone passed the place where the edict was engraved, the local people would bow before it, weeping.

The Hongdao Lu comments: Many of the things worthy of praise during Renzong’s reign were marked by his benevolence. Thus, when he first heard another person’s advice, he might be surprised, but he would then come to understand, and in the end would certainly abolish an unjust decree at once. How vast the difference between him and those who hear advice but do not examine it, and persist in refusing to correct themselves. Renzong’s virtue was enough to move people’s hearts, and the people in turn showed the fullest measure of their gratitude.

Wang Gongchen said to the emperor, “What merit did Fu Bi have? He merely increased the quantity of silk and gold, treated the northern peoples generously, and exhausted the resources of the Central Kingdom.” Emperor Renzong replied, “That is not so. What I cherish is the land and the people; it is not that I begrudge the money.” Wang Gongchen said, “Doesn’t the money also come from the people?” Renzong replied, “The state’s expenses are not all collected in a single day…”

之積歲出以賜夷狄亦未至困民若兵興調 發歲出不貲非若今之緩取也拱辰曰犬戎 無厭好窺中國之隙且陛下只有一女萬一 欲求和親則如何仁宗憫然色動曰苟利社 稷朕亦何愛一女邪拱辰言塞遽曰臣不知 陛下屈己愛民如此堯舜之主也灑泣再拜 而去  録曰愚觀王拱辰之言即欽若孤注之說  也非惟漫潤之不行且雖屈己而無憾帝  至是眞如天之無不覆也地之無不載也  以爲堯舜之主誠哉是言矣 文彦博富弼同平章事帝嘗問置相扵王素 素曰惟宦官宫妾不知姓名者可克其選帝 曰如是則富弼爾至是與彦愽同召至郊詔 百官迎之范鎮曰隆之以虚禮不若推之以 至誠陛下用兩人爲相舉朝皆謂得人然近 制兩制不得詣宰相居弟百官不得聞見是 不推之以誠也願罷郊迎而除謁禁則扵御 臣之術爲兩得矣及宣制士大夫相慶扵朝 帝遣小黄門覘知之語翰林學士歐陽脩曰 古之命相或得諸夢卜今朕用相人情如此 豈不賢扵夢卜哉  録曰本朝置相豈盡殉扵宦官宫妾哉然  而仁宗之世紛紛皆君子而李迪王曾范  仲淹文彦愽富弼韓琦尤所著聞推原其  故正以公天下之情而非出于一己之私  也豈惟賢扵夢卜實可傳扵後世故録漢  文之仁者存其言録宋帝之仁者存其相  嗚呼相道得而萬國理矣
Interpretation

The wealth accumulated over the years could be used to grant some of it to the northern tribes without bringing hardship upon the people. But once troops were sent to war, the amount of money that would have to be raised was beyond measure. It would be nothing like the relatively easy levies being collected now.

Wang Gongchen said, “The Dog Rong—the name given to the Tangut and other tribes along the northwestern frontier—are insatiable and always look for openings in the Central Plain. Moreover, Your Majesty has only one daughter. What if they demand a marriage alliance? What would you do?” Emperor Renzong’s expression turned sorrowful. “If it would benefit the state and its altars of soil and grain, why should I begrudge them one daughter?”

Wang Gongchen hurriedly replied with humble deference, “I had never imagined that Your Majesty would be willing to sacrifice so much of yourself to care for the people. You truly are a ruler like Yao and Shun.” In tears, he bowed twice, then took his leave.

The Hongdao Lu comments: In my view, Wang Gongchen’s words were simply a variation on the ‘all-in gamble’ argument. Renzong did not delay and evade the issue, as he had in earlier discussions advocating peace. He was even willing to make a personal sacrifice without the slightest resentment. Renzong truly was like Heaven, covering all things, and like Earth, bearing all things. To call him a ruler like Yao and Shun was indeed apt.

Wen Yanbo and Fu Bi served together as chief councilors, holding the office of Tongping Zhangshi. Renzong once asked Wang Su whom he should appoint as chief councilor. Wang Su replied, “The right choice would be someone whose name is unknown even to the eunuchs and the women of the palace.” Renzong said, “By that standard, it would be Fu Bi.” Later, Fu Bi and Wen Yanbo were summoned together, and the court issued an order for all officials to greet them in the suburbs.

Fan Zhen said, “Honoring them with empty ceremony is not as good as treating them with sincerity. Your Majesty has appointed these two men as chief councilors, and the whole court believes the right choice has been made. But under the current rules, Hanlin Academicians and other officials of the Two Drafting Institutes may not visit the chief councilors at their residences, and officials may not meet with them. That cannot be called treating them sincerely. I hope Your Majesty will cancel the suburban welcoming ceremony and lift the ban on visiting the chief councilors. In this way, the court can preserve its proper rules of governance while treating its ministers with sincerity.” The Two Drafting Institutes refers to officials responsible for drafting edicts and other documents.

After the appointment edict was announced, the scholar-officials congratulated one another at court. Renzong sent a junior palace eunuch to find out what was happening. He then said to the Hanlin Academician Ouyang Xiu, “In ancient times, chief councilors were sometimes appointed on the basis of dreams or divination. Now that I have appointed chief councilors and the people’s hearts are so firmly behind the choice, is this not better than relying on dreams and divination?”

The Hongdao Lu comments: Were appointments of chief councilors in our dynasty really made only by following the opinions of eunuchs and palace women? During Renzong’s reign, there were many worthy men, among them Li Di, Wang Zeng, Fan Zhongyan, Wen Yanbo, Fu Bi, and Han Qi. The reason was that Renzong considered the shared judgment of the people under Heaven, rather than acting out of personal interest. This was not only better than relying on dreams and divination; it was also worthy of being passed down to later generations. That is why this book records the benevolent words and deeds of Emperor Wen of Han, and also Renzong of Song’s benevolent choice of chief councilors. Alas, when the way of the chief councilor is sound, all the states under Heaven can live in peace.

初河北京東大水民流就食青州富弼勸所 部民出粟益以官廪得公私廬舍十餘萬嘔 散䖏其人以便薪水官吏自前資待缺寄居 者皆賦以禄使即民所聚選老弱病瘠者廪 之仍書其勞約他日爲奏請受賞每五日趣 遣人持酒肉飯𩝠慰藉出扵至誠人人爲盡 力山林川澤之利可資以生者聴民擅取及 麥大熟民各以遠近受粮而歸凡活五千餘 萬人募爲兵者萬計前此救灾者皆聚民城 郭中爲粥食之蒸爲疾疫及相蹈藉或待哺 數日不得粥而仆名爲救之而實殺之自弼 立法簡便周盡天下傳以爲式帝聞遣使褒 勞加禮部侍郞 又益利路飢韓琦爲體量安撫使蠲减稅以 募人入粟招募壯者刺以爲厢禁軍一人充 軍數口之家得以全活檄劎門關民流移而 欲東者勿禁簡州艱食爲甚明道中以灾傷 嘗勸誘納粟後糶錢十六萬餘歸扵常平琦 曰是錢乃賑濟之餘非官緡也發庫盡以給 四等以下户逐貪殘不職吏能冗役七百六 十人爲饘粥活飢人一百九十餘萬復知楊 州徒定州兼安撫使賑活飢民數百萬璽書 褒激粼道視以爲準  録曰以帝之憂民而弼與琦盡心荒政譬  則萬華之國而值製錦者體裁之工也良  玉之肆而遇善冶者追琢之美也天非不  欲常煦也流行之度難保其無寒恃吾有
Interpretation

At first, severe flooding struck Hebei and the eastern region around the capital. The people were displaced and went to Qingzhou in search of food. Fu Bi persuaded local residents to contribute grain, then supplemented it with grain from government storehouses, gathering a large supply. He also requisitioned more than a hundred thousand public and private buildings, spreading the refugees among them so they could easily obtain water and firewood.

Among the local officials, anyone who had left office, was waiting for an appointment, or was staying temporarily in the area received a stipend and was sent to help where the refugees had gathered. They selected the elderly, the frail and sick, and the emaciated to receive food rations. They recorded each person’s contributions and promised to submit a memorial later requesting rewards from the court. Every five days, Fu Bi also sent people to visit the refugees with wine, meat, prepared food, and gifts. His manner was deeply sincere, so everyone was willing to do their utmost to help.

The people were allowed to gather or catch whatever they could use to make a living in the forests, mountains, rivers, lakes, and marshes. When the wheat harvest was fully ripe, the refugees received travel rations according to the distance they had to go, then each returned home. Fu Bi saved more than fifty million people, and tens of thousands enlisted in the army.

Previously, those who organized relief usually gathered people in the cities and distributed cooked gruel. This could easily cause illness, and refugees might trample one another. Some waited several days without receiving any gruel, then collapsed and died. Relief in name, it was actually doing people harm. Fu Bi’s method was simple and comprehensive, and throughout the realm it became a model for disaster relief. When the emperor heard of it, he sent an envoy to convey his gratitude and praise, and promoted Fu Bi to Vice Minister of Rites.

Later, famine struck the Yili Circuit, and Han Qi served as commissioner for assessing conditions and pacifying the region. He reduced taxes and recruited people to deliver grain to the government. He also recruited able-bodied men, who were tattooed and enrolled in the regional army or the imperial guard. This meant that when one person enlisted, the earnings could support several members of the family and keep them alive. He also ordered that people in the area around Jianmen Pass who wished to migrate east should not be stopped.

Food shortages were especially severe in Jianzhou. During the Mingdao era, a previous famine there had led the authorities to encourage people to deliver grain, which was later sold. The proceeds—more than 160,000 strings of cash, with a string being a unit of currency—were placed in the Ever-Normal Granary. Han Qi said that this money was what remained after famine relief, not government revenue. He therefore opened the storehouse and distributed all of it to households classified as poorer than the fourth tier. He removed greedy, brutal, and incompetent officials, cut 760 redundant service positions, and saved more than 1.9 million famine victims by providing gruel.

Han Qi later served as prefect of Yangzhou, then was transferred to Dingzhou and also appointed pacification commissioner, saving several million famine victims. The emperor issued an edict praising and encouraging him, and nearby regions took his methods of disaster relief as their standard.

The Hongdao Lu comments: The emperor was concerned for the people, while Fu Bi and Han Qi devoted all their efforts to managing the famine. This is like a richly patterned brocade that, in the hands of a skilled tailor, can be made into a well-fitting garment; or fine jade that, once placed in the hands of a skilled carver and polished, reveals its beauty. Heaven does not wish to keep all things from warmth for long; but as the seasons turn, cold is bound to come at times. The original text below this point breaks off at “relying on what I have,” leaving the meaning incomplete.

 以禦之則恒温矣民非不欲常飽也適逢  之數未必其無飢賴吾有以䖏之則無患  矣雖然弼所活五千餘萬人而琦所活亦  數百萬苟非眞心實意視民之溺猶己溺  之視民之飢猶己飢之至誠感動扵上下  公私之間焉能人人盡如己哉嗚呼法可  傳而心不可傳能盡心扵無我則能盡心  扵二公之政矣 嘉祐八年春三月辛未帝崩遺制下日雖深 山窮谷莫不奔走悲號而不能止  録曰中庸曰故大德必德其位必德其禄  必得其名必德其壽帝眞難得者矣盖位  人可得也必若幼冲踐祚𣇄盛當乾以至  扵四十二年之久此不可必也禄人可得  也必若泮涣爾游優爾游休以至扵歌舞  太平之盛此不可必也名人可得也必若  君子道長小人道消以至扵康定慶曆之  際此不可必也壽人可得也必若深山窮  谷如喪考妣以至扵奔走悲號之極此不  可必也斯帝之所以爲仁宗也 史臣賛曰仁宗恭儉仁恕出扵天性一遇水 旱或密禱禁廷或跣立殿下有司請以玉清 舊地爲御苑帝曰吾奉先帝苑囿猶以爲廣 何以是爲燕私常服澣濯惟帟衾裯多用繪 絁宫中夜飢思膳燒羊戒勿宣索恐膳夫自 此𢦤賊物命以備不時之須大辟疑者皆令 上讞歲嘗活千餘人吏部選人一坐失入死 罪皆終身不遷每諭輔曰朕未嘗□人以死
Interpretation

Good governance can ensure that the people always have enough to eat and wear. They do not want to go hungry; it is only that when famine strikes, they cannot always escape hunger. If we have ways to provide relief, they need not suffer.

Fan Zhongyan, whose courtesy name was Xiwen, is said to have aided more than fifty million people, and Han Qi several million. But without sincere concern—without seeing the people’s hardship as his own and their hunger as his own—how could anyone treat each person as he would himself? This is possible only when genuine sincerity moves everyone at court, from top to bottom. Alas, methods can be taught, but sincerity cannot. If one can devote oneself fully to the public good and set aside private interests, one can govern with the same dedication as these two gentlemen.

On the Xinwei day of the third lunar month in the spring of Jiayou 8 (1063), Emperor Renzong died. On the very day the imperial edict announcing his death was issued, people even in the remotest mountain valleys ran about weeping bitterly, overcome by grief.

The Hongdao lu records: The Doctrine of the Mean says, “Thus, a person of lofty virtue is sure to be worthy of the position, salary, reputation, and longevity that correspond to it.” Renzong was truly a rare ruler. Anyone might attain high position, but no one could count on ascending the throne so young, seeing the realm later flourish, and ruling for forty-two years as he did. Anyone might receive a salary, but no one could count on enjoying an age of peace so calmly and at leisure, with music and dancing filling the land. Anyone might gain a reputation, but no one could count on seeing worthy gentlemen rise and petty men withdraw, ushering in the well-governed years of the Kangding and Qingli eras. Anyone might live a long life, but no one could count on the people in remote mountain valleys grieving his death as if they had lost their parents, running about and weeping in utter despair. These are the reasons Renzong was given the posthumous title “Renzong,” meaning “Benevolent Ancestor.”

The court historian praised him: “Renzong’s reverence, frugality, benevolence, and generosity came naturally to him. When floods or droughts struck, he sometimes prayed quietly in his chambers; at other times he stood barefoot beneath the palace hall. When an official asked to turn the former site of the Jade Clarity Palace into an imperial garden, he replied, ‘I have inherited the gardens of the late emperor, and even those seem too large to me. Why should I need this place as well for my amusement?’ He wore his everyday clothes again and again after they had been washed. Most of the palace curtains, bedding, and mats were made of coarse silk with patterned designs.

“One night, feeling hungry, he thought of roast mutton. But he ordered that no one send word to obtain any, fearing that the kitchen staff might thereafter slaughter livestock in order to have it ready whenever he wanted. Whenever he had doubts about a death sentence, he ordered the relevant offices to review the case. In a single year, he saved more than a thousand people from execution. A group of candidates for official posts in the Ministry of Personnel had all been sentenced to death over one mistaken judgment; they were barred from promotion for the rest of their lives. Renzong often said to his senior ministers, ‘I have never lightly sentenced anyone to death…’”

况敢濫用辟乎至扵夏人犯邉禦之出境契 丹渝盟增以歲幣在位四十二年之間吏治 若媮惰而任事蔑殘刻之人刑法似縱馳而 决獄多平允之士國未嘗無嬖倖而不足以 以累治世之體朝未嘗無小人而不足以勝 善類之氣君臣上下惻怛之心忠厚之政有 以培壅宋三百餘年之基子孫一矯其所爲 馴致扵亂傳曰爲人君止于仁帝誠無愧焉 新安胡氏曰當仁宗時或有獻蛤蜊二十八 枚枚千錢帝曰一下筋費千錢吾不堪也北 使言高麗職貢竦欲加兵帝曰此只王子罪 今加兵且屠戮百姓卒寑兵京師疫出通天 犀療治或請留供服御曰朕豈貴異物而賤 百姓哉蘇轍對策言過直或請黜之曰求直 言而以直棄之天下謂何又好學崇儒扶值 斯道尤爲盛矣經筵謂侍臣曰朕盛暑未嘗 少倦但恐卿等勞耳噫若帝者存心致治粹 乎無以議矣  録曰或問曰帝誠無愧扵爲君矣然扵古  之帝王可以匹休乎曰未也獨不觀孔子  之告哀公乎曰果能此道矣雖愚必明雖  柔必强帝之天資粹矣而郭后之慙德實  聖學之不純雖以諸賢在朝無能改扵其  德則以仁柔有餘剛斷不足未免趙宋之  主而已故曰惟精惟一又曰惟幾惟康此  從古辟王之要法 五倫書 仁宗昭皇帝天禀純明孝友之行出扵天性
Interpretation

Moreover, how could he have dared to abuse the use of punishments? When the Xia people of Western Xia crossed the border, he sent troops to drive them back. When the Khitan broke their treaty, he increased the annual payments. During his forty-two years on the throne, officials may at times have been lax in administering government affairs, but among those he appointed to carry out his policies there were no cruel and harsh men. The laws may have seemed lenient, yet many of those who judged cases were fair. The state was not without favored courtiers, but they were not enough to corrupt the customs of good government. Nor was the court without petty men, but they could not overwhelm the upright and virtuous. From top to bottom, ruler and ministers shared a compassionate concern for the people. Through loyal and generous governance, they nurtured the foundations of the state and laid the groundwork for the Song dynasty’s more than three hundred years of rule. When later generations went against this course, they gradually fell into disorder and calamity. An ancient book says, “A ruler should make benevolence his highest aim.” Renzong truly lived up to this.

The Hu family of Xin’an said: During Renzong’s reign, someone presented twenty-eight clams, each worth a thousand coins. Renzong said, “One bite costs a thousand coins. I cannot bring myself to accept that.” When a northern envoy spoke of Goryeo’s tribute, someone proposed sending troops. Renzong said, “This is only the fault of the king of Goryeo’s son. If we send troops over it, I fear we will slaughter the people.” In the end, the campaign was called off. When plague broke out in the capital, someone brought out a tongtian rhinoceros horn, which people in ancient times believed could be used as medicine, to treat him. Someone asked that it be kept for the emperor’s use. Renzong said, “Do I value rare treasures and despise the people?” Su Shi’s younger brother, Su Zhe, wrote his response to an official policy question in language that was too blunt, and someone asked that he be demoted. Renzong said, “If we seek frank advice, then reject a man because his words are frank, what will people throughout the realm think?” He also loved learning, honored Confucianism, and upheld the Way of the sages; these pursuits flourished especially in his reign. At the imperial lectures on the classics and histories, he said to the officials attending him, “Even in the height of summer, I have never felt the least weariness. I worry only that you are tiring yourselves.” Ah, this ruler devoted himself to governing the realm with such sincerity that there is truly nothing to fault.

The Record says: Someone asked, “Renzong truly lived up to the Way of a ruler. Can he be compared with the emperors of antiquity?” The answer was: “Not yet. Have you not read what Confucius said to Duke Ai of Lu? If this Way can truly be put into practice, even the foolish will become discerning, and even the weak will become strong. Renzong’s nature was pure, but the failing in virtue revealed by the affair of Empress Guo shows that his study of the Way of the sages was not fully complete. Though the court had many worthy ministers, they could not change his character. This was because he had more than enough benevolence and gentleness, but lacked firmness and decisiveness. In the end, he was only a ruler of the Zhao Song dynasty. Thus the ancients said, ‘Be discerning and be single-minded,’ and also, ‘Be attentive to what is subtle, and be at peace.’ These are the essential principles by which emperors have governed since antiquity.”

The Book of the Five Relationships says: Emperor Zhaoxiao Renzong was naturally clear-minded and pure, and his filial devotion and fraternal affection arose from his very nature.

在儲位二十年深明人君之道暨嗣位勵精 圖治推誠任人每曰爲人君止扵仁耳故弘 施霈澤悉罷科買己逋責詢民隱急農事褒 舊勞舉墜典屢𩛙法司崇寬厚戒深刻惟日 以恤人爲務  録曰自宋至今又五百餘年之間直謚 仁宗者一再見焉鴻名懿號由百世之後  孝子神孫視之豈不美哉 皇明名臣言行録 孝宗敬皇帝登 大寳一十八載每存心扵 天下嘗召問尚書劉大夏曰天下何時太平 朕幾時做得如古之帝王大夏曰求治不宜 太急但凡用人行政有疑者即召内閣并執 政大臣面議停當行去自然順理便是太平 都御史戴珊懇辭老病今諭 㫖曰說與戴 珊朕以天下事推誠付托猶家人父子也太 平未兆何忍捨朕而先歸乎  録曰周詩曰昊天有成命二后受之成王  不敢康夙夜基命宥密嗚緝熙單厥心肆  其靖之斯言若爲我 孝皇頌也 明興百五十餘年天之成命 列聖既受之矣 孝皇繼之實能不敢康寧至扵基命宥密緝  熙單心尤爲親切盖 孝皇之德深沉而不露淵靜而有本夙夜積  累以承籍天命而身望太平是眞能繼續  光明 二祖四宗之鴻業而盡其心故至  今天下安靖而保億萬年之休也使天假  之以年何古之帝王不可及哉 時户部郞中李夢陽嘗建言以指斥政事之
Interpretation

For twenty years, he had occupied the position of heir apparent and understood deeply the Way of governing that a ruler ought to follow. After ascending the throne, he governed diligently and appointed capable people with sincerity. He often said, “In the final analysis, a ruler’s task is to show benevolence.” He therefore widely extended his kindness, ended government requisitions and purchases, forgave old debts, asked after the people’s hardships, gave priority to agricultural production, honored those who had rendered service in the past, and restored neglected institutions and regulations. He repeatedly urged judicial officials to be lenient and to avoid harshness and severity, making concern for the people his daily priority.

The Record says: From the Song dynasty to the present, over more than five hundred years, only one or two rulers have received “Benevolent” as their posthumous title, the name bestowed after death. Is it not wonderful that such a fine reputation and honorific title should still be praised by filial sons and worthy descendants a hundred generations later?

Records of the Words and Deeds of Eminent Officials of the Great Ming

Emperor Jing of Xiaozong (Zhu Youtang of the Ming dynasty) reigned for eighteen years and was constantly concerned with the realm. He once summoned the Minister Liu Daxia and asked him, “When will the realm finally be at peace? When will I be able to govern like the emperors of antiquity?” Liu Daxia replied, “One should not be too hasty in seeking good government. Whenever there is doubt about appointments or policy, summon the grand secretaries and senior ministers to discuss the matter in person. Once it has been properly decided, put it into practice, and things will naturally accord with reason. That is peace.”

The Censor-in-Chief Dai Shan, old and often ill, asked to resign. The emperor issued an edict saying, “Tell Dai Shan that I entrust the affairs of the realm to you sincerely, as a father entrusts matters to his son within one family. The realm has yet to show signs of peace. How could I bear for you to leave me and return home first?”

The Record says: The Hymns of Zhou states, “Heaven has established the great mandate, and the two former kings received it. King Cheng dared not rest at ease; day and night he laid the foundations, carefully and thoroughly receiving the Mandate of Heaven. He carried on and advanced its brightness, devoting all his strength, and thus the realm was brought to peace.” These lines seem to have been written precisely to praise Emperor Xiaozong.

More than a hundred and fifty years after the founding of the Ming dynasty, the great mandate established by Heaven had been received in succession by sage rulers across the generations. After Xiaozong inherited the throne, he truly dared not rest at ease. The words about carefully receiving Heaven’s mandate, carrying on and advancing its brightness, and devoting all one’s strength fit him especially well. His virtue was deep but unobtrusive, calm and firmly rooted; day and night he steadily accumulated effort to continue the Mandate of Heaven. He longed for peace throughout the realm, and truly was able to carry forward and enlarge the great achievements of Taizu, Chengzu, and the emperors before him, devoting his full strength to the task. As a result, the realm remains at peace to this day, and the state has long enjoyed good fortune. If Heaven had granted him a longer life, which emperor of antiquity could he not have surpassed?

At that time, Li Mengyang, a director in the Ministry of Revenue, submitted a memorial criticizing the government …

非孝皇怒下之獄比具詞以讞有 㫖令復 職他日劉大夏奏事畢 上曰近日外事若 何大夏頓首曰近有㫖釋李夢陽中外懽呼 聖德如天地之大 上曰李夢陽語言狂妄 朕不得已而下之獄鎮撫司本上朕試問左 右作何批行一人曰此人狂妄宜付錦衣衛 撻以釋之朕揣知此輩意欲得㫖下便令重 責致其死以快宫中之怒使朕受殺直臣之 名左右不忠如此朕所以即釋復職更不令 法司擬罪也大夏復頓首曰陛下行此一事 堯舜之仁也 嘗因遼東都指揮張天祥襲殺虜㓂爲功大 理少卿吴一貫當其罪死會天祥斃于獄 孝皇大怒親鞠于廷欲置一貫重辟時刑部 尚書閔珪與都御史戴珊進曰一貫推案不 實罪當徒既忤 㫖猶力諍曰法如是足也 遂問劉大夏曰且道自古何君何大臣亦嘗 如此對曰臣幼讀孟子見云舜爲天子臯陶 爲士瞽䏂殺人惟執之而已今之法司恐亦 如是 上頷之明日㫖下一貫罪止免官 又一日召劉大夏論時政且及當時人才 孝皇曰如山西副使王鴻儒他日可大用對 曰誠如 聖諭後大夏以告鄉人胥員外文 相曰朝廷用此等人方擔當得大事予老不 及見子其識之  録曰凡比皆我 孝皇誠心密意迥出近代帝王萬萬者恨㣲  臣跼蹐海隅無由愽觀 國史盡天高地
Interpretation

At the time, Emperor Xiaozong was angered by Li Mengyang’s case and had him imprisoned. After the case was examined, the relevant officials drew up a confession and prepared to submit it to the emperor for sentencing. Later, the emperor issued an order restoring Li Mengyang to his former post.

One day, after Liu Daxia had finished presenting a memorial, the emperor asked, “How are things beyond the court these days?” Liu Daxia kowtowed and replied, “Recently, an order was issued to release Li Mengyang. Everyone inside and outside the court rejoiced and celebrated, saying that Your Majesty’s benevolence is as vast as Heaven and Earth.”

The emperor said, “Li Mengyang spoke recklessly, and I had no choice but to imprison him. When the Office of the Imperial Guard sent over the case files, I asked the attendants and close ministers what should be done. One person said, ‘This man is reckless. He should be handed over to the Embroidered Uniform Guard to be beaten and then released.’ I saw what these people intended: they wanted me to issue an order for Li Mengyang to be severely beaten again, until he was beaten to death. That would let the palace vent its anger while leaving me with the reputation of having killed an upright minister. Since the attendants and close ministers were so disloyal, I released Li Mengyang at once, restored him to his former post, and stopped the judicial officials from deciding on a charge.” Liu Daxia kowtowed again and said, “Your Majesty’s conduct is the benevolence of Yao and Shun.”

On one occasion, Zhang Tianxiang, a regional military commander in Liaodong, attacked and killed enemy bandits, but was sentenced to death by Wu Yiguan, a vice minister of the Court of Judicial Review. Zhang Tianxiang later died in prison. Emperor Xiaozong was furious and personally questioned Wu Yiguan at court, intending to impose a severe sentence. The Minister of Justice, Min Gui, and the Censor-in-Chief, Dai Shan, stepped forward and said, “Wu Yiguan examined the case improperly; his offense merits a sentence of penal servitude.” Though the emperor was displeased, they continued to remonstrate, saying, “The law provides for this. A sentence at this level is sufficient.”

The emperor then asked Liu Daxia, “Tell me: which rulers and ministers of antiquity acted in this way?” Liu Daxia replied, “When I was young, I read the Mencius and saw that it says that when Shun was emperor, Gao Yao served as the judicial officer. When Gu Sou, Shun’s father, killed a man, Gao Yao simply arrested him according to the law. Surely the officials who enforce the law today should act in the same way.” The emperor nodded in agreement. The next day, he issued an order that Wu Yiguan should only be dismissed from office.

Another day, Emperor Xiaozong summoned Liu Daxia and discussed current affairs, including the talented people of the time. The emperor said, “A man like Wang Hongru, the assistant commissioner of Shanxi, could be entrusted with important responsibilities in the future.” Liu Daxia replied, “Your Majesty is quite right.” Later, Liu Daxia told his fellow townsman, the clerk Xu Wenxiang, what had been said. He remarked, “The court can entrust great affairs only to people like him. I am old now and fear I will not live to see that day. Remember this.”

The compiler of the Hongdao Lu comments: All these events reveal Emperor Xiaozong’s sincere and profound intentions, which far surpassed those of emperors in recent times. Sadly, I, a humble servant confined to the seacoast, had no opportunity to consult the official histories more widely and record all these events.

 厚之仁而區區見于諸臣言行録者如此  故並録以終焉
Interpretation

The ministers recorded in the histories as renowned for their benevolence and kindness did little more than this.

These accounts are therefore included together here as the conclusion of the whole book.

The Hongdao lu ends here.

 弘道録終

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0033); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →