中文 · EN · JA

《太上感應篇集注》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Qing Daoist texts 清代道教文獻 1 volumes 57,852 characters

About this page. The original text of 《太上感應篇集注》 (Qing Daoist texts 清代道教文獻, 1 volume) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 118 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

Vol. 1

太上感應篇集註序 儒者之學以求誠也而誠貫乎學 之終始傳曰不誠無物况學之大 乎六籍皆勸善禁惡導吉避凶之 書學者服習其文至於老死鮮有 明於心而行於身者則亦不誠之 故而已矣夫天之與人一誠之所 爲也故舉念而天監焉出言而天 聽焉行事而天視焉禍福之報各 以類應亦惟其誠而已孔子曰善 不積不足以成名惡不積不足以 滅身董子曰善惡之極乃與天地 流通而往來相應夫善惡積之而 至於極則誠矣誠安有不感感安 有不應孟子曰至誠而不動者未 之有也不誠未有能動者也動卽 感應之謂也古今言感應者未有 深切著明於此者也余觀太上篇 中旣列善惡之目而於終篇則要 之以語視行三者夫一日之間三 者皆備可謂誠矣而又積之至於 三年則誠之至矣禍福之應豈自 外來乎夫無妄之福無妄之禍君 子無所容心焉若夫致自己者正 當取之以攷其善與不善誠與不 誠如是則禍福皆修身之助矣世 之諱言之者竊以爲過矣一日在 内直見查澹遠宫詹手一編專視 而貌肅若神明與俱者就而視之 則感應篇集註不書撰人名氏其 箋釋則先發明義理而後證以事 實或更引他說以暢之其文約而 不漏詳而不雜切近而顯明用之
Interpretation

The Confucian pursuit of learning aims for the state of "sincerity" (cheng 诚), which permeates the entire process of study. The Doctrine of the Mean states, "Without sincerity, nothing can exist"—how much more does this apply to profound learning! The Six Classics (referring to the Book of Songs, Book of Documents, Book of Rites, Book of Changes, Book of Music, and Spring and Autumn Annals) all advocate virtue and censure vice, guiding toward auspiciousness and away from misfortune. Yet among scholars who devote their lives to studying them, few truly internalize these principles and manifest them in conduct—precisely because they lack "sincerity."

Both heavenly principles and human affairs are sustained by sincerity. Thus when humans conceive thoughts, Heaven observes; when they speak, Heaven listens; when they act, Heaven watches. The retribution of fortune and misfortune echoes like sound waves, with sincerity as the pivotal point. Confucius said: "Accumulated good deeds cannot fail to establish one's reputation, nor accumulated evil deeds avoid self-destruction." Dong Zhongshu similarly noted: "When good and evil accumulate to their extremes, they resonate with the Qi of Heaven and Earth, producing corresponding responses." When this accumulation reaches its zenith, it becomes the state of "utmost sincerity" (zhicheng 至诚). Where utmost sincerity exists, can there be absence of resonance? And where there's resonance, can there be no response? Mencius expressed it even more plainly: "There has never been a case of utmost sincerity failing to move others, nor of insincerity successfully moving them." Here, "moving" precisely means "resonance." No discourse on resonance throughout history surpasses this in profundity.

Observing the Treatise on Response and Retribution (Taishang Ganying Pian), I note its detailed enumeration of good and evil deeds, concluding with special emphasis on three aspects: speech, sight, and action. If one can maintain complete sincerity in these three areas throughout a single day, they may be considered sincere. Persisting in this accumulation for three years leads to the state of utmost sincerity. At this stage, why seek external explanations for fortune or misfortune? The noble person neither obsesses over inexplicable fortune nor misfortune, but regards self-incurred outcomes as mirrors reflecting their own virtue and sincerity. Thus both fortune and misfortune become valuable aids for self-cultivation. People's aversion to discussing retribution strikes me as excessive.

While serving at the imperial court one day, I noticed Palace Academician Zha Danyuan holding a book with reverence as if facing the gods. Upon closer inspection, it proved to be this Annotated Collection on the Treatise of Response and Retribution. Though the compiler remains unnamed, the annotation method first elucidates principles, then supports them with factual evidence, occasionally expanding through alternative interpretations. The prose achieves conciseness without omission, thoroughness without disorder—practical yet profoundly clear.

警世動俗可以勉進於正而懲創 其邪僻與六籍所載勸善禁惡導 吉避凶之指無異焉而澹遠好之 如此其誠由是道也暗室屋漏出 王游衍皆若昊天鬼神之降監其 有裨於吾儒立誠之學者豈淺尠 哉旣嘉是書之可以警世動俗也 遂與澹遠共捐貲以付剞劂澹遠 屬余標其大指書於簡端云 (龍集康熙四十又五年六月朔日丁亥    澤州陳廷敬書) 太上感應篇 太上曰禍福無門惟人自召善惡之報 如影隨形是以天地有司過之神依人 所犯輕重以奪人算算減則貧耗多逢 憂患人皆惡之刑禍隨之吉慶避之惡 星災之算盡則死又有三台北斗神君 在人頭上錄人罪惡奪其紀算又有三 尸神在人身中每到庚申日輙上詣天 曹言人罪過月晦之日竈神亦然凡人 有過大則奪紀小則奪算其過大小有 數百事欲求長生者先須避之是道則 進非道則退不履邪徑不欺暗室積德 累功慈心於物忠孝友悌正己化人矜 孤恤寡敬老懷幼昆蟲草木猶不可傷 宜憫人之凶樂人之善濟人之急救人 之危見人之得如己之得見人之失如 己之失不彰人短不衒己長遏惡揚善 推多取少受辱不怨受寵若驚施恩不 求報與人不追悔所謂善人人皆敬之 天道祐之福祿隨之眾邪遠之神靈衞
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the moral teachings of the Taishang Ganying Pian (Treatise of the Exalted One on Response and Retribution), elucidating the principles of karmic retribution for good and evil deeds. I'll explain it section by section:

First, the text highlights the book's purpose to awaken worldly people, transform negative social trends, and guide individuals toward virtue while avoiding wrongdoing—a shared objective with Confucian classics that advocate moral improvement and prohibition of evil. Chen Tingjing (a Qing dynasty scholar) and a man named Danyuan jointly funded its publication, inviting Chen to compose the preface.

The core content of Taishang Ganying Pian follows:

Fortune and misfortune have no fixed gates—they are summoned by people themselves. The retribution for good and evil is as inevitable as a shadow following the body. Between heaven and earth, there exist deities specifically recording human transgressions, deducting lifespan according to the severity of offenses. With diminished longevity comes poverty and distress, making one despised by others. Calamities pursue such individuals while blessings depart. Malevolent stars bring disasters, and when one's lifespan is exhausted, death follows.

It details several overseeing deities:

The divine lords of the Santai and Beidou stars hover above human heads, documenting sins. The Three Corpses Gods (three spirits residing within the human body) ascend to heaven every gengshen day (occurring every 60 days) to report faults. On the last day of each month, the Kitchen God also submits reports. Transgressions are categorized as major (deducting twelve years of life) or minor (deducting one hundred days), with hundreds of specific offenses listed.

Methods for attaining longevity:

One must avoid wickedness and follow the upright Dao (the Way). Refrain from crooked paths and secret misdeeds in dark rooms. Accumulate virtuous deeds (De) and nurture compassion for all beings. Practice loyalty, filial piety, and brotherly love while cultivating oneself and teaching others. Show pity for orphans and widows, respect the elderly, cherish the young, and refrain from harming even insects or plants.

Principles for human conduct:

Sympathize with others' misfortunes; rejoice in their virtuous acts. Aid those in peril and relieve urgent needs. Feel genuine joy for others' gains as if they were your own; grieve for their losses as personal ones. Never expose others' shortcomings or flaunt your strengths. Suppress evil and promote goodness. When distributing benefits, take less and give more. Bear insults without resentment; receive favors with humility. Bestow kindness without expecting repayment, and never regret what you've given.

Finally, the blessings of virtuous people:

Such individuals earn universal respect, receive heaven's protection, and attract prosperity. Malevolent spirits stay distant while divine beings guard them. All auspicious things converge, and misfortunes naturally dissolve.

之所作必成神仙可冀欲求天仙者當 立一千三百善欲求地仙者當立三百 善苟或非義而動背理而行以惡爲能 忍作殘害陰賊良善暗侮君親慢其先 生叛其所事誑諸無識謗諸同學虛誣 詐僞攻訐宗親剛强不仁狠戾自用是 非不當向背乖宜虐下取功謟上希旨 受恩不感念怨不休輕蔑天民擾亂國 政賞及非義刑及無辜殺人取財傾人 取位誅降戮服貶正排賢淩孤逼寡棄 法受賂以直爲曲以曲爲直入輕爲重 見殺加怒知過不改知善不爲自罪引 他壅塞方術訕謗聖賢侵淩道德射飛 逐走發蟄驚棲塡穴覆巢傷胎破卵願 人有失毁人成功危人自安減人自益 以惡易好以私廢公竊人之能蔽人之 善形人之醜訐人之私耗人貨財離人 骨肉侵人所愛助人爲非逞志作威辱 人求勝敗人苗稼破人婚姻苟富而驕 苟免無耻認恩推過嫁禍賣惡沽買虛 譽包貯險心挫人所長護己所短乘威 迫脅縱暴殺傷無故剪裁非禮烹宰散 棄五穀勞擾眾生破人之家取其財寶 決水放火以害民居紊亂規模以敗人 功損人器物以窮人用見他榮貴願他 流貶見他富有願他破散見他色美起 心私之負他貨財願他身死干求不遂 便生呪恨見他失便便說他過見他體 相不具而笑之見他才能可稱而抑之
Interpretation

This scripture discusses how attaining immortality through cultivation requires the accumulation of virtuous deeds, while enumerating various wicked acts that invite karmic retribution.

To achieve the status of Celestial Immortal (the highest rank of transcendence), one must complete 1,300 virtuous deeds; to become an Earthly Immortal (a lower rank), at least 300 good deeds are required. Acting unjustly or violating the principles of Heaven will inevitably bring misfortune. The text specifically lists forty-six types of evil conduct:

These include ruthlessly harming others, secretly plotting against good people, disrespecting rulers and parents, betraying one’s teachers, deceiving the ignorant, slandering fellow disciples, hypocrisy and deceit, attacking one’s own kin, obstinacy and arrogance, confusing right and wrong, mistreating subordinates to please superiors, ingratitude, disrupting state governance, unfair rewards and punishments, scheming for wealth at the cost of lives, ostracizing the virtuous, oppressing widows and orphans, corruption and bribery, distorting truth, refusing to correct mistakes, obstructing the methods of cultivation, defaming sages and worthies, harming living beings (such as disturbing hibernating animals, destroying birds’ nests, or injuring pregnant creatures), taking pleasure in others’ misfortune, profiting at others’ expense, passing off inferior goods as genuine, exploiting public office for private gain, plagiarizing others’ work, exposing private matters, destroying families, forcibly seizing what others cherish, aiding tyrants, abusing power to oppress others, ruining crops, sabotaging marriages, being wealthy yet uncharitable, evading responsibility, shifting blame onto others, seeking fame through hypocrisy, harboring sinister intentions, suppressing talent, covering up faults with rhetoric, using violence and coercion, indiscriminate killing, wasting food, exhausting the people and squandering resources, profiting from others’ calamities, arson and harm, undermining others’ endeavors, damaging others’ possessions, envying others’ wealth and status, coveting others’ wives and daughters, refusing to repay debts while cursing creditors, resenting what one cannot obtain, gloating over others’ suffering, mocking the disabled, suppressing capable individuals, and so on.

All such wicked deeds hinder spiritual progress and invite calamity. By detailing these behaviors, the scripture warns cultivators to constantly examine themselves and avoid evil conduct.

埋蠱厭人用藥殺樹恚怒師傅抵觸父 兄强取强求好侵好奪擄掠至富巧詐 求遷賞罰不平逸樂過節苛虐其下恐 嚇於他怨天尤人訶風罵雨鬬合爭訟 妄逐朋黨用妻妾語違父母訓得新忘 故口是心非貪冒於財欺罔其上造作 惡語讒毁平人毁人稱直罵神稱正棄 順效逆背親向疎指天地以證鄙懷引 神明而鑒穢事施與後悔假借不還分 外營求力上施設淫慾過度心毒貌慈 穢食餧人左道惑眾短尺狹度輕秤小 升以僞雜眞採取姦利壓良爲賤謾驀 愚人貪婪無厭呪詛求直嗜酒悖亂骨 肉忿爭男不忠良女不柔順不和其室 不敬其夫每好矜誇常行妬忌無行於 妻子失禮於舅姑輕慢先靈違逆上命 作爲無益懷狹外心自呪咒他偏憎偏 愛越井越竈跳食跳人損子墮胎行多 隱僻晦臘歌舞朔旦號怒對北唾涕及 溺對竈吟詠及哭又以竈火燒香穢柴 作食夜起裸露八節行刑唾流星指虹 霓輙指三光久視日月春月燎獵對北 惡罵無故殺龜打蛇如是等罪司命隨 其輕重奪其紀算算盡則死死有餘責 乃殃及子孫又諸橫取人財者乃計其 妻子家口以當之漸至死喪若不死喪 則有水火盜賊遺亡器物疾病口舌諸 事以當妄取之直又枉殺人者是易刀 兵而相殺也取非義之財者譬如漏脯
Interpretation

This scripture enumerates various sinful acts that incur karmic retribution, primarily categorized into several major types:

First are acts that harm others, such as using gu poison to injure people, poisoning trees, showing anger toward teachers and elders, defying parents and elder brothers, forcibly seizing property, enriching oneself through robbery, scheming for official positions through deception, unfair rewards and punishments, mistreating subordinates, or intimidating others. These behaviors disrupt human relationships and social order.

The second category involves transgressions against cosmic principles, including blaming heaven and others, cursing wind and rain, instigating lawsuits, forming cliques for selfish gains, obeying wives and concubines while disobeying parents, favoring the new while despising the old, duplicity in speech and action, greed for wealth while deceiving superiors, spreading slander, feigning righteousness while secretly defaming others, blaspheming deities, or abandoning the true Dao. Such acts show disrespect to heaven, earth, and the divine.

Third are deceitful and greedy behaviors, such as regretting after giving alms, failing to return borrowed items, excessive pursuit of profit, extravagance and waste, indulgence in desires, appearing kind while harboring cruelty, feeding people unclean food, deluding the public with sorcery, cheating in measurements, passing off fakes as genuine, exploiting good citizens, deceiving the ignorant, insatiable greed, drunken rages, or family members turning against each other. These stem from avarice and deception.

The fourth type concerns the corruption of family ethics, including men lacking loyalty and honesty, women lacking gentleness and obedience, marital discord, disrespect toward husbands, boastfulness, habitual jealousy, mistreating wives and children, improper conduct toward parents-in-law, neglecting ancestors, or defying superiors. These lead to familial disharmony.

Lastly, specific taboos are mentioned, such as singing and making noise at forbidden hours, spitting toward the north, crying by the stove, burning incense with stove fire, cooking with unclean firewood, being naked at night, carrying out executions on seasonal festival days, spitting at shooting stars, pointing at rainbows, staring at the sun or moon for prolonged periods, or killing turtles and snakes without reason. These acts are considered violations of nature and the sacred.

The scripture warns that all such offenses will be recorded by the Siming Shen (the deity governing lifespan), who will deduct years of life according to the severity of the transgression. When one's allotted lifespan is exhausted, death follows—sometimes even bringing misfortune to descendants. Those who obtain wealth unlawfully will have their retribution borne by family members or suffer disasters and illnesses. Murderers are likened to those who kill with knives, and ill-gotten gains are as harmful as eating rotten meat.

救饑鴆酒止渴非不蹔飽死亦及之夫 心起於善善雖未爲而吉神已隨之或 心起於惡惡雖未爲而凶神已隨之其 有曾行惡事後自改悔諸惡莫作眾善 奉行久久必獲吉慶所謂轉禍爲福也 故吉人語善視善行善一日有三善三 年天必降之福凶人語惡視惡行惡一 日有三惡三年天必降之禍胡不勉而 行之 康熙四十五年丙戌五月朔奉持弟子 海甯查昇齋沭敬書 BEGIN_VERSE  太上垂訓  感應之篇  日誦一遍  滅罪消愆  受持一月  福祿綿綿  行之一季  七祖昇天  久行不怠  夀命長延  天神恭敬  名列諸仙  太極眞人讚  (秋浦曹曰瑛敬書) END_VERSE 重刋道藏輯要 太上感應篇集註  (太上者道門至尊之稱也由此動彼謂之感由彼答此謂之應言善惡感動天地必有報應也) 太上曰禍福無門惟人自召(此二句合下二句爲一節乃一篇之綱領也葢言天地無私因物付 物是以禍之福之常因人之善惡本無一定之門今人求福則萌僥倖之念而不知福緣善生遇禍則起怨尤之私而不知禍 因惡致善惡實由人自作則禍福豈不由人自召乎太上恐人不肯反求諸已故首揭己召二字以示人也大抵一念起處卽
Interpretation

The Taishang Ganying Jing (Scripture of the Supreme One on Response and Retribution) teaches us that fortune and misfortune do not arise without cause—they are all brought upon oneself. It is like quenching thirst with poisoned wine: though it may provide temporary relief, it ultimately leads to death.

When the human heart gives rise to good thoughts, even before they are acted upon, auspicious spirits already follow and protect. Conversely, when evil thoughts arise, calamitous spirits immediately take notice. If someone has committed wrongs but later sincerely repents, abandons evil, and cultivates goodness with perseverance, misfortune will eventually transform into fortune.

A virtuous person who speaks kind words, beholds good deeds, and performs righteous acts every day—if they persist for three years, heaven will surely bestow blessings. A wicked person who utters malicious words, beholds evil deeds, and commits misdeeds daily—within three years, misfortune will inevitably strike. Why not strive diligently to do good?

On the first day of the fifth month in the 45th year of the Kangxi reign (1706), the devout disciple Zha Sheng of Haining, after purifying himself through fasting and ablution, reverently transcribed this scripture.

(Note: "Taishang" is the Daoist honorific for the highest deity. When the human heart moves heaven and earth, it is called gan (response); when heaven and earth reciprocate, it is called ying (retribution). This means that good and evil deeds resonate with the cosmos and will inevitably bring corresponding consequences.)

The scripture particularly emphasizes: Fortune and misfortune have no fixed path—they are entirely summoned by one’s own actions. These two lines serve as the guiding principle of the entire text, illustrating that heaven and earth are impartial, bestowing rewards and punishments according to human virtue and vice. Modern people often seek fortune with opportunistic mindsets, unaware that blessings stem from good deeds. When misfortune strikes, they blame heaven and others, failing to realize that calamities arise from their own wrongdoing. Since good and evil are self-created, fortune and misfortune are naturally self-invited.

(Note: "Taiji Zhenren" [Great Ultimate Perfected Being] is a high-ranking Daoist immortal. This passage was reverently transcribed by Cao Yueying of Qiupu and is included in the Chongkan Daozang Jiyao [Revised Daoist Canon Essentials], specifically in the Taishang Ganying Jing Jizhu [Collected Commentaries on the Scripture of Response and Retribution].)

Practicing this scripture by reciting it daily can absolve sins and eliminate transgressions. Maintaining this practice for a month ensures lasting prosperity and blessings. Persisting for a season enables seven generations of ancestors to ascend to the celestial realms. Long-term, unwavering adherence extends longevity, secures divine protection, and ultimately leads to immortal transcendence.

分善惡善惡旣分禍福卽殊昔衞仲達初爲館職被攝至冥冥官命吏呈善惡二錄惡錄盈庭善錄纔如筋小索秤稱之小軸 乃能壓惡錄官曰君可出矣衞曰某年未四十過惡何得如是之多乎官曰一念不正此卽書之不待犯也衞曰軸中所書何 事官曰朝廷嘗興大工修三山石橋君上疏止之此疏稿也衞曰某雖言朝廷未從何益官曰君此念已在萬民向使聽從則 善力更大矣奈惡念太多力已減半不可復望大拜後果止吏部尙書噫仲達止是空念尙損合作宰相之福况本自福薄又 多實犯者乎李昌齡曰禍福由自召亦由自轉轉念得則㝛業可破善根可培矣是在人之反求也)善惡之報如 影隨形(善惡感也禍福應也此感彼應毫髮不爽如人有形則有影也佛說眾生造業其報有三一現報今生造業今 生受二生報今身造業後身受三後報今生造業更一生受此通三世論也儒家亦言之曰子孫保之曰苟爲善後世子孫必 有王者亦通三世論也今但據目前某人善而得禍某人惡而得福豈通論乎曰然則形影之喩其說何也曰此言其必然也 非定言其速也卽影之肖形亦有遠近影遠則大影近則小報之遠近甯獨不然速則報輕遲則報重或惡業多則先受惡報 或善業多則先受善報或善心退轉則又因福而得禍或惡念改悔則又因禍而得福雖是種種不一總之一定不移故曰如
Interpretation

This story recounts Wei Zhongda's experience of witnessing his own records of good and evil deeds in the underworld. When young Wei Zhongda served in the imperial court, he was taken to the underworld where officials presented his ledger. The records of his misdeeds filled an entire room, while his good deeds were recorded on a slip no larger than a chopstick. Yet when placed on a scale, that tiny record of good deeds outweighed the roomful of evil ones.

The underworld official explained this paradox by revealing Wei's memorial advising against the oppressive Three Mountains Stone Bridge project that would burden the people. Though the court ignored his advice, the mere intention to benefit the populace was exceptionally rare. The official noted that had his counsel been heeded, his merit would have been greater still, but his habitual negative thoughts had already halved his potential blessings. True to this judgment, Wei eventually rose only to the position of Minister of Personnel, never attaining the post of Chancellor.

This account illustrates how even a single virtuous thought gets recorded, just as every malicious impulse does. As Li Changling observed: While misfortune and blessing are self-invited, they can be transformed through shifting one's mental orientation. Past karma can be dissolved and virtuous roots cultivated—the crucial factor being one's capacity for self-reflection.

The retribution of good and evil follows as inevitably as a shadow trails its form. Virtue begets blessings as vice begets calamity, with unerring precision. Buddhist teachings identify three types of karmic retribution: immediate (manifesting in this life), next-life (appearing in the subsequent rebirth), and delayed (emerging across multiple lifetimes). The Confucian classic similarly states "Families accumulating virtue will have overflowing blessings." One shouldn't doubt cosmic justice upon seeing wrongdoers prosper or virtuous people suffer—this merely reflects the timing of karmic fruition. Swift retribution indicates lighter offenses, while delayed consequences signal grave transgressions. Those with abundant good karma receive blessings first; those weighed by evil endure suffering sooner. Should virtuous practitioners waver, their blessings may transform into misfortune; if wrongdoers repent, their calamities might convert to boons. Though manifestations vary, the law of cause and effect remains immutable.

影隨形)是以天地有司過之神依人所犯輕重以奪人算(自此至算盡則 死爲一節言人之一生日夜時刻上下四旁皆有鬼神鑒察也葢神居幽暗人居顯明神嘗見人人不見神譬如人居幽暗能 見顯明人居顯明則不能見幽暗也因人之不見神而遂謂之無神可乎中誡經云皇天雖高其應在下后土雖卑其應在上 人處其中凡有言動天地皆知故天有三官五帝地有五嶽諸司日夜巡行察人過犯其中又有舉意司專主關達人之事始 事始者人之起念處也凡此皆謂之司過之神不言司功言司過者非不記功以人之所爲過多功少故止言司過也聰明正 直謂之神聰明則無遺漏正直則無委曲是以輕重之間各得其當犯輕者奪算亦輕犯重者奪算亦重算謂夀數也五福以 夀爲先故罰過以奪算爲首)算減則貧耗多逢憂患(財祿有長有消厯境有安有危無非鬼神主之 旣已奪其算矣祿料甯得獨豐故貧耗福氣安得獨厚故憂患靑帝之訓曰行善如春園之草不見其長日有所增行惡如磨 刀之石不見其損日有所虧按虧損二字卽貧耗憂患之根也)人皆惡之(旣爲減算之人則必爲人厭惡玉樞經曰 斬神除魄使之癲倒人所厭惡人所嫌害今但恨人之欺我豈知乃天奪吾鑑令不逢世乎)刑禍隨之(諺云人非
Interpretation

The shadow always follows the form. Between heaven and earth, there are deities specifically tasked with recording human transgressions, reducing people's lifespans according to the severity of their faults (from this point until "when lifespan is exhausted, death follows" forms one section, explaining how throughout a person's life, every moment and every action is secretly monitored by deities). The deities dwell in darkness while humans live in light; the deities can see humans, but humans cannot see the deities. Just as people in darkness can clearly see things in the light, but those in light cannot discern what lies in darkness. Because humans cannot see the deities, they assume deities don't exist—is this thinking correct?

The Scripture of Central Admonition states: Though heaven is lofty and distant, it responds to the world below; though earth is low and humble, it answers heaven above. Humans live between heaven and earth, and not a single word or deed escapes their observation. Thus, in heaven reside the Three Officials and Five Emperors (the Daoist Three Primes and Five Directional Deities), while on earth preside the Five Sacred Peaks and various departments (mountain deities and other divine officials), ceaselessly inspecting and recording human transgressions day and night. Among them exists the "Department of Rising Intentions" specifically documenting people's thoughts and impulses. The reason only deities recording faults are mentioned, not those recording merits, isn't that merits go unrecorded—it's simply because human faults typically outnumber virtuous deeds.

Deities are called "spiritually luminous" (shenming) precisely because they perceive with perfect clarity and act with impartial justice. Being perceptive, they omit nothing; being upright, they show no bias—thus punishments match the offense: minor faults reduce lifespan slightly, major ones substantially. "Calculation" here refers to a person's allotted lifespan. Among the Five Blessings (longevity, wealth, health, virtue, and peaceful death), longevity ranks first—hence lifespan reduction serves as the primary penalty for transgressions.

When lifespan is diminished, people become impoverished and beset by troubles. Wealth fluctuates, circumstances alternate between security and peril—all governed by the deities. Since lifespan has been reduced, wealth naturally cannot flourish, nor can blessings run deep, leaving one constantly mired in hardship. The Admonitions of the Green Emperor states: Practicing goodness is like spring grass in a garden—unseen growing yet daily taller; committing wrongs resembles a whetstone—unseen wearing down yet daily thinner. The phrase "diminishment and loss" encapsulates the root of poverty and distress.

Such individuals will be despised by others. Those with reduced lifespans inevitably become disliked. The Jade Pivot Scripture says: The deities will cloud a person's mind, making them detested and shunned. People only resent others for mistreating them, unaware that heaven has withdrawn their blessings, leaving them thwarted at every turn. Calamities and punishments follow accordingly. As the saying goes, "People are not..."

欺心不遭官刑人無隱過不遭橫禍彼罰算之人能免此乎隨之有跟定不離之義)吉慶避之(惠迪乃吉積善斯慶 一經減算便是有罪之人吉化爲凶慶轉爲禍若或避之也)惡星災之(吉慶旣避則必有惡星爲災葢惡自人爲 星因災之非星惡也世人不明此義而徒仗師巫禳解順星何其不察之甚乎)算盡則死(自依人所犯輕重至此句 皆太上苦口垂誡之詞言減算不已畢竟至此眞可哀也夫浮生短世人夀幾何今日以某事減算若干明日以某事減算若 干減之又減以至於無則死期至矣一死之後更有三惡險道或爲畜生或爲餓鬼或墮地獄又非是一死便能了帳也)又 有三台北斗神君在人頭上錄人罪惡奪人紀算(此一節言人之一身行住 坐卧皆有鬼神鑒察也三台有六星上台司命中台司中下台司錄上帝署爲天曹主人生死夀夭人有三魂上應三台北斗 乃紫極都曹精應玉淸尤位之至尊者也業報因緣經有云七星之炁常結爲一星在人頭上去頂三寸其人爲善則光大而 明其人爲惡則光小而暗)又有三尸神在人身中每到庚申日輒上詣天曹 言人罪過(此一節言人之一心幾微萌動皆有鬼神鑒察也三尸亦名三彭上尸名彭踞中尸名彭躓下尸名彭蹻 每於庚申日乘人寐時上至天曹言人罪過所謂心口意語鬼聞人聲者三尸其最也庚申屬金乃天曹斷決之日故修眞之
Interpretation

This scripture discusses the relationship between human virtue and vice with destiny's fortunes and misfortunes. Daoism teaches that every human action is observed and recorded by divine beings.

The phrase "deception in heart avoids official punishment" means that when someone harbors deceit, even if they temporarily escape earthly justice, their hidden transgressions will eventually attract calamity. Those whose lifespans are diminished will find misfortune following them like a shadow.

"Good fortune departs" signifies how original blessings transform into disasters. Only virtuous conduct brings auspiciousness - once evil deeds are committed, blessings withdraw. Then "malefic stars" bring misfortune - though these aren't inherently evil stars, but rather the karmic consequences of one's own wrongdoing. People often seek shamans to avert misfortune, not realizing the fundamental solution lies in correcting their own behavior.

The text explains "exhausted calculation brings death": a lifespan is gradually reduced according to the severity of committed offenses. Today's lifespan diminishes for one transgression, tomorrow for another, until the allotted time is exhausted in death. Beyond death awaits the more terrible "Three Wretched Realms" - possible rebirth as animals, hungry ghosts, or descent into hell. Death doesn't end consequences.

The scripture mentions the "Three Platforms and Northern Dipper Divine Lords" - celestial deities (the Three Platforms comprise six stars governing human destiny; the Big Dipper represents supreme divinities) who constantly record good and evil three inches above a person's head. Virtuous people radiate brightness above their crowns, while evildoers show dimmed auras.

There are also the "Three Corpse Spirits" (also called Three Pengs: Upper Peng Ju, Middle Peng Zhi, Lower Peng Qiao). These three spirits reside within the human body. On every Gengshen Day (considered in Daoism as celestial judgment day), they ascend to heaven during sleep to report the person's misdeeds. Therefore, Daoist practitioners particularly emphasize staying awake on Gengshen Days to prevent the Three Corpses from making their accusatory reports.

家遇此日則守夜不寐然非淸心寡慾檢身克已卽何能己三尸諱之程子霄詩云不守庚申更不疑此心常與道相依帝天 已自知行止任爾三彭說是非此言誠見道者矣)月晦之日竈神亦然(此一節言人之一家動靜居處 皆有鬼神鑒察也月晦之日月盡之日也竈爲司命之神司人一家之命於人朝夕善惡無微不察每至月終輒上詣天曹奏 之最能旋轉禍福)凡人有過大則奪紀小則奪算(此一節總結上文言鬼神鑒察如是是以 大小之過皆不能掩而奪紀奪算確乎其不誣也十二年爲一紀百日爲一算經云人之受生所得之算皆紀在諸天太上勅 諸神巡行考校三日一言十日一奏百日一結若修善立功便可延年萬一造罪立見減削唐婁師德爲左驍衞郎將後遷納 言一日晨起入朝忽見星官謂曰汝曾誤殺二命罪當奪紀星光將盡矣言訖不見是日隨卽神昏不能入朝因謂侍者曰我 一生謹愼只因誤殺二命今遂早死一紀未幾卒此大過奪紀之證也宋符仲信白手起家年三十五因病入冥遇故舊數人 呼曰恩公何爲至此相與拜求一吏吏曰此人本合飢寒以好施故能起家夀本五十九以不燒香睡起遲今將削盡數人謂 此二事皆小過吏曰不燒香卽是無敬奉天地心睡起遲卽是有多淫之意豈爲小過數人相顧嘆曰厚德如符公尙以此奪
Interpretation

On every Gengshen Day (Daoism teaches that three corpse worms reside in the human body, which ascend to heaven on these days to report one's transgressions), people should stay awake throughout the night to restrain the three corpses. But if one fails to purify the heart and reduce desires, or lacks strict self-discipline, how can they truly subdue these parasites? Master Cheng Zixiao once wrote in verse: "No need to rigidly observe Gengshen nights—simply keep your heart aligned with the Dao (the Way). Heaven naturally discerns your conduct, regardless of the three corpses' (San Peng) slander." This reflects the true insight of an enlightened practitioner.

On the last day of each lunar month, the Kitchen God (a household deity overseeing family fortunes) also ascends to make his report. This illustrates how every human action is secretly monitored by divine beings. As the Director of Destinies (Siming), the Kitchen God records each household's good and evil deeds from dawn till dusk, submitting detailed accounts to the celestial court at month's end—possessing the power to transform misfortune into blessing.

For human transgressions, major offenses deduct twelve years (one ji) from one's lifespan, while minor faults reduce it by one hundred days (one suan). This occurs because spiritual auditors operate everywhere; no misdeed, great or small, can be concealed. The lifespan allotted at birth is recorded in heaven's archives, where the Most High Lord Lao (Taishang Laojun) commands deities to conduct regular evaluations: reporting every three days, submitting memorials every ten days, and conducting full assessments every hundred days. Accumulating virtue through good deeds extends longevity, whereas wickedness immediately shortens it.

During the Tang dynasty, when official Lou Shide (once Left Militant Guard Commandant) attended court one morning, an astral officer warned him: "You mistakenly took two lives, mandating a twelve-year lifespan reduction. Your destiny star now flickers out." That very day, he fell into delirium and couldn't attend court. On his deathbed, he lamented: "Though cautious all my life, merely two accidental killings cost me twelve years." In Song times, wealthy merchant Fu Zhongxin, gravely ill at thirty-five, encountered an old friend pleading for him in the underworld. A netherworld official declared: "Destined for poverty, his charitable deeds brought wealth and a lifespan of fifty-nine years. But neglecting incense offerings to deities and indulging in oversleeping have exhausted his allotted time." When the friend dismissed these as minor faults, the official countered: "Skipping incense shows disrespect to heaven and earth; excessive sleep reveals self-indulgence—how are these trivial?" Hearing this, the assembly sighed: "Even a virtuous man like Master Fu could thus have his years cut short."

算况其他乎符驚寤因自述其說以告人此小過奪算之證也)其過大小有數百事欲求長生 者先須避之(此節承上文而言過大奪紀過小奪算是過無大小皆害我者也見害不避名爲眞痴太上憫之故 特指人以避之之路數百事如篇中自非義而動以至殺龜打蛇皆其事也又因奪紀奪算之言而專及求長生者以見造命 延年之訣莫切於此其實天下無人不在過中無人不當避過若欲求長生者尤當修眞鍊性使身心淨若明珠卽纎翳微塵 亦不可有耳先須二字又啓下文千善百善之義葢未立善先須避過旣避過更須立善也)是道則進非道 則退(此一節是綱下二段是目不履邪徑以下是道之目也非義而動以下非道之目也道猶大路也坦平正直卽是道 也崎嶇邪僻卽非道也進退兩途決之於已有趨吉避凶之義趙淸獻公嘗曰吾晝之所爲夜必焚香告之於天不敢告者不 敢爲也蘇黃門書陰君之言曰晝之所爲夜必記之於紙不可記者不可爲也二公所言卽是此義)不履邪徑(小路 爲徑邪者不正也動履不正皆從心起心正則步履不期正而正矣趙抃帥蜀時有妓戴杏花公偶戲曰髻上杏花眞有幸妓 應聲曰枝頭梅子豈無媒至晚公使一老兵呼妓遲遲不至公忽厲聲呼曰趙抃不得無禮急令人召回老兵老兵乃自幕後
Interpretation

This scripture explains how practitioners of the Dao must avoid transgressions and accumulate virtuous deeds to attain longevity. It states that human faults vary in severity—major ones shorten one's lifespan (called "stealing a ji-period"), while minor ones diminish blessings ("stealing a suan-calculation"). Hundreds of such faults exist, including committing unrighteous acts or killing turtles and snakes. Those seeking extended years must first abstain from these offenses.

The text particularly emphasizes that while all people err, Dao cultivators must cultivate themselves with exceptional rigor, refining body and mind until they become like flawless pearls without the slightest blemish. Before accumulating merit, one must first eliminate faults; after avoiding transgressions, one must actively perform good deeds.

The scripture then elucidates the nature of the Dao: it resembles a broad, straight highway—following this correct path constitutes "advancement," while straying from it means "regression." Two ancient exemplars are cited: Zhao Qingxian (Zhao Bian) would daily report his conduct to Heaven, daring not to perform any act unfit for such celestial accounting; Su Huangmen (Su Zhe) recorded each day's deeds nightly, avoiding any action unworthy of documentation. These represent proper adherence to the Dao's path.

Finally, the text recounts an anecdote about Zhao Bian: while serving as an official in Shu, he once jested with a courtesan wearing apricot blossoms in her hair, who responded with wit. That evening, when sending attendants to summon her, Zhao suddenly realized his impropriety. Immediately reproaching himself—"This disrespect must not be!"—he recalled his messengers. This story illustrates how Dao cultivators must maintain constant vigilance, suppressing even the slightest improper thought the moment it arises.

出曰某實未往某事相公最久相公邪徑分毫不染知今日之事不過一時此念便息耳此將履邪徑一念能改者也陳良謨 遊學廣德本庠張掌教謂公曰歸安武大尹今秋必入簾吾引爾往拜其門塲中必當留意公唯而出私念窮通有命進不出 正識者所鄙遂托辭不往而是嵗恰中武公房内假使當時一拜則彼此俱無以自明矣此未履邪徑一念能持者也夫邪徑 二字所包極廣路頭畧差便是大錯一朝失足遺恨千古可不愼乎)不欺暗室(暗室者人所不見不聞之處也經云 人間私語天聞若雷暗室虧心神目如電孰謂暗室遂可欺乎宋黃靖國爲儀州判官一夕被攝至冥冥官曰卿在儀州有一 美事曾知之乎命吏取薄示之乃醫士聶從志某年月日在華亭楊宅行醫楊妻李氏淫奔從志從志力拒得免上帝賜聶從 志延夀一紀子孫三世登科靖國旣還說與從志從志駭曰此事妻子亦未嘗與言不意已書陰籍此不於暗室欺人色者也 蒲州楊溥父爲人忠信不欺業商淮揚一日有陝客事急回家宻以千金寄公處三年不返公將金埋花盆中植時卉於上遣 人關中訪之本商巳死止生已子公呼至以金與之其子疑不敢領公曰此汝父所寄爾何必辭其子叩謝携去後生溥爲太 師孫俊民戸部尙書曾孫元祥翰林檢討此不以暗室欺人財者也善乎王梅溪詩曰室明室暗兩奚疑方寸長存不可欺莫
Interpretation

This passage illustrates two crucial moral principles through historical anecdotes: "not treading the crooked path" and "not deceiving in dark chambers."

First, on "not treading the crooked path": There was an official who long served as an aide to the prime minister, yet never strayed onto improper paths. He understood that momentary temptations were but fleeting delusions and could promptly dismiss wicked thoughts. When Chen Liangmo was studying in Guangde, the local education official urged him to visit the incoming chief examiner (a county magistrate), promising preferential treatment in the exams. Chen maintained that poverty and success were matters of fate, and that seeking backdoor favors was beneath a true gentleman, so he declined with an excuse. As it happened, that very magistrate presided over the exams that year. Had Chen actually visited him, both parties would have struggled to prove their integrity. The text emphasizes that "crooked paths" encompass a broad meaning—even slight missteps in life can become grave faults, and a single lapse may bring eternal regret.

Next, on "not deceiving in dark chambers": A "dark chamber" refers to hidden places where no one observes. Yet scriptures state that whispered secrets thunder in heaven's ears, and wicked thoughts in darkness flash like lightning to the gods. During the Song dynasty, when Huang Jingguo served as assistant prefect of Yizhou, he was temporarily taken to the underworld. There, an underworld official showed him a merit register recording how physician Nie Congzhi had resisted the advances of Lady Li, wife of Yang—an incident Nie hadn't even told his own wife about. This secret virtue earned him twelve extra years of life and three generations of descendants passing imperial examinations.

Another story tells of Yang Pu's father from Puzhou: While trading in Yangzhou, a Shaanxi merchant urgently departing entrusted him with a thousand taels of silver in secret. After three years with no return, Yang's father buried the silver in a flowerpot and sent someone to Shaanxi, only to find the merchant had died, leaving only a son. When Yang returned the silver, the son initially dared not accept it. Later, the Yang family produced eminent officials—a Grand Preceptor, Minister of Revenue, and Hanlin Academy proofreader—manifesting the karmic reward for "not deceiving over hidden wealth."

The passage concludes with Wang Meixi's verse: Whether in light or darkness, one should harbor no doubts; with constant upright thoughts in mind, there's nothing to conceal. These stories demonstrate that people must be especially cautious in solitude, for deities watch from just overhead, and secret good deeds ultimately bring blessings.

問天高鬼神惡要須先畏自家知人能於獨知處時時檢點又何欺之與有)積德累功(存諸心曰德見諸事曰功 由少至多曰積由卑至高曰累德不積不崇功不累不大漢先主誡其子曰勿以善小而不爲此正積累之說也今人不肯行 善動云做好事那得錢使豈知積德累功自有不必用錢者乎鎭江太守葛繁嘗語人曰始予日行一利人事或二或三或數 四今四十餘年未嘗少廢問何爲利人事公指座間踏子曰且如此物置不正則䠞人足吾爲正之若人渴與之杯水皆利人 事也無論貧富皆可行惟悠久乃有益此則貧賤家所當效法者也然有力之家亦不得以此借口宜興吳頤山無子有李生 獻種子方曰方今嵗荒殆天假公以會也乃列數事一貧民錢糧兩數以下代納二輕犯追贓贖罪者代完三各城門設粥廠 四族屬姻黨貧者不時餽遺五村落窮民親自給粟六置藥療疫七掩骼八造橋九置義庄十助學田吳公欣然行之後連舉 三子此又富貴家所當效法者也大約力到處行好事力未到處常行好心勿務名勿辭難勿始勤終怠則所云一千三百善 日行一事只須四年三百善日行一事只須一年人亦何憚而不爲乎)慈心於物(慈者萬善之本誠欲積德累功 不獨愛人兼當愛物第物類至殊易多忽畧故太上於此先言之大藏經曰人不殺生得長夀報又云人家小兒頑戲凡蠅蝶
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the methods and importance of accumulating virtuous deeds (De). It begins by pointing out that to move heaven, earth, and spirits, one must first start with reverential awe toward one's own heart-mind. When alone, a person who constantly examines their conduct will harbor no self-deceptive thoughts.

The accumulation of virtuous deeds is divided into two aspects: "De" (Virtue) and "meritorious deeds." Good intentions hidden within the heart are called "De," while benevolent actions put into practice are called "meritorious deeds." Virtue should be accumulated through small acts, and good deeds should begin from humble beginnings. As Liu Bei taught his son, "Do not refrain from doing good because the deed seems small"—this precisely embodies the principle of accumulating virtuous merit.

Some people today hesitate to perform good deeds, claiming that charity requires money. In truth, many acts of kindness cost nothing. Ge Fan, a magistrate of Zhenjiang, made it his daily practice to perform several small kindnesses—such as straightening a stool blocking a pathway or offering water to the thirsty—and continued this for over forty years without fail. This demonstrates that regardless of wealth or poverty, anyone can practice goodness; what matters is perseverance.

For those with greater means, more good deeds should be undertaken. Wu Yishan of Yixing, originally childless, performed ten major acts of charity during a famine: paying taxes for the poor, redeeming petty offenders, setting up soup kitchens, aiding relatives and friends, personally distributing grain to the destitute, providing medicine to the sick, burying the dead, repairing bridges, establishing charitable estates, and funding schools. Later, he was blessed with three sons. This shows that wealthy families in particular should practice generosity.

The principles of virtuous action are: do as much good as one's capacity allows, and maintain a benevolent heart when resources are insufficient; avoid seeking empty fame, fear no hardship, and persist to the end. By this measure, performing one good deed daily would accumulate 1,300 merits in four years; three daily deeds would complete 300 merits in a single year. Seen this way, how difficult is it to do good?

Finally, it emphasizes that compassion is the root of all goodness—one should love not only people but all living beings. Buddhist scriptures state that refraining from killing brings blessings of longevity. The text particularly reminds us that when children harm insects in play, adults must stop them promptly to nurture their compassion.

鳥雀之類切宜禁戒非惟傷生且熾其殺心長大不知仁恕又云人於行住坐卧間見一切眾生投身死地當方便救護使得 生全又經云燈燭熖上別有微細眾生吞食其光人氣一吹隨吹卽死故諸佛戒人勿以口氣吹滅燈燭又云水中有微細蟲 人不能見須以囊濾水方可飮諸聖於微細物命切切護念如此况飛走之大者乎昔陶隱君已獲道要不得上昇託桓闓訪 之三日桓君來吿曰君所修本草以䖟蟲水蛭爲藥功雖及人而害及物命以此淹留耳隱君復以草木可代物命者另著本 草三卷行世遂得仙去噫隱君以救人之故而傷害物命尙且不免有過今人害物命而恣饜口腹視此又何如耶)忠孝 (履茲土者人孰無君具此身者人皆有親無君無親是與禽獸等矣故立善多端莫先忠孝卽成仙證佛亦何嘗不根基於此 東鄕司命曰人雖有應仙格當登仙品然必多厯年所始得漸進惟大忠大孝今日謝世明日便補仙階釋家則曰皇王水土 不敢忘也又謂人不先供養父母而有施者是名惡人孰謂二氏之學爲不談忠孝者耶然所謂忠孝者惟在隨分自盡不必 犯難死節然後爲忠不必割股割肝然後爲孝居官有居官之忠士庶亦有士庶之忠富貴有富貴之孝貧賤亦有貧賤之孝 此中義類不可勝舉卽古來賢喆芳規亦難槩述姑引一二以見大凡李善南陽李元家奴也元家染疫盡死止遺一孫名續
Interpretation

This scripture expounds two fundamental principles: reverence for life and the primacy of loyalty and filial piety.

Regarding reverence for life, several examples are given: even small creatures like birds should not be harmed, as killing not only creates karmic consequences but also fosters cruelty in human nature. In daily life, whenever encountering any living being in danger, one should make every effort to help. Even the tiniest creatures near candle flames can perish from a human breath—thus practitioners are cautioned against blowing out candles with their mouths. Water contains microscopic organisms invisible to the naked eye, so it must be filtered through cloth before drinking. Even Tao Hongjing (Master Tao the Recluse), an accomplished Daoist adept, nearly failed to ascend to immortality because his Materia Medica (Bencao) included leeches and horseflies as medicinal ingredients, harming living beings. Only after substituting herbs did he achieve transcendence. This illustrates how harming life obstructs spiritual cultivation.

Concerning loyalty and filial piety, the text emphasizes these as the foundation of human virtue. Both Buddhist and Daoist traditions uphold them—those who embody great loyalty and filial piety may immediately join the ranks of immortals after death. Such virtues need not manifest in grand gestures: officials and commoners each fulfill loyalty differently; the wealthy and the poor express filial piety in their own ways. For instance, Li Shan, though a servant of the Li Yuan household, protected the family’s sole surviving heir, Li Xu, during a plague that wiped out the clan—an example of ordinary loyalty.

The text specifically clarifies that Buddhist and Daoist practice does not neglect loyalty and filial piety; rather, these are its very basis. True loyalty and filial piety lie not in outward forms but in wholeheartedly fulfilling one’s duties.

未滿週嵗諸奴咸欲謀殺分其財產善乃潛負續入山中親自哺養推燥居濕備嘗辛勤續雖孩稚奉之不異長君每出入間 必跪吿乃行至十餘嵗出山吿縣令鍾離意意捕諸奴悉殺之後朝廷聞之拜善及續俱爲太子舍人復遷善爲日南太守道 經南陽至元塜一里外卽脫朝服衣故衣持鋤去草拜墓哭甚哀自執爨以祀曰主君夫人善在此數日乃去以厮養之卒尙 知盡忠如此彼居官食祿儼然稱縉紳先生者又可自恕乎楊一武進圩橋人也行乞養父母所得食雖極餓不敢嘗必先以 奉親有酒則跪進跳躍起舞唱山歌以悅之如是者十年鄕人感其孝與之金僱爲傭不受曰吾親烏可一日離也父母相繼 死乞得棺脫已衣殮之己嚴寒赤身弗恤葬於野卽露㝛棺旁日夜哀號嵗時拜獻未嘗缺失以乞丏之義尙知孝親如此彼 舊家子弟力量少能自給者又可自恕乎)友悌(兄愛弟曰友弟敬兄曰悌兄弟之生情同手足卽有繼有庶其原止是一 人薄待兄弟便是薄待父母矣禮曰父母之所愛亦愛之眞知重父母者固未有薄待兄弟者也吳興富翁莫氏老年私一婢 有娠懼其嫗姤遂遣嫁一賣羹者已而生男甫十嵗翁遂死里中羣小指爲奇貨因語其婢曰汝子孰不知莫氏子其家產應 有分胡不歸取之不聽則訟之耳因作一孝服被其子使往且戒曰至靈前拜畢亟出我輩俟汝至屋旁卽吿官其子如其教
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories illustrating loyalty, filial piety, benevolence, and righteousness.

The first story tells of Shan (a person's name) protecting his young master Xu (another person's name). At the time, Xu was less than a year old, and the household servants plotted to kill him and divide the family property. Shan secretly carried Xu on his back and fled into the mountains, raising him personally. He gave the dry spots to the child while sleeping in damp places himself, enduring great hardship. Though young, Xu treated Shan with the respect due an elder, kneeling and asking for permission before going out. Over a decade later, they emerged from the mountains and reported the matter to the authorities. The county magistrate Zhongli Yi executed the treacherous servants. When the imperial court learned of this, both Shan and Xu were appointed as Palace Attendants (a government position), and later Shan was promoted to Governor of Rinan. When passing through Nanyang, Shan deliberately changed into old clothes to pay respects at his former master’s grave, personally preparing offerings and weeping mournfully.

The second story recounts the filial deeds of the beggar Yang Yiwu. He begged to support his parents, always feeding them first even when starving himself. If he obtained wine, he would kneel to offer it, singing and dancing to cheer them, persisting in this way for ten years. After his parents died, he begged for coffins and used his own clothes to shroud them, disregarding his own shivering from cold. Once buried, he kept vigil day and night, wailing sorrowfully and never neglecting timely sacrifices.

The third story discusses the proper way for brothers to treat one another. It emphasizes that brothers are like limbs—neglecting them is neglecting one’s parents. Quoting the Book of Rites, it states: "What parents love, children must also love." Truly filial people never mistreat their brothers.

Finally, a negative example is given: A wealthy man from Wuxing, surnamed Mo, had an affair with a maidservant and fathered a child. When the boy was ten, the man died. Villagers incited the child to claim the family fortune, teaching him to dress in mourning clothes, kneel before the coffin, and then sue for inheritance—revealing the treachery of human greed.

These stories collectively demonstrate that even servants and beggars can fulfill loyalty and filial duty, so those who hold office and enjoy privilege should hold themselves to higher standards. Brothers should live in harmony, while the passage also exposes the disgrace of those who forsake righteousness for profit.

入其家哭且拜家内駭然嫗罵欲逐之莫長子亟前曰不可遂抱持問曰汝非賣羹子乎曰然遂引拜其母曰此汝母吾乃長兄汝當拜遍指家人曰此爲汝長嫂此爲次兄次嫂當拜又指云此爲汝長姪此爲次姪汝當受拜拜畢曰汝當在此執喪勿 去卽命櫛沐去故衣易新衣使與諸兄弟同寢處又呼其生母至許以月廩嵗衣羣小俟久不出計遂大阻夫此子一敦友愛 内全先人之體外息羣小之禍不可爲分別異母者勸乎然世亦有同胞共乳而兄弟往往參商者揆厥所由匪止一端而爭 較財物尤其最著不知財物易求兄弟難得朋友相洽尙通有無何况兄弟昔趙彥霄兄彥雲好遊生業廢半彥霄諫不聽遂 求析箸五年而兄蕩費已盡除夕彥霄置酒語兄曰弟初無分爨意以兄不節敬爲兄守先業之半亦足以供朝夕請歸仍主 家政卽取分劵焚之付以筦鑰更出所蓄償諸負者次年彥霄與長子俱鄉薦登第今人重財物輕手足其食報亦可知已法 昭禪師偈曰同氣連枝各自榮些些言語莫傷情一回相見一回老能得幾時爲弟兄兄弟同居忍便安莫因毫末起爭端眼 前生子又兄弟畱與兒孫作樣看此語最堪感悟)正已化人(表正影直已正人化不能化人是已未正耳自不 履斜徑至此皆屬正已自此至與人不追悔皆屬化人化人亦正已中事也陳白沙嘗舟行遇盜盡劫財物白沙居舟尾呼曰
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories about brotherly affection and moral exhortations, which I will explain section by section:

A stranger suddenly burst into a household, weeping and prostrating himself, alarming the entire family. When the elderly matriarch tried to drive him away, the eldest son quickly intervened. Embracing the man, he asked, "Aren't you the child from that family who used to sell soup?" After confirming his identity, the eldest son presented him to their mother, saying, "She is your birth mother, and I am your eldest brother." He then had the man pay respects to each family member: "This is your elder sister-in-law, these are your second elder brother and his wife, and these are your nephews." After the greetings, the eldest son instructed him to stay for mourning rites, arranged for his bathing and change of clothes, had him live with the other brothers, and even brought his birth mother to be cared for. Through this sincere display of brotherly love, the eldest son preserved the family lineage while preventing potential discord.

Yet in this world, some blood brothers from the same parents become like strangers—mostly due to property disputes. People should understand that wealth can be easily regained, but brotherly affection is hard to come by. Even friends practice mutual aid—how much more should flesh-and-blood siblings?

The narrative then tells of Zhao Yanxiao: his elder brother Zhao Yanyun squandered the family fortune. When repeated admonitions failed, Yanxiao chose to divide the household. Five years later, when his brother went bankrupt, Yanxiao hosted a New Year's Eve banquet, declaring: "I never wanted to divide our family—I was merely preserving half our ancestral estate for you." He burned the division contract on the spot, returned management of the property to his brother, and even used his personal savings to settle his brother's debts. The following year, both Yanxiao and his eldest son passed the imperial examinations. Contrast this with modern people who value wealth over kinship—their karmic retribution is predictable.

Chan Master Fazhao left this instructive gatha: "Branches from the same root grow separately—don't let trivial matters wound your bond. Each meeting means one less encounter—how long can you remain brothers? Practice patience in fraternal relations—don't quarrel over minor matters. We were brothers in past lives too—set an example for future generations." These words are profoundly thought-provoking.

Regarding the principle of "rectifying oneself to transform others": only by being upright can one influence people. Like shadows following forms, how can the crooked straighten others? From refusing to take shortcuts when walking—all such acts cultivate the self. Transforming others is likewise part of self-cultivation. When scholar Chen Baisha encountered pirates during a boat journey, he called out from the stern...

我有行李在此可取去盜問爲誰答曰我陳獻章盜訝曰小人無知驚動君子舟中之人卽公友也忍取其財乎悉還而去海 陵王心齋從陽明先生講學以良知爲宗一日盜至其家公亦與之講良知羣盜譁曰如吾輩者良知安在公曰汝試去衣良 知便露羣盜因去衣惟一褲相顧不去公曰此卽良知所在也汝不去此是有恥心此心本有謂之良知因爲之反覆曉喩羣 盜感悟而去夫人之難化莫如盜而兩公俱能格其非心豈非正已人自化耶苟不知正已專務化人雖至親豈能相信)矜 孤恤寡(孤兒寡婦世之窮而無吿者我能矜之恤之是以補天地生成之不逮矣閬州陳喩言已度世爲眞武部下判 官一日隨眞武下降忽聞哭聲俯聽乃其妻也因懇眞君求通音信允令寫書差直符送下書中示其妻以始末且囑曰撫育 諸孤保守門戸噫嘻已得度世者繫念尙爾况未得度世者耶是矜孤恤寡不但植厚德於人間兼可慰幽魂於地下此處關 係陰騭更是不小)敬老(老者閱世久更事多衮衮少年無限淪喪龎眉皓首獨保康强可不敬乎語云敬老得老四字 實有至理昔楊億以弱冠中殿元與周翰朱昻同在禁掖時二公皆老楊輕侮之翰曰君莫侮我老老亦終留與君昻摇手曰 莫與莫與恐後人侮之億果方壯而卒○抑聞老吾老因以及人之老垂白在堂不知尊禮而泛云敬老秖成悖德無怪乎逆
Interpretation

Here are two stories about transforming thieves through moral influence. The first tells of Chen Xianzhang (a Ming Dynasty philosopher) encountering thieves who recognized him as a virtuous man and voluntarily returned his belongings before leaving. The second describes how Wang Xinzhai (a disciple of Wang Yangming) used the doctrine of "innate moral knowledge" (liangzhi) to enlighten thieves: he instructed them to remove their clothes layer by layer until they refused to take off their final undergarments. Wang pointed out this refusal itself demonstrated liangzhi—the innate human sense of shame. The thieves, awakened by this realization, departed repentant.

The text then discusses the principle of "showing compassion to orphans and widows"—the most helpless members of society. Helping them compensates for what Heaven and Earth might overlook in nurturing all beings. An example is given of Chen Yu from Langzhou: after attaining immortality and becoming Judge under the Perfected Warrior Emperor (Zhenwu), he heard his mortal wife's weeping and obtained permission to appear in her dream, instructing her to raise their children well. This illustrates that even immortals care for their families—how much more should ordinary people cherish orphans and widows? Such actions accumulate earthly virtue (De) while comforting departed souls.

Regarding "respecting the elderly": elders possess hard-won wisdom, and while the young often die prematurely, the aged attain longevity—both reasons to honor them. As the proverb wisely states: "Those who respect age will attain old age." The text cites the Song Dynasty's Yang Yi, who achieved early success but scorned elder statesmen like Zhou Han and Zhu Ang. Zhou warned him against disrespecting the aged, while Zhu predicted future generations would mock him—prophecies fulfilled when Yang died young. The passage concludes: those who fail to honor their own elders while preaching filial piety invite karmic retribution through their hypocrisy.

These stories collectively demonstrate: to transform others, one must first rectify oneself. When the unvirtuous attempt to teach virtue, even close relatives will distrust them.

子頑孫踵踵相繼也原穀有祖年老父母厭其苛察命穀作一輿送祖至別室穀泣諫不聽隨收輿歸父曰爾焉用此曰留此 以待父老耳父感悟卽迎祖歸養卒成孝子此事雖奇可以爲鑒)懷幼(幼者位卑力弱苟挾長憑陵則彼無利口辨是 非又無强力較勝負可憫孰甚故吾之幼宜加意撫惜人之幼亦宜撫惜之也昔楊翥官宫僚出入止乘一驢隣翁老而得子 恐家驢驚之遂賣驢徒行懷幼如楊公者尙何分人我耶由此推廣字養之仁益無窮盡葉夢得云子在許昌嵗大水流殍無 數奏發常平賑濟活十餘萬人惟遺棄小兒無法救之偶問左右無子者何不收養曰願子者固有頗患嵗豐人長而父母來 認耳因爲設法凡因災傷遺棄小兒父母不得復子當其棄置時恩義已絶收之爲恩更多遂作空劵數千印給内外凡得兒 者自言所從來明於劵畧爲籍記使以時上數收多者賞且分常平餘粟量給貧者爲貲事定稽劵凡三千八百人此亦臨民 者所當知也又云兵興以來有伏匿林莽者多因兒啼聞聲遂得其處不免被害於是避賊者率棄嬰兒不顧有教爲綿毬置 兒口中畧使滿口而不閉氣少蓄甘草末繫時量水漬使咀其味兒口中有此自不作聲綿軟又不傷口因鏤板以揭道上已 酉冬賊自江西犯饒信居民空城去而嬰兒得全活者甚多此又遇變者所當知也○遺棄嬰兒不獨災傷時有之卽太平豐
Interpretation

This scripture conveys the principles of filial piety and caring for the young through several historical anecdotes.

The first story tells of Yuan Gu's filial devotion: When Yuan Gu's aging grandfather became difficult to handle, his parents ordered him to build a litter to abandon the old man. Unable to dissuade them through tearful pleas, Yuan Gu kept the litter. Asked by his father why he preserved it, he replied, "For when you grow old." Struck by this response, the father immediately brought the grandfather home, eventually becoming a filial son himself. Though peculiar, this story offers valuable lessons.

The second account describes the benevolence of Yang Zhu, a Ming dynasty official who normally rode only a donkey. When elderly neighbors had a late-life child, fearing his donkey might frighten the infant, he sold the animal and walked instead. This demonstrates care for the young that transcends personal boundaries.

Ye Mengde, a Song dynasty official stationed in Xuchang during a major famine, opened granaries to save over 100,000 lives. Noticing many abandoned children went unadopted because rescuers feared biological parents might later reclaim them, Ye instituted an "empty deed" system: adopters could register permanent custody, severing original parental ties. This ultimately saved 3,800 infants.

Another method preserved babies during wartime: stuffing cotton in infants' mouths (while maintaining breathing space) with licorice powder to chew. This prevented crying that might reveal their location while keeping them unharmed—a technique that saved many children during conflicts.

The scripture concludes by observing that child abandonment occurs not only in disasters but also peaceful times, reminding people to consistently protect the vulnerable. These stories collectively embody the Daoist values of filial devotion and universal compassion.

年亦然葢貧家不能舉子多置路傍或厭兒女繁者甘心棄置甚有私胎分娩者溺死盆中其爲慘毒更甚邇有揚州居民蔡 璉建立育嬰社募眾協舉爲利甚溥其法以四人共養一嬰每人月出銀一錢五分遇路遺子女收至社所有貧婦領乳者月 給工食銀六錢每逢月望驗兒給銀考其肥瘠以定賞罰三年爲滿待人哺養此法不獨恤幼又兼賑貧免一時溺嬰之慘興 四方好善之心世間功德莫此爲盛凡城邑村鎭皆可倣此行之爲官司者循此勸導各方利濟更易宏也時陳曼仙致政家 居爲之刋定社規極精極詳名之曰育嬰編)昆蟲草木猶不可傷(前言慈心於物意已盡矣此二語啟 下文愛人之意葢言昆蟲物之至微者也草木物之無情者也存心愛物者猶且不忍傷之况於人乎)宜憫人之 凶(宜字直貫下十六句乃承上二語而言也凶者凶惡之凶何龍圖曰凡人惡之初作只緣一念之差未必不可勸禁惡之 旣熾猶有一念之明未必不可救解但世每拒絶如仇而渠亦趨死如鶩彼固不肖我亦非賢故邵子曰聞人之惡如負芒刺 愛人猶己者自如此矣周文襄公忱閱一死獄欲活之無由反覆不安形於愁嘆使吏抱成案讀之至數萬言背手立聽至一 處忽點首曰幸有此可生乃出其罪此眞能憫人之凶者)樂人之善(人發善願天聞若雷諸佛護念上眞主持奈何
Interpretation

The passage presents two key themes: the benevolent practice of rescuing abandoned infants, and the principle of compassionate treatment toward all beings.

In Yangzhou, a resident named Cai Lian established an organization called the "Infant Nurturing Society" dedicated to caring for abandoned children. Their method involved four sponsors jointly supporting one foundling, with each contributor donating one qian and five fen of silver monthly. When abandoned infants were discovered on roadsides, they were brought to the society where impoverished wet nurses were employed, receiving six qian monthly. On the fifteenth of each month, the infants' health was examined, with rewards or penalties given based on weight gain, continuing for three-year cycles. This system not only saved children but also provided livelihoods for poor women, preventing tragic infanticide. After retirement, Chen Manxian further developed detailed "Infant Nurturing Regulations" as a model for other regions.

The latter section expounds the philosophy of universal compassion. If even insects and plants—the smallest forms of life—should not be harmed, how much more should humans be treated with mercy? Even wrongdoers deserve pity, for they may simply be temporarily misguided. The text cites the example of Duke Wenxiang of Zhou reviewing capital cases: he meticulously examined legal documents until finding grounds for clemency, demonstrating true compassion toward offenders. When witnessing others' good deeds, one should rejoice, knowing virtuous acts receive celestial protection.

世人妄行嫉妬假使妬不行彼之善自若也卽使妬行而彼之善愈高矣徒壞心術於已何利苟能樂善不獨誘掖奬勸善自 我成者爲吾善也卽彼之善已成吾能播揚之推引之使有善者固而堅信無善者亦聞而興起此便是無量功德矣誰謂善 之在人於我無與哉昔范文正公卜居錢氏園林陰陽家謂此地當踵生公卿公曰吾家獨貴孰若使吳中之士咸教育於此 遂奏以其地爲學宫此眞能樂人之善者)濟人之急(人之急不止一端疾病則醫藥急死喪則殯葬急饑乏則衣食 急如此之類不可悉數但當各隨其急濟之宋鄧元發知鄆州時淮南京東大饑元發慮流殍日聚必且蒸爲疫癘先相度城 外空地召諭宦家富室使出力爲蓆舍一夕之内成二千五百餘間井竈器用無一不具民至如家遇疾卽治全活五萬人後 爲龍圖閣學士年八十五無疾而終張彥明善醫貧者不受錢或反周之富者以錢求藥不問多寡必多與藥人有請者必速 往不計遠近嘗雪夜赴人延請家人止之曰彼病人輾轉牀榻可緩須臾乎一夕城中火起周迴燒盡其居獨存後子孫俱貴 顯濟人疾病之急者鑒此劉岑守維揚有故人子以父未葬爲請詰以所費幾何子厯厯具陳岑曰且留相伴密使幹吏齎金 往辦之兩月吏回使與說曰喪已舉矣子可速歸岑語人曰此子氣太爽得錢必不以親爲重不若留此而畢其事先友之志
Interpretation

People often commit wrongdoings out of jealousy. Yet even if you envy others, their virtuous deeds remain unchanged; the more you resent them, the more their goodness shines. This jealousy only corrupts your own character—what benefit does it bring you?

If instead you rejoice in others' good deeds—not merely encouraging, guiding, and rewarding those who do good—but truly understanding that when others accomplish virtuous acts, their merits become your merits too; when their goodness is achieved, you can help spread it, strengthening the resolve of the virtuous and inspiring others to follow their example—this is immeasurable merit. Who says others' good deeds have nothing to do with you?

Consider Fan Zhongyan (Duke Wenzheng of Fan) when selecting his residence. A feng shui master told him the Qian family garden would produce high-ranking officials for generations. Fan replied, "Rather than my family alone enjoying prosperity, why not let all scholars of Wu region receive education here?" He petitioned to convert the land into an academy. This is the mark of one who truly delights in others' virtue.

Relieving others' urgent needs (济人之急) takes many forms: medicine for the sick, burial for the deceased, food and clothing for the hungry and cold—such crises are countless, and the key lies in offering aid according to circumstance. When Deng Yuanfa served as prefect of Yunzhou during the great famine in Huainan and Jingdong, he foresaw that refugee gatherings would breed plague. He prepared makeshift shelters on empty land outside the city, mobilizing the wealthy to contribute. Overnight, 2,500 shelters were built, complete with wells, stoves, and utensils. Refugees settled as if returning home, receiving immediate medical care—50,000 lives were saved. Later, he rose to Academician of the Dragon Diagram Pavilion and died peacefully at eighty-five.

Physician Zhang Yanming, a master healer, treated the poor for free and even paid their expenses, while charging the wealthy without haggling, always giving extra herbs. When summoned, he departed instantly regardless of distance. Once, his family tried stopping him from a snowy night visit. He said, "How can I delay while the patient suffers?" Later, when fire razed the city, his home alone stood untouched, and his descendants achieved prominence. Such is the karmic reward for relieving medical emergencies.

As governor of Weiyang, Liu Cen was approached by an old friend's son who lacked funds to bury his father. After detailing the costs, Liu said, "Stay with me awhile," while secretly sending an aide with money to arrange the funeral. Two months later, when the aide returned, Liu told the young man, "All is settled—you may go home." He explained: "This youth was impulsive; had I given him money directly, he might not have prioritized the burial. Better to keep him here while I fulfilled my late friend's wish."

酬矣浮梁甯崇禮常造棺襯施人享夀至八十没後託夢與家人曰我生平多做屋定與人濟人之急坐此積累陰功慶流子 孫可說與十四郎明年必發解自此接續登科者不絶十四郎名謙光次年果發解自此無虛榜濟人死喪之急者鑒此范忠 宣知慶州嵗大饑公請發倉賑濟郡官皆曰須奏乃可公曰人不食七日則死奏豈能及乎諸君但勿憂有罪吾當自坐卽日 發倉賑之揚州興化韓樂吾家素貧適嵗饑典質俱盡一日正餘米二升五合有同社友絶糧欲分半以贈妻曰如明日何樂 吾曰吾等是明日死彼却是今日死遂分贈之濟人饑乏之急者鑒此)救人之危(元帝垂訓曰凡人在顚沛患難 之中善用一言解救上資祖考下廕兒孫又曰推人與扶人都是一般手陷人與讚人都是一般口甯使扶人手莫開陷人口 若能依此言前程永固久又雲笈七籖曰危難中救人一命延年一紀救是善人又當倍之衢州范元之貧士也一日盛暑浴 於江岸傍拾遺金一袋歸語其子曰世人以財命爲往往殉財以死匿之不忍明日乃携金待於岸果見一婦悲號前來詰其 故言夫久繫獄旦夕將死昨鬻產謀出夫罪急遽亡此夫其休矣元之驗實而還之次年父子俱登第此以還遺救人之危者 也徽商王志仁三十無子相者謂其十月必有大難王素神其言因急往蘇州歛貲歸旅寓中晚步見一婦投水王急取二十
Interpretation

The Story of Ning Chongli: This benevolent man from Fuliang County (present-day Jingdezhen, Jiangxi) often made coffins to give to the poor. When he passed away at eighty, he appeared in his family's dream saying: "Throughout my life, I frequently made coffins to help others in urgent need. These accumulated hidden virtues (Yinde) will bring blessings to my descendants." He specifically mentioned that the fourteenth son (referring to Fan Qiangguang) would surely pass the imperial examinations the following year. Indeed, Fan Qiangguang succeeded the next year, and from then on, the family produced a continuous line of successful examination candidates. This exemplifies the karmic reward for aiding others in funeral emergencies.

While serving as prefect of Qingzhou, Fan Zhongyan encountered a severe famine and requested opening the granaries to relieve the victims. Subordinate officials insisted they must first petition the court, but Fan replied: "People starve to death after seven days without food—how can we wait for an official reply? Don’t worry, gentlemen; I’ll take full responsibility." He opened the granaries that very day. Han Lewu of Xinghua, Yangzhou, lived in poverty and pawned belongings to survive the famine. One day, with only two and a half liters of rice left at home, he learned his neighbor had run out of food and wanted to share half. His wife asked, "What will we do tomorrow?" Han answered: "We might starve tomorrow, but our friend will starve today." In the end, he gave the rice away. These cases illustrate the merit of relieving others’ hunger crises.

The teachings of the Celestial Worthy of Primordial Beginning (Yuanshi Tianzun) state: When aiding others in peril with kind words, such virtuous deeds glorify one’s ancestors above and bless descendants below. It further says: The same hand that pushes someone down can lift them up; the same mouth that slanders can praise. Better be a lifting hand than a harming mouth. Those who follow these teachings will surely have a stable future. According to the Seven Bamboo Tablets of the Cloudy Satchel (Yunji Qiqian), saving a life in peril extends one’s lifespan by twelve years—doubled if the rescued is virtuous.

Fan Yuanzhi, an impoverished scholar from Quzhou, found a bag of gold while bathing by the river. Returning home, he told his son: "People often risk lives for wealth—how could I keep this?" The next day, he waited by the riverbank and encountered a weeping woman. Upon inquiry, he learned her husband faced execution after she lost the money raised by selling their property to pay his ransom. After verifying her story, Fan returned the gold. The following year, both he and his son passed the imperial exams—a karmic reward for his integrity and lifesaving act.

Wang Zhiren, a childless thirty-year-old merchant from Huizhou, was warned by a fortune-teller of impending disaster in October. Taking this seriously, he hurried to Suzhou to collect debts. During an evening stroll, he saw a woman attempting suicide by drowning and immediately offered twenty taels of silver to save her. The woman had been driven to despair after money from her husband’s pig sale was stolen. That night, Wang’s lodging collapsed, but he survived unharmed—later fathering eleven sons and living to ninety-six. This mirrors the Tract of Actions and Retributions (Ganying Pian)’s teaching: "Saving others from peril" brings visible karmic rewards.

金呼漁舟救之問其故婦曰夫傭工度日畜一豕將抵租昨賣之不意皆假金也夫歸箠楚且無聊生耳王倍價周之婦歸告 其夫夫不信偕婦至王寓質焉王已闔門寢婦叩門呼曰投水婦來謝王厲聲曰汝少婦我孤客昏夜豈宜相見婦曰吾夫亦 在此王乃披衣起纔啟門牆忽傾倒卧榻已壓碎矣夫婦驚嘆而去王歸復遇相者駭曰子滿面陰德不獨免難抑且獲福後 生三子兩登科第此以已財救人之危者也廬陵周必大監臨府和劑局局内失火火犯當死公問吏曰假若火起自官當得 何罪吏曰削籍爲民必大遂自誣伏坐失官吏免死後必大復中詞科官至宰相封益國公此以已位救人之危者也吳獻臣 與羅玘同在太學玘僕染疫死玘亦染疫獻臣爲煮粥負之登厠晝夜十數次玘病痊同登進士此以已身救人之危者也感 應種種累牘難盡又有最奇者高郵張百戸往淮安返舟湖堤望一小舟浮沉波上有人居舟背呼救張憐而急出白金十兩 呼漁舟救之至則其子也正德年七月海溢沿海居民皆漂没少定見一女子手扶一笥浮沉而來將抵岸一人利其笥遂沉 此女及發笥見一庚帖乃其所聘妻也夫救人而適救其子殺人而適殺其妻天道之報施亦巧矣哉)見人之得 如己之得見人之失如己之失(世人忌得幸失只緣此心不平抑思人所得豈分諸我而有忌
Interpretation

This passage recounts several true stories illustrating the principle of karmic retribution:

A merchant named Wang encountered a woman about to drown herself in a river. Upon inquiry, she explained her husband worked odd jobs to make ends meet and had raised a pig to pay rent. After selling it, she'd received counterfeit silver. Certain her husband would beat her to death upon returning, she preferred suicide. Merchant Wang bought the fake silver at double its value. When the woman told her husband, he disbelieved and dragged her to Wang's house to confront him. Wang had already retired for the night when they knocked. The woman called out her thanks, but Wang sternly replied, "You're a young woman and I'm a bachelor—how could we meet at this hour?" She explained her husband was present. Just as Wang donned his robe and opened the door, the wall collapsed—directly onto his bed. The astonished couple departed. Later, a physiognomist noticed Wang's face bore special "virtue lines" (yinde wen) indicating not only survival from disaster but future blessings. Indeed, Wang later fathered three sons, two of whom became imperial scholars. This exemplifies rescuing others through wealth.

When Zhou Bida supervised Lin'an Prefecture's medicinal bureau in Luling (modern Ji'an, Jiangxi), a fire broke out. According to law, the night watchman faced execution. Zhou asked subordinates, "What punishment would an official face for causing such a fire?" They answered, "Dismissal from office." Zhou voluntarily accepted responsibility, sparing the watchman's life. Later, Zhou passed the imperial examinations, rose to become prime minister, and was ennobled as Duke of Yi. This demonstrates saving lives through official position.

During their studies at the Imperial Academy, Wu Xianchen cared for his plague-stricken classmate Luo Qi after Luo's servant died from the disease. Wu personally cooked congee, carried Luo to the latrine, and tended to him day and night through dozens of crises. After Luo recovered, both men passed the imperial examinations together. This shows rescuing others through personal sacrifice.

Such responsive phenomena are too numerous to record—some even more remarkable: Gaoyou commander Zhang Baihu, returning from Huaian, saw a sinking boat on the lake and urgently paid ten taels to hire fishermen for rescue—only to discover the saved boy was his own son. During the Zhengde reign, a tsunami swept a woman clinging to a bamboo chest toward shore. A greedy man, coveting the chest, pushed her underwater—then opened it to find his own betrothal contract inside. The rescuer coincidentally saved his own child; the wrongdoer unwittingly harmed his future wife—how exquisitely precise is Heaven's retribution!

The scripture's conclusion reveals the key principle: Rejoice in others' gains as your own; grieve their losses as your own. Ordinary people often envy others' gains and delight in their misfortunes—all from unbalanced hearts. In truth, what others obtain was never yours to begin with—why envy?

心人所失何益於我而有快心總之自生煩惱徒增罪孼耳建德王本立嘗云某爲諸生時於嵗考後適有分守某行縣諸生 謁見間言及考事惟問案首姓名幫補進學人數而止餘不問焉越數日分巡某繼至亦言及考事惟問黜退停降人數而止 餘不問焉諸生私訝曰二公發問相反如此吾曹誌之觀二公去後祿位何如未幾分守公官至戸部侍郎子繼登第分巡公 陞陝西副使遇安化王作亂腰斬之吁豈一問間遂能致禍福哉言者心之聲而行之表也存心仁厚則一言一行依乎厚焉 存心刻薄則一言一行依乎薄焉君子以厚德載物彼殘忍刻薄之人豈享福之器哉然則見人之得如有所失見人之失如 有所得者皆殘忍刻薄之人也)不彰人短(人處塵勞不能無短苟或彰之則彼之名從此敗而素守亦從此隳矣是 以韓魏公爲相每見文字有攻人隱惡者必手自封記不使人見文待詔徵明不喜聞人過有談及者必巧以他語更之先輩 用心之厚今古同轍如此又如羅狀元父循會試寓京失去罽褐同舍生不自安訪得之紿循訪其人比至舉褐示循循急趨 出語生曰我失褐初無損彼得惡名尙可爲士乎生始謝服又如王狀元華居官時人以他人事誣之或勸之辯白曰此吾同 年友事若白之是我詰友也竟不辯後新建官京師聞士論猶爲此事紛紛新建欲具疏奏辯公馳書止之曰汝以此事爲父
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates important principles for human conduct through several historical anecdotes:

During the Ming Dynasty, Prince Jiande Benli once recounted an incident where two local officials—the Defense Commissioner and the Surveillance Commissioner—interviewed scholars in markedly different ways. The Defense Commissioner only inquired about outstanding students and supplemental admissions, while the Surveillance Commissioner exclusively asked about those who had failed or been demoted. Later, the Defense Commissioner rose to become Vice Minister of Revenue (equivalent to Deputy Finance Minister), and his son passed the imperial examinations. The Surveillance Commissioner, however, was executed by waist-cutting during a rebellion after being promoted to Vice Commissioner of Shaanxi. This wasn’t because their questions directly caused fortune or misfortune, but because their inquiries reflected two contrasting mindsets: benevolent individuals naturally speak and act with kindness, while harsh individuals inevitably behave with cruelty.

The text then cites positive examples: Han Qi (Duke Wei) of the Song Dynasty, when serving as prime minister, would seal any memorials that exposed others’ private affairs; Wen Zhengming (Scholar Wen) of the Ming Dynasty would tactfully change the subject whenever he heard someone discussing another’s faults. Two particularly exemplary cases follow: Luo Xun, father of the Zhuangyuan (top imperial examinee) Luo Hongxian, discovered a classmate stealing his blanket but not only refrained from exposing the thief but also deliberately avoided the situation. Wang Hua, another Zhuangyuan, chose to endure false accusations implicating him in a colleague’s legal case without defending himself, and later prevented his son from clearing his name.

These stories collectively demonstrate that taking pleasure in others’ failures or resenting their successes stems from a petty and unkind disposition. Truly virtuous individuals understand the principle of "not exposing others’ shortcomings," because revealing faults can destroy reputations and corrupt minds. The magnanimous character displayed by ancient sages in treating others with kindness remains worthy of emulation today.

恥倘攻發吾友反爲吾一大恥遂止噫此二公者一則寧失己物不形人醜一則寧損己名不揚人過豈不更超出尋常萬萬 乎)不衒己長(人有所長定有所短胡可衒露且一念自矜卽此已是短處矣是以歐陽修長於文章對客多談政 事不及文章蔡襄長於政事對客每談文章不及政事二公皆善居其長者也每見年少英露之士眼前併無一切到底只是 平常甚有困頓湮鬱而死者豈非福量淺薄自無受享之地乎昔李泌七嵗能文嘗賦一長歌見志聞者莫不嘆賞張九齡戒 之曰君早得美名必有所折宜自韜晦歌詩只可賞咏風景豈得自揚乎泌感悟泣謝從此不復自衒遂爲一代名相)遏 惡揚善(惡者易橫勢如燎原則阻遏之使其改行善者易微機如伏火則表揚之以成其美黃仲昭爲吏部文選汲汲 以人才爲慮嘗曰國家需才如農之積粟今士大夫矯激沽名以閉門謝客爲高天下人才何由知之故公每客至輒延見詢 訪有所得必書於册雖小官亦不敢忽此遏一人卽以遏萬人揚一人卽以揚萬人之法也劉夢震曰人嘗謂激濁揚淸是非 太明亦足召禍此不盡然宜遏則遏宜揚則揚此爲順天之命安可一意姑息昔王賀爲御史逐捕羣盜多所縱捨自謂子孫 必食厚報後果貴盛無比至於王莽乃竟族滅此何以故葢捕盜而縱盜必有不當縱而縱者不當縱而縱則如放虎驅蛇害
Interpretation

This passage expounds two crucial principles for conducting oneself in the world: not flaunting one's strengths, and restraining evil while promoting goodness.

First, the principle of "not flaunting one's strengths": every person has both merits and shortcomings, and deliberately showcasing one's strengths is itself a shortcoming. The text provides two examples: Ouyang Xiu excelled at writing, yet when conversing with guests would discuss governance rather than literature; Cai Xiang was versed in statecraft, yet often talked about poetry rather than political affairs with visitors. Both understood the wisdom of concealing their advantages. The author laments how contemporary youths often relish flaunting their brilliance—what appears as distinction is actually mediocrity, with some even ending in lifelong destitution due to this tendency, all stemming from shallow blessings and ignorance of restraint. The Tang Dynasty child prodigy Li Bi could compose poetry at seven; when receiving widespread praise, Chancellor Zhang Jiuling warned him that premature fame would diminish one's blessings, and that poetry should celebrate landscapes rather than boast of oneself. Moved to tears, Li Bi thereafter refrained from ostentation and ultimately became a renowned statesman.

Regarding "restraining evil and promoting goodness": evil spreads like wildfire and must be promptly checked to reform offenders, while goodness resembles a feeble flame requiring encouragement to grow. Ming Dynasty official Huang Zhongzhao, while serving in the Ministry of Personnel, particularly emphasized discovering talent. He remarked that a nation's need for capable individuals resembles farmers' need to store grain—if scholars all secluded themselves pursuing empty fame, how could genuine talent be found? Thus he engaged earnestly with every visitor, recording promising individuals in his register without neglecting minor officials. Restraining one evildoer prevents ten thousand crimes; commending one virtuous act inspires myriad good deeds. Some fear that distinguishing right from wrong may invite misfortune, but the author maintains we must restrain what requires restraint and praise what deserves praise, for this aligns with the Dao of Heaven. The passage concludes with the contrasting story of Han Dynasty's Wang He: as censor he tolerated bandits, believing it would accumulate blessings for his descendants. While his lineage indeed achieved prominence, it produced the usurper Wang Mang who brought familial ruin—illustrating how indulging the unworthy resembles releasing a tiger back to the mountains, breeding endless calamity.

人不少人旣受害豈得無報夢震此言的是至論)推多取少(人生窮富天已註定今日取多豈遂爲多今日取少 豈遂爲少究竟能喫虧者未嘗不是討便宜處也昔薛包與諸弟分財異居田廬取荒頓者曰吾少時所理也奴婢取其老者 曰與我共事久爾不能用也器物取其朽敗者曰吾素所服食身口所安也後諸弟屢破其產包復賑之張士選幼寄養於叔 叔有七子一日叔謂選曰吾與汝析箸產分爲二選曰不忍諸兄弟止共一分可分爲八彼此固讓卒如選言選年十七預薦 入京一術士謂之曰此少年乃有滿面陰德必登高第及揭榜果然然推多取少不獨兄弟世人皆然不獨財產凡事皆宜然 也)受辱不怨(凡人辱我定非無因但思我有可辱何怨於彼我無可辱彼自妄耳我又何怨昔呂文穆公初爲相 有朝士於簾内指而譏之同列欲詰其姓名公曰若一知姓名便恐不能忘不如不知富文忠公少時有罵之者公若罔聞或 吿之公曰恐罵他人曰明呼公名公曰恐同姓名者其人聞之大慙二公所謂量大福亦大者也長洲尤翁開典鋪嵗終有人 白手來取質物司典者不允遂大聲罵詈翁徐諭之曰我知汝意不過爲過新年計耳此小事何以爭爲命檢原質得衣帷四 五事翁指絮衣曰此禦寒不可少又指道袍曰與汝爲拜年用他物非所急自可留也其人嘿然而去是夜竟死於他家涉訟
Interpretation

This passage elucidates two essential principles for navigating human relationships: "yielding abundance while taking little" and "enduring humiliation without resentment."

The principle of "yielding abundance while taking little" teaches the virtue of deference in interpersonal conduct. The text cites two exemplary cases: Xue Bao, when dividing family property, deliberately chose the poorest fields, dilapidated houses, elderly servants, and worn-out utensils, later frequently assisting his bankrupt brothers; Zhang Shixuan insisted on dividing his uncle's estate into eight equal shares rather than claiming half, and subsequently achieved top honors in imperial examinations. These examples demonstrate that those willing to accept apparent disadvantages are actually accumulating De (Virtue/Power), which ultimately brings favorable retribution. This wisdom applies not only to property division but should permeate all aspects of human conduct.

Regarding "enduring humiliation without resentment," the text advocates maintaining magnanimity when facing insults. Prime Minister Lü Mengzheng ignored malicious gossip about him; young Fu Bi pretended not to hear when verbally abused. Their broad-mindedness later brought them great blessings. Merchant You Weng, when confronted by an unreasonable customer at his pawnshop, not only remained unangered but gifted the man clothing—thereby avoiding litigation. These cases collectively illustrate that when encountering humiliation, one should first examine whether any fault truly lies with oneself. If blameless, there is even less reason to engage, as such forbearance often dissolves conflicts and averts misfortune.

Both principles instruct people to "repay resentment with De (Virtue/Power)" and maintain generous-heartedness. This approach not only accumulates hidden virtue (yin De) but prevents unnecessary troubles.

經年葢此人因負債多已服毒知尤翁可詐故來此旣不獲則移於他家耳翁因語人曰凡非理相干其中必有所恃小不忍 則禍立至矣古人云忍字敵災星人若不能忍未有能受辱者故佛法以忍辱爲第一)受寵若驚(寵榮寵也一切 名位利祿皆是世間禍福相倚事難預料人於受寵時或有盛滿之念卽此便有禍機盧多遜初拜叅政其父愀然曰吾家世 儒素一旦富貴至此未知所終矣多遜不念父言竟以事敗种放初爲上召聲名大振其母言曰吾勸汝勿求名今果爲人知 不得安處矣放不思母言竟以名敗然則受人之寵遂可恃乎故儒者以愛我爲美疢佛氏以恭敬供養爲軟賊三教聖人其 言如出一口)施恩不求報(梁武帝問達摩祖師曰朕一生施捨有功德否師曰無功德葢有心求報卽非功德 也經云求報故施名不淨施若求報施名爲施者商賈之人亦可爲施是故萬萬不宜求報也北魏李士謙好施值嵗荒出粟 千石貸鄕人明年又荒人無以償公卽對眾焚券明年大熟人爭償之不受明年又大荒公復施粥賑濟全活萬餘或曰子陰 德大矣公曰陰德猶耳鳴人無知者今子已知何爲陰德後謙夀百嵗子孫皆顯官宜興邵靈甫積穀數千石嵗大饑或勸之 出糶公曰是圖利也或勸之賑粥公曰是好名也乃盡發所積雇傭除道自縣至湖四十里復浚蠡河橫塘水道八十餘里又
Interpretation

This passage conveys several principles for personal conduct:

The first principle concerns the importance of "forbearance" (ren). There was a debtor who tried to extort Elder You. The wise elder taught people that whenever someone makes unreasonable demands, there must be ulterior motives behind it. If one cannot restrain momentary anger, disaster will swiftly follow. Ancient sages said the character for "forbearance" (忍) can dispel calamity—those who cannot endure humiliation will struggle to bear disgrace. Thus Buddhism considers patient endurance (renru) as paramount spiritual practice.

The second principle explains "being overwhelmed by favor" (shouchongruojing). Here "favor" refers to fame, wealth and status. Since worldly fortunes are unpredictable, arrogance during prosperity plants seeds of future misfortune. Two examples illustrate this: When Lu Duoxun attained high office, his scholar-father worried, "Our family has been scholarly for generations—such sudden wealth makes me fear the consequences." When Chong Fang gained imperial favor and fame, his mother warned, "I advised against pursuing reputation—now that you're known, you'll find no peace." Both ignored these warnings and ultimately fell due to their attachments. Thus Confucianism considers excessive concern for others' approval a flaw, while Buddhism compares craving reverence and offerings to "soft thieves" (gentle traps)—showing how the Three Teachings' wisdom converges.

The third principle teaches "giving without seeking reward." When Emperor Wu of Liang asked Bodhidharma about merit from his lifelong almsgiving, the patriarch replied there was none—because seeking repayment voids true virtue. Scriptures call reward-seeking charity "impure giving," akin to mercantile exchange. Two positive examples follow: During famine, Northern Wei's Li Shiqian lent grain to villagers; when disaster struck again, he publicly burned the promissory notes. Later while distributing porridge to save lives, others praised his accumulated "hidden virtue" (yinde), but he responded, "True hidden virtue should be like tinnitus—known only to oneself." Another example is Yixing's Shao Lingfu, who during famine neither sought profit nor fame, but used stored grain to employ workers in building roads and canals—truly benefiting the people.

通罨畫溪入震澤邑人爭受役皆賴全活而水陸又均得利後靈甫夀九十餘子孫相繼登第如此二公眞施恩不求報者究 竟我不求報報亦未嘗不得語云恩雖亂施有不期而自會怨不可結恐窄路之遭逢洵確論也)與人不追悔 (惡事追悔之則將來惡事漸止善事追悔之則將來善念不生以物與人而更追悔非惟墮厥初心且塞將來善念也范文正 公子純仁嘗往江東收租麥五百斛舟載以歸道遇石曼卿自言三喪未葬當世無可謀者堯夫悉以麥舟付之單騎抵家見 父文正公曰江東曾見故人否堯夫曰石曼卿爲三喪未葬久滯丹陽文正曰何不以麥舟付之堯夫曰付之矣文公聞而大 喜此不惟不悔且以爲快聖賢德器過人豈不遠乎明正德間江西舒翁遠館湖廣嵗底歸里路逢一婦哭甚哀問之答曰夫 欠官銀十三兩有零賣吾以償吾去則兒失哺必死故悲耳翁爲惻然曰吾同舟皆江西塾師各出一兩足完汝事矣返告皆 不應翁遂盡捐束修與之未至家百里糧盡眾凑銀買米翁無有人爭非之中有憐而食之者翁亦不敢飽及至家呼妻曰吾 飢二日矣速炊飯婦曰無米翁曰借之隣家妻曰借已多專候汝歸償之翁告之捐金之故妻曰如此則吾有家常飯可同飽 也遂往山中採苦菜和根煮爛同食一飽旣寢忽聞窗外有神呼曰今宵食苦菜明年產狀元此甘受飢餒而不悔者後生子
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories about accumulating virtue through good deeds, illustrating the principle of "doing good without seeking reward."

The first story describes how when Tongyan Creek was channeled into Zhenze (the ancient name for Lake Tai), the local people all benefited from the water conservancy project. The official who oversaw the project later lived past ninety, and his descendants all achieved scholarly honors. This shows that those who genuinely do good may not seek rewards, but blessings naturally follow. As the saying goes: kindness given unintentionally may bring unexpected returns, while enmity should be avoided, for paths will inevitably cross again.

The second story tells of Fan Chunren (courtesy name Yaofu), son of the renowned statesman Fan Zhongyan (posthumously titled Duke Wenzheng), who used his boatload of wheat to help his friend Shi Manqing bury family members. After giving away the entire shipment, Fan Chunren returned home empty-handed. When Fan Zhongyan heard this, he was delighted, considering it the right action. This demonstrates how the magnanimity of sages far surpasses ordinary people.

The third story occurred during the Zhengde era of the Ming Dynasty. Elder Shu from Jiangxi, while teaching in Huguang, encountered on his year-end journey home a weeping woman whose husband owed official silver and was about to be sold. Shu gave her all his savings—thirteen taels of silver from his teaching wages—leaving himself without food for two days. Upon returning, the couple could only dig bitter herbs to eat, yet his wife voiced no complaints. That night, a divine voice outside their window prophesied: "Eating bitter herbs tonight, next year bears a top scholar." They indeed later had a son who became the top imperial examinee. This illustrates how those willingly enduring hardship without regretting their good deeds ultimately receive blessings.

These stories collectively elucidate the Daoist concept of karma: sincere virtue requires no calculation of immediate gain or loss, as heaven naturally bestows corresponding blessings. They also remind us that good deeds must stem from genuine intent—regret afterward can obstruct future virtuous inclinations.

芬果狀元及第)所謂善人(自此至神仙可冀爲一節言積善受福厯厯不爽如此也此言能行上文所言善事卽爲 善人)人皆敬之(人心本善見眞實善人未有不敬者古昔芳踪難以盡述姑以近代一二言之王恕爲吏部尙書罷 歸天下縉紳過三原者必屏呵從走謁劉大夏爲兵部尙書居家時值朝廷調士兵討流㓂所在擄掠至華容見公悉羅拜曰 大人鄕里安敢犯陳獻章新會人嶺南有遊國學者北士必問曾遊白沙先生門否因以之爲輕重文徵明居吳四方入貢者 造之不得見必望其居遙拜而去嗚呼王劉二公功業在世宜人皆敬之白沙衡山不過一書生耳而爲人敬慕若此豈非善 心感發自然而然者歟)天道祐之(古云天道無親常與善人葢善人行善與天心合故天祐之也昔劉器之疏劾 章惇貶竄嶺外諺云春循梅新與死爲隣高竇雷化說着便怕凡此八州公厯其七人謂必死公未嘗一日病時有一貲郎揣 知惇意求殺公爲效惇卽擢爲本路運判其人飛騎將至去公所僅二十里至夜半忽聞運判暴死矣此之謂天道祐之)福 祿隨之(隨之謂不求而自得也善氣所感福氣順應自然之理卽如醫官甄百里本一庸人然能用心治人病不厭煩 苦一日上不豫或薦之一服果愈於是寵冠宮禁數月之間積金至二萬餘是福祿非不求而自得者乎)眾邪遠之
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the blessings that naturally arise from accumulating virtue (De) through good deeds, a principle that is profoundly clear. Those who can practice the various virtuous acts mentioned earlier are truly good people. Such individuals naturally command respect from others—because human nature is fundamentally good, and no one fails to revere a genuinely virtuous person.

For example, after Wang Shu of the Ming Dynasty retired from his position as Minister of Personnel, officials passing through his hometown of Sanyuan would visit him in modest attire. Similarly, when Liu Daxia served as Minister of War, his hometown of Huarong County was threatened by rogue soldiers. Yet upon seeing him, the soldiers knelt and said, "This is Minister Liu’s homeland—how could we dare to harm it?" Even Chen Xianzhang (styled Baisha), though merely a scholar, was so revered that when students from Lingnan traveled to the capital, northern scholars would ask if they had been taught by Master Baisha. Wen Zhengming (styled Hengshan), while residing in Wu, was so respected that envoys who failed to meet him would bow toward his residence from afar. The admiration these virtuous individuals received stemmed from the natural influence of their goodness.

The Dao of Heaven also protects the virtuous. As the ancients said, "The Dao of Heaven shows no favoritism, yet it always sides with the good," because the actions of virtuous people align with the will of Heaven. For instance, during the Song Dynasty, Liu Qizhi was exiled to Lingnan for impeaching the corrupt official Zhang Dun. At the time, a saying described the region’s harsh conditions: "Chun, Xun, Mei, and Xin—neighbors of death; Gao, Dou, Lei, and Hua—just hearing their names brings fear." Yet Liu Qizhi traveled through seven of these prefectures unharmed. A subordinate seeking to curry favor with Zhang Dun attempted to kill Liu but suddenly died just twenty li away—a clear sign of Heaven’s protection.

Fortune and prosperity also follow the virtuous naturally, without forced pursuit. Take the case of an ordinary physician named Zhen Baili, who diligently treated patients without complaint. By chance, he cured the emperor’s illness and within months amassed great wealth. This exemplifies how virtuous actions naturally attract blessings. When one cultivates goodness, all malevolent forces instinctively withdraw.

(邪正不兩立譬日照冰山日固自如冰當自解所謂遠也昔景淸爲人正直赴舉過湻化邸有女爲妖所纒淸入妖遂不至淸 去妖復來女詰之曰避景秀才女以告父父追景語之爲書景淸在此四字粘於戸妖遂絶心正可以治邪信然)神靈 衞之(神靈隨處皆有所敬者道德所興者忠厚所契者正直所取者陰德果係善人神靈無不衞也昔管甯自遼東歸渡 海遇暴風惟自反以一日科頭三晨晏起爲罪已而他船皆沒惟甯州自若時夜晦瞑舟人莫知所泊遠望有火光趨之得島 島無居人又無火燭人皆以爲神光燭之也嘉靖壬戌年興化被冦止忠孝世德三家保全先是世德之家失去珠環婢恐懼 逃匿城隍廟夜聞元女至城隍問曰興化城將破奈何答曰天數也那可救吾來專欲保全三家耳一忠一孝一世德俄喚婢 出諭曰環係猪誤吞此其小者汝家有世德速告主人宜遠避婢歸殺猪果得環遂全家避賊後賊入城亦戒勿入忠孝兩家) 所作必成(人事旣合天心則天意豈違人願善人凡所作爲無有不成者天與之也梅公儀知滑州夜報河決勢甚 危險公督兵夫隨處堤塞正窘急間見白鬚老人載一舟⬤稈往來助力天明老人忽不見水勢遂平竟有成功歙縣余永甯 祖販木爲業一日邑中議建石橋估費四千金余立意獨任而貲本適止四千又已市木在山因往彼急賣歸而舉事及至彼
Interpretation

Integrity and wickedness are like the sun and an iceberg that cannot coexist—when sunlight shines upon them, the sun remains unchanged while the iceberg naturally melts away. This illustrates the principle that "evil cannot prevail over righteousness."

There was once a man named Jing Qing, a scholar of upright character. While traveling to the capital for the imperial examinations, he stayed at the Chunhua post station, where he encountered a woman plagued by a malevolent spirit. The moment Jing Qing took up residence, the spirit dared not approach. Yet when he departed, the haunting resumed. When the woman questioned the spirit, it replied, "I must avoid Scholar Jing." Upon hearing this, her father sought out Jing Qing and explained the situation. Jing Qing simply wrote the words "Jing Qing is here" and posted them on the door—thereafter, the spirit never returned. This demonstrates how a mind grounded in integrity can indeed suppress malign forces.

Divine beings protect those who walk the path of righteousness (The spirits are omnipresent—they revere those with virtue, aid the loyal and sincere, affirm the upright, and safeguard those who accumulate hidden merit. All who embody true goodness receive their guardianship). During the Three Kingdoms period, Guan Ning was returning from Liaodong by sea when a violent storm arose. Reflecting on his conduct, he realized he had only two faults: going bareheaded one day and rising late on three occasions. While other ships foundered in the tempest, his vessel alone remained unharmed. That night, amid pitch darkness, the crew spotted distant firelight and steered toward it, only to find an uninhabited island devoid of any actual flames—all recognized this as divine guidance.

In the Jiajing era of the Ming dynasty, when Xinghua City was attacked by Japanese pirates, only three households were spared: those of a loyal official, a filial son, and a family with accumulated virtue. Earlier, this virtuous household had lost a pair of pearl earrings. Their maidservant, fearful of punishment, hid in the City God Temple, where at midnight she overheard the Mysterious Maiden of the Nine Heavens ask the City God: "What shall be done when Xinghua falls?" The deity replied: "This is heaven's decree—beyond remedy. Yet I come specifically to preserve three households: the loyal, the filial, and the virtuous." The goddess then summoned the maid, revealing: "Your earrings were accidentally swallowed by a pig—this is trivial. Your family's generations of accumulated merit demand you warn your masters to flee." Upon returning home, they slaughtered the pig and recovered the jewels, escaping just before the pirates arrived—who themselves avoided harming the loyal and filial households.

Deeds aligned with heaven's will inevitably succeed (When human affairs accord with celestial intent, providence fulfills mortal wishes. The virtuous meet no failure in their endeavors, for heaven lends its aid). When Magistrate Mei Gongyi governed Huazhou, the Yellow River's dike ruptured at night. Leading the emergency repairs himself, he was miraculously assisted by an aged man with white whiskers who ferried bundles of reeds to plug the breach. At dawn, the old man vanished and the floodwaters receded, completing the successful repair.

Yu Yongning's grandfather from She County once resolved to single-handedly fund the construction of a stone bridge requiring four thousand taels of silver—precisely the sum he possessed from his timber business. Having already purchased mountain timber for this sum, he rushed to sell it. Upon reaching the market, timber prices suddenly surged, and the sale yielded exactly the required amount for the bridge.

木價騰湧獲利數倍橋工旣成其本如故所作必成大都如此)神僊可冀(鍾離曰仙之求人甚於人之求仙純陽亦 云天涯到處人求我走遍天涯不見人孰以神仙之道爲𣺌茫不可冀者乎求之聞見最著者如子房之忠吳猛之孝蘭期之 友愛兄弟王惟賢之不失婦節劉翊之損己分人趙素臺之濟窮恤死許眞君之行符施水嚴君平之以善導人周伯持之收 瘞遺骸李五郎之不欺斗斛陳安世之不殺物命李奚子之拯濟飢禽唐若山之性無忿怒景相之酷好放生皆自積功累行 以至登仙若使人人積功累行豈不人人可望登仙乎)欲求天仙者當立一千三百善欲 求地仙者當立三百善(此一節總結上文深明作善爲修眞之本也功行滿足超居洞天名曰天仙煉 形住世長生不死名曰地仙立積也一千三百亦刻期成功之意孫眞人曰養成自性雖絶藥餌可保延年若德行不充雖玉 液金丹亦自無益斯言可爲修仙一大印證)苟或非義而動背理而行(自此至殺龜打蛇皆承前 文其過大小有數百事而來此二句先統言之以下然後條分縷晰示人儆戒夫一念有差謬已千里非義背理豈在大乎) 以惡爲能(惡如用刁用勢之類以爲能者自負爲手段也眼前做得行則揚揚得計究竟自作自受未曾討得些子
Interpretation

When lumber prices soared, some reaped multiple profits, yet when the bridges were built, the costs remained unchanged—such opportunistic schemes often meet this very end. In truth, attaining immortality is not beyond reach. Zhongli Quan (one of the Eight Immortals) once said that celestial beings seek worthy disciples more urgently than mortals seek the Dao. Lü Dongbin also lamented how people search everywhere for immortals yet neglect self-cultivation. History records many who achieved immortality through accumulating virtue: Zhang Liang (Zifang) was renowned for loyalty, Wu Meng for filial piety, Lan Qi for brotherly love, Wang Weixian for upholding womanly virtue, Liu Yi for selfless aid, Zhao Sutai for relieving the poor, Xu Xun (the True Lord) for using talismans (fulu) to control floods, Yan Junping for guiding others toward goodness, Zhou Bochi for burying nameless bones, Li Wulang for fair trade, Chen Anshi for sparing living creatures, Li Xizi for feeding starving birds, Tang Ruoshan for never harboring anger, and Jing Xiang for his passion for releasing captive animals—all ascended to immortality through persistent good deeds. If everyone could accumulate merit this way, why worry about failing to attain immortality?

To pursue the highest rank of celestial immortality (tianxian), one must complete 1,300 virtuous acts; for earthly immortality (dixian, longevity in the mortal realm), 300 suffice. This passage emphasizes that virtuous deeds are the foundation of cultivation: those whose merit is complete ascend to the celestial grottoes as tianxian, while those whose physical form endures become dixian. The term "establish" (立) refers to sustained accumulation, and "1,300" sets a clear goal. The Medicine King Sun Simiao once said: "Cultivating one’s nature can prolong life even without elixirs, but if virtue is lacking, even divine pills will prove useless." These words reveal the essence of immortality cultivation.

Should someone act contrary to heavenly principles (as detailed later—killing turtles, beating snakes, and hundreds of other transgressions fall under this category), these lines first summarize the harm. Wrongdoing often begins with subtle thoughts—how can violations of righteousness and principle be measured by scale? Worse still are those who pride themselves on wickedness (such as wielding cunning tactics), briefly reveling in their cleverness, only to ultimately reap what they sow, gaining not the slightest advantage.

便宜安見爲能陳良謨曰正德巳卯余北上至漷縣正家渡同泊數舟皆吾輩也俄聞舟人與土人毆捽至乃余家僮余薄責 家僮諭遣土人去坐中同年某者新喩人忽怒罵曰咄爾何人敢集多人上我官船行刼反誣我舟人毆爾耶縛而撻之其人 叩頭哀乞乃叱去在坐者皆嘖嘖稱其才能某亦揚揚自爲得意語余曰兄何迂哉今之爲官者才能智畧耳人心天理四字 用不着矣余撫然不答其人後爲紹興推官惟憑胸臆肆虐百姓竟以考察謫爲⬤陽縣丞疽發背洞胸而死無子今其家且 狼籍不忍聞矣吁人心天理詎可置乎哉)忍作殘害(殘害指殺生害命而言人之所以不作殘害者恃有此不忍之 一念也一有忍心則無所不爲矣閩將吳某新鑄一劎甚利禱於黎山廟曰某願以此劎手戮千人其夕夢神謂曰人不可發 惡願吾祐汝使汝不死於他人手後果以此劎自刎夫閩將止是空願而不免以身受報所以然者惡其忍也至如微軀物命 亦當時存不忍心不宜殘害王愈忿鵲噪生斷其舌後竟死於舌瘡張霖忿蛙鳴沃以𤍠灰後忽死於湯爛周昂惡燕雛呢喃 飼以蒺藜後生三子皆啞果報昭昭眞可謂如影隨形)陰賊良善(陰賊謂之陰謀賊害也陰謀爲害比之暗箭傷 人其心最慘不可施之庸流况可施之良善良善之人在朝廷則爲國之楨在鄕黨則爲民之望苟陰賊之必爲天地所不容
Interpretation

During the Zhengde era of the Ming dynasty, a man named Chen Liangmo recorded this incident: In the year Jǐmǎo of Zhengde (1519), while traveling north, I passed by the Zheng Family Ferry in Huoxian County. Several boats were moored by the riverbank, all carrying fellow provincial graduates. Suddenly, I heard boatmen fighting with locals, only to discover my own servant had provoked the conflict. After briefly disciplining the servant and dispersing the locals, a fellow graduate from Xinyu on the same boat suddenly flew into a rage, shouting: "Who do you think you are, daring to board my official vessel with your men to rob us?" He then had the man tied up and flogged. Only after repeated kowtows and pleas was the offender driven away. Those present praised his competence, and he smugly told me: "You're too pedantic, old friend! Nowadays, officialdom requires strategy and cunning—things like 'human conscience' and 'heavenly principle' are utterly useless." I remained silent. Later, this man became the judicial officer of Shaoxing, where he tyrannized the people until demoted to deputy magistrate of ⬤yang. He eventually died from a festering boil that pierced his chest, leaving no heirs and reducing his household to such ruin that it pained others to hear of it. Alas, how can one disregard human conscience and heavenly principle?

The account continues with the matter of harming living creatures. What prevents humans from evil deeds is solely that spark of compassion in their hearts. Once cruelty takes root, nothing remains forbidden. A Fujianese military officer once forged a sharp sword and vowed at Lishan Temple to kill a thousand men with it. That night, a deity appeared in his dream saying: "Men should not make wicked vows. I shall ensure you die by no hand but your own." Later, he indeed took his own life with that very sword. If this officer suffered retribution merely for an empty vow, how much more severe must be the consequences for actual bloodshed?

Several examples of immediate karmic retribution follow: Wang Yu, annoyed by magpies' noise, cut out their tongues—later dying from tongue ulcers; Zhang Lin scalded croaking frogs with hot ashes—only to be boiled alive; Zhou Ang, disturbed by fledgling swallows' chirping, fed them thorns—and subsequently fathered three mute children. These repercussions follow like shadows, never missing their mark.

Finally, the text addresses secretly harming virtuous people. Good individuals form the nation's pillars and community exemplars. To plot against them with hidden schemes is more vicious than striking with concealed arrows. Such perpetrators invariably find no quarter between heaven and earth.

矣故莊子曰爲不善於顯者人得而誅之爲不善於幽者鬼得而誅之近時衙門吏胥砌欵單買窩訪下邪火送匿揭種種陰 謀爲害不少而徒恃佞佛齋僧銷除罪業豈知庇奸黨惡佛必不爲賊人未已終當自賊天道好還理自不爽也)暗侮 君親(君親恩同天地此身皆君親所有所恃以報恩者惟此心也可暗侮乎暗侮君者非是違背乎君凡隱忍規避先私 後公此心不可與君知卽暗侮君也暗侮親者非是忤逆其親凡虛文粉飾奉養不誠此心不可以對親卽暗侮親也萬石君 石奮每遇賜食於家必稽首俯伏而食如在上前尹和靖將赴經筵必沐浴端拱以明日所講書置案上朝衣再拜此非不暗 侮君者乎顧悌得父書拜跪讀之每句應諾或聞父疾則臨書垂泣語便哽咽郭琮事孀母三十年不茹葷酒朝夕虔禱暗祈 母夀母得夀一百四嵗此非不暗侮親者乎推之劉璡夜聞兄呼下牀著衣立然後應且不暗侮其兄矣米芾將書柬於友至 頓首字必叩首者三是又不暗侮其友矣大抵暗侮二字無有是處旣可暗侮卽可顯悖太上不言顯悖而言暗侮亦嚴矣哉) 慢其先生(人生於三事之如一是先生之尊與君親等也不可暗侮君親又可慢先生乎正統間祭酒李時勉忤王 振被囚國學前太學生石大用具疏請代謁銀臺銀臺懼之以法石曰死生以義何懼之有疏入䝉詔並釋此直救之危難敢
Interpretation

Zhuangzi said: "Those who commit evil in the open will be punished by men; those who commit evil in secret will be punished by spirits." Today, corrupt officials fabricate charges, bribe informants, secretly frame innocent people, and file anonymous accusations—these underhanded schemes cause immense harm. Some believe that chanting Buddhist sutras and maintaining vegetarian diets can absolve their sins, yet fail to realize that shielding wickedness will never earn Buddha's protection. Those who do evil will ultimately reap what they sow, for the Dao's cycles never fail to deliver retribution.

To secretly deceive one's ruler or parents (The kindness of rulers and parents is as vast as heaven and earth—everything we have comes from them. The only way to repay this debt is with sincere devotion. How could one deceive them in secret? Deceiving a ruler isn't limited to open defiance—any duplicity, feigned compliance, or abuse of power that one dares not reveal constitutes deception. Deceiving parents isn't limited to outright disobedience—any superficial filial piety with hidden insincerity that one cannot face openly is deception). Consider the exemplary conduct of Shi Fen, Marquis of Wanshi, who would kneel in reverence when receiving imperial gifts at home as if standing before the emperor himself; or Yin Tun of the Hejing Academy, who would bathe, change into ceremonial robes, and arrange the scriptures with utmost care before lecturing to the emperor—these are true models of undeceiving loyalty. Gu Ti would kneel while reading his father's letters, responding respectfully to each line, weeping openly upon learning of his father's illness. Guo Cong served his widowed mother for thirty years, abstaining from meat and wine while praying day and night for her longevity—she lived to 104. These exemplify true filial piety without deception. Extending this principle: Liu Jin would rise from bed, dress properly, and stand attentively before answering his elder brother's nighttime summons—this is how one doesn't deceive siblings. The calligrapher Mi Fu would physically kowtow three times whenever writing "I bow my head" in letters to friends—this is how one doesn't deceive companions. In essence, the phrase "secret disrespect" should never apply to any circumstance—what can be hidden in darkness may eventually break into open defiance. The Supreme Venerable Sovereign (Taishang Laojun) didn't say "open rebellion" but specifically warned against "secret disrespect"—a stern admonition indeed.

To neglect one's teachers (In human life, ruler, parents, and teachers deserve equal reverence—a teacher's status equals that of sovereign and progenitor). During the Ming Zhengtong reign, Imperial Academy Chancellor Li Shimian was imprisoned after offending the eunuch Wang Zhen. His former student Shi Dayong petitioned to suffer punishment in his teacher's stead. When officials threatened him with prosecution, Shi declared: "What fear should one have in dying for righteousness?" The emperor ultimately pardoned both. This exemplifies the courage to rescue one's teacher in times of peril.

慢之居平耶宋彭汝礪少師倪天隱及官保信卽迎天隱於齋閣猶執弟子禮甚恭天隱死母猶未葬明年妻亦死公爲葬其 三喪嫁其女於同年進士宋渙此直敬之没後忍慢之生前耶○陳成卿曰古人十年以長則兄事之年長以倍則父事之凡 長於我者卽謂之先生俱不可慢)叛其所事(僚屬之於官長卒伍之於主帥僕妾之於家主皆所事也叛不必背 逆凡緩急不相倚利害不相䘏皆是趙延嗣事制誥舍人江陵幾江死止遺三女家甚貧延嗣竭力養之十餘年未嘗識女面 及三女長乃至京訪舍人舊交翰林宋白侍郎楊徽之大哭道其所以二人驚謝曰汝之所爲吾儕不及也於是合迎三女至 京擇名士嫁之延嗣不以存亡易心誠可爲義僕矣舉此一條庶幾出於僕之上者知所愧慕焉)誑諸無識(誑者 言語虛詐之謂無識之人正當隨事曉諭豈可欺誑以無爲有以非爲是使之迷誤楞嚴經云眩惑無識疑誤眾生死後當墮 入無間地獄彼世之誑妄者習久成慣豈復畏罪如僧人則挾談空而誑方士則挾丹藥而誑師巫則挾鬼神而誑醫卜則各 挾其術而誑不知作妄時已久爲鬼神伺察矣昔白岑遇異人授發背方療疾甚驗有驛吏欲傳其方普行救濟與數十金岑 以假方授之以之治疾不效後岑爲虎所食遺一小囊於道上吏過而得之内乃發背眞方也此可爲醫士誑人者戒亦可爲
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories and principles concerning proper conduct, loyalty, and integrity in human relationships.

The first story describes the reverential attitude of Northern Song official Peng Ruli (courtesy name Shaoshi) toward his teacher Ni Tianyin. Even after attaining high office, Peng welcomed his teacher into his home, maintaining the utmost respect as a disciple. After the teacher's passing, Peng arranged funeral matters for the teacher's mother and wife, and married the teacher's daughter to fellow imperial graduate Song Huan. This illustrates that respect for teachers should remain constant, not changing after their death.

The second story exemplifies loyalty of subordinates to superiors and servants to masters. It recounts how Zhao Yansi, after his master Jiangling's death, devotedly raised the master's three daughters for over a decade without ever seeing their faces. Later, he escorted the girls to the capital and entrusted them to his master's old friends Song Bai and Yang Huizhi, who were so moved they found them good marriages. This demonstrates how one should remain loyal and trustworthy, not altering one's devotion after a master's passing.

The third story warns against deceiving the ignorant. When dealing with those lacking knowledge, one should patiently instruct rather than mislead with falsehoods. Quoting the Śūraṅgama Sūra, it states that deceiving the ignorant leads to hell. The example of Bai Cen is given: after obtaining a secret recipe for treating back sores, he deliberately gave a fake version to a courier official, only to be eaten by a tiger himself while the true recipe remained on the roadside. This cautions medical practitioners and other specialists against exploiting their knowledge to deceive others.

The text also mentions ancient customs: treating those ten years older as elder brothers, those twenty years older as fathers, and addressing all elders respectfully as "xiānshēng" without any discourtesy. These stories collectively embody traditional virtues of honoring teachers and the Dao, maintaining loyalty and trustworthiness, and never deceiving the ignorant.

一切誑人者戒)謗諸同學(同學之友情同兄弟面當責善心存回護若妄加謗毁是小人也昔郭尙書贄初作賦有 名同學李勉忌之飛布謗語後贄竟登第及再知貢舉勉方以明經充選詔下之日勉甚愧悔然則謗之而終不能掩其長謗 亦何損于人乎三山蘇大璋治易有名戊午鄕試夢中第十一名偶與同經友言之友訢於郡謂其與考官有約及塡榜十一 名果習易者郡守携狀徧示考官因抽一備卷更之旣折號則自備卷而中式者大璋也由中式而改爲備卷者訢狀之人也 然則謗人而適以自阻其進謗亦何益於己乎)虛誣詐僞(漫無根據曰虛妄有污衊曰誣詭計䝉人曰詐矯情欺世 曰僞合而言之皆不誠也此輩縱能欺人一時久必敗露丁謂平生無眞實語自謂人莫能測乃世共目之爲五鬼豈非枉用 機心乎藥山曰欲識餓鬼道卽今之多虛少實令人不信者是陽世陰府俱惡虛僞如此)攻訐宗親(宗親謂本族一 脉相延自當親厚少有猜嫌卽肆攻訐薄德甚矣且宗親不肖辱及祖先我攻訐之卽是攻訐我祖也豈非大逆昔范文正公 有言吾宗族甚眾於吾雖有親疎然自吾祖視之均是子孫且自祖宗來積德百餘年始發於吾若獨享富貴不卹宗族他日 何以見先人於地下今日何顏入家廟乎故其恩例俸賜必均及族中又於姑蘇買良田數百畝爲義庄於族之貧乏者每人
Interpretation

Deception is a vice that must be strictly abstained from. Slandering fellow practitioners (referring to Daoist companions who share bonds as close as brothers) is truly the behavior of petty individuals. Outwardly, one should mutually encourage virtuous conduct, while inwardly maintaining a protective mindset. To engage in reckless slander is the mark of a base character. Consider the example of Guo Zhi, a Tang Dynasty minister who gained early fame for his poetic compositions. His classmate Li Mian, consumed by jealousy, spread malicious rumors everywhere. Later when Guo Zhi passed the imperial examinations and presided over the civil service exams, Li Mian happened to be a candidate. On the day results were posted, Li Mian was overwhelmed with shame. This demonstrates how slander ultimately cannot conceal another's merits—how could it truly harm them?

During the Southern Song Dynasty, Su Dazhang of Sanshan (modern Fuzhou) mastered the "Book of Changes." Before the provincial examinations in the wuwu year, he dreamed of ranking eleventh. He casually mentioned this to a fellow "Book of Changes" examinee, who then falsely accused him to officials of colluding with examiners. When the rankings were finalized, the eleventh position indeed went to a "Book of Changes" specialist. The magistrate confronted the examiners with the accusation, prompting them to substitute a reserve candidate. Upon unsealing the names, it was revealed that the selected candidate was Su Dazhang himself, while the accuser was demoted from the main list to the reserve. Thus we see how slandering others may ruin one's own prospects—what benefit does such behavior bring?

Falsehood, defamation, deceit, and hypocrisy are all forms of dishonesty. Falsehood means baseless speech; defamation is malicious slander; deceit employs cunning deception; hypocrisy feigns authenticity. Though such people may deceive temporarily, truth will eventually emerge. The Northern Song villain Ding Wei never spoke truthfully in his life, believing others couldn't see through him, yet he was universally condemned as one of the "Five Ghosts"—wasn't this effort utterly wasted? Master Yaoshan said: To understand the realm of hungry ghosts, observe those whose words are mostly empty, rarely truthful, and utterly untrustworthy. Both the yang world and yin realms despise hypocrites.

Attacking one's own clan members is particularly immoral. Kinsmen should maintain harmony—to exchange harsh words over minor grievances reveals shallow virtue. Moreover, when clan members behave improperly and dishonor ancestors, attacking them means attacking one's own forebears. Is this not grave impiety? Fan Zhongyan remarked: Our clan has many members, some closer to me than others, yet in our ancestors' eyes, all are descendants. Our forebears accumulated virtue for over a century until prosperity manifested in my generation. If I alone enjoy wealth without supporting the clan, how could I face our ancestors hereafter? How could I enter the ancestral temple now? Therefore, he always shared imperial rewards with clansmen and established charitable estates with hundreds of fertile acres in Suzhou to aid impoverished relatives.

日給米一升嵗給絹一疋乃至嫁娶喪葬皆有賙給其子純仁克繼父志俸祿盡廣義庄今人旣不能推恩睦族如公父子又 何至肆其攻訐自傷根木之地乎)剛强不仁(此爲使氣者言也好剛使氣則遇人接物純是殺機烏能仁哉故曰 强梁者不得其死又曰堅强者死之徒世之剛强自恃者未必害人早已自害卽高明之士亦或不免殊可戒也)狠戾 自用(此爲恃才任性者言也凡人行事用人則智自用則愚自用不可况於狠戾每見高才力學之士生平儘有見解究 竟身名俱敗貽禍更慘者何故總由一向執抝自以爲是不肯服人卽有好友誰來相親雖有善言誰來相吿以故終身失誤 一至於此然則狠戾自用不必爲惡惡莫大矣)是非不當(此言處事者天下事是則是非則非自有公論以非爲是 以是爲非是不當也在一人則關繫一人之臧否在一鄕則關繫一鄕之利害在天下則關繫天下之安危率意妄爲何得無 罪)向背乖宜(此言處人者人有正有邪向正背邪謂之得宜向邪背正謂之乖宜在仕途中尤爲熟審也昔尹穡 少有名譽及爲官偶附湯思退力詆張魏公遂除諫議後貶竄嶺南追悔前事謂周益公曰我三十年名譽一時不審遂至破 壞掃地亦思所得於彼者幾何而甘爲此耶至今悔之不可及矣益公每舉此爲士大夫之戒)虐下取功(功成報國
Interpretation

Fan Zhongyan (a renowned Northern Song statesman) distributed a liter of rice daily, a bolt of silk annually, and even provided relief for weddings and funerals. His son Fan Chunren carried on his father's mission, devoting his entire salary to charitable estates. If people today cannot emulate the Fan family's generosity in benefiting their clan and fostering harmony, how can they recklessly attack others and undermine their own foundations?

The passage on "unyielding cruelty" critiques those with violent tempers. Those who persistently act with brute force and approach others with hostility—how could they possibly embody benevolence? Thus Laozi states, "The violent and fierce do not die a natural death," and adds, "What is rigid belongs to the category of death." The stubbornly self-willed in this world may not necessarily harm others, but they often harm themselves first. Even the wise are not immune to such errors—this should serve as a stern warning.

The section on "ruthless self-assertion" targets those who flaunt their talents arrogantly. When ordinary people handle affairs, employing others' wisdom appears judicious, while obstinacy appears foolish. If mere stubbornness is inadvisable, how much worse is malicious intransigence? We often see brilliant scholars whose unique insights ultimately lead to their downfall—even catastrophic consequences—precisely because they obstinately reject others' counsel. Such behavior alienates even close friends, leaving them without honest advice, resulting in lifelong grave mistakes. Clearly, ruthless self-assertion is itself a great vice.

The passage on "distorting right and wrong" discusses principles for handling affairs. Matters under heaven are either right or wrong—this is self-evident. To call wrong right and right wrong is to invert truth. Such errors, when committed by individuals, tarnish personal reputations; when committed locally, affect regional welfare; when committed nationally, jeopardize the world's safety. How can such willful actions be without consequence?

The section on "misguided allegiances" concerns interpersonal conduct. People divide into upright and wicked—drawing close to integrity and distancing from villainy is the correct path. This demands particular caution in official circles. Yin Se of the Southern Song enjoyed high esteem in youth, but after entering office, he attached himself to the treacherous minister Tang Sidui, slandering the loyal official Zhang Jun. Though promoted to Remonstrance Counselor, he was ultimately exiled to Lingnan. Later, confessing to Zhou Bida (Duke Yi), he lamented: "Thirty years of reputation destroyed in a moment of poor judgment." Gaining mere vanity at such bitter cost, Zhou often cited this case to warn fellow officials.

The passage on "extorting subordinates for merit" condemns exploiting inferiors for personal achievement.

固屬公心爲賞圖功亦是恆願但自爲亦須爲人如虐下而取之或罷人力或剝人財或傷人性命縱令功成豈能享受王安 石欲開淮河併修河堤二百里范子淵迎其意自薦往糜費百萬溺死者千百竟無成功後論罪流徒峽州夫子淵意欲取功 乃反取罪功其可必取乎嘉靖時御史王珣巡按三吳舊例獲盜至三百人者陞四品俸珣部中所獲至數千人按之多非實 公盡釋去曰我不敢殺人以取功也任滿公陞左都御史後四子皆登進士夫王公不虐下取功竟䝉陞擢功亦何待虐下取 乎殷棠川曰凡官長居民之上皆當爲民捍患恤災今乃有水旱頻仍不爲請命反急催科不能拯援反行敲扑其意亦曰吾 以全功名也嗟嗟功可取也下不可虐也此誠救時之論哉)謟上希㫖(謟謟媚也希有先意迎合之意上人意旨 不善當諫止之豈可先意迎合漢史弻爲平原相時詔下舉鉤黨諸郡皆望風承旨株連無數惟弻獨無一人使者切責曰靑 洲六郡其五有黨平原何得獨無弻曰先王分疆畫界風俗不齊他郡自有平原自無胡可相比若承順上旨誣䧟良善則平 原之民戸可爲黨相有死而已所不爲也使臣怒奏弻欺隱値黨禁中解弻竟免罪此不謟上希旨者景泰中王翰爲御史上 疏勸易儲與南城禁錮事甚切及英宗復位翰乃屢言二事之非上悅之許以大用一日上御便殿忽風飄一本宛轉上前閱
Interpretation

This passage illustrates principles of governance through historical anecdotes: one should neither harm the people in pursuit of merit, nor flatter superiors by endorsing their misguided decrees.

First, regarding the pursuit of merit. When Wang Anshi proposed dredging the Huai River and constructing two hundred li of embankments, Fan Ziyuan volunteered to curry favor, squandering millions in funds and drowning over a thousand people. The project ultimately failed, and Fan was exiled to Xiazhou—a classic case of seeking fame only to incur punishment. During the Jiajing reign of the Ming dynasty, censor Wang Xun was inspecting the Three Wu regions where the customary benchmark for promotion was arresting three hundred bandits. His subordinates detained thousands, but Wang investigated and released most, declaring, "I cannot earn merit by killing the innocent." He was later promoted to Left Censor-in-Chief, and all four of his sons passed the imperial examinations. As Yin Tangchuan rightly observed: Officials exist to relieve suffering, yet during floods or droughts they intensify tax collection instead of disaster relief; failing to aid the people, they resort to harsh interrogations while claiming "this preserves official merit." Merit may be pursued, but never through oppressing the people.

Concerning sycophancy, during the Han dynasty, Prefect Shi Bi of Pingyuan refused to arrest partisans when ordered, unlike other officials. Challenged by an imperial envoy, he replied: "Local customs differ—Pingyuan truly has no partisans. If forced to frame innocents to please the throne, I’d rather die." When the partisan ban was lifted, Shi was exonerated. During the Ming Jingtai era, Wang Han had petitioned to depose the crown prince and confine Emperor Yingzong, yet after the emperor’s restoration, he vehemently disavowed his own proposal. One day, a sudden breeze blew a memorial into the emperor’s chamber—revealing Wang’s original petition. This proves that opportunists are eventually exposed.

These stories teach us: Governance requires impartiality—never sacrifice the people for personal advancement; when superiors err, remonstrate rather than comply. This is the Dao (Way) of rescuing one’s era.

之則翰勸易儲與禁錮疏也急宣翰來發前疏示之翰稽顙出血請死上遽斥出誅之此謟上希旨者○謟上希旨不獨臣之 於君如屬官迎合上司紳士迎合官府書吏衙役迎合本官奸僕豪奴迎合家主皆是爲人下者阿意曲承爲非作惡罪固不 待言矣爲人上者好諛喜佞使人有隙而投以至毒流無窮𡨚結不休甯能獨免於陰譴乎)受恩不感(一飯之恩 古人必報報卽無力心必懷感若不懷感是禽獸不如矣三國時李信純家養一犬甚愛之一日信純飲酒城南醉卧荒草中 太守出獵見野草深茂命縱火焚之犬口拽信純衣摇之不醒旁有一溪犬乃入水濕身近信純數步内將草盡爲浸濕火遇 濕而止犬數入水病甚遂死信純旁信純覺而知之痛哭負歸具棺衾以葬太守聞而義之名其塜曰義犬人而忘恩負德視 此不當愧死耶抑恩更有大焉者太極葛仙公著大懴法教人報答慈恩一天地二父母三國王四師長世人憒憒一生君親 未報而徒沾沾於私恩小德是又棄本逐末與於負恩之甚者也亦可憫已)念怨不休(受人之害彼時不能無怨 過後便當消釋若念之不忘則𡨚𡨚相報豈有已時昔王沂公暮年子嗣不蕃謂人曰予行已無愧而獲此報何耶但一事有 恨予初守鄆州爲監司所輕後秉政陰遷本官畧無甯嵗不意竟死於道路想必爲報也噫沂公尙不免以此受報况他人乎)
Interpretation

This passage discusses two types of wicked deeds and their karmic retribution: flattery and ingratitude.

First, regarding flattery. It's not just ministers currying favor with rulers—subordinates pandering to superiors, local gentry fawning over officials, petty clerks buttering up their superiors, or wicked servants groveling before their masters. These underlings who distort their principles to please others and commit misdeeds are obviously guilty. But what about those in high positions who delight in flattery, giving opportunists openings that ultimately lead to endless poison and cycles of vengeance? Can they escape Heaven's punishment?

Now concerning ingratitude. The ancients would repay even the kindness of a single meal—if unable to reciprocate, they'd at least remain grateful. During the Three Kingdoms period, a man named Li Xinchun kept a dog. Once, drunk, he collapsed in a field of wild grass when the governor ordered hunting fires set to clear brush. The dog desperately tugged his clothes but couldn't rouse him, so it jumped into a stream to wet itself, then drenched the grass around its master. Exhausted, it died. Upon learning this, the governor erected a "Loyal Dog's Tomb." Shouldn't those who are ungrateful die of shame upon hearing this? Ge Xuan, the Taiji Immortal Master, taught in the Great Repentance Ritual that humans must repay four great kindnesses: Heaven and Earth's nurturing grace, parents' life-giving grace, rulers' governing grace, and teachers' instructive grace. Yet deluded people neglect these profound debts while obsessing over trivial favors—this is the ultimate ingratitude.

Finally, the consequences of holding grudges. While resentment is natural when harmed, one should let go afterward. If grievances are nursed endlessly, when will the cycle of vengeance cease? Wang Zeng (posthumously titled Duke Yi) of the Song Dynasty reflected in his childless old age: "My conscience is clear—why this retribution? Perhaps one regret: as Yunzhou prefect, I was slighted by a surveillance commissioner. Later when in power, I secretly transferred him to a harsh post where he died en route." Even a virtuous chancellor like Wang Zeng suffered retribution for harboring resentment—how much more ordinary people?

輕蔑天民(凡此蒼生皆上帝之赤子故曰天民輕蔑小民卽是輕蔑上帝其陰受天譴不待言矣陶文僖公大臨嘗 謂人曰吾儕一列仕籍卽令念念濟人利物一生罪業不能贖萬一况可漫不加意乎憶吾往嵗出差赴越往還數千里或出 陸路所用負載役夫不知若干人或由水路所用牽挽夫不知若干人茲念小民皆人子也或當炎蒸淋汗如雨或値嚴冬衝 冐霜雪由此而踣頓道路委塡溝壑者何可數也此等罪業皆由我作如釋氏果報之說不誣能無惕然乎噫凡臨民者烏可 不三復斯言)擾亂國政(國政者天下之公事也以一己之私意更變之是爲擾亂葢祖宗成法有司久已奉行民 亦安以爲便有一番更改定有一番擾害近則爲病一時遠則遺患數世如宋時熙甯新法其明徵大驗者已是以李文靖公 爲相惟務安靜不擾同年馬亮責之曰外人以公爲無口匏公笑曰沆於政事實無補萬一惟中外所陳利害一切報罷聊以 報國耳今國家法制纎若凝脂苟循所陳一一行之則所傷實多彼炫名喜事之人幸一時之進肯念擾亂斯民耶時人以公 爲得相體)賞及非義(賞待有功所以示勸非義者不宜及而及之也長惡容奸最干天怒故凡司爵賞之柄者俱當 愼之胡嘉諫曰賞當則忠良勸罰當則奸究懲今世黜陟舉劾等事不聞悉心亷訪止憑傳聞揭帖讒口諛舌播弄其間直道
Interpretation

This passage from the Collected Commentaries on the Treatise of the Most High on Action and Response discusses three behaviors that inevitably bring negative consequences:

The first is contempt for common people. The text states that all living beings under heaven are children of Heaven (called "Tianmin" or Heaven's people), and to despise them is to despise Heaven itself, which will surely incur hidden celestial retribution. Tao Wengong (Tao Dalin) once lamented that officials like himself should constantly consider how to assist the people. He recalled traveling thousands of miles on official business, witnessing porters laboring under extreme heat and bitter cold, some even dying on the road—all of which he regarded as karmic burdens he had helped create.

The second is disrupting state governance. Government affairs are public matters, and altering them arbitrarily for private motives creates chaos. When ancestral laws that people have grown accustomed to are recklessly changed, calamity inevitably follows. The text cites Wang Anshi's New Policies (Xining Reforms) of the Song dynasty as an example of reforms causing long-term harm. It also mentions Li Wenjing (Li Hang), who as chancellor adhered to the principle of "not disturbing the people," believing it better to maintain the status quo than implement new policies that might harm them.

The third is improper rewards. Rewards should go to the deserving; bestowing them on the unworthy (termed "contrary to righteousness") fosters wickedness. Those warding the power to reward must exercise particular caution. Hu Jiajian observed that proper rewards encourage loyalty while appropriate punishments deter evil. Yet many officials now make decisions based on hearsay rather than firsthand investigation—a deeply flawed practice.

Note: The term "Buddhist retribution" (Shishi guobao) refers to karmic consequences in Buddhist doctrine; the "Xining Reforms" were the policy changes implemented by Wang Anshi during the Northern Song dynasty; "Li Wenjing" was the posthumous title of the renowned Song statesman Li Hang.

難容奸巧易售此賞所以多非義而潔已守正不善夤緣之士每每多屈抑也嗚呼賞旣僭則罰必濫其何以治天下哉)刑 及無辜(刑者不得已而用之卽果有罪亦當詳審况可濫及無辜乎唐武后僭位慮天下謀已屢興大獄周興來俊臣 等附之誣引天下豪傑一切以反論朝野震恐獨徐有功據法力爭前後所活數千百家周興等屢劾有功故出反囚罪當斬 以此三坐大辟將刑泰然不憂赦之亦不喜嘗曰豈我獨死諸人永不死耶後周興等相繼族誅有功由殿中侍御厯官至都 督子孫皆顯官夫周來諸惡阿意酷刑豈不自謂得計乃不轉眼間竟至身夷族滅而犯顏極諍之孤臣獨全身昌後於殺人 如麻之世天道好生而惡殺豈不昭昭可信哉然枉法用刑又非必有意好殺或者審之不明因循定罪或者形跡可疑憑律 誤斷如此之類雖非故殺而𡨚債有主卽與故殺無殊矣趙時爲無爲軍教授夢一囚吿曰某不幸爲祖翔枉殺魂訴於天祖 不久矣時曰祖公明習法律安有枉者囚曰不然某死雖非祖意實因其一疑遂致移獄𡨚有所自非祖而何月餘祖果卒則 用刑之際可不愼乎○吕叔祖嘗作刑戒八章甚善今附於此一曰五不打老不打幼不打病不打衣食不繼不打人打我不 打一曰五莫輕打宗室莫輕打官莫輕打生員莫輕打上司差人莫輕打婦人莫輕打三曰五勿就打人急勿就打人忿勿就
Interpretation

This passage discusses the principle of exercising caution in judicial punishment in ancient times, with particular emphasis on avoiding wrongful convictions of innocent people.

Several historical cases are cited: During Wu Zetian's reign, when she feared conspiracies against her, cruel officials like Zhou Xing and Lai Junchen falsely accused prominent figures across the land, labeling many as rebels. Only Xu Yougong insisted on following the law strictly, thereby saving thousands of families. Ironically, Zhou Xing and others impeached Xu Yougong for allegedly releasing rebels intentionally, nearly resulting in his execution. Later, however, Zhou Xing and his cohorts met with extermination of their clans, while Xu Yougong enjoyed an illustrious official career, with his descendants attaining high status. This illustrates how the Dao of Heaven cherishes life—those who indiscriminately kill the innocent ultimately face retribution.

Another case involves Zhao Shi, an instructor in Wuwei Commandery, who dreamed of a prisoner claiming to have been wrongfully executed due to Zu Xiang's judgment. Though Zu Xiang acted without malice, he had ruled based on a single doubtful point. Shortly thereafter, Zu Xiang died, demonstrating that even unintentional miscarriages of justice incur accountability.

Finally, the text quotes Lü Shuzu's "Eight Admonitions on Punishment," outlining prohibitions in judicial practice: five types of people who should not be beaten (the elderly, children, the sick, those too poor to eat, and those offering no resistance), five types requiring careful handling (imperial relatives, officials, scholars, envoys from superiors, and women), and five situations warranting postponement of punishment (when parties are emotionally agitated, angry, drunk, when cases remain unclear, or when evidence is insufficient). These represent valuable lessons distilled from ancient judicial experience.

The core message is this: While law enforcement must be strict and impartial, greater caution must be exercised in meting out punishments to prevent wrongful convictions. Wronging the innocent is more harmful than letting the guilty go free—a reflection of Daoism's principle of "cherishing life and abhorring killing."

打人醉勿就打人隨行遠路勿就打人跑來喘息勿就打四曰五且緩打我怒且緩打我醉且緩打我病且緩打我見不眞且 緩打我不能處分且緩打五曰三莫又打已拶莫又打已來莫又打要枷莫又打六曰三憐不打盛寒炎暑憐不打佳節令晨 憐不打人方傷心憐不打七曰三應打不打尊長該打爲與卑㓜訟不打百姓該打爲與衙門人訟不打工役鋪行該打爲修 私衙及買辦自用物不打八曰三禁打禁重杖打禁從下打禁佐貳非刑打南皋鄒公曾將此戒刻石於刑部人言刑官無後 誠守此戒我知其後必昌也)殺人取財(財有分定不可强求人若强求必將得禍况殺人以求之乎洞庭山蔣舉 人剋剝營利致富十萬雖至親不拔一毛一日盜劫其家鞭撻炮烙備施罄其所有席捲去盜喜過望殺牲載酒賽願於小雷 山神山在湖中斷崖絶無人居盜登祭畢酣飮大醉不虞廟祝共舟人截纜而去盜歸無計嚴冬凍餒共斃廟中此殺人取財 之報也然世之殺人取財者不必盡是劫盜如貪吏取財斃人刑獄之中豪家取財迫人死喪之際庸醫取財乘人危急之時 其爲殺人一也揆之往蹟皆墮惡報)傾人取位(元始上帝曰一官一職各有義命義命當有不足爲難義命若無只 做一日也不可得豈可傾䧟訛人而自取之彌德超見樞密曹彬勲望隆重因誣以不軌於是彬罷德超拜樞密不數日趙普
Interpretation

This scripture expounds on penal codes and moral principles for conduct, presenting several key admonitions:

Regarding judicial punishments, it establishes the "Seven Do Not Strike" principle: one should never administer beatings to intoxicated individuals, those exhausted from long journeys, persons panting from recent running, at dawn, in moments of anger, while drunk oneself, during illness, when facts remain unclear, or when unable to make sound judgments. Nor should punishments be repeated on those already sentenced, those who voluntarily surrender, or those requiring cangues. Extreme cold or heat, festival days, or when the accused is grieving all warrant compassion without corporal punishment. Elders deserving punishment due to disputes with juniors, commoners clashing with officials, or laborers working on private government buildings or procurements should all be exempt from beatings. Three punishments are expressly forbidden: using excessively heavy rods, striking upward from below, and deputies employing illegal penalties. Master Zou Nangao once had these prohibitions engraved on stone tablets at the Ministry of Justice.

The section on ill-gotten wealth illustrates through the story of Provincial Graduate Jiang from Dongting Mountain how coveting unrighteous gains invites retribution. Jiang's miserly accumulation of wealth through harsh means ended with bandits plundering his entire fortune, who subsequently froze to death drunk after temple sacrifices. The text clarifies that "killing for profit" encompasses not just banditry but also corrupt officials, powerful families, and incompetent physicians whose actions indirectly cause deaths—all such deeds invite karmic consequences.

Concerning official appointments, the scripture quotes the Primordial Heavenly Sovereign (Yuanshi Shangdi) stating that government positions are heaven-ordained and should never be obtained by framing others. The example of Mi Dechao slandering General Cao Bin to become Privy Councilor—only to be swiftly exposed by Chancellor Zhao Pu—demonstrates the inevitable repercussions of such actions.

力爲辦雪復名彬德超遠竄盧多遜見宰相趙普位望特重因設計傾之於是普罷多遜拜相旣而事狀明白趙普復相多遜 遠竄朱崖觀此二子凡傾人者當自傾也實非傾人)誅降戮服(禦敵斬級名曰應兵不得已也若旣降服而又殺之 禍莫大矣漢李廣屢著邊功不得封侯語王朔曰豈吾相不當封侯耶朔曰將軍自念嘗有所恨否廣曰吾爲隴西守時羗嘗 反吾誘降者八百餘人殺之至今獨恨此耳朔曰禍莫大於殺已降此將軍所以不侯也後廣出征失道自刎殷士儋曰殺降 旣不可乃今之爲將者視殺降尤甚寇至殺人盈野寇退卽斷被殺者之首隱冐上功又或撲掩行旅洗劫村坊充其級數此 等慘毒受報不待言矣司覈驗者不肯盡發其狀其罪亦與同科)貶正排賢(正人賢士中外所倚乃或貶逐之或 排擠之則妨賢病國爲惡已大受報必慘陳後主時幸臣司馬申好排䧟人一日晝卧尙書省忽有惡鳥集身啄其口吻血流 被席死周世宗時陶穀亦好䧟害人死後葬昭覺寺忽雷雨大作劈開墓門震攝其屍不知所在貶正排賢之報不當如是耶) 凌孤逼寡(孤兒寡婦人間之最不幸者有等惡人幸其無依乘機騙害或侵占田產或驅奪財物或詭派差役使孤 寡流離無所控訴神鬼伺察必有代爲伸𡨚者矣吉水灘周傑占其孤姪地基造樓二間姪不敢爭惟焚香訴天宏治二年五
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the principle of karmic retribution through historical anecdotes:

Lu Duoxun conspired to frame Chancellor Zhao Pu, only to end up exiled to Zhuya (modern-day Hainan). It resembles two drinkers facing each other—the one who tries to intoxicate another often gets drunk first. Harming others ultimately harms oneself.

The renowned Han dynasty general Li Guang achieved countless military feats yet never received nobility. Diviner Wang Shuo revealed this was because Li had deceitfully executed 800 surrendered Qiang tribespeople (ethnic minorities from the northwest). This slaughter of prisoners invited retribution. Li Guang eventually committed suicide after losing his way during a campaign. Today, some commanders commit worse atrocities—when enemies attack, corpses litter the battlefield, yet after retreats, they decapitate the dead to fake military merits, even massacring merchants and villagers to inflate numbers. Such cruelty inevitably invites heavenly punishment.

During Emperor Houzhu of Chen's reign in the Southern Dynasties, the sycophantic minister Sima Shen—who specialized in persecuting loyal officials—was suddenly pecked to death by a strange bird while napping at the Imperial Secretariat, his mouth torn open and blood soaking his mat. Similarly, Tao Gu of Later Zhou dynasty in the Five Dynasties period had his grave struck by lightning posthumously, scattering his bones, due to his history of framing others. These cases prove that persecuting the virtuous invites terrible retribution.

Oppressing orphans and widows (the defenseless) constitutes particularly grave evil. In Jiangxi's Jishui county, a local bully named Zhou Jie forcibly seized his nephew's land to build a mansion, leaving the orphaned nephew no choice but to burn incense and appeal to Heaven. By 1489 (Hongzhi 2nd year), retribution came... (the text breaks off, implying the tyrant's eventual downfall).

The passage particularly emphasizes three categories of evil: slaughtering surrendered troops, persecuting virtuous officials, and oppressing widows and orphans. Heaven and earth's deities secretly record such deeds, ensuring perpetrators reap what they sow. Just as officials who cover up fraudulent military merits share the criminals' punishment, these historical lessons all confirm the supreme truth of "Taishang's Response"—the Daoist classic on cosmic retribution.

月十八日忽大風雷移其樓於他處空還舊地不差尺寸傑跪基上不能言者七日始曰吾已知欺孤之罪矣不二年竟惡疾 死此凌孤者方城鞏固以機械治生其隣周氏家富一旦男子相繼疫死止餘一老媪并十嵗孫固置酒延媪謂曰汝年已老 挾此美產殊非善計盍以產售我我爲爾息俟汝孫長產仍歸汝媪喜從計固因盡室徙居之未一年寇犯唐州鞏氏家口盡 殺其處無一得免寇退周媪復歸舊業此逼寡者)棄法受賄(居官棄法必因受賂賄賂一入則曲直輕重皆不問 矣豈知一法一律鬼神所主棄法受賂功名壽算便當減奪乎荆州府推官魏釗以公事往夷陵道經某鎭鎭有鄕紳徐少卿 夢神告曰明晚魏推官過鎭此人前程遠大後當爲吏部宜預結之次日果至因欵留焉數日少卿復夢曰可怪魏推官此去 受賂四百金故出人罪使死者含𡨚上帝已削其官爵夀亦不永矣少卿訪之果然未幾魏丁憂歸逾年卒家業凋零夫居官 棄法受賄得報固應如此爲鄕紳者每每受人賍私伐爲囑託致使官府枉法狥情司報應者豈遂無法處此輩耶台州舉人 左蹕赴禮部試卷甚佳房考擬爲第一忽夢神告曰比台州左蹕文也頃居鄕受賄若干爲人請託致有枉法而死者今已滅 折祿算幸無取也遂黜之及榜發查對原卷果左蹕也未幾蹕客死燕山○朱璣曰棄法受賄豈惟官長凡書吏衙役亦多有
Interpretation

On the eighteenth day of the lunar month, a sudden storm arose with violent winds, thunder, and lightning. Remarkably, an entire building was lifted and relocated to another open space without any change in its structural integrity. A man named Jie knelt on the original foundation, rendered speechless for seven full days before he finally spoke: "Now I understand the sin of oppressing the orphaned." Within two years, he contracted a severe illness and died.

This is an example of retribution for bullying the helpless. In Fangcheng, a man named Gong amassed wealth through deceitful schemes. His neighbor, the Zhou family, had once been prosperous, but after the men of the household succumbed one after another to plague, only an elderly widow and her ten-year-old grandson remained. Gong invited the old woman to a banquet and persuaded her: "You're advanced in years—managing such extensive property is impractical. Why not sell it to me? I'll safeguard it for you and return it when your grandson comes of age." Trusting him, the widow agreed. Yet less than a year after Gong and his family moved into the Zhou estate, bandits raided Tangzhou, slaughtering every last member of the Gong household. After the bandits withdrew, the Zhou widow reclaimed her original property.

This illustrates the retribution for exploiting widows. Officials who take bribes and pervert justice, twisting right and wrong, fail to realize that every law is overseen by unseen spirits. Corruption inevitably erodes their merit, rank, and lifespan. When Wei Zhao, a judicial officer (equivalent to a modern judge) from Jingzhou, passed through a town on official business, the local gentry Xu Shaoqing dreamed of a deity who told him: "Tomorrow, Judge Wei will arrive. His future is illustrious—he will rise to high office in the Ministry of Personnel. You should befriend him in advance." The next day, Wei Zhao indeed arrived, and Xu Shaoqing hosted him warmly. Days later, Xu dreamed again: "Strange—Judge Wei accepted four hundred taels of silver in bribes for this case, deliberately exonerating the criminal and leaving the deceased wronged. The Heavenly Emperor has stripped him of rank, and his remaining years are few." Upon inquiry, Xu confirmed the truth. Soon after, Wei Zhao returned home for mourning, and within a year, he died, his family fortunes collapsing.

That corrupt officials face retribution is just. But what of the gentry who facilitate bribery and intercede unjustly? Can they escape punishment? Zuo Bi, a provincial graduate from Taizhou, traveled to the capital for the imperial examinations. His exam essay was outstanding, and the examiner initially ranked him first. Suddenly, the examiner dreamed of a deity saying: "This is Zuo Bi's paper. Previously, in his hometown, he accepted bribes to manipulate lawsuits, resulting in wrongful deaths. His blessings and emoluments have been reduced—he cannot pass." Zuo Bi failed the exams and later died in the capital. Zhu Ji remarked: "Corruption is not limited to officials; clerks and runners face the same retribution."

之葢官長耳目有限事事操之公門中人其間狐假虎威舞文亂法奸弊豈止一端造惡造業未有不遭天譴者不然此等怨 毒之財能安享乎)以直爲曲以曲爲直(韓魏公曰兩訟在官曲直未定生死予奪繫吾一言其可輕忽 今不免曲直顚倒非因受賄卽是狥情否則率意鹵莽耳有一於此豈宜居民上乎錢若水爲同州推官有富民失女奴父母 訴於州委之錄叅錄叅舊與富民隙遂申劾富民父子共殺富民已誣服獨若水遲疑錄叅語侵之若水笑曰父子皆坐重辟 豈不容某熟察又越旬不決知州亦有言若水終不奪一日潛詣知州告曰某以家財訪女奴今得之矣知州遂釋富民父子 富民詣若水謝若水閉門不納富民遶垣而哭知州欲以此奏之朝廷若水辭曰某初心止圖拔𡨚非圖爵賞且朝廷聞之如 錄叅何知州嘆服太宗聞其事擢知制誥進樞密使後無病而卒陳舊爲開封府曹時章獻太后臨朝太后族人杖殺一卒公 當驗屍太后遣中使十數輩諭㫖吏惶懼欲以病死聞舊獨正色曰彼實𡨚死待我而伸奈何懼罪驗不以實乎汝等勿憂吾 當任咎奏入雖大忤㫖舊亦不及罪自是著名不數年厯臺省官至三司以上二事一是不以直爲曲一是不以曲爲直由此 大者推及小者凡事皆當平斷葢百姓多愚或被一事之枉啣怨終身甚有慚憤抑鬱而死者是故讞決之際不可以不察也)
Interpretation

The eyes and ears of officials are limited, and many affairs must be handled by their subordinates. These underlings often abuse their authority, manipulate legal statutes to create confusion, and employ endless schemes of fraud and malpractice. Those who commit evil deeds never escape Heaven's punishment—otherwise, how could wealth obtained by oppressing the people ever be enjoyed with peace of mind?

Han Qi (a renowned Northern Song statesman, posthumously titled Duke of Wei) once said: When two parties bring a dispute to court, before right and wrong are determined, life and death hang on the words of the official. How can such matters be treated lightly? Nowadays, some officials pervert justice—whether accepting bribes, acting out of personal favoritism, or simply through reckless negligence. How can such men be called "father and mother officials" to the people?

When Qian Ruoshui served as a judicial officer in Tongzhou, a wealthy household lost a maidservant. The girl’s parents filed a complaint with the prefecture, and the case was assigned to a subordinate official. This clerk, who had long harbored a grudge against the wealthy family, falsely accused the father and son of conspiring to commit murder. Under duress, the family confessed, but Qian Ruoshui found the case suspicious. When the clerk pressed him, Qian smiled and said, "Both father and son face the death penalty—can you not allow me to investigate carefully?" For over ten days, he delayed the verdict despite the prefect’s urgings, refusing to change his stance. Later, he privately informed the prefect: "I’ve spent my own money to locate the maidservant—she’s been found." The wealthy family was exonerated. When they came to thank him, Qian shut his door and refused to meet them. The prefect wished to recommend the matter to the court, but Qian declined: "I only sought to clear an injustice, not rewards. Moreover, if the court learns of this, what will become of that clerk?" The prefect deeply admired him. Emperor Taizong of Song, hearing of this, promoted Qian to drafting edicts, and he later rose to become Military Affairs Commissioner, eventually passing away peacefully in old age.

When Chen Xiliang served as a judge in Kaifeng, Empress Dowager Zhangxian was regent. A member of her clan had beaten a soldier to death, and an autopsy was required by law. The empress sent over a dozen eunuchs to pressure the officials, who grew fearful and wanted to declare the death natural. Only Chen Xiliang sternly declared: "This man died unjustly—it falls to me to uphold justice. How can we falsify the report for fear of offending the powerful? Do not worry—I take full responsibility." Though his memorial greatly displeased the empress dowager, Chen suffered no punishment. His reputation soared, and within years he was promoted to high office, including Commissioner of Finance.

These two cases—one refusing to turn right into wrong, the other refusing to turn wrong into right—demonstrate how major principles apply to minor affairs. All judgments must be fair. The common people are mostly simple and honest; if they suffer a single injustice, they may harbor lifelong resentment or even die of despair. Thus, in adjudicating cases, one must discern with the finest clarity.

入輕爲重(書曰罪疑惟輕又曰甯失出毋失入若犯罪本輕而反重入之所謂哀矜之意安在乎楊旬爲夔州推司 處心正直積累陰功有子名椿年二十四中天下都魁夔州使君聞之請旬來令旬解職旬曰念旬爲吏四十年家無餘貲惟 積陰德留下三箇慳囊乞台㫖取來開看第一箇有三十九文當三錢第二箇有四千餘文折二錢第三箇有萬箇小錢使君 問故旬曰每決獄囚但遇入輕爲重者或從死罪改爲流罪卽投一當三錢或從流罪改爲杖罪卽投一折二錢或從杖罪改 放便投一小錢今日旬男奪天下都魁皆平日行善所致也敢舍公門而自放逸哉噫公門好修行此語誰不知之而積德行 善者有幾如旬所存眞可爲此輩勸也陳軒未第時夢至一官府門懸金榜題曰左丞陳軒右丞黃履後履官至右丞而軒止 龍圖學士晚年語諸子曰吾平生不作欺心事今位不副夢當思昔守杭州有達官執一老兵送府欲杖之此兵罪不應杖遂 令贖達官折柬相責乃呼入行杖不意竟死杖下至今二十年恆以自尤違法狥情宜不登顯位汝等戒之夫初念不忍旣以 達官見責而移是不忍之心不勝其畏達官之心也達官何足畏不過爲自己欲登顯位計耳孰知反以此削其顯位彼承順 上司入輕爲重者不當鑒此乎萬厯初王萬祚爲巡江御史極淸亷而性頗嚴刻捶楚之下有以小過而被重杖者有以輕罪
Interpretation

This passage discusses the issue of "imposing excessive punishment for minor offenses" in judicial proceedings and the principle of karmic retribution for good and evil deeds. Ancient texts advise that "when in doubt about a crime, lean toward leniency" and state that "it's better to err on the side of acquittal than wrongful conviction." If a defendant deserving mild punishment receives severe sentencing, where then lies the so-called compassion?

The narrative then recounts the story of Yang Xun, who served as a judicial officer in Kuizhou (modern-day Fengjie, Chongqing). Known for his integrity, he quietly accumulated virtuous deeds. His son Yang Chun achieved the highest honor in the national imperial examinations at just twenty-four. When the Kuizhou governor inquired how Yang Xun had raised such an exceptional son, Yang Xun explained that during forty years of public service, his family had amassed no wealth—only three bags of "hidden virtue." The first bag contained thirty-nine high-denomination coins, the second held over four thousand medium-value coins, and the third contained ten thousand small coins.

Yang Xun revealed his system: for each death sentence commuted to exile, he deposited one high-value coin; for exile reduced to flogging, one medium-value coin; and for flogging commuted to acquittal, one small coin. "My son's success as the top scholar," he said, "is simply the karmic return of these daily acts of mercy. How could I ever compromise justice for personal gain?" Though government service provides ample opportunity for virtue, few maintain such principles as steadfastly as Yang Xun.

Another account features Chen Xuan, who in youth dreamed of an official gate displaying a golden roster listing him as "Left Chancellor" alongside Huang Lü as "Right Chancellor." While Huang Lü eventually attained that position, Chen Xuan only rose to Academician of the Dragon Diagram Pavilion. Reflecting in old age, he told descendants: "Though my conscience remains clear of wrongdoing, my rank fell short of the dream's promise—likely because during my Hangzhou magistracy, I yielded to a superior's pressure to flog an old soldier whose offense didn't warrant corporal punishment. The man died from the beating. For twenty years this haunted me as karmic retribution for bending the law. My initial reluctance gave way to fear of authority—but what truly merits fear? Career concerns blinded me, costing the very high position I coveted."

Finally, the text mentions Wanji Wang, an early Wanli-era River Inspector renowned for integrity but excessive harshness in meting out severe penalties for minor infractions. These accounts collectively warn officials: those who impose disproportionate punishments to curry favor with superiors will ultimately reap what they sow.

而致殞命者未幾得病衙中嘗有𡨚鬼前後呼呌僚佐往候之無不聞者數日而死夫淸以持身必不當刻以絶人然持已淸 者往往多刻入輕爲重事所必有已每見吾鄕士大夫居官甚淸介有聲及身死而其子孫蹇落不振母亦犯有此病歟故居 官任性者亦當鑒此)見殺加怒(人之有罪固其自取然死者不能復生目擊心傷憐憫不暇加怒何爲昔子羔爲衞 士師刖人足後值衞亂子羔出走刖者守門屢引之逃匿羔謂刖者曰吾向者親刖汝足今吾在難正子報怨之時而反如此 何也刖者曰刖足固我之罪向者見君論刑時有愀然不樂之色此吾所以感君也然則見殺加怒死者其能無憾乎)知 過不改(過與惡不同惡有心過無心凡一念之差一事之誤皆謂之過然初時不覺無心之失也旣而覺之不能卽改 則是無心變爲有心矣故袁了凡曰人未行善先須改過佛家教人懺悔亦是勸人改過也嘉靖中葛守禮爲陝西布政當大 計日有小吏塡老疾當罷公請留之吏部曰計簿出自藩伯何自忘也公曰此邊吏去省遠徒取文書登簿今見其人方知誤 塡過在布政司何可使小吏受枉尙書驚服曰誰肯於吏部堂上自陳過誤卽此可謂賢能第一矣後官至刑部尙書江陰張 畏巖甲午鄕試不中大駡試官旁有道者笑曰還是相公文不佳張叱曰野道烏知之道者曰文貴心和氣平相公心氣如此
Interpretation

This passage expounds on principles for governance, personal cultivation, and correcting faults. It begins by noting how those who treat others harshly often meet swift retribution. For instance, in government offices where the cries of wronged ghosts are heard by visiting colleagues, the harsh official typically dies within days. While maintaining personal integrity is crucial, one must not become severe toward others. History shows many upright officials whose descendants fell into poverty after their death—likely due to this very failing.

The text then discusses how to regard those who err. Though people bring misfortune upon themselves through wrongdoing, the dead cannot return to life; we should respond with compassion rather than anger. The example of Zigao illustrates this: As a judge, he once sentenced a man to foot amputation. Later, during political turmoil in Wei, this same amputee helped him escape, explaining, "I saw the reluctance in your expression during sentencing, so I repay this kindness." This demonstrates how treating offenders with empathy bears unexpected rewards.

Finally, it addresses the danger of persisting in known errors. Mistakes differ from crimes—the former being unintentional faults. But when recognized yet unamended, these unintentional lapses become deliberate transgressions. Yuan Liaofan advised that "cultivating virtue begins with correcting faults," while Buddhism emphasizes repentance for the same reason. Two Ming Dynasty examples follow: Ge Shouli, discovering his subordinate was mistakenly listed for dismissal due to "old age and illness," personally admitted his department's error to the Ministry of Personnel; and provincial graduate Zhang Weiyan, who raged at examiners after failing, was admonished by a Daoist priest that "true writing flows from tranquil qi (energy)," revealing the need for honest self-reflection.

文安得佳張不覺屈服自此折節自持丁酉夢見試錄一册中多缺行問之旁人答曰科第三年一考拔中所缺皆原該中式 或新有薄行而去之者指後一行云汝三年來改過自修當補此是科果中一百五名)知善不爲(長春眞人曰人 在世間方便第一力到便行蹉過可惜今之不爲善者亦未嘗盡是不爲或者有好名心持於大而忽於小又或者有求報心 勉於始而怠於終豈知存此心者皆爲太上之罪人乎南豐劉徹屢舉不第祈夢於神夢神語曰汝生平見善不爲且有虧德 何望登第徹訴平生並無虧德神曰汝弟負官錢不能助令死杖下非虧德乎徹又以弟不肖爲解神曰行道之人見且不忍 何况兄弟汝不知朱軾代納靑苖事耶行獲爲善之報矣徹覺訪於軾軾曰今年某遠館歸見途中械繫者云欠靑苖錢二千 五百限滿無償某因以束修與之不意已䝉神契後軾生三子皆顯官噫世人終身不爲一善而自謂善人又或齋僧造寺不 惜千金而同氣顚連不一引手者比比是也盍以劉徹事類觀之)自罪引他(引扳引也與推過嫁禍者不同不善 之人自作罪惡及至事發則扳引他人不知孼惟自作終當自受若妄相扳引是業中造業矣縱逃王法豈逃天誅昔夏原吉 爲戸部尙書吏污精微文書驚懼待罪公曰汝勿憂明日公入朝請罪曰臣不謹筆污精微文書上曰易之吏得無罪夫他人
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories about changing one's fate through virtuous deeds, with the core message urging people to practice genuine kindness in a timely manner.

There was a man named Zhang Bujue who was initially arrogant by nature. Later, he dreamed that many spots on the imperial examination roster were left vacant. Someone in the dream explained these vacancies occurred because candidates who had committed wrongdoings were removed, pointing to a particular line and saying: "Through three years of self-reformation, you qualify to fill this position." Eventually, Zhang indeed passed the exam in 105th place.

Changchun Zhenren (Qiu Chuji, patriarch of the Quanzhen Daoist school) taught: Practicing virtue is life's most urgent matter. When capable, one must act immediately—missing such opportunities is truly regrettable. Those who fail to do good often err in three ways: some aim too high, neglecting small deeds while chasing grand ones; others start enthusiastically but grow lax over time; still others perform good deeds expecting rewards. All these attitudes are misguided.

Liu Che from Nanfeng repeatedly failed the imperial exams and sought divine guidance through dreams. A deity revealed his moral failing: he had refused to help his younger brother repay official debts, resulting in the brother's fatal beating. When Liu defended himself by citing his brother's poor character, the deity retorted: "Shouldn't any bystander aid someone in peril, let alone one's own brother? Have you not heard of Zhu Shi helping others pay their crop loans?" Later inquiries showed Zhu Shi—who used his teaching income to settle a stranger's debt—was rewarded with three sons who all became high officials.

The author reflects: Many claim to be virtuous despite never performing a single good deed, or donate lavishly to build temples while ignoring suffering relatives. Like Xia Yuanji, the Minister of Revenue who took blame before the emperor when a subordinate soiled important documents—claiming personal negligence to protect the minor clerk. This exemplifies true virtuous responsibility.

These stories collectively demonstrate: Good deeds must be performed sincerely, regardless of scale or expectation of return; evil inevitably brings self-inflicted consequences, and evading responsibility compounds guilt. The Dao's justice is manifest—retribution for good and evil follows like shadows.

之罪尙欲引歸已身彼自罪引他是何等心術乎)壅塞方術(方術如農圃醫卜之類凡人挾一技一能淺者藉以 養生高者用以濟世苟一語阻之使不得行一事遏之使不得售卽是壅塞翟乾佑在世時念雲安一邑江險有一十五處一 日作法召灘神俾平之一神峩冠大袖慨然進詞曰觀師之意不過欲便舟楫不知從事舟楫者日常倍利縱有小費不足爲 損沿江小民三四百家無田可耕無桑可蠶全賴挽負資生今若盡平灘險小民衣食如何師嘆曰汝所見非吾所及也遂止 以此推悟壅塞方術豈得無罪然亦視方術何如耳昔朱文公患足疾有道人爲針治旋覺輕便公喜贈以詩後道人去數日 足疾大作追尋莫知所往公嘆曰非欲罪彼但索前詩恐持此誤人耳世間庸醫不少可懲壅塞之弊遂妄爲薦揚乎至於巫 蠱之術與夫燒煉採戰諸方皆能令人亡身喪家此輩尤當禁制)訕謗聖賢(三教聖賢皆當並尊何敢訕謗其訕 謗者約有兩種一是愚痴無識一是才辨自雄愚痴之人罪坐不知而才辨之士往往執所見以謗所不見其罪乃更甚於愚 痴不知儒與釋老教雖分門理實一致今儒者徒見僧道一種惡習遂妄議二氏短長盍思眼前儒者品行大謬無惡不爲亦 可以此訉訕孔子乎故知偏見橫議甚爲不可然訕謗二氏之罪報應從來不爽人或信而畏之惟儒家不談禍福遂反有肆
Interpretation

This passage discusses several types of transgressions and their consequences. The first is "obstructing practical arts" (fangshu), which refers to hindering others' legitimate means of livelihood. Practical arts (including agriculture, medicine, divination, and other skills) are essential for people to make a living and benefit society. Deliberately preventing others from practicing these skills constitutes a transgression. The text cites the example of Zhai Qianyou: he initially intended to use magic to calm the treacherous rapids of Yun'an River for safer navigation, but the River God pointed out this would deprive hundreds of riverside families who relied on towing boats for their livelihood. Upon hearing this, Zhai immediately stopped. This illustrates that obstructing legitimate skills is indeed wrong, but context must also be considered.

Next is the story of Zhu Xi (Master Zhu Wen): when a Daoist priest cured his foot ailment, Zhu expressed gratitude with a poem. Later, when the illness recurred, Zhu sought to retract the poem, fearing the priest might misuse it for fraud. This shows that while charlatans should be guarded against, one shouldn't dismiss all practical arts because of them. As for harmful practices like sorcery (wugu) or exploitative sexual techniques (caizhan), these must be prohibited.

The second part addresses the transgression of "slandering sages." The sages of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism all deserve respect. Those who vilify them fall into two categories: the ignorant and the arrogantly self-assured. Some scholars, upon encountering corrupt individuals among monks or priests, attack the entire religion, forgetting that Confucian scholars also include morally bankrupt figures—would that justify slandering Confucius? The text notes that retribution for slandering Buddhist or Daoist teachings has always been swift, yet because Confucianism avoids discussing karma, some grow even more unrestrained.

The passage primarily warns people: do not obstruct legitimate livelihoods, and learn to distinguish between proper and harmful arts; maintain reverence for sages, and avoid slander born of prejudice.

意訉彈者究竟何嘗無報耶宋湻佑中南昌先師廟傾圯知縣李作新廟於縣南往移聖像十餘人舉之不動一士人在旁戲 曰是之謂重泥其人夜夢朱衣人追至廡下決杖三十及覺如痴人自是更不識一字夫一語之戲受罰尙爾况訕謗乎○朱 璣曰書籍字紙乃聖賢之遺亦不可忽梓潼帝君勸惜字有云楊百行坐經文而舉家害癩鮮子坤殘孟子而全家滅亡楊全 善埋字紙而五世登科李子材塟字紙而一身顯宦果報昭然均可爲鑒故作踐字紙亦當與訕謗聖賢同辠)侵凌道 德(三教在世均有主持之人爲之接引故道高德厚者尊爲世間導師經云道高龍虎伏德重鬼神欽彼何等人乃敢侵欺 而凌辱之在有道德者固犯亦不較不知司過之神怒其悖逆思欲垂戒他人罪必不免成化開操江都御史某酷惡遊方僧 道驅逐甚嚴忽有一比丘不知何來坐大中橋說法眾如雲集御史聞之怒甚親往鞫之至則比丘端坐不動怒愈甚命左右 擒之不能動遂命掌其頰頰中白光一道昭耀如朗月御史方驚駭而兩股軟罷不能立矣急回語妻曰此天人道德尊者吾 誤以左道疑之今死矣言訖遂絶)射飛逐走(射飛不止用弓箭如用藥鎗鳥銃粘竿扣索之類皆是鎭江錢叅將 部下卒獲一鴈籠之舟尾空中有一鴈隨舟悲號將登岸籠中鴈伸頸向外大呼空中鴈忽下二鴈以頸相交而死錢叅將聞
Interpretation

This passage recounts several karmic retribution stories that emphasize how disrespect toward sages, written words, and spiritual practitioners invites misfortune.

The first incident occurred during the Chunyou era of Southern Song Dynasty when Nanchang's Confucian Temple collapsed. Magistrate Li Zuo oversaw the temple's reconstruction and relocation of sacred statues. While a dozen strong men couldn't lift a sage's statue, a scholar joked, "This must be what they call 'heavy mud' (a pun mocking Confucius as 'heavy nun')." That night, the man dreamed of a crimson-robed deity striking him thirty times. Upon waking, he'd become completely illiterate, unable to recognize a single character. The commentator marvels: if such severe punishment befell a mere joke, how much worse for those who slander sages!

The text then quotes Zhu Ji on respecting paper bearing written characters. The Emperor of Zitong (Wenchang Dijun) warned: Yang Baixing contracted leprosy for his whole family after sitting on scriptures; Xian Zikun's entire lineage perished after he destroyed Mencius' texts. Conversely, Yang Quan prospered for five generations of imperial graduates after burying discarded papers; Li Zicai rose to official prominence through similar reverence. These clear karmic consequences prove that defiling written words equals slandering sages.

The third story tells of a Ming Dynasty censor who despised itinerant monks. Hearing of a bridge preacher, he led guards to arrest him but found himself paralyzed. When the censor ordered the monk slapped, moonlight radiated from the monk's face. The terrified official confessed to his wife about offending an enlightened master and died immediately.

Finally, the cruelty of "shooting birds and chasing beasts" manifests in Zhenjiang: A general's soldier caged a wild goose aboard his boat while its mate cried overhead. Docking ashore, the captive stretched its neck screaming—its partner swooped down, their necks entwined in death. This tragedy proves harming creatures invites inevitable retribution.

之大怒同舟兵卒各杖三十河南潘檉好獵入山見一老猴發弩射之初發爲猴所接再發中臂度不能支遂抱其子乳之復 摘木葉數片盛餘乳在傍大號而死潘見之破弩折弓終身不獵由此二事觀之一切禽獸皆有人性皆有眷屬或飛或走射 而逐之如人離家出遊路被殺害妻子盼望其慘何如詩云勸君莫打三春鳥子在巢中望母歸此言不獨爲射飛者勸兼可 爲逐走者勸)發蟄驚棲(蟄者藏也蟲之伏蟄猶人之隱處倘被發掘必至傷殘故高子羔啟蟄不殺孔子稱其賢 曹彬孟春不修牆屋曰恐傷蟄蟲仁人愛物固當如是至鳥之棲㝛亦猶人之寢息有意驚之亦是忍作殘害之一端如王遵 忿鵲喧噪俟夜深棲定以竹竿戳爆竹驚之後遵得疾驚悸而死則驚悸豈微過乎)塡穴覆巢(穴者眾生聚處之所 自人視之一穴耳自彼視之則皆以爲安樂房舍若塡塞絶其出路豈不覆族盡死芝里朱某平生惡蜂窠每見蜂從竅入雖 高處必設梯塞之在人家亦然後生二子穀道皆塞人教以秤尾燒紅鑽之竟死鳥之有巢抱卵哺雛所以寄生育也覆之是 絶其生育矣不仁孰甚蘇州薛氏小兒屢升木杪覆巢取雛一日上樹不期先有大蛇啖雛巢中兒驚視張口蛇竟入口兒遂 死不仁之報於此可見)傷胎破卵(物之胎卵猶人孕育若剖破之使不得育卽是戕絶天地生機慈心於物者斷
Interpretation

This scripture conveys its moral teachings through several cautionary tales about showing compassion to animals and refraining from harming living creatures.

The first story tells of Pan Cheng from Henan, an avid hunter who once shot an old monkey. Realizing it was mortally wounded, the monkey cradled its infant while nursing it, then gathered leaves to hold the remaining milk before wailing mournfully and dying. Witnessing this profoundly moved Pan Cheng—he broke his bow on the spot and never hunted again. This illustrates how animals share human emotions and family bonds.

The second narrative cites the Book of Songs (Shijing) to admonish: in spring one must not shoot birds, for nestlings await their mother's return. This serves as both a warning against bird hunting and a broader lesson for all hunters.

The third account explains the principle of "disturbing hibernating creatures or roosting birds"—dormant insects resemble reclusive humans, easily harmed when startled. Confucius praised Gao Zigao as virtuous for sparing hibernating insects, while General Cao Bin refused to repair his house in spring to avoid disturbing them. A man named Wang Zun who frightened magpies with firecrackers later died of shock himself, proving such disturbances are grave transgressions.

The fourth parable reveals the karmic consequences of "destroying burrows and nests"—animal homes are sacred. A man surnamed Zhu who habitually sealed wasp nests later fathered two sons born with sealed anuses; attempts to open them with red-hot rods proved fatal. Another tale tells of a Suzhou boy who routinely robbed birds' nests until one day, reaching into a tree, he encountered a snake devouring nestlings. Startled, he gasped—and the snake slithered into his mouth. Such retribution demonstrates the profound inhumanity of violating creatures' dwellings.

The conclusion equates destroying eggs or unborn young with killing pregnant women—an act that severs the generative vitality of heaven and earth. Those possessing true compassion would never commit such deeds.

不然也宋眞宗祀汾陰見一羊自擲道旁怪而問之對曰今日尙膳殺其羔眞宗慘然不樂自是不許殺羊羔學士周豫嘗煮 鱣見有彎身向上者剖之腹中皆有子乃知曲身避湯者以護子故觀此則胎尙可傷卵尙可破乎○佛經云魚子不經鹽漬 三年尙可再活宣和間富啇楊序大書此語於通衢人由是知戒見人殺魚卽投子於江中夜夢神告曰子本踰期當死今活 億萬命夀可延矣無力放生者當知此)願人有失(武安王云願天常生好人願人常行好事邵康節曰每日淸晨 一炷香謝天謝地謝三光所求處處田禾熟但願人人夀命長國有賢臣安社稷家無逆子惱爹娘四方平靜干戈息我縱貧 來也不妨古人發願如此彼獨願人有失何耶我知人未失已必先失矣李士衡與余英奉使高麗所得貨物甚多英恐過海 船漏盡以士衡之物籍船底以己物置其上及開船遇大風船幾沉舟人急請減載倉皇信手抛去及風定檢驗則所棄皆英 物士衡物在船底竟無一失)毁人成功(毁有二義一毁敗一毁譖人之立功無論大小莫不竭力圖成及其方成 乃欲毁之此等心術蛇蝎不如矣昔王欽若毁寇準之功命促無子秦檜毁岳飛之功子孫滅絶究竟萊公與武穆雖受毁不 磨而欽若與檜千載遺臭人亦何爲迷而不悟耶)危人自安(危人自安者如與人同處令人當其險我居其安與
Interpretation

During Emperor Zhenzong of Song's (Northern Song emperor) sacrificial ceremony at Fenyin, he witnessed a ewe collapse by the roadside. Puzzled, he inquired of his attendants, who replied: "The imperial kitchen slaughtered this ewe's lamb today." Deeply moved, the emperor henceforth prohibited the slaughter of lambs. Another account tells of scholar Zhou Yu boiling eels, when he noticed several arching their bodies upward. Upon dissection, he found them filled with roe—realizing they had contorted themselves to protect their unborn young. Can we bear to harm pregnant creatures or destroy birds' eggs after witnessing such devotion?

Buddhist scriptures state: "Fish eggs can hatch after three years even without brine immersion." During the Xuanhe era of Northern Song, wealthy merchant Yang Xu publicized this teaching on city placards, awakening many to abstain from killing. Whenever Yang witnessed fish slaughter, he returned the roe to rivers. One night, a deity appeared in his dream saying: "Your lifespan was exhausted, but through saving countless lives, it has been extended." (Even those incapable of large-scale liberations should understand this principle.)

Regarding the mentality of "wishing misfortune upon others," Lord Guan (Marquis Wu'an) declared: "May Heaven ever produce good people, may earth ever nurture virtuous deeds." Shao Yong (Shao Kangjie) daily offered morning incense with this prayer: "Grateful to Heaven-Earth and sun-moon, may harvests flourish everywhere, people enjoy longevity, nations be governed by wise ministers, households free of unfilial children distressing parents, and peace prevail without war—even if I remain impoverished." When sages made such benevolent vows, how could anyone wish others ill? Know that cursers often reap misfortune first.

When envoys Li Shiheng and Yu Ying returned from Goryeo laden with goods, Yu—fearing leaks—placed Li's cargo beneath his own. During a storm, crew jettisoned the upper layers indiscriminately. When calm returned, all discarded goods proved to be Yu's, while Li's bottom-stowed merchandise remained intact.

"Sabotaging others' success" manifests two ways: undermining near-completed endeavors or slandering achievements. Whether great or small, all accomplishments require effort—yet some deliberately destroy them. Such venom exceeds serpents'. Historically, Wang Qinruo's defamation of Kou Zhun's merits brought him early death without heirs; Qin Hui's framing of Yue Fei doomed his descendants. Yet Kou (Duke Lai) and Yue (Wumu), though wronged, achieved immortality through their deeds, while Wang and Qin earned eternal infamy. Why persist in such delusion?

"Endangering others for self-preservation" means shifting peril onto companions while securing one's safety. For instance...

人同事令彼失便我得無恙也李緒知永安軍時大盜方起恐及禍乃薦范鉶代已於是鉶知永安緒得離任後盜破永安鉶 舉家被害未幾李緒改任杭州路遇劫賊亦舉家被害一還一報豈不捷如影響乎)減人自益(減損乎人自取饒益 所謂只願己富不顧他貧是也究竟明來暗去誰益誰損陳祈有幼弟三人慮其長而均分田產乃先取田私典於厚友毛烈 迨弟長止以現在產均分後以錢贖所質田烈知其故受錢畢竟不與劵祈憤甚訴之東岳祠祈與烈皆死旣而祈還述其對 審時烈惟持劵爲證王指其心曰劵何足憑止憑此心耳烈乃伏罪付重獄祈以兄剋弟亦減祿算釋回夫祈欲減弟自益而 被烈劫烈欲減祈自益而受神誅暗中銷算⬤忽不爽可懼哉常州蘇掖仕至監司富而多吝嘗買一別墅反覆欲減價售者 情急無可奈何其子在旁曰大人可少增金兒輩他日賣之亦得善價父愕然自此少悟噫此子所言可以醒世之減人自益 者)以惡易好(物有美惡人情愛憎因之若以低醜之物換人好物是卽穿窬之行也宋蘇軾珍藏一美玉章持求 觀因以燕石換去軾初不覺旣而覺之但發一笑及持流死台州不知美玉又歸何人矣大抵世間好物原自流通得之巧失 之必巧私之何益)以私廢公(徇一己之便誤天下之事徇一己之愛憎枉天下之是非皆爲以私廢公趙抃爲御
Interpretation

During Li Xu's tenure in Yong'an Garrison, banditry was rampant. Fearing entanglement in disaster, he recommended Fan Xing to succeed him. After Li's departure, bandits sacked Yong'an, massacring Fan's entire household. Soon Li was reassigned to Hangzhou, but his family met identical fate when ambushed by robbers en route. Such karmic retribution manifested with the swiftness of shadow following form and echo answering sound.

Those who harm others for personal gain—like profiteering while ignoring others' poverty—ultimately suffer hidden losses despite apparent profits. Chen Qi, fearing his three younger brothers would claim equal inheritance, secretly mortgaged family lands to his friend Mao Lie before the division. When his brothers came of age, Chen divided only visible assets, planning to redeem the mortgaged plots later. But Mao, privy to the scheme, kept the deeds after payment. In rage, Chen lodged a complaint at the Eastern Peak Temple (a Daoist shrine overseeing underworld judgment), where both men suddenly died. During the underworld trial, Mao presented the deeds as evidence, but the judge pointed to his heart: "What proof are deeds? Only this heart matters!" Mao was condemned to hell, while Chen's lifespan was shortened for oppressing his brothers before returning to life.

Su Ye, a stingy Changzhou official who rose to Surveillance Commissioner, once haggled viciously when buying a villa, leaving the seller desperate. His son remarked: "Father, why not pay more? It'll help our resale price later." Su was startled into realization—this child's words should warn all who profit at others' expense.

Substituting inferior goods (like swapping treasures with counterfeits) differs little from theft. When Su Shi lent his fine jade to Zhang Chi for viewing, it was replaced with common stone. Su Shi laughed it off, but later Zhang died in exile in Taizhou, and the jade vanished. Worldly treasures follow natural circulation—those seized by force inevitably slip away.

Sacrificing public good for private interests—like Zhao Bian distorting judicial truths as Censor due to personal biases—typifies such misconduct. Prioritizing convenience over state affairs or warping fairness for selfish ends invariably invites calamity.

史時與范鎭論事有隙及王安石爲相鎭屢訐其短於上安石恨之一日上問鎭於安石對曰問趙抃便知鎭之爲人上果問 抃抃曰忠臣也上曰何以知之曰昔仁宗違豫鎭請立皇嗣疏十九上候命百日鬚髮皆白非忠臣而何上然之旣退安石曰 公不與鎭有隙乎曰抃何敢以私隙而廢公道安石大慚王翱爲吏部尙書時次孫疄已蔭監生將秋試以有司印卷白公公 曰朝廷取士至公無私汝若以僥倖中選則妨一寒士進步且汝已有階得仕又何必爾裂卷焚之此皆不以私廢公者以私 廢公何得無罪)竊人之能(竊者非其有而取之之謂人有才能我明用之仍當歸美於人可遂竊爲己有乎高齡初 年學道晚遭病魔祈佑於眞君眞君判曰齡敗德已久鬼訟日多又嘗竊古銘記以爲己文水官譴其竊能沽譽特列爲巧詐 之首其不免矣未幾死夫竊能不但竊人文字如竊人之謀以爲己所畫竊人之功以爲己所成竊師傳之教誨以爲己之識 見是皆欺心之事獲譴必矣)蔽人之善(凡人稍有所長皆謂之善葢之使不得彰卽蔽之也許眞君在世嘗修一 觀欲記其事偶得一片古碑文已磨滅因剗去舊跡勒其新記一日恍聞空中有聲曰所剗舊碑文雖磨滅而當時文人愬君 奪名自顯盍早圖之許於是尋訪舊文另爲立石是夜夢一人謝曰䝉君再顯吾名君亦由此證道矣夫人一文字耳死後尙
Interpretation

During a discussion on state affairs, Shi Shi and Fan Zhen had a disagreement. Later, when Wang Anshi became prime minister, Fan Zhen repeatedly reported Wang's faults to the emperor, earning Wang's resentment. One day, the emperor asked Wang Anshi for his opinion of Fan Zhen. Wang replied, "Ask Zhao Bian—he knows Fan Zhen's character well." The emperor did so.

Zhao Bian answered, "Fan Zhen is a loyal minister." The emperor asked, "How so?" Zhao Bian explained, "When Emperor Renzong was critically ill, Fan Zhen submitted nineteen consecutive memorials urging the designation of an heir. He waited outside the palace gates for a hundred days until his hair and beard turned white from exhaustion. If that isn’t loyalty, what is?" The emperor was deeply convinced. After court, Wang Anshi asked Zhao Bian, "Didn’t you have conflicts with Fan Zhen?" Zhao Bian replied, "How dare I let personal grudges override fairness?" Wang Anshi was ashamed upon hearing this.

Another example involves Wang Ao, who served as Minister of Personnel. His second grandson, Wang Lin, had already secured a position as a student in the Imperial Academy through hereditary privilege and was preparing for the autumn examinations. The examiner brought a pre-sealed exam paper to seek Wang Ao’s approval. Wang Ao said, "The court values fairness above all in selecting talent. If you pass by luck, you’ll rob a deserving scholar of their future. Besides, you already hold an official post—why pursue this further?" With that, he tore up and burned the exam paper. These are models of refusing to let personal interests undermine public duty. Conversely, those who do so cannot escape blame.

"Stealing others' abilities" means claiming what isn’t yours. If someone is talented, we should employ them openly and credit their achievements—how can we steal them as our own? Gao Ling studied the Dao in his youth but suffered illness in old age. When he prayed to the True Lord (Zhenjun), the divine verdict read: "Gao Ling’s virtue has long decayed, and the spirits have many grievances against him. He once plagiarized an ancient inscription as his own work. The Water Official (a Daoist deity) condemns him for stealing others’ talents to seek fame, listing deceit as his chief offense. He cannot evade punishment." Gao Ling soon died. "Stealing abilities" isn’t limited to plagiarizing texts—it includes appropriating others’ strategies as your own plans, claiming their merits as your achievements, or passing a master’s teachings off as your insights. These are acts of deception that invite retribution.

"Obscuring others’ goodness" means that any virtue in others counts as goodness. Concealing it so it goes unrecognized is "obscuring goodness." When the True Lord Xu (Xu Zhenjun) built a Daoist temple, he sought to compose a stele inscription. He found an ancient stele with faded text, scraped it clean, and carved a new one. Suddenly, a voice from the sky said, "Though the old inscription was worn away, the scholar who wrote it now accuses you of erasing his name to glorify your own. Why not reconsider?" Xu Zhenjun then tracked down the original text and erected a new stele. That night, he dreamed of a man thanking him: "You restored my name, and for this, you’ve attained Daoist fruition." Even a single text, after its author’s death—

欲彰之况善有甚於文字者乎萬厯間江陰縣修縣志一廩生有才與其事偶見二節婦有其名而無實蹟可考遂削之城隍 廟道士夜夢二婦人泣訴云某等一生苦節死載縣志某生不訪氏行表章之反并氏名氏削去神曰此生合登黃甲旣輕節 義當削其祿籍令蹭蹬諸生二婦泣拜而去生聞之斤爲妄語明年果考劣奪廩遂憤鬱而死)形人之醜(人有醜事 或偶誤或不幸當爲之委曲掩護今巧爲形容豈是厚道聶從儀好作詩嘲笑人後坐謗政竄死登州章齊一戲成一詩人醜 畢露晚得惡疾嚼舌而死惡報多端不能盡述其最傷陰德者尤是談閨閫致人終身受污無可辯雪此等受報又豈止嚼舌 而死乎)訐人之私(訐攻發也私者陰暗之事人之陰私最怕人知乘機攻發使無所容則心地陰險實爲鬼神所 忌姚舜牧曰經目之事猶恐未眞聞人曖昧切不可出諸口一句虛言拆盡平生之福此語誠可深省也昔劉邠劉恕同在館 中邠一日問恕曰聞君昨日冒雨往州西何耶恕曰丁君閒冷故訪之耳邠戲謂曰丁方判刑部得非有所干請耶恕遂懷忿 至不能解異日邠方知果有干求彼時誤中其諱耳可見一語之誤便已結怨如此况有意攻訐者乎)耗人貨財 (耗消耗也破人之家取其財寶是一網打盡耗人貨財是逐漸侵漁也世間奸惡小人蠱惑愚痴於中取利愚痴墮其術中久
Interpretation

During the Wanli era of the Ming Dynasty, when Jiangyin County was revising its local gazetteer, a scholar participated in the compilation. He happened to notice that two chaste widows were only recorded by name without any verifiable deeds, so he removed their names. Later, a Daoist priest at the City God Temple dreamed of the two women weeping and complaining: "We remained chaste our entire lives, and our names should have been preserved in the county records. Instead of investigating our virtue (De) to honor us, that scholar deleted our names." The City God declared: "This man was originally destined to pass the imperial examinations and become a jinshi. But since he disregarded moral integrity, his scholarly rank and official prospects shall be revoked, leaving him a troubled career." The two women bowed in gratitude and departed. When the scholar heard of this, he dismissed it as nonsense. The following year, he indeed performed poorly in the evaluations, was stripped of his rank, and ultimately died in resentment.

Exposing others' shameful affairs (When people face embarrassing situations—whether due to unintentional mistakes or misfortune—one ought to protect them tactfully. Deliberately sensationalizing such matters is truly unkind). Nie Congyi enjoyed composing mocking poems about others and was later exiled to Dengzhou for slandering court policies, where he died; Zhang Qiyi wrote a doggerel poem airing someone's flaws in full, and in his old age, he succumbed to a vile illness, biting off his own tongue before death. Such karmic retribution is too numerous to count, but the most virtue-eroding (De-depleting) act is gossiping about private matters from the inner chambers, leaving people humiliated for life with no chance to defend themselves. The retribution for this surely goes beyond merely biting off one's tongue?

Revealing others' secrets ("訐" means to expose). People fear nothing more than having their hidden affairs brought to light. To seize an opportunity to embarrass someone reveals a sinister heart even ghosts and spirits despise. Yao Shunmu said: Even what we see with our own eyes may not be true—how much less should we spread ambiguous rumors we've merely heard? A single untrue word can destroy a lifetime of blessings. These words are worth deep reflection. Once, Liu Bin and Liu Shu served together in the Hanlin Academy. Liu Bin casually asked Liu Shu, "I heard you went out west of the prefecture in the rain yesterday—what for?" Liu Shu replied, "Ding Jun has been idle and neglected, so I visited him." Liu Bin joked, "Ding Jun was just transferred to the Ministry of Justice—surely you weren't there to lobby him?" Liu Shu nursed this grudge endlessly. Later, Liu Bin learned Liu Shu had indeed gone to lobby and had inadvertently touched a nerve. See how even an offhand remark can breed enmity—how much worse when deliberately exposing faults?

Embezzling others' wealth ("耗" means gradual exploitation). Murder for property is a clean sweep, but slowly draining someone's assets is equally detestable. The cunning in this world often deceive the simple-minded, setting traps for profit. The gullible fall into these schemes, ultimately losing everything they own.

而不覺始雖逐漸消磨終必一敗塗地爲害可勝言乎列其事狀如引人嫖賭哄人燒煉唆人鬬訟代人通關節之類徐池嘉 靖時人富而狡嘗欲圖徐入房因令人誘其子徐臣嫖賭累債數多遂賣此房池買得之後二子五孫俱染瘵疾設醮禱於城 隍廟有乞兒迎問曰公非徐池乎昨夜我㝛廟中有人向神呼汝名告汝耗其貲財吞謀產業神亦大怒池驚返遂卒二子五 孫相繼而死文奇蜀人挾燒煉之術諸貴悉爲所欺富啇李十五積貨累萬惑奇之術三年掃地遂至自經奇復在劍州僦一 屋煉藥火發延燒奇倉皇走避迷入林中爲鷙獸逐出深入溪谷復爲鷙獸逐出竟死於燒藥之所舉此二條餘可推已○冐 起宗曰子每見權貴之門及暴富之室不肖子孫淫蕩恣靡或身未死而產已暗鬻他家或肉未寒而人已裂據其室前人一 銖一寸而積之後人如泥如沙而棄之而彼不肖者又大半皆聰明人也此何以故葢因當日逞威挾智逼勒牢籠以成巨富 始而耗人後爲人耗語云來得不明去得正好葢此謂也此言又可爲貪積貨財者下一針砭)離人骨肉(眞西山曰 有親族不和父子兄弟夫婦參商者當曲爲調停使之和好實修眞要路也陝西袁公值闖賊亂父子失散流寓江南欲取妾 生子適有人賣一婦與銀三十兩婦至背燈而哭公詰之婦曰家中貧餓難忍夫欲自盡妾故賣身以活之念平日夫妻情篤
Interpretation

This scripture reveals the principle of karmic retribution through several true stories.

Xu Chi was a cunning wealthy man during the Jiajing era of the Ming dynasty. To seize the Xu family's property, he deliberately lured their son into debauchery and gambling, plunging him into massive debt, ultimately acquiring the estate at a bargain price. Later, Xu Chi's two sons and five grandsons all contracted consumption. While holding a zhaijiao (Daoist purification ritual) at the City God Temple to pray for blessings, a beggar told him: "Last night in the temple, I heard the deities angrily denounce your schemes to seize wealth and ruin lives." Xu Chi died of fright, and his descendants perished soon after.

Another story tells of Wen Qi from Sichuan, who pretended to master waidan (external alchemy) and swindled the merchant Li Shiwu out of his entire fortune, driving Li to hang himself. Later, while renting a house in Jianzhou to practice alchemy, Wen Qi accidentally caused a fire. Fleeing the blaze, he was chased by wild beasts and ultimately died at the very site where he had practiced his alchemy.

The commentator Mao Qizong observed: We often see prominent families or suddenly wealthy households where wastrel descendants squander fortunes recklessly. The wealth painstakingly accumulated by predecessors is casually destroyed by later generations. These prodigal sons are often quite intelligent—the root cause lies in how their ancestors originally amassed wealth through abuse of power and cunning schemes, only to have their own descendants similarly deceived. As the saying goes, "Ill-gotten gains are rightly lost."

Finally, the story of Master Yuan from Shaanxi is mentioned: After being separated from his son during wartime, he planned to take a concubine to bear heirs. However, he discovered the woman he purchased had sold herself to save her impoverished husband. Touched by her devotion, Yuan refrained from separating the couple. Zhen Dexiu (styled Xishan) commented: When encountering family discord, one should strive to mediate and restore harmony—this is the essential meaning of cultivating the Dao.

一旦改事他人故不禁傷痛耳公惻然不忍犯次日送還其夫除身價不取仍贈白金令之治生夫婦泣拜而受一日其夫至 揚州遇數人牽一童賣貌甚淸夫私計曰吾欲覔一閨女報袁公一時未得盍先以此進之因問身價幾何曰每嵗一兩童十 二嵗遂出十二金沽之渡江送至袁公家袁公熟視之則其子也父子相抱大慟已而大笑此全人骨肉之報也孫侍郎洪少 遊太學一同舍生得家書云昨夢至一宫府見登科錄汝與孫洪皆有名但洪名下有硃批云某年月日不合寫離書當除名 孫見之愕然曰事果有之向過某州適見翁媪相詬求離乞子代寫離書輕應之實無他意不謂受譴乃爾及就試生果中而 孫下第後訪其人夫婦俱未偶因述前事置酒合之孫果登第屢典大郡所至有離婚未嘗不婉轉調護夫洪以無心之失且 有鬼神所譴彼有意挾私挑唆離間者又當何如乎)侵人所愛(一器一物彼旣愛之孰肯與我欲侵人者當思我之 所愛人若侵奪我將何如則貪念息矣孫泰山陽人有姨將死以二女託曰姊損一目汝取其妹姨死泰嫁其妹取其姊嘗買 一鐵鐙臺歸而磨洗之乃銀也送還之又嘗用錢二百緡置別墅將遷入聞老嫗哭聲問之曰舊居相戀已久一旦爲他人得 故悲耳泰卽取劵焚之不索其直古人不肯奪人之好如此彼奪人之好者能安然常享耶張該有宅宏麗以乏用典張俊千
Interpretation

This passage recounts several true stories illustrating the principle of karmic retribution for good and evil deeds. The first tells of Merchant Yuan: A trader purchased a handsome twelve-year-old boy for twelve taels of silver and brought him to Yuan's household, only to discover the child was Yuan's long-lost son. Father and son embraced, weeping in recognition—a direct reward for Yuan's earlier kindness in reuniting another separated couple.

The second story concerns Sun Hong during his youth at the Imperial Academy. A fellow student received a letter from home describing a dream of the civil service examination results, where Sun's name bore a vermilion notation: "To be disqualified on [date] for drafting a letter of divorce." Sun then recalled having unwittingly drafted divorce papers for a quarreling elderly couple. Though done without malice, this caused him to fail the exams. Later, he located the couple, hosted a reconciliation banquet for them, and ultimately passed the highest examinations. As an official, he became particularly devoted to mediating marital disputes.

The third account describes how Sun Taishan (of Yangzhou), when entrusted by his dying aunt with her two daughters' care—with instructions to marry the unafflicted younger sister—instead married the elder sister who had an eye disability. Another time, he purchased what he thought was an iron lampstand, only to discover upon cleaning it that it was silver, which he immediately returned. When buying a country villa, he heard the elderly owner weeping for her beloved home, so he burned the deed and waived payment. Such was the ancients' refusal to take what others cherished.

Finally, the tale of Zhang Gai's magnificent mansion—mortgaged to Zhang Jun during financial hardship—serves as reminder: Can those who forcibly seize others' beloved possessions truly enjoy them with peace of mind? Just as we would resent having our own treasured belongings taken, so should we reflect this understanding to dissolve covetous desires.

緡俊心愛之乃厚賂牙人換作賣契後該益窘詣俊找價出契示之該不能辨仰天洒淚而已末幾俊子孫皆失音而死夫侵 人所愛而以至愛之子孫償之何其愚耶)助人爲非(爲一惡事受一惡報理之常也若助人爲非則己無惡跡人負 惡名較自己爲惡不更加一等乎丹陽縣令楊開性暴橫果於決責惟與楊詢最厚詢明知其非不敢忤意但一切讚嘆而已 一夕詢夢神責之曰成楊開之惡者汝也開罪當坐汝亦難免未踰月果中惡疾死葢一語讚嘆卽其助也不待出力)逞 志作威(凡人立身正直自能服人若動逞意氣故作威凌此怨府也人誰肯服又何况造物忌盈陰譴將至乎南京史 良佐爲西城御史而家住東城每出入怒里人不爲起乃執數軰送東城御史究治東城御史詰之對曰民等總被倪尙書誤 了曰何誤曰尙書亦南京人其掌兵部時出入里中眾或走避輒使人止之曰與爾曹同鄕里我不能過里門下車乃煩爾曹 起耶民等愚意史公猶倪公遂不爲起不意逢彼怒也東城御史笑而釋之噫聞此言者應當愧死無俟陰譴之至矣)辱 人求勝(恥心人皆有之誰肯甘心受辱者乃於此中求勝天道好還辱人還自辱矣昔林退齋尙書臨終子孫跪請曰 大人何以訓兒輩公曰無他言只要喫虧噫從古英雄只爲不能喫虧害多少事林公此言凡勢要人誠宜大書屏右常目在
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates the dire consequences of "aiding evil deeds" and "abusing power through intimidation" through several cautionary tales.

There was a man named Min Jun who coveted another's treasure and bribed a broker to alter the sales contract. When the original owner discovered the deception but couldn't prove it, he could only weep to the heavens. Soon after, Min Jun's descendants all became mute and died. The scripture laments: How foolish to seize what others cherish, only to repay the debt with one's own beloved descendants!

Next comes the retribution for abetting evil. Magistrate Yang Kai of Danyang County was notoriously cruel, yet maintained a close friendship with Yang Xun. Though aware of Yang Kai's misdeeds, Yang Xun constantly flattered him. One night Yang Xun dreamed of a deity rebuking him: "You're the one enabling Yang Kai's wickedness!" Within a month, he died suddenly from illness. The scripture observes: Even verbal agreement constitutes complicity in evil.

The story of Nanjing censor Shi Liangzuo proves even more enlightening. He demanded commoners rise and bow whenever he passed through the eastern district, once arresting several who failed to comply. The people explained: "When Minister Ni (a high-ranking official) passed by, he never required bows—we assumed you followed the same practice." The eastern district censor laughed and released them. The scripture remarks: Hearing such words should bring shame enough to kill a man—why wait for underworld punishment?

Finally, the text quotes Minister Lin Tuizhai's dying admonition: "In human affairs, learn to accept losses." Throughout history, countless heroes have ruined great causes through unwillingness to yield. The scripture suggests all powerful individuals inscribe this saying on their screens as constant reminder.

These narratives collectively demonstrate: Seizing by force, aiding tyrants, or bullying through power may bring temporary gain, but ultimately invite retribution. True wisdom lies in Minister Ni's compassion for commoners and Minister Lin's willingness to accept disadvantage—embodying the Daoist virtues of humility and non-contention (Wuwei).

之)敗人苗稼(苗稼在土皆有穡神司之合家勤苦春耕夏耘始得有此苗稼官司仰賴性命攸關可敗之乎敗之 者或阻其水利以旱之或潰其隄防以淹之或縱其牲畜以踐食之不仁甚矣泰州富安塲孫某每日五更縱牛食人靑苗萬 厯辛亥年爲雷震死人皆以爲害農之報夫牲畜踐食所敗猶少惟官吏豪民壅泉放水所敗尤多其受報必將不止於此矣) 破人婚姻(破人未合前破人已合後皆破也梓潼帝君救劫章曰瀘州李挺先才高自以爲第一以好破人婚姻遂 降其籍諺云一世破婚三世窮葢有意破婚最是慘毒之行宜受此報也○又有自毁婚姻者何元益爲其子與趙明夫議親 已定而趙女失明家計寥落元益毁其盟與單子文爲親次年父子俱喪趙女適士人葉惟先惟先登第三典大郡此事亦載 之梓潼救劫章○或問至親宻友託我詢訪亦可專意和合誤人終身否曰若容貌之媸宜爲掩飾惟其人不肖及其家世不 當聯姻者勸之斟酌可也)苟富而驕(非義而致富謂之苟富如剝人肥己僥倖獲財皆是也大抵冒越之利鬼神所 忌因福致禍往往有之况可以之驕人耶梅溪有富翁最貪鄙錢穀日積陳棟塘曰此人當有奇禍旣財積不散又無一善狀 欲無殃得乎且往惟貪吝可鄙近漸驕橫是速禍也未幾爲賊所殺又棟塘見聞紀訓曰正德三年州大旱各鄕失收獨吾村
Interpretation

Damaging Others' Crops (Crops growing in the fields are under the protection of agricultural deities. A family's hard work through spring planting and summer cultivation yields these crops, upon which both government and commoners depend for sustenance—how can one willfully destroy them? Methods of destruction include blocking water sources to cause drought, breaching dikes to create floods, or allowing livestock to trample and devour the crops—all profoundly unvirtuous acts. In Taizhou's Fuan district, a man named Sun routinely released his cattle at dawn to graze on others' green seedlings. During the Wanxu era (1611), he was struck dead by lightning—what people called "retribution for harming farmers." While livestock damage is relatively minor, the worst offenses come from officials and powerful figures who block waterways or recklessly flood fields. Their future karmic retribution will surely be far heavier.)

Ruining Others' Marriages (This can occur in two forms: preventing marriages before they're established, or destroying them afterward. The Emperor of Zitong (Wenchang Dijun) records in his "Chapter on Saving from Calamity": Li Tingxian of Luzhou, though brilliantly talented and self-assured, lost his scholarly honors due to his habit of sabotaging marriages. As the saying goes, "One who breaks a marriage bond will suffer poverty for three lifetimes"—for intentionally destroying unions is among the cruelest acts, warranting such retribution. Another case involves breaking one's own engagement: He Yuanyi had arranged his son's marriage to Zhao Mingfu's daughter, but when the girl went blind and Zhao's family declined, the He family canceled the betrothal to marry into the Shan family. The following year, both father and son died, while Zhao's daughter later married scholar Ye Weixian, who passed imperial exams and became a governor. This too is recorded in the "Zitong's Chapter on Saving from Calamity." Some ask: "If close relatives entrust me to investigate a potential match, should I blindly promote it even if unsuitable?" The answer: While minor flaws like plain appearance may be overlooked, if the person's character is flawed or families are truly mismatched, one should advise careful reconsideration.)

Wealth Gained Unjustly with Arrogance (Ill-gotten riches—called "fortune by foul means"—come from exploitation, profiting at others' expense, or sharp practices. Such improper gains are detested even by spirits, often turning blessings into curses, especially when paired with arrogance. In Meixi lived an exceptionally greedy miser whose wealth kept growing. Chen Dongtang observed: "This man invites catastrophe—hoarding without sharing, never performing a good deed. How can he escape disaster? Worse, his recent shift from greed to outright arrogance hastens calamity." Soon after, bandits murdered the miser. Chen's "Records of Witnessed Events" also notes: During the 1509 drought when all villages starved, only our hamlet...)

賴堰水獲熟官以災槩免租明年大水各鄕淹沒吾村獨高阜得收官又以災槩免且得買別鄕器皿價廉獲利三倍於是各 家狼戾屑越無日不揚揚樂也余曰吾村當有奇禍吾家與某某根基稍厚或止於損耗彼俞費芮李四姓恐不免未幾村大 疫四家男婦盡死越一年吾三家果陸續罹回禒然則苟富而驕能免禍乎)苟免無恥(免者或免刑罰或免死亡 也湼槃經曰無慚愧者名爲畜生人當患難之時搖尾乞憐哀求苟免旣已苟免便當悔悟乃反揚揚得意略無恥心是尙得 爲人乎昔范純仁嘗與司馬光論役法不合後朝廷治司馬黨韓維以執政曰與光不合得免或勸純仁借維爲例純仁曰吾 昔與君實同朝論事不合則可以爲今日解脫地則不可有愧心而生孰若無愧心而死乎不苟如此公眞可法)認恩 推過(恩非己出而冐認之過本在己而推之於人此悖戾小人所爲用心平等者斷不爾也王曾爲相士夫有請差者公 察其可用必先正色拒之旣而擢用併不與言嘗曰用賢人主之事若使之知卽是我狥私而市恩也恩欲歸已怨使誰當此 不認恩者曹彬與王全斌伐蜀斌殺降卒三千餘人公諫不聽及歸上怒必欲鞫勘公自誣伏全斌獲免此不推過者)嫁 禍賣惡(前云自罪引他又云認恩推過引與推其惡顯然太上猶且深惡之况設計陰險嫁禍賣惡乎嫁禍者如嫁女
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories about karmic retribution and moral teachings.

The first story tells of a village that, due to its elevated terrain, escaped flooding for two consecutive years. The villagers took advantage of the disaster by purchasing goods from affected areas at low prices and reselling them for profit, becoming arrogant and extravagant. The author predicted that the village would soon face calamity, and indeed, a plague later broke out. The four most arrogant households all perished from illness, while the remaining three families suffered misfortune one after another. This illustrates that if people grow proud and indulgent after attaining wealth and status, they will ultimately be unable to escape disaster.

The text criticizes those who, having narrowly avoided punishment, become complacent and forget their moral bearings. It cites the example of Fan Chunren, son of the renowned statesman Fan Zhongyan: though he disagreed politically with Sima Guang, he refused to exploit this disagreement to evade the imperial court’s investigation of Sima Guang’s faction, declaring, "To live with guilt is worse than to die without regret."

Two particularly reprehensible behaviors are highlighted: first, claiming credit for others’ achievements while shifting blame for one’s own mistakes. The text contrasts this with the virtuous conduct of Chancellor Wang Zeng, who recommended officials based solely on merit without letting them know he had advocated for them. Second, the story of General Cao Bin, who took responsibility for the massacre of surrendered soldiers during the conquest of Shu, shielding his colleague Wang Quanbin from blame. These two examples form a stark moral contrast.

Finally, the passage condemns the act of "shifting misfortune onto others" as even more despicable than openly evading responsibility. Like marrying off a daughter to pass on misfortune, such underhanded scheming is especially detestable.

於人人亦樂娶賣惡者如賣物於人人亦願買此等機械甚深受報必加慘矣姚孜與王虎奉命同盤大雲倉孜受監吏賄虛 檯欠折正數虎不知也及事將敗孜將原受金銀托漆其外以寄虎虎不疑留之後上司鞫勘孜誣虎同受賍搜驗得金銀托 虎乃知爲孜所賣氣結而死孜復用計盡將己罪坐之得自脫自是常遇虎時時發狂若與人毆擊口鼻流血旣絶復甦如是 三年知州錢延年爲請道錄宋之才禳救孜忽從卧榻趨出跪眞武案前自陳始末延年從旁錄其語俟醒示之慙憤而死) 沽買虛譽(譽者名也沽買有用賄邀致行術招引之意陳希夷曰名者古今之美器造物之所深忌每見古來忠臣 孝子淸流正士身被榮名必遭困抑或子孫多不昌所以然者名亦福也造物不肯以全福𢌿人豐茲嗇彼必然之數況無實 沽譽者其折挫更何如乎梓潼帝君有云假行竊名最攖神怒夫博名於人而干怒於神豈爲善計乃今世之人迷而不悟甯 爲神嫉不爲俗非如居官本不亷要人稱亷本不公要人稱公買囑薦揚刋刻碑頌種種欺世之事方且自謂得計甯畏鬼瞰 其旁耶又如假名士假文章假道學假節義互相標榜廣通聲氣一日敗露聲名俱喪往往名士得禍其慘更甚於平流則務 虛名者又不但折福已也不可不戒)包貯險心(貯藏也包藏於心人不能窺也世間一切壞事皆由心造險心常在
Interpretation

This scripture recounts two karmic retribution stories that warn against scheming and seeking fame through deceit.

The first tale concerns Yao Zi and Wang Hu's fate: Appointed as co-supervisors of the Dayun Granary, Yao Zi accepted bribes from minor officials and falsified accounts. Unaware of this, Wang Hu later became an unwitting pawn when Yao Zi, fearing exposure, hid his ill-gotten gold and silver in a lacquer box entrusted to Wang Hu's care. During the subsequent investigation, Yao Zi framed Wang Hu as an accomplice, leading to the discovery of "stolen goods" in Wang Hu's residence. Realizing he'd been betrayed, Wang Hu died vomiting blood in rage. Though Yao Zi escaped punishment, he was haunted by Wang Hu's vengeful ghost for three years—frequently driven to madness and self-harm. During a Daoist purification ritual (Zhaijiao) performed by the prefect, Yao Zi suddenly rushed before the statue of Zhenwu the Perfected Warrior, confessed his crimes, and died of shame upon awakening.

The second section exposes the perils of reputation-hunting: While good repute is inherently virtuous, Heaven particularly detests those who attain it through improper means. Consider how ancient loyal ministers and filial sons, though earning glorious names, often met with adversity and left few descendants—this shows fame itself constitutes a form of blessing, and Heaven never permits complete enjoyment of all fortunes. As Lord Zitong (the God of Culture) warned, nothing enrages deities more than fraudulent reputation-building. Yet modern men remain deluded: officials crave praise for incorruptibility while practicing graft, demand recognition for impartiality while dispensing favoritism, even commissioning flattering recommendations and merit steles—foolishly believing their schemes escape divine notice. So-called scholars and moralists who trade empty accolades fare even worse when exposed, suffering humiliations beyond ordinary men's experience. Thus vanity-seeking transcends mere fortune-depletion; it demands solemn vigilance.

The conclusion reveals all wrongdoing stems from treacherous hearts. Though men may bury malice deep, none evade Heaven's luminous justice.

卽不加之於人已是滿腔惡業矣况旣存諸心未有不見之行事者乎故佛經謂修橋補路不如先平心地心地旣平一切皆 平)挫人所長(前云蔽人之善又云挫人所長挫較蔽更甚蔽是隱而勿彰挫則故示摧折也夫人有所長正當委 曲造就以盡其才反行挫折使之志銷意喪乎穆修以詩著名眞宗見其詩大加賞嘆曰有文如此公卿何不薦來丁謂一言 沮曰此人行不逮文上由是不復問謂挫人所長如此所以死無葬地也)護己所短(此與知過不改有別葢知而不 改特不改耳未必故爲掩餙也護則有多方掩飾之意如人有病亟須醫治諱疾忌醫必爲一生之害矣冒起宗曰凡人護短 初念或畏人譏彈或徐圖改易眼前雖彌縫得好心上還打點不過殆遷延不改則認非爲是久假不歸始猶欺人終且自欺 是以病入膏盲竟不可救短其可自護乎○護短不獨自己一身凡子弟家人及吏胥門客所作過惡皆因我而起不能防檢 反養成之亦是護已所短)乘威廹脅(迫是逼迫脅是挾制乘威迫脅較之逞志作威又加一等葢動逞威凌取快一 時與乘借威權恣行逼勒爲惡雖同輕重自別如爲官者因不服而逼之使服財不與而偪之使與以至興一工役刻期取完 催徵錢糧急於星火皆威脅也又如富貴之家借勢橫行女不從淫而逼之使從產不願售而逼之使售以至逼索債負倚强
Interpretation

This passage discusses the consequences of malevolent thoughts and actions arising from the human heart-mind. It first points out that even when evil intentions aren't acted upon, merely harboring them in one's heart creates negative karma. Buddhist scriptures suggest that virtuous deeds like building bridges or repairing roads matter less than first cultivating peace within one's own heart-mind—when the inner landscape becomes harmonious, everything naturally follows suit.

The text then analyzes specific types of harmful behaviors in detail. The first is "suppressing others' strengths" (挫人所长), which goes beyond merely concealing others' merits to actively suppressing their talents. The example given is Song Dynasty poet Mu Xiu, whose poetic gifts earned imperial favor until the official Ding Wei maliciously suppressed him under pretext of "moral misconduct"—a case where the suppressor Ding Wei ultimately met a wretched end without even a proper burial.

The second harmful behavior is "shielding one's own shortcomings" (护己所短), referring to elaborate concealment of personal flaws. Unlike ordinary failure to correct mistakes, this involves deliberate whitewashing. Like a patient hiding illness from their doctor, such behavior inevitably leads to disaster. Scholar Mao Qizong observes that those who shield faults initially fear ridicule, but gradually come to mistake wrong for right—first deceiving others, then ultimately themselves, until their condition becomes incurable. This shielding extends beyond oneself to include tolerating misdeeds by family or subordinates.

The third is "oppressing through intimidation" (乘威迫胁), meaning bullying through power and coercion. More severe than ordinary abuse of authority, this includes officials coercing false confessions or extorting money, or the wealthy forcing families to sell daughters or property. Such behaviors all involve leveraging power to force compliance from others.

取盈收歛租稅錙珠務盡亦威脅也人怨天怒其不受報者鮮矣○梅侍郎衡湘公初爲固安縣令邑中多宦爲梗一日有中 宦饋公豚蹄乞爲追負公烹蹄召中宦飮併召負債者至前訶之負者訴以貧公叱曰貴人債敢以貧辭乎今日必償少遲死 杖下矣負者泣而去中貴意似惻然公復呼來蹙額曰吾固知汝貧然無可如何也亟賣爾妻與子持錢來雖然吾爲汝父母 何忍使汝骨肉驟離姑寛一日歸與妻子訣別此生不得相見矣負者聞言愈泣中貴亦泣辭不願償爲之毁劵嗟嗟世之乘 威迫脅者特未念其鬻妻賣子一段光景耳誠念及此尙忍乘威迫脅乎)縱暴殺傷(凡爲將相而橫暴殺人爲人好 殺眾生皆是也天道好生人命至重彼無心致人於死者𡨚報尙自不爽況乃縱一日之暴乎宋王韶經略熙河殺人甚多晚 年皈依禪門嘗悔前事一日問祖心禪師曰昔未聞道罪業良多今聞道矣罪業滅乎曰今有貧人負債及富貴而債主至其 償乎韶曰必償師曰然則聞道矣奈債主不放何歸卽言動發狂尋背疽終日合眼醫命開視韶曰有無數斬頭截腳人在前 安敢開遂死語云憑君莫話封侯事一將功成萬骨枯爲將者念之哉至物之於人軀殼雖異命無兩般但試自觀我今有病 肯遂死乎不免求醫問卜以冀速安大限若至亦肯死乎又不免祈天禱地以求增算我旣畏死彼甯不畏我旣貪生彼甯不
Interpretation

This scripture recounts two stories illustrating the principle of karmic retribution. The first tells of Mei Hengxiang, a Ming Dynasty magistrate of Gu'an County, who encountered a eunuch demanding debt repayment. A destitute debtor was being hounded by the eunuch, whereupon Magistrate Mei pretended to harshly reprimand the debtor, ordering him to repay that very day or face execution by beating. When the debtor wept, pleading genuine poverty, Mei feigned insistence that he must then sell his wife and children to settle the debt, theatrically declaring, "I'll give you one day to bid your family farewell." These words moved both debtor and eunuch to tears, ultimately leading the eunuch to voluntarily tear up the promissory note. Through this method, Mei enabled the privileged eunuch to viscerally experience the anguish of forcing families into separation, thereby resolving the dispute.

The second story concerns the fate of the Song Dynasty general Wang Shao. Having slaughtered multitudes during military campaigns in the Xihe region, he later converted to Buddhism seeking redemption in his twilight years. Yet the Chan master Zuxin warned him: just as wealthy debtors must eventually repay, the karma of killing cannot be erased simply by hearing the Dao. True to this admonition, Wang Shao ultimately died in madness, crying out that countless slain souls had come to claim his life. The text cautions: generals should remember that "behind one general's triumph lie ten thousand bleached bones." Though animals and humans differ in form, both equally cling to life and fear death. When we fall ill, we spare no effort seeking medicine—should we think creatures facing slaughter feel no terror?

Both stories demonstrate how abusing power and wanton killing invite retribution. The first shows Magistrate Mei skillfully awakening a powerful man to the suffering of the poor, while the second uses General Wang's fate to warn of karmic consequences for taking life. The passage particularly emphasizes that retribution applies not only to killing humans but also to slaughtering animals, for all living beings share the instinct to survive.

貪物尙如此人可知已)無故剪裁(機婦織女晝夜勤勞千⬤萬縷方成寸疋非甚不得已何忍剪裁至羅綺之類 尤宜珍惜古人謂一片之衣千蠶之命今世于綾錦縀疋視爲泛常獨不念及於此乎永樂十二年上坐便殿裏衣袖敝垢納 而復出侍臣贊聖德上曰朕雖日易千衣亦可但念當惜福耳夫以天子之貴猶思惜福何况士庻自俗尙不古士庶之家競 習奢靡至有以乳哺之年便衣錦著帛者其爲暴殄尤甚恒見閭巷中履穿衣敝之子半屬當年紈袴之兒折福招報感應不 爽深可畏也獨不聞袁了凡内人之說乎了凡初無子後生儼其母爲作冬襖將買絮公曰⬤綿輕煖家中自有何必絮母曰 ⬤貴絮賤吾欲以貴易賤多製絮衣贈族中寒無衣者公喜曰誠如是此子夀矣後儼登進士不獨夀而且貴凡爲父母者爲 幼子惜福當以此思之)非禮烹宰(養親祀先敬賔諸大禮所在或不得已而烹宰若徒供口腹致害生靈其罪大 矣蘇東坡曰予少不喜殺生近始能斷有餽子蠏蛤者卽放江中雖無活理庶幾萬一便令不活亦愈於烹煎何忍以口腹故 使眾生受無量怖苦胡廬山曰世儒語不殺生則必爲曰佛教是亦未考於聖人之訓也禮曰天子無故不殺牛大夫無故不 殺羊士無故不殺犬豕無故不殺則有故而殺者無幾矣孟子曰見其生不忍見其死聞其聲不忍食其肉夫見殺聞殺不食
Interpretation

This passage expounds on the principle of treasuring material goods and practicing frugality to preserve one's blessings. It states that creating a single garment—from weaving the cloth to its completion—requires tremendous effort, particularly for luxurious fabrics like silk and brocade. The ancients said, "A single robe costs the lives of a thousand silkworms," yet modern people treat these precious materials as commonplace. Even Emperor Yongle (Zhu Di) of the Ming Dynasty, despite his imperial status, continued wearing robes with frayed sleeves. He remarked that while he could change garments a thousand times daily, true fortune lies in understanding the value of conservation.

Yet today, extravagance runs rampant among the populace—some infants still nursing already wear fine silks. Such reckless squandering of blessings will inevitably invite retribution. The text cites the example of Yuan Liaofan: when his mother wished to exchange expensive silk floss for cheaper cotton batting to make more winter clothes for the poor, Yuan advised that this act of accumulating virtue (De) would ensure their child's longevity. Indeed, his son later passed the imperial examinations and enjoyed a long life.

Regarding the taking of life, the passage clarifies that except for unavoidable circumstances like sacrificial rites or hosting guests, killing creatures to satisfy mere culinary desires constitutes grave wrongdoing. Su Dongpo recounted how he disliked killing even in his youth, and now even releases crabs and clams. Hu Lushan refuted those who claimed non-violence was solely a Buddhist teaching by pointing to Confucian classics: the Book of Rites (Liji) long decreed that emperors shouldn't slaughter cattle without reason, nor officials sheep, dogs, or swine, while Mencius taught, "Seeing them alive, one cannot bear to see them die." These teachings all guide humanity toward cultivating benevolence and cherishing life.

則不出見聞而食者亦無幾矣孰謂聖人之教全不戒殺乎今人殺心未斷惡業日增或一飡而斃數命或一羹而傷百生或 生蠏投糟或養魚造膾或取嫩胎或食脆肉百計烹熬難可名狀姑無論殺業滿前昭報不爽試一深思冥念安忍殘毒至此 也至于六畜之中惟牛最苦私宰耕牛律有明禁尤宜永戒元帝垂訓曰夫牛者上天元武之精下土太牢之氣非郊祀不敢 用非天神不敢歆其形上應天星其力下興地利有功於世無害於民殺之者國有刑法食之者幽有禍愆牢字從牛獄字從 犬不食牛犬牢獄可免太乙牢山俱有眞形食之三日魔神攝精戒之三日名上玉淸牛食百草與人何害人食百物牛犬可 戒居官者循是說而多方禁約功德甯可思議乎)散棄五穀(散抛散也棄浪置也五穀爲天之所生所以養人何 可散棄散棄者或在田抛撒而不收或在倉使之朽爛或置之踐踏之下或委之水火之中以致天降㐫荒水旱洊至飢饉之 報皆自取也昔劉元眞於終南道中逢一貴人呵從甚盛元眞問何往答曰某山神也上帝以麥大熟人不知愛使降霪雨收 其半耳旣而果然則五穀其可輕棄乎天府吏魁沈判司屢世敬奉元帝一夕夢帝謂曰家人抛棄五穀罪歸家長汝奈何聽 家人狼戾全不覺察數日大厄至矣夢覺入厨下視之果然沈判令家人盡出泛湖約以湖上相候家人出乃淨淘溝中棄飯
Interpretation

This scripture passage primarily addresses two acts that violate heavenly principles: wanton killing of living beings and wasting food, along with the karmic retribution they incur.

Regarding killing, the text observes that people today harbor excessive bloodlust, where a single meal may cost multiple lives. Some drown live crabs in fermented wine mash, raise fish solely for sashimi, even consume animal embryos and young, employing various cruel cooking methods. Such acts of killing inevitably invite terrible retribution. Particularly concerning oxen—these creatures have rendered meritorious service to humanity, and heaven decrees they must not be slaughtered indiscriminately. Oxen embody the primordial martial essence (Yuanwu zhi jing) of the northern Xuanwu constellation and represent a vital earthly force, so even ritual sacrifices must use them judiciously. Those who eat beef will face punishment in the underworld. The character for "prison" (牢) contains the radical for "ox," while "jail" (狱) incorporates "dog"—avoiding consumption of these animals may prevent incarceration. Citing the teachings of the Celestial Worthy of Universal Salvation (Taiyi Jiuku Tianzun), the scripture notes oxen only graze on grass without harming humans, whereas people devour everything—a truly unjust practice.

Concerning food waste, the five grains are heaven's gift to nourish humanity. Yet some allow crops to rot in fields, grains to mold in granaries, or thoughtlessly squander food, provoking celestial wrath through famines. Two illustrative cases follow: Liu Yuanzhen of Zhongnan Mountain encountered a mountain deity who revealed that because people disregarded wheat, heaven would unleash torrential rains to destroy half the harvest; another tells of Judicial Officer Shen who dreamed the Primordial Emperor (Yuandi) rebuked his household for wasting grain—upon waking, he discovered discarded leftovers in the kitchen drain.

The passage's essence urges abstention from killing and conservation of food, warning of divine punishment otherwise. Through concrete examples, it demonstrates the immediate karmic consequences of such transgressions, embodying the Daoist worldview of "heaven-human resonance" (Tianren ganying) where moral conduct directly affects cosmic retribution.

加椒菜爲炊以待家人日晚候沈不至怒歸餒甚爭取食之踰數日方道其故家人由是相戒沈竟無恙)勞擾眾生 (我身欲安孰不欲安我身欲樂孰不欲樂若以安樂自處而以勞擾待人眞不仁也宋熙甯間新法方行民苦煩擾邵伯温初 入仕請教於程明道先生先生曰凡奉行官司文書於其急處能寛一分民受一分之賜此誠仁人之言哉明成化間朝廷好 寶玩中官言宣德朝曾遣王三保下西洋獲寶無算上因命兵部查西洋水程時劉大夏爲部郎中先匿其冊尙書項忠使都 吏遍檢不得公語項曰三保下西洋時勞擾軍民死者萬計縱得珍寶何益舊案雖在亦當燬之何足追究有無耶項降位揖 謝指其位曰公陰德不細此位不久屬公矣後果爲兵部尙書○劉夢震曰玩眾生二字所該甚廣非單指百姓也百姓其一 耳)破人之家取其財寶(事出無心偶至破之惡已不小況爲之寶而破之乎浙江米信夫爲人狡柔里 有大家兄弟爭財因唆弟訟兄結合官吏破其家而有之兄弟俱抑鬱死信夫由是富二十餘年至元戊寅遭反謀牽連結訟 到縣見吏儼如其弟抑令招承忿而訟吏於府見府吏儼如其兄復抑令招承家產旣罄與妻女子息八人俱死於獄○亦有 人取我財寶而我不忍破其家者海門崔鐄以稅金五百兩付鎔工工欺其無證而負焉鐄變產以償後王端毅公爲守廉得
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the karmic consequences of "harassing living beings" and "ruining households to seize treasures" through historical anecdotes.

First, the principle of "harassing living beings": All people desire peaceful and happy lives. If one seeks personal pleasure while causing others to suffer toil and hardship, this violates both humaneness and righteousness. During the Xining era of the Song Dynasty when new policies were implemented, the common people suffered greatly. When Shao Bowen first became an official and sought advice from Cheng Mingdao, Master Cheng advised: "When executing official documents, if you can relax stringent measures by even one-tenth, the people will gain one-tenth more benefit." These were truly words of a humane person. In the Chenghua era of the Ming Dynasty, when the court coveted treasures and sought to examine the records of Zheng He's (the Three-Jewel Eunuch) maritime expeditions, Liu Daxia, then serving as a ministry official, deliberately hid the archives. He told Minister Xiang Zhong: "Zheng He's voyages exhausted the people and drained the treasury, costing tens of thousands of lives. What use are these treasures? Such old records should be destroyed." Upon hearing this, Xiang Zhong bowed and said: "Your accumulation of hidden virtue (Yinde) is considerable. Soon this ministerial position will be yours." Later, Liu Daxia indeed became Minister of War.

Next, the karmic retribution for "ruining households to seize treasures": In Zhejiang, a cunning man named Mi Xinfu instigated litigation between wealthy brothers, colluding with officials to ruin their household. Both brothers died of despair, while Mi grew suddenly rich. Over twenty years later, when falsely accused of rebellion, he encountered a bailiff at the county yamen who resembled the younger brother he had wronged, forcing his confession. Appealing to the prefecture, he met another bailiff resembling the elder brother. Ultimately, all eight family members died in prison, their wealth completely lost. In contrast, Haimen resident Cui Huan, after a silversmith defaulted on five hundred taels of tax silver he had entrusted, chose to sell his own property to make up the loss rather than sue and ruin the craftsman's family. Later, when Wang Duanyi served as prefect, he uncovered the truth of this matter.

Note: "Harassing living beings" refers not just to humans but all living creatures; "hidden virtue" (Yinde) means secretly accumulated meritorious deeds. These stories demonstrate that harming others for personal gain ultimately invites retribution, while treating people with generosity naturally brings blessings.

其狀命訟工對曰鐄家已破若訟之是又破一家也鎔工聞而感愧遂舉前金還之鐄子潤孫崑曾孫桐相繼登第)決水 放火以害民居(長春眞人曰修橋補路拯溺救焚皆大方便事凡人遭遇水火正當竭力救護若決水放火以 害民居甯爲上帝所容乎宋楊丙所居近河嵗積芻茭幸河決賣以取利因屢誘奸民穴堤郡官趙昌言知其事一日值秋潦 堤吏告急昌言命吏竟取丙家芻茭以充堤用將丙送獄根勘伏罪此決水害民之報李轅最孝母一夕有客來投㝛轅適臨 溪烹雞旣具飯不以供客客怒不食轅曰母病思肉故烹一雞不及君也客愈怒而出是夜屋後火起將及廬忽天雨反風火 滅隣人奔視見客卧火中火炬猶在手人已死矣此放火害民之報若乃護堤防水亢旱防火此有司之職苟爲有司者因循 怠忽致民居有漂沒塗炭之災較之決水放火者亦豈有異)紊亂規模以敗人功(此與毁人成功有別 一則功已成而毁之一則功未成而敗之一則傾危排謗明示其毁一則肆志紛更陰敗其功也規模如一切律令政教之類 凡人作事不知如何籌畫然後定爲規模此雖一人之功而天下之安危得失或皆賴之若亂其規模致功業立敗罪莫大矣 昔寰朔之役楊業奉命進討時𧶂正攻寰州業與監軍王侁計曰我師一至𧶂必悉眾以迎公等伏兵石碣谷口吾引賊至此
Interpretation

This scripture passage recounts several historical anecdotes illustrating the karmic retribution for evil deeds that violate heavenly principles and harm common people.

The first story involves a legal dispute: A craftsman initially intended to sue another family but later learned that the opposing household had already fallen into ruin. Realizing that further litigation would bankrupt yet another family, he felt remorse and returned the money he had taken. As a result, his descendants passed imperial examinations in succession, receiving blessings as reward.

Two cautionary tales follow, demonstrating the consequences of deliberately breaching dikes or setting fires. During the Song dynasty, Yang Bing lived by a river and hoarded straw yearly, hoping floods would break the embankments so he could sell his stock at inflated prices. Officials discovered his scheme, confiscated his straw to reinforce the dikes, and imprisoned him. Another story tells of Li Yuan, a filial son who cared for his mother. A guest, angered at being denied chicken for dinner, stormed off—only to return that night and set fire to the Li family’s home. Suddenly, rain poured from the heavens, and the wind reversed direction, extinguishing the flames while the arsonist perished in his own fire.

The text emphasizes that officials who neglect flood prevention or fire control duties, thereby causing public suffering, bear the same guilt as those who directly breach dikes or commit arson. It further distinguishes two types of sabotage: destroying accomplishments after success, or covertly undermining efforts before completion. Particularly grave is the sin of recklessly altering state laws or policies—matters vital to national stability—leading to catastrophic failure.

The passage concludes with an allusion to the Northern Song general Yang Ye during the Huanshuo Campaign: He planned to lure enemies into an ambush, ordering supervisor Wang Shen to set traps at Shijie Valley’s entrance—a strategic "framework" (guimo) in military terms. The implication is clear: sabotaging such critical operations invites severe repercussions.

縱兵擊之必獲大勝旣戰侁乃以賊爲巳遁欲爭其功引兵而去業至不見一兵遂受擒非侁沮之功巳成矣王侁當爲業兵 臠食斯須而盡)損人器物以窮人用(器物如耕之犁鋤匠之斧鑿武之刀仗文之紙筆之類卽器物極小 而用所必需皆不可缺今損其器物令之臨用無措心術壞矣甯無罪報朱少傅國楨曰浙有二生俱春秋有名秋試前一夕 一生宻取彼生謄眞筆嚼去其穎及入塲抽用已盡秃矣慟哭欲棄卷出假寐間覺有促之寫者起視筆依然完好寫畢仍秃 筆也交卷至二門遇彼生迎問曰佳卷得意否謝曰但得完卷耳其人面發赤明日嚼穎生貼出不得終塲秃穎生竟魁選可 見損人器物徒自損耳何損於彼)見他榮貴願他流貶(凡民有四而榮貴者獨出其上得到此地皆非 偶然或由夙世培植福基或由祖宗積德所致見之者正當追慕其前修豈可妄生惡願且願之流貶能卽流貶乎徒自造意 業耳宋盧多遜貶朱厓李符謂趙普曰朱厓雖在海外而水土不甚惡春州雖在内地而至者無生還曷若改竄春州普不答 未幾符亦坐事竄宜州上怒未已或以符語奏上卽日將符改竄春州到未浹旬而卒願他流貶者鑒此或曰此是口出惡言 不止心生惡願矣曰人有惡心必有惡言觸事卽發總由心起彼心生惡願者但未適逢其會耳設使適逢其會能不肆其毒
Interpretation

Wang Shen could have assisted the renowned Song general Yang Ye in achieving a great victory, but his envy drove him to withdraw troops prematurely, leaving Yang isolated to be captured. Such sabotage driven by jealousy is as cruel as devouring a living person whole.

Destroying tools essential to others—like a farmer’s plow, a craftsman’s chisel, a warrior’s sword, or a scholar’s brush—rendering them useless in critical moments, is an act of malice that inevitably invites retribution. The Ming scholar Zhu Guozhen recorded an incident: Before the provincial examinations, one Zhejiang scholar secretly chewed the tip off his rival’s brush. During the test, the victim discovered his brush ruined and wept, ready to abandon the exam. But in a dream, someone urged him to write—and upon waking, his brush miraculously restored itself, only to revert to its ruined state after he finished. Ultimately, the chewer failed, while his intended victim passed. This proves that harming others ultimately harms oneself.

Wishing misfortune upon those who prosper ignores that wealth and status often stem from either accumulated virtue in past lives or ancestral merit. When the Northern Song official Lu Duoxun was exiled to Hainan, Li Fu slandered him to Chancellor Zhao Pu, saying, "Hainan isn’t harsh enough—send him to Chunzhou instead" (a notorious miasma-ridden region in Guangdong). Soon after, Li Fu himself was exiled to Chunzhou and died within ten days. Malicious intent inevitably rebounds. Those who speak evil have already planted seeds of malice in their hearts, waiting to sprout when opportunity arises.

害如李符乎故太上於此直從源頭起處勘之如願人有失願他破散願他身死起心私之便生咒恨等語皆是此義)見 他富有願他破散(人之富有乃其福命或由前生布施作福而來此可敬不可妒也抑或苦心勞力經營起 家飢不敢食寒不敢衣及其旣富常受眾怨此可憫不可妒也縱使富而不賢會有敗時在我何可起心願其破散虹縣周義 夫富而恣橫同郡孫識之常從容勸戒義夫輒怒罵識之恨之曰吾且伺其敗也後義夫以事繫獄適識之登第爲本路漕官 竟處死籍其家未一載識之家遇㓂一旦破敗無異義夫夫識之且伺其敗一語所謂願他破散也後事權在手竟如其願而 行甚矣惡願之不可發也如此夫)見他美色起心私之(諸惡業中惟色易犯敗德取禍亦莫過此嘗卽 百惡淫爲首一語思之世間惡業無窮何至以淫爲最葢淫念一生諸念皆生邪緣未凑生幻妄心勾引無計生機械心少有 阻礙生嗔恨心欲情顚倒生貪着心羡人之有生妒毒心奪人之愛生害殺心廉恥喪盡倫理俱虧種種惡業從此而起種種 善願從此而消故曰百惡淫爲首夫一動淫心未必實有其事已積惡造罪如此况顯蹈明行罔知顧忌者耶陰律云姦人妻 者得絶嗣報姦人室女者得子孫淫佚報世有忠厚善人而身後不昌才士文人而終年潦倒者其病皆由於此今欲斷除此
Interpretation

When seeing others wealthy, one wishes for their ruin (A person's wealth is the karmic reward of their destiny, likely accumulated through virtuous deeds like charity in past lives—such individuals deserve respect, not envy. Others may have built their fortune through frugality and hard work—these deserve compassion rather than jealousy. Even if the wealthy behave immorally, cosmic justice will naturally prevail—how can we harbor malicious hopes for their downfall?).

In Hong County, a man named Zhou Yi abused his wealth to bully villagers. His neighbor Sun Shi often advised him to restrain himself but was instead insulted. Nursing resentment, Sun Shi muttered, "Just wait for his downfall." Later, Zhou Yi was imprisoned for a crime, and coincidentally, Sun Shi passed the imperial exams to become a transport official—he then seized the opportunity to execute Zhou Yi and confiscate his family's wealth. Within a year, Sun Shi's own home was ransacked by bandits, suffering the exact same fate as Zhou Yi. This is the immediate karmic retribution for the malicious thought of "wishing ruin upon others."

Upon encountering beauty, lustful thoughts arise (Among all sinful karma, sexual desire is the easiest to commit and brings the gravest consequences. As the saying goes, "Lust is the foremost of all evils," because once lust arises, countless other wicked thoughts follow: unfulfilled desire breeds obsession, seduction schemes lead to deceit, obstruction incites resentment, indulgence fosters greed, witnessing others' happiness provokes envy, and even murderous intent may emerge to seize what one covets. Shame is abandoned, human relations collapse, and all virtuous thoughts are devoured by lust.)

Even harboring lustful thoughts without acting upon them creates profound karmic burden—how much worse for those who brazenly commit such acts? The laws of the underworld decree: those who defile another's wife will be cut off from descendants, while violators of maidens will see their descendants mired in debauchery. In this world, some kind and virtuous men lack prosperous heirs, while talented scholars languish in lifelong poverty—the root cause lies here. To sever this cycle of retribution...

病當自起念時截斷病根太上不言私他美色而言見美起心意可知已昔陸仲錫生有異才年十七隨師邱某居京對門一 女甚美仲錫與其師屢窺心動師曰都城隍最靈汝試往禱或當有合遂禱之是夜夢與師俱爲城隍所追大加訶責命查其 祿位吏檢簿陸某下註甲戌狀元邱某下無所有曰陸某奏聞上帝削其祿籍邱某抽腸夢甫醒而館僮敲戸報邱先生絞腸 pb:CK-KZ_KR5i0014_01p044a> 痧死矣後仲錫終身貧賤如神言夫人淫心一動神鬼森羅巳無不察卽不凟告神靈能不爲神靈譴責乎善乎謝上蔡之言 曰天道禍淫不加悔罪之人人能悔罪則邪念日消自能當境操持矣試舉一二能持者言之曹鼐初爲泰和典史因捕盜獲 一美女於驛亭意欲就公公奮然曰處子可犯乎取片紙書曹鼐不可四字焚之終夜不輟天明召其家領回後殿試對策忽 風飄一紙墜硯前有曹鼐不可四字於是文思沛然狀元及第王華餘姚人館於富家夜深有一妾出奔公不納妾出一帖示 之葢主人親筆云欲求人間子公批其後曰恐驚天上神次日卽辭館去明年富家設醮拜章道士久不起主人訝之道士曰 適至天門見放來春狀元榜問記名否答曰未見名只見馬前彩旗上書欲求人間子恐驚天上神二句次年狀元及第果王
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates the dangers of lustful thoughts and the blessings of upholding righteous intentions through several historical anecdotes.

Lu Zhongxi was a gifted youth who, at seventeen, accompanied his teacher Qiu to the capital. They often secretly admired a beautiful woman across the way, and the teacher even suggested praying at the City God Temple for divine assistance. That night, both dreamed of being reprimanded by the City God (Chenghuang). Checking the Register of Fortunes, they discovered Lu was originally destined to be the top scholar in the imperial examinations (Zhuangyuan) in the year 1514, but his lustful thoughts had stripped him of this honor. Qiu fared worse—his intestines were ripped out as punishment. Upon waking, Qiu indeed died suddenly of acute abdominal pain, while Lu lived out his days in poverty. This shows how deities instantly perceive lustful thoughts, and punishment follows even without explicit prayers.

Yet as Xie Shangcai wisely noted: Heaven may punish lust, but forgives those who repent. Sincere remorse naturally dispels wicked thoughts. Two positive examples follow:

When Cao Nai served as a county clerk in Taihe, he detained a beautiful woman at a post station. Though tempted, he suddenly realized: "How can I violate an innocent woman?" He repeatedly wrote "Cao Nai must not" on paper, burned it, and maintained this vigil until dawn when he sent her home. Later, during the palace examination, a slip bearing those same characters floated onto his inkstone—inspired, he excelled and became Zhuangyuan.

While tutoring a wealthy family, Wang Hua was approached at night by a concubine. After refusing, he found this was actually his employer’s test. Annotating the seduction note with "Lest I startle the gods above," he resigned immediately. The next year, during the family’s Daoist ritual (Zhaijiao), the priest reported seeing next year’s Zhuangyuan list prefaced with those very words—Wang Hua indeed claimed the title.

(Notes: "Capital City God" refers to the municipal guardian deity; "conducting rituals and submitting petitions" describes Daoist blessing ceremonies; "Zhuangyuan" denotes the highest imperial examination honor.)

華也羅倫赴會試舟次姑蘇夜夢范文正公來訪曰來年狀元屬子矣羅謙不敢當公曰某年某樓之事誠動太淸以此報子 耳羅因憶昔年曾拒奔女於此樓夢當不妄及廷試果然若此皆報及其身者鎭江靳翁年五十無子訓蒙金壇其妻鬻釵梳 買隣女爲妾翁歸因置酒於房謂翁曰吾老不能育此女頗良或可延嗣翁俯首面赤妻出反扄其戸翁踰窗出曰汝意固厚 但此女㓜時吾嘗提抱之今不可以辱遂謁隣人還其女次年夫人生文僖公十七嵗發解位至宰輔餘干陳醫師嘗醫活一 貧士士感之一日薄暮假㝛其家值士出館母命婦伴陳㝛報德陳拒之婦曰姑意也陳曰不可婦强之陳連曰不可不可後 幾不能自持遂取筆連書曰不可二字甚難天明乃去後陳有子爲士應鄕試考官棄其文忽聞呼曰不可復閱其卷又欲去 之又聞呼曰不可不可因細詳其卷決意棄去忽聞大聲連呼曰不可二字最難考官不得已錄之揚州高尙書父販貨京口 客寓中時聞息香撲鼻一日忽見壁隙中伸進一枝公從隙窺之見一少女獨坐次日公訪之主人卽其女也問何不字人答 曰擇壻難耳數日公訪得一壻白主人曰吾見高鄰某郎甚佳欲爲令愛作伐何如曰吾意亦屬之但其家甚貧恐畢姻後不 堪作家計耳公曰不妨吾當借貲與之是日卽爲說合贈數十金公歸夢神語曰汝本無子今賜汝一子讀書可命名銓踰年
Interpretation

During his journey to the capital for the imperial examinations, Luo Lun anchored his boat in Suzhou. One night, he dreamed of Fan Zhongyan (a renowned Northern Song statesman, posthumously titled Wenzheng) visiting him. Fan said, "Next year's top scholar should be you." Luo modestly declined, but Fan replied, "Your act of refusing sexual temptation in that tower years ago moved Heaven—this is your reward." Luo then recalled how in his youth he had indeed rejected a woman who threw herself at him in a tower, realizing the dream was no illusion. Later, he indeed achieved the top rank in the palace examination. These are examples of immediate karmic retribution.

In Zhenjiang, there was an elderly man named Jin who, at fifty, still had no son and taught in Jintan. His wife sold her jewelry to buy a neighbor's daughter as his concubine. When Jin returned home, his wife prepared wine in their chamber and said, "I'm too old to bear children, but this girl is virtuous—perhaps she can continue our lineage." Jin blushed and lowered his head. After his wife left and locked the door, he climbed out the window, saying, "Your intentions are kind, but I once held this girl in my arms as a child—I cannot commit such injustice now." He promptly returned her to the neighbors. The following year, his wife gave birth to Jin Gui (posthumously titled Wenxi), who placed first in the provincial exams at seventeen and later became prime minister.

In Yugan County, a physician named Chen once cured a poor scholar's illness. Grateful, the scholar invited him to stay overnight one evening when he was away teaching. The scholar's mother instructed her daughter-in-law to share the bed with the doctor as repayment. Chen refused, but the woman insisted, "This is my mother-in-law's wish." Chen repeatedly muttered, "This cannot be." When nearly overcome by temptation, he grabbed a brush and wrote "cannot" over and over until dawn before leaving. Later, when Chen's son took the provincial exams, the examiner initially intended to reject his paper but suddenly heard someone say, "Cannot." Upon reconsidering rejection, he heard "Cannot, cannot!" Finally resolved to discard it, he distinctly heard a loud voice proclaiming, "These two words 'cannot' are hardest to uphold!" The examiner had no choice but to pass him.

In Yangzhou, the father of Minister Gao Quan once conducted business in Jingkou, where he often noticed a fragrance wafting through cracks in the inn's wall. Peering through one day, he saw a young woman sitting alone next door. Upon inquiry, he learned she was the innkeeper's unmarried daughter. Days later, Gao's father arranged her marriage to an impoverished scholar and funded their wedding. That night, he dreamed of an immortal saying, "You were fated to be sonless, but now we grant you a scholarly heir—name him Quan." The next year, Gao Quan was born.

(Note: "Taiqing" refers to the highest Daoist celestial realm; "faxie" denotes passing provincial exams; "zuofa" means matchmaking. These stories embody the Daoist core tenet of "karmic retribution for good and evil," emphasizing how upholding virtue yields tangible blessings in this life.)

果生一子後登進士仕至尙書若此皆報及其子孫者大抵人之一心平日能持則當境自定從來有平日搖搖當境能不染 者也今人於色界中未見則先思見旣見則欲貪見枝牽蔓引必欲陷入火坑而後快彼云人禍不及我謂天刑難逃矣○蔣 善曰見色起心固屬不可至於言之聽之尤宜謹戒葢邪䙝之語最能炫惑人心言者不知其非聽者方以爲快其實是自生 煩惱徒多罪障也劉夢震曰凡人談及淫蕩之事人皆樂聽若能援引果報曉勸愚蒙亦何嘗不造福利獨不聞如皋冐起宗 之事乎起宗爲諸生時讀書暇輒莊誦感應篇戊午入闈病甚昏憒中竟不知何處下筆及登鄕薦赴督學親供見墨卷字端 楷如常疑有神助巳未下第歸發願增註此經因念好色損德尤甚於見他色美二句下備列報應以誡世人時塾師羅憲岳 助寫後憲岳歸南昌戊辰正月夢道粧三人一老翁中立二少年左右侍老翁手持一冊左顧曰爾誦來羅竊聽愕然曰此冒 公感應篇見他美色下註語也誦畢老翁曰刻中復右顧曰爾咏詩卽咏曰貪將折桂廣寒宮那信三千色是空看破世間迷 眼相榜花一到滿城紅羅醒卽作書併詩寄其子及榜發公果登第八月公歸其子呈羅書惟詩中榜花二字不可解後偶閱 一書有云唐時禮部放榜姓氏稀僻者號榜花乃知冒姓實應之後官至憲副觀此則色之一關可不愼哉我願世人甯甘朴
Interpretation

This scripture recounts several karmic tales warning against lustful desires. It first observes that those who fail to maintain self-discipline in daily life will inevitably succumb when faced with sensual temptations. Modern people often entertain improper thoughts before even encountering beauty, then indulge in craving upon seeing it, ultimately falling into the pit of desire. Some foolishly believe misfortune won't befall them, unaware that heavenly retribution is inescapable.

Jiang Shan remarked: While lustful thoughts upon seeing beauty are wrong, one must be even more cautious with speech. Lewd words most effectively delude the mind—speakers feel no wrongdoing, while listeners find perverse pleasure, yet this only creates needless suffering and accumulates karmic debt. Liu Mengzhen noted: Though people enjoy hearing salacious tales, using karmic retribution stories to admonish the ignorant actually accumulates virtue (De). He cited the example of Mao Qizong from Rugao:

When Mao Qizong was still a scholar, he devoted his leisure to earnestly reciting the Tract of Taishang on Action and Response (感应篇). During the provincial examinations in the wuwu year, though gravely ill and unconscious, he somehow completed his examination papers. Later, finding his handwriting remarkably neat as usual, he suspected divine assistance. After failing the exams, he vowed to annotate the Tract, particularly expanding on passages like "seeing another's beauty" with detailed accounts of karmic consequences to awaken society. His tutor Luo Xianyue helped transcribe these notes. After returning to Nanchang, Luo dreamed of three Daoist adepts (an elder and two youths) holding a book, instructing him to recite Mao's annotations on "seeing another's beauty." After reciting, the elder had the youths compose poetry mentioning "list flowers" (榜花). Later, Mao indeed passed the imperial examinations, eventually rising to Vice Surveillance Commissioner (Xianfu, a Ming dynasty judicial title). Research revealed "list flowers" referred to Tang dynasty candidates with rare surnames—fitting Mao's uncommon family name.

This story demonstrates how the trial of sensual desire demands utmost caution. The author advises cultivating plain simplicity rather than risking temptation's allure.

拙莫羡多情縱有邪緣且思陰報若謂腐言不堪入耳豈往事盡屬虛誣自病自療惟在發其源而治之可也)負他貨 財願他身死(負者乏時借用久而不還也中誡經曰欠他債負目下未還常思憂負勤思還之若以不還之故至 願其死現生便是豺狼來世甯逃犬馬亦愚甚矣永嘉徐輝嘗借丹陽一大商千餘貫未及償而商死商家不知亦不復索後 輝生一子甚聰俊輝切愛之八嵗大病召醫市藥貨財耗盡而病不減一日忽語所親老尼曰我欲歸去尼曰此汝家也汝復 何歸曰我丹陽人也徐公貸我錢千餘貫幸我死不償今來取之耳言訖遂絶夫輝無願商身死之心不過因其死而私幸耳 且還報不爽如此彼願其死者又當何如乎)千求不遂便生咒恨(干求如求陞薦求財物求寛宥之類 不知愧恥惟務干求已非美德若不遂而咒恨尤小人也抑思我知求人本非正理安能必其遂意此不遂之根原自我帶來 何關於彼故咒他實自咒耳陝西夏縣張甡性好夤緣少不遂其請則百端嗔怒詛咒誹謗無所不至後七竅流血而死咒恨 之報應當如是)見他失便便說他過(失便卽失意之事也人生百年豈能事事如意有失便處或是數之 已定或是變之偶值若見人遭此卽摘他平日短長謂宜有此失意事是爲幸災樂禍能無報乎李熊以文行著名有疾不起
Interpretation

Do not envy those who are romantic and flirtatious, for even if they have romantic encounters, they must face retribution in the underworld. If these words of caution sound unpleasant, can it be that past events were all false? One must heal their own ailments, and the key lies in identifying the root cause.

Failing to repay debts while wishing for the creditor’s early death ("负" means borrowing temporarily but refusing to repay for a long time). The Zhongjie Jing (Scripture of Central Admonition) states: Those who refuse to repay their debts, even if the creditor does not come to collect immediately, should remain anxious and diligently think of repayment. If someone curses their creditor to die just to avoid repayment, such a person is no better than a wolf in human form—how can they escape the retribution of being reborn as an ox or horse in the next life? This is truly the height of foolishness.

There was a man named Xu Hui in Yongjia who once borrowed over a thousand strings of coins from a wealthy merchant in Danyang. Before he could repay the debt, the merchant died. The merchant’s family was unaware of the debt and never came to collect it. Later, Xu Hui had a clever and handsome son, but at the age of eight, the child fell seriously ill. Despite exhausting the family’s wealth on doctors and medicine, there was no improvement. One day, the child suddenly said to a familiar old nun, "I must return now." The nun replied, "This is your home—where else would you return to?" The child answered, "I am from Danyang. Master Xu borrowed over a thousand strings of coins from me and took advantage of my death to avoid repayment. Now I have come to collect the debt." With that, the child passed away. Though Xu Hui never cursed his creditor to die, he merely secretly rejoiced at the other’s death to evade repayment—yet the retribution was so clear. How much worse would it be for those who truly curse their creditors?

Feeling resentment when one’s requests are unmet ("干求" refers to seeking promotions, wealth, or forgiveness). Shamelessly seeking favors from others is not virtuous in the first place, and harboring resentment when denied is the behavior of a petty person. One must understand that making demands on others is inherently unreasonable—how can one expect everything to go their way? The root of dissatisfaction lies within oneself; what does it have to do with the other party? Thus, cursing others is, in truth, cursing oneself. Zhang Shen of Xia County in Shaanxi was fond of scheming, and whenever things did not go his way, he would fly into a rage and curse. Later, he died bleeding from all seven orifices. Such is the retribution for harboring hatred toward others.

Saying someone "deserves" their misfortune when they face hardship ("失便" refers to unfavorable circumstances). How can life always go smoothly over a hundred years? When adversity strikes, it may be due to fate or mere chance. To gloat over others’ misfortunes by pointing out their past wrongs and saying they "had it coming"—how can such malicious joy escape retribution? Li Xiong was once renowned for his literary talent and virtue, yet he died young from illness (hinting that his harshness brought about this fate).

妹壻何時揚言曰此郎素負能幹今日如何聞者莫不薄其爲人逾年時亦死豈非口舌輕薄之報乎至於後學之士往往以 成敗輕議古人尤爲可笑班固作漢書謂司馬遷博物洽聞而不能以智自全乃固以黨竇氏竟拷死獄底視遷之宫刑更重 范瞱作後漢書論班固身陷大戮智及而不能守乃曄以謀逆故竟殞厥宗視固之得禍更慘人之智如目睫然能見人不能 自見大率類此不可不戒)見他體相不具而笑之(人生四體殘缺相貌不備謂之天刑見之者正當生 悲憫心何可訕笑訕笑之根起於輕侮種隙深矣孫文懿公貌陋赴試京師縣令李昭言戲之曰似君人物有幾人耶是年聞 懿以第三人登第未幾判審官昭言方以選人赴調一見大慚遂解綬歸古人形奇貌劣者多至大貴徒以外貌取人豈不盡 失乎)見他才能可稱而抑之(前曰貶正排賢又曰蔽人之善又曰挫人所長貶與排無論已蔽則猶有 幽錮之意挫則尙有摧折之慘此則又進一層曰見他才能可稱而抑之葢可稱而不稱卽是抑也較前二條罪似少輕而推 勘愈細太上之憐才何其至乎大抵天生才能不能自顯於世必有爲之先者稱道而表揚之今可稱不稱不抑而抑是逆天 矣逆天不祥豈得無罪昔龎士元性好奬借或過其才人問之龎曰方今世教衰微善人常少不美其談卽聲名不足企慕而
Interpretation

The Collected Commentaries on the Treatise on Response and Retribution conveys moral lessons through historical anecdotes, warning people to watch their words and deeds while maintaining reverential awe.

The first account concerns a man named He Shiyang who habitually boasted of his own capabilities, only to meet with misfortune later—a clear retribution for careless speech. The text then critiques later scholars who presumptuously judge historical figures based solely on success or failure, highlighting the folly of such behavior. It cites Ban Gu, who criticized Sima Qian in Book of Han for failing to preserve himself, yet Ban Gu himself died in prison after being implicated in the Dou family case. Similarly, Fan Ye commented on Ban Gu's misfortunes in Book of Later Han, only to be executed for rebellion along with his entire clan. These examples illustrate how people often discern others' faults while remaining blind to their own.

Next comes a warning against mocking physical disabilities. The story of Sun Wenyi, who had an unattractive appearance, demonstrates this: Magistrate Li Zhaoyan ridiculed him by asking, "How many people like you could possibly succeed?" That same year, Sun placed third in the imperial examinations. When Li later encountered the now-successful Sun, he resigned in shame. The text emphasizes that appearances deceive, as many with unusual features later achieve great wealth and status.

Finally, the text admonishes against suppressing talented individuals. Beyond previously mentioned behaviors like disparaging the worthy, obscuring others' merits, or undermining their strengths, it identifies even "failing to praise the capable" as a form of suppression. The author argues that talent requires recognition and promotion—withholding praise constitutes suppression contrary to heavenly principle. The example of Pang Shiyuan illustrates this: he made a habit of praising others, sometimes even exaggerating their abilities. When questioned, he explained that in these morally degenerate times when virtuous people are scarce, failing to amplify their praise would allow good reputations to fade unrecognized.

爲善者益少矣今拔十得五猶得其半以之興善長俗不亦可乎世之爲考官持世教者念此)埋蠱厭人(厭制也埋 蠱厭人是刻木埋之於地畫符咒以魘制人也按元都律考之人生爲巫覡皆是先世獲罪之人今又爲人行魘制之術是愈 增其罪矣然有起心而使之爲者其罪更甚於巫昔呂用之伏誅軍人發其中堂得一石函内有一銅人身被桎梏背書高駢 姓字是以高駢每爲用之所制噫高駢旣爲用之所制用之奚爲又及於戮當如埋蠱魘人未能害人適足以自速其禍也) 用藥殺樹(一草一木皆具造物生意故高柴方長不折孔子稱之佛家亦謂樹木年久者多爲神鬼所棲不可輕伐 伐之往往得禍夫伐且不可况用藥殺之乎用藥殺之者或他人之樹已不得伐而暗用藥以殺之也近有一人家因隣宅大 樹一株遮碍風水乃暗用皮硝皂角水灌之樹死兩家俱敗則用藥殺樹果何利乎)恚怒師傅(前云慢其先生此復 云恚怒師傅葢恚怒之罪更甚於慢也古人事師之道無犯無隱凡有所教皆當虛心和氣以受之何可恚怒恚怒者必是薄 德無福之人也抑尊師重傅太上之訓人爲子弟者固然然爲師傅者亦當自盡師傅之職乃世有浮薄之士受人子弟重托 而終朝燕惰虛糜館穀或改眞作僞欺䝉父兄甚者引誘頑徒作諸不肖誤人子弟如此則其獲罪於太上更不待言矣昔鄧
Interpretation

Fewer people nowadays engage in virtuous deeds. If we can find five out of ten who still practice goodness, that would already be half the battle won. Using this standard to encourage kindness and improve social customs—wouldn’t that be worthwhile? Those who serve as examiners or oversee moral education should reflect on this principle.

Regarding "burying gu to harm others" (where "ya" means to suppress): This refers to carving wooden figurines, burying them underground, and casting spells or curses to oppress others. According to the Yuandu Code, those who become shamans (those who summon spirits through dance) in this life are burdened with sins from past lives. To further assist others in performing such malevolent rituals only compounds their guilt. If someone instructs a shaman to carry out these dark arts, their offense is even greater than the shaman’s. When Lü Yongzhi was executed, soldiers dug up a stone box in his house containing a bronze figure shackled with a cangue, its back inscribed with Gao Pian’s name. This was why Gao Pian was always under Lü’s control. Alas, if Gao Pian was already ensnared, why did Lü Yongzhi still seek to harm him? Similarly, those who bury curses to harm others often fail to injure their targets—instead, they hasten their own calamities.

Regarding "poisoning trees with chemicals": Every plant and tree embodies the life-giving force of creation. In ancient times, Gao Chai refused to break living branches, earning Confucius’s praise. Buddhism also teaches that aged trees often house spirits and deities; thus, they should not be recklessly felled, as doing so invites misfortune. If even cutting them is forbidden, how much worse is poisoning them? Some, unable to legally remove another’s tree, secretly use chemicals like saltpeter or soapberry water to kill it. Recently, one household poisoned a neighbor’s large tree that obstructed their feng shui. The tree died—and both families suffered. What good comes from poisoning trees?

Regarding "resenting one’s teacher": Earlier, we discussed neglecting teachers; here, we address resentment, an even graver offense. The ancients served their teachers with neither defiance nor concealment, accepting all teachings with humility and calm. How could anger or resentment arise? Only those shallow in virtue and devoid of blessings would resent their mentors. That said, while revering teachers is a commandment of the Supreme Dao (referring to the highest Daoist deity), and disciples must uphold it, teachers must also fulfill their duties. Nowadays, frivolous and shallow individuals accept heavy responsibilities to educate the young yet idle away their days, collecting tuition without merit. Some deceive parents with falsehoods, while others lead students astray into vice. Such people incur even greater condemnation from Lord Laozi (the deified Laozi). In the past, Deng....

至爲塾師教人以誠熙甯九年神宗御集英殿第進士至長子綰爲翰林學士侍立上前及唱名至其弟績綰下殿謝又唱至 其二孫綰又下殿謝上顧而笑王恭公從旁贊曰此其父鄧至盡誠教人所致也嗚呼爲人師者可以法矣)抵觸父 兄(父母生我劬勞辛苦長養教誨冀其成立以是恩德昊天難報可抵觸乎兄弟分形如手如足一切痛癢無不關心苟或 相傷是傷父母可抵觸乎卽或父有偏私兄有侵凌只宜委曲解喩反身自修萬一父兄執迷不返亦須和氣平心久自調洽 若少有忿氣至於抵觸根本旣虧鬼神必厭絶之矣昔張義每旦必告天消平生罪過一日被攝至陰司陰君示以黑簿簿中 罪目一一皆已勾破惟餘一事不勾細視之乃義幼時於刈禾處張目反顧其父又微罵數語以此不赦葢天律不孝之罪不 通懴悔故也義大懼卽日削髮爲僧入山修道臨潼殷貴兄殷富貴素欺兄嘉靖初死死三日復生匍匐向富叩頭曰弟今後再 不敢欺兄矣富訝問故貴曰貴始病革被卒拽赴城隍廟跪堦下殿上厲聲曰汝何得欺兄罪杖百鬼拽貴下將行杖貴惶懼 大呼曰貴愚䝉自今改過卽聞殿上曰汝果能改姑免杖放還見鄭優一家皆被拷掠痛聲不忍聞因一跌而寤隨問鄭優家 皆疫死矣此可爲抵觸者戒按抵觸二字凡語言詞氣之間微有不順卽謂之抵觸但比之暗侮則加甚耳)强取强
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories emphasizing filial piety and fraternal devotion, highlighting the importance of maintaining reverence and obedience toward parents and elder siblings.

The narrative begins with Deng Zhi, a private tutor who taught his students with utmost sincerity. During Emperor Shenzong's reign in the Song Dynasty, his son Deng Wan served as a Hanlin Academician. At the palace examination when names were announced, Deng Wan's two younger brothers and two grandsons successively passed the imperial exams, each time requiring them to descend the hall to express gratitude. The emperor watched with amusement, while Minister Wang Gonggong remarked that this fortune stemmed from Deng Zhi's sincere dedication in educating students.

The text then underscores the paramount importance of filial devotion. Parents give us life, nurture us through hardship, and their kindness surpasses heaven's expanse—how could we ever confront or offend them? Siblings are like limbs—harming them means harming our parents. Even if parents show favoritism or elder brothers act unfairly, one should offer gentle remonstrance while examining one's own conduct. Should parents or elder siblings remain obstinate, one must patiently resolve conflicts with tranquility. Harboring resentment and defying parents damages one's fundamental virtue, incurring even the disdain of spirits.

Two illustrative examples follow: Zhang Yi daily confessed his sins to heaven, yet could never erase the transgression of once glaring defiantly at his father during youth; Yin Gui, after death, was reprimanded in the underworld by the City God for bullying his elder brother, frightening him into reviving immediately to kowtow in apology. Another account tells of Zheng You whose entire family perished as karmic retribution for their misdeeds.

The passage concludes by noting that "defiance" encompasses not just overt disobedience but even minor verbal or attitudinal resistance—more severe than covert disrespect. These stories collectively serve as moral admonitions to honor parents and cherish sibling harmony.

求(分所不當得而必欲得之故謂之强以人供我曰取以我于人曰求四川張御史語所親林繼曾曰子昔按雲南時夜獨 坐有朱衣人現前曰某爲公守藏神待公久矣子曰金何在神指座下視之果有白金千兩因語神曰御史豈得携此神曰願 得鄕貫帖送至公家子書焚之神遂隱比復命同年某託薦一官强納二百金歸而夜禱前事神復至僅存八百金問其故曰 某同年金是也悚然愧謝强取者鑒此臨安沈一性最貪開酒庫於錢塘門外一日將二皷有貴公子五人來飮沈意其爲五 道神也叩求曰得遇尊神一生遭際願求小富貴客笑曰不難令一卒負一囊授沈沈拜受摸其中皆酒器也急携入城又慮 有聲爲人詰問悉隔囊搥匾歸家喜謂妻曰我得橫財矣妻開視驚曰此似吾家物因啟篋驗之皆烏有矣沈大慙强求者鑒 此大抵世間一切得失皆有定數數不當得卽以父之財子亦不得而有之况可强之他人耶嘉興一賈人積銀數百兩貯磁 甕以金釵二股置上埋地中出商於外不料其子窺見竊發之視甕中惟淸水一泓耳以手探之無物封葢如故父歸發甕問 妻曰吾藏金誰曾發耶吾所置金釵在上今在下何也後子言其事因共嘆息)好侵好奪(以詭計暗取曰侵以勢力 明取曰奪又侵則所取少奪則取之盡也此皆損人利己之事何可孳孳好之旣好侵奪則所侵所奪者自難消受暗裏塡還
Interpretation

This scripture uses several parables to warn against forcibly taking wealth that is not rightfully one's own. The first story tells of Imperial Censor Zhang who, while serving in Yunnan, encountered a treasure-guarding deity offering him a thousand taels of silver. Knowing it improper for a censor to accept such gifts, he politely declined. Later, when helping a fellow examination graduate secure an official post, he reluctantly accepted two hundred taels—only to discover the deity's original offering had mysteriously decreased by that exact amount, revealing how forcibly obtained wealth never truly belongs to its possessor.

The second parable concerns Hangzhou wine merchant Shen Yi, whose greed led him to beseech five noble guests (actually the Five Path Gods) for riches. They gave him a sack filled with wine vessels, which he joyfully carried home—only to find these were his own household items temporarily transformed and returned by the deities, leaving him with empty delight.

The third account describes a Jiaxing merchant who buried several hundred silver taels underground. When his son secretly dug them up, the urn contained only clear water. Later, the father noticed his gold hairpin had moved, realizing his son had tampered with the hoard—yet the money had already vanished.

These stories collectively illustrate how worldly gains and losses follow predetermined measures. Wealth wrongly obtained, even if temporarily acquired, will inevitably be lost through unforeseen circumstances. Secretly scheming to take what belongs to others is called "encroachment" (侵), while openly seizing through power constitutes "plunder" (夺)—both self-serving acts that harm others. Forcibly seized possessions ultimately return to their rightful place through hidden channels of cosmic recompense, leaving the taker worse off. As the scripture states: if even a son cannot inherit his father's wealth when destiny denies it, how much less justified is seizing what belongs to strangers?

將必併其本有者皆失之矣畢昶以苛刻立業凡田產與之相隣者百計欲侵之及其有急而賣則陽拒之曰我不欲也旣復 使人陰鈎之及至則又曰我實不欲也其人無奈只得減價以就及成契則又曰我銀不便期以某日來取及取時或以色銀 或以米穀凑而與之原數併不得全平生所爲類如此後㫤長子以人命繫獄破產而死次子流落乞丐死於他方嗣竟絶此 好侵之報也林達爲人姦柔里有墳地一區風水甚吉達思圖之乃僞立文劵稱其父未故時賣與某不能辨嗟恨而已達遂 遷其父葬之是夕卽夢父語曰福地在心不在墳塋安有奪人之地而子孫得享福利者乎今絶祀矣未幾達死其子亦死此 好奪之報也○按侵奪不止田地凡一切貨物皆是)擄掠致富(虜掠如乘客人被溺撈取貨物皆因人家失火剽竊 貲財或因賊寇經過乘釁刼掠又其甚者如爲官吞剝百姓盜用公帑爲吏科斂民財偷取庫藏皆虜掠也以此至富焉得受 享)巧詐求遷(遷陞轉也士君子旣登仕版便當忠直存心今求遷而濟以巧詐則其心術不端甚矣况人生功名 利鈍落地已定卽營營終身何加毫末徒爲鬼神訶責耳西谿龍霓在京邸同年某行人過之告以將避湖廣楊暫註門籍霓 曰湖廣非遠差况尊翁在堂便道歸省豈不善反欲避耶行人曰不然吏部將選科道若承此差恐不得與選吾姑避之則揚
Interpretation

This scripture recounts two true stories illustrating the karmic retribution for seizing others' property through force or deceit.

The first story concerns Bi Chang, who built his fortune through ruthless schemes. Whenever neighbors owned desirable land, he would scheme relentlessly to appropriate it. When owners became desperate to sell, he'd first feign disinterest while secretly sending agents to pressure them into lowering prices. Upon closing deals, he'd invent excuses to delay payment, ultimately settling with inferior silver or grain. After a lifetime of such predatory practices, his eldest son was imprisoned for homicide, resulting in family ruin; his second son became a beggar who died homeless abroad, ultimately cutting off their ancestral lineage.

The second story tells of Lin Da, who coveted an auspicious feng shui plot in his village. He forged land deeds, falsely claiming his deceased father had purchased it, and forcibly relocated his ancestral graves there. That very night, he dreamt of his father saying: "Blessings stem from virtuous hearts, not burial sites. How could stolen geomancy possibly bring fortune? Our family line shall end." True to this warning, Lin Da and his son soon perished.

The commentary clarifies that such usurpation extends beyond land—including profiteering from others' misfortunes (like looting merchandise when travelers drown or stealing during fires), exploiting chaos (like plundering during bandit raids), and particularly officials embezzling public funds or inventing tax pretexts—all constituting "plunder-based enrichment." Some even scheme for promotions (like the imperial messenger in the text who avoided visiting his father during official Hunan-Hubei travels to campaign for censorial positions). Such crafty manipulations defy predestined fate—vain stratagems only invite celestial punishment.

(Note: "Censorial positions" refers to Ming-Qing dynasty surveillance offices; "imperial messengers" were officials handling edict deliveries and enfeoffment ceremonies.)

子山當行霓止之不聽遂稱病註門籍纔一二日吏部卽開選行人勢不可卽出楊竟應選得吏科給事中行人仍得前差徒 自恨而已噫一以巧詐求之一以不巧詐得之世間凡事似此者極多豈獨官職)賞罰不平(前云賞及非義刑及 無辜是賞罰俱不當也此云不平者謂均之一賞而多寡任意均之一罰而輕重狥私爲不平也賞罰旣不平人心必不服積 怨招禍率由乎此故太上又以此爲戒)逸樂過節(國語謂民勞則思善逸則思淫是不欲人逸也孟子謂人生於 憂患死於安樂是不欲人樂也况逸樂可過節乎過節亦非必驕奢淫佚凡志氣昏惰貪戀安享以至服食日用不遵常度皆 謂之過節逸樂過節不促算則招殃必然之理也范文正公嘗言吾每夜就寢計一日飮食奉養之費及所爲之事若相稱則 鼾睡熟寐苟或不然則終夜不能安枕人能存心敬畏如此又豈有逸樂時耶南蘭黃含仲曰人無夀天祿盡則死是以一生 財祿皆有定數服用之際豈宜過享譬如人有錢一千一日用盡則明日無有一文若日用一百則可至十日日用五十又可 至二十日凡人惜福當作是觀)苛虐其下(居官而酷責吏民處家而過撻婢僕皆苛虐也○居官法戒前已略見矣 請得專言處家之義洪州司馬王簡易得腹疾中有塊隨氣上下旣絶復甦謂其妻曰吾舊使小奴偶因約束太嚴遂至斃適
Interpretation

Zishan attempted to block someone's promotion but failed, so he feigned illness and secluded himself at home. Within days, the Ministry of Personnel unexpectedly initiated official selections, forcing him to emerge and participate. He was appointed as a supervising secretary in the Office of Scrutiny for Personnel, while the official he tried to obstruct still received an external assignment, leaving Zishan secretly frustrated. Alas! Some scheme for positions yet fail, while others obtain appointments without manipulation - such occurrences in this world are legion, extending far beyond official posts alone.

Regarding inequitable rewards and punishments: Earlier we discussed rewarding the unworthy and punishing the innocent as improper application of both. Here "inequity" refers to arbitrary determination of reward amounts for equally deserving cases, or personal bias affecting punishment severity for similar offenses. Once rewards and punishments become unfair, popular resentment inevitably follows, with accumulated grievances breeding misfortune. Thus the Treatise on the Response of the Dao (Taishang Ganying Pian) particularly warns against this.

On excessive indulgence: The Discourses of the States (Guoyu) observes that people cultivate virtue through labor but become dissolute through ease; Mencius similarly noted survival through hardship and ruin through comfort. How much more dangerous then is indulgence beyond proper limits? "Exceeding bounds" need not imply extreme debauchery - any slackening of will, excessive comfort-seeking, or even daily food and clothing beyond one's station constitutes transgression. Overindulgence inevitably brings either shortened lifespan or calamity. Fan Zhongyan would nightly assess whether his day's expenditures matched his accomplishments, lying awake if they didn't. Maintaining such vigilance would prevent indulgence. Huang Hanzhong remarked that human blessings have fixed measures - like possessing a thousand coins: spending all daily exhausts them immediately, while spending a hundred lasts ten days, and fifty lasts twenty. People should contemplate fortune thus when practicing frugality.

On harsh treatment of subordinates: Officials treating commoners cruelly or households excessively punishing servants both constitute oppression. Having previously addressed governance principles, we focus here on household management. Wang Jianyi, a military advisor in Hongzhou, developed an abdominal illness with wandering internal masses. Before dying, he told his wife: "My former excessive discipline caused a young servant's death - just now I saw him leading underworld officers to claim my life."

至陰司被小奴持訴不可解今腹中物正彼作祟吾不久矣妻曰小奴安敢如此曰陽間有貴賤陰間則一般也未幾果卒嗚 呼孰謂奴僕下賤遂可任吾苛虐乎卽主僕之分宜有貴賤念彼父母深憐痛惜豈不相同一旦勢不得已沒身歸我割肉剜 心已自難忍我復從而苛虐之豈有人心者所爲試一返觀我之兒女供人打罵我能忍乎筋疲力盡我能忍乎一旦有疾幽 置別室我能忍乎我不能忍便知他人父母亦復如是是以苛虐之事仁者不爲也昔楊誠齋夫人年七十餘每冬月黎明躬 詣厨下作粥一釜遍給奴婢方令服役其子東山請曰天寒何自苦如此夫人曰奴婢亦人子淸晨寒冷須使腹中有火氣乃 堪役使耳古人愛恤下人如此眞可爲法戸部尙書馬森父年四十止生一子甫五嵗夫妻寶之婢偶抱出門失手跌傷左額 死封翁見之呼婢奔避自抱死兒入太夫人驚慟幾絶撞倒封翁者數四索婢撻之無有婢歸母家日夜祝天願公早生貴子 次年遂生森左額宛然赤痕也夫奴僕犯罪之大者孰如死其子此事尙可恕又何事不可寛乎袁氏世範曰奴僕下人天資 多暗作事多乖又性好忘囑之以事全不記憶又性多執不是自以爲是又性多戾輕於抵對不識尊卑所以主人使令動輒 觸怒其言愈辯於是箠楚加之或失手至於不測者有矣凡爲家長於使令之際有不如意當云天資愚蠢宜寬處之多教誨
Interpretation

This story illustrates the principle of karmic retribution in the underworld. A wealthy man who abused his young servant fell gravely ill. On his deathbed, he saw underworld attendants (ghostly envoys from the nether courts) leading the very servant he had mistreated coming to claim his life. When his wife protested that a mere servant would never dare such a thing, the dying man explained: "The mortal world distinguishes nobility from commoners, but in the underworld all beings are equal." He soon perished.

The author reflects: How can one abuse servants merely because of their lowly status? Though masters and servants differ in station, we must remember these servants were once children cherished by their parents. Their sale into servitude already inflicted wounds as deep as carved flesh—to further mistreat them shows utter inhumanity. Consider this: If your own children were beaten, overworked to sickness, or locked in cold rooms when ill, could you endure it? Thus, truly benevolent people never abuse others.

Two examples follow: Yang Wanli's wife, in her seventies, personally cooked hot porridge for her maidservants on freezing mornings, saying, "These servants are also someone's children." Ma Sen's father, a Ming Dynasty Minister of Revenue, when his only son was accidentally dropped to death by a maid, not only spared her punishment but helped hide her. This maid prayed day and night for the family to bear another son—the next year, Ma Sen was born with a red birthmark on his left temple (hinting at his deceased brother's rebirth).

The text concludes by quoting Family Instructions of the Yuan Clan: Servants are naturally slow-witted—they often err, forget, and stubbornly contradict. Wise masters should compassionately accommodate their limitations through patient guidance. Frequent beatings may provoke fatal accidents.

(Note: "Fengweng" respectfully denotes elders with honorary titles; "Grand Dowager" refers to Ma Sen's grandmother. These stories embody Daoist karma ("good and evil receive retribution") and Confucian "benevolence" governing master-servant relations.)

省嗔怒主人胸中亦覺安樂卽或犯事當懲治亦不可親自鞭打惟徐徐責問令他人執而行之旣已懲治呼喚使令顏色便 當如常庶無他事至於婦人秉性褊愎不識道理其責備下人尤非丈夫比須是平日常以待奴僕之理喩之不可縱之扑打 家中子弟亦不許擅打奴僕有事當令告之家長婢僕旣欲其出力辦事不可不察其飢寒㝛卧去處亦當留意冬時風寒夏 日蚊暑亦須爲之檢點庶幾仁人之用心也噫此論爲家長者皆當手書一通置之座右也)恐嚇於他(恐嚇有二 一是遇人急難不行安慰故倡其勢動其憂恐一是圖利修怨虛張聲勢使之怕我冀遂所欲皆是恐嚇與乘威迫脅者不同 夫人有怖畏尙爲曲爲寛解乃反以危言恐嚇或致非命則孽自我作能無報乎李舜卿以佃戸張三欠租必欲令還致自經 死孫季明以女使與小奴作過必欲根究致投水死雖其自殺實我殺之爲其恐嚇使然也太上業報因緣經載此二事以爲 尤戒)怨天尤人(閻浮世界素號缺䧟人安得每事稱心其不稱心者必因積累薄而受享亦薄也於天何與於人何 尤荊門楊大同素侈縱貲產費盡貧苦無聊每怨天不公恨親不顧一日遇一少年云有一好處但隨我去不患不富貴遂隨 至一所少年忽不見欲出無路忽聞數人大呌捉賊毆擊到官乃是半夜入一巨室不能分理遂死然則天可怨人可尤乎)
Interpretation

To restrain anger, the master himself will find inner peace and contentment. Even when servants make mistakes that warrant punishment, one should not personally administer physical discipline. Instead, patiently inquire about the reasons and have others carry out the correction. After punishment, daily interactions should resume as usual to avoid further complications. As for stubborn and unreasonable women who often punish servants more harshly than men, they should be educated on proper treatment of servants and not indulged in arbitrary beatings.

Household members are also forbidden from arbitrarily disciplining servants—matters should be reported to the head of the family. Since we rely on maids and servants for labor, we must care for their basic needs: warmth in winter, shelter from mosquitoes and summer heat. These considerations reflect the compassion of a benevolent person. Alas, this discourse is worth copying and keeping on one’s desk as a constant reminder.

There are two types of intimidation: first, exaggerating dangers to heighten someone’s distress instead of offering comfort during emergencies; second, fabricating threats for personal gain or vengeance to instill fear and manipulate outcomes. Though different from direct coercion, both are forms of intimidation. When others are fearful, they need reassurance—using terrifying words that drive someone to death makes one culpable for the sin. For instance, Li Shunqing hounded his tenant Zhang San over unpaid rent until he hanged himself, and Sun Jiming investigated a feud between a maid and a young servant until she drowned. Though seemingly suicides, these deaths resulted from intimidation. The Supreme Karmic Retribution Scripture records these cases as warnings.

As for blaming heaven and others: The Jambudvīpa world (the human realm in Buddhist terms) is inherently flawed—how can everything go one’s way? Discontent often stems from insufficient merit. Take Yang Datong of Jingmen, who squandered his family fortune, then blamed heaven’s injustice and his relatives’ coldness instead of reflecting on his own faults. Later, deluded by illusions, he broke into a mansion at night and was beaten to death as a thief—what good comes from cursing fate and others?

(Note: The term "阎浮世界" (Yánfú shìjiè) is translated as "Jambudvīpa world" with a parenthetical explanation, as it is a Buddhist cosmological term. Daoist technical terms from the glossary were not present in this passage, so standard translations were used.)

訶風罵雨(疾風暴雨皆有神主之禮曰若有疾風迅雷甚雨雖夜必興衣服冠而坐葢畏天之怒也今無知之民雨 多則怨澇晴多則怨旱風烈則怨暴不思陰陽愆數俱各方造孽所致乃敢呵罵之能無愈增罪逆乎)鬬合爭訟 (見人爭訟善言勸解使兩得安樂功德不小豈可三言兩舌面是背非鬬合成乎崔煒於開元寺見一乞食老嫗足蹶覆人酒 甕被店主毆擊煒趨解曰酒直幾錢曰直一貫煒脫衣代償老嫗不謝而去異日遇諸途乃日蒙君解難吾不敢忘吾善治贅 疣今有越井岡艾少許相贈若遇贅疣一灼卽愈其後遇一僧贅垂於耳依法愈之由是知名延之者眾遂富或曰老嫗卽鮑 姑也由此觀之見人爭訟不當解釋耶永福縣薛敷工刀筆每代人寫詞狀翻亂是非由是積有中人產一日請道士鄭法林 設醮法林伏壇下良久起言表尾批云家付火司人付水司不知何故迨旬月室中無故失火家財燒盡敷挾巧筆欲過江湖 口中流桅折擊身墜江而死則鬬合爭訟獲罪不小安可不戒至於訟息止爭尤是當官第一事有民社之任者更宜留心也 鄭瑄曰今人詞訟到官多是生事造謊一人訴詞必牽引多人以爲未辨是非且得追呼一擾耗其錢財耳則反坐之律可不 嚴乎嚴反坐之法則虛妄者知儆而訟自稀矣然又有法焉訟期宜少宜緩葢人有一時忿激便欲投詞需日稍久怒解事定
Interpretation

This scripture primarily addresses two behaviors that violate natural principles and human ethics: cursing wind and rain, and stirring up litigation, along with their corresponding karmic retributions.

Regarding cursing wind and rain, the text explains that storms and tempests are governed by divine beings (ancient belief held that natural phenomena were controlled by deities). The Book of Rites records that when encountering violent winds, thunder or heavy rain, even at midnight, the ancients would dress properly and sit upright as a sign of reverence for celestial might. Nowadays, some ignorant commoners complain about floods during prolonged rains, drought during extended sunny periods, and excessive wind during storms, failing to recognize these as consequences of disrupted Yin-Yang balance and collective karmic transgressions. How dare they curse the wind and rain? Isn't this compounding their offenses?

Concerning litigation-mongering, the scripture presents two contrasting examples: During the Kaiyuan era, Cui Wei witnessed a tavern owner beating an old woman who had knocked over wine jars at Kaiyuan Temple. He mediated the dispute and compensated the loss with his own clothing. Later, this old woman (implied to be the immortal Bao Gu) gifted him with miraculous mugwort, enabling him to become a renowned physician and gain wealth. The negative example comes from Yongfu County's Xue Fu, who made his living by drafting deceptive legal petitions. When Daoist priest Zheng Falin performed a ritual for him, he saw the celestial officials' verdict: "Household wealth to the Fire Department, human life to the Water Department." True enough, his home soon burned down, and he later drowned when his boat capsized while crossing a river.

The text concludes with Zheng Xuan's observation: Many contemporary lawsuits stem from fabricated claims that implicate innocent parties. He recommends that authorities strictly enforce the "retributive punishment" system (where false accusers suffer the penalty intended for the accused), which would naturally reduce frivolous lawsuits. Additionally, legal proceedings should incorporate cooling-off periods, as many lawsuits arise from momentary anger that dissipates given time.

(Note: The "ritual offering" [zhaijiao] mentioned refers to a form of Daoist ceremonial practice, while "Fire Department" and "Water Department" denote the divine bureaus in Daoist belief that govern fire disasters and water calamities respectively.)

必有和勸而不復來者此亦息訟之一義也)妄逐朋黨(胡嘉棟曰君子原無黨小人欲逐君子以快其私必借口 朋黨一網打盡然得志未幾而天災人害未有不並至者如曹節王甫已事可鑒也按此則逐爲屏逐之逐○劉夢震曰逐隨 逐也朋者五倫之一黨欲何爲不過借眾以凌寡濟惡以欺善利盡則疎勢盡則散一或妄逐未有不墜坑落阱者上而士大 夫下而後生小子皆當痛戒也此句緊接鬬合爭訟句明是小人分門別戸互相攻排曩作屏逐之逐者非也愚謂長公說爲 是)用妻妾語(妻妾爲人内助苟有善言正當從之但婦人賢明者少愚暗者多且其性多褊愎不耐事情又巧餙 短長語似中竅故爲丈夫者易於迷惑或畏其悍戾惟命是從或惜其嬌癡有言必聽近則一家離心遠則終身受累敗亡之 禍率由此已洪武中下詔褒鄭濂累世同居徵至京師問其治家之道對曰惟不聽婦人言帝深嘉之則妻妾之語其可用乎 王經事繼母不孝奉養殊缺經有二子相繼暴卒經亦喪明始悔前非每自言曰此皆水邱婦教我至此後經卒水邱婦病癩 亦卒靑田居民倪九惑於婦言謂其生母原爲婢妾不認其母終嵗置母庖爨下略如老婢而身與妻子安享自如時新穀方 熟令母烹雞治飯飯未熟忽暴風疾雨有大石自山巓裂墜正壓倪九寢室石復破壁而去一夫一婦一兒皆斃焉陳中洲快
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses two types of improper conduct and their dire consequences:

The first concerns the dangers of factionalism. While noble individuals (junzi) should never form cliques, petty people (xiaoren) often falsely accuse them of doing so in pursuit of selfish interests, seeking to eliminate their opponents entirely. Historical examples like Cao Jie and Wang Fu (eunuchs of the Eastern Han dynasty) serve as cautionary tales—after gaining power, they soon faced natural disasters and human calamities. Genuine friendship is one of the Five Cardinal Relationships (ruler-subject, father-son, husband-wife, elder-younger siblings, and friends), but petty people form factions merely to overpower others with numbers, aiding evil to oppress good. Once their shared interests vanish, they quickly drift apart. Both officials and commoners must guard against such mutual slander.

The second addresses the disastrous outcomes of heeding wives' and concubines' slander. While wives should ideally be virtuous helpmates, most women have limited perspectives and stubborn dispositions—yet their words often appear reasonable, easily deceiving their husbands. Some husbands fear their wives' ferocity, while others are infatuated with beauty, blindly obeying their every word. At best, this creates family discord; at worst, it invites catastrophe. Several examples illustrate this: The Zheng Lian family received imperial commendation for "not listening to women's words"; Wang Jing, who obeyed his stepmother's slander and neglected filial piety, saw his two sons die suddenly and himself go blind; Ni Jiu, incited by his wife to mistreat his birth mother, had his entire family crushed by a boulder rolling down a mountain. These cases demonstrate that one must discern right from wrong in spouses' improper remarks rather than follow them blindly.

其事作誅逆巖記夫用妻妾語而背父母此固其罪之大者至於離間兄弟侵欺鄕黨偏私兒女凌虐婢僕種種惡語又當隨 事省察若夫聽信妾語薄棄正妻尤人情所易惑而不可不愼者太上因妻而及妾有以夫)違父母訓(父母生育 功侔造化旣生矣湔濯以時乳哺無缺推乾就濕慮病防危悉心護持然後成人旣成人矣又須男教以學女教以工漸漸長 成婚嫁時至擇婚辦嫁耗損精神事尙未周晚景已逼人命無常流光易失今日維存明日難保萬一蹉過生死永隔卽欲訓 誨胡可得耶况天下無不是的父母其諄諄教訓無非望我成立卽使鞭扑頻加終是愛我念我今乃肆行己意有言不從或 浮沈順之陽受陰拒此等不孝之罪眞爲天地所不容矣昔鵞湖費宏爲翰林時與關中某同年對奕爭勝戲批其頰某不悅 公悔日往請罪終不出費封翁聞之大怒乃封號一竹板送至京邸令公自扑公持父書及竹板登其堂自扑三次某始出抱 頭而哭公訝問故某曰公尙有父督責我求督責我者不可得也於是大慟自此相好如初噫不違父訓如費公者誠人情所 難而關中某公數語亦令人悚惕之至矣)得新忘故(天地間新故相推人物皆然小而衣服器用大而親誼交情皆 有新故新者終成故故者昔曾新可遽忘耶天順中都指揮馬良最爲上愛妻亡上每慰問適數日不出上怪之左右以新娶
Interpretation

This scripture primarily addresses the grave offense of disobeying parental teachings by heeding the counsel of wives and concubines, along with common moral failings in human interactions.

It first condemns obeying wives and concubines while disregarding parents' wishes as a serious transgression. Other reproachable behaviors include sowing discord among brothers, bullying neighbors, showing favoritism toward one's children while mistreating servants—all requiring constant self-reflection. Particular emphasis is placed on the common pitfall of neglecting one's principal wife due to a concubine's whispers, a mistake demanding utmost caution.

The text then expounds on parents' nurturing grace: their care in bearing and raising children parallels the creative power of Heaven and Earth. From washing, swaddling, and feeding at birth to meticulous care during growth, through exhausting their resources for children's weddings—their devotion knows no bounds. Life's impermanence means once parents depart, reunion becomes impossible, and their guidance can never be heard again. No parents are ever truly wrong; their teachings always aim for their children's success, and even physical discipline stems from love. To defy parental will through surface compliance while secretly disobeying constitutes unfilial conduct that Heaven and Earth abhor.

The narrative cites the example of Fei Hong of Ehu: while serving in the Hanlin Academy, he struck a colleague during a chess dispute. Later, carrying bamboo rods sent by his father, he presented himself for punishment. The moved colleague wept, saying, "You still have a father to discipline you—I long for such correction but have no chance." This illustrates how rare it is to find someone like Fei Hong who truly honors paternal instruction.

Finally, it discusses the problem of "favoring the new while neglecting the old": though the cyclical renewal of all things follows cosmic law, what is new inevitably becomes old, and the old was once new—how can one forget past affections? The example of Commander Ma Liang during the Tianshun reign period is given, who remarried shortly after his wife's death, astonishing even the emperor.

對上怒曰這厮夫婦之道尙薄豈能事我耶杖而疎之今人於妻妾間得新忘故者多矣鑒此可發深省)口是心非 (心口皆是純善之人也卽心口皆非人猶得而防之惟言稱堯舜心同桀紂口誓山海恨深吳越者最難測度以此而誑庸愚 䧟同列何所不至世間大蠧正在此軰死而抽腸拔舌又何說之辭昔庾道季久病設醮祈祐保命眞君判曰庾道季平生爲 人心口不同自少及長善功無一罪過已定死在旦夕佞神求免得乎數日果卒)貪冐於財欺罔其上 (索取無厭曰貪昏昧無耻曰冒人臣持已以廉事上以忠乃大節也今以貪財之故至於欺罔上人大節安在縱令一時富貴 子孫其能久享乎紹興某布政巧於貪饕及敗官歸買田十萬畝富甲一郡止一子一孫淫賭無節皆夭死布政復染癱瘓不 數年間家貲已盡矣將死時忽瞪目口吟曰我官至布政不小田至十萬不少我手中置我手中了不曉吟畢遂卒歸安仰思 忠精於堪輿六合尹林克正延之入閩爲其姻某氏葬父得一地甚佳方點穴間雨驟至遂下山是夜思忠夢一老人告曰此 地切勿與某此人爲考官賣三舉子當有陰禍若葬此地非天意矣思忠明日訪之果如夢中所云遂託故辭歸越二三年問 其鄕人則某氏與勢家爭墳地致死人命官司牽纒至今未葬家業亦凋落矣)造作惡語讒毁平人(人縱
Interpretation

The superior angrily declared: "This couple has even neglected the most basic marital affection—how could they possibly serve me well?" Thereupon he had them beaten with rods and distanced them. Many people today treat their wives and concubines with fickle affections, chasing the new while discarding the old—seeing this example should give them profound cause for reflection.

Those whose words contradict their hearts are most terrifying. Kind people whose speech matches their thoughts are certainly good, and even those whose words and hearts are both unkind can at least be guarded against. Most dangerous are those who mouth lofty words like the sage-kings Yao and Shun while harboring hearts as cruel as the tyrants Jie and Zhou; who swear oaths as steadfast as mountains and seas while nursing hatred as deep as the ancient enmity between Wu and Yue. Such people can deceive even ordinary folk, and when harming colleagues, they spare no vicious means. The world's great scourges are precisely this type. That they end up disemboweled with tongues torn out after death is nothing but deserved retribution.

There was a man named Yu Daoji who suffered prolonged illness and held a zhaijiao (Daoist purification ritual) to entreat the Life-Preserving True Lord's protection. The True Lord descended with this judgment: "Yu Daoji's whole life has been duplicitous—from youth to adulthood not a single good deed performed. His karmic retribution is fixed, and death comes within days. Now he seeks to flatter deities to escape punishment—is this possible?" Sure enough, he died shortly after.

Those insatiably amassing wealth while deceiving superiors inevitably meet wretched ends. Relentless grasping we call "greed"; shameless stupidity we call "audacity." As ministers, they should have maintained integrity and loyal service—these are fundamental virtues. Daring to cheat even superiors for profit—what virtue remains? Even temporary wealth and rank—can descendants long enjoy them?

In Shaoxing lived a Provincial Administration Commissioner notoriously corrupt. After dismissal, he purchased 100,000 mu of farmland, becoming the region's wealthiest. Yet he had but one son and one grandson, both lost to gambling and debauchery. Later he became paralyzed, his fortune squandered within years. Dying, his eyes suddenly widened as he muttered: "My office reached Provincial Commissioner—not small; my lands reached 100,000 mu—not few. What my hands acquired, my hands have lost." Then he expired.

Gui'an's Yang Sizhong, expert in fengshui (geomancy), was invited by Liuhe Magistrate Lin Kezheng to Fujian to evaluate burial sites. One family, interring their father, found an auspicious spot, but heavy rain interrupted the "dotting the acupoint" (determining the grave's precise position). That night Sizhong dreamed an old man warned: "Never give this land to that man! As examiner he betrayed three provincial graduates (juren)—yin retribution awaits. Him obtaining this site defies Heaven's will." Next day, verification proved true, so Sizhong excused himself. Within years, the family—embroiled in fatal disputes over the burial plot—remained unable to inter their dead, their fortunes ruined.

Those fabricating slander ultimately reap what they sow.

有過亦當曲爲掩護若本是平白無辜之人而乃編造流言揑作穢事亦讒毁之豈得不反招惡報乎陳良謨曰余昔叅楚藩 時公安縣白教諭㑹試入京有太和山道姑造衙化緣其妻以教諭名書簿施銀一兩又與紵⬤一丈繡旛甫去而同官妻過 訪曰適疏簿乃上司出給者見儒官與道姑往來恐爲累不小白妻信之急令人追尋不獲旦夕怏怏比教諭下第回取紵⬤ 裁衣却又剪動益不自安遂自縊死後撫院林公㑹議賢否冊謂余曰白教諭姦學吏妻其妻有言勒令縊死豈非狗彘余曰 然乃述所聞以告公沉吟間余曰未審前言得之何人請更訪之公幡然悟曰是矣是矣卽奮筆抹去考語白因得陞國子助 教余轉官閩臬見林公於莆田公指隣家曰此吳姓者向爲公安訓導毁白教諭者是也後陞萍鄕教諭亦爲同僚譛歸過鄱 陽湖舟幾覆僅以身免今且無聊矣吁昔自謗人今爲人謗報施之說豈不信然)毁人稱直(此所謂訐以爲直者 與造作惡語者不同夫正直之人心本忠厚當言卽言使人知改所謂直也若毁者污人之名快己之怒薄德已極而猶託言 直道以竦人聽豈不可恨程伊川先生曰君子於人當於有過中求無過不當於無過中求有過今之好譏議人者每每舍長 取短以爲快樂存心正直之人固如是乎顏茂猷曰有一等人見人爲善不毁曰腐儒則毁曰是齋公一流不則又毁曰姑息
Interpretation

When someone commits a mistake, one ought to discreetly help conceal it. But if an innocent person is instead slandered with fabricated rumors and false accusations, how can this not invite retribution?

Chen Liangmo recounted a true case: During his tenure in Hubei, the wife of Bai Jiaoyu (a county school instructor) in Gong'an County encountered a Daoist nun from Wudang Mountain (Taihe Mountain) who came to the yamen seeking alms. She donated one tael of silver in her husband’s name and a length of hemp cloth for an embroidered banner. Shortly after the nun left, the wife of a colleague came to stir trouble, saying, "That alms ledger was issued by higher authorities. If they see your family associating with Daoist nuns, you might face repercussions." Bai’s wife took this to heart and sent someone to chase after the nun, but to no avail. She became so consumed by anxiety that she could neither eat nor sleep in peace. When Bai Jiaoyu returned home after failing the imperial examinations, his wife used the cloth to make him a garment but discovered it was the wrong size, deepening her distress until she eventually hanged herself. Later, when Provincial Governor Lin was reviewing officials, he inexplicably believed the rumors and wrote in the records that "Bai Jiaoyu committed adultery and drove his wife to death." Chen Liangmo immediately clarified the truth, and Governor Lin, realizing his error, promptly removed the false accusation. Only then was Bai Jiaoyu promoted to an assistant instructor at the Imperial Academy. As for the instructor surnamed Wu, who had spread the slander, he nearly drowned in Poyang Lake while traveling for a promotion and spent his later years in poverty and disgrace—having once slandered others, he was now slandered in turn. Is this not proof of the principle of karmic retribution?

Those who "claim righteousness to defame others" are, in truth, false paragons of virtue. Truly upright individuals act with kindness, speaking only when necessary and with the intent to encourage improvement. Petty individuals, however, vent their spite by smearing others—though morally shallow, they posture as righteous, making them all the more detestable. Master Cheng Yi (Cheng Yichuan) once said, "A noble person seeks merit in others’ faults, not faults in their merit." Those today who delight in mocking others, taking pleasure in their shortcomings—can this truly be the conduct of the upright? Yan Maoyou pointed out: There are those who, upon seeing virtuous deeds, either dismiss them as "pedantic" or "hypocritical," or else sneer that they are "indulgent and permissive." Such a mindset is truly lamentable.

柔軟養成人惡又有一等人以己度人見人爲善不毁曰釣譽沽名則毁曰希求福報甚或毁之曰假公濟私種種惡語加人 方且自謂口快心直神誅鬼殛知不免矣犯此病者盍自省之)罵神稱正(聖人教人敬鬼神而遠之何敢慢罵罵神 已大悖聖人之教矣尙得謂之正乎其爲鬼神譴責斷斷無辭已鎭江定波門于某幼子痘亡于憤甚寫一狀詞欲向城隍廟 告痘神其妻奪向竈下㷊之是夜夢城隍責曰汝家竈神申汝有狀告痘神汝小民無識姑薄懲之發送楊知縣責十五板明 日丹徒令楊蜀亭從定波門出于門首弔撘礙破官傘卽時擒出當街責十五板病月餘始愈頴上高天佑同二生赴試金陵 聞雞鳴山守源禪師有道行齊往謁之師曰三位皆當中惟高君不能矣以途中用楞嚴作枕故除名耳高愕然始悟經在匣 中以匣作枕不知請出也比榜放果如所言高後以明經官至州守夫䙝凟經典受罰如此彼罵神之罪又當何如乎)棄 順效逆(君義臣忠父慈子孝兄愛弟敬所謂順也少凌長小加大賤凌貴遠間親新間舊淫破義所謂逆也順則宜從 效之逆則宜棄絶之今反棄順而效逆豈非速禍之道乎南極夀星眞君曰天道福善而禍淫神明賞順而罰逆人能刻意爲 善恭已順天則我命在我不爲司殺所制苟或違天地肆愚悖侮神明反仁慈虧忠孝明則刑網隨之幽則鬼神誅之及將死
Interpretation

This scripture enumerates several types of wicked conduct that incur divine retribution, using concrete examples to admonish people to guard their words and deeds while maintaining reverence for the divine.

The first is malicious speech. Some individuals of unvirtuous character, upon witnessing others performing good deeds, immediately harbor suspicions—accusing them of "seeking fame" or slandering them as "exploiting public office for private gain." Such people pride themselves on being "frank and outspoken," unaware that spirits are recording their words, and retribution will inevitably follow. In Zhenjiang, a man named Yu wrote a formal complaint to denounce the Smallpox Deity at the City God Temple after his youngest son died of smallpox. His wife secretly burned the complaint in their kitchen stove. That night, she dreamed of the City God reprimanding: "Your Kitchen God has already reported you. Considering your ignorance, you shall receive leniency." The next day, when the county magistrate passed by, the Yu family's door curtain tore the official parasol. The magistrate immediately ordered Yu to receive fifteen strokes of the cane, leaving him bedridden for over a month.

The second is blasphemy against deities and scriptures. Gao Tianyou from Anhui, along with two scholars, went to Nanjing for examinations and visited an eminent monk at Jiming Mountain. The monk predicted the other two would pass but said Gao would fail because he had used a scripture box as a pillow. When the results were announced, the prediction proved true. Although Gao later obtained an official post through another examination, the retribution for his sacrilege had already manifested. The scripture emphasizes that even disrespect toward sacred texts incurs punishment—how much more severe would be the consequences for insulting deities!

The third is violation of ethical principles. The bonds between ruler and subject, father and son, elder and younger brother embody heavenly principles and human relations. To defy superiors, allow the lowly to oppress the noble, or disrupt social order is to act contrary to the Dao. The Great Longevity Star of the South Pole declares: "The Dao of Heaven invariably bestows blessings upon the virtuous and calamities upon the wicked. Divine beings reward those who align with the Dao and punish those who transgress its principles." If one wholeheartedly cultivates virtue and conforms to heavenly principles, one masters their destiny. But those who defy heaven and earth, scorn the divine, or practice disloyalty and filial impiety will face legal punishment in the mortal realm and divine retribution in the underworld—finding no peace even in death.

These narratives collectively demonstrate that malicious speech, sacrilege against the divine, and ethical transgressions all invite karmic retribution in this very life. Through concrete cases, the scripture admonishes people to maintain reverential awe, exercise caution in speech and action, and harmonize with heavenly principles.

而言善求悔亦不可得悲哉)背親向疏(孔子曰不愛其親而愛他人者謂之悖德不敬其親而敬他人者謂之悖 禮今背親而向疎非因恩怨狥私卽從炎涼起見悖德悖禮甚矣昔楊黼慕蜀中無際大士往訪之途遇老僧語曰見無際不 如見佛黼曰佛安在老僧曰汝但囘見披衾倒屣者卽是遂回暮夜抵家其母聞扣門聲喜甚披衾倒屣出戸黼一見感悟由 是竭力養親噫今世背親向疎者又不止一端如瞞背父母私託婦家視父母之親如泛常而待妻黨則甚厚兄弟錙銖必較 而處朋友外人獨慷慨近情甚或本族貧寒不相顧而冐認他宗趨炎附勢如此之類何可勝數所願世人從此猛醒也)指 天地以證鄙懷(鄙懷鄙䙝之懷也皇天后土覆載高深人卽小心敬畏尙虞積愆不少何敢以下賤鄙懷妄指 作證明明赫赫豈能任吾䙝凟乎徒得罪於天無所禱耳李景遜母鄭氏嚴教諸子一日牆壞得錢一甕復掩之卽㷊香祝天 曰天地憫我母子孤苦特賜此錢然妾心惟願諸子成名錢非所願也後景遜果登第官至少保可見人有一念之善天地亦 可作證特所指鄙䙝則大不可耳可弗愼歟)引神明而鑑猥事(猥者鄙賤之謂所爲鄙賤輒呼神明鑒察 是以不敢訴之官府質之朋類者反敢訴之神明矣豈不悖乎楊起元屢試春官不第奮曰得非吾念頭有差乎乃供文昌帝
Interpretation

This scripture primarily criticizes two types of behavior that violate the principles of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue):

The first is "abandoning kin while favoring strangers." Confucius taught that loving others while neglecting one's own family violates moral principles, and respecting outsiders while disregarding one's relatives breaches ritual propriety. The scripture recounts the story of Yang Fu: originally intending to visit Master Wuji, he encountered an old monk on the road who told him, "When you return home, the person who comes running out wrapped in a quilt and wearing slippers is the Buddha." This turned out to be his elderly mother overjoyed at her son's return. This revelation awakened him, and from then on he devoted himself to caring for his parents. Nowadays, people distance themselves from their parents while lavishing attention on in-laws, haggle over matters with siblings yet are generous to outsiders, even neglecting impoverished relatives to curry favor with wealthy and powerful strangers—all these behaviors violate fundamental human ethics.

The second is "invoking heaven and earth to justify base intentions." The celestial deities and earthly spirits are supremely sacred, and humans should maintain reverential awe. The scripture tells of Li Jingsun's mother: when her collapsed wall revealed a jar of coins, she burned incense and prayed, saying she only wished for her son's success rather than keeping the money. Later, her son indeed passed the imperial examinations. This demonstrates that when people harbor virtuous thoughts, heaven and earth bear witness. But using divine beings to validate one's ignoble actions constitutes sacrilege.

The third behavior condemned is "summoning deities to witness vulgar affairs." Yang Qiyuan repeatedly failed the imperial exams and reflected on whether his thoughts were improper, so he enshrined Emperor Wenchang (the deity overseeing scholarly honors) to scrutinize his conduct. Such behavior absurdly treats sacred beings as witnesses to one's shameful deeds.

These teachings warn people: one must be filial to parents and reverent toward deities, never exploiting sacred matters to justify improper conduct.

君像旦夕䖍禱曰有如志富貴不志道德爲身家不爲生民上負吾君下負吾親神明鑒之三年登第噫敬信神明有感必應 如此知敬信之獲福則知䙝凟之必獲罪矣蓮池大師曰神明固不可䙝而亦不可謟如祈求願心切勿吿許宰殺牲牢之類 此名惡願有業無功縱得遂心終有苦報乃至造像造殿袍旛供器只宜隨便喜助不可有心求福葢大悲平等是佛正直無 私是神豈有因賄降福之理若以理言惟在忠君孝親憐貧愛老救災恤苦戒殺放生種種陰騭種種方便隨分所能力行不 怠耳由是言之神明尙不當謟之以求福况可引之以鑑猥事耶戒之戒之)施與後悔(周惠化好施窮困辛苦不 倦一日智觀眞人化爲乞丏試驗其事周果樂施卽日度之今爲西華眞人陽伯雍好施義漿一日遇一異人授以一升玉種 子孫皆大富貴裴延年兄弟三人皆好施一日有老人踵門乞漿兄弟待之盡敬後安史之亂老人引入一洞中得脫兵難奚 百三本貧者而生一贅一日見一道人詣鋪家乞一文錢鋪家不與百三乃自探腰間一錢授之是夜夢道人爲之去贅及覺 贅果落史秉直築室得金嘆曰財者人之命也旣䝉天賜豈宜獨享盡散之貧者一家數口俱登夀考瞿嗣興樂善好施凡負 販者必多償其直曰彼胼手胝足止求升斗自活吾何忍與之相較後享年八十四無病而終當知施與一事立功最速然必
Interpretation

This person prayed devoutly morning and evening, saying: "If I only seek wealth and status without pursuing virtue (De), care only for my family while neglecting the people's welfare, I would betray both my sovereign above and my parents below. The celestial deities and earthly spirits witness all." Three years later, he indeed passed the imperial examinations. This shows that sincere reverence toward the divine inevitably evokes response.

Thus we understand that reverent sincerity brings blessings, while sacrilege invites retribution. Master Lianchi taught: "Toward deities, one should neither be disrespectful nor flattering. When making vows, never promise blood sacrifices—this constitutes 'evil vows' that accumulate only sin without merit. Even if such wishes are granted, they ultimately bring calamity. As for crafting divine images, building temples, or offering robes and banners, contribute according to your means without calculating rewards. Buddhas and bodhisattvas embody great compassion for all beings, while righteous deities act with impartial integrity—how could they bestow blessings through bribery? Truly virtuous acts—loyalty to country, filial piety, compassion for the poor and elderly, disaster relief, abstaining from killing, liberating captive creatures, and all secret accumulations of virtue through helping others—these constitute the true path when practiced consistently within one's capacity."

From this perspective, even flattering deities for blessings is improper—how much more so invoking them as witnesses to disgraceful affairs? Utmost caution is warranted!

Regarding post-donation regret: Zhou Huihua practiced charity tirelessly despite his own poverty. One day, the Perfected Zhiguan tested him disguised as a beggar. Recognizing Zhou's genuine generosity, he immediately elevated him to become Perfected Xihua. Yang Boyong regularly offered tea to travelers until a transcendent being rewarded him with jade seeds that brought prosperity to his descendants. The Pei brothers—Yannian and his siblings—were all charitable. When an elderly man sought water, they served him respectfully. Later during the An Lushan Rebellion, this elder guided them to safety in mountain caves. Xi Baisan, a poor man with facial tumors, once saw a Daoist priest being refused alms. Giving his last copper coin, he dreamed that night of the priest removing his tumors, which had vanished by dawn. Shi Bingzhi discovered buried gold while building his house. Declaring "Wealth concerns human lives—how could I hoard heaven's gift?", he distributed it all to the poor, and his family enjoyed longevity. Qu Sixing always paid vendors extra, saying "They toil merely to survive—how could I haggle?" He died peacefully at eighty-four.

These accounts demonstrate that charity is the swiftest path to accumulating virtue (De), but requires three principles: First, genuine intent without expectation of return; second, giving within one's means without strain; third, consistent practice without interruption. Those who regret their generosity are like farmers digging up sown seeds—how could they expect harvest?

樂善不倦方有進步卽或財力不逮亦須常存此心可後悔乎未與而悔之則不果施旣與而悔之則不樂施雖有悔不同皆 是善念轉成惡念均可惜也)假借不還(范益謙座右戒曰凡借人物不可損壞不還蓋借人之物非得已也旣不 得已則須愛護如己物用畢隨卽歸還不特無厭於人亦且無愧於心至借貸錢財尤宜淸白豈可久而乾没今世多有欠錢 不肯還者不思財非吾財卽留之亦終去銀旣無有債又仍在佛家嘗云未了㝛債死後當償其爲驢馬牛犬生償其負者稗 史往往載之茲不具述也○朱璣曰世人通財於我本是好意往往因其追取反成仇怨吾不知此種人設心爲何等也昔張 孝基爲某富翁壻翁止一子甚不肖逐出翁死遂盡以家財付孝基數年見其子乞於路召問曰能灌園乎曰得就食甚幸少 自力復召問曰能管庫乎曰管園已幸敢望管庫久而視其謹愿無復故態乃盡舉家財還之後孝基有友遊嵩山見孝基儀 衞如王者詢其自答曰上帝嘉我還財一事命主此山言訖不見夫承受之財尙思還人况原繫假借者乎)分外營 求(太乙眞人曰予有經六字人當受持一字經曰忍二字經曰方便三字經曰依本分人之所以不肯依本分者只謂營求 可恃耳豈知人生世間富貴貧賤一定不移陰註陽受皆㝛業也可分外求乎新平縣令裴璞素稱正直卒於官其友韋元方
Interpretation

To progress on the spiritual path, one must delight in doing good without weariness. Even when lacking material means, maintaining virtuous intentions ensures no regrets arise. Regretting before giving leads to hesitation; regretting after giving robs the act of its joy. Both forms of regret transform virtuous thoughts into harmful ones—a true spiritual loss.

Failing to return borrowed items violates Daoist ethics. Fan Yiqian's wall inscription admonishes: "What you borrow must neither be damaged nor kept." Borrowing should be a last resort; when unavoidable, treat the item as your own and return it promptly. This preserves harmony and keeps conscience clear. Monetary debts demand even greater clarity—how can prolonged default be justified? Many today withhold repayment without realizing: wealth not rightfully yours will ultimately depart. Silver spent leaves debts unpaid. Buddhist teachings warn: unresolved debts compel rebirth as beasts of burden—donkeys, horses, oxen, or dogs—to repay karmic debts. Historical records abound with such accounts.

Zhu Ji observed: "Lenders act from kindness, yet debt collection breeds enmity. Such mentality defies understanding." Consider Zhang Xiaoji, son-in-law to a wealthy man whose prodigal heir was disinherited. Inheriting the estate, Zhang later encountered the destitute heir begging. Testing his reform through humble tasks—first gardening, then storekeeping—Zhang ultimately restored the inheritance when true change appeared. Years later, pilgrims at Mount Song witnessed Zhang attended like nobility, who revealed: "Heaven rewards my restitution by appointing me guardian here." If even inherited wealth merits return, how much more borrowed possessions?

Seeking beyond one's ordained lot violates cosmic order. The Great Unity Perfected Being (Taiyi Zhenren) taught: "My six-word true scripture all should heed: First word—'forbearance' (ren), second—'expedient means' (fangbian), third—'abide by your lot' (yi benfen)." People spurn contentment, trusting in cunning schemes. Yet life's circumstances—wealth or poverty—are karmic assignments from past deeds, recorded in underworld registers and manifested in this realm. Can force alter what destiny decrees? Magistrate Pei Pu of Xinping County, known for integrity, died in office. His friend Wei Yuanfang...

客隴右道遇璞躍馬來騎從數十驚問之曰吾職西川掠剩使專司世間財物之盈縮夫世間農勤求穀商勤求財士勤求祿 只得本分所有不增本分所無不勤則併其本分失之矣故凡一飮一啄以至財貨少過其數吾皆得掠之此言營求得之事 不惟無益反有損也歸安省祭孫邦華就選北上有姐夫某者亦以省祭赴選比選某得太原府倉官華以候選無缺且束裝 歸忽姐夫暴死華乃語其甥曰爾父一生辛勤已矣顧文憑現在盍使我冒爲之得貲均分何如甥從之華遂赴任任滿共得 七百餘金乃與甥中分之華自喜得計復入京投文聽選及拈籖則恰補其姐夫之缺勢不可復往矣涕泣而歸夫使邦華能 安分待時則太原倉官依然自在且可獨專其利而將來遷轉又未可知今以一奸巧自失之豈非越分營求爲神所掠乎可 爲炯戒已)力上施設(挾勢厚之力以臨人旣已爲人所畏矣又從而施威設法勢不使盡不已謂之力上施設如以 長吏之力施設百姓以豪貴之力施設貧賤是也○或曰不恤其力而驅使過迫卽力上設施也)淫慾過度(邪緣 外合滅德喪心太上固已垂戒於前矣至於夫婦之道人生所不能廢者尤有節度不當過縱董江都曰天地之氣不致盛滿 不交陰陽是以君子甚愛氣而謹遊於房道書曰人身慾念不興則精氣散於三焦榮華百脈及慾想一起慾火熾然翕撮三
Interpretation

This passage presents two cautionary tales about coveting ill-gotten wealth and indulging in excessive desires, along with related Daoist cultivation principles.

The first story recounts an encounter in the Longyou region (modern-day Gansu) where a man met an official who called himself the "Plunderer of Surplus from Western Shu." This deity was responsible for overseeing the gain and loss of worldly wealth, explaining that people who strive for riches beyond their destined share will ultimately lose even what was rightfully theirs. He claimed that any food, drink, or wealth exceeding one’s predestined measure would be taken away by him. This illustrates that forcibly seizing what does not belong to oneself is not only futile but harmful.

Next is the story of Sun Banghua, who went with his brother-in-law to apply for official posts. His brother-in-law was selected as a granary official in Taiyuan Prefecture, while Sun failed and prepared to return home. Later, when his brother-in-law suddenly died, Sun fraudulently used his documents to assume the position. After completing his term, he split over seven hundred taels of silver with his brother-in-law’s nephew. When he later reapplied for an official post, he was assigned the exact vacancy left by his brother-in-law—rendering him unable to take office. This was the karmic retribution for coveting ill-gotten wealth, which cost him even his rightful position.

The second section discusses the harms of "oppression by force" (力上设施) and "excessive lust" (淫欲过度). "Oppression by force" refers to abusing power—such as officials exploiting commoners or the wealthy bullying the poor—though some interpretations also include overworking others. Meanwhile, "excessive lust" does not solely pertain to illicit relations; even within marriage, moderation is essential. Dong Zhongshu (also known as Dong Jiangdu) stated: "The Qi of Heaven and Earth never overflows, and Yin-Yang must also unite in moderation." Daoist texts similarly record: "When a person is free from desire, their Jing (essence) and Qi nourish the entire body, but once desire arises, the fire of lust consumes Jing and Qi."

焦精神流溢並從命門輸瀉而出可懼哉又按攝生之說二至之月宜戒大寒大暑宜戒日月薄蝕宜戒大風大霧迅雷暴雨 宜戒又本命日庚申日甲子日丙丁日四立二分日二社日弦望晦朔日又每月十五日二十八日正月初三日十四日十六 日二月初二日三月初九日四月初四日初八日五月三個五日六日七日名爲九毒日十月初十日十一月廿五日十二月 初七日二十日俱宜戒凡此皆所謂度也彼淫慾過度者亦自求速死耳甯謂一死之後遂無冥譴哉)心毒貌慈 (心懷狠毒外飾慈和此眞人類之豺虎世内之梟獍也死入地獄必當永墮三途昔李義府貌極柔恭每與人言嬉怡微笑然 陰賊無比人號之爲笑中刀後竟竄死於嶲蔡元度對客滿面春風雖所憎者亦親厚無間人莫能測謂之笑面夜乂後亦不 得其死○按此則更甚於包貯險心者矣葢彼止令人難窺此直令人相忘也)穢食餧人(餧人與人食也不潔之食 人所不欲强以餧人是等人於犬彘人旣嗔之神亦惡之矣宋翟永夀販米爲業紹興乙卯間米價踴貴永夀於中路聞之乃 取稻田水潤米不知其田已下糞矣少頃黑雲忽起震雷大作永夀知罪度必不免因探腰間錢一貫授與同行囑令歸遺其 母作是語已天忽開霽夫誤用穢水潰米遂千天怒若非一念孝心豈不早斃雷斧之下乎)左道惑眾(不正之道
Interpretation

This passage covers two main aspects: prohibitions for health cultivation, and warnings about personal conduct.

Regarding health cultivation, it particularly emphasizes restraining desires during specific times. For example, during the solar terms of the winter solstice and summer solstice, extreme weather conditions of severe cold or heat, celestial phenomena like solar and lunar eclipses, as well as harsh weather such as strong winds, heavy fog, thunderstorms, and torrential rain, one must exercise caution. Additionally, special dates like one’s birth year (本命年), the Gengshen (庚申) and Jiazi (甲子) days, the first and fifteenth days of each lunar month, and the "Four Beginnings" (立春, 立夏, 立秋, 立冬) and "Two Equinoxes" (春分, 秋分) within the 24 solar terms require particular restraint. The fifth lunar month has nine especially inauspicious days called the "Nine Poison Days" (九毒日). The common feature of these forbidden periods is that they are times when one’s vital Qi (元气) is easily depleted—indulging in excess desires during these times is akin to courting death.

The second part criticizes several types of immoral behavior. "Poisonous heart but kind appearance" (心毒貌慈) refers to those who are ruthless inside but outwardly gentle, like wolves in sheep’s clothing—such people will fall into hell after death. Examples include Li Yifu of the Tang Dynasty and Cai Yuandu of the Song Dynasty, both of whom wore pleasant smiles while harboring cruelty in their hearts, ultimately meeting miserable ends.

"Feeding people filthy food" (秽食餧人) means deliberately giving others unclean food, treating them like pigs or dogs. The passage recounts the story of Zhai Yongshou from the Song Dynasty, who mixed feces into rice to seek excessive profit, only to be struck by lightning—he narrowly escaped death only because of his filial piety.

"Deluding the masses with heretical ways" (左道惑众) refers to misleading people with unorthodox methods, a grave violation of heavenly principle. These teachings serve as warnings that one must nurture good intentions and uphold proper conduct—otherwise, divine retribution is inevitable.

謂之左道三教聖人道雖不同上者使人明心見性其次使人遷善遠惡未有好爲詭異以惑人者凡惑人者皆左道也葢人 心多愚最易惑以禍福一爲所惑因而生盜生姦甚則聚黨作亂及其事敗身首異處從無一人得免者遠無具論楊州近事 可鑒也便益門外黃金壩一鄕愚擔糞灌園忽有數人誘之曰汝終嵗灌田殊勞苦耳吾有一術可致富貴汝肯從乎應曰唯 因引至僻處盡授訣明日鄕愚方灌園忽狂呼跳踴自稱都天神下降大言不立廟祀我此方無遺類人因其愚咸信之先搆 蓆殿奉鄕愚居稱之曰活菩薩云遠近聞活菩薩名日益集男婦雜𨓬不可以數計鄕愚終日默坐不飮食有所禱卜筊而已 一切募化人願免災皆爭輸如是月餘官長無不知有活菩薩矣太守金公往按之擒出一鞫便伏立斃數人於杖下餘黨悉 散殿立燼焉○沃起鳳曰近日奸徒聚眾借名說法漁色賺財固該萬磔而爲其所惑者聽其家之婦女源源入菴觀寺院以 致宣淫露醜傷風敗化惡得盡無罪哉主風教者苟能亟爲禁戒之亦未必非正俗之一助也)短尺挾度輕秤 小升(自此至採取姦利皆言小人貪利之事也度者分寸丈尺之總名先王立此以量長短所以平人心之不平也今以 短狹者量出勢必以長廣者量入不平孰甚至於秤升以須公平蓋細民日用爲急卽一文之錢得之甚艱故與人貿易秤不
Interpretation

This passage discusses the dangers of heretical paths. Although the teaching methods of the Three Teachings (Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism) differ, their highest wisdom all guides people to illuminate their minds and realize their true nature (明心见性). The secondary teachings at least instruct people to embrace goodness and shun evil—never employing bizarre methods to deceive others. Those who specialize in deluding people's minds are undoubtedly practicing heterodox ways.

Most human minds are prone to ignorance and are easily swayed by superstitious claims of fortune and misfortune. Once deceived, people may engage in theft, fraud, or even gather in mobs to cause chaos. When such schemes are exposed, the participants inevitably meet grim fates—some even losing their heads. Without mentioning distant examples, recent events in Yangzhou serve as clear evidence.

Outside the Bianyi Gate in Yangzhou's Golden Dam, a peasant made his living by carrying manure to fertilize vegetable gardens. Suddenly, a few men approached him, saying: "Toiling year-round watering vegetables is exhausting. We have a method to make you immensely wealthy and noble—would you like to learn it?" The peasant agreed, and they led him to a secluded spot to impart their "secret technique." The next day, while watering his crops, the peasant suddenly went into a frenzy, shouting that he was the incarnate "God of the Capital" (都天神) and declaring that unless a temple was built to worship him, calamity would befall the entire region. Because he appeared deranged, people actually believed him. They first erected a thatched shrine to enshrine him, calling him the "Living Bodhisattva."

As word of the "Living Bodhisattva" spread, pilgrims from near and far flocked to pay homage—men and women mingling in uncountable numbers. The peasant sat in meditation all day without eating or drinking, and when supplicants sought divination, he would cast divination blocks (掷筊). Followers competed to donate wealth in hopes of averting disaster, and this commotion lasted over a month. When local officials became aware, Prefect Jin personally investigated. The truth was immediately revealed during interrogation: the ringleaders were beaten to death on the spot, their accomplices scattered in fear, and the thatched shrine was burned to the ground.

Wo Qifeng commented: "Recently, wicked individuals often gather crowds under the pretense of preaching doctrines, but in truth, they covet wealth and sensual pleasures—such crimes indeed deserve death. Yet are those who are deceived entirely blameless? When they allow women in their households to frequent temples and monasteries without restraint, leading to moral corruption, they too bear responsibility. If those in charge of moral instruction could promptly prohibit such behavior, it would greatly aid in rectifying social customs."

The passage then turns to the wicked practices of merchants who cheat in weights and measures: from "shortening rulers to reduce measurements" (短尺挟度) to "profiting through deceit" (采取奸利), all describe the unscrupulous methods of petty profit-seekers. "Measurement standards" (度) were established by ancient kings to ensure fairness. Yet today, some deliberately use short rulers when selling goods and long ones when buying, or tamper with scales and measuring vessels. Ordinary people already struggle to make ends meet—every coin is hard-earned. In trade, fairness should always prevail.

可輕升不可小輕出旣不可則重入亦不可小出旣不可則大入亦不可否則冒太上之禁失自心之平雷火之誅不旋踵而 至矣周才美爲子娶婦見其能令理家政付以斗斛秤尺各兩等諭以多入少出之法婦不悅求去曰翁所爲有逆天道妾他 日生子定不肖破家人謂是妾所生恐被玷累才美悟乃曰依汝言及今改之未晚也婦問用此幾年矣曰約二十餘載婦曰 如必欲婦留當反用二十年少入多出以酬前日欺瞞之數才美許諾後生二子皆登第江山縣祝大郎富而不仁所用斗斛 秤尺大小不一忽有道人過門戒曰汝宜用心平等豈可如是今若有人來取斗秤等物家必有災是夕卽夢二靑衣來取夢 中付與旣覺急尋之已失矣因憶道人之言謂災者火也卽盡徙室中之藏於山上質庫方稍定庫地忽迸裂洪水湧出屋宇 錢帛順流而下所居頃刻化爲深潭至今呼爲祝家潭)以僞雜眞(僞者假也以假物作眞物如鹽内攙沙酒中攙 水之類此等事獲利固倍損德亦多德旣受損則災禍至矣亦復何利至於使用假銀尤爲誤人正德間兪翱嘗以鑽鉛假銀 一兩八錢買四羊賣羊者乃一婦人不識也夫歸識之怒罵其妻妻忿縊死夫痛其妻亦縊焉不數日翱被迅雷擊死湖濱四 羊亦死葢其屍上此非假銀誤人之報乎又世間最可恨者貨賣假藥誤人更甚張安國知撫州日出榜戒曰陶隱君孫眞人
Interpretation

This passage expounds the principle of karmic retribution, emphasizing the importance of fairness and integrity in human conduct while warning against deception.

The text first establishes that deception, whether on a small or large scale, must be avoided. Violating this principle not only transgresses celestial prohibitions but also disrupts inner harmony, swiftly inviting punishment through thunder and fire (in Daoist belief, the Thunder Department deities punish evildoers).

Two illustrative stories follow: Zhou Caimei, when arranging his son's marriage, gave his daughter-in-law two sets of measuring tools (bushels and scales), instructing her to use larger measures when collecting rent and smaller ones when lending grain. His daughter-in-law protested that this violated heavenly principle, threatening to leave and warning that such practices would beget unworthy descendants who would ruin the family. Awakened to this truth, Zhou adopted fair measurements and was later blessed with two sons who passed the imperial examinations.

Another account tells of Zhu Dalang from Jiangshan County, who cheated others using rigged measuring tools. After being warned by a Daoist practitioner, black-clad officers (underworld enforcers) confiscated his fraudulent devices that very night. Subsequently, his household suffered a flood that swept away all possessions, leaving his residence submerged as a deep pool still known as "Zhu Family Pond."

The text specifically condemns severe forms of fraud: mixing sand into salt, diluting wine with water—practices that yield material gain but erode virtue (De) even more drastically. The gravest offense involves counterfeit silver; the example given is Yu Ao, whose fake silver payment for sheep drove the sellers to hang themselves, after which he himself was struck dead by lightning.

Finally, the passage highlights the particular evil of selling counterfeit medicine. During the Song dynasty, when Zhang Anguo served as prefect of Fuzhou, he posted public notices quoting admonitions from Tao Hongjing (the Hermit Tao) and Sun Simiao (the Perfected Sun)—both renowned Daoist medical scholars who emphasized compassionate healing—to warn the populace.

千金方濟物利生多積陰德名在列仙自此以來行醫貨藥誠心救人獲福甚眾曾見貨賣假藥積利起家自謂得計不知冥 㝠之中暗減其祿或身多橫禍天火雷震子孫非理破蕩葢緣贖藥之人疾病急切將錢告買只望一服見效却被假藥誤賺 反致損傷尋常殺一飛走猶有因果人命最重無辜被害其痛何窮噫此眞所謂仁人之言也)採取姦利(人非謀利 何以治生不能無取但取當以正可採取姦利乎姦利如私鹽私鑄以及一切躧船頭撞木鐘挑米過付之類諺云越姦越巧 越貧窮姦巧原來天不容富貴若從姦巧得世間騃漢吸西風今採取姦利而自謂久長此必不得之數也孫南金以交結官 吏致富晚年益多貪求凡人所不敢爲者無不爲之人所不敢取者無不取之忽有惡疾飮食不進枯瘠如𧲣及死乃作驢鳴 云○廬陵嵗旱龍昌裔有米將糶因天雨其價稍減昌裔爲文禱於神剛廟更祈一月不雨焚訖還家憩道旁一亭俄有黑雲 自廟後出頃之雷雨大至昌裔震死亭中人視之於髻中得一紙則禱廟之文也今之富家閉糴坐待高價者盍鑒此)壓 良爲賤(人家兒女皆謂之良奴婢皆謂之賤若本出良家而我以勢力强制之使爲奴婢是壓良爲賤也至賣良爲娼 罪重惡極又不必言矣昔鍾離瑾爲德化縣令有女字隣縣許令子將嫁買一婢爲媵婢至背屏而泣詰之卽前令女也瑾惻
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses two categories of wicked deeds and their corresponding retributions:

The first concerns the karmic consequences of selling counterfeit medicine. Physicians should follow the example of the Essential Formulas Worth a Thousand Gold by healing the world and accumulating hidden virtue (Yinde) to attain immortality. Yet some profit from fake remedies, believing themselves clever while unknowingly having their blessings diminished. Common retributions include sudden misfortunes, lightning strikes, and prodigal descendants who squander family fortunes. When desperate patients purchase these fraudulent medicines, their conditions worsen or treatment is delayed. Even killing animals carries karmic consequences—how much graver is the sin of endangering human lives? This constitutes one of the most severe transgressions.

The second category involves profiteering through deceit. While making a living is necessary, it must be done righteously. Schemes like smuggling salt and iron or manipulating grain prices may seem shrewd but inevitably invite disaster. Two cautionary tales illustrate this: Sun Nanjin colluded with officials to amass wealth, growing insatiable in old age until he died emaciated like a skeleton, braying like a donkey; Long Changyi hoarded rice during a drought while praying for no rain, only to be struck by lightning—villagers later discovered rain-suppressing prayers hidden in his hair bun.

Finally, the text condemns the sin of "oppressing the noble into servitude" (forcing freeborn citizens into slavery or prostitution), citing Zhong Lijin as a counterexample. Upon discovering a purchased maidservant was actually a former magistrate's daughter, he immediately restored her freedom and arranged a proper marriage. This serves as a warning to wealthy households that exploit disaster victims or coerce commoners into bondage.

然乃以書寄許公求緩婚期日近買婢得前令女當用女裝先嫁之許答曰昔遽伯玉耻獨爲君子君何自專仁義乎願以前 令女配吾季子於是二女皆歸許氏以此陰德上帝賜瑾十任太守以夀考終彼反此而壓良爲賤者豈不永受惡報乎)謾 驀愚人(謾者欺人不知不見也驀者快㨗伶俐之貌凡用詭計設騙令人墮其術中者謂之謾驀謾驀皆不可用而加 之愚人則尤爲可憐卽愚人不能報冥冥之中豈無有憐其愚而代爲之報者遂昌村中三人同行前臨一渡而舟在彼岸中 有一人愚蠢乃使之赴水取舟其人脫衣下水出没湍流僅而獲濟復撐舟來渡二人二人纔登舟愚者忽腹痛欲泄急跳岸 上二人竟撐舟去曰日已晚不及候汝矣俄而水急舟橫抵岸一觸舟覆俱溺死而愚者在岸無恙)貪婪無厭(以口 取物曰婪言人之貪如口之食物無有窮極也老子曰罪莫大於多欲禍莫大於不知足夫人心之欲豈有限量知足雖貧賤 亦樂不知足雖富貴亦憂昔胡九韶家甚貧課兒力耕僅給衣食猶每日謝天淸福妻笑曰一日三飡菜粥何名淸福九韶曰 幸生太平之世無兵禍又幸一家骨肉不至飢寒又幸榻無病人獄無囚人非淸福而何此眞知足者也又有不知足者南京 守備劉瑯鎭陝西歸貲積無比復於私第建眞君祠日講爐火方士知瑯有玉縧環價値百鎰紿令獻神祈福遂併丹鼎竊去
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories illustrating the principle of karmic retribution.

The first story tells of Xu Jin's (Lord Xu) virtuous deeds. When someone wrote to Xu Jin requesting a marriage postponement, he later discovered while purchasing a maidservant that she was the daughter of a former county magistrate. Xu Jin decided to first have the young woman married as his own daughter. He responded: "In ancient times, Ju Boyu (a virtuous official of the Spring and Autumn period) considered it shameful to cultivate virtue alone—why should you bear the burden of righteousness by yourself?" He then arranged for the former magistrate's daughter to marry his youngest son, so both women became part of the Xu family. Due to such hidden virtue (accumulated good deeds done in secret), heaven rewarded Xu Jin with ten consecutive terms as a prefect, and he ultimately died peacefully. In contrast, those who oppress good people or force respectable women into servitude—will they not suffer eternal retribution?

Next comes a tale about retribution for deceiving the simple-minded. "Deceptive tricks" refers to using cunning to cheat others, particularly pitiable when targeting the naive. The story tells of three men traveling together to a ferry crossing where the boat was on the opposite shore. The most simple-minded was told to swim across to retrieve it. Risking his life in the rapids, he succeeded and had just ferried the other two aboard when suddenly he needed to relieve himself. Upon his return to shore, the two men rowed away saying they couldn't wait. But the boat capsized in the rapids, drowning both deceivers, while the simpleton they'd cheated remained unharmed.

Finally, the text warns against the calamity of insatiable greed. "Greed" resembles a mouth endlessly consuming without satisfaction. Laozi said the greatest sin is excessive desire, the greatest misfortune is discontent. Two examples illustrate this: Hu Jiushao, though poor, daily thanked heaven for simple blessings—living in peaceful times with no starving or freezing family members, nor sickness or imprisonment; conversely, Nanjing garrison commander Liu Lang amassed great wealth during his Shaanxi posting, even building a Zhenjun shrine seeking immortality, only to be swindled by alchemists out of jade belt ornaments worth a hundred yi and his entire alchemical furnace set.

有人夜題其門曰堆金積玉已如山須向仙家學煉丹金鼎未成抛白璧眞君原也愛縧環瑯慚憤而死)咒咀求直 (咒咀者誓於神也求直者求神速報也此不待入廟投詞凡忿爭之時呼天叫地者皆是夫事理本有曲直如直則日久自明 何須急於表暴如曲則自反有愧安敢對神一爲咒咀眞忘命矣按咒誓章有云四方八面受人咒咀一切凶惡之鬼皆得乘 間同隙行其禍害若非天神降解未易斷除則咒咀其可爲乎世間狂悖小人明知所作非理猶欲誓神以塞其謗不思神明 鑒臨豈容汝肆其欺悖往往慘絶橫亡竟有如其所咒而死者可畏也已)嗜酒悖亂(嗜好也四戒以酒爲第一可飮 而不可嗜世人嗜飮無厭以致氣昏心亂膽大心狂久且喪心敗德能使士敗名官落職農荒[田夀]商賈喪貲可嗜之乎甚且有 損肺腐腸因之招疾而死者蘇易簡爲學士平生好飮因此衂血感疾而卒王全爲殿中丞自恃量高一日大醉臍裂而死葢 嗜酒之人必至悖亂悖亂之人必不令終古人斥爲禍泉指爲狂藥其垂戒之意深矣)骨肉忿爭(天下凡事皆宜 和平處之不當爭競何况骨肉佛云六度萬行忍爲第一張公九世同居惟一忍字人唯不能忍所以多至忿爭人倫旣傷天 災必至自然之理也袁氏世範曰人家父子兄弟多有不和者或因責望太過或是分財不均或人之性情不一作事不齊或
Interpretation

Someone once wrote on a door at midnight: "Mountains of gold and silver pile high, yet you seek to learn the alchemist's art. Before the golden cauldron of neidan (internal alchemy) is perfected, you discard precious white jade—yet even perfected immortals originally delighted in jade ornaments." This person later died in shame and rage.

Regarding swearing oaths to demand justice: Swearing means making vows to the gods, while demanding justice seeks divine retribution. Such acts need not be formally reported at temples—any angry quarrel accompanied by cries to heaven counts. Affairs naturally have right and wrong; if one is truly righteous, time will reveal the truth—why demand immediate divine judgment? If in the wrong, one should feel ashamed upon self-reflection—how dare swear before the gods? This is tantamount to gambling with life! The Chapter on Curses and Oaths states: "When cursed from all directions, all malicious ghosts seize the chance to bring calamity. Unless celestial deities intervene, such misfortune is hard to dispel." Can oath-swearing then be taken lightly? Reckless villains who know they're wrong yet try to silence others with oaths forget the gods see all—how can deception be tolerated? They often meet violent deaths, their own terrible vows fulfilled—how dreadful!

Concerning drunkenness and moral collapse: Among worldly indulgences, alcohol ranks first among the four major prohibitions—it may be consumed moderately but never indulged. People today drink without restraint, clouding their shen (spirit), confusing their minds, and growing recklessly bold until they lose reason and ruin virtue. Scholars thus ruin their careers, officials lose their posts, farmers neglect fields, merchants squander capital—how can such indulgence continue? Worse cases damage organs, corrode intestines, and cause fatal illnesses. For instance, scholar Su Yijian, a lifelong drunkard, died from alcohol-induced hemorrhaging; Palace Secretary Wang Quan, proud of his capacity, once drank until his navel split open. Drunkards inevitably act perversely, and the perverse never die well. Ancient warnings called wine "the spring of calamity" and "madness medicine"—how profound these admonitions!

Regarding quarrels among kin: All worldly affairs should be handled peacefully—why contend, especially with flesh and blood? Buddhists say the six perfections and myriad practices begin with forbearance. Zhang Gongyi maintained nine generations under one roof solely through endurance. People quarrel precisely because they cannot endure. When human relations are damaged, heavenly disasters inevitably follow—this is cosmic law. Yuan Cai's Family Instructions observed: "Fathers and sons, brothers at odds—either expectations are too high, property divided unfairly, or temperaments and methods clash."

聽婦女之言彼此離間數者皆不和之根也若悟此理父兄子弟各盡其道父兄愛子弟不必責子弟之必順子弟敬父兄不 必責父兄之必慈則情意之間自得和恊至於財物尤宜打破富者當思吾財果是因眾成私獨擁不分心豈無歉果是自置 財產分與貧者明則爲高義幽則爲陰德豈不勝於連年結訟虛費家貲乎貧者亦宜自思彼實竊眾成家亦辛苦營運以至 增益豈可盡分况實彼私財吾等佔之甯不自愧苟能知此必無爭訟之費至人之性情或柔或剛或謹守或豪縱或喜安靜 或喜紛更臨事之際一是一非自然不同唯各隨所宜不因我是求其必合豈復爭執婦人賦性褊愎其於翁姑妯娌之間大 率輕恩易怨又有婢妾喜事者從中挑逗是非以爲快樂是以積恨往往不解此在爲丈夫者嚴禁婢妾不許傳遞語言同居 之人往來行走須令曳履揚聲使入聞之恐適逢議我彼此生隙其妻妾有言雖或中情亦不可聽如此卽欲忿爭從何而起 此處家至要之論也○洪武中有告鄭氏交通胡惟庸者吏捕之湜請行曰弟在其忍使兄罹刑律濂曰吾家長當任罪弟無 與焉二人爭下獄上聞之謂近臣曰有人如此而肯從人爲非耶宥而擢用之今之骨肉忿爭者總只爲自己不肯喫虧耳觀 鄭氏爭獄一事天下又有何事當忿爭者乎)男不忠良(忠者誠實之謂良者方正之謂萬物惟人最靈人又以男
Interpretation

This scripture passage expounds the principles of maintaining family harmony. It first identifies listening to women's divisive words as the root cause of family discord. Understanding this truth, fathers and elder brothers should care for younger members without demanding obedience, while younger members should respect elders without insisting on their affection—this naturally leads to harmonious coexistence.

Regarding wealth distribution, the affluent should reflect: If their riches were accumulated with others' help, wouldn't they feel ashamed to hoard it all without sharing? If the wealth was self-earned, distributing it to the poor constitutes noble righteousness in human society and accumulates virtue (De) in the spiritual realm—surely this surpasses annual lawsuits that waste family assets? The less fortunate should also consider: The wealthy genuinely worked hard for their prosperity, so how can one demand everything for oneself? Understanding this prevents contentious disputes.

Human temperaments vary—some gentle, some strong-willed; some cautious, others bold—naturally leading to different approaches in handling matters. Mutual tolerance without imposing conformity prevents conflicts.

Women's dispositions often tend toward stubbornness, making them prone to holding grudges among in-laws. Troublemaking maids who stir discord for amusement compound these festering resentments. Husbands must strictly forbid servants from spreading gossip, and family members should make audible movements to avoid suspicion of eavesdropping. Even when wives or concubines speak reason, their words shouldn't be readily believed—this eliminates the seeds of quarrels. This constitutes the most crucial principle of household management.

The passage concludes with an example from the Hongwu era of Ming Dynasty: When the Zheng family was accused of conspiring with Hu Weiyong, Zheng Shi voluntarily offered to replace his elder brother in punishment, while Zheng Lian insisted on bearing responsibility as family head. The emperor, moved by this, remarked: "How could such people commit wrongdoing?" and pardoned and promoted them. Contemporary relatives quarrel because none will yield. Witnessing the Zheng family competing to assume blame—what worldly matter remains worth disputing?

The scripture finally clarifies "male disloyalty": Loyalty means honesty, and goodness means integrity. Among all beings, humans possess the highest wisdom, and men particularly should embody loyalty and goodness.

子爲貴旣爲男子而奸佞不忠險僻不良豈不負此七尺軀乎朱璣曰古來忠良者多矣不能盡述唯取近今一二人以爲勸 可乎揚州諸生蔣應參字三去幼孤而貧事嫡母以孝聞爲人端方正直幾微不苟自始冠至老未嘗一日釋冠對五經四書 必歛容整肅教人以誠素奉佛戒殺好施每出必擕錢百文路贈乞丐未嘗以乞丐呼之呼曰貧民色甚恭其誠恪類如此先 生有子名善字同菴聲重儒林丙子應鄕試其硃卷忽從眾卷中徐徐自出房師張公調鼎異之拔冠本房人皆以爲先生忠 良之報乙酉揚州城破同菴先擕家避兵毘陵忽土人錢克承來訪詢之則曰子二年前夢見天榜免難江都蔣善居第一後 同菴果以夀考終當塗楊璜字希周持已以正不詭隨人丙戌嵗兵擾其鄕璜戀祖父坵隴不忍去因匿妻妾與子於林中以 身守隴兵見璜趨執之璜急投水兵捨去其子甫十嵗自林間見父溺亦號哭奔溺父子擕手而死妻陸氏感悼幾絶撫妾泣 曰汝有遺腹子吾死誰爲吾夫撫者遂不死自此每晨哭夫畢輒禮佛祈祝生男及嵗暮妾乃生女陸氏泣曰已矣無可復望 矣族人咸欲分其產族長不忍議至小祥屆期親族集焉妾偶抱女卧女忽呱呱哭不已妾方夢魘陸來抱女溺啓視之則見 其和處已易女爲男矣大驚異急呼親族共視親族無不愕然因共聞於知縣張公張公使人驗之果然一時傳播以爲異事
Interpretation

This passage recounts two stories about virtuous individuals and their descendants receiving divine rewards. The first tells of Jiang Yingcan (courtesy name Sanqu), a scholar from Yangzhou who lost his father in childhood and grew up in poverty, yet served his stepmother with exceptional filial piety. A man of upright character and strict discipline, he maintained dignified conduct from adulthood through old age. He devoutly studied Confucian classics, taught others sincerity, observed Buddhist precepts against killing, and delighted in charitable deeds. Whenever he went out, he carried a hundred coins to give to beggars—never calling them "beggars" but respectfully addressing them as "the impoverished." His son Jiang Shan (courtesy name Tong'an) experienced a marvel during the imperial examinations: his exam paper miraculously rose to the surface from a pile of submissions. The examiner Zhang Tiaoding, astonished by this phenomenon, selected him. Later, when Yangzhou fell to invaders, Jiang Shan survived the massacre because his name had appeared on a celestial roster in someone's prophetic dream, ultimately living out his days in peace.

The second story concerns Yang Huang (courtesy name Xizhou) from Dangtu, a man of unyielding integrity. During wartime chaos, he was captured while guarding his ancestral graves and drowned himself. His ten-year-old son, witnessing this, wept and leaped into the river after him—father and son perished hand in hand. Yang Huang's wife, née Lu, was heartbroken but persevered for the sake of their concubine's unborn child. Later, the concubine miraculously gave birth to a boy after initial signs of a girl—a wonder verified by the local magistrate, becoming a celebrated marvel of the time. Both narratives illustrate how heaven ultimately blesses the loyal and righteous, along with their descendants.

此豈非忠良之報乎)女不柔順(婦人者伏於人者也若不柔順或至悍妒豈婦人之道乎唐張孟仁妻鄭氏其弟中 義妻徐氏共處一室紡績寸⬤不入私房有所饋則納於姑臨用則請之不問孰爲己物鄭歸甯則徐乳其子徐歸甯則鄭乳 其子朝廷旌其門曰二難近見人家婦女或挾制丈夫或不敬翁姑或妯娌不和或凌虐婢妾種種惡習雖女子質性之劣亦 由男子有以養成之語云教婦初來教子幼孩凡爲丈夫者須先事事諭之以理不可溺於床第之愛縱使失道尤不可輕信 其言凡事令之專制至於女子未嫁者又在父母朝夕教誨切勿順其喜怒之性今日在家事父母卽異日事舅姑丈夫之法 今日在家待兄弟姊妹卽異日待妯娌小姑之法今日在家使奴婢卽異日馭婢妾之法少有過差便當委曲開導萬勿姑息 容忍久之馴伏純熟德器若自然矣)不和其室(人之有妻便成家室夫妻和好家道未有不興隆者世有愚人或寵 妾而侮妻或迷戀聲妓不受妻勸忿罵嗔責無所不至乖氣致戾所以然巳顏茂猷曰人生莫作婦人身百般苦樂由他人彼 離親別愛所倚惟我我則薄倖躭情姬侍罔念結髮自揣於心忍乎恕乎卽或婦有不是處當念彼未讀書明理唯委曲勸諭 使之聽從何得遽生嗔怒且世人遇强悍之婦則受其欺凌遇醕朴之婦則加以凌虐欺善怕惡此豈丈夫所宜有也吾願世
Interpretation

This scripture discusses familial ethics, particularly the proper way for husband and wife to coexist harmoniously.

A woman should be gentle and compliant (as it is natural for women to embody humility and softness). The harmonious relationship between Zheng Shi, wife of Zhang Mengren, and Xu Shi, wife of Zhang Zhongyi (Zhang Mengren's younger brother) during the Tang dynasty serves as an excellent example. They lived together in the same household, pooling all their earnings from spinning and weaving for their mother-in-law to manage, requesting funds only when needed and never disputing ownership. When Zheng returned to her parents' home, Xu nursed her children, and vice versa. The imperial court honored their household as "Two Virtues" (referring to rare and commendable moral conduct).

Today, some women either dominate their husbands, disrespect their in-laws, quarrel with sisters-in-law, or mistreat maids and concubines. While these faults may stem from feminine nature, men also bear responsibility. As the saying goes, "Teach a bride from the moment she enters your home; teach children from their earliest years." A husband should guide his wife with reason, neither indulging her in sensual pleasures that lead to wrongdoing nor trusting her pillow talk so much that she usurps authority.

Unmarried women especially depend on parental guidance and must not be allowed to act willfully. How a girl treats her parents and siblings now foreshadows how she will treat in-laws and sisters-in-law later; how she treats servants now reflects how she will manage maids and concubines in the future. When faults arise, teach patiently—never indulge—and over time, virtuous character will naturally develop.

Marital discord is a grave family misfortune. Some foolish men either favor concubines while humiliating their wives or frequent prostitutes, ignoring their wives' admonitions, even resorting to beatings and abuse. Remember: after marriage, a woman leaves her parents and relies solely on her husband. If the husband is cold-hearted, obsessed with beauty, where is his conscience? Even if the wife errs, consider her limited education and lack of understanding—guide her patiently rather than vent anger. Some men endure abuse from fierce wives yet bully gentle ones—what kind of hero cowers before the strong while oppressing the weak?

(Note: In this text, "gu" refers to the mother-in-law; "jiu gu" means parents-in-law; "zhóu li" denotes wives of brothers; "xiao gu" is the husband's younger sister.)

人有犯此者當爲戒之○劉廷式登第其所聘女已雙瞽矣女家力辭劉曰失明於定婚之後義不可棄若此女某不娶將何 所歸爰擇吉成禮夫婦相敬如賔生二子皆成進士後瞽女死廷式哭之盡哀今以嫌妻貌醜而不和者盍視此劉思文流寓 蜀中成都楊某納爲壻旣而謀歸竊見妻與母兄議事有不豫之色問其故曰父存日議以田四十畝爲嫁貲邇來事多鬻之 幾盡今僅能一半適立劵爲此不安也劉取劵焚之曰豈有爲人壻而逼其家以爲粧奩者竟携妻歸極其和好後登第官至 侍郎今之爭競賠房而不和者盍視此)不敬其夫(夫者婦之天胡可不敬其不敬者非悍婦卽淫蕩之婦也嗚呼 凡作女身多因㝛譴若更侮夫甯不益墮惡道乎)每好矜誇(矜者自是也人之謙者福澤必深厚其器量大也人 之盈者福澤必減少其器量淺也况造物忌盈人道好謙矜誇太甚豈不犯天之忌干人之怒乎究其所爲矜誇者不過恃其 富貴才能抑思富貴才能有何足恃石崇與王愷鬬富誇恃奇麗愷作紫⬤步障四十里崇作錦步障五十里其他珍異之物 莫不爭勝後崇因罪伏誅乃嘆曰奴軰利吾財耳此富不足誇之證也杜鎬少年登第嘗與同軰遊一寺中老僧問其姓氏旁 人遂以科名誇之老僧顧而笑曰皆不知也杜内愧其言因題詩曰家在城南杜曲旁兩枝丹桂一時芳禪師都未知名姓始
Interpretation

After Liu Tingshi passed the imperial examination to become a jinshi, he discovered his betrothed had gone blind. Though her family offered to annul the engagement, he declared: "Her blindness came after our pledge—how could I abandon her in good conscience? If I don't marry her, where else could she go?" He solemnized the marriage on an auspicious date, treating his blind wife with utmost respect. They later raised two sons who both became jinshi. When she eventually passed away, Liu mourned so deeply it nearly destroyed him. Those modern couples who quarrel over superficial appearances would do well to heed this example.

Another account tells of Liu Siwen, who married into the Yang family in Chengdu during his travels in Shu. Preparing to return home, he noticed his wife and brother-in-law looking troubled. Upon inquiry, he learned his late father-in-law had promised forty acres as dowry, but family misfortunes had reduced it to twenty. As they shamefacedly drafted the amended deed, Liu burned the document saying, "What groom would extort dowry from his wife's family?" They returned home in harmony, and he later rose to Vice-Minister. Modern couples bickering over marriage settlements should take note.

The scripture continues: Wives who disrespect their husbands (for the husband is heaven to his wife—how dare she not revere him? Such irreverence marks either shrews or wantons) should understand that being born female often reflects karmic retribution. To then scorn one's husband only deepens one's descent into wretched rebirths.

On the folly of ostentation: The prideful invite meager blessings, for their qi capacity is narrow; the humble attract abundant fortune, for their qi capacity is vast. Heaven's Dao abhors excess while human virtue honors humility. Flaunting wealth or talent offends both cosmic principles and human sensibilities. Consider the cautionary tale of Shi Chong and Wang Kai's extravagance contest—one flaunting forty-li purple silk screens, the other fifty-li brocade partitions—until Shi's eventual execution brought the realization: "My followers only coveted my riches." Likewise, when Du Gao's colleagues boasted of his early success to an elder monk, the cleric's "I've never heard of him" prompted Du's chastened poem: "By Du Qu south of town I dwelled, twin laurels briefly bloomed so well... Yet the Zen master knows no name..."

覺空門意味長此貴不足誇之證也指揮湯允績有英才詩文亦雄健有氣然性殊傲慢好加於人嘗自言才兼文武可當一 面人因以湯一面呼之後補陝西叅將與賊交鋒一箭中喉而死人遂號曰湯一箭此才能不足誇之證也然則好矜誇者又 將何所恃耶)常行妒忌(人之隱惡無如妒忌一萌此心便當克制乃必欲行之斷爲鬼神所不容矣况常行乎昔 宋大夫薛瑗有子十人一僂一跛一𤼣一躄一顚一痴一聾一瞽一啞一獄死公明子皋見之問曰大夫所行如何而禍至此 瑗曰予生平無他惡惟好行嫉妒勝己者忌之佞己者悅之聞人之善疑之聞人之惡信之見人有失己如有所得見人有得 己如有所失子皋嘆曰大夫心行如此須至滅門矣惡類甯止此乎瑗聞其言惶然畏懼子皋曰天雖高而察甚下若改往修 來轉禍爲福不患晚矣瑗自此改惕盡返生平所行不數年諸子所疾皆愈由此觀之妒忌可常行乎○玩上下文則此條似 爲婦人而)無行於妻子(妻者我之敵體子者我之後身待妻宜和而敬待子宜嚴而慈今之待其妻者或刻 薄寡恩或狎昵無度今之待其子者或姑息太過或督責太苛皆謂之無行已實無行又將何以責妻子乎閩士李某赴試道 過衢州店主夢土神告曰明日有李秀才來乃科甲中人可善待之及至主人欵待甚優且告以夢李甚喜夜思登第做官惟
Interpretation

This scripture uses two stories to warn people against the perils of arrogance and jealousy.

The first story recounts the tale of Tang Yunji, a Ming dynasty general. While truly talented with robust literary skills, his arrogant nature led him to constantly boast about being accomplished in both civil and martial arts, claiming he could single-handedly manage affairs. This earned him the mocking nickname "One-Sided Tang." Later, during a battle against bandits in Shaanxi, he was struck by an arrow through the throat and died, prompting people to rename him "One-Arrow Tang." This illustrates how boasting about one's abilities often invites calamity.

The second story is even more thought-provoking. During the Song dynasty, physician Xue Yuan had ten sons, each afflicted with disabilities: hunchbacked, lame, paralyzed, insane, mentally impaired, deaf, blind, mute, and one who died in prison. Physiognomist Gongming Zigao (a renowned ancient fortune-teller) asked what misdeeds Xue had committed. Xue confessed his lifelong habit of jealousy: envying those superior to him, doubting others' good deeds, delighting in others' misfortunes, and feeling personally slighted when others prospered. Zigao warned that such mentality could bring ruin to his entire family. Profoundly awakened, Xue completely reformed himself, and within a few years, his sons miraculously recovered. This demonstrates the devastating consequences of jealousy.

The scripture further advises moderation in family relationships. A wife should be treated as an equal partner, while children represent the continuation of life. Harmony and respect should govern marital relations, and parenting should balance discipline with kindness. Some people today either treat their wives with cold harshness or excessive familiarity, while either spoiling children unreasonably or being overly critical—all improper behaviors.

A concluding anecdote tells of Fujian scholar Li who, while traveling for imperial examinations, had his innkeeper dream of the local earth god announcing Li as a future palace graduate deserving good hospitality. Upon learning this, Li became smug, fantasizing about his future officialdom. The next day, the innkeeper's attitude changed drastically—the earth god had reappeared in a dream to say Li's improper thoughts had revoked his scholarly honors. This vignette reaffirms the importance of "maintaining virtuous intentions."

所娶妻不堪作夫人果貴不患無美者旣去主人復夢曰李秀才功名未遂便欲棄妻名不成矣生回店主又以夢告之生驚 愧而去此無行於妻之報也涿郡王瑤溺愛二子養成惡性後不能制而告官二子俱死於法後瑤死次年二月十五夜城隍 廟道士劉進聞廟中聲喧起窺之見王瑤持狀求淸明祀神怒曰爾有子不能教自絶其後誰供爾祀不准其人大哭而去明 日訪之乃知瑤已死此無行於子之報也)失禮於舅姑(舅姑俗呼翁婆也婦事舅姑一如子事父母少或失禮卽 爲不孝罪通於天矣試以古之至孝者言之姜詩事母至孝妻龎氏奉姑尤謹姑好飮江水龎氏出汲遇風還遲姑因渴怒甚 詩遂責妻遣之龎氏不忍去寄居隣舍晝夜紡績日市珍羞使隣母自以其意遺姑久之姑怪問隣母以實告姑感而命還姑 嗜魚膾又不能獨食夫妻力作以供呼隣母共之其後舍側忽湧甘泉味如江水日躍雙鯉以供其膳赤眉賊經詩里疾馳而 過曰驚大孝必觸鬼神吾軰何敢朝廷聞其孝拜詩爲郎中噫婦之於舅姑以人合者也子之於父母以天合者也從來未有 子不孝父母而婦能獨孝公姑之理故凡婦之失禮皆其子有以致之也天神降罰豈能盡責之婦人乎願爲子者念之)輕 慢先靈(先靈祖先之靈也凡殯殮無禮居喪違制安葬不速齋祭不誠拜掃不勤皆爲輕慢而停柩不葬尤輕慢之大
Interpretation

If a man marries a virtuous wife, his future prosperity will naturally follow. There was a scholar named Li who despised his wife and sought to divorce her. An innkeeper dreamed of a deity saying, "This man abandons his wife before achieving merit and fame—he is destined never to succeed." When Li learned of this, he left in shame—such is the retribution for mistreating one's spouse.

In Zhuozhou (modern Hebei), a man named Wang Yao excessively doted on his two sons, allowing their vile temperaments to flourish until they became uncontrollable. When he finally reported them to the authorities, both sons were executed. The following year, on the 15th day of the second lunar month, Daoist priest Liu Jin heard commotion in the City God Temple and saw Wang Yao pleading with the City God (Chenghuang) for ancestral offerings during the Qingming Festival. The deity rebuked him: "You failed to discipline your sons and severed your own lineage—who will make offerings to you now?" His request was denied. Such is the retribution for failing to educate one's children.

Disrespect toward parents-in-law is also a grave transgression. In ancient times, Jiang Shi served his mother with utmost filial piety, while his wife Pang Shi attended to her mother-in-law with equal devotion. When the elderly woman craved river water, Pang Shi would fetch it—though once delayed by strong winds, causing her mother-in-law to grow thirsty and furious. Jiang Shi reproached his wife and sent her away. Yet Pang Shi, unable to bear separation, lodged with neighbors, weaving day and night to buy delicacies which she sent to her mother-in-law through them. When the truth was revealed, the old woman was deeply moved and welcomed her back. Later, when the mother-in-law developed a taste for fish, the couple labored tirelessly to purchase it, even sharing with their neighbors. Miraculously, a sweet spring resembling river water bubbled beside their home, yielding two carp daily. Even the Red Eyebrow rebels (Chimei, a historical peasant uprising) avoided their village, declaring, "Disturbing such filial exemplars would anger the spirits." The imperial court eventually appointed Jiang Shi to office.

Understand this: while the bond between daughter-in-law and parents-in-law is forged through marriage, that between children and parents is ordained by heaven. Never has there been a case where unfilial children coexisted with a dutiful daughter-in-law. Thus when a wife errs, often the husband has failed in his example. How then can divine retribution fall solely upon the wife?

Neglecting ancestral spirits constitutes another offense—this includes improper funerary rites, violating mourning taboos, delaying burials, perfunctory sacrifices, or infrequent tomb-sweeping. Among these, leaving coffins unburied is the gravest disrespect.

(Note: "City God" refers to the Daoist deity guarding urban settlements, while "Red Eyebrow rebels" denotes the historical peasant uprising during the late Western Han dynasty.)

者羅鞏遊太學以前程禱於神夜夢神告曰子父母久不葬已得罪於冥安問功名鞏曰某尙有兄何獨受罪神曰子爲儒者 明知禮義子兄碌碌不足責也是年果卒○朱璣曰古葬禮大夫三月士踰月故不葬則不變服易食哀親之未有歸也今人 惑於風水之說有貪求吉地遷延日久者有旣葬多疑屢行啓掘者不思古人卜地之義惟是孝子慈孫重親遺體不爲風水 所侵不爲蟲蟻所蝕不爲耕犂所及他日不爲道路不爲城郭溝池如是足巳豈以親之骸骨爲子孫福利之具哉則風水不 必貪也又有惑於分房之說兄弟議多終年牽制旣擇年月日時又疑山水偏向則是父母多生一子反增一日之暴露矣豈 知人之禍福各有因緣於山水何與則分房不必執也倘若執迷不悟一遇利名牽逐淹滯他鄕年復一年幾無安土之望或 遭水火又有焚溺之虞爲人子者獨能帖然於心乎○又權厝一事萬不可久久則雨水侵淋日氣下蒸未及歸土木已腐矣 仁人孝子亦當念之)違逆上命(上命如君命臣父命子將帥命士卒官長命子民家長命僕役之類理所宜遵固當 從命卽所命未當亦須委曲諷諫便合道理安可違逆違逆之罪當與不忠不孝等矣林景度爲給事時蜀郡荒旱朝廷命發 十萬米賑濟景度以米數太多蜀道難行封還成命朝廷遂以一半賑之是夜夢朱衣人持天符至曰上帝有敕謂汝逆㫖害
Interpretation

While studying at the Imperial Academy, Luo Gong once prayed to the deities for his future prospects. That night, a deity appeared in his dream and said: "Your parents have passed away long ago but remain unburied. They are already condemned in the underworld—how can you speak of scholarly honors?" Luo Gong defended himself by saying he had an elder brother. The deity replied: "You are a scholar who understands ritual propriety, while your brother is ignorant and ordinary—thus he bears no responsibility." That very year, Luo Gong indeed passed away.

Zhu Ji commented on this: Ancient burial rites stipulated that high officials should be interred within three months of death, while scholars within one month. While parents remained unburied, children were to wear plain mourning garments and eat simple food, grieving that their loved ones had no resting place. Yet people today are obsessed with geomancy (fengshui): some delay burials indefinitely seeking auspicious sites; others repeatedly exhume and rebury their dead due to superstitious doubts. They fail to understand the original purpose of tomb selection—filial descendants merely sought to protect their ancestors' remains from geomancy's harm, from insect infestation, from plowshares disturbing the earth, ensuring the graves wouldn't later become roads or city walls and moats. How could one use ancestral bones to seek benefits for descendants? Therefore, one shouldn't covet fengshui advantages.

Others are misled by the "divided households" theory, causing endless disputes among brothers—they demand perfect astrological timing while suspecting unfavorable mountain-water orientations. This means parents suffer one more day of exposure for each additional child. Don't they realize human fortunes stem from cause and effect—what have mountains and rivers to do with it? Thus one shouldn't cling to household division theories. If stubbornly persisting in these delusions while chasing fame and wealth in distant lands, year after year delaying burials—what if flood or fire strikes, burning or drowning the remains? How could any child's conscience bear this?

Even temporary encoffinment (quancuo) must never be prolonged—over time, coffins soaked by rain and steamed by earthly qi (vital energy) will rot before proper burial. All humane and filial people should remember this.

Regarding disobeying superiors (including rulers to ministers, fathers to children, generals to soldiers, officials to commoners, or masters to servants)—in principle, obedience is proper. Even with improper orders, one should tactfully remonstrate to make them reasonable—how can direct defiance be justified? The crime of disobedience equals disloyalty and unfilial conduct. When Lin Jingdu served as Reminder of the Left, a drought struck Shu region. The court ordered 100,000 dan of rice for relief—he deemed this excessive given Shu's treacherous roads and returned the edict. The court eventually halved the amount. That night he dreamed of a red-robed messenger holding a celestial decree: "By Heaven's command, your defiance of imperial orders has harmed the people..."

民有滅絶子孫之禍卽驚悸而醒自此不安以病免官行至福州卒二子年餘繼殁門戸遂絶違逆上命不必皆如此事此特 舉其事之大者餘可類而推也)作爲無益(世間萬事轉頭卽空惟有興利除害等事生生世世所獲福報無有窮已 如有德能者闡繹經傳修輯方書有財勢者修井築堤造橋補路置社倉立義塜皆是有益於人之事有益於人則亦有益於 已矣若夫宫館臺池之費以及一切文字珍奇之玩皆足喪志累身何益之有陳恭公於潤州造一大第皆用文梓爲梁花石 鋪砌極其精華第成而公已病但得肩輿一登西樓而已遂卒人因名其第爲三不得謂居不得修不得賣不得云後果獻之 於官日久頹廢此工作之無益者黃魯直好爲豔詞人爭傳之法雲秀老屢誡黃曰空語無妨秀曰李伯時但以念想在馬腹 遂至墮落公豔語滿天下使人冐犯亷恥踰越禮法何止入馬腹死當入泥犁此文字之無益者○張纘孫爲書誡人作淫詞 甚中時病附載其畧云今世文字之禍百怪俱興往往倡淫穢之詞撰造小說以爲風流佳話使觀者魂摇色奪毁性易心其 意不過網取蠅頭耳在有識者因知爲海市蜃樓寓言幻影其如天下高明特達者少隨俗波靡者多彼見當時文人才士已 儼然筆之爲書昭布天下則閨房醜行未嘗不爲文人才士之所訐平日天良一綫或猶畏鬼畏人至此則公然心雄膽潑矣
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates through several stories how engaging in meaningless actions brings misfortune, while performing beneficial deeds for others accumulates true blessings.

First, the consequences of defying heaven's will: A man who disobeyed his superior's orders caused his lineage to be cut off. Though not all disobedience leads to such severe outcomes, this example shows that grave transgressions inevitably bring grave retribution.

Truly beneficial actions are those that serve all beings: Scholars compiling medical classics, wealthy individuals digging wells, building dams and bridges, establishing public granaries and charitable burial grounds. These virtuous deeds not only help others but ultimately bless the doer. Conversely, squandering wealth on extravagant mansions or indulging in rare curios only depletes one's vital energy (Qi). Take Chen Gonggong's luxurious estate in Runzhou—adorned with precious woods, yet he fell ill and died immediately after its completion, barely having time to ride his sedan chair up to view it once. Later generations called it the "Three Cannot" mansion—cannot live in it, cannot repair it, cannot sell it—until it lay in ruins.

Regarding literary pursuits: Huang Tingjian (Huang Luzhi) delighted in writing romantic poetry. Though wildly popular, the eminent monk Fayun Xiu warned him: "Li Gonglin (Li Boshi) was reborn as a horse merely for constantly imagining equine paintings. You compose these licentious verses that lead people to transgress propriety—you'll likely fall into hell." Another scholar, Zhang Zuansun, similarly denounced contemporary writers profiting from obscene fiction. Such works, illusory as mirages, erode readers' sense of shame—particularly harming the impressionable who, seeing renowned literati write thus, indulge all the more recklessly.

These cases demonstrate a universal truth: Only deeds benefiting all beings accumulate real merit. What appears as refined pleasure—extravagant luxuries or wanton poetry—ultimately harms both self and others.

若夫幼男童女血氣未定見此等詞說必至鑿破混沌抛捨軀命小則滅身大則滅家嗚呼誰實使之然耶况吾軰旣已含齒 戴髮更復列身士林不思遏之禁之何忍驅迫齊民盡入禽獸一路哉禍天下而害人心莫此之甚已倘謂四壁相如不妨長 門賣賦則何不取古今來忠孝節義之事編爲稗官野史未嘗不可騁才未嘗不可射利何苦必欲爲此况矢口定是佳人才 子密約偷期絶不新奇頗爲落套而况綺語爲殃虛言折福不獨誤人兼亦自誤吾實爲作者危之惜之故不憚與天下共質 之也)懷挾外心(臣有外心則必欺君子有外心則必遺親妻有外心則必背夫兄弟有外心必至相賊朋友有外心 必至相傾卽人不知我神鬼已陰瞰之矣處士朱貞曰世人常言不欺神明吾謂不欺心卽不欺神也彼懷挾外心者將誰欺 欺天乎)自咒咒他(咒咀一事篇中屢言之干求不遂便生咒恨是慚愧而咒罵他人也咒咀求直是忿激而洗白 自己也自咒咒他是怒而自咒又兼咒他人也兇悖若此豈無顯報堰典妻嘗與人私又竊隣家一手巾隣家詬罵典乃咒曰 我妻果與人私及竊汝巾當爲雷擊否則汝亦如之未幾果斃於雷斧典脇下有字曰痴人保妻妻脇下亦有字曰行姦爲盜 此自咒咒他之報也)偏憎偏愛(人之可憎者或有一端好處偏憎則併其好處而廢之矣人之可愛者亦或有一端
Interpretation

This passage discusses several types of immoral behavior and their consequences, which I'll explain point by point:

Regarding young people's exposure to harmful content: Adolescents with unsettled Qi (vital energy) can suffer physical and mental harm—or worse, bring disgrace to their families—if prematurely exposed to writings describing illicit relationships. We educated people should take the lead in banning such materials—how can we allow common folk to descend into beastly ways? These writings poison minds most severely. Even if one must write for livelihood, why not compose stories of loyalty, filial piety, chastity and righteousness? Why must one resort to these clichéd tales of scholars and beauties engaging in secret affairs? Remember: frivolous and flowery language (qiyu) invites calamity, while empty words diminish blessings—harming both others and oneself.

On harboring divided loyalties: When ministers are disloyal, they deceive their sovereign; when children are disloyal, they abandon their parents; when wives are disloyal, they betray their husbands; when brothers are disloyal, they harm each other; when friends are disloyal, they scheme against one another. Even if others remain unaware, the gods have already witnessed it. Master Zhu Zhen was right: "To deceive one's heart is to deceive the divine." Those who nurse sinister designs—whom do they truly deceive? They merely deceive Heaven itself.

On the karmic consequences of cursing others: The text repeatedly mentions the retribution for curses. Some curse out of spite when their demands go unfulfilled—this is shame-turned-rage; some use curses to prove their innocence—this is extreme behavior born of anger; others curse both themselves and their targets. Such violent defiance—how could it escape retribution? Take the case of Yan Dian: when his adulterous wife stole a neighbor's handkerchief and the neighbor cursed them, Yan Dian swore, "If my wife truly committed adultery and theft, may we be struck by lightning—otherwise may you suffer retribution." Soon after, the couple was indeed lightning-struck, their corpses bearing inscriptions: "Fool protecting his wife" and "Adulterous thief." This is the immediate karmic consequence of self-cursing and cursing others.

On the danger of prejudice: Even the most disliked person may have merits, but prejudice blinds us to them; even the most beloved...

不是處偏愛則併其不是處而掩之矣愛憎一偏是非倒置因而生釁長亂往往有之嘗見人家兄弟相仇至於破家敗產者 其始皆由於父母偏愛偏憎彼見愛者必揚揚得意見憎者必鬱鬱不舒積久遂成仇恨是父母之偏愛非眞愛之乃所以害 之也苟父母均所愛兄弟自相和睦豈不兩全亦有手足情深不因愛憎之偏而生隙者昔王祥弟覽爲繼母朱氏所生朱氏 愛所生而憎祥然祥愈孝母覽亦敬兄祥被楚撻覽輒涕泣抱持或以非理使祥覽輒與祥共作又虐使祥妻覽令妻亦趨而 共之朱氏緣此遂大感悟噫偏愛偏憎爲人上者固不宜有此而王祥兄弟以不私愛憎終至格親爲人下者則又何可以不 法也舉此一端他可類及)越井越竈(越跨越也井之利濟甚廣必有神以司之語曰臨井勿窺又曰古井不可唾窺 與唾且不可况可跨越竈居五祀之一爲人一家之主元元道君曰奉吾道者醮祭家竈及祀拜先亡之外不得淫祀他鬼然 則人之於竈也可越乎不可越乎是以吳湛編護井泉得證道果陰子方䖍祀竈神驟至大富崇敬者得福若此則觸穢者獲 罪可知矣○觸穢井竈不但跨越如坐井欄及以足踏竈門皆觸穢也不可不戒)跳食跳人(跳者跨之過也食者 民之天䙝而玩之是䙝天矣至人有富貴貧賤雖勢位不同但得爲人則皆一也其可跳乎故凡遇人卧床着地皆當迂道過
Interpretation

This passage addresses two significant matters: the harmful consequences of parental favoritism and the disrespectful treatment of sacred objects like wells and hearths.

First, let’s discuss the issue of parental favoritism. When parents show partiality toward one child, they often overlook that child’s wrongdoings. This biased affection distorts right and wrong, frequently leading to disputes and chaos. In reality, we often see siblings turn against each other due to parental favoritism, sometimes even to the point of family ruin. It usually begins with the favored child becoming arrogant while the neglected one grows resentful, and over time, this breeds deep-seated hatred. Thus, parental favoritism is not true love—it harms the children instead. If parents treat their children fairly, siblings will naturally live in harmony, creating a win-win situation.

The text cites the example of Wang Xiang and his half-brother Wang Lan. Their stepmother, Madame Zhu, favored her own son, Wang Lan, and despised Wang Xiang. Yet, Wang Xiang responded with even greater filial devotion. Whenever Wang Xiang was punished, Wang Lan would weep and embrace his brother. When their stepmother unreasonably ordered Wang Xiang to work, Wang Lan would join him in labor. When she mistreated Wang Xiang’s wife, Wang Lan had his own wife assist as well. Eventually, Madame Zhu was moved and awakened to her wrongdoing. This illustrates that those in positions of authority should not show favoritism, and the brothers’ selfless conduct, free from personal grudges, inspired their mother’s transformation—a model worth emulating.

Next, let’s examine the disrespect toward wells and hearths. The term "越" (yuè) in "越井越灶" means to step over or cross. Wells benefit all people and are governed by the Well Spirit. As the saying goes, "Do not peer into wells" and "Do not spit into ancient wells." If even looking or spitting is forbidden, how much worse is stepping over one? The Hearth God is one of the Five Household Deities, overseeing family affairs. The Primordial Daojun (the supreme deity in Daoism) taught that Daoist practitioners, aside from honoring their hearth and ancestors, must not worship other spirits indiscriminately. How, then, can one step over the hearth?

The text provides two examples: Wu Zhan attained the Dao (the Way) by protecting a well, while Yin Zifang gained sudden wealth by devoutly worshiping the Hearth God. This shows that reverence brings blessings, while disrespect invites misfortune. Disrespect toward wells and hearths isn’t limited to stepping over them—sitting on a well’s edge or stepping on a hearth’s threshold also counts as sacrilege and must be avoided.

Finally, let’s discuss "jumping over food or people." Here, "jump" (跳, tiào) means to step across. Grain is the people’s sustenance from heaven, so treating it carelessly is akin to defying the heavens. As for "jumping over people," though individuals may differ in wealth and status, the dignity of life is equal for all. Thus, when encountering someone lying on the ground, one should detour around them rather than step over them.

之○翟林與正叔先生假㝛僧舍坐處偶背聖像先生曰轉椅勿背林曰何耶先生曰凡具人形貌皆不當慢况聖像乎龜山 聞而大賞其語今之以人爲戲者烏能曉之)損子墮胎(物命至微尙體天地之心放生戒殺况乎子女乃世之愚 民或以野合淫奔而欲滅其迹或以家產不厚而厭其多生於是有旣生而損者有未生而墮者罪深業重莫甚於此不聞元 秀之事乎梓潼帝君救劫章有云元秀家財四十萬有子四人其餘諸妾所生並瘞埋之一日夢中見十數輩來追殺人賊秀 大驚起兩手兩足已爲牛蹄展轉於牀大呌三日頭斷而死陰府申奏天曹帝大怒曰性根不壞方得人身天神誦章方離母 腹愚人不禁情慾嬰兒有何罪愆揆以正條倍於故殺殺人償命理所當然牒下陰府將元秀永囚地獄在生四子注籍刑名 四十萬家財没入官府近又特差北方飛天神王巡行天下有似此者卽許便宜施行不待事終赴十獄考鞫則損子與墮胎 豈非天地神明所共痛惡者乎又世俗以養女爲賠錢貨溺死盆中者甚多何龍圖因作歌戒世畧曰虎狼雖至毒猶知有父 子.人爲萬物靈奈何不如彼生男與生女懷抱一而已生男旣收養生女胡不舉我聞殺女時其苦狀難比胞血尙淋漓有口 不能語吚嚶盆水中良久乃得死吁嗟父母心殘忍一至此我因勸我民母爲殺其女荆釵與裙布未必遂貧女隨分而嫁娶
Interpretation

When Zhai Lin and Master Zhengshu were lodging in a temple, their seats happened to face away from the divine statue. The master reminded them: "Turn your chairs around so as not to turn your backs to the sacred image." When Zhai Lin asked why, the master explained: "Any representation in human form should not be treated disrespectfully, let alone sacred statues." When Master Guishan (Yang Shi, a Northern Song Confucian scholar) heard this, he greatly admired this teaching. How could those who casually mock human forms understand such principles today?

The sin of harming or aborting fetuses is particularly grave. Even tiny creatures deserve compassion in accordance with Heaven and Earth's virtue of nurturing life (De), which encourages releasing living beings and abstaining from killing—how much more so one's own flesh and blood? Among ignorant people in this world, some seek to conceal evidence of illicit pregnancies, while others resent having many children due to limited family resources. Thus some harm born infants, others abort fetuses. No sin is heavier than this. Have they not heard of Yuan Xiu's retribution?

The Imperial Lord of Zitong (Wenchang Dijun) records in the "Chapter on Saving from Calamities": Yuan Xiu possessed 400,000 in family wealth and had four legitimate sons, yet buried alive all children born of his concubines. One day he dreamed of over ten people coming to kill him. Waking in terror, he found his hands and feet transformed into ox hooves. After three days of writhing in agony on his bed, screaming in torment, he finally died by decapitation. When the underworld officials reported to the Celestial Court, the Heavenly Emperor thundered in wrath: "Only when spiritual nature remains undiminished does one obtain human form; only when celestial deities chant scriptures does the child leave the mother's womb. Foolish men indulge their lust—what crime have the infants committed? By law, this crime warrants double punishment for intentional murder!" Ultimately, Yuan Xiu was eternally imprisoned in hell, his four sons sentenced to punishment, and his 400,000 in assets confiscated. Recently, the Celestial Court specially dispatched the Northern Flying Celestial King to inspect the world—such evils may be punished immediately without waiting for posthumous judgment. Clearly, harming infants provokes the collective wrath of Heaven, Earth, and the divine.

Worldly people also consider daughters "money-losing goods," drowning many baby girls in washbasins. Official He Longtu composed an admonitory song: "Though tigers and wolves are fierce, they know parental love—how can humans, the most spiritual of creatures, prove inferior to beasts? Sons and daughters are both one's own flesh—why raise sons yet abandon daughters? When I witness infanticide, the cruelty is unbearable to behold—the afterbirth still bloody, the infant unable to speak, struggling weakly in the basin until breath fades. Alas, that parental hearts can be so cruel!" I exhort people: do not kill your daughters. A girl in simple thornwood hairpins and coarse cloth need not impoverish the family—arrange marriages according to your means.

男女俱得所此歌㪚民間萬民當記取)行多隱僻(隱僻非止一事如姦盜邪淫之類凡不可使天知不可對人言 者皆是也而姦人妻女與害人功名兩者爲重至兩者相較則又以淫人妻女爲尤重蓋淫人妻女瀆倫亂種損德最甚故不 憚反復爲世人告之昔李登年十八魁鄕薦自謂狀元及第不足爲難乃屢上公車皆不遇聞葉法靖有道行往叩之踰數日 葉告登曰汝初生時上帝賜以玉印年十八魁鄕薦十九作狀元五十三作宰輔因汝鄕薦後窺鄰女張燕娘事雖未諧而繫 其父張澄於獄以此罪展十年降第二甲後隱占兄李豐屋基至形於訟以此罪又展十年降第三甲後長安寓中淫一良家 婦鄭氏以此罪又展十年降第四甲後又盜鄰女王慶娘上帝謂汝爲惡不改已將福籍削盡死在旦夕何望登第登聞其語 一夕愧憤死噫觀此一事則知一切詭秘之行終有發露之時欲蓋彌彰事無不敗戒之哉)晦臘歌舞(晦者一月 之盡月大三十月小廿九乃司命竈君上言功過之期臘者一歳之盡卽除夕之日也其日上下諸神考校生人善惡以定罪 福人遇此等時皆當修省宿愆倍加儆懼豈宜歌舞○一曰臘五臘也正月初一爲天臘五月初五爲地臘七月初七爲道德 臘十月初十爲嵗臘十二月遇臘爲侯王臘此五日先靈眷屬皆得歸家領受享祀按此則亦不當歌舞之日)朔旦號
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses two types of behavior that incur karmic retribution: committing evil deeds in secret and indulging in revelry during inauspicious days.

Regarding covert wrongdoing, several grave offenses are emphasized: foremost is the defilement of others' wives and daughters, followed by sabotaging others' career achievements. Among these, violating women is considered most severe as it disrupts human relationships and bloodlines, causing the greatest damage to one's De (Virtue). The example of Li Deng is cited: though originally destined to become the top imperial scholar and chancellor, his repeated evil acts (including attempted seduction of a neighbor's daughter, seizing his elder brother's property, and violating virtuous women) gradually diminished his blessings until he met a sudden, violent death. This illustrates how all hidden misdeeds will eventually be exposed—the more one tries to conceal them, the more evident they become.

Concerning taboos during the "dark day" (month's end) and "La Festival days" (specific annual sacrificial dates): these are crucial periods when deities inspect human morality to determine fortunes. The dark day marks when the Kitchen God ascends to report human merits and faults, while the La Festival represents the year-end divine evaluation. Engaging in singing and dancing during such solemn occasions meant for self-reflection constitutes grave disrespect.

Five specific La days are mentioned: the "Heavenly La" on the first day of the first lunar month, the "Earthly La" on the fifth day of the fifth month, the "Dao-Virtue La" on the seventh day of the seventh month, the "Annual La" on the tenth day of the tenth month, and the "Noble La" on the last Xu day of the twelfth month. During these days when ancestral spirits return to receive offerings, boisterous entertainment is particularly inappropriate.

Even loud wailing on the first day of each month (Shuo Dan) is deemed improper. Though not explicitly explained, contextual understanding suggests such behavior offends celestial and earthly deities.

怒(朔者每月之初一日也旦者每日之早晨也朔爲一月之首旦爲一日之首一月之所爲基於朔一日之所爲基於旦若 號與怒則濁氣隨肝而升眞氣隨聲而㪚於是神昏氣濁善念不生矣佛經云嗔是失諸善法之根本墮諸惡道之因緣當急 棄之毋令增長是號怒平日亦當謹戒况朔旦乎)對北唾涕及溺(北方乃北斗星君所居北極爲天之樞三 界十方百靈眾眞皆所統屬是則中天斗極號爲至尊而至尊之所又何可觸穢若以長生經言之所謂北者又不止正北凡 春東夏南秋西冬北月建所指皆爲犯北斗柄切須避之)對竈吟咏及哭(吟咏卽歌唱也黃帝竈經曰竈門不 得歌咏哭泣咒罵呌喊與此篇所言一也今人在官府之前尙不敢高聲妄語况竈爲司命之神乃敢對之吟咏及哭寧無䙝 瀆之罪乎)又以竈火燒香(香必潔淨方可供神倘竈有穢柴以之燒香則不䖍甚矣按天師門下科令竈下灰 火謂之伏龍屎是故不可燒香披閱教典香火避忌又不止此一事如油漬紙撚不可爇紙供養眞武夏不可用李子冬不可 用石榴延降上眞不可燒乳頭香檀香謂之浴香月季謂之不時花金桐謂之鬼花皆當避忌)穢柴作食(柴雖下爨 氣實上蒸穢柴不淨厭濁之氣觸犯竈神是故不可作食也)夜起裸露(裸露赤體也晝屬陽夜屬陰夜卽百靈交
Interpretation

The first day of each month and the early morning hours are particularly significant times. The first day marks the beginning of a lunar month, while dawn heralds the start of a new day. If one shouts in anger during these periods, it causes turbid Qi to rise with liver fire while vital energy scatters with the outburst. This leads to mental confusion, murky breath, and obstructs the generation of benevolent thoughts. Buddhist scriptures also state that wrath is the root of losing all virtuous dharmas and the cause for falling into evil paths—it must be swiftly abandoned and not allowed to flourish. If anger should generally be avoided with care, how much more so during these critical hours of the month and day?

Facing north to spit, blow one’s nose, or urinate is a grave taboo. The north is the dwelling direction of the Great Dipper Lord (an important Daoist deity), where the North Star serves as the pivot of the celestial dome, governing the myriad spirits of the Three Realms and Ten Directions. The Dipper of the Central Heaven is revered as the supreme authority—how can one defile such a sacred direction? According to the Scripture of Long Life, "north" does not only refer to due north; any direction aligned with the monthly celestial markers—east in spring, south in summer, west in autumn, and north in winter—counts as offending the Dipper’s handle and must be carefully avoided.

Singing or weeping before the kitchen stove is also improper. The Yellow Emperor’s Scripture of the Hearth (a classic text of the Stove God, who oversees a household’s fortunes) states: one must not sing, weep, curse, or shout before the stove. People today wouldn’t dare raise their voices before a government office—how much more irreverent would it be to sing or weep before the Stove God, who governs destiny? Is this not blasphemy against the divine?

Using stove fire to burn incense is another prohibition. Incense must remain pure to honor the gods; burning it with tainted firewood is deeply disrespectful. According to the liturgical rules of the Celestial Master (Zhang Daoling) tradition, ashes and embers from the stove are called "dragon’s waste" and must never be used for incense. Daoist texts list further incense taboos: oil-stained paper spills must not light incense; when offering to the True Warrior Emperor, plums are forbidden in summer and pomegranates in winter; when summoning higher deities, frankincense and sandalwood (known as "bathing incense") must not be burned; monthly roses are called "untimely flowers," and golden paulownia blossoms are termed "ghost flowers"—all to be avoided.

Cooking with impure firewood is likewise unacceptable. Though the fire burns below, its smoke rises upward; the foul Qi from unclean wood offends the Stove God, making such fuel unfit for meal preparation.

Going naked when rising at night is especially to be avoided. Day belongs to Yang, night to Yin—after dark is precisely when spirits conduct their inspections and transitions.

會之時不欲人裸露者恐冒犯也)八節行刑(立春春分立夏夏至立秋秋分立冬冬至謂之八節凡遇節則諸神 會集開度羣䝉條錄罪福是日宜淸淨和平習吉除凶惡與序更善隨時進仰答天地之生成可耳無論殺戮卽鞭笞亦所不 可服官居家皆宜謹戒何比干字少卿初爲汝陰獄吏每至八節之日百端哀懇縣令從重減輕從輕減免全活甚多後爲丹 陽縣令獄無𡨚囚至於八節良辰設法矜恤有罪之人民皆稱爲何父一日老媪至門曰君家世有陰德君又治獄平怨上天 賜策以廣君子孫因舉策授之凡九百餘葉曰子孫佩印綬者當如此數後果世榮貴皆如媪言此八節免刑之報也上淸眞 人曰八節之日皆當謀諸善事不可恚怒忿爭此㫖天人大忌獲罪非小夫恚怒且不可况行刑乎)唾流星(流星卽奔 星也世俗愚人乃妄指之爲妖往往以唾爲解不知奔流非妖妖實自召惟當恐懼修省急修所以禳解之德其可輒唾)指 虹霓(赤白色曰虹青白色曰霓虹霓者斗星餘氣昔孔子孝經旣成齋戒向北斗自陳所以著書之意忽有赤虹自天而 下化爲黃玉刻文孔子跪而受之孰謂虹霓而可指乎)輒指三光(日月星爲三光指之是不敬也昔晉陵大旱郡 守曾公祈禱甚䖍夢神告曰明辰有一老人挾傘進西門城逼之以禱必應其異處只在一傘耳昧旦遣人伺之果得公延以
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the taboos and virtuous practices to observe during specific seasonal periods and when encountering natural phenomena.

Regarding the "Eight Solar Terms" (the eight key seasonal nodes: Beginning of Spring, Spring Equinox, Beginning of Summer, Summer Solstice, Beginning of Autumn, Autumn Equinox, Beginning of Winter, and Winter Solstice), these are days when various deities descend to examine human virtue and vice. During these periods, one should maintain purity and harmony, perform good deeds to accumulate De (Virtue/Power), and refrain even from corporal punishment—let alone killing. The text cites the example of He Bigan, an official who reduced prisoners' punishments during these solar terms and was later blessed by immortals, with his descendants enjoying prosperity for generations—a karmic reward for his seasonal leniency. The Shangqing Zhenren (high-ranking Daoist immortals) also emphasize performing virtuous acts during these periods, avoiding anger and disputes, and strictly prohibiting punishments.

Similar reverence should extend to celestial phenomena: one must never spit at shooting stars (ancients considered them not ominous but believed spitting would invite misfortune—better to reflect and cultivate virtue); never point at rainbows (considered auspicious manifestations of stellar Qi—the text mentions how Confucius witnessed a crimson rainbow transforming into jade while composing the Classic of Filial Piety); nor casually point at the sun, moon or stars (seen as disrespectful—the text recounts how during a drought in Jinling, a governor's sincere prayers brought divine guidance for rain).

These teachings instruct people to revere nature and harmonize with celestial timing. During specific seasonal periods especially, one must practice caution and virtue to receive heavenly protection.

隆禮懇其祈禱老者悚懼辭謝公告以夢老者不得已赴壇焚香告天誓三日不雨願就火焚四圍積薪以俟至三日天忽大 雨頃刻水深尺許公禮謝之因問老者一傘有何異處老人曰愚民今年八十生平唯敬天地三光所挾一傘遇出路便溺張 以護身使不穢觸三光耳公厚贈之不受而去)久視日月(記曰子之事父臣之事君垂首鞫躬無敢仰視觀此則知 久視爲不敬也况日爲太陽之宫月爲太陰之宫代天司照其位尤尊何可久視○道藏中教人每年二月初一日祀日八月 十五日祀月今世俗則止祀月)春日燎獵(燎獵者焚林而獵也獵之所殺有數燎獵則所殺無窮彼射飛逐走太上 且有明戒况燎獵乎獨言春日者春爲萬物發生之候縱獵不已已傷生生之仁乃復以縱之火則草木由之而枯焦百蟄因 之而煨燼是天方生之我輒戕之罪斯大矣高陽許憲爲餘杭縣令其子獵於仇王廟側忽有三白麞從屋後出遂引弓而射 忽失所在復以火圍之風吹火滅反燒其面而死此其報也)對北惡罵(唾涕特細事耳獨以對北猶爲罪愆况於 惡罵愚人忿心所使一時不暇顧看或對北怒罵者有之不知戾氣惡聲觸犯實甚我怒欲泄神怒如何昔管甯偶晨起對北 櫛髮忽瞿然曰北辰至尊所居何可䙝犯深自引咎若無可容古人對北敬愼如此尙有惡罵之事乎)無故殺龜
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories and principles about revering heaven and earth while respecting nature.

The first tale tells of an official who met an eighty-year-old man. Throughout his life, the old man had revered the Three Luminaries of heaven, earth, sun, and moon (referring to the sun, moon, and stars). He always carried an umbrella when going outdoors to relieve himself, using it to shield his body so that impurities would not offend the Three Luminaries. Later, when the official asked him to pray for rain, the old man vowed to burn himself alive if rain did not come within three days—and sure enough, heavy rain soon poured from the skies.

The text particularly emphasizes that one should not gaze directly at the sun or moon for extended periods. The sun and moon are the palaces of the Solar and Lunar Deities, shining upon the human world on behalf of heaven, and thus hold a sacred status. In Daoist tradition, the sun is worshipped on the first day of the second lunar month, and the moon on the fifteenth day of the eighth month—though today, only the moon festival remains in folk custom.

Burning forests for hunting (known as liaolie) is considered a grave offense, especially in spring when all things are growing. The records mention retribution for such acts: Xu Xian of Gaoyang once hunted beside the Temple of the King of Vengeance, using fire to encircle three white deer, only for the wind to blow the flames back and burn him to death.

Cursing toward the north is also seen as deeply disrespectful. The north is where the Northern Dipper (Polaris) resides—the position of utmost reverence. Even Guan Ning of ancient times felt uneasy when combing his hair facing north in the morning, fearing he had offended the divine. How much worse, then, to hurl insults, spit, or direct foul language toward the north!

Finally, the text warns against killing turtles without cause. In Daoism, turtles are regarded as sacred creatures, and harming them needlessly invites misfortune.

打蛇(應世眞人曰一切物命皆不可殺而龜蛇陰精應北方玄武之㝛尤不可殺若無故殺之必罹慘報是以仁者常切 救護劉彥回以放龜而脫水厄孫眞人以救蛇而獲仙方古來放龜蛇者往往有奇報其爲神物可知已)如是等罪 司命隨其輕重奪其紀算算盡則死死有餘責乃殃及子孫(如是 等罪總結上文之詞自非義而動以至殺龜打蛇皆是輕重二字有一篇總較之輕重有逐句細分之輕重如暗侮君親與抵 觸父兄較則暗侮輕抵觸重也就暗侮一句中論之則暗侮日有重自有輕也隨其輕重奪其紀算卽前文如影隨形之義死 有餘責殃及子孫所謂積不善之家必有餘殃是也夫上帝好生卽草木禽魚尚不忍其滅息何况人爲萬物之靈乃欲殃其 子孫然欲懲惡以勸善不得不然梓潼帝君詩云妙藥難醫𡨚債病橫財不富命窮人虧心折盡平生福行短天教一世貧生 事事生君莫願害人人害汝休嗔從來天地無差報不在身兮在子孫此非殃及子孫之意乎○亦有現報者秀水屠戸潘騏 肆惡橫行無業不造一日死而復甦呼妻子告曰吾死至地獄見閻君閻君言善惡之報陰府顯然毫釐不爽死者受報生者 不知良由陰陽道隔無從曉諭以故受者方苦作者熾然卽輪迴報應之說尙多疑而未信深可悲憫今潘騏罪業已極着令
Interpretation

This passage discusses the Daoist concept of karmic retribution, highlighting several key points:

Certain animals like turtles and snakes hold special significance in Daoism. The turtle-snake combination represents the Black Tortoise of the North (Xuanwu, one of the Four Symbols in Daoist cosmology), considered spiritually potent creatures. Wantonly killing them invites severe retribution. Historical accounts illustrate this principle—Liu Yanhui avoided flood disaster by releasing turtles, while Sun Zhenren (likely referring to Sun Simiao) obtained celestial prescriptions after saving snakes, demonstrating how protecting life brings benevolent rewards.

The severity of punishment corresponds to the degree of wrongdoing. The Director of Destinies (Siming Shen), the deity governing lifespans, deducts years from a person's life according to their transgressions. When all allotted years are exhausted, death follows; particularly heinous sins may even bring calamity upon descendants. Like shadows following forms, retribution arrives with perfect precision.

A crucial emphasis: cosmic justice operates with mathematical exactness. Those committing grave evils may face retribution in their current existence. The case of butcher Pan Qi from Xiushui exemplifies this—after lifelong wickedness, he confronted the unerring justice of the underworld's Yama King postmortem. Yet the living, separated by the Yin-Yang divide, often remain blind to these consequences, persisting in evil—a truly lamentable state.

The text cites a poem by Emperor Zitong (Wenchang Dijun, the Daoist deity of culture) to illustrate: "No medicine cures illnesses born of karmic debt / Ill-gotten wealth won't enrich the destined poor / Frequent misdeeds erode blessings / Unvirtuous conduct ensures lifelong poverty." Cosmic retribution never errs—if not visiting the perpetrator, it will surely befall their descendants.

At its core, this teaching encourages virtue through the logic of karmic cause and effect: protecting life brings rewards while harming creatures and committing evils inevitably invites suffering—sometimes extending across generations.

暫返陽間假此一人以警萬眾遂操刀自割其陰曰此吾宣淫之報自斫手足曰此吾屠宰殺生之報自剖腹剜心提出臟腑 曰此吾陰險殘賊種種害人之報遠近喧傳觀者萬眾言訖而死)又諸橫取人財者乃計其妻 子家口以當之漸至死喪若不死喪則有水火盜賊遺亡器物 疾病口舌諸事以當妄取之直(上文旣明隨時受報而此節又特取貪財者言之見此罪爲易 犯也以威勢逼取曰橫直謂原數當直謂恰合原取之數也夫橫取人財者多謂妻子家口計不思司命正計其妻子家口以 報貪惡則利之適所以害之耳佛說人生產業嘗爲五家負之而去一曰國王二曰水三曰火四曰盜賊五曰不肖子今太上 所舉耗端又多遺亡疾病口舌三種則其所以折罰人者其途不益廣乎孫奮爲扶風郡掾尅取民財遂至巨富大將軍聞其 富索白珠十斛紫金三千兩不與坐以叛逆抄沒貲產迸逮家口相繼滅絶此妻子家口漸至死喪者也韋公幹知瓊州瓊多 奇木公幹驅匠採伐鞭撻橫施及離任具二大舟盡載奇木雜以金銀浮海而歸行未百里二舟具沒此以水災折之者吕師 造爲池州剌史剽竊公帑侵漁百姓厚載而歸舟泊竹篠忽見一物躍入舟中火卽隨發一舟之物皆成煨燼此以火災折之 者丁謂貶朱厓至龍門南彭婆店忽遇巨盜盡劫所有此以盜賊折之者馬襄爲西川漕劉旴之亂倉皇間親持五十兩大銀
Interpretation

This individual temporarily returned to the mortal realm, borrowing his own body to warn the masses. First, he cut off his genitals with a knife, declaring this the retribution for his licentiousness. Next, he severed his own limbs, stating this was punishment for his slaughter of living creatures. Finally, he sliced open his abdomen, extracted his heart, and pulled out his internal organs, proclaiming these were the consequences of his treacherous cruelty and countless acts of harming others. The incident quickly spread, drawing crowds of tens of thousands to witness. After delivering these words, he perished.

For those who forcibly seize others' property, retribution will befall their wives, children, and family members. In severe cases, it leads to the destruction of entire households. Even without fatalities, disasters such as floods, fires, robberies, lost possessions, illnesses, and malicious gossip will occur—all serving as repayment for their plundering sins.

(This passage particularly emphasizes how easily one transgresses through greed for wealth. Seizing property by abuse of power is called "forcible taking," and retribution is calculated precisely according to the amount stolen. Those who plunder often act selfishly, unaware that the Director of Fate (Siming) administers justice through their families. Greed may appear profitable but ultimately harms oneself. Buddhist scriptures state that human wealth can be lost through five circumstances: government confiscation, floods, fires, thieves, and unworthy descendants. Here, additional retributive methods are mentioned—lost possessions, illnesses, and slander—making three more categories.)

Several examples illustrate this: When Sun Fen served as an official in Fufeng Commandery, he amassed enormous wealth by extorting commoners. Later, a general demanded his riches unsuccessfully and confiscated his entire family estate under false charges of rebellion, leading to their successive deaths. Wei Gonggan, while governing Qiongzhou, conscripted craftsmen to fell precious timber. Upon leaving office, he loaded two ships with lumber and gold, only for both vessels to sink within a hundred li. Lü Shizao, as prefect of Chizhou, embezzled public funds and oppressed the people. While returning home, his ship docked at Zhuxiao Port when suddenly an unidentified object leaped aboard, igniting a fire that reduced the entire cargo to ashes. When Ding Wei was exiled to Zhuya, bandits robbed him at Pengpo Inn, stripping him of all possessions. Ma Xiang, a grain transport official in Xichuan, fled in panic with fifty taels of silver during a rebellion.

十錠沉井中亂定取不可得此以遺亡器物折之者金昱三世患癩醫藥不效聞何奎有道術往問之奎曰汝家必有他人功 德在家作耗昱歸問母母曰佛前紗窗乃圍城中所得急撤起醮祭遣之病果愈此以疾病折之者劉治奉命點盤蜀宫恣意 掠取一時謗議騰沸及解職乃自請押綱希圖塞謗至新都爲羅令璠脅取而去此以口舌折之者厯觀諸報厯厯不爽當其 倖得豈料及此而冥冥之中必有不肯少貸者人亦何爲迷而不悟乎)又枉殺人者是易刀兵而 相殺也(此節又申明殺人之報以見陰府之罪最重殺人也人以一言相犯一掌相加必思報復無已况於枉殺人者 乎枉殺之事不一而其所易犯者如將不約束用兵枉殺吏不愼刑𡨚獄枉殺醫不審病用藥枉殺人不寡慾墮胎枉殺甚至 因一時之怒一言之讒無故枉殺一還一報𡨚對分明雖曰殺人實以自殺故曰易刀兵而相殺也○諸枉殺之報前巳間列 於前矣惟醫藥一事未之及茲補載之以示鑒戒可也劉大初醫薛司法妻差誤致死後數年白晝有一婦人䝉首至其家口 稱某人妻就醫劉偶他出家人辭去劉歸遇諸途敘前病症數劉用藥之誤劉驚駭汗出回家而死嗚呼今之以醫殺人者所 在皆有特未遇厲鬼如司法妻者耳遂可謂𡨚對已盡釋乎又當塗徐外科醫富人江舜明背瘡索其謝已許三百金矣攻療
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates the principle that evil deeds inevitably bring retribution through several true cases.

The first story tells of a man who threw ten silver ingots into a well to cause mischief, only to find them irretrievable when he later tried to retrieve them. This happened because seizing others' property invites karmic punishment—his family suffered from leprosy for three generations, with no cure from medicine. Hearing that He Kui (a Daoist adept) possessed spiritual methods, he sought his advice. He Kui said, "Your household must be haunted by merit objects taken from others." Upon returning home and questioning his mother, she recalled that the silk window curtain before their Buddhist altar had been looted during a siege. They immediately removed it, performed a Zhaijiao (Daoist purification ritual) to return it, and the illness vanished. This exemplifies how sickness offsets karmic debt.

Another case involves Liu Zhi, who was tasked with auditing the Shu palace treasury but plundered its wealth wantonly, drawing widespread condemnation. After leaving office, he attempted to redeem himself by overseeing an official shipment of goods, only to have them forcibly seized by County Magistrate Luo Fan in Xindu. Here, slander and disputes served as the means of karmic repayment. Such retribution is unmistakable—those who profit unjustly seldom foresee it, yet the cosmic ledger never errs by even a fraction.

The scripture particularly emphasizes that wrongful killing is the gravest sin, akin to mutual slaughter with blades. Specifically: generals who fail to restrain soldiers from indiscriminate killing, officials who abuse judicial power to execute the innocent, physicians whose misdiagnoses or prescriptions cause deaths, those who kill through abortion due to lust, or even those who murder in fits of rage or on slanderous rumors—all invite reciprocal vengeance. Outwardly, they kill others; inwardly, they destroy themselves.

A supplementary case involves physician Liu Dachu, whose misdiagnosis led to the death of Judicial Officer Xue’s wife. Years later, a veiled woman visited him in broad daylight, detailing his past medical errors. Terrified, Liu returned home and died. Many incompetent doctors harm people today—just because they haven’t yet encountered vengeful spirits doesn’t mean their karmic debts are settled. Another example is Xu, a surgeon in Dangtu, who agreed to treat wealthy man Jiang Shunming’s back abscess for three hundred gold coins....

旬日法當潰膿徐欲得謝復以藥紙撚插入江呼痛苦徐曰付我謝金痛乃可止江子怒不與反復爭論乃許其半時紙撚已 入一更矣乃拔出血湧如泉遂死江子訴於官徐受刑將斃行賄免焉未幾徐病呌苦不絶聲但云江舜明莫打我我固不是 令郎亦殊悞事如此數日乃死夫技術不精猶云誤殺乘危妄索豈非故傷外科賺財不遂往往移輕作重使之决裂而徐收 其功亦烏知陰報之已隨其後也亦愚矣哉)取非義之財者譬如漏脯救飢鴆酒止 渴非不暫飽死亦及之(此節又申明貪利之害以世人好利心重故反復申明也財非己有以計奪之 以術誆之皆爲非義較之上文一味橫取者雖少有不同然律以亷正總屬貪饕未有不致禍者世人利令智昏始旣不顧是 非繼且不顧利害往往忘身殉利自取速死非好死也好利也譬如肉中有蠱酒中有毒方其嗜之何知傷生之速乎然而死 必及之從無一人倖免者可嘆也○胡嘉棟曰今世縉紳居鄕者多以請託媒利且云脫人刑獄受金何傷成人功名取利非 枉不知刑賞國之大法我以片語尺牘顚倒是非使有罪者倖免則無辜者必含𡨚無學者倖進則有才者必被枉抑人情好 惡之公奪天道禍福之柄眞衣冠之大盜名教之罪人也以此取利而謂可以遺子孫計長久又何異認漏脯鴆酒爲長生之
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of an incompetent physician named Xu who harmed others and ultimately faced retribution:

When a man named Jiang developed a festering wound, Xu insisted on first draining the pus with medication. Deliberately prolonging treatment, he extorted exorbitant fees from Jiang, threatening to withhold pain relief unless paid. Jiang only agreed to pay half, so Xu inserted the medicated wick too deeply into the wound—when he pulled it out, Jiang bled to death. Later, Xu was reported and sentenced to punishment, escaping only through bribery. But soon after, he fell mysteriously ill, constantly crying, "Jiang Shunming, don’t beat me!" Within days, he too died.

The author uses this to illustrate: harming others through medical incompetence may be manslaughter, but exploiting desperation for profit is deliberate harm. Some unscrupulous doctors deliberately prolong mild illnesses into severe ones to profit, unaware that retribution follows swiftly.

Two metaphors then warn the world: ill-gotten wealth is like eating rotten meat to stave off hunger or drinking poisoned wine to quench thirst—it may bring temporary satisfaction but quickly proves fatal. Wealth obtained unjustly, whether through force or deceit, stems from greed. Blinded by profit, people first abandon moral judgment, then even disregard their own lives—is this seeking death? No, it’s pure avarice!

Finally, quoting Hu Jiadong, the text criticizes contemporary corruption: some officials profit by handling lawsuits or securing appointments for locals, believing it righteous to exonerate the guilty or secure undeserved promotions. Yet justice and governance are state affairs—twisting truth with a single letter, letting criminals escape and the incompetent rise, makes them robbers in official robes! To hoard such wealth for descendants is no different from passing off poisoned wine as an elixir of immortality.

(Note: "Rotten meat" refers to meat spoiled by roof leaks; "poisoned wine" is legendary venom-laced liquor.)

藥也哉○劉夢震曰屋漏水滴脯上名爲漏脯有毒能殺人鴆酒是鴆鳥羽入酒飲之則死以此鳥食蛇腹有毒也)夫心 起於善善雖未爲而吉神已隨之或心起於惡惡雖未爲而凶 神已隨之(此節又總論善惡之幾欲人知所謹也凡人一切善惡皆起於心心起一念善則羣邪撲滅惡則三途現 前故吉神凶神隨念隨至何煩一毫等待乎江陰南門軍張旺嘗夜盜城西田父菜被執濡首厠中遂懷恨一夕匿火往燒之 道經官溝有畫師吳碧山未寢聞步履聲窺見旺有惡鬼數十尾之頃又聞履聲窺旺回有靑衣童男前導明日叩旺旺曰我 初欲燬其室忽念𡨚𡨚相報將無已時故止不意有鬼隨行如此卽棄俗出家此與元自實之事正相同大抵意有所向卽是 已露天人相感各以類應理固如此斷不誣也中誡經曰心口意語鬼聞人聲邵康節曰人之善惡形於言發於事人得而知 之但萌於心發於慮鬼神得而知之是以君子於起念之際常切檢點檢點旣純斯有善無惡矣昔趙康靖公常置瓶豆於几 案間每一念起必隨善惡以豆別之善則投一白豆於瓶惡則投一黑豆於瓶初則黑豆甚多旣而漸少久而善惡二念俱忘 瓶豆亦置而不用此眞修意之善則也○玩一或字有不入於此則入於彼之義)其有曾行惡事後自 改悔諸惡莫作眾善奉行久久必獲吉慶所謂轉禍爲福也(此節
Interpretation

This scripture explains how human thoughts and intentions instantly attract corresponding blessings or misfortunes. Just as poisonous "leaking jerky" (meat spoiled by dripping rainwater) and "zhen wine" (liquor poisoned with zhen bird feathers) can be fatal, the moment good or evil thoughts arise, auspicious or malevolent spirits immediately follow.

When a virtuous thought emerges in your heart, even before being acted upon, benevolent deities are already protecting you. Conversely, when wicked intentions form, though not yet carried out, baleful ghosts have already marked you. There was a garrison soldier named Zhang Wang in Jiangyin who stole vegetables at night and was punished by being dunked in a cesspit. Filled with resentment, he planned arson as revenge. On his way, a painter saw dozens of evil spirits following him. Later, when he reconsidered and realized the endless cycle of vengeance, deciding to abandon his plan, the pursuing demons transformed into blue-robed attendants guiding his path. This mirrors the story of Yuan Zishi, demonstrating how the moment thoughts arise, cosmic resonance responds immediately.

The Scripture of Central Admonition states that all human thoughts and words are heard by spirits. Shao Kangjie (the Northern Song Neo-Confucian scholar) also remarked that while people perceive good and evil through speech and actions, spirits already know thoughts the moment they sprout. Therefore, noble persons must examine themselves at the inception of every thought. Zhao Kangjing (Zhao Bian) of the Song dynasty recorded his thoughts with black and white beans: white beans for virtuous thoughts, black beans for wicked ones. Initially, black beans predominated, but gradually decreased until even the need for recording vanished.

The scripture concludes by emphasizing that past misdeeds can be transformed through sincere repentance, abandoning evil and cultivating goodness with perseverance—eventually turning misfortune into blessing. Like the game of "either/or" (referring to moral choices), one must choose between paths, with the crucial point being timely reformation toward virtue.

因上文而示人以禍福之幾欲人知改過也葢善惡初分則一念之起亦可招報改悔自我雖已行之事猶可轉移誰謂吉凶 禍福皆有定數乎夫數定者天命也感應者天心也天心旣格則天命自隨之而轉矣阿耶律本一巨盜夜至佛寺見佛燈欲 滅拔劍挑之燈忽大明卽日竦然改惡從善後竟得道朱㹠亦一大盜事敗入終南山日夜懺悔眞人馮君憐之授以道要修 之不怠竟得輕舉以盜與仙佛較之相去不止霄壞也乃一日回頭皆可得道則改悔一途豈非至便之法門乎然太上便恐 人誤認放下屠刀立地成佛二語妄想以一杯水救車薪之火故又誡曰諸惡莫作眾善奉行諸惡莫作望其刮磨淨盡也眾 善奉行欲其積累成功也行之久而又久方得贖前罪而轉禍爲福今之愚懵自知所作不善請仗僧道宣禮懴文以圖釋罪 是眞欲以杯水救車薪也豈不惑哉)故吉人語善視善行善一日有三善三年天 必降之福㐫人語惡視惡行惡一日有三惡三年天必降之禍 (此節承上文而復言感應之必然欲人知所決也葢行善之久必獲慶則作惡之久必獲㐫約以三年是其候也吉人卽善人 㐫人卽惡人不言善惡言吉㐫者以其爲善卽是福爲惡卽是禍也語善如非禮之言不言樂道人之善開發人之善心是也
Interpretation

This passage explains how individuals can transform their destiny by changing their conduct. The author illustrates through two stories of repentant bandits attaining enlightenment that even the most wicked people can receive blessings if they sincerely reform.

There was a notorious robber named Aye Lü who once entered a Buddhist temple at night and saw a lamp about to go out. When he used his sword to adjust the wick, the lamp suddenly blazed brightly, awakening his conscience. He immediately abandoned his evil ways and later attained the Dao through cultivation. Another bandit, Zhu Tun, fled to Mount Zhongnan (a sacred Daoist mountain) after committing crimes and spent days and nights in repentance. Moved by his sincerity, the Daoist master Feng Jun taught him cultivation methods. Through diligent practice, Zhu Tun eventually ascended as an immortal. The author emphasizes that while bandits and enlightened beings may seem worlds apart, genuine repentance opens the path to the Dao, proving that self-renewal is the most direct gateway to spiritual progress.

However, the Taishang Ganying Pian (Treatise on the Response of the Dao) warns against misinterpreting the saying "lay down the butcher’s knife and become a Buddha instantly" as an excuse to believe minor good deeds can offset grave misdeeds. Just as a cup of water cannot extinguish a cartload of burning firewood, superficial acts of virtue are futile against accumulated evil. True repentance requires "abstaining from all wrongs and practicing every good"—not only completely ceasing harmful actions but also persistently accumulating virtuous deeds over time to dissolve karmic burdens and turn misfortune into blessings. Some today, fully aware of their wrongdoing, foolishly expect priests or monks to absolve their sins through rituals—an effort as absurd as dousing a fire with a single cup of water.

The passage concludes: A virtuous person who daily speaks good words, observes good deeds, and performs good acts (the "three goods") will surely receive heavenly blessings after three years. Conversely, a wicked person who daily speaks malice, witnesses evil, and commits wrongdoing (the "three evils") will inevitably incur divine retribution after three years. Here, the terms "auspicious person" (jiren, one destined for fortune) and "inauspicious person" (xiongren, one doomed to calamity) replace "good" and "evil" to stress that virtue itself is fortune, while wickedness is its own punishment. "Speaking good" includes avoiding improper speech, joyfully praising others’ virtuous acts, and inspiring kindness in others.

視善如不視非禮之色樂見賢人樂觀善書是也行善如足不踐非禮之地爲善不遺餘力倡引一方善與人同是也惡則反 是三年千日也三年不改變則終身可知福如篇首所言人敬天祐之類禍如篇首所言貧耗憂患之類降福降禍卽必之於 三年之中殆所云無不自己求之也大抵無善不福無惡不禍者天道之常而善惡之報有在其身者亦有在其子孫者亦有 因禍而得福因福而得禍者故曰陽憲速而可逃陰憲遲而不漏今人偶行一善便欲獲報少不如意則曰天道難知豈知人 但不飢不寒無災無害士得讀書農得耕田時開笑口日少蹙眉卽此便是平安之福不然人欲無涯世界缺陷安得人人富 貴利達哉世人惟尊奉此篇隨事力行盡其在已禍福聽天可也○三善三惡皆以語爲第一可見人生造業口過居多卽如 篇中所載誑諸無識謗諸同學攻訐宗親訕謗聖賢形人之醜訐人之私干求不遂便生咒恨見他失便便說他過見他體相 不具而笑之見他才能可稱而抑之怨天尤人呵風罵雨口是心非造作惡語讒毁平人毁人稱直罵神稱正指天地以證鄙 懷引神明而鑑猥事咒咀求直每好矜誇自咒咒他晦臘歌舞朔旦號怒對竈吟咏及哭對北惡罵如是等罪皆口過也噫昔 嚴君平委曲諭人以善立證仙階葛孝先與人好說好話而聞道度世爲善之功亦何嘗無藉於語言人縱不能以語言作福
Interpretation

The Taishang Ganying Pian with Collected Commentaries primarily expounds on the principle of karmic retribution for good and evil deeds, with particular emphasis on the gravity of verbal karma (karmic consequences arising from speech).

Regarding karmic retribution: When witnessing virtuous acts, one should maintain natural detachment as if having seen nothing, while cultivating an affinity for virtuous individuals and deriving joy from reading texts that encourage goodness. In performing good deeds, one must exert full effort, avoid transgressing ritual propriety, and inspire others to join in virtuous conduct. Evil actions produce precisely the opposite effects. If one persists in unwavering virtuous practice for three years (approximately a thousand days), the blessings of a lifetime become discernible. Such blessings manifest as described in the opening passage—receiving human reverence and celestial protection, whereas misfortunes appear as poverty, depletion, and persistent afflictions. Typically, retribution becomes evident within three years, illustrating the adage: "Misfortunes and blessings have no gates—they are summoned by people themselves."

The Dao of Heaven operates thus: Virtuous acts inevitably attract blessings, while evil deeds unfailingly invite calamity. Retribution may manifest either in one's own person or upon descendants. Sometimes blessings hide within misfortunes, and misfortunes lurk within blessings. Yang-world punishments arrive swiftly yet may be averted, whereas yin-world retribution, though delayed, never fails. Contemporary individuals often expect immediate rewards for minor good deeds, complaining of Heaven's injustice at the slightest disappointment. They fail to recognize that freedom from hunger and cold, absence of disasters, scholars' undisturbed study, farmers' peaceful cultivation, frequent laughter, and rare sorrow—these constitute the blessings of peace.

Special emphasis falls on verbal karma as paramount: Most karmic offenses in human life stem from speech transgressions. Examples include deceiving the ignorant, slandering classmates, attacking relatives, mocking sages, exposing others' shortcomings, cursing people, making callous remarks about others' misfortunes, ridiculing the disabled, suppressing the talented through envy, blaming Heaven and others, duplicitous speech, spreading malicious rumors, swearing false oaths in deities' names, boisterous singing and dancing during Daoist fasting days (like the last day of the lunar month or La Month), venting anger at dawn on the new moon, chanting or weeping before the kitchen stove, or hurling abuse northward—all constitute verbal offenses.

Yan Junping (a Han dynasty Daoist recluse) patiently guided people toward goodness and ultimately attained immortality, while Ge Xuan (the renowned Three Kingdoms Daoist) achieved Daoist transcendence through habitual virtuous speech. These cases demonstrate that words too may accumulate merit. Even if one cannot create blessings through speech, one must at least refrain from using it to create evil.

奈何徒以口舌造業哉)胡不勉而行之(此一句總結全篇見篇中千言萬語到底無有別意只是要人行善 也胡不二字承上文降福降禍之說而來若云人縱不願行善獨不願受福乎深訝之也勉字有警人力行之意葢自然而然 惟善根深者方能如此世間善根深者能有幾人惟是勉强力行庶幾有得書曰非知之艱行之惟艱華嚴經曰如人善美饌 自餓而不食於法不力行多聞亦不是元始天尊曰我今說經止救末劫若能遵行此道則雖疑惑誹謗猶信也若不遵行此 道則雖齋戒敬誦猶不信也噫三教聖人之言可謂深切著明矣○周穀城曰讀感應篇者須知六除五發之說一除自恃念 凡人塵習紛擾自謂寡過不知尋常舉動少一檢點罪戾叢集豈可自恃終日乾乾自攻其惡此除之之法也二除謂避念學 期主敬畏欲非畏理也畏難思退暴棄孰甚焉勿憚檢察爲煩勿視約束爲苦力行旣久自樂此不疲矣三除因循念語云勸 人須下無情口學者除舊自新亦須下無情手如理亂⬤鋼刀立斷何煩猶豫乎四除好名念爲善得名者增一名亦損一善 俗稱善曰陰德言不是人知也可信節昭昭墮行冥冥乎五除徼福念學者入道原當修身以俟命分心求効善力便減若有 所求而爲之將無所求而不爲乎故知因善求福善福皆虛六除間斷念善念不紀與無善等古人云吉人爲善惟日不足斷
Interpretation

Why do people only create negative karma through speech? Why not strive to practice virtuous deeds? This statement encapsulates the core message of the entire text—after thousands of words, the ultimate teaching is simply to urge people to do good. The phrase "why not" connects with the preceding discussion about blessings and misfortunes, implying: Even if one is unwilling to do good, can they truly not desire blessings? This serves as a profound warning to humanity. The word "strive" emphasizes diligent practice, because only those with deep roots of virtue can naturally perform good deeds. Yet such individuals are exceedingly rare in this world; most must make conscious efforts to achieve meaningful progress.

The Book of Documents states, "Understanding principles is not difficult—the true challenge lies in putting them into practice." The Avatamsaka Sutra offers the analogy: "It is like someone who, facing a feast, would rather starve." The Celestial Venerable of Primordial Beginning (Yuanshi Tianzun) makes it even clearer: "I expound these scriptures to deliver beings in this decadent age. Those who follow this path, even if initially harboring doubts or slander, will ultimately come to faith. But those who fail to practice, though they may observe fasting and recite scriptures, will struggle to develop genuine belief." The teachings of the sages from the Three Traditions (Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism) are profoundly insightful.

Zhou Gucheng proposed six delusions to overcome when cultivating the Tract of Actions and Retributions: First, self-righteousness—ordinary people often believe they have few faults, yet negligence in minor matters breeds transgressions, necessitating constant self-reflection and correction. Second, fear of difficulty—true learning requires reverential awe; abandoning practice due to hardship is self-defeating, so one must persist in self-examination. Third, procrastination—urging change requires resolute determination, like cutting tangled hemp with a sharp blade. Fourth, craving fame—seeking recognition for good deeds diminishes their merit; ancient sages called true virtue "hidden virtue" precisely because it remains unknown. Fifth, impatient pursuit of blessings—cultivation should focus on self-refinement while awaiting destiny; obsessing over results weakens the power of goodness. Sixth, inconsistency—sporadic practice is equivalent to no practice at all, as the ancients said, "The virtuous always feel there's never enough time for good deeds."

These principles all point to one truth: The essence of virtuous practice lies in sustained action, not mere words or utilitarian motives. Genuine cultivation requires dispelling distracting thoughts and grounding oneself in tangible practice.

未有中道而自畫者也六念旣除五心斯發除自恃念則發謙心除畏避念則發信心除因循念則發勇心除好名徼福念則 發誠心除間斷念則發不已心如此而不獲契於太上者吾未之聞也勉行者宜知之) 先曾大父通奉公生平䖍奉感應篇手 書行世不下數十本嘗謂古今勸善之 書無有踰於感應篇者茲集註一篇乃 任宮詹時偕澤州陳文貞公捐資付梓 嵗久板片無存余家舊藏是冊因急授 剞人以承先志以公同好云旹 乾隆五十一年丙午三月朔日海昌查 瑩
Interpretation

The Collected Commentaries on the Treatise on Response and Retribution discusses six negative mental states to overcome in spiritual practice, along with five corresponding positive states of mind. It begins by emphasizing that no one attains success on the path of cultivation by abandoning it midway. One must eliminate six delusions: an arrogant mindset gives rise to humility; escapism and fear transform into steadfast faith; procrastination and laziness develop into courageous diligence; craving for empty fame and blessings awakens one's authentic heart; an intermittent practice cultivates perseverance. The author asserts that he has never encountered anyone who achieved these transformations yet failed to align with the Supreme Dao (Taishang refers to the ultimate Dao).

The latter part provides publication details. It mentions how the author's great-grandfather, the Lord Tongfeng (an ancient official title), devoted his life to reverently practicing the Treatise on Response and Retribution, hand-copying and circulating no fewer than several dozen editions. He believed no moral guide throughout history surpassed this text. This annotated edition was originally carved during the author's tenure as Palace Academician (an official serving the crown prince), jointly funded with Lord Chen Wenzhen of Zezhou (modern Jincheng, Shanxi). As the original woodblocks were lost over time, this new edition is based on a family-preserved copy, honoring ancestral aspirations while sharing it with fellow practitioners. The colophon records the publication date as the first day of the third lunar month in the 51st year of the Qianlong reign (1786), respectfully noted by Zha Ying of Haichang (modern Haining, Zhejiang).

Note: The Treatise on Response and Retribution is a renowned Daoist ethical text emphasizing cosmic resonance between heaven and humanity, and the principle of karmic retribution. Its immense influence peaked during the Ming-Qing periods. The "six delusions and five minds" cultivation method reflects Daoism's characteristic dual cultivation of nature and life (xingming shuangxiu), revealing one's fundamental true nature through dissolving delusions.

謹跋

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5i0014); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback