中文 · EN

《漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Qing Daoist texts 清代道教文獻 Vol. 2 / 7 20,246 characters

About this page. The original text of 《漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集》 Vol. 2 (Qing Daoist texts 清代道教文獻, 7 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 40 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

重刊道藏輯要 漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集卷之一              三十六世孫羲基編輯   年譜  羲謹按古人年譜無事則闕此依楊本𡻕引時事楊曰維侯  降神以挽炎祚而桓靈之傾圯旣深操權之竊據巳固是故  伊呂之征誅易而侯之興復難時爲之也光和以前藴亂未  熾黃巾卓操適際侯生特紀厥要以志時艱而事涉魏吳爲  稍詳焉 靈帝光和四年辛酉是𡻕侯生  按建興十二年甲寅丞相亮卒於軍時年五十四則知爲辛  酉年生 是𡻕皇子協生卽獻帝 光和五年壬戌  是𡻕以災異博問得失議郞曹操上書切諫 光和六年癸亥  初鉅鹿張角以妖術教授分遣弟子轉相誑誘遂置三十六  方大方萬餘人小方六七千方猶將軍也各立羣帥訛言蒼  天巳死黃天當立以中常侍爲内應約明年甲子内外俱起 中平元年甲子  春角弟子上書告之詔三公司隸案驗有事角道者誅殺千  餘人下冀州逐捕角等角等馳勅諸方一時俱起皆著黃巾  爲標幟故謂黃巾賊帝召羣臣會議赦天下黨人 中平二年乙丑  崔烈爲司徒因傅母入錢五百萬時人謂之銅𦤀 中平三年丙寅  諫議大夫劉陶言天下大亂皆由宦官宦官共譛陶下獄死  前司徒陳耽忠正宦官怨之亦陷死獄中 中平四年丁卯  長沙賊區星自稱將軍詔以議郞孫堅爲長沙太守討平之
Interpretation

This passage records the historical context surrounding the birth of Zhuge Liang (courtesy name Kongming, posthumous title Marquis Zhongwu) during the late Eastern Han dynasty. Compiled by Zhuge Xiji, the 36th-generation descendant of Zhuge Liang, based on chronological records edited by scholar Yang, it primarily supplements major events related to Zhuge Liang's life.

The text states: In the fourth year of Emperor Ling's Guanghe era (Xinyou year, 181 CE), Zhuge Liang was born. Calculating backward from his death at age 54 in the twelfth year of Jianxing (234 CE) confirms this birth year. Notably, Emperor Xian of Han, Liu Xie, was also born this same year.

Subsequent entries depict the turmoil of the late Eastern Han: In 182 CE, natural disasters struck, and Court Counselor Cao Cao submitted blunt memorials of admonishment. In 183 CE, Julu native Zhang Jiao gathered followers through heretical practices, establishing thirty-six military divisions (large units of 10,000+, smaller units 6-7,000) and proclaiming "The Azure Heaven has perished, the Yellow Heaven shall rise," secretly planning rebellion for the following year.

The Yellow Turban Rebellion erupted in 184 CE under Zhang Jiao's leadership, marked by rebels wearing yellow headscarves. The court was forced to pardon the Partisan Prohibitions scholars (literati persecuted by eunuch factions) to address the crisis. In 185 CE, Cui Lie attained the position of Minister Over the Masses (one of the Three Excellencies) through bribery, earning contemporary ridicule as "the stench of copper." In 186 CE, Imperial Counselor Liu Tao was framed and executed after denouncing eunuch dominance. In 187 CE, rebel leader Ou Xing caused disturbances in Changsha, suppressed by Sun Jian (father of Sun Quan) dispatched by the court.

These records outline the Eastern Han's decline into eunuch domination and widespread revolts during Zhuge Liang's infancy, providing crucial context for understanding his later ambition to "restore Han's glory." The editor specifically notes: Events involving Wei and Wu receive detailed coverage as these rival states were intrinsically linked to Shu Han's historical trajectory.

 封堅鳥程侯 中平五年戊辰  太常劉焉建議以刺史威輕宜攺置牧伯侍中董扶私謂焉  曰益州有天子氣焉乃求爲益州牧州任之重自此始 中平六年已巳靈帝崩  立皇子辯 袁紹勸大將軍何進誅宦官不就進被殺紹遂  勒兵捕諸宦官無少長悉誅之 召董卓將兵詣京師卓廢  帝立陳留王協袁紹奔冀州 獻帝初平元年庚午  關東諸郡起兵討卓推袁紹爲盟主卓遷帝長安 劉表爲  荆州剌史 是𡻕昭烈領平原相以關羽張飛爲别部司馬 初平二年辛未  袁紹使人說韓馥馥讓紹爲冀州牧 袁術遣孫堅擊劉表  表將黃祖部曲射殺堅堅子策年十七有復讐之志徑到夀  春見術術以父兵千餘還策表拜懷義校尉 初平三年壬申  王允使呂布殺董卓卓將校求赦不許武威賈詡勸李催爲  卓報讐大戰長安中允被殺 初平四年癸酉  曹操攻陶謙初操父太尉曹嵩避難瑯琊爲謙别將士卒所  殺操引兵擊謙坑殺男女數十萬攻其三縣皆屠之雞犬亦  盡 興平元年甲戌  是年陶謙卒眾推昭烈領徐州牧 興平二年乙亥  李催郭𣲆共鬬催刼天子氾質公卿遂燒宮殿帝幸弘農長  安城空四十餘日 按陳志亮早孤從叔父元依荆州牧劉  表則知侯寓襄鄧當在此年以後武侯是年十五𡻕 建安元年丙子
Interpretation

This historical account chronicles the chaotic fragmentation of power during the late Eastern Han dynasty:

In 188 CE (the fifth year of Zhongping era), Liu Yan, the Grand Minister of Ceremonies (one of the Nine Ministers), proposed reforming the local governance system to the imperial court. Arguing that regional inspectors held insufficient authority, he advocated establishing provincial governors (the highest local administrators). Palace Attendant Dong Fu privately informed Liu Yan that Yi Province harbored "imperial qi (vital energy)." Seizing this opportunity, Liu Yan petitioned to become Governor of Yi Province, initiating an era of increasingly powerful regional warlords.

The following year (189 CE), Emperor Ling died and was succeeded by his son Liu Bian. When Yuan Shao's attempt to persuade General-in-Chief He Jin to eliminate the eunuchs backfired—resulting in He Jin's assassination—Yuan Shao led troops to massacre all eunuchs indiscriminately. Subsequently summoning Dong Zhuo's forces to the capital, Yuan Shao witnessed Dong Zhuo depose the emperor in favor of Prince Liu Xie (Emperor Xian), prompting his flight to Ji Province.

By 190 CE (the first year of Chuping era), eastern provinces united against Dong Zhuo under Yuan Shao's leadership as coalition leader. Dong Zhuo responded by forcibly relocating the capital to Chang'an with the emperor. That same year, Liu Bei (posthumously known as Emperor Zhaolie) became Chancellor of Pingyuan, appointing Guan Yu and Zhang Fei as subordinate commanders.

In 191 CE, Yuan Shao pressured Han Fu into surrendering his governorship of Ji Province. Meanwhile, Yuan Shu dispatched Sun Jian to attack Liu Biao, leading to Sun Jian's death by Huang Zu's arrow. His seventeen-year-old son Sun Ce, vowing vengeance, directly petitioned Yuan Shu at Shouchun. Yuan Shu returned Sun Jian's former troops and appointed Sun Ce Commandant of Huaiyi.

The pivotal year 192 CE saw Wang Yun orchestrate Dong Zhuo's assassination by Lü Bu. When Dong Zhuo's followers were denied amnesty, Jia Xu advised Li Jue to avenge his master, triggering fierce battles in Chang'an that claimed Wang Yun's life.

In 193 CE, Cao Cao launched a brutal campaign against Tao Qian after the latter's subordinates murdered Cao Cao's father Cao Song during his refuge in Langya. The offensive slaughtered hundreds of thousands across three counties, leaving no living creature behind.

Following Tao Qian's death in 194 CE, regional leaders appointed Liu Bei as the new Governor of Xu Province. The next year witnessed Li Jue and Guo Si's infighting, culminating in the emperor and ministers being taken hostage while palaces burned. Emperor Xian fled to Hongnong, leaving Chang'an deserted for over forty days. According to Records of the Three Kingdoms, the fifteen-year-old Zhuge Liang (later known as the Martial Marquis), having lost his father, followed his uncle Zhuge Xuan to seek refuge with Liu Biao in Jing Province.

The year 196 CE (first year of Jian'an era) marked a crucial turning point toward the Three Kingdoms period. Through detailed chronological events, this narrative reveals the power struggles during the Han dynasty's collapse, setting the stage for the tripartite division of the realm.

 袁術攻昭烈以爭徐州呂布襲下邳 秋七月駕至洛陽曹  操迎天子遂遷都許昌孫策取會稽太守王朗迎降策目領  會稽太守 呂布攻昭烈昭烈敗走歸曹操操表爲豫州牧  使東擊布 二年丁丑  韓暹楊奉冦畧徐揚間昭烈邀擊斬之 三年戊寅  曹操禽呂布昭烈從操還許表爲左將軍 四年巳卯  孫策徇豫章太守華歆降 初車騎將軍董承稱受帝衣帶  中密詔與昭烈共誅曹操會操遣昭烈擊袁術昭烈遂殺徐  州刺史車胄東海郡縣多叛操爲昭烈 五年庚辰  董承謀洩操殺承等自擊昭烈拔下邳禽闗羽昭烈奔袁紹   孫策殺吳郡太守許貢貢奴客爲貢報讐射殺策策創甚  呼弟權佩以印綬策卒年二十六權時年十九 是年關羽  爲曹操斬袁紹將顏良盡封操所賜而犇昭烈於袁軍 六年辛巳  曹操擊昭烈昭烈奔劉表表使屯新野 七年壬午  袁紹自軍敗慙憤發病嘔血死 曹操責孫權任子張昭等  猶豫不決權引周瑜與定議遂不送質 八年癸未  孫權西伐黃祖討山冦悉平之 九年甲申  曹操攻袁尙尙奔中山 十年乙酉  曹操攻袁譚斬之 十一年丙戌  荆州豪傑歸昭烈者日益多表疑其心陰禦之使拒夏侯惇  于禁等於博望昭烈設伏自燒屯僞遁惇等追之伏發見敗 十二年丁亥
Interpretation

This historical account describes the chaotic period of warlordism during the late Eastern Han dynasty. When Yuan Shu attacked Liu Bei for control of Xuzhou, Lü Bu seized the opportunity to raid Xiapi. In the seventh month of the first year of the Jian'an era (196 CE), Emperor Xian of Han arrived in Luoyang, where Cao Cao welcomed the emperor before relocating the capital to Xuchang. Meanwhile, Sun Ce captured Kuaiji Commandery, forcing Administrator Wang Lang to surrender, after which Sun Ce appointed himself as Kuaiji's governor.

Lü Bu later attacked Liu Bei, who after being defeated sought refuge with Cao Cao. Cao Cao petitioned the imperial court to appoint Liu Bei as Governor of Yuzhou and dispatched him eastward to attack Lü Bu. In the second year of Jian'an (197 CE), Han Xian and Yang Feng rebelled in the Xuzhou-Yangzhou region, whereupon Liu Bei intercepted and executed them.

In the third year of Jian'an (198 CE), Cao Cao captured Lü Bu, and Liu Bei accompanied him back to Xuchang, where he was recommended for the position of General of the Left. The following year, Sun Ce seized Yuzhang Commandery, prompting Administrator Hua Xin to surrender. Around this time, General of Chariots and Cavalry Dong Cheng claimed to have received a secret edict from Emperor Xian (hidden in a girdle) and conspired with Liu Bei to assassinate Cao Cao. Coincidentally, Cao Cao had just dispatched Liu Bei to attack Yuan Shu, during which Liu Bei took the opportunity to kill Che Zhou, the Inspector of Xuzhou, causing counties across Donghai Commandery to defect from Cao Cao and join Liu Bei.

In the fifth year of Jian'an (200 CE), Dong Cheng's plot was exposed, leading Cao Cao to execute Dong and his associates before personally leading troops against Liu Bei. Cao's forces captured Xiapi and seized Guan Yu, while Liu Bei fled to Yuan Shao. That same year, Sun Ce was assassinated by retainers of Xu Gong, Governor of Wu Commandery, and on his deathbed entrusted his official seal to his younger brother Sun Quan. During this period, Guan Yu slew Yuan Shao's general Yan Liang for Cao Cao before taking Cao's rewards and rejoining Liu Bei in Yuan Shao's camp.

In the sixth year of Jian'an (201 CE), Cao Cao attacked Liu Bei, who then sought refuge with Liu Biao and was stationed at Xinye. The following year, Yuan Shao died from illness exacerbated by shame and rage after his defeat at Guandu. When Cao Cao demanded Sun Quan send a son as hostage, Sun Quan—initially hesitant along with advisors like Zhang Zhao—ultimately followed Zhou Yu's advice and refused.

In the eighth year of Jian'an (203 CE), Sun Quan campaigned westward against Huang Zu while suppressing Shanyue rebellions. Over subsequent years, Cao Cao systematically eliminated remnants of the Yuan clan's forces. Beginning in the eleventh year of Jian'an (206 CE), Jing Province's local elites increasingly defected to Liu Bei, arousing Liu Biao's suspicion. Liu Biao secretly took defensive measures, dispatching Liu Bei to Bowang Slope to resist Xiahou Dun, Yu Jin, and others. There, Liu Bei feigned retreat to lure the enemy into an ambush, ultimately crushing Cao Cao's forces.

 是年昭烈見孔明於隆中時年二十七 後主禪生於荆州  按章武三年癸卯太子禪卽位年十七則知爲丁亥年生正  侯出隆中之𡻕也 十三年戊子  罷三公官曹操自爲丞相 操殺太中大夫孔融 劉表卒  子琮降操昭烈走當陽侯奉命使吳與周瑜魯肅等破操於  赤壁以侯爲軍師中郞將 十四年巳丑  孫權分南岸地給昭烈 十五年庚寅  昭烈自詣孫權求都督荆州有孔明諫孤莫行之語 以龎  統爲治中與侯並爲軍師 是𡻕周瑜卒 十六年辛卯  曹操以子丕爲丞相副 益州别駕張松勸劉璋迎昭烈昭  烈西上侯與雲長守荆州 十七年壬辰  孫權徙治⬤陵作石頭城攺⬤陵爲建業 劉璋殺張松勅  關戍勿通昭烈昭烈怒斬璋將楊懷高沛進攻涪城 十八年癸巳  曹操攻孫權權率眾禦之相守月餘操還 操自爲魏王加  九錫 昭烈舉兵向雒劉璋諸將皆敗退多降昭烈 自十  三年至此侯在荆州 十九年甲午  是𡻕龎統卒 侯留關羽守荆州自率張飛趙雲等分定郡  縣成都平昭烈領益州牧以侯爲益州太守 是𡻕操使華  歆等收皇后璽綬并二皇子皆酖殺之 二十年乙未  立操女爲皇后 昭烈聞曹操將攻漢中求和於孫權遂分  荆州以湘水爲界 二十一年丙申  曹操進爵爲王 二十二年丁酉
Interpretation

In this year (the 12th year of the Jian'an era), Liu Bei visited Zhuge Liang in Longzhong. At the time, Zhuge Liang was twenty-seven years old. That same year, Liu Shan, the later emperor, was born in Jingzhou.

Based on calculations from the year Guimao (223 CE, the 3rd year of the Zhangwu era) when Liu Shan ascended the throne at seventeen, we can deduce that he was born in the year Dinghai (207 CE)—the very year Zhuge Liang left his seclusion to assist Liu Bei.

13th Year of Jian'an (Wuzi, 208 CE):

The imperial court abolished the Three Excellencies, and Cao Cao appointed himself as Chancellor. Cao Cao executed Kong Rong, the Grand Master of Splendid Happiness. Liu Biao passed away, and his son Liu Cong surrendered to Cao Cao. Liu Bei suffered defeat at Dangyang, while Zhuge Liang was sent as an envoy to Eastern Wu, where he allied with Zhou Yu, Lu Su, and others to defeat Cao Cao decisively at the Battle of Chibi. After the battle, Zhuge Liang was appointed General of the Household and Central Army Commander.

14th Year of Jian'an (Jichou, 209 CE):

Sun Quan ceded parts of the southern Yangtze region to Liu Bei.

15th Year of Jian'an (Gengyin, 210 CE):

Liu Bei personally traveled to Eastern Wu to request governorship over Jingzhou. Zhuge Liang had advised against it, warning, "My lord must not go alone." Pang Tong was appointed as Chief Clerk, serving alongside Zhuge Liang as a military strategist. That same year, Zhou Yu passed away.

16th Year of Jian'an (Xinmao, 211 CE):

Cao Cao appointed his son Cao Pi as Vice Chancellor. Zhang Song, the Inspector of Yi Province, persuaded Liu Zhang to invite Liu Bei into Shu. Liu Bei led his forces westward, while Zhuge Liang and Guan Yu remained to guard Jingzhou.

17th Year of Jian'an (Renchen, 212 CE):

Sun Quan moved his capital to Moling (later renamed Jianye) and constructed the Stone City fortress. Liu Zhang executed Zhang Song and ordered the sealing of mountain passes. Enraged, Liu Bei killed Liu Zhang’s generals Yang Huai and Gao Pei and advanced to attack Fucheng.

18th Year of Jian'an (Guisi, 213 CE):

Cao Cao attacked Sun Quan, but after a month-long stalemate, he withdrew. Cao Cao declared himself King of Wei and was granted the Nine Distinctions. Meanwhile, Liu Bei advanced to Luocheng, where Liu Zhang’s generals suffered successive defeats and surrendered. From the 13th to the 18th year of Jian'an, Zhuge Liang remained stationed in Jingzhou.

19th Year of Jian'an (Jiawu, 214 CE):

Pang Tong passed away. Zhuge Liang left Guan Yu to defend Jingzhou and personally led Zhang Fei, Zhao Yun, and others to pacify the surrounding commanderies. After the pacification of Chengdu, Liu Bei assumed the governorship of Yi Province and appointed Zhuge Liang as Administrator of Yi Province. That same year, Cao Cao sent Hua Xin and others to seize the empress’s seal and poisoned two imperial princes.

20th Year of Jian'an (Yiwei, 215 CE):

Cao Cao’s daughter was installed as empress. Upon hearing that Cao Cao intended to attack Hanzhong, Liu Bei negotiated peace with Sun Quan, redividing Jingzhou with the Xiang River as the new boundary.

21st Year of Jian'an (Bingshen, 216 CE):

Cao Cao was promoted to King of Wei.

22nd Year of Jian'an (Dingyou, 217 CE):

(No specific events recorded in the original text.)

 操設天子旌旗出入稱警蹕京兆金禕與少府耿紀司直韋  晃太醫令吉本本子邈邈弟穆謀挾天子以攻操 是𡻕魯  肅卒 二十三年戊戌  吉邈等眾潰見殺 曹操自將擊昭烈昭烈屯陽平 二十四年巳亥  昭烈自陽平南渡沔水遣黃忠擊斬夏侯淵遂定漢中進位  漢中王 是年關羽攻曹仁于禁等七軍皆没 孫權稱臣  於操呂䝉陸遜以詐取江陵羽卒 陳羣等勸操纂漢 二十五年庚子(魏曹丕黃初元年)  曹操死子丕纂漢封漢帝爲山陽公 昭烈皇帝章武元年辛丑(魏黃初二年)  蜀中傳言漢帝遇害於是漢中王發喪制服侯與羣下勸稱  尊號夏四月王卽皇帝位以侯爲丞相 章武二年壬寅(魏黃初三年吳黃武元年)  帝恥關羽之殁自將擊孫權爲陸遜所敗入白帝城攺白帝  爲永安孫權請和遣鄭泉來聘帝使太中大夫宗瑋報之漢  吳復通 是𡻕孫權受曹丕封爲吳王攺元黃武 張飛卒  以侯領司隸校尉 章武三年癸卯夏五月以後卽後帝建興元年(魏黃初四年吳黃武元年)  二月侯至永安四月帝崩於永安年六十三侯受遺詔奉喪  還成都五月太子禪卽位時年十七封丞相亮爲武鄉侯兼  領益州牧政事皆決於亮 使鄧芝聘吳 朱褒高定等叛   是𡻕魏華歆王朗陳羣等各有書與侯欲使稱藩侯不答  作正議文載傳
Interpretation

This passage primarily documents historical events during the period when Zhuge Liang, Chancellor of Shu Han during the Three Kingdoms era (posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu), assisted Liu Bei and his son Liu Shan. Below is a chronological summary of key events:

In the 23rd year of the Jian'an era (218 AD), Ji Miao and others conspired to kidnap Emperor Xian of Han to resist Cao Cao but failed and were executed. Liu Bei (posthumously titled Emperor Zhaolie) confronted Cao Cao at Yangping Pass.

The following year (219 AD), Liu Bei crossed the Mian River southward, where Huang Zhong killed Cao's general Xiahou Yuan. After capturing Hanzhong, Liu Bei declared himself King of Hanzhong. That same year, Guan Yu launched a northern campaign, flooding Yu Jin's seven armies, but was defeated when Eastern Wu's Lü Meng and Lu Xun attacked Jing Province. The Cao faction began plotting to usurp the Han dynasty.

In 220 AD (the first year of Huangchu in Wei), Cao Cao died, and his son Cao Pi usurped the Han throne, declaring himself emperor while granting Emperor Xian the title Duke of Shanyang. The next year (221 AD), upon hearing rumors of Emperor Xian's death, Liu Bei proclaimed himself emperor in Chengdu, appointing Zhuge Liang as Chancellor.

In 222 AD, Liu Bei launched an eastern campaign against Sun Quan to avenge Guan Yu, suffering a devastating defeat by Lu Xun's fire attack and retreating to Baidi City (renamed Yong'an). Sun Quan sent envoys to sue for peace, restoring diplomatic relations between Shu and Wu, though Sun Quan simultaneously accepted Cao Pi's enfeoffment as King of Wu. That same year, Zhang Fei died, and Zhuge Liang assumed the additional post of Colonel-Director of Retainers.

In April 223 AD, Liu Bei died of illness at Yong'an, entrusting his heir to Zhuge Liang on his deathbed. In May, Liu Shan (later known as the Later Sovereign) succeeded to the throne, enfeoffing Zhuge Liang as Marquis of Wuxiang and Governor of Yi Province, with all military and administrative authority over Shu Han concentrated in Zhuge Liang's hands. Zhuge Liang dispatched Deng Zhi as envoy to Wu to reaffirm their alliance while suppressing rebellions led by Zhu Bao and others. Faced with surrender letters from Wei officials like Hua Xin, Zhuge Liang composed the "Zheng Yi" treatise to clarify his stance and reject submission.

(Note: "Marquis" in the text refers to Zhuge Liang; "Zhaolie" is Liu Bei's posthumous title; "Later Sovereign" refers to Liu Shan; "Colonel-Director of Retainers" was an office overseeing the capital region; "Governor of Yi Province" was the highest administrative position in the Shu region.)

建興二年甲辰(魏黃初五年吳黃武三年)  吳張温來聘復使鄧芝聘吳 是𡻕務農殖穀閉關息民 建興三年乙巳(魏黃初六年吳黃武四年)  侯率眾南征斬雍闓七擒孟獲 建興四年丙午(魏黃初七年吳黃武五年)  五月曹丕死丕子叡立 建興五年丁未(魏太和元年吳黃武六年)  三月侯率眾伐魏上表出師 是𡻕侯子瞻生按建興十二  年甲寅侯在武功與兄瑾書云瞻今已八𡻕又按景耀元年  癸未瞻戰死年三十七則知爲丁未年生 建興六年戊申(魏太和二年吳黃武七年)  春侯率諸軍伐魏有出師表關中響震前軍馬謖違侯節度  敗於街亭疏請自貶詔以亮爲右將軍行丞相事拔西縣千  餘家還漢中 十一月復上表出師圍陳倉糧盡引還斬其  追將王雙 二表俱載傳 建興七年已酉(魏太和三年吳龍元年)  伐魏攻武都陰平郭淮敗走遂拔二郡復策拜丞相 夏四  月孫權稱帝使以並尊二帝來吿 遣衞尉陳震往賀因與  吳盟 建興八年庚戌(魏太和四年吳黃龍二年)  魏曹眞司馬懿入冦侯次於城固以待之魏延敗郭淮於陽  谿 建興九年辛亥(魏太和五年吳黃龍三年)  伐魏圍祁山始以木牛運大敗司馬懿獲甲首三千級玄鎧  五千領角弩三千一百張糧盡引退斬其追將張郃
Interpretation

This historical account documents the military and administrative activities of Zhuge Liang (posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu), the Chancellor of Shu Han, between 224 and 231 CE. The events are recorded chronologically as follows:

In 224 CE (5th year of Huangchu in Wei, 3rd year of Huangwu in Wu), Wu envoy Zhang Wen visited Shu Han, which reciprocated by sending Deng Zhi to Wu. That year, Zhuge Liang implemented policies for recuperation, encouraging agriculture and closing borders to allow civilians to rest.

In 225 CE, Zhuge Liang led a southern expedition, suppressing the Nanzhong rebellion. He executed rebel commander Yong Kai and famously captured then released the Nanman chieftain Meng Huo seven times until his submission.

In May 226 CE, Wei Emperor Cao Pi died and was succeeded by his son Cao Rui.

In March 227 CE, Zhuge Liang submitted the famous "Memorial on the Expedition" and launched the northern campaign against Wei. That same year, his son Zhuge Zhan was born (calculated from later records showing Zhuge Liang mentioning his eight-year-old son in correspondence, and Zhuge Zhan dying at 37 in 263 CE).

In spring 228 CE, Zhuge Liang launched another northern campaign, during which the renowned "Memorial on the Expedition" was composed. The Wei capital region was shaken, but vanguard Ma Su's disobedience led to the loss of Jieting. Zhuge Liang demoted himself to General of the Right while retaining his chancellor duties, relocating over a thousand households from Xixian to Hanzhong. That November, he besieged Chencang but withdrew due to supply shortages, killing pursuing Wei general Wang Shuang during retreat.

In 229 CE, Zhuge Liang captured Wudu and Yinping commanderies, defeating Wei general Guo Huai. In summer's fourth month, Sun Quan declared himself emperor, prompting Shu Han to send Chen Zhen to congratulate Wu and reaffirm their alliance.

In 230 CE, Wei generals Cao Zhen and Sima Yi invaded. Zhuge Liang defended at Chenggu while Wei Yan defeated Guo Huai at Yangxi.

In 231 CE, Zhuge Liang besieged Qishan in his northern campaign, first employing "wooden oxen" (munic) transport vehicles. He decisively defeated Sima Yi, capturing substantial military equipment (including armor, crossbows etc.). After withdrawing due to exhausted supplies, his forces killed the pursuing Wei general Zhang He during retreat.

Note: The "wooden oxen" (munic) were Zhuge Liang's invented transport devices resembling wheelbarrows; "armor with heads" (jiashou) referred to captured armor with enemy heads, "black armor" (xuankai) denoted iron armor, and "horn crossbows" (jiaonu) were powerful bows decorated with animal horns. These campaigns exemplified Zhuge Liang's strategic principle of "using offense as defense."

建興十年壬子(魏太和六年吳嘉禾元年)  是年休士勸農教兵講武 建興十一年癸丑(魏青龍元年吳嘉禾二年)  是年運米斜谷口治邸閣息民休士三年而後用之 建興十二年甲寅(魏青龍二年吳嘉禾三年)  遣使約吳同時大舉由斜谷出師始以流馬運乃分兵屯田  爲久住計與司馬懿相守百餘日侯數挑戰懿不出乃遺懿  巾幗婦人之服 八月丞相亮卒於軍中年五十四遺命退  軍節度司馬懿追之敗走  是年漢獻帝亦殂於魏  按侯於獻帝生同辛酉殁同甲寅固巳巧合且帝以八月葬  而侯八月卒不尤異哉鳴呼漢不亡則侯不死侯死而漢乃  眞亡矣  綱目 劉備見諸葛亮於隆中  特筆也終綱目未有書見賢者於是特書交予之也備之業  定於隆中終綱目書見賢一而已(書法) 漢中王卽皇帝位以諸葛亮爲丞相  書卽皇帝位何正統也故孫曹皆斥姓名書稱皇帝立后立  太子皆不書皇所以殊之於正統也(書法) 帝崩於永安丞相亮受遺詔輔政太子禪卽位封亮爲武鄉侯 領益州牧  自宣帝之末書受遺詔是後無聞焉於是復書亮其人也司  馬懿書受遺不書詔(書法) 丞相亮南征 丞相亮討雍闓誅之遂平四郡 丞相亮率諸軍出屯漢中以圖中原  劉縯之起書曰興復帝室特筆也於是特書曰以圖中原其
Interpretation

In the year 232 (the sixth year of the Taihe era in Wei, first year of the Jiahe era in Wu), Zhuge Liang ordered his troops to rest, encouraged agricultural production, and simultaneously trained the army, instructing them in martial skills.

The following year (233), the Shu Han forces transported grain supplies to the mouth of the Xie Valley, constructing granaries for storage. This allowed both civilians and soldiers to recuperate, with plans to utilize these stockpiled resources after three years of preparation.

By 234 (the second year of the Qinglong era in Wei, third year of Jiahe in Wu), Zhuge Liang dispatched envoys to coordinate a simultaneous northern expedition with Wu. The Shu army marched from Xie Valley, employing for the first time the "flowing horses" (an improved version of the wooden oxen transport system) to deliver provisions. Soldiers were assigned to reclaim wasteland for military farming, preparing for long-term encampment. Zhuge Liang faced off against Wei's general Sima Yi for over a hundred days, repeatedly challenging him to battle, but Sima Yi consistently avoided engagement. Zhuge Liang eventually sent women's headscarves and garments to humiliate Sima Yi. In the eighth month of that same year, Prime Minister Zhuge Liang passed away in camp at age fifty-four. His final orders commanded troop withdrawal, and though Sima Yi pursued, the Shu forces repelled him.

Historians note a remarkable coincidence: Emperor Xian of Han also died in Wei that same year. Both Zhuge Liang and Emperor Xian had been born in the Xinyou year (181) and died in the Jiayin year (234). Even more strikingly, Emperor Xian was buried in August, the very month Zhuge Liang died. The chronicler reflects: had the Han dynasty not fallen, Zhuge Liang would not have died; with Zhuge Liang's passing, the Han truly met its end.

Regarding the historiographical approach in the Comprehensive Mirror: special attention is given to Liu Bei's visit to Zhuge Liang at Longzhong—the only instance in the entire chronicle where "visiting a worthy man" is recorded with such emphasis, marking the foundation of Liu Bei's enterprise. When recording Liu Bei's imperial accession, the text deliberately states "ascended the imperial throne" to affirm legitimacy, whereas Sun Quan and Cao Cao are referred to by name only. The appointments of empresses and crown princes omit the honorific "imperial" character, distinguishing orthodox from non-orthodox succession.

After Liu Bei's death at Yong'an Palace, Prime Minister Zhuge Liang received the posthumous edict to assist Crown Prince Liu Shan's accession, being enfeoffed as Marquis of Wuxiang and Governor of Yizhou. The explicit recording of "receiving the posthumous edict" is the first such notation since Emperor Xuan of Han, highlighting Zhuge Liang's exceptional status. In contrast, Sima Yi's record states merely "received posthumous [instructions]" without the imperial edict character, reflecting the historian's evaluative brushwork.

Subsequent records detail Zhuge Liang's southern campaign suppressing Yong Kai's rebellion and reclaiming four southern commanderies, followed by his garrison at Hanzhong to plan the northern expedition. Phrases like "restoring the imperial house" and "strategizing for the Central Plains" embody his lifelong dedication to reviving the Han dynasty.

 予亮以討復之義矣自是亮五伐魏必書丞相若右將軍予  之也(書法) 丞相亮伐魏戰於街亭敗績詔貶亮右將軍行丞相事  街亭之敗違命者馬謖耳而以丞相亮書之者權歸主將也  貶官三等自請者孔明耳而以詔貶亮書之者命出於上也  惟孔明身任討伐之責事幼主而無二心是以所書如此綱  目亦豈私於孔明者哉(發明) 右將軍亮伐魏圍陳倉不克而還斬其追將王雙 右將軍亮伐魏拔武都陰平復拜丞相 魏冦漢中丞相亮出次成固魏師還  書魏以冦尊漢也(書法)  綱目凡諸侯之于王室蠻狄之于中國僣僞之于正統或加  兵犯境則書曰冦非此類則不書諸葛孔明左右昭烈爲漢  討賊聲大義於天下功雖不就名則正矣自陳夀志三國以  魏爲主通鑑因之紀年故於孔明伐魏之舉反以入冦書之  則是以討賊之人名之爲賊耳綱目旣以昭烈紹漢之統故  於魏兵犯境書之爲冦然後名正言順而正僞之辨始明故  非好爲立異也正前人之未正卒歸之是亦所以更相發明  云耳九原可作竊爲司馬光必有取於斯言(發明) 丞相亮以蔣琬爲長史 亮敗魏司馬懿於鹵城殺其將張郃  司馬懿用兵如神算無遺策未易敵也然每與丞相亮交鋒  動輒敗北是以其徒有畏蜀如虎之譏而陳夀乃以將畧非
Interpretation

This passage primarily documents Zhuge Liang's northern expeditions against the Wei Kingdom and discusses the issue of historiographical bias in official records.

Regarding the Battle of Jieting: During Zhuge Liang's northern campaign, the defeat at Jieting occurred when Ma Su disobeyed military orders. Yet historical records still state that "Prime Minister Zhuge Liang was defeated," because commanding officers bore ultimate responsibility. Zhuge Liang voluntarily requested demotion by three ranks, and the imperial court decreed his reduction to General of the Right (a senior military title), while still allowing him to perform prime ministerial duties. This reflects the power-responsibility relationship between ruler and minister.

Subsequent military records: Continuing his northern expeditions as General of the Right, Zhuge Liang unsuccessfully besieged Chencang but achieved victory by killing Wei general Wang Shuang. After capturing Wudu and Yinping commanderies, he was restored to the position of Prime Minister. When Wei forces attacked Hanzhong, Zhuge Liang stationed troops at Chenggu, prompting the Wei army's retreat. Historical texts deliberately used the term "invade" (kou) to describe Wei's military actions, revealing their pro-Shu and anti-Wei stance.

Discussion of historiographical methods: Orthodox historical records consistently use "kou" to describe vassal states attacking the royal house, foreign invasions of the Central Plains, or usurping regimes assaulting legitimate dynasties. Chen Shou's Records of the Three Kingdoms, which recognized Wei as legitimate, paradoxically labeled Zhuge Liang's northern campaigns as "invasion," effectively portraying the punisher of rebels as rebels themselves. Zhu Xi's Outline and Details of the Comprehensive Mirror, recognizing Liu Bei as inheriting Han legitimacy, properly recorded Wei's attacks as "invasion," thereby clarifying the distinction between legitimate rule and illegitimate pretenders.

Other notable events: Zhuge Liang appointed Jiang Wan as his Chief Clerk (chief secretary); defeated Sima Yi at Lucheng, killing Wei general Zhang He. Though Sima Yi was renowned for military genius, he suffered repeated defeats against Zhuge Liang, leading Wei troops to say they "feared Shu like tigers." The author criticizes Chen Shou's Records of the Three Kingdoms for unfairly diminishing Zhuge Liang's military capabilities in its evaluation.

(Note: "Zhaolie" refers to Liu Bei's posthumous temple name Emperor Zhaolie; "Chen Shou" authored Records of the Three Kingdoms; "Outline and Details" refers to Zhu Xi's Outline and Details of the Comprehensive Mirror)

 亮所長貶之今觀綱目書此不曰亮敗魏軍而曰亮敗司馬  懿者見其所對者勍敵而非脆敵亮能勝之則其將畧果有  大過人者然則夀之妄肆譏評其說不攻自破矣世以成敗  論人若夀輩者非一可勝嘆哉(發明) 丞相亮伐魏 丞相亮進軍渭南魏大將軍司馬懿引兵拒守亮始分兵屯田 丞相武鄉侯諸葛亮卒於軍  嗚呼亮自經畧中原至是首尾僅八載綱目五書伐魏一戰  街亭一次成固一圍陳倉祁山一拔武都陰平一斬王雙敗  司馬懿殺張郃至於是舉書進軍渭南分兵屯田懿雖引軍  拒守甘受巾幗婦人之服勢已窮蹙而亮乃吿終天不祚漢  使之功業不就謂之何哉然亮受遺託孤之際蓋嘗以竭股  肱之力効忠貞之節繼之以死爲告至其出軍上表又以鞠  躬盡瘁死而後已爲言由今觀之可謂不食其言矣書卒於  軍以見殁於王事之實其討賊之義死而不屈至今凛凛猶  有生氣其視曹馬輩欺孤弱寡狐媚以取人家國者曾犬彘  之不若世豈可以成敗論人物哉不有綱目特書屢書表而  出之則孔明亦若而人耳噫(發明) 漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集卷之二  傳 諸葛亮字孔明瑯琊陽都人也漢司隸校尉諸葛豐後也父𡋣 字君貢漢末爲太山郡丞亮早孤從父玄爲袁術所署豫章太 守玄將亮及亮弟均之官會漢朝更選朱皓代玄玄素與荆州
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses Zhuge Liang's Northern Expeditions and their historical assessments. The text notes that when recording Zhuge Liang's five northern campaigns, the Zizhi Tongjian Gangmu (Outline and Details of the Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government) deliberately emphasizes that he defeated formidable opponents like Sima Yi rather than ordinary generals, thereby proving his exceptional military prowess. The author refutes Chen Shou's criticism of Zhuge Liang in the Records of the Three Kingdoms (Sanguozhi), arguing that one cannot judge a hero solely by success or failure.

The text meticulously enumerates Zhuge Liang's military campaigns: the Battle of Jieting, the Siege of Chenggu, the Battles of Chencang and Qishan, the capture of Wudu and Yinping, the execution of Wang Shuang, and the defeats of Sima Yi and Zhang He. It particularly highlights Zhuge Liang's final northern expedition, during which—despite gaining an advantage by stationing troops in Weinan for farming, forcing Sima Yi to endure humiliation (such as accepting women's garments)—he unfortunately fell ill and died in camp, leaving his mission to restore the Han dynasty unfulfilled.

The author highly praises Zhuge Liang's spirit of "devoting every ounce of his strength until his dying day," believing that he remained faithful to his promise to Liu Bei and fought against traitors until the end. In contrast, figures like Cao Cao and Sima Yi, who oppressed orphans and widows to usurp power, were "worse than pigs and dogs." The text concludes by emphasizing that historical judgment should not be based solely on outcomes but on moral integrity and steadfastness.

The passage briefly records Zhuge Liang's family background: his courtesy name was Kongming, and he hailed from Yangdu in Langya. His ancestor was Zhuge Feng, who served as the Director of the Capital during the Han dynasty. His father, Zhuge Gui, held the post of Assistant Administrator of Taishan Commandery but died young, after which Zhuge Liang was raised by his uncle, Zhuge Xuan. Zhuge Xuan was appointed by Yuan Shu as the Grand Administrator of Yuzhang and took Zhuge Liang and his brothers to his post. However, he later lost his position when the court reassigned Zhu Hao to replace him.

(Note: The "Gangmu" refers to Zhu Xi's Zizhi Tongjian Gangmu; "Shou" refers to Chen Shou, author of the Records of the Three Kingdoms; and "Cao-Ma" refers to the Cao and Sima families, i.e., Cao Cao and Sima Yi's lineages.)

牧劉表有舊往依之  獻帝春秋曰初豫章太守周術病卒劉表上諸葛玄爲豫章  太守治南昌漢朝聞周術死遣周皓代玄皓從揚州太守劉  繇求兵擊玄玄退屯西城皓入南昌建安二年正月西城民  反殺玄送首詣繇此書所云與本傳不同 卒亮躬耕隴畝好爲梁父吟  漢晉春秋曰亮家於南陽之鄧縣在襄陽城西二十里號曰  隆中 身長八尺每自比於管仲樂毅時人莫之許也惟博陵崔州平 潁川徐庶元直與亮友善謂爲信然  按崔氏譜州平太尉列子均之弟也  魏畧曰亮在荆州以建安初與潁川石廣元徐元直汝南孟  公威等俱游學三人務於精熟而亮獨觀其大畧每晨夜從  容常抱膝長嘯而謂三人曰卿三人仕進可至刺史郡守也  三人問其所至亮但笑而不言後公威思鄉里欲北歸亮謂  之曰中國饒士大夫遨遊何必故鄉耶  臣松之以爲魏畧此言謂諸葛爲公威計者可也若謂兼爲  已言可謂未達其心矣老氏稱知人者智自知者明凡在賢  達之流固必兼而有焉以諸葛之鑒識豈不能自審其分乎  夫其高吟俟時情見乎言志氣所存旣已定於其始矣若使  游步中華騁其龍光豈夫多士所能沈翳哉委質魏氏展其  器能誠非陳長文司馬仲達所能頡頑而况於餘哉苟不患  功業不就道之不行雖志恢宇宙而終不北向者蓋以權御
Interpretation

This passage primarily documents Zhuge Liang's early life experiences and aspirations.

Liu Biao, Governor of Jing Province, had longstanding ties with Zhuge Liang's family, which led Zhuge Liang to seek refuge with him. At the time, Zhou Shu, the Grand Administrator of Yuzhang, had passed away, and Liu Biao recommended Zhuge Xuan (Zhuge Liang's uncle) to succeed him as Grand Administrator of Yuzhang, stationed in Nanchang. However, the Han court appointed Zhou Hao instead, who led troops to attack Zhuge Xuan, forcing him to retreat to Xicheng. In the first month of the second year of the Jian'an era (197 CE), the people of Xicheng rebelled, killed Zhuge Xuan, and sent his head to Liu Yao. This account differs from other historical biographies.

At the time, Zhuge Liang was farming in Nanyang's Deng County, a place twenty li west of Xiangyang City known as Longzhong. He stood eight chi tall (approximately 1.84 meters) and often compared himself to Guan Zhong (a renowned statesman of the Spring and Autumn period) and Yue Yi (a famed general of the Warring States period). However, most people did not acknowledge his claims—only his close friends Cui Zhouping from Boling and Xu Shu (styled Yuanzhi) from Yingchuan believed in his true talent.

In the early Jian'an era, Zhuge Liang studied alongside Shi Guangyuan, Xu Shu, and Meng Gongwei. While the other three pursued deep scholarly refinement, Zhuge Liang focused only on grasping the essential principles. He would often sit with his knees hugged, sighing deeply, and once told the three of them, "You all could attain positions like provincial governor or commandery administrator." When asked about his own ambitions, he merely smiled without answering. Later, when Meng Gongwei expressed a desire to return to his northern homeland, Zhuge Liang advised him, "The Central Plains are full of talented individuals—why must you return to your hometown?"

Pei Songzhi, the historian who annotated the Records of the Three Kingdoms, believed that Zhuge Liang's advice to Meng Gongwei was simply out of consideration for his friend. Given Zhuge Liang's insight, he clearly understood his own path. His usual words and actions reveal that his ambitions had long been settled. Had he served Cao Wei, his abilities would undoubtedly have surpassed those of Chen Qun (styled Changwen) and Sima Yi (styled Zhongda). Yet he ultimately chose not to pledge allegiance to the northern regime of Cao Wei, a decision informed by his assessment of the political landscape of the time.

 巳移漢祚將傾方將翊贊宗傑以興微繼絶克復爲巳任故  也豈其區區利在邊鄙而巳乎此相如所謂鵾鵬已翔於遼  廓而羅者猶視於藪澤者矣公威名建在魏亦貴達 時先主屯新野徐庶見先主先主器之謂先主曰諸葛孔明者 卧龍也將軍豈願見之乎  襄陽記曰劉備訪世事於司馬德操德操曰儒生俗士豈識  時務識時務者在乎俊傑此間自有伏龍鳳雛問爲誰曰諸  葛孔明龎士元也 先主曰君與俱來庶曰此人可就見不可屈致也將軍宜枉駕 顧之由是先主遂詣亮凡三往乃見因屏人曰漢室傾頺姦臣 竊命主上䝉塵孤不度德量力欲信大義於天下而智術淺短 遂用猖獗至于今日然志猶未已君謂計將安出亮答曰自董 卓以來豪傑並起跨州連郡者不可勝數曹操比於袁紹則名 微而眾寡然操遂能克紹以弱爲强者非惟天時抑亦人謀也 今操已擁百萬之眾挾天子以令諸侯此誠不可與之爭鋒孫 權據有江東巳厯三世國險而民附賢能爲之用可以爲援而 不可圖也荆州北據漢沔利盡南海東連吳會西通巴蜀此用 武之國而其主不能守此殆天所以資將軍將軍豈有意乎益 州險塞沃野千里天府之土高祖因之以成帝業劉璋闇弱張 魯在北民殷國富而不知存恤智能之士思得明君將軍旣帝
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of how Liu Bei visited Zhuge Liang's thatched cottage three times during the Three Kingdoms period to seek his counsel, along with Zhuge Liang's analysis of the political landscape.

At that time, the Han dynasty's fortunes were in decline, and Zhuge Liang harbored aspirations to restore the Han imperial house. When Liu Bei was stationed at Xinye, Xu Shu recommended Zhuge Liang to him, calling him the "Crouching Dragon" and advising Liu Bei to personally visit him. Liu Bei consulted Sima Decao about the situation of the realm, to which Sima replied that only exceptional talents like Zhuge Liang (the "Crouching Dragon") and Pang Tong (the "Young Phoenix") could truly discern the times.

Xu Shu told Liu Bei: "For a man like Zhuge Liang, you must visit him personally—you cannot simply summon him." Thus Liu Bei made three trips before finally meeting Zhuge Liang. During their meeting, Liu Bei poured out his heart, expressing his desire to restore the Han dynasty despite his limited resources, and sought Zhuge Liang's advice.

Zhuge Liang analyzed the situation thus: Since Dong Zhuo's tyrannical rule, powerful warlords had risen everywhere. Although Cao Cao initially had fewer resources than Yuan Shao, he ultimately triumphed against the odds and now commanded a million troops, controlling the emperor to order the feudal lords—making direct confrontation impossible for the time being. Sun Quan had held Jiangdong for three generations; its terrain was strategically secure, and the people were loyal—he could be an ally but not a target for conquest.

Jing Province occupied a supremely strategic location: bordered by the Han and Mian rivers to the north, connected to Wu and Kuaiji commanderies to the east, and leading to Ba-Shu (Sichuan) to the west—making it vital for military operations. Yet its current ruler could not defend it; this might be Heaven's gift to you, General. Yi Province (modern Sichuan) had impregnable terrain and fertile land—it was from here that Emperor Gaozu of Han had established his imperial rule. Now its governor, Liu Zhang, was incompetent, with Zhang Lu threatening from the north, while local talents yearned for a wise ruler.

Zhuge Liang advised Liu Bei to first secure Jing and Yi Provinces as bases, form an alliance with Sun Quan, and await the right moment to march north against the Central Plains. This analysis became the famous "Longzhong Plan," formulating Liu Bei's strategy of "dividing the realm into three."

室之胄信義著於四海總攬英雄思賢如渴若跨有荆益保其 險阻西和諸戎南撫蠻越外結好孫權内修政理天下有變則 命一上將將荆州之軍以向宛洛將軍身率益州之眾以出秦 川百姓孰敢不簞食壺漿以迎將軍者乎誠如是則霸業可成 漢室可興矣先主曰善於是與亮情好日密關羽張飛等不悅 先主解之曰孤之有孔明猶魚之有水也願諸君勿復言羽飛 乃止  魏畧曰劉備屯於樊城是時曹公方定河北亮知荆州次當  受敵而劉表性緩不曉軍事亮乃北行見備備與亮非舊又  以其年少以諸生意待之坐集旣畢眾賓皆去而亮獨留備  亦不問其所欲言備性好結毦時適有人以氂牛尾與備者  備因手自結之亮乃進曰明將軍當復有遠志但結毦而巳  耶備知亮非常人也乃投毦而言曰是何言與我聊以忘憂  耳亮遂言曰將軍度劉鎭南孰與曹公耶備曰不及亮又曰  將軍自度何如也備曰亦不如曰今皆不及而將軍之眾不  過數千人以此待敵得無非計乎備曰我亦愁之當若之何  亮曰今荆州非少人也而著籍者寡平居發調則人心不悅  可語鎭南令國中凡有游戸皆使自實因錄以益眾可也備  從其計故眾遂强備由此知亮有英畧乃以上客禮之九州  春秋所言亦如之  臣松之以爲亮表云先帝不以臣卑鄙猥自枉屈三顧臣於
Interpretation

Zhuge Liang (courtesy name Kongming, posthumous title Marquis Zhongwu) was a descendant of the Han imperial clan, renowned throughout the land for his integrity and righteousness. He excelled at attracting heroes and talents, thirsting for worthy individuals like a parched man seeks water. If we could simultaneously hold Jingzhou and Yizhou, secure strategic passes, maintain peaceful relations with western tribes, pacify southern minorities, ally externally with Sun Quan, and cultivate enlightened governance internally—then when the empire's situation changes, we could dispatch a great general leading Jingzhou's forces to attack Wancheng and Luoyang, while you personally command Yizhou's main army through the Qin River region. The common people would surely welcome you with food and wine. Thus could we achieve hegemonic enterprise and restore the Han dynasty." After hearing this, Liu Bei exclaimed, "Excellent!" From then on, his relationship with Zhuge Liang grew increasingly close. Guan Yu, Zhang Fei and others expressed displeasure, to which Liu Bei explained, "Having Kongming is like a fish finding water. I beg you to speak no more of this." Only then did Guan and Zhang desist.

The Weilue records: At that time, Liu Bei was garrisoned at Fancheng when Cao Cao had just pacified Hebei. Zhuge Liang foresaw that Jingzhou would soon face threats, while Liu Biao's indecisive nature left him incompetent in military affairs. Thus Zhuge Liang traveled north to meet Liu Bei. Being unacquainted with Zhuge Liang and considering him merely a young scholar, Liu Bei received him as an ordinary literatus. After the banquet concluded and other guests departed, Zhuge Liang alone remained. Liu Bei didn't inquire about his purpose. Noticing Liu Bei plaiting yak-tail ornaments, Zhuge Liang approached saying, "Does the general aspire only to such handicrafts?" Only then did Liu Bei realize this was no ordinary man. Setting aside his work, he replied, "This merely distracts me from sorrow." Zhuge Liang continued, "How would you compare Liu Biao (General Who Guards the South) to Cao Cao?" Liu Bei answered, "He falls short." "And yourself?" Zhuge Liang pressed. Liu Bei frankly admitted, "I too am inferior." Zhuge Liang pointed out, "Presently all aspects fall short of Cao Cao, yet your troops number merely several thousand—how will you oppose the enemy?" Liu Bei sought counsel, whereupon Zhuge Liang advised: "Jingzhou's population is substantial but household registers incomplete. Propose that Liu Biao investigate transient people and register them to expand military resources." Liu Bei adopted this strategy, greatly increasing his forces thereafter, and treated Zhuge Liang as an honored guest. The Jiuzhou Chunqiu records identically.

Pei Songzhi (the historian who annotated Records of the Three Kingdoms) observes that when Zhuge Liang wrote in his Memorial on Launching a Campaign—"The Late Emperor did not disdain my humble origins, thrice visiting my thatched cottage"—he referred precisely to these events.

 草廬之中諮臣以當世之事則非亮先詣備明矣雖聞見異  辭各生彼此然乖背至是亦良爲可怪 劉表長子琦亦深器亮表受後妻之言愛少子琮不悅於琦琦 每欲與亮謀自安之術亮輒拒塞未與處畫琦乃將亮游觀後 園共上高樓飮宴之間令人去梯因謂亮曰今日上不至天下 不至地言出子口入於吾耳可以言未亮答曰君不見申生在 内而危重耳在外而安乎琦意感悟陰規出計會黃祖死得出 遂爲江夏太守俄而表卒琮聞曹公來征遣使請降先主在樊 聞之率其眾南行亮與徐庶並從爲曹公所追被獲庶母庶辭 先主而指其心曰本欲與將軍共圖王霸之業者以此方寸之 地也今已失老母方寸亂矣無益於事請從此别遂詣曹公  魏畧曰庶先名福本單家子少好任俠擊劍中平末嘗爲人  報讐白堊突面被髮而走爲吏所得問其姓名閉口不言吏  乃於車上立柱維磔之擊皷以令於巿𨞬莫敢識者而其黨  伍共篡解之得脫於是感激棄其刀㦸更疎巾單衣折節學  問始詣精舍諸生聞其前作賊不肯與共止福乃卑躬早起  常獨掃除動靜先意聽習經業義理精熟遂與同郡石韜相  親愛初平中中州兵起乃與韜南客荆州到又與諸葛亮特  相善及荆州内附孔明與劉備相隨去福與韜俱來北至黃  初中韜仕厯郡守典農校尉福至右中郞將御史中丞逮太
Interpretation

In his thatched cottage, Liu Bei sought Zhuge Liang's counsel on matters of state—clearly it was not Zhuge Liang who took the initiative to join Liu Bei. Though various accounts differ in their details, the discrepancies are surprisingly vast.

Liu Biao's eldest son, Liu Qi, also held Zhuge Liang in high esteem. However, Liu Biao, swayed by his second wife, favored his younger son Liu Cong and disliked Liu Qi. Liu Qi repeatedly tried to consult Zhuge Liang on how to secure his own safety, but Zhuge Liang always declined to involve himself in such schemes. Later, Liu Qi took Zhuge Liang to the rear garden for a stroll, and together they ascended a high tower. While drinking, Liu Qi had the ladder removed and said to Zhuge Liang, "Now we are neither connected to heaven nor earth—what comes from your lips enters only my ears. Can you speak now?" Zhuge Liang replied, "Have you not heard the story of Shen Sheng, who remained in court and met disaster, while Chong Er fled into exile and found safety?" Liu Qi suddenly understood and secretly planned to leave. Coinciding with the death of Huang Zu, Liu Qi was able to take up the post of Governor of Jiangxia. Soon after, Liu Biao passed away, and when Liu Cong heard that Cao Cao was advancing, he sent envoys to surrender.

At the time, Liu Bei was in Fancheng. Upon receiving the news, he led his troops southward, with Zhuge Liang and Xu Shu accompanying him. When Cao Cao's forces caught up with them, Xu Shu was captured. As Xu Shu bid farewell to Liu Bei, he pointed to his chest and said, "I had wished to join you, General, in building a great enterprise, relying solely on this sincere heart. But now that my aged mother has been taken, my mind is in turmoil, and I can no longer serve you. I must take my leave." With that, he went over to Cao Cao.

According to the Weilüe, Xu Shu was originally named Xu Fu and came from a humble background. In his youth, he was fond of chivalrous deeds and swordsmanship. Toward the end of the Zhongping era, he once avenged someone by smearing his face with white powder and fleeing with disheveled hair, only to be captured by officials. When questioned for his name, he remained silent, so they tied him to a cart and paraded him through the streets, beating drums to summon onlookers who might identify him—yet no one dared to point him out. Later, his companions banded together to rescue him. Deeply affected by this experience, Xu Fu abandoned martial pursuits for scholarly ones, donning Confucian robes and devoting himself to study. When he first arrived at the academy, his fellow students, hearing of his past as a bandit, refused to share lodgings with him. Xu Fu humbled himself, rising early each day to sweep the grounds alone, observing others' expressions while focusing on his studies, until he mastered the classics and befriended Shi Tao from his commandery. During the turbulent years of the Chuping era, the two traveled south to Jing Province together, where they became especially close with Zhuge Liang. Later, when Jing Province submitted to Cao Cao, Zhuge Liang followed Liu Bei away, while Xu Fu and Shi Tao went north. By the Huangchu era, Shi Tao had risen to the rank of commandery governor and Commandant of Agriculture, while Xu Fu became a Right Palace Attendant and Imperial Censor.

 和中諸葛亮出隴右聞元直龎士元才如比歎曰魏殊多士  邪何彼二人不見用乎庶後數年病卒有碑在彭城今猶存焉 先主至於夏口亮曰事急矣請奉命求救於孫將軍時權擁 軍在柴桑觀望成敗亮說權曰海内大亂將軍起兵據有江東 劉豫州亦收眾漢南與曹操並爭天下今操芟夷大難畧已平 矣遂破荆州威震四海英雄無所用武故豫州遁逃至此將軍 量力而處之若能以吳越之眾與中國抗衡不如早與之絕若 不能當何不案兵束甲北面而事之今將軍外託服從之名而 内懷猶豫之計事急而不斷禍至無日矣權曰苟如君言劉豫 州何不遂事之乎亮曰田橫齊之壯士耳猶守義不辱况劉豫 州王室之冑英才葢世眾士慕仰若水之歸海若事之不濟此 乃天也安能復爲之下乎權勃然曰吾不能舉全吳之地十萬 之眾受制於人吾計決矣非劉豫州莫可以當曹操者然豫州 新敗之後安能抗此難乎亮曰豫州軍雖敗於長阪今戰士還 者及關羽水軍精甲萬人劉琦合江夏戰士亦不下萬人曹操 之眾遠來疲弊聞追豫州輕騎一日一夜行三百餘里此所謂 彊弩之末勢不能穿魯縞者也兵法忌之日必蹶上將軍且北 方之人不習水戰又荆州之民附操者偪兵勢耳非心服也今 將軍誠能命猛將統兵數萬與豫州協規同力破操軍必矣操
Interpretation

When Zhuge Liang was in Longyou, he heard of the exceptional talents of Xu Shu (styled Yuanzhi) and Pang Tong (styled Shiyuan), and sighed: "The Wei state abounds with capable men—why are these two worthies not employed?" Later, Xu Shu passed away from illness, and his memorial stele still stands in Pengcheng to this day.

As Liu Bei's forces retreated to Xiakou, Zhuge Liang, recognizing the dire situation, volunteered to seek aid from Sun Quan. At that time, Sun Quan was stationed at Chaisang, observing the unfolding events. Zhuge Liang advised him:

"The realm is in chaos. You, General Sun, hold the lands east of the Yangtze, while Imperial Uncle Liu (Liu Bei) has gathered the talents of Jing and Xiang—together, you could contend with Cao Cao. Yet Cao Cao has already pacified the north, conquered Jingzhou, and now his might shakes the realm. With no ground for heroes to act, Liu Bei has retreated here. You must weigh your strength: if you can oppose Cao Cao with the forces of Jiangdong, then sever ties at once. If not, why not submit early? To feign obedience while hesitating inwardly invites calamity."

Sun Quan retorted: "If that is so, why does Imperial Uncle Liu not surrender?"

Zhuge Liang replied: "Tian Heng was merely a stalwart of Qi, yet he held fast to his principles. How much more so Liu Bei, a scion of the Han imperial house, whose brilliance overshadows the age and whom the people revere as rivers flow to the sea? If his cause fails, it is Heaven’s will—how could he bow to another?"

Sun Quan’s expression darkened: "How could I surrender all of Wu and a hundred thousand troops to another’s control? My mind is made—none but Liu Bei can oppose Cao Cao. Yet he has just suffered defeat—how can he resist?"

Zhuge Liang analyzed the situation: "Though defeated at Changban, Guan Yu’s fleet of ten thousand elite marines remains intact, and Liu Qi’s Jiangxia forces also number ten thousand. Cao’s army, exhausted from their long march, has pursued us over three hundred li in a day—their strength is spent, like an arrow at the end of its flight. Northern soldiers are unaccustomed to naval warfare, and the people of Jingzhou submit to Cao Cao only under duress. If you, General Sun, dispatch a fierce commander with tens of thousands of troops to join forces with Liu Bei, Cao Cao will surely be defeated."

(Note: This historical account records Zhuge Liang’s critical diplomatic mission to Eastern Wu before the Battle of Red Cliffs, where his masterful rhetoric forged the Sun-Liu alliance. Phrases like "an arrow at the end of its flight" (彊弩之末) became enduring idioms, showcasing his keen military insight and diplomatic brilliance.)

軍破必北還如此則荆吳之勢彊鼎足之形成矣成敗之機在 於今日權大悅卽遣周瑜程普魯肅等水軍三萬隨亮詣先主 并力拒曹  袁子曰張子布薦亮於孫權亮不肯留人問其故曰孫將軍  可謂人主然觀其度能賢亮而不能盡亮吾是以不留臣松  之以爲袁孝尼著文立論甚重諸葛之爲人至如此言則失  之殊遠觀亮君臣相遇可謂希世一時終始之分誰能間之  甯有中違斷金甫懷擇主設使權盡其量便當翻然去就乎  葛生行巳豈其然哉關羽爲曹公所獲遇之甚厚可爲能盡  其用矣猶義不背本曾爲孔明之不若雲長乎 曹公敗於赤壁引軍歸鄴先主遂收江南以亮爲軍師中郞將 使督零陵桂陽長沙三郡調其賦稅以充軍實  零陵先賢傳云亮時住臨蒸 建安十六年益州牧劉璋遣法正迎先主使擊張魯亮與關羽 鎭荆州先主自葭萌還攻璋亮與張飛趙雲等率眾泝江分定 郡縣與先主共圍成都成都平以亮爲軍師將軍署左將軍府 事先主外出亮常鎭守成都足食足兵二十六年羣下勸先主 稱尊號先主未許亮說曰昔吳漢耿弇等初勸世祖卽帝位世 祖辭讓前後數四耿純進言曰天下英雄喁喁冀有所望如不 從議者士大夫各歸求主無爲從公也世祖感純言深至遂然 諾之今曹氏纂漢天下無主大王劉氏苖族紹世而起今卽帝
Interpretation

This passage recounts Zhuge Liang's significant deeds during the Three Kingdoms period:

When Sun Quan allied with Liu Bei to resist Cao Cao, Zhou Yu, Cheng Pu, and Lu Su led thirty thousand naval troops to assist Liu Bei alongside Zhuge Liang. When asked why he didn't remain to serve Sun Quan instead, Zhuge Liang remarked that while Sun Quan could employ worthy talents, he couldn't fully utilize his capabilities ("He can honor my worth but cannot exhaust my potential"). Later generations observed that the bond between Zhuge Liang and Liu Bei was a rare meeting of minds—one that precluded any shift in allegiance.

After the Battle of Red Cliffs, as Cao Cao retreated in defeat and Liu Bei secured control south of the Yangtze, Zhuge Liang was appointed General of the Household and Central Army Advisor, overseeing taxation in Lingling, Guiyang, and Changsha commanderies to bolster military supplies. In the 16th year of the Jian'an era (211 CE), when Liu Zhang, Governor of Yi Province, sent Fa Zheng to invite Liu Bei into Shu to attack Zhang Lu, Zhuge Liang remained in Jing Province with Guan Yu. Later, when Liu Bei turned from Jiameng to attack Liu Zhang, Zhuge Liang joined Zhang Fei, Zhao Yun, and others in leading troops upriver, pacifying various commanderies and counties before converging with Liu Bei to besiege Chengdu.

Following Chengdu's pacification, Zhuge Liang was appointed General of the Army and put in charge of the Left General's headquarters. During Liu Bei's campaigns, Zhuge Liang routinely garrisoned Chengdu, ensuring grain supplies and troop reinforcements. In the 26th year of Jian'an (221 CE), when court officials urged Liu Bei to proclaim himself emperor, he initially declined. Quoting Geng Chun's historical persuasion of Emperor Guangwu of Han to ascend the throne ("All heroes under heaven await their enlightened sovereign—if you refuse, they will seek another"), Zhuge Liang ultimately convinced Liu Bei to assume imperial authority.

This narrative highlights Zhuge Liang's exceptional political acumen and military prowess, as well as the profound ruler-minister bond he shared with Liu Bei.

位乃其宜也士大夫隨大王久勤苦者亦欲望尺寸之功如純 言耳先主於是卽帝位策亮爲丞相曰朕遭家不造奉承大統 競競業業不敢康甯思靖百姓懼未能綏於戲丞相亮其悉朕 意無怠輔朕之闕助宣重光以照明天下君其勖哉亮以丞相 錄尙書事假節張飛卒後領司隸校尉  蜀記曰晉初扶風王駿鎭關中司馬高平劉寶長史熒陽桓  隰諸官屬士大夫共論諸葛亮于時譚者多譏亮託身非所  勞困蜀民力小謀大不能度德量力金城郭冲以爲亮權智  英畧有踰管晏功業未濟論者惑焉條亮五事隱没不聞於  世者寶等亦不能復難扶風王慨然善冲之言臣松之以爲  亮之異美誠所願聞然冲之所說實皆可疑謹隨事難之如  左其一事曰亮刑法峻急刻剝百姓自君子小人咸懷怨歎  法正諫曰昔高祖入關約法三章秦民知德今君假借威力  跨據一州初有其國未垂惠撫且客主之義宜相降下願緩  刑弛禁以慰其望亮答曰君知其一未知其二秦以無道政  苛民怨匹夫大呼天下土崩高祖因之可以弘濟劉璋暗弱  自焉以來有累世之恩文法覊縻互相承奉德政不舉威刑  不肅蜀土人士專權自恣君臣之道漸以陵替寵之以位位  極則賤順之以恩恩竭則慢所以致弊實由於此吾今威之  以法法行則知恩限之以爵爵加則知榮榮恩並濟上下有
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses Zhuge Liang's governance philosophy and related controversies during his tenure as Chancellor of Shu Han in the Three Kingdoms period.

After Liu Bei ascended the throne, he appointed Zhuge Liang as Chancellor. In the imperial edict, Liu Bei expressed his diligent and cautious mindset upon inheriting the imperial mandate, hoping Zhuge Liang would assist him in governing the realm. Zhuge Liang not only served as Chancellor but also held the concurrent position of Imperial Secretary (responsible for court documents). Following Zhang Fei's death, he additionally assumed the role of Colonel-Director of Retainers (overseeing capital security).

Later, during the Western Jin dynasty, when Sima Jun, Prince of Fufeng, was stationed in Guanzhong, officials debated Zhuge Liang's legacy. Many at the time criticized him, arguing that aligning with Shu Han was a misguided choice and that his policies exhausted the people and resources without achieving great success. However, Guo Chong defended Zhuge Liang, presenting five overlooked examples to demonstrate that his abilities surpassed even those of Guan Zhong and Yan Ying. Pei Songzhi (the historian who annotated Records of the Three Kingdoms), while appreciating these discussions, raised doubts about Guo Chong's claims.

The most contentious issue was Zhuge Liang's strict legal code. Fa Zheng (a Shu Han strategist) once advised him, citing how Liu Bang won popular support by simplifying laws to three articles upon entering the Qin capital, and suggested Zhuge Liang mitigate punishments. Zhuge Liang replied: The Qin dynasty lost the empire due to tyranny, so Liu Bang could govern leniently. But Liu Zhang (the former Governor of Yi Province) ruled weakly, allowing local magnates to dominate Shu—thus, strict laws were necessary to establish authority. He advocated "governing through awe-inspiring laws" (wei zhi yi fa) alongside "restricting through noble ranks" (xian zhi yi jue), arguing that rigorous legalism would teach people gratitude, while measured enfeoffments would help them understand honor. Only through this balance, he believed, could proper governance be established.

 節爲治之要於斯而著難曰案法正在劉主前死今稱法正  諫則劉主在也諸葛職爲股肱事歸元首劉主之世亮猶未  領益州慶賞刑政不出於已尋冲所述亮答專自有其能有  違人臣自處之宜以亮謙順之體殆必不然又云亮刑法峻  急刻剝百姓未聞善政以刻剝爲稱其二事曰曹公遣刺客  見劉備方得交接開論伐魏形勢甚合備計稍欲親近刺者  尙未得便會旣而亮入魏客神色失措亮因而察之亦知非  常人須臾客如厠備謂亮曰向得奇士足以助君補益亮問  所在備曰起者其人也亮徐歎曰觀客色動而神懼視低而  忤數奸形外漏邪心内藏必曹氏刺客也追之巳越墻而走  難曰凡爲刺客皆暴虎憑河死而無悔者也劉主有知人之  鑒而惑於此客則此客亦一時之奇士也又語諸葛云足以  助君補益則亦諸葛之流亞也凡如諸葛之儔鮮有爲人作  刺客者矣時主亦當惜其器用必不投之死地也且此人不  死要應顯達爲魏竟是誰乎何其寂滅而無聞 章武三年春先主於永安病篤召亮於成都屬以後事謂亮曰 君才十倍曹丕必能安國終定大事若嗣子可輔輔之如其不 才君可自取亮涕泣曰臣敢竭股肱之力効忠貞之節繼之以 死先主又爲詔敕後主曰汝與丞相從事事之如父  孫盛曰夫杖道挾義體存信順然後能匡主濟功終定大業
Interpretation

This passage recounts several key historical episodes involving Zhuge Liang (courtesy name Kongming, posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu), the chancellor of Shu Han.

There appears to be chronological inconsistency regarding records of Fa Zheng (Liu Bei's chief strategist). Fa Zheng passed away while Liu Bei was still alive, and Zhuge Liang, as a subordinate, did not yet wield complete authority over rewards and punishments in Yi Province. Given Zhuge Liang's character—marked by humility and caution—it's unlikely he would act unilaterally in such matters. Some critiques accusing him of harsh legal enforcement and exploiting the people contradict his reputation for "benevolent governance."

A particularly intriguing anecdote involves an assassin: Cao Cao dispatched an assassin to approach Liu Bei. The two conversed harmoniously, with the assassin's analysis of the campaign against Wei greatly impressing Liu Bei. Just as the assassin was about to strike, Zhuge Liang suddenly entered and noticed the man's nervous demeanor. When the assassin excused himself to the restroom, Liu Bei enthusiastically praised having found an extraordinary talent. But Zhuge Liang astutely observed: "This man's shifty eyes and fearful expression mark him as an assassin." By the time they gave chase, the assassin had already scaled the wall and escaped. This account warrants scrutiny: genuine assassins are typically desperate outlaws, yet one capable of deceiving Liu Bei must have been exceptionally capable. A strategist of Zhuge Liang's caliber would hardly resort to assassination, and Liu Bei would surely have employed such talent.

In the spring of the third year of the Zhangwu era, Liu Bei lay critically ill at Yong'an and urgently summoned Zhuge Liang from Chengdu to entrust him with state affairs. Liu Bei declared: "Your abilities surpass Cao Pi's tenfold—you will surely stabilize our kingdom. If my son Liu Shan proves worthy, assist him; if not, you may assume the throne yourself." With tears, Zhuge Liang vowed to exhaust every effort. Liu Bei further commanded Liu Shan in an edict: "Serve the chancellor as you would your father."

Historian Sun Sheng remarked: Only those who uphold righteousness and maintain integrity can truly assist rulers in achieving great deeds. These accounts reveal Zhuge Liang's loyalty as a minister and the profound trust between ruler and subject during Liu Bei's deathbed entrustment of his heir.

 語曰奕者舉棊不定猶不勝其偶况量君之才否而二三其  節何以摧服强鄰囊括四海者乎備之命亮亂孰甚焉世或  有謂備欲以固委付之人且以一蜀人之志君子曰不然苟  所寄忠賢則不須若斯之誨如非其人不宜啟篡逆之塗是  以古之顧命必貽話言詭僞之辭非託孤之謂幸値劉禪闇  弱無猜險之性諸葛威畧足以檢衞異端故使異同之心無  由自起耳不然殆生疑隙不逞之釁謂之爲權不亦惑哉 建興元年封亮武鄉侯開府治事頃之又領益州牧政事無巨 細咸決於亮南中諸郡並皆叛亂亮以新遭大喪故未便加兵 且遣使聘吳因結和親遂爲與國  亮集曰是𡻕魏司徒華歆司空王朗尙書令陳羣太史令許  芝謁者僕射諸葛璋各有書於亮陳天命人事欲使舉國稱  藩亮遂不報書作正議曰昔在項羽起不由德雖處華夏秉  帝者之勢卒就湯鑊爲後永戒魏不審鑑今次之矣免身爲  幸戒在子孫而二三子各以耆艾之齒承僞指而進書有若  崇疎稱莽之功亦將偪於元禍苟免者邪昔世祖之創迹舊  基奮羸卒數千摧莽彊旅四十餘萬於昆陽之郊夫據道討  淫不在眾寡及至孟德以其譎勝之力舉數十萬之師救張  郃於陽平勢窮慮悔僅能自脫辱其鋒銳之眾遂喪漢中之  地深知神器不可妄獲旋還未至感毒而死子桓淫逸繼之
Interpretation

This passage recounts several significant events and statements from the life of Zhuge Liang (styled Kongming, posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu) during the Three Kingdoms period.

Regarding Liu Bei's entrusting of his orphaned heir to Zhuge Liang, contemporary critics remarked: "Even in chess, hesitation leads to defeat—how much more so when vacillating in selecting a ruler's talent? How could one conquer powerful enemies and unify the realm this way?" Liu Bei's deathbed bequest of the Shu Han legacy to Zhuge Liang was indeed a momentous decision. Some suggested Liu Bei acted thus to win popular support and secure the allegiance of Shu's people. But true gentlemen would never think this way—if entrusting affairs to loyal and worthy men, such stratagems become unnecessary; if given to unreliable persons, it would only pave the road to usurpation. Ancient rulers leaving orphaned heirs always provided final instructions, but never employed deceitful rhetoric. Fortunately, Liu Shan (Liu Bei's son) possessed a docile nature free of suspicion, while Zhuge Liang's prestige and strategic brilliance sufficed to deter dissent—thus no discord arose. Otherwise, suspicion and calamity might have followed, and calling this political maneuvering would be sheer folly.

In the first year of Jianxing (223 CE), Liu Shan enfeoffed Zhuge Liang as Marquis of Wuxiang, granting him authority to establish an administrative office. Later he additionally served as Governor of Yizhou (equivalent to provincial governor), deciding all governmental affairs great and small. Though southern commanderies were in rebellion, Zhuge Liang refrained from immediate military action due to Liu Bei's recent death, first dispatching envoys to reconcile with Eastern Wu and establish their alliance.

The Collected Works of Zhuge Liang records: That year, Wei officials including Minister Over the Masses Hua Xin, Minister of Works Wang Lang, Imperial Secretary Chen Qun, Grand Historian Xu Zhi, and Chief Palace Attendant Zhuge Zhang all wrote to Zhuge Liang, urging Shu's surrender to Wei using arguments about heavenly mandate and human affairs. Zhuge Liang declined to reply individually, instead composing Righteous Argument as his response: "Though Xiang Yu once dominated the Central Plains and proclaimed himself emperor, his failure to cultivate virtuous governance brought personal destruction and state collapse—a warning for later generations. Now Wei repeats these errors; preserving their lives would be fortunate enough, as calamity must extend to their descendants. Yet you veteran ministers obediently write surrender exhortations following false decrees, resembling those who flattered Wang Mang during his usurpation—how could you escape disaster? Emperor Guangwu of Han with mere thousands of exhausted troops crushed Wang Mang's 400,000 at Kunyang, proving that punishing the unprincipled requires no numerical superiority. Consider how Cao Cao (styled Mengde), employing deceitful tactics with hundreds of thousands of troops, came to rescue Zhang He at Yangping Pass only to suffer heavy losses and forfeit Hanzhong—then realizing heaven's mandate cannot be seized by force, he died poisoned during retreat. His son Cao Pi (styled Zihuan) succeeded him only to wallow in greater debauchery."

 以篡縱使二三子多逞蘇張詭靡之說奉進驩兜滔天之辭  欲以誣毁唐帝諷解禹稷所謂徒喪文藻煩勞翰墨者矣夫  大人君子之所不爲也又軍誡曰萬人必死橫行天下昔軒  轅氏整卒數萬制四方定海内况以數十萬之眾據道而臨  有罪可得干擬者哉 三年春亮率眾南征  詔賜亮金鈇鉞一具曲葢一前後羽葆鼓吹各一部虎賁六  十人事在亮集 其秋悉平軍資所出國以富饒  漢晉春秋曰亮在南中所在戰捷聞孟獲者爲蠻漢之所服  募生致之旣得使觀於營陣之間問曰此軍何如獲對曰向  者不知虛實故敗今䝉賜觀看營陣若祗如此卽定易勝耳  亮笑縱使更戰七縱七擒而亮猶遣獲獲止不去曰公天威  也南人不復反矣遂至滇池南中平皆卽其渠率而用之或  以諫亮亮曰若留外人則當留兵兵留則無所食一不易也  加蠻新傷破父兄死喪留外人而無兵者必成禍患二不易  也又蠻累有廢殺之罪自嫌釁重若留外人終不相信三不  易也今吾欲使不留兵不運糧而綱紀粗定蠻漢粗安故耳 乃治戎講武以俟大舉五年率諸軍北駐漢中臨發上疏曰先 帝創業未半而中道崩殂今天下三分益州疲弊此誠危急存 亡之秋也然侍衞之臣不懈於内忠志之士忘身於外者蓋追 先帝之殊遇欲報之於陛下也誠宜開張聖聽以光先帝遺德
Interpretation

This passage records Zhuge Liang's southern expedition and northern campaigns. At the time, some used sophistry (like the deceptive rhetoric of Su Qin and Zhang Yi) to slander ancient sage rulers Yao and Shun, as well as virtuous ministers Yu and Ji. Zhuge Liang considered such behavior beneath men of virtue (De). Quoting military strategy, he stated: "When ten thousand men unite in purpose, they become invincible under heaven. The Yellow Emperor once pacified the four directions with merely tens of thousands of troops—how much more can be accomplished now with several hundred thousand soldiers fighting for justice?"

In spring of the third year of Jianxing era, Zhuge Liang led the southern expedition. The imperial court bestowed upon him the golden battle-axe (symbolizing military command authority), a ceremonial canopy, an honor guard with feather decorations and musicians, plus sixty elite bodyguards. By autumn that year, he had pacified the Nanzhong region, acquiring substantial military supplies that enriched the state.

The Chronicles of Han and Jin records: After achieving repeated victories in Nanzhong, Zhuge Liang learned that local chieftain Meng Huo enjoyed deep popular support and ordered his capture alive. When brought before him, Meng Huo was shown around the military camp and remarked: "My earlier defeat came from not understanding your actual strength. Having seen your camp's condition now, I could surely win next time if it remains like this." Zhuge Liang laughed and released him to fight again. After seven captures and releases, Meng Huo finally submitted wholeheartedly, declaring: "The Chancellor's heavenly might makes us southerners dare not rebel again."

When advisors suggested leaving Han officials to govern Nanzhong, Zhuge Liang raised "Three Difficulties": stationed officials would require garrison troops, yet grain supplies were problematic; the war-torn region might breed chaos if officials stayed without military support; local chieftains, conscious of their grave offenses, would distrust outside administrators. Thus he adopted the strategy of "no garrisoned troops, no transported provisions," appointing native leaders to maintain order.

Before the northern expedition in Jianxing's fifth year, Zhuge Liang submitted the Memorial on the Expedition: "Our late emperor's unfinished enterprise ended at mid-course. Now with the realm divided in three and Shu-Han weakened, we stand at survival's critical juncture. Yet ministers remain loyal inside and out, all moved by the late emperor's kindness. Your Majesty should broaden channels for counsel and uphold his virtuous legacy."

(Note: "Huan Dou" refers to a wicked minister under Emperor Yao; "Yu and Ji" denote flood-controlling Great Yu and crop-teaching Lord Ji; "Dian Lake" lies in present-day Kunming, Yunnan)

恢弘志士之氣不宜妄自菲薄引喻失義以塞忠諫之路也宮 中府中俱爲一體陟罰臧否不宜異同若有作奸犯科及爲忠 善者宜付有司論其刑賞以昭陛下平明之理不宜偏私使内 外異法也侍中侍郞郭攸之費褘董允等此皆良實志慮忠純 是以先帝簡拔以遺陛下愚以爲宮中之事事無大小悉以諮 之然後施行必能裨補闕漏有所廣益將軍向寵性行淑均曉 暢軍事試用於昔日先帝稱之曰能是以眾議舉寵爲督愚以 爲營中之事悉以諮之必能使行陣和睦優劣得所親賢臣遠 小人此先漢所以興隆也親小人遠賢臣此後漢所以傾頺也 先帝在時每與臣論此事未嘗不歎息痛恨於桓靈也侍中尙 書長史參軍此悉貞良死節之臣願陛下親之信之則漢室之 隆可計日而待也臣本布衣躬耕於南陽苟全性命於亂世不 求聞達於諸侯先帝不以臣卑鄙猥自枉屈三顧臣於草廬之 中諮臣以當世之事由是感激遂許先帝以驅馳後値傾覆受 任於敗軍之際奉命於危難之間爾來二十有一年矣  臣松之案劉備以建安十三年敗遣亮使吳亮以建興五年  抗表北伐自傾覆至此整二十年然則備始與亮相遇在敗  軍之前二年時也 先帝知臣謹愼故臨崩寄臣以大事也受命以來夙夜憂歎恐 託付不效以傷先帝之明故五月渡瀘深入不毛
Interpretation

This passage comes from Zhuge Liang's Memorial on the Campaign, a petition written to Shu Han's later ruler Liu Shan before the Northern Expeditions. Its main content advises Liu Shan to govern diligently, drawing close to virtuous ministers while distancing from petty men, while also recounting Zhuge Liang's own journey following Liu Bei.

First, Zhuge Liang admonishes Liu Shan: As a ruler, he should inspire the morale of his subjects and not underestimate himself. The imperial palace and the chancellor's office are one entity, and the standards for rewards and punishments should be uniform. Those who commit crimes or demonstrate loyalty and good deeds should all be handed over to the relevant authorities for appropriate rewards or punishments according to the law—only then can the Dao of fair and just governance be upheld.

He particularly recommends several virtuous ministers: Court officials like Guo Youzhi, Fei Yi, and Dong Yun are all loyal and reliable, and all palace affairs, whether major or minor, may be consulted with them. General Xiang Chong is well-versed in military affairs, and camp matters may be entrusted to him. Zhuge Liang uses historical lessons to warn: Drawing close to virtuous ministers and distancing from petty men was the reason for the Western Han's prosperity; conversely, favoring petty men while alienating virtuous ministers led to the Eastern Han's decline. When the late Emperor Liu Bei was alive, he often spoke of the lessons from Emperor Huan and Emperor Ling of the Eastern Han with deep sorrow.

Next, Zhuge Liang recounts his own experience: Originally a commoner tilling the fields in Nanyang, he merely sought survival in chaotic times. The late Emperor Liu Bei, not disdaining his humble origins, visited his thatched cottage three times to consult on the affairs of the realm, deeply moving him into pledging allegiance. From the 13th year of Jian'an (208 CE), when Liu Bei, after suffering defeat, sent him as an envoy to Eastern Wu, to the 5th year of Jianxing (227 CE) when this memorial was submitted before the Northern Expeditions, a full twenty years had passed. On his deathbed, Liu Bei entrusted him with the affairs of state, and he has since been consumed with anxiety day and night, fearing he might fail in this heavy responsibility. Thus, in the 3rd year of Jianxing (225 CE), in the fifth month, he risked crossing the Lu River, venturing deep into the barren southern lands to suppress rebellions.

(Note: "Jian'an" was the era name of Emperor Xian of Han, while "Jianxing" was the era name of Shu Han's later ruler Liu Shan. The "Lu River" refers to the modern Jinsha River, and the "barren lands" indicate the southern region of Nanzhong at the time.)

 漢書地理志曰瀘河水出牂牁郡句町縣 今南方已定兵甲已足當奬率三軍北定中原庶竭駑鈍攘除 奸凶興復漢室還於舊都此臣所以報先帝而忠陛下之職分 也至於斟酌損益進盡忠言則攸之褘允之任也願陛下託臣 以討賊興復之效不效則治臣之罪以告先帝之靈責攸之褘 允等之慢以彰其咎陛下亦宜自謀以諮[輒-車言]善道察納雅言深 追先帝遺詔臣不勝受恩感激今當遠離臨表涕零不知所言 遂行屯於沔陽  郭冲三事曰亮屯於陽平遣魏延諸軍并兵東下亮惟留萬  人守城晉宣帝率二十萬眾拒亮而與延軍錯道徑至前當  亮六十里所偵候白宣帝說亮在城中兵少力弱亮亦知宣  帝垂至已與相偪欲前赴延軍相去又遠回迹反追勢不相  及將士失色莫知其計亮意氣自若敕軍中皆卧旗息皷不  得妄出菴幔又令大開四城門掃地𨚫洒宣帝常謂亮持重  而猥見勢弱疑其有伏兵於是引軍北趨山明日食時亮謂  參佐拊手大笑曰司馬懿必謂吾怯將有彊伏循山走矣候  邏還白如亮所言宣帝後知深以爲恨難曰案陽平在漢中  亮初屯陽平宣帝尙爲荆州都督鎭宛城至曹眞死後始與  亮於關中相抗禦耳魏嘗遣宣帝自宛由西城伐蜀値霖雨  不果此之前後無復有於陽平交兵事就如冲言宣帝旣舉
Interpretation

The Book of Han: Treatise on Geography records that the Lu River originates from Juting County in Zangke Commandery (present-day Guizhou region).

Now that the southern regions have been pacified and military supplies are abundant, it is time to rally the three armies to march north and stabilize the Central Plains. I shall exhaust my humble abilities to eradicate traitors, restore the Han dynasty, and return the imperial court to its former capital. This is my duty—to repay the late Emperor (Liu Bei) and serve Your Majesty (Liu Shan) with unwavering loyalty. As for weighing advantages and disadvantages or offering loyal counsel, that responsibility falls to Guo Youzhi, Fei Yi, Dong Yun, and others. I implore Your Majesty to entrust me with the task of quelling the rebels and reviving the Han dynasty. Should I fail, punish me for my crimes to appease the spirit of the late Emperor; at the same time, hold Guo Youzhi, Fei Yi, and Dong Yun accountable for their negligence to expose their shortcomings. Your Majesty must also deliberate carefully, seek wise counsel, and heed sound advice, earnestly adhering to the late Emperor’s final edict. Deeply moved by Your Majesty’s grace, I am overwhelmed with gratitude. Now, as I prepare to embark on this distant campaign, I face this memorial with tears streaming down my face, unable to find the right words.

Subsequently, Zhuge Liang led his troops to station at Mianyang (present-day Mian County, Shaanxi).

Guo Chong’s Three Accounts records: Zhuge Liang was stationed at Yangping Pass (west of present-day Mian County, Shaanxi) and dispatched generals such as Wei Yan to lead troops eastward, leaving only ten thousand soldiers to guard the city. Sima Yi (later known as Emperor Xuan of Jin) led an army of two hundred thousand to resist Zhuge Liang but, missing Wei Yan’s forces, advanced directly toward Zhuge Liang’s position, coming within sixty li. Scouts reported that Zhuge Liang’s city was weakly defended, and Zhuge Liang himself learned of Sima Yi’s imminent arrival—the situation was dire. By then, it was too late to regroup with Wei Yan, and the officers and soldiers were panicked, unsure of how to respond. Yet Zhuge Liang remained calm and composed. He ordered all banners lowered and drums silenced, forbidding any unauthorized movement, and commanded the city gates to be opened wide while the streets were swept and watered. Sima Yi, who had always regarded Zhuge Liang as cautious, now saw him feigning weakness and suspected an ambush. He thus withdrew his forces northward into the mountains. The next day, during a meal, Zhuge Liang clapped his hands and laughed, saying to his subordinates, “Sima Yi must have thought I was timid and had laid an ambush, which is why he retreated along the mountains.” Scouts later confirmed this exactly as Zhuge Liang had predicted. When Sima Yi later learned the truth, he deeply regretted his decision.

However, historical records show that Yangping Pass was located in Hanzhong. When Zhuge Liang first garrisoned Yangping, Sima Yi was still the Governor of Jingzhou, stationed in Wancheng (present-day Nanyang, Henan). It was only after Cao Zhen’s death that Sima Yi confronted Zhuge Liang in the Guanzhong region. The Wei state once ordered Sima Yi to attack Shu-Han from Wancheng via Xicheng (present-day Ankang, Shaanxi), but heavy rains prevented the campaign. Before this, the two sides had never clashed at Yangping Pass. Even if Guo Chong’s account were true, why would Sima Yi, leading a massive army, retreat so easily merely out of suspicion of an ambush? This clearly defies reason.

 二十萬眾已知亮兵少力弱若疑其有伏正可設防持重何  至便走乎案魏延傳云延每隨亮出輒欲請精兵萬人與亮  異道會於潼關亮制而不許延常謂亮爲怯歎已才用之不  盡也亮尙不以延爲萬人别統豈得如冲言頓使將重兵在  前而以輕弱自守乎且冲與扶風王言顯彰宣帝之短對子  毁父理所不容而云扶風王慨然善冲之言故知此書舉引  皆虛 六年春揚聲由斜谷道取郿使趙雲鄧芝爲疑軍據箕谷魏大 將曹眞舉眾拒之亮身率諸軍攻祁山戎陣整齊賞罰肅而號 令明南安天水安定三郡叛魏應亮關中響震  魏畧曰始國家以蜀中惟有劉備備旣死數𡻕蜀寂然無聞  是以畧無備預而卒聞亮出朝野恐懼隴右祁山尤甚故三  郡同時應亮 魏明帝西鎭長安命張郃拒亮亮使馬謖督諸軍在前與郃戰 於街亭謖違亮節度舉動失宜大爲郃所破亮拔西縣千餘家 還於漢中  郭冲四事曰亮出祁山隴西南安二郡應時降圍天水拔冀  城獲姜維驅畧士女數千人還蜀人皆賀亮亮顏色愀然有  戚容謝曰普天之下莫非漢民國家威力未舉使百姓困於  豺狼之吻一夫有死皆亮之罪以此相賀能不爲愧於是蜀  人咸知亮有吞魏之志非惟拓境而已難曰亮有吞魏之志  久矣不始於此眾人方知也且於時師出無成傷缺而反者
Interpretation

This passage primarily recounts several historical records and related controversies regarding Zhuge Liang's Northern Expeditions during the Three Kingdoms period.

Regarding the account of Wei Yan (a renowned Shu Han general): Whenever Wei Yan accompanied Zhuge Liang on campaigns, he frequently requested permission to lead ten thousand troops on a separate route to rendezvous with the main force at Tong Pass, but Zhuge Liang consistently refused. Wei Yan often believed Zhuge Liang was overly cautious and lamented that his talents remained underutilized. If Zhuge Liang wouldn't even permit Wei Yan to independently command ten thousand troops, how could he possibly have acted as Guo Chong (a Jin dynasty figure) described—placing the main force in front while personally leading weaker troops? Moreover, Guo Chong's remarks to Prince Fufeng (Sima Jun, son of Sima Yi) clearly disparaged Sima Yi (Emperor Xuan). For a son to listen to outsiders slandering his father violates ethical principles, making this account unreliable.

In the spring of the sixth year of Jianxing (228 AD), Zhuge Liang spread news of attacking Mei County via the Xie Valley route while sending Zhao Yun and Deng Zhi as decoy forces to occupy Ji Valley. The Wei general Cao Zhen led troops to block them. Meanwhile, Zhuge Liang personally commanded the main force to attack Qishan, maintaining strict military discipline. Three commanderies—Nan'an, Tianshui, and Anding—rebelled against Wei and responded to Shu, causing upheaval in the Guanzhong region. Wei records state that initially, the court considered only Liu Bei a threat to Shu Han. After Liu Bei's death, with Shu remaining inactive for years, Wei had let down its guard. The sudden news of Zhuge Liang's offensive caused panic throughout the court, particularly in the Longyou and Qishan regions, hence the simultaneous rebellion of the three commanderies.

Emperor Ming of Wei personally took command at Chang'an, dispatching Zhang He to resist Zhuge Liang. Zhuge Liang appointed Ma Su (styled Youchang) as vanguard to engage Zhang He at Jieting. However, Ma Su disregarded Zhuge Liang's battle plan, suffered defeat at Zhang He's hands, and was routed. Consequently, Zhuge Liang had to relocate over a thousand households from Xi County and retreat to Hanzhong.

Guo Chong's fourth account states: When Zhuge Liang marched on Qishan, the two commanderies of Longxi and Nan'an immediately surrendered. While besieging Tianshui, he recruited Jiang Wei (who later became a prominent Shu Han general) and brought back several thousand civilians. When Shu officials came to congratulate him, Zhuge Liang appeared troubled and said: "All people under heaven are subjects of Han. When the court's power proves insufficient, causing the people to suffer—every single death becomes my sin. Your congratulations only deepen my shame." Thereupon, the Shu officials realized Zhuge Liang's ambition was to conquer Wei, not merely expand territory. However, skeptics argue: Zhuge Liang's ambition to annex Wei was longstanding, not suddenly revealed then. Moreover, the expedition ultimately failed, resulting in lost troops and commanders before withdrawal.

 眾三郡歸降而不能有姜維天水之匹夫耳獲之則於魏何  損拔西縣千家不補街亭所喪以何爲功而蜀人相賀乎 戮謖以謝眾上疏曰臣以弱才叨竊非據親秉旄鉞以厲三軍 不能訓章明法臨事而懼至有街亭違命之闕箕谷不戒之失 咎皆在臣授任無方臣明不知人恤事多闇春秋責帥臣職是 當請自貶三等以督厥咎於是以亮爲右將軍行丞相事所總 統如前  漢晉春秋曰或勸亮更發兵者亮曰大軍在祁山箕谷皆多  於賊而不能破賊爲賊所破者則此病不在兵少也在一人  耳今欲滅兵省將明罰思過校變通之道於將來若不能然  者雖兵多何益自今已後諸有忠慮於國但勤攻吾之闕則  事可定賊可死功可蹻足而待矣於是考微勞甄壯烈引咎  責躬布所失於天下厲兵講武以爲後圖戎士簡練民忘其  敗矣亮聞孫權破曹休魏兵東下關中虛弱十一月上言曰  先帝慮漢賊不兩立王業不偏安故託臣以討賊也以先帝  之明量臣之才故知臣伐賊才弱敵强也然不伐賊王業亦  亡惟坐待亡孰與伐之是故託臣而弗疑也臣受命之日寢  不安席食不甘味思惟北征宜先入南故五月渡瀘深入不  毛并日而食臣非不自惜也顧王業不可得偏全於蜀都故  冒危難以奉先帝之遺意也而議者謂爲非計今賊適疲於
Interpretation

This passage primarily documents Zhuge Liang's self-reflection and subsequent actions following the defeat at Jieting.

Although the Shu Han kingdom had successfully incorporated three commanderies, they only gained an average talent like Jiang Wei, which did little to substantially weaken Wei's strength. While Zhuge Liang relocated over a thousand households from Xi County, it could not compensate for the losses suffered at Jieting. To quell public discontent, he executed Ma Su and submitted a memorial condemning himself: admitting that his inadequate abilities had led to his unsuitability for high office, that his leadership of the three armies had failed to enforce strict discipline, and that these shortcomings had resulted in the violations of orders at Jieting and the collapse at Jigu. He attributed all failures to his poor judgment in personnel and decision-making and, in accordance with the Spring and Autumn Annals principle that "the commander bears responsibility," requested a demotion of three ranks. Consequently, the court reduced him to General of the Right while still allowing him to act as chancellor.

Some advised Zhuge Liang to reinforce the army and resume the campaign. He analyzed the situation: at both Qishan and Jigu, their forces had outnumbered the enemy yet were defeated—proving the issue lay not in troop numbers but in command. What they needed now was to streamline the military, enforce clear rewards and punishments, reflect on mistakes, and study adaptive strategies. He publicly pledged that henceforth, all loyal subjects of the state could openly criticize his faults. He then commended meritorious officers, openly acknowledged his errors, and reorganized the army, gradually lifting the people’s spirits from the shadow of defeat.

When news arrived that Sun Quan had defeated Cao Xiu and Wei’s eastern redeployment left Guanzhong vulnerable, Zhuge Liang submitted a memorial in the eleventh month justifying another northern expedition: the late emperor had been acutely aware that Shu Han and Cao Wei could not coexist—rather than passively awaiting destruction, they must take the initiative to attack. Since inheriting this mandate, he had labored day and night, even risking the southern campaign to fulfill the late emperor’s will. Now, those opposing the expedition argued the timing was unfavorable, but with the enemy exhausted by Eastern Wu, this was precisely the opportune moment to strike.

 西又務於東兵法乘勞此進趨之時也謹陳其事如左高帝  明並日月謀臣淵深然陟險被創危然後安今陛下未及高  帝謀臣不如良平而欲以長計取勝坐定天下此臣之未解  一也劉繇王朗各據州郡論安言計動引聖人羣疑滿腹眾  難塞胸今𡻕不戰明年不征使孫䇿坐大遂并江東此臣之  未解二也曹操智計殊絶於人其用兵也髣髴孫吳然困於  南陽險於烏巢危於祁連偪於黎陽幾敗北山殆死潼關然  後僞定一時耳况臣才弱而欲以不危而定之此臣之未解  三也曹操五攻昌霸不下四越巢湖不成任用李服而李服  圖之委任夏侯而夏侯敗亡先帝每稱操爲能猶有此失况臣  駑下何能必勝此臣之未解四也自臣到漢中中間期年耳  然喪趙雲陽羣馬玉閻芝丁立白夀劉郃鄧銅等及曲長屯  將七十餘人突將無前賓叟青羌散騎武騎一千餘人此皆  數十年之内所糾合四方之精銳非一州之所有若復數年  則損三分之二也當何以圖敵此臣之未解五也今民窮兵  疲而事不可息事不可息則住與行勞費正等而不及早圖  之欲以一州之地與賊持久此臣之未解六也夫難平者事  也昔先帝敗軍於楚當此時曹操拊手謂天下巳定然後先  帝東連吳越西取巴蜀舉兵北征夏侯授首此操之失計而  漢事將成也然後吳更違盟關羽毁敗秭歸蹉跌曹丕稱帝
Interpretation

This passage presents Zhuge Liang (posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu) analyzing the contemporary political landscape, articulating six perplexities regarding the Shu Han dynasty's current predicament.

First, Zhuge Liang observes that even Emperor Gaozu of Han, Liu Bang—whose brilliance shone like the sun and moon—relied on advisors of profound wisdom yet still endured hardships before stabilizing the realm. Yet the present emperor (Liu Shan) lacks Gaozu’s capabilities, and his counselors fall short of strategists like Zhang Liang and Chen Ping. To pursue victory through prolonged defensive tactics despite these shortcomings is his first perplexity.

Next, he cites the examples of Liu Yao and Wang Lang, who controlled provinces but indulged in empty discussions of sagehood while vacillating in action, allowing Sun Ce to grow powerful and annex Jiangdong. Failing to take the initiative now risks repeating their mistakes—his second perplexity.

Third, he notes that even Cao Cao, whose military genius seemed divine, repeatedly found himself in peril. Acknowledging his own inferiority to Cao Cao, Zhuge Liang questions how he could pacify the realm without taking risks—his third perplexity.

Fourth, he continues with Cao Cao’s example, pointing out five failed campaigns against Chang Ba and four fruitless crossings of Lake Chao, alongside frequent misjudgments in appointments. The late Emperor Liu Bei often praised Cao Cao’s abilities, yet even he suffered these defeats. How then, with his own mediocrity, could Zhuge Liang guarantee victory? This is his fourth perplexity.

Fifth, he grieves over the losses sustained since arriving in Hanzhong over a year prior: more than seventy commanders, including Zhao Yun, and over a thousand elite cavalry—veterans accumulated over decades. If this continues, two-thirds will be lost within years, leaving them even weaker against the enemy.

Finally, he highlights the present hardships: the people impoverished, the army exhausted, yet warfare cannot cease. Rather than delay, it would be better to act now, as maintaining the status quo consumes resources comparable to launching an offensive. To imagine sustaining prolonged resistance against the enemy with a single province is his sixth perplexity.

Zhuge Liang concludes: The ways of the world are unpredictable. When the late emperor suffered defeat in Chu, Cao Cao assumed the realm was settled—yet later, the emperor allied with Wu, secured Bashu, and saw Xiahou Yuan fall during the northern campaign. Tragically, Wu later betrayed the alliance, Guan Yu was defeated, and Cao Pi declared himself emperor. All this demonstrates the inconstancy of the world’s tides.

 凡事如是難可逆料臣鞠躬盡瘁死而後已至於成敗利鈍  非臣之明所能逆覩也於是有散關之役此表亮集所無出  張儼默記 冬亮復出散關圍陳倉曹眞拒之亮糧盡而還魏將王雙率騎 追亮亮與戰破之斬雙七年亮遣陳式攻武都陰平魏雍州剌 史郭淮率眾欲擊式亮自出至建威淮退還遂平二郡 漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集卷之三  傳                 蜀誌 詔䇿亮曰街亭之役君引愆深自貶抑重違君意聽順所守前 年燿師馘斬王雙今𡻕爰征郭淮遁走降集氐羌興復二郡威 震凶㬥功勳顯然方今天下騷擾元惡未梟君受大任而久自 挹損非所以光揚洪烈矣今復君丞相君其勿辭  漢晉春秋曰是𡻕孫權稱尊號其羣臣以並尊二帝來告議  者咸欲絶其盟好亮曰權有僭逆之心久矣國家所以畧其  釁情者求犄角之援也今若加顯絶便當移兵東戍與之角  力須并其土乃議中原彼賢才尙多將相緝穆未可一朝定  也頓兵相持坐而須老使北賊得計非算之上者昔孝文卑  辭匃奴先帝優與吳盟皆應權變通弘思遠益非匹夫之爲  分者也今議者咸以權利在鼎足不能併力且志望已滿無  上岸之情推此皆似是而非也何者其智力不侔故限江自  保權之不能越江猶魏賊之不能渡漢非力有餘而利不取
Interpretation

This passage records significant achievements of Zhuge Liang (posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu), the Chancellor of Shu Han during the Three Kingdoms period, along with the imperial court's evaluation of him.

Regarding military campaigns: During the Battle of San Pass, Zhuge Liang retreated due to depleted supplies, but when the Wei general Wang Shuang led cavalry in pursuit, Zhuge Liang defeated and killed him. In the seventh year of Jianxing, Zhuge Liang dispatched Chen Shi to attack the two commanderies of Wudu and Yinping. Guo Huai, the Governor of Yong Province under Wei, led troops to counter, but Zhuge Liang personally advanced to Jianwei, forcing Guo Huai to withdraw. Shu Han successfully reclaimed these two commanderies.

When Emperor Liu Shan reinstated Zhuge Liang as Chancellor, his edict praised: "After the defeat at Jieting, you took responsibility and demoted yourself. Last year, you led troops to slay Wang Shuang; this year, you campaigned to repel Guo Huai, subdued the Di and Qiang tribes, and recovered two commanderies—your might shook the enemy, and your merits are profound. Now, the realm remains in turmoil, and Cao Wei remains unvanquished. Though you bear a heavy responsibility, you have long humbled yourself, which does not serve the grand legacy of the late Emperor. We hereby restore you as Chancellor—do not decline."

The Han Jin Chunqiu records: When Sun Quan declared himself emperor, many Shu Han officials advocated severing the Shu-Wu alliance. Zhuge Liang analyzed: "Sun Quan has long harbored ambitions to usurp the imperial title. Our forbearance aims to secure an ally against Wei. An open rift would force us to divide our forces, benefiting Wei instead." Citing precedents—Emperor Wen of Han's conciliatory stance toward the Xiongnu and the late Emperor’s (Liu Bei's) alliance with Wu—he argued this was strategic necessity. "Some claim Sun Quan is content with a tripartite division, but this view is misleading. Sun Quan only defends the Yangtze because his strength is insufficient, just as Wei cannot cross the Han River—not for lack of ambition."

 也若夫大軍致討彼上當分裂其地以爲後規下當畧民廣  境示武於内非端坐者也若就其不動而睦於我我之北伐  無東顧之憂河南之眾不得盡西此之爲利亦巳深矣權僭  之罪未宜明也乃遣衞尉陳震慶權正號 九年亮復出祁山以木牛運  漢晉春秋曰亮圍祁山招鮮卑軻比能比能等至故北地石  城以應亮於是魏大司馬曹眞有疾司馬宣王自荆州入朝  魏明帝曰西方事重非君莫可付者乃使西屯長安督張郃  費曜戴陵郭淮等宣王使曜陵留精兵四千守上邽餘眾悉  出西救祁山郃欲分兵駐雍郿宣王曰料前軍能獨當之者  將軍言是也若不能當而分爲前後此楚之三軍所以爲黥  布禽也遂進亮分兵留攻自逆宣王於上邽郭淮費曜等徼  亮亮破之因大芟刈其麥與宣王遇於上邽之東歛兵依險  軍不得交亮引而還宣王尋亮至於鹵城張郃曰彼遠來逆  我我請戰不得謂我利不在戰欲以長計制之也且祁山知  大軍以在近人情自固可止屯於此分爲奇兵示出其後不  宜進前而不敢偪坐失民望也今亮縣軍食少亦行去矣宣  王不從故尋亮旣至又登山掘營不肯戰賈栩魏平數請戰  因曰公畏蜀如虎奈天下笑何宣王病之諸將咸請戰五月  辛巳乃使張郃攻無當監何千於南圍自案中道向亮亮使
Interpretation

This historical account documents the military standoff between Zhuge Liang during his Northern Expeditions and the Cao Wei general Sima Yi (Sima Xuanwang). At the time, Zhuge Liang led his troops to besiege Mount Qi, coordinating with the Xianbei tribal leader Kebineng for joint operations. Emperor Ming of Wei, facing urgent military threats in the west, dispatched Sima Yi to Chang'an to oversee the campaign.

Sima Yi deployed part of his forces to hold Shanggui (present-day Tianshui, Gansu) while leading the main army westward to relieve Mount Qi. General Zhang He suggested dividing their troops to defend Yongmei, but Sima Yi argued that dispersing their forces would make them vulnerable to piecemeal defeat, much like how Xiang Yu's army had been overcome by Qing Bu. When Zhuge Liang saw Wei reinforcements approaching, he split his own forces to contain them while leading the main army to establish defensive positions east of Shanggui, harvesting local wheat to replenish supplies. Both armies maintained their positions cautiously, neither side initiating battle easily.

Zhang He analyzed that the Shu forces, operating far from home with limited provisions, would be best countered through defensive tactics, yet Sima Yi insisted on pursuit. Later during the standoff at Lucheng, Wei generals Jia Xu and Wei Ping repeatedly petitioned to attack, taunting Sima Yi for "fearing Shu like tigers," ultimately forcing him to order Zhang He to assault the Shu southern encirclement. This record reveals the intricate strategic interplay between Zhuge Liang's northern campaigns and Wei's countermeasures, particularly highlighting Sima Yi's decision-making process under pressure from his subordinates.

 魏延高翔吳班赴拒大破之獲甲首三千級玄鎧五千領角  弩三千一百張宣王還保營 糧盡退軍與魏將張郃交戰射殺郃  郭冲五事曰魏明帝自征蜀幸長安遣宣王督張郃諸軍雍  涼勁卒三十餘萬潛軍密進規向劍閣亮時在祁山旌旗利  器守在險要十二更下在者八萬時魏軍治陳旛兵適交參  佐咸以賊眾强盛非力所制宜權停下兵一月以併聲勢亮  曰吾統武行師以大信爲本得原失信古人所惜去者束裝  以待期妻子鶴望而計日雖臨征難義所不廢皆催遣令去  於是去者感悅願留一戰住者憤踴思致死命相謂曰諸葛  公之恩死猶不報也臨戰之日莫不拔刀爭先以一當十殺  張郃𨚫宣王一戰大尅此信之由也難曰臣松之案亮前出  祁山魏明帝身至長安耳此年不復自來且亮大軍在關壟  魏人何由得越亮徑向劍閣亮旣出戰場本無久住之規而  方休兵還蜀皆非經通之言孫盛習鑿齒搜求異同罔有所  遺而並不多載冲言知其乖剌矣 十二年春亮率大眾由斜谷出以流馬運據武功五丈原與司 馬宣王對於渭南亮每患糧不繼使已志不伸是以分兵屯田 爲久住之基耕者雜於渭濱居民之間而百姓安堵軍無私焉  漢晉春秋曰亮自至數挑戰宣王亦表固請戰使衞尉辛毗  持節以制之姜維謂亮曰辛佐治仗節而到賊不復出矣亮
Interpretation

This passage documents several pivotal campaigns during Zhuge Liang's Northern Expeditions in the Three Kingdoms period, showcasing the military operations of the Shu Han forces and Zhuge Liang's philosophy of army management.

Generals Wei Yan, Gao Xiang, and Wu Ban led their troops to engage the enemy, decisively defeating the Wei army and capturing 3,000 sets of armor, 5,000 iron breastplates, and 3,100 powerful crossbows. The Wei commander Sima Yi (Xuanwang) was forced to retreat to his fortified camp. Later, when the Shu army withdrew due to exhausted provisions, they clashed with Wei general Zhang He and killed him with arrows.

The fifth account recorded by Guo Chong mentions: Emperor Ming of Wei personally led an expedition against Shu Han, establishing his command at Chang'an while appointing Sima Yi to lead generals including Zhang He, mustering over 300,000 elite troops from Yong and Liang provinces to secretly advance toward Jiange. At that time, Zhuge Liang was garrisoned at Qishan, deploying defenses using the treacherous terrain, with 80,000 soldiers remaining on rotational duty. Facing the overwhelming Wei forces, subordinate officers suggested postponing the troop rotation to project greater strength. However, Zhuge Liang insisted on the principle that "army discipline must be rooted in trustworthiness," maintaining that promised rotation dates couldn't be dishonored. Deeply moved, the soldiers scheduled to return home voluntarily requested to stay and fight, while the remaining garrison troops also had their morale boosted, pledging absolute loyalty. Ultimately in battle, every soldier fought courageously against the odds, defeating Sima Yi and killing Zhang He.

However, Pei Songzhi (styled Chen) verified through textual research: While Emperor Ming of Wei did indeed visit Chang'an during Zhuge Liang's earlier Qishan campaign, he didn't personally lead this expedition. Moreover, with Shu's main forces deployed in the Guanzhong-Longyou region, the Wei army couldn't possibly bypass Zhuge Liang to attack Jiange directly. Historical records by Sun Sheng and Xi Zuochi didn't adopt Guo Chong's version, indicating clear problems with his account.

In spring of the 12th year of Jianxing reign, Zhuge Liang again led a major army through the Xie Valley route, using improved "flowing horse" transport vehicles (modified wooden oxen) for supplies, encamping at Wuzhangyuan in Wugong County. Facing Sima Yi across the Wei River's southern bank, Zhuge Liang implemented military farming along the river to solve supply issues, maintaining harmonious relations with local civilians through strict discipline. According to Han-Jin Annals, despite Zhuge Liang's repeated challenges, Sima Yi refused to engage. When Wei's Emperor dispatched Palace Guard Xin Pi bearing the imperial scepter (representing the emperor) to supervise the army, Jiang Wei told Zhuge Liang: "With Xin Pi carrying the ceremonial staff, the Wei army will be even less likely to give battle."

 曰彼本無戰情所以固請戰者以示武於其眾耳將在軍君  命有所不受苟能制吾豈千里而請戰耶  魏氏春秋曰亮使至問其寢食及其事之煩簡不問戎事使  對曰諸葛公夙興夜寐罰二十以上皆親擥焉所噉食不至  數升宣王曰亮將死矣 相持百餘日其年八月亮疾病卒於軍時年五十四  魏書曰亮糧盡勢窮憂恚嘔血一夕燒營遁走入谷道發病  卒  漢晉春秋曰亮卒於郭氏塢  晉陽秋曰有星赤而芒角自東北西南流投於亮營三投再  還往大還小俄而亮卒  臣松之以爲亮在渭濱魏人躡跡勝負之形未可測量而云  嘔血葢因亮自亡而自誇大也夫以孔明之畧豈爲仲達嘔  血乎及至劉琨喪師與晉元帝箋亦云亮軍敗嘔血此則引  虛記以爲言也其云入谷而卒緣蜀人入谷發喪故也 及軍退宣王案行其營壘處所曰天下奇才也  漢晉春秋曰楊儀等整軍而出百姓奔吿宣王宣王追焉姜  維令儀反旗鳴鼓若將向宣王者宣王乃退不敢偪於是儀  結陣而去入谷然後發喪宣王之退也百姓爲之諺曰死諸  葛走生仲達或以吿宣王宣王曰吾能料生不便料死也 亮遺命葬漢中定軍山因山爲墳冡足容棺斂以時服不須器 物詔䇿曰惟君體資文武明叡篤誠受遺託孤匡輔朕躬繼絶 興微志存靖亂爰整六師無𡻕不征神武赫然威震八荒將建
Interpretation

This historical account records the final years of Zhuge Liang (courtesy name Kongming, posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu) during his Northern Expeditions. At that time, Zhuge Liang faced off against Sima Yi (courtesy name Zhongda, later posthumously honored as King Xuan of Jin) across the Wei River, with Sima Yi steadfastly refusing battle. When Zhuge Liang sent an envoy to the Wei camp, the messenger was only questioned about trivial matters like Zhuge's daily routine and diet, with no discussion of military affairs. Upon hearing that Zhuge Liang personally attended to every matter and ate very little, Sima Yi predicted his rival wouldn't live much longer.

After over a hundred days of stalemate, Zhuge Liang indeed passed away in camp at age 54. Wei's official histories claimed he died vomiting blood from distress over exhausted supplies and military defeat, but historian Pei Songzhi (who annotated Records of the Three Kingdoms) considered this Wei propaganda. Contemporary celestial phenomena showed an unusual red meteor streaking toward the Shu camp shortly before Zhuge Liang's death.

Following Zhuge Liang's demise, subordinates Yang Yi and Jiang Wei (his designated military successor) led the retreat. When Sima Yi pursued, the Shu troops suddenly reversed their banners in feigned counterattack, frightening Sima Yi into withdrawal—giving rise to the folk saying "Dead Zhuge scares away living Zhongda." Later inspecting Zhuge Liang's camp fortifications, Sima Yi marveled at him as "a rare genius under heaven."

Zhuge Liang's final instructions requested burial at Dingjun Mountain in Hanzhong, with a hillside grave just large enough for his coffin. He specified burial in ordinary clothes without funerary objects. The imperial edict praised his unparalleled civil-martial talents, diligent loyalty in assisting the young ruler, and determination to pacify the chaotic age—lauding how his years of campaigns awed the realm, and how his great undertaking was cut short at its peak.

(Note: "King Xuan" refers to Sima Yi, posthumously honored by his grandson Sima Yan; "Zhongda" was Sima Yi's courtesy name; "Liang" denotes Zhuge Liang; "Jiang Wei" was Zhuge's chosen military successor; "Yang Yi" was a Shu Han official)

殊功於季漢參伊周之巨勳如何不弔事臨垂克遘疾隕喪朕 用傷悼肝心若裂夫崇德序功紀行命諡所以光昭將來刋載 不朽今使使持節左中郎將杜瓊贈君丞相武鄉侯印綬諡君 爲忠武侯魂而有靈嘉茲寵榮嗚呼哀哉鳴呼哀哉初亮自表 後主曰成都有桑八百株薄田十五頃子孫衣食自有餘饒至 於臣在外任無别調度隨身衣食悉仰於官不别治生以長尺 寸若臣死之日不使内有餘帛外有贏財以負陛下及卒如其 所言亮性長於巧思損益連弩木牛流馬皆出其意推演兵法 作八陣圖咸得其要云  魏氏春秋曰亮作八務七戒六恐五懼皆有條章以訓厲臣  子又損益連弩謂之元戎以鐵爲矢矢長八寸一弩十矢俱  發  亮集載木牛流馬法木牛方腹曲頭一脚四足頭入領中舌  著於腹載多而行少特行者數十里羣行者二十里曲爲牛  頭雙爲牛脚橫爲牛領轉爲牛足覆爲牛背方爲牛腹垂者  爲牛舌曲者爲牛肋刻者爲牛齒立者爲牛角細者爲牛鞅  攝者爲牛鞦軸牛仰雙轅人行六尺牛行四歩載一𡻕糧日  行二十里而人不勞流馬肋長三尺五寸廣三寸厚二寸二  分左右同前軸孔分墨去頭四寸徑中二寸前脚孔分墨二  寸去前軸孔四寸五分廣一寸前杠孔去前脚孔分墨二寸  七分孔長二寸廣一寸後軸孔去前杠分墨一尺五分大小
Interpretation

Zhuge Liang (courtesy name Kongming, posthumous title Marquis Zhongwu) rendered outstanding service to the Shu Han dynasty, comparable to virtuous ministers like Yi Yin of the Shang dynasty and the Duke of Zhou in the Zhou dynasty. It is profoundly regrettable that he succumbed to illness at the threshold of completing his life's work, leaving me (Emperor Liu Shan) utterly grief-stricken. To honor his virtue and achievements, I have dispatched Left General of the Household Du Qiong to posthumously confer the Prime Minister's seal and ribbons, bestowing the posthumous title "Marquis Zhongwu." May his heroic spirit receive this honor.

During his lifetime, Zhuge Liang memorialized to me: "In Chengdu, I possess only eight hundred mulberry trees and fifteen qing of marginal farmland—sufficient to keep my descendants clothed and fed. While serving abroad, all expenses were covered by my official salary without any private enterprises. At my death, my household shall hold no surplus wealth, proving myself worthy of Your Majesty's trust." Events later unfolded exactly as he predicted.

His inventive genius manifested in multiple domains: he enhanced the repeating crossbow (a rapid-fire archery weapon), designed the "wooden ox and flowing horse" transport devices, and developed the Eight Formation Diagrams military tactics through strategic deduction. According to the Wei Shi Chunqiu chronicles, he also established administrative regulations including the "Eight Duties, Seven Admonitions, Six Cautions and Five Vigilances" to instruct officials.

Technical details of his inventions: His improved repeating crossbow, called the "Yuanrong Crossbow," fired ten iron-tipped bolts per volley. The wooden ox featured ingenious craftsmanship—a square belly with curved head and four articulated legs, capable of transporting heavy loads steadily over dozens of li daily. The flowing horse's specifications were meticulously documented: ribs measuring three chi five cun, precisely positioned front/rear axle holes, and scientifically optimized structure. These innovations dramatically reduced logistical burdens, enabling twenty-li daily marches without exhausting the troops.

(Note: The term "fenmo" refers to ancient carpentry measurement units marked by ink lines.)

 與前同後脚孔分墨去後軸孔三寸五分大小與前同後杠  孔去後脚孔分墨二寸七分後載尅去後杠孔分墨四寸五  分前杠長一尺八寸廣二寸厚一寸五分後杠與等板方囊  二枚厚八分長二尺七寸高一尺六寸五分廣一尺六寸每  枚受米二斛三斗從上杠孔去肋下七寸前後同上杠孔去  下杠孔分墨一尺三寸孔長一寸五分廣七分八孔同前後  四脚廣二寸厚一寸五分形制如象靬長四寸徑面四寸三  分孔徑中三脚杠長二尺一寸廣一寸五分厚一寸四分同  杠耳 亮言教書奏多可觀别爲一集景曜六年春詔爲亮立廟於沔 陽  襄陽記曰亮初亡所在各求爲立廟朝議以禮秩不聽百姓  遂因時節私祭之於道陌上言事者或以爲可聽立廟於成  都者後主不從步兵校尉習隆中書郞向充等共上表曰臣  聞周人懷召伯之德甘棠爲之不伐越王思范蠡之功鑄金  以存其像自漢興以來小善小德而圖形立廟者多矣况亮  德範遐邇勳葢季世興王室之不壞實斯人是賴而蒸嘗止  於私門廟像闕而莫立使百姓巷祭戎蠻野祀非所以存德  念功述追在昔者也今若盡順民心則瀆而無典建之京師  又偪宗廟此聖懷所以惟疑也臣愚以爲宜因近其墓立之  於沔陽使所親屬以時賜祭凡其臣故吏欲奉祠者皆限至  廟斷其私祀以崇正禮於是始從之
Interpretation

This passage documents the historical process of establishing a temple and conducting sacrifices for Zhuge Liang, the chancellor of Shu Han during the Three Kingdoms period, after his death.

During his lifetime, Zhuge Liang's edicts, official documents, and memorials were exceptionally well-written and were compiled into a separate collection. In the spring of the sixth year of the Jingyao era (263 CE), the imperial court issued an edict to establish a temple for Zhuge Liang in Mianyang (present-day Mian County, Shaanxi).

According to Records of Xiangyang: Shortly after Zhuge Liang's death, people from various regions petitioned to build a temple in his honor, but the court deemed it inappropriate according to ritual regulations. As a result, the common people spontaneously held sacrifices for him by the roadside. Later, some proposed establishing a temple in Chengdu, but Emperor Liu Shan did not approve. Infantry Commandant Xi Long and Court Secretary Xiang Chong, among others, jointly submitted a memorial stating:

"We have heard that the people of the Zhou dynasty cherished the virtue of Duke Shao so deeply that they could not bear to cut down the sweet pear tree under which he once rested. King Goujian of Yue, grateful for Fan Li's contributions, cast a bronze statue to commemorate him. Since the founding of the Han dynasty, many individuals of even minor virtue have had portraits and temples erected in their honor—how much more so for Zhuge Liang, whose moral influence was renowned far and wide, whose achievements surpassed his era, and who was the pivotal figure in sustaining the imperial house. Yet now, sacrifices to him are held only in private homes, with no official temple or statue, while commoners offer worship in the streets and border residents conduct rites in the wilderness. This does not align with the tradition of honoring merit and remembering sages.

"To fully indulge popular sentiment might violate ritual propriety, yet constructing a temple in the capital would place it too close to the imperial ancestral shrines. We propose establishing a temple near his burial site (Mount Dingjun) in Mianyang, allowing his relatives to conduct seasonal sacrifices there. His former subordinates who wish to pay respects should do so at the temple, while private sacrifices should be prohibited to uphold proper ceremonial decorum." In the end, the court adopted this suggestion.

(Note: The first half of the passage, which mentions mechanical components such as "lever holes," appears to be an unrelated fragment of ancient technical instructions that may have been mistakenly inserted, as it has no connection to the main subject of Zhuge Liang's temple.)

秋魏鎭西將軍鍾會征蜀至漢川祭亮之廟令軍士不得於亮 墓所左右芻牧樵採亮弟均官至長水校尉亮子瞻嗣爵  襄陽記曰黃承彥者高爽開列爲沔南名士謂諸葛孔明曰  聞君擇婦身有醜女黃頭黑色而才堪相配孔明許卽載送  之時人以爲笑樂鄉里諺曰莫作孔明擇婦正得阿承醜女 諸葛氏集目錄   開府作牧第一     權制第二   南征第三       北出第四   計算第五       訓厲第六   綜覈上第七      綜覈下第八   雜言上第九      雜言下第十   貴和第十一      兵要第十二   傅運第十三      與孫權書第十四   與諸葛瑾書第十五   與孟達書第十六   廢李平第十七     法檢上第十八   法檢下第十九     科令上第二十   科令下第二十一    軍令上第二十二   軍令中第二十三    軍令下第二十四  右二十四篇凡十萬四千一百一十二字 臣夀等言臣前在著作郞侍中領中書監濟北侯臣荀勖中書 令關内侯臣和嶠奏使臣定故蜀丞相諸葛亮故事亮毗佐危 國負阻不賓然猶存錄其言恥善有遺誠是大晉光明至德澤 被無疆自古以來未之有倫也輒刪除複重隨類相從凡爲二 十四篇篇名如右亮少有逸羣之才英霸之器身長八尺容貌
Interpretation

This passage records the deeds of Zhuge Liang, Chancellor of the Shu Han during the Three Kingdoms period, along with a catalog of his collected works.

When Zhong Hui, General Who Guards the West of the Wei state, launched an attack on Shu Han, he passed through the Hanzhong region and made a special visit to Zhuge Liang’s shrine to pay homage. He also ordered his soldiers not to graze livestock or gather firewood near Zhuge Liang’s tomb. Zhuge Liang’s younger brother, Zhuge Jun, held the position of Colonel of Changshui, while his son, Zhuge Zhan, inherited his noble title.

The Xiangyang Ji recounts an amusing anecdote: Huang Chengyan, a renowned scholar from the Miannan region, once said to Zhuge Liang, "I hear you are seeking a wife. I have an unattractive daughter—yellow-haired and dark-skinned—but her talents match yours." Zhuge Liang agreed to the proposal and promptly married her. At the time, people found this amusing, and a local saying emerged: "Don’t follow Zhuge Liang’s example in choosing a wife, ending up with the ugly Huang girl."

The text then lists the twenty-four chapters of The Collected Works of the Zhuge Clan, including Establishing the Government and Governing the People, Temporary Regulations, Southern Campaign, Northern Expedition, and other military and administrative writings, totaling 104,112 characters.

Finally, the compilers—Chen Shou and others—note that they were commissioned by Xun Xu and He Qiao, high-ranking officials of the Jin dynasty, to compile and edit the works of the late Shu Han Chancellor Zhuge Liang. Although Zhuge Liang had served Shu Han, a rival state to Jin, the Jin court preserved his writings as a testament to the dynasty’s magnanimous virtue. The editors removed redundant material and organized the texts into twenty-four categorized chapters. They also praised Zhuge Liang for his extraordinary talent even in his youth, standing eight chi tall (approximately 1.84 meters) and possessing a dignified appearance.

甚偉時人異焉遭漢末擾亂隨叔父玄避難荆州躬耕於野不 求聞達時左將軍劉備以亮有殊量乃三顧亮於草廬之中亮 深謂備雄姿傑出遂解帶寫誠厚相結納及魏武帝南征荆州 劉琮舉州委質而備失勢眾寡無立錐之地亮時年二十七乃 建奇䇿身使孫權求援吳會權旣宿服仰備又覩亮奇雅甚敬 重之卽遣兵三萬人以助備備得用與武帝交戰大破其軍乘 勢克捷江南悉平後備又西取益州益州旣定以亮爲軍師將 軍備旣稱尊號拜亮爲丞相錄尙書事及備殂没嗣子幼弱事 無巨細亮皆專之於是外連東吳内平南越立法施度整理戎 旅工械技巧物究其極科教嚴明賞罰必信無惡不懲無善不 顯至於吏不容奸人懷自厲道不拾遺彊不侵弱風化肅然也 當此之時亮之素志進欲龍驤虎視包括四海退欲跨陵邊疆 震蕩宇内又自以爲無身之日則未有能蹈涉中原抗衡上國 者是以用兵不戢屢耀其武然亮才於治戎爲長奇謀爲短理 民之幹優於將畧而所與對敵或値人傑加眾寡不侔攻守異 體故雖連年動眾未能有克昔蕭何薦韓信管仲舉王子城父 皆忖已之長未能兼有故也亮之器能政理抑亦管蕭之亞匹 也而時之名將無城父韓信故使功業陵遲大義不及耶蓋天 命有歸不可以智力爭也青龍二年春亮帥眾出武功分兵屯
Interpretation

In his youth, Zhuge Liang displayed extraordinary talent. During the turmoil of the late Eastern Han dynasty, he followed his uncle Zhuge Xuan to seek refuge in Jing Province, living in seclusion and farming without pursuing fame. At that time, Liu Bei (General of the Left) recognized his exceptional abilities and visited his thatched cottage three times. Deeply moved by Liu Bei's heroic bearing, Zhuge Liang responded with sincere devotion, and the two became close confidants.

Later, when Cao Cao (Emperor Wu of Wei) launched a southern campaign against Jing Province and Liu Cong surrendered, Liu Bei found himself in dire straits. The 27-year-old Zhuge Liang proposed the ingenious strategy of allying with Wu to resist Cao Cao, personally traveling to Eastern Wu to persuade Sun Quan. Sun Quan, who already respected Liu Bei, was further impressed by Zhuge Liang's remarkable presence and immediately dispatched 30,000 troops to assist them. With this support, Liu Bei dealt a crushing defeat to Cao Cao's forces and reclaimed the southern territories. Subsequently, Liu Bei conquered Yi Province (modern Sichuan) and appointed Zhuge Liang as General of the Army. After Liu Bei declared himself emperor, Zhuge Liang rose to the position of Chancellor, overseeing all state affairs.

Following Liu Bei's death, the young ruler Liu Shan ascended the throne, and Zhuge Liang personally attended to every matter, great and small. Externally, he maintained the alliance with Eastern Wu; internally, he pacified Nanzhong (modern Yunnan region), established legal systems, reorganized the military, and advanced military technology, bringing about clean governance in Shu Han. Officials dared not commit wrongdoing, the people cultivated virtue, lost items went unclaimed on the roads, the strong refrained from oppressing the weak—such was the exemplary social atmosphere of the time.

Throughout his life, Zhuge Liang harbored grand ambitions: to unify the realm and awe the four directions. Aware that Shu Han could hardly rival Wei without seizing the Central Plains during his lifetime, he continually launched military campaigns. However, while excelling in statecraft, he was somewhat less adept in military strategy. Facing formidable opponents like Sima Yi and overwhelming numerical disadvantages, his repeated campaigns yielded little breakthrough. Just as Xiao He recommended Han Xin and Guan Zhong promoted Prince Chengfu, each person has their strengths. Zhuge Liang's administrative prowess matched that of Guan Zhong and Xiao He, yet Shu Han lacked a general of Han Xin's caliber, leaving his grand mission unfulfilled. Perhaps this was the will of heaven, beyond mortal striving.

In the spring of 234 (the second year of the Qinglong era), Zhuge Liang led his troops through Wugong, dividing his forces for garrison farming...

田爲久駐之基其秋病卒黎庶追思以爲口實至今梁益之民 咨述亮者言猶在耳雖甘棠之詠召公鄭人之歌子產無以遠 譬也孟軻有云以逸道使民雖勞不怨以生道殺人雖死不忿 信矣論者或怪亮文彩不豔而過於丁甯周至臣愚以爲咎繇 大賢也周公聖人也考之尙書咎繇之謨畧而雅周公之誥煩 而悉何則咎繇與舜禹共談周公與羣下矢誓故也亮所與言 盡眾人凡士故其文指不得及遠也然其聲教遺言皆經事綜 物公誠之心形於文墨足以知其人之意理而有補於當世伏 惟陛下邁蹤古聖蕩然無忌故雖敵國誹謗之言咸肆其辭而 無所革諱所以明大通之道也謹錄寫上詣著作臣夀誠惶誠 恐頓首頓首死罪死罪泰始十年二月一日癸巳平陽侯相臣 陳夀上 喬字伯松亮兄瑾之第二子也本字仲愼與兄元遜俱有名於 時論者以爲喬才不及兄而性業過之初亮未有子求喬爲嗣 瑾啟孫權遣喬來西亮以喬爲巳適子故易其字焉拜爲駙馬 都尉隨亮至漢中  亮與兄瑾書曰喬本當還成都今諸將子弟皆得傳運思惟  宜同榮辱今使喬督五六百兵與子弟傳於谷中書在亮集 年二十五建興元年卒子攀官至行護軍翊武將軍亦早卒諸 葛恪見誅於吳子孫皆盡而亮自有胄裔故攀還復爲瑾後
Interpretation

This passage records the deeds of Zhuge Liang (courtesy name Kongming, posthumous title Marquis Zhongwu), the chancellor of Shu Han during the Three Kingdoms period, and his family. It mentions that when Zhuge Liang implemented garrison farming in Hanzhong, the local people toiled diligently without complaint, embodying Mencius' saying: "When the people are employed in ways that bring them ease, they may be worked hard without resentment. When criminals are executed in accordance with life-preserving principles, they may be put to death without anger."

Regarding Zhuge Liang's literary style, some critics argued his writings lacked ornamentation yet were overly meticulous. The author counters this by noting: The ancient sage-minister Gao Yao (a virtuous official during the reigns of Shun and Yu) wrote with concise elegance, while the Duke of Zhou (founding statesman of the Zhou dynasty) employed exhaustive thoroughness—their styles differed according to their audiences. As Zhuge Liang primarily addressed ordinary scholars, his prose naturally remained plain. Yet his words consistently addressed practical matters, infused with sincere devotion to public service, making them profoundly valuable for governance.

The text also documents Zhuge Liang's family circumstances: His nephew Zhuge Qiao (courtesy name initially Zhongshen, later changed to Bosong) was the second son of his elder brother Zhuge Jin. Since Zhuge Liang then had no heir, he adopted Zhuge Qiao as his son and altered his courtesy name. Zhuge Qiao accompanied the army to Hanzhong to supervise grain transport, but unfortunately died at twenty-five. Later, Zhuge Liang's biological son Zhuge Zhan inherited the family legacy, while Zhuge Qiao's son Zhuge Pan—after the execution of Zhuge Ke's (Zhuge Jin's eldest son) family in Wu—returned to Eastern Wu to continue Zhuge Jin's lineage.

A notable observation emphasizes how deeply the people cherished Zhuge Liang's governance, likening their devotion to ancient praises of the Duke of Shao (Western Zhou's virtuous minister) and Zichan (renowned Zheng statesman). The author asserts that even slander from rival states should be faithfully recorded, for only through such impartiality can the comprehensive principles of enlightened governance be truly illuminated.

瞻字思遠建興十二年亮出武功與兄瑾書曰瞻今已八𡻕聰 慧可愛嫌其早成恐不爲重器耳年十七尙公主拜騎都尉其 明年爲翰林中郞將屢遷射聲校尉侍中尙書僕射加軍師將 軍瞻工書畫彊識念蜀人追思亮咸愛其才敏每朝廷有一善 政佳事雖非瞻所建倡百姓皆相傳吿曰葛侯之所爲也是以 美聲溢譽有過其實景耀四年爲行都護衞將軍與輔國大將 軍南鄉侯董厥並平尙書事六年冬魏征西將軍鄧艾伐蜀自 陰平由景谷道旁入瞻督諸軍至涪停住前鋒破退還住綿竹 艾遣書誘瞻曰若降者必表爲琅琊王瞻怒斬艾使遂戰大敗 臨陣死時年三十七眾皆離散艾長驅至成都瞻長子尙與瞻 俱沒  于寶曰瞻雖智不足以扶危勇不足以拒敵而能外不負國  内不改父之志忠孝存焉  華陽國志曰尙歎曰父子荷國重恩不早斬黃皓以致傾敗  用生何爲乃馳赴魏軍而死 次子京及攀子顯等咸熙元年内移河東  案諸葛氏譜云京字行宗  晉泰始起居注載詔曰諸葛亮在蜀盡其心力其子瞻臨難  而死義天下之善一也其孫京隨才署吏後爲郿令  尙書僕射山濤啟事曰郿令諸葛京祖父亮遇漢亂分隔父  子在蜀雖不達天命要爲盡心所事京治郿自復有稱臣以  爲宜以補東宮舍人以明事人之理副梁益之論京位至廣  州剌史
Interpretation

This passage recounts the life of Zhuge Zhan, the son of Zhuge Liang. When Zhuge Zhan (courtesy name Siyuan) was eight years old, Zhuge Liang mentioned in a letter to his elder brother Zhuge Jin that the boy was intelligent and lovable, but expressed concern that his premature display of talent might hinder his future achievements.

At seventeen, Zhuge Zhan married a princess and was appointed Cavalry Commandant. He later held various positions including Imperial Guard General, Archery Commandant, Palace Attendant, and Assistant Director of the Secretariat, eventually being promoted to Army Advisor General. Skilled in calligraphy and painting with an exceptional memory, he was beloved by the people of Shu, who cherished him for his father's legacy. Whenever beneficial policies were implemented, even if not proposed by Zhuge Zhan, commoners would credit "Lord Zhuge," thus his reputation exceeded his actual abilities.

In the fourth year of Jingyao (261 CE), Zhuge Zhan became Acting Capital Guardian General, jointly administering secretariat affairs with Grand General Dong Jue. In winter 263, when Wei's Conquering West General Deng Ai invaded Shu via a surprise attack through Jinggu Valley from Yinping, Zhuge Zhan led troops to Fucheng. After his vanguard's defeat, he retreated to Mianzhu. Deng Ai's surrender offer promising enfeoffment as Prince of Langye provoked Zhuge Zhan to execute the messenger in anger. He ultimately fell in battle at thirty-seven, alongside his eldest son Zhuge Shang.

Historian Yu Bao remarked: Though Zhuge Zhan's wisdom couldn't avert crisis nor his valor repel strong enemies, he upheld loyalty to his state externally and his father's aspirations internally, fulfilling both virtues.

Zhuge Shang's dying words lamented: "Our family enjoyed imperial favor yet failed to eliminate the eunuch Huang Hao earlier, causing the kingdom's fall. What purpose remains in living?" before charging into enemy lines.

Zhuge Zhan's younger son Zhuge Jing (courtesy name Xingzong) and Zhuge Pan's son Zhuge Xian were relocated to Hedong in 264. During the Jin Dynasty's Taishi era, an imperial edict honored the Zhuge family, praising Zhuge Liang's Shu service, Zhuge Zhan's sacrificial death, and Zhuge Jing's subsequent magistracy in Mei County. Secretariat Director Shan Tao recommended Zhuge Jing as Eastern Palace Attendant, arguing this would demonstrate proper service to rulers while comforting Liang-Yi region commoners. Zhuge Jing ultimately rose to Guangzhou Governor.

董厥者丞相亮時爲府令史亮稱之曰董令史良士也吾每與 之言思愼宜適徙爲主簿亮卒後稍遷至尙書僕射代陳祗爲 尙書令遷爲大將軍平臺事而義陽樊建代焉  案晉百官表董厥字龔襲亦義陽人建字長元 延熙二十四年以校尉使吳值孫權病篤不自見建權問諸葛 恪曰樊建何如宗預也恪對曰才識不及預而雅性過之後爲 侍中守尙書令自瞻厥建統事姜維常征伐在外宦人黃皓竊 弄機柄咸共將護無能匡矯  孫盛異同記曰瞻厥等以維好戰無功國内疲弊宜表後主  召還爲益州剌史奪其兵權蜀長老猶有瞻表以閻宇代維  故事晉永和三年蜀史常璩說蜀長老云陳夀嘗爲瞻吏爲  瞻所辱故因此事歸惡黃皓而云瞻不能匡矯也 然建特不與皓和好往來蜀破之明年春厥建俱詣京都同爲 相國參軍其秋並兼散騎常侍使蜀慰勞  漢晉春秋曰樊建爲給事中晉武帝問諸葛亮之治國建對  曰聞惡必改而不矜過賞罰之信足感神明帝曰善哉使我  得此人以自輔豈有今日之勞乎建稽首曰臣竊聞天下之  論皆謂鄧艾見枉陛下知而不理此豈馮唐之所謂雖得頗  牧而不能用者乎帝笑曰吾方欲明之卿言起我意於是發  詔治艾焉 評曰諸葛亮之爲相國也撫百姓示儀軌約官職從權制開誠
Interpretation

Dong Jue served as the Chief Clerk (a document officer in the chancellor's office) under Zhuge Liang during his tenure as Chancellor. Zhuge Liang once praised him, saying: "Chief Clerk Dong is a man of virtue and talent. Every time I converse with him, I find his considerations thorough and his words and actions appropriate." Later, Dong Jue was transferred to the position of Registrar. After Zhuge Liang's death, he gradually rose through the ranks, eventually becoming Vice Director of the Imperial Secretariat, succeeding Chen Zhi as Director of the Imperial Secretariat, and later promoted to Grand General. Subsequently, Fan Jian of Yiyang succeeded him in this position.

According to the Official Roster of the Jin dynasty, Dong Jue's courtesy name was Gongxi, and he was also from Yiyang; Fan Jian's courtesy name was Changyuan. In the 24th year of the Yanxi era (261), Fan Jian was sent as an envoy to Eastern Wu in the capacity of a Commandant. At that time, Sun Quan was seriously ill and unable to receive him. Sun Quan asked Zhuge Ke, "How does Fan Jian compare to Zong Yu?" Zhuge Ke replied, "His talent and insight are inferior to Zong Yu's, but his character is more refined." Later, Fan Jian served as Palace Attendant and concurrently as Director of the Imperial Secretariat.

During the period when Zhuge Zhan, Dong Jue, and Fan Jian jointly governed state affairs, Jiang Wei was frequently away on military campaigns, allowing the eunuch Huang Hao to monopolize power. They merely went with the flow and failed to rectify the political corruption. Sun Sheng recorded in Records of Differences and Similarities that Zhuge Zhan and others believed Jiang Wei was overly fond of war, achieving little while exhausting the state's resources. They proposed submitting a memorial to the Later Ruler to recall Jiang Wei, replacing him as Inspector of Yi Province and stripping him of military authority. Elders in Shu also passed down accounts that Zhuge Zhan had once suggested replacing Jiang Wei with Yan Yu.

In the third year of the Yonghe era (347) of the Jin dynasty, the Shu historian Chang Qu mentioned that Chen Shou had once served as a subordinate official under Zhuge Zhan. Having been humiliated by him, Chen Shou attributed the faults of the time to Huang Hao in his historical writings and criticized Zhuge Zhan for failing to correct the court's misrule. However, Fan Jian consistently refused to associate with or befriend Huang Hao. In the spring following the fall of Shu-Han, Dong Jue and Fan Jian traveled together to Luoyang, where both were appointed as Military Advisors to the Imperial Chancellor. That autumn, they were additionally given the concurrent position of Cavalier Attendants-in-Ordinary and were sent on a mission to Shu to console the people.

The Chronicle of Han and Jin records that when Fan Jian served as a Palace Attendant, Emperor Wu of Jin, Sima Yan, asked him about Zhuge Liang's methods of governance. Fan Jian replied, "Zhuge Liang corrected his mistakes upon learning of them without boasting, and his rewards and punishments were so just that they could move the spirits." The emperor sighed and said, "If I had such a man to assist me, how could I be so weary as I am now?" Fan Jian kowtowed and said, "The common people all believe that Deng Ai died unjustly, yet Your Majesty, though aware of this, has not exonerated him. Is this not like what Feng Tang said—'Even if you had Lian Po and Li Mu, you could not employ them properly'?" The emperor laughed and said, "I was just about to clarify this matter, and you have reminded me." He then issued an edict to rehabilitate Deng Ai.

Historians commented: When Zhuge Liang served as Chancellor, he comforted the people, established laws and regulations, standardized official duties in accordance with the times, and governed with openness and sincerity, treating others with wholehearted trust.

心布公道盡忠益時者雖讐必賞犯法怠慢者雖親必罰服罪 輸情者雖重必釋游辭巧飾者雖輕必戮善無微而不賞惡無 纎而不貶庶事精練物理其本循名責實虛僞不齒終於邦域 之内咸畏而愛之刑政雖峻而無怨者以其用心平而勸戒明 也可謂識治之良才管蕭之亞匹矣然連年動眾未能成功葢 應變將畧非其所長歟  袁子曰或問諸葛亮何如人也袁子曰張飛關羽與劉備俱  起爪牙腹心之臣而武人也晚得諸葛亮因以爲佐相而羣  臣悅服劉備足信亮足重故也及其受六尺之孤攝一國之  政事凡庸之君專權而不失禮行君事而國人不疑如此卽  以爲君臣百姓之心欣戴之矣行法嚴而國人悅服用民盡  其力而下不怨及其兵出入如賓行不寇芻蕘者不獵如在  國中其用兵也止如山進退如風兵出之日天下震動而人  心不憂亮死至今數十年國人歌思如周人之思召公也孔  子曰雍也可使南面諸葛亮有焉又問諸葛亮始出隴右南  安天水安定三郡人反應之若亮速進則三郡非中國之有  也而亮徐行不進旣而官兵上隴三郡復亮無尺寸之功失  此機何也袁子曰蜀兵輕銳良將少亮始出未知國中彊弱  是以疑而嘗之且大會者不求近功所以不進也曰何以知  其疑也袁子曰初出遲重屯營重複後轉降未進兵欲戰亮
Interpretation

This passage records the governance and military strategies of Zhuge Liang (styled Kongming, posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu), the chancellor of Shu Han during the Three Kingdoms period. Through a dialogue between Yuanzi (likely Yuan Zhun) and others, the text reveals Zhuge Liang’s political acumen and military style.

In governing the state, Zhuge Liang adhered to principles of impartiality: those loyal to the nation were rewarded, even if they were former enemies, while those who violated laws or neglected duties were punished severely, even if they were close associates. He placed great emphasis on factual accuracy—leniency was granted to those who sincerely repented, but harsh penalties were imposed on those who used deceit to cover their faults. No merit, however small, went unrewarded, and no transgression, however minor, escaped censure. He mastered the essence of governance, insisting that names match reality and eliminating hypocrisy. As a result, the people of Shu both revered and loved him. Though his laws were strict, none complained, precisely because he acted with fairness and clarity in admonishment.

In military affairs, Zhuge Liang enforced strict discipline: his troops moved without disturbing civilians, treating the people as honored guests. During marches, there was no plundering, and even woodcutters went unharassed. His army stood firm as a mountain when stationary and moved swiftly as a gale when in action, shaking the realm with every campaign. Decades after his death, the people of Shu still sang his praises and remembered him fondly, much like the Zhou people cherished the memory of Duke Shao.

The text particularly examines Zhuge Liang’s cautious strategy during his first northern expedition. At the time, three commanderies in Longyou (Nan’an, Tianshui, and Anding) had responded to the Shu forces, yet Zhuge Liang did not advance immediately. Yuanzi analyzes this decision: though the Shu army was elite, it lacked seasoned generals, and Zhuge Liang, on his first campaign, needed to test the strength of the Wei forces. Moreover, those with grand vision do not chase petty gains—thus, he chose a steady, measured approach. His initial tight encampments and gradual advances reveal his characteristic prudence in probing the enemy’s defenses.

 勇而能鬬三郡反而不速應此其疑徵也曰何以知其勇而  能鬬也袁子曰亮之在街亭也前軍大破亮屯去數里不救  官兵相接又徐行此其勇也亮之行軍安靜而堅重安靜則  易動堅重則可以進退亮法令明賞罰信士卒用命赴險而  不顧此所以能鬬也曰亮帥數萬之眾其所興造若數十萬  之功是其奇者也所至營壘井竈圊溷藩籬障塞皆應繩墨  一月之行去之如始至勞費而徒爲飾好何也袁子曰蜀人  輕脫亮故堅用之曰何以明其然也袁子曰亮治實而不治  名志大而所欲遠非求近速者也曰亮好治官府次舍橋梁  道路此非急務何也袁子曰小國賢才少故欲其尊嚴也亮  之治蜀田疇辟倉廪實器械利蓄積饒朝會不譁路無醉人  夫本立故末治有餘力而後及小事此所以勸其功也曰子  之論諸葛亮則有證也以亮之才而少其功何也袁子曰亮  持本者也其於應變則非所長也故不敢用其短曰然則吾  子美之何也袁子曰此固賢者之遠矣安可以備體責也夫  能知所短而不用此賢者之大也知所短則知所長矣夫前  識與言而不中亮之所不用也此吾之所謂可也  吳大鴻臚張儼作默記其述佐篇論亮與司馬宣王書曰漢  朝傾覆天下崩壞豪傑之士競希神器魏氏跨中土劉氏據  益州並稱兵海内爲世霸王諸葛司馬二相遭値際會託身
Interpretation

This passage records a dialogue between Yuan Zhun (also known as Yuanzi), a minister of the Wu Kingdom during the Three Kingdoms period, and others discussing Zhuge Liang's military and administrative talents, as well as Zhang Yan's comparative evaluation of Zhuge Liang and Sima Yi in Silent Records.

Regarding Zhuge Liang's military prowess, Yuan Zhun cited the Battle of Jieting as an example: when the vanguard forces suffered a crushing defeat at Jieting, Zhuge Liang, stationed just a few miles away, did not rush to their aid. Even when engaging the enemy, he remained composed—a testament to his courage. His military discipline was strict: his troops marched quietly and steadily, orders were clear, rewards and punishments were fair, and soldiers willingly risked their lives for him, making his army exceptionally formidable.

Some questioned whether Zhuge Liang’s meticulous approach—deploying tens of thousands of troops to achieve the logistical efficiency of hundreds of thousands—was worth the effort. Wherever he camped, he standardized the construction of fortifications, wells, stoves, latrines, and fences, so that even a month after departure, the site remained as orderly as when they first arrived. Critics argued this was wasteful, but Yuan Zhun explained that the Shu people were inherently impulsive, and Zhuge Liang deliberately imposed strict discipline to restrain them.

As for Zhuge Liang’s focus on seemingly non-urgent tasks—building government offices, guesthouses, bridges, and roads—Yuan Zhun reasoned that small states like Shu lacked talent, so solemn rituals and institutions were necessary to establish authority. In reality, Zhuge Liang’s governance yielded remarkable results: farmland was cultivated, granaries were full, equipment was refined, reserves were ample, court assemblies were orderly, and drunkenness was never seen on the streets. He prioritized the fundamentals of governance and only attended to minor matters when he had surplus capacity.

When asked why Zhuge Liang, despite his extraordinary talent, achieved limited success, Yuan Zhun pointed out that while he excelled at grasping the essentials, improvisation was not his strength—so he wisely avoided situations that played to his weaknesses. This was the foresight of a wise man: recognizing and circumventing one’s shortcomings is itself great wisdom. That Zhuge Liang refused to employ those who indulged in empty talk without practical ability was precisely what made him praiseworthy.

Finally, the passage mentions Silent Records: On Assistants by Zhang Yan, Grand Herald of Wu: After the fall of the Han Dynasty, the realm fell into chaos as warlords vied for the throne. The Wei Kingdom dominated the Central Plains, while Liu Bei held Yizhou (modern Sichuan), both contending for supremacy. Zhuge Liang and Sima Yi, the two chancellors, each bore heavy responsibilities in this extraordinary historical period.

 盟主或收功於蜀漢或冊名於伊洛備丕旣歿後嗣繼統各  受保阿之任輔翼幼主不負然諾之成亦一國之宗臣霸王  之賢佐也厯前以觀近事二相優劣可得而詳也孔明起巴  蜀之地蹈一州之土方之大國其戰士人民蓋有九分之一  也而以貢贄大吳抗對北敵至使耕戰有伍刑法整齊提步  卒數萬長驅祁山慨然有飲馬河洛之志仲達據天下十倍  之地仗兼并之眾據牢城擁精銳無擒敵之意務自保全而  已使彼孔明自來自去若此人不亡終其志意連年運思刻  日興謀則涼雍不解甲中國不釋鞍勝負之勢以決矣昔子  產治鄭諸侯不敢加兵蜀相其近之矣方之司馬不亦優乎  或曰兵者凶器戰者危事也有國者不務保安境内綏靜百  姓而好開闢土地征伐天下未爲得計也諸葛丞相誠有匡  佐之才然處孤絶之地戰士不滿五萬自可閉關守險君臣  無事空勞師旅無𡻕不征未能進咫尺之地開帝王之基而  使國内受其荒殘西土苦其役調魏司馬懿才用兵眾未易  可輕量敵而進兵家所愼若丞相必有以䇿之則未見坦然  之勳若無䇿以裁之則非明哲之謂海内歸向之意也余竊  疑焉請問其說答曰蓋聞湯以七十里文王以百里之地而  有天下皆用征伐而定之揖讓而登王位者惟舜禹而已今  魏蜀爲敵戰之國勢未俱王自操備時彊弱懸殊而備猶出
Interpretation

This passage compares the achievements and abilities of two pivotal figures from the Three Kingdoms period: Zhuge Liang (style name Kongming) and Sima Yi (style name Zhongda).

Though Zhuge Liang governed only a single province in Shu Han (one of the Three Kingdoms), with a population and military strength merely one-ninth that of Wei, he was able to discipline his troops, establish laws, and lead tens of thousands of infantrymen in northern campaigns against Wei, even harboring ambitions to seize the Central Plains at one point. In contrast, Sima Yi, despite commanding resources ten times greater than Shu Han and possessing elite forces, sought only self-preservation, allowing Zhuge Liang to maneuver freely. The author suggests that had Zhuge Liang not died prematurely, his strategic persistence in offensive campaigns might well have altered the balance of power in the realm. The text likens Zhuge Liang to Zichan, a statesman of the Spring and Autumn period renowned for his governance, asserting his superiority over Sima Yi.

Some critics argue that war exhausts the people and drains resources, pointing out that Zhuge Liang, with fewer than fifty thousand troops, should have fortified his borders rather than waging continuous campaigns. They contend that his relentless warfare neither expanded Shu’s territory nor strengthened its position, instead leaving the state weakened. Moreover, given Sima Yi’s overwhelming military advantage, reckless offensives would have been unwise.

The respondent counters with historical precedents: Kings Tang of Shang and Wen of Zhou both secured the realm through conquest, while only Shun and Yu ascended through abdication. Given the irreconcilable enmity between Wei and Shu, and despite the disparity in strength, Liu Bei (style name Xuande) had persisted in military action even when at a disadvantage. This implies that Zhuge Liang’s northern campaigns were an extension of Shu Han’s founding spirit of determined ambition.

 兵陽平擒夏侯淵羽圍襄陽將降曹仁生獲于禁當時北邊  大小憂懼孟德身出南陽樂進徐晃等爲救圍不卽解故蔣  子通言彼時有徙許渡河之計會國家襲取南郡羽乃解軍  玄德與操智力多少士眾眾寡用兵行軍之道不可同年而  語猶能暫以取勝是時又無大吳犄角之勢也今仲達之才  減於孔明當時之勢異於曩日玄德尙與抗衡孔明何以不  可出軍而圖敵耶昔樂毅以弱燕之眾兼從五國之兵長驅  彊齊下七十餘城今蜀漢之卒不少燕軍君臣之接信於樂  毅加以國家爲脣齒之援東西相應首尾如蛇形勢重大不  比於五國之兵也何憚於彼而不可哉夫兵以奇勝制敵以  智土地廣狹人馬多少未可偏恃也余觀彼治國之體當時  旣肅整遺教在後及其辭意懇切陳進取之圖忠謀謇謇義  形於主雖古之管晏何以加之乎  蜀記曰晉永興中鎭南將軍劉弘至隆中觀亮故宅立碣表  其閭命太傅掾犍爲李興爲文曰天子命我於沔之陽聽皷  鞞而永思庶先哲之遺光登隆山以望遠軾諸葛之故鄉蓋  神物應機大器無方通人靡滯大德不常故谷風發而騶虞  嘯雲雷升而潛鱗驤摯解褐於三聘尼得招而褰裳管豹變  於受命貢感激以回莊異徐生之摘寶釋卧龍於深藏偉劉  氏之傾葢嘉吾子之周行夫有知已之主則有竭命之良固
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses Zhuge Liang's Northern Expedition military strategies and their historical assessment. By comparing the situations during Zhuge Liang's era with those of Cao Cao and Liu Bei's periods, it argues that although Shu Han's military strength was inferior to Cao Wei's, Zhuge Liang's strict discipline and exceptional strategic acumen fully qualified him to launch the Northern Expeditions.

The author cites several historical precedents: Liu Bei had achieved temporary victories despite being vastly outnumbered by Cao Cao; during the Warring States period, Yue Yi led the weak state of Yan in alliance with five other states to decisively defeat the powerful Qi. Now, Shu Han had Eastern Wu as a strategic ally ("lips and teeth supporting each other"), creating an east-west pincer movement—a more favorable situation than the five-state alliance of old. The essence of military strategy lies in achieving victory through surprise, not merely comparing territorial size or troop numbers.

The text particularly praises Zhuge Liang's governance, noting that his laws were rigorous, his teachings profound, and his expansion strategies marked by loyalty and integrity—qualities that even surpassed ancient renowned ministers like Guan Zhong and Yan Ying.

The latter part quotes the Records of Shu: during the Yongxing era (304–306 CE) of the Western Jin dynasty, General Liu Hong of Zhennan visited Zhuge Liang's former residence in Longzhong, erecting a stele in commemoration and commissioning Li Xing to compose its inscription. The inscription lavishly extols Zhuge Liang through metaphors: like a valley breeze awakening divine beasts, or thunderclouds stirring a dormant dragon; like Yi Yin being summoned to serve, or Guan Zhong meeting a wise ruler to unleash his talents. It concludes by emphasizing that only under Liu Bei—a ruler who recognized true worth—could Zhuge Liang, the "Crouching Dragon," devote his utmost loyalty and achieve greatness.

(Note: "Mengde" was Cao Cao's courtesy name, "Kongming" Zhuge Liang's, and "Zhongda" Sima Yi's; "Guan-Yan" refers to the Spring and Autumn period statesmen Guan Zhong and Yan Ying; "Crouching Dragon" was Zhuge Liang's epithet before his rise to prominence.)

 所以三分我漢鼎跨帶我邊荒抗衡我北面馳騁我魏疆者  也英哉吾子獨含天靈豈神之奇豈人之精何思之深何德  之清異世通夢恨不同生推子八陣不在孫吳木牛之奇則  亦般模神弩之功一何微妙千井齊甃又何秘要昔在顚夭  有名無迹孰若吾儕良籌妙畫藏文旣沒以言見稱又未若  子言行並徵夷吾反玷樂毅不終奚比於爾明哲守冲臨終  受寄讓過許繇負扆莅事民言不流刑中於鄭教美於魯蜀  民知恥河渭安堵匪皋則伊甯彼管晏豈徒聖宣慷慨屢歎  昔爾之隱卜惟此宅仁智所處能無規廓日居月諸時殞其  夕誰能不殁貴有遺格惟子之勳移風來世詠歌餘典懦夫  將厲遐哉邈矣厥規卓矣凡若吾子難可究已疇昔之乖萬  里殊塗今我來思覿爾故墟漢高歸魂於豐沛太公五世而  反周思魍魎以髣
Interpretation

This passage is a later eulogy praising Zhuge Liang (courtesy name Kongming, posthumous title Marquis Zhongwu). The general meaning is:

From the small territory of Shu Han, Zhuge Liang established a tripartite balance of power against Cao Wei in the Central Plains and Sun Wu in Jiangdong. He alone embodied the spiritual energy of heaven and earth, combining divine genius with the most refined human wisdom—his thoughts far-reaching, his virtue sublime. Even across different eras, people commune with him in dreams, lamenting they couldn't share his era.

His creation of the Eight Formation Diagram surpassed the military strategies of ancient masters Sun Wu and Wu Qi; his invention of the "wooden ox and gliding horse" (ancient mechanical transports) rivaled the ingenuity of Lu Ban; his improved repeating crossbow (Zhuge crossbow) was exquisitely ingenious; the thousand wells he dug brought prosperity to the people. Compared to ancient sages who had fame without substance, Zhuge Liang was a true marvel who transformed brilliant strategies into practice.

Unlike Guan Zhong (Yiwu) who compromised his integrity late in life or Yue Yi who left his ambitions unfulfilled, Zhuge Liang maintained wisdom that preserved his clarity till the end. Entrusted with the heavy responsibility of a dying ruler's orphan, his humility surpassed the ancient recluse Xu You; when governing, the people bore no resentment—his justice in punishment matched Zheng's Zichan, his civilizing influence equaled Lu's Confucius. The people of Shu understood honor, and the Wei River region flourished in peace. Such achievements rival sages like Gao Yao and Yi Yin—how could Guan Zhong or Yan Ying compare?

In your earlier days of seclusion at Longzhong, you chose this land of benevolence and wisdom. The sun and moon revolve, all lives must end, yet precious is the immortal legacy you left. Your meritorious deeds transformed customs; your poetry passed to later generations, inspiring even cowards. Your plans were profound and grand—such talent as yours is rare in any age. Once we were separated by ten thousand miles; now I come seeking traces of you. Like Emperor Gaozu's spirit returning to Feng and Pei, or Jiang Taigong's descendants restoring Zhou after five generations, I long to sense your lingering presence. If spirits retain awareness, perhaps you may understand this devotion of mine.

髴冀影響之有餘魂而有靈豈其識諸

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5i0078); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →