中文 · EN · JA

《漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Qing Daoist texts 清代道教文獻 7 volumes 165,487 characters

About this page. The original text of 《漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集》 (Qing Daoist texts 清代道教文獻, 7 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 2 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Vol. 1

漢丞相諸葛忠武侯集敘 羲垂髫時父卽示以祖長史公與伯父大行公所手鈔羅相忠 武侯公書長史公題其簡末云兵燹遺軼欲編彙成書未能也 羲受而藏之崇禎壬申承督臨庾適弟倬自白門購書十餘篋 來因得茂苑楊去奢所集忠武侯公書乃慨然謂倬吾祖與伯 父雅有志而未逮者父以屬我今當相與成之楊本列年譜傳 畧紹漢連吳等目自云承於婁東王[冂@(丷/口)]伯較之家鈔舊本互有 存遺楊謂陳承祚所載侯開務作牧諸篇而裴松之註時時引 侯集今俱不可見此蘇東坡葉水心俱有不見全書之恨若心 書將苑梁父吟黃牛廟記爲後人僞作槪去不錄茲集惟年譜 仍楊之舊餘依家本傳用陳志而節錄諸傳附之次遺文次遺 事陣圖次遺蹟亡者旣無從攷存者亦不得遺槪晉唐以下詩 賦論贊碑頌巨公文人之筆異同之論咸竝載之間有未備俟 之他日凡爲卷二十有三十六萬三千六百有餘言弟倬曉夜 搜討叅攷羣書精意較讐庶無掃葉之嘆而羲於糠粃斗斛之 暇亦輙共編訂遠聘吳中善手付之剞劂兢兢庶詳且愼焉夫 去奢冏伯以論世好古採綴研核其言曰追惋散軼彌深豔羨 欲用以弘濟世業勸奬忠孝况爲之後人乎書成更附宋祖少 保公及祖長史公二傳於後寒家系自蜀派宋紹熙間祖諱安
Interpretation

When I was young, my father showed me the collected works of Zhuge Liang (the Loyal Martial Marquis) that had been hand-copied by my grandfather, the Chief Historian, and my uncle, the Grand Traveler. At the end of the bamboo scrolls, my grandfather had inscribed: "These scattered writings that survived the chaos of war—I had intended to compile them into a proper collection but never completed the task."

In the Ren Shen year of Chongzhen (1632), while I was stationed at Linyu, my younger brother Zhuo brought over a dozen crates of books from Nanjing, among which was a compilation of Zhuge Liang's works edited by Yang Qushe of Maoyuan. Moved with emotion, I said to my brother: "What our grandfather and uncle wished to accomplish but could not, and what our father entrusted to us—now is the time for us to complete it together."

Yang Qushe's edition included a chronological biography, historical accounts, records of the alliance with Wu against Wei, and other materials, claiming to have referenced the version by Wang Jiongbo of Loudong. Comparing it with our family's manuscript, we found each version had its own additions and omissions. Yang believed that the political writings of Zhuge Liang recorded in Chen Shou's Records of the Three Kingdoms, as well as the excerpts cited in Pei Songzhi's annotations, were already lost by his time—even Su Dongpo and Ye Shi had lamented never seeing the complete collection. He had excised later forgeries like The Book of the Mind, The General's Garden, Liangfu Yin, and Record of the Yellow Ox Temple.

Our newly compiled edition retained Yang's chronological biography but primarily followed the main biography in Records of the Three Kingdoms, supplementing it with excerpts from other historical accounts. The work was divided into sections: surviving writings, historical events, battle formations, and historical sites. What had been lost was beyond recovery, but we included all extant materials. From Jin and Tang dynasty poetry to contemporary essays, eulogies, and stele inscriptions—anything related to Zhuge Liang, regardless of perspective, was incorporated, with occasional omissions to be filled later.

The complete work spanned twenty volumes, totaling over 363,600 characters. My brother Zhuo devoted himself day and night to researching texts and meticulously collating them, while I contributed editorial work during breaks from official duties. We specially commissioned skilled artisans from Suzhou for the woodblock printing, striving for thoroughness and precision. Compilers like Yang Qushe and Wang Jiongbo had sought to honor sages and promote loyalty and filial piety—how much more should we, their successors, do the same. Upon completion, we appended biographies of our Song dynasty ancestors: the Junior Guardian and the Chief Historian—for our family descended from Shu Han, with an ancestor named An during the Shaoxi era (1190-1194) of the Southern Song.

節公爲福建轉運使始家福建四傅爲少保兵部尙書公諱廷 瑞去侯二十二世又十二傳乃爲祖長史公諱應科家世頗有 顯者世次傳誌甚詳而獨附此二傳則以忠孝之道奕葉之不 墜如此夫論世好古者尙欲勵之天下後世又况淵源可遡弓 冶世承而爲之後人者乎羲倬撫卷之餘其交相勖勉以勿替 祖德而毋負庭訓云 崇禎壬申十一月三十六世孫羲頓首謹序於臨庾之
Interpretation

This passage documents the lineage of Zhuge Liang (posthumously titled Marquis Zhongwu). Zhuge Tingrui, the Fiscal Commissioner of Fujian (a Song Dynasty official overseeing regional finance and transportation), was the twenty-second generation descendant of Zhuge Liang. Twelve generations later came Zhuge Yingke (the title "Chief Secretary" refers to an ancient administrative role equivalent to a chief of staff). This family enjoyed prominence across generations, with detailed genealogical records. However, these two figures are singled out for their biographies precisely because they embodied the virtue of transmitting the Dao of loyalty and filial piety through the ages.

The author, Zhuge Xi (a thirty-sixth-generation descendant), composed this preface in the eleventh month of the Renshen year of the Chongzhen era (1632) at the official office in Linyu (present-day Dayu County, Jiangxi). He believed that those who study history and revere ancient traditions should take this as inspiration for later generations—how much more so for descendants like themselves, who can trace their heritage back to the virtuous influence of their ancestor Zhuge Liang (referred to metaphorically as "the bow-forger," alluding to his invention of the repeating crossbow). Holding the family genealogy with deep emotion, he expressed hope that future descendants would encourage one another, never abandoning the ancestral virtues nor betraying the family's teachings.

公署

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5i0078); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback