中文 · EN · JA · KO

《沖虚至德真經》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 8 volumes 34,848 characters

About this page. The original text of 《沖虚至德真經》 (Dongshen 洞神部, 8 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 88 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Vol. 1

沖虚至德眞經卷上     天瑞第一 子列子居鄭圃四十年人無識者 國君卿大 夫眎之猶衆庶也 國不足將嫁於衛弟子曰 先生往無反期弟子敢 有所謁先生將何以 教先生不聞壺丘子林之言乎子列子笑曰 壺 子何言哉雖然夫子嘗語伯昏瞀人吾側 聞 之試以告女其言曰有生不生 有化不化 不生者能生生不化者 能化化生者不能不 生化者不能不化 故常生常化常生常化者 無時不生無 時不化陰陽爾四時爾 不生者 疑獨不化者往復其際不可 終疑獨其道不 可窮 黄 帝書曰谷神不死是 謂玄牝玄 牝之門是 謂天地之根綿綿若存用之 不勤故生物者 不生化物 者不化 自生自化自 形自色自智 自力自消自息謂之生化形色智力消 息者 非也子列子曰昔者聖人因陰陽 以統天地 夫有形者生於無形 則天地安從生故曰有 太易有太初有太始有太素 太易者未見氣 也 太初者氣之始也太始者形之始也太素 者質之始也氣形質具而未相離 故曰渾淪 渾渝者言萬物相渾淪而未相離也 視之不 見聽之不聞循之不得故曰易 也易無形埒
Interpretation

Liezi lived in seclusion in the gardens of the Zheng state for forty years, yet no one truly understood him. Even the ruler and his ministers regarded him as an ordinary commoner. When famine struck Zheng, Liezi prepared to move to the neighboring state of Wei. His disciples asked: "Master, you may not return from this journey. We venture to ask—do you have any final teachings for us? Have you forgotten the instructions of your own teacher, Huqiuzi Lin?" Liezi smiled and replied: "What did Master Huqiu ever say? Though I recall him speaking once to Bohun Maoren—I happened to overhear it, and shall now share it with you."

The essence of his teaching was this: That which gives birth to all things is itself unborn; that which transforms all things is itself unchanging. The unborn gives rise to all births; the unchanging governs all transformations. What is born must undergo birth; what changes must experience change. Thus all things exist in perpetual states of becoming and transformation. This endless process of generation and mutation never ceases—the cyclical movements of yin-yang and the four seasons bear witness. The unborn (Dao) appears solitary and immutable; the unchanging (Dao) revolves in endless cycles. Its boundaries cannot be traced; its principles cannot be exhausted.

The Yellow Emperor's Classic states: "The valley spirit (the mysterious void of Dao) never dies—this is the Dark Feminine (Xuanpin). The gateway of the Dark Feminine is the root of heaven and earth. Subtle yet continuous, seeming absent yet ever-present, its efficacy never wanes." Therefore, the true creator remains uncreated; the true transformer remains unchanged. Though things appear to generate themselves, transform, take form, acquire color, develop wisdom, gain strength, then decline and cease—to claim they accomplish this independently is erroneous.

Liezi continued: The ancient sages mastered yin-yang to govern heaven and earth. All formed things emerge from the formless—but from where do heaven and earth themselves arise? Thus cosmic evolution unfolds through stages: First came the Grand Inception (Taiyi, when even qi was absent), then the Grand Commencement (Taichu, the beginning of qi), followed by the Grand Initiation (Taishi, the beginning of form), and finally the Grand Simplicity (Taisu, the beginning of substance). When qi, form and substance coexisted inseparably, this was called "primordial chaos" (Hunlun)—a state where all things intermingled without distinction. Invisible to the eye, inaudible to the ear, intangible to touch—this is called "Change" (Yi). This "Change" has no concrete form or boundaries.

易變而爲一一變而爲七七變而爲九 九變 者究也乃復變而爲一一者形變之始 也清 輕者上爲天 濁重者下爲地冲和氣者爲人 故天地 含精萬物化生子列子曰天地 無全 功聖人無全能萬物無全用故天職生覆地 職形載聖 職教化物職所宜然則天有所短 地有所長聖有 所否物有所通何則生 覆者 不能形載形載者不能教化教化者不能違 所宜宜定 者不出所位故天地之道非陰則 陽聖人之教非仁則義 萬物之宜非柔則剛 此皆隨所宜而不能出所位者也 故有生者 有生生者有形者有形形 者有聲者有聲聲 者有色者有色色者有味者有味味者 生之 所生者 死矣而生生者未嘗終形之所形者 實矣而形形者未嘗有聲之所 聲者聞矣而 聲聲者未嘗發色之所色者彰矣而色色者 未嘗顯 味之所味者嘗矣而味味者未嘗呈 皆無 爲之職也能陰能陽能柔能剛能短能 長能 圓能方能生能死能暑能涼能浮能沉 能宫能商能出能没能玄 能黄能甘能苦能 羶能香無知也無能也而無不知也而無不 能 也子列 子適衛食於道從者見百歲髑髏 攓蓬而指顧謂弟子百豐 曰唯予與彼知而 未嘗生未嘗死也 此過養乎過歡乎種有幾 若鼃 爲鶉得水爲㡭得水土之際則爲鼃蠙 之衣 生於陵屯則爲陵舄陵舄得鬱栖則爲
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the fundamental patterns of cosmic generation and transformation, along with the distinct roles of the Three Powers—heaven, earth, and humanity.

The primordial transformation begins with "Change" (Yi), sequentially evolving into "One," "Seven," and "Nine"—with Nine representing the culmination of transformation before reverting back to One. This "One" marks the inception of tangible transformation. Within this process, the clear and light Qi ascends to form heaven, while the turbid and heavy Qi descends to coalesce as earth. The harmonious interplay of Yin and Yang gives rise to humanity. Heaven and earth contain the essence (Jing) and Qi, from which all things are born and transformed.

Liezi observed: Heaven-earth, sages, and all beings each possess their unique strengths and limitations. Heaven's function is to canopy and nurture life; earth's role is to bear and support forms; the sage's duty lies in cultivation and instruction; while all things fulfill their purpose by abiding in their inherent nature. Thus, heaven cannot replace earth's supportive function, earth cannot substitute the sage's teachings, and instruction must not violate the intrinsic nature of things. The operation of heaven-earth cannot depart from Yin-Yang; the sage's cultivation cannot deviate from benevolence and righteousness; the nature of all things cannot exist without firmness and flexibility—all must adhere to their fundamental roles.

The text further delineates the hierarchical layers of cosmic generation: there are living beings, and there is the source that generates life; there are physical forms, and there is the root that gives rise to forms; there are phenomena like sound, color, and flavor, and there are the origins that produce these phenomena. Specific living beings may perish, but the source of life never ceases; concrete forms possess materiality, yet the foundation of form is emptiness itself.

This primordial source embodies infinite transformative capacity: it can manifest as Yin or Yang, as soft or hard, as life or death, as cold or heat, as ascending or descending, capable of producing all tones and displaying all colors and flavors. Though appearing devoid of knowledge and ability, it paradoxically knows and accomplishes all.

Finally, Liezi encountered a century-old skull on the road in Wei. Pointing to it, he told his disciples: "Only this skull and I understand the state of 'neither having been born nor having died.'" This represents a realization transcending life-death duality and surpassing sorrow-joy distinctions. Just as frog eggs transform into tadpoles in water, become moss at the water-earth boundary, turn into plantain herbs on hills, and evolve into other plants in fertile soil—demonstrating how life forms adapt to environmental conditions.

爲足烏足 之根爲蠐螬其葉爲胡蝶胡 蝶胥 也化而爲蟲生竈下其狀若脱其名曰𪀊掇 𪀊 掇千日化而爲鳥其名曰乾餘骨乾餘骨 之沫爲斯彌 斯彌爲食醯頤輅食醯頤輅生 乎食醯黄軦食醯黄軦生乎九猷九 猷生乎 瞀芮瞀芮生乎腐蠸羊肝化爲地臯馬血之 爲轉燐也人血之爲野火也鷂之爲鸇鸇之 爲布穀布穀 乆復爲鷂也燕之爲蛤也田鼠 之爲鶉也杇爪之爲魚也老韭之爲 莧也老 羭之爲猨也魚卵之爲蠱亶爰之獸自孕 而 生曰類河澤之鳥視而生曰 鶂純䳄其名大 腰純雄其名穉蜂 思士不妻而感思女不夫 而孕後 稷生乎巨跡 伊尹生乎空桑 厥昭生 乎濕醯雞生乎酒羊奚比乎 不筍乆竹生青 寧青寧生程 程生馬馬生人人乆入於機萬 物皆出於 機皆入於機 黄 帝書曰形 動不生形而生影聲動不生聲 而生響無動不生無而 生有形 必終者也天 地終乎與我偕終終進乎不知 也道終乎本 無始進乎本不乆有生 則復於不生有形則 復於無形不生者非不生者也本無形者 非 本無形
Interpretation

This scripture reveals the natural laws of cyclical transformation through a series of marvelous metamorphoses of living forms. For instance, plant roots may transform into insects (grubs), leaves into butterflies; these butterflies then become insects beneath the stove (fire-moths), which after a thousand days turn into birds called "dry-bones." The bird's saliva transforms into tiny insects (silkworms), which then evolve into vinegar insects (vinegar-eaters), ultimately tracing back to a creature called the nine-transformer.

The text enumerates numerous natural phenomena: sheep livers transforming into marsh grasses, horse blood becoming will-o'-the-wisps, human blood turning into wild fires, sparrowhawks changing into kites and reverting to cuckoos, swallows becoming clams, field mice transforming into quails, the claws and teeth of rotten wood turning into fish, old leeks becoming amaranth, and aged ewes transforming into apes. It particularly notes certain creatures capable of self-reproduction (like the self-birthing beast), marsh birds that conceive through mutual gazing (the gaze-breeding bird), giant-waist insects that are all male, and young bees that are all female.

It also records extraordinary reproductive phenomena: yearning men can conceive children without marriage through spiritual resonance, yearning women can become pregnant without taking husbands; Houji (Lord Millet) was born from a giant's footprint, while Yi Yin emerged from a hollow mulberry tree. The text then describes various chains of biological generation: the dawn-mist insect is born from dampness, vinegar-flies emerge from wine, the sheep-why grass grows alongside bamboo that never sprouts shoots, until finally the azure-tranquil insect gives birth to the Cheng beast, the Cheng beast produces horses, and horses give birth to humans.

Finally, it quotes the Yellow Emperor's Classic with this philosophical insight: "When form moves, it does not produce new form but shadow; when sound moves, it does not produce new sound but echo." It declares that all formed things will ultimately perish, heaven and earth will end together with humanity, yet this ending is not true annihilation. The Dao (cosmic origin) fundamentally has no beginning, nor will it persist forever. Living beings ultimately return to the lifeless state, formed things return to the formless. What is called "non-generation" is not absolute non-existence, nor is "formlessness" sheer nothingness—rather, it is a return to the primordial source-state.

者也生者理之必終者也終者不得 不終亦如生者之不得 不生而欲恒其生盡 其終 惑於數也精神者天之分骨骸者地之 分屬天清而散屬地濁 而聚精神離形各歸 其眞故謂之鬼鬼歸也歸其眞 宅黄帝曰精 神入其門骨骸反其根我尚何存 人自生至 終大化有四 嬰孩也少壯也老耄也死亡也 其在嬰孩氣專志一和 之至也物不傷焉德 莫加焉其在少壯則血氣飄溢欲 慮充起物 所攻焉德故衰焉其在老耄則欲慮柔焉體 將休焉物莫先焉雖未及嬰孩之全方於少 壯間矣 其在死亡也則之於息焉反其極矣 孔子遊於太山見榮啓期行乎 郕之野鹿裘 帶索鼓琴而歌孔子問曰先生所以樂何也 對曰吾樂 甚多天生萬物唯人爲貴而吾得 爲人是一樂也 男女之别男尊女卑故以 男 爲貴吾既得爲男矣是二樂也人生有不見 日 月不免襁褓者吾既已行年九十矣是三 樂也貧者士之常也死者 人之終也處常得
Interpretation

This passage explores the natural cycle of life from birth to death, examining the distinctive characteristics of each life stage. It posits that where there is life, death inevitably follows—an immutable law of existence. Just as life must begin, death remains its certain conclusion. The desire for eternal life or complete avoidance of mortality is but a delusion that defies natural principles.

In Daoist cosmology, human consciousness and spirit (Shen) belong to Heaven (representing the ethereal, formless realm), while the physical body and bones belong to Earth (symbolizing the dense, material plane). At life's end, spirit and form separate, each returning to its origin—the spirit ascending to Heaven, the corporeal form descending to Earth. This return to source is termed "ghost" (gui), etymologically meaning "to return," signifying reunion with one's true abode. The Yellow Emperor observed: "When the spirit enters the celestial gate and bones return to earth, what remains of 'me'?"

Human life unfolds through four distinct phases: infancy, prime adulthood, old age, and death, each with defining attributes:

During infancy, one's Qi remains concentrated and the mind perfectly unified—a state of supreme harmony. External forces cannot harm such purity, and one's Virtue (De) manifests most completely. In adulthood, while blood and Qi flourish, desires and intellectual calculations multiply, making one vulnerable to external disturbances as Virtue begins its gradual decline. The elderly experience waning desires and mental activity; the body enters gradual repose as external stimuli lose their dominance. Though not matching the perfection of infancy, this state surpasses the turbulence of middle age. Death then represents ultimate rest—the return to one's primordial condition.

The text recounts a parable: While traveling to Mount Tai, Confucius encountered the hermit Rong Qiqi in the wilderness of Cheng, clad in crude deerskin with a grass belt, playing his zither and singing joyfully. When questioned about his happiness, Rong cited three blessings: First, among all beings, humans hold supreme dignity—and he was fortunate to be born human. Second, while gender distinctions exist, males are honored—and he was privileged to be male. Third, while many die young, he had reached ninety years. Poverty, he asserted, is the scholar's constant companion; death, life's inevitable destination. To abide peacefully in these constants while harmonizing with nature constitutes the greatest joy.

終當何憂哉孔子曰善乎能自寬者也 林類 年且百歲底春被裘拾遺穗於故畦 並歌並 進孔子適衛望之於野顧謂弟子曰彼叟可 與言 者試往訊之子貢請行逆之隴端面之 而嘆曰先生曾不悔乎而行 歌拾穗林類行 不留歌不輟子貢叩之不已乃仰而應曰吾 何悔邪 子貢曰先生少不勤行長不競時老 無妻子死期將至亦有何樂而 拾穗行歌乎 林類笑曰吾之所以爲樂人皆有之而反以 爲憂 少不勤行長不競時故能壽若此老無 妻子死期將至故能樂若此 子貢曰壽者人 之情死者人之惡子以死爲樂何也林類曰 死之 與生一往一反故死於是者安知不生 於彼故吾知其不相若矣吾 又安知營營而 求生非惑乎亦又安知吾今之死不愈昔之 生乎 子貢聞之不喻其意還以告夫子夫子 曰吾知其可與言 果然然彼得之而不盡者 也 子貢倦於學告仲尼曰願有所息 仲尼曰 生無所息子貢曰然則賜息無所 乎仲尼曰 有焉耳望其壙睪如也宰如也墳如也鬲如
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of Perfect Virtue in the Grand Void) records a dialogue between Confucius and the recluse Lin Lei, a centenarian hermit. While traveling through the outskirts of the state of Wei, Confucius saw this hundred-year-old man gathering wheat ears in a harvested field during late spring, still wearing a fur coat and singing as he walked.

Confucius sent his disciple Zigong to inquire. Zigong intercepted the old man at the field's edge and asked, "Do you have no regrets about living this way?" Lin Lei continued gathering wheat and singing until pressed further, then finally looked up and replied, "What is there to regret?"

Perplexed, Zigong pressed on: "In your youth, you were not diligent; in your prime, you sought no achievement; now in old age, you have neither wife nor children, and death approaches. How can you find joy in gathering wheat and singing like this?" Lin Lei laughed and said, "Precisely because of this, I am happy! In youth, I avoided struggle; in my prime, I avoided fame—that is why I’ve lived so long. Now in old age, I am free from attachments, and death is near—that is why I can be joyful."

Zigong persisted: "Long life is a common human desire, while death is universally dreaded. Why do you rejoice in death?" Lin Lei explained, "Life and death are like a cycle of coming and going. Dying here, how do I know I won’t be reborn elsewhere? How do I know that clinging to life isn’t delusion? Perhaps this death is better than past existence."

When Zigong reported this to Confucius, the sage sighed and said, "I knew I could speak deeply with him. He truly understands the Dao, though his words are not yet fully expressed."

Later, Zigong grew weary of study and told Confucius he wished to rest. Confucius replied, "In life, there is no rest." Zigong asked, "Then will I never find rest?" Confucius pointed to distant burial mounds and said, "See those graves—raised high like ancient cauldrons—that is where final rest is found."

也則知所息 矣子貢曰大哉死乎君子息焉 小人伏焉 仲尼曰賜汝知之矣人胥知生之 樂 未知生之苦知老之憊未知老之佚知死 之惡未知死之息也 晏子曰善哉古之有死 也 仁者息焉不仁者伏焉死 也者德之徼也 古者謂死人爲歸人夫言 死人爲歸人則生 人爲行人矣行而不知歸失家者也一人失 家一世 非之天下失家莫知非焉有人去 鄉 土離六親廢家業遊於四方而不歸者何人 哉世必謂之爲狂 蕩之人矣又有人鍾賢世 矜巧能修名譽誇張於世而不 知己者亦何 人哉世必以爲智謀之士此二者胥失者也 而世 與一不與一唯聖人知所與知所去 或 謂子列子曰子奚貴虚列子曰虚者無貴也 子列子曰非其名 也莫如 靜莫如虚靜也虚 也得其居矣取也與也失其所矣 事之破䃣 而 後有舞仁義者弗能復也 粥熊曰運轉亡 已天地密移疇覺之哉 故物損於彼者盈於 此成於此者虧於彼損 盈成虧隨世隨死往 來相接間不可省疇覺之哉 凡一氣不頓進
Interpretation

This passage explores perspectives on life, death, and spiritual attainment through dialogues among various sages. Zigong (a disciple of Confucius) laments that death marks the boundary where noble persons find rest while petty men submit. Confucius (Zhongni) responds: People all know the joy of living, yet fail to understand life's suffering; they recognize the weariness of aging, but remain unaware of old age's tranquility; they fear death's terror, never realizing it represents liberation.

Master Yan further elaborates: Death is actually the homecoming of De (Virtue). The ancients called the deceased "returnees," while the living were "wayfarers." To journey onward without knowing one's destination is like losing one's homeland. Some abandon family and native land to wander recklessly - such people are deemed madmen. Others obsess over worldly fame and flaunt cleverness unwittingly - yet these are paradoxically considered wise. Both have lost their authentic nature, though the world only condemns the former. Only sages understand what to embrace and what to relinquish.

Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) presents the philosophy of "emptiness and stillness": Genuine stillness requires no deliberate display - maintaining serene emptiness allows one to dwell in original nature, while chasing gains and losses leads to confusion. Like broken vessels that cannot be mended with benevolence and righteousness, the natural order (what Zhou Xiong called "ceaseless cyclical movement") operates silently - all things wax and wane in perpetual alternation, with the cycle of life and death flowing as naturally as breath, though ordinary people seldom perceive its mystery. The cosmic transformations of Qi (vital energy) never occur abruptly.

一形不頓虧亦不覺其成不覺其 虧亦如人 自世至老貌色智態亡日不異皮膚 爪髮隨 世隨落非嬰孩時有停而不易也間 不可覺 俟至後知杞國有人憂天地崩墜身亡所寄 廢寢食者 又有憂彼之所憂者因往曉之 曰 天積氣耳亡處亡氣若屈伸呼吸終日在天 中行止奈何憂崩 墜乎其人曰天果積 氣日 月星宿不當墜邪曉之者曰日月星宿亦積 氣中之有光耀者 只使墜亦不能有所中傷 其人曰奈 地壞何曉者曰地積塊耳充塞四 虚亡處亡塊若躇步跐蹈終日在 地上行止 奈何憂其壞其人舍然大喜曉之者亦舍 然 大喜長廬子聞而笑 之曰虹霓也雲霧也風 雨也四時也此積氣之成乎天者也山嶽也 河海也金石也水火也此積形之成乎地者 也知積氣也知積塊也 奚謂不壞夫天地空 中之 一細物有中之最巨者難終難窮此固 然矣難測難識此固然矣憂 其壞者誠爲大 遠言其不壞者亦爲未是天地不得不壞則 會歸於 壞遇其壞時奚爲不憂哉子列 子聞
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of the Ultimate Virtue of Profound Emptiness) discusses the imperceptible transformations of phenomena and the limits of human perception. The human body does not suddenly decay nor abruptly grow—these changes are so subtle they elude our awareness. Consider how from birth to old age, one's appearance, intellect, and physique shift imperceptibly each day. Skin, nails, and hair constantly shed and renew, yet this does not mean an infant remains unchanged; the transformations are simply too minute to notice until their cumulative effects become evident later.

The text illustrates this with the parable of the man from Qi who feared the sky might collapse: A man from the state of Qi incessantly worried that heaven would cave in or the earth crumble, leaving him no refuge. His anxiety grew so severe he could neither eat nor sleep. Another man, troubled by this distress, sought to counsel him: "Heaven is but accumulated Qi (vital energy), present everywhere. You breathe and move within it daily—why fear its collapse?" The worrier pressed, "But what if the sun, moon, and stars fall?" The counselor replied, "These too are merely luminous Qi. Even if they descended, they couldn't harm anyone." When the man asked about the earth collapsing, the answer came: "The earth is compacted soil filling all directions. You walk upon it constantly—why dread its giving way?" Finally reassured, the anxious man found peace, and his counselor rejoiced.

Yet when the philosopher Changluzi heard this, he laughed and remarked: "Rainbows, clouds, wind, rain—these are the accumulated Qi forming heaven; mountains, rivers, metals, fire—these are the condensed matter constituting earth. Knowing heaven and earth are composed of Qi and matter, how can one claim they are indestructible? Though heaven and earth may seem vast to us, they are but minuscule specks within the cosmic void—their true nature lies beyond complete comprehension. To fret over their destruction is indeed excessive, yet to assert their permanence is equally mistaken. All things, including heaven and earth, must eventually dissolve. When that time comes, should we not be concerned?" Upon hearing this, Liezi (the text implies) remained silent, leaving the matter open for reflection.

而笑曰言天地壞者亦謬言天地不壞者亦 謬壞與不壞吾所 不能知也雖然彼一也此 一也 故生不知死死不知生來不知去去不 知來壞與不壞吾何容 心哉 舜問乎烝曰道 可得而有乎曰汝身非汝有也 汝何得有夫 道舜曰吾身非吾有孰 有之哉曰是天地之 委形也生非汝有是天地 之委和也性命非 汝有是天地之委順也 孫子非汝有是天地 之 委蜕也故行不知所往處不知所持食不 知 所以天地强陽氣也又胡可得而有邪 齊 之國氏大富宋之向氏大貧自宋之齊請其 術國氏告 之曰吾善爲盜始吾爲盜也一年 而給二年而足三年大穰自此以 往施及州 閭向氏大喜喻其爲盜之言而不喻其爲盜 之道遂踰垣 鑿室手目所及亡不探也未及 時以贜獲罪没其先居之財向氏以 國氏之 謬己也往而怨之國氏曰若爲盜若何向氏 言其狀國氏曰 嘻若失爲盜之道至此乎今 將告若矣吾聞天有時地有利 吾盜天地之 時利雲雨之滂潤山澤之産育以生吾禾殖
Interpretation

This scripture consists of two parts. The first discusses the nature of existence and life, while the second illustrates the principle of "stealing from Heaven and Earth" through a parable.

The first part states: Someone laughed and said that those who claim Heaven and Earth will perish are wrong, and those who say they won't perish are also wrong. Whether Heaven and Earth perish is ultimately unknowable to us. Whether they perish or not, it remains the same Heaven and Earth, and this is the same Heaven and Earth we inhabit. The living cannot know the affairs of the dead, nor can the dead know the affairs of the living; those coming cannot know about departure, nor can those departing know about arrival. Why should I concern myself with whether Heaven and Earth perish?

Emperor Shun (an ancient sage ruler) asked the wise man Zheng: "Can the Dao (the Way) be obtained and possessed?" Zheng replied: "Even your own body does not belong to you—how could you possess the Dao?" Shun pressed further: "If my body doesn't belong to me, then to whom does it belong?" Zheng explained: "Your physical form is temporarily entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth; your life doesn't belong to you—it's the harmonious Qi (vital energy) bestowed by Heaven and Earth; your innate nature and destiny don't belong to you—they follow the operational patterns arranged by Heaven and Earth; even your descendants don't belong to you—they're the continuity granted by Heaven and Earth. Thus when people walk, they don't know where they're going; when dwelling, they don't know what they rely upon; when eating, they don't understand why they eat. All these are manifestations of the flowing Yang Qi between Heaven and Earth—how could they possibly be possessed by you?"

The second part presents a parable: The Guo family of Qi State was wealthy, while the Xiang family of Song State was poor. Xiang went to Qi to learn Guo's method for gaining wealth. Guo said: "I excel at 'stealing.' When I began 'stealing,' within one year I had enough for food and clothing, in two years I became prosperous, and after three years I was extremely wealthy and could even assist my neighbors." Misunderstanding the meaning of "stealing," Xiang returned home and began breaking into houses, only to be caught and have his property confiscated. He blamed Guo for deceiving him. Guo then explained: "You misunderstood the true meaning of 'stealing.' What I meant was utilizing the timeliness of Heaven and the benefits of Earth—'stealing' the nourishment of clouds and rain, the bounty of mountains and marshes to cultivate crops. This is the true Dao of 'stealing from Heaven and Earth.'"

吾稼築 吾垣建吾舍陸盜禽獸水盜魚鼈亡 非盜也夫禾稼士木禽獸魚鼈 皆天之所生 豈吾之所有然吾盜 天而無殃夫金玉珍寳 穀帛財貨人之所聚豈天之 所與若盜之而 獲罪孰怨哉向 氏大惑以爲國氏之重罔己 也遇東郭先生問焉東郭先生曰若一 身庸 非盜乎盜陰陽之和以成若生載若形況外 物而非盜哉 誠然天地萬物不相離也仞而 有之 皆惑也 國氏之盜公道也故 亡殃若之 盜私心也故得罪有公私 者亦盜也亡公私 者亦盜也公 公私私天地之德知天地之 德 者孰爲盜耶孰爲不
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of Perfect Virtue and Pervading Emptiness) presents a philosophical reflection on the concept of "theft" through a dialogue between Guo Shi and Xiang Shi, exploring the relationship between humans and all things in nature.

Guo Shi says: "When I cultivate crops, build walls, construct houses, hunt animals on land, or catch fish and turtles in water—none of these count as theft. Crops, timber, beasts, and fish are all naturally produced—how could they be considered my possessions? I take what nature provides yet incur no calamity. But gold, silver, jewels, grain, cloth, money, and goods—these are all accumulated by human effort, not bestowed by Heaven. If stealing such things brings punishment, who is to blame?"

Perplexed, Xiang Shi suspects Guo Shi of deceiving him and consults Master Dongguo. The master replies: "Isn't your own body also 'stolen'? You appropriate the harmonious blending of Yin and Yang (Yin-Yang) to sustain your life, borrowing physical form to exist—how much more so with external things? Aren't these all 'taken'?"

In truth, all things between Heaven and Earth are interconnected. To forcibly claim ownership is delusion. Guo Shi's "theft" follows the natural Dao (the Way), thus avoiding calamity; ordinary theft stems from selfish desire, hence incurring punishment. Yet ultimately, whether motivated by private or public gain, it is all "theft." Those who comprehend the great De (Virtue/Power) of Heaven and Earth—who can definitively say what is theft and what is not?

This passage uses the concept of "theft" to reveal the Daoist teaching of "the unity of all things," suggesting that human appropriation of natural resources aligns with the Dao when done in harmony with cosmic principles rather than through forceful grasping.

盜耶

Vol. 2

黃帝第二 黄 帝即位十有五年喜天下戴己養正命娱 耳目供鼻 口焦然肌色皯(居按/切)黣昏然五情 爽惑又十有五年憂 天下之不治竭聰明進 智力營百姓焦然肌色皯黣(眉回/切)昏然五 情 爽惑黄帝乃喟然讚曰朕之過淫矣養 一己 其患如此治萬物其患如此於是放萬 機舍 宫寢去直侍徹鐘懸减厨膳退而間居大庭 之館齋心服形 三月不親政事晝寢而夢遊 於華 胥氏之國華胥氏之國在弇州之西台 州之北 不知斯齊國幾千萬里蓋非舟車足 力之所及神 遊而已其國無帥長自然而已 其民無嗜慾 自然而已不知樂生不知惡死 故無夭殤不知親己不知 疏物故無愛憎不 知背逆不知向順故無利害 都無所愛惜無 所畏忌入水不溺入火不熱斫撻無傷 痛指 擿無痟(音/簫)癢乘空如履實寢 虚若處牀雲霧 不硋(與礙/同)其視雷霆不亂其聽美惡不滑共
Interpretation

During the fifteenth year of the Yellow Emperor's reign, he grew complacent with the people's adoration and indulged daily in sensory pleasures—eyes, ears, mouth, and nose. As a result, his complexion turned sallow and haggard, his spirit (Shen) became scattered, and his emotions—joy, anger, sorrow, and delight—descended into chaos. Another fifteen years passed, and he began to fret over poor governance, exhausting himself in state affairs until his face grew ashen and his mind dull.

The Yellow Emperor lamented, "My faults are grave indeed! Indulgence brings such calamity, yet governing the world likewise leads to distress." So he set aside his burdensome duties, left the palace, dismissed his attendants, reduced musical entertainments, simplified his meals, and retired alone to the residence of the Great Court Official. There, he purified his heart and restrained his desires, nurturing body and mind for three full months without attending to state affairs.

One day, while napping, he dreamed his spirit journeyed to the land of Huaxushi—a legendary utopia. This realm lay west of Yanzhou and north of Taizhou, so distant that no boat or carriage could reach it; only the spirit could travel there. It had no rulers, for all followed the natural course (Wuwei). The people harbored no cravings, wholly aligned with the Dao. They neither clung to life nor feared death, so none died young; neither favored themselves nor spurned others, so love and hate did not exist. Unaware of rebellion or obedience, they knew no conflict of gain and loss.

To them, nothing was beloved or feared: entering water did not drown them, fire did not burn them, blades and whips brought no pain, and scratches caused no itch. They walked the void as if treading solid ground, slept in emptiness as if on beds. Clouds and fog obscured no sight, thunderclaps disturbed no hearing, and beauty or ugliness could not sway their hearts.

心山谷不躓 其步神行而已黄帝既寤怡然 自得召天老 力牧太山稽告之曰朕間居三 月齋心服形思有以養身治物 之道弗獲其 術疲而睡所夢若此今知至道不可 以情求 矣朕知之矣朕得之矣而不能以告若矣又 二 十有八年天下大治幾若華胥氏之國而 帝登假百姓號之二百 餘年不輟列姑射山 在海河洲中山上有神人焉吸風 飲露不食 五穀心如淵泉形如處女 不偎不愛仙聖爲 之臣 不畏不怒原慤爲之使不施 不惠而物 自足不聚不歛而己無愆陰陽常調日月常 明四 時常若風雨常均宇育常時年穀常豐 而土無札傷人無夭惡 物無疵癘鬼無靈響 焉 列子師老商氏友伯高子進二子之道乘 風而歸 尹生聞之從列子居數月不省舍因 問請蘄其術者十 反而十不告尹生懟而請 辭列子又不命尹生退數月意不已又往 從 之列子曰女何去來之頻尹生曰曩章戴有 請於子子不 我告固有憾於子今復脱然是 以又來列子曰曩吾以汝爲達 今汝之鄙至
Interpretation

The Yellow Emperor could traverse mountain valleys without stumbling, having attained the state of divine movement (shenxing). Upon awakening, he felt extraordinary joy and summoned his ministers Tianlao, Limu, and Taishanji. He told them: "After three months of secluded purification (zhaijie), gathering my spirit (shen) and nurturing my form, I pondered methods for cultivating life and governing the world yet found no essential path. Weary, I fell asleep and had this dream. Now I understand the supreme Dao cannot be sought through ordinary means. I have comprehended it, I have attained it, yet cannot convey it to you in words."

Twenty-eight years later, the world was perfectly governed, nearly as ideal as the legendary kingdom of Huaxushi. After the Yellow Emperor ascended as an immortal (xian), the people cherished his memory for over two centuries uninterrupted. On the mythical mountain of Guyeshan in the midst of the Haihe River, there dwelled a divine being who inhaled wind and drank dew, consuming no grains. His heart-mind was tranquil as an abyss, his appearance pure as a maiden. Neither intimate nor aloof, even immortals and sages willingly served as his ministers; neither fearful nor angry, even the most sincere people voluntarily labored for him. Without bestowing favors, all things were naturally abundant; without hoarding possessions, he himself never lacked.

Yin and Yang remained eternally harmonized, sun and moon perpetually bright, the four seasons perfectly ordered, wind and rain evenly distributed. All beings grew according to their seasons, crops flourished without fail. The land knew no calamities, people no untimely deaths, creation no imperfections, and spirits dared not cause mischief.

Liezi studied under the master Laoshangshi and befriended Bogaozi. Having acquired their true teachings, he rode the wind home. Hearing of this, Yinsheng followed Liezi for several months without returning home, repeatedly requesting instruction in the Dao yet being refused ten times. When Yinsheng resentfully asked to leave, Liezi didn't detain him. Months later, Yinsheng returned unable to resist. Liezi asked: "Why do you come and go so frequently?" Yinsheng replied: "Previously I sought with sincerity yet you wouldn't teach, so naturally I felt discontent. Now my anger has dissipated, hence I've returned." Liezi said: "At first I thought you profoundly perceptive, now I see how shallow you remain."

此乎姬將告女所學於夫子者矣自吾之事 夫子 友若人也三年之後心不敢念是非口 不敢言利害始得 夫子一盻而已五年之後 心更念是非口更言 利害夫子始一解顔而 笑 七年之後從心之所念更無是非從口之 所言更 無利害夫子始一引吾並席而坐 九 年之後橫心之所念横口之所言亦不知 我 之是非利害歟亦不知彼之是非利害歟亦 不知夫子之爲我師 若人之爲我友内外進 矣而後眼 如耳耳如鼻鼻如口無不同也心 凝形釋骨肉都融不覺形之所倚 足之所履 隨風東西猶木葉幹殻竟不知風乘我邪我 乘風乎 今女居先生之門曾未浹時而懟憾 者再三汝之片體將 氣所不受汝之一節將 地所不載履 虚乘風其可幾乎尹生甚怍屛 息良乆不敢復言列子問關尹曰至 人潜行 不空蹈火不熱行乎萬物 之上而不慓請問 何以至於此關尹曰是純 氣之守也非智巧 果敢之列姬 魚語女凡有貌像聲色者皆物 也 物與物何以相遠也夫奚足以至乎先是 色而已 則物之造乎不形而止乎無所化 夫 得是而窮之者焉得而正焉 彼將處乎不深 之度而藏乎無端之 紀游乎萬物之所終始
Interpretation

This scripture vividly depicts the process of a Daoist practitioner gradually attaining the state of self-oblivion through Liezi (an important Daoist figure) recounting his learning experience to Yin Sheng.

Liezi recalls nine stages of studying under his teacher: In the first three years, he dared not even contemplate right and wrong or personal gain; after five years, he could naturally discern right and wrong, earning his teacher's smile; after seven years, all distinctions between right and wrong vanished from his mind, and his teacher allowed him to sit at the same mat; after nine years, he completely transcended all dualities of right and wrong and personal interests, even forgetting who was teacher and who was friend. At this stage, the boundaries of his senses dissolved completely—his eyes could hear like ears, his ears could smell like a nose, and his body merged with nature until he could no longer distinguish whether he was floating or the wind was carrying him.

Liezi then criticizes Yin Sheng for complaining repeatedly despite being a beginner, pointing out that such an impatient mindset cannot even bear the Qi (vital energy) of heaven and earth, let alone attain the state of "walking on emptiness and riding the wind." When Liezi asks Guan Yinzi (a Daoist perfected being) why realized adepts can walk through water without drowning or tread on fire without burning, Guan Yinzi explains that this depends on preserving pure primordial Qi rather than cleverness or courage. He emphasizes that all things with form and appearance are merely "objects," while true adepts reach the formless state, wandering freely in the origin of all things, maintaining perfect harmony and merging with the endless rhythm of Dao.

Through these progressively deepening stages of cultivation, the text reveals the core principles of "self-forgetting" and "guarding Qi" in Daoist practice, ultimately pointing toward the supreme state of transcending form and uniting with the Dao.

壹其性養其氣含其德以通乎物之所造 夫 若是者其天守全其神無却物奚自入焉 夫 醉者之墜於車也雖疾不死骨節與人同而 犯害與人 異其神全也乘亦弗知也墜亦弗 知也死生驚懼不入 乎其胸是故遻物而不 慴彼得全於酒而猶若是 而況得全於天乎 聖人藏於天故物 莫之能傷也列禦寇爲伯 昏無人射引之盈貫 措盃水其肘上發之鏑 矢復沓方矢復寓 當是時也猶象人也伯昏 無人曰是射之 射非不射之射也當與汝登 高山履 危石臨百仞之淵若能射乎於是無 人遂登高山履危 石臨百仞之淵背逡巡足 二分垂在外揖禦寇而進之禦寇伏地汗 流 至踵伯昏無人曰夫至人者止闚青天下潜 黄泉揮斥八極神氣 不變今汝怵然有恂目 之志爾於中也殆矣夫范氏有子曰子華 善 養私名舉國服之有寵於晋君不仕而居三
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the state of "complete spiritual concentration" (quanshen) through two parables. The first uses the example of a drunkard who falls from a carriage yet escapes serious injury—because his spirit is wholly immersed in intoxication, remaining oblivious to external dangers, he paradoxically preserves himself. This demonstrates that if even drunkenness can produce such protective effects, how much more so would complete union with the natural Dao (de quan yu tian, "attaining wholeness through heaven") achieve.

The second story recounts Liezi's archery skill. When shooting on level ground, he displayed remarkable technique, maintaining perfect balance with a cup of water placed on his elbow. But Bohun Wuren (a Daoist sage) pointed out this was merely "deliberate archery." When they climbed a cliff face and Liezi became paralyzed with fear, sweating profusely, Bohun Wuren explained that a true perfected person (zhiren) maintains unshaken spirit even when facing bottomless chasms.

The passage concludes by mentioning a man named Zihua from the Fan clan who excelled at cultivating personal reputation. Though holding no official position, he enjoyed high status in the state of Jin. This serves as a contrast to the preceding teachings, subtly implying the distinction between worldly fame and genuine Daoist cultivation.

卿之右目所 偏視晋國爵之口所偏肥晋國 黜之遊其庭者侔於朝子華 使其俠客以智 鄙相攻强弱相凌雖傷破於前不用介意終 日夜以 此爲戲樂國殆成俗禾生子伯范氏 之上客出行經坰外宿 於田更商丘開之舍 中夜禾生子伯二人相與言子華之名勢 能 使存者亡亡者存富者貧貧者富商丘開先 窘於饑寒潜於牖 北聽之因假糧荷畚之子 華之門子華之門徒皆世族也縞衣乘軒 緩 步闊視顧見商丘開年老力弱面目黧黑衣 冠不檢莫不眲之(仍吏/ 切)既而狎侮欺詒儻(止/兩) (切)㧙(必結/切)挨(倚海/切)抌(勇主/切)亡所不爲商丘開 常無愠容而諸客之技單憊於戲笑遂與商 丘開俱乘高臺於衆 中漫言曰有能自投下 者賞百金衆皆競應商丘開以爲信然遂先 投下形若飛鳥揚於地𩨒骨無䃣范氏之黨 以爲偶然未詎怪也因 復指河曲之淫隈曰 彼中有寳珠泳可得也商丘開復從而泳之 既 出果得珠焉衆昉同疑子華昉令豫肉食 衣帛之次俄 而范氏之藏大火子華曰若能
Interpretation

In the state of Jin, there lived a nobleman named Zihua who wielded immense power. Whoever caught the favor of his right eye would receive aristocratic rank in Jin, and whoever earned his verbal praise would obtain official emoluments. Those who visited his residence received treatment comparable to an audience with the ruler himself. Zihua took pleasure in pitting his retainers against each other—the clever bullying the dull, the strong oppressing the weak—caring not if they bloodied each other in the process. This cruel amusement became a prevailing custom throughout Jin.

Two men named Hesheng and Zibo, high-ranking retainers of the Fan clan, were once traveling through the countryside and took lodging at the home of an old farmer named Shangqiu Kai. Late at night, they discussed Zihua's formidable influence—how he could make the living die and the dead live, the rich become poor and the poor become rich. Shangqiu Kai, who was suffering from hunger and cold, overheard their conversation by the northern window. Borrowing some grain, he set out with a winnowing basket on his back to seek Zihua's patronage.

Zihua's followers were all scions of noble families, dressed in white robes and riding ornate carriages, swaggering as they walked. When they saw the elderly Shangqiu Kai—weak, sallow-faced, and shabbily dressed—they treated him with contempt. They devised every manner of prank to torment him, pushing, striking, and humiliating him without restraint. Yet Shangqiu Kai never grew angry, while his tormentors exhausted themselves in the effort.

Later, the group ascended a high platform where someone jested, "Whoever dares to jump from here will be rewarded with a hundred pieces of gold." Everyone clamored in agreement. Shangqiu Kai, taking the offer at face value, leaped first—descending as lightly as a bird, completely unharmed. The Fan retainers dismissed it as coincidence, showing no surprise. Then someone pointed to a deep bend in the river, saying, "There are precious pearls there—dive down and you can retrieve them." Shangqiu Kai plunged in again and indeed surfaced with pearls. Only then did the crowd begin to suspect something unusual, and Zihua provided him with fine clothes and sumptuous meals. Soon after, when the Fan family's storehouse caught fire, Zihua declared...

入火取錦者從所得多少賞若商丘 開往無 難色入火往還埃不漫身不焦范氏之黨以 爲有道乃共謝 之曰吾不知子之有道而誕 子吾不知子之神人而辱子子其 愚我也子 其聾我也子其盲我也敢問其道商丘開曰 吾亡道雖吾 之心亦不知所以雖然有一於 此試與子言之曩子二客之宿吾舍 也聞譽 范氏之勢能使存者亡亡者存富者貧貧者 富吾誠之無 二心故不遠而來及來以子黨 之言皆實也唯恐誠之之不至行之 之不及 不知形體之所措利害之所存也心一而物 亡迕者如斯 而已今昉知子黨之誕我我内 藏猜慮外矜觀聽追幸昔日之不焦 溺也怛 然内熱惕然震悸矣水火豈復可近哉自此 之後范氏門徒 路遇乞兒馬醫弗敢辱也必 下車而揖之宰我聞之以告仲尼仲尼 曰汝 弗知乎夫至信之人可以感物也動天地感 鬼神橫六合而無 逆者豈但履危險入水火 而已哉商丘開信僞物猶不逆況彼我皆 誠 哉小子識之周宣王之牧正有役人梁鴦者
Interpretation

There was a man named Shang Qiu Kai who could enter fire to retrieve silk brocades, and people rewarded him based on the quantity he retrieved, much like merchants conducting trade. When he moved in and out of the flames, his expression remained unchanged, and though he walked back and forth, he was never stained by smoke or scorched by the fire. The retainers of the Fan family (a noble clan of the Jin state during the Spring and Autumn period) believed him to be a man of Dao (the Way), so they collectively apologized to him, saying: "We did not realize you were a man of Dao and earlier mocked you; we did not know you were a divine being and even insulted you. Were you feigning ignorance to deceive us? Were you pretending not to hear? Were you pretending not to see? May we ask what Dao you cultivate?"

Shang Qiu Kai replied: "I possess no special arts of Dao. Though I am aware in my heart, I do not know why this happens. However, there is one thing I can tell you: previously, two guests stayed at my home, and I heard them praise the Fan family’s power, saying it could make the living die and the dead revive, make the rich poor and the poor rich. I believed these words completely, so I traveled thousands of miles to come here. Upon arriving, I found that everything you said was true. I was only afraid that my sincerity might be insufficient or my actions inadequate—I never even considered the safety of my body or the balance of gain and loss. With my mind wholly focused, external things could not affect me. That was all there was to it. Now I realize you were merely toying with me. My heart is filled with doubt and worry, and though I feign composure outwardly, when I recall how I wasn’t burned to death before, it seems mere luck—the thought still terrifies me. How would I dare approach fire or water again?"

From then on, whenever Fan’s disciples encountered beggars or horse doctors on the road, they no longer dared to insult them but would invariably dismount and bow. When Confucius’s disciple Zai Wo heard of this, he reported it to Confucius. Confucius said: "Don’t you understand? A person of utmost sincerity and faith can move all things, shake heaven and earth, summon spirits and ghosts, and traverse the world without obstruction—how could it be limited to merely entering fire and water? Shang Qiu Kai believed even in falsehoods without resistance—how much more should this apply when both sides are sincere? Young men, remember this principle well."

During the reign of King Xuan of Zhou, there was a laborer named Liang Yang under the Mu Zheng (an official in charge of livestock)...

能養野禽獸委食於 園庭之内雖虎狼鵰鶚 之類無不柔馴者雌雄在前孳尾成羣異類 雜 居不相搏噬也王慮其術終於其身令毛 丘園傳之梁鴦曰鴦賤役 也何術以告爾懼 王之謂隱於爾也且一言我養虎之法凡順 之則 喜逆之則怒此有血氣者之性也然喜 怒豈妄發哉皆逆之所犯也 夫食虎者不敢 以生物與之爲其殺之之怒也不敢以全物 與 之爲其碎之之怒也時其饑飽達其怒心 虎之與人異類而媚養己者順也故其殺之 逆也 然則吾豈敢逆之使怒哉亦不順之使 喜也夫喜之復也必怒怒 之復也常喜皆不 中也令吾心無逆順者也則鳥獸 之視吾猶 其儕也故遊吾園者不思高林曠澤寢吾庭 者不願深山 幽谷理使然也顔回問乎仲尼 曰 吾嘗濟乎觴深之淵矣津人操舟若神吾 問焉曰操舟可學邪曰可 能游者可教也善 游者數能乃若夫没人則未 嘗見舟而謖操 之者也吾問焉而不告敢問何謂也仲 尼曰 𧮒吾與若玩其文乆矣而未達其實而固且
Interpretation

This scripture conveys the profound principle of "following nature's course" through two parables. The first recounts how Liang Yang mastered the art of taming wild beasts—his tigers, wolves, and eagles coexisted peacefully because he practiced the method of "neither opposing nor indulging." When feeding them, he avoided live prey (to prevent triggering their hunting instincts) and whole carcasses (to avoid stimulating their tearing impulses), instead precisely attuning to their hunger cycles to dissolve their aggression. Liang Yang revealed the key lay in his own mindset—neither deliberately pleasing nor willfully contradicting, so the animals regarded him as kin and naturally stayed.

The second story features a dialogue between Yan Hui and Confucius. Observing a ferryman's supernatural boat-handling skills, Yan Hui learned the ferryman's secret: skilled swimmers quickly master steering, while expert divers can operate boats without prior experience. Confucius explained this mirrors how we often study surface texts without grasping their essence—true mastery comes from forgetting external techniques, like the diver who merges completely with water to intuitively understand its nature. Both parables demonstrate that the highest forms of interaction or skill arise from thorough attunement to the inherent nature of things.

道與 能游者可教也輕水也善游者之數能 也 忘水也乃若夫没人之未嘗見舟也而謖 操之也彼視淵若 陵視舟之覆猶其車却也 覆却萬物方陳乎前而不得入其舍 惡往而 不暇以瓦摳者巧以鈎摳者憚以黄金摳者 惛 巧一也而有所矜則重外也凡重外者拱 内 孔子觀於吕梁懸水三十仞流沫三十里 黿鼉魚鼈之 所不能游也見一丈夫游之以 爲似有苦而欲死者也使弟子並流而 承之 數百步而出被髮行歌而游於棠行孔子從 而問之 曰吕梁懸水三十仞流沫三十里黿 鼉魚鼈所不能游向吾見子道 之以爲有苦 而欲死者使弟子並流將承子子出而被髮 行歌 吾以子爲鬼也察子則人也請問蹈水 有道乎曰亡吾無道吾始乎 故長乎性成乎 命與齎俱入與汨偕出從水之道而不 爲私 焉此吾所以道之也孔子曰何謂始乎故長 乎性成乎命也曰 吾生於陵而安於陵故也 長於水而安於水性也 不知吾所以然而然 命也仲尼適楚出 於林中見痀瘻者承蜩猶
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the Daoist core concept of "following nature's course" through several vivid parables.

The first story illustrates the principle of swimming: skilled swimmers can teach others because they understand water's nature; true masters even forget water's existence, like those who expertly steer boats having never seen one before—they perceive deep abysses as flat ground and capsizing vessels as mere carriage reversals. Such individuals remain undisturbed by external phenomena. The gambling analogy follows: betting with tiles brings ease, silver hooks induce tension, while gold stakes cause mental confusion—the skill remains identical, yet overvaluing external objects burdens the heart-mind.

The second narrative recounts Confucius' encounter at Lüliang Falls. The thirty-ren (approx. 54m) cascade with thirty-li rapids where even turtles couldn't swim, yet a man moved effortlessly through the torrent. Mistaking him for suicidal, Confucius sent disciples to rescue him, only to witness the swimmer emerge hundreds of paces downstream, singing while walking with hair unbound. When asked his secret, the man replied: "I possess no technique. Born on hills, I adapted to hills; raised by water, I harmonized with currents—this became my unthinking nature, what you call following Heaven's mandate. I dive with whirlpools and surface with upwellings, completely yielding to water's patterns without personal will."

The third fragment describes Confucius observing a hunchbacked elder catching cicadas with bamboo poles in Chu's forests. Though incomplete, this episode similarly demonstrates achieving the "self-and-object forgotten" state through prolonged concentrated practice.

These parables collectively reveal: authentic Dao (the Way) resides not in forced pursuit, but in perfect attunement to things' inherent nature, arriving at that spontaneous state of "knowing-not-how-yet-thus-it-is." Whether swimming, gambling, or cicada-catching, when humans shed attachments to externals and fully merge with their environment, they attain transcendent mastery.

掇之也仲尼曰子巧乎有道邪曰我有道 也 五六月纍現(音/九)二而不墜則失者錙銖 纍三 而不墜則失者十一纍五而不墜猶掇之也 吾 處也若橛株駒吾執臂若槁木之枝雖天 地之大萬物之 多而唯蜩翼之知吾不反不 側不以萬物易蜩之翼何爲而不得 孔子顧 謂弟子曰用志不分乃疑於神其痀瘻 丈人 曰汝逢衣徒也亦何知問是乎修汝所以而 後載 言其上海上之人有好漚鳥者每旦 之 海上從漚鳥游漚鳥之至者百住而不止其 父曰 吾聞漚鳥皆從汝游汝取來吾玩之明 日之海上漚鳥舞而不下也 故曰至言去言 至爲無爲齊智之所知則淺矣 趙襄子率徒 十萬狩於中山籍芿 燔林扇赫百里有一人 從石壁中出隨煙燼上下衆謂鬼物火過徐 行而出若無所經涉者襄子怪而留之徐而 察之形色七竅人也氣 息音聲人也問奚道 而處石奚道而入火其人曰奚物而謂石奚 物 而謂火襄子曰而向之所出者石也而向 之所涉者火 也其人曰不知也魏文侯聞之 問子夏曰彼何人哉子 夏曰以商所聞夫子 之言和者大同於物物無得傷閡者游金石 踏 水火皆可也文侯曰吾子奚不爲之子夏 曰刳心去智商未之能雖然 試語之有暇矣 文 侯曰夫子奚不爲之子夏曰夫子能之而 能不爲者也文侯大說 有神巫自齊來處於
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of the Ultimate Virtue of Profound Emptiness), which conveys the Daoist philosophy that "the ultimate speech is beyond words, the ultimate action is non-action (Wuwei)" through several parables.

The first story tells of Confucius meeting an old man who was exceptionally skilled at catching cicadas. The old man explained that during his practice, his concentration reached its peak: he stood as steady as a tree stump, his arms as motionless as withered branches, and his eyes saw only the cicada’s wings—nothing in the world could distract him. Confucius marveled, "When the mind is wholly focused, it attains spiritual communion."

The second story describes a man by the sea who loved seagulls and played with hundreds of them daily. His father asked him to catch one for amusement, but the next day, the gulls only circled in the air and refused to land. This illustrates how deliberate pursuit disrupts natural harmony.

The third story recounts how Lord Xiang of Zhao encountered a strange man while hunting, one who could walk through stone walls and tread unharmed through fire. When questioned, the man replied, "What are stones? What is fire?" showing he paid no heed to such distinctions. Zixia explained that this was "the state of oneness with all things," but ordinary people, with impure minds, could hardly attain it.

These stories all demonstrate that true wisdom transcends words, and the highest form of action is non-action. When one discards cunning thoughts and merges completely with nature, one reaches a carefree state where metal and stone yield, and fire and water cannot harm. Deliberate striving, however, disrupts this natural harmony.

鄭命曰季咸知人死生存亡禍福壽夭期以 歲月旬日如神鄭人見 之皆避而走列子見 之而心醉而歸以告壺丘 子曰始吾以夫子 之道爲至矣則又有至焉者矣壺 子曰吾與 女既其文未既其實而固得道歟衆雌而無 雄而又奚卵 焉 而以道與世抗必信矣夫故 使人得而相汝 嘗試與來以予示之明日列 子與之見壺子出而謂列子曰譆 子之先生 死矣弗活矣不可以旬數矣吾見怪焉見濕 灰焉列子入 涕泣沾衿以告壺子壺子曰向 吾示之以地文罪(合 作/萌)乎不誫(合作/震)不止 是 殆見吾杜德幾也嘗又與來 明日又與之見 壺子出而謂列子曰幸矣子之先生遇我也 有瘳矣 灰然有生矣吾見杜權矣列子入告 壺子壺子曰 向吾示之以天壤名實不入而 幾 發於踵此爲杜權是殆見吾善者幾也嘗 又與來明日又與之見壺子出而謂列子曰 子之 先生坐不齋吾無得而相焉試齋 將且 復相之列子入告壺子壺子曰向吾示之以 太冲莫朕 是殆見吾衡氣幾也鯢旋之潘爲 淵止水之 潘爲淵流水之潘爲淵濫水之潘 爲淵沃水之潘爲淵沈水之潘爲淵雍水之 潘爲淵汧水之潘爲淵肥水之潘爲淵是爲 九淵焉嘗又與來明日又與之見壺子立未
Interpretation

In the state of Zheng, there was a shaman named Ji Xian who could foresee people's life and death, fortune and misfortune, predicting events down to the exact year, month, and day with uncanny accuracy. The people of Zheng would flee in fear at the sight of him. Only Liezi (Lie Yukou, a prominent Daoist figure) admired him greatly and returned to tell his teacher, Master Huqiu: "I used to think your mastery of the Dao was the most profound, but now I realize there are even greater adepts."

Master Huqiu replied: "What I've taught you so far are only superficial techniques, not the true essence. How can you presume to have attained the Dao? It's like having a hen without a rooster—how could eggs be hatched? With such shallow skills, you try to compete with worldly men, so of course they can see through you. Bring him to meet me tomorrow."

The next day, Liezi brought Ji Xian to see Master Huqiu. Upon leaving, the shaman told Liezi: "Your teacher is dying—he won't last ten more days. I saw his complexion like damp ashes, utterly lifeless." Liezi returned in tears to report this. Master Huqiu said: "I showed him the 'Earthly Pattern' state (referring to a meditative state where vital energies are withdrawn), with Qi as still as the earth. He probably only perceived my sealed vitality."

On the third day during their meeting, Ji Xian emerged saying: "Fortunately, your teacher met me—he can be saved! I see his vitality beginning to return." Master Huqiu explained: "This time I manifested the 'Heaven-Earth' state (a cultivation stage where cosmic energies interact), where conceptual distinctions don't enter the mind and vitality rises from the feet. He glimpsed the signs of my recovering Qi."

At their fourth encounter, Ji Xian said: "Your teacher's spirit is unsettled today—I can't read him. Wait until he's calm." Master Huqiu remarked: "Now I revealed the 'Supreme Equilibrium' state (the pinnacle of Yin-Yang balance), where Qi harmonizes without trace. Like a fathomless abyss with nine depths (using water's changing states to metaphorize cultivation stages), he couldn't possibly discern my true condition."

On the final day, Ji Xian took one look at Master Huqiu and fled. The master said: "This time I manifested the 'Not-Yet-Emerged-from-My-Source' state (the supreme unity with the Dao). He found it completely inscrutable—like trying to grasp reeds in a gale or catch floating pestles in a torrent—so he had to run away."

定自失而走壺子曰追之列子追之而不及 反以報壺子曰已滅矣已失矣吾不及也壺 子曰向吾示之以未始出吾宗吾與之虚而 猗移不知其誰何因以爲茅靡因以爲波流 故逃也然後列子自以爲未始學而歸三年 不出爲其妻爨食狶如食人於事無親雕琢 復朴塊然獨以其形立㤋然而封戎壹以是 終子列子之齊中道而反遇伯昏瞀人伯昏 瞀人曰奚方而反曰吾驚焉惡乎驚吾食於 十漿而五漿先饋伯昏瞀人曰若是則汝何 爲驚已曰夫内誠不解形諜成光以外鎮人 心 使人輕乎貴老而𩐎其所患 夫漿人特爲 食羹之貨無多餘之嬴其爲利也 薄其爲權 也輕而猶若是而況萬乘 之主身勞於國而 智盡於事彼將任我以事而效我以功吾 是 以驚伯昏瞀人曰善哉觀乎汝 處已人將保 汝矣無幾何而往則 户外之屨滿矣伯昏瞀 人北面而立敦杖蹙之乎頤立有 間不言而 出賔者以告列子列子提履徒跣而走暨乎 門問曰先生 既來曾不廢藥乎曰已矣吾固 告汝曰人將保汝果 保汝矣非汝能使人保 汝而汝不能使人 無汝保也而焉用之感也 感豫出 異且必有感也揺而本身又無謂也 與汝遊者莫汝告也彼所小言盡人毒 也莫 覺莫悟何相孰也楊朱南之沛老聃西遊於 秦邀 於郊至梁而遇老子老子中道仰天而
Interpretation

Liezi, a prominent Daoist figure, believed he had grasped the true essence of the Dao (the Way), but Master Huzi (an enlightened sage) revealed to him a far profounder realm. Liezi pursued but couldn't catch up, returning to report that the master had vanished without trace. Master Huzi explained that what he'd demonstrated was the state of "never departing from my primordial source" (the original condition of the Dao). He had merely followed natural transformations like reeds bending with the wind or waves flowing with the current, thus effortlessly eluding capture. Only then did Liezi realize he hadn't even begun his spiritual journey. He returned home and practiced behind closed doors for three years—personally tending the hearth to cook for his wife, treating pigs and people with equal regard, shedding all artifice to return to primal simplicity. His form became like withered wood in solitary stillness, ultimately attaining the state where self and objects are both forgotten.

Later, when Liezi journeyed to Qi, he turned back midway and encountered Bohun Maoren (another enlightened master). Liezi confessed that at ten congee shops along the way, five had voluntarily offered him food—a circumstance that unsettled him. Bohun pointed out: "When inner attachments remain unextinguished, outward radiance manifests. This overawes people's hearts, making them slight elders who deserve respect, thereby inviting misfortune. These congee sellers operate on meager margins with trivial profits, yet they treated you thus—how much more would rulers of states? They'd surely burden you with state affairs and demand measurable achievements. Hence your fear."

Bohun Maoren prophesied: "Soon many will come to depend on you." Indeed, before long, visitors' shoes piled up outside Liezi's gate. When Bohun arrived leaning on his staff, he stood silently before departing. Liezi ran barefoot to the gate seeking guidance. Bohun said: "Didn't I foretell people would cling to you? This stems not from your capability, but your failure to prevent their dependence. Why deliberately display extraordinariness? To agitate your innate nature is meaningless. Those who associate with you won't warn you—their sweet words are poison, yet neither side perceives it."

The subsequent passage mentions Yang Zhu's southward journey and Laozi's westward travels, describing their encounter at Liang where Laozi gazed skyward mid-journey with a sigh. This episode primarily teaches that cultivators should preserve inner authenticity while avoiding outward brilliance that attracts worldly entanglements, emphasizing the essential practice of "harmonizing radiance and blending with the dust."

嘆曰始以汝爲可教今不可教也楊朱不答 至舍 進涫漱巾櫛脱履户外膝行而前曰向 者夫子仰天而嘆曰始以汝 爲可教今不可 教弟子欲請夫子辭行不間是以不敢今夫 子問矣 請問其過老子曰而睢睢而盱盱而 誰與居大 白若辱盛德若不足楊朱蹙然變 容曰敬聞命矣其 往也舍者迎將家公執席 妻執巾櫛舍者避席煬者避竈 其反也舍者 與之爭席矣楊朱過宋東之於逆旅 逆旅人 有妾二人其一人美其一人惡惡者貴而美 者賤楊子問其 故逆旅小子對曰其美者自 美吾不知其美也其惡者自惡吾不知 其惡 也楊子曰弟子記之行賢而去自賢之行安 往而不愛哉 天下有常勝之道有不常勝之 道常 勝之道曰柔常不勝之道曰强二者亦 知而人未之知故上古之 言强先不己若者 柔先出於己者先不己若者 至於若己則殆 矣先出於己者無所殆矣以此勝一身若 徒 以此任天下若徒謂不勝而自勝不任而自 任也 粥子曰欲剛必以柔守之欲强必以 弱 保之積於柔必剛積於弱必强 觀其所積以 知禍福之鄉强勝不若己至於若己者剛 柔 勝出於己者其力不可量老聃曰兵强則滅 木强 則折柔弱者生之徒堅强者死之徒狀
Interpretation

Yang Zhu (a Daoist scholar) went to visit Laozi (the founder of Daoism). Laozi looked up at the sky and sighed, saying: "At first I thought you could be taught, but now I see it's impossible." Yang Zhu remained silent.

Returning to his lodgings, Yang Zhu respectfully washed and groomed himself, then removed his shoes and approached Laozi on his knees, saying: "Earlier, Master sighed and said I was unteachable. I wished to ask why but dared not disturb you. Now I beg you to point out my faults." Laozi replied: "You carry yourself with such arrogance—who would want to associate with you? Those who truly possess De (Virtue) appear humble, as if lacking something." Hearing this, Yang Zhu's expression changed dramatically, and he bowed deeply, saying: "I shall remember your teaching."

Afterward, Yang Zhu completely transformed his demeanor. Where innkeepers had once greeted him with deference, now everyone interacted with him as an equal. Once while staying at an inn in the state of Song, Yang Zhu noticed the innkeeper had two concubines—one beautiful, the other plain—yet the innkeeper respected the plain one more. When Yang Zhu asked why, the innkeeper explained: "The beautiful one thinks herself lovely, but I don’t see it; the plain one considers herself unattractive, yet I find her otherwise." From this, Yang Zhu realized: Truly virtuous people must discard any self-consciousness of their virtue—only then will they be cherished wherever they go.

The text illustrates two approaches to life: Weakness is the path of constant victory, while rigidity is the path of constant defeat. Ancient sages said: Those who always seek to surpass others face danger when meeting equals, whereas those who cultivate themselves avoid such peril. Applying the principle of weakness to self-cultivation leads to personal fulfillment; applying it to governance brings order to the world. What seems incapable of overcoming others is actually the highest form of victory; what appears as Wuwei (non-action) is in fact the most skillful action.

Master Zhou (a Daoist figure) said: To achieve strength, one must first be pliant; to become mighty, one must begin by accumulating from small and weak beginnings. When weakness accumulates to its extreme, it transforms into strength. Observing the degree of a person’s accumulation foretells their fortune or misfortune. Those who rely on brute force can only overpower inferiors—when facing equals, they falter. But those who cultivate inner power possess immeasurable potential.

Laozi concluded: Weapons that are too hard break easily; trees that are too rigid snap readily. Weakness is the way of survival, while rigidity leads to death.

不必童而智童 智不必童而狀童聖人取童 智而遺童狀衆人近童狀而疏童智狀 與我 童近而愛之狀與我異者疏而畏之有七尺 之骸手足之異 戴髮舍齒倚而趣者謂之人 而未必無獸心雖有獸心以狀而見 親矣傳 翼戴角分牙布爪仰飛伏走謂之禽獸而禽 獸未必無人心 雖有人心以狀而見疏矣疱 犧氏女蝸氏神農氏夏后氏蛇身人面 牛首 虎鼻此有非人之狀而有大聖之德夏桀殷 紂魯桓楚穆狀貌七竅皆同於人而有禽獸 之心而衆人守一狀以求至智未可幾也黄 帝與炎帝戰於阪泉之野帥熊羆狼豹貙虎 爲前驅鵰鵾鷹鳶爲旗幟此以力使禽獸者 也堯使夔典樂擊石拊石百獸率舞簫韶九 成鳳凰來儀此以聲致禽獸者也然則禽獸 之心奚爲異人形音與人異而不知接之之 道焉聖人無所不知無所不通故得引而使 之焉禽獸之智有自然與人童者其齊欲攝 生亦不假智於人也牝牡相偶母子相親避 平依險違寒就温居則有群行則有列小者
Interpretation

This passage reveals a profound truth through comparing human and animal forms and mentalities: essence cannot be judged by appearance alone.

The text explains that true wisdom doesn't reside in childlike appearance but in childlike purity of mind. Sages value the innocent wisdom of children, while ordinary people merely favor those who look like children. Humans tend to bond with those sharing similar appearances while distancing themselves from differently featured beings. For instance, people with seven-foot stature, differentiated limbs, head hair, complete teeth, and upright posture are considered human, yet such individuals may harbor bestial natures. Conversely, winged beasts with horns and sharp claws that can fly or run might possess human-like consciousness.

Several examples illustrate this: ancient sage-kings like Fuxi, Nüwa, Shennong, and the Xia rulers had serpent bodies with human faces or ox heads with tiger noses—unconventional appearances yet bearing supreme virtue. Tyrants like Jie of Xia, Zhou of Shang, Duke Huan of Lu, and King Mu of Chu had ordinary human features but beastly hearts. This proves the futility of seeking supreme wisdom through fixed physical standards.

The Yellow Emperor commanding bears, leopards, wolves, and panthers at the Battle of Banquan, or Emperor Yao making beasts dance and phoenixes gather through music, demonstrate how sages could govern animals through power and harmony. Animal consciousness actually shares common ground with humans—they instinctively seek survival, mating, parental care, warmth, and social organization without learning human wisdom.

This passage teaches us: to discern the essence of any being, we must look beyond superficial traits to perceive inner nature. What distinguishes sages from ordinary people is precisely this ability to transcend physical limitations and truly comprehend the fundamental nature of all things.

居内壯者居外飲則相携食則鳴群太古之 時則與人同處與人並行帝王之時始驚駭 散亂矣逮於末世隱伏逃竄以避患害今東 方介氏之國其國人數數解六畜之語者蓋 偏知之所得太古神聖之人備知萬物情態 悉解異類音聲會而聚之訓而受之同於人 民故先會鬼 神魑魅次達八方人民末聚禽 獸蟲蛾言血氣之 類心智不殊遠也神聖知 其如此故其所教訓者無所遺逸焉宋有 狙 公者愛狙養之成羣能解狙之意狙亦得公 之心損其 家口充狙之欲俄而匱焉將限其 食恐衆狙之不馴於己也先誑 之曰與若芧 朝三而暮四足乎衆狙皆起而怒俄而曰與 若芧 朝四而暮三足乎衆狙皆伏而喜物之 以能鄙相籠皆猶此也聖人 以智籠羣愚亦 猶狙公之以智籠衆狙也名實不虧使其喜 怒哉紀 渻子爲周宣王養鬥鷄十日而問鷄 可鬥已乎曰未也方虚驕而恃 氣十日又問 曰未也猶應影響十日又問曰未也猶疾視 而 盛氣十日又問曰幾矣鷄雖有鳴者已無
Interpretation

This scripture recounts several parables that illustrate the changing relationship between humans and all creatures from ancient times to later eras, as well as the way sages educated living beings.

In high antiquity, people coexisted harmoniously with all things and could understand the language of animals. For instance, most inhabitants of the Jieshi Kingdom in the East comprehended the speech of domestic animals—a skill they acquired through special cognitive abilities. The divine sages of the primordial era fully understood the nature of all beings, interpreting the sounds of different creatures. They gathered them together for instruction, enabling peaceful coexistence with humanity. Thus, these sages first communicated with spirits, mountain demons (chimei), and supernatural beings before educating the common people of all regions, and finally domesticating birds, beasts, and insects. Recognizing that although these creatures differed in form, their fundamental consciousness was interconnected, the sages taught them without discrimination.

The text then recounts the story of a monkey trainer: In the state of Song, there was a man who raised monkeys and could understand their thoughts, while the monkeys likewise comprehended his intentions. When his family fortunes declined and he sought to reduce their food rations, fearing their disobedience, he deceived them, saying: "Three chestnuts in the morning and four in the evening—is that enough?" The monkeys grew furious. He then said: "What if it's four in the morning and three in the evening?" At this, the monkeys rejoiced. This demonstrates how clever tactics to manipulate the ignorant resemble the trainer's tricks to placate his monkeys. The sage's use of wisdom to educate the common people follows the same principle.

Finally, there is the story of Ji Shengzi training fighting cocks for King Xuan of Zhou: After ten days of training, the king asked if the rooster was ready to fight. The reply was negative—the bird still relied on bluster. Another ten days passed, and the trainer reported it remained reactive to external stimuli. After ten more days, he noted its gaze had grown too sharp and its energy too fierce. Only after forty days did he declare it ready—by then, the rooster remained unmoved even when hearing other crows. This parable illustrates how genuine cultivation requires shedding restless Qi (vital energy) to attain a state undisturbed by external phenomena.

變 矣望之似木鷄矣其德全矣異鷄無敢應 者反走耳 惠盎見宋康王康王 蹀足聲欬疾 言曰寡人之所說者勇有力也不說爲仁義 者也客將 何以教寡人惠盎對曰臣有道於 此使人雖有勇刺之不入雖有力擊 之弗中 大王獨無意邪宋王曰善此寡人之所欲聞 也惠盎曰夫刺 之不入擊之不中此猶辱也 臣有道於此使人雖有勇弗敢刺雖有 力弗 敢擊夫弗敢非無其志也臣有道於此使人 本無其志也夫無 其志者未有愛利之心也 臣有道於此使天下丈夫女子莫不驩然 皆 欲愛利之此其賢於勇有力也四累之上也 大王獨無意邪 宋王曰此寡人之所欲得也 惠盎對曰孔墨是已孔丘墨 翟無地而爲君 無官而爲長天下丈夫女子莫不延頸舉踵 而願安 利之今大王萬乘之主也誠有其志 則四境之内皆得其利矣其賢 於孔墨也遠 矣宋王無以應惠盎趨而出宋王謂左右曰 辯矣客之 以說服寡人也 沖虚至德眞經
Interpretation

This passage recounts a dialogue between Hui Ang and King Kang of Song. When Hui Ang went to see the King, the ruler was stamping his feet and coughing impatiently, declaring: "I only admire those who are brave and strong, not those who preach benevolence and righteousness. What could you possibly teach me?"

Hui Ang replied: "I possess a method of the Dao that renders even the most courageous unable to stab you, and the strongest incapable of striking you." This piqued the King's interest. But Hui Ang continued: "Yet this is still inadequate. I have a superior method that prevents people from even daring to attack you—not because they lack ability, but because the thought never arises in their minds."

He then explained the highest attainment: "My Dao method can make all people, men and women alike, joyfully desire to cherish and support you. This far surpasses mere physical might." The King admitted this was precisely what he sought.

Seizing the moment, Hui Ang counseled: "This is what Confucius and Mozi achieved. Though possessing no territory, they were revered like sovereigns; holding no official posts, they were beloved as leaders. Now as ruler of this state, if Your Majesty sincerely practices this way, benefiting all your subjects, your De (Virtue/Power) will surpass even that of Confucius and Mozi." The King fell silent, and Hui Ang withdrew quickly. Later, the King remarked to his attendants: "This visitor's eloquence has truly convinced me."

Through progressive reasoning, the dialogue reveals that true Dao lies not in martial defense but in winning hearts through virtuous influence. Hui Ang skillfully began with the King's preoccupation with physical power, ultimately guiding him to recognize the superior strength of benevolent virtue.

卷上

Vol. 3

沖虚至德眞經卷中慕 八     周穆王第三 周穆王時西極之國有化人來入水火貫金 石反山川移城邑 乘虚不墜觸實不硋千變 萬化不可窮極既已變物之形又且易人 之 慮穆王敬之若神事之若君推路寢以居之 引三牲以 進之選女樂以娱之化人以爲王 之宫室卑陋而不可處王之厨饌 腥螻而不 可饗王之嬪御膻惡而不可親穆王乃爲之 改築土 木之功赭堊之色無遺巧焉五府爲 虚而臺始成其高千仞臨終南 之上號曰中 天之臺簡鄭衛之處子娥媌靡曼者施芳 澤 正娥眉設笄珥衣阿錫曳齊紈粉白黛黑 珮 玉環雜芷若以滿之奏承雲六瑩九韶晨露 以樂之 月月獻玉衣旦旦薦玉食化人猶不 舍然 不得已而臨之居亡幾何謁王同遊王 執化人之袪騰而上者 中天迺止暨及化人 之宫化人之宫搆以金銀絡以珠玉出雲雨 之 上而不知下之據望之若屯雲焉耳目所 觀聽鼻口所納嘗皆非人 間之有王實以爲
Interpretation

During the reign of King Mu of Zhou, a man of miraculous transformations arrived from the farthest reaches of the West. This metamorphic being could freely pass through fire and water, penetrate metal and stone, overturn mountains and rivers, move entire cities, fly through the air without falling, and pass through solid objects unobstructed—his transformations were boundless. Not only could he alter the forms of objects, but he could also transform human thoughts. King Mu revered him as a divine being, serving him as one would a sovereign, offering him the main palace hall for residence, sacrificing the three ritual animals (oxen, sheep, and pigs), and selecting female musicians to entertain him.

Yet the metamorphic man found King Mu's palace crude and uninhabitable, the imperial cuisine foul and inedible, and the concubines' bodily odors unbearable. Thus, the king commissioned a new palace for him, employing every architectural craft available, painting it in red and white pigments, and exhausting the state treasury to construct the Mid-Heaven Tower—a structure a thousand ren (an ancient unit of measurement, approximately eight feet) high—atop Mount Zhongnan.

King Mu selected beautiful maidens from Zheng and Wei, adorning them with fragrant ointments, painted eyebrows, hairpins and earrings, fine silk garments, and trailing skirts of Qi silk. They were powdered and adorned with jade rings, perfumed with angelica. Ancient melodies like "Bearing Clouds," "Six Gems," "Nine Shao," and "Morning Dew" were played to entertain him. Each month, jade robes were presented, and each day, exquisite delicacies were offered—yet the metamorphic man remained unsatisfied. After reluctantly staying for a short while, he invited King Mu to journey with him.

Holding the sleeve of the metamorphic man, King Mu ascended into the sky, arriving at the man's palace. Built of gold and silver, adorned with pearls and jade, it floated above the clouds and rain, with no visible foundation below—from afar, it resembled a mass of gathered clouds. Everything seen, heard, tasted, or smelled there belonged not to the mortal world. King Mu became convinced that this was truly the realm of Qingxu (the Daoist term for the pure and empty abode of immortals).

清都紫微鈞天廣樂帝之所居 王俯而視之 其宫 榭若累塊積蘇焉王自以居數十年不 思其國也化人復 謁王同游所及之處仰不 見日月俯不見河海光影所照王曰眩不 能 得視音響所來王耳亂不能得聽百骸六藏 悸而不凝意迷精 喪請化人求還化人移之 王若碩虚焉 既寤所坐猶嚮者之處侍御猶 嚮者之人視其前則酒未清肴 未昲(方微/切)王 問所從來左右曰王默存耳由此穆王自失 者三月而 復更問化人化人曰吾與王神游 也形奚動哉 且曩之所居奚異王之宫曩之 所游奚異王之圃王間恒 疑蹔亡變化之極 疾徐之間可盡模哉 王大悦不恤國事不樂 臣妾 肆意遠游命駕八駿之乘右服𦽊(音/華)騮 而左緑耳右驂赤驥 而左白𣚘(音/義)主車則造 父爲御𧮼齊𠱛合爲右次車之乘右 服渠黄 而左踰輪左驂盜驪而右山子栢夭主車叁 百爲御奔戎爲 右馳驅千里至于巨蒐氏之 國巨蒐氏乃獻白鵠之血以飲王具牛馬 之 湩以洗王之足及二乘之人已飲而行遂宿
Interpretation

This scripture recounts the marvelous celestial journey of King Mu of Zhou (referred to simply as "the King" in Daoist classics) with a shape-shifting immortal (huaren).

The Purple Tenuity Palace (Ziwei Gong, believed in Daoism to be the celestial abode of the Heavenly Emperor) shone with golden splendor, yet when King Mu gazed downward, those majestic structures appeared to him like mere clods of earth and thatched piles. As the immortal guided the King deeper into their spiritual voyage, they arrived at a wondrous realm where looking up revealed neither sun nor moon, and glancing down showed no rivers or seas. The dazzling light overwhelmed the King's vision, while strange sounds deafened his ears. His internal organs trembled, and his spirit (shen) grew faint and disoriented. Unable to endure, the King begged to return, whereupon the immortal gave him a gentle push—and he awoke with the sensation of falling from great heights.

Upon awakening, the King found himself seated exactly where he had been, with his attendants still present. The wine and dishes before him hadn't even cooled. His attendants informed him that he had merely been sitting in quiet meditation. This experience left the King in a state of melancholy for three months. Later, the immortal explained: "We were traveling with our spirits alone—our physical bodies never moved. Those celestial sights are no different from your own palaces and gardens." Only then did King Mu realize that in such swiftly shifting realms, distinctions between speed and slowness, reality and illusion, become impossible to grasp.

From that moment, the King lost interest in worldly governance and became obsessed with distant travels. He rode in a chariot drawn by eight divine horses (each meticulously named and positioned), driven by legendary charioteers like Zaofu, accompanied by his retinue as they raced thousands of miles to the land of the Jusou people. The Jusou offered white crane's blood for the King to drink and bathed his feet in mare's and cow's milk, feasting the entire procession. After the banquet, they continued their journey, spending the night encamped outdoors.

Through King Mu's spiritual journey, this passage illustrates the Daoist practice of "spirit wandering through the great void" (shenyou taixu). At the same time, it employs hyperbolic descriptions of the King's subsequent earthly travels, creating a striking contrast between the realms of illusion and reality.

于崑崙之 阿赤水之陽别日升崑崙之丘以 觀黄帝之宫而 封之以貽後世遂賔于西王 母觴于瑶池之上西王母 爲王謡王和之其 辭哀焉迺觀日之所入 一日行萬里王乃歎 曰於乎于一人不盈于德而諧於樂 後世其 追數吾過乎穆王幾神人哉能 窮常身之樂 猶百年乃徂世以爲登假焉 老成子學幻於 尹文先生三年不告老成子請其過而求退 尹 文先生揖而進之於室屏左右而與之言 曰昔老聃之徂西也顧而 告予曰有生之氣 有形之狀盡幻也造化之所始陰陽之所變 者謂 之生謂之死窮數達變因形移易者謂 之化謂之幻 造物者其巧妙其功深固難窮 難終 因形者其巧顯其功淺故隨起隨滅 知 幻化之不異生死也始可與學幻矣 吾與汝 亦幻也奚須學哉老成子歸用尹文先生 之 言深思三月遂能存亡自在幡校四時冬起 雷夏造冰飛者走走 者飛 終身不著其術故 世莫傳焉 子列子曰善爲化者其道密庸其 功同人 五帝之德三王之功未必盡智勇之 力或由化而成孰測之哉 覺有八徴夢有 六 候奚謂八徴一曰故二曰爲三曰得四曰喪
Interpretation

At the southern foothills of Mount Kunlun, on the northern banks of the Red River, King Mu of Zhou (the fifth ruler of the Western Zhou Dynasty) once ascended to the mountain's summit. Gazing upon the ruins of the Yellow Emperor's palace, he performed sacrificial rites to preserve their legacy. Later, he visited the Queen Mother of the West (the highest-ranking female immortal in Daoism) and held a banquet by the Jade Pool. The Queen Mother sang ballads for King Mu, who responded in kind, their voices tinged with melancholy. As King Mu observed the sunset, he marveled at traversing thousands of miles in a single day and sighed: "Alas! My virtue (De) is incomplete, yet I indulge in pleasures. Will future generations condemn my failings?" King Mu nearly attained the realm of divine beings, experiencing all worldly joys and living a century before passing—so much so that people believed he had ascended to immortality as a transcendent.

Lao Chengzi studied the art of transformation under Master Yin Wen for three years without receiving any instruction. When Lao Chengzi inquired about his shortcomings and requested to leave, Master Yin Wen led him into an inner chamber, dismissed the attendants, and said: "When Laozi journeyed westward, he once told me: 'The vital energy (Qi) of all living things and the forms of all phenomena are illusory. At the dawn of creation, the interplay of yin and yang gives rise to what we call life, while their separation is called death. To penetrate the principles of things and master the ability to shift forms—this is true transformation. The profound mysteries of the Creator are unfathomable, while the techniques of shape-shifting are superficial, appearing and vanishing with time. Only by understanding that transformation and life-death share the same essence can one learn this art. In truth, both you and I are illusions—why strain to learn it?'" Returning home, Lao Chengzi contemplated these words deeply. After three months, he could freely manipulate existence and annihilation, overturn the seasons—summoning thunder in winter, creating ice in summer, making flying creatures run and walking creatures soar. Yet he never displayed these abilities in his lifetime, leaving the world none the wiser.

Liezi remarked: "Those truly versed in the Dao of transformation employ methods so subtle and ordinary that their results appear no different from ordinary people. The virtue (De) of the Five Emperors of antiquity and the achievements of the Three Kings may not have stemmed solely from wisdom or courage—perhaps they were attained through such natural transformations. Who can fully comprehend this? In waking life, there are eight signs; in dreams, six manifestations. The so-called eight signs are: first, the recurrence of past events; second, deliberate action; third, gain; fourth, loss..." (The remaining signs are not fully preserved in the original text.)

五曰哀六曰樂七曰生八曰死此者八徴形 所接也奚謂六候一曰 正夢二曰蘁夢三曰 思夢四曰寤夢 五曰喜夢六曰懼夢此六者 神所交 也不識感變之所起者事至則惑其 所由然識感變之所 起者事至則知其所由 然知其所由然則無所怛 一體之盈虚消息 皆通於天地應於物 類故陰氣壯則夢涉大 水而恐懼 陽氣壯則夢涉大火而燔焫陰陽 俱壯則夢生 殺甚飽則夢與甚飢則夢取 是 以以浮虚爲疾者則夢揚以沈實爲疾者則 夢溺藉帶 而寢則夢蛇飛鳥銜髮則夢飛將 陰夢火將疾夢食飲酒者憂 歌儛者哭子列 子曰神遇爲夢形接爲 事故晝想夜夢神形 所遇 故神凝者想夢自消信覺不語信夢不 達物化之 往來者也古之眞人其覺自忘其 寢不夢幾虚 語哉西極之南隅有國焉不知 境界之所 接名古莽之國陰陽之氣所不交 故寒暑亡辨日月之光所不照故 晝夜亡辨
Interpretation

This passage discusses eight emotional states and six types of dream phenomena in humans. The eight emotions include sorrow, joy, life, death, and others—all being the body's responses to external stimuli. The six dream types are: ordinary dreams (zhengmeng), nightmares (emeng), longing-induced dreams (simeng), half-awake dreams (wumeng), joyful dreams (ximeng), and fearful dreams (jumeng), all resulting from mental activities.

Without understanding the causes behind these emotions and dream transformations, one becomes confused when encountering situations; comprehending their principles allows one to grasp the reasons behind events. Understanding these reasons eliminates fear. The interplay of Yin-Yang within the human body resonates with heaven and earth, corresponding to all things in creation. Thus when Yin Qi becomes excessive, one dreams of wading through water and feels terror; when Yang Qi predominates, one dreams of raging fires; when both Yin and Yang are overly active, one dreams of life-and-death struggles. Overeating leads to dreams of giving, while starvation brings dreams of taking.

Those with floating, insubstantial bodies tend to dream of soaring, while those with heavy constitutions frequently dream of drowning. Sleeping with a belt tied may induce snake dreams; dreaming of flight occurs when birds seem to carry one's hair in their beaks. Excessive Yin generates fire dreams; illness produces dreams of eating and drinking. The inebriated dream of song and dance, while the sorrowful dream of weeping.

Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) said: When spirit makes contact, dreams form; when the body makes contact, reality manifests. Therefore, what occupies one's daytime thoughts easily becomes nighttime dreams—this is the mutual interaction of spirit and form. Those with concentrated spirit naturally experience fewer distracting thoughts and dreams. The truly awakened don't talk in their sleep; those who truly understand dreams don't cling to the transformations of phenomena.

The ancient perfected ones (zhenren) who attained the Dao could forget themselves while awake and remain dreamless while asleep. In the extreme western lands lies the ancient Mang Kingdom where Yin and Yang energies never intersect—thus no alternation of cold and heat; where sunlight and moonlight never reach—thus no division between day and night.

其民不食不衣而多眠五旬一覺以夢中所 爲者實覺之所 見者妄四海之齊謂中央之 跨河南北越岱東西萬有餘 里其陰陽之審 度故一寒一暑昏明之分察故一晝一夜其 民有智 有愚萬物滋殖才藝多方有君臣相 臨禮法相持其所云爲不可稱 計一覺一寐 以爲覺之所爲者實夢之所見者妄東極之 北隅有國 曰阜落之國其土氣常燠日月餘 光之照其土不生嘉苗其民食草根 木實不 知火食性剛悍强弱相藉貴勝而不尚義多 馳步少休息常 覺而不眠周之尹氏大治産 其下趣役 者侵晨昏而弗息有老役夫筋力 竭矣而使之彌勤晝則呻呼而即 事夜則昏 憊而熟寐精神荒散昔昔夢爲國君居人民 之上總一國之 事游燕宫觀恣意所欲其樂 無比覺則復役人有慰喻其勤者役夫 曰人 生百年晝夜各分吾晝爲僕虜苦則苦矣夜 爲人君其樂 無比何所怨哉尹氏心營世事 慮鍾家業心形俱疲夜亦昏憊而寐 背昔夢 爲人僕趨走作役無不爲也數駡杖撻無不
Interpretation

This scripture describes two distinctly different nations and their people's ways of life, along with a fable about dreams and reality.

First, it speaks of a peculiar country where the people neither eat nor wear clothes, waking only once every fifty days. They believe the experiences in their dreams are real, while what they see when awake is illusory. This land is vast, stretching across the Yellow River from north to south and Mount Tai from east to west, spanning ten thousand li. Here, Yin and Yang are clearly divided, giving rise to the alternation of cold and heat; day and night are distinct, creating the cycle of light and darkness. The people vary in wisdom and foolishness, all things flourish, skills and arts abound, and there exists a hierarchy of rulers and subjects along with rituals and laws. Yet they, too, consider their waking actions real and their dreams illusory.

Far to the northeast lies a land called Fuluo, where the climate is scorching, illuminated only by the residual light of the sun and moon. The soil yields no good crops, so the people survive on wild roots and fruits, never having learned to use fire. Their customs are fierce—the strong prey on the weak, valuing martial prowess over righteousness. The people here are always on the move, rarely resting, remaining awake year-round without sleep.

Next comes the story of a wealthy man named Yin from the Zhou dynasty: Obsessed with expanding his fortune, he drove his old servant to toil from dawn till dusk without respite. During the day, the servant groaned in exhaustion, but at night he would collapse into deep slumber, his spirit wandering as he dreamed nightly of being a king—ruling the state, indulging in pleasures, experiencing boundless joy. Upon waking, he returned to his labor. When others tried to console him, he replied, "A human life lasts a hundred years, divided equally between day and night. Though I suffer as a servant by day, by night I reign as a king in utmost delight—what have I to complain about?" Meanwhile, Master Yin spent his days consumed by worldly affairs, managing his estate until his body and mind were utterly spent. At night, he would sink into a heavy sleep, only to dream of being a servant—enduring all manner of drudgery, often beaten and cursed.

Through the contrast between these two imaginary nations and the dreams of master and servant, this story explores the relationship between reality and illusion, as well as how people in different circumstances perceive suffering and joy differently.

至也眠中啽囈 呻呼徹旦息焉尹氏病之以 訪其友友曰若位足榮身資財 有餘勝人遠 矣夜夢爲僕苦逸之復數之常也若 欲覺夢 兼之豈可得邪尹氏聞其友言寬其役夫之 程减己思慮 之事疾並少間鄭人 有薪於野 者過駭鹿御而擊之斃之恐人見之也遽而 藏諸隍中 覆之以蕉不勝其喜俄而遺其所 藏之處遂以爲夢焉順途而詠其 事傍人有 聞者用其言而取之既歸告其室人曰向薪 者夢得鹿 而不知其處吾今得之彼直眞夢 者矣室人曰若將是夢見薪者之 得鹿邪詎 有薪者邪今眞得鹿是若之夢眞邪夫曰吾 據得鹿何用 知彼夢我夢邪薪者之歸不厭 失鹿其夜眞夢藏之之處又夢得之 之主爽 旦案所夢而尋得之遂訟而爭之歸之士師 士師曰若初眞得 鹿妄謂之夢眞夢得鹿妄 謂之實彼眞取若鹿而與若爭鹿室人又 謂 夢仞人鹿無人得鹿今據有此鹿請二分之 以聞鄭君鄭君曰嘻 士師將復夢分人鹿乎 訪之國相國相曰夢與不夢臣所不能辨也 欲辯覺夢唯黄帝孔丘今亡黄帝孔丘孰辨 之哉 且恂士師之言可也宋陽里華子中年
Interpretation

(Selected passage from the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing translated into vernacular Chinese)

There was a man named Yin who would constantly moan and talk in his sleep, only stopping at dawn. Troubled by this, he visited a friend who told him: "Your status brings you honor, your wealth exceeds what you could ever spend—you've surpassed ordinary people in every way. Dreaming of hard labor at night is simply nature's way of balancing your daytime indulgences. Did you expect to enjoy blessings both day and night?" Upon hearing this, Yin reduced his servants' workloads and lessened his own worries, and the condition indeed improved.

A woodcutter from Zheng State once encountered a startled deer that crashed into a tree and died while he was chopping wood in the wilderness. Fearing discovery, he hastily hid the deer in a dry ditch, covering it with banana leaves, overjoyed at his luck. But soon he forgot the hiding spot and assumed it had all been a dream. As he muttered about it on his way home, a passerby overheard him, found the deer exactly as described, and took it home. The man told his wife: "Just now a woodcutter dreamed of getting a deer but couldn't find it—now it's mine! He's the real dreamer." His wife retorted: "Are you sure you didn't dream of a woodcutter getting a deer? What woodcutter? Since we actually have the deer, maybe you're the one dreaming!" The husband replied: "The deer's in my hands—who cares who's dreaming!"

The woodcutter, still preoccupied with his loss, later dreamed that night of both the hiding place and the passerby taking the deer. At dawn, he followed the dream's clues and indeed found the man. Their dispute escalated to a magistrate (Shishi), who ruled: "Initially the woodcutter truly got the deer but called it a dream; the passerby truly dreamed of getting it but called it reality. Now the passerby indeed holds the woodcutter's deer, yet you each insist on your version. Since the deer's ownership is disputed, split it equally." When the king of Zheng heard this, he laughed: "Was that magistrate dreaming too when he divided the deer?" Consulting his prime minister, he was told: "I can't distinguish dream from reality either. To discern waking from dreaming would require the rebirth of Huangdi or Confucius. Let's just follow the magistrate's ruling for now."

Yangli Huazi of Song State developed amnesia in middle age... (subsequent text not provided)

病忘朝取而夕忘夕與而朝忘在塗則忘行 在室則忘坐今不識先 後不識今闔室毒之 謁史而卜之弗占謁巫而禱之弗禁謁醫而 攻 之弗已魯有儒生自媒能治之華子之妻 子以居産之半請其方儒 生曰此固非卦兆 之所占 非祈請之所禱 非藥石之所攻 吾試 化其心變其 慮庶幾有瘳乎於是試露之而 求衣饑之而求食幽之而求明儒生欣然告 其子曰疾可 已也然吾之方密傳世不以告 人試屛左右獨與居室七日從之莫 知其所 施爲也而積年之疾一朝都除 華子既悟廼 大怒黜妻罰子操戈逐儒生宋人執而問 其 以華子曰曩吾忘也蕩蕩然不知天地之有 無今頓識既往數十 年來存亡得失哀樂好 惡擾擾萬緒起矣吾恐將來之存亡得失哀 樂好惡之亂吾心如此也須臾之忘可復得 乎子 貢聞而怪之以告孔子孔子曰此非汝 所及乎顧謂顔回記之 秦人逢氏有子少而
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of the Ultimate Virtue of Profound Emptiness) presents a parable about "amnesia":

In the state of Lu, there was a man named Hua Zi who suffered from severe forgetfulness. He would forget by evening what he had taken in the morning, lose track of his destination while walking, and sit indoors forgetting what he intended to do—unable even to distinguish the sequence of events. His entire household was deeply distressed. Divinations by court historians proved useless, prayers by shamans ineffective, and medical treatments unsuccessful.

Later, a Confucian scholar claimed he could cure the condition. Hua Zi's wife offered half their family fortune for the remedy. The scholar said: "This illness cannot be diagnosed through divination, resolved through prayer, or treated with medicine. I shall attempt to transform his mind and adjust his thinking." Thus began the treatment: exposing Hua Zi to cold made him seek clothing, starvation taught him to ask for food, and confinement in darkness drove him to seek light.

After seven days of treatment, Hua Zi's years of amnesia suddenly vanished. Yet upon regaining his memory, he flew into a rage—berating his wife, punishing his children, and arming himself to pursue the scholar for execution. When apprehended by men of Song and questioned, Hua Zi explained: "Formerly in my oblivion, I knew not whether heaven and earth even existed. Now suddenly I recall decades of gains and losses, joys and sorrows, loves and hatreds—this chaotic flood of thoughts terrifies me. That brief carefree void—might I ever regain it?"

When Zigong heard of this, he found it perplexing and reported it to Confucius. The sage replied: "This lies beyond your understanding," instructing Yan Hui to record the incident. The narrative concludes by mentioning a similar case involving a child of the Feng family in Qin.

Through this exaggerated tale of amnesia, the text explores the dialectic between "forgetting" and "remembering"—sometimes oblivion brings liberation, while memory may inflict suffering. It reflects the Daoist philosophy of "rejecting sageliness and discarding knowledge" (juesheng qizhi), suggesting that excessive knowledge and memory become burdens rather than blessings.

惠及壯而有迷罔之疾 聞歌以爲哭視白以 爲黑饗香以爲朽嘗甘以 爲苦行非以爲是 意之所之天地四方水火寒暑無不倒錯者 焉楊 氏告其父曰魯之君子多術藝將能已 乎汝奚不訪焉其父之魯過 陳遇老聃因告 其子之證老聃曰汝庸知汝子之迷乎今天 下之人皆 惑於是非昏於利害同疾者多固 莫有覺者且一身之迷不足傾一 家一家之 迷不足傾一鄉一鄉之迷不足傾一國一國 之迷不足傾天 下天下盡迷孰傾之哉向使 天下之人其心盡如汝子汝則反迷矣 哀樂 聲色臭味是非孰能正之且吾之言未必非 迷况魯之君 子迷之郵者焉能解人之迷哉 榮汝之糧不 若遄歸也燕人生於燕長於楚 及老而還 本國過晋國同行者誑之指城曰 此燕國之城其人愀然變容指社 曰此若里 之社乃喟然而嘆指舍曰此若先人之廬乃 涓然而泣指 壠曰此若先人之冢其人哭不 自禁同行者啞然大笑曰予昔紿若 此晋國 耳其人大慙及至燕眞見燕國之城社眞見 先人之廬冢悲 心
Interpretation

There was a young man who suffered from a peculiar illness—everything appeared inverted to him. He mistook singing for weeping, perceived white as black, registered fragrance as stench, tasted sweetness as bitterness, and regarded wrongdoing as righteousness. In his distorted perception, the heavens and earth, the four directions, even fire and water, heat and cold—all were reversed.

His father, a man named Yang, heard that the state of Lu boasted many learned gentlemen and planned to seek their help. Passing through the state of Chen, he encountered Laozi (the founder of Daoism) and described his son’s condition. But Laozi replied, "How do you know your son is the deluded one? Nowadays, the people of the world cannot distinguish right from wrong or recognize benefit and harm. There are countless 'afflicted' like him—only no one realizes it. One person’s delusion cannot disrupt a household; one household’s delusion cannot disrupt a village; one village’s delusion cannot disrupt a state. But if the entire world were deluded, who could say who is deluded? If everyone were like your son, you would be the one who seems confused. Joy and anger, sorrow and pleasure, sounds and colors, flavors and judgments—who can truly define them? Even my words may well be deluded, let alone those gentlemen of Lu, who are themselves utterly confused. How could they unravel another’s bewilderment? You’d better save your provisions and hurry home."

Later, another story is told of a man from Yan who grew up in the state of Chu. In his old age, while returning home through the state of Jin, his companions deceived him, claiming that Jin’s city walls, ancestral shrines, houses, and graves were all from his homeland. The man believed them, shedding tears before the false shrines and weeping at the fabricated tombs. When his companions laughed and revealed the jest, he was deeply ashamed. Yet when he finally returned to Yan and beheld his true ancestral land, his grief was far less intense than before.

These two tales illustrate how what the world calls "clarity" may in fact be delusion, while what seems like "confusion" might align more closely with truth. When the conventional understanding shared by all is overturned, our so-called "normal" suddenly appears absurd. Like the man from Yan, whose emotional response to deception was stronger than his reaction to reality, we often dwell in illusions of our own making.

更微

Vol. 4

仲尼第四 仲尼閑居子貢入侍而有憂色子貢不敢問 出告顔回顔回援琴而歌 孔子聞之果召回 入問曰若奚獨樂回曰夫子奚獨憂 孔子曰 先言爾志曰吾昔聞之夫子曰樂天知命故 不憂回 所以樂也孔子愀然有間曰有是言 哉 汝之意失矣此吾昔日之言爾請以今言 爲正也 汝徒知樂天知命之無憂未知樂天 知命有憂之大也 今告若其實脩一身任窮 達知去來之非我亡變亂於心 慮爾之所謂 樂天知命之無憂也曩 吾脩詩書正禮樂將 以治天下遺來世 非但脩一身治魯國而已 而魯 之君臣曰失其序仁義益衰情性益薄 此道不行一國與當年其 如天下與來世矣 吾始知詩書禮樂無救於 治亂而未知所以 革之之方此樂天知命者之所憂 雖然吾得 之矣夫樂而知者 非古人之所謂樂知也無 樂 無知是眞樂眞知故無所不樂無所不知 無 所不憂無所不爲詩書禮樂何 棄之有革
Interpretation

During Confucius' leisure at home, Zigong came to attend to him and noticed his master's worried expression but dared not inquire. After leaving, he informed Yan Hui, who then played the zither and sang. Hearing this, Confucius indeed summoned Yan Hui.

Yan Hui entered and asked, "Master, why do you sit alone in sorrow?" Confucius countered, "And why do you sit alone in joy?" Yan Hui cited his teacher's past teaching: "I once heard you say, 'Those who delight in Heaven and know the Mandate (顺应天道、知晓天命) do not grieve.' That is why I am joyful."

Confucius' expression grew solemn. After a moment of silence, he said, "Those were indeed my words in the past, but now we must take a new understanding as correct. You only know that delighting in Heaven and knowing the Mandate brings no sorrow, yet fail to realize that this very state contains a far greater worry."

Confucius explained further: "Now I shall tell you the truth. Cultivating oneself, remaining content whether in hardship or prosperity, understanding that life, death, and fate are beyond one's control, and keeping the inner self undisturbed by external changes—this is what you call 'delighting in Heaven and knowing the Mandate brings no sorrow.' But when I compiled the Book of Songs and the Book of Documents, and established the rites and music, it was to govern the world and set an example for later generations—not merely for self-cultivation or ruling Lu alone. Now, the ruler and ministers of Lu have lost order, benevolence and righteousness have decayed, and human bonds have weakened. My teachings cannot even be implemented in one state, in one era—how much less for the world and future generations?"

"Now I understand that the Book of Songs, the Book of Documents, and the rites and music cannot resolve the problems of order and chaos, yet I have not found the means to reform—this is the true worry of one who delights in Heaven and knows the Mandate. However, I have realized this: true joy and wisdom are not the 'delight and knowledge' spoken of by the ancients. Not deliberately pursuing joy is true joy; not clinging to knowledge is true wisdom. Only then can one be joyful in all things, know all things, grieve over all things, and act in all things. Why must we discard the Book of Songs, the Book of Documents, or the rites and music? The key lies in renewing their spirit."

(Note: This dialogue reveals the evolution of Confucius' thought—from his early emphasis on the open-mindedness of "delighting in Heaven and knowing the Mandate" to his later realization that true wisdom lies in transcending dualities, embracing the Dao (the Way) while taking responsibility for reforming society.)

之何爲顔回北面拜手曰 回亦得之矣岀告 子貢子貢茫然自失歸 家淫思七日不寢不 食以至骨立顔回重往喻之乃反丘 門弦歌 誦書終日不輟陳大夫聘魯私見叔孫氏叔 孫氏 曰吾國有聖人曰非孔丘邪曰是也何 以知其聖乎 叔孫氏曰吾嘗聞之顔回 曰孔 丘能廢心而用形 陳大夫曰吾國亦有聖 人 子弗知乎曰聖人孰謂曰老聃之弟子有亢 倉子者得聃 之道能以耳視而目聽 魯侯聞 之大驚 使上卿厚禮而致之亢倉子應聘而 至魯侯 卑辭請問之亢倉子曰傳之者妄我 能視聽不用耳目不能易耳曰 之用魯侯曰 此增異矣其道奈何寡人 終願聞之亢倉子 曰我體合於心心合於氣 氣合於神神合於 無 其有介然之有唯然之音雖遠在八 荒之 外近在眉睫之内來干我者我必知之 乃不 知是我七孔四支之所覺心腹六藏之所知 其自知而已 矣魯侯大悦他日以告仲尼仲 尼笑而不答 商太宰見孔子曰丘聖者歟孔 子曰聖則丘何敢 然則丘博學多識者也 商
Interpretation

Yan Hui (disciple of Confucius) bowed northward and said: "I too have comprehended this principle." After leaving, he told Zigong (another disciple of Confucius), who upon hearing this became utterly disoriented. Returning home, Zigong pondered for seven days and nights without sleep or food, becoming emaciated to the point of skin clinging to bones. Only after Yan Hui went to enlighten him again did Zigong return to Confucius's school, where he spent his days ceaselessly playing the zither and studying texts.

When a high official from the state of Chen visited Lu, he privately met with Shusun Shi (a Lu nobleman). Shusun remarked: "In our state we have a sage—is it not Confucius?" The Chen official asked: "How do you know he is a sage?" Shusun replied: "I once heard Yan Hui say: 'Confucius can relinquish subjective consciousness to accord with the natural form.'"

The Chen official said: "Our state also has a sage—did you not know?" When asked "Who is this sage?", he answered: "Lao Dan (Laozi) had a disciple named Kangcangzi who received the true transmission. He can see with his ears and hear with his eyes." When Duke Lu heard of this, he was astonished and sent a high minister with rich gifts to invite him. Kangcangzi accepted and came to Lu, where the Duke humbly sought instruction. Kangcangzi said: "The rumors are mistaken. I can see and hear without using eyes and ears, but this doesn't mean exchanging their functions." The Duke exclaimed: "This is even more marvelous! What principle governs this? I sincerely wish to understand."

Kangcangzi explained: "My body unites with the mind, the mind unites with Qi (vital energy), Qi unites with Shen (spirit), and Shen unites with emptiness. Even the subtlest existence or faintest sound—whether beyond the eight directions or right before me—if it touches me, I will perceive it. Yet this isn't through the senses of the seven orifices and four limbs, nor the cognition of the five viscera and six bowels, but spontaneous awareness." The Duke was delighted and later told Confucius, who smiled without responding.

When the Grand Steward of Song met Confucius, he asked: "Are you a sage?" Confucius replied: "How dare I claim to be a sage? I'm merely someone broadly learned." The Steward sighed: "Were the Three Kings (Yu of Xia, Tang of Shang, and Wen of Zhou) sages?" Confucius said: "The Three Kings excelled in employing the wise and courageous—whether they were sages, I don't know." Asked "Were the Five Emperors (Huangdi etc.) sages?", he replied: "They excelled in practicing benevolence and righteousness—whether they were sages, I don't know." Pressed further about the Three Sovereigns (Fuxi etc.), Confucius answered: "They followed celestial timing—whether they were sages, I still don't know." The astonished Steward asked: "Then who is truly a sage?" Confucius, altering his expression, said: "In the west there is a Zhenren (True Person, referring to Laozi) who governs without deliberate action yet the world isn't chaotic, persuades without speaking yet is naturally trusted, administers without policies yet all is orderly—this is the true sage."

太宰曰三王聖者歟孔子曰三王善任智勇 者聖則丘弗知曰 五帝聖者歟孔子曰五帝 善任仁義者聖則丘弗知曰三皇聖者歟 孔 子曰三皇善任因時者聖則丘弗知 商太宰 大駭 曰然則孰者爲聖孔子動容有間曰西 方之人有聖 者焉不治而不亂不言而自信 不化而自行 蕩蕩乎民無能名焉 丘疑其 爲 聖弗知眞爲聖歟眞不聖歟商太宰默然心 計 曰孔丘欺我哉子夏問孔子曰顔回之爲 人奚若子 曰回之仁賢於丘也曰子貢之爲 人奚若子曰賜之辯賢於丘也曰子 路之爲 人奚若子曰由之勇賢於丘也曰子張之爲 人奚若子曰師 之莊賢於丘也子夏避席而 問曰然則四子者何爲事夫子 曰居吾語汝 夫回能仁而不能反賜能辯 而不能訥由能 勇而不能怯師能莊而不能同 兼四子之有 以易吾吾弗許也 此其所以事吾而不貳也 子列 子既師壺丘子林友伯昏瞀人乃居南 郭從之處者日數而不 及雖然子列子亦微 焉朝朝相與 辯無不聞而與南郭子連墻二
Interpretation

A minister of the Shang Dynasty asked Confucius: "Were the rulers of the Three Dynasties (Xia, Shang, Zhou) sages?" Confucius replied: "The Three Kings excelled in employing wisdom and martial prowess, but whether they attained sagehood, I dare not presume to judge." The minister pressed further: "Then were the Five Emperors (Yellow Emperor, Zhuanxu, Emperor Ku, Yao, and Shun) sages?" Confucius said: "The Five Emperors excelled in promoting benevolence and righteousness, but whether they reached sagehood, I still cannot ascertain." Undeterred, the minister continued: "Surely the Three Sovereigns (Fuxi, Shennong, and the Yellow Emperor) must have been sages?" Confucius answered: "The Three Sovereigns excelled in adapting to the times, but whether they achieved the realm of sagehood—that I truly cannot say."

The Shang minister was astonished and asked: "Then who could possibly be called a sage?" Confucius grew solemn, remained silent for a moment, and then replied: "In the western regions, there is a cultivator who governs without deliberate action (Wuwei), yet order arises naturally; who teaches without words, yet the people trust him; who transforms without coercion, yet all things follow their course. His Virtue (De) is so vast and boundless that the people cannot even find words to praise him. I suspect he may be a true sage, yet I dare not confirm whether he has truly attained the sage's realm." Hearing this, the minister thought to himself: "Is Master Confucius deceiving me?"

Later, Confucius's disciple Zixia asked him: "What about Yan Hui?" Confucius said: "Yan Hui's benevolence surpasses mine." Zixia asked: "And Zigong?" Confucius replied: "Duanmu Ci (Zigong) is more eloquent than I." "What of Zilu?" Confucius answered: "Zhong You (Zilu) is braver than I." "And Zizhang?" Confucius said: "Zhuan Sunshi (Zizhang) carries himself with greater dignity than I." Zixia rose from his seat and pressed further: "If these four all surpass you in these ways, why do they still follow you as their teacher?"

Confucius said: "Sit, and I will tell you. Yan Hui is benevolent but lacks adaptability; Zigong is eloquent but cannot remain silent; Zilu is courageous but lacks caution; Zizhang is dignified but cannot be accommodating. Even if you combined the strengths of all four and offered them in exchange for my learning, I would not agree. This is why they devote themselves to studying under me without wavering."

Liezi (a Daoist master) studied under Master Huqiuzi Lin and befriended Bohun Maoren (a Daoist recluse). Later, he dwelled in the southern outskirts, where disciples gathered daily. Despite this, the depth of Liezi's Dao remained unfathomable. They engaged daily in profound discussions and debates, and their words spread far and wide. Liezi lived next to Master Nanguo (another Daoist practitioner), separated only by a single wall.

十年不相謁請 相遇於道目若不相見者門 之徒役以爲子列子與 南郭子有敵不疑有 自楚來者問子列子曰先生與南郭子奚 敵 子列子曰南郭子貌充心虚耳無聞曰無見 口無言心無知形無 惕往將奚爲雖然試 與 汝偕往閲弟子四十人同行見南郭 子果若 欺魄焉而不可與接顧視子列子 形神不相 偶而不可與羣南郭子俄 而指子列子之弟 子未行者與言衎衎若 專直而在雄者子列 子徒駭之反舍咸有疑色子列 子曰得意者 無言進知者亦無言用無言爲言亦言 無知 爲知亦知無言與不言無知與不 知亦言亦 知亦無 所不言亦無所不知亦無所言亦無 所知 如斯而已汝奚妄駭哉 子列子學也三 年之後心不敢念是非口不敢言利 害始得 老商一眄而已五年之後心更念是非曰更 言利害老商 始一解顔而笑七年之後從心 之所念更無是非從口之所言更無 利害夫 子始一引吾並席而坐 九年之後橫心之所 念橫口之所言亦不知我之是非利害歟 亦 不知彼之是非利害歟外内進矣而後眼如 耳耳如鼻鼻如口口 無不同心凝形釋骨肉 都融不覺形之所倚足之所履心之所念言 之所藏如斯而已則理無所隱矣 初子列子 好游壺丘子曰禦寇好游游 何所好列子曰 游之樂所玩無故人之游也觀其所見我之
Interpretation

Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) and Master Nanguo (another recluse) had not visited each other for ten years. Once they met on the road yet passed by as if seeing nothing. Liezi’s disciples suspected some conflict between them. Later, a visitor from Chu asked Liezi: "Has something happened between you and Master Nanguo?"

Liezi explained: "Master Nanguo’s outward form is full, yet his inner being remains empty and still. His ears do not listen, his eyes do not see, his mouth does not speak, his mind does not cling, and his body does not strain. What purpose would there be in my visiting such a man? But since you’re curious, let us go see him together." He then took forty disciples to observe Master Nanguo, who indeed remained as unresponsive as a wooden puppet, making communication impossible. Liezi realized Nanguo’s body and spirit (Shen) seemed utterly detached, defying ordinary understanding.

Suddenly, Master Nanguo pointed at the disciples lagging behind and spoke with the intensity of a debater. The disciples were astonished and returned visibly perplexed. Liezi counseled them: "Those who embody the Dao (the Way) need no words; true wisdom transcends speech. To express through 'not-speaking' is still expression; to know through 'not-knowing' is still knowing. At this stage, nothing remains unexpressed or unknown—yet it appears as if nothing was said or known. Why should this surprise you?"

Liezi then recounted his own cultivation journey: For the first three years, he dared not harbor thoughts of right/wrong or speak of gain/loss—only then did his teacher Lao Shangshi glance at him sidelong. After five years, when he began contemplating right/wrong and discussing gain/loss, Lao Shangshi finally smiled. After seven years, when distinctions of right/wrong faded from his mind and calculations of gain/loss vanished from his speech, his teacher let him share the mat. After nine years, his thoughts and words flowed freely—he could no longer separate his own judgments from others’, his senses merged completely, his mind concentrated while his form dissolved, until he felt no bodily existence and merged wholly with the Dao.

Earlier in the text, it’s mentioned that young Liezi loved traveling. His teacher Huzi asked: "Yu Kou (Liezi’s given name), what do you seek in your travels?" Liezi replied: "The joy lies in witnessing novelty. Others travel to see external sights—I travel to observe internal transformations." This exchange reveals the Daoist practitioner’s path from outward exploration to inward cultivation.

游也觀其所變游乎游乎未有能 辨其游者 壺丘子曰禦寇 之游固與人同歟而曰固與 人異歟凡所見亦恒見其變 玩彼物之無故 不知我亦無故 務外游不知務内觀外游者 求備於物内觀者取足於身取足於 身游之 至也求備於物游之不至也 於是列 子終身 不出自以爲不知游壺丘子曰游其至 乎至 游者不知所適至觀者不知所眂 物物皆游 矣物物皆觀矣是我 之所謂游是我之所謂 觀也故曰游 其至矣乎游其至矣乎龍叔謂 文摯曰子之術微矣吾有疾子能已 乎文摯 曰唯命所聽然先言子所病之證龍叔曰吾 鄉譽不以爲榮 國毁不以爲辱得而不喜失 而弗憂視生如死視富如貧視人如豕 視吾 如人處吾之家如逆旅之舍觀吾之鄉 如戎 蠻之國凡此衆疾爵賞不能勸刑罰不能威 盛衰利害 不能易哀樂不能移固不可事國 君交親友御妻子制僕隸 此 奚疾哉奚方能 已之乎文摯乃命龍叔背明而立文摯自後 向明而 望之既而曰嘻吾見子之心矣方寸 之地虚矣幾聖人也子心六孔流 通一孔不 達今以聖智爲疾者或由此乎非吾淺術所 能已也無所由而常生者道也由生而生 故 雖終而不亡常也 由生而亡不幸也有所由
Interpretation

This passage discusses two distinct types of "wandering" (referring to spiritual states of experience): external wandering and internal contemplation.

Huzi (a Daoist master) said to Liezi: Your way of wandering appears similar to others on the surface, but differs in essence. Ordinary people only perceive superficial changes in phenomena, becoming obsessed with the impermanent nature of external things while remaining unaware of their own impermanence. Those who pursue only external wandering constantly seek fulfillment from external objects, while those who understand internal contemplation find completeness within themselves. The highest form of wandering is precisely this inner completeness. After hearing this, Liezi never ventured out again, realizing he hadn't yet understood true "wandering."

Huzi further explained: The supreme wandering doesn't cling to destinations; the supreme observation doesn't fixate on objects. When one attains this state, all things exist within both "wandering" and "observation."

The subsequent narrative tells of Longshu visiting the famous physician Wen Zhi for treatment. Longshu described his peculiar symptoms: praise from villagers brought him no honor, nor did slander from the state bring shame; gains didn't delight him nor losses sadden him; he viewed life as death and wealth as poverty; saw others as pigs or dogs and himself as just another person; lived in his own home as if in an inn, and regarded his hometown as barbarian lands. These "symptoms" made him impervious to official rewards, unafraid of punishments, and unaffected by worldly changes.

Wen Zhi had Longshu stand with his back to light and observed him from behind, then said: I see your heart—empty, luminous, and tranquil, nearly attaining sagehood. Your heart originally had seven apertures; now six are fully open with only one remaining. You consider these sage-like realizations to be illness—this is beyond my medical art to cure.

The passage concludes by clarifying: What exists eternally without external causes is the Dao (the Way). Those who follow life's natural patterns, though their bodies perish, have spirits that never vanish—this is the constant principle. But to live while losing one's true nature—that is genuine misfortune.

而 常死者亦道也由死而死故雖未然而自 亡 者亦常也由死而生幸也故 無用而生謂 之道用道得終謂之常有所用而死者亦 謂 之道用道而得死者亦謂之常季梁之死楊 朱 望其門而歌隨梧之死楊朱撫其尸而哭 隸人之生隸 人之死衆人且歌衆人且哭 目 將眇者先覩秋毫耳將聾者先聞蚋飛口將 爽者先 辨淄澠鼻將窒者先覺焦朽體將 僵 者先亟奔佚心將迷者先識是非 故物不至 者則不反 鄭之圃澤多賢東里多才圃澤之 役 有伯豐子者行過東里遇鄧析鄧析 顧其 徒而笑曰爲若舞彼來者奚若其徒曰所願 知也鄧析謂伯豐子曰汝知養養之義乎受 人養而不 能自養者犬豕之類也養物而物 爲我用者人之力也使汝之徒食 而飽衣而 息執政之功也長幼群聚而爲牢籍庖厨 之 物奚異大豕之類乎伯豐子不應伯豐子之 從者越次 而進曰大夫不聞齊魯之多機乎 有善治土木者有善治 金革者有善治聲樂 者有善治書數者有善治軍旅者有善治宗 廟 者羣才備也而無相位者無能相使者 而 位之者無知使之者無能而知之與能爲之 使焉
Interpretation

This scripture primarily explores the philosophy of life-and-death and the proper employment of talents.

Regarding life and death, the text states: Death itself is a manifestation of the Dao (the Way). Those destined to die will naturally perish even before their time comes—this is the normal course. Surviving the brink of death is but fortune. Existing effortlessly without forced action is the Dao, while following the Dao to complete one's natural lifespan is the principle. Similarly, dying for a purpose is also the Dao, and dying for the Dao is likewise the principle. The text cites the example of Yang Zhu: When Ji Liang passed away, Yang Zhu sang at the door, yet when Sui Wu died, he wept over the corpse. This illustrates that life and death are natural phenomena, and whether people sing or weep are normal responses.

It then uses sensory changes as metaphors: Those about to go blind first discern minute details; those about to go deaf first hear the buzzing of mosquitoes; before losing taste, one distinguishes between the waters of Zi and Mian; before nasal congestion, one detects scorched smells; before the body stiffens, one rushes to run; and before the mind becomes confused, one distinguishes right from wrong. This demonstrates that when things reach their extremes, they reverse.

The latter part recounts a story from the state of Zheng: The Puze region had many virtuous scholars, while Dongli produced numerous talented individuals. When Bofengzi passed through Dongli, he encountered Deng Xi (a representative figure of the School of Names during the Spring and Autumn period), who mocked Bofengzi and his kind as being like pigs and dogs—fed by others yet unable to stand independently, only capable of living in groups and depending on others. Bofengzi’s attendant retorted: The states of Qi and Lu had many skilled artisans—some excelled in architecture, others in metalwork, some in music, others in writing and arithmetic, some in military strategy, and others in ancestral temple rituals. These talents each had their strengths, but the key lay in whether a wise ruler could employ them properly. Without a leader’s discernment, even the greatest talents remain useless.

Through its perspectives on life-and-death and talent, this passage elucidates the Daoist ideas of following nature, the reversal of extremes, and the governance principle of recognizing and utilizing people’s abilities wisely.

執政者乃吾之所使子奚矜 焉鄧析無 以應目其徒而退公儀伯以力聞諸侯堂谿 公言之於周 宣王王備禮以聘之公儀伯至 觀形懦夫也宣王心惑而 疑曰女之力何如 公儀伯曰臣之力能折春螽之股堪秋蟬之 翼 王作色曰吾之力者能裂犀兕之革曳九 牛之尾猶憾以弱女 折春螽之股堪秋蟬之 翼而力聞天下何也公儀伯長息退席曰善 哉王之問也臣敢以實對臣之師有商丘子 者力無敵於天下而六 親不知以未嘗用其 力故也臣以死事之乃告臣 曰人欲見其所 不見視人所不窺欲得其所不得修人所不 爲 故學視者先見輿薪學聽者先聞撞鐘夫 有易於内者 無難於外於外無難故名不出 於一家 今臣之名聞於諸侯是臣違師之教 顯臣之能者 也然則臣之名不以負其力者 也以能用其力者 也不猶愈於負其力者乎 中山公子牟者魏國之賢公子也 好與賢人 游不恤國事而悦趙 人公孫龍樂正子輿之 徒笑之公子牟曰子何笑牟之悦公孫龍也
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the true essence of rulership and power. Gongyi Bo was renowned among feudal lords for his extraordinary strength, prompting King Xuan of Zhou to summon him with grand ceremony, only to find a seemingly timid man. The perplexed king asked, "What exactly is your strength capable of?" Gongyi Bo replied, "I can break the legs of spring locusts and crush the wings of autumn cicadas." The king's countenance darkened: "I can tear rhinoceros hide and halt nine oxen by their tails, yet still find my strength insufficient. How could such petty skills earn you fame?"

Gongyi Bo sighed deeply and explained: "Your question cuts to the heart of the matter. Let me speak truthfully—my teacher Shangqiu Zi possessed strength unmatched in the world, yet even his family remained unaware, for he never displayed it. Only upon his deathbed, after my lifelong service, did he reveal his wisdom: 'One must perceive what others overlook, observe what escapes notice, pursue what others neglect, and cultivate what remains undone. Thus when learning to see, begin by examining cartloads of firewood; when training hearing, start with bell strikes. When inner cultivation reaches perfection, external mastery follows effortlessly.'"

"My reputation among lords actually violates my teacher's instruction—I revealed my capability. Yet my fame springs not from brute force, but from understanding how to employ strength wisely. Is this not superior to mere displays of might?"

The narrative continues with the story of Prince Mou of Zhongshan from Wei, who neglected state affairs to associate with worthies, particularly admiring Gongsun Long (representative of the School of Names). When mocked for this preference, the prince retorted, "Why ridicule my appreciation of Gongsun Long?" Through these two parables, the text demonstrates that true power resides in inner cultivation rather than external display, and that wisdom outweighs physical strength.

子輿曰公孫龍 之爲人也行無師學無友佞 給而不中漫衍 而無家好怪而妄言欲惑人 之心屈人之口與 韓檀等肄之公子牟變容 曰何 子狀公孫龍之過歟請聞其實子輿曰 吾笑 龍之詒孔穿言善射者能令後鏃中前 括發發 相及矢矢相屬前矢造準而無絶落 後矢之括猶銜弦視之若一焉 孔穿駭之龍 曰此未其妙者 遠蒙之弟子曰鴻超怒其妻 而怖之引烏號之弓綦衛之箭 射其目矢來 注眸子而眶不睫矢墜地而塵不揚 是豈智 者之言歟公子牟曰智者之言固非愚者之 所曉後鏃中前括鈞後於前 矢注眸子而眶 不睫盡矢之 勢 也子何疑焉樂正子輿曰子 龍之徒 焉得不飾其闕吾又言其尤者龍誑 魏王曰有意不心 有指不至有物 不盡 有影 不移 髮引千鈞 白馬非馬孤犢未嘗有 母其 負類反倫不可勝言也公子牟曰子 不諭至 言而以爲尤也尤其在子矣夫無意則心同 無 指則皆至盡物者常有影不移者說 在改 也髮引千鈞勢至等 也白馬非馬形名離也 孤犢未嘗有母非孤犢也樂正子輿曰子以 公孫龍之鳴皆條也設令發於餘竅子亦將 承之 公子牟默然良乆告退曰請待餘日更 謁子論 堯治天下五十年不知天下治歟不 治歟不 知億兆之願戴己歟不願戴己歟顧
Interpretation

This dialogue records the debate between Ziyu and Prince Mou regarding Gongsun Long's doctrines. Ziyu criticized the absurdity in the teachings of Gongsun Long (a prominent logician of the Warring States period's School of Names), citing several typical examples: for instance, Gongsun Long claimed a divine archer could make the tip of a following arrow hit the fletching of the preceding one, creating an unbroken chain of arrows; he also recounted how Gongsun's disciple Hong Chao, in a fit of anger, shot an arrow at his wife's eye, yet when the arrow reached her eyelid, she didn't even blink, and when it fell, it didn't stir any dust.

Prince Mou defended Gongsun Long, arguing these statements revealed subtle truths about phenomena: the trailing arrow catching the leading one demonstrated balanced force, while the arrow failing to make an eyelid flutter showed exhausted momentum. He further listed other propositions by Gongsun Long, such as "having intention doesn't mean having a mind," "a white horse is not a horse," and "an orphaned calf never had a mother," maintaining these were profound insights that shattered conventional thinking.

Ziyu retorted that such claims were like strange noises emitted from bodily orifices, and Prince Mou eventually withdrew in silence, proposing to continue the discussion another day. The passage abruptly concludes with an allusion to Emperor Yao's fifty-year reign, hinting that the validation of truth requires the test of time.

(Note: The "Wuhao bow" and "Qiwei arrows" refer to famous ancient weapons; the "School of Names" was a Warring States period philosophical school renowned for logical disputation, with Gongsun Long's propositions like "a white horse is not a horse" exploring the relationship between names and realities.)

問左右左右不知問外朝外朝不知問在野 在野不知 堯乃微服游於康衢聞童兒謡曰 立我蒸民莫菲爾極不識不知順 帝之則堯 喜問曰誰教爾 爲此言童兒曰我聞之大夫 問大夫大夫曰古詩也堯 還宫召舜因禪以 天下舜不辭而受之關尹喜曰在已無 居形 物其著其動若水其靜若鏡其應若響故 其 道若物者也物自違 道道不違物善若道者 亦不用耳亦不用目亦不用力亦 不用心欲 若道而用視聽形智以求之弗當矣瞻之在 前 忽焉在後用之彌滿六虚廢之莫知其所 亦非有 心者所能得遠亦非無心者所能得 近 唯默而得之而性成之者得之知而忘情 能而不爲 眞知眞能也發無知何能情發不 能何能爲聚塊 也積塵也雖無爲而非
Interpretation

This scripture recounts two stories that reveal the essence of the Daoist principle of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)."

The first story tells how Emperor Yao, wishing to understand the people's condition, traveled incognito among the commoners. After questioning officials and citizens alike without finding anyone who knew the way of governance, he heard children in the marketplace singing: "To nourish the people—must we not follow heaven's Dao? Unknowingly, unawares, we conform to the celestial law." Delighted, Emperor Yao traced the song's origin and discovered it was an ancient folk verse. He then returned to his palace and abdicated the throne to Shun, who accepted without hesitation.

The second story, through the words of Guan Yinxi (Laozi's disciple), expounds a core Daoist view: The true Dao operates like flowing water, a mirror's reflection, or an echo's response—utterly spontaneous. The Dao never contradicts the myriad things; only things may deviate from the Dao. Those who truly understand the Dao need not strain their senses, strength, or intellect to pursue it. The Dao seems ahead, then suddenly behind; when employed it fills heaven and earth, yet when released it leaves no trace. Neither can those who deliberately seek it distance themselves from the Dao, nor can the indifferent draw near to it.

Those who genuinely comprehend the Dao attain it through silent realization and alignment with their innate nature. To know yet remain unmoved, to possess ability yet refrain from forced action—this constitutes true knowledge and true capability. Like piled earth and drifting dust that appear inactive yet naturally accord with heavenly principle, the text emphasizes abandoning willful striving to follow the celestial Dao through effortless spontaneity.

理也

Vol. 5

湯間第五 殷湯問於夏革曰古初有物乎夏革曰古初 無物今 惡得物後之人將謂今之無物可乎 殷湯曰然則物無先後乎夏革曰物之終始 初無極 已始或爲終終或爲始惡知其紀然 自物之外自事之先朕所不知也殷湯曰然 則上 下八方有極盡乎革曰不知也 湯固問 革曰無則無極有則有盡朕何以知之然無 極之外復無無極無盡之中復無無盡無 極 復無無極無盡復無無盡 朕以是知其無極 無盡也而不知其有極有盡 也湯又問曰四 海之外奚有革曰猶齊州也湯曰 汝奚以實 之革曰朕東行至營人民猶是也問營之東 復猶營 也西行至豳人民猶是也問豳之西 復猶豳也朕以是知四海四荒 四極之不異 是也故大小相含無窮極也含萬 物者亦如 含天地含萬物也固不窮 含天地也故無極 朕亦焉知天地之表不有大天地者乎 亦吾 所不知也
Interpretation

King Tang of Shang (the founding ruler of the Shang dynasty) asked Xia Ge (an ancient sage): "Did material existence have a primordial beginning?" Xia Ge replied: "In the primordial state there was nothing. Where then did present existence come from? If we speak this way, might future generations regard our present reality as equally void?"

Tang pressed further: "Then does material existence lack sequence of before and after?" Xia Ge explained: "The beginnings and endings of things inherently lack demarcation. What appears as one thing's beginning may be another's ending, and what seems an ending may birth new beginnings - who can discern their patterns? As for conditions before material forms coalesced or events manifested, this too lies beyond my knowledge."

Tang continued questioning: "Do heaven and earth's eight directions have boundaries?" Xia Ge said: "I do not know." Under Tang's persistent inquiry, Xia Ge elaborated: "In emptiness there are no borders, yet concrete existence must have limits - but how could I know their particulars? However, beyond the Wuji (Limitless) there can be no greater boundlessness, and within the endless (infinite time) cannot reside greater infinity. Thus I comprehend the infinitude of space-time while remaining ignorant of where such boundaries might lie."

Tang asked further: "What exists beyond the Four Seas?" Xia Ge responded: "The same as within the Central Plains." Tang challenged: "How do you verify this?" Xia Ge said: "Journeying east to Yingzhou (modern Liaodong), I found its people no different from ours. Inquiring beyond Yingzhou, they reported similar conditions. Traveling west to Bin territory (modern Shaanxi), its inhabitants matched our own. Asking beyond Bin, the accounts were identical. Thus I understand the Four Seas, Four Wastes (distant borderlands), and Four Extremities share this fundamental sameness."

Finally Xia Ge concluded: "All things great and small intercontain without exhaustion. The space encompassing all phenomena resembles that containing heaven and earth. Since the vessel holding heaven and earth knows no bounds, how could I presume nothing greater exists beyond them? This too remains beyond my understanding."

然則天地 亦物也物有不足故昔 者女媧氏練五色石以補其闕 斷鼇之足以 立四 極其後共工氏與顓頊爭爲帝怒而觸 不周之山 折天柱絶地維故天傾西北日月 星辰 就焉地不滿東南故百川水潦歸焉湯 又問物有巨細乎有修短乎 有同異乎革曰 渤海之東不知幾億萬里有大壑焉實惟無 底之谷 其下無底名曰 歸墟八紘九野之水 天漢之流莫不注之而無增無减焉 其中有 五山焉一曰岱輿二曰貟嶠三曰方壺四 曰 瀛洲五曰蓬萊其山高下周旋三萬里其頂 平處九千里山之中 間相去七萬里以爲鄰 居焉其上臺觀皆金玉其上禽獸皆純縞珠 玕之樹皆叢生華實皆有滋味食之皆不老 不死所居之人皆仙聖 之種一日一夕飛相 往來者不可數焉而五山之 根無所連著 常 隨潮波上下往還不得蹔峙焉仙聖毒之訴 之於帝帝 恐流於西極失羣聖之居乃命禺 疆使巨鼇十 五舉首而戴之迭爲三番六萬 歲一交焉五山始峙而 不動而龍伯之國有
Interpretation

Heaven and Earth are ultimately composed of material substance, and all matter inevitably has imperfections. In ancient times, the goddess Nüwa smelted five-colored stones to mend the ruptures in the celestial vault and severed the legs of a giant turtle to support the four pillars of the cosmos. Later, when the water deity Gonggong contended with Emperor Zhuanxu (one of the Five Emperors) for the throne, he angrily crashed into Mount Buzhou in his rage, breaking the celestial pillar and severing the earthly tethers. Consequently, the heavens tilted northwestward, causing the sun, moon, and stars to move in that direction, while the earth collapsed in the southeast, drawing all rivers to flow toward that region.

King Tang of Shang then asked: "Do all things have distinctions of size? Are there differences in length? Can we discern similarities and variations among them?" Liezi replied: "East of the Bohai Sea, beyond countless billions of miles, lies an unfathomable abyss called the 'Guixu' (Returning Depths). The waters of the eight directions and the celestial river all pour into it, yet its level never rises or falls. There stand five divine mountains: Daiyu, Yuanjiao, Fanghu, Yingzhou, and Penglai. These mountains rise thirty thousand miles high, with plateaus at their summits spanning nine thousand miles, and they stand seventy thousand miles apart from one another. Their towers and pavilions are built of gold and jade, their beasts and birds are pure white, and their forests of pearl- and jade-like trees bear fruits that grant immortality. The inhabitants are all immortals (xian) and sages, who fly about daily in such numbers that their comings and goings cannot be counted.

Yet these five mountains lacked stable foundations and often drifted up and down with the tides. Troubled by this, the immortals pleaded their case to the Celestial Emperor (Tian Di). Fearing the mountains might drift to the western extremity and deprive the immortals of their abode, the emperor commanded the sea god Yuqiang to dispatch fifteen giant turtles to take turns holding up the mountains with their heads, rotating every sixty thousand years. Only then did the five mountains stabilize. Later, a man from the land of Longbo (the kingdom of giants)...".

大人舉足不盈數步而暨五山之所一釣而 連 六鼇合負而趣歸其國灼其骨以數焉 於 是岱輿 貟嶠二山流於北極沉於大海仙聖 之播遷者巨億計帝憑怒 侵减龍伯之國使 阨侵小龍伯之民使短至伏羲神農時其國 人猶 數千丈從中 州以東四十萬里得僬僥 國人長一尺五寸東北極有人名 曰諍人長 九寸荆之南有冥靈者以五 百歲爲春五百 歲爲秋上古有大樁者以八千歲爲春八千 歲爲秋 朽壤之上有菌芝者生於朝死於晦 春夏之月有蠓蚋者因雨而生 見陽而死終 髮北之北有溟海者天池也有魚焉其廣數 千里 其長稱焉其名爲鯤有鳥焉其名爲鵬 翼若垂天之雲其體稱焉世 豈知有此物哉 大禹行而見之伯益 知而名之夷堅聞而志 之 江浦之間生麽蟲其名曰焦螟羣飛而集 於蚊睫弗相觸也栖宿去來蚊弗覺也離朱 子羽方晝拭眥揚眉而 望之弗見其形𧣾(丑/豸) (文余普/弭三切)俞師曠方夜擿耳俛首而 聽之弗聞 其聲 唯黄帝與容成子居空同之上同齋三 月心死形廢 徐以神視塊然見之若嵩山之 阿 徐以氣聽砰然聞之若雷霆之聲吴
Interpretation

This passage recounts a series of marvelous legends and supernatural phenomena, showcasing the wondrous diversity of all things in the Daoist cosmological worldview.

It mentions a "Great Man" (referring to a spiritual adept with supernatural powers) who could stride over five mountains in a few steps and catch six giant turtles with a single cast of his fishing line. Later, the immortal mountains Daiyu and Yuanjiao drifted to the North Pole and sank into the sea, displacing countless immortals and sages. The Heavenly Emperor grew furious at this and punished the kingdom of Longbo (the land of giants), reducing its inhabitants' height from thousands of zhang to mere inches.

The text then describes numerous extraordinary lands: the people of Jiaoyao Country stand only 1.5 chi tall, while the "contentious people" of the northeastern extremes measure a mere nine cun. In the south grows the Mingling Tree that counts five hundred years as a single season; in antiquity there was the Great Chun Tree that measured eight thousand years per season. There are also mushrooms that sprout at dawn and wither by dusk, and midges that are born in rain and die in sunlight.

The northern region contains a celestial pond called the "Ming Sea," home to the giant fish Kun and the enormous bird Peng whose wings resemble clouds draping from the sky. The Great Yu once witnessed these marvels, which Bo Yi named and Yi Jian recorded.

By the river lives a minuscule creature called the "Jiaoming" that gathers in swarms on mosquito eyelashes without touching each other, coming and going unnoticed by their hosts. Even Li Zhu and Ziyu with their extraordinary vision, or Shi Kuang with his acute hearing, could neither discern their forms nor detect their sounds.

Finally, the passage recounts how the Yellow Emperor and Rong Chengzi practiced purification rituals on Mount Kongtong for three months. After attaining the state of "the mind dying and the form dissolving," they used divine power to perceive these microscopic creatures as large as Mount Song and sensed their movements as loud as thunder through Qi perception. This illustrates how advanced Daoist cultivation enables practitioners to perceive microscopic realms beyond ordinary human perception.

楚之 國有大木焉其名爲櫾碧樹而冬生實丹而 味酸 食其皮汁已憤厥之疾齊州珍之渡淮 而北而化爲枳焉鸜鵒不踰 濟貉踰汶則死 矣地氣然也雖然形氣異也性鈞已無相易 已生皆全已分皆足已吾何以識其巨細何 以識其脩短何以識其 同異哉大形王屋二 山 方七百里高萬仞本在冀州之南河陽之 北北山愚公者 年且九十面山而居懲山北 之塞出入之迂也聚室而謀 曰吾與汝畢力 平險指通豫南達于漢陰可乎雜然相許其 妻 獻疑曰以君之力曾不能損魁父之丘如 太形王屋何 且焉置土石雜曰投諸渤海之 尾隱土之北遂率 子孫荷擔者三夫叩石墾 壤箕畚運於渤海之尾鄰人京城氏之孀 妻 有遺男始齓跳往助之寒暑易節始一反焉 河曲智叟笑而 止之曰甚矣汝之不慧以殘 年餘力曾不能毁山之一毛 其如土石何北 山愚公長息曰汝心之固固不可徹曾不若 孀妻弱 子雖我之死有子存焉子又生孫孫 又生子子又生子子又生孫子 子孫孫無窮 匱也而山不加增何若而不平河曲智叟亡 以應 操蛇之神聞之懼其不已 也告之於帝 帝感其誠命夸娥氏 二子負二山一厝朔東 一厝雍南自此冀之南漢之 陰無隴斷焉 夸 父不量力欲追日影逐之於隅谷之際渴欲
Interpretation

In the state of Chu grew a remarkable tree called the you tree (yòu). This tree bore fruit in winter—bright red but sour in taste. Its bark's sap could cure fainting spells, and the people of Qi highly valued it. Strangely, though, when transplanted north of the Huai River, it transformed into a different plant called the zhi tree (zhǐ).

Just as mynah birds cannot fly beyond the Ji River, or raccoon dogs perish when crossing the Wen River, these changes occur due to differences in local climate and terrain. Though forms and temperaments may shift, the intrinsic nature of all things remains fundamentally the same. Since all beings are born complete, each with its own innate sufficiency, why should we trouble ourselves distinguishing their size, length, or differences?

Now, let us recount the tale of the Taihang and Wangwu Mountains. These two peaks spanned seven hundred li in circumference, towering ten thousand ren (an ancient unit of length) high. Originally situated south of Jizhou and north of Heyang, they blocked the path of an elderly man—nearly ninety years old—who lived north of the mountains. Troubled by the long detours required to travel around them, he gathered his family and proposed: "Let us work together to level these mountains, clearing a path to the south of Yuzhou and the southern banks of the Han River. What say you?" His family all agreed.

Only his wife raised doubts: "With your strength, you couldn’t even remove a small mound like Kuifu—how much less these massive Taihang and Wangwu Mountains? And where would we put all the earth and stones we dig up?" The family suggested dumping them by the shores of the Bohai Sea. So the old man, along with three of his descendants who could carry loads, began chiseling rocks and digging soil, hauling the debris in baskets to the distant sea. A widow from the neighboring Jingcheng clan had a young son, just losing his baby teeth, who eagerly skipped along to help. Their round trip took a full year.

An old man from Hequ, known as Wise Elder, mocked the old man: "How foolish you are! With your frail bones, you can’t even pluck a single blade of grass from the mountain—what hope do you have of moving earth and stone?" The old man sighed deeply and replied: "Your mind is too rigid! When I die, my sons will carry on; they will have sons and grandsons in turn, generation after generation without end. But the mountains won’t grow taller—how could we not level them in time?" The Wise Elder had no answer.

The mountain god, hearing of this, feared the old man might persist indefinitely and reported it to the Heavenly Emperor. Moved by the old man’s sincerity, the Emperor commanded the two sons of Kua’e to carry away the mountains—one was placed east of Shuofang, the other south of Yongzhou. From then on, the lands from southern Jizhou to the southern banks of the Han River were no longer obstructed by towering peaks.

(Finally, there is mention of the tale of Kuafu chasing the sun.) Kuafu, overestimating his strength, sought to overtake the sun, pursuing it all the way to the Valley of Yu (where legend says the sun sets). Parched with thirst, he....

得飲赴飲河渭河渭不足將走北飲大澤未 至道渴而死棄其杖尸 膏肉所浸生鄧林鄧 林彌廣數千里焉大禹曰六合 之間四海之 内照之以日月經之以星辰紀之以四時要 之以太歲 神靈所生其物其形或夭或壽唯 聖人能通其道 夏革曰然則亦有不待神靈 而生不待陰陽 而形不待日月而明不待殺 戮而夭不待 將迎而壽不待五穀而食不待 繒纊而衣不待舟車 而行其道自然非聖人 之所通也 禹之治水土也迷而失塗謬之一 國濱北 海之北不知距齊州幾千萬里其國 名曰終北不知際畔之所 齊限無風雨霜露 不生鳥獸蟲魚草木之類四方悉平周以喬 陟 當國之中有山山名壺領狀若甔甄頂有 口狀若貟環 名曰滋穴有水湧出名曰神瀵 臭過蘭椒味過醪醴一源分 爲四埒注於山 下經營一國亡不悉徧土氣和亡札厲人性 婉而從物不競不爭柔心而弱骨不驕不忌 長幼儕居不君不臣男 女雜游不媒不聘縁 水而居不耕不稼土氣温適不織不衣百年 而 死不夭不病其民孳阜亡數有喜樂亡衰 老哀苦其俗好聲相携 而迭謡終日不輟音 饑倦則飲神瀵力志和平過則醉經旬乃醒
Interpretation

This passage presents two contrasting worldviews and visions of an ideal realm. The first part describes the perspective of Yu the Great (legendary flood-control hero of antiquity): he believed all phenomena between heaven and earth were governed by the movements of celestial bodies, seasonal cycles, and the Grand Year (an ancient calendrical concept), with deities creating various life forms—patterns only sages could comprehend.

However, Xia Ge proposed an opposing view: certain existences require no divine creation, need no formation through Yin-Yang, depend not on sunlight or moonlight, cannot be prematurely ended by violence, need not deliberately pursue longevity, sustain themselves without consuming the Five Grains, wear no silken garments, and travel without carts or boats—these beings follow the natural Dao so completely that even sages cannot fully understand them.

The latter portion details an ideal land called "Ultimate North." Located in the extreme northern reaches, this kingdom knows no wind, rain, frost, or dew, nor do birds, beasts, or vegetation exist there. At its center stands Mount Huling, whose summit holds a cavern named "Nourishing Grotto" that gushes forth a spring called "Divine Effluvia"—its fragrance surpassing orchids and pepper plants, its flavor more exquisite than fine wine. The waters divide into four streams flowing throughout the land, creating a temperate climate entirely free from pestilence.

The people of Ultimate North possess gentle dispositions, recognizing no distinctions of rank or age. Men and women mingle freely without matchmakers, dwelling along the waterways without practicing agriculture. The perpetual warmth eliminates any need for woven clothing. They live to a hundred years and die naturally, knowing neither illness nor untimely death, their flourishing population untouched by care. Delighting in song, they spend days hand-in-hand singing in turns. When hungry or weary, they drink the Divine Effluvia—overindulgence brings a pleasant intoxication lasting ten days before awakening. Here emerges a vision of society perfectly attuned to nature, utterly free from desire or striving.

沐 浴神瀵膚色脂澤香氣經旬乃歇周穆王 北游過其國三年忘歸既 反周室慕其國𢠵 然自失不進酒肉不召嬪御者數月乃復管 仲勉 齊桓公因遊遼口俱之其國幾尅舉隰 朋諫曰君舍齊國之廣人民 之衆山川之觀 殖物之阜禮義之盛章服之美妖靡盈庭忠 良滿朝 肆咤則徒卒百萬視撝則諸侯從命 亦奚羨於彼而棄齊 國之社稷從戎夷之國 乎此仲父之耄奈何從之桓公乃止以隰明 之 言告管仲仲曰此固非朋之所及也臣恐 彼 國之不可知之也齊國之富奚戀隰朋之 言奚顧 南國之人祝髮而祼北國之人鞨巾 而裘中國之人冠冕而裳九土 所資或農或 商或田或漁如冬裘夏葛水舟陸車默而得 之性而成 之越之 東有輒休之國其長子生 則鮮而食之謂之宜弟其大父 死負其大母 而棄之曰鬼妻不可與同居處楚之南有炎 人之國其 親戚死㱙(與咼/同)其肉而棄之然後 埋其骨迺成爲孝子秦之西有儀渠文康 之 國者其親戚死聚柴積而焚之燻則煙上謂
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories about the customs of different nations, reflecting ancient people's observations and reflections on foreign cultures.

When King Mu of Zhou traveled north, he arrived at a peculiar country where people bathed in divine water that left their skin smooth and fragrant for over ten days. The king stayed there for three years, forgetting to return home. Even after going back to the Zhou court, he remained nostalgic for months, losing his appetite and avoiding the company of women.

Guan Zhong once planned to take Duke Huan of Qi to visit this land and nearly succeeded. But Xi Peng admonished: "You possess the vast state of Qi with its multitudes of people, majestic mountains and rivers, abundant resources, complete rituals, and splendid attire. Your court has both enchanting beauties and loyal ministers. At your command, a million troops stand ready; with a gesture, feudal lords obey. Why envy that small barbarian state and abandon Qi's sacred land?" The duke thus abandoned the plan. When Guan Zhong learned of this, he remarked: "Xi Peng fails to understand that country's profundity. What worries me is the inscrutable mystery of that place."

The text then lists distinctive customs from various regions:

  • Southerners cut their hair short and went naked
  • Northerners wrapped their heads in cloth and wore fur garments
  • Central Plains people wore ceremonial caps and long robes

With different local products, people farmed or traded, hunted or fished—just as one wears fur in winter and linen in summer, or rides boats on water and chariots on land—all customs formed naturally.

Several nations' unusual funeral practices are recorded:

  • In the Zhexiu Kingdom east of Yue: The firstborn son was cooked and eaten, called "benefiting younger brothers"; when grandfathers died, grandmothers were carried away and abandoned as "ghost wives cannot cohabit."
  • Among the Yanren people south of Chu: After a relative's death, flesh was cut away and discarded before burying the bones—only then was one considered filial.
  • In the Yiqu Wenkang Kingdom west of Qin: Deceased relatives were burned on pyres, the rising smoke symbolizing their ascent to heaven.

These accounts reveal ancient people's fascination with cultural differences while showcasing their ethnographic observations and reflections on "the Other."

之登遐然後成爲孝 子此上而爲政下以爲 俗而未足爲異也孔子東游見兩小兒 辨鬥 問其故一兒曰我以日始出時去人近而日 中時遠也一兒以 日初出遠而日中時近也 一兒曰日初出大如車蓋及日中則如盤 盂 此不爲遠者小而近者大乎一兒曰日初出 則滄滄凉凉及其日中 如探湯此不爲近者 熱而遠者凉乎孔子不能决也兩小兒笑曰 孰 爲汝多知乎均天下之至理 也連於形物 亦然均髮均縣輕重而髮絶髮 不均也均也 其絶也莫絶 人以爲不然自有知其然者也 詹何 以獨繭絲爲綸芒鍼爲鈎荆蓧爲竿剖 粒爲餌引盈車之魚 於百仞之淵汩流之中 綸不絶鈎不伸竿不撓 楚王聞而異之召問 其故詹何曰臣 聞先大夫之言蒲且子之弋 也弱弓纖繳乘風振之連雙 鶬於青雲之際 用心專動手均也臣因其事放而學釣五年 始盡其 道當臣之臨河持竿心無雜慮唯魚 之念投綸沈釣手無輕重物莫 能亂魚見臣 之鈎餌猶沈埃聚沫吞之不疑所以能以弱
Interpretation

This passage recounts two stories that both embody the Daoist cultivation wisdom of "single-minded concentration."

The first is the famous "Two Children Debating the Sun" tale: While traveling in the east, Confucius encountered two children arguing about the sun's distance. One child said the morning sun appears as large as a carriage canopy but shrinks to plate-size by noon, proving it's closer in the morning. The other countered that the cool morning and hot noon prove the opposite. Unable to decide, Confucius was mocked: "Who said you were so learned?" This illustrates how fundamental truths manifest in concrete phenomena—like how evenly distributed force won't break a hair suspending weights, but uneven force will. Though some may doubt this principle, certain individuals truly understand it.

The second story describes the miraculous fishing skill of Zhan He: Using a single silk thread as line, a fine needle as hook, a bramble as rod, and crushed rice as bait, he could land cart-filling fish from deep torrents without breaking line, straightening hook, or bending rod. Summoned by the King of Chu, Zhan He revealed he'd learned from ancient archer Pu Juizi's method—using weak bows and fine strings to shoot two birds from the clouds by riding wind currents, the key being "single-minded concentration and even application of force." After five years mastering this focus, he fished with no distracting thoughts—only the fish in mind—applying precisely measured movements undisturbed by externalities. Fish took his bait as naturally as swallowing water bubbles or dust. This demonstrates how seemingly weak tools can achieve great feats through the cultivated state of mental focus and balanced energy application.

制彊以輕 致重也大王治國誠能若此則天 下可運於一握將亦奚事哉楚王 曰善魯公 扈趙齊嬰二人有疾同請扁鵲求治扁鵲 治 之既同愈謂公扈齊嬰曰汝曩之所疾自外 而干府藏者固藥石之 所已今有偕生之疾 與體偕長今爲汝攻之何如二人曰願先聞 其 驗扁鵲謂公扈曰汝志彊而氣弱故足於 謀而寡於斷 齊嬰志弱而氣彊故少於慮而 傷於專若换 汝之心則均於善矣扁鵲遂飲 二人毒酒迷死三日剖胸探心易 而置之投 以神藥既悟如初二人辭歸於是公扈反齊 嬰之室而有 其妻子妻子弗識齊嬰亦反公 扈之室有其妻子妻子亦弗識 二室因相與 訟求辨於扁鵲扁鵲辨其 所由訟乃已 瓠巴 鼓琴而鳥舞魚躍鄭師文聞之棄家從師襄 游柱指鈞絃三年不成章師襄曰子可 以歸 矣師文舍其琴嘆曰文非絃之不能鈞非章 之不能成文 所存者不在絃所志者不在聲 内不得於心外不應 於氣故不敢發手而動 絃且小假之以觀其後 無幾何復見師襄師 襄曰子之琴何如師文曰得之矣請嘗試之
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of Perfect Virtue in the Highest Emptiness) contains two parables that explore the relationship between inner cultivation and external manifestation.

The first story illustrates the art of governance through the King of Chu. True mastery in ruling resembles maintaining perfect equilibrium—appearing effortless yet capable of handling significant affairs. When a ruler comprehends this Dao of balance, governing the realm becomes as natural as holding something in one's palm. The King of Chu acknowledged this wisdom upon hearing it.

This is followed by the renowned tale of Bian Que's heart transplant. Two patients—Gong Hu from Lu and Qi Ying from Qi—simultaneously sought treatment from the legendary physician Bian Que. Beyond their physical ailments, Bian Que discerned their congenital temperament flaws: Gong Hu possessed strong willpower but lacked courage, excelling in strategy yet prone to indecision; Qi Ying was the opposite—overflowing with boldness but deficient in willpower, acting impulsively without deliberation. Bian Que proposed swapping their hearts to balance their dispositions. During the procedure, he administered an anesthetic wine that induced a three-day coma, performed the thoracic surgery, then revived them with divine medicine. The aftermath created confusion: Gong Hu returned to Qi Ying's household claiming his wife, while Qi Ying went to Gong Hu's home doing the same, leading to legal disputes until Bian Que intervened to explain. This parable demonstrates how inner nature determines outward behavior.

The second narrative recounts how the musician Hu Ba's zither playing could make birds dance and fish leap. Upon hearing this, Shi Wen sought apprenticeship. After three years of arduous practice without mastering basic melodies, his teacher dismissed him. Shi Wen set aside his instrument and lamented: "The problem lies not in finger techniques, but in inner cultivation. Without spiritual awakening, my Qi remains unaligned—how dare I pluck the strings carelessly?" He pleaded for more time for contemplation. When he later revisited his teacher, Shi Wen had realized the essence of music lies in the unity of heart and Qi. This story emphasizes that artistic mastery stems from inner refinement rather than external skill.

Both parables embody the Daoist principle of "inner cultivation as foundation"—whether in governance, healing, or arts, the key lies in attaining internal equilibrium.

於是當春而叩商絃以召南吕凉風忽至草 木成實 及秋而叩角絃以激夾鍾温風徐回 草木發榮 當夏而叩羽絃以召黄鍾霜雪交 下川池暴 沍及冬而叩徴絃以激蕤賔陽光 熾烈堅冰 立散將終命宫而總 四絃則景風 翔慶雲浮甘露降澧泉涌師襄乃撫心高蹈 曰微矣子之彈也雖師曠之清角 鄒衍之吹 律 亡以加之彼將挾琴執管而從子之後耳 薛譚學 謳於秦青未窮青之技自謂盡之遂 辭歸秦青弗止 餞於郊衢撫節悲歌聲振林 木響遏行雲薛譚乃謝求反終身不敢 言歸 秦青顧謂其友曰昔韓娥東之齊匱糧過雍 門鬻歌 假食既去而餘音繞梁欐三日不絶 左右以其人弗去過逆旅逆旅 人辱之韓娥 因曼聲哀哭一里老幼悲愁垂涕相對三日 不 食遽而追之娥還復爲曼聲長歌一里老 幼喜躍抃舞弗能自禁 忘向之悲也乃厚賂 發之故雍門之人至今善歌哭效娥之遺 聲 伯牙善鼓琴鍾子期善聽伯牙鼓琴志 在登 高山鍾子期曰善哉峨峨兮若泰山志在流 水鍾子期曰善哉 洋洋兮若江河伯牙所念 鍾子期必得之伯牙游於泰山之陰卒逢 暴 雨止於巖下心悲乃援琴而鼓之初爲霖雨 之操更造崩山之音 曲每奏鍾子期輒窮其 趣伯牙乃舍琴而歎曰善哉善哉子之聽夫
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories illustrating the transformative power of music. When the shang tone (one of the ancient pentatonic notes) was played in spring, the nanlü pitch (one of the twelve tonalities) summoned cool breezes that caused plants to bear fruit. Playing the jue tone in autumn brought warm winds that revived withered vegetation. The yu tone performed in summer summoned frost and snow, while the zhi tone played in winter made sunlight blaze forth to melt solid ice. When the four strings were finally harmonized with the gong tone, auspicious winds swirled, propitious clouds appeared, sweet dew descended, and sweet springs bubbled forth. Master Xiangzi (an ancient musician), upon hearing this, slapped his chest and stamped his feet in excitement, declaring this music surpassed even the legendary skills of masters Shi Kuang and Zou Yan.

The text then tells of Xue Tan studying singing with Qin Qing. Before completing his training, Xue Tan assumed he had mastered the art and prepared to leave. At his farewell banquet in the suburbs, Qin Qing marked time while singing a mournful tune so powerfully it shook the forest trees and halted passing clouds. Only then did Xue Tan realize his inadequacy, begging to continue his studies—he never again spoke of returning home.

Another account describes the ancient singer Han E. When she performed for food at Yongmen in Qi State, her songs lingered around the rafters for three days after her departure. Once mistreated by an innkeeper, she responded with such plaintive singing that the entire neighborhood grieved for three days without eating. Later, her joyful songs made the townspeople dance with delight. Thereafter, the people of Yongmen all learned this moving style of singing.

Finally, there's the famous "zhiyin" (understanding music) story of Boya and Zhong Ziqi. When Boya played the qin while imagining mountains, Zhong Ziqi would say, "Majestic as Mount Tai"; when envisioning flowing water, Zhong Ziqi remarked, "Vast as the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers." Once during a mountain storm, Boya improvised music depicting rain and landslides—Zhong Ziqi perfectly grasped every nuance. Boya sighed, acknowledging Zhong Ziqi as the only one who truly understood his music.

志想象猶吾心也吾於何逃聲哉周穆 王西 巡狩越崑崙不至弇山反還未及中國道有 獻工人名偃師 穆王薦之問曰若有何能偃 師曰臣唯命所試然臣 已有所造願王先觀 之穆王曰日以俱來吾與若俱觀之越日 偃 師謁見王王薦之曰若與偕來者何人對曰 臣之所造能倡者 穆王驚視之趣步俯仰信 人也巧夫鎮其頤則歌合律捧其乎 則舞應 節千變萬化唯意所適王以爲實人也與盛 姬内御並觀之 技將終倡者瞬其目而招王 之左右侍妾王大怒立欲 誅偃師偃師大懾 立剖散倡者以示王皆傳會革木膠漆白黑 丹青 之所爲王諦料之内則肝膽心肺脾腎 腸胃外則筋骨支節皮毛齒 髮皆假物也而 無不畢具者合會復如初見王試廢其心 則 口不能言廢其肝則目不能視廢其腎則足 不能步 穆王始悦而歎曰人之巧乃可與造 化 者同功乎詔貳車載之以歸 夫班輸之雲 梯墨翟之飛鳶自謂能之極也 弟子東門賈 禽滑釐聞偃飾之巧以告二子二子終 身不 敢語藝而時執規矩甘蠅古之善射者彀弓 而獸 伏鳥下弟子名飛衛學射於甘蠅而巧 過 其師紀昌者又學射於飛衛飛衛曰爾先 學不瞬而後可言射矣紀 昌歸偃卧其妻之 機下以自承牽挺二年之後雖錐末倒眥而
Interpretation

This story recounts how King Mu of Zhou encountered a master craftsman named Yanshi during his western tour. When the king asked about his skills, Yanshi claimed to have created a performing artificial man. The next day, Yanshi presented this automaton before the king—it walked, bowed, and raised its head with perfect human likeness, singing and dancing in rhythm while executing countless intricate movements. King Mu initially mistook it for a real person and even summoned his favorite concubine Shengji to watch the performance.

Near the finale, the artificial man suddenly winked flirtatiously at the royal consort. Enraged, the king ordered Yanshi executed. The terrified craftsman immediately dismantled the figure—revealing its construction from leather, wood, lacquer, and pigments. Remarkably, it contained complete internal organs and external features including bones, sinews, and hair, all capable of disassembly and reassembly. When the king experimentally removed its heart, the automaton fell silent; without its liver it went blind; without kidneys it couldn't walk. Amazed, King Mu's fury turned to delight, exclaiming: "Human craftsmanship can truly rival the Creator's work!" He then brought Yanshi back to court in a secondary carriage.

The narrative continues by mentioning how even legendary craftsmen like Gongshu Ban (Lu Ban) with his cloud ladders and Mozi with his wooden kites—who considered their skills unsurpassed—ceased boasting of their abilities after their disciples reported Yanshi's achievements.

The text then shifts to the tale of master archer Gan Ying: wild beasts would prostrate themselves when he drew his bow, and birds fell from the sky at the twang of his string. His disciple Fei Wei surpassed him, while Fei Wei's pupil Ji Chang reached even greater heights. Fei Wei first required Ji Chang to master unblinking focus—the apprentice practiced for two years lying beneath a loom, staring at the shuttle's movement until he could remain unfazed even when awl points stabbed toward his eyes.

不瞬也以告飛衛飛衛曰未也必學視而後 可視小如大視微如著 而後告我昌以氂懸 虱於牖南面而望之旬日之間浸大也三年 之 後如車輪焉以覩餘物皆丘山也乃以燕 角之弧朔蓬 之簳射之貫虱之心而懸不絶 以告飛衛飛衛高蹈 拊膺曰汝得之矣紀昌 既盡衛之術計天下之敵己者一人而已乃 謀 殺飛衛相遇於野二人交射中路矢鋒相 觸而墜於地而塵不揚飛 衛之矢先窮紀昌 遺一矢既發飛衛以棘剌之端扞之而無差 焉於是二子泣而投弓相拜於塗請爲父子 尅臂以誓不得告術於 人造父之師曰泰豆 氏造父之始從習御 也執禮甚卑泰豆三年 不告造父執禮愈謹乃告之曰古詩言良弓 之子必先爲箕良冶之子必先爲裘 汝先觀 吾趣趣如吾然後六轡可持六 馬可御造父 曰唯命所從泰豆乃立木爲塗僅可容足計 步而 置履之而行趣走往還無跌失也造父 學之三日盡其巧泰豆 歎曰子何其敏也得 之捷乎凡所御者亦如此也曩汝之行得 之 於足應之於心推於御也齊輯乎轡銜之際 而急緩乎脣吻之和 正度於胸臆之中而執 節乎掌握之間内得於中心而外合於馬志
Interpretation

This passage recounts two classical parables of mastery: the archer Ji Chang learning from master Fei Wei, and the charioteer Zao Fu studying under Tai Dou.

When Ji Chang sought archery instruction from Fei Wei, the master first required him to develop his vision—to perceive small objects as large and discern minute details clearly. Ji Chang suspended a louse by yak hair before his window, gazing at it daily. After ten days, the louse appeared larger; after three years, it seemed wheel-sized while other objects loomed like mountains. Using a bow of Yan-state ox horn and arrows of northern reeds, he pierced the louse's heart without breaking the hair. Fei Wei patted his chest, declaring, "You've grasped the essence!"

Later, believing only Fei Wei could surpass him, Ji Chang sought to kill his teacher. Their duel in the wilderness saw arrows meeting midair without stirring dust. When Fei Wei exhausted his arrows, Ji Chang's final shot was deflected by a thorn tip. Moved, they cast aside their bows, swore a father-son bond on the road, and vowed never teach outsiders.

Zao Fu's charioteer training under Tai Dou began with three years of apparent neglect. Only after demonstrating utmost reverence was he told: "A master bowyer's son first learns basket-weaving; a swordsmith's son begins with leatherwork. Observe my walking—master this before handling six steeds." Tai Dou ran effortlessly across narrow beams; Zao Fu replicated this in three days. The master praised his agility, revealing charioteering's principle: coordinated limbs, focused mind, reins moving as extensions of will—perfect unity of man and horse.

(Notes: Zao Fu was a legendary charioteer; Tai Dou his teacher. "Six reins" refers to controlling a six-horse team; "coordinated control" describes harmonious handling.)

是故能進退履繩而旋曲中規矩取道致遠 而氣力有餘誠得其術 也得之於銜應之於 轡得之于轡應之於手得之於手應之於心 則 不以目視不以策驅心閑體正六轡不亂 而二十四蹄所投無差迴 旋進退莫不中節 然後輿輪之外可使無餘轍馬蹄之外 可使 無餘地未嘗覺山谷之嶮原隰之夷視之一 也吾術窮矣汝其識 之 魏黑卵以暱嫌殺丘 邴章丘邴章之子來丹謀報父之讎丹氣其 猛形甚露計粒而 食順風而趣雖怒不能稱 兵以報之恥假力於人誓 手劍以屠黑卵黑 卵悍志絶衆力抗百夫筋骨皮肉非人類也 延頸 承刃披胸受矢鋩鍔推屈而體無痕撻 負其才力視來丹猶雛鷇也 來丹之友申他 曰子怨黑卵至矣黑卵之易子過矣將奚謀 焉來丹 垂涕曰願子爲我謀申他曰吾聞衛 孔周其袓得殷帝之寳劍一童 子服之却三 軍之衆奚不請焉來丹遂適衛見孔周執僕 御之禮請 先納妻子後言所欲孔周曰吾有 三劍唯子所擇皆不能殺人且先 言其狀一 曰含光視之不可見運之不知其有所觸也 泯然無際經 物而物不覺二曰承影將旦昧 爽之交旦夕昏明之際北面而察之 淡淡焉 若有物存莫識其狀其所觸也竊竊焉有聲 經物而物 不疾也三曰宵練方晝則見影而 不見光方夜見光而不見 形其觸物也𩦐然
Interpretation

The text recounts two distinct narratives. The first describes the sublime art of charioteering, while the second tells the story of Lai Dan seeking a sword to avenge his father's death.

When charioteering reaches its highest mastery, the driver's movements perfectly conform to the rules of the art, allowing long journeys without exhaustion. The key lies in grasping the essential principles: from the bit to the reins, from the reins to the hands, and from the hands to the heart—all must harmonize flawlessly. At this level of skill, one needs neither eyes to see nor whips to urge the horses forward. With a relaxed mind and upright posture, the six reins remain perfectly ordered, and all twenty-four hooves strike the ground with absolute precision. Every turn, advance, or retreat is executed with perfect timing. The wheels leave no extraneous tracks beyond their path, and the horses' hooves tread no unnecessary ground. Whether traversing perilous mountain valleys or open plains, all terrain appears equally level to such a master.

The second narrative recounts how Hei Luan of Wei murdered Qiu Bingzhang due to personal enmity. Qiu's son Lai Dan sought vengeance. Though Lai Dan possessed courage, his body was frail—he could only eat rice grain by grain and had to walk with the wind's assistance. Yet he resolved to personally slay Hei Luan with a sword. However, Hei Luan's strength was immense, his body impervious to blades, and he regarded Lai Dan with utter contempt.

Lai Dan's friend Shen Ta advised him to seek help from Kong Zhou in the state of Wei. Kong Zhou's ancestors had received legendary swords from the Yin dynasty emperors—swords said to enable even a child wearing them to repel entire armies. Lai Dan journeyed to Wei and humbly prostrated himself before Kong Zhou, offering to present his wife and children before stating his purpose. Kong Zhou revealed he possessed three swords, though none could kill. He then described their properties: The first, named "Han Guang" (Hidden Radiance), could neither be seen nor felt—when it passed through objects, they remained completely unharmed. The second, "Cheng Ying" (Catching Shadows), appeared faintly visible at dawn and dusk—its passage produced a faint sound but left no wound. The third, "Xiao Lian" (Night Forge), showed only shadows without light by day and light without form by night—its cuts felt swift but caused no injury.

而過隨過隨合覺疾而不血刃焉此 三寳者 傳之十三世矣而無施於事匣而藏之未嘗 啓封來丹 曰雖然吾必請其下者孔周乃歸 其妻子與齋七日晏陰之間 跪而授其下劍 來丹再拜受之以歸來丹遂執劍從 黑卵時 黑卵之醉偃牖下白頸至腰三斬之黑卵不 覺來丹以黑 卵之死趣而退遇黑卵之子於 門擊之三下如投虚黑卵之子方笑 曰汝何 蚩而三招予來丹知劍之不能殺人也歎而 歸黑卵既醒怒其 妻曰醉而露我使我嗌疾 而腰急其子曰疇昔來丹之來遇我於門 三 招我亦使我體疾而支彊彼其厭我哉周穆 王大征西戎西戎獻 錕鋙之劍火浣之布其 劍長尺有咫練鋼赤刃用之切玉如切泥焉 火浣之布浣之必投於火布則火色垢則布 色出火而振之皓然疑 乎雪皇子以爲無此 物傳之者妄蕭叔曰皇子果於自信果 於誣 理哉 沖虚至德眞經卷中 沖虚至德眞經卷下慕九    力命第六 力 謂命曰若之功奚若我哉命曰汝奚功於 物而欲比朕力曰壽夭窮達貴賤貧富我力 之所能也命曰彭祖之智不出堯舜之上而 壽八百顔淵之才不出衆人之下而壽四八 仲尼之德不出諸侯之下而困於陣蔡殷紂 之行不出三仁之上而居君位季札無爵於 吴田恒專有齊國夷齊餓于首陽季氏富於 展禽若是汝力之所能奈何壽彼而夭此窮
Interpretation

This passage recounts two parables. The first tells of Lai Dan seeking revenge through Kong Zhou's swords. Kong Zhou's family possessed three ancestral swords passed down thirteen generations yet never used. Lai Dan insisted on borrowing the least potent one, which Kong Zhou entrusted to him after seven days of purification rituals (zhaijiao). Lai Dan struck his drunken enemy Hei Luan three times with the sword but failed to inflict harm. When Hei Luan awoke, he only felt discomfort in his throat and waist, while his son reported becoming stiff after Lai Dan gestured toward him three times at their gate. The sword appeared sharp yet couldn't harm anyone, leaving Lai Dan to return sighing in resignation.

The second story describes King Mu of Zhou's western expedition, where the Western Rong tribes presented two marvels: the Kunwu Sword that could slice jade effortlessly, and fire-washed cloth that emerged whiter after being cleansed in flames. A skeptical prince dismissed these as fabrications, but Xiao Shu rebuked him for arrogantly denying reality.

The concluding section features a dialogue between "Human Effort" and "Destiny" exploring fate's dominion over human affairs. Effort claims authority over lifespan and fortune, while Destiny counters with examples: Pengzu's longevity, Yan Yuan's early death, Confucius' hardships, and King Zhou's undeserved throne—all demonstrating life's outcomes transcending mortal control. This exchange reveals core Daoist philosophy of "following Heaven's mandate" (shuntian), emphasizing the limits of human striving and the ultimate governance of destiny.

聖而達逆賤賢而貴愚貧善而富惡邪力曰 若如是言我固無功於物而物若此耶此則 若之所制邪命曰既謂之命奈何有制之者 邪朕直而推之曲而任之自壽自夭逢窮自 達自貴自賤自富自貧朕豈能識之哉朕豈 能
Interpretation

This passage expresses the Daoist perspective on destiny. It states: When the wise find themselves in hardship, the virtuous are disregarded, while fools are honored; when the good suffer poverty while the wicked prosper—can this truly be fate's arrangement? If so, then who controls this so-called fate?

The author maintains that what we call destiny is simply allowing things to follow their natural course. Let the upright flourish and the crooked go their own way. Each person's lifespan—whether long or short, their experiences of poverty or success, their status as noble or humble, their circumstances of wealth or destitution—all emerge spontaneously from nature's workings. How could I possibly comprehend its principles? How could I truly understand destiny?

Here we see the embodiment of the Daoist concept of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)," which holds that the rise and fall, honor and disgrace of all things in the world are simply the natural unfolding of the Dao. Human effort cannot interfere with this process, nor should we attempt to force outcomes against nature's flow.

識之

Vol. 6

哉 北宫子謂西門子曰朕與子並世 也而人子達並族也而人子敬並 貌也而人 子愛並言也而人子庸並行也而人子誠並 仕也而人子 貴並農也而人子富並商也而 人子利朕衣則短褐食則粢糲居則 蓬室出 則徒行子衣則文錦食則粱肉居則連欐(山/宜) 切出則結駟在家熙 然有棄朕之心在朝諤 然有敖朕之色請謁不相及遨遊不同行固 有年矣子自以德過朕邪西門子曰予無以 知其實汝造事而窮予 造事而達此厚薄之 驗歟而皆謂與予並汝之顔厚矣北宫 子無 以應自失而歸中塗遇東郭先生先生曰汝 奚往而反偊偊而 步有深愧之色邪北宫子 言其狀東郭先生曰吾將舍汝之愧與汝 更 之西門氏而問之曰汝奚辱北宫子之深乎 固且言之西門子曰 北宫子言世族年貌言 行與予並而賤貴貧富與予異予語之曰予 無以知其實汝造事而窮予造事而達此將 厚薄之驗歟而皆謂與 予並汝之顔厚矣東 郭先生曰汝之言厚薄不過言才德之差吾 之 言厚薄異於是矣夫北宫子厚於德薄於 命汝厚於命薄於德汝之 達非智得也北宫 子之窮非愚失也皆天也非人也而 汝以命 厚自矜北宫子以德厚自愧皆不識夫固然 之理矣西門子 曰先生止矣予不敢復言北
Interpretation

Beigongzi said to Ximenzi: "We live in the same era, yet people honor you with distinction. We come from the same clan, yet people respect you. Our appearances are comparable, yet people favor you. We speak similarly, yet people believe you. Our conduct is alike, yet people trust you. We both hold office, yet you rise to greater prominence. We both farm, yet you grow richer. We both trade, yet you reap greater profits. I wear coarse hemp garments, eat rough grains, dwell in a thatched hut, and walk wherever I go. Yet you dress in embroidered silks, dine on fine meats, reside in lofty mansions, and ride in four-horse carriages. At home, you glow with self-importance and look down on me; at court, you strut with arrogance and disdain me. We haven't interacted for years, nor traveled together—do you truly believe your virtue surpasses mine?"

Ximenzi replied: "I know not the truth of it. But where your endeavors meet obstacles, mine find smooth passage—isn't this proof of our differing fortunes? That you claim equality with me shows remarkable audacity." Beigongzi fell silent, crestfallen, and turned homeward. On the road, he encountered Master Dongguo.

Master Dongguo inquired: "From whence do you return? Why do you walk hunched, your face clouded with shame?" After hearing the account, the master said: "I shall cleanse your humiliation—let us confront Ximenzi together." Addressing Ximenzi, he demanded: "Why this disgrace toward Beigongzi? Explain yourself."

Ximenzi responded: "Beigongzi claims we share era, lineage, age, appearance, speech and conduct—yet differ in status and wealth. I told him: your failures against my successes demonstrate our unequal fortunes. Still he insists we're equals—isn't this shameless?"

Master Dongguo observed: "Your 'fortune' speaks of talent and virtue, but my interpretation runs deeper. Beigongzi possesses profound virtue yet meager destiny; you enjoy bounteous destiny but shallow virtue. Your eminence springs not from wisdom, nor his adversity from folly—both flow from Heaven's decree, beyond mortal control. You pride yourself on fortunate fate; he shames himself for virtuous depth—neither comprehending this is simply the Dao's natural order."

Hearing this, Ximenzi said: "Master, speak no more—I dare not dispute further."

宫子既歸衣其短褐有狐貉之温 進其茙菽 有稻粱之味庇其蓬室若廣厦之蔭乘其蓽 輅若文軒之 飾終身逌然不知榮辱之在彼 在我也東郭先 生聞之曰北宫子之寐久矣 一言而能寤易悟也哉管夷吾鮑叔牙 二人 相友甚戚同處於齊管夷吾事公子糾鮑叔 牙事公子小白齊 公族多寵嫡庶並行國人 懼亂管仲 與召忽奉公子糾奔魯鮑叔奉公 子小白奔莒既而 公孫無知作亂齊無君二 公子爭入管夷吾 與小白戰於莒道射中小 白既立脅魯殺子糾召 忽死之管夷吾被囚 鮑叔牙謂桓公曰管夷吾能可以治國桓公 曰我讎也願 殺之鮑叔牙曰吾聞賢君無私 怨且人能爲其主亦必能爲人君如 欲霸王 非夷吾其弗可君必舍之遂召管仲魯歸之 齊鮑叔牙郊迎 釋其囚桓公禮之而位於高 國之上鮑叔牙 以身下之任以國政號曰仲 父桓公遂霸管仲嘗歎曰吾少窮 困時嘗與 鮑叔牙賈分財多自與鮑叔不以我爲貪知 我貧也吾嘗爲 鮑叔謀事而大窮困鮑叔不
Interpretation

Beigongzi returned home wearing coarse hemp garments yet feeling as warm as in fox-fur robes, eating rough legumes yet savoring them like fine grains, dwelling in a thatched hut yet comfortable as in grand mansions, riding a crude firewood cart yet at ease as in an ornate carriage. Throughout his life he remained serenely content, utterly indifferent to worldly honors or disgraces. When Master Dongguo heard of this, he sighed: "Beigongzi has lingered long in this grand dream. That a single phrase could awaken him shows remarkable clarity indeed!"

The subsequent passage recounts the story of Guan Zhong (courtesy name Yiwu) and Bao Shuya: The two were closest friends who both served in the state of Qi. Guan Zhong attended to Prince Jiu, while Bao Shuya assisted Prince Xiaobai. At that time, the Qi court was embroiled in succession disputes between legitimate and collateral lines, creating turbulent circumstances. When Gongsun Wuzhi launched a rebellion, the two princes fled separately to Lu and Ju states. Ultimately Xiaobai returned to ascend the throne as Duke Huan of Qi, compelling Lu to execute Prince Jiu. While Guan Zhong was imprisoned, Bao Shuya advised the duke: "Guan Zhong is a minister of exceptional governance. A wise ruler should not harbor personal grudges. Moreover, one who remained loyal to his former lord will surely serve his new sovereign faithfully. If you aspire to achieve hegemony, you must employ Guan Zhong." The duke heeded this counsel, welcoming Guan Zhong with great ceremony and appointing him prime minister, elevating him above other officials with the honorific title "Uncle Zhong." Later, Guan Zhong helped Duke Huan establish Qi's hegemony. He often reflected: "In my youth when doing business with Bao Shuya, I took larger shares of profit, yet he never considered me greedy - he understood my poverty. When my strategies for him brought greater hardship, he never blamed me."

以我爲愚知時有利不利也吾嘗三仕 三見 逐於君鮑叔不以我爲不肖知我不遭時也 吾嘗三戰三北鮑 叔不以我爲怯知我有老 母也公子糾敗召忽死之吾幽囚受辱鮑 叔 不以我爲無恥知我不羞小節而恥名不顯 於天下也生我者父 母知我者鮑叔也此世 稱管鮑善交者小白善用能者然實無善 交 實無用能也實無善交實無用能者非更有 善交更有善用能也 召忽非能死不得不死 鮑叔非能舉賢不得不舉 小白非能用讎不 得不用及管夷吾有病小白問之 曰仲父之 病病矣可不諱云至於大病則寡人惡乎屬 國而可夷吾曰公誰欲歟小白曰鮑叔牙可 曰不可其爲人潔廉善 士也其於不已若者 不比之人一聞人之過終身不忘 使之埋國 上且鈎乎君下且逆乎民 其得罪於君也將 弗乆矣小白曰然則孰可對曰勿已則隰朋 可 其爲人也上忘而下不叛愧其不若黄帝 而哀不 已若者以德分人謂之聖人以財 分 人謂之賢人以賢臨人未有得人者也以賢
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story between Guan Zhong (Guan Yiwu), Bao Shuya, and Duke Huan of Qi (Xiao Bai), illustrating the wisdom of ancient people in handling talent and interpersonal relationships.

Guan Zhong once said: When others think I am foolish, it is because the circumstances were favorable or unfavorable. I served as an official three times and was dismissed three times, yet Bao Shuya did not consider me incompetent—he knew I simply hadn’t encountered the right opportunity. I fought in three battles and fled three times, but Bao Shuya did not think me a coward—he understood I had an elderly mother to care for. After Prince Jiu’s defeat, Zhao Hu committed suicide to follow his lord in death, while I chose to endure imprisonment and humiliation. Bao Shuya did not deem me shameless—he recognized that I disregarded minor matters and cared only about achieving great renown. My parents gave me life, but Bao Shuya truly understood me.

People praise the friendship between Guan and Bao as exemplary and commend Duke Huan of Qi for his wisdom in employing talent, yet in truth, there was no flawless principle of friendship or perfect discernment in governance.

Zhao Hu did not truly wish to die—he had no choice. Bao Shuya did not genuinely desire to recommend worthy men—he had no choice. Duke Huan of Qi did not sincerely wish to employ his enemy (referring to Guan Zhong, who had once shot him with an arrow)—he had no choice.

Later, when Guan Zhong fell ill, Duke Huan visited him and asked, "Father Zhong, your illness is severe. If the worst should happen, to whom should I entrust the state?" Guan Zhong countered, "Whom does Your Grace wish to appoint?" Duke Huan suggested, "Could Bao Shuya be suitable?" Guan Zhong replied that he would not, explaining that Bao Shuya was too upright and principled—he would not associate with those he deemed inferior and never forgot another’s faults once he learned of them. If he governed the state, he would oppose the ruler above and alienate the people below, quickly losing the ruler’s trust.

Duke Huan then asked, "Then who would be suitable?" Guan Zhong answered, "If you must choose, consider Xi Peng. He is humble toward superiors and kind to subordinates, always feeling himself less virtuous than the Yellow Emperor and showing compassion for those beneath him. To transform others through virtue is the way of a sage; to aid others with material goods is the way of a worthy man. But to govern others while presuming oneself a worthy will never win their hearts."

下人 者未有不得人者也其於國有不聞也 其於家有不見也 勿已則隰朋可 然則管夷 吾非薄鮑叔也不得不薄非厚隰朋也不得 不 厚厚之於始或薄之於終或厚之於始厚 薄之去來弗由 我也鄧析操兩可之說設無 窮之辭當子産執政作竹刑 鄭國用之數難 子産之治子産屈之子産執而戮之俄而誅 之 然則子産非能用竹刑不得不 用鄧析非 能屈子産不得不屈子産非能誅鄧析不得 不誅也 可以生而天福也可以死而死 天福 也可以 生而不生 天罰也可以死而不死天 罰也 可以生可以死得生得 死有矣不可以 生不可以死或死或生有矣 然而生生死死 非物非我皆命也智之所無奈 何故曰窈然 無際天道自會漠然無分天道 自運天地不 能犯聖智不能干鬼魅不能欺自然者默 之 成之平之寧之 將之迎之楊朱之友曰季梁 季梁得疾七日大漸 其子環而泣之請醫季 梁謂楊朱曰吾子不肖如此之甚汝奚不爲 我歌以曉之楊朱歌曰天其弗識人胡能覺
Interpretation

This passage primarily explores the relationship between destiny and human agency, illustrating the principles of celestial Dao through several historical anecdotes.

First, it discusses the art of employing people: those who are truly humble in their dealings never fail to win hearts. Take Guan Zhong (Guan Yiwu) - he didn't intentionally slight Bao Shuya, nor did he particularly favor Xi Peng; circumstances dictated his actions. The closeness or distance between people isn't entirely determined by personal will.

The narrative then cites the story of Zichan, a minister of Zheng, and Deng Xi: Deng Xi excelled in sophistry. Though his "Bamboo Penal Code" was adopted by Zheng, he repeatedly obstructed Zichan's governance policies. Ultimately, Zichan had no choice but to execute Deng Xi. This demonstrates how many situations compel actions contrary to one's subjective intentions.

The text subsequently expounds on perspectives of life and death: what appears to be human choice in matters of life and death is actually governed by celestial mandate. To live when it's time to live is a blessing, and to die when it's time to die is equally a blessing. Conversely, clinging to life when one should die invites heavenly punishment. What seems like choice is ultimately fate's arrangement, beyond mortal power to alter.

Finally, through the story of Yang Zhu and Ji Liang, it illustrates how the Dao of Heaven operates with unfathomable profundity, accomplishing things naturally. When Ji Liang fell gravely ill, Yang Zhu comforted his family with a ballad: "If even Heaven itself doesn't comprehend all mysteries, how can mere mortals fully understand celestial will?" This emphasizes aligning with the natural Dao.

Collectively, these stories demonstrate that all phenomena follow their inherent patterns. Human wisdom cannot interfere with celestial Dao - we should accept destiny's arrangements with equanimity.

匪祐自天弗孽由人我 乎汝乎其弗知乎醫 乎巫乎其知之乎其子 弗曉終謁三醫一曰 矯氏二曰俞氏三曰廬氏診其所 疾矯氏謂 季梁曰汝寒温不節虚實失度病由飢飽色 慾精慮煩 散非天非鬼雖漸可攻也季梁曰 衆醫也亟屛之俞氏曰女始則胎 氣不足乳 湩有餘病非一朝一夕之故其所由來漸矣 弗可已也季 梁曰良醫也且食之廬氏曰汝 疾不由天亦不由人亦不由鬼禀生 受形既 有制之者矣亦有知之者矣 藥石其如汝何 季梁曰神醫也重貺遺之俄而季梁之疾自 瘳生非貴之所能存身非愛之所能厚生亦 非賤之所能夭身亦非 輕之所能薄故貴之 或不生賤之或不死愛之或不厚輕之或不 薄 此似反也非反也此自生自死自厚自薄 或貴之而生或賤之而死 或愛之而厚或輕 之而薄此似順也非順也此亦自生自死自 厚自 薄鬻熊語文王曰自長非所增自短非 所損算之所亡若何 老聃語關尹曰天之所 惡孰知其故言迎 天意揣利害不如其已 楊 布問曰有人於此年兄弟也 才兄弟也貌兄 弟也而壽夭父子也貴賤父子也名譽父子
Interpretation

This passage uses the story of physicians diagnosing Ji Liang's illness to reveal the profound Daoist philosophy of "natural non-action" (Wuwei).

When Ji Liang fell ill, he consulted three doctors. The first, Jiao Shi, diagnosed the illness as resulting from immoderate living and excessive indulgence, prescribing medicinal treatment. The second, Yu Shi, attributed it to congenital deficiency compounded by acquired imbalance, declaring the condition irreversible. The third, Lu Shi, asserted the illness stemmed neither from heavenly will nor human actions, but from the natural course of life itself, making medicine fundamentally ineffective. Ji Liang recognized Lu Shi as the true divine physician, and soon after, his illness resolved without treatment.

The text then illustrates through contrast how life's essence remains unchanged by human valuations of nobility or baseness, love or hatred. Seeming contradictions—where the cherished die young while the neglected live long, or the favored remain frail while the overlooked stay healthy—actually demonstrate life's inherent patterns. As Yu Xiong told King Wen of Zhou: life's duration cannot be lengthened or shortened by external forces; what destiny ordains cannot be altered.

Lao Dan (Laozi) further explained to Guan Yinzi: speculating about heaven's will or calculating gains and losses proves futile. Yang Bu's question about brothers born in the same year with similar appearances and talents yet vastly different lifespans and social standings further highlights these natural variations. All these examples show life follows its own internal principles, where human interference often produces opposite effects.

也愛憎父子也吾惑之楊子曰古之人有言 吾嘗識之將以告若不 知所以然而然命也 今昏昏昧昧紛紛若若隨所爲隨 所不爲日 去曰來孰能知其故皆命也夫信命者亡壽 夭信 理者亡是非信心者亡逆順信性者亡 安危 則謂之都亡所信都亡所不信眞矣慤 矣奚去奚就奚哀奚 樂奚爲奚不爲黄帝之 書云至人居若死動若械 亦不知所以居亦 不知所以不居亦不知所以動亦不知所以 不 動亦不以衆人之觀易其情貎亦不謂衆 人之不觀不易其情貌 獨往獨來獨出獨入 孰能礙之墨(音/眉)杘(敕夷 女/履二切)單(音/戰)至(音/咥)嘽(豈然/切) 咺(許元火/遠二切)憋(蒲結/切)懯(芳無/切)四人相與游於世 胥 如志也窮年不相知情自以智之深也巧 佞愚直婩(魚踐午/漢二切)斫(夫約/切)便辟 四人相與游 於世胥如志也窮年而不相語術自以巧之 微 也㺒(何交/切)㤉(午交魚/駕二切)情露讓(許偃居/辰二切)極凌 誶四人相與游於世胥 如志也窮年不相曉
Interpretation

This scripture explores the relationship between "destiny" and "natural essence." It references an ancient saying: Some things happen without our understanding why—this is destiny. People today muddle through life, coming and going each day—who can comprehend the reasons behind it all? These are the arrangements of destiny.

Those who truly believe in destiny do not concern themselves with longevity or brevity of life. Those who trust in cosmic principles do not calculate rights and wrongs. Those who have faith in their original mind do not dwell on favorable or adverse circumstances. Those who embrace their inherent nature do not worry about safety or danger. Such individuals may be said to have reached the supreme state of "neither believing nor doubting anything," where distinctions between coming and going, sorrow and joy, action and non-action (Wuwei) naturally dissolve.

The Yellow Emperor's classic records: Those who have attained the Dao (the Way) appear as if dead when still, and move like mechanisms when active. They neither know why they remain still nor why they don't move; neither understand why they act nor why they refrain. They won't alter their attitude because of others' opinions, nor maintain appearances due to being unobserved—coming and going alone, utterly unconstrained.

The text then presents four groups of contrasting personalities: The Mo-Chi, Dan-Zhi, Chan-Xuan, and Bie-Fu quartet consider themselves profoundly wise; the Qiao-Ning, Yu-Zhi, Nian-Zhuo, and Bian-Bi four pride themselves on exquisite skills; the Xiao-Ya, Qing-Lu, Rang-Ji, and Ling-Sui group each harbor private agendas. Though these people may interact for years, they never truly understand one another, each immersed in their own perceptions. This subtly suggests that Daoist practitioners should transcend such worldly attachments and return to their natural essence.

悟自以爲才之得也眠(莫典/切)娗(徒典/切)諈(主蘂/切) 諉勇敢 怯疑四人相與游於世胥如志也窮 年不相讁發自 以行無戾也多偶自專乘權 隻立四人相與游於世胥如志也窮年 不相 顧眄自以時之適也此衆態也其貌不一而 咸之於道命所歸也 佹佹(俱爲/切)成者俏(仙妙/切) 成也初非成也佹佹敗者俏敗者也初非敗 也故迷生於俏俏之際昧然於俏而 不昧然 則不駭外禍不喜内福 隨時動隨時止智不 能知也信命者於彼 我無二心於彼我而有 二心者不若揜目塞耳背坂面隍亦不 墜仆 也故曰死生自命也貧 窮自時也怨夭折者 不知命者也怨貧窮 者不知時者也當死不 懼在窮不威知命安時也其使 多智之人量 利害料虚實度人情得亦中亡亦中其少智 之人 不量利害不料虚實不度人情得亦中 亡亦中量與不量料與不料 度與不度奚以 異唯亡所量亡所不量則全而亡喪亦 非知 全亦非知喪自全也自亡也自喪也齊 景公 游於牛山北臨其國城而流涕曰美哉國乎
Interpretation

The passage describes four personality types (bold, timid, skeptical, and evasive) coexisting in society and explores the Daoist understanding of destiny.

Though differing in temperament, all four types live according to their nature without mutual reproach throughout the year. Each considers their conduct blameless—some follow the crowd while others stand apart—yet all find contentment. This reveals that diverse human expressions ultimately return to Dao (the Way) as their fundamental principle.

Those appearing successful may not truly be so; those seeming failures may not truly fail. People often become confused by superficial appearances, perplexed between the facades of success and failure. Those who truly comprehend the principle feel neither terror toward external misfortunes nor excessive joy for internal blessings. They understand when to act or rest according to circumstance—wisdom unattainable through calculation.

Those who trust destiny treat others and themselves equally. To discriminate would be worse than closing one's eyes, stopping one's ears, turning one's back to the mountain while facing the city wall—at least then one wouldn't stumble. Thus life and death follow destiny; wealth and poverty obey timing. Those who lament early deaths don't understand destiny; those who resent poverty don't understand timing. Facing death without fear and enduring poverty without sorrow—this is the wisdom of harmonizing with destiny and resting content in circumstance.

The clever calculate advantages, weigh possibilities, and scrutinize human relations—achieving mixed results. The simple-minded make no such calculations—yet their outcomes remain equally mixed. Calculation makes no difference; only complete relinquishment preserves one's original nature without confusion. This preservation isn't attained through deliberate pursuit, but emerges naturally. Like Duke Jing of Qi weeping on Mount Niu while gazing at his capital's splendor—such reactions flow from genuine, unforced nature.

(Note: "Dao" refers to the fundamental cosmic principle in Daoist thought; "Duke Jing of Qi" was a Spring and Autumn period ruler whose mountain contemplation became a classic illustration of spontaneous emotion toward transient beauty)

鬱鬱芊芊若何 滴滴去此國而死乎使古無 死者寡人將去斯而之何史孔梁丘據 皆從 而泣曰臣賴君之賜跪食惡肉可得而食駑 馬稜車可得而乘 也且猶不欲死而況吾君 乎晏子獨笑於旁公雪涕而顧晏子曰寡 人 今日之游悲孔與據皆從寡人而泣子之獨 笑何也晏子對曰使 賢者常守之則太公桓 公將常守之矣使有勇者而常守之則莊公 靈公將常守之矣數君者將守之吾君方將 披簑笠而立乎畎畝之 中唯事之恤行假念 死乎則吾君又安得此位而立焉以其 迭處 之迭去之至於君也而獨爲之流涕是不仁 也見不仁之君見 謟諛之臣臣見此二者臣 之所爲獨竊笑也景公慙焉舉觴自罰罰 二 臣者各二觴焉魏人有東門吴者其子死而 不憂其相室曰公之 愛子天下無有今子死 不憂何也東門吴曰吾常無子無子之時不 憂今子死乃與嚮無子同詎奚憂焉農赴時 商趣利工追術仕逐 勢勢使然也然農有水 旱商有得失工有成敗仕有遇否命使然
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of Perfect Virtue in the Realm of Emptiness) conveys profound insights on life, death, gain, and loss through two illustrative stories.

The first story recounts how Duke Jing of Qi, while on an excursion, lamented the fleeting beauty of nature and the brevity of human life. His minister, Kong Liangqiu Ju, wept along with him, saying, "Thanks to Your Grace’s generosity, we enjoy meat and fine carriages—if even we do not wish to die, how much more must this be true for you, my lord?" Only Yanzi stood by, laughing. When the duke asked why he laughed, Yanzi replied, "If wise rulers could reign forever, then Grand Duke Jiang and Duke Huan would still be ruling. If mighty rulers could endure, then Duke Zhuang and Duke Ling would never have passed away. The succession of rulers through the ages is the natural order. Yet now you weep over life and death—this shows a lack of wisdom. And those sycophantic ministers who join in weeping are simply insincere." Hearing this, the duke felt ashamed and punished himself with a drink, then penalized the two ministers.

The second story tells of Dongmen Wu, a man of Wei, who did not grieve when his son died. His steward asked why he felt no sorrow, to which Dongmen Wu replied, "When I had no child, I was not troubled. Now that my son has died, it is no different from when I had no child—why should I grieve?" He then offered an analogy using four professions: farmers labor with the seasons, merchants chase profit, artisans refine their craft, and officials seek power—each fulfilling their natural role. Yet farmers face floods and droughts, merchants experience gains and losses, artisans see successes and failures, and officials encounter smooth or troubled careers—all governed by fate.

(Note: The "Grand Duke" refers to Jiang Taigong, while Dukes Huan, Zhuang, and Ling were rulers of Qi. Yanzi was a renowned virtuous minister of Qi. "Chongxu Zhide" refers to the Daoist ideal of emptiness, stillness, and non-action—the supreme virtue of non-contention.)

也

Vol. 7

楊朱第七 楊朱游於魯舍於孟氏孟氏問曰人而已矣 奚以名爲曰以名者爲 富既富矣奚不已焉 曰爲貴既貴矣奚不已焉曰爲死既死矣奚 爲 焉曰爲子孫名奚益於子孫曰名乃苦其 身憔其心乘 其名者澤及宗族利兼鄉黨况 子孫乎凡爲名者必廉廉斯貧爲名者必讓 讓斯賤 曰管仲之相齊也君淫亦淫君奢亦 奢志 合言從道行國霸死之後管氏而已田 氏之相齊也君盈則己降君 歛則己施民皆 歸之因有齊國子孫享之至今不絶若實名 貧僞名富曰實無名名無 實名者僞而已矣 昔者堯舜僞以天下讓許由善卷而 不失天 下享祚百年伯夷叔齊實以孤竹 君讓而終 亡其國餓死於首陽之山實僞之辨如此其 省也楊 朱曰百年壽之大齊得百年者千無 一焉設有一者孩抱以逮昏老 幾居其半矣 夜眠之所弭晝覺之所遺又幾居其半矣痛 疾哀苦亡 失憂懼又幾居其半矣量十數年 之中道然而自得亡介焉之慮者 亦亡一時
Interpretation

During his travels in the state of Lu, Yang Zhu (a Daoist thinker of the Warring States period) stayed with the Meng family. A member of the Meng household asked him: "What is the purpose of human existence? Why do people pursue fame?" Yang Zhu replied: "People pursue fame to attain wealth." When asked further, "Why don't they stop after becoming wealthy?" Yang Zhu responded: "They seek status." Pressed again with "Why remain unsatisfied after achieving high status?" he answered: "They want posthumous reputation." Meng then questioned: "What benefit does fame bring to one's descendants?" Yang Zhu explained: "Though the pursuit of fame exhausts body and mind, it truly brings honor to one's clan and benefits the local community—how much more so for descendants!"

Yang Zhu then analyzed: Those who chase empty fame invariably become incorruptible, and incorruptibility leads to poverty; those obsessed with reputation inevitably practice excessive humility, and such humility results in lowly status. He cited two historical examples: When Guan Zhong served Duke Huan of Qi, he matched his ruler's debauchery with debauchery and mirrored his extravagance with extravagance—his words and deeds being perfectly aligned. Though this made Qi a hegemon, the Guan clan declined after his death. Conversely, when the Tian clan (Tian Chang) served Qi's rulers, they practiced thrift when the ruler was greedy and distributed wealth when the ruler hoarded, winning the people's allegiance until the Tian clan eventually supplanted the Qi rulers, securing prosperity for generations.

Yang Zhu pointed out: Genuine reputation brings poverty, while false reputation yields wealth—fame is essentially illusory. He illustrated this with the examples of Yao and Shun, who ostensibly abdicated their thrones to the hermits Xu You and Shan Juan while actually retaining power and ruling for a century. In contrast, Bo Yi and Shu Qi (virtuous princes of late Shang) sincerely renounced the throne of Guzhu kingdom only to starve to death on Shouyang Mountain. Such is the stark difference between true and false fame.

Finally, Yang Zhu reflected on life's brevity: Few live to a hundred years. Even those who do spend nearly half their lives in childhood and old age. Sleep and rest claim another half of the remaining time, while illness and suffering consume what's left. Calculated this way, the days of genuine carefree joy amount to very few within a decade.

之中爾則人之生也奚爲哉奚樂哉爲美厚 爾爲聲色 爾而美厚復不可常厭足聲色不 可常翫聞乃復爲刑賞之所禁 勸名法之所 進退遑遑爾競一時之虚譽規死後之餘榮 偊偊(王矩/切)爾慎 耳目之觀聽惜身意之是非 徒失當年之至樂不能自肆於一時重 囚纍 梏何以异(音/異)哉太古之人知生之暫來知死 之暫往 故從心而動不違自然所好當身之 娱非所去也故不爲名所勸 從性而游不逆 萬物所好死後之名非所取也故不爲刑所 及 名譽先後年命多少非所量也楊朱曰萬 物所異者生也所 同者死也生則有賢愚貴 賤所以異也死則有臭腐消滅是所同也 雖 然賢愚貴賤非所能也臭腐消滅亦非所能 也故生非所生死非 所死賢非所賢愚非所 愚貴非所貴賤非所賤然而 萬物齊生齊死 齊賢齊愚齊貴齊賤十年亦死百年亦死 仁 聖亦死凶愚亦死生則堯舜死則腐骨生則 桀紂死則腐骨 一矣孰知其異且趣當生奚 遑死後 楊朱曰伯夷非亡欲矜清之卸以放
Interpretation

What is the true purpose of human existence? And what truly brings joy? Whether pursuing luxurious garments and fine food or indulging in sensual pleasures, these material satisfactions can never truly fulfill the human heart, nor can fleeting sensory delights be sustained. Instead, people become bound by worldly rewards and punishments, driven by the laws of fame and profit, anxiously competing for empty reputations all day long while calculating posthumous glory. They cautiously restrain their senses, obsessing over rights and wrongs of body and mind, only to forfeit life's genuine joys—not even daring momentary unrestrained abandon. How does this differ from prisoners weighed down by heavy shackles?

The sages of antiquity understood that life is as fleeting as a white steed glimpsed through a crack, and death but a temporary departure. Thus they followed their hearts without violating their innate nature, embracing present joys without artificial avoidance, never seduced by empty fame. They wandered freely in accordance with their essence without resisting the patterns of all things. Posthumous reputation held no value for them, and therefore they remained unburdened by punitive consequences. As for the sequence of fame or lifespan's length—these were never their concerns.

Yang Zhu (a Daoist philosopher of the Warring States period) said: The greatest difference among the myriad things lies in their states while living, while their greatest similarity is in death. In life, there are distinctions of wisdom and folly, nobility and baseness, but in death all alike decay into putrid dissolution. Yet neither wisdom nor folly, nobility nor baseness are matters of human choice, just as decay and dissolution cannot be altered by human effort. Thus life and death are not subject to human will—all distinctions of worth are relative. In essence, the myriad things are simultaneously born and simultaneously perish, equally wise and equally foolish, equally noble and equally base. Those who live ten years will die; those who live a hundred will die. Benevolent sages perish; wicked fools perish too. In life one may be a sage-king like Yao or Shun, but in death just a pile of rotting bones. In life one may be a tyrant like Jie or Zhou, but in death equally transformed into decaying remains. Since the end is identical for all, why concern ourselves with distinctions? Better to live well in the present moment—what use is worrying about what comes after death?

Yang Zhu further observed: Bo Yi (a recluse of late Shang dynasty) was not without desires—he merely concealed them behind an aloof demeanor.

餓死展季非亡情矜貞之 卸以放寡宗清貞 之誤善之在此楊朱曰 原憲窶於魯子貢殖 於衛原憲之窶損生子貢之殖累身然 則窶 亦不可殖亦不可其可焉在曰可在樂生可 在逸身故善樂生 者不窶善逸身者不殖楊 朱曰古語有之生 相憐死相捐此語至矣相 憐之道非唯情也勤能使逸餓能使飽寒 能 使温窮能使達也相捐之道非不相哀也不 含珠玉不服文錦不 陳犧牲不設明器也晏 平仲問養生於管夷吾管夷吾曰肆之而已 勿壅勿閼晏平仲曰其目奈何夷吾曰恣耳 之所欲聽恣目之所欲 視恣鼻之所欲向恣 口之所欲言恣體之所欲安恣意之所欲行 夫耳之所欲 聞者音聲而不得聽謂之閼聰 目之所欲見者美色而不得視謂 之閼明鼻 之所欲向者椒蘭而不得嗅謂之閼顫口之 所 欲道者是非而不得言謂之閼智體之所 安者美厚而不得從謂 之閼適意之所欲爲 者放逸而不得行謂之閼性凡此諸閼廢虐 之 主去廢虐之主熙熙然以俟死一日一月
Interpretation

Yang Zhu, a Daoist thinker of the Warring States period, conveys profound wisdom in the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Classic of Perfect Virtue of the Most Empty): Though Zhan Ji (Liu Xiahui, renowned for his moral integrity) would rather starve than compromise his principles, this isn't to deny the value of noble character, but to caution that excessive rigidity in form may cause us to lose our authentic nature.

He illustrates this with two examples: Yuan Xian (a disciple of Confucius) lived in dire poverty in Lu, while Zi Gong (another Confucian disciple) amassed wealth through commerce in Wei. Yuan Xian's destitution harmed his livelihood, yet Zi Gong's riches became a burden to his health. This shows neither poverty nor wealth represents the ideal state. What, then, is proper? The key lies in living joyfully with ease of body and mind. Those who truly understand joyful living won't plunge themselves into poverty, just as those skilled in self-cultivation won't be shackled by material possessions.

Yang Zhu cites an ancient saying: "In life, care for one another; in death, handle matters simply." This is supreme wisdom. Caring during life means not just emotional support, but ensuring the weary find rest, the hungry are fed, the cold warmed, and the struggling find their way. After death, there's no need for excessive mourning—no jade pearls in the mouth, no lavish burial garments, no elaborate offerings or grave goods.

When Yanzi (Yan Pingzhong) asked Guan Zhong (Guan Yiwu) about the art of nurturing life, Guan replied: "Follow what comes naturally, without repression or obstruction." The method is this: Let ears hear what they wish, eyes see what they desire, the nose smell what it enjoys, the mouth speak its mind, the body relax when it needs, and the heart-mind (Xin) pursue its inclinations. Blocking what the ears long to hear stifles hearing; preventing the eyes from beholding beauty stifles vision; denying the nose fragrant scents stifles smell; restraining free speech stifles wisdom; depriving the body of comfort stifles ease; constraining the heart-mind's freedom stifles our innate nature (Xing). All such repressions are roots of harm to body and spirit. Only by removing these obstructions can one pass each day and month in untroubled contentment.

一年十年吾所謂養枸 此廢虐之主録而不 舍戚戚然以至乆生 百年千年萬年非吾所 謂養管夷吾 曰吾既告子養生矣送死奈何 晏平仲曰送死略矣將何以告焉管 夷吾曰 吾固欲聞之平仲曰既死豈在我哉焚之亦 可瘞 之亦可露之亦可衣薪而棄諸溝壑亦 可衮衣繡裳而納諸石椁 亦可唯所遇焉管 夷 吾顧謂鮑叔黄子曰生死之道吾二人進 之矣 子産相鄭專國之政三年善者服其化 惡者畏其禁鄭國以治諸 侯憚之而有兄曰 公孫朝有弟曰公孫穆朝好酒穆好色朝之 室也 聚酒千鍾積麴成封望門百步醴漿之 氣逆於人鼻方其荒於酒也 不知世道之安 危人理之悔吝室内之有亡九族之親疏存 亡之哀樂 也雖水火兵刃交於前弗知也穆 之後庭比房數十皆擇雉齒婑(儒 隹/切)媠(吐火/切) 者以盈之方其耽於色也屛親眤絶交遊逃 於後庭以晝 足夜三月一出意猶未愜鄉有 處子之娥姣者必賄而招之媒而挑 之弗獲 而後已子産日夜以爲戚密造鄧析而謀之
Interpretation

This passage recounts the differing views on life, death, and desires held by several notable figures during the Spring and Autumn period, along with the governance challenges faced by Zichan in the state of Zheng.

Guan Zhong (Guan Yiwu) and Yan Ying (Yan Pingzhong) discussed the Dao of nurturing life and handling death. Guan Zhong stated that what he pursued was "nourishing in accordance with nature" – referring to a way of cultivating life that follows natural principles rather than deliberately seeking immortality. Yan Ying believed that how one handles death matters little – whether through cremation, burial, leaving the corpse exposed in the wilderness, wrapping it in straw mats to discard in ditches, or even dressing it in fine robes and placing it in a stone coffin. All depended on circumstances. Guan Zhong told Bao Shuya that the two of them had already comprehended the Dao of life and death.

After governing Zheng for three years, Zichan had achieved a state where virtuous people followed his teachings, wrongdoers feared his prohibitions, and neighboring states stood in awe of Zheng's growing power. Yet he faced a personal dilemma with his two brothers: Gongsun Chao was an alcoholic who kept thousands of jars of wine at home, with fermenting yeast piled like mountains – the aroma could be smelled a hundred paces away. When immersed in drink, he became completely oblivious to worldly affairs, human relationships, and even imminent dangers like fire, flood, or weapons. Gongsun Mu was obsessed with women, keeping dozens of rooms filled with beautiful young concubines in his rear courtyard. During his indulgences, he would shut his doors to all visitors, sometimes not emerging for three months at a time, and still unsatisfied, would use money to seduce local beauties.

Tormented day and night by this situation, Zichan secretly consulted his advisor Deng Xi for solutions. This episode reflects the Daoist critique of excessive indulgence – the pursuit of wine and women to the point of losing touch with reality. It also illustrates the ethical dilemma faced by rulers: while charged with guiding the people through moral education, they must simultaneously confront the challenges posed by their own family members' unrestrained behavior.

曰僑聞治身以 及家治家以及國此言自於 近至於遠也僑爲國則治矣而家則亂 矣其 道逆邪將奚方以救二子子其詔之鄧析曰 吾怪之乆矣未敢 先言子奚不時其治也喻 以性命之重誘以禮義之尊乎子産用鄧 析 之言因間以謁其兄弟而告之曰人之所以 貴於禽獸者智慮智 慮之所將者禮義禮義 成則名位至矣若觸情而動耽於嗜慾則性 命危矣子納僑之言則朝自悔而夕食禄矣 朝穆曰吾知之乆矣擇 之亦乆矣豈待若言 而後識之哉凡生之難遇而死之 易及以難 遇之生俟易及之死可熟念哉而欲尊禮義 以夸人矯情 性以招名吾以此爲弗若死也 爲欲盡一生之歡窮當年之樂唯患腹溢而 不得恣口之飲力 憊而不得肆情於色不遑 憂名聲之醜性命之危也且若以治國之 能 夸物欲以說辭亂我之心榮禄喜我之意不 亦鄙而可憐哉我又 欲與若别之夫善治外 者物未必治而身交苦善治内者物 未必亂 而性交逸以若之治外其法可蹔行於一國
Interpretation

This dialogue presents contrasting perspectives on governing a state and cultivating the self. Gongsun Qiao (Zichan) believed one should first cultivate the self and regulate the family before governing the state and bringing peace to the world, proceeding from the near to the distant. However, he found himself highly successful in statecraft while encountering domestic troubles, so he sought advice from Deng Xi.

Deng Xi suggested that he should use the importance of one's innate nature (xing) and life (ming) to admonish his family members and guide them with the nobility of ritual propriety (li) and righteousness (yi). Zichan adopted this advice and exhorted his brothers, saying: "What makes humans nobler than beasts is their wisdom and adherence to ritual and righteousness. By observing these, one gains reputation and status, whereas indulging desires endangers one's very life. If you heed this advice, you can quickly repent and receive official emoluments."

However, Chao Mu (another interlocutor) countered: "I've long understood this principle—human life is fleeting, and death comes easily. Why should we use our hard-won life to await inevitable death while boasting of ritual righteousness and distorting our innate nature for fame? To me, such a life isn't worth living. I only wish to enjoy life to the fullest—my worries are whether my stomach is too full to drink freely or my strength too weak to indulge in pleasures. How could I spare concern for reputation or life's dangers? You come preaching your methods of statecraft, trying to move me with promises of glory and wealth—isn't this utterly laughable?"

Finally, Chao Mu highlights the crucial distinction: "Those skilled at governing external affairs (statecraft) may fail at self-mastery, exhausting both body and mind. Those skilled at inner cultivation may find external affairs naturally ordered while their innate nature remains at ease. Your methods of governance might work temporarily in one state, but they aren't the fundamental Way (Dao)."

未合於人心以 我之治内可推之於天下君 臣之道息矣吾常欲以此術而喻之若 反以 彼術而教我哉子産忙然無以應之他日以 告鄧析鄧析曰子 與眞人居而不知也孰謂 子智者乎鄭國之治偶耳非子之功也衛 端 木叔者 子貢之世也藉其先貲家累萬金不 治世故放意所好其生民之所 欲爲人意之 所欲玩者無不爲也無不玩也墻屋臺榭園 囿池沼飲 食車服聲樂嬪御擬齊楚之君焉 至其情所欲好耳所欲聽目所 欲視口所欲 嘗雖殊方偏國非齊土之所産育者無不必 致之猶 藩墻之物也及其游也雖山川阻險 塗逕脩遠無不必之猶人之行 咫步也賔客 在庭者日百往庖厨之下不絶煙火堂廡之 上不絶聲 樂奉養之餘先散之宗族宗族之 餘次散之邑里邑里之餘乃散之 一國行年 六十氣幹將衰棄其家事都散其庫藏珍寳 車服妾媵一 年之中盡焉不爲子孫留財及 其病也無藥石之儲及其死也無瘞 埋之資 一國之人受其施者相與賦而藏之反其子
Interpretation

This scripture recounts two stories that reveal the Daoist perspective on worldly governance and human pursuits.

The first story tells of Zichan, a senior minister of Zheng (a renowned statesman of the Spring and Autumn period), who attempted to instruct an enlightened master in statecraft, only to have the master reveal the truth: genuine governance should stem from cultivating one's heart and nature. When Zichan recounted this encounter to Deng Xi (a representative figure of the School of Names), Deng bluntly pointed out: "You dwell with a true person yet fail to recognize the true Dao. What Zheng calls peace is merely accidental—not your achievement."

The second story details the life of Duanmu Shu, a wealthy man of Wei (descendant of Zigong). Inheriting vast riches, he indulged his desires completely: building extravagant palaces and gardens, collecting rare treasures from across the land, and feasting day and night. Yet what set him apart was that after satisfying his pleasures, he distributed his entire fortune—first to his clan, then to his neighbors, and finally to the entire state. By age sixty, he kept nothing, not even funds for medicine or burial, truly embodying the ideal of "coming naked and leaving unburdened." As a result, the people who had benefited from his generosity spontaneously pooled resources to bury him and returned the remaining wealth to his children.

Together, these stories illustrate core Daoist principles: the art of governance originates in self-cultivation, and rigid attachment to worldly achievements pales beside following nature's flow; true abundance lies not in hoarding wealth but in transcending material desires to unite with the Dao. Duanmu Shu's seemingly decadent life actually concealed profound wisdom—"using things without being used by things"—that aligns with the deepest Daoist understanding.

孫之財焉禽骨 釐聞之曰端木叔狂人也辱 其祖矣段于生聞之曰木叔達人也德 過其 祖矣其所行也其所爲也衆意所驚而誠理 所取衛之君子多 以禮教自持固未足以得 此人之心也孟孫陽問楊子曰有人於此 貴 生愛身以蘄不死可乎曰理無不死以蘄乆 生可乎曰理無乆生 生非貴之所能存身非 愛之所能厚且乆生奚爲五情好 惡古猶今 也四體安危古猶今也世事苦樂古猶今也 變易治亂古 猶今也既聞之矣既見之矣既 更之矣百年猶厭其多況乆生之苦 也乎 孟 孫陽曰若然速亡愈於乆生則踐鋒刃入湯 火得所志矣 楊子曰不然既生則廢而任之 究其所欲以俟於死將死 則廢而任之究其 所之以放於盡無不廢無不任何遽 遲速於 其間乎楊朱曰伯成子高不以一毫利物舍 國而隱耕大禹 不以一身自利一體偏枯古 之人損一毫利天下不與也悉天下奉 一身 不取也人人不損一毫人人不利天下天下 治矣禽子問楊朱 曰去子體之一毛以濟一
Interpretation

This passage records a discussion among several Daoist figures concerning life, virtue, and the way of conducting oneself in the world.

When Qin Guli heard of Duanmu Shu's behavior, he considered him a madman who dishonored his ancestors, while Duan Gansheng praised Duanmu Shu as a man of surpassing virtue who transcended his forebears. Though his actions astonished ordinary people, they aligned with the true Dao (the Way). The gentlemen of that time, constrained by ritual norms, found it difficult to comprehend the inner realm of such a person.

Meng Sunyang asked Yang Zhu about the matter of longevity. Yang Zhu replied: In principle, there are no immortal people, nor are there those who live forever. Life does not extend simply because you cherish it, nor does the body remain eternally healthy just because you care for it. Moreover, what meaning is there in living long? People of ancient and modern times share the same joys and sorrows, the same bodily sensations, the same vicissitudes of worldly affairs. Having experienced, witnessed, and changed, even a hundred years of life would feel too long—how much more so the suffering brought by immortality?

Meng Sunyang countered: Then would it be better to die early rather than seek longevity? For example, by actively seeking death? Yang Zhu said: Not so. Since you are alive, live naturally until death comes; when death approaches, face it naturally as well. Why deliberately pursue speed or slowness?

Yang Zhu further elaborated his view: Bo Chengzi Gao refused to use the benefit of a single hair to help others, abandoning his throne to live in seclusion and farm. Yu the Great sought no personal gain, to the point of exhausting his body. The ancient sages neither wished to sacrifice the slightest for the world's benefit, nor desired to take the world's resources to nourish themselves. If no one harmed others to benefit themselves or sacrificed themselves to benefit others, the world would naturally be at peace.

Finally, Qinzi asked Yang Zhu: If plucking one hair from your body could save the world, would you be willing? This dialogue reveals the Daoist philosophy of "valuing the self" and "preserving life," advocating for following nature—neither deliberately sacrificing oneself nor greedily pursuing external things, but maintaining the original, authentic state of life.

世汝爲之乎楊子曰世固非 一毛之所濟禽 子曰假濟爲之乎楊子弗應禽子出 語孟孫 陽曰子不達夫子之心吾請言之有侵若肌 膚獲萬 金者若爲之乎曰爲之孟孫陽曰有 斷若一節得一國子爲之乎禽 子默然有間 孟孫陽曰一毛微於肌膚肌膚微於一節省 矣然 則積一毛以成肌膚積肌膚以成一節 一毛固一體萬分中之一物 奈何輕之乎禽 子曰吾不能所以答子然則以子之言問老 聃關尹 則子言當矣以吾言問大禹墨翟則 吾言當矣 孟孫陽因顧與其徒說他事楊朱 曰天下之美歸之舜禹周孔 天下之惡歸之 桀紂然而舜耕於河陽陶於雷澤四體不得 蹔安口 腹不得美厚父母之所不安弟妹之 所不親行年三十不告而娶及 受堯之禪年 已長智已衰商鈞不才禪位於禹戚戚然以 至於死此 天人窮毒者也鯀治水土績用不 就殛諸羽山禹纂業事讎惟荒 土功子産不 字過門不入身體偏枯手足胼胝及受舜禪 卑宫室 美緩冕戚戚然以至於死此天人之
Interpretation

This dialogue takes place between Yang Zhu (a Daoist philosopher) and his student Qin Guli, discussing the relationship between individual benefit and collective interest.

Yang Zhu argues that the world's problems cannot be solved by the sacrifice of "a single hair." Qin Guli counters by asking whether he would be willing to do so if it hypothetically resolved the issue, to which Yang Zhu remains silent. Later, Meng Sunyang (another disciple of Yang Zhu) explains: The skin is more important than a single hair, and a limb is more important than the skin. Yet even a hair is part of the body—how can it be dismissed lightly? This illustrates the Daoist emphasis on the individual and rejection of sacrificing the small self for the greater whole.

Later, Yang Zhu critiques historical figures: People attribute all virtue to Shun, Yu, the Duke of Zhou, and Confucius, while blaming all wickedness on Jie and Zhou. Yet in reality, Shun endured a life of hardship—he only married at thirty and was forced to abdicate in old age, dying in sorrow. Yu became physically disabled from taming the floods and remained burdened with worry even after ascending the throne. These sage-kings may appear glorious, but in truth, they were pitiable figures tormented by fate. This reflects the Daoist critique of the Confucian idealization of sage-kings, viewing them as having violated their natural instincts and lived without true freedom.

Note: In the text, "a single hair" (一毛) symbolizes minor individual interests, "skin and flesh" (肌肤) represents moderate interests, and "a limb" (一节) signifies major interests. The Yang Zhu school advocates "valuing the self and cherishing life" (贵己重生), opposing the sacrifice of the individual for the collective—a sharp contrast to the Mohist doctrine of "universal love" (兼爱).

憂苦者也武王既終成王幼弱 周公攝天子 之政召公不悦四國流言居東三年誅兄放 弟僅免其 身戚戚然以至於死此天人之危 懼者也孔子明帝王之道應時君 之聘伐樹 於宋削迹於衛窮於商周圍於陳蔡受屈於 季氏見辱於 陽虎戚戚然以至於死此天民 之遑遽者也凡彼四聖者生無一日 之歡死 有萬世之名名者固非實之所取也雖稱之 弗知雖賞之不 知與株塊無以異矣 桀籍累 世之資居南面之尊智足以距羣下威足以 震海内恣耳目 之娱窮意慮之所爲熙熙然 以至於死此天民之逸蕩者也紂亦 籍累世 之資居南面之尊威無不行志無不從肆情 於傾宫縱欲於 長夜不以禮義自苦熙熙然 以至於誅此天民之放縱者也彼二凶 也生 有從欲之歡死被愚暴之名實者固非名之 所與也雖毁之不 知雖稱之弗知此與株塊 奚以異矣 彼四聖雖美之所歸苦以至終同 歸於死矣彼二凶雖惡之所歸樂 以至終亦 同歸於死矣楊朱見梁王言治天下如運諸
Interpretation

After King Wu of Zhou passed away, the young King Cheng ascended the throne, and the Duke of Zhou (King Wu’s younger brother) acted as regent in his stead. The Duke of Shao resented this arrangement, and rumors spread among the feudal lords. The Duke of Zhou withdrew to the eastern capital for three years, during which he was forced to execute his elder brother Guan Shu for rebellion and exile his younger brother Cai Shu. He barely managed to preserve his own life, spending his days in deep anxiety until his death. Such was the precarious situation even a sage faced when dealing with the will of Heaven and human affairs.

Confucius, though profoundly versed in statecraft, encountered repeated setbacks: he was driven out of Song by men cutting down the tree he rested under, barred from entering Wei, reduced to poverty in the lands of Shang and Zhou, besieged between Chen and Cai, humiliated by the Ji family, and insulted by Yang Hu. His entire life was marked by hardship and worry. These four sages never knew a day of peace while alive, yet their names endured for generations after death. But posthumous fame was never the tangible value they sought—even if praised, they remained unaware, as insensible as blocks of wood or clods of earth.

The tyrant Jie of Xia, relying on wealth accumulated over generations, occupied the supreme position of emperor. His intellect was sharp enough to dominate his ministers, and his authority awed the realm. He indulged in every sensual pleasure, acting recklessly until his death—this was the epitome of hedonistic excess. Similarly, King Zhou of Shang inherited his ancestors’ legacy, reigning with absolute power. He gratified his desires in lavish palaces, reveling night after night without restraint, never tempering himself with ritual or righteousness, until he met a violent end. These two despots enjoyed boundless pleasure in life but were branded as fools and tyrants after death. Yet the actual enjoyment they pursued bore no relation to reputation—even if reviled, they remained oblivious, no different from unfeeling wood or earth.

Those four sages, though adorned with virtue, suffered bitterly throughout their lives, all meeting the same end: death. Those two tyrants, though steeped in wickedness, reveled in pleasure until death claimed them as well. (Using these examples, Yang Zhu said to King Liang of Wei:) Governing the world is like turning an object in the palm of your hand—there’s no need to fixate excessively on gain and loss, honor and disgrace.

掌梁王曰先 生有一妻一妾而不能治三畝 之園而不能芸而言治天下如運諸 掌何也 對曰君見其牧羊者乎百羊而羣使五尺童 子荷箠而隨之 欲東而東欲西而西使堯牽 一羊舜荷箠而隨之則不能前矣且臣 聞之 吞舟之魚不游枝流鴻鵠高飛不集汙池何 則其極遠也黄鍾 大吕不可從煩奏之舞何 則其音疏也將治大者不治細成大功者 不 成小此之謂矣楊朱曰太古之事滅矣孰誌 之哉三皇之事若存 若亡五帝之事若覺若 夢三王之事或隱或顯億不識一當身之事 或聞或見萬不識一目前之事或存或廢千 不識一太古至于今日 年數固不可勝紀伏 羲已來三十餘萬歲賢愚好醜成敗是非無 不消滅但遲速之間爾矜一時之毁譽以焦 苦其 神形要死後數百年中餘名豈足潤枯 骨何生之樂哉楊朱曰人肖 天地之類懷五 常之性有生之最靈者人也人者爪牙 不足 以供守衛肌膚不足以自捍禦趨走不足以 逃利害無毛羽以 禦寒暑必將資物以爲養
Interpretation

King Liang asked a certain master: "You can't even manage one wife and one concubine properly, nor tend a three-acre vegetable garden well, yet you claim governing the world is as easy as turning something in your palm. Why is that?"

The master replied: "Have you ever seen a shepherd? A single man drives a hundred sheep, with just a child holding a whip behind him—he can lead them east or west as he pleases. But if you had Yao (the ancient sage king) leading one sheep with Shun (another sage king) following with a whip, they wouldn't make progress. I've also heard: giant fish that can swallow boats don't swim in narrow streams, and swans that soar high don't alight in filthy ponds—such is the grandeur of their purpose. The solemn tones of the Huangzhong and Dalu (ancient ceremonial music) cannot accompany disorderly dances, for their harmonies are dignified. Those who govern great affairs don't fuss over trivialities; those who achieve great merit don't dwell on minor matters. This is the principle."

Yang Zhu (a Warring States philosopher) said: The affairs of deepest antiquity have vanished—who remembers them now? The deeds of the Three Sovereigns seem half-real, those of the Five Emperors like half-remembered dreams, while events from the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties flicker between obscurity and clarity—what we know amounts to less than one in a hundred million. Of events happening around us, we genuinely comprehend less than one in ten thousand. Present circumstances arise and fade before we grasp even one in a thousand. From primordial times to today, the years are beyond counting—since Fuxi's era alone spans over 300,000 years. Whether wise or foolish, beautiful or ugly, successful or failed, right or wrong—all ultimately vanish, differing only in timing. To torment body and spirit over momentary praise or blame—can posthumous fame lasting a few centuries moisten dry bones? Where then lies life's joy?

Yang Zhu continued: Humans are patterned after Heaven and Earth, endowed with the Five Constant Virtues (benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom and faithfulness), making them the most spiritual of creatures. Yet our nails and teeth cannot defend us, our skin and muscles cannot withstand injury, we lack speed to escape calamity, and grow no feathers against heat or cold—we must depend on external things to survive.

性任智而不恃力故智之所貴存我爲 貴力 之所賤侵物爲賤然身非我有也既生不得 不全之物非我有 也既有不得而去之身固 生之主物亦養之主雖全生身不可有其 身 雖不去物不可有其物有其物有其身是橫 私天下之身橫私天 下之物其唯聖人乎公 天下之身公天下之物其 唯至人矣此之謂 至至者也 楊朱曰生民之不得休息爲四事 故一爲壽二爲名 三爲位四爲貨有此四者 畏鬼畏人畏威畏刑此謂 之遁人也可殺可 活制命在外不逆命何羨壽不矜 貴何羨名 不要勢何羨位不貪富何羨貨此謂順民也 天下 無對制命在内故語有之曰人不婚宧 情欲失半人不衣食 君臣道息周諺曰田父 可坐殺晨出夜入自以性之恒啜菽茹藿自 以味之極肌肉麤厚筋節腃(驅圓/切)急一朝處 以柔毛綈幕薦以 梁肉蘭橘心㾓(螢玄/切)體煩 内熱生病矣商魯之君與田父侔地則亦不 盈 一時而憊矣故野人之所安野人之所美 謂天下 無過者昔者宋國有田夫常衣緼黂 僅以過冬暨春東作自 曝於日不知天下之 有廣厦隩室綿纊狐狢顧其妻曰負日之暄
Interpretation

This passage explores the Daoist perspective on life, material possessions, and desires. The core teaching is that neither our bodies nor worldly things truly belong to us, and excessive attachment only brings suffering.

The text observes that true wisdom lies in self-preservation, while brute force manifests in violating others. Though we inhabit our bodies, they are not our personal property; though all things sustain life, none should be claimed as possessions. Only sages can "treat their bodies as belonging to all under heaven, and regard all things as communal property," understanding both physical form and material objects as shared resources of the cosmos.

Yang Zhu (a representative Daoist figure) identified four common pursuits that disturb human peace: longevity, reputation, status, and wealth. Chasing these makes people fear ghosts and deities, dread others' opinions, cower before authority, and tremble at punishment—becoming what he called "fugitives from their true nature." In contrast, those who don't resist Heaven's decree needn't envy long life; those who don't flaunt nobility needn't chase fame; those indifferent to power and position, unconcerned with wealth—these are the "aligned people" who follow nature's course.

A farmer's parable illustrates this wisdom: A peasant in Song Dynasty wore tattered hemp clothes in winter yet felt perfectly content basking in spring sunlight among his fields, unaware of mansions with heated rooms or fox-fur robes. This shows how ordinary people find genuine fulfillment in simple living. Were such a farmer suddenly given luxurious comforts, his body and mind would grow unsettled and sick. The lesson: one should remain content with one's lot.

Throughout, the text emphasizes the Daoist principle of "fewer selfish desires," teaching that excessive pursuit of external things makes us lose our innate nature. The supreme state comes through aligning with nature's flow and practicing contentment.

人莫知者以獻吾君將有重賞里之富室告 之曰昔人有美戎菽甘 枲莖芹萍子者對鄉 豪稱之鄉豪取而嘗之蜇(陟列/切)於口慘於 腹 衆哂而怨之其人大慙子此類也楊朱曰豐 屋美服厚味姣色有 此四者何求於外有此 而求外者無厭之性無厭之性陰陽之蠹也 忠不足以安君適足以危身義不足以利物 適足以害生 安上不由於忠而忠名滅焉利 物不由於義而義名絶焉君臣兼安 物我兼 利古之道也鬻子曰去名者無憂老子曰名 者實之賔而悠 悠者趨名不已名固不可去 名固不可賔邪今有名則尊榮亡名則 卑辱 尊榮則逸樂卑辱則憂苦憂苦犯性者也逸 樂順性者也斯 實之所係矣名胡可去名胡 可賔但惡夫守名而累實守名而累實 將恤 危亡之不救豈徒逸樂憂苦之
Interpretation

This scripture reveals the dangers of pursuing empty fame and external pleasures through vivid parables and sayings from Daoist thinkers.

It begins with a fable: Someone presented ordinary beans, hemp stalks, and water weeds as delicacies to a local gentry, causing him tongue numbness and stomach discomfort, which drew public ridicule. Yang Zhu (a Warring States period Daoist philosopher) commented that when people already possess the four luxuries of fine houses, beautiful clothes, exquisite food, and attractive companions yet still crave more, it's their insatiable nature at work. Such greed corrodes one's Yin-Yang balance like termites eating through wood.

The text then observes how blind loyalty fails to stabilize rulers while endangering oneself, and rigid adherence to righteousness harms life rather than benefiting all things. True statecraft should bring stability to both rulers and ministers, benefiting both nature and humanity. Master Yu (a Daoist figure) advocated abandoning vain reputation to remain carefree, yet Laozi pointed out that fame is merely the shadow of substance - while ordinary people chase this shadow relentlessly.

Finally, it illuminates the core paradox: Fame brings honor and glory, while obscurity leads to humility and disgrace. Honor grants comfort and joy, disgrace breeds worry and suffering. Yet obsessive pursuit of fame burdens one's true nature - in such a state, one can't even attend to imminent peril, let alone simple matters of pleasure and pain. The fundamental principle lies in not damaging one's authentic self for the sake of empty reputation.

間哉

Vol. 8

說符第八 子列子學於壺丘子林壺丘子林曰子知持 後則可言持身矣 列子曰願聞持後曰顧若 影則知之列子顧而觀影形枉則影 曲形直 則影正然則枉直隨形而不在影屈伸任物 而不在我此之 謂持後而處先關 尹謂子列 子曰言美則響美言惡則響惡身長則影長 身短則 影短名也者響也身也者影也故曰 慎爾言將有 和之慎爾行將有隨之是故聖 人見出以知入觀 往以知來此其所以先知 之理也 度在身稽在人人愛我我必愛之人 惡我我必惡之 湯武愛天下故王桀紂惡天 下故亡此所稽也稽度皆明而 不道也譬之 出不由門行不從徑也以是 求利不亦難乎 嘗觀之神農有炎之德稽之虞夏商周之 書 度諸法士賢人之言所以存亡廢興而非由 此道者未之有也 嚴恢曰所爲問道者爲富 今得珠亦富矣安用道 子列子曰桀紂唯重 利而輕道是以亡 幸哉余未汝語也人而無 義唯食而已是鷄狗也彊 食靡用勝者爲制 是禽獸也爲鷄狗禽獸矣而欲人之尊 己不 可得也人不尊己則危辱及之矣 列子學射 中矣請於關尹子尹子曰子知子之所以中
Interpretation

When Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) sought instruction from Master Huzi (a Daoist recluse), the master told him: "You must first comprehend the principle of 'holding to the rear' before discussing self-cultivation." When Liezi inquired about this concept, Master Huzi used the analogy of a shadow: "Observe your own shadow—when your body bends, the shadow slants; when your body straightens, the shadow becomes upright. This shows the shadow's form is entirely determined by bodily movements, not by the shadow itself. Similarly in human affairs, gain and loss, honor and disgrace all stem from one's own actions, not external judgments. This is the wisdom of 'holding to the rear yet occupying the forefront.'"

Master Guanyin (a Daoist perfected being) elaborated further: "Beautiful words produce pleasant echoes, harsh words create grating echoes; a tall figure casts a long shadow, a short stature makes a brief shadow. Reputation is like an echo, while conduct resembles a shadow. Therefore sages speak cautiously knowing there will be responses, and act carefully understanding others will emulate. They discern essence by observing manifestations, and foresee the future by examining the past."

The crux of self-cultivation lies in self-discipline, while its verification appears in others' reactions. When people treat me kindly, I naturally reciprocate with goodwill; when others dislike me, I first examine myself. Kings Tang of Shang and Wu of Zhou became true monarchs by loving their people, while Jie of Xia and Zhou of Shang perished by harming the world—this is history's testimony. Understanding these principles yet failing to practice them is like exiting through side doors or traveling without following roads—such approaches make success nearly impossible.

Having studied the virtuous governance of Shennong (the legendary sage-king), examined the classics of Yu, Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, and weighed the teachings of wise sages, I've found that every nation's survival or decline follows this pattern. When the fictional character Yan Hui asked: "Isn't seeking the Dao (the Way) just for gaining wealth? Now that I've obtained precious pearls and become rich, why pursue the Dao?" Liezi countered: "It was precisely because Jie and Zhou valued profit over the Dao that they lost their kingdoms. Without moral principles, humans obsessed with food and drink differ little from chickens and dogs. Those who rely on brute force in competition behave as wild beasts. How can one who acts like a beast expect others' respect? Without respect, calamity and disgrace will surely follow."

After mastering archery to the point of hitting every target, Liezi consulted Master Guanyin. The master responded with a question: "Do you understand why you can hit the mark?" (implying true mastery requires grasping the underlying principles behind success, not just superficial skill)

者乎對曰弗知也關尹子曰未可退而習之 三年又以 報關尹子尹子曰子知子之所以 中乎列子曰知之矣關尹子曰可 矣守而勿 失也非獨射也爲國與身亦 皆如之故聖人 不察存亡而察其所以然 列子曰色盛者驕 力盛者奮未可 以語道也故不班白語道失 而况 行之乎故自奮則人莫之告人莫之告 則孤而無輔矣 賢者任人故年老而不衰智 盡而不亂故 治國之難在於知賢而不在自 賢 宋人有爲其君以玉爲楮葉者三年而成 鋒殺莖柯毫芒繁澤 亂之楮葉中而不可别 也此人遂以巧食宋國子列子聞之曰使天 地之生物三年而成一葉則物之有葉者寡 矣故聖人恃道化而 不恃智巧子列子窮容 貌有飢色客有言之 鄭子陽者曰列禦寇蓋 有道之士也居君之國而窮君無乃爲不好 士乎鄭子陽即令官遺之粟子列子出見使 者再拜而辭使者去子 列子入其妻望之而 拊心曰妾聞爲有道者之妻子皆使佚樂今
Interpretation

Master Guan Yinzi (a Daoist figure) asked Liezi (Lie Yukou) if he understood the principle of archery. Liezi replied that he did not. Guan Yinzi instructed him to go back and practice. Three years later, Liezi returned to seek guidance again. Guan Yinzi asked, "Do you now understand why you can hit the target?" Liezi said he did. Guan Yinzi declared that this was sufficient and advised him to hold fast to this principle without losing it—for it applied not only to archery but also to governing a state and cultivating one's character. Thus, the sages do not focus on superficial success or failure but investigate the root causes.

Liezi said: Those with ruddy complexions are prone to arrogance, and those with great strength are prone to assertiveness. Such people cannot be reasoned with about the Dao. Therefore, even those whose hair has not yet turned gray err when discussing the Dao—how much more so when attempting to practice it? If a person is always domineering, others will not offer him honest advice; without advice, he will be isolated and helpless. The wise excel at employing people, which is why they remain vigorous in old age and clear-minded even when their wisdom seems exhausted. The difficulty in governing lies in recognizing talent, not in presuming oneself to be virtuous.

A man from the state of Song once carved a leaf from jade, spending three years to complete it. The veins and texture were so finely detailed that it was indistinguishable when placed among real leaves. The man made a living in Song by this craft. When Liezi heard of this, he remarked: If Heaven and Earth took three years to produce a single leaf, there would be very few leafy plants. Therefore, the sages rely on the natural transformations of creation rather than on clever artifice.

Liezi lived in poverty, his face showing signs of hunger. A guest once said to Ziyang, the prime minister of Zheng: "Lie Yukou is a man who has attained the Dao, yet he lives in your state in such destitution—does this not suggest you neglect worthy scholars?" Ziyang immediately sent an envoy with provisions for Liezi. Upon meeting the messenger, Liezi repeatedly bowed in gratitude but declined the offer. After the envoy left, his wife beat her chest in frustration, saying: "I’ve heard that the families of those who embody the Dao live in comfort and joy, yet here we starve. The prime minister sends food, and you refuse—is this our fate?"

有 飢色君過而遺先生食先生不受豈不命 也哉子列子笑謂之曰君 非自知我也以人 之言而遺我粟至其罪我也又且以人之言 此吾 所以不受也其卒民果作難而殺子陽 魯施氏有二子其一好學其 一好兵好學者 以術干齊侯齊侯納之以爲諸公子之傳好 兵者之 楚以法干楚王王悦之以爲軍正禄 富其家爵榮其親施氏之鄰人 孟氏同有二 子所業亦同而窘於貧羨施氏之有因從請 進趣 之方二子以實告孟氏孟氏之一子之 秦以術干秦王秦王曰當今 諸侯力爭所務 兵食而已若用仁義治吾國是滅亡之道遂 宫而放 之其一子之衛以法干衛侯衛侯曰 吾弱國也而攝乎大國之間大國 吾事之小 國吾撫之是求安之道若賴兵權滅亡可待 矣若全而歸 之適於他國爲吾之患不輕矣 遂刖之而還諸魯既反孟氏之父子 叩胸而 讓施氏施氏曰凡得時者昌失時者亡子道 與吾同而功 與吾異失時者也非行之謬也 且天下理無常是事無常 非先日所用今或
Interpretation

This story illustrates the importance of timing and worldly wisdom. Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure), though starving, refused the grain offered to him, recognizing that the benefactor did not truly understand him but was merely acting on hearsay. Later, as predicted, turmoil ensued and that very benefactor Ziyang was killed.

The Shi family of Lu had two sons: one devoted himself to scholarship, the other to military strategy. The scholar went to Qi and impressed its ruler with his learning, becoming tutor to the princes; the strategist gained the King of Chu's favor through his military expertise and was appointed an officer. Both branches of the family thus achieved wealth and prominence. Their neighbors, the Meng family, also had two sons who studied literature and martial arts respectively, yet remained in poverty. They approached the Shis to learn their secret of success.

The elder Meng son went to Qin advocating benevolent governance. The King of Qin declared: "In this age of rival warlords, we value only military preparedness and grain supplies. Governing through benevolence would be our ruin." He had the young man castrated and banished. The younger Meng son went to Wei promoting military strategy, but Marquis Wei responded: "We're a small state caught between powerful neighbors. Survival demands we yield to greater states and pacify smaller ones. Relying on arms would hasten our demise." He had the youth's feet amputated before sending him back to Lu.

Beating their breasts in anguish, the Meng family blamed the Shis, who explained: "Success depends on seizing the right moment. Your methods mirrored ours, yet outcomes differed—not because your approach was wrong, but because the timing wasn't right. No principle under heaven remains eternally valid; what worked yesterday may fail today."

棄之今之所棄後或用之此用與不用無定 是非 也投隙抵時應事無方屬乎智智苟不 足使 若博如孔丘術如吕尚焉往而不窮哉 孟氏 父子舍然無愠容曰吾知之矣子勿重 言晋文公出會欲伐衛公子 鋤仰天而笑公 問何笑曰臣笑鄰之人有送其妻適私家者 道見桑 婦悦而與言然顧視其妻亦有招之 者矣臣竊笑此也公寤其言乃 止引師而還 未至而有伐其北鄙者矣晋 國苦盜有郄(乞/逆) (切)雍者能視盜之貌察其眉睫之間而得其 情晋 侯使視盜千百無遺一焉晋侯喜告趙 文子曰吾得一人而一國盜 爲盡矣奚用多 爲文子曰吾君恃伺察而得盜盜不盡矣且 郄雍必 不得其死焉俄而羣盜謀曰吾所窮 者郄雍也遂共盜而殘之晋 侯聞而大駭立 召文子而告之曰果如子言郄雍死矣然取 盜何 方文子曰周諺有言察見淵魚者不祥 智料隱匿者有殃且 君欲無盜莫若舉賢而 任之使教明於上化行於下民有恥心則何 盜之爲於是用隨會知政而羣盜奔秦焉 孔
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates the principle of "wisdom in application" through several parables.

First, it teaches that what is discarded today may prove useful tomorrow—there are no fixed standards for usefulness. Seizing the moment and adapting to circumstances requires wisdom. Without it, even someone as learned as Confucius or as strategically brilliant as Jiang Ziya (Jiang Taigong) would stumble at every turn.

Next comes the story of the Meng father and son: Though misunderstood by others, they remained unperturbed, calmly stating, "I already understand," and refrained from further explanation.

Then follows the tale of Duke Wen of Jin: When preparing to attack the state of Wei, his minister Gongzi Chu dissuaded him with a joke. He told of a man who flirted with a mulberry-picking woman by the roadside, only to turn and find another man seducing his own wife. Duke Wen realized this was a warning—"While you invade another state, your own land may be vulnerable to attack"—and withdrew his troops, thus averting disaster.

Lastly, there is the story of Jin’s crackdown on thieves: A man named Xi Yong could identify robbers by studying their faces and captured many. The Marquis of Jin was pleased, but minister Zhao Wenzi predicted this method would not last. Sure enough, the thieves banded together and killed Xi Yong. Zhao Wenzi advised: Rather than relying on detection, appoint virtuous officials to promote moral education, so the people would feel shame and refrain from theft. The Marquis heeded this and appointed Sui Hui to govern—soon, the thieves all fled to Qin.

These stories reveal: True wisdom is not mere cleverness but understanding the fundamental Dao (the Way). Relying on tactics offers only temporary solutions; only through moral transformation can lasting peace be achieved.

子自衛反魯息駕乎河梁而觀焉有懸 水三 十仞圜流九十里魚鼈弗能游黿鼉弗能居 有一丈夫方將厲 之孔子使人並涯止之曰 此懸水三十仞圜流九十里魚鼈弗能游 黿 鼉弗能居也意者難可以濟乎丈夫不以錯 意遂度而出孔子問 之曰巧乎有道術乎所 以能入而出者何也丈夫對曰始吾之入也 先以忠信及吾之出也又從以忠信忠信錯 吾軀於波流而吾不敢 用私所以能入而復 出者以此也孔子謂弟子曰二三子識之水 且 猶可以忠信誠身親之而況人乎白公 問 孔子曰人可與微言乎孔子不應白公 問曰 若 以石投水何如孔子曰吾之善没者能取 之曰若 以水投水何如孔子曰淄澠之合易 牙 嘗而知之白公曰人固不可與微言乎孔 子曰何爲不可唯 知言之謂者乎夫知言之 謂者不 以言言也爭魚者濡逐獸者趨非樂 之也故至言 去言至爲無爲夫淺知之所爭 者末矣 白公不得已遂死於浴室趙襄子使 新穉穆子 攻翟勝之取左人中人使遽人來 謁之 襄子方食而有憂色左右曰一朝而兩 城下此人之所喜也今 君有憂色何也襄子 曰夫江河之大也不過三日飄風暴雨 不終 朝日中不須臾今趙氏之德行無所施於積
Interpretation

Confucius was returning from the state of Wei to Lu when he stopped to rest by a river bridge. There he saw a waterfall plunging thirty ren (approximately 54 meters), its turbulent currents forming whirlpools stretching ninety li—so fierce that neither fish nor turtles could swim through, nor could giant turtles or crocodiles find refuge. A man was about to cross, so Confucius instructed his attendants to warn him from the bank: "This waterfall drops thirty ren with whirlpools spanning ninety li. Even aquatic creatures cannot pass—surely it’s too dangerous to cross?" The man paid no heed and swam across effortlessly before returning safely.

Confucius asked him, "Is this skill or Daoist art? How can you traverse so freely?" The man replied, "When I enter the water, I embrace loyalty and sincerity; when I emerge, I still hold fast to them. Loyalty and sincerity bear my body through the torrents. I dare not entertain selfish thoughts—that is why I can come and go unharmed." Confucius turned to his disciples and said, "Understand this: even water responds to loyalty and sincerity with intimacy—how much more so should people?"

Later, Duke Bai of Chu asked Confucius, "Can one speak of hidden truths with others?" Confucius remained silent. Duke Bai pressed, "What if one throws a stone into water?" Confucius answered, "A skilled diver could retrieve it." Duke Bai asked again, "What if one pours water into water?" Confucius said, "Like mixing the Zi and Min rivers—the chef Yi Ya could distinguish them with one taste." Duke Bai persisted, "So ultimately, one cannot speak of secrets?" Confucius replied, "Why not? But you must find those who grasp meaning beyond words. Those who truly understand need no verbal explanations. Fishermen get wet, hunters must run fast—not because they enjoy it. Thus, the highest speech transcends words; the greatest action is Wuwei (non-action). Petty people quarrel over trivialities." Duke Bai failed to grasp the lesson and later met his end in a bathhouse.

Another story tells of Zhao Xiangzi sending Xinzhi Muzi to attack the state of Di, where they swiftly captured the cities of Zuoren and Zhongren. When the victory report arrived during a meal, Zhao Xiangzi wore a troubled expression. His attendants asked, "Conquering two cities in a day should bring joy—why does my lord grieve?" Xiangzi said, "Great rivers flood for no more than three days; storms rage for no more than a morning; the midday sun lingers but a moment. Our house of Zhao has not yet accumulated sufficient De (virtue), yet we’ve suddenly achieved great triumph. I fear such fortune cannot endure."

一朝而兩城下亡其及我哉孔子聞之曰趙 氏其昌乎 夫憂者所以爲昌也喜者所以爲 亡也勝非其難者也持 之其難者也賢主以 此持勝故其福及後世齊楚吴越皆常勝矣 然卒取亡焉不達乎持勝也唯有道之主爲 能持勝 孔子之勁能拓國門之關而不肯以 力聞 墨子爲守攻公輸般服而不肯以兵知 故善持勝者以强爲弱宋人有好行仁義者 三世不懈家無故黑牛生白犢以問孔子孔 子曰此吉祥也以薦上 帝居一年其父無故 而盲其牛又復生白犢其父又復令其子問 孔 子其子曰前問之而失明又何問乎父曰 聖人之言先迕後合其事 未究姑復問之其 子又復問孔子孔子曰吉祥也復教以祭其 子歸 致命其父曰行孔子之言也居一年其 子又無故而盲其後楚攻宋 圍其城民易子 而食之析骸而炊之丁壯者皆乘城而戰死 者太半 此人以父子有疾皆免及圍解而疾 俱復宋有蘭子者 以技干宋元宋元召而使 見其技以雙枝長倍其身 屬其脛並趨並馳 弄七劍迭而躍之五劍常在空中元君大驚 立賜 金帛又有蘭子又能燕戲者聞之復以 干元君元君大怒 曰昔有異技干寡人者技 無庸適值寡人有歡心故賜金帛彼 必聞此 而進復望吾賞拘而擬戮之經月乃放秦穆 公謂伯樂曰子之年長矣子姓有可使求馬
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates the Daoist wisdom of "the soft and weak overcoming the hard and strong" through several parables.

When Confucius heard that the state of Zhao had captured two cities simultaneously, he predicted: "Zhao will soon prosper." For it is through vigilance that states flourish, while complacency leads to ruin. Achieving victory is not difficult—the true challenge lies in maintaining it. Enlightened rulers understand this principle, thus securing blessings for future generations. The states of Qi, Chu, Wu, and Yue each enjoyed temporary hegemony, yet all ultimately perished because they lacked the wisdom to preserve their triumphs. Only rulers who have attained the Dao (the Way) can truly sustain victory.

Two examples then demonstrate how true strength never flaunts might: Confucius possessed the strength to lift a city gate's massive bar, yet never became known for martial prowess; Mozi (founder of Mohism) impressed the master craftsman Gongshu Ban with his defensive strategies, yet refused to be celebrated as a military genius. Those skilled at preserving victory often appear weak outwardly.

The text recounts a story about a Song family: Three generations of their household practiced virtue, and their black cow bore a white calf (considered an auspicious omen in antiquity). Confucius declared this a propitious sign, advising them to use it for sacrifice. A year later, the father suddenly went blind, and the black cow again bore a white calf. The son hesitated to consult Confucius again, but the father insisted: "The sage's words first bring adversity, then fortune." True enough, the son also lost his sight the following year. When Chu later invaded Song, both father and son survived the war's devastation because of their blindness—and afterward, their vision miraculously restored.

Finally, two entertainers are contrasted: A Song acrobat received lavish rewards for his exceptional skills, but when another performer came later displaying similar feats, the ruler—then in ill temper—nearly executed him. Duke Mu of Qin asked the horse expert Bole: "You've grown old—do any descendants possess your gift for judging steeds?"

These stories collectively reveal: True wisdom lies not in displays of strength, but in discerning timing and using softness to overcome hardness. At the peak of prosperity, one must maintain vigilance—what appears weak and yielding often endures longest.

者乎 伯樂對曰良馬可形容筋骨相也天下 之馬者 若滅若没若亡若失若此者絶塵 弭 𨅊臣之子皆下才也可告以良馬不可告以 天下之馬也臣 有所與共擔纏薪菜者有九 方臯此其於馬非臣之下 也請見之穆公見 之使行求馬三月而反報曰已得之矣 在沙 丘穆公曰何馬也對曰牝而黄使人往取之 牡而驪穆公不 說召伯樂而謂之曰敗矣子 所使求馬者色物牝牡尚弗能知 又何馬之 能知也伯樂喟然太息曰一至於此乎是乃 其所以千萬 臣而無數者也若臯之所觀天 機也 得其精而忘其麄在其内而忘其外見 其所 見不見其所不見視其所視而遺其所 不視若辠 之相者乃有貴乎馬者 也馬至果 天下之馬也楚莊王問詹何曰治 國奈何詹 何對曰臣明於治身而不明於治國也楚莊 王曰 寡人得奉宗廟社稷願學所以守之詹 何對曰臣未嘗聞身治而 國亂者也又未嘗 聞身亂而國治者也故本在身不敢對以末 楚王 曰善狐丘丈人謂叔孫敖曰人有三怨
Interpretation

Bo Le (an ancient horse physiognomy expert) replied to Duke Huan of Qi: "Ordinary fine horses can be judged by their form, bones, and sinews. But the truly exceptional thousand-mile steed of the world—its characteristics seem to exist yet not exist, elusive and impossible to grasp. When it runs, its speed leaves even the dust behind. My sons are men of mediocre talent who can only recognize ordinary good horses, incapable of identifying such a treasure of the world. However, there was Jiufang Gao (a master horse judge) who once gathered firewood and carried burdens with me—his skill in judging horses far surpasses mine."

When Jiufang Gao searched for a thousand-mile steed for Duke Mu of Qin, he returned after three months reporting he'd found one at Sandy Hill. Asked what kind of horse it was, he replied it was a yellow mare. But when sent to retrieve it, the horse turned out to be a black stallion. An angry Duke Mu confronted Bo Le, who sighed in admiration: "This is precisely where he surpasses me ten thousandfold! Jiufang Gao observes the horse's innate divine vitality (Shen), grasping its essence while overlooking superficial traits, valuing inner qualities rather than external features. He sees only what should be seen and disregards what's unimportant. This realm of horse judgment is more precious than the skill itself." The horse later proved indeed to be a rare, exceptional steed.

When King Zhuang of Chu sought governance advice from Zhan He (a Daoist recluse), Zhan He replied: "I only understand self-cultivation, not state governance." The king insisted on learning statecraft methods, to which Zhan He responded: "I've never heard of a ruler who cultivated himself rigorously yet governed a chaotic state, nor seen a ruler of corrupt character presiding over a prosperous kingdom. The root of governance lies in self-cultivation—I dare not answer you with trivial details." The king praised this wisdom.

The Elder of Fox Hill (a hermit) said to Shusun Ao (Prime Minister of Chu): "There are three ways men invite resentment: high nobility provokes envy, great office arouses the ruler's suspicion, and generous emoluments easily draw others' resentment."

子知之乎叔孫 敖曰何謂也對曰爵高者人 妬之官大者主惡之禄厚者怨逮之 叔孫敖 曰吾爵益高吾志益下吾官益大吾心益小 吾禄益厚吾 施益博以是免於三怨可乎叔 孫敖疾將死戒其子曰王亟封我矣 吾不受 也爲我死王則封汝汝必無受利地楚越之 間有寢丘者此 地不利而名甚惡楚人鬼而 越人機可長有者唯此也叔孫 敖死果以美 地封其子子辭而不受請寢丘與之至今不 失 牛缺者上地之大儒也下之邯鄲遇盜於 耦沙之中 盡取其衣裝車牛步而去視之歡 然亡憂吝之色盜進而問其故曰 君子不以 所養害其所養盜曰嘻賢矣夫既而相謂曰 以彼之賢往 見趙君使以我爲必困我不如 殺之乃相與追而殺之燕人聞之聚 族相戒 曰遇盜莫如上地之牛缺也皆受教俄而其 弟適秦至關下 果遇盜憶其兄之戒因與盜 力爭既而不如又追而以卑辭請物盜 怒曰 吾活汝弘矣而追吾不已迹將著焉既爲盜 矣仁將焉在遂殺 之又傍害其黨四五人焉
Interpretation

This scripture illustrates the Daoist wisdom of "maintaining softness and abiding in humility" through two contrasting stories.

The first story tells of Sunshu Ao, the prime minister of Chu. Someone warned him: "The higher your position, the more envy you attract; the greater your power, the more suspicion from the ruler; the richer your wealth, the heavier the resentment." Sunshu Ao replied: "The higher my rank, the more humble my heart; the greater my authority, the more cautious my actions; the more abundant my wealth, the more generously I share." On his deathbed, he advised his son: "The king of Chu has repeatedly offered me rewards, but I refused them all. If after my death, the king wishes to grant you land, never accept fertile territory. Instead, ask for Qinqiu (modern-day Gushi, Henan), a barren and ill-omened place (the character '寝' suggests death). The people of Chu believe in ghosts and spirits, while the Yue people trust omens—neither would want it, so it will remain in our family forever." His son followed this advice, and the land remained in their possession for generations.

The second story concerns the Confucian scholar Niu Que, a renowned scholar from Shangdi, who encountered robbers in Handan. Though they took all his belongings, he remained calm. Puzzled, the robbers asked why, to which he replied: "A nobleman does not let material possessions harm his inner cultivation." The robbers marveled, saying, "Truly a virtuous man!" But then they reconsidered: "If such a wise man reports us to the king of Zhao, we’ll be in trouble." So they chased him down and killed him. When the people of Yan heard of this, they warned each other: "If you meet robbers, don’t act like Niu Que." Later, Niu Que’s younger brother traveled to Qin and was also robbed. Remembering his brother’s fate, he first resisted fiercely, then groveled when overpowered. Enraged, the robbers shouted: "Sparing your life was mercy enough! Yet you still beg for your things—this will expose us!" They killed him and several others with him.

These two stories present a stark contrast: Sunshu Ao understood that "high status demands greater humility," ensuring his peaceful end and his family’s lasting security by willingly choosing "unfavorable land." Meanwhile, the Confucian Niu Que, though morally upright, invited death by displaying his virtue, while his brother, overcorrecting, provoked violence by appearing weak. Together, they embody the Daoist philosophy that "softness overcomes hardness" and "daring not to take the lead in the world."

虞氏者梁之富 人也家充殷盛錢帛無量財 貨無訾登高樓臨大路設樂陳酒擊博 樓上 俠客相隨而行樓上博者射明瓊張中反兩 㯓(記盍/切)魚而笑 飛鳶適墜其腐鼠而中之俠 客相與言曰虞氏富樂 之日乆矣而常有輕 易人之志吾不侵犯之而乃辱我以腐鼠此 而 不報無以立慬(渠客叵/靳二切)於天下請與若等 戮力一志率徒屬必滅其家 爲等倫皆許諾 至期日之夜聚衆積兵以攻虞氏大滅其家 東方有人焉曰爰旌目將有適也而餓於 道 狐父之盜曰丘見而下壺餐以餔之爰旌目 三餔而後能視曰子 何爲者也曰我狐父之 人丘也爰旌目曰譆汝非盜邪胡爲而餐我 吾 義不食子之食也兩手據地而嘔之不出 喀喀□□(切/嘔也)然遂伏而死孤父之 人則盜矣 而食非盜也以人之盜因謂食爲盜而不敢 食是失名實 者也柱厲叔事莒敖公自爲不 知已去居海上夏日則食菱芰冬日 則食橡 栗莒敖公有難柱厲叔辭其友而往死之其 友曰子自以爲 不知已故去今往死之是知
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (Scripture of the Ultimate Virtue of Empty Nothingness) presents two instructive anecdotes concerning human conduct and worldly interactions.

The first tale recounts a wealthy man named Yu from Liang State, whose riches were beyond measure. He often amused himself by hosting gambling feasts in his street-facing tower. Once, during a dice game, a thrown die happened to strike a rotting rat below, provoking uproarious laughter from the revelers. Passing knights-errant took this as a grave insult, reasoning: "The Yu family's prolonged luxury has bred contempt for others. Though we never provoked them, they shame us with putrid vermin. Unless we avenge this slight, how can we maintain our standing in the martial world?" That night, they gathered their followers and exterminated the entire Yu household.

The second narrative tells of Yuan Jingmu, who collapsed from starvation on the road. A bandit named Qiu (from the robber-infested region of Hufu) compassionately fed him. After three meals restored his sight, Yuan learned his benefactor's identity and immediately tried to vomit the food, ultimately starving himself to death. The commentary observes: Though Qiu was a robber, the food wasn't stolen. To reject sustenance because the giver bears a thief's name is to confuse reputation with substance.

The text further relates the story of Zhu Lishu: He retreated to the seashore gathering water chestnuts and acorns, believing Lord Ju'ao failed to recognize his worth. Yet when the lord faced calamity, Zhu rushed to die with him. To puzzled friends he explained: "I left because of being misunderstood; now I die precisely to prove my true value."

與不知無辨也柱厲叔曰不然自以爲 不知 故去今死是果不知我也吾將死之以醜後 世之人主不知其 臣者也凡知則死之不知 則弗死此直道而行者也柱厲叔可謂懟 以 忘其身者也楊朱曰利出者實及怨往者害 來發於 此而應於外者唯請是故賢者慎所 出 楊子之鄰人亡羊既率其黨又請楊子之 竪追之楊子曰嘻亡一羊 何追者之衆鄰人 曰多岐路既反問獲羊乎曰亡之矣曰奚亡 之曰 岐路之中又有岐焉吾不知所之所以 反也楊子戚然變容不言者 移時不笑者竟 日門人怪之請曰羊賤畜又非夫子之有而 損言笑 者何哉楊子不答門人不獲所命弟 子孟孫陽出以告心都子心 都了他日與孟 孫陽偕入而問曰昔有昆弟三人游齊魯之 間同師而 學進仁義之道而歸其父曰仁義 之道若何伯曰仁義使我愛身而 後名仲曰 仁義使我殺身以成名叔曰 仁義使我身名 並全彼三術相反而同出於儒孰是孰非 邪 楊子曰人有濱河而居者習於水勇於泅操 舟鬻渡利供百口褁 糧就學者成徒而溺死 者幾半本學泅不學溺而利害如此若以 爲 孰是孰非心都子默然而出孟孫陽讓之曰 何吾子問之迂夫子 答之僻吾惑愈甚心都 子曰大道以多岐亡羊學者以多方喪生學
Interpretation

Zhu Lishu said: "To those who do not understand me, my existence makes no difference. Believing myself to be misunderstood, I chose to depart. Now if I die, it will precisely prove their failure to comprehend me. I shall use death to shame future rulers who fail to understand their ministers. Those who truly know me would die for me, while those who don't would not—this is the upright path of the Dao (the Way)." Zhu Lishu may be called one who forgot his own safety in expressing righteous indignation.

Yang Zhu (a Warring States period philosopher) remarked: "Kindness extended invites reciprocation, while resentment expressed invites misfortune. What emanates from within finds its counterpart without—thus the wise remain cautious in speech and action."

When Yang Zhu's neighbor lost a sheep, he not only mobilized his whole household but also enlisted Yang Zhu's servants in the search. Yang Zhu asked: "Why dispatch so many for one missing sheep?" The neighbor replied: "There are too many branching paths." Upon their return, Yang Zhu inquired: "Did you find it?" The neighbor said: "It's lost." Asked how, he explained: "The branching paths had further branches—we knew not which way to pursue, so we returned." Yang Zhu's countenance darkened with sorrow; for a full day he neither spoke nor smiled. His disciples found this strange: "Sheep are lowly creatures, and this wasn't even yours—why such grief?" Yang Zhu remained silent.

Disciple Meng Sunyang reported this to Xinduzi. Later, Xinduzi came with Meng Sunyang to consult Yang Zhu: "Once there were three brothers who studied in Qi and Lu under the same master to learn the Dao of humaneness and righteousness (Ren-Yi). Upon returning, their father asked what they had learned. The eldest said humaneness teaches us to cherish life above reputation; the second said it requires sacrificing life for reputation; the youngest said it preserves both life and reputation. These contradictory teachings all stem from Confucianism—which is right or wrong?"

Yang Zhu responded with a parable: "By the riverside lived an expert swimmer who ferried people to support his hundred-member household. Many came to learn swimming, yet nearly half drowned. They came to learn swimming, not drowning—yet this was the result. Who would you say was right or wrong?" Xinduzi departed in silence. Meng Sunyang reproached him: "Your question was circuitous, the master's reply obscure—I'm more confused than ever." Xinduzi said: "The great road loses sheep through its many forks; seekers lose their lives through myriad methods. The root of learning lies in returning to the origin, not straying amidst proliferating branches."

非本不同非本不一而末異若是唯歸同反 一爲亡得喪子長先生 之門習先生之道而 不達先生之況也哀哉楊朱之弟曰布衣素 衣 而出天雨解素衣衣緇衣而反其狗不知 迎而吠之楊布怒將扑之 揚朱曰子無扑矣 子亦猶是也嚮者使汝狗白而往黑而來豈 能無 怪哉楊朱曰行善 不以爲名而名從之 名不與利期而利歸之利不與爭期而爭及 之 故君子必慎爲善 昔人有言有知不死之 道者燕君使人受之不捷而言者死燕君甚 怒其使者將加誅焉幸臣諫曰人所憂者莫 急乎死己所重者莫過 乎生彼自喪其生安 能令君不死也乃不誅有齊子亦欲學其道 聞 言者之死乃撫膺而恨富子聞而笑之曰 夫所欲學不死其人已死 而猶恨之是不知 所以爲學胡子曰富子之言非也凡人有術 不能 行者有矣能行而無其術者亦有矣衛 人有善數者臨死以訣喻其子其 子志其言 而不能行也他人問之以其父所言告之問 者用其言而 行其術與其父無差焉若然死 者奚爲不能言生術哉 邯鄲之民以正月之 旦獻鳩於簡子簡子大悦厚賞之客 問其故 簡子曰正旦放生示有恩也客曰民知君之 欲放之故競而 捕之死者衆矣君如欲生之 不若禁民勿捕捕而放之恩過不相補 矣簡
Interpretation

This passage conveys profound truths through several allegorical stories.

The first story tells of Yang Bu, younger brother of the philosopher Yang Zhu from the Warring States period. Yang Bu went out wearing white clothes, but after rain forced him to change into black garments, his own dog failed to recognize him and barked furiously. When Yang Bu wanted to beat the dog, Yang Zhu remarked: "If your dog had gone out white and returned black, wouldn't you also be astonished?" This illustrates how misunderstandings naturally arise when external appearances change.

Next comes a lesson about virtuous deeds: Performing good acts shouldn't be for fame, yet fame naturally follows; fame shouldn't be pursued for profit, yet benefits naturally come; benefits shouldn't invite contention, yet conflict inevitably arises. Therefore, noble persons must exercise particular caution in virtuous conduct.

Then follows the story of the ruler of Yan: A man claimed knowledge of immortality techniques, so the king sent envoys to learn them. Before mastery was achieved, the man died. When the furious king wanted to execute the envoys, a minister advised: "How could someone who couldn't preserve his own life possibly grant you immortality?" This satirizes those blindly pursuing longevity without understanding fundamental principles.

In Wei state, a skilled mathematician on his deathbed taught his son calculation secrets. The son memorized them but couldn't apply them. When questioned, the son repeated his father's words, yet the questioner could actually use the method. This shows: Those who know methods may fail to practice them, while practitioners may lack theoretical knowledge. Similarly, the dead cannot transmit techniques for eternal life.

Finally, the story of Handan citizens presenting turtledoves to Lord Jian of Zhao on New Year's Day: The delighted lord rewarded them handsomely, claiming he'd release the birds to demonstrate benevolence. A guest pointed out: "When people know you'll release captured birds, they'll compete to catch more, causing greater mortality. Better to simply forbid capture - so-called mercy through release cannot offset the original harm." This reveals how surface-level good deeds may produce worse consequences.

子曰然齊田氏祖於庭食客千人中坐有獻 魚雁者田氏視之 乃歎曰天之於民厚矣殖 五穀生魚鳥以爲之用衆客和之如響鮑 氏 之子年十二預於次進曰不如君言天地萬 物與我並生類也類 無貴賤徒以小大智力 而相制迭相食非相爲而生之人 取可食者 而食之豈天本爲人生之是蚊蚋噆膚虎狼 食肉非天本 爲蚊蚋生人虎狼生肉者哉齊 有貧者常乞於城市城市患其亟 也衆莫之 與遂適田氏之廐從馬醫作役而假食郭中 人戲之曰從 馬醫而食不以辱乎乞兒曰天 下之辱莫過於乞乞猶不辱豈辱馬 醫哉宋 人有遊於道得人遺 契者歸而藏之密數其 齒告鄰人曰吾富可待矣 人有枯梧樹者其 鄰父言枯梧之樹不祥其鄰人遽而伐 之鄰 人父因請以爲薪其人乃不悦曰鄰人之父 從欲爲薪而教吾伐之也與我鄰若此其險 豈可哉人有 亡鈇者意其鄰之子視其行步 竊鈇也顔色竊鈇也言語竊鈇也作 動態度 無爲而不竊鈇也俄而抇(音/掘)其谷而得其鈇 他日復見其 鄰人之子動作態度無似竊鈇 者 白公勝慮亂罷朝而立倒校策錣(張剖切/策端有) (鐵/也)上貫頤
Interpretation

The Tian clan of Qi held a grand ancestral sacrifice in their courtyard, hosting a banquet for over a thousand guests. During the feast, someone presented fish and wild geese as offerings. Tian looked at these sacrificial items and sighed, "How benevolent Heaven is to the common people! It makes the five grains grow and produces fish and birds for human consumption." The guests all echoed his sentiment in perfect unison, like reverberating echoes.

At this moment, a twelve-year-old boy named Bao who was among the guests stepped forward and said, "I cannot agree with your view. All beings between Heaven and Earth share equal life with us humans—there are no inherent hierarchies. It's merely differences in physical size and intellectual capacity that create relationships of mutual restraint and consumption, not because Heaven specially created these creatures for humans. Just as humans select edible foods to eat, can we say that mosquitoes sucking blood or tigers and wolves eating meat means Heaven specifically created humans for mosquitoes and meat for predators?"

In Qi, there was a poor man who often begged in the city. The townspeople, annoyed by his frequent appearances, stopped giving him alms. He eventually went to work in Tian's stables assisting the horse doctors for food. The townspeople mocked him: "Aren't you ashamed to eat by working with horse doctors?" The beggar replied, "The greatest shame under Heaven is begging. If I feel no shame in begging, why should I feel ashamed working with horse doctors?"

A man of Song found someone's lost contract on the road. Returning home, he secretly counted the notches carved on it (ancient contractual proof) and told his neighbor, "My day of wealth is near." Another family had a withered phoenix tree, and an elderly neighbor said dead phoenix trees were inauspicious, so the owner hurriedly chopped it down. Later when the old neighbor came asking for firewood, the man said resentfully, "So this old man tricked me into cutting the tree just to get firewood! Such scheming neighbors!"

A man who lost his axe suspected his neighbor's son had stolen it. The boy's walk seemed like a thief's, his expression seemed like a thief's, his speech seemed like a thief's—everything about him appeared suspicious. Later when the axe was found in a valley, the man saw the neighbor's son again and found nothing about him resembled a thief.

When Bai Gong Sheng (a senior official of Chu) was plotting rebellion, even after court dismissal he would stand fiddling with his horsewhip until its iron tip pricked his chin. (This detail revealed his inner anxiety)

血流至地而弗知也鄭人聞之曰 頤之忘將何不忘哉意之所 屬者其行足躓 株塪頭柢植木而不自知也昔齊人有欲金 者清旦 衣冠而之市適鬻金者之所因攫其 金而去吏捕得之問曰人皆在 焉子攫人之 金何對曰取金之時不見人徒見金 沖虚至德眞經
Interpretation

In the state of Zheng, there was a man so absorbed in his thoughts while walking that he didn't even notice his own blood dripping onto the ground. When the locals heard about this, they remarked: "When one is this focused, even pain is forgotten—what else couldn't be forgotten?" When the mind becomes completely fixated on something, one might trip over tree stumps or bump into trunks without realizing it.

Long ago in the state of Qi, there was a man obsessed with obtaining gold. One morning, he dressed properly and went to the marketplace, heading straight for the gold vendor's stall, where he grabbed the gold and ran. The officers caught him and asked, "With so many people around, how dare you openly steal gold?" The man replied, "When I took the gold, I didn’t see any people—only the gold."

(This passage uses two parables to illustrate the state of "spirit concentration" (shen ning): when the mind is intensely focused on one thing, awareness of the external world fades. In Daoist cultivation, this state is both an achievement and a warning—excessive fixation can lead to losing one’s true nature.)

卷下

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0049); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback