中文 · EN · JA · KO

《道德真經集解(一)》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 4 volumes 35,710 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集解(一)》 (Dongshen 洞神部, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 69 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Vol. 1

道德眞經集解卷之一𠕏一     趙學士集解    道可道章第一 道可道非常道  莫非道也而可道者不可常今夫仁義禮  智此道之可道者不可道仁不可以爲義  禮不可以爲智可道則不可常不可道則  能常然後在仁爲仁在義爲義在禮爲禮  在智爲智可道不常而道不變不可道之  能常如此 名可名非常名  道不可道而況可得而名之乎凡名皆其  可道者也名旣立則方圓曲直之不同不  可常矣嚴遵君平曰有名非道也無名非  道也有爲非道也無爲非道也無名而無  所不名無爲而無所不爲 無名天地之始有名萬物之母常無欲以觀 其妙常有欲以觀其徼  自其無名形而爲天地天地位而名始立  播而爲萬物萬物道而名不勝用所以無  名者道之體而有名者道之用也聖人體  道以爲天下用入於衆有而常無將以觀  其妙也體其至無而常有將以觀其徼也  若夫行於其徼而不知其妙粗而不神矣  流於其妙而不知其徼精而不通矣司馬  君實曰名天地之始曰無名萬物之母曰  有王雱曰有無同體始母之言亦筌蹄也  王弼以爲有欲以觀其徼苟爲有欲矣則  將沉溺轉徙於物又何徼之能觀乎  末有天地孰得而名之哉無名天地之始  有名然後萬物生焉故有名萬物之母莊  子云老氏建以常無有不立一物兹謂常
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound meaning behind the opening lines of the Daodejing: "The Dao that can be spoken is not the eternal Dao." The true Dao cannot be fully expressed in words—whatever can be articulated is not the unchanging, eternal Dao. Concepts like benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom are manifestations of the Dao, yet benevolence is not identical to righteousness, nor is propriety the same as wisdom. These specific expressions are subject to change and cannot endure eternally.

The same applies to names—whatever can be named is not an eternal, unchanging name. In the primordial state of heaven and earth, there was only nameless chaos (referring to the undifferentiated state before the cosmos took form). Only after the emergence of the myriad things did names come into being. The nameless represents the essence of the Dao, while the named represents its function. The sage comprehends the nature of the Dao, capable of both immersing in concrete phenomena with a mind of emptiness to observe their mysteries (referring to the deeper patterns beyond appearances) and grasping the boundaries of manifestation from absolute nothingness.

If one focuses solely on phenomena without understanding their essence, they remain superficial. Conversely, if one speaks only of abstract principles without practical application, they fall into empty theorizing. As Zhuangzi said, Laozi established the concepts of "constant nothingness" (chang wu) and "constant being" (chang you), but not to cling to either extreme. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period Neo-Daoist scholar) suggested observing the boundaries of things through desire—a view open to debate, as desire can lead to attachment to material things, obscuring true perception.

The core message here is that the Dao is both transcendent and immanent, formless yet manifest in all things. The sage must grasp both the essence and function of the Dao—neither fixating on concrete phenomena nor losing themselves in abstract nothingness. This is the complete way of understanding.

 無不廢一物兹謂常有常無在理其上不  皦天下之至精也故觀其妙常有在事其  下不昧天下之至變也故觀其徼弃有則  著空徇末則忘本是以大智並觀焉 此兩者同出而異名同謂之玄  以形而言有無則信兩矣安知無運而爲  有有復而爲無未嘗不一哉其名雖異其  本則一知本之一也則玄矣凡遠而無所  至極者其色必玄故老子常以玄寄極也  太平光師曰有對則名 玄之又玄衆妙之門  玄玄則極矣然猶有知玄之心在焉玄之  又玄則盡矣不可以有加矣衆妙之門所  從出也光曰忘玄之玄則曰玄玄趙秉文  曰此章明重玄之極致非但可道非道不  可道亦非道莊子云語默皆不足以盡道  非但道常無名有名無名亦不足以盡道  無名者道之似也常無者佛氏所謂眞空  也常有者佛氏所謂妙有也有無皆不足  以盡道故又寄之重玄政和曰玄者天之  色色之所色者彰矣而色色者未嘗顯玄  之又玄所謂色色者也玄妙之理萬物俱  有天之所以運地之所以處人之所以靈  百物之所以昌皆妙也而皆出於玄故曰  衆妙之門    天下皆知章第二 天下皆知美之爲美斯惡已皆知善之爲善 斯不善已故有無之相生難易之相成長短 之相形高下之相傾音聲之相和前後之相 隨  天下以形名而言美惡其所謂美且善者
Interpretation

This passage expounds the dialectical relationship between "being" (you) and "non-being" (wu). All things follow the principle of existence (being) and dissolution (non-being) — these seemingly opposite states actually originate from the same source. The supreme truth (Dao) encompasses both "constant being" (eternal existence) and "constant non-being" (eternal emptiness). Just as when observing phenomena, one must perceive both their subtle essence (observing their mystery) and their changing manifestations (observing their boundaries).

The term "xuan" (profound) here refers to the abstruse, unfathomable ultimate truth. Like the dark azure hue of the distant sky at its extremity, "the profound upon profound" indicates a truth transcending all dualities. Neither Buddhism's "absolute emptiness" nor its "marvelous existence" can fully describe the Dao, hence the need for the concept of "chongxuan" (doubly profound absolute truth beyond opposition). The movement of heaven and earth, human spirituality, and the flourishing of all creatures all stem from this mysterious source, thus called "the gate of all wonders."

Chapter two discusses the principle of relativity: when all under heaven recognize beauty as beauty, the concept of ugliness arises; when all recognize good as good, the notion of not-good emerges. Concepts like being/non-being, difficult/easy, long/short, high/low, sound/echo, and before/after all depend on and transform into each other. While people use names to distinguish beauty from ugliness or good from evil, these very standards of judgment inevitably create opposition.

 豈信美且善哉彼不知有無難易長短高  下音聲前後之相奪皆非其正也方且自  以爲長而有長於我者臨之斯則短矣方  且自以爲前而有前於我者先之斯則後  矣苟從其所美而信之則失之遠矣肇曰  有無相生其猶高必有下然則有無雖殊  俱未免於有也此乃言象之所以形故借  出有無之表者以祛之光曰此六對者物  之所以不齊唯喪偶者能同之政和曰道  無異相熟爲美否性本一致熟爲善否有  美也惡爲之對故曰天下皆知美之爲美  斯惡已有善也不善爲之對故曰天下皆  知善之爲善斯不善已太易未判萬象同  體兩儀旣生物物爲對此六對者群變所  交百慮所生殊塗所起世之人所以陷溺  而不能自出者也 是以聖人處無爲之事行不言之教  當事而爲無爲之之心者當教而言無言  之之意者夫是以出於長短之度離於先  後之數非美非惡非善非不善而天下何  足以知之吕惠卿曰聖人終日爲而未嘗  爲終日言而未嘗言 萬物作而不辭生而不有爲而不恃功成不 居  萬物爲我作而我無所辭我生之爲之而  未嘗有未嘗恃至於功成亦未嘗以自居  也此則無爲不言之教其爲美且善也豈  復有惡與不善繼之哉 夫唯不居是以不去  聖人居於貧賤無貧賤之憂居於富貴無
Interpretation

This scripture explores the nature of relative concepts and the way of the sage in navigating the world. It points out that people often cling to notions like "beauty" and "goodness," unaware that these concepts are inherently relative. For instance, someone who considers themselves tall will appear short when encountering someone taller; those who believe they are ahead will be surpassed by faster individuals. These paired opposites (being and non-being, difficulty and ease, length and brevity, height and lowness, sound and silence, front and back) form the root of all differentiation in the world and the source of human confusion.

The way of the sage (one who has attained the Dao) differs markedly from ordinary approaches: their actions appear as wuwei (non-action, without forced striving), and their teaching transcends words. They allow all things to develop naturally without interference, create without claiming possession, act without self-importance, and accomplish without dwelling on achievements. Precisely because they do not cling to ownership, they never experience loss. Whether in poverty or wealth, the sage maintains a transcendent state of mind.

The text cites several commentators' insights: Zhao observes that the mutual generation of being and non-being resembles the relativity of height and lowness, neither escaping the realm of "being"; Guang notes that only those who transcend duality can unify these contradictions; Zhenghe maintains that at the level of the Dao (cosmic origin), there exists no inherent distinction between beauty and ugliness or good and evil—these opposing concepts are all human constructs.

 富貴之累此所謂不居也我且不居彼尚  何從而去哉此則居之至也政和曰萬物  並作隨感而應無所辭也自形自化自生  自色孰有之哉趙曰有對待無爲有眞無  爲有對待無言有眞無言有爲無爲有言  無言對待也與有無高下何異若夫眞無  爲無言喪偶絶待者也    不尚賢章第三 不尚賢使民不爭不貴難得之貨使民不爲 盜不見可欲使心不亂是以聖人之治虚其 心實其腹弱其志强其骨  尚賢則民恥於不若而至於爭貴難得之  貨則民病於無有而至於盜見可欲則民  患於不得而至於亂雖然天下知三者之  爲患爲欲舉而廢之則惑矣聖人則不然  未嘗不用賢也獨不尚賢耳未嘗棄難得  之貨也獨不貴之耳未嘗去可欲也獨不  見之耳夫是以賢者用而民不爭難得之  貨可欲之事畢效於前而盜賊禍亂不起  是不亦虚其心而不害腹之實弱其志而  不害骨之强也哉今將舉賢而尚之寳貨  而貴之衒可欲而示之則是心與腹皆實  也若舉而廢之是志與骨皆弱也心與腹  皆實則民無不爭志與骨皆弱則事無以  立矣趙曰虚心實腹則上不尚不貴不見  使民無知無欲是也或云虛心養道雖於  義無害非此章本指 常使民無知無欲使夫知者不敢爲也  聖人之治務使民得其性命而已多知以
Interpretation

The burdens brought by wealth and honor are what we call "non-attachment" (bu ju). If I remain unattached to these things, how can they affect me? This is the highest form of worldly wisdom. Zhenghe (Note: the Daoist name of Emperor Huizong of Song) explains: All things grow naturally, transforming in response to circumstances without refusal. They take form by themselves, change by themselves, grow by themselves, and manifest by themselves—where is the need for human intervention?

Zhao (Note: likely commentator Zhao Zhijian) says: The concept of "non-action" (wuwei) exists in contrast to its opposite; there is true non-action. The concept of "wordlessness" exists in contrast to its opposite; there is true wordlessness. "Action" and "non-action," "speech" and "wordlessness"—these are all relative concepts, no different from "being and non-being" or "high and low." True non-action and true wordlessness transcend all dualistic concepts.

Chapter Three discusses not exalting the worthy. When worthiness isn't glorified, the people won't compete for fame. When rare goods aren't prized, the people won't steal. When desirable things aren't displayed, minds won't be disturbed. Therefore, when sages govern the world, they empty people's minds but fill their bellies, weaken their competitive ambitions while strengthening their physical foundations.

If worthiness is exalted, people will feel ashamed at not measuring up and consequently contend. If rare goods are prized, people will suffer from not obtaining them and consequently steal. If desirable things are displayed, people will grow anxious from lacking them, leading to social chaos. Yet to completely abolish worthiness, treasures, and desires because of this would be wrong. The sage's method is: employing the worthy without glorifying them, keeping treasures without valuing them, permitting desires without flaunting them. Thus the worthy are employed without public contention, and precious objects remain visible without inspiring theft or disorder. This is how minds are emptied without affecting material sufficiency, and competitive wills are weakened without harming physical strength.

If instead worthiness is exalted, treasures flaunted, and desires stimulated, the people's minds and material cravings will both become excessive. If these things are completely abolished, the people's willpower will decline and their bodies weaken. The former leads to endless contention; the latter leads to the neglect of all affairs. Zhao explains: Empty minds and full bellies result precisely from rulers neither glorifying, nor flaunting, nor stimulating—thereby preserving the people's simplicity. Some say "emptying the mind to nurture the Dao" is a fine sentiment, but it's not this chapter's main point.

The key to the sage's governance is letting people abide in their original nature. Too much knowledge disrupts this nature, so people must be kept simple, preventing the clever from daring to act recklessly.

 殘性命之分多欲以傷性命之情名曰治  之亂孰甚焉故常使民無知無欲不以妄  者衒之則民不知所慕淡乎其無所欲雖  有知者無所用巧矣趙曰知無所慕不敢  爲也政和曰辯者不敢騁其善勇者不敢  奮其忮能者不敢矜其材智者不敢施其  察此所謂使夫知者不敢爲也 爲無爲則無不治矣  即用三者之自然而不尚不貴不見所謂  爲無爲也政和曰聖人之治豈棄人絶物  而恝然自立於無事之地哉爲出於無爲  而已物有作也順之以觀其復物有生也  因之以致其成豈有不治者哉    道冲章第四 道冲而用之或似不盈淵兮似萬物之宗  夫道冲然至無耳然以之適衆有雖天地  之大山河之廣無所不遍以其無形故似  不盈者淵兮深渺吾知其爲萬物宗也而  不敢正言之故曰似萬物之宗 挫其銳解其忿和其光同其塵湛兮似或存  人莫不有道也而聖人能全之挫其銳恐  其流於妄也解其忿恐其與物構也不流  於妄不構於物外患已去而光生焉又從  而和之恐其與物異也光至潔也塵至雜  也雖塵無所不同恐其棄萬物也如是而  後全則湛然其常存雖存而人莫之識故  曰似或存耳開元曰道無不在在光在塵  皆與爲一一光塵耳而妙本非光塵也王  弼曰存而不有没而不無有無莫測故曰
Interpretation

This passage discusses the principles of governance and the nature of the Dao. When rulers excessively interfere in people's lives and damage human nature through various desires, what appears to be governance actually creates greater chaos. Therefore, the people should maintain their natural simplicity, free from excessive desires and cunning minds. When people cease to admire superficial glamour and cultivate inner tranquility, even the clever cannot employ their craftiness. The eloquent dare not flaunt their rhetoric, the brave dare not display brute force, the talented dare not boast of their abilities, and the wise dare not show off their cleverness—this is the state of "making the clever dare not act."

True governance is "governing through non-action (Wuwei)," where nothing remains ungoverned. When sages govern the world, they do not abandon human affairs but rather follow the natural patterns of things. They observe the cyclical movement as all beings arise, and nurture their natural maturation as they grow—how could anything then remain ungoverned?

Chapter Four describes the characteristics of the Dao: Though the Dao appears empty, its function is inexhaustible and unfathomable, like the origin of all things. Though formless and shapeless, it embraces all existence between heaven and earth. It blunts sharp edges, untangles complications, tempers brightness, and mingles with the dust—existing in a state that seems both present and absent.

Every person embodies the Dao to some degree, but only sages can fully preserve it. Blunting sharp edges prevents falling into falsehood; dissolving anger prevents conflict with all beings. Without falsehood or conflict, when external calamities are eliminated, inner radiance naturally manifests. Yet this radiance must be tempered, for excessive brilliance creates separation from all things. While brightness represents ultimate purity and dust represents ultimate impurity, the sage rejects neither, fearing to abandon anything. Only by achieving this can one fully preserve the Dao—seemingly faint yet profoundly elusive. As the Kaiyuan Zhenren said: The Dao is omnipresent, existing in both radiance and dust, yet its essence is neither radiance nor dust. Wang Bi explains: The Dao seems to exist yet cannot be possessed; it seems to disappear yet never ceases to be—this state of apparent presence and absence defies measurement.

 似存政和曰銳則傷紛則雜挫其銳則不  爭解其紛則不亂和其光莊子所謂光矣  而不耀也同其塵莊子所謂與物委蛇而  同其波也泰定之中天光自照惛然若忘  而存 吾不知誰子象帝之先  道雖常存終莫得而名然亦不可謂無也  故曰此豈帝之先耶帝先矣而又先於帝  則莫或先之者矣趙曰此章首尾言道挫  銳解紛和光同塵下知者不言章言人體  道者絶待玄同亦非與俗雷同也    天地不仁章第五 天地不仁以萬物爲芻狗聖人不仁以百姓 爲芻狗  天地無私而聽萬物之自然故萬物之自  生自死死非吾虐之生非吾仁之也譬如  結芻爲狗設之於祭祀盡飾以奉之夫豈  愛之時適然也旣事而棄之行者踐之夫  豈惡之亦時適然也聖人之於民亦然特  無以害之則民全其性死生得喪吾無與  焉雖未嘗仁之而仁亦大矣政和曰恩生  於害害生於恩以仁爲恩害則隨至天地  之於萬物聖人之於百姓輔其自然無愛  利之心焉仁無得而名爲芻爲狗祭祀所  用適則用之過則棄之彼萬物之自生百  姓之自治曾何容心焉 天地之間其猶橐簫乎虚而不屈動而愈出  物之而有橐有籥也方其一動氣之所及  無不靡也不知者以爲機巧極矣然橐籥  則何爲哉蓋亦虚而不屈是以動而愈出
Interpretation

This passage conveys two main layers of meaning:

The first part explains the principle of "blunting sharpness and untangling complications, harmonizing radiance and merging with the dust." As Zhuangzi described, true illumination never dazzles the eyes (guang er bu yao), and harmonizing with all things resembles following the current (yu wu wei yi er tong qi bo). When one reaches a state of profound inner stillness (taiding), natural wisdom manifests—appearing muddled yet profoundly real. The Dao existed before the Celestial Emperor; though eternal, it defies description yet cannot be said to be nonexistent. Master Zhao notes that this chapter begins and ends with discourse on the Dao, emphasizing that cultivators must soften their edges, resolve conflicts, temper their brilliance, and blend with worldly dust—yet this doesn't mean mindless conformity.

The second part discusses how "Heaven and Earth are not benevolent." They treat all things like straw dogs (chugou) used in sacrifices—showing no preference, letting them follow their natural course of life and decay. Similarly, sages treat common people without imposing deliberate kindness or harm, allowing them to preserve their innate nature. Master Zhenghe observes: Benevolence breeds harm, and harm in turn fosters benevolence. Heaven, Earth, and sages merely assist the natural development of all things without partiality. Like ritual straw dogs—used when needed, discarded afterward—all things grow naturally and people govern themselves. Why impose artificial interference?

The passage concludes with the bellows (tuoyue) metaphor: The space between Heaven and Earth resembles an empty bellows—seemingly void yet never exhausted; the more it's worked, the more wind it produces. Some consider this a clever mechanism, but the bellows itself does nothing. Precisely because of its emptiness can it generate endless motive force.

 耳天地之間其所以生殺萬物彫刻衆形  者亦若是而已矣政和曰橐籥虚而能受  受而能應故應而不窮有實其中則觸處  皆礙 多言數窮不如守中  見其動而愈出不知其爲虚中之報也故  告之以多言數窮不如守中之不窮也陸  曰萬物資天地而生天地無取於萬物也  百姓仰聖人而治聖人無假於百姓也猶  芻狗因神明而成神明無用於芻狗也夫  唯無用則無私無私則無恩是以天地無  恩而大恩生聖人不仁而大仁成故百姓  不辭德於聖人萬物不謝生於天地何以  知其然哉吾觀天地之間猶橐籥之無心  也橐籥無心故其聲不屈其氣愈出天地  無心故生成而不息聖人無心故爲治而  不至於多言多言而無實則動數窮矣未  若無爲無言乃守中之術也    谷神不死章第六 谷神不死是謂玄牝  谷至虚而猶有形谷神則虚而無形也虚  而無形尚無有生安有死耶謂之谷神言  其德也謂之玄牝言功也牝生萬物而謂  之玄焉言見其生之而不見其所以生也  孫思邈曰谷神虚而靈者也政和曰有形  則有盛衰有數則有成壞形數具而生死  分物之理也谷應群動而常虚神妙萬物  而常寂眞常之中與道爲一不麗於形不  墮於數生生而不窮故云不死谷神以況  至道之常玄牝以明造物之妙 玄牝之門是謂天地根
Interpretation

Between heaven and earth, the power that generates all things and shapes myriad forms operates much like the workings of bellows (tuóyuè). The bellows must remain hollow inside to contain air—only through this capacity can it produce an unceasing dynamic force. If the bellows were stuffed with solid matter, it would become obstructed at every turn. This is akin to how excessive speech quickly exhausts one's reasoning, making it better to maintain a state of tranquil emptiness and centered stillness.

People observe the bellows continuously expelling air when pumped, yet fail to realize this is precisely because its interior remains void. Thus, Laozi reminds us: excessive speech eventually reaches its limit, while abiding in the Dao of central emptiness endures. Just as the myriad things rely on heaven and earth to grow, yet heaven and earth demand nothing in return; the people depend on sages for governance, yet sages require no power from the people. Like straw dogs (chúgǒu) used in rituals that derive meaning from the divine, yet the deities have no need for these offerings. It is precisely through non-imposition that impartiality arises; with impartiality, there is no expectation of repayment. Thus, heaven and earth appear heartless yet accomplish great benevolence; sages seem unkind yet achieve supreme kindness. The people do not consciously thank the sage's virtue, nor do the myriad things repay heaven and earth's nourishment.

Why is this so? Observe the operation of heaven and earth as you would observe mindless bellows: the bellows has no mind, thus its sound never ceases and its airflow remains inexhaustible; heaven and earth have no mind, thus their creative transformations never stop; the sage has no mind, thus governing the world involves no excessive intervention. Excessive speech without substance leads action into predicaments. Better to emulate the Dao of wuwei (non-action) and wordless teaching—this is the essential method for preserving one's fundamental truth.

Regarding the profound meaning of "The valley spirit never dies" (Chapter 6): The valley spirit (the Dao's characteristic of empty mystery) exists eternally and may be called the "mysterious feminine" (xuánpìn—the wondrous creative power of the maternal). A valley is supremely empty yet still has form, whereas the valley spirit is so empty it transcends all form and appearance. Without physical existence, how could there be life or death? Calling it "valley spirit" describes its virtue (De), while naming it "mysterious feminine" reveals its function. Though the maternal gives birth to all things, we call it "mysterious" because we only see manifested life, not life's primordial source.

Sun Simiao said the valley spirit is an existence both empty and luminous. The Zhenghé Master observed: Where there is form, there is flourishing and decay; where there is fixed measure, there is completion and destruction. Once form and measure exist, life and death follow—this is the pattern of all things. Yet the valley responds to all sounds while maintaining stillness, miraculously nurturing all beings while remaining profoundly silent. Merged with the Dao in the realm of constant truth, it neither clings to form nor falls into fixed measure—ever-generating, thus called "never dying." The valley spirit metaphorizes the Dao's eternity, while the mysterious feminine illuminates creation's profundity.

That gateway of the mysterious feminine (the mechanism of creation) constitutes the very root of heaven and earth. Just as the maternal birth canal is life's origin, the Dao continuously generates heaven, earth and the myriad things through this mysterious portal.

 玄牝之門言萬物自是出也天地根言天  地自是生也 綿綿若存用之不勤  綿綿微而不絶也若存存而不可見也能  如是雖終日用之而不勞矣王弼曰欲言  存耶不見其形欲言亡耶萬物以生故綿  綿若存無物不成而用不勞故曰不勤趙  曰此章言道無爲無形生天生地自古以  固存河公以玄牝爲口鼻養生者尚之何  其小哉    天長地乆章第七 天長地久  天地雖大未離於形數則其長久蓋有量  矣然老子言長乆極於天地蓋以人所見  者言之耳若夫長乆之至則所謂天地根  者是也 天地所以能長且乆者以其不自生故能長 生是以聖人後其身而身先外其身而身存 非以其無私耶故能成其私  天地生萬物而不自生立於萬物之外故  能長生聖人後其身而先人外其身而利  人處衆人之表故能先且存如使天地與  物競生而聖人與人爭得則天地亦一物  耳聖人亦一人耳何以大過之哉雖彼其  無私非以求成私也而私以之成道則固  然耳巨濟曰聖人與天地同則後身外身  如天地之不自生身先身存如天地之能  長生後身則人下之故身先外身則人保  之故身存政和曰自營爲私未有能成其  私者也    上善若水章第八 上善若水水善利萬物而不爭處衆人之所 惡故幾於道
Interpretation

This passage elucidates several core concepts about the Dao from the Daode Jing:

Regarding the "Mysterious Feminine Gate" (referring to the creative portal of the Dao) and the "Root of Heaven and Earth" (the primordial source of the Dao), the scripture states that all things originate from the Dao, and even Heaven and Earth are born from it. Though subtle and invisible, the Dao never exhausts itself—all beings rely on it yet never deplete it. Commentators like Wang Bi and the Zhao lineage emphasize the Dao's formless nature and Wuwei (non-action), eternally existing since antiquity. He Shang Gong's interpretation limiting the "Mysterious Feminine" to breathing techniques for longevity is overly narrow.

Chapter Seven explains why Heaven and Earth endure: their longevity stems from not existing for themselves ("not self-generating"), thus achieving perpetual existence. Sages emulate this by placing themselves behind others yet finding themselves ahead, by not clinging to life yet preserving it fully. Is this not because they are selfless? Precisely thus do they fulfill themselves. Were Heaven and Earth to compete with creatures for survival, or sages to contend with people for gain, they would become no different from ordinary beings. By modeling Heaven and Earth—yielding precedence yet being elevated, disregarding self yet being preserved—the sage embodies true fulfillment. Those who deliberately seek personal gain ultimately fail to realize themselves.

Chapter Eight uses water to symbolize the Dao: The highest virtue resembles water, which nourishes all things without contention, willingly dwelling in low places people disdain. Thus it comes nearest to the Dao's perfection.

 易曰一陰一陽之謂道繼之者善也成之  者性也又曰天一生水蓋道運而爲善猶  氣運而爲水也故曰上善若水二者皆自  無而始成形故其理同道無所不在無所  不利而水亦然然而旣已麗於形則於道  有間矣故曰幾於道矣然而可名之善未  有若此者也故曰上善 居善地心善淵與善仁言善信政善治事善 能動善時  避高趍下未嘗有所逆善地也空虚靜默  深不可測善淵也利澤萬物施而不求報  善仁也規必旋方必折塞必止决必流善  信也洗滌群穢平側高下善治也遇物賦  形不留於一善能也冬凝春泮涸溢不失  節善時也 夫唯不爭故無尤  有善而不免於人非者以其爭也水唯不  爭七善而無尤    持而盈之章第九 持而盈之不如其已揣而銳之不可長保  知盈之必溢以持固之不若不盈之安也  知銳之必折而以揣先之不知揣之不可  必恃也若夫聖人有而不有尚安有盈循  理而後行尚安有銳無盈則無所用持無  銳則無所用揣矣政和曰持盈以防溢而  盈之則重溢也故勢必傾危如欲勿溢則  莫如勿盈也揣所以慮失而銳之則重失  也如欲勿失則莫如勿銳也 金玉滿堂莫之能守富貴而驕自遺其咎功 成名遂身退天之道  日中則移月滿則虧四時之運功成者去
Interpretation

The Yijing (Book of Changes) states that the alternation of Yin and Yang constitutes the movement of the Dao (the Way), and to sustain this pattern is called goodness, while to fulfill it is called nature. It also says, "Heaven first generates water," meaning the operation of the Dao produces goodness just as the movement of Qi (vital energy) gives rise to water. Thus, the highest goodness resembles water—both begin from formlessness and gradually take shape, sharing the same principle as the Dao. The Dao is omnipresent and benefits all things, just as water does. However, once form manifests, it differs from the pure Dao, which is why water is said to be merely close to the Dao. Yet among all named forms of goodness, none come closer to the Dao than water, hence it is called "supreme goodness."

Water embodies seven virtues:

1. It dwells in low places without contending for height—this is "goodness of place."

2. Its heart is empty, still, and profound—this is "goodness of depth."

3. It nourishes all things without seeking reward—this is "goodness of benevolence."

4. It turns when encountering roundness, bends when meeting squareness, stops when blocked, and flows when breached—this is "goodness of trustworthiness."

5. It cleanses filth and levels unevenness—this is "goodness of governance."

6. It takes the shape of any container without clinging to fixed form—this is "goodness of adaptability."

7. It freezes in winter, melts in spring, and its ebb and flow follow the seasons—this is "goodness of timeliness."

Because water does not contend with others, it is free from fault. Other things may possess goodness but inevitably invite criticism due to their competitive nature. Only water achieves all seven virtues without contention, thus remaining flawless.

Chapter Nine explains:

Carrying a brimming basin of water is less stable than leaving it unfilled; over-sharpening a blade makes it difficult to retain its edge. Knowing that fullness leads to spillage, it is better not to fill to the limit than to strain to maintain it. Knowing that excessive sharpness leads to breakage, it is better not to hone too keenly than to preemptively grind. The sage possesses without claiming—how could there be an issue of excess? Acting in accordance with principle—how could there be a problem of锋芒毕露 (flaunting sharpness)? Without pursuing fullness, there is no need to labor to sustain it; without displaying锋芒 (sharpness), there is no need to deliberately hone it. The Zhenghe commentary notes: Striving to prevent spillage by forcefully maintaining fullness only makes overturning more likely; seeking to avoid error by excessive sharpness only increases the risk of mistakes. Thus, the best approach is to avoid extremes.

A house filled with gold and silver cannot be kept secure; arrogance after attaining wealth and honor invites calamity. To withdraw at the height of achievement and fame aligns with the Dao of Heaven. The sun declines after reaching its zenith; the moon wanes after becoming full—the cycle of the four seasons also follows this principle of withdrawing after fulfillment.

 天地尚然而況於人乎政和曰寳金玉者  累於物累於物者能勿失乎故莫之能守  富貴而驕則害於德害於德者能免於患  乎故自遺其咎    載營魄章第十 載營魄抱一能無離乎  魄之所以異於魂者魄爲物魂爲神也易  曰精氣爲物遊魂爲變是故知鬼神之情  狀魄爲物故雜而止魂爲神故一而變謂  之營魄者言其止也蓋道無所不在其於  人爲性而性之妙爲神言其純而未雜則  謂之一言其聚而未散則謂之樸其歸皆  道也各從其實言之耳聖人性定而神凝  不爲物遷雖以魄爲舍而神所欲行魄無  不從則神常載魄矣衆人以物役性神昏  而不治則神聽於魄耳目困於聲色口鼻  勞於嗅味魄所欲行而神從之則魄常抱  神矣故教之以抱神載魄使兩者不相離  此固聖人所以修身之要至于古之眞人  深根固蔕長生乆視之道亦猶是也陸曰  載夫也發語之端也政和曰魄陰也麗于  體而有所止故老氏於魄言營魂陽也託  於氣而無不之故易於魂言遊聖人以神  御形以魂制魄故神常載魂而不載於魄  天一生水於物爲精地二生火於物爲神  精神生於道形本生於精守而勿失與神  爲一則精與神合而不雜以精集神以神  使形以形存神精全而不虧神用而不與  形生而不敝如日月之麗乎天如草木之  麗乎土未嘗離也
Interpretation

Does not even the movement of Heaven and Earth follow natural laws, let alone humans? The Zhenghe commentary (from Emperor Huizong of Song's era) states: Those who treasure gold, silver, and precious jade become burdened by external things. How can those weighed down by material attachments avoid losing their true nature? Thus such possessions ultimately cannot be retained.

Wealth and honor lead to arrogance and indulgence, which damages De (Virtue). How can those with impaired De escape calamity? Hence these misfortunes are self-inflicted.

Chapter Ten discusses the relationship between "yingpo" (the corporeal soul governing the physical body) and "hun" (the ethereal soul). Can one truly unite spirit and form without separation?

The distinction lies in this: Po governs the physical body (yin aspect), while hun governs the spiritual consciousness (yang aspect). The Book of Changes states that refined Qi (vital energy) forms the body, and wandering hun creates transformation—thus we comprehend the nature of spirits. Po belongs to the material realm, therefore mixed and quiescent; hun belongs to the spiritual realm, therefore pure and changing. "Yingpo" emphasizes stability. The Dao permeates all things—in humans it manifests as innate nature, whose most refined expression is the spiritual consciousness (shenhun).

The state of perfect purity is called "One"; the state of undifferentiated unity is called "Uncarved Block"—both ultimately express the Dao from different perspectives. The sage's mind remains tranquil, spirit concentrated, undisturbed by external things. Though dwelling in the po (physical form), wherever the shenhun moves, the po follows—this is the spirit carrying the corporeal soul. Ordinary people, however, become enslaved by external objects, their consciousness confused and uncontrolled—here the shenhun obeys the po instead. When eyes and ears are trapped by sights and sounds, when mouth and nose chase after flavors, the po's desires dominate the shenhun's obedience—this is the corporeal soul hijacking the spirit. Therefore Laozi teaches people to let shenhun lead the po, maintaining their inseparability. This constitutes the essential method of sage self-cultivation, just as ancient Zhenren (perfected beings) achieved profound rootedness and longevity through similar practices.

Lu Xisheng (Tang dynasty scholar) explains: "Zai" functions as a grammatical particle. The Zhenghe commentary holds that po, being yin, depends on physical form with inherent limitations—hence Laozi describes it as "ying" (garrisoned); hun, being yang, relies on Qi and moves boundlessly—thus the Book of Changes describes it as "wandering." Sages use shenhun to govern form and hun to restrain po, ensuring the spirit always carries the soul rather than being controlled by it.

In cosmic generation theory, Heaven's One generates water, manifesting in humans as Jing (essence); Earth's Two generates fire, manifesting as Shen (spirit). Shenhun originates from the Dao, physical form from refined Qi. Preserving unspilled Jing to unite with shenhun achieves undifferentiated fusion of essence and spirit. Using Jing to concentrate shenhun, shenhun to direct the body, and the body to nourish the spirit—this creates abundant essence without depletion, where spirit functions unimpeded by physical burdens. Like the sun and moon suspended in heaven, like plants rooted in earth—never separated.

專氣致柔能如嬰兒乎  神不治則氣亂强者好鬪弱者喜畏不自  知也神治則氣不妄作喜怒各以其類是  之謂專氣神虚之至也氣實之始也虚之  極爲柔實之極爲剛純性而亡氣是之謂  致柔嬰兒不知好惡是以性全性全而氣  微氣微而體柔專氣致柔能如嬰兒極矣  政和曰靜而不雜謂之專和而不暴謂之  柔嬰兒居不知其所爲行不知其所之不  藏是非美惡故氣專而致柔孟子曰蹶者  趨者是氣也而反動其心心不能以專氣  則氣有蹶趨之不正而心至於動動則不  可繫聖人虚己以遊世心無使氣之强則  其靜而不雜和而不暴與嬰兒何擇故曰  能如嬰兒乎 滌除玄覽能無疪乎  聖人外不爲魄所載内不爲氣所使則其  滌除塵垢盡矣於是其神廓然玄覽萬物  知其皆出於性等觀靜穢而無所瑕疪矣  滌除萬行而不有玄覽妙理而默識 愛民治國能無爲乎  旣以治身又推其餘以及人雖至於愛民  治國一以無心遇之苟其有心則愛民者  適足以害之治國者適足以亂之也 天門開闔能爲雌乎  天門者治亂廢興所從出也旣以身任天  下者其開闔變會之間衆人貴得而患失  則先事而徼福聖人循理而知天命則待  唱而後和易曰先天而天弗違非先天也  後天而奉天時非後天也言其先後常與
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the essential principles of Daoist self-cultivation, with its core being the return to an infant-like state of pristine purity.

First, let's examine "concentrating Qi to attain softness" (专气致柔): When one's spirit (Shen) lacks self-mastery, the Qi within becomes disordered—the strong tend toward conflict, the weak toward fear, all without self-awareness. When the spirit gains control, Qi no longer moves chaotically, and emotions like joy and anger remain balanced. This state is called "concentrating Qi." When the spirit reaches utmost emptiness and tranquility, Qi naturally becomes substantial. Extreme emptiness manifests as pliancy, while extreme substance manifests as strength. Preserving innate nature while diminishing acquired habits—this is "attaining softness."

Infants, unaware of distinctions between likes and dislikes, preserve their innate nature intact. Those with complete innate nature have gentle Qi and naturally supple bodies. The Daoist master Zhenghe further explains: an undisturbed and uncluttered mind is "concentrated," while peacefulness without harshness is "soft." Infants act without deliberate purpose, harboring no mental distinctions between right/wrong or beautiful/ugly—thus their Qi remains concentrated and soft. As Mencius said, when thoughts scatter, one's breath becomes as unsteady as a limping gait. Sages maintain mental emptiness, never letting aggressive Qi dominate, naturally achieving an infant's purity.

Next is "cleansing the mysterious mirror" (涤除玄览): Sages neither succumb to external temptations (associated with the Po, or corporeal soul) nor are driven by internal emotions (Qi), thus purifying their mental dust. With transparent spirit, they perceive (玄览) the essence of all things, understanding everything originates from Dao-nature. Viewing reality without discrimination, they remain flawless. Though experiencing worldly affairs, they maintain detachment; though comprehending principles, they embody silent realization.

Regarding "loving the people and governing the state" (爱民治国): Sages first cultivate themselves, then extend this practice to statecraft. Even when caring for people and administering governance, they maintain Wuwei (non-action). Forced efforts to "love" may harm, and deliberate "governing" may bring chaos.

Finally, the "opening and closing of the celestial gate" (天门开阖): The celestial gate symbolizes the pivot between order/chaos and prosperity/decline. When sages shoulder the world's burdens during pivotal transitions (开阖), ordinary people fret over gains/losses and rush results. But sages follow heavenly timing—as the Yijing states: neither rushing ahead of heaven's will nor lagging behind its timing, they always harmonize perfectly with the Dao's movement.

 天命會耳不然先天者必早後天者必暮  皆失之矣故所謂能爲雌乎者亦不失時  而已政和曰知其雄守其雌爲天下谿 明白四達能無知乎  内以治身外以治國至於臨變莫不有道  非明白四達而能之乎明白四達心也是  心無所不知然而未嘗有能知之心也夫  心一而已茍又有能知之心者則是二也  自一而二蔽之所自生愚之所自始也今  夫鏡之於物來而應之則已矣又安得知  應物者乎本則無有以意加之此妄之源  也政和曰聰明聖智守之以愚 生之畜之生而不有爲而不恃長而不宰是 謂玄德  其道足以生畜萬物又能不有不恃不宰  雖有大德物莫知也故曰玄德王雱曰此  篇自爲士以至於體神入聖修身之序盡  矣    三十輻章第十一 三十輻共一轂當其無有車之用埏埴以爲 器當其無有器之用鑿户牖以爲室當其無 有室之用故有之以爲利無之以爲用  竭知盡物以爲器而器之用常在其無有  中非有則無無以致其用非無則有有以  施其利是以聖人常無以觀其妙常有以  觀其徼知此兩者之爲一而不可分則至  矣    五色章第十一一 五色令人目盲五音令人耳聾五味令人口 爽  視色聽音嘗味其本皆出於性而未有物  也至矣及其目縁五色耳縁五音口縁五
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the Daoist wisdom of self-cultivation and worldly conduct, centered on grasping the dialectical relationship between "being" (you) and "non-being" (wu).

Regarding the distinction between the innate and acquired: Those who follow natural laws (heavenly mandate) act with perfect timing, while those who violate these principles constantly miss their moment. The truly wise understand the value of maintaining softness and humility (shou ci), embracing all things like the valleys of the world. This wisdom extends universally without deliberate display, benefiting both personal cultivation and state governance.

The original nature of the mind is pure unity. The very thought "I want to know" creates duality (er xin), just as a mirror naturally reflects objects without consciously remembering which reflection is the mirror itself. The genuinely wise appear simple-minded, giving birth to all things without claiming possession, accomplishing deeds without taking credit—this embodies the profoundest "mysterious De" (xuan de).

Three metaphors illustrate the function of "non-being": Thirty spokes converge at the hollow hub to make the wheel turn; empty space within pottery creates its usefulness; doors and windows form the livable spaces in houses. Thus while "being" provides convenience, it's "non-being" that truly enables function. Sages contemplate the mystery of "non-being" while recognizing the boundaries of "being," understanding their fundamental unity.

Finally, it warns against sensory excess: Gorgeous colors blind the eyes, enchanting music deafens the ears, and rich flavors dull the palate. While these pleasures originate from natural inclinations, excessive pursuit of external stimuli leads to losing one's true nature. Just as hunting on horseback agitates the spirit, rare treasures tempt improper conduct. Therefore, sages focus on inner cultivation rather than chasing external pleasures.

 味奪其所縁而忘其本則雖見而實盲雖  聞而實聾雖嘗而實爽也羅什曰不知即  色之空與聲相空與聾盲何異 馳騁田獵令人心發狂難得之貨令人行妨 是以聖人爲腹不爲目故去彼取此  聖人視色聽音嘗味皆與人同至於馳騁  田獵未嘗不爲而難得之貨未嘗不用也  然人著以爲病而聖人獨以爲福何也聖  人爲腹而衆人爲目目貪而不能受腹受  而未嘗貪故也彼物之自外至者此性之  凝於内者也陸曰爲腹則知止足不爲目  則不見可欲    寵辱章第十三 寵辱若驚貴大患若身  古之達人驚寵如驚辱知寵之爲辱先也  貴身如貴大患知身之爲患本也是以遺  寵而辱不及忘身而患不至 何謂寵辱寵爲下得之若驚失之若驚是謂 寵辱若驚  所謂寵辱非兩物也辱生於寵而世不悟  以寵爲上以辱爲下者皆是也若知辱生  於寵則寵固爲下矣故古之達人得寵若  驚未嘗安寵而驚辱也所謂若驚非實驚  也若驚而已光曰唯凡聖情盡者無驚 何謂貴大患若身吾所以有大患者爲吾有 身及吾無身吾有何患  貴之爲言難也有身大患之本而世之士  難於履大患不難於有身故聖人因其履  患而教之以難於有身知有身之爲難而  大患去矣性之於人生不能加死不能損  其大可以充塞天地其精可以蹈水火入
Interpretation

This passage conveys two main ideas: the moderation of sensory desires, and the wisdom regarding favor/disgrace and the body.

First, concerning sensory desires. Ordinary people are deluded by external temptations of sights, sounds, and material gains—like seeing with eyes yet remaining blind, hearing with ears yet staying deaf, tasting with tongue yet losing true flavor. Hunting and chasing after things drive their minds to frenzy, while rare objects distort their behavior. Sages are different. Though they also see colors, hear sounds, hunt, and use precious items, they never become obsessed. The distinction lies in how ordinary people pursue things through their "eyes" (external desires), while sages perceive through their "belly" (inner needs). The belly can contain without greed, whereas the eyes crave endlessly without satisfaction.

Next, regarding the concept of favor and disgrace. The ancients understood that favor and disgrace are two sides of the same coin. When favored, they remained as vigilant as when disgraced, knowing that favor could invite humiliation. They valued their bodies as seriously as they would a great calamity, recognizing that the body itself is the root of all troubles. Thus, by not seeking favor, they avoided disgrace; by forgetting the body as a source of calamity, they prevented misfortune. The saying "favor and disgrace seem alarming" doesn't imply actual fear, but rather constant vigilance. Those truly enlightened (whose ordinary and sage-like sentiments are exhausted) never experience panic at all.

Concerning the body as the "great calamity," worldly people always view hardships as difficulties, yet never consider having a body to be problematic. Sages teach people to regard "possessing a body" itself as the fundamental challenge—understanding that the body is the root of all calamities—so the great calamity naturally dissolves. Human nature remains unaffected by life and death; its vastness can fill heaven and earth, while its subtlety can penetrate through fire and water.

 金石凡物莫能患也然天下嘗患亡失本  性而惟身之爲貴見愛身之情篤而物始  能患之矣生死疾病之變攻之於内寵辱  得失之變纓之於外未有一物而非患者  夫惟達人知性之無壞而身之非實忽然  忘身而天下之患盡去然後可以涉世而  無累矣趙曰肇云大患莫若於有身故滅  身以歸無此則二乘境界談道者以不驚  寵辱遺身滅智爲極則豈知聖人之㫖哉  政和曰據利勢擅賞罰作福天下畏之如  神明尊之如上帝可謂貴矣聖人則不以  貴自累故能長守貴而無患譬如人身墮  支體黜聰明離形去智通於大同則無入  而不自得也世之人以物易性故累物而  忘勢以形累心故喪心不能忘形其患大  矣夫死生亦大矣而無變於己況得喪福  禍之所介乎此古之至人所以不以利累  形不以形累心視萬物與我將擇焉不可  得則吾身非吾有也上與造物者遊下與  外死生無終始者爲友吾有何患且寵者  世所榮也而以爲辱貴者人所樂也而以  爲患蓋外物之不可恃理固然矣誠能有  之以無有則雖寵而不辱雖貴而無患 故貴以身爲天下若可寄天下愛以身爲天 下若可託天下  人之所以騖於權利溺於富貴犯難而不  悔者欲將以厚其身耳今也禄之以天下  而重以身任之則其忘身也至矣如此而
Interpretation

Nothing in this world can truly harm a person, yet people often lose their original nature by excessively valuing their physical form, thereby creating distress. When one becomes overly attached to self-preservation, external things can indeed cause harm. Life, death, and illness assail from within, while glory, disgrace, gain, and loss entangle from without—there is nothing that does not become a source of suffering.

Those who are truly enlightened understand that their original nature cannot be damaged and that the body is not ultimately real. When one suddenly forgets the body, all worldly worries vanish, allowing one to live in the world without attachments. Scholar Zhao said: "The greatest suffering lies in possessing a body, so one must eliminate the body to return to emptiness"—this is merely the view of the Hinayana Buddhist school. Those who speak of cultivating the Dao take not being disturbed by glory or disgrace, abandoning the body, and extinguishing wisdom as the highest principles. How could they grasp the true intention of the sages?

Master Zhenghe (Emperor Huizong of Song) said: Those who wield power, control rewards and punishments, and bring blessings to the world are revered by people as divine and honored as gods—truly the pinnacle of nobility. Yet the sage is not bound by such nobility, and thus can maintain it eternally without distress. Just as one casts off the constraints of limbs, discards cleverness and wisdom, transcends form and mind, and merges with the Dao, one becomes free and at ease in any circumstance. Ordinary people trade their innate nature for external things, thus becoming burdened by objects and forgetting their essence. They let their physical form weigh down their spirit, losing their true heart and failing to transcend form—this is the greatest suffering.

Life and death are significant matters, yet they do not affect those who have attained the Dao—how much less so minor concerns like gain, loss, fortune, or misfortune? The ancient perfected ones did not allow profit to burden their form, nor their form to burden their spirit. They regarded all things as equal to themselves, and when faced with no choice, they realized that "my body does not truly belong to me." Roaming above with the Creator, befriending below those who transcend life and death without beginning or end—what could they possibly have to worry about? The glory pursued by the world is seen by them as disgrace; the nobility coveted by the world is seen by them as suffering. For external things are inherently unreliable—this is the principle of nature. If one can hold all things with an attitude of "non-being," then even when honored, one will not feel disgraced, and even when noble, one will not suffer distress.

Therefore, only those who value governing the world more than themselves can be entrusted with it; only those who cherish the world as they cherish themselves can be given its care. People chase power and profit, indulge in wealth and status, and take risks without regret—all in pursuit of personal benefit. But if one were to offer them the entire world as their reward, and they still prioritized fulfilling their duty over their own well-being, this selfless state would reach its ultimate expression.

 以天下予之雖天下之大不能患之矣政  和曰天下大器也非道莫運天下神器也  非道莫守聖人體道故在宥天下天下樂  推而不厭其次則知貴其身而不自賤以  役於物者若可寄而已知愛其身而不自  賊以困於物者則可託而已故曰道之眞  以治身緒餘以治國家土苴以治天下世  之君子乃危身棄生以徇物豈不悲哉光  曰物爲身患身爲道患忘物則身全忘身  則道備雖忘外累貴愛尚存可寄可託而  已身物俱忘以道自任藏天下於天下也  趙曰以天下之患爲身之患則忘貴愛矣  故可以寄託天下古之聖人身處南面之  尊其自視如山林道人不以聲色富貴動  其心則天下不能爲之累矣    視之不見章第十四 視之不見名曰夷聽之不聞名曰希搏之不 得名曰微此三者不可致詰故混而爲一  視之而見者色也所以見色者不可見也  聽之而聞者聲也所以聞聲者不可聞也  搏之而得者觸也所以得觸者不可得也  此三者雖智者不能詰也要必混而歸於  一而後可爾所謂一者性也三者性之用  也人始有性而已矣乃其與物搆然  裂四出爲視爲聽爲搏日用而不知反其  本而爲一則日遠矣若推而廣之  則佛氏所謂六入皆然矣首楞嚴有云反  流全一六用不行此之謂也趙曰曰夷曰
Interpretation

Though the world is vast, if entrusted to one who comprehends the Dao (the Way), no calamity will arise. Zhenhe Zhenren (the Daoist title of Emperor Huizong of Song) remarked: The world is like a precious vessel—without the Dao, it cannot function; the world is like a sacred vessel—without the Dao, it cannot be preserved. The sage understands the Dao and thus governs through wuwei (non-action), while the people naturally support him without growing weary. Those of lesser attainment know to value themselves, refusing to degrade their being as slaves to material things—such individuals may temporarily be entrusted with the world. Those who cherish themselves without harming their essence or becoming trapped by external matters may also temporarily govern the world. Thus, the essence of the Dao is used to cultivate the self; what remains may govern the state, and the dregs may govern the world. Yet modern gentlemen harm their bodies and abandon their lives in pursuit of external things—is this not lamentable?

Guang Zhenren (one of the commentators) explained: External things are calamities to the body, and the body is an obstacle to cultivating the Dao. By forgetting external things, one preserves the body; by forgetting the body, one perfects the Dao. Though such a person may forget external burdens, their care for self-preservation remains—thus they may only temporarily govern the world. Only one who utterly forgets both self and externals, wholly identifying with the Dao while "hiding the world within the world" (acting in accord with nature), is a true master of the Way.

Zhao Zhenren (another commentator) added: One who treats the world's calamities as their own transcends mere self-love—only such a person may be entrusted with the world. The ancient sages, though occupying imperial thrones, regarded themselves as recluses in mountain forests, unmoved by sensual pleasures or wealth. Thus, nothing in the world could burden them.

In the commentary to Chapter 14 ("Looked at but unseen"): What is looked at but unseen is called "Yi" (formless); listened to but unheard is called "Xi" (soundless); grasped at but unfelt is called "Wei" (intangible). These three states cannot be interrogated further, for they are originally blended into one. We see forms and colors, but what enables seeing cannot itself be seen; we hear sounds, but what enables hearing cannot itself be heard; we touch objects, but what enables touching cannot itself be touched. Even the wise cannot trace these three faculties to their source—they must be blended and returned to unity to be understood. This "One" is human nature; the three faculties are its functions. Originally, humans possessed only pure nature, but contact with the world divided it into seeing, hearing, and touching—used daily yet never returning to the source, drifting ever farther from the One. Extending this principle, Buddhism's "six entrances" (senses of eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind) follow the same pattern. The Śūraṅgama Sūtra states, "Return to the source and merge into one, where the six faculties cease their functions"—this speaks precisely of such realization.

 希曰微曰一皆道之强名道體之妙心困  焉而不能知口辟焉而不能言豈可以視  聽搏取也哉世人視不過色聽不同聲非  眞知也若能無見之見見不以目而以耳  無聞之聞聞不以耳而以目則眼如耳耳  如鼻六根互用此莊子所謂氣聽列子所  謂視聽不以耳目則混而爲一矣 其上不皦其下不昧  物之有形者皆麗於陰陽故上皦下昧不  可逃也道雖在上而不皦在下而不昧不  可以形數推之陸曰上與日月同光其光  不皦下與瓦礫同寂其明不昧 繩繩不可名復歸於無物  繩繩運而不絶也人見其運而不絶則以  爲有物矣不知其卒歸於無物也 是謂無狀之狀無物之象是謂惚恍  狀其著也象其微也無狀之狀無物之象  皆非無也有無不可名是謂惚恍陸曰繩  繩然運行而不絶不可得而名之雖千變  萬化復歸於無物然道體眞精本非無物  但不可以視聽摶執而得之故謂之無質  之狀無形之象言其狀則惚然若無言其  象則恍然若有 迎之不見其首隨之不見其後  道無所不在故無前後可見陸曰莫知其  始故迎之不見其首莫知其終故隨之不  見其後 執古之道以御今之有能知古始是謂道紀  古者物之所從生也有者物之今則無者  物之古也執其所從生則進退徐疾在我
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the profound mystery of the Dao (the Way). As the cosmic origin, the Dao defies verbal description—we reluctantly name it "rare," "subtle," or "the One." Its essence is so refined that the mind cannot grasp it, words cannot express it, nor can ordinary perception through eyes or ears apprehend it.

Ordinary people typically perceive only colors and sounds, which do not constitute true understanding. To reach the state where one "sees without using the eyes and hears without using the ears," allowing the senses to function interchangeably—as Zhuangzi spoke of "listening with Qi" or Liezi described "seeing and hearing without eyes and ears"—is to achieve the unity of self and all things.

Above, the Dao does not appear glaringly bright; below, it does not seem dim or obscure. Ordinary tangible things are governed by Yin-Yang principles, so they inevitably have distinctions of light and darkness. Yet the Dao transcends such dualities and cannot be measured by concrete forms. As Lu Xisheng explained: "Above, it shares radiance with the sun and moon yet does not dazzle; below, it mingles with tiles and pebbles yet does not darken."

The Dao operates like an unbroken thread, ceaselessly flowing. People observe its continuous movement and mistake it for something tangible, yet ultimately, it returns to nothingness. This is what is called "the form of the formless, the image of the imageless," referred to as "vague and indistinct" (huhuang)—seemingly empty yet truly present, said to exist but indescribable, said to be nothing yet actively functioning. Lu Xisheng clarifies: "Though the Dao transforms endlessly, it ultimately returns to nothingness. Its essence is real, yet it cannot be directly grasped through the senses. Hence, it is called 'a form without substance, an image without shape.'"

If you try to meet it, you cannot see its beginning; if you follow it, you cannot find its end—because the Dao is omnipresent and thus has no distinction of front or back. Lu Xisheng remarks: "Since we do not know its origin, we cannot see its head when approaching; since we do not know its conclusion, we cannot see its tail when following."

By holding fast to the eternal Dao, one can master the transformations of all things in the present. To know the primordial origin of all things is to grasp the guiding principle of the Dao. "Ancient" signifies the source from which all things arise, while "existence" refers to the myriad beings of the present. By comprehending this origin, one responds effortlessly to all changes.

 矣陸曰唯能執古無爲之道御今有爲之  名者乃可還淳反樸復於太古之初能知  古之淳樸斯乃大道之紀綱吕曰所謂古  者非異於今也以知古之所自始也所謂  今者非異於古也以知今之所從來也誠  知古之所自始則知今之所從來始無所  自來無所從此所謂無端之紀    古之善爲士章第十五 古之善爲士者微妙玄通深不可識  粗盡而微微極而妙妙極而玄玄則無所  不通而深不可識矣 夫唯不可識故强爲之容豫若冬涉川  戒而後動曰豫其所欲爲猶迫而後應豫  然若冬涉川逡巡如不得已也 猶若畏四鄰  疑而不行曰猶其所不欲遲而難之猶然  若畏四鄰之見之也 儼若容  無所不敬未嘗墮也 涣若冰將釋  知萬物之出於妄未嘗有所留也政和曰  水凝而爲冰冰釋而爲水其實一體蔽於  執一者如水之凝通於大同者如冰之釋 敦兮其若樸  人僞已盡復其性也政和曰敦者厚之至  性本至厚如木之樸未散爲器 曠兮其若谷  虛而無所不受也政和曰曠者廣之極心  源無際如谷之虚受而能應 渾兮其若濁  和其光同其塵不與物異也 孰能濁以靜之徐清孰能安以動之徐生  世俗之士以物汨性則濁而不復清枯槁  之士以定滅性則安而不復生今知濁之
Interpretation

Lu Xi-sheng (Tang Dynasty Daoist) said: Only by grasping the ancient Dao of Wuwei (non-action) to govern the contemporary world of artificial constructs can one return to pristine simplicity and recover the primordial purity of the Great Antiquity. To comprehend this ancient essence is to master the fundamental principle of the Dao.

Lü Hui-qing (Song Dynasty Daoist) explained: What we call "ancient" does not oppose the present, but reveals the origin of things; what we term "modern" doesn't sever connection with antiquity, but clarifies the source of current conditions. Truly understanding beginnings leads to comprehending present manifestations. In truth, the origin knows neither coming nor going - this is the eternal law without beginning or end.

Chapter Fifteen on "The Ancients Who Mastered the Dao" describes the realm of realized adepts:

True practitioners of the Dao possess wisdom so subtle and profound, so penetrating yet unfathomable, that ordinary people cannot comprehend its depths. When coarse perception exhausts itself, one touches the subtle; when subtlety reaches its zenith, it becomes mysterious; when mystery culminates, it becomes all-pervading - this state is immeasurably profound.

Being ineffable, we can only approximate their manner through description: They move cautiously like crossing winter streams, weighing each step deliberately. Their "hesitation" resembles carefully testing responses when compelled to act; their "wariness" mirrors the caution of one fearing neighbors' observation.

Their demeanor remains reverent and dignified, never treating others lightly; their consciousness flows like thawing ice, recognizing all phenomena as illusory manifestations, thus remaining unattached. The Zhenghe Sage (Emperor Huizong's Daoist title) used the water-ice metaphor: water freezing into ice and melting back to water share one essence - the attached become congealed ice while Dao-realized beings return like flowing water to the source.

Their nature stays uncarved like raw timber, wholly rejecting artificiality to return to innate authenticity. The Zhenghe Sage said "genuine" means ultimate simplicity, like unworked wood before becoming vessels.

Their minds expand like empty valleys, embracing all with boundless openness. The Zhenghe Sage explained "expansive" means ultimate vastness - the heart-mind like infinite valleys receives and responds to all things.

They mingle with worldly dust yet remain untainted, like turbid water that appears mixed yet never loses its nature. Who can remain still until turbidity clarifies itself? Who can maintain serenity until new life stirs anew? Ordinary people become hopelessly muddled when external things disturb their essence, while forced ascetics suppress vitality into sterile rigidity. Only understanding clarity within turbidity and life within stillness preserves this Dao's true essence.

 亂性也則靜之靜而徐自清矣知滅性之  非道也則動之動而徐自生矣易曰寂然  不動感而遂通天下之故今所謂動亦若  是矣 保此道者不欲盈  盈生於極濁而不能清安而不能生所謂  盈也 夫唯不盈故能弊不新成  物未有不弊者也夫唯不盈故其弊不得  新成而自去雱曰知道者濁以乆而徐清  安以乆而徐生又不欲盈而有之故無新  成之弊    致虛極章第十六 致虛極守靜篤  致虚不極則有未亡也寧靜不篤則動未  亡也丘山雖去而微塵未盡未爲極與篤  也蓋致虚存虚猶未離有守靜存靜猶陷  於動而況其他乎不極不篤而責虚靜之  用難矣光曰虚爲有待致虚極者絶其待  絶其待則即有而虚靜爲動偶守靜篤者  亡其偶亡其偶則即動而靜故虚靜不至  者無以明道政和曰虚故足以受群實靜  故足以應群動致虚而要其實守靜而至  于篤則萬態雖雜而吾心常徹萬變雖殊  而吾心常寂此之謂天樂 萬物並作吾以觀其復  極虚篤靜以觀萬物之變然後不爲變之  所亂知凡作之未有不復者也苟吾方且  與萬物皆作則不足以知之矣光曰物先  無物物從無而並作陸曰雷在地中天地  之復也動在靜中聖人之復也政和曰物  之生有所乎萌終有所乎歸方其並作而
Interpretation

When the human mind becomes disordered, one should maintain stillness and stability, and clarity will naturally return in time. If aware that certain actions harm one's inherent nature (contrary to the Dao), one must consciously adjust, allowing the nature to gradually regenerate. The Yijing states: "In stillness and non-movement, when stimulated, one penetrates all affairs under heaven." The "movement" mentioned here follows the same principle.

Those who uphold the Dao do not pursue fullness. Fullness arises from extremes—when turbidity cannot be clarified, or stagnation cannot renew—this is the state of "fullness." Precisely because they do not seek fullness, they avoid the cycle of decline and regeneration. All things inevitably decline; only by not pursuing fullness can decline naturally dissipate without forming new flaws. Those who understand the Dao remain in turbidity until clarity emerges naturally, abide in stillness until renewal arises spontaneously, and never crave fullness—thus avoiding the pitfalls of endless cycles.

Chapter Sixteen speaks of attaining ultimate emptiness and stillness. If one cannot reach ultimate emptiness, remnants remain; if one cannot maintain perfect stillness, subtle stirrings persist. It is like removing a mountain but leaving behind dust—this cannot be called ultimate purity. Deliberately pursuing emptiness leads to attachment to "having," while forcibly maintaining stillness traps one in "movement"—how much more so in other matters? Without reaching ultimate purity, the benefits of emptiness and stillness are difficult to attain. True emptiness transcends dualities; reaching ultimate emptiness means severing all dependencies, so that even within "having," one remains empty. True stillness transcends the dichotomy of movement and stillness; reaching ultimate stillness eliminates opposition, so that even within "movement," one remains still. Thus, those who fail to attain the extremes of emptiness and stillness cannot truly comprehend the Dao. Emptiness accommodates all existence; stillness responds to all movement. Achieving ultimate emptiness while preserving substance, maintaining perfect stillness to attain purity—even amidst the complexity of phenomena, the mind remains transparent; even through myriad transformations, the spirit stays serene. This is "heavenly joy" (the natural bliss of union with the Dao).

When observing the growth and operation of all things, I contemplate their cyclical return in a state of utmost emptiness and profound stillness. Only by observing the transformations of all things through perfect emptiness and stillness can one avoid being disturbed by change and understand that all that arises must return. If one follows the restless movement of things, true knowledge of patterns becomes impossible. All things emerge simultaneously from emptiness—just as thunder lies hidden within the earth, manifesting heaven and earth's cyclical nature, movement is contained within stillness, revealing the sage's return to authenticity. All things in their flourishing have a beginning and an end. When they thrive vigorously,

 趨於動出之塗吾觀其動者之必靜及出  者之必復而因以見天地之心則交物而  不與物俱化此之謂觀其復 夫物芸芸各復歸其根  萬物皆作於性皆復於性譬如花葉之生  於根而歸於根濤瀾之生於水而歸於水  耳光曰夫物芸芸如水作波各歸其根如  波復水 歸根曰靜  苟未能自復于性雖止動息念以求靜非  靜也故唯歸根然後爲靜光曰道爲動靜  之根根非動靜非動靜者靜之至也 靜曰復命  命者性之妙也性猶可言至於命則不可  言矣易曰窮理盡性以至於命聖人之學  道必始於窮理中於盡性終於復命仁義  禮樂聖人所以接物也而仁義禮樂之用  必有知其所以然者不知其所以然則徇  其名而爲之世俗之士也知其所以然而  後行之君子也此之謂窮理雖然盡心以  窮理而後得之不求則不得也事物日搆  於前必求而後能應則其爲力也勞而爲  功也少聖人外不爲物所蔽其性湛然不  勉而中不思而得物至而能應此之謂盡  性雖然此吾性也猶有物我之辯焉則幾  於妄矣君之命曰命天之命曰命以性接  物而不知其爲我是以寄之命也此之謂  復命 復命曰常  方其作也雖天地山河之大未有不變壞  而常者惟復於性而後湛然常存矣 知常曰明  不以復性爲明則皆世俗之智雖自謂明
Interpretation

All things in motion and transformation ultimately return to stillness; that which radiates outward must in time return to its source. By observing this cyclical principle, one may comprehend the fundamental law of heaven and earth. Though engaging with myriad phenomena, one remains untainted by them—this is the Dao of "observing the return" (guanfu).

The world's complexities ultimately revert to their origins. Just as flowers bloom from roots only to wither and return, or waves rise from water only to subside into calm, all things emerge from their intrinsic nature and ultimately return to it. Though water's surface may ripple endlessly, it inevitably restores its placid state.

True return to the origin constitutes "stillness" (jing). Forced cessation of movement or suppression of thoughts cannot achieve genuine stillness—only by returning to the root can one attain ultimate tranquility. The Dao is the source of all movement and stillness, yet this source itself transcends both motion and rest. This state beyond duality represents the highest stillness.

Returning to stillness is "recovering destiny" (fuming). "Destiny" (ming) manifests the profound mystery of "inherent nature" (xing). While "nature" may be described in words, "destiny" defies articulation. The Yijing states that only through exhaustive investigation of principles and complete penetration of nature can one finally comprehend heavenly mandate. Sages cultivate the Dao by first examining phenomena, then penetrating their nature, ultimately achieving reunion with celestial destiny.

Benevolence, righteousness, ritual, and music are the sage's methods for guiding humanity, yet their fundamental principles must be understood. Ordinary people grasp only superficial forms, while true gentlemen comprehend inner workings—this constitutes "exhausting principles" (qiongli). However, deliberate pursuit of principles often obstructs genuine understanding. Sages differ—their luminous nature responds spontaneously without forced seeking, achieving "fulfilling nature" (jinxing). Progressing further, even the distinction between "self" and "external objects" dissolves as one acts in complete accordance with celestial mandate—this is "recovering destiny."

Returning to celestial mandate constitutes the "eternal" (chang). Though mountains, rivers, and the great earth may transform and decay, only by returning to intrinsic nature can one attain enduring permanence. Understanding this eternal truth constitutes true wisdom—all else remains worldly cleverness that mistakes superficial knowledge for genuine realization.

 而非明也 不知常妄作凶  不知復性則縁物而動無作而非凶雖得  於一時而失之遠矣 知常容  方迷於妄則自是而非彼物皆吾敵吾何  以容之苟知其皆妄則雖仇讎猶將哀而  憐之夫何所不容哉 容乃公  無所不容則彼我之情盡而尚誰私乎 公乃王  無所不公則天下將往而歸之矣 王乃天  無所不懷雖天何以加之 天乃道  天猶有形至於道則極矣然而雖道亦不  能復進於此矣 道乃乆没身不殆  政和曰道者萬世無弊趙曰此章談歸根  復命以虚靜爲本老氏所謂命佛氏所謂  性也惟性無死生爲常知性則容且公矣  流俗以益生爲命此莊子所謂心死奚益  妄作者也    太上章第十七 太上下知有之  以道在宥天下而未嘗治之民不知其所  以然故惟知有之而已 其次親之譽之  以仁義治天下其德可懷其功可見故民  得而親親之其名雖美而厚薄自是始矣 其次畏之侮之  以政齊民民非不畏也然力之所不及則  侮之矣 信不足有不信  吾誠自信則以道御天下足矣唯不自信  而加之以仁義重之以刑政而民始不信  矣 猶其貴言功成事遂百姓謂我自然  聖人自信有餘其於言也猶然貴之不輕  出諸口而民信之矣及其功成事遂則民  日遷善遠罪而不自知矣
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the fundamental principles of the Dao. Those who fail to comprehend the eternal laws act recklessly and invite misfortune. Without understanding how to return to one's original nature, one becomes enslaved by external things - every action brings danger, and even temporary gains ultimately lead to greater losses.

Those who truly understand the "constant Dao" possess expansive minds. When people indulge in illusions, they perceive everyone as adversaries; but once they realize these are mere illusions, they can even show compassion toward enemies. Embracing all things eliminates selfish biases. Without selfishness comes impartiality, and impartiality makes one a refuge for all - this state is as vast as heaven itself. Yet while heaven has discernible form, the Dao represents the ultimate that not even itself can transcend. Following the Dao ensures lasting peace, free from lifelong perils.

Zhenghezi (note: a Daoist thinker) states the Dao never becomes obsolete. This chapter discusses returning to the root and recovering heavenly mandate (Tianming), with emptiness and stillness as foundation. What Laozi calls "life" (ming) corresponds to what Buddhists term "original nature" (xing) - only when one's nature transcends life and death does it become eternal. Understanding this nature enables all-embracing impartiality. Ordinary people mistake nourishing physical life for heavenly mandate - precisely what Zhuangzi meant by "those with dead hearts" acting recklessly.

Chapter 17 of the Supreme Purity Scripture states: The highest ruler governs so subtly that people merely know of his existence. He administers through the Dao without conscious action, leaving people unaware of being governed. The next level ruler earns people's affection and praise through benevolience and righteousness - though renowned, this already creates distinctions. The inferior ruler inspires fear that turns to contempt when governing through laws and force.

When sincerity is lacking, people distrust. Were rulers truly self-assured, governing through the Dao alone would suffice; it's their insecurity that makes them add benevolence, laws and punishments, breeding public distrust. The sage weighs his words carefully, seldom making promises, yet people trust him completely. When accomplishments manifest, people naturally turn toward goodness and shun evil without realizing it.

   大道廢章第十八 大道廢有仁義  大道之隆也仁義行於其中而民不知道  旣廢而後仁義見矣 智慧出有大僞  世不知道之足以贍萬物也而以智慧加  之於是民始以僞報之矣 六親不和有孝慈國家昏亂有忠臣  六親方和孰非孝慈國家方治孰非忠臣  堯非不孝也而獨稱舜無瞽瞍也伊尹周  公非不忠也而獨稱龍逄比干無桀紂也  涸澤之魚相喣以沬相濡以濕不如相忘  於江湖    絕聖棄智章第十九 絶聖棄智民利百倍  非聖智不足以知道使聖智爲天下其有  不以道御物者乎世之人不足以知聖智  之本而見其末以爲巧勝物者也於是馳  騁於其末流而民始不勝其害矣故絶聖  棄智民利百倍 絶仁棄義民復孝慈  未有仁而遺其親者未有義而後其君者  仁義所以爲孝慈及其衰也竊仁義之名  以要利於世於是子有違父父有虐子此  則仁義之跡爲之也故云 絶巧棄利盜賊無有  巧所以便事也利所以濟物也二者非以  爲盜而賊盜不得則不行故云耳 此三者以爲文不足故令有所屬見素抱樸 少私寡欲  世之貴此三者以爲天下之不安由文之  不足故也是以或屬之以聖智或屬之以  仁義或屬之以巧利蓋將以文治之也然  而天下益以不安曷不反其本乎見素抱
Interpretation

When society deviates from the natural Dao (the fundamental cosmic principle), people begin to emphasize benevolence and righteousness. In an era where the Dao prevails, these virtues naturally exist within it, yet the common people remain unaware of them. Only when the Dao declines do benevolence and righteousness become deliberately proclaimed.

When people start valuing clever strategies and schemes, hypocrisy and deceit inevitably emerge. Humanity fails to understand that the Dao inherently nourishes all things, instead resorting to artificial cleverness to interfere with nature. Consequently, the common people respond with pretense.

Filial sons and loving mothers only stand out when families are disharmonious; loyal ministers are only praised when the state is in chaos. Emperor Yao was not unfilial, yet only Shun’s filial piety was specially celebrated because Shun’s father, Gusou, was unkind. Ministers like Yi Yin and the Duke of Zhou were not disloyal, yet only Long Feng and Bi Gan’s loyalty was remembered because they served tyrants like Jie and Zhou. It is like fish in a dried-up pond, spitting moisture to moisten each other—seemingly touching, yet far less natural than living freely in rivers and lakes, unaware of one another.

Discard artificial standards of sagehood and clever calculations, and the people will benefit a hundredfold. True wisdom should follow the Dao, yet the world often mistakes its surface appearance for clever manipulation, believing it can conquer all things. The result is profound harm to the people.

Abandon the formal preaching of benevolence and righteousness, and people will return to their innate filial and compassionate nature. True benevolence and righteousness do not abandon family or neglect rulers, yet when these virtues become empty labels, children rebel and parents abuse.

Renounce cleverness and the pursuit of profit, and thieves will naturally vanish. Skills were meant to ease life, and benefits to aid all things, yet when misused, they become tools for bandits.

These three proposals (sage wisdom, benevolence-righteousness, and clever-profit) are merely superficial remedies, insufficient to address the root. To return people to the fundamental: preserve innate purity, hold fast to simple sincerity, and reduce selfish desires. The world often believes unrest stems from inadequate ritual systems, so some promote sage wisdom, others emphasize benevolence-righteousness, and still others chase clever-profit—only to plunge society into deeper chaos. Why not return to simplicity? Maintain the unadorned nature and lessen selfish cravings—this is the true solution.

 樸少私寡欲而天下各復其性雖有三者  無所用之矣故曰我無爲而民自化我好  靜而民自正我無事而民自富我無欲而  民自樸此明聖智之大仁義之至巧利之  極也然孔子以仁義禮樂治天下老子絶  而棄之或者以爲不同易曰形而上者謂  之道形而下者謂之器孔子之慮後世也  深故示人以器而晦其道使中人以下守  其器不爲道之所眩以不失爲君子而中  人以上自是以上達也老子則不然志於  明道而急於開人心故示人以道而薄於  器以爲學者惟器之知則道隱矣故絶仁  義棄禮樂以明道夫道不可言可言皆其  似者也達者因似以識眞而昧者執似以  陷於僞故後世執老子之言以亂天下者  有之而學孔子者無大過因老子之言以  達道者不少而求之於孔子者常若無所  從入二聖人者皆不得已也全於此必略  於彼矣趙曰投石於海必至於底則已不  至則無以測海之深談道者不至於未始  有物無以見道之極致方其掃蕩則聖智  絶棄及其建立則事物不棄況聖智乎    絕學無憂章第二十 絶學無憂  爲學日益爲道日損不知性命之正而以  學求益曾其所未聞積之不已而無以一  之則以圓害方以直害曲其中紛然而不  勝其憂矣患夫學者之至此也故曰絶學  無憂若夫聖人未嘗不學而以道爲主不
Interpretation

This passage explores the divergent philosophical approaches of Laozi and Confucius regarding governance.

Laozi advocated that rulers should minimize selfish desires and maintain their innate simplicity, allowing the people to naturally return to their authentic state. His concept of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)" posits that when rulers refrain from forced interference, the people become naturally cultivated; when rulers cherish tranquility, the people naturally become upright; when rulers avoid disturbing livelihoods, the people naturally prosper; when rulers lack greed, the people naturally return to purity. This represents the highest form of governing wisdom.

While Confucius emphasized governing through benevolence, righteousness, and ritual music, Laozi advocated abandoning these constructs. The author explains this divergence stems from their different starting points. Confucius, considering practical realities of later generations, presented concrete methods (the "vessels") while keeping profound principles (the Dao) implicit, enabling those of average or below-average capacity to adhere to tangible norms. Laozi took the opposite approach, urgently clarifying the Great Dao while de-emphasizing specific methods, believing excessive attachment to concrete norms would obscure the fundamental truth.

The author observes that the Dao itself is ineffable—what can be articulated are only approximations. Those with understanding can perceive truth through these approximations, while the confused become attached to the approximations and fall into falsehood. History shows some have indeed distorted Laozi's words to disrupt society, while followers of Confucius rarely make grave errors; yet many have comprehended the Dao through Laozi's teachings, whereas those limited to Confucian doctrine often find themselves unable to penetrate deeper.

Finally, the discussion turns to the concept of "transcending conventional learning brings peace"—if one doesn't understand life's true essence but merely accumulates knowledge, it only creates mental confusion. The sages weren't against learning per se, but prioritized awakening to the Dao, thus remaining unperturbed by excessive information.

(Note: Here "vessels" refers to concrete methods and norms, while "Dao" signifies fundamental principles and truth; "transcending conventional learning brings peace" means going beyond mere knowledge accumulation to attain worry-free clarity.)

 學亦不少多學亦不亂廓然無憂安用絶  學耶光曰未絶學者計善惡期於有用此  有用之小用也絶學者知道一生死齊得  喪無往而不適故無憂此無用之大用也  肇曰習學謂之聞絶學謂之鄰過此二者  謂之眞過然則絶學之外向上猶有事在 唯之與阿相去幾何善之與惡相去何若  學者溺於所聞而無以一之則唯之爲恭  阿之爲慢不可同日言矣而況善惡之相  反乎夫唯聖人知萬物同於性而皆成於  妄矣如畫馬牛如刻虎彘皆非其實泯焉  無是非同異之辯孰知其相去幾何哉若  知此矣則萬物並育而不相害道並行而  不相悖理無足怪矣 人之所畏不可不畏  聖人均彼我一同異其心無所留然豈以  忽遺世法犯分亂理而不顧哉人之所爲  吾亦爲之人之所畏吾亦畏之雖列於君  臣父子之間行于禮樂刑政之域而天下  不知其異也其所以不纓於物者其志之  已政和曰鼓萬物而不與聖人同憂者道  也吉凶與民同患者事也體道者無憂涉  事者有畏人之所畏而不知爲之戒能無  患者鮮矣故君子以恐懼修省 荒兮其未央哉  人皆徇其所知故介然不出畦畛聖人兼  涉有無無入而不可則荒兮其未央也趙  曰蘇說爲名教得矣然以道言之人之所  畏喜唯而怒阿是善而非惡未能忘善惡
Interpretation

Learning does not lie in quantity—no amount of study can disturb the mind. The truly enlightened have no worries, so why deliberately abandon learning? "Guang" (a commentator) notes: Those who cling to learning obsess over distinctions of good and evil, pursuing utilitarian value—this is merely petty utility. Those who transcend learning understand the essence of the Dao (the Way), seeing through life and death, gain and loss. They adapt effortlessly to all circumstances, thus free from worry—this is the great utility of non-utility.

"Zhao" (another commentator) explains: Clinging to learning is called "hearing of the Dao," while abandoning learning is called "approaching the Dao." Only by surpassing both can one attain the "true Dao." Yet beware—beyond abandoning learning lies an even higher realm. How far apart are compliance ("yes") and opposition ("no")? What real difference exists between good and evil? Scholars mired in their limited perceptions, unable to grasp the whole, mistake compliance for reverence and opposition for arrogance—these cannot even be compared, let alone the polar opposites of good and evil. Only sages recognize all things share the same illusory nature, like painted horses or carved tigers—none are real creatures. When distinctions of right and wrong dissolve, who would dwell on their differences? Understanding this reveals how all things grow without interfering, how myriad principles coexist without contradiction—this is no marvel.

What people fear, I too must fear. Sages regard self and other as equal, blending differences, their minds unbound. Yet how could they thereby neglect worldly norms or defy human relations? I follow what people do; I fear what they fear. Even while fulfilling roles of ruler and subject, parent and child, observing rituals and laws, the world finds nothing extraordinary in him. His freedom from external entanglements springs from inner transcendence. "Zhenghe" (Emperor Huizong’s Daoist name) adds: What nurtures all things yet shares no sage’s anxiety is the Dao; what bears fortune and misfortune alongside the people is worldly affairs. Those embodying the great Dao know no worry; those handling mundane affairs know fear. Without vigilance toward what others dread, few escape calamity—thus the noble person cultivates reverence and self-reflection.

Boundless indeed (is the sage’s realm)! Ordinary people cling to their limited views, like crops confined by field ridges. Yet sages roam freely between "being" and "non-being," entering any state without resistance—thus their realm knows no limits. "Zhao" (another annotator) observes: Su Shi’s Confucian interpretation holds merit, but by the Dao’s standard, people’s preference for compliance over opposition, their praise of good and condemnation of evil—these still fail to transcend dualistic distinctions.

 一是非絶學無憂荒兮其未渠央哉下言  獨異於衆人可知 衆人熙熙如享太牢如春登臺我獨泊兮其 未兆如嬰兒之未孩  人各溺於所好其美如享太牢其樂如春  登臺閣然從之而不知其非聖人深究其  妄遇之泊然不動如嬰兒之未能孩也 乘乘兮若無所歸  乘萬物之理而不自私故若無所歸 衆人皆有餘而我獨若遺  衆人守其所知各自以爲有餘聖人包舉  萬物而不主於一超然其若遺也政和曰  功蓋天下而我不自己 我愚人之心也哉純純兮  純純若愚而非愚也政和曰天機不張而  默與道契 俗人昭昭我獨若昏俗人察察我獨悶悶  世俗以分别爲知聖人知衆妄之不足辯  也故其外若昏其中若悶 忽焉若晦寂兮似無所止  忽焉若晦不見其津涯也寂然無眹不見  其所止宿也 衆人皆有以我獨頑似鄙  人各有能故世皆得而用之聖人才全德  備若無能焉故疑似頑鄙 我獨異於人而貴食母  道者萬物之母衆人徇物而忘道而聖人  脱遺萬物以道爲宗譬如嬰兒無
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the distinction between those who have attained the Dao (the Way) and ordinary people. The Dao-realized appear simple and dull, yet their wisdom resembles foolishness—what the ancients called "great wisdom appearing foolish."

Ordinary people bustle about like attendees at a grand banquet or springtime sightseers climbing scenic heights. In contrast, the Dao-realized remain serene and detached, as innocent as an infant who has not yet learned to smile. Common folk become intoxicated by their desires, mistaking transient pleasures for true beauty and joy, blindly following illusions without recognizing their emptiness. The sage perceives through these illusions, maintaining unwavering tranquility—that pure, uncontrived state of infant-like simplicity.

Those who embody the Dao follow nature's patterns without selfish attachment, thus appearing to hold no fixed position. Where ordinary people pride themselves on worldly knowledge, the sage embraces all things without partiality, abiding beyond mundane distinctions. Even when accomplishing deeds that benefit the world, they claim no merit for themselves.

The mind of the Dao-realized seems dull, yet this reflects primal authenticity. Though heaven's mysteries (natural truths) remain hidden, they silently harmonize with the Dao. Where worldly people flaunt cleverness, the Dao-attuned appear confused; where others nitpick over trifles, they seem muddle-headed. For the sage knows vain pursuits warrant no contention—thus their outward obscurity conceals inner luminosity.

At times the Dao-realized resemble shadows in darkness, so profoundly still they seem anchorless. Ordinary people each possess specialized skills that society readily employs, while the sage's complete virtue and talent paradoxically make them appear inept—almost crude and foolish. Yet their true distinction lies in "nourishing from the mother": the Dao as source of all things. Commoners chase external objects forgetting the root, whereas sages transcend phenomena to dwell in the Dao's essence—as purely as an infant sustained solely by its mother's milk.

所雜食  食於母而已 道德眞經集解卷之一

Vol. 2

道德眞經集解卷之二𠕏二     趙學士集解    孔德之容章第二十一 孔德之容唯道是從  道無形也及其運而爲德則有容矣故德  者道之見也自是而推之則衆有之容皆  道之見於物也 道之爲物惟恍惟惚惚兮恍其中有象恍兮 惚其中有物  道非有無故以恍惚言之然及其運而成  象著而成物未有不出於恍惚者也 窈兮㝠兮其中有精  方有無之未定恍惚而不可見及夫有無  之交則見其窈㝠深渺雖未成形而精存  乎其中矣 其精甚眞其中有信  物至於成形則眞僞雜矣方其有精不容  僞也眞僞旣雜自一而爲二自二而爲三  紛然而錯不可復信矣方其有精不吾欺  也 自古及今其名不去以閲衆甫  古今雖異而道則不去故以不去名之惟  未嘗去故能以閲衆甫之變也甫美也雖  萬物之美不免於變也 吾何以知衆甫之然哉以此  聖人所以知萬物之所以然者以能體道  而不去故也光曰道本無名無形旣假德  以形道則曰象曰物曰精曰閲衆甫之始  此德之容而道之見也    曲則全章第二十二 曲則全  聖人動必循理理之所在或直或曲要於  通而已故與物不迕故全也 枉則直  直而非理則非直也循理雖枉天下之至  直也 窪則盈  衆之所歸者下也雖欲不盈不可得矣 弊則新
Interpretation

In Chapter 21 of the Collected Exegesis of the True Scripture of Dao and De, it discusses how "supreme De" (the highest manifestation of virtue) completely follows the patterns of the Dao. The Dao itself has no concrete form, yet when it operates and manifests as De, it becomes visibly apparent. Thus we say De is the manifestation of the Dao. Extending this principle, the forms of all things are simply the Dao manifesting differently across phenomena.

The Dao exists in a state between being and non-being—elusive and difficult to grasp. Within this liminal space of seeming presence and absence lies the image of the Dao; within these flickering appearances and disappearances resides the substance of the Dao. When in the undifferentiated state prior to the division of being and non-being, the Dao appears profoundly mysterious. Though not yet taking concrete form, it already contains the subtle essence (Jing). This essence is utterly real and beyond doubt. Once things assume concrete forms, truth and falsehood become intermixed—what was originally unified divides into two, then three, becoming increasingly complex until distinguishing authenticity becomes difficult. But at the essential stage, it remains perfectly genuine.

From ancient times to the present, the essence of the Dao has never changed, thus enabling observation of all things' beginnings and transformations. "Fu" (甫) signifies excellence—even the most excellent things cannot avoid transformation. The reason sages can comprehend the patterns of all transformations is precisely because they embody and maintain the essence of the Dao.

Chapter 22 discusses wisdom in worldly conduct: those who can yield and accommodate will ultimately preserve themselves. Sages invariably act according to principle—straight when straightness is called for, bending when bending is needed. The key lies in penetrating the underlying patterns, thus achieving harmony with all things without conflict. What appears as a winding path, if it accords with principle, becomes the straightest shortcut. Low-lying areas naturally accumulate water—this is the Dao's natural pattern. The worn-out will inevitably be replaced by the new—this is the necessary course of all phenomena.

 昭昭察察非道也悶悶若將弊矣而日新  所自出也 少則得  道一而已得一則無不得矣 多則惑  多學而無以一之則惑矣 是以聖人抱一爲天下式  抱一者復性者也蓋曲則全枉則直窪則  盈弊則新少則得多則惑皆抱一之餘也  故以抱一終之葉曰曲則全窪則盈少則  得理也枉則直弊則新勢也枉非以求直  而枉之極必直弊非以求新而弊之反必  新理勢之相成或更爲終始或迭爲得失  紛然其不可窮而聖人獨能抱一不與之  俱變故以爲天下式 不自見故明  目不自見故能見物鏡不自照故能照物  如使自見自照則自爲之不暇何暇及物  哉 不自是故彰不自伐故有功不自矜故長夫 惟不爭故天下莫能與之爭  不自見不自是不自伐不自矜皆不爭之  餘也故以不爭終之 古之所謂曲則全者豈虚言哉誠全而歸之  世以直爲是以曲爲非將循理而行於世  則有不免於曲者矣故終篇復言之曰此  豈虚言哉誠全而歸之夫所謂全者非獨  全身也内以全身外以全物物我兼全而  歸復於性則其爲直也大矣    希言自然章第二十三 希言自然  言出於自然則簡而中非其自然而强言  之則煩而難信矣故曰道之出口淡乎其  無味視之不足見聽之不足聞用之不可
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core Daoist concepts of "embracing the One" (holding fast to the fundamental Dao) and "non-contention." Things that appear dazzlingly bright actually deviate from the Great Dao, while what seems dim and obscure contains the vitality of daily renewal. The Dao is supremely simple—by grasping the fundamental "One," one can comprehend all things; excessive pursuit only leads to confusion. Thus, the sage takes "embracing the One" as the standard for the world.

"Embracing the One" is the method of returning to one's original nature. Just as what is bent will eventually become straight, what is low will be filled, what is worn out will be renewed, and what is lacking will be fulfilled, while excess leads to bewilderment—all these are outcomes of "embracing the One." The development of things follows its natural pattern: the bent need not deliberately seek straightness, for when bending reaches its limit, it naturally becomes straight; the worn-out need not deliberately seek renewal, for when decay reaches its limit, it naturally renews itself. The sage transcends these transformations, always holding fast to the fundamental Dao.

Only when the eyes do not fixate on themselves can they clearly see external things; only when a mirror does not reflect itself can it mirror other objects. By not displaying oneself, one becomes manifest; by not boasting, one achieves merit; by not being arrogant, one endures. Precisely because one does not contend with others, no one in the world can contend with them. The ancient saying that "to bend is to preserve whole" is no empty phrase—those who truly understand the way of preservation not only preserve themselves but also preserve external things, attaining the state where both self and others are made whole. This is the greatest integrity.

Chapter 23 discusses "few words accord with the Dao." Speech that conforms to the natural Dao is concise and appropriate, while forced preaching becomes tedious and unconvincing. When the Great Dao is spoken, it seems bland and flavorless; looked for, it cannot be seen; listened for, it cannot be heard; yet used, it is inexhaustible. This teaches us that the true Dao lies not in ornate words but in the practice of natural Wuwei (non-action).

 旣此所謂希言矣光曰希言者言而不得  所言之迹則言而未嘗言合自然道喙嗚  而已 飄風不終朝驟雨不終日孰爲此者天地 天地尚不能乆而況於人乎  陰陽不爭風雨時至不疾不徐盡其勢之  所至而後止若夫陽亢而上陰伏而下否  而不得洩於是爲飄風暴雨若將不勝然  其勢不能以終日古之聖人言出於希行  出於夷皆因其自然故乆而不窮世或厭  之以爲不若詭辭之悦耳怪行之驚目不  知其不能乆也政和曰天地之造萬物風  以散之委衆形之自化而雨以潤之任萬  物之自滋故不益生不勸成而萬物自遂  於天地之間所以長且乆也飄驟則陰陽  有謬戾之患必或使之而被其害故不能  久 故從事於道者道者同於道德者同於德失 者同於失同於道者道亦得之同於德者德 亦得之同於失者失亦得之  孔子曰苟志於仁矣無惡也故曰仁者之  過易辭志於仁猶若此而況志於道者乎  夫苟從事於道矣其所謂合於道者得道  合於德者得德不幸而失雖失於其所爲  然必有得於道德矣肇曰眞者同眞僞者  同僞靈照㝠諧一彼實相無得無失無凈  無穢明與無明等也 信不足有不信  不知道者信道不篤因其失而疑之於是  益以不信惟知道者然後不以得失疑道  也雱曰降乎希則失性命之常信不足必
Interpretation

Laozi here speaks of the principle of "rare speech" (xiyan). The so-called "rare speech" means speaking without leaving traces of deliberate preaching—appearing to speak yet seeming not to have spoken at all, wholly in accordance with the natural Dao, as effortless as birdsong.

Observe how a gale cannot last a full morning, nor a downpour persist an entire day. Who creates these phenomena? Heaven and Earth. Even the tempests wrought by Heaven and Earth cannot endure long—how much less can human words and actions?

When Yin and Yang energies are in harmony, wind and rain arrive just right—neither too hasty nor too slow, moving with the flow, ceasing when it is time. But if Yang energy becomes excessive and surges upward while Yin energy is suppressed and stagnates below, violent storms arise. Though they may seem fierce, they cannot sustain even a single day. The ancient sages spoke sparingly and precisely, acting with calm and without force, always in accord with nature. Thus, their influence endured without decline. Yet worldly people disdain this natural way, finding it less appealing than eloquent rhetoric or attention-grabbing novelty, unaware that such things cannot last.

Heaven and Earth nurture all things: they send wind to disperse vitality, allowing beings to transform naturally; they bring rain to moisten growth, letting all flourish of their own accord. Neither forcing progress nor hastening outcomes, all things grow naturally between Heaven and Earth—hence they endure. Storms and tempests, however, are signs of Yin-Yang imbalance, inevitably bringing calamity, and thus cannot persist.

Therefore, those who seek the great Dao: those who align with the Dao attain the Dao; those who align with De (Virtue) attain De; those who stray from the true path lose it. Confucius said, "Those who set their will on benevolence seldom do wrong." If this is true even for benevolence, how much more so for those devoted to the Dao? As long as one seeks the great Dao, what aligns with it will be attained, and what aligns with De will be gained. Even occasional deviations will, in the course of pursuit, surely yield some realization.

Truth returns to truth; falsehood returns to falsehood. The awakened understand that all things share the same essence—there is no gain or loss, purity or defilement, for light and darkness are ultimately one.

Those whose faith in the Dao is insufficient cannot truly believe. Those who do not understand the Dao, encountering setbacks in practice, grow doubtful and increasingly disbelieving. Only those who truly comprehend the Dao will never waver in their conviction, regardless of transient gains or losses.

 至於不信趙曰此章談道妙當從僧肇然  文意不相連屬試爲之說曰希言自然談  道本也道德之失而後有仁義禮智苟從  事於道矣孰爲得失但後世至誠不足有  不信者如飄風驟雨而豈能終日哉    跂者不立章第二十四 跂者不立跨者不行自見者不明自是者不 彰自伐者無功自矜者不長  人未有不能立而且能行者也苟以行立  爲未足而加之以跨跂者未有不喪其行  立者彼其自見自是自伐自矜者亦若是  矣政和曰跂而欲立跨而欲行違性之常  而形之適難矣自見則知不足以周物故  不明自是則仁不足以同衆故不彰有其  善喪厥善故無功矜其能喪厥功故不長 其於道也曰餘食贅行  譬如飲食適飽則已有餘則病譬如四體  充完則已有贅則累 物或惡之故有道者不處    有物混成章第二十五 有物混成先天地生  夫道非清非濁非高非下非去非來非善  非惡混然而成體其於人爲性故曰有物  混成此未有知其生者蓋湛然常存而天  地生於其中耳光曰道不可分曰混亡功  曰成無始曰先無物之物先天地而獨存  者也政和曰天地亦待是而後生故云先  天地生 寂兮寥兮獨立而不改周行而不殆可以爲 天下母  寂兮無聲寥兮無形獨立於無匹而未嘗  變周行於群有而未嘗殆俯以化育萬物
Interpretation

This passage explores the fundamental nature of the Dao and the proper attitude for spiritual cultivation.

Regarding the essence of the Dao: The Dao emerges spontaneously from primordial chaos, existing before heaven and earth. It is soundless and formless (寂兮寥兮), standing alone without change, circulating endlessly while serving as the source of all creation. The Dao is neither pure nor turbid, neither high nor low, neither coming nor going, neither good nor evil—it is an undifferentiated whole. All beings in heaven and earth depend on the Dao for their existence.

Concerning the attitude of cultivation: Those who strain to stand on tiptoe cannot stay balanced; those who force long strides cannot walk far. Those who display themselves lack true understanding; those who assert themselves fail to shine; those who boast accomplish nothing; those who grow arrogant cannot endure. Such behaviors violate natural harmony, like falling ill from overeating or bearing the burden of an unnecessary growth. Those who have truly attained the Dao do not act this way.

The scripture observes that moral concepts like humaneness, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom only became emphasized after people lost touch with the Dao. Later generations, lacking sincerity, have eroded trust—just as violent winds and torrential rains cannot last all day, artificial virtue cannot endure. True cultivation follows natural spontaneity, free from forced effort or self-promotion.

 則皆其母也光曰絶待曰獨立眞常曰不  改政和曰不涉於動不交於物湛然而已  大定持之不與物化言道之體利用出入  往來不窮言道之用萬物恃之以生 吾不知其名字之曰道强爲之名曰大  道本無名聖人見萬物之無不由也故字  之曰道見萬物之莫能加也故强爲之名  曰大然其實則無得而稱之也光曰不涉  數量曰大 大曰逝逝曰遠遠曰反  自大而求之則逝而往矣自往而求之遠  不及矣雖逝雖遠然反而求之一心足矣  陸曰道强名爲大則實已逝矣遠矣其去  不遠在知其反以名反實以事反理光曰  孤運無住曰逝近極絶待曰遠即近而彌  遠即遠而彌近曰反 故道大天大地大王亦大域中有四大而王 居其一焉人法地地法天天法道道法自然  由道而言之雖天地與王皆不足大也然  世之人皆知三者之大而不信道之大也  故以實告之人不若地地不若天天不若  道道不若自然然使人一日復性則此三  者人皆足以盡之矣陸曰域中云者明道  非六合之外也光曰三才法道末不離本  自然即道也遣道之强名表重玄之極則  也趙曰或問中條隱士袁用之曰言道則  涉中矣以可道則非道也    重爲輕根章第二十六 重爲輕根靜爲躁君  凡物輕不能載重小不能鎭大不行者使
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the essential characteristics of the Dao (the Way) and its relationship with all phenomena. The Dao transcends all existence—it stands alone unchanging (independent of any conditions), eternally constant (unaffected by time), and pure in its Wuwei (non-action, non-interference). The Dao itself has no name; sages observed that all things follow the Dao's principles in their movements, thus reluctantly using the term "Dao" to designate it. Since nothing surpasses the Dao, they reluctantly described it as "great" (da).

The Dao's movement follows this pattern: vast and boundless (great) → ceaselessly moving (passing) → circulating far and wide (distant) → returning to its source (reversing). Though the Dao may seem remote, it truly resides in the awakening of returning to one's original heart-mind. In the cosmos, there are Four Greats—Dao, Heaven, Earth, and Humanity (the sovereign)—among which the Dao is most fundamental. Humans emulate Earth, Earth emulates Heaven, Heaven emulates the Dao, and the Dao emulates ziran (its own spontaneous nature). Ordinary people often consider Heaven, Earth, and Humanity as supremely vast, yet fail to recognize that the Dao alone is truly boundless. By returning to one's innate nature, one can realize that all three are encompassed within the Dao.

The later section discusses the principle that "the heavy is the root of the light," just as weight forms the foundation for lightness, and stillness governs agitation. This metaphor illustrates the Dao's fundamental nature—like roots supporting branches and leaves, profound stillness can master superficial restlessness. The text particularly notes that even speaking of the "Dao" risks limitation, for any Dao that can be described in words is no longer the eternal Dao (the profound meaning behind "the Dao that can be spoken is not the constant Dao"). Through multiple negations (transcending quantity, movement/stillness, etc.), this passage reveals the Dao's nature beyond dualistic concepts, ultimately pointing toward the Daoist supreme realm of "chongxuan" (twofold mystery)—transcending all opposing constructs.

 行不動者制動故輕以重爲根躁以靜爲  君 是以君子終日行不離輜重雖有榮觀燕處 超然  行欲輕而不離輜重榮觀雖樂而必有燕  處重靜之不可失如此 奈何萬乘之主而以身輕天下  人主以身任天下而輕其身則不足以任  天下矣 輕則失臣躁則失君  輕與躁無施而可然君輕則臣知其不足  賴臣躁則君知其志於利故曰輕則失臣  躁則失君趙曰古人謂高明爲觀高明之  觀樓觀是也雖有榮觀燕處超然以況靜  也榮如南榮    善行無轍迹章第二十七 善行無轍迹  乘理而行故無迹光曰乘以尻輪御以神  馬此無時而發彼無處而到安有轍迹 善言無瑕謫  時然後言故言滿天下無口過光曰至人  於言喙鳴鍾應不存實義即夢說夢即言  忘言復何瑕謫 善計不用籌筭  萬物之數畢陳於前不計而知安用籌筭  光曰即塵了地即滴竟海即道窮物以一  知萬何假籌筭 善閉無關鍵而不可開善結無繩約而不可 解  全德之人其於萬物如母之於子雖縱之  而不去故無關而能閉無繩而能約 是以聖人常善救人故無棄人常善救物故 無棄物  彼方執筭以計設關以閉持繩以結其力  之所及者少矣聖人之於人非特容之又  善救之我不棄人而人安得不歸我乎 是謂襲明
Interpretation

This passage elucidates Daoist wisdom regarding the relationship between movement and stillness, lightness and weight, as well as the way of being for sages.

Concerning movement and stillness with lightness and weight: Those who truly master situations appear motionless yet control all movement; lightness requires stability as its foundation, while agitation must be governed by tranquility. Thus the noble person may travel all day without departing from the carriage bearing essential supplies (metaphor for foundational roots); though surrounded by splendid sights, remains transcendentally detached. One may move lightly but must never lose the root; while enjoying glory, one maintains a detached mindset. As the ruler of a great nation, if one treats oneself lightly, one cannot bear the responsibility of governing the world. Lightness forfeits the trust of ministers, while impetuousness loses the ruler's inherent dignity.

Chapter 27 illustrates the realm of Dao-realized beings through five "excellences":

Those excellent at walking leave no traces (acting in accordance with natural laws without artificial marks); those excellent at speaking make no mistakes (speaking at appropriate times); those excellent at calculating need no counting rods (understanding cosmic patterns beyond concrete computation); those excellent at closing require no bolts yet cannot be opened (governing through virtue without coercion); those excellent at binding use no cords yet cannot be untied (the natural connections forged through Dao).

The Dao-realized sage excels at rescuing people, hence none are abandoned; excels at utilizing all things, hence nothing is wasted. Ordinary people employ concrete means like calculations, locks, and ropes, whose influence remains limited. The sage not only embraces all things but excels at redeeming them, naturally inspiring universal allegiance. This realm is called "inherited illumination" (Xi Ming) – inheriting the luminous wisdom of the great Dao.

 救人於危難之中非救之大者也方其流  轉生死爲物所蔽而推吾至明以與之使  暗者皆明如燈相傳襲而不絶則可謂善  救人矣 故善人不善人之師不善人善人之資不貴 其師不愛其資  聖人無心於教故不愛其資天下無心於  學故不貴其師聖人非獨吾忘天下亦能  使天下忘我故也 雖智大迷是謂要妙  聖人之妙智者亦有所不諭光曰病在藥  存病瘳藥遣藥病雙遣人法兩忘大悟如  迷方爲要妙    知其雄章第二十八 知其雄守其雌爲天下谿爲天下谿常德不 離復歸於嬰兒知其白守其黑爲天下式爲 天下式常德不忒復歸於無極知其榮守其 辱爲天下谷爲天下谷常德乃足復歸於樸  雌雄先後之及我者也黑白明暗之及我  者也榮辱貴賤之及我者也夫欲先而惡  後欲明而惡暗欲貴而惡賤物之情也然  而先後之及我不若明暗之切明暗之及  我不若貴賤之深古之聖人去妄以求復  性其性愈明則其守愈下其守愈下則其  德愈厚其德愈厚則其歸愈大蓋不知而  不爲不若知而不爲之至也知其雄守其  雌知性者也知性而爭心止則天下之爭  先者皆將歸之如水之赴谿莫有去者雖  然譬如嬰兒能受而未能用也故曰復歸  於嬰兒知其白守其黑見性者也居暗而  視明天下之明者皆不能以形逃也故衆
Interpretation

Saving people from peril is not the highest form of salvation. When beings are trapped in the cycle of life and death, obscured by external phenomena, illuminating them with one's purest wisdom—allowing the light to pass endlessly like an eternal flame to those in darkness—this is true mastery in delivering beings.

Thus, the virtuous serve as teachers for the unvirtuous, while the unvirtuous become the students of the virtuous. Yet the sage neither clings to the role of teacher nor fixates on transforming others. Without any intention to instruct, the sage remains unattached to teaching; since the world lacks conscious desire to learn, there is no need to exalt teachers. The sage not only forgets the world within themselves, but enables the world to forget them as well.

What appears as wisdom yet resembles great confusion—this is the most sublime state. The profound mystery of the sage cannot be fully comprehended even by the wise. Like medicine that exists when illness is present but is discarded after recovery, ultimately both remedy and ailment are relinquished. When person and method are both forgotten—seeming confusion that is actually supreme enlightenment—this is the most wondrous state.

Chapter 28 teaches: Knowing strength yet abiding in softness makes one like the valley streams of the world. Thus eternal De (Virtue) never departs, returning to the purity of an infant. Knowing brightness yet dwelling in obscurity makes one the model for the world. Thus eternal De never errs, returning to the boundless origin. Knowing glory yet remaining humble makes one like the mountain valleys of the world. Thus eternal De becomes complete, returning to unadorned simplicity.

The feminine and masculine represent sequence, black and white represent light and darkness, honor and disgrace represent distinction. People naturally desire precedence, brightness, and nobility. Yet the distinction of sequence is less profound than that of light and darkness, which in turn is less far-reaching than the differentiation of status. Ancient sages eliminated delusions to restore original nature—the clearer the nature, the more one dwells in humility; the more humble, the deeper the virtue; the deeper the virtue, the vaster the return to the source.

Knowing strength yet abiding in softness manifests understanding of original nature. Understanding nature stills contentious hearts, causing all who contend in the world to return like waters to the valley. Yet this resembles an infant—able to receive but not yet to apply—hence the return to infancy. Knowing brightness yet dwelling in obscurity manifests penetrating insight into original nature. Abiding in darkness yet perceiving light, nothing in the world's brightness can remain hidden.

 明則之以爲法雖應萬物而法未嘗差用  未嘗窮也故曰復歸於無極知其榮守其  辱復性者也諸妄已盡處辱而無憾曠兮  如谷之虚物來而應之德足於此純性而  無雜矣故曰復歸於樸 樸散則爲器聖人用之則爲官長故大制不 割  聖人旣歸於樸復散樸以爲器以應萬物  譬如人君分政以立官長亦因其勢之自  然雖制而未有所割裂也政和曰形而上  者謂之道形而下者謂之器有形名焉有  分守焉道全則天與人合而爲一器散則  天與人離而爲二趙曰上言復歸於樸樸  者道之全割則分裂有二物矣故大制不  割    將欲取天下章第二十九 將欲取天下而爲之吾見其不得已  聖人之有天下非取之也萬物歸之不得  已而受之其治天下非爲之也因萬物之  自然而除其害耳若取而爲之則不可得  矣 天下神器不可爲也爲者敗之執者失之  凡物皆不可爲也雖有百人之聚不循其  自然而妄爲之則必有齟齬不服者而況  天下乎雖然小物寡衆蓋有可以力取而  智奪者至於天下之大有神主之不待其  自歸則叛不聽其自治則亂矣 故物或行或隨或呴或吹或强或羸或載或 隳是以聖人去甚去奢去泰  陰陽相盪高下相傾大小相使或行於前  或隨於後或呴而暖之或吹而寒之或益
Interpretation

This passage conveys two main layers of meaning:

The first layer discusses the nature and function of the Dao (the Way). Those who understand the principles of the Dao and take them as their guiding laws, though they must respond to the transformations of all things, will find the Dao's laws never err or become exhausted. Returning to the state of Wuji (the primordial cosmic condition), understanding glory yet abiding in humility—this demonstrates a return to one's fundamental nature. When all deluded thoughts are eliminated, one can remain in humble circumstances without regret, with a mind as open and receptive as an empty valley, naturally responding when things come. Here, De (Virtue/Power) reaches its perfection, and one's nature becomes pure and unadulterated—this is returning to the state of "Pu" (the original, unadorned simplicity).

When "Pu" disperses, it forms concrete things, and sages use these concrete things to govern all phenomena. Just as a ruler establishes offices to administer a state, this follows natural tendencies—though there may be planning, there is no forced division. Zheng He (possibly a person's name) says: "The formless is called the Dao, the formed is called 'Qi' (concrete things). Where there is form, there are names and responsibilities." When the Dao is whole, heaven and humanity are united as one; when the Dao disperses, heaven and humanity separate into two. Zhao (possibly another person's name) adds: "The earlier discussion of returning to 'Pu'—'Pu' is the complete state of the Dao. If it is split, it divides into two things. Thus, the most enlightened systems never forcibly divide."

The second layer discusses the principles of governing the world. Those who wish to seize the world and act forcefully—I see this as impossible. The sage possesses the world not by seizing it, but because all things naturally submit, and he accepts it out of necessity. Governing the world is not deliberate action but following the natural patterns of all things, merely removing what is harmful. Forced seizure and action cannot succeed.

The world is a sacred entity—it cannot be forcibly manipulated. Forceful action leads to failure; forceful control leads to loss. No thing can be subjected to forceful action. Even in a small group, acting contrary to natural principles will inevitably lead to conflict—how much more so in governing the world? Though small matters might be seized by strength or obtained through cleverness, the world is vast, presided over by divine spirits. If it does not submit naturally, it will rebel; if not governed naturally, it will descend into chaos.

Thus, among all things, some advance while others follow, some bring warmth while others bring cold, some are strong while others are weak, some are stable while others are precarious. Therefore, the sage eliminates extremes, extravagance, and excess. Yin and Yang interact, heights and depths depend on each other, the great and small influence one another—some walk ahead, others follow behind; some give warmth, others bring cold.

 而强之或損而羸之或載而成之或隳而  毁之皆物之自然而勢之不免者也然世  之愚人私己而務得乃欲拒而違之其禍  不覆則折聖人知其不可逆則順而待之  去其甚去其奢去其泰使不至過而傷物  而天下無患矣此不爲之至也堯湯之水  旱雖不能免而終不至於敗由此故也易  之泰曰后以財成天地之道輔相天地之  宜以左右民三陽在内三陰在外物之泰  極矣聖人懼其過而害生故財成而輔相  之使不至於過此所謂去甚去奢去泰也    以道佐人主章第三十 以道佐人主者不以兵强天下其事好還  聖人用兵皆出於不得已非不得已欲以  强勝天下雖或能勝其禍必還報之楚靈  齊泯秦始皇漢孝武或以殺其身或以禍  其子孫人之所毒鬼之所疾未有得免者  也 師之所處荆棘生焉大軍之後必有凶年  兵之所在民事廢故田不脩用兵之後殺  氣勝故年穀傷凡兵皆然而況以兵强天  下者耶 故善者果而已不敢以取强  果决也德所不能綏政所不能服不得已  而後以兵决之耳 果而勿矜果而勿伐果而勿驕果而不得已 是果而勿强  勿矜勿伐勿驕不得已四者所以勿强也 物壯則老是謂不道不道早已  壯之必老無不然也唯有道者成而若缺  盈而若冲未嘗壯故未嘗老未嘗死以兵
Interpretation

When things reach their peak of strength, they may suffer harm; when they decline, they may receive support; when they reach fullness, they may face destruction—these are the natural laws that cannot be avoided. Yet foolish people in the world, obsessed with selfish gain, attempt to resist these laws, only to meet with utter failure or severe consequences. The sage understands that one must not defy the natural order, so they follow it and wait patiently, eliminating excess, extravagance, and extremes, ensuring that things do not suffer harm from overdevelopment. In this way, calamity is averted in the world. This is the highest manifestation of Wuwei (non-action). Though the floods in Emperor Yao's time and the droughts in Emperor Tang's era were unavoidable, they ultimately did not cause great disasters precisely because of this principle.

The Book of Changes (Yijing), in the Hexagram of Tai (Peace), states: "The ruler should harmonize the patterns of heaven and earth, assist in their transformative and nurturing functions, and thereby guide the people." When Yang Qi resides within and Yin Qi without, things reach their zenith. The sage, fearing that excess may bring harm, regulates and assists, preventing overdevelopment. This is the principle of eliminating excess, extravagance, and extremes.

Those who use the Dao to assist rulers do not rely on military might to dominate the world, for warfare easily invites retribution. When sages resort to arms, it is always out of necessity. If one seeks to conquer the world by force without true necessity, even temporary victory will eventually be repaid with disaster. King Ling of Chu, King Min of Qi, the First Emperor of Qin, and Emperor Wu of Han—some met their deaths, while others brought calamity upon their descendants. Such actions, loathed by the people and detested by the spirits, spare no one from retribution.

Where armies are stationed, thorns grow; after great wars, years of famine follow. This is because war disrupts the people's livelihood, leaving fields untended, and afterward, the killing Qi lingers, damaging harvests. This is true of all warfare—how much more so for those who seek to dominate the world by force?

Thus, those skilled in warfare stop once their objective is achieved, never presuming to bully the weak. "Resolution" (果) here means decisiveness—resorting to arms only when virtue fails to transform and governance fails to command obedience, acting as a last resort.

After achieving the goal, one must not become complacent, boastful, or arrogant, but recognize it as a necessity. This is the principle of achieving without domination.

When things reach their zenith, they begin to decline—this is called straying from the Dao. What strays from the Dao perishes swiftly. All things, after reaching their peak, inevitably decline. Only those who embody the Dao accomplish things as if lacking, remain full as if empty, and never reach their zenith. Thus, they neither decline nor perish. The same applies to those who rely on military might—it is a path to ruin.

 强天下壯亦甚矣而能無老乎    夫佳兵章第三十一 夫佳兵者不祥之器物或惡之故有道者不 處  以之濟難不以爲常是以不處 是以君子居則貴左用兵則貴右兵者不祥 之器非君子之器不得已而用之恬淡爲上 勝而不美而美之者是樂殺人夫樂殺人者 不可得志於天下吉事尚左凶事尚右是以 偏將軍處左上將軍處右則以喪禮處之殺 人衆多以悲哀泣之戰勝則以喪禮處之    道常無名章第三十二 道常無名樸雖小天下不敢臣侯王若能守 萬物將自賔  樸性也道常無名則性亦不可名矣故其  爲物舒之無所不在歛之不盈毫末此所  以雖小而不可臣也故匹夫之賤守之則  塵垢粃糠足以陶鑄堯舜而侯王之尊不  能守則萬物不賔矣 天地相合以降甘露人莫之令而自均  冲氣升降相合爲一而降甘露脗然被於  萬物無不均遍聖人體至道以應諸有亦  如甘露之無不及者此所以能賔萬物也 始制有名名亦旣有夫亦將知止知止所以 不殆  聖人樸散爲器因器制名豈不徇名而忘  樸逐末而喪本哉蓋亦知復於性是以乘  萬變而不殆也 譬道之在天下如川谷之與江海  江海水之鍾也川谷水之分也道萬物之  宗也萬物道之末也皆水也故川谷歸其  所鍾皆道也故萬物賔其所宗趙曰諸說
Interpretation

Mighty military force may appear awe-inspiring, but how can it be sustained forever? Those sophisticated weapons are all inauspicious objects that even ordinary people detest, so those who have attained the Dao (the Way) do not wield them lightly. Weapons should only be used as a last resort to resolve crises, never relied upon in ordinary times. Thus, the noble person honors the left in daily life (in ancient times, the left symbolized Yang and peace) but honors the right in warfare (the right symbolized Yin and violence). Weapons are not the tools of a noble person, and even when forced to use them, one must maintain a detached mindset. Victory is not something to boast of—to glorify triumph is to take pleasure in killing. Those who revel in slaughter will never win the hearts of the world.

According to ritual propriety, auspicious matters honor the left, while inauspicious matters honor the right. Thus, in the military, the lieutenant general stands on the left, while the commander-in-chief stands on the right—this treats warfare with the solemnity of a funeral. When many are slain in battle, one must mourn with grief; even in victory, the rites of mourning should be observed.

The great Dao (the Way) can never be defined in words (nameless). Like unworked wood (Pu, "the uncarved block"), it is simple and seemingly insignificant, yet none in the world dare belittle it. If feudal lords and rulers uphold the Dao, all things will naturally submit. This "uncarved block" represents original nature—since the Dao is nameless, so too is original nature beyond description. When unfolded, it permeates all things; when withdrawn, it is finer than the tip of a hair. Thus, though it appears minute, it cannot be disregarded. If ordinary people uphold it, even dust and chaff can produce sages like Yao and Shun; if rulers fail to uphold it, all things will refuse to submit.

When the Qi (vital energy) of Heaven and Earth—Yin and Yang—blends harmoniously, sweet dew descends naturally, nourishing all things equally without human intervention. The sage, comprehending the supreme Dao, responds to all things just as the dew falls impartially, thereby winning the hearts of all.

When the Dao differentiates into concrete things (Qi, "vessels"), names and forms arise. But once names are established, one must know when to stop—understanding boundaries prevents danger. Though the sage creates concrete things from the simplicity of the Dao and assigns them names, they do not become lost in names and forget the essence. Because they know to return to original nature, they remain unshaken amidst all changes.

The relationship between the Dao and the myriad things of the world is like that of streams to rivers and seas. Rivers and seas are where water returns; streams are its branches. The Dao is the source of all things; all things are its manifestations. Just as streams ultimately return to rivers and seas, all things ultimately return to the origin of the Dao.

 皆以萬物賔道猶川谷之歸江海秉文獨  異之曰若然則應言萬物賔道猶如川之  歸海江河與焉馬誕疑與字遂改作赴皆  非也竊意此章言道本無名及其始制有  名爲日月星辰山川草木聖人用之制爲  官長名雖不同同一道也譬水之在天下  爲川谷爲江海爲水不同同一水也欲學  者忘名還於無名之樸也故夫亦將知止  止於道也    知人者智章第三十三 知人者智自知者明  分别爲智蔽盡爲明分别之心未除故止  於知人而不能自知蔽盡則無復分别故  能自知而又可以及人也 勝人者有力自勝者强  力能及人而不能及我能克己復性則本  非力之所及故可謂强矣 知足者富  知足者所遇而足則未嘗不富矣雖有天  下常挾不足之心以處之則是終身不能  富也 强行者有志  不與物爭而自强不息物莫能奪其志也 不失其所者乆  物變無常而心未嘗失則乆矣 死而不亡者壽  死生之變亦大矣而性湛然不亡此古之  聖人能不生不死者也什曰在生而不生  曰乆在死而不死曰壽    大道汎兮章第三十四 大道汎兮其可左右  汎兮無可無不可故左右上下周旋無不  至也光曰其可不可也大道不可以固必  求不可以對待取 萬物恃之以生而不辭功成不名有
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the essence and characteristics of the Dao. It begins by noting that all things return to the Dao, just as rivers ultimately flow into the seas. The author explains that the Dao was originally nameless, only later being assigned various designations like the sun, moon, stars, mountains, rivers, and vegetation. Sages used these names to establish official positions—while the names differ, their essence remains the same Dao. Just as water in the world manifests in various forms like valleys, rivers, or oceans, its fundamental nature remains unchanged. This teaches practitioners to transcend the limitations of names and return to the primordial state of namelessness.

Chapter 33 describes several realms of personal cultivation: Understanding others demonstrates wisdom, but knowing oneself reveals true clarity; conquering others shows strength, but mastering oneself constitutes real power; those who are content are always abundant; those who persevere in practice possess true resolve; those who never lose their original mind endure; and those whose physical forms perish while their spirit remains undiminished achieve genuine longevity. It particularly emphasizes that true strength lies not in overpowering others but in restraining one's desires and returning to one's intrinsic nature.

Chapter 34 portrays the attributes of the Great Dao: The Dao flows everywhere, omnipresent ("it can go left or right"). All things depend on it to grow, yet it never declines responsibility; it accomplishes all without claiming merit. The Dao cannot be measured by fixed standards nor comprehended through dualistic concepts. It transcends all binary oppositions, being neither "affirmable" nor "negatable."

 世有生物而不辭者必將名之以爲己有  世有避物而不有者必將辭之而不生生  而不辭成而不有者惟道而已 衣被萬物而不爲主故常無欲可名於小萬 物歸焉而不爲主可名於大是以聖人終不 爲大故能成其大  大而有爲大之心則小矣政和曰覆露乎  萬物而示其宰制之功故不爲主鼓舞乎  羣衆而莫窺歸往之迹故不知主夫道非  大小之可名也云可名者道之及乎物者  耳孟子曰大而化之之謂聖夫大而能化  則豈有爲大之累所以能成其大    執大象章第三十五 執大象天下往  道非有無故謂之大象苟其昭然有形則  有同有異同者好之異者惡之好之則來  惡之則去不足以使天下皆往矣 往而不害安平泰  有好有惡則有所利有所害好惡旣盡則  其於萬物皆無害矣故至者無不安無不  平無不泰 樂與餌過客止道之出口淡乎其無味視之 不足見聽之不足聞用之不可旣  作樂設餌以待來者豈不足以止過客哉  然而樂闋餌盡彼將捨之而去若夫執大  象待天下天下不知好之又況得而惡之  乎雖無臭味形色聲音以悦人而其用不  可盡矣    將欲歙之章第三十六 將欲歙之必固張之將欲弱之必固强之將 欲廢之必固興之將欲奪之必固與之是謂 微明  未嘗與之而遽奪則勢有所不極理有所
Interpretation

There exists a power that creates all things yet never claims credit for its work. People often try to appropriate this power for themselves. Yet another kind of power withdraws from creation without seeking possession, actively declining any creative merit. Only the Dao can accomplish this—bringing forth all beings without claiming their achievements, perfecting everything without taking ownership.

The Dao clothes and shelters all things without ruling over them. Because it remains forever free of selfish desires, we might call it insignificant. Though all beings return to it, it refuses dominion, and thus we might also call it great. Therefore, the sage never considers himself great, and thereby attains true greatness. Those who presume greatness while clinging to notions of "greatness" ultimately diminish themselves.

The Dao cannot be defined by size—what we call "greatness" is merely its manifestation when acting upon the world. As Mencius said: "Only one who can transform all things deserves to be called a sage." The truly great can nurture all beings without being burdened by the empty title of "greatness," and thus achieve genuine greatness.

Chapter 35 states: "Those who hold fast to the Great Image (Da xiang) will find all under heaven turning to them." Because the Dao transcends being and non-being, it is called the "Great Image." If it appeared with obvious form, distinctions of preference would arise—those who like it would come, those who dislike it would depart, and it could never unite all under heaven. Those who return to the Dao suffer no harm; all attain peace, harmony, and well-being.

Music and fine food may detain passing guests, but when the music ends and the food is consumed, the guests will leave. Those who uphold the Great Dao in dealing with the world inspire neither particular fondness nor aversion. Though the Dao seems bland and flavorless, unremarkable to the eye and unpleasing to the ear, its function is inexhaustible.

Chapter 36 declares: "To contract something, one must first expand it; to weaken something, one must first strengthen it; to abolish something, one must first promote it; to take something, one must first give it." This is subtle wisdom. Without first giving, any sudden taking will fail to achieve the best outcome and violates the principle of the Dao.

 不足勢不極則取之難理不足則物不服  然此幾於用智也與管仲孫武何異聖人  之與世俗其迹故有相似者也聖人乘理  而世俗用智乘理如醫藥巧於應病用智  如商賈巧於射利知歙於張知弱於强知  興於廢知與於奪非知幾者孰能與此故  曰微明 柔弱勝剛强  聖人知剛强不足恃故以柔弱自處天下  之剛强方相傾相軋而吾獨柔弱以待之  及其大者傷小者死而吾以不校坐待其  斃此所謂勝也雖然聖人豈有意爲此以  勝物哉知勢之自然而居其自然耳 魚不可脱於淵國之利器不可以示人  魚之爲物非有爪牙之利足以勝物也然  方其託於深淵雖强有力者莫能執之及  其脱淵而陸則蠢然一物耳何能爲哉聖  人居於柔弱而剛强者莫能傷也又將以  前制其後此不亦天下利器也哉魚惟脱  於淵然後人得而制之聖人惟處於柔弱  而不厭故終能服天下此豈與衆人共之  者哉葉曰事物之變不可以盡窮疑若有  居無事而推行之者故見其張者不知所  欲歙見其强者不知所欲弱其於廢興與  奪亦然是雖微而可明此柔之所以能勝  剛弱之所以能勝强聖人之於天下蓋亦  有運之者焉而不可以示人謂之利器趙  曰開元注以爲聖人用權非也聖智在所  棄況權詐乎陸氏蘇氏以爲物理有之幾
Interpretation

When strength is insufficient and circumstances have not reached their extreme, forcibly seizing will rarely succeed; when the rationale is inadequate, all things will not submit. Yet this already approaches the methods of strategic cunning—how does it differ from the tactics of strategists like Guan Zhong or Sun Wu? The actions of sages may appear similar to those of ordinary people on the surface, but their essence differs entirely—sages act in accordance with the principles of heaven, while worldly people merely play with clever schemes.

Following heavenly principle is like a skilled physician prescribing the right remedy, while cunning is like a merchant speculating for profit. Knowing when to contract requires first understanding expansion; recognizing the need to appear weak demands first showing strength; understanding that decline precedes rise, and that giving is ultimately for gaining—who but those who grasp the subtle signs of things can achieve this? Thus, this is called "subtle wisdom."

The soft and weak can overcome the hard and strong. Sages know that strength is unreliable, so they consciously maintain a posture of gentleness. When the strong of the world clash and exhaust each other, the sage observes quietly from a position of softness, emerging victorious without effort once the mighty have worn each other down. Yet this is not the sage’s deliberate scheming—it is simply understanding the patterns of nature and flowing with them.

Just as fish cannot leave deep waters, the crucial methods of governance should not be lightly revealed. Fish lack sharp teeth or claws, yet when hidden in the depths, even the strongest cannot catch them; once they leave the water, they become helpless fools for slaughter. The sage abides in the way of softness, unharmed by the strong, and even turns retreat into control—this is the true "sharp weapon." Fish are caught only when they leave the water, but the sage remains ever gentle, thus ultimately conquering all under heaven. How could such wisdom be shared with ordinary people?

The transformations of things are inexhaustible, appearing as non-action (Wuwei) yet operating naturally. Seeing expansion, one does not perceive its coming contraction; witnessing strength, one does not foresee its decline—such is the nature of rise and fall, gain and loss. These subtle signs, though small, can be discerned, revealing why softness overcomes hardness. In governing the world, the sage has his own way of operation, yet it must not be carelessly displayed—this is what is called the "sharp weapon."

(Note: As mentioned in the text, Zhao’s critique of the Kaiyuan Commentary for interpreting the sage’s wisdom as mere strategy is mistaken, as sagely wisdom transcends cunning. Scholars like Lu and Su, however, argue that this reflects the inherent patterns of things themselves.)

 矣葉氏以謂若有造物推行之以證成柔  弱勝剛强之義當矣所謂利器豈所謂柔  弱者歟    道常無爲章第三十七 道常無爲而無不爲  無所不爲而無爲之之意耳 侯王若能守萬物將自化化而欲作吾將鎭 之以無名之樸  聖人以無爲化萬物萬物化之始於無爲  而漸至於作譬如嬰兒之長人僞日起故  三代之衰人情之變日以益甚方其欲作  而上之人與天下皆靡故其變至有不可  勝言者茍其方作而不爲之動終以無名  之樸鎭之庶幾可得而止也 無名之樸亦將不欲不欲以靜天下將自正  聖人中無抱樸之念外無抱樸之迹故樸  全而用大苟欲樸之心尚存於胸中則
Interpretation

Here the commentator Ye suggests that if there were indeed a creator driving the operation of all things, it would precisely demonstrate how the soft and yielding overcomes the hard and strong. Are not these so-called "sharp tools" (利器) in fact those seemingly soft and yielding things?

Chapter 37 of the Dao De Jing states: "The Dao is eternally without action (Wuwei), yet nothing is left undone." The great Dao forever maintains its natural state of non-action, yet accomplishes everything. This doesn't mean the Dao deliberately acts, but rather that while it brings all things to completion, it does so without any intentional effort.

If rulers can uphold this principle, all things will transform and develop naturally. When excessive desires arise in the course of things' development, they should be settled using the "nameless simplicity" (无名之朴) - referring to the Dao's original authentic state. The sage transforms all things through non-action. Initially, the changes in all things occur spontaneously, but gradually human artifice emerges. Just as an infant grows into adulthood, hypocrisy and affectation increasingly accumulate.

During the decline of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties, the changes in human hearts grew increasingly severe. When desires first begin to stir, if rulers simply follow these trends, such changes will develop beyond control. But if one remains unmoved when desires first appear, consistently using the pure simplicity of Dao to settle them, perhaps this tendency can be checked.

Yet this "nameless simplicity" itself should not become an object of attachment. When even the thought of maintaining purity disappears, the world naturally returns to tranquility. The true sage neither deliberately maintains purity in heart nor deliberately displays simplicity in appearance - only thus can the complete nature of Dao be preserved and its greatest function realized. If one still harbors thoughts like "I must maintain purity," one remains far from the true Dao.

失  之遠矣 道德眞經集解卷之二

Vol. 3

道德眞經集解卷之三𠕏三     趙學士集解    上德不德章第三十八 上德不德是以有德下德不失德是以無德  聖人縱心所欲不踰矩非有意於德而德  自足其下知德之貴勉强以求不失蓋僅  自完耳而何德之有 上德無爲而無以爲下德爲之而有以爲  無爲而有以爲之則猶有爲也唯無爲而  無以爲之者可謂無爲也其下非爲不成  然猶有以爲之非徒作而無術者也政和  曰不思而得未勉而中不行而至上德也  不思則不得不勉則不中不行則不至下  德也 上仁爲之而無以爲上義爲之而有以爲  仁義皆不勉於爲之矣仁以無以爲爲勝  義以有以爲爲功耳德有上下而仁義有  上而無下何也下德在仁義之間而仁義  下者不足復言可也 上禮爲之而莫之應則攘臂而仍之  自德以降而至於禮聖人之所以齊民者  極矣故爲之而不應則至於攘臂而强之  强之而又不應於是刑罰興而甲兵起則  徒作而無術矣 故失道而後德失德而後仁失仁而後義失 義而後禮夫禮者忠信之薄而亂之首也  忠信而無禮則忠信不見禮立而忠信之  美發越於外君臣父子之間夫婦朋友之  際其外燦然而其中無餘矣故順之則治  違之則亂治亂之相去其間不容以髮故  曰亂之首也 前識者道之華而愚之始也
Interpretation

Chapter 38 of the Dao De Jing discusses the varying manifestations of De (Virtue/Power) and their fundamental distinctions. The highest form of De (shangde, superior virtue) does not consciously flaunt its virtuousness, and thus truly embodies De. The inferior form of De (xiade) clings to not losing virtue, yet in doing so, it loses the true essence of De. The sage follows their heart's desires without transgressing natural laws—they do not deliberately pursue virtue, yet their De is naturally complete.

The supreme state of De is aligning with nature through Wuwei (non-action) without deliberate effort (wuyiwei). The inferior form of De still involves purposeful action. True Wuwei is entirely free from artificial striving, while the inferior form, though still virtuous, bears traces of human contrivance. The Zhenghe Zhenren explains: "To naturally harmonize without thought, to effortlessly attain balance without force, to achieve without action—this is shangde." Conversely, anything requiring deliberate effort belongs to xiade.

Benevolence (ren) and righteousness (yi) both fall within the realm of action: the benevolent act without utilitarian motives (wuyiwei), while the righteous act with clear principles (youyiwei). De has higher and lower forms, but ren and yi only have superior expressions—their inferior forms are not even worth mentioning. As for ritual propriety (li), when people perform rites yet receive no response, they roll up their sleeves and force compliance. From De to li, these are the sage’s last resorts in governing the people. When coercion fails, punishment and force must be employed—at which point governance descends into lawless brutality.

Thus, only when the great Dao is lost does De arise; when De declines, ren is emphasized; when ren is lacking, yi is invoked; and when yi decays, li is imposed. Li is actually the product of waning loyalty and sincerity, and paradoxically becomes the beginning of chaos. True loyalty and sincerity need no ritual to manifest, yet once li is established, their beauty becomes superficial form. Between ruler and subject, parent and child, husband and wife, or friends—outwardly, they may conform to ritual, but inwardly, they are hollow. Observing li brings order, violating it brings chaos. The line between order and chaos is thin, hence li is called "the beginning of disorder."

Those who claim to foresee the future (qianshi) merely grasp the superficial ornamentation of the Dao—precisely the onset of foolishness. Just as a great man stands firm in life, they should be substantial and sincere, not frivolous and shallow, preserving their true essence rather than chasing empty appearances.

 聖人玄覽萬物是非得失畢陳於前如鑑  之照形無所不見而孰爲前後世人視止  於目聽止於耳思止於心㝠行於萬物之  間役智以求識而偶有見焉雖以爲明不  知至愚之自是始也 是以大丈夫處其厚不處其薄居其實不居 其華故去彼取此  世之鄙夫樂其有得於下而忘其上故喜  薄而遺厚采華而棄實非大丈夫孰能去  彼取此陸曰忠信之質衰於中則制禮以  防其亂故禮居亂之首非謂禮爲亂之首  前識者道德之華發於外則崇禮以導其  愚非謂智乃愚之始也仁義禮智適時之  用執古御今則以道德之本處其厚也化  今復古則以禮爲之始從流反其源也趙  曰原聖人之意執古御今欲漸復無爲之  治故先陳道德次迷仁義末明禮樂其漸  必至刑政之苛語馴致而然耳流俗之士  遂輕蔑仁義毁滅禮法使一日無仁義則  亂一日無禮法則幾何其不胥而爲禽獸  也此晋宋之士所以蕩而忘返以至於國  破身亡而不自知也豈知聖人立言之眞  指與老氏論禮之本也哉    昔之得一章第三十九 昔之得一者天得一以清地得一以寧神得 一以靈谷得一以盈萬物得一以生侯王得 一以爲天下正  一道也物之所以得爲物者皆道也天下  之人見物而忘道天知其清而已地知其  寧而已神知其靈而已谷知其盈而已萬
Interpretation

The sage perceives all things with clarity, where right and wrong, gain and loss are reflected as clearly as in a mirror, leaving nothing unaccounted for—how could there be any need to impose an order of priority? Ordinary people, however, rely solely on their eyes to see, ears to hear, and minds to deliberate, groping blindly among the myriad things, forcibly seeking knowledge through intellect. When they occasionally grasp something, they consider themselves wise, unaware that this is precisely the beginning of foolishness.

Thus, the great man (one of wisdom) chooses the profound and substantial essence, not the shallow and superficial appearance; he dwells in the solid foundation, not the flashy branches and leaves. He discards the illusory and grasps the fundamental.

Worldly people become obsessed with petty gains before their eyes and forget the great Dao (the Way) at their roots. Thus, they prefer the shallow and discard the profound, plucking flowers while abandoning the root. If not for the great man, who could distinguish truth from falsehood? As Master Lu (the commentator) explains: When the inner qualities of loyalty and sincerity decline in people, rituals must be established to prevent chaos. Hence, it is said, "Rituals mark the beginning of disorder"—not that rituals themselves cause chaos. "Premature discernment" (judgment made too early) is the flower of De (Virtue/Power). When external conduct requires regulation, rituals are upheld to guide the ignorant—this does not mean wisdom is the origin of foolishness.

Benevolence, righteousness, rituals, and wisdom are all tools for timely use. To govern the present with the ancient Dao, one must take De as the foundation and dwell in profundity. To reform the present and return to the ancient Dao, one must begin with rituals, like returning to the source from a tributary. As Master Zhao (another commentator) elaborates: Delving into the sage's original intent, using the ancient Dao to govern the present is a gradual restoration of Wuwei (non-action) governance. Thus, the sage first expounds on Dao and De, then discusses benevolence and righteousness, and finally explains rituals and music. This gradual process inevitably leads to harsh laws and severe governance—a result of gradual evolution. Yet worldly people scorn benevolence and righteousness, abandoning ritual propriety. Imagine a single day without benevolence—chaos would ensue; a single day without rituals, would people not regress into beasts? This is why, during the Jin and Song periods (referring to the Wei-Jin and Southern Dynasties era), people indulged recklessly, leading to the collapse of states and families without realizing it. How could they understand the true purpose of the sage's teachings or the original meaning of Laozi's rituals?

Chapter 39: "Those of Old Who Attained the One"

In ancient times, those who attained the Dao (the "One" is Dao):

Heaven attained it and became clear,

Earth attained it and became tranquil,

Spirits attained it and became efficacious,

Valleys attained it and became full,

The myriad things attained it and came to life,

Kings and lords attained it and the world was governed.

Dao is singular, yet all things are able to be what they are because of it. People see only the myriad things but forget Dao:

Heaven knows only clarity,

Earth knows only tranquility,

Spirits know only efficacy,

Valleys know only fullness.

(This is to see only the surface and miss the essence.)

 物知其生而已侯王知其爲天下正而已  不知其所以得此者皆道存焉耳 其致之天無以清將恐裂地無以寧將恐發 神無以靈將恐歇谷無以盈將恐竭萬物無 以生將恐滅侯王無以貴高將恐蹶  致之言極也天不得一未遽裂也地不得  一未遽發也神不得一未遽歇也谷不得  一未遽竭也萬物不得一未遽滅也侯王  不得一未遽蹶也然其極必至於此耳 故貴以賤爲本高以下爲基  天地之大侯王之貴皆一之所致夫一果  何物也視之不見執之不得則亦天下之  至微也此所謂賤且下也 是以侯王自稱孤寡不穀此其以賤爲本耶 非乎  昔之爲此稱者亦舉其本而遺其末耳 故致數輿無輿不欲琭琭如玉落落如石  輪輻蓋軫衡軛轂轊會而爲車物物可數  而車不可數然後知無有之爲車所謂無  之以爲用者也然則天地將以大爲天地  耶侯王將以貴爲侯王耶大與貴之中有  一存焉此其所以爲天地侯王者而成者  莫知之耳故一處貴而非貴處賤而非賤  非若玉之琭琭貴而不能賤石之落落賤  而不能貴也趙曰諸說皆以輿訓車義有  未安竊意與衆也又輿臺皆賤者之稱上  文言其致一也此言故致數衆也衆無衆  猶言皆輿人無輿人之稱矣無輿人亦無  侯王之稱也容成氏曰除日無歲亦此意
Interpretation

All beings need only know they exist; rulers need only understand they serve as models for the world. Neither needs to inquire deeply why this is so, for all originates from the presence of the Dao (the fundamental principle of the universe).

Should this foundation be lost: heaven deprived of clarity would collapse, earth deprived of stability would quake, spirits deprived of efficacy would vanish, valleys deprived of fullness would wither, all beings deprived of vitality would perish, and rulers deprived of noble status would fall.

What we call "the ultimate" means reaching the extreme limit: heaven momentarily deviating from the Dao may not immediately collapse, nor earth instantly quake, but persisting to the limit inevitably brings such consequences. Thus nobility must take humility as its root, and elevation must have lowness as its foundation.

The vastness of heaven and earth, the nobility of rulers—all are accomplished through the "One" (manifestation of the Dao). What exactly is this "One"? Look and it cannot be seen, grasp and it cannot be held—it is the most subtle presence under heaven, what we call "humility and lowliness."

Hence rulers style themselves "solitary," "desolate," and "unworthy" (ancient royal self-deprecations), precisely demonstrating humility as their foundation. Ancient use of these terms grasped the essence while overlooking appearances.

Consider crafting a chariot: wheels, spokes, canopy—these components can be counted, yet the complete chariot cannot be reduced to their sum. Only then do we understand that "non-being" (holistic integrity) is the key to forming the chariot. This is how the function of so-called "non-being" manifests. Does heaven-and-earth become so through "vastness"? Do rulers become so through "nobility"? Within both "vastness" and "nobility" resides the "One"—this is their true foundation, though people remain unaware.

Thus the "One" dwells in nobility without claiming nobility, abides in humility without claiming humility. Unlike jade that esteems itself too highly to lower, or coarse stone that resigns itself too lowly to rise. Previous interpretations taking "yu" as chariot are imprecise—I believe it should mean "the multitude." "Yu tai" (ancient terms for lowly servants) emphasizes essential unity. To say "no servant-mind" renders royal titles meaningless. As ancients said: "Remove the days and years vanish"—the same principle applies.

 也不欲如玉之琭琭石之珞珞貴賤之名  殊其爲一也遠矣然未敢自以爲是姑俟  來哲王吕改輿作譽亦近乎鑿    反者道之動章第四十 反者道之動  復性則靜矣然其寂然不動感而遂通天  下之故則動之所自超也雱曰反本則靜  靜乃能動 弱者道之用  道無形無聲天下之弱者莫如道然而天  下之至强莫加焉此其所以能用萬物也 天下之物生於有有生於無  世不知靜之爲動弱之爲强故告之以物  之所自生者蓋天下之物聞有以母制子  未聞有以子制母者也    上士聞道章第四十一 上士聞道勤而行之中士聞道若存若亡下 士聞道大笑之不笑不足以爲道  道非形不可見非聲不可聞非知先萬物  之表廓然無蔽卓然有見未免於不信也  故下士聞道以爲荒唐繆悠而笑之中士  聞道與之存亡出没而疑之惟了然見之  者然後勤行服膺而不怠孔子曰語之而  不墯者其回也與斯所謂上士也哉 建言有之  建立也古之立言者有是說而老子取之  下之所陳者是也 明道若昧  無所不照而非察也 進道若退  若止不行而天下之速者莫之或先也 夷道若類  或夷或類所至則平而未嘗削也 上德若谷  上德不德若谷之虚也 大白若辱  使白而不受污此不屑不潔之士而非聖  人也
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the profound teachings about the Dao (the Way) from the Daode Jing. It begins by pointing out that whether it's precious jade or ordinary stone, they are essentially the same in nature—it is only people who impose distinctions of value. The truly wise do not cling stubbornly to their own views but remain open-minded, awaiting the judgment of future generations.

The chapter on "Reversal is the movement of the Dao" explains that the Dao operates in cyclical patterns. Returning to one's original nature leads to stillness, yet this stillness is not lifeless inertia but the fundamental force containing infinite vitality. Though the Dao appears soft and formless, it is the most powerful force in the world, capable of governing all things. All phenomena in the world arise from "being" (you), yet "being" itself originates from "non-being" (wu).

The text then discusses the varying levels of understanding among people: those of superior wisdom hear the Dao and diligently practice it; those of average wisdom half-believe and half-doubt; while those of inferior wisdom mock it. The Dao is not a tangible thing, making it difficult for ordinary people to comprehend. Only those who truly grasp it can persevere in its cultivation.

Several paradoxical yet unified truths are presented: true brightness appears dim; advancement seems like retreat; the smoothest path appears rugged; the highest virtue (De) is as humble as a valley; the purest white seems stained. These illustrate the dialectical nature of the Dao, showing that true wisdom often contradicts conventional understanding.

These teachings stem from the insights of ancient sages, which Laozi quoted and expanded upon, revealing the profound essence and operational principles of the Dao.

廣德若不足  廣大而不可復加則止於此而已非廣也 建德若偷  因物之自然而無所立者外若偷墯而實  建立也 質眞若渝  體性抱神隨物變化而不失其眞者外若  渝也政和曰不曰堅乎磨而不磷不曰白  乎涅而不緇 大方無隅  全其大方不小立圭角也 大器晚成  器大不可近用也 大音希聲  非耳之所得聞也 大象無形  非目之所得見也 道隱無名夫惟道善貸且成  道之所遇無所不見凡此十二者皆道之  見於事者也而道之大全則隱於無名惟  其所遇推其有餘以貸不足物之賴之以  成者如此    道生一章第四十二 道生一一生二二生三三生萬物萬物負陰 而抱陽冲氣以爲和  夫道非一非二及其與物爲偶道一而物  不一故以一名道然則道非一也一與一  爲二二與一爲三自是以往而萬物生雖  有萬不同莫不負陰而抱陽冲氣以爲和  者蓋物生於三而三生於一理之自然也  雱曰一太極二陰陽三冲氣也 人之所惡唯孤寡不穀而王公以爲稱  世之人不知萬物之所自生莫不賤寡小  而貴衆大然王公之尊而自稱孤寡不穀  古之達者蓋已知之 故物或損之而益益之而損人之所教亦我 義教之强梁者不得其死吾將以爲教父  世以柔弱爲損强梁爲益不知其非也故
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the characteristics of the Dao (the Way) and its operational principles. The most expansive De (Virtue/Power) appears insufficient, because true vastness cannot be increased further—thus it paradoxically seems lacking. When establishing virtue, one appears relaxed yet is actually aligning with nature through Wuwei (non-action); what seems outwardly idle contains profound meaning within.

Those who preserve essential purity may appear adaptable externally, yet never lose their fundamental truth internally. As the ancients said: "What is truly hard cannot be worn thin; what is truly white cannot be stained black." The most square objects have no corners, the greatest vessels take the longest to complete, the loudest sounds become inaudible, and the grandest forms remain invisible.

The Dao itself is hidden and nameless, yet skillfully nourishes all things to maturity. These twelve phenomena manifest the Dao in concrete forms, while its totality remains concealed within namelessness. It consistently uses surplus to compensate deficiency—all things rely on the Dao for fulfillment.

Chapter 42 describes the generative process of existence: The Dao gives birth to One (Taiji, the Supreme Ultimate), One generates Two (Yin-Yang), Two produces Three (the harmonizing Qi [vital energy] from Yin-Yang interaction), and Three gives rise to the myriad things. All beings carry Yin on their backs while embracing Yang, their opposing energies vibrating into harmonious states. The Dao itself is neither One nor Two—when referenced against creation, we call it "One." Though the myriad things differ vastly, all follow the natural law of Yin-Yang harmonization.

People dislike being called "orphaned," "widowed," or "unworthy," yet rulers adopt these terms for themselves. Ancient sages understood that all things develop from modest beginnings—what appears weak contains latent vitality. Ordinary people consider diminishment harmful and increase beneficial, but this isn't necessarily true. The violently domineering often meet untimely ends—this truth serves as education's foundational principle.

 使天下之教者皆以此教之曰不見强梁  者不得其死乎强梁妄之極也人知强梁  之不免於死則知妄之不可爲而後可與  言道矣故曰吾將以爲教父    天下之至柔章第四十三 天下之至柔馳騁天下之至堅無有入於無 間吾是以知無爲之有益不言之教無爲之 益天下希及之  以堅御堅不折則碎以柔御堅柔亦不靡  堅亦不病求之於物則水是也以有入有  捍不相受以無入有無未嘗勞有未嘗覺  求之於物鬼神是也是以聖人唯能無爲  故能役使衆强出入衆有故終之曰不言  之教無爲之益天下希及之    名與身章第四十四 名與身孰親身與貨孰多  先身而後名貴身而賤貨猶未爲忘我也  夫忘我者身且不有而況名與貨乎然貴  以身天下非忘我不能故使天下知名之  不足親貨之不足多而後知貴身知貴身  而後知忘我此老子之意也 得與亡孰病  不得者以亡爲病及其旣得而患失則病  有甚於亡者唯齊有無均得喪而後無病 是故甚愛必大費多藏必厚亡  愛之甚則凡可以求之者無所不爲能無  費乎藏之多則攻之者必衆能無亡乎 知足不辱知止不殆可以長乆    大成若缺章第四十五 大成若缺其用不弊大盈若冲其用不窮  天下以不缺爲成故成必有弊以不冲爲
Interpretation

The Dao teaches all under heaven thus: Those who act with tyrannical force will ultimately meet an untimely end, for excessive force represents the height of arrogance. When people understand that the forceful inevitably perish, they will recognize the folly of reckless action, and only then can they begin to discuss the Great Dao. Therefore, I take this principle as the foundation of instruction.

The softest things in the world can overcome the hardest. The formless can penetrate where there are no gaps—from this I comprehend the benefits of wuwei (non-action). The teaching without words, the benefits of non-action, these are things few in the world can attain. When hardness opposes hardness, one will break and the other will shatter; when softness meets hardness, the soft remains unharmed while the hard remains uninjured. In nature, water exemplifies this perfectly. When form opposes form, both suffer damage; when the formless enters form, the formless never wearies while the form remains unaware. In nature, this is how spirits and ghosts operate. Thus, the sage, precisely because he practices non-action, can govern the strong and move freely among all forms. The conclusion remains: The teaching without words, the benefits of non-action, these are things few in the world can attain.

Which is more precious—fame or life? Which is more important—life or wealth? To value life above fame and prize life over wealth does not yet constitute true selflessness. The truly selfless do not cling even to their own being—how much less to fame and wealth? Yet to govern the world by esteeming life, one must reach this state of selflessness. Therefore, people must first understand that fame is not worth pursuing and wealth not worth hoarding before they can learn to cherish life; only by cherishing life can they attain selflessness. This is Laozi’s essential meaning.

Which brings greater suffering—gain or loss? Before obtaining something, one suffers from its absence; after obtaining it, one fears losing it—this suffering exceeds the pain of loss itself. Only by regarding possession and lack, gain and loss as equal can one be free from such suffering. Thus it is said: Excessive miserliness leads to great waste; excessive hoarding invites severe loss. When love becomes extreme, one will stop at nothing to obtain—how can this not be wasteful? When hoarding becomes excessive, it attracts many contenders—how can this not bring loss? Knowing contentment prevents disgrace; knowing when to stop avoids danger—only thus can one endure.

What is most perfect seems flawed, yet its function never fails; what is most full seems empty, yet its function is inexhaustible. Ordinary people believe perfection means having no flaws, so their perfection inevitably decays; they believe fullness means having no emptiness...

 盈故盈必有窮聖人要於大成而不恤其  缺期於大盈而不惡其冲是以成而不弊  盈而不窮也 大直若屈大巧若拙大辯若訥  直而不屈其直必折循理而行雖屈而直  巧而不拙其巧必勞付物自然雖拙而巧  辯而不訥其辯必窮因理而言雖訥而辯 躁勝寒靜勝熱清靜爲天下正  成而不缺盈而不冲直而不屈巧而不拙  辯而不訥譬如躁之不能靜靜之不能躁  耳夫躁能勝寒而不能勝熱靜能勝熱而  不能勝寒皆滯於一偏而非其正也唯泊  然清靜不染於一非成非缺非盈非冲非  直非屈非巧非拙非辯非訥而後無所不  勝可以爲天下正矣葉曰寒暑者天地之  氣也有人於此躁猶可以勝寒靜猶可以  勝熱苟知其所勝孰往而不可爲則清勝  濁靜勝動其效亦可已矣而況於缺之勝  成冲之勝盈屈之勝直拙之勝巧訥之勝  辯惟其不察此故必求其能勝之者苟求  勝之終非其正也唯清靜爲天下正    天下有道章第四十六 天下有道却走馬以糞天下無道戎馬生於 郊  天下各安其分則不爭而自治故却走馬  而糞田天下無道戎馬生於郊矣政和曰  以道治天下民各樂其業而無所爭糞其  田疇而已 罪莫大於可欲禍莫大於不知足咎莫大於 欲得  以其可欲者示人固有罪矣而不知其足
Interpretation

When things reach their peak of fullness, they inevitably decline. The sage pursues the highest achievements yet does not dwell on shortcomings, aspires to perfect wholeness yet does not despise emptiness. Only in this way can success be maintained without decline, and fullness be preserved without exhaustion.

True uprightness appears bent, true skill appears clumsy, true eloquence appears mute. If one insists on being rigidly straight without bending, such uprightness is prone to break. Following the natural order, what seems bent is actually upright. If one relentlessly pursues cleverness while refusing to appear clumsy, such cleverness will eventually exhaust its wielder. Aligning with the Dao, what seems clumsy is truly skillful. If one constantly argues without ever remaining silent, such eloquence will ultimately lead to deadlock. Speaking in accordance with principle, what appears mute is in fact profoundly eloquent.

Movement can withstand cold, while stillness overcomes heat—yet serene Wuwei (non-action) is the true path to governing the world. To pursue only success while rejecting shortcomings, to seek only fullness without allowing emptiness, to demand straightness without understanding bending, to chase cleverness while disdaining clumsiness, to value eloquence while shunning silence—this is as one-sided as movement that cannot be still or stillness that cannot move. Movement may conquer cold but cannot overcome heat; stillness may subdue heat but cannot withstand cold—both represent attachment to extremes. Only by maintaining tranquil detachment, free from fixation on any polarity—success or failure, fullness or emptiness, straightness or bending, skill or clumsiness, eloquence or silence—can one become truly invincible and embody the world's proper path.

As Lord Ye observed: "Cold and heat are the natural Qi of heaven and earth." When people move vigorously, they withstand cold; when they remain still, they overcome heat. Understanding these cyclical patterns of conquest and generation, what could possibly be beyond attainment? That clarity overcomes turbidity and stillness overcomes agitation is already evident. How much more so that deficiency conquers fullness, emptiness conquers solidity, bending conquers rigidity, clumsiness conquers cleverness, and silence conquers eloquence. People simply fail to comprehend this principle, hence their constant pursuit of superficial victory. Fixation on winning and losing can never represent the true path. Only serene Wuwei constitutes the fundamental law for governing the world.

Chapter 46 of The Dao in the World states: "When the world follows the great Dao, warhorses retire to fertilize fields; when the world abandons the Dao, even the suburbs breed warhorses." When all things occupy their proper places without contention, peace arises naturally—thus warhorses may return to plowing. When governance becomes disordered, warhorses multiply in wilderness. Governing through the Dao, people dwell contentedly without strife, simply cultivating their own fields.

No crime exceeds indulging desires, no calamity surpasses insatiability, no fault exceeds greed. While tempting people with desirable objects constitutes wrongdoing, the root lies in humanity's inability to know contentment.

 者其禍尤甚所欲必得者其咎最大匹夫  有一于身患必及之侯王而爲是必戎馬  之所自起也陸曰無道之君毒痛天下其  惡有三心見可欲非理而求故罪莫大焉  求而不已害人必多故禍莫大焉欲而不  得其心愈熾故咎莫大焉 故知足之足常足矣  知足所遇而足故無不足也    不岀戶章第四十七 不出户知天下不窺牖見天道其出彌遠其 知彌少  性之爲體充遍宇宙無遠近古今之異古  之聖人其所以不出户牖而無所不知者  特其性全故耳世之人爲物所蔽性分於  耳目内爲身心之所紛亂外爲山河之所  障塞見不出視聞不出聽户牖之微能蔽  而絶之不知聖人復性而足乃欲出而求  之是以彌遠而彌少也以身觀身以内知  外原小而知大明近而諭遠 是以聖人不行而知不見而名不爲而成  性之所及非特能知能名而已蓋可以因  物之自然不勞而成之矣光曰情封即滯  理契即神陸曰聖人當食而思天下之飢  當衣而思天下之寒愛其親以及天下之  老愛其子以及天下之幼不俟出户而天  下可知矣已好生則知天道之生萬物己  成務則知天道之成四時己樂善則知天  道之與善人安用窺牖而後見天道哉夫  不行而能察知人情不見而能名天道不  爲而成至治反推身心故也    爲學日益章第四十八
Interpretation

Those who are insatiable in their greed will invite greater calamities; those who forcefully seek to obtain everything will inevitably suffer the most severe consequences. Ordinary people who indulge in such faults will face misfortune, while rulers who act this way will inevitably provoke chaos. Lu Xisheng (a Tang Dynasty Daoist) explains that foolish and unprincipled rulers who bring suffering to the world commit three major evils: First, seizing what they desire without reason is the gravest crime. Second, boundless greed inevitably harms more people, which is the greatest disaster. Third, when desires remain unfulfilled, the inner fire of craving grows stronger—this is the most serious failing. Thus, only those who understand contentment can truly attain lasting fulfillment. Because the contented remain at peace with their circumstances, they will never feel deprived.

Chapter 47 speaks of the "wisdom of staying within doors": Those who have truly attained the Dao (the Way) need not step outside to understand the affairs of the world, nor must they look out the window to grasp the patterns of Heaven’s principles. Those who rush about seeking the Dao only comprehend less the farther they travel. This is because one’s innate nature (referring to the original spiritual essence of a person) already permeates the entire cosmos, unbound by time or space. The ancient sages could know all things without leaving their homes precisely because they preserved the wholeness of their nature. Ordinary people, however, are obscured by external distractions—their nature is fragmented, internally disturbed by the seven emotions and six desires, externally blocked by mountains, rivers, and scenery. Their eyes see only what is before them, their ears hear only what is nearby; even small barriers like doors and windows completely obstruct their perception. They fail to realize that the sages, by restoring their innate nature, already possess all they need. Instead, they seek outwardly, and thus the farther they go, the less they understand. In truth, by observing oneself, one can infer others; from within, one can comprehend the external; from the small, one can grasp the great; from the near, one can deduce the distant. Therefore, the sages need not travel far to know, nor must they see directly to understand. Without deliberate action, they achieve success. Wherever the innate nature extends, one not only recognizes and names things but also aligns with the natural patterns of all things, effortlessly accomplishing everything.

Cheng Xuanying (a Tang Dynasty Daoist) says: "When closed off by desires, one becomes obstructed; when in harmony with the principles of Heaven, one attains spiritual clarity." Lu Xisheng adds: "When the sages eat, they think of those starving in the world; when they clothe themselves, they think of those suffering from cold. From cherishing their own kin, they extend compassion to all elders; from loving their own children, they extend care to all children. Thus, without stepping outside, they understand the world’s affairs. By valuing their own lives, they grasp the Dao’s way of generating all things; by achieving their own endeavors, they comprehend the Dao’s operation of the four seasons; by delighting in good deeds, they understand the Dao’s protection of the virtuous. Why must one look out the window to recognize the Dao? Without traveling far, one can discern human affairs; without direct observation, one can understand Heaven’s principles; without forced action, one can achieve perfect governance—all this comes from turning inward and reflecting on oneself."

Chapter 48 discusses "learning and cultivating the Dao": Those who pursue worldly knowledge accumulate more and more information, but those who cultivate the great Dao (the Way) reduce their desires further and further. By continuously diminishing desires, one ultimately reaches the state of wuwei (non-action). Through wuwei, one can accomplish everything. In governing the world, one must always avoid excessive interference—those who are eager to act are, in fact, unfit to rule.

爲學日益  不知道而務學聞見日多而無以一之未  免爲學者也孔子曰多聞擇其善者而從  之多見而識之知之次也 爲道日損  茍一日知道顧視萬物無一非妄去妄以  求復性而性復實無幾孔子謂子貢曰女  以予爲多學而識之者與曰然非與曰非  也予一以貫之 損之又損之以至於無爲無爲而無不爲  去妄以求復性可謂損矣而去妄之心猶  存及其兼忘此心性純而無餘然後無所  不爲而不失於無爲矣損之在漸初損損  迹又損損心心迹俱忘以至無爲 故取天下常以無事及其有事不足以取天 下  人皆有欲取天下之心故造事而求之心  見於外而物惡之故終不可得聖人無爲  故無事其心見於外而物安之雖不取天  下而天下歸之    聖人無常心章第四十九 聖人無常心以百姓心爲心善者吾善之不 善者吾亦善之德善信者吾信之不信者吾 亦信之德信  虚空無形因萬物之形以爲形在方爲方  在圓爲圓如使虚空自有形則何以形萬  物哉是以聖人無心因百姓之心以爲心  無善不善皆善之無信不信皆信之善不  善在彼而吾之所以善之者未嘗渝也可  謂德善矣信不信在彼而吾之所以信之  者未嘗變也可謂德信矣不然善善而棄  不善信信而棄不信豈所謂常善救人故  無棄人哉
Interpretation

The pursuit of knowledge leads to daily accumulation of information, yet if one fails to synthesize this knowledge into a coherent whole, they remain merely a bookish scholar. Confucius once said: "Listen widely to diverse perspectives, selecting the worthy to follow; observe extensively and retain what you see—this is a secondary form of understanding."

The cultivation of the Dao (the Way) operates in the opposite manner, requiring daily reduction. Once one comprehends the Dao, they realize all phenomena in the world are illusory and insubstantial. By discarding illusions to return to one's true nature, little effort is ultimately needed. Confucius asked Zigong: "Do you think I attain wisdom through extensive learning and memorization?" Zigong replied: "Indeed—isn't that so?" Confucius said: "No. I thread all knowledge with a single fundamental principle."

Continue reducing until reaching the state of Wuwei (non-action). While appearing inactive, nothing remains undone. Eliminating illusions to restore one's original nature is already reduction, yet if the thought "I must discard illusions" persists, the process remains incomplete. Only when even this thought is forgotten, when the mind becomes utterly pure and untainted, can one spontaneously accomplish all while maintaining Wuwei. This reduction must proceed gradually—first diminishing outward actions, then inner attachments, until both body and mind are completely released.

Thus governing the world requires following natural patterns. Forced intervention inevitably fails. People's ambitions to contend for the world create artificial disturbances—when such intentions manifest externally, all things recoil, ensuring ultimate failure. The sage maintains Wuwei, creating no disturbances; when their mind manifests, all things naturally settle. Though not actively pursuing the world, the world returns to them.

Chapter 49 describes the sage's mind: Sages hold no fixed opinions but take the people's hearts as their own. To the virtuous I extend virtue; to the non-virtuous I also extend virtue—this is true virtue. To the trustworthy I extend trust; to the untrustworthy I also extend trust—this is true trust.

Emptiness has no fixed form—it adapts to all shapes, becoming square with squares and round with circles. If emptiness possessed inherent form, how could it contain all things? Therefore sages hold no fixed views but take the people's hearts as their own. Whether others are virtuous or not, I meet them with virtue; whether trustworthy or not, I meet them with trust. Others' virtue is their concern—my virtuous heart never wavers; this constitutes true virtue. Others' trustworthiness is their concern—my trusting heart remains constant; this constitutes true trust. To only cherish the virtuous while rejecting others, or only trust the reliable while abandoning the rest—how could this be called "eternally saving all, therefore rejecting none"?

聖人之在天下惵惵爲天下渾其心百姓皆 注其耳目聖人皆孩之  天下善惡信僞方各自是以相非相賊不  知所定聖人憂之故惵惵爲天下渾其心  無善惡無信僞皆以一待之彼方注其耳  目以觀聖人之予奪而吾一以嬰兒遇之  於善無所喜於惡無所嫉夫是以善者不  矜而惡者不怒釋然皆化而天下始定矣  葉曰聖人之在天下在而不治也    出生入死章第五十 出生入死  性無生死出而爲生入而爲死 生之徒十有三死之徒十有三人之生動之 死地十有三  用物取精以自滋養者生之徒也聲色臭  味以自戕賊者死之徒也二者旣分生死  之道矣吾又知作而不知休知言而不知  默知思而不知忘以趣於盡則所謂動而  之死地者也生死之道以十言之三者各  居其三矣豈非生死之道九而不生死之  道一而已乎不生不死則易所謂寂然不  動者也老子言其九不言其一使人自得  之以寄無思無爲之妙也政和曰與死生  爲徒者固未免夫與貪生而背理忘生而  徇利凡民之生動之死地則其生也與死  奚擇 夫何故以其生生之厚  有生則有死故生之徒則死之徒也人之  所賴於生者厚則死之道常十九 蓋聞善攝生者陸行不遇兕虎入軍不被甲 兵兕無所投其角虎無所措其爪兵無所容
Interpretation

The sage governs the world with a cautious and reverent heart, guiding all people's minds back to simplicity. While the common folk attentively observe the sage's every action, the sage cherishes them like infants.

People often quarrel and fight due to differing standards of good and evil, truth and falsehood, not knowing how to find peace. Troubled by this, the sage carefully restores simplicity to human hearts, treating all without distinction between good and evil, truth and falsehood. The people focus on the sage's rewards and punishments, yet the sage maintains an attitude of childlike purity—neither overly pleased by good deeds nor excessively resentful of wrongdoing. Thus, the virtuous are not prideful, and the wicked are not enraged. All are naturally transformed, and the world attains peace. Ye Mengde comments that the sage exists in the world without forcefully governing it.

On Life and Death (Chapter 50):

The emergence of life is called "birth," and its disappearance is called "death." Original nature has no birth or death—it appears as life and withdraws as death.

Three-tenths nourish life, three-tenths harm it, and another three-tenths result from reckless actions that bring about death. Using external things wisely to nurture Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) belongs to the category of life; indulging in sensory pleasures that damage life belongs to the category of death. These two already distinguish the paths of life and death. But if one only labors without rest, only speaks without silence, only thinks without forgetting—such extremes lead to self-inflicted death. If divided into tenths, these three categories each account for three parts, showing that the ways of life and death occupy nine-tenths, while the Dao beyond life and death occupies only one-tenth. That state of neither birth nor death is what the Yijing calls "serene and unmoving." Laozi speaks only of the nine-tenths, leaving the one-tenth for people to realize the profound mystery of no-thought and Wuwei (non-action).

Why do people bring death upon themselves? Because they excessively pursue longevity. Where there is life, there must be death—over-attachment to preserving life instead leads easily to death. Those truly skilled in nourishing life walk on land without encountering rhinos or tigers and enter battlefields without armor or weapons—rhinos find no place to gore, tigers no place to claw, and weapons no place to strike. This is because they do not place themselves in death's path.

其刃夫何故以其無死地  至人常在不生不死中生地且無焉有死  地哉    道生之章第五十一 道生之德畜之物形之勢成之  道者萬物之母故生萬物者道也及其運  而爲德牧養群衆而不辭故畜萬物者德  也然而道德則不能自形因物而形見物  不能自成遠近相取剛柔相交積而爲勢  而興亡治亂之變成矣 是以萬物莫不尊道而貴德  形雖由物成雖由勢而非道不生非德不  畜是以尊道而貴德尊如父母貴如侯王  道無位而德有名故也 道之尊德之貴夫莫之爵而常自然  恃爵而後尊貴者非實尊貴也 故道生之畜之長之育之成之熟之養之覆 之生而不有爲而不恃長而不宰是謂玄德  光曰道若恃宰則道外有物非玄德也陸  曰載營魄章言人同於道德此章言道德  同於人    天下有始章第五十二 天下有始以爲天下母  無名天地之始有名萬物之母道方無名  則物之所資始也及其有名則物之所實  生也故旣謂之始又謂之母其子則萬物  也 旣得其母以知其子旣知其子復守其母没 身不殆  聖人體道以用物譬如以母知子了然無  不察也雖其智能周之然而未嘗以物忘  道故終守其母也 塞其兊閉其門終身不勤開其兊濟其事終 身不救  天下皆具此道然常患忘道而徇物目悦
Interpretation

Why is it said that the highest adepts can evade death? Because they transcend the boundaries of life and death—where even the concept of birth does not exist, how could death?

In Chapter 51, The Dao Gives Life, it is said: The Dao (cosmic origin) generates all things, while De (the manifestation of Dao) nourishes them. Concrete forms are given by material substance, and environmental forces facilitate their development. The Dao is like the mother of all things, while De silently nurtures beings like a shepherd. Though Dao and De themselves have no tangible form, they are revealed through the existence of all things. Yet nothing can take shape on its own—it requires distant and near interactions, hard and soft complementing one another, accumulating momentum before the cycles of rise and fall, order and chaos emerge.

Thus, all things revere the Dao and treasure De. Though forms are shaped by matter and development is driven by circumstance, without the Dao, nothing would be born; without De, nothing could be nurtured. Honoring the Dao is like respecting one’s parents, while valuing De is akin to revering a ruler—for though the Dao holds no formal rank, De exerts its influence visibly. This reverence is not conferred by any authority but arises naturally. If nobility depends on external bestowal, it is not true nobility.

Therefore, the Dao generates, nourishes, cultivates, perfects, matures, protects, and embraces all things. It creates without possessing, acts without claiming merit, guides without dominating—this is the profoundest "Mystic De (玄德)." As the commentary explains: If the Dao were to deliberately dominate, it would imply something beyond the Dao, and thus it would no longer be Mystic De. Earlier, in The Chapter on Carrying the Hun and Po, the text discusses how humans align with Dao and De, while this chapter shows how Dao and De manifest in the human world.

Chapter 52, All Under Heaven Has a Beginning, states: The myriad things of heaven and earth have an origin, which can be regarded as the mother of all under heaven. When the Dao is in its "nameless" state, it serves as the foundation for the beginning of all things; when it manifests as the "named," it becomes the womb that nurtures them. Thus, it is called both the "beginning" and the "mother," while all things are its children.

Those who awaken to the Dao comprehend all things by grasping the root, just as one understands a child by knowing its mother. Though wisdom allows them to observe all phenomena, they never lose themselves in chasing external things, thus always abiding in the source of the Great Dao. If one blocks the desires of the senses (the "openings" or dui refer to sensory gates) and closes the doors of temptation, they will enjoy peace all their life. Conversely, indulging the senses and chasing external things leads to lifelong bondage. All people possess the potential for awakening, yet they often lose themselves in external distractions—eyes craving beauty, ears chasing music, the tongue indulging in flavors, the mind trapped in gain and loss. In this way, they drift ever further from the root.

 於色耳悦於聲開其悦之之心而以其事  濟之是以終身陷溺而不能救夫聖人之  所以終身不勤者唯塞而閉之未嘗出  徇之也 見小曰明  悦之爲害始小而浸大知小而將大塞而  閉之可謂明矣 守柔曰强  趣其所悦而不願自以爲强而非强也唯  見悦而知畏之者可謂强也 用其光復歸其明無遺身殃是謂襲常  世人開其所悦以身徇物往而不反聖人  塞而閉之非絶物也以神應物用其光而  己身不與也夫耳之能聽目之能視鼻之  能嗅口之能嘗身之能觸心之能思皆所  謂光也蓋光與物接物有至而明無損是  以應萬變而不窮殃不及於其身故其常  性湛然相襲而不絶也政和曰明者光之  體光者明之用    使我介然章第五十三 使我介然有知行於大道唯施是畏  體道者無知無行無所施設而物自化今  介然有知而行於大道則所施設建立非  其自然有足畏者矣肇曰有所知則有所  不知聖心無知故無所不知小知大知之  賊也 大道甚夷民甚好徑  大道甚夷易無有險阻世之不知者以爲  迂緩而好徑以求捷故凡舍其自然而有  所施設者皆欲速者也 朝甚除田甚蕪倉甚虛服文彩帶利劍厭飲 食財貨有餘是謂盜誇非道也哉  俗人昭昭我獨若昏俗人察察我獨悶悶
Interpretation

When the eyes are captivated by beauty and the ears enthralled by enchanting sounds, indulging in these sensory desires ultimately traps people in inescapable bondage. The reason sages can maintain purity is that they understand how to close the gates of desire, never indulging in the pursuit of external things.

True wisdom lies in recognizing subtle omens. The harm of desire may be minuscule at first but gradually expands; to guard against it while it is still small is the mark of true wisdom. Maintaining a gentle and yielding posture leads to genuine strength. Those who chase desires while believing themselves strong are not truly powerful; only those who remain reverent in the face of temptation possess real strength.

Using sensory perception without losing one’s original mind avoids calamity—this is the way of constancy. Ordinary people indulge their desires, led astray by external things, never to return. Sages close the gates of desire not to cut themselves off entirely from the world but to engage with it through the spirit (shen). They employ their senses (the "light" refers to the faculties of sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch, and thought) without becoming ensnared by them. Though these senses perceive the transformations of all things, their inner clarity remains unaffected, allowing them to respond to all changes without harm, preserving their unchanging nature. As Master Zhenghe said: Clarity is the state of the original essence, while perception is its function.

Chapter 53, "If I Were Suddenly Enlightened," states: If I were to suddenly acquire some knowledge to propagate the Dao, my greatest fear would be this kind of artificial striving. Those who truly embody the Dao need no deliberate knowledge or action—all things naturally flourish. To forcibly impose knowledge in spreading the Dao is a sign of misguided effort, worthy of caution. The monk Sengzhao said: To know something is to be ignorant of something else; the sage’s mind, free from fixed knowledge, knows all. Petty cleverness only obstructs true wisdom.

The Dao is inherently smooth and easy to follow, yet people insist on taking shortcuts. The Dao is naturally accessible, without obstacles, but those who do not understand it consider it circuitous and always seek faster paths. Thus, abandoning the natural way in favor of forced action is a symptom of impatience and greed.

(Criticizing worldly extravagance) The courts are adorned in splendor while fields lie barren, and granaries stand empty. People dress in fine robes, gird themselves with sharp swords, feast daily, and hoard wealth—these are nothing but the boasts of bandits, utterly contrary to the Dao. The worldly appear shrewd, while I seem foolish; the people calculate meticulously, while I remain simple and unadorned.

 豈復飾末廢本以施設爲事誇以誨盜哉    善建不拔章第五十四 善建者不拔善抱者不脱子孫祭祀不輟  世豈有建而不拔抱而不脱者乎惟聖人  知性之眞審物之妄損物而修身其德充  積實無所立而其建有不可拔者實無所  執而其無有不可脱者故至其子孫猶以  祭祀不輟也 修之身其德乃眞修之家其德乃餘修之鄉 其德乃長修之國其德乃豐修之天下其德 乃普  明身旣修推其餘以及外雖至於治天下  可也 故以身觀身以家觀家以鄉觀鄉以國觀國 以天下觀天下吾何以知天下之然哉以此  天地外者世俗所不見矣然其理可推而  知也修身之至以身觀身以家觀家以鄉  觀鄉以國觀國皆吾之所及知也然安知  聖人以天下觀天下不若吾之以身觀身  乎豈身可以身觀而天下獨不可以身觀  乎故曰吾何以知天下之然哉以此言亦  以身知之耳陸曰善建者以道鎭國本則  深根固蔕而不可拔善抱者以德懷民心  則無繩約而不可解而子孫享祚長乆祭  祀不輟下文修之身下其施轉大以身觀  身以至天下有常然之理不出户而知也    含德之厚章第五十五 含德之厚比於赤子  老子之言道德每以嬰兒況之者皆言其  體而已未及其用也今夫嬰兒泊然無欲  其體之者至矣然嬰兒物來而不知應故
Interpretation

Where in this world can we find structures that are built yet never dismantled, or things embraced that never slip away? Only the sages understand the true nature of our being and see through the illusory quality of external things. They reduce their attachment to worldly matters while cultivating themselves, accumulating abundant De (Virtue). Though they appear to establish nothing deliberately, the foundations they lay remain unshakable; though they seem to grasp at nothing, what they hold fast to can never be lost. Thus, even their descendants for generations will maintain unbroken ancestral sacrifices.

By cultivating oneself, one's De becomes pure and genuine. By cultivating the family, De overflows in abundance. By cultivating the village, De endures long. By cultivating the nation, De flourishes in richness. By cultivating the world, De becomes universal. Once self-cultivation is perfected, its surplus influence extends outward—even governing the world becomes possible.

Therefore, observe the self to understand the Dao of self-cultivation; observe the family to understand the Dao of family harmony; observe the village to understand the Dao of village governance; observe the nation to understand the Dao of statecraft; observe the world to understand the Dao of universal peace. How do I come to know the workings of the world? Precisely through this method. Things beyond the heavens and earth remain unseen by ordinary people, yet their principles can be comprehended through analogy. The highest path of self-cultivation begins with oneself and extends to family, village, and nation. If we can understand self-cultivation by observing ourselves, why can’t the sages understand governing the world by observing it? Can it be that the self is observable, but the world is not? Thus, the way I understand the world is also through this method of analogy.

Commentator Lu remarks: Those skilled at establishing things use the Dao to stabilize the nation’s foundation, like deep-rooted trees that cannot be shaken. Those skilled at preserving use De to unite the people’s hearts, so that even without binding ropes, they never scatter. Thus, their descendants enjoy lasting blessings, and sacrifices remain unbroken. The passage further explains how the principles of self-cultivation extend to bringing peace to the world—one need not step beyond the door to comprehend the workings of all under heaven.

Those deeply nourished in Dao and De are like newborn infants. When Laozi speaks of Dao and De, he often uses the infant as a metaphor—not to describe its actions but its essential state. The infant is free from desire, and this essential state is the purest. Yet when the infant encounters external things, it does not know how to respond...

 未可以無用也 毒蟲不螫猛獸不據攫鳥不搏  道無形體物莫得而見也況可得而傷之  乎人之所以至於有形者由其有心也故  有心而後有形有形而後有敵敵立而後  傷之者至矣無心之人物與敵者曷由傷  之夫赤子之所以至此者唯無心也 骨弱筋柔而握固未知牝牡之合而䘒作精 之至  無執而自握無欲而自作是知其精有餘  而非心也 終日號而嗌不嗄和之至  心動則氣傷氣傷則號而嗄終日號而不  嗄是以知其心不動而氣和也 知和曰常  和者不以外傷内也復命曰常遇物而知  其本也知和曰常得本而應萬物也其實  一道也故皆謂之常 知常曰明益生曰祥  生不可益而欲益之則非其正矣祥妖也 心使氣曰强  氣惡妄作而又以心使之則强梁甚矣 物壯則老是謂不道不道早已  益生使氣不能聽其自然日入於剛强而  老從之則失赤子之性矣    知者不言章第五十六 知者不言言有不知塞其兊閉其門挫其銳 解其忿和其光同其塵是謂玄同  道非言說亦不離言說然能知者未必言  能言者未必知唯塞兊閉門挫銳解忿和  光同塵以治其内者默然不言而與道同  矣光曰知者不言言而不言實在忘言言  者不知目擊未當況言議乎體道絶待不  得所同之迹曰玄同司馬曰鋒角猛露道
Interpretation

The Dao cannot be simply dismissed as "useless." Observe how venomous creatures do not sting it, fierce beasts do not pounce upon it, and birds of prey do not attack it. The Dao has no concrete form—how could the myriad beings perceive it, let alone harm it?

Human beings acquire form through the arising of discriminating mind. With discrimination comes form, with form comes opposition, and with opposition comes harm. Those without discriminating mind—whether people or things—have no opposites, so how could they be harmed? This is why infants remain unharmed: they lack discriminating mind.

Though an infant's sinews and bones are soft, it can naturally clench its fist; though unaware of sexual matters, it can spontaneously achieve erection—both manifestations of abundant Jing (essence). Without conscious effort it grasps firmly, without desire it responds naturally, demonstrating this is the work of vital essence rather than conscious intent.

An infant may cry all day without growing hoarse, revealing perfect internal harmony. When the Shen (spirit) becomes agitated, it injures the Qi (vital energy), and injured Qi leads to hoarseness. That crying doesn't produce hoarseness shows the spirit remains tranquil and the breath harmonious.

Understanding harmony is called "constant Dao" (the eternal Way). Harmony means not allowing external things to injure one's inner nature. Returning to the source is also called "constant Dao"—it means recognizing essence when encountering the myriad things. To know harmony is to grasp the root in dealing with all phenomena—these two are ultimately one, both called "constant Dao."

To know the constant is wisdom, but forcibly promoting growth invites calamity. Life cannot be willfully extended—such forcing violates the Dao's proper course, making what seems "auspicious" actually ominous. When will forcibly drives Qi, it becomes excessive and domineering.

Things that reach their peak must decline—this is called "not abiding in Dao." Not abiding in Dao leads to premature demise. Forced growth and willful manipulation of Qi, being unnatural, gradually lead to rigidity and decay, forfeiting the infant's pure authenticity.

Those who truly understand Dao don't speak excessively; those who speak much don't truly understand. Block sensory desires, close the gates of mind, blunt sharp edges, untangle knots, soften brilliance, and merge with the dust—this achieves "mysterious unity" (profound oneness with Dao). The Dao cannot be fully expressed in words, yet never departs from them. True knowers may not speak; eloquent speakers may not know. Only through inner cultivation reaching wordless silence can one unite with Dao. Real wisdom transcends language, for speech inevitably deviates from Dao's essence. Realizing the great Dao requires surpassing all dualistic concepts—this traceless state of unity is called "mysterious unity."

 所惡也事爲煩亂道所鄙也輝華顯赫道  所敗也污辱卑下道所貴也 故不可得而親不可得而疏不可得而利不 可得而害不可得而貴不可得而賤故爲天 下貴  可得而親則可得而疏可得而利則可得  而害可得而貴則可得而賤體道者均覆  萬物而孰爲親疏等視逆順而孰爲利害  不知榮辱而孰爲貴賤情計之所不及此  所以爲天下貴也    以正治國章第五十七 以正治國以奇用兵以無事取天下  古之聖人柔遠能邇無意於用兵唯不得  已然後有征伐之事故以治國爲正以用  兵爲奇雖然此亦未足以取天下天下神  器不可爲也爲者敗之執者失之唯體道  者廓然無事雖不足以取天下而天下歸  之矣 吾何以知天下之然哉以此天下多忌諱而 民彌貧  人主多忌諱下情不上達則民貧而無告  矣 民多利器國家滋昏  利器權謀也明君在上常使民無知無欲  民多權謀則其上眩而昏矣 人多伎巧奇物滋起  人不敦本業而趨末伎則非常無益之物  作矣 法令滋彰盜賊多有  患人之詐僞而多爲法令以勝之民無所  措手足則日增於盜賊矣 故聖人云我無爲而民自化我好靜而民自 正我無事而民自富我無欲而民自樸    其正悶悶章第五十八 其政悶悶其民淳淳其政察察其民缺缺禍
Interpretation

The Dao (the universal source and principle) abhors complexity and chaos, disdains ostentation and showiness, rejects impurity and baseness, and treasures simplicity and naturalness.

Thus, the Dao never alters its essence based on closeness or distance, benefit or harm, nobility or lowliness. It shows no favoritism to the intimate nor rejection of the distant; remains unchanged by profit or loss; neither elevates the honorable nor demeans the humble. This is precisely why the Dao is the most precious thing under heaven.

If something can be embraced, it can equally be rejected; if it brings benefit, it can equally cause harm; if it can be exalted, it can equally be despised. Those who truly embody the Dao treat all things equally without distinction between intimate and distant; regard fortune and misfortune alike without calculating gains and losses; remain unaware of honor and disgrace, indifferent to nobility and baseness. This state transcends worldly calculations, making it the most valuable existence in the world.

Chapter 57 discusses governance: Govern the state with upright principles, command armies with unconventional strategies, and win the world through Wuwei (non-action, effortless action). Ancient sages pacified distant regions through benevolent policies and educated nearby populations through virtuous governance, resorting to military force only when absolutely necessary. Governance should be rooted in proper principles, with military action as a last resort. Even so, these methods alone cannot truly attain the world. The world is like a sacred vessel—it cannot be forcibly controlled. Those who try will fail; those who cling will lose. Only those who embody the Dao, with their expansive minds and Wuwei governance, though not actively seeking the world, will naturally receive its allegiance.

How do I know this is so? By observing these phenomena: The more prohibitions a ruler imposes, the poorer the people become; the more cunning strategies flourish among the populace, the more chaotic the state grows; the more people obsess over extraordinary skills and decadent crafts, the more bizarre occurrences emerge; the harsher the laws become, the more thieves and bandits multiply.

Therefore, the sage says: "Through my Wuwei governance, the people naturally transform; through my tranquility, they naturally become upright; through my non-interference, they naturally prosper; through my desirelessness, they naturally return to simplicity."

Chapter 58 reveals: Benevolent governance cultivates honest people; harsh policies produce cunning citizens. Fortune and misfortune are intertwined—who can discern their patterns? What appears normal may turn strange; what seems good may become evil. This mysterious transformation has perplexed humanity for ages.

兮福所倚福兮禍所伏孰知其極其無正邪 正復爲奇善復爲妖民之迷其日固乆  天地之大世俗之見有所䀭而不知也蓋  福倚於禍禍伏於福譬如晝夜寒暑之相  代正之爲奇善之爲妖譬如老稚生死之  相繼未始有正而迷者不知也夫惟聖人  出於萬物之表而覽其終始得其大全而  遺其小察視之悶悶若無所明而其民淳  淳各全其性矣若夫世之人不知道之全  體以耳目之所知爲至矣彼方且自以爲  福而不知禍之伏於其後方且自以爲善  而不知妖之起於其中區區以察爲明至  於察甚傷物而不悟其非也可不哀哉 是以聖人方而不割廉而不劌直而不肆光 而不耀  知小察之不能盡物是以雖能方能廉能  直能光而不用其能恐其陷於一偏而不  反也此則世俗所謂悶悶也政和曰方者  介於辯物廉者矜於自潔直而肆則凌物  之態生光而耀則揚行之患至知而不用  
Interpretation

Fortune and misfortune are interdependent in an eternal, unchanging pattern. Behind good fortune may lurk disaster, while within calamity may gestate blessings—who can truly discern the ultimate mystery of this? In this world, there exists no absolute distinction between righteousness and wickedness.

People often mistake the upright for the strange and the virtuous for the demonic—such confusion has persisted for ages. Though heaven and earth are vast, worldly vision perceives only fragments, blind to the whole. Fortune leans against misfortune, while misfortune hides within fortune, much like the alternation of day and night or the cycle of cold and heat. The upright transforms into the bizarre, the virtuous into the sinister, just as elders become children and life gives way to death—this is the natural order, yet the deluded fail to grasp it.

Only sages transcend the surface of things, penetrating their origins and conclusions, holding the whole while disregarding trivialities. They appear muddled and unrefined, yet they preserve the people’s innate simplicity. Ordinary folk, ignorant of the Dao’s totality, mistake what their eyes and ears perceive for the complete truth. When they revel in what they believe is good fortune, they remain unaware of the lurking disaster; when they pride themselves on virtuous deeds, they fail to see the wickedness growing within. Obsessed with minute observations, they fancy themselves wise, not realizing such excessive scrutiny harms all things—truly pitiable.

Thus, sages abide in the world with rectitude yet do no harm, with purity yet without severity, with forthrightness yet without arrogance, with brilliance yet without glaring. They understand that fragmented scrutiny cannot exhaust truth, and so, though possessing many talents, they refrain from overuse—lest they fall into obstinacy with no return. To the mundane, such a state seems like "bewilderment." The Zhenghe commentary (referring to annotations from Emperor Huizong of Song’s era) explains: Rectitude easily turns into harshness, purity into pride, forthrightness into domineering, and radiance invites envy. To possess abilities yet refrain from excess—this is perhaps attainable only by sages.

其能者其惟聖人乎 道德眞經集解卷之三

Vol. 4

道德眞經集解卷之四𠕏四     趙學士集解    治人事天章第五十九 治人事天莫若嗇夫惟嗇是謂早服早服謂 之重積德重積德則無不克無不克則莫知 其極莫知其極可以有國有國之母可以長 久  凡物方則割廉則穢趙(定作劌/居衛反)直則肆光  則耀惟聖人方而不割廉而不劌直而不  肆光而不耀此所謂嗇也夫嗇者有而不  用者也世患無以服人茍誠有而能嗇雖  未嘗與物較而物知其非不能也則其服  之早矣物旣以服歛藏其用而至於殁身  終不試則德重積矣德積旣厚雖天下之  剛强無不能克則物莫測與量矣如此而  後可以有國彼世之小人有尺寸之柄而  輕用之一試不服天下測其深淺而爭犯  之雖欲保其國家而不可得也吾是以知  嗇之可以有國則有國之母也 是謂深根固蔕長生乆視之道  孟子曰盡其心養其性所以事天也以嗇  治人則可以有國者是也以嗇事天則深  根固蔕者是也古之聖人保其性命之常  不以外耗内則根深而不可拔蔕固而不  可脱雖以長生乆視可也蓋治人事天雖  有内外之異而莫若嗇則一也    治大國章第六十 治大國若烹小鮮  烹小鮮者不可撓治大國者不可煩煩則  人勞撓則魚爛 以道蒞天下其鬼不神  聖人無爲使人各安其自然外無所求内
Interpretation

In governing the people and serving Heaven, nothing surpasses the principle of "restraint" (se). Only through restraint can one be said to prepare early. Early preparation means the continuous accumulation of De (Virtue/Power). When De becomes profound, nothing remains unconquered; when nothing remains unconquered, no one can fathom its limits. Only upon reaching this state can one govern a nation. By mastering the root of governance, lasting stability can be achieved.

In worldly affairs, excessive squareness injures others, excessive sharpness invites breaking, excessive directness leads to recklessness, and excessive brilliance dazzles the eyes. Only the sage can be square without injuring, sharp without breaking, direct without recklessness, and brilliant without dazzling—this is the true meaning of "restraint." Its essence lies in possessing without abusing. People often struggle with gaining others' trust, but if one truly practices inner restraint, even without contention, others will recognize one's capability and submit willingly. When people are convinced, they naturally restrain their sharp edges, never lightly revealing them throughout life, thus allowing continuous accumulation of De. When De becomes profoundly deep, it can overcome the strongest things under Heaven, making one's depths unfathomable. Only upon reaching this state can one govern a nation. Petty men, when gaining slight authority, wield it rashly; once failing to command respect, the world tests their limits and vies to challenge them, ultimately endangering the nation's survival. From this we understand that "restraint" is the root of governance.

This is the truth behind establishing deep roots and unshakable foundations—the way to enduring vision and longevity. Mencius said, "Fulfill the heart's nature to serve Heaven." Using "restraint" to govern people preserves the state; using "restraint" to serve Heaven establishes firm foundations. The ancient sages' constant way of nurturing life was to prevent external things from depleting inner Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy), thus creating roots too deep to uproot and foundations too solid to shake—naturally achieving enduring vision and longevity. Though governing a state and serving Heaven differ as internal and external matters, their root principle of "restraint" remains the same.

Governing a great nation is like cooking small fish. Small fish cannot withstand constant turning, nor can a great nation endure excessive decrees. Excessive decrees exhaust the people, just as overhandling ruins the fish.

When the Dao governs the world, even ghosts and spirits lose their potency. The sage rules through Wuwei (non-action), allowing people to settle into their nature—seeking nothing outwardly, desiring nothing inwardly...

 無所畏則物莫能侵雖鬼無所用其神矣  陸曰聖人以道蒞天下天地之和應寒暑  變化生成而已當是之時鬼無靈響何神  之有 非其鬼不神其神不傷人非其神不傷人聖 人亦不傷人  非其鬼之不神亦有神而不傷人耳非神  之不傷人聖人亦未嘗傷人故鬼無能爲  耳葉曰聖人亦不傷人以下文德交歸焉  考之人當爲神 夫兩不相傷故德交歸焉  人鬼之所以不相傷者由上有聖人耳故  德交歸焉人歸德於神亦歸德於聖人    大國者下流章第六十一 大國者下流  天下之歸大國猶衆水之趨下流也 天下之交天下之牝牝常以靜勝牡以靜爲 下  衆動之赴靜猶衆高之赴下者也 故大國以下小國則取小國小國以下大國 則取大國  大國能下則小國附之小國能下則大國  納之 故或下以取或下而取  大國下以取人小國下而取於人言大之  於下宜若可以無下而下之者以取於人  也言小之於大不得不下而取之也 大國不過欲兼畜人小國不過欲入事人兩 者各得其所欲故大者宜爲下  政和曰天道下濟而光明故無不覆地道  卑而上行故能承天人法地地法天故大  者宜爲下    道者萬物之奥章第六十二 道者萬物之奥善人之寳不善人之所保美 言可以市尊行可以加人人之不善何棄之 有
Interpretation

This passage speaks of a state where when humans attain fearlessness, external forces cannot harm them, and even spirits and deities cannot exert their powers. Lu Xisheng (a Tang dynasty Daoist) explains that when sages govern the world with the Dao (the Way), heaven and earth naturally operate in harmony—the alternation of cold and heat, the growth of all things occur spontaneously. In this state, spirits and deities have no opportunity to manifest their powers, let alone exercise them.

This doesn't mean spirits and deities lose their powers, but rather that their powers won't harm humans. Nor is it solely because spirits don't harm people—what's more crucial is that the sages themselves do no harm to others. Ye Mengde (a Song dynasty scholar) adds that precisely because sages harm no one, both humans and spirits can each find their proper place and coexist harmoniously.

Regarding the relationship between large and small states, it follows the same principle as water flowing downward. If a large state can humbly accommodate smaller ones, it will win their allegiance; if a small state can modestly approach a large one, it will gain the larger state's acceptance. A large state's humility gathers people's hearts, while a small state's humility seeks protection. The Zhenghe era commentary (from Emperor Huizong of Song's reign) points out that the Dao of heaven shines downward to illuminate all things, and the Dao of earth remains humble to sustain creation—thus large states should maintain this humble orientation.

The Dao is the most profound mystery of all things—it serves as the treasure of virtuous people and the protective shelter of the non-virtuous. Noble speech earns respect, while good deeds transform others. Since the Dao benefits all people equally, why should we abandon those who lack virtue?

 凡物之見於外者皆其門堂也道之在物  譬如之奥物皆有之而人莫之見耳夫惟  賢者得而有之故曰善人之寳愚者雖不  能有然而非道則不能安也故曰不善人  之所保蓋道不遠人而人則遠之今誠有  人美言之則可以爲市於世尊行之則可  以加於人矣朝爲不義而夕聞大道妄盡  而性復雖欲指其不善不可得也而又安  可棄之哉 故立天子置三公雖有拱璧以先駟馬不如 坐進此道  立天子置三公將以此道救人耳雖有拱  璧之貴以先駟馬之良而進不如坐進此  道之多也 古之所以貴此道者不曰求以得有罪以免 邪故爲天下貴  道本在我人患不求求則得之矣道無功  罪人患不知知則無罪不能污也    爲無爲章第六十三 爲無爲事無事味無味大小多少報怨以德  聖人爲無爲故無所不爲事無事故無所  不事味無味故無所不味其於大小多少  一以道遇之而已蓋人情之所不忘者怨  也然及其愛惡之情忘則雖報怨猶報以  德也則知無所不用其德也 圖難於其易爲大於其細天下難事必作於 易天下大事必作於細是以聖人終不爲大 故能成其大夫輕諾必寡信多易必多難是 以聖人猶難之故終無難  世之人莫不畏大而侮小難多而易少至  於難而後圖大而後爲則事常不濟矣聖
Interpretation

All things in the world manifest only outward appearances, while the true Dao (the fundamental principle of the universe) lies hidden within. Like the deepest chamber of a house, the Dao resides in all things, though ordinary people cannot perceive it. Only the wise can comprehend and master it, which is why it is called the treasure of the virtuous. Though fools may not possess the Dao, they cannot live in peace without it—thus, the Dao is also the refuge of the unvirtuous. In truth, the Dao has never abandoned humanity; it is people who have turned away from it.

If someone sincerely praises the Dao, their words will spread far and wide. If they revere and practice it, they will rise above the ordinary. Even if one commits wrongdoing in the morning but hears the great Dao by evening, their delusions will dissolve, and their true nature will be restored. At that point, there would be no grounds to condemn them—how could they be cast aside?

Thus, when appointing an emperor or high ministers like the Three Dukes (Grand Preceptor, Grand Mentor, and Grand Guardian), it would be better to sit quietly and contemplate the Dao than to present jade discs with both hands or offer chariots drawn by four steeds. These exalted positions were established in ancient times precisely to teach people the Dao. No matter how precious the jade or how fine the horses, none compare to truly mastering the Dao. Did the ancients not revere the Dao because following it could absolve one of faults? That is why the Dao is treasured by all under heaven.

The Dao inherently exists within every person—the only fear is that they will not seek it. If one sincerely seeks, they will surely find it. The Dao itself makes no distinction between merit and blame—the only fear is that people will not understand it. Once truly comprehended, one will no longer be tainted by wrongdoing.

Chapter 63, Wuwei (Non-Action), states:

Act through non-action, handle affairs by taking no unnecessary action, and savor flavors without attachment. Whether matters are great or small, many or few, respond to resentment with virtue. The sage acts through non-action and thereby accomplishes all things; handles affairs by taking no unnecessary action and thereby manages all affairs; savors flavors without attachment and thereby perceives their true essence. In all matters, whether great or small, many or few, they adhere to the standard of the Dao.

What people find hardest to relinquish is resentment, but when love and hatred are both forgotten, even repaying resentment becomes like repaying kindness—thus, there is no place where virtue cannot be extended.

To resolve difficulties, start with what is easy; to achieve great things, begin with what is small. All difficult matters under heaven arise from what was once simple; all great undertakings accumulate from what was once minute. Therefore, the sage never seeks greatness, yet accomplishes great things.

Promises made too lightly are hard to keep; tasks viewed as too easy will encounter unexpected difficulties. Thus, the sage always proceeds with caution, and in the end, nothing is truly difficult.

People often fear great tasks but belittle small ones, dread difficulties but take the easy for granted. Only when hardship arrives do they seek solutions; only when matters grow large do they begin to act—and thus, they often fail.

 人齊小大一多少無所不畏無所不難而  安有不濟者哉    其安易持章第六十四 其安易持其未兆易謀其脆易破其微易散 爲之於未有治之於未亂  方其未有持而謀之足矣及其將然非泮  而散之不去也然猶愈於旣成也故爲之  於未有者上也治之於未亂者次也 合抱之木生於毫末九層之臺起於累土千 里之行始於足下爲者敗之執者失之是以 聖人無爲故無敗無執故無失  治亂禍福之來皆如彼三者積小以成大  聖人待之以無爲守之以無執故能使福  自生使禍自亡譬如種苗深耕而厚耔之  及秋自穰譬如被盜危坐而熟視之盜將  自却世人不知物之自然以爲非爲不成  非執不留故常與禍爭勝與福生贅是以  禍至於不救福至於不成蓋其理然也 民之從事常於幾成而敗之愼終如始則無 敗事  聖人知有爲之害不以人助天始終皆因  其自然故無不成者世人心存於得喪萬  事之微猶有不知而聽其自然者及見其  幾成而重失之則未有不以爲敗之者故  曰愼終如始則無敗事 是以聖人欲不欲不貴難得之貨學不學復 衆人之所過以輔萬物之自然而不敢爲  人皆徇其所欲以害物信其所學以害理  聖人非無欲也欲而不欲故雖欲而不害  於物非無學也學而不學故雖學而不害
Interpretation

When affairs are still in a state of tranquility, they are easiest to manage; when signs have not yet appeared, they are easiest to plan for; when things are fragile, they are easiest to resolve; when they are minute, they are easiest to disperse. One must address problems before they take shape and bring order before chaos arises.

When matters have not yet occurred, a slight effort in planning is enough to control them. But when they are on the verge of happening, it becomes difficult to dissolve them as easily as melting ice. Still, dealing with them at this stage is better than waiting until they have fully formed. Thus, the highest wisdom lies in prevention before anything arises, while the next best approach is to bring order when chaos first appears.

A towering tree grows from a tiny sprout; a nine-story terrace is built basket by basket of earth; a thousand-mile journey begins with a single step. Forcing things leads to failure, and clinging tightly results in loss. Therefore, the sage (one who has attained the Dao) does not act with force and thus does not fail; does not cling and thus does not lose.

The rise and fall of order and chaos, fortune and misfortune in the world all follow this principle—they accumulate from small beginnings into great outcomes. The sage approaches them with wuwei (non-action) and guards them without attachment, allowing blessings to grow naturally and misfortunes to fade away on their own. It is like farming: after deep plowing and careful tending, the autumn harvest comes naturally. Or like encountering a thief: by remaining calm and observant, the thief will retreat of their own accord.

People in the world do not understand the natural progression of things. They believe that without deliberate effort, nothing can be accomplished, and without forceful clinging, nothing can be retained. Thus, they often struggle against misfortune and entangle themselves with blessings, resulting in calamities that cannot be remedied and fortunes that are hard to achieve—this is the inevitable outcome.

People often fail when they are on the verge of success. If they treated the end as carefully as the beginning, they would not meet with failure. The sage understands the harm of forced action and does not interfere with the natural order, always following the way of spontaneity. Thus, there is nothing they do not accomplish. Ordinary people, however, obsess over gains and losses, failing to notice even the subtlest changes. When success is near, they become anxious over outcomes—this is why they never avoid failure.

Therefore, the sage seeks what others do not seek and does not value rare possessions; they learn what others do not learn, correcting the faults of the multitude. They assist the natural development of all things without daring to act recklessly. People indulge their desires, harming external things, and cling to their views, defying the principles of heaven. The sage is not without desires, but though they have desires, they are not controlled by them; they are not without learning, but though they learn, they do not cling to rigid views. Thus, they can both learn and not violate the natural order.

 於理然後内外空明廓然無爲可以輔萬  物之自然而待其自成矣    古之善爲道章第六十五 古之善爲道者非以明民將以愚之  古之所謂智者知道之大全而覽於物之  終始故足貴也凡民不足以知此而溺於  小智以察爲明則智之害多矣故聖人以  道治民非以明之將以愚之耳蓋使無知  無欲而聽其上之所爲則雖有過亦小矣 民之難治以其智多故以智治國國之賊  吾以智御人人亦以智應之而上下交相  賊矣 不以智治國國之福知此兩者亦楷式能知 楷式是謂玄德玄德深矣遠矣與物反矣然 後乃至大順  吾之所貴者德也物之所貴者智也德與  智固相反然智之所順者小而德之所順  者大矣葉曰以智治國國之賊不以智治  國國之福然是足以爲楷式而非道也故  謂之玄德積玄德而至深且遠則近乎本  而與物反夫然後各安其性命之情是以  謂之大順    江海爲百谷王章第六十六 江海所以能爲百谷王者以其善下之故能 爲百谷王是以聖人欲上人以其言下之欲 先人以其身後之  聖人非欲上人非欲先人也蓋下之後之  其道不得不上且先耳 是以聖人處上而人不重處前而人不害是 以天下樂推而不厭以其不爭故天下莫能 與之爭    天下皆謂章第六十七
Interpretation

The ancient masters who excelled in practicing the Dao did not use it to make the people clever, but to preserve their simplicity. What the ancients called wisdom was understanding the holistic patterns of the Dao and comprehending the beginning and end of all things—this was truly valuable. Ordinary people cannot grasp these truths, instead becoming obsessed with petty cleverness, mistaking shrewdness for wisdom. Thus the harm caused by such "wisdom" becomes great. Therefore, the sage governs the people with the Dao not to make them clever, but to preserve their simplicity. In this way, the people remain free from excessive knowledge and desires, following the guidance of their leaders. Even if mistakes occur, they will not be grave.

The people become difficult to govern precisely because they have too much cunning. To rule a state with clever stratagems is the calamity of a nation. If I use cunning to manipulate others, they will respond in kind, and when superiors and subordinates scheme against each other, mutual harm ensues.

To govern without cunning artifice is the true blessing of a state. Understanding this distinction means grasping the principle of governance. One who comprehends this principle may be said to possess "profound Virtue" (Xuande). Profound Virtue reaches deep, moving contrary to worldly pursuits—only thus can the greatest harmony be achieved.

What I value is Virtue (De), while the world values cleverness. Virtue and cleverness are fundamentally opposed: cleverness can only accommodate small matters, while Virtue accommodates the great. Thus governing with cleverness is a nation's calamity, while governing without it is its blessing. Although this can serve as a principle of governance, it is not the highest expression of the Dao—hence it is called Profound Virtue. When accumulated to its deepest extent, it approaches the root, moving opposite to worldly desires. In this state, all things abide in the authenticity of their nature—this is called great harmony.

The reason rivers and seas can be lords of all streams is that they excel at staying low. Therefore, when the sage wishes to stand above others, he humbles himself in speech; when he wishes to lead the people, he places himself behind them. The sage does not deliberately seek to stand above or lead others—it is precisely through his humble and yielding character that he naturally attains honored status.

Thus when the sage occupies the highest position, people feel no burden; when he stands at the forefront, they feel no harm. Therefore all under heaven gladly support him without resentment. Precisely because he contends with nothing in the world, nothing in the world can contend with him.

天下皆謂我道大似不肖夫唯大故似不肖 若肖久矣其細也夫  夫道曠然無形頽然無名充遍萬物而與  物無一相似此其所以爲大也若似於物  則亦一物矣何足大哉 我有三寳保而持之一曰慈二曰儉三曰不 敢爲天下先  道以不似物爲大故其運而爲德則亦悶  然以鈍爲利以退爲進不合於世俗今夫  世俗貴勇敢尚廣大夸進銳而吾之所寳  則慈忍儉約廉退此三者皆世俗所謂不  肖者也 夫慈故能勇  世以勇决爲賢而以慈忍爲不及是不知  勇决之易挫而慈忍之不可勝其終必至  於勇也 儉故能廣  世以廣大蓋物而以儉約爲陋不知廣大  之易窮而儉約之易足其終必至於廣也 不敢爲天下先故能成器長  世以進銳爲能而以不敢先爲恥不知進  銳之多惡於人而不敢先之樂推於世其  終卒爲器長也蓋樸散則爲器聖人用之  則爲官長自樸成器始有屬其長矣 今捨其慈且勇捨其儉且廣捨其後且先死 矣  勇廣先三者人之所共疾也爲衆所疾故  嘗近於死 夫慈以戰則勝以守則固天將救之以慈衛 之  以慈御物物之愛之如己父母雖爲之效  死而不辭故可以戰可以守天之將救是  人也則開其心志使之無所不慈則皆爲  之衛矣趙曰老氏之道大心困焉而不能
Interpretation

All under heaven say the Dao (the cosmic origin and principle) is vast beyond compare, yet it resembles no concrete thing. Precisely because it is supremely boundless, it cannot be likened to any particular object. Were it to resemble something specific, it would long ago have become insignificant.

The Dao is expansive without fixed form, undifferentiated without definite name, permeating all things yet unlike any one of them - this is the very reason for its greatness. If it resembled any particular thing, it would merely be an ordinary object - how could it be called great?

I cherish three treasures which I constantly uphold: first is compassion, second is frugality, and third is daring not to put myself ahead of others. The Dao takes greatness in not resembling concrete things, thus when it manifests as De (virtue/power), it appears dull and clumsy - taking bluntness for sharpness, yielding for advancing, completely contrary to worldly views. Nowadays, the world values courage and strength, pursues extravagance and grandeur, and boasts of aggressive competition, while what I treasure are kindness and forbearance, restraint and moderation, humility and deference - all qualities the world considers unbecoming of "great men."

In truth, only compassion can produce genuine courage. People regard decisive action as worthy while seeing compassionate forbearance as weakness, failing to understand that decisiveness is easily thwarted while compassionate endurance is invincible, ultimately achieving true bravery.

Frugality alone can accomplish real abundance. People think extravagance can encompass all things while viewing thrift as meanness, not realizing that lavishness is easily exhausted while moderation brings contentment, ultimately achieving true wealth.

Daring not to lead actually enables one to become the leader of all vessels (sovereign of all things). People consider aggressive competition as ability while seeing reluctance to take precedence as shame, not understanding that pushiness invites aversion while yielding invites support, ultimately attaining true leadership. Just as raw timber (pu) is divided to make various utensils, the sage employing these becomes the administrator - in the transformation from raw wood to finished implements, a natural ruler emerges.

Nowadays some discard compassion to contend violently, abandon frugality to pursue luxury, and spurn yielding to compete aggressively - this is truly courting death. These three - ferocity, extravagance, and aggressive competition - are precisely what people commonly detest, and being hated by all surely means death is near.

With compassion in battle one achieves victory; in defense one achieves stability. When heaven would save someone, it guards them with compassion. Treating all things with compassion, they cherish him as parents, willingly dying for him - thus he can attack and defend. When heaven would save someone, it opens his mind to harbor boundless compassion, so all things come to protect him. As the Zhao commentator said: Laozi's Dao is too vast - people pursue it with heart yet find it hard to fully comprehend.

 知口辟焉而不能言者是也世俗何足以  知之聊舉是三者以爲世教一經之中十  居七八戒用兵者五章戒驕者一章戒奢  崇儉者三章柔弱不爭者十五章又於其  中以慈爲首天將救是人也付之以慈所  謂天誘其衷是也天將棄是人也付之以  惡所謂天奪其魄是也    善爲士章第六十八 善爲士者不武  士當以武爲本行之以怯若以武行武則  死矣 善戰者不怒  聖人不得已而後戰若出於怒是以我故  殺人天必殃之 善勝敵者不爭  以吾不爭故能勝彼之爭若出於爭則未  必能勝矣 善用人者爲之下  人皆有相尚之心故莫能相爲用誠能下  之則天下皆吾用也 是謂不爭之德是謂用人之力是謂配天古 之極  趙曰可以配天古之至極要道    用兵有言章第六十九  用兵有言老氏痛當世用兵以殺爲本故  舉古之軍志以明不得已之徵 吾不敢爲主而爲客  主造事者也客應敵者也 不敢進寸而退尺  進者有意於爭者也退者無意於爭者也 是謂行無行  無意於爭雖用兵與不用均也不與物爭與  無行同 攘無臂仍無敵執無兵  苟無意於爭則雖在軍旅如無臂可攘無  敵可因無兵可執安有用兵之咎耶葉曰  大司馬之法曰伐者以鍾鼓聲其罪而告  之止於境上服其罪則已不必於進也故
Interpretation

This passage describes how those who comprehend the Dao (the Way) often remain silent, as worldly people find such profound states difficult to understand. In the Daode Jing, Laozi repeatedly emphasizes several fundamental principles: five chapters warn against rash military action, one chapter cautions against arrogance, three advocate frugality over extravagance, and fifteen expound on the virtue of gentleness and non-contention. Among these, "compassion" stands as the most fundamental—when heaven wishes to save someone, it endows them with a merciful heart; when abandoning someone, it fills them with malice.

Chapter 68 explains that true warriors do not rely on brute strength. Though possessing martial prowess, they act with caution. Those who revel in aggression and violence ultimately invite their own destruction. Skilled fighters never let rage cloud their judgment—sages only engage in battle when absolutely necessary. Warfare waged in anger amounts to deliberate killing, which inevitably draws heaven's wrath. Those adept at overcoming opponents avoid contention altogether; precisely because they do not contend, they prevail over those who do. Those skilled in leadership maintain humility, recognizing that people naturally compete for dominance—only through humility can one truly command others' service. This embodies the virtue of non-contention, the wisdom of leadership, and aligns with heaven's eternal principle.

Chapter 69 cites ancient military strategy, with Laozi lamenting how people of his era treated slaughter as warfare's primary objective. The proper way of employing arms should be: never initiating aggression but responding when compelled; never advancing rashly but willingly retreating when appropriate. Thus one may deploy troops yet appear to have done nothing. Without contentious intent, even within an army, one would have no arm to raise, no enemy to strike, no weapon to wield—naturally avoiding the errors of warfare. The ancient Grand Marshal's code declared: when launching punitive campaigns, first sound bells and drums to proclaim the enemy's crimes, demonstrate military might at the borders, then halt if they submit—without need for actual attack.

 進以寸則常寡退以尺則常多此雖行而  若無行也雖攘而若無臂也不見可敵若  無仍也雖執之若無兵也 禍莫大於輕敵輕敵則幾喪吾寳  聖人以慈爲寳輕敵則輕戰輕戰則輕殺  人喪其所以爲慈矣 故抗兵相加哀者勝矣  兩敵相加而吾出於不得已則有哀心哀  心見而天人助之雖欲不勝不可得矣    吾言甚易知章第七十 吾言甚易知甚易行天下莫能知莫能行  道之大復性而足而性之妙見於超居飲  食之間耳聖人指此以示人豈不易知乎  人能體此以應物豈不易行乎然世之常  患日用而不知知且不能而況行之乎 言有宗事有君夫惟無知是以不我知  言者道之筌也事者道之迹也使道可以  言盡則聽言而足矣可以事見則考事而  足矣惟言不能盡事不能見非捨言而求  其宗遺事而求其君不可得也蓋古之聖  人無思無爲而有漠然不自知者存焉此  則思慮之所不及是以終莫吾知也 知我者希則我者貴  衆人之所能知亦不足貴矣 是以聖人被褐懐玉  聖人外與人同而中獨異耳趙曰此章起  下章知不知之意夫惟無知非如木石之  無知也道不可以知知識識泯視聽絶情  量而已夫道固非窈㝠昏默之然自窈㝠  昏默而入此豈世俗所能知哉世雖不知  獨體道者外晦而内貞不亦可貴乎
Interpretation

Advancing an inch often yields little, while retreating a foot frequently brings greater gains. It is like acting yet appearing to take no action, raising an arm yet seeming to have no arm. When facing an opponent, it appears as if there is nothing to confront; holding a weapon yet feeling as if unarmed.

The greatest calamity lies in underestimating one's adversary, for doing so nearly causes us to lose what we hold most precious. The sage treasures compassion above all—underestimating an enemy leads to rash warfare, rash warfare leads to reckless killing, and thus the original heart of compassion is lost. Therefore, when two armies stand opposed, the side that maintains compassion will ultimately prevail. When conflict arises and we are compelled to fight, if we do so with a heart of compassion, even heaven and earth will come to our aid—victory becomes inevitable.

The truth I speak of is actually easy to understand and simple to practice, yet few in the world truly grasp or embody it. The root of the Dao (the Way) lies in returning to our original nature, and the profundity of this nature is revealed in the ordinary rhythms of daily life—rising, resting, eating, and drinking. When the sage points this out to awaken people, is it not simple to comprehend? If one realizes this and applies it in engaging with all things, is it not easy to practice? Yet the common failing of people is that they use it daily without awareness—they cannot even recognize it, let alone put it into practice.

Words have their guiding principle; actions have their foundation. Precisely because the Dao cannot be grasped by ordinary understanding, people fail to comprehend what I say. Words are merely tools for capturing the Dao; actions are but traces it leaves behind. If the Dao could be fully expressed in words, listening to others would suffice. If it could be completely manifested through actions, examining deeds would be enough. But because words cannot exhaust it and actions cannot fully reveal it, one must look beyond words to seek their essence and transcend actions to discover their source—only then can the Dao be realized. The ancient sages acted without thought or deliberate effort, yet within them existed a state of natural, unselfconscious harmony—a realm beyond the reach of ordinary thinking. Thus, in the end, no one truly understands me.

Those who comprehend me are few; those who emulate me are rarer still. If even ordinary people could grasp this truth, it would not be so precious. Therefore, the sage wears coarse cloth on the outside but holds jade within. Outwardly, the sage appears no different from others, yet inwardly stands apart. As Master Zhao remarked, this chapter introduces the meaning of "knowing without knowing" in the following chapter. The "unknowing" spoken of here is not the insentience of wood or stone, but rather that the Dao cannot be understood through ordinary cognition—it requires dissolving dualistic thinking, transcending sensory perception, and freeing oneself from emotional calculations. The Dao itself is not some dark and obscure appearance, yet one approaches it through practices that embrace such obscurity—how could worldly people comprehend this? Though the world does not understand, those who realize the Dao alone may appear dull on the surface but preserve purity within—is this not truly precious?

   知不知章第七十一 知不知上不知知病  道非思慮之所及故不可知然方其未知  則非知無以入也及其旣知而存知則病  矣故知而不知上也不知而知病也光曰  道不屬知不屬不知知是妄覺不知是無  計然知道了反如不知則終日知而知不  涉縁即爲保道之眞知故尚矣未明其道  從無立知穿鑿涉縁故病吕曰道之爲體  不知而能知者也知其不知而以不知知  之知之至也雖知其不知而以知知之其  心庸詎寧乎病矣夫惟知知之爲病反乎  無知而知不足以病之矣 夫惟病病是以不病  旣不可以不知又不可以知惟知知之爲  病者久而病自去矣 聖人不病以其病病是以不病  趙曰楞嚴云知見無見即知不知上也知  見立知即不知知病也故知其不可知者  而存知則病矣夫惟病可知之病乆而病  自亡矣聖人本無妄知之病以其病衆人  之病權立知以去其知之病是以雖立知  而不爲病矣吕曰夫惟知知之爲病而病  之則反乎無知而知不足以病之矣故曰  夫惟病病是以不病南伯子綦曰我悲人  之自喪者吾又悲夫悲人者吾又悲夫悲  人之悲者其後而日遠矣若子綦一謂病  病矣    民不畏威章第七十二  民不畏威則大畏至  夫性自有威高明光大赫然物莫能加此
Interpretation

Chapter 71 of the Collected Commentaries on the Dao De Zhenjing discusses the dialectical relationship between "knowing" and "not knowing." The true Dao (the cosmic origin and ultimate truth) cannot be comprehended through ordinary thinking, hence it is said to be unknowable. Yet before we realize the Dao, we must approach it through cognition; once truly realized, clinging to this cognition becomes an obstacle. Thus, the highest state is to know yet appear not to know.

The Dao belongs neither to the category of "knowing" nor "not knowing." Deliberately pursuing "knowing" is a vain attachment, while complete "not knowing" is ignorance. Those who truly awaken to the Dao, though understanding the truth, maintain a state of seeming ignorance, ensuring their cognition remains undisturbed by external conditions—this is genuine knowledge that preserves the great Dao. Forcing cognition before grasping the Dao's essence only leads to forced interpretations and distortions.

The reason sages are free from the maladies of cognition is precisely because they recognize the common tendency to cling to knowledge, thus transcending this limitation. As Nanbo Ziqi (a Daoist figure) said: "First I lamented people losing themselves, then lamented those who lament others, until even this lamentation was relinquished"—this is seeing the nature of the "malady" and ultimately surpassing it.

Chapter 72 addresses the question of "majesty." Human nature inherently possesses majesty—a radiance so vast nothing can override it. When people cease revering this natural majesty, greater calamities arise. This majesty does not refer to external authority but the dignified bearing that naturally manifests when one's inner being aligns with the Dao.

 所謂大威也人常患溺於衆妄畏生死而  憚得喪萬物之威雜然棄之終身惴慄之  不暇雖有大威而不自知也苟誠知之一  生死齊得喪坦然無怖畏則大威燁然見  於前矣 無狹其所居無厭其所生夫惟不厭是以不 厭  性之大可以包絡天地彼不知者以四支  九竅爲己守也守之而不厭是以見不出  視聞不出聽叢然其甚陋也故教之曰無  狹其所居彼知之者知性之大而吾生之  狹也則愀然厭之欲脱而不得不知有厭  有慕之方囿於物也故教之曰無厭其所  生夫唯聖人不狹不厭而與人同生而與  道同居無廣狹凈穢之辯旣不厭生而後  知生之無可厭也陸曰心者神之舍無以  嗜欲褻之則不狹矣神者形所以生無以  多事擾之則不厭矣人不厭神神亦不厭  人樂天矣詩云亦莫戀此名亦莫厭此身 是以聖人自知不自見自愛不自貴故去彼 取此  聖人雖自知之而不自見以示人雖自愛  之而不自貴以眩人恐人之有厭有慕也  厭慕之心未忘則猶有畏也畏去而後大  威至矣雱曰自知則明於性而不爲妄自  見則矜伐自愛則保其身而不爲非自貴  則賤物    勇於敢章第七十三 勇於敢則殺勇於不敢則活知此兩者或利 或害天之所惡孰知其故是以聖人猶難之  勇於敢則死勇於不敢則生此物理之大
Interpretation

People are often troubled by delusional thoughts—fearing life and death, worrying over gains and losses. Faced with the threats of worldly phenomena, they flail about in escape, spending their entire lives in fear, utterly unaware of the mighty power of Virtue (De) that lies within. If one truly comprehends this principle—seeing through life and death, becoming indifferent to gain and loss—they will stand fearless and unshaken. Only then does the genuine power of Virtue manifest clearly.

Do not confine the dwelling of your heart-mind (i.e., do not be bound by narrow perceptions), nor despise the essence of your life. Only by not despising life can one truly abide in it. Human nature is vast and boundless, capable of encompassing heaven and earth. Those who fail to understand this mistake their limbs and nine orifices for their entirety, clinging to these superficial aspects without weariness. Thus, their vision is limited to what their eyes see and ears hear, becoming exceedingly narrow. Hence the teaching: "Do not confine the heart-mind."

Those who grasp this truth recognize that while nature is vast, life is fleeting. They may feel anguish and seek liberation, unaware that this very aversion and longing are themselves forms of external bondage. Thus comes the teaching: "Do not despise life." Only sages can achieve neither confinement nor aversion, dwelling alongside ordinary people while abiding with the great Dao (the Way), making no distinctions between vastness and narrowness, purity and defilement. Only by not despising life can one realize there is truly nothing to despise.

Lu Xiujing (a renowned Daoist of the Southern Dynasties) said: The heart-mind is the dwelling of spirit (Shen)—do not defile it with desires, and you will not feel confined. Spirit is the root of the body—do not disturb it with trivial matters, and you will not grow weary. When humans do not weary their spirit, spirit will not weary of humans, allowing one to enjoy the joy of heaven. As the Book of Songs says: "Neither cling to empty fame, nor despise this body."

Thus, the sage has self-awareness but does not flaunt it; knows self-love but does not exalt the self. Therefore, they discard the superficial and grasp the essential. Though sages understand these principles, they do not deliberately display them; though they cherish themselves, they do not appear superior—lest they stir envy or aversion in others. Where there remains envy or aversion, fear still lingers. Only by eliminating fear does genuine Virtue descend.

Wang Pang (a Song Dynasty scholar) explains: Self-awareness allows one to understand their nature without reckless action, while self-display leads to arrogance. Self-love enables one to preserve their being without wrongdoing, while self-exaltation breeds contempt for others.

Chapter 73 discusses "courage and timidity": Reckless boldness invites fatal consequences, whereas cautious gentleness preserves life. Understanding these two outcomes reveals what is beneficial and what is harmful. Who can fully fathom what heaven despises? Even sages find it difficult to grasp. Courage that manifests as aggression leads to death; courage that manifests as yielding ensures survival—this is the most fundamental principle between heaven and earth.

 常也然而敢者或以得生不敢者或以得  死世遂僥倖其或然而怒其常理夫天道  之遠其有一或然者孰知其好惡無從來  哉故雖聖人猶以常爲正其於勇敢未嘗  不難之列子曰迎天意揣利害不知其已  患天道之難知是以歷陳之也 天之道不爭而善勝  不與物爭於一時要於終勝而已 不言而善應  孔子曰天何言哉四時行焉萬物生焉未  有求而不應者也 不召而自來  神之格思不可度思矧可射思此又誰召  之哉 繟然而善謀  繟然舒緩若無所營而其謀度非人之所  及也 天網恢恢疏而不失  世人其目觀天見其一曲而不覩其大全  有以善而得禍惡而得福者未有不疑天  網之疏而多失也唯能要其終始而盡其  變化然後知恢恢廣大雖疏而不失也    民常不畏死章第七十四 民常不畏死奈何以死懼之  政乖刑重民無所措手足則常不畏死雖  以死懼之無益也 若使人常畏死而爲奇者吾得執而殺之孰 敢  民安於政常樂生畏死然後執其詭異亂  羣者而殺之孰有不服哉開元曰爲奇詐  者假令吾勢得執而殺孰敢即殺以天綱  不失其殺者也 常有司殺者殺  司殺者天也方世之治而詭兵亂群之人  恣行於其間則天之所棄也天之所棄而  吾殺之則是天殺之而非我也
Interpretation

This passage explores the operation of the Heavenly Dao (natural law) and how rulers should emulate it in governing the people.

The Heavenly Dao is characterized by: achieving ultimate victory without contention, responding naturally to all things without words, manifesting spontaneously without summons, and appearing gradual while planning with profound foresight. Like an immense net stretching boundlessly, it seems loose yet leaves nothing unaccounted for. Ordinary people often perceive only partial phenomena—such as the virtuous suffering misfortune while the wicked prosper—and thus doubt the Dao's fairness. Yet when viewed across the full span of time, it becomes clear that the Heavenly Dao never errs.

Regarding governance, the text observes: When decrees are chaotic and punishments excessively harsh, the people grow unafraid even of death, rendering threats of execution useless. Conversely, under clear and just governance where people live in peace and cherish life, punishing those who violate laws will ensure universal compliance. The true authority to punish belongs to the Heavenly Dao (the Executioner), with rulers merely acting as its agents.

The passage quotes Liezi to illustrate the futility of speculating about Heaven's intent—even sages take adherence to constant principles as their standard. Confucius likewise remarked, "Does Heaven speak?" showing that the Heavenly Dao manifests through the movement of seasons and the growth of all things. The comings and goings of the divine (referring to the Heavenly Dao) are unfathomable, let alone subject to manipulation.

夫代司殺者殺是代大匠斲夫代大匠斲希 有不傷其手矣  非天之所殺而吾自殺之是代司殺者殺  也代大匠斲則傷其手代司殺者殺則及  其身矣趙曰善乎楚靈王之言曰予殺人  子多矣能無及乎以天道好還此嗜殺人  者之戒也秦毒痛天下固不足道以疑似  而殺李君羡以猜忌而殺王景文此豈天  道也哉若漢唐諸賢謀誅宦竪宦竪之罪  誠大矣天未老其惡故有代大匠斲傷手  之禍又況肆行殺戮者哉鮮不及矣然惡  不可長幸不可恃楚漢之戰五季之亂其  所誅屠夷滅者十室而九亦天殺之也爲  惡者可無懼乎    民之飢章第七十五 民之飢以其上食税之多是以飢民之難治 以其上之有爲是以難治人之輕死以其求 生之厚是以輕死  上以有爲導民民亦以有爲應之故事多  而難治上以利欲先民民亦爭厚其生故  雖死而求利不厭 夫惟無以生爲者是賢於貴生  貴生之必至於之惟無以生爲而生  自全矣趙曰此章皆言上章唯無以厚  生爲者民輕死何以貴生然    民之生章第七十六 民之生也柔弱其死也堅强草木之生也柔 脆其死也枯槁故堅强者死之徒柔弱者生 之徒  冲氣在焉則體無堅强之病至理在焉則  事無堅强之累 是以兵强則不勝  兵以義勝者非强也强而不義其敗必速
Interpretation

This scripture expounds two fundamental teachings:

The first teaching concerns the karmic retribution of killing. Just as one who substitutes for a carpenter chopping wood risks injuring their own hand, those who presume to execute killings on Heaven's behalf often bring harm upon themselves. The text cites several historical examples: King Ling of Chu's excessive executions ultimately brought retribution upon himself; Qin Shihuang's tyrannical rule over the empire; and the Tang dynasty's unjust executions of loyal ministers Li Junxian and Wang Jingwen due to imperial suspicion. These were all man-made killings, not ordained by Heaven. Even the Han and Tang dynasties' executions of corrupt eunuchs, because they weren't Heaven-arranged punishments, ultimately brought misfortune. The devastating conflicts between Chu and Han or the Ten Kingdoms period's "nine empty houses out of ten" desolation were actually Heaven's punishments for wickedness.

The second teaching addresses principles of governance. People starve when rulers overtax them; people become difficult to govern when rulers overmanage them; people lose fear of death when rulers indulge in excessive pleasures. The manner in which rulers guide the people determines how the people respond. When rulers practice Wuwei (non-action) through quietude, the people can preserve their lives. Like living plants that remain supple but turn stiff when dead, rigid things belong to the category of death while pliant things brim with vitality. This principle applies even to warfare - victory through righteousness doesn't constitute forcefulness, but relying solely on military might without Dao (the Way) ensures swift defeat.

(Note: "Great Craftsman" refers to Heaven; "Executioner" denotes deities governing life and death; "Chongqi" indicates the life energy of balanced Yin-Yang; "Supreme Principle" means the highest cosmic law)

木强則共  木自拱把以上必伐矣 强大處下柔弱處上  物之常理精者在上粗者在下其精必柔  弱其粗必强大    天之道章第七十七 天之道其猶張弓乎  張弓上筋弛弓上角故以況天之張高舉  下 高者抑之下者舉之有餘者損之不足者補 之天之道損有餘補不足人之道不然損不 足以奉有餘  天無私故均人多私故不均者 孰能有餘以奉天下唯有道者  有道者贍足萬物而不辭旣以爲人己愈  有旣以與人己愈多非有道者無以堪此 是以聖人爲而不恃功成不處其不欲見賢 耶  爲而恃成而處則賢見於世賢見於世則  是以有餘自奉也    天下柔弱章第七十八 天下柔弱莫過於水而攻堅强者莫之能勝 其無以易之故柔勝剛弱勝强天下莫不知 莫能行是以聖人言受國之垢是謂社稷主 受國之不祥是謂天下王正言若反  正言合道而反俗俗以受垢爲辱受不祥  爲殃故也    和大怨章第七十九 和大怨必有餘怨安可以爲善  夫怨生於妄而妄出於性知性者不見諸  妄而又何怨乎今不知除其本而欲和其  末故外雖和而内未忘也 是以聖人執左契而不責於人故有德司契 無德司徹(徹通/也)  契之有左右所以爲信而息爭者也聖人  與人均有是性人方以妄爲常馳騖於爭
Interpretation

When trees grow too tall and robust, they are felled. Once a tree's trunk becomes as thick as what two arms can encircle, it inevitably meets the axe. This is nature's universal principle: the strong and mighty tend to occupy lower positions, while the soft and weak rise above. Just as in plants—the tender leaves and branches, the essence (Jing) of growth, flourish atop, while the coarse trunk remains below.

The Dao's movement resembles drawing a bow to shoot an arrow. When pulling the bowstring, it rises; when releasing, the bow's tips lift. This illustrates the Dao's way—what is elevated will be lowered, and what is low will be raised. The Dao invariably reduces excess to supplement deficiency. Yet human society does the opposite, stripping the insufficient to serve the surplus. Because the Dao is selfless, it balances; because humans are selfish, they create imbalance. Only those who embody the Dao can use their abundance to nourish the world. Such beings nurture all things without refusal—the more they give, the more they gain; the more they share, the richer they become. Thus, the sage acts without claiming credit, achieves without dwelling on success, and shuns displays of worthiness. To boast of deeds or cling to achievements is to flaunt one's surplus—a way of serving oneself, not others.

Nothing in the world is softer than water, yet nothing surpasses its power to overcome the hard. This truth is irreplaceable: the soft conquers the rigid; the weak overcomes the strong. Though all under heaven know this, few practice it. Hence, the sage declares: "Only those who bear a nation's humiliation are fit to be its lords; only those who shoulder its calamities can become kings of the world." These seemingly paradoxical words align perfectly with the Dao—they simply contradict worldly views. The world sees disgrace as shame and disasters as misfortune.

To mediate deep-seated resentment inevitably leaves lingering grievances—how can this be called resolution? Resentment arises from illusion, and illusion stems from losing one's true nature. Those who understand their nature avoid illusion—how, then, could resentment arise? People today fail to eradicate resentment at its root, settling instead for superficial reconciliation. Outwardly, peace appears; inwardly, it remains unfulfilled. Thus, though the sage holds the left half of a debt contract (the creditor's proof), they never press for repayment. Those with virtue (De) keep the covenant as a token; those without haggle relentlessly ("che" signifies exhaustive pursuit). Contracts split into left and right halves were meant to establish trust and resolve disputes. Sages and ordinary people share the same nature—yet humans mistake illusion for reality, chasing only conflict.

 奪之場而不知性之未始少妄也是以聖  人以其性示人使之除妄以復性待其妄  盡而性復未有不廓然自得如右契之合  左契不待責之而自服也然則雖有大怨  懟將涣然冰釋知其本非有矣而安用利  之彼無德者乃欲人人而通之則亦勞而  無功矣雱曰左契取於人右契取人左契  乃受責者所執與之而已 天道無親常與善人  天道無私惟善人則與之契之無私亦猶  是也惟合者則得之矣葉曰有來干我知  持吾信以待之而已彼當償則吾不知也  夫然後能當天下之求而未嘗勞兹不亦  如天之無親而惟善人之與乎    小國寡民章第八十 小國寡民  老子生於衰周文勝俗弊將以無爲救之  故於其書之終言其所志願得小國寡民  以試焉而不可得耳 使民有什伯之器而不用使民重死而不遠 徙  民各安其分則小有才者不用於世什伯  之器則材堪什夫伯夫之長者也樂生故  重死安之故不遠徙 雖有舟輿無所乘之雖有甲兵無所陳之使 民復結繩而用之  事少民樸雖結繩足矣 甘其食美其服安其居樂其俗  内足外無所慕故以其所有爲美以其所  處爲樂而不復求也 鄰國相望鷄犬之音相聞民至老死不相往 來  民物繁夥而不相求則彼此皆足故也    信言不美章第八十一
Interpretation

When discussing how to eliminate delusions and restore one's original nature, Laozi points out that sages (those who have attained the Dao) demonstrate their true nature to others, teaching them to dispel false thoughts. When delusions are completely removed and original nature is restored, one suddenly becomes enlightened—just as the right half of a tally naturally matches the left half without any forced effort. In this state, even the deepest grievances melt away like ice and snow, for one realizes that resentment never truly existed in the first place. Why then resort to mediation through material interests? Those who fail to grasp this principle exhaust themselves trying to forcibly enlighten everyone. Wang Pang (a Song Dynasty scholar) explains that the left tally is held by the creditor and the right by the debtor; once the debt is repaid, the tally becomes void on its own.

The Dao of Heaven shows no favoritism, yet it always supports the virtuous. Impartial and selfless, it operates like a tally, devoid of personal bias—only those who meet its conditions receive its blessings. Ye Mengde (another Song Dynasty scholar) remarks: When someone approaches me, I respond with sincerity. Whether they reciprocate is not my concern. Only in this way can one meet the needs of all people without exhaustion—is this not akin to the Dao of Heaven, which is impartial and aids only the virtuous?

Chapter 80 describes the ideal society of "small states with sparse populations." Living in an era of Zhou Dynasty decline and hollow ritualism, Laozi sought to remedy the situation through Wuwei (non-action), and thus concludes the text by depicting his vision of an ideal society—though he knew such a state of small, isolated communities would be difficult to achieve.

Let the people possess tools but have no use for them; let them value life and refrain from distant migrations. Content with their lot, even the clever find no occasion to employ their skills. The "tools for tens and hundreds" refer to talents capable of managing groups of ten or a hundred. Because people live in peace, they cherish life; because their lives are stable, they see no need to travel far.

Though they have boats and carriages, they do not ride them; though they have weapons, they do not display them. Let the people return to the simplicity of knotting ropes to keep records. With affairs simple and customs pure, knotted cords suffice. They find their food sweet, their clothing beautiful, their homes comfortable, and their traditions joyful. Inner contentment breeds no envy of the outside world, so they cherish what they have and delight in their surroundings, desiring nothing more.

Neighboring states are within sight of each other; the crowing of roosters and barking of dogs can be heard. Yet the people grow old and die without ever visiting one another. Though goods abound, none are taken, for all have enough.

Chapter 81 states: Truthful words are not pleasing. Laozi observes that eloquent speech is often deceitful—the kind are not artful, and the artful are not kind. Those who truly understand the Dao do not flaunt their knowledge; those who flaunt their knowledge do not truly understand. Sages do not hoard wealth. The more they give to others, the richer they become; the more they share, the more they possess. Such is the Dao of Heaven: it benefits without harming. Such too is the way of sages: they assist without contending.

信言不美美言不信  信則爲實而已故不必美美則爲觀而已  故不必信 善者不辯辯者不善  以善爲主則不求辯以辯爲主則未必善 知者不博博者不知  有一以貫之則無所用博學博學而日益  者未必知道也 聖人無積旣以爲人己愈有旣以與人己愈 多  聖人抱一而已他無所積也然施其所能  以爲人推其所有以與人人有盡而一無  者然後知一之貴也政和曰善貸且成而  未嘗費我萬物皆往資焉而不匱 天之道利而不害聖人之道爲而不爭  勢可以利人則可以害人矣力足以爲之  則足以爭之矣能利能害而未嘗害能爲  能爭而未嘗爭此天與聖人所以大過人  而爲萬物宗者也凡此皆老子之所以爲  書與其所以爲道之大略也故於終篇復  言之趙曰莊子言老氏以有積爲不足無  藏爲有餘言聖人之道如海酌之而不竭  挹之而愈深故旣以爲人己愈有旣以與  人己愈多此莊子所謂天府佛氏所謂無  盡藏也終篇繼之以天
Interpretation

Genuine words are often not ornate, while flowery rhetoric is often untrustworthy. For truth values substance over form, requiring no deliberate embellishment; whereas ornate language serves only superficial beauty, and thus may lack authenticity.

Truly virtuous people do not engage in arguments, and those who relish debate may not be virtuous. Those grounded in goodness do not seek verbal victories, while those focused on contention may have strayed from goodness' essence.

The truly wise do not flaunt erudition, and those who parade knowledge may not truly understand the Dao. One who grasps the fundamental principle can comprehend all things without amassing extensive learning. Those whose knowledge grows ever broader may never apprehend the true Dao.

The sage (one who has attained the Dao) does not hoard personal possessions. The more they assist others, the more abundant they become; the more they give to others, the richer they grow. The sage clings only to the root—the Dao—accumulating nothing else. They exhaust their abilities to help others and empty their stores to give. Only when people realize material things are ultimately exhaustible do they understand the Dao's preciousness. As the Zhenghe commentary (referring to Emperor Huizong of Song's annotation) states: "Skillful giving completes all things yet never depletes itself. All things come to draw from it yet it never runs dry."

The Dao of nature benefits all things without harming them; the sage's standard is to act without contention. Those capable of benefiting others may also harm them; those capable of action may also contend. But the Dao of heaven and the way of sages can benefit without harming, act without contending—this is precisely what elevates them above ordinary people and makes them the root of all things.

These represent the core ideas of Laozi's Daode Jing and the essence of the Dao he transmitted, hence their reiteration at the text's conclusion. The Zhao commentary (possibly referring to Song scholar Zhao Zhijian) quotes Zhuangzi: "Laozi considered accumulation as insufficiency, while not hoarding meant abundance. The sage's Dao resembles the sea—inexhaustible, growing deeper the more one draws from it. Thus the more one gives to others, the more one possesses; the more one shares, the richer one becomes." This is what Zhuangzi called the "Celestial Storehouse" and Buddhism terms the "Inexhaustible Treasury." The text concludes with the Dao of heaven, demonstrating how the sage's way resonates with heavenly principle.

(End of Volume Four of Collected Commentaries on the Daode Zhenjing)

道者明此道同天  也 道德眞經集解卷之四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0080); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback