中文 · EN

《列子》Vol. 1

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

此为张湛注四库本,白文本见《列子》。

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 1 / 8 9,414 characters

About this page. The original text of 《列子》 Vol. 1 (Dongshen 洞神部, 8 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 20 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《列子》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

欽定四庫全書  列子卷一             晉 張湛  注             唐 殷敬慎 釋文   天瑞第一(夫巨細舛錯脩短殊性雖天地之大羣/品之衆涉於有生之分關於動用之域)   (者存亡變化自然之符夫唯寂然至虚凝一/而不變者非隂陽之所終始四時之所遷革) 子列子(載子於姓上者首章或/是弟子之所記故也)居鄭圃(音布鄭/有圃田)四十年 人無識者(非形不與物接言不與物交不/知其德之至則同於不識者矣)國君卿大夫 眎之猶衆庶也(非自隔於物直言無是非/行無軌迹則物莫能知也)國不足(年/饑)將 嫁於衛(自家而出/謂之嫁)弟子曰先生徃無反期弟子敢有所 謁先生將何以教先生不聞壺丘子林之言乎(壺丘子/林列子) (之/師)子列子笑曰壺子何言哉(四時行百物生/豈假於言哉)雖然夫子 嘗語伯昏瞀(莫侯/反)人吾側聞之試以告女(伯昏列子之/友同學於壺) (子不言自受教於壷/子者列子之謙言也)其言曰有生(今塊然/之形也)不生(生物而/不自生) (者/也)有化(今存亡/變改也)不化(化物而不/自化者也)不生者能生生(不生者/固生物) (之/宗)不化者能化化(不化者固/化物之主)生者不能不生化者不能
Interpretation

The opening chapter of Liezi·Tian Rui discusses the fundamental principles governing the generation and transformation of all things. The text states that all phenomena in the world, whether large or small, long or short, possess their own distinct characteristics. All living, active beings undergo birth, death, and change—these are manifestations of natural law. Only that which is absolutely still, utterly empty, and eternally unchanging (referring to the Dao) remains unaffected by the transformations of Yin-Yang or the cycles of the four seasons.

Liezi (a key Daoist figure, whose surname was Lie and given name Yukou) lived in seclusion in Putian, in the state of Zheng, for forty years, yet no one truly understood him. Because he did not outwardly display his wisdom and refrained from argumentative speech, even rulers and ministers regarded him as an ordinary man. One year, when famine struck Zheng, Liezi prepared to move to the state of Wei. His disciples, fearing he might not return, asked for parting teachings.

Liezi smiled and responded with a question: "What did my teacher, Huqiu Zilin (Liezi’s master), ever say?" He then recounted his teacher’s words to their mutual friend Bohun Maoren (a fellow Daoist practitioner): In this world, there exists "that which is born" (concrete, visible forms) and "that which is un-born" (the source that creates all things but is itself uncreated); there exists "that which transforms" (observable phenomena of change) and "that which does not transform" (the unchanging essence that drives transformation). That which is "un-born" gives rise to all things, while that which is "untransformed" propels all change. Yet the things that are born must inevitably undergo birth and death, and phenomena that transform must inevitably experience transition.

Here, the core Daoist teaching is revealed: behind the world of appearances lies an eternal, unchanging essence (the Dao), which, though not directly manifest, is the fundamental basis for the birth, death, and transformation of all things. Through the dialogue between master and disciple, Liezi transforms profound cosmological insights into everyday conversation, embodying the Daoist wisdom of "the Dao follows what is natural."

不化(生者非能生而生化者非能化而化/也直自不得不生不得不化者也)故常生常化 (涉於有動之分/者不得蹔無也)常生常化者無時不生無時不化(生化/相因) (存亡徃復/理無間也)隂陽爾四時爾(隂陽四時節變化之物而復/屬於有生之域者皆隨此陶) (運四時改而不停萬/物化而不息者也)不生者疑獨(不生之主豈可實而/驗哉疑其冥一而無) (始終/也)不化者徃復(音服後不/音者倣此)其際不可終(代謝無間形/氣轉續其道) (不/終)疑獨其道不可窮(亦何以知其窮與不窮哉直自疑/其獨立而不改周行而不殆也) 黃帝書曰谷神不死(古有此書今已不存夫谷虚而宅/有亦如莊子之稱環中至虚無物) (故謂谷神本自/無生故曰不死)是謂𤣥牝(毗忍反老子有此一章王弼/注曰無形無影無逆無違處) (卑不動守静不衰谷以之成而不見其形/此至物也處卑而不可得名故謂之𤣥牝)𤣥牝之門是 謂天地之根綿綿若存用之不勤(王弼曰門𤣥牝之所/由也本其所由與太) (極同體故謂天地之根也欲言存邪不見其形欲言亡/邪萬物以生故曰綿綿若存無物不成而不勞也故曰) (不/勤)故生物者不生化物者不化(莊子亦有此言向秀注/曰吾之生也非吾之所)
Interpretation

This elucidates the principle of natural transformation in the cosmic order. Those phenomena that appear to create life do not do so through deliberate intention; what seems to cause transformation does not act with conscious purpose. These processes of generation and transformation occur spontaneously, which is why the world perpetually exists in a state of ceaseless renewal and constant flux.

No entity with physical form and movement can maintain absolute stillness. The so-called "constant generation and transformation" refers to this uninterrupted process where creation and change are interdependent, cycling endlessly. The alternation between life and death, existence and dissolution continues perpetually like the interplay of Yin-Yang or the rotation of seasons. All things undergo continuous metamorphosis within this natural order.

What remains eternally unchanging is the independently existing noumenon (referred to as "suspected singularity"). It has neither beginning nor end, and cannot be verified through concrete phenomena. The cyclical boundaries of ever-changing things are likewise inexhaustible. As stated in the Yellow Emperor's classic: "The valley spirit never dies" (where "valley spirit" signifies the mysterious function within emptiness), this void-originating source never perishes.

This is what we call the "Mysterious Feminine" (Xuanpin), the fundamental origin of heaven, earth, and all things. Though invisible and intangible, it exists continuously without exhaustion. Thus, the true source of life requires no creation itself, and the agent of transformation remains unchanged. As Zhuangzi observed, our lives are not determined by our own will, but manifest through the workings of natural law.

(生則生自生耳生生者豈有物哉故不生也吾之化也/非物之所化則化自化耳化化者豈有物哉無物也故) (不化焉若使生物者亦生化物者亦化則與物俱化亦/奚異於物明夫不生不化者然後能為生化之本也) 自生自化自形自色自智自力自消自息(皆自爾耳豈/有尸而為之) (者/哉)謂之生化形色智力消息者非也(若有心於生化形/色則豈能官天地)  (而府萬物瞻羣/生而不匱乎)子列子曰昔者聖人因隂陽以統天地 (天地者舉形而言隂/陽者明其度數統理)夫有形者生於無形(謂之生者則/不死無者則) (不生故有無之不相生理既然矣則有何由而生忽爾/而自生忽爾而自生而不知其所以生不知所以生生) (則本同於無本同於無而非無也此/明有形之自形無形以相形者也)則天地安從生(天/地) (無所從生/而自然生)故曰有太易有太初有太始有太素(此明物/之自微) (至著變化之/相因襲也)太易者未見(賢遍反/注同)氣也(易者不窮滯之/稱凝寂於太虚) (之域將何所見耶如易繫/之太極老氏之渾成也)太初者氣之始也(隂陽未判/即下句所) (謂渾/淪也)太始者形之始也(隂陽既判則/品物流形也)太素者質之始也
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle of the spontaneous generation and transformation of all things. Life arises of itself, not created by any specific entity. What we call "generation" actually has no true creator, hence it can also be termed "non-generation." Similarly, the transformations of all things occur naturally without any controlling master.

If one believes that what creates life can also die, or that what drives change can itself change, then these forces would be no different from ordinary phenomena. Only by truly understanding the principle of "neither generating nor transforming" can one comprehend the root of all creation.

All things follow their own natural course: they generate themselves, transform themselves, take form spontaneously, manifest their own colors, acquire wisdom naturally, develop strength autonomously, perish of themselves, and rest independently. These all occur spontaneously—how could there be any master arranging them? If someone deliberately tries to create life or manufacture change, how could they possibly govern heaven and earth, encompass all things, nurture myriad beings without ever exhausting their power?

Liezi said: The ancient sages governed heaven and earth through yin and yang. Heaven and earth refer to concrete forms, while yin and yang reveal their patterns and laws. All formed things emerge from the formless. What we call "generation" does not truly die, and "non-being" does not truly generate—between being and non-being there exists no mutual causation. All things appear suddenly of themselves—we neither know why they arise nor understand their cause of generation. Since we cannot know their generative cause, it is equivalent to "non-being." Yet though equivalent to non-being, it is not absolute nothingness. This shows that formed things arise naturally, while formless principles accompany them.

From where, then, do heaven and earth arise? In truth, they have no specific origin—they emerge spontaneously. Therefore, the ancients spoke of four stages—Great Change (Taiyi), Great Beginning (Taichu), Great Commencement (Taishi), and Great Simplicity (Taisu)—to illustrate the process from subtlety to manifestation:

  • The Great Change stage precedes even the appearance of qi (referring to the primordial chaos, like the Taiji of the Yijing or the undifferentiated state in Laozi)
  • The Great Beginning marks the inception of qi (when yin and yang were not yet separated—the "undifferentiated mass" described below)
  • The Great Commencement sees the beginning of form (after yin and yang separate, things begin taking concrete shapes)
  • The Great Simplicity brings the beginning of substance (when all things acquire their material properties)
(質性也既為物矣則方貟/剛柔静躁沈浮各有其性)氣形質具而未相離(此直論/氣形質) (不復説太易太易為三者/宗本於後句别自明之也)故曰渾(音/魂)淪(音論/下同)渾淪者言 萬物相渾淪而未相離(力智反/去也)也(雖渾然一氣不相離/散而三才之道實潜) (兆乎其中淪/語之助也)視之不見聽之不聞循之不得故曰易也 易無形埒(不知此下一字老子曰視之不見名曰希如此曰/希而此易易亦希簡之别稱也大易之義如此) (而已故能為萬化宗/主冥一而不變者也)易變而為一(所謂易者窈冥惚恍/不可變也一氣恃之) (而化故寄/名變耳)一變而為七七變而為九九變者究也(究窮/也一) (變而為七九不以次數/者全舉陽數領其都㑹)乃復變而為一一者形變之始 也(既涉於有形之域理數相推自一之九九數既終乃/復反而為一反而為一歸於形變之始此盖明變化) (徃復無/窮極)清輕者上為天濁重者下為地(天地何邪直虚/實清濁之自分) (判者耳此一章全/是周易乾鑿度也)沖和氣者為人故天地⬤精萬物化 生(推此言之則隂陽氣徧交會而氣和氣/和而為人生人生則有所倚而立也)子列子曰天 地無全功聖人無全能萬物無全用(全猶/備也)故天職生覆
Interpretation

This passage describes the process of cosmic generation and transformation. The primordial state is called "Hunlun" (a state of undifferentiated chaos), where all things existed as an undivided whole—invisible, inaudible, and intangible—hence referred to as "Yi" (the origin of change).

Though this "Yi" is formless and shapeless, it serves as the fundamental source of all transformations. It first gives rise to "One" (the most primordial form), which then transforms into "Seven," and "Seven" further changes into "Nine." "Nine" represents the ultimate stage of transformation, after which it returns to "One," marking the beginning of manifest change.

During differentiation, the clear and light Qi ascends to form Heaven, while the turbid and heavy Qi descends to form Earth. The interaction of Yin and Yang energies produces a harmonious Qi, and this balanced, dynamic energy gives birth to humans. Thus, it is said that the essential Qi of Heaven and Earth's union nurtures all things.

Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) maintains that Heaven and Earth cannot encompass all functions, sages cannot be omnipotent, and all beings cannot fully realize every potential. Heaven's role lies in generating and covering all things, Earth's function is to support and nourish them, the sage's responsibility is to teach living beings, and each entity has its specific purpose. This is determined by the natural order.

地職形載聖職教化物職所宜(職主也生各有性/性各有所冝者也)然則 天有所短地有所長聖有所否物有所通(夫體適於一/方者造餘塗) (則閡矣王弼曰形必冇所分聲必有所/屬若温也則不能凉若宫也則不能商)何則生覆者不 能形載形載者不能教化教化者不能違所宜(順之則/通也) 宜定者不出所位(皆有素分/不可逆也)故天地之道非隂則陽聖 人之教非仁則義萬物之宜非柔則剛此皆隨所宜而 不能出所位者也(方圓静躁理不得兼然尋形即事則/名分不可相干任理之通方圓未必) (相乖故二儀之德聖人之道燾育羣生澤周萬物盡其/清寧貞粹而已則殊塗融通動静澄一蓋由聖人不逆) (萬物之性萬物不犯聖人之化凡滯於一方/者形分之所閡耳道之所運常冥通而無待)故有生者 有生生者有形者有形形者有聲者有聲聲者有色者 有色色者有味者有味味者(形聲色味皆忽爾而生不/能自生者也夫不能自生) (則無為之本無為之本則無留於一象無係/於一味故能為形氣之主動必由之者也)生之所生 者死矣而生生者未嘗終形之所形者實矣而形形者 未嘗有聲之所聲者聞矣而聲聲者未嘗發色之所色 者彰矣而色色者未嘗顯味之所味者甞矣而味味者
Interpretation

This passage explains how all things in heaven and earth have their distinct roles and characteristics that cannot be substituted for one another. Heaven governs the canopy (referring to how the sky envelops all things), earth presides over bearing (referring to how the ground carries all existence), the sage's duty is moral instruction, while all beings abide in their proper places. Each existence has its limitations: heaven cannot bear weight, earth cannot teach, and sages cannot forcibly alter things against their inherent nature.

All things possess their fixed attributes and positions, just as the complementary opposites of yin-yang, humaneness-righteousness, and softness-firmness are naturally formed orientations. The movement of heaven and earth cannot depart from the alternation of yin-yang, the teachings of sages cannot stray from the principles of humaneness-righteousness, and the nature of all things cannot exist without the harmony of softness and firmness. These are all natural manifestations of inherent qualities, incapable of transcending their defined boundaries.

The text then discusses the layers of cosmic generation: the source that produces life (the life-generator) does not itself die; the root that forms physical shapes (the form-creator) has no form itself; the origin that emits sounds (the sound-originator) makes no sound itself; the essence that manifests colors (the color-manifester) does not display itself; and the foundation that generates flavors (the flavor-producer) does not taste itself. These fundamental existences are all formless and traceless—they reveal their functions by producing concrete things, yet they eternally maintain a pure state beyond specific forms.

(Note: Concepts such as "the life-generator" refer to the Daoist understanding of the primordial forces of the cosmos, which create all things yet remain unconstrained by their forms—similar to the generative nature of the Dao.)

未嘗呈(夫盡於一形者皆隨代謝而遷革矣/故生者必終而生生物者無變化也)皆無為之 職也(至無者故能為/萬變之宗主也)能隂能陽能柔能剛能短能長 能圓能方能生能死能暑能涼能浮能沈能宫能商能 出能沒能𤣥能黃能甘能苦能羶能香無知也無能也 而無不知也而無不能也(知盡則無知能極則無能故/無所不知無所不能何晏道) (論曰有之為有待無以生事而為事由無以成夫道之/而無語名之而無名視之而無形聽之而無聲則道之) (全焉故能昭音嚮而出氣物包形神而章光影𤣥以之/黒素以之白矩以之方規以之圓圓方得形而此無形) (白黒得名而/此無名也)子列子適衛食於道從者見百嵗髑髏攓 蓬而指(攓音蹇/拔也)顧謂弟子百豐曰唯子與彼知而未嘗 生未嘗死也(俱涉變化之塗則子生而彼死推之/至極之域則理既無生亦又無死也)此過 (古卧/反)養乎此過歡乎(遭形則不能不養遇生則不能不/歡此過誤之徒非理之實當也) 種(章勇/反)有幾(居豈反○先問變化種數/凡有㡬條然後明之於下)若䵷為鶉(事見/墨子) 得水為㡭(音計司馬彪云謂水/土之氣相繼而生也)得水土之際則為䵷蠙
Interpretation

This passage explores the essential nature of the Dao and the patterns of transformation in all things. The primordial source (Dao) that generates all phenomena remains unchanging itself—formless yet governing all transformations. This source manifests as both Yin and Yang, softness and hardness, brevity and longevity, roundness and squareness. It gives birth yet brings death, generates heat yet produces coolness; it ascends and descends, produces the gong and shang musical notes; appears and disappears, manifests as profound black and bright yellow; tastes both sweet and bitter, carries both rank and fragrant qualities.

Though appearing devoid of cognition and action (Wuwei), it in fact knows all and accomplishes everything. Just as ultimate knowledge appears like ignorance and supreme capability resembles incapacity, the true Dao transcends all forms: when named, no suitable designation can be found; observed, it shows no shape; listened to, it makes no sound. Precisely through this quality of emptiness, it manifests sound, generates Qi (vital energy), contains both form and Shen (spirit), and reveals light and shadow. Black appears black because of it, white appears white through it, squares gain their angles and circles their roundness from it—yet the Dao itself remains formless and nameless.

The text records an anecdote about Liezi (a prominent Daoist figure) traveling to Wei. While eating by the roadside, his attendants discovered a century-old skull. Brushing aside the surrounding weeds, Liezi pointed to the skull and told his disciple Baifeng: "Only you and this truly understand what it means to have never been born nor died." This illustrates that from the perspective of transformation, one may appear alive and another dead, but from the ultimate truth, there is no real distinction between life and death.

Finally, the passage describes various transformations among creatures: frogs may transform into quails (as recorded in the Mozi), water creatures become "ji" (organisms emerging from the interaction of water and earth Qi), while those at water-earth boundaries turn into frogs and clams. These examples all demonstrate the principle of mutual transformation among all things.

(步田反司馬彪云物根在水土際布在水中就水土視/之不見鈔之可得如張縣在水中矣楚人謂之䵷蠙之) (衣/)之衣(衣猶/覆蓋)生於陵屯(音豚阜也○陵/屯髙㓗處也)則為陵舄(此隨/所生) (之處而/變者也)陵舄得鬰栖則為烏足(此合而/相生也)烏足之根為蠐 螬其葉為胡蝶(根本也葉散也言烏足為蠐/螬之本其末散化為胡蝶也)胡蝶胥也 (胥皆也言/物皆化也)化而為蟲生竈下其狀若脱(郭注爾雅云/脱謂剥皮也)其 名曰鴝(音/衢)掇(丁括反鴝掇蟲名○此/一形之内變異者也)鴝掇千日(千日/而死)化 而為鳥其名曰乾餘骨乾餘骨之沫為斯彌(沫猶精/華生起)斯 彌為食醯(許兮反若酒上/蠛蠓也下同)頥輅(上怡/下路)食醯頥輅生乎食 醯黃軦(音呪頥輅黃/軦皆蟲名)食醯黃軦生乎九猷(李云九當作/久久老也猷) (蟲名/也)九猷生乎瞀(茂謀/二音)芮(音蚋小/蟲也)瞀芮生乎腐(音/漸)蠸(音/權) (一音歡謂瓜中黃甲蟲也○/此皆死而更生之一形者也)羊肝化為地臯馬血之為 轉鄰也(説文作㷠又作粦皆鬼火也/淮南子云血為燐也音吝)人血之為野火也 (此皆一形之/内自變化也)鷂之為鸇鸇之為布穀布穀乆復為鷂也
Interpretation

This passage describes the wondrous phenomena of mutual transformation among various life forms in nature. According to Sima Biao's interpretation, the origin of all things lies at the boundary between water and earth, like objects suspended in water, which the Chu people called "wabian" (an aquatic creature).

When these life forms grow on high hills and mounds (lingtun), they transform into lingxi (a type of plant). When lingxi encounters damp environments (yuqi), it becomes wuzu grass. The roots of wuzu grass metamorphose into qicao (grubs of scarab beetles), while its leaves transform into butterflies. After the butterfly dies, it becomes a small insect found beneath stoves, whose shed skin is called "quduo" (a type of insect).

After a thousand days, the quduo transforms into a bird named "ganyugu." The vital essence (Qi) of this bird then becomes "simi" (microscopic life forms), which in turn transform into "shixi," tiny flying insects found on vinegar and wine. From shixi emerge yilu insects, which produce huangkuang insects, which then transform into jiuyou insects (where "jiu" should be "jiu," meaning aged insects). The jiuyou insects give birth to maorui (tiny flying insects), which then become fuquan (yellow beetles found in melons). All these represent the cyclical transformations of the same life form.

The text further mentions: sheep's liver can transform into digao (a type of fungus), horse's blood can become will-o'-the-wisp (phosphorescent fire), and human blood can turn into wildfire. Sparrow hawks transform into zhan birds, which then become cuckoos, and after prolonged time, the cuckoos revert back to sparrow hawks. These are all natural transformation processes occurring within the same life form.

燕之為蛤也田鼠之為鶉也朽瓜之為魚也老韭之為 莧也老羭(音/俞)之為猨也(羭牝/羊也)魚卵之為蟲(此皆無所因/感自然而變) (者/也)亶爰(上蟬/下袁)之獸自孕而生曰𩔖(亶音蟬山海經云亶/爰之山有獸其狀如) (狸而有髮其名曰𩔖/自為牝牡相生也)河澤之鳥視而生曰鶂(五歴反○/此相視而) (生者也莊子曰白鶂相視/眸子不運而風化之也)純雌其名大⬤純雄其名稺 (古稚/字)蜂(司馬彪云稚蜂細⬤者取桑蟲祝之使似己子/也○⬤龜龞之𩔖也稺小也此無雌雄而自化) (上言蟲獸之理既然下/明人道亦有如此者也)思士不妻而感思女不夫而孕 (大荒經曰有思幽之國思士不妻思女不夫精/氣潜感不假交接而生子也此亦白鶂之𩔖也)后稷生 乎巨跡(傳記云髙辛氏之妃名姜嫄見大人跡好而履/之如有人理感已者遂孕因生后稷長而賢乃) (為堯佐即/周祖也)伊尹生乎空桑(博記曰伊尹母居伊水之上/既孕夢有神告之曰旧水出) (而東走無顧明日視旧出水告其鄰東走十里而顧其/邑盡為水身因化為空桑有莘氏女子採桑得嬰兒于) (空桑之中故命之曰伊尹而獻其/君令庖人養之長而賢為殷湯相)厥昭生乎濕(此因蒸/潤而生)
Interpretation

This passage records ancient legends about the natural transformations of creatures and miraculous human conceptions. Swallows under certain conditions transform into clams, field mice turn into quails, rotten melons become fish, old leeks mutate into amaranth, elderly ewes metamorphose into apes, and fish eggs develop into insects—these are all wondrous natural transformations occurring without external causes.

There exists a mythical creature called "Lei" (recorded in the Classic of Mountains and Seas, resembling a wildcat but covered in hair) capable of self-conception. Birds in river marshes called "Yi" (mentioned by Zhuangzi as white waterfowl) can conceive simply by gazing at each other without blinking. Creatures with purely feminine essence were called "Da X" while purely masculine ones were termed "Zhi Feng" (ancient people believed slender-waisted wasps could transform mulberry worms into their offspring).

Humans exhibit similar phenomena: women yearning for men can conceive without marriage, and men longing for women can impregnate without wedlock (as recorded in the Classic of Great Wilderness about the "Land of Hidden Thoughts," where subtle Qi interaction enables conception without physical contact).

The text also documents miraculous births of historical figures: Hou Ji (progenitor of the Zhou dynasty) was conceived when his mother Jiang Yuan stepped on a giant's footprint; Yi Yin (wise minister of King Tang of Shang) was born after his mother dreamed of deities and transformed into a hollow mulberry tree, later discovered there by a woman of the Youshen clan; and creatures called "Juezhao" were said to spontaneously generate in humid environments. These legends collectively reflect ancient people's distinctive understanding of life's origins.

醯雞生乎酒(此因酸/氣而生)羊奚比(音/毗)乎不筍(此異𩔖而/相親比也)乆竹 生青寧(因於林/藪而生)青寧生程(自從繼至於程皆生生之物/虵鳥蟲獸之屬言其變化無) (常或以形而變或死而更/生終始相因無窮已也)程生馬馬生人人乆入於機 萬物皆出於機皆入於機(夫生死變化胡可測哉生於/此者或死於彼死於彼者或) (生於此而形生之主未嘗暫無是以聖人知生不常存/死不永滅一氣之變所適萬形萬形萬化而不化者存) (歸於不化故謂之機機者羣有之始動之/所宗故出無入有散有反無靡不由之也)黃帝書曰形 動不生形而生影聲動不生聲而生響(夫冇形必有影/有聲必有響此) (自然而並生俱出而俱没豈有相資前後之差哉郭象/注莊子論之詳矣而世之談者以形動而影隨聲出而) (響應聖人則之以為喻明物動則失/本静則歸根不復曲通影響之義也)無動不生無而生 有(有之為有恃無以生言生必由無而無不生有此/運通之功必賴於無故生動之稱因事而立耳)形 必終者也天地終乎與我偕終(料巨細計修短則與我/殊矣㑹歸於終理固無) (差/也)終進乎不知也(進當為盡此書盡字例多作進也聚/則成形散則為終此世之所謂終始)
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist perspective on the generation and transformation of all things. In a wine vat, small flying insects (xi ji) emerge spontaneously, while different species (such as the plant yang xi) demonstrate mutual dependence. When bamboo ages, it gives rise to moss (qing ning), which in turn generates other life forms (cheng). These transformations cycle endlessly—from cheng to horse, from horse to human, ultimately returning to the primordial source of all existence (ji).

The Yellow Emperor's Scripture states: "Bodily movement does not produce form, but rather creates shadow; sound vibrations do not produce sound, but rather create echoes." These phenomena occur simultaneously in nature without sequential cause and effect. Modern people often misunderstand this relationship, believing shadows follow forms and echoes chase sounds. In truth, this illustrates how movement causes things to lose their fundamental nature, while stillness allows return to the origin.

"Non-being" (wu) does not generate movement by itself, yet gives birth to "being" (you). All existing "being" depends on "non-being" for its emergence. Physical forms ultimately perish, and heaven-earth will reach their end alongside us. Yet what we call "ending" is actually a return to the unknowable primordial state (where "advance" should be understood as "exhaustion"). Just as matter coalesces into form and disperses into termination, this constitutes what ordinary people describe as the cycle of life and death.

(也然則聚者以形實為始以離散為終㪚者以虛漠為/始以形實為終故迭相與為終始而理實無終無始者) (也/)道終乎本無始進乎本不久(久當為有無始故/不終無有故不盡)有生 則復於不生有形則復於無形(生者反終形者反/虛自然之數也)不生 者(此不生者先有其/生然後之於死滅)非本不生者也(本不生者初/自無生無滅)無形 者(此無形亦先有其/形然後之於離散)非本無形者也(本無形者初自無/聚無散者也夫生) (生物者不生形形物者無形故能生形萬物於我體無/變今謂既生既形而復反於無生無形者此故存亡之) (徃復爾非始終/之不變者也)生者理之必終者也終者不得不終亦 如生者之不得不生(生者不生而自生故雖生而不知/所以生不知所以生則生不可絶) (不知所以死則/死不可禦也)而欲⬤其生畫其終惑於數也(畫亡/也)精 神者天之分骨骸者地之分屬天清而散屬地濁而聚 精神離形各歸其真(天分歸天地分/歸地各反其本)故謂之鬼鬼歸也 歸其真宅(真宅太/虛之域)黄帝曰精神入其門骨骸反其根我 尚何存(何生之無形何形之無氣何氣之無靈然則心/智形骸隂陽之一體徧積之一氣及其離形歸)
Interpretation

All things in their convergence begin with concrete form, ultimately moving toward dispersion; what is dispersed begins again from the state of emptiness, ultimately coalescing into substance. This cycle of convergence and dispersion appears to have a beginning and end, yet its fundamental principle is without origin or cessation.

The ultimate state of the Dao is a return to "original non-being" (the void state of cosmic origin), which neither begins nor ends. Living beings inevitably return to the lifeless state; what has form ultimately dissolves into formlessness. Here, "lifelessness" does not mean never having existed, but rather the return from living to non-living; "formlessness" does not mean never having form, but the return from convergence to dispersion.

What is truly eternal is that source which generates all things yet remains unbound by the laws of birth and death, that essence which forms all things yet remains unaffected by cycles of convergence and dispersion. That life must end is as inevitable as its beginning—this is the way of nature. To forcibly prevent life's conclusion or artificially impose endpoints is foolishness that violates celestial order.

The human spirit belongs to the clear, light yang qi (vital energy) and returns to heaven; bones belong to the turbid, heavy yin qi and return to earth. At death, the spirit departs the physical form, each returning to its origin—the spirit to the Great Void (primordial cosmic space), the bones to the earth. The Yellow Emperor said: When the spirit enters the gate of the Great Void and bones return to earth, what remains of the true "self"?

(Note: This passage reflects the Daoist cyclical view of "reversal at the extreme" and the dualistic life perspective of "form and spirit," seeing life as a temporary convergence of yin-yang energies that ultimately return to cosmic origins. The "true abode" refers to the eternal state beyond physical form, the ultimate destination of Daoist cultivation.)

(根則反其真宅/而我無物焉)人自生至終大化有四(其間遷易無時/蹔停四者蓋舉) (大較而/言者也)嬰孩也少壯也老耄也死亡也其在嬰孩氣專 志一和之至也物不傷焉德莫加焉(老子曰含德之/厚比於赤子)其 在少壯則血氣飄溢欲慮充起物所攻焉德故衰焉(處/力) (競之地物/所不與也)其在老耄則欲慮柔焉體將休焉物莫先焉 (休息也已無競/心則物不與争)雖未及嬰孩之全方於少壯間矣其在 死亡也則之於息焉反其極矣孔子逰於太山見榮啓 期行乎郕(音成魯/邑名)之野鹿裘帶索(先各/反)鼔琴而歌孔子 問曰先生所以樂(音洛/下同)何也對曰吾樂甚多天生萬物 唯人為貴而吾得為人是一樂也(推此而言明人之神/氣與衆生不殊所適) (者異故形貎不一是以榮啓期深測倚伏之縁洞/識幽顯之驗故忻遇人形兼得男貴豈孟浪而言)男女 之别(彼列/反)男尊女卑故以男為貴吾既得為男矣是二 樂也(人之將生男女亦無/定分故復喜得男身)人生有不見日月不免襁褓 者吾既已行年九十矣是三樂也貧者士之常也死者 人之終也處常得終當何憂哉孔子曰善乎能自寛者 也(不能都忘憂樂善其/能推理自寛慰者耳)林𩔖年且百嵗(書傳無聞盖/古之隱者也)底
Interpretation

From birth to death, human life undergoes four major stages of transformation (though these changes are continuous, we'll outline them broadly here): infancy, prime adulthood, old age, and death.

During infancy, a person's Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) remain concentrated, with a singular and pure state of mind, representing the most harmonious condition. External forces cannot harm them, and their De (virtue/power) is most complete (as Laozi said, "One who embodies profound virtue resembles a newborn"). Upon reaching prime adulthood, vigorous blood and Qi dominate, while desires and overthinking proliferate, making one vulnerable to external disturbances—De begins to decline (in competitive environments, external forces show no mercy). Entering old age, desires and overthinking weaken, the body gradually rests, and external forces no longer contend (because one no longer competes, neither do external things). Though not as perfect as infancy, this stage is better than prime adulthood. Finally, at death, one returns to peaceful rest—the ultimate homecoming.

While traveling on Mount Tai, Confucius once saw Rong Qiqi (an ancient hermit) in the outskirts of Cheng, dressed in crude deerskin tied with a straw rope, playing the qin and singing. Confucius asked why he was so joyful. Rong Qiqi replied: "I have many reasons for joy: Heaven nurtures all things, yet humans are the most noble—that I became human is my first joy. Men and women differ, yet men are more esteemed—that I became a man is my second joy. Some die at birth, yet I've lived to ninety—this is my third joy. Poverty is the scholar's constant state; death is life's inevitable end. I abide in the constant and fulfill my natural lifespan—what is there to grieve?" Confucius sighed in admiration: "Well said! Truly one who knows self-contentment." (Though not entirely free from sorrow and joy, such rational self-consolation is rare indeed.) There was also a hermit named Lin Lei, nearly a hundred years old...

春被裘拾遺穗於故畦(收刈後田中/棄穀拾之也)並歌並進孔子適 衛望之於野顧謂弟子曰彼叟可與言者試徃訊之子 貢請行逆之壠端面之而歎曰先生曾不悔乎而行歌 拾穗林𩔖行不留歌不輟子貢叩之不已乃仰而應(於/證) (反/)曰吾何悔邪子貢曰先生少不勤行(下孟反/下同)長不競 時老無妻子死期將至亦有何樂而拾穗行歌乎林𩔖 笑曰吾之所以為樂人皆有之而反以為憂(我所以為/樂者人人) (皆同但未能觸事/而夷故無蹔歡)少不勤行長不競時故能夀若此(不/勤) (行則遺名譽不競時則無利欲二者不/存於胷中則百年之夀不祈而自獲也)老無妻子死期 將至故樂若此(所謂樂天知/命故無憂也)子貢曰夀者人之情死者 人之惡子以死為樂何也林𩔖曰死之與生一徃一反 故死於是者安知不生於彼故吾知其不相若矣吾又 安知營營而求生非惑乎亦又安知吾今之死不愈昔 之生乎(尋此㫖則存亡/徃復無窮已也)子貢聞之不喻其意還以告夫 子夫子曰吾知其可與言果然然彼得之而不盡者也 (卒然聞林𩔖之言盛以為已造極矣而夫子方謂未盡/夫盡者無所不盡亦無所盡然後盡理都全耳今方對)
Interpretation

In spring, wearing a fur coat, he walked through harvested fields gleaning fallen ears of grain while singing. When Confucius traveled to the State of Wei and saw this old man in the wilderness, he turned to his disciples and said, "That elder is worth conversing with. Go and try speaking with him." Zigong volunteered and approached the ridge of the field to meet him. Facing the old man, he sighed and said, "Don’t you feel any regret, sir? How can you still sing while gleaning grain?"

Lin Lei (the gleaning elder) continued walking without stopping, his song uninterrupted. Only after Zigong pressed him repeatedly did he finally look up and reply, "What do I have to regret?" Zigong said, "In your youth, you were not diligent; in your prime, you did not seize opportunities. Now, in old age, you have neither wife nor children, and death approaches. What joy is there in singing while gleaning grain?"

Lin Lei laughed and explained, "The reason for my joy is something everyone possesses, yet you consider it sorrow. Precisely because I did not exhaust myself in youth or struggle for gain in my prime, I have lived this long (by not chasing fame and fortune, one naturally attains longevity). In old age, I am free from attachments, and with death near, I am all the more joyful (this is the state of accepting fate with contentment)."

Zigong pressed further, "Long life is what people desire, and death is what they dread. Why do you find joy in death?" Lin Lei replied, "Life and death are like a cycle of coming and going. To die here—how do we know we will not be reborn elsewhere? How do I know that striving desperately to live is not delusion? Perhaps dying now is better than living in the past! (Life and death are part of an eternal cycle.)"

Zigong could not comprehend this and returned to report to Confucius. Confucius said, "I knew he was worth discussing the Dao with, but what he has realized is not yet ultimate (Lin Lei believes he has reached the pinnacle, yet the truth encompasses all without attachment)." This dialogue illustrates the Daoist transcendent attitude toward life and death, showing that following nature and releasing attachments to gain and loss constitute true wisdom.

(無於有去彼取此則不得不覺内外之異然所不盡者/亦少許處耳若夫萬變𤣥一彼我兩忘即理自夷而實) (無所遣夫冥内逰外同於人/羣者豈有盡與不盡者乎)子貢倦於學告仲尼曰願 有所息(學者所以求復其初乃至/於厭倦則自然之理⬤矣)仲尼曰生無所息(勞/知) (慮役支體此生者之/事莊子曰生為徭役)子貢曰然則賜息無所乎仲尼曰 有焉耳望其壙(音曠墓/穴也)睪(音/臯)如也宰如也墳如也鬲(音/歴) (形如鼎/又音隔)如也則知所息矣(見其墳壤鬲異則知息之/有所莊子曰死為休息也)子 貢曰大哉死乎君子息焉小人伏焉(樂天知命泰然以/待終君子之所以) (息去離憂苦昧然而/死小人之所以伏也)仲尼曰賜汝知之矣人胥知生之 樂未知生之苦知老之憊未知老之佚知死之惡未知 死之息也(莊子曰太塊載我以形勞我/以生佚我以老息我以死耳)晏子曰善哉古 之有死也(生死古今所同而獨善古之死/者明古人不樂生而惡死也)仁者息焉不 仁者伏焉(修身慎行恒懷兢懼此仁者之所憂貪欲縱/肆常無厭足此不仁者之所苦唯死而後休) (息寢/伏之)死也者德之徼(音/呌)也(德者得也徼者歸/也言各得其所歸)古者謂死
Interpretation

This dialogue occurs between Zigong (a disciple of Confucius) and Confucius (Zhongni), discussing the meaning of life, death, and rest.

Feeling weary from his studies, Zigong tells Confucius he wishes to rest. Confucius replies: "There is no true rest in life (生无所息), for life itself is continuous activity." When Zigong presses him about where one might find rest, Confucius points to the graves and says: "Look at those burial mounds—raised high like ancient tripod cauldrons (鼎鬲). That is the place of rest." implying that death is the only true cessation.

Zigong, enlightened, exclaims: "How great is death! The noble find peace in it, while the petty succumb to it." Confucius elaborates: "People know the joys of life but not its toils; they know the weariness of old age but not its ease; they fear death but do not see it as rest." Quoting Zhuangzi, he adds: "Nature gives us form to labor, old age to relax, and death to rest."

Finally, the perspective of Yanzi (a renowned statesman of Qi during the Spring and Autumn period) is cited: "The ancients saw death as a return (德之徼, De's homecoming). Those of perfected Virtue (De) rest in it, while the unvirtuous are overcome by it. Death is life’s destination, like a traveler returning home."

Through this teacher-disciple exchange, the dialogue reveals the Daoist understanding of life and death: existence is a process of toil, and death is not an end but a return to nature’s original state. The noble (君子) align with the Dao (the Way), accepting death as homecoming, while the petty (小人) cling to life in fear. The metaphor of "De's homecoming" (德之徼) is particularly profound—framing death as a wanderer’s return, embodying the Daoist transcendence that unites life and death in harmony.

人為歸人夫言死人為歸人則生人為行人矣行而不 知歸失家者也一人失家一世非之天下失家莫知非 焉(此衆寡相傾者也晏子儒墨為家重/形生者不辨有此言假託所稱耳)有人去鄉土離 六親廢家業游於四方而不歸者何人哉世必謂之為 狂蕩之人矣又有人鍾賢世(鍾賢世宜/言重形生)矜巧能修名譽 誇張於世而不知已者亦何人哉世必以為智謀之士 此二者胥失者也(此二者雖行事小異/而並不免於溺喪也)而世與一不與 一唯聖人知所與知所去(邱吕反注同○以生死為寤/寐者與之溺喪忘歸者去之) 或謂子列子曰子奚貴虚列子曰虚者無貴也(凡貴名/之所以) (生必謂去彼而取此是我而非物今有無兩忘萬/異冥一故謂之虚虚既虚矣貴賤之名將何所生)子列 子曰非其名也(事有實著非假/名而後得也)莫如静莫如虚静也虚 也得其居矣取也與也失其所矣(夫虚静之理非心慮/之表形骸之外求而) (得之即我之性内安諸已則自然真全矣故物以全者/皆由虚靜故得其所安所以敗者皆由動求故失其所) (處/)事之破䃣(音/毁)而後有舞仁義者弗能復也(當為之於/未有治之)
Interpretation

This passage from the Liezi primarily discusses the ultimate destination of human life and the question of values. The text presents an analogy: if we call the deceased "returnees," then the living are "wayfarers." Those who keep journeying without knowing their destination are people who have lost their way home. When an individual loses their way, everyone condemns them; yet when an entire society loses its way, no one sees anything wrong with it.

The text then illustrates two types of lost individuals: The first abandon their homeland, forsake their kin, and wander without returning—such people are considered dissolute madmen by the world. The second are those obsessed with worldly fame and success, who pride themselves on their intellect while chasing empty reputation without self-awareness—yet the world praises them as wise. In truth, both types have lost their original nature, but people often only condemn the former while approving the latter. Only sages can discern what should be embraced and what should be relinquished.

When asked why Liezi esteemed the state of "emptiness" (xu), he replied: Genuine "emptiness" inherently recognizes no distinction between nobility and baseness. He emphasized non-attachment to names and forms, maintaining a state of tranquil emptiness to preserve one's original nature. The moment thoughts of acquisition or giving arise, one loses authenticity. Like shattered vessels that cannot be restored, attempting to mend ruined affairs with benevolence and righteousness (renyi) afterward is already too late.

(Note: The term "emptiness" (xu) here is a key Daoist concept referring to the state of relinquishing attachments and returning to the source; "those who esteem worldly achievement" (zhongxian shi) refers to people who value conventional success; "drowning in loss" (ni sang) means being submerged in delusion.)

(於未亂乃至虧喪凋殘方欲鼔舞仁/義以求反性命之極者未之得也)粥(音/育)熊(周文王師/封於楚著) (子書二/十二篇)曰運轉亡已天地密移疇覺之哉(此則莊子舟/壑之義孔子) (曰日夜無隙丘以是徂夫萬物與化為體體化而遷化/不蹔停物豈守故故向之形生非今形生俯仰之間而) (已涉萬變氣散形朽非一旦頓至而昧者操必/化之器託不停之運自謂變化可逃不亦悲乎)故物損 於彼者盈於此成於此者虧於彼(所謂川竭谷虚/邱夷淵實也)損盈 成虧隨世隨死(此世亦/宜言生)徃來相接間不可省疇覺之哉 (成者方自謂成而已虧矣/生者方自謂生潜已死矣)凡一氣不頓進一形不頓虧 亦不覺其成不覺其虧(皆在冥中而潜化/固非耳目所瞻察)亦如人自世 (音/生)至老貎色智態亡日不異皮膚爪髪隨世(音生/下同)隨落 非嬰孩時有停而不易也(形色髮膚有精麄者新故相/換猶不可識况妙於此者乎) 間不可覺俟至後知杞國有人憂天地崩墜身亡所寄 廢寢食者又有憂彼之所憂者因徃曉之(彼之所憂者/惑矣而復以) (不惑憂彼之所惑不憂彼之所/憂喻積惑彌深何能相喻也)曰天積氣耳亡處亡氣 若屈伸呼吸終日在天中行止奈何憂崩墜乎(夫天之/蒼蒼非)
Interpretation

Master Xiong (teacher of King Wen of Zhou, feudal lord of Chu, and author of twenty-two philosophical texts) once said: The movement of heaven and earth never ceases, and all things undergo imperceptible transformations—who can truly perceive this? This echoes Zhuangzi's principle of the "boat and ravine" (metaphor for constant change), and Confucius similarly observed that "day and night alternate without end, and all things flow with the passage of time."

All phenomena follow the transformations of creation, and this process never stops. The form of life from yesterday is not the same as today's; in the blink of an eye, countless changes have already occurred. When Qi (vital energy) dissipates and the physical form decays, it does not happen abruptly—yet foolish people believe they can escape this inevitable transformation. How lamentable!

Where something is depleted here, it will be replenished elsewhere; where something is achieved here, it will be lost there (just as rivers dry up and valleys empty, hills erode and abysses fill). This cyclical alternation of gain and loss, life and death, repeats endlessly, yet people remain unaware. When we think we have succeeded, decline has already begun; when we believe we are alive, death quietly approaches.

The transformations of Qi and form are gradual, never sudden, so people do not notice them. Consider how, from birth to old age, a person's appearance, intellect, and physique change daily—skin, nails, and hair constantly renew and shed. It is not as if one remains unchanged since infancy. If even these subtle shifts escape our notice, how much more elusive are the workings of creation's finer processes?

A man of Qi once spent his days in fear that the sky would collapse and the earth cave in, leaving him no place to dwell. He worried so much that he could neither eat nor sleep. Another man, concerned for him, went to offer counsel: "The sky is nothing but accumulated Qi (vital energy), present everywhere. You move within this Qi all day—why fear its collapse?" (Yet the vast depths of heaven are far more profound than what meets our eyes.)

(䃘然之質則所謂天者豈但逺而無所極邪自/地而上則皆天矣故俯仰喘息未始離天也)其人曰 天果積氣日月星宿(音秀/下同)不當墜邪曉之者曰日月星 宿亦積氣中之有光耀者(氣亦何所不勝雖天地之大/猶自安於太虚之域况乃積) (氣相舉/者也)只使墜亦不能有所中(丁仲/反)傷其人曰奈地壞 何曉者曰地積塊耳充塞四虚亡處亡塊若躇步跐(音/此) 蹈(徒到反四字/皆踐踏之貎)終日在地上行止奈何憂其壞其人⬤ (音釋/下同)然大喜(舍宜作釋此/書釋字作⬤)曉之者亦⬤然大喜(此二人/一以必) (敗為憂一以必全為喜此未知所以為憂喜/也而互相慰喻使自解釋固未免於大惑也)長廬子聞 而笑之曰虹蜺也雲霧也風雨也四時也此積氣之成 乎天者也山岳也河海也金石也火木也此積形之成 乎地者也知積氣也知積塊也奚謂不壞(夫混然未判/則天地一氣) (萬物一形分而為天地散而為萬/物此蓋離合之殊異形氣之虚實)夫天地空中之一細 物有中之最巨者難終難窮此固然矣難測難識此固 然矣憂其壞者誠為大(音/泰)逺言其不壞者亦為未是天 地不得不壞則會歸於壞遇其壞時奚為不憂哉(此知/有始)
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Liezi, recording a dialogue between two individuals discussing whether heaven and earth might perish.

The first person asks: "If heaven is formed by the gathering of Qi (vital energy), wouldn't the sun, moon, and stars fall down?" The enlightened one explains: "The sun, moon, and stars are also luminous objects within Qi. Qi permeates everywhere—even something as vast as heaven and earth remains stable within the void, let alone these celestial bodies supported by Qi. Even if they were to fall, they wouldn't harm anyone."

The questioner then asks: "What if the earth collapses?" The enlightened one replies: "The earth is formed by accumulated clods of soil, filling all directions—everywhere is soil. You walk and tread upon it all day long, so why worry about it collapsing?" Hearing this, the questioner is greatly pleased, and the enlightened one shares his joy. (Here the author comments: One worries that heaven and earth must inevitably perish, while the other rejoices in their eternal existence—yet neither truly understands what should be cause for worry or joy. Their mutual consolation and explanations still fail to free them from confusion.)

Later, when Changluzi hears of this, he laughs and says: "Rainbows, clouds, wind, rain, and the four seasons—these are celestial phenomena formed by the gathering of Qi. Mountains, rivers, metals, stones, fire, and wood—these are terrestrial phenomena formed by the accumulation of matter. Since we know heaven is an aggregation of Qi and earth an accumulation of matter, how can we claim they won’t perish? In the vastness of the void, heaven and earth are but small things, yet within the world of form, they are the greatest. That they are unfathomable and immeasurable is natural. To worry about their destruction is indeed thinking too far ahead, yet to say they will never perish is also incorrect. Heaven and earth will ultimately perish—when that time comes, how can we not be concerned?" (Here the text points out: Understanding the principle that all things that have a beginning must have an end.)

This discussion reflects ancient Chinese cosmological thought, using "Qi" and "form" to explain the composition of all things. It acknowledges both the vastness of heaven and earth and recognizes their inherent limitations.

(之必終有形之必敗而不識休戚/與隂陽升降器質與天地顯没也)子列子聞而笑曰言 天地壞者亦謬言天地不壞者亦謬壞與不壞吾所不 能知也雖然彼一也此一也(彼一謂不壞者也此一謂/壞者也若其不壞則與人) (偕全若其壞也則與人偕/亡何為欣戚於其間哉)故生不知死死不知生來不 知去去不知來壞與不壞吾何容心哉(生之不知死猶/死之不知生故) (當其成也莫知其毁及其毁也亦何知其成此去來之/見驗成敗之明徴而我皆即之情無彼此何處容其心) (乎/)舜問乎丞曰道可得而有乎(舜欲明羣有皆同於無/故舉道以為發問之端) 曰汝身非汝有也汝何得有夫道(郭象曰夫身者非汝/所能有也塊然而自) (有耳有非所/有而況無哉)舜曰吾身非吾有孰有之哉(據有此身/故重發問)曰 是天地之委形也(是一氣之/偏積者也)生非汝有是天地之委和 也(積和故/成生耳)性命非汝有是天地之委順也(積順故有存/亡耳郭象曰) (若身是汝有則美惡死生當制之由汝令氣聚而生汝/不能禁也氣散而死汝不能止也明其委結而自成非) (汝之/有也)孫子非汝有是天地之委蛻(音/稅)也(氣自委結而蟬/蜕耳若是汝有)
Interpretation

When Liezi heard people debating whether heaven and earth would perish, he smiled and responded: Those who claim heaven and earth will perish are wrong, and those who claim they won't perish are equally mistaken. Whether they perish or not fundamentally transcends our capacity to know. In truth, perishing or not perishing are ultimately the same - if heaven and earth don't perish, we coexist with them; if they do perish, we vanish along with them. Why then should we feel either joy or anxiety about it?

The living cannot comprehend death, nor can the dead comprehend life; when we enter this world we know not whence we came, and when we depart we know not whither we go. Why should we trouble ourselves with questions about heaven and earth's survival that surpass human understanding? Just as things in formation don't know when they'll be destroyed, and things destroyed don't know when they'll reappear - these transformations are all manifestations of nature's patterns, and we should simply follow their natural course.

Emperor Shun once asked the ancient sage Cheng: "Can humans possess the Dao (the Way)?" Cheng replied: "Your own body doesn't even belong to you - how could you possibly possess the Dao?" Shun pressed further: "If my body doesn't belong to me, then to whom does it belong?" Cheng explained: "Your physical form is but the coalescence of Qi (vital energy) between heaven and earth; your life is the harmonious manifestation of Yin-Yang energies; your very existence displays nature's patterns. Even your descendants are merely the metabolic renewal of heaven and earth's Qi, like a cicada shedding its skin. None of this is within your control - since you can't even govern the gathering and dispersion of your life's breath, how could you presume to possess the profound Dao?"

(則男女多少/亦當由汝也)故行不知所徃處不知所持食不知所以 (皆在自爾中來/非知而為之也)天地强陽氣也又胡可得而有邪(天地/即復) (委結中之最大者也今行處食息皆彊陽氣之所運動/豈識其所以然彊陽猶剛實也非剛實理之至反之虚) (和之極則無形無生不死不終則性命何所委順/子孫何所委蜕行處何所止泊飲食何所因假也)齊之 國氏大富宋之向氏大貧自宋之齊請其術國氏告之 曰吾善為盜始吾為盜也一年而給二年而足三年大 壤(如掌反/又作攘)自此以徃施(以智反/延也)及州閭向氏大喜喻其 為盜之言而不喻其為盜之道遂踰垣鑿室手目所及 亡(音無/下同)不探也未及時以贓獲罪没其先居之財向氏 以國氏之謬已也徃而怨之國氏曰若為盜若何向氏 言其狀國氏曰嘻(音熈哀/痛之聲)若失為盜之道至此乎今將 告若矣吾聞天有時地有利(謂春秋冬夏/方土出有也)吾盜天地之 時利雲雨之滂(普浪/反)潤山澤之産育以生吾禾殖吾稼 築吾垣建吾⬤陸盜禽獸水盜魚鱉亡非盜也夫禾稼 土木禽獸魚鱉皆天之所生豈吾之所有(天尚不能自/生豈能生物) (人尚不能自有豈能有物/此乃明其自生自有也)然吾盜天而亡殃(天亡其施/我公其心)
Interpretation

The Liezi presents a parable about "stealing" that conveys profound wisdom. In the state of Qi lived a wealthy man named Guo, while in Song there was a poor man named Xiang. Seeking the secret to prosperity, Xiang went to consult Guo, who revealed: "I excel at 'stealing.' When I first began 'stealing,' I had enough for food and clothing within a year, achieved comfort in two years, and amassed abundant wealth after three."

Xiang rejoiced at this advice but grasped only the superficial meaning. He took to burglary - scaling walls and breaking into houses to steal whatever he found. Soon apprehended for theft, he lost even his family inheritance. Convinced he'd been deceived, Xiang confronted Guo, who sighed: "You've completely misunderstood the Dao of 'stealing'!"

Guo explained: "When I speak of 'stealing,' I mean appropriating Heaven's timing and Earth's bounty: harnessing seasonal cycles, utilizing rain's nourishment, and drawing from mountain and marsh resources to cultivate crops and build dwellings; taking game from land and fish from waters. These are Nature's gifts, not my personal creations. By aligning with natural patterns to obtain resources, I incur no misfortune."

This contrast illustrates true wisdom: authentic "stealing from Heaven" means harmonizing with natural laws to obtain sustenance, not forcible plundering. Guo's approach represents lawful utilization of natural resources, while Xiang's literal theft brought legal consequences. The text emphasizes all things arise spontaneously (zisheng ziyou) from the Dao, and humans should follow celestial patterns when securing life's necessities. The parable echoes Daoist principles of wuwei (non-action) - true attainment comes not through forceful acquisition but through alignment with cosmic rhythms.

(何徃而/有怨哉)夫金玉珍寳穀帛財貨人之所聚豈天之所與 (天尚不能與豈人所能/聚此亦明其自能自聚)若盜之而獲罪孰怨哉(人有其/財我犯) (其私所/以致咎)向氏大惑以為國氏之重罔已也過東郭先生 問焉東郭先生曰若一身庸非盜乎盜隂陽之和以成 若生載若形況外物而非盜哉(若其有盜邪則我身即/天地之一物不得私而) (有之若其無盜邪/則外内不得異也)誠然天地萬物不相離(力智/反)也認(音/仞) 而有之皆惑也(夫天地萬物之都稱萬物天地之别名/雖復各私其身理不相離認而有之心) (之惑也因此而言夫天地委形非我有也飭愛色貎矜/伐智能已為惑矣至於甚者横認外物以為已有乃標) (名氏以自異倚親族以自固整章服以耀物藉名位以/動衆封殖財貨樹立權黨終身欣玩莫由自悟故老子) (曰吾所以有大患為吾身莊子曰百骸六藏吾誰與為/親領斯㫖也則方寸與太虚齊空形骸與萬物俱有也) 國氏之盜公道也故亡殃若之盜私心也故得罪(公者/對私) (之名無私則公名滅矣今以犯天/者為公犯人者為私於理未至)有公私者亦盜也(直/所) (犯之異耳/未為非盜)亡公私者亦盜也(一身不得不有財物不得/不聚復欲遣之非能即而)
Interpretation

This passage comes from the Liezi, using a parable about "theft" to explore the relationship between humans and the myriad things of heaven and earth.

The text states: Gold, silver, and material wealth—these possessions are all gathered by people themselves. Could they truly be bestowed by heaven? Since even heaven cannot grant them, how can humans genuinely possess them? If one is punished for stealing, whom can they blame? Xiangshi (a character in the story) was deeply perplexed by this, thinking Guoshi (another character) had deceived him, so he went to consult Master Dongguo.

Master Dongguo explained: In truth, isn't our very existence also a form of "theft"? We "steal" the harmonious blending of Yin and Yang (Yin-Yang) to sustain our lives and form our bodies—how much more so for external possessions? Heaven, earth, and the myriad things are fundamentally an interconnected whole. To insist on claiming certain things as one's own is delusion.

Guoshi's "theft" aligned with the natural Dao (the Way), so he incurred no misfortune, whereas Xiangshi's "theft" stemmed from selfishness, leading to punishment. Yet ultimately, whether for public or private ends, both are forms of "taking"—the difference lies only in method. The truly transcendent state, beyond distinctions of public and private, is realizing the oneness of all things, free from attachment to possession or rejection.

Through the metaphor of "theft," this passage expresses the Daoist philosophical view of "the unity of all things," suggesting that humans should follow the natural Dao (the Way), neither excessively pursuing personal gain nor deliberately rejecting external things.

(無心/者也)公公私私天地之德(生即天地之一理身即天地/之一物今所愛吝復是愛吝) (天地之間生身耳事無/公私理無愛吝者也)知天地之德者孰為盜邪孰為 不盜邪(天地之德何邪自然而已自然而已何所歴其/公私之名公私之名既廢盜與不盜理無差也)  
Interpretation

This passage describes the state of "no-mind" (wuxin). The true sage views public and private matters with the same naturalness as heaven and earth operate (the De of heaven and earth). Human life is fundamentally a manifestation of heaven and earth's movement, and the body is but one phenomenon within this cosmic process. What people now cling to and covet are ultimately just manifestations of existence within heaven and earth.

Between heaven and earth, both life and physical form are natural phenomena. In themselves, affairs make no distinction between public and private, nor does the Dao principle contain any inherent differentiation between what should be cherished or begrudged. Those who truly understand the operation of heaven and earth—how could they distinguish between what constitutes theft and what does not? What is the principle of heaven and earth? Simply natural spontaneity. Since all things operate spontaneously, why bother with conceptual distinctions between public and private? When notions of public and private cease to exist, theft becomes indistinguishable from non-theft in the Dao's principle.

(Note: This passage embodies the Daoist philosophy of "equalizing all things" (qiwu), advocating transcendence beyond artificial distinctions to return to the original state of natural authenticity. "No-mind" refers to the clear mental state free from attachment to subjective differentiations.)

             列子卷一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0125); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

Vol. 2 →