中文 · 繁體 · EN · KO

《太上感應篇》Vol. 18

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 18 / 30 4,827 characters

About this page. The original text of 《太上感應篇》 Vol. 18 (Taiqing 太清部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 9 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《太上感應篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

太上感應篇卷之十八廉七     李昌齡傳鄭清之賛 破人之家取其財寳  傳曰事出無心偶至破之爲惡巳自不小  若爲財寳而輙至破之真大惡也請以能  爲巳破家者復歸其産一二羙事言之庶  㡬後之臨民或遇此事皆能如是於巳破  者方爲有益劉敞知揚州州有雷陂舊屬  民由官奪之蓄水以便漕運歳久陂壞漕  運亦未嘗賴此久而爲毫族所占田主屢  訴不獲公到任立判還之由是田主三十  六家男女三百餘口復得其田不獲飢餒  侯叔獻爲汜縣令縣多没官田有一李誠  莊方圍十里河貫其中最爲膏腴佃戸百  家皆成奥族舊估價一萬五千貫未賣賈  魏公當國又欲増價五千貫賣之陳道古  銜命而來與叔獻議増其價叔獻太息曰  郎中知此本末否李誠者在太祖時爲酒  務專知以不能救護當物爲溢水所損估  所損價當五千貫勒誠償之是時朝廷出  度支錢預俵民間令買鵰翎箭桿弓弩材  木以備軍需及李重進叛方議起兵而預  買之物皆莫集太祖大怒凡欠負官錢者  皆籍其産而李誠者實非預領官錢之人  官吏畏威不敢開析一例抄没誠之子孫  遂至破碎惜相國未能雪正給還其田莫  若更損五千貫俾誠子孫買之在官司巳  得倍利在誠子孫亦不至於狼狽郎中以  爲何如道古曰某實不知苟利於人何所
Interpretation

This scripture passage recounts karmic narratives concerning property usurpation and remedial actions.

It begins by stating: Deliberately destroying families to seize their treasures constitutes grave wrongdoing. However, restoring partial property after such destruction becomes a virtuous act.

Two historical cases are then presented:

The first recounts Liu Chang's tenure as Yangzhou magistrate, where he discovered the Lei Embankment (a water conservancy project) originally belonged to local villagers but had been forcibly appropriated for government grain transport. After the project fell into disuse, powerful local clans seized it. Upon assuming office, Liu immediately ruled to return the lands, restoring livelihoods for thirty-six households comprising over three hundred people.

The second case describes Hou Shuxian's magistracy in Sishui County, where he found fertile government-owned fields that had originally been the property of Li Cheng. During Emperor Taizu's reign, Li Cheng had been penalized for official misconduct requiring compensation, but his entire estate was later wrongfully confiscated. Hou proposed the court reduce the repurchase price by five thousand strings of cash for Li's descendants - allowing the government double profit while preventing the Li family's displacement. Chen Daogu, the official sent to negotiate, agreed to implement the plan upon verifying its benefit to the people.

These examples demonstrate that when officials encounter similar cases of property seizure, they should emulate Liu Chang and Hou Shuxian's impartial handling to restore people's rightful entitlements.

 不可於是損價五千貫而去叔獻乃以此  議召誠子孫諭之皆泣拜曰實荷公恩柰  家貧何叔獻復召衆佃諭曰汝輩本出下  戸以得李莊之利今皆復爲倉廪變爲豪  民官賣此田而李貧獨患無力萬一爲他  人所得勢必撤廪拆屋離業而去豈復容  汝軰復享厚利耶曷若百家共醵此錢俾  李氏請買我則爲汝寛其限責如此則田  復歸李氏而汝軰亦得久逺佃食兩獲其  利不亦可乎衆皆拜曰願如公言由是誠  之子孫復得此田彼破人之家而取其財  寳者能如是乎惜其莫悟天堂地獄端由  乎此作何所見乃敢如此    賛曰   人之成家基於艱苦前遺後承   俯捨仰取誰歟㓂攘輸掠其聚   當路之狼苛政之虎相在爾室   鬼瞰其戸 决水放火以害居民  傳曰水火漂焚世間禍害莫此爲酷今乃  决水放火以害居民罪其輕乎此其所以  不爲上真所容明神必戮也天聖二年大  名府黃河▲口忽壩▲俱破水遂横流其  勢頗猛時韓魏公判北京忽一吏馳報▲  口有一大龜久爲▲患龜若潜伏水自安  流龜若出浮水必汎濫今出浮矣爲之柰  何時使臣鄭圭奉命適至堤所一箭射殺  其龜旣而爲龜所訴閻羅追攝鄭圭使與  龜對其日適遇真武靈應真君下降𠷕呸  羅山校勘生死遂蒙真君雪正將▲口妖
Interpretation

This scripture recounts two stories illustrating the principle of karmic retribution.

The first story tells of Li Shuxian's virtuous handling of a land dispute. When someone attempted to forcibly purchase Li family's fields at a low price, Li gathered his descendants and tenant farmers for discussion. He addressed the tenants: "You were all originally impoverished families who only attained better lives by renting and cultivating the Li family's land. If these fields are sold off by the authorities and our family cannot redeem them, the new owner will surely demolish your homes and evict you, leaving you unable to continue farming." He thus proposed that the hundred tenant households pool funds to help the Li family repurchase the land, thereby preserving the ancestral property while allowing tenants to keep their livelihoods. All parties gladly agreed. The scripture contrasts this with those who destroy families and seize property by force, pointing out how such people fail to understand that the karmic consequences of heaven and hell originate precisely from such actions.

The second story recounts how flood control official Zheng Gui shot a giant turtle causing disastrous waves, only to be accused by the turtle's spirit in the court of Yama (King of Hell). During a Yellow River breach, a massive turtle frequently surfaced, triggering floods. Zheng Gui, tasked with flood management, killed the creature with an arrow. Unexpectedly after death, the turtle's spirit lodged a complaint with Yama. Fortunately, Zhenwu Dadi (the Great Emperor of Perfect Virtue, an important Daoist deity governing demon subjugation) descended to the underworld to adjudicate the case, exonerating Zheng Gui. This narrative demonstrates how flood and fire disasters are among humanity's greatest scourges, and those who intentionally breach dikes or set fires to harm people will inevitably face divine punishment.

The passage concludes with a poetic summary: A family requires arduous effort to establish, with ancestors accumulating and descendants inheriting. Those who plunder like wolves or tyrannical rulers—their wicked deeds are all witnessed by the unseen eyes of spirits and deities.

 龜向空碎爲㣲塵不使人間復有此物爲  人之害仍命直符押還鄭圭復歸人間然  則水可决乎李轅事母最孝薄暮忽有客  欲來投宿轅適臨溪烹雞客謂必以相欵  旣而具飯乃脫粟也客大怒不食而出轅  實告曰母病思𠬦山居無有故烹一雞不  及君也客怒愈甚是夕即從屋後乘風放  火將及其廬忽天雨反風火即隨滅旣而  隣里聚觀乃見一人卧在火中所執火炬  尚猶在手細視乃客也且自言曰我俠士  也以亡命至此不謂主人待我如是當縱  火時明見一大神狀如神君立於空中叱  火令反故至反及今則死矣言訖遂絶然  則放火是可爲乎    賛曰   長民之官苟且畏避遇水失防   與决何異救焚不力亦放之𩔖   歸咎天灾逃責人事原情定罪   心迹無二 紊人規模以敗人功  傳曰人之立功功雖歸巳然宗廟社稷天  下生靈實皆賴之彼無能者其可紊其規  模而幸其敗乎雖曰敗彼之功實是敗國  之事其爲利害自不爲小豈無罪乎寰朔  之役楊業奉命副潘美進討旣至虜又攻  䧟寰州業謂美曰賊鋒方銳卒未可戰冝  引兵出大石路先遣人諭雲朔守將俟大  軍離代州日即令將兵先出我師若至應  州虜必悉衆來拒此時朔州吏民便可坌  入石碣谷内仍分强弩千人使守谷口所  有騎士悉令援於中路如此則三州之衆
Interpretation

This scripture recounts two karmic retribution stories that illustrate principles of governance.

The first tale describes how a man ground a turtle into dust, believing he was removing a harmful creature from the world. Later, celestial deities (Tianshi) dispatched emissaries to bring this man back to the human realm for judgment. The narrative then shifts to Li Yuan's story demonstrating karmic justice: Li, a filial son, once hosted a traveler at dusk. When his ailing mother craved chicken, he cooked their only fowl for her, serving the guest coarse grains instead. Enraged, the traveler left but returned that night to set the house ablaze in revenge. Suddenly, torrential rain fell, winds reversed direction, and the flames turned back to consume the arsonist. Dying, the traveler confessed he was a fugitive who saw celestial beings (Shen) rebuking him from the sky, directing the fire against him.

The second story uses General Yang Ye's exploits to show how service to the state transcends personal glory. When incompetent officials sabotage others' achievements, they harm the nation itself. The text details Yang's tactical arrangements during the Huanshuo Campaign: he advised commander Pan Mei to adopt flanking maneuvers—first notifying regional garrisons for coordinated action, then ambushing enemy forces—thereby safeguarding three prefectures' populations.

The conclusion emphasizes that negligent officials who fail to prevent floods are no different from those who breach dikes themselves; those who inadequately fight fires share culpability with arsonists. Blaming disasters on heavenly will (Tianyi) while evading responsibility reflects identical malicious intent when judged by cosmic principles. Those who undermine others' meritorious service may appear to harm individuals, but ultimately damage the state—an offense far from trivial.

(Note: "Zhifu" refers to Daoist guardian deities on duty; "Zheng Gui" may name a punished individual; "Yang Ye" is the famed Northern Song general Yang Jiye, with "Pan Mei" as his commanding officer; the "Huanshuo Campaign" denotes Song-Liao border conflicts.)

 必萬全矣監軍王侁沮之計不得行且責  業曰君之此言豈畏死乎業曰吾非畏死  行即死矣且祝美曰吾去公等可於谷口  張功兵分强弩爲左右翼以爲吾援吾轉  戰至此縱兵擊之必大捷也美如其言陣  于谷口旣而王侁乃以虜爲巳遁欲爭其  功引兵而去業至不見一兵撫膺大哭復  奮身决戰手刃數百人身被十數鎗力乏  遂爲賊擒不食三日乃死非侁沮之功不  立乎是以識者曉此凡任其責必先預爲  之計貝州之役明鎬爲將軍中有所奏請  多爲樞宻夏竦所沮時文彦博爲參政大  不平之因自請前徃督戰且面奏曰巨在  軍中請得便冝行事更不中覆上從其請  旣至有牢城卒董秀劉炳者請穴地而入  旣而日夜穿掘晝則伏於穴内夜則棄土  水中穴成從教場中出旣出登城殺守者  官軍繼進皆得乘絙而上賊帥王則於是  與其徒張巒卜𠮷等突圍走出巒𠮷死於  亂兵則爲官軍所獲夏竦猶言賊恐非真  及檻送至京方且語塞卿非潞公預爲之  計功不敗乎    賛曰   杜預平呉羊祜之功元齡善謀   如晦必從事業旣立勲名俱崇   曽是楄心齊▲盡東彼則敗矣   吾亦何庸 損人器物以窮人用  傳曰損人器物以窮人用而太上書以爲  戒者亦不善用心之一也不善用心固有  罪又有因此而搆成莫大之禍結成無窮
Interpretation

This passage recounts two historical anecdotes illustrating how military leaders' failures to adhere to well-laid plans led to disastrous outcomes.

The first story concerns the Northern Song Dynasty general Yang Ye (courtesy name Ye). During a campaign, imperial supervisor Wang Shen (a court-appointed military overseer) rejected Yang's battle strategy and accused him of cowardice. Yang responded that his reluctance stemmed not from fear of death, but from certainty that reckless engagement meant certain doom. He proposed positioning crossbowmen at the valley mouth as reinforcements, planning to lure enemies into this ambush. But Wang Shen, believing the enemy had fled, abandoned the plan to pursue personal glory. Left isolated, Yang fought valiantly—slaying hundreds single-handedly while sustaining dozens of spear wounds—before being captured and dying by starvation strike. This tragedy resulted entirely from Wang's sabotage of the original strategy.

The second episode occurred during the Beizhou campaign. General Ming Hao repeatedly saw his tactical proposals vetoed by Chief Military Commissioner Xia Song (head of the Song Dynasty's supreme military council). Deputy Chief Councilor Wen Yanbo (equivalent to vice-chancellor), witnessing this obstruction, volunteered for frontline command and secured imperial authority for autonomous decision-making. Upon arrival, soldiers Dong Xiu and Liu Bing proposed tunneling beneath city walls. Working by night and hiding by day, they secretly excavated from the training grounds until breaching the defenses. Though rebel leader Wang Ze was captured, Xia Song still doubted the prisoner's identity until confronted with irrefutable evidence in the capital. Without Wen's decisive preparations, the operation would have failed.

The text concludes with an ancient maxim: "To deliberately sabotage another's tools—rendering them unusable—reveals malicious intent." The Supreme Venerable Sovereign (Daoism's highest deity) prohibits such conduct, recognizing how ill intentions spawn both moral transgressions and catastrophic consequences. Historical exemplars like Du Yu's conquest of Eastern Wu or Fang Xuanling's strategic brilliance succeeded through meticulous preparation, while those who undermined plans through prejudice invariably courted failure.

 之怨者此則尤當獲大罪報也然則損人  器物以窮人用其可不戒昔華嚴和尚妙  於華嚴又且樂於講說以是得名從之者  衆然好嚴缾鉢聽徒三百餘衆皆爭效之  中有一僧道行獨髙寢疾不出者巳數月  矣有一琉璃寳鉢頗𤤽惜之一日有一客  僧來自逺方缾鉢莫具或令從病僧暫借  初拒不許力告乃從且戒至切齋罷宜速  見還旣而持還無何失足墮地破碎病僧  大怒詬罵良久乃絶後數年華嚴移住嵩  山時病僧弟子及借鉢客僧皆在㑹中一  日方講說間忽聞寺外蕭蕭作風水聲華  嚴巳知亟呼客僧坐之背後少頃有一大  蟒長可十丈努目張口徑趨而入衆將驚  散華嚴止之且以錫杖約住蟒曰汝於三  百衆中道業最髙只爲多瞋不從吾教今  果至是尚爲一鉢欲害其僧耶因命大衆  爲授三皈三敬及誦經呪爲作懴㧞蟒乃  卷身而出華嚴召其弟子謂曰適來大蟒  乃汝師也累劫修行將證果位但以臨終  一怒遂至如此若不遇吾必呑其僧若吞  其僧定墮地獄自此流轉何時而巳又白  衆曰明日山後茶毗亡僧旣至乃昨日大  蟒巳碎首而死矣茶毗訖華嚴又召其弟  子告曰汝師明年當於裴家託生爲女臨  産稍艱必至怒害其母則業愈重爾及期  汝可急徃救之但呼其名作吾傳語必無  他矣巳而果然嗚呼彼修行者只爲一必
Interpretation

This scripture recounts a cautionary tale about the karmic consequences of anger:

The eminent Tang dynasty monk Huayan once had a highly accomplished disciple who fell ill and remained bedridden for months. This sick monk particularly cherished his alms bowl made of precious lapis lazuli. One day, a visiting monk from afar requested to borrow it. Initially refusing, the sick monk reluctantly agreed after repeated pleas, sternly warning that it must be returned immediately after the meal. When the visiting monk accidentally shattered the bowl upon returning it, the sick monk flew into a rage with vicious curses and soon died from his fury.

Years later, when Huayan was lecturing on scriptures at Songshan Mountain, a thirty-meter-long python suddenly slithered into the monastery. Blocking it with his staff, Huayan publicly revealed: "This python is none other than that sick monk. He could have been the first among my three hundred disciples to attain spiritual fruition (cultivation achievement), but because he succumbed to wrath over a mere bowl at death's door, he fell into python rebirth. Now seeking revenge against the visiting monk—should he actually harm anyone, hellish rebirth awaits." He then led the assembly in repentance rituals (chanting scriptures to dissolve karmic obstacles).

The next day during the python's cremation (Buddhist funeral rites) behind the mountain, Huayan prophesied the deceased monk would be reborn as a daughter in the Pei family. During childbirth, her birth anger would fatally harm her mother, compounding his karmic burden. He instructed disciples to intervene by calling his name and delivering warnings when the time came—which later proved effective.

This story warns: Even practitioners who accumulate merits across lifetimes can nullify all progress by yielding to anger. Like that accomplished monk who lost his chance for enlightenment over a bowl, then cycled through wretched rebirths. The text particularly emphasizes "vessels exist to serve human needs"—harshly judging others over material attachments invites severe karmic retribution.

 尚至如是況不知修行者乎意其怒時怒  懷毒意故也    賛曰   制器尚象蓋取諸易或任私智   紊亂成式輕重權衡増損丈人   肆其欺謾甚於毁擲民無則焉   豈非凶德 見他榮貴願他流貶  傳曰民凡有四曰士曰農曰工曰商而榮  貴者獨出其上福凢有五曰冨曰壽曰康  寜曰攸好德曰考終命而榮貴者亦出其  上然則得到其地豈偶然哉皆其夙植德  本故能如是彼不及者其可妄生憎嫉而  起念願其流貶乎國初盧多遜貶朱崖李  符白宰相趙普曰朱崖雖在海外而水土  不甚惡春州雖在内地而至者無生還曷  若攺竄春州外示台坐寛貸而實置之必  死之地普不答未幾符亦坐事竄宣州上  怒未巳普於是以符語奏即日攺竄春州  到任未浹旬而卒㓂萊公之貶也丁謂之  力居多初議竄地時丁謂與馮拯同在中  書謂當秉筆顧拯曰欲與竄崖又恐逺渉  鯨波乃擬竄雷州未幾謂亦坐事當竄拯  時猶在中書適當秉筆笑謂曽參曰鶴相  始欲竄㓂於崖且有涉鯨波之嘆今且煩  相公逺渉鯨波一廵遂與竄崖然則見他  榮貴願他流貶是可爲乎    賛曰   名爵儻來初匪實觀嫓彼花畦   抱甕以灌風露潔鮮煙雨散漫   榮枯瞬息何足把玩作如是想   忌心冰渙 見他冨有願他破散  傳曰第二十祖闍夜他問第十九祖鳩摩
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principles of malevolent thoughts in the human heart and the law of karmic retribution. Even practitioners of cultivation may harbor anger and wicked thoughts—how much more so for those who do not cultivate? When a person becomes enraged, their heart often conceals venomous intentions.

The crafting of tools must follow established standards, just as the principles outlined in the Yijing (Book of Changes) teach. If one acts solely based on selfish whims, arbitrarily altering established rules and disrupting measures of propriety, such behavior is far worse than outright destroying objects. It leaves the common people lost and confused—is this not the epitome of perilous De (Virtue)?

Upon seeing others enjoy wealth and honor, some wish for their downfall and exile. In this world, there are the four classes of people—scholars, farmers, artisans, and merchants—yet the prosperous and noble stand above them. In life, there are the five blessings—wealth and nobility, longevity, health and peace, virtuous character, and a peaceful death—and prosperity and nobility rank foremost among them. Are these blessings obtained by mere chance? They are the karmic rewards of virtuous deeds accumulated in past lives. How can those who fall short of others allow jealousy to breed wicked thoughts in their hearts?

The text cites several historical cases from the Song dynasty: When Lu Duoxun was exiled to Zhuya (Hainan), Li Fu whispered slander to Prime Minister Zhao Pu, suggesting he be sent instead to the even more treacherous Chunzhou (Yangchun, Guangdong). Yet later, Li Fu himself was exiled to Chunzhou and died within ten days of arrival. When Kou Zhun was exiled, Ding Wei deliberately had him sent to Leizhou (Guangdong), only for Ding Wei himself to later be exiled to the even more distant Yazhou (Hainan). These examples demonstrate that those who curse others with misfortune often suffer retribution first.

Fame and status are like drifting clouds—fleeting and transient. They resemble flowers in a garden that require watering, yet after enduring wind, dew, and mist, their splendor fades in an instant. Why cling to them? If one can reflect in this way, the heart of jealousy will naturally melt away like ice.

Similarly, seeing others' wealth and wishing for their ruin is an unworthy mindset. As seen in the case of the 20th Zen Patriarch, Śākyadeva, who sought guidance from the 19th Patriarch, Kumāralāta (as recorded in the Jingde Chuandenglu, Śākyadeva attained sudden enlightenment upon witnessing Kumāralāta manifesting spiritual powers), it illustrates that practitioners must transcend attachments and discriminating thoughts.

 羅多曰我家素信三寳而常縈疾瘵凡所  管作皆不稱遂至如隣家久爲旃陀羅行  而身常勇健所作和合彼何幸而我何辜  耶羅多曰善惡之報有三時焉世人但見  仁天暴壽逆吉義凶便自亡因果虛罪福  殊不知影響相隨毫釐靡忒縱經百千萬  劫亦不磨滅時闍夜陀頓釋所疑羅多曰  汝雖巳信而未能明業從惑生惑因識有  識依不覺不覺依心心本清靜無生滅無  造作無報應無勝負寂寂然靈靈然汝若  入此法門便可與諸佛同矣嗚呼世之見  人冨有而願他破散者能曉此乎縱令冨  而不賢㑹有敗日在我則不可起心而願  其破散也周義夫虹縣人其家大冨覇于  一方頗多恣横隣郡有孫識之者嘗從容  戒之義夫輙怒罵曰小鬼何知敢預我事  及識之登第爲本路漕義夫猶怒罵曰彼  爲監司亦柰我何一日識之按郡至虹適  義夫撻人于市爲被撻者所訴識之因諷  令訴其不法即日送所司根勘無何首事  者偶死于獄議之遂勅奏官吏移送他郡  義夫竟坐謀殺䖏死子孫皆編管家籍于  官不數年識之移漕河北適當軍興闔家  皆死于虜一且破散無異義夫非其報乎  錢若水爲同州推官冨家有失一小女奴  爲其母爺所訴州委録參根勘録參舊有  求於冨家不獲因劾冨家以爲父子共殺  女奴投尸水中獄具上于州州委官審覆
Interpretation

Luo Duo (a wise man) said: "My family has worshipped the Three Jewels (Buddha, Dharma, Sangha) for generations, yet we suffer from chronic illnesses and constant misfortunes. Meanwhile, our neighbor, who has long worked as a butcher (referring to the Chandala caste in India's caste system), enjoys robust health and smooth sailing in all matters. Why is he so fortunate, and what have I done wrong?"

Luo Duo explained: "The retribution of good and evil manifests in three possible timeframes. Ordinary people only see the virtuous dying young, the cruel living long, the rebellious prospering, and the upright suffering—and thus doubt the truth of karmic retribution. They fail to realize that the consequences of good and evil follow like shadows, never deviating by even a hair's breadth. Even after countless kalpas (immeasurably long periods), they will not vanish." After hearing this, Yedu's doubts were instantly dispelled.

Luo Duo continued his teaching: "Though you believe in cause and effect, you have not yet truly understood it. Karma (the latent effects of actions) arises from delusion, delusion stems from false cognition, false cognition clings to ignorance (the state of non-enlightenment), and ignorance, in turn, attaches to the nature of mind. The nature of mind is originally pure—free from birth and death, free from contrivance, free from retribution, free from victory or defeat—serene and luminous. If one awakens to this truth, they attain the same realm as the Buddhas."

Alas! Can those in the world who envy the wealthy and wish for their downfall comprehend this principle? Even if the prosperous are unvirtuous, their downfall will come naturally—we must never harbor curses in our hearts. Zhou Yifu, a man from Hong County, amassed immense wealth and dominated the region with his tyrannical behavior. A well-meaning neighbor named Sun Shizhi once tried to advise him but was insulted: "What does a nobody like you know, daring to meddle in my affairs?" Later, when Sun Shizhi passed the imperial exams and became a Transport Commissioner (an official overseeing grain transport), Zhou Yifu remained defiant, saying, "Even if he's an inspector, what can he do to me?" One day, while Sun was inspecting Hong County, Zhou happened to be beating a commoner in the marketplace. The victim seized the chance to file a complaint. Sun hinted that they should expose Zhou's unlawful activities, and a case was opened that very day. Unexpectedly, the main suspect suddenly died in prison, escalating the charge to murder. Zhou Yifu was sentenced to death, and his descendants were confiscated as government slaves. Not long after, when Sun Shizhi was transferred to Hebei as Transport Commissioner, he encountered warfare, and his entire family was slaughtered by enemy troops—a ruin identical to Zhou Yifu's. Is this not retribution in action?

When Qian Ruoshui served as a judge in Tongzhou, a wealthy household lost a young maidservant, and her parents filed a complaint with the prefecture. The case was assigned to a clerk who had previously tried to extort bribes from the family. Failing in his attempt, he falsely accused the wealthy father and son of jointly murdering the maid and dumping her body in the river. After the case was concluded and reported, the prefecture sent officials to review it.

 亦無異辭惟若水疑之堅不署字因自出  巳錢宻令人訪㝷女奴旣而得之民遂得  脫若非遭遇若水爲冨民者亦不免爲一  義夫矣以愚觀之非獨冨民拜賜録參亦  自拜賜冨民若死録參其有安乎    賛曰   龍驤之舟可航萬斛一棄掀舞   積羽猶覆鵬鷃逍遥各適所欲   賦量不同安分斯足内熱自焚   如飲鴆毒 見他色(一作/室)羙起心科之  傳曰生死輪迴不得解脫無非五隂無非  五藴義本一同特譯家翻處字稍異耳何  名五隂歷歷分明色隂也領納在心受隂  也心縁此理想隂也行用此理行隂也汙  穢真性識隂也何名五藴四大所成色藴  也領納苦樂并不苦樂受藴也取種種境  想藴也諸心所法貪而不息行藴也於所  縁境了别爲性亦名心意採集所攝識藴  也一切世人其於聲色妄生惑著莫不皆  由乎此使於色空有悟豈至是耶昔張寳  知成都有華陽李尉者妻貌絶美蜀中知  名寳有意於私之因上元士女出游宻令  人何其出入㣲服竊窺一見果絶色也於  是徧託尼姑妳子宻諭此意妻初峻拒久  而亦似有意無何李尉適以𧷢敗寳因劾  奏于朝送獄根勘獄具竄于嶺外遂死于  路寳乃厚賂尉母强委禽焉蓋尉妻嘗有  庸奴其夫之恨至是故亦樂從寳得妻大  喜妻亦滿愜其意於是相歡旦暮不捨無
Interpretation

This passage recounts several stories and philosophical reflections on karmic retribution.

The first story tells of Ruoshui (a person's name) who adhered to principles, refusing to sign unjust documents. He even spent his own money secretly searching for abducted female slaves, ultimately securing the release of innocent commoners. The commentator notes this not only saved the people but also rescued the official (lucan) himself.

The second story employs metaphors: a dragon boat capable of carrying ten thousand dan of grain may capsize and vanish in an instant; though a single feather is light, enough accumulated can sink a great ship. The roc and the quail each have lifestyles suited to their nature - forcibly grasping what isn't yours is like drinking poison to quench thirst.

The third section explains Buddhist concepts of the "Five Aggregates" (form, sensation, perception, mental formations, consciousness) and "Five Skandhas," pointing out worldly obsession with sensory pleasures stems from these attachments. Were one to comprehend that "form is emptiness," such behavior would cease.

Finally, a karmic tale: Zhang Bao coveted the beauty of Magistrate Li's wife, framed Li leading to his death, then forcibly married the widow. Though their union initially appeared harmonious, seeds of calamity were sown. The text implies such immoral coercion inevitably invites misfortune.

Through concrete examples and philosophical exposition, the entire passage illustrates how one must be prudent in thoughts and intentions, for coveting what isn't rightfully yours ultimately brings self-inflicted suffering.

 何妻病恍惚常見李尉在傍未幾遂至乎  卒寳亦得病夢妻告曰妾感公恩不敢不  報尉已訴於上天取公期在旦夕公若深  居未必得便苟或輕出必爲所執一日暮  坐遥見堂下竹間有一紅袖招之意謂尉  妻偶忘其告疾趨急赴旣至乃尉毆且罵  曰你這賊若不以紅袖招汝汝肯來乎良  久口鼻流血踣地乃卒於是當知起心私  之誰目男子然黙含許意實出女人與其  輕許而掇禍至是孰若確然有守於此生  中度此一報身乎嚴武少時與一軍使隣  居軍使有女頗羙武竊窺愛之因百計誘  至其家遂與俱遁旣而軍使知之詣闕進  狀詔出制使收捕武懼罪夜醉女子觧琵  琶絃縊殺沉之于水明日制使至則巳無  獲由是獲免及在蜀得病明見女子在前  責曰妾之從君固是失行然實無負於君  君縱懼罪曷不捨我而去乃至見殺真忍  人也妾巳訴于上天期在明日武慚懼請  命黎明果卒於此益知女人稍有姿色徃  徃易至如是使其一念不移凛然氷雪彼  雖欲私可得私乎愚所以斷而言曰起心  私之雖自男子黙含許意實出女人也游  賞之地墻壁之間其可不謹    賛曰   子夏有言賢賢易色先聖之訓   必曰好德哲婦傾城賢德
Interpretation

This passage uses two stories of karmic retribution to warn people to rid themselves of lustful thoughts.

The first story tells of He’s wife, who, while ill, repeatedly saw the deceased Li Wei, an ancient military officer, standing beside her. She died soon afterward. Later, He fell ill too and dreamed that his late wife said, “I am grateful for your kindness, so I must tell you: Li Wei has already lodged a complaint against you in the Celestial Court. Your time to die is only days away. If you stay indoors and keep out of sight, you may escape, but if you go out, you will be seized.” One evening, He saw someone in a bamboo grove beckoning him with a red sleeve. Forgetting his wife’s warning, he ran toward the figure and was beaten severely by Li Wei. Li Wei cursed him: “If I hadn’t lured you with a red sleeve, how would a rogue like you have taken the bait?” Blood streamed from He’s nose and mouth, and he collapsed dead. This shows that lustful intentions often begin with men, but women who willingly consent and take part can also bring calamity upon themselves.

The second story tells of Yan Wu, who, when young, seduced the daughter of a neighboring military officer and eloped with her. The officer reported him to the imperial court. Afraid of being punished, Yan Wu strangled the young woman with a pipa string and hid her body. Later, while serving as an official in Shu, he fell ill and repeatedly saw the woman come to claim his life. “Though I lost my virtue, I did not betray you. Why will you not leave me in peace? I have already lodged a complaint in the Celestial Court. Tomorrow is the day you will die.” Just as she predicted, Yan Wu died suddenly at dawn.

The passage concludes by stressing that when faced with beauty, one should remain clear-minded, as though standing before ice and snow. It quotes Zixia, a disciple of Confucius, as saying, “Esteem virtue above beauty,” and points out that beautiful women often become a source of harm to virtue. Once one’s thoughts turn improper, reason is lost and one’s dignity is disgraced. Such evils all arise from a moment’s lapse.

(Note: “zhishi” refers to an official acting under imperial orders; “going to the palace gate” means submitting a memorial to the emperor; a “pipa string” is a string from a Tang-dynasty musical instrument.)

之賊   心失其正至於狂惑降志辱身   一念之忒 太上感應篇卷之十八

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0001); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 17 Vol. 19 →