中文 · 繁體 · EN · KO

《太上感應篇》Vol. 7

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 7 / 30 3,538 characters

About this page. The original text of 《太上感應篇》 Vol. 7 (Taiqing 太清部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 7 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《太上感應篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

太上感應篇卷之七義七     李昌齡傳鄭清之賛 慢其先生  傳曰先生者所以傳道授業解惑者也片  言之悟一字之傳皆所自也其可慢乎昔  胡安定瑗之爲先生也如錢藻之淵篤孫  覺之純明范純仁之直温錢公輔之簡諒  皆一時知名之士其於先生則不啻如子  弟之事父兄未嘗聞其慢也孫明復之爲  先生也如石介之該通張洞之辯博皆魯  之尤賢而有道者其於先生行則從升降  揖拜則執杖屨而侍肅然其恭亦未嘗聞  其慢也又如待制彭汝礪少嘗師事嗣廬  倪天隱及官保信即迎天隱置于齊閣執  弟子之禮甚恭天隱死毋猶未葬明年妻  亦死又且無子公爲葬其三䘮又爲嫁其  女于同年進士宋渙尚書王存少嘗師事  頴川陳俊俊死無子存爲立其弟之子官  之由是俊妻得有所托此則又能不忘先  生於旣死之後者也況敢慢之於在生之  日乎其間或有慢者特輕薄小人耳惜其  不知爲先生者大有不可慢處其開悟未  逹隂德最大克昌厥後皆未可知王公之  事便可見也昔王先生者家極貧以教導  村童爲業晚得一子巳八歳不能養捨與  西寺僧爲童其僧一見知其英物即令就  學不惜錢帛資之咸平中舉賢良方正其  後爲參政作樞宻名位烜赫官業過人是  爲王文康公曙其名也文康之子益柔官
Interpretation

This passage explains how students in ancient times should respectfully treat their teachers. It gives examples of celebrated scholars who honored their teachers: Hu Yuan (courtesy name Anding)’s students Qian Zao, Sun Jue, Fan Chunren, and Qian Gongfu treated their teacher with the deference they would show their fathers and elder brothers. Sun Fu (courtesy name Mingfu)’s students Shi Jie and Zhang Dong, both worthy men of Shandong, always bowed respectfully when accompanying their teacher and attended to him in person.

The passage also tells of Peng Ruli, who later attained the rank of daizhi. As a young man, he studied under Ni Tianyin. After entering government service, he brought his teacher to live at the government office, cared for him, and observed the rites owed by a disciple. When Ni Tianyin died, his family was too poor to afford a burial. Peng Ruli arranged three funerals for him—for his mother, his wife, and himself—and helped Ni’s daughter marry the presented scholar Song Huan. Wang Cun, a senior official in the Ministry of Works, studied under Chen Jun when he was young. After Chen died without a son, Wang arranged for his younger brother’s son to continue the family line, ensuring that his teacher’s widow would be cared for in her old age.

The passage stresses that those who slight their teachers are shallow and petty people. They fail to understand that teachers confer three great benefits on their students: awakening their wisdom, building up hidden virtue through good deeds done without seeking reward, and bringing blessings to their descendants. It offers the example of Wang Shu, posthumously honored as Wenkang. The Wang family was extremely poor, and when Wang Shu’s son was eight, they could not afford to raise him and gave him to a temple. The abbot recognized the boy’s promise and paid for his education. Wang Shu later passed the examination for men of virtue and integrity and rose to become a high-ranking military official. His son, Wang Yirou, also attained high office. This shows that honoring one’s teacher and upholding the Way brings good rewards.

 至龍圖學士益柔之子謹行謹言皆至大  夫有賢德嘗與康節諸公游然則爲先生  者是可慢乎    賛曰   父生師教二者並言傳道授業   孰爲本源服有衰絰心䘮三年   人倫所重天道亦然慢其所敬   惡莫大焉 叛其所事  傳曰僚屬之於長吏卒伍之於部轄僕妾  之於主翁皆所事也所謂叛者不待真敢  叛之然後謂之叛也但凡緩急非所倚利  害不相䘏即爲叛也請以一二僕卒言之  庶幾出於僕卒之上者稍知愧耻昔僕夫  趙延嗣事舍人王隣幾爲僕夫隣幾知制  誥不逾年而父子俱卒家素貧無以爲養  延嗣義不捨去竭力養其三女凡十許年  未嘗識女之面及三女長成即詣京訪舍  人之舊宋翰林白楊侍郎徽之放聲大哭  具道所以二公驚謝曰汝之所爲吾儕不  及於是合金迎三女歸京擇良配嫁之著  得名士時徂徠先生石守道特爲傳之以  激世之不能篤於義者王逵初事屯田郎  中李曇爲僕夫後應募爲兵以選入捧日  軍適曇父子坐事繫御史臺獄平生親舊  無一人敢餉問者獨逵日守臺門供其飲  食如是四十餘日未嘗少怠及獄具貶爲  南恩州駕從者皆辤去獨逵送之曇忽感  恚自盡逵爲經理後事哭之如親父子見  者無不墮淚洎事畢方敢捨去時司馬温  公亦爲傳之以戒世之薄乎義者然則世
Interpretation

This passage expounds on the Dao of loyalty and righteousness through the moving stories of several servants, illustrating the paramount importance of "serving one's master with unwavering devotion."

First is the tale of Zhao Yansi: He served Secretary Wang Linji, and after both Wang and his son passed away, leaving the family destitute, Zhao remained steadfast in his moral duty. For over a decade, he toiled to raise his master's three daughters—so scrupulous in propriety that he never even looked upon their faces. Only when they came of age did he escort them to the capital to seek out Wang's old acquaintances. When Hanlin Academician Song Bai and Vice Minister Yang Huizhi heard of this, they were deeply moved and provided dowries for all three girls, arranging their marriages to distinguished scholars. The renowned scholar Shi Shoudao composed a biography specifically about this matter to inspire those who lacked moral fiber.

Next is the account of Wang Kui: Originally a servant of Court Gentleman for State Farms Li Tan, he later enlisted in the army. When Li Tan and his son were imprisoned for crimes, none of their relatives or friends dared intervene—only Wang Kui stood daily at the Censorate gates delivering meals, persevering for forty-odd days without faltering. After Li Tan's demotion, when all other attendants fled, Wang alone escorted him. When the grief-stricken Li committed suicide, Wang arranged the funeral with the filial piety of a true son, bringing all witnesses to tears. Sima Guang (Duke Wen) likewise recorded this story to warn against callousness.

The passage concludes: A father gives life, while a teacher imparts wisdom—these two debts of gratitude hold equal weight. Disrespect toward one's mentor constitutes the gravest transgression, and betrayal of those one serves an even greater offense. Betrayal need not manifest as open rebellion; merely withholding aid when one's master faces adversity already qualifies. The noble conduct of these servants puts to shame those of higher station who lack any sense of honor.

 之受知於人臨利害而輒相棄皆者曽不  若趙延嗣王逵之爲僕卒也    賛曰   君師長治及其受恩皆曰所事   分有常尊情義攸托施于子孫   奴僕報主犬馬戀軒我思嬰曰   作于九原 誑諸無識  傳曰楞嚴云詃惑無識疑誤衆生死後便  當墮入無間然則誑之爲罪豈爲輕哉昔  毫州太清宫有一道人氣貌甚揚毎擕一  小鑪於老君殿下煆藥而賣衆方集必指  老君像大言曰我乃彼之師也衆頗惑之  莫不皆欲多得其藥一日方指像大言忽  火自鑪出飛入其身須㬰焰發五體烘燒  衆皆以水沃之沃不能滅號呼跳躍不勝  其苦良久面老君像俯伏如待罪狀視之  則巳死矣時楊克勤聞之於驗屍官甚的  張懷素者亦偉然其人也自言道術通神  飛走之屬皆能呼遣至言孔子誅少正卯  時彼正在旁諌其太早又言漢楚成臯之  戰彼正登髙觀戰姦如蔡卞尚猶惑之毎  對客言及必極口稱嘆惟忠肅陳瓘不信  其後事敗抵罪名士多被汚衊惟忠肅獨  免羅織然則誑諸無識其掇禍終可免乎  大抵誑妄之人但知貪財不復畏罪爲僧  人則挾談空而誑爲方士則挾丹藥爲誑  爲師巫則挾鬼神而誑爲醫卜則各挾其  術而誑安知誑妄爲罪非獨掇禍又當墮  大地獄乎    賛曰   笑烈於怒志慘於兵侮玩紿惑
Interpretation

This scripture recounts the karmic retribution for deceiving the ignorant. Even servants like Zhao Yansi and Wang Kui remained loyal to their masters, and even dogs and horses know to cherish their owners—yet deceit brings severe calamities.

The text records two exemplary cases: At the famous Daoist temple Bozhou Taiqing Palace, there was a priest who often set up a small furnace before the statue of Lao Jun (an honorific name for the deified Laozi) to refine medicines for sale. Arrogantly claiming to be Lao Jun's own teacher, he deluded crowds into clamoring for his remedies. One day, as he pointed at the sacred statue while spouting blasphemies, furnace flames suddenly sprayed onto his body, instantly engulfing him in fire. Though bystanders doused him with water, the flames wouldn’t extinguish, and he ultimately died kneeling before Lao Jun’s image.

Another charlatan named Zhang Huaisu boasted of commanding birds and beasts, even fabricating stories—claiming he had tried to dissuade Confucius from executing Shao Zhengmao, and that he witnessed the Chu-Han Battle of Chenggao from a hilltop. Even officials like Cai Bian were fooled by him; only the steadfast Lord Chen Guan remained skeptical. When Zhang’s crimes were later exposed, many eminent scholars were implicated—yet Chen Guan alone escaped unscathed.

The scripture warns that deceiving the ignorant invites not only earthly disasters but also rebirth in Avīci Hell (the Buddhist concept of the most excruciating hell). Charlatans exploit Buddhism, elixirs, spirits, or divination—coveting wealth while heedless of karmic consequences. Just as mockery cuts deeper than rage, and malice wounds more cruelly than blades, those who cheat and delude others will ultimately reap what they sow.

  殆非人情淵魚可躍漚鳥易驚   矧我同類萬物之靈以誑爲巧   掩耳盜鈴 謗諸同學  傳曰人倫有五曰君臣曰父子曰兄弟曰  夫婦曰朋友居于其一然則朋友之道豈  爲輕乎況諸同學平日相處於硯席之間  雍容笑語非不親厚其可妄起嫉心而輒  加毀謗乎昔郭尚書贄初作賦即有聲時  同學李勉深忌其能潜加毀謗由是贄連  上不中選其後竟先登第及再知貢舉而  勉方以明經充選詔下之日勉大悔而歸  贄聞之亟命親厚者召還俾復就選遂得  中第然則郭之所長終可掩乎今復頼之  得無愧乎惜其不知前輩同學未嘗不相  親厚也昔韓億少與李若谷同學又嘗同  途赴試共有一被一氈毎出謁則互爲僕  從是年李先登第受許州長社簿將之官  李自爲其妻控騾韓從後爲負一籠旣至  界所惟餘八百見錢中分爲二一哭而别  明年韓亦登第後皆官至參政世爲婚姻  有相謗乎又如趙安仁少嘗與宋元興同  學元興蚤世裔嗣衰替安仁旣貴屢以清  俸濟之又爲訓其諸子手寫周易論語老  子孝經凡七子人各授以一帙此則尤能  不忘同學於旣死之後者也彼不忠厚者  烏足以語此哉    賛曰   儀秦交訾敗於傾覆㳙臏胥忌   䘮身刖足相觀而善道盛仁熟   借使非才石可攻玉須友以成   千禄百福 虚誣詐僞
Interpretation

This scripture passage illustrates through historical anecdotes the importance of sincerity and kindness in human relationships, particularly emphasizing mutual support among classmates. In modern terms: even fish in water and birds in the air can be disturbed—how much more we humans, the most spiritual of all creatures? Deception and petty cunning are as laughable as covering one's ears while stealing a bell.

The text provides contrasting examples: During the Northern Song dynasty, official Guo Zhi was repeatedly failed in examinations due to slander from his jealous classmate Li Mian. Yet when Li later took the imperial exams filled with remorse, Guo selflessly assisted him to success. Another case tells of Han Yi (later a Song dynasty chancellor) who in his youth shared both meals and bedding with Li Ruogu—both eventually rose to vice-chancellorship and intermarried their families for generations. Zhao Anren, another Northern Song statesman, supported his deceased classmate Song Yuanxing's family by personally copying Confucian classics like the Zhouyi and Analects to educate the children.

Negative examples include the Warring States strategists Zhang Yi and Su Qin (referred to as "Yi-Qin" in the text), whose mutual defamation led to tragic ends. The scripture concludes: Human relationships require polishing like jade—only genuine interaction brings blessings, while deception ultimately backfires.

The mentioned "Five Cardinal Relationships" (Wulun) refer to ancient society's fundamental bonds: ruler-subject, father-child, elder-younger brothers, husband-wife, and friends. While friendship ranks last, its importance remains undiminished, with classmate bonds being particularly precious. These stories embody the Daoist concept of "retribution" (baoying)—that good and evil inevitably bear corresponding fruits.

 傳曰虚也者漫浪不根也誣也者妄有汚  衊也詐也者詭計百出也僞也者矯飾過  情也離而言之則有四合而言之皆不誠  也大抵誠者天之道也思誠者人之道也  今乃捨誠而習爲虚誣詐僞即是戾天之  道而失人之道也旣戾天道又失人道不  入三惡其將何歸是故藥山曰欲識餓鬼  道者即今之多虚少實令人不信者是(藥/山)  (曰保欲識地獄道只今鑊湯煎煑者是欲/識餓鬼道即今多虚少寳不令人信者是)  (欲識畜生道見今不識仁義不辯親疏者/是豈須披毛戴角斬截倒懸欲識人天即)  (令洗淨威儀持缾/挈鉢者是也云云)夫多虚少實在虚誣詐  僞中特四之一耳其從墜之速尚至如此  況兼其四而皆犯之乎從墜之說姑置勿  論且以一二誠實之士言之庶幾皆知自  克昔李及爲監司旣替登對神宗問曰麥  價幾何及曰臣於職事無不盡公獨不知  麥價耳他日欲得一官爲諸路按察宰執  屢薦其人終不能當上意一日上自言曰  向時不知麥價者爲誰宰執問故上曰朕  欲周知四方利病須忠誠信實人方可委  任如麥價不知有甚撰一箇不得於是召  及遂蒙信用王隱者本皇城司一徤𡵯也  時河決大發丁夫隨處築塞上遣數輩徤  𡵯往來偵視先有兩輩至言決流已塞水  復故道俄而隱至其言亦然既而又曰初
Interpretation

This scripture expounds on the principle of integrity and trustworthiness in human conduct. It identifies four manifestations of dishonesty: exaggeration (speaking boastfully without substance), slander (falsely accusing others), deception (employing cunning schemes), and pretense (excessive disguise). Though distinct as four separate faults, they collectively constitute dishonesty.

The author emphasizes that integrity is the fundamental principle governing heaven and earth's operation, and pursuing truthfulness is the proper path for human beings. To abandon integrity while indulging in these vices—exaggeration, slander, deception, and pretense—is to violate the Dao of heaven and forfeit the way of humanity. Where else could such people end up if not falling into the three wretched paths of hungry ghosts, hell realms, or animal rebirth? As Chan Master Yaoshan observed: "To understand the hungry ghost realm, observe those whose empty words make them untrustworthy; to comprehend hell realms, witness those suffering torment; to recognize animal rebirth, look upon those who understand neither benevolence nor righteousness, unable to distinguish closeness from distance."

The text particularly notes that the single vice of "much emptiness with little substance" alone can swiftly cause one's downfall—how much worse when all four forms of dishonesty are committed together? It then presents two positive examples: When Li Ji served as supervising censor, Emperor Shenzong inquired about wheat prices. Li frankly admitted his ignorance, and this honesty unexpectedly won imperial trust. Another case involves Wang Yin, a palace guard who, while reporting a Yellow River breach, not only gave accurate information but voluntarily supplemented details, demonstrating rare integrity.

These stories illustrate how honest individuals ultimately gain recognition and trust. Through contrasting positive and negative examples, the scripture admonishes people to shun exaggeration, slander, deception, and pretense while steadfastly maintaining fundamental honesty.

 來時頗覺津流未斷恐尚煩聖慮上怒抅  之少頃報至則水勢暴猛復衝壞大揵横  注數郡矣上因召隱慰諭立遷小校自是  𥙷擬校列多䝉超擢及東宫擇親衛指揮  使巳得劉謙尚闕一名上曰王隱誠實可  用即已𥙷之其後位至侍衛𡵯軍都指揮  使保寧軍節度使得任子恩前後凡一十  七人然則二公誠實豈不愈於虚誣詐僞  而速入惡趣者乎    賛曰   不誠無物命之曰虚言不可復   其實也誣僞則奪真詐反近愚   以此行巳誰食其餘骨肉猜阻   況於國都 攻訐宗親  傳曰禮曰親親則諸父昆弟無怨所謂親  親者各親其親也身旣列爲族屬上復同  乎祖先其可不相親乎求之前輩無若范  文正公言之最爲切當也文正曰吾之宗  族居於呉中者甚多在吾固有親踈在祖  先視之則均爲子孫無親踈也且祖先以  來積德凡百餘年至吾身而後發今爲大  官若或獨享富貴不復少䘏宗親異日何  以見祖先於地下今日亦何顔以入家廟  乎是故恩例俸賜必以均及宗親又於姑  蘇近郊買良田四十頃爲義庄以養羣從  之貧者且擇長而賢者一人主其出入毎  人日給米一升歳給縑一四乃至嫁娶䘮  葬肯有贈給其子純仁尤能克紹其志惟  守廉儉俸禄所得盡以廣義庄前後任子  之恩必先及踈屬身殁之日勿子五孫尚
Interpretation

This passage recounts two stories about integrity and kinship ties.

The first tells of a man named Wang Yin who gained imperial favor through his honesty and reliability. Initially, the emperor had concerns about water conservancy projects, and when floods later destroyed the dikes as predicted, Wang Yin was summoned. The emperor promoted him from a minor post to important positions, eventually making him Commander of the Imperial Guard. Seventeen of his descendants received official appointments. This illustrates how living with integrity brings greater blessings than deceitful schemes.

Next is the story of Fan Zhongyan (posthumously titled Duke Wenzheng) and his devotion to clan relations. Fan believed that while kinship ties might vary in closeness, all descendants were equal in their ancestors' eyes. He considered his high official position the accumulated virtue of his ancestors over generations, and felt he'd be ashamed to face them in the afterlife if he enjoyed wealth alone without caring for his clan. Upon assuming office, he distributed his salary and imperial rewards among relatives. In Suzhou, he purchased 400 acres of fertile land to establish a charitable estate (yizhuang), managed by capable clan members, which provided daily rice rations, seasonal silk distributions, and assistance for weddings and funerals. His son Fan Chunren continued this legacy, expanding the estate and prioritizing distant relatives when assigning official posts. When Fan Zhongyan died, all five of his grandsons still wore plain cloth garments.

The passage concludes with an ancient adage: the dishonest ultimately lose everything, and deceit rebounds upon itself. If even family members harbor suspicions, how much more so in state affairs? Attacking one's kin is particularly reprehensible. The principle of "cherishing kinship" in rites means fulfilling one's proper role in caring for relatives, ensuring no resentment remains between uncles, brothers, and cousins.

 有未官者如公父子其於親親之說可謂  允蹈者也又如彭尚書思永其撫宗族有  恩張康節公昇常分俸以及九族趙夫又  世開嘗捐金以賙族人之貧不及筭者吾  恭安公存嘗收䘏族人之孤嫠者爲之▲  娶此亦能親親者也旣能親親何自而有  攻訐之失乎所謂攻訐者即今之彼我必  爭絲毫必校或相忿嫉或相傾奪皆是也  不待如何然後謂之攻訐也戒哉    賛曰   巳惡當攻待人必恕以許爲直   聖人所惡於厚者薄尤可愧懼   根本平時視若行路不務睦蘇   彛倫攸斁    虚靜天師頌   人之一性湛然圎寂涉境對動   種種皆妄一念失正即是地獄   敬誦斯文髪
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principles for maintaining kinship relations, citing exemplary conduct from ancient figures: commoners like Gong Fuzi who treated relatives with sincere devotion; Minister Peng Siyong who showed kindness to his clan; Lord Zhang Kangjie (posthumous title) who regularly shared his official salary with nine generations of kin; Zhao Fuyou Shikai who donated funds to aid impoverished clan members; and my own ancestor Lord Gong'an who adopted orphaned clan members, cared for widows, and even arranged their marriages. These all represent models of familial devotion.

When one can cherish kin with such affection, how could mutual attacks occur? What we call "attacking" today manifests as petty calculations, jealousy, and contention among people. These need not reach extreme levels—the mere presence of such attitudes constitutes attack, and we must remain vigilant!

The subsequent eulogy states: Be strict in correcting your own faults, yet generous toward others. Mistaking harshness for honesty is abhorrent to the sages. Most shameful is treating those who deserve kindness with indifference. Regarding kin as strangers in daily life and failing to foster harmony violates fundamental human relationships.

The Celestial Master (Tianshi) of Void-Quietness (Xujing) proclaims in verse:

Human nature is originally pure and complete,

But contact with external realms stirs deluded movements,

From which all manner of false thoughts arise.

A single unwholesome thought

Is equivalent to falling into hell.

Reading these words with reverence

Makes one's hair stand on end and cold sweat flow—

Extinguish the heart's fire,

Tame the restless Qi (vital energy).

These principles serve both

As self-admonishment

And warning for generations to come.

[Note: The translation maintains Daoist terminology (Qi, Tianshi) while contextualizing historical titles and relationships. The poetic section preserves the original's rhythmic quality while clarifying its contemplative intent. Kinship terms are rendered naturally while preserving the hierarchical nuances of the original.]

立汗下煨燼心火   馴服氣馬旣以自鏡且告來者 太上感應篇卷之七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0001); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 6 Vol. 8 →