中文 · EN

《抱朴子外篇》Vol. 18

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 18 / 51 906 characters

About this page. The original text of 《抱朴子外篇》 Vol. 18 (Taiqing 太清部, 51 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 2 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《抱朴子外篇》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

抱朴子外篇卷之十八    擢才 抱朴子曰華章藻蔚非矇瞍所玩英逸之才 非淺短所識夫瞻視不能接物則衮龍與素 褐同價矣聦鑒不足相涉則俊民與庸天一 槩矣眼不見則美不入神焉莫之與則傷之 者至焉且夫愛憎好惡古今不鈞時移俗易 物同賈異譬之夏后之璜曩直連城鬻之於 今賤於銅鐵故昔以隱居求志爲高士今以 山林之儒爲不肖故聖世人之良幹乃闇俗 之罪人也往者之介潔乃末葉之羸劣也弘 偉之士履道之生其崇信匪徒重仞之墻其 淵澤不唯吕梁之深也故短近不能賞而淺 促不能測焉因以異乎己而薄之矣以不求 我而疾之矣不貴不用何足言乎乃有播埃 塵於白珪生瘡痏於玉肌訕疵雷同攻伐獨 立曾參蒙劫剽之垢巢許獲穿踰之謗自匪 明並懸象玄鑒表微者焉能披泥抽淪玉澄 川掇沉珠哉夫珪璋居肆而不售矧乃翳於 槃璞乎竒士扣角而見遏況乃潜於臯藪乎 孫臏思騁其祕略而司馬刖之韓非願建治 績而李斯殺之賈誼慷慨懷經國之術而武 夫排之子政忠良有匡危之具而恭顯陷之 和氏所以抱璞而泣血禽息所以發憤而碎 首也夫玉石易别於賢愚愛寳情篤於好士 以易别之寳合篤好之物猶獲罪截趾歷世 受誣況乎難知之賢非意所急讒人畫蛇足
Interpretation

The chapter "Selecting Talent" from the Outer Chapters of Baopuzi discusses the importance and difficulty of recognizing and promoting capable individuals.

Splendid writings cannot be appreciated by the blind, just as exceptional talents cannot be recognized by those with limited vision. If one's eyes cannot see, there's no difference between an embroidered dragon robe and coarse hemp cloth; if one's judgment is inadequate, the outstanding and mediocre become indistinguishable. Without vision, one cannot perceive beauty; without recommendation, talent suffers harm. Moreover, people's standards of preference vary across ages—as times change and customs shift, the value of identical things transforms. The jade huang pendants of the Xia dynasty once equaled the worth of cities, yet now rank below copper and iron. Recluses who sought spiritual fulfillment were once revered as noble scholars, while today's mountain-dwelling intellectuals are dismissed as incompetent. Thus, pillars of a flourishing age may be condemned as criminals in turbulent times; yesterday's pure-hearted scholars might be deemed useless by later generations.

Truly exceptional individuals possess virtues higher than city walls and knowledge deeper than the Lüliang abyss. Those with narrow vision cannot appreciate them, nor can petty minds comprehend them. People often despise talent simply for being different, or hate others for not actively seeking their favor. Neglect and rejection are bad enough, but worse still is throwing dust on white jade or carving scars on fine jade—joining the chorus to slander those who stand apart. Like when Zeng Shen was falsely accused of theft, or when the hermits Chao Fu and Xu You suffered slander. Without judgment bright as sun and moon, how could one distinguish jade from mud or find pearls in murky waters?

Even displayed in shops, fine jade struggles to find buyers—how much harder when still encased in rough stone? When extraordinary scholars actively seek opportunities they still meet obstacles—what chance for those secluded in mountains? Sun Bin wished to employ his strategies but was framed by Pang Juan; Han Fei sought to establish merit but was killed by Li Si; Jia Yi's statecraft wisdom faced military opposition; Liu Xiang (Zizheng) met eunuch intrigues despite his loyalty. This explains why Bian He wept holding uncut jade, and why Qin Xi smashed his head in frustration. Distinguishing jade proves easier than recognizing worth; loving treasures remains more common than cherishing talent. Even easily identifiable valuables and genuinely beloved objects lead to severed feet and generational infamy—how much more for unrecognizable sages whom none urgently seek? Like petty men who draw legs on snakes, they invariably obstruct true talent.

(Note: Historical figures mentioned—Bian He, Qin Xi, Sun Bin, Han Fei—represent classic cases of unrecognized talent; Chao Fu and Xu You were famous recluses; "Lüliang" denotes extremely deep river waters; "selecting talent" refers to identifying capable individuals.)

於無形姦臣畏忠貞之害己體曲者忌繩墨 之容夜祼者憎明燭之來是以高譽美行抑 而不揚虚構之謗先形生影又無楚人號哭 之薦萬無一遇固其宜矣夫以玉爲石者亦 將以石爲玉矣以賢爲愚者亦將以愚爲賢 矣以石爲玉未有傷也以愚爲賢者亡之診 也蓋診亡者雖存而必亡猶脉死者雖生而 必死也可勿愼乎於戲悲夫莫之思者也昔 仲尼上聖也東受累於齊人南見塞於子西 文種大賢也初不齒於荆俗末雍游於鈞如 競年立功不亦難乎夫結緑玄黎非陶猗不 能市也千鈞之重非賁獲不能抱也白雪之 絃非靈素不能徽也邁倫之才非明主不能 用也然耀靈光夜之珍不爲莫求而虧其質 以苟且於賤賈洪鍾周鼎不爲委淪而輕其 禮取見舉於侏儒嶧陽雲和不爲不御而息 唱以競顯於淫哇冠群之德不以沉抑而履 徑而剸節於流俗是以和璧變爲滯貨柔木 廢於勿用赤刀之鑛不得經歐冶之罏元凱 之疇終不值四門之闢也 抱朴子外篇卷之
Interpretation

This passage depicts the perennial predicament where virtuous talents are often overlooked and subjected to envy. Those treacherous courtiers fear that upright individuals might obstruct their schemes, much like warped wood resents the straight carpenter's line, or naked men detest bright candlelight. Thus, men of high virtue (De) are frequently suppressed, while slanderous rumors spread like shadows preceding reality.

Through metaphorical language, the author illustrates: Those who mistake jade for ordinary stone will inevitably mistake stone for jade; those who regard sages as fools will conversely hail fools as sages. Mistaking stone for jade is harmless, but mistaking fools for sages heralds a nation's downfall—like a patient whose pulse has ceased: though still breathing, death is certain.

Historical examples abound: Even Confucius (Zhongni) faced obstruction—by the people of Qi in the east and by Zixi in the south. Worthy men like Wen Zhong initially went unrecognized in Chu. Precious jades like Jielü and Xuanli require connoisseurs like Tao Zhugong for fair appraisal; objects weighing thousands of jun need Herculean figures like Meng Ben and Xia Yu to lift them. The ethereal "White Snow" melody demands a discerning ear like Master Kuang's to appreciate, just as extraordinary talents require enlightened rulers for proper employment.

Yet the author emphasizes: Night-luminous pearls don't diminish their radiance when unappreciated; ceremonial bronze vessels (Hongzhong Dading) retain their worth even when buried; famed zithers like Yiyang Yunhe never cease their latent resonance when unplayed. Similarly, men of peerless virtue (De) never compromise their principles under oppression. Tragically, reality shows treasures like the He's Jade treated as unsellable goods, premium timber left to rot, superior iron like the Red Blade never forged by master Ou Yezi, and paragons like the Eight Yuan and Eight Kai talents ultimately denied their rightful place in governance.

十八

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0021); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 17 Vol. 19 →