中文 · EN

《弘道錄》Vol. 27

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 27 / 41 6,819 characters

About this page. The original text of 《弘道錄》 Vol. 27 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 41 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 14 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《弘道錄》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

弘道録卷之三十四相三  禮   昆弟之禮 孟子曰欲常常而見之故源源而來不及貢 以政接于有庳  録曰所以謂之常常者相繼之義也彼漢  景之於梁王警蹕旂常縱不驕恣不可繼  矣所以謂之源源者不竭之義也彼唐玄  之於五王連枕共被縱使至親有時竭矣  覲聘者朝廷之禮也接見者手足之親也  不及貢則燕私之情洽不以政則非辟之  干遠而後得以常常而見源源而來孟子  其善探聖人者歟 孟子曰徐行後長者謂之弟疾行先長者謂 之不弟夫徐行者豈人所不能哉所不爲也 堯舜之道孝弟而己矣  録曰夫弟者第也出于天而自然有次叙  是故兄之齒隨行弟之齒燕行一定而可  紊乎彼有疾棄其長者或以權或以寵或  以利大而有國之君小而有家之子一踰  其分未有不滅亡者孟子以不能不爲發  之與長者折枝同意皆所以開人心自然  之天拯季世亂忘之弊不可以不察也 小雅燕兄弟之樂歌曰棠棣之華鄂不韡韡 凡今之人莫如兄弟死喪之威兄弟孔懷原 隰裒矣兄弟求矣着令在原兄弟急難每有 良朋况也永嘆兄弟䦧于墻外禦其侮每有 良朋烝也無戎喪亂既平既安且寧雖有兄 弟不如友生儐爾邉豆飮酒之飫兄弟既具 和樂且孺妻子好合如鼓瑟琴兄弟既翕和
Interpretation

The Rites of Conduct Between Brothers

Mencius said, “He wished to see him often, so he came again and again, even without waiting for the customary time to present tribute.” This means that when a ruler treated his brothers with affection, he could see them frequently.

The Hongdao Lu explains: “‘Often’ means repeatedly, without interruption. Emperor Jing of Han treated his younger brother Liu Wu, the Prince of Liang, with exceptional honor. When they traveled, he even granted him a ceremonial escort approaching that of the Son of Heaven. Yet even if the Prince of Liang had not become arrogant and unruly, such honors would have been difficult to sustain for long. ‘Again and again’ means continuously, without end. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang once shared a bed and pillow with the Five Princes of the Zhongzong era, showing them great intimacy. But even among close kin, affection can be exhausted. Court audiences and diplomatic visits are dealings governed by court ritual; receiving one’s brothers is an expression of the affection between siblings. If they could meet without waiting for the time to present tribute, their fraternal affection could flourish. If their visits were not constrained by the formalities of state affairs, they would not invite improper interference. Only then could they meet often and keep up an unbroken exchange. Mencius truly understood the Way of the sages!”

Mencius said, “Walking slowly behind an elder is called being dutiful to one’s elder brother. Hurrying ahead of an elder is called failing in that duty. Is it really beyond people to walk slowly behind an elder? Some simply do not wish to do so. In the end, the Way of Yao and Shun is nothing other than filial piety and respect for elders.”

The Hongdao Lu explains: “‘Respect for elders’ also means observing the proper order between the young and the old. This order comes from our nature and is naturally present from the beginning. Thus an older brother walks ahead, and a younger brother follows; once their order is established, it should not be upset. Some people, impatient to get ahead, leave their elders behind, or use power, favor, or personal gain to place themselves above them. Whether one is the ruler of a state or a son in a family, anyone who goes beyond their proper place is headed for ruin. Mencius’s point that people are ‘not unable to do it, but unwilling to do it’ carries the same meaning as his remarks about massaging an elder’s limbs: both aim to awaken the natural human disposition and to remedy a world fallen into disorder, where people have forgotten their proper relationships. This point must be understood clearly.”

One song in the Lesser Odes of the Book of Songs celebrates the joy of feasting with brothers:

“The crabapple blooms, its petals so bright! Among all the people of the world, none compares with a brother. When the threat of turmoil draws near, brothers grieve deeply for one another; when bones lie scattered across the fields and hills, brothers search for one another far and wide.

“When brothers face urgent danger, they always come to one another’s aid. Even a good friend can only sigh in sorrow. Brothers may quarrel at home, but when outsiders threaten them, they stand together; even a good friend may be unable to help.

“When turmoil has passed and life is at peace, even brothers may seem less dear than friends. The plates and cups are set out, and we drink our fill; all the brothers are gathered, joyful and close. Wives and children live together in harmony, like the music of zithers and lutes; and the brothers, too, are at peace with one another…”

樂且湛宜爾室家樂爾妻孥是究是圖亶其 然乎  録曰鹿鳴四牡皇華之後而繼以棠棣者  以周召王室之所仰人心之所頼也聖人  不以變廢常不以義勝恩不以一時之所  遇而易萬世之所重其公而愛之心皎然  青天白日不可掩也脩然雨露霜雪無非  教也故曰其過也如日月之食焉人皆見  之及其更也人皆仰之此之謂也是故和  樂且孺者父母且不可間矧他人乎和樂  且湛者妻孥尚不可先矧外物乎此所以  雖遭流言之變管蔡之辜曾不若後世遂  廢懿親之重不信兄弟之親也今去周公  之世數千百年爲之歌棠棣莫不因心發  見孰謂當其筵受之几有不能感動者哉  盖不待垂涕淚而越人已無不化矣 又燕兄弟親戚之詩曰有頍者弁實維伊何 爾酒既㫖爾殽既嘉豈伊異人兄弟匪他蔦 與女蘿施于松栢未見君子憂心奕奕既見 君子庶幾說懌有頍者弁實彼何期爾酒既 㫖爾殽既時豈伊異人兄弟俱來蔦與女蘿 施于松上未見君子憂心怲怲既見君子庶 幾有臧有頍者弁實維在首爾酒既㫖爾殽 既皁豈伊異人兄弟甥舅如彼雨雪先集維 霰死喪無日無幾相見樂酒今夕君子維宴  録曰愚觀此詩一篇之中而三緯具備眞  足以感人於舞窮也夫鶺鴿小物也而飛  鳴行搖曾是親切而有味乎蔦蘿小草也
Interpretation

“May your whole family live in harmony and peace, with your wife and children all joyful. Think it over carefully and plan it through: is it truly so?”

The Hongdao lu says: After “Deer Calling,” “The Four Stallions,” and “The August Envoy,” the editors placed “Peach Tree Branches” next, because what the Duke of Zhou, the Duke of Shao, and the royal house depended on was the kinship that people themselves rely upon. The sages did not abandon the constant Way when circumstances changed; they did not let moral principle outweigh affection for their kin, nor did they let temporary misfortune alter the regard for family ties that endures through the ages. Their impartial and benevolent hearts were as clear as the blue sky and bright sun, impossible to obscure. Even upheavals like wind and rain, frost and snow could become occasions for teaching and transforming people.

Thus it is said that people’s faults are like eclipses of the sun and moon: everyone sees them. When the sun and moon return to their normal course, everyone looks up at them again. That is the point. If even parents and children, who should live in harmony and affection, must not be set against one another, how much less should outsiders do so? If harmony and intimacy between spouses and children must not be cast aside, how much less should things beyond the family take precedence?

So although the Duke of Zhou was slandered by rumors, and Guan Shu and Cai Shu rebelled, he did not behave like some people in later generations, abandoning regard for his closest kin and losing trust between brothers. Thousands of years have passed since the Duke of Zhou’s time, yet when people sing “Peach Tree Branches,” family affection still arises naturally in their hearts. Who can say that those who heard this poem at the banquet in those days were not moved? Even if they did not go so far as to weep, people far away had already all been transformed by it.

There is another poem about a feast for brothers and relatives. It says:

“Why wear a tall cap upon your head? Your wine is sweet, and the dishes are delicious. Are those who have come strangers? They are all our own brothers. Dodder and climbing plants wind around the pines and cypresses. Before I saw you, my heart was troubled; after seeing you, joy filled me.

“Why wear a tall cap upon your head? What do you hope for? Your wine is sweet, and the dishes are just right. Are those who have come strangers? The brothers have all arrived. Dodder and climbing plants cling to the pines. Before I saw you, I was full of worry; after seeing you, I wish you well.

“A tall cap rests upon the head; the wine is sweet, and the dishes are all set out. Are those who have come strangers? They are brothers, nephews, and uncles. When snow falls, the first to fall are always the little snowflakes. Anyone may leave this world at any time, and there are few days left for us to meet. So tonight, let us drink our fill and feast together.”

The Hongdao lu says: As I read this poem, I see three layers of feeling woven through it, truly enough to move people as a banquet draws to a close. The wagtail is a small bird. Do its flying, calling, walking, and bobbing really seem so intimate and full of meaning? Dodder and climbing plants are small herbs too…

 而纒綿依附曾是固結而可觧乎盖由聖  人因心體物遇兄弟之急難則不暇束髮  彼有秦人視越人者則鶺鴒乎何有於兄  弟之相依則心誠求之彼有教猱升木者  則蔦蘿又何如哉此學詩之大義爲禮之  大本不可以不察也 又祭畢而燕父兄耆老之詩曰敦彼行葦牛 羊勿踐履方苞方體維葉泥泥戚戚兄弟莫 遠具爾或肆之筵或授之几肆筵設席授几 有緝御或獻或酢洗酌奠斝醓醢以薦或燔 或炙嘉殽脾臄或歌或咢敦功既堅四鍭既 鈞含矢既鈞序賔以賢敦兮既句既挾四鍭 四鍭如樹序賓以不侮曾孫維主酒醴維醹 酌以大斗以祈黄耈黄耈台背以引以翼壽 考維祺以介景福  録曰爲此詩者其知禮之至乎夫禮不妄  說人不辭費不踰節不侵侮不好狎周家  世德忠厚内親九族外事黃耈皆由於自  然不事勉强豈妄說人乎筵几雖陳不爲  過設侍御雖多不爲過勞飲食雖盛不爲  過腆豈辭費乎獻酬而後禮交禮交而後  樂備樂備而後射以觀德豈踰節乎揖讓  而升下而飲以賢而序賓以爭而君子豈  侵侮乎養耈老以相引翼介景福而饗壽  祺邦家有光君臣有慶豈好狎乎有此數  者故曰知禮之至也 父兄之答行葦曰既醉以酒既飽以德君子 萬年介爾景福既醉以酒爾殽既將君子萬
Interpretation

How could bonds of mutual affection and support, once so deeply formed, be easily undone? The sage teaches by following the human heart and understanding the way things naturally work. When a brother faces urgent trouble, one rushes to help without even taking time to arrange one’s hair or straighten one’s clothes. If someone were to treat his brother as indifferently as the people of Qin regarded the people of Yue, what meaning would the “jiling” bird in the Classic of Poetry have? It is often used as an image of brothers helping one another in times of need. Brothers ought to rely on each other and sincerely seek one another’s help. If someone teaches a monkey to climb a tree and pushes it into danger, how could the creeping vine, the niao-luo, match the bond between brothers who depend on one another? These are the essentials of studying the Classic of Poetry and the foundations of ritual. They deserve careful reflection.

Another poem describes a feast held after the sacrifices, in honor of fathers, elder brothers, and other elders:

“Lush reeds grow beside the road; let neither cattle nor sheep trample them. They are putting forth shoots, their leaves tender and glistening. Close brothers, do not keep apart; come together and draw near. Some spread the mats, while others bring the armrests. The mats are laid and the places set; attendants serve one after another. Some offer wine to the guests, and others return the toast. Cups are rinsed and filled, and the goblets respectfully set in place. Meat sauce is presented; some dishes are roasted, others grilled. Tasty morsels, including spleen and cheek, are all prepared. Some sing, while others join in with music. The archery rite begins: the bowstrings are firm, the four arrows evenly matched in weight, and the arrows held in the mouth are ready. Guests are seated in order according to their virtue. The archers draw their bows and fit their arrows; four arrows fly, each standing firm in its mark. Then the guests are seated again according to ritual order, with no one treated slightingly. The descendant of the ancestor serves as host. The sweet wine is rich; it is poured in a great measure, with prayers for the elders’ long lives. Their backs are mottled like a sturgeon’s, and they are guided and cared for. May they enjoy long life and good health, and receive abundant blessings.”

The Hongdao lu comments: “The poet who composed this piece may be said to have understood the principles of ritual. Ritual does not mean trying casually to please others, speaking needlessly, exceeding what is proper, bullying or slighting people, or behaving with frivolous familiarity. The Zhou house passed down generations of loyal and generous virtue. Within the family it cherished the nine degrees of kinship; beyond it, it honored the elderly. All this arose naturally, without forced display. How could it be mere pandering?

“The mats and armrests are all properly provided, but there is no excessive display. Though there are many attendants, no one is overburdened. Though the food is abundant, there is no wasteful extravagance. How could this be ostentatious speech?

“First come the offering of wine and the return toast. Only after the exchanges of courtesy between host and guests are complete does the feast begin. After the meal, music and ritual are fully observed, and finally the archery rite is used to observe people’s virtue. How could this exceed the bounds of ritual?

“The guests exchange bows as they ascend the hall. After the archery rite, they drink according to ritual, and then are seated in order of virtue. Even when there is competition, a gentleman does not contend in a way that violates ritual. How could this be bullying or slighting others?

“The elders are cared for, guided, and supported, and wished long lives and lasting blessings. The state is thereby honored, and ruler and ministers rejoice together. How could this be frivolous familiarity? Since the poem embodies all these things, it may be said to understand the principles of ritual.”

The fathers and elder brothers replied to the “Xingwei” poem with another poem, which says: “We have drunk our fill and received the full measure of virtue’s grace. May the gentleman live for ten thousand years and receive abundant blessings. We have drunk our fill, and the dishes have all been prepared. May the gentleman live for ten thousand years…”

年介爾昭明昭明有融高朗令終令終有俶 公尸嘉告其告維何籩豆靜嘉朋友攸攝攝 以威儀威儀孔時君子有孝子孝子不匱永 錫爾類其類維何室家之壼君子萬年永錫 祚胤其胤維何天被爾禄君子萬年景命有 僕其僕維何釐爾女士釐爾女士從以孫子  録曰此其曰鳧翳既醉至今頌大平者必  以首稱何也蓋曲禮曰道德仁義非禮不  成道之所包者廣故曰昭明有融德之所  具者身故曰威儀類善人之所聚者順故  曰景命百禄義之所和者利故曰祚胤孫  子是數者人情之至願君德之至純然必  和氣周旋而人心歡悅故首曰既醉以酒  既飽以德可以見王者之高致父兄之盛  節萬世之下固不能外之以爲頌禱也嗚  呼至是而周家八百年之基固矣 祭之明日繹而賓尸之樂曰鳧鷖在涇公尸 來燕來寧爾酒既清爾殽既馨公尸燕飮福 禄來成鳧鷖在沙公尸來燕來宜爾酒既多 爾殽既嘉公尸燕飮福禄來爲鳧鷖在渚公 尸來燕來處爾酒既湑爾殽伊脯公尸燕飲 福禄來下鳧鷖在潨公尸來燕來宗既燕于 宗福禄攸降公尸燕飮福禄來崇鳧鷖在亹 公尸來止熏熏㫖酒欣欣燔炙芬芬公尸燕 飲無有後艱  録曰鄭氏䟽云謂之公尸者天子以卿言  諸侯也諸侯有功德者入爲天子卿祭則  爲尸故云公尸然則非周召畢榮之徒不
Interpretation

Your radiance is so manifest, bright and vast; your virtue is lofty, bringing things to a good end and beginning them well. The representative of the ancestor at the sacrifice brings a favorable message. What does he announce? The ritual vessels are arranged neatly and beautifully; the guests each assist with the rites, conducting themselves with dignity and observing proper ceremony. The gentleman has filial descendants, and their filial devotion continues without end. You will long bestow blessings upon them. What are these blessings of goodness? They are harmony within the family. May the gentleman live ten thousand years, and may his blessings extend to his descendants. And what are these descendants like? They are the emoluments bestowed upon you by Heaven. May the gentleman live ten thousand years, enjoying a mighty Mandate from Heaven and many assistants. And what are these assistants? They are worthy and virtuous women bestowed upon you; may worthy and virtuous women be bestowed upon you, and bear descendants for you.

The Hongdao lu says: This poem is known as “The Waterfowl” and “Already Drunk.” Even today, those who praise an age of peace often quote it. Why is it always placed at the beginning? The Quli says, “The Dao, virtue, benevolence, and righteousness cannot be fulfilled without ritual.” The scope of the Dao is vast, hence the words “bright and vast”; De is embodied in oneself, hence “conducting themselves with dignity and observing proper ceremony.” Good people gather and their relations are harmonious, hence “a mighty Mandate from Heaven and abundant blessings and emoluments.” Righteousness brings harmony between people, and thus blessings and the flourishing of descendants. These are the deepest wishes of human feeling and expressions of a ruler’s pure and substantial virtue. Yet this can be achieved only when a harmonious and joyful spirit flows throughout, bringing gladness to people’s hearts. That is why the poem begins, “The wine is drunk, the virtue is full”: it reveals the king’s lofty character and the rich ceremonial bearing of the elders of the family. Even ten thousand generations later, people will still use this poem to praise and offer blessings. Ah, once this state is attained, the foundations that sustained the Zhou dynasty for eight hundred years are secure.

On the day after the sacrifice, a “continuation rite” was also performed, with music offered in entertainment of the representative of the ancestor. The poem sings:

Waterfowl on the Jing River: the representative of the ancestor comes to the feast, at ease and rejoicing. Your wine is clear, your dishes fragrant; as the representative feasts, blessings and emoluments will be secured.

Waterfowl on the sandbank: the representative of the ancestor comes to the feast, each at ease with the other. Your wine is abundant, your dishes fine; as the representative feasts, blessings and emoluments will arrive.

Waterfowl on the islet in the water: the representative of the ancestor comes to the feast and settles in comfort. Your wine is clear, your dishes include dried meat; as the representative feasts, blessings and emoluments will descend.

Waterfowl where the currents converge: the representative of the ancestor comes to the feast and is shown honor. The feast in the ancestral temple is complete, and blessings and emoluments descend from it; as the representative feasts, blessings and emoluments will increase.

Waterfowl by the water gate: the representative of the ancestor comes and stays, his expression cheerful. The fine wine brings delight, and the roast meat sends forth its fragrance; as the representative feasts, there will be no further calamity.

The Hongdao lu says: Zheng Xuan’s commentary explains that “representative of the ancestor” refers to a minister serving in that role. This passage concerns a sacrifice performed by the Son of Heaven. If a feudal lord had meritorious virtue and entered the court as a minister of the Son of Heaven, he could serve as the representative during a sacrifice. Those who could serve in this role would therefore have been figures such as the Duke of Zhou, the Duke of Shao, the Duke of Bi, and the Duke of Rong; later, at “not…” the text breaks off.

 能任也此時上有守成之君下有弼直之  臣以己則齊明盛服以人則肅雝秉德以  儀則至治馨香以物則玉帛交錯公尸安  則神明無不安公尸宜則神明無不宜是  以洋洋然而愛樂熏熏然而和悅皆太平  之効至治之休也不然酒清殽馨夫誰不  有而何獨稱鳧鷖既醉乎 公尸之答鳧鷖曰假樂君子顯顯令德宜民 宜人受禄于天保佑命之自天申之干禄百 福子孫千億穆穆皇皇宜君宜王不愆不忘 率由舊意威儀抑抑德音秩秩無怨無惡率 由群匹受福無疆四方之綱之綱之紀燕及 朋友百辟卿士媚于天子不觧于位民之攸 塈  東萊吕氏曰君燕其臣臣媚其君此上下  交而爲泰之時也泰之時所憂者怠荒而  巳此詩所以終于不觧于位民之攸塈也  録曰泰之時所憂者不但怠荒而已其所  最憂者作聦明而亂舊章以辯言而亂舊  政咈其耈長而任新進棄其芻蕘而召寵  利皆足以爲顯顯令德之累秩秩德音之  蠹也是詩一則曰不愆不忘率由舊章二  則曰無怨無惡率由群匹夫能由舊章則  有典則之可依成憲之可度由群匹則有  老成之可任孝德之可憑如是而民人不  宜天禄不永紀綱不垂於當時令名不傳  於後代吾未之信也抑公尸而爲此言信  非周召畢榮之徒而能若是哉 春秋文公二年八月丁卯有事於太廟躋僖
Interpretation

At this time, the ruler was capable of bearing great responsibility: above him stood a ruler who upheld the achievements of the past, and below him were upright ministers who assisted him. The ruler himself was correct and clear-minded, his clothing and cap neat and proper. He treated his ministers with dignity and kindness, and upheld Virtue. When he performed the rites, government and instruction were harmonious and beautiful, their fragrance moving all who encountered them. The sacrificial offerings were arranged in good order, with jade and silk interwoven. The “Lord of the Corpse,” who represented the ancestors and received the offerings, was at ease in the sacrifice; thus the spirits were all at ease as well. The Lord of the Corpse declared it fitting, and so did all the spirits. The atmosphere was therefore filled with affection and delight, and all were joined in harmony. These were splendid signs of peace throughout the realm and clear government. Otherwise, who does not have clear wine and fragrant dishes? Why, then, praise the poems “The Mallards” (Fuyi, a poem in the Book of Songs) and “Already Drunk”?

Speaking through the poem “The Mallards,” the Lord of the Corpse replied: “How joyful is this noble ruler, whose Virtue is bright and excellent, and who is suited to govern the people and bring them peace. He receives blessings and emoluments from Heaven; Heaven protects him and grants him its mandate, then continues to bestow more from above. He seeks blessings and emoluments, and every kind of good fortune gathers to him; his descendants multiply by the thousands and tens of thousands. Majestic and splendid, he is fit to be a ruler and king. He commits no transgression, does not forget the old statutes, and follows the established laws of his forebears. His bearing is dignified, his words orderly. He provokes neither resentment nor discord, and relies on the support of his worthy ministers; his blessings are without end. He becomes the guiding standard for the four quarters, and his blessings extend to friends, lords, and high ministers. They respect and love the Son of Heaven, remain diligent in their duties, and enable the people to live in peace.”

Master Lü of Donglai said: “When a ruler hosts a feast for his ministers and the ministers love their ruler, those above and below are in accord, and the state is at peace. In times of peace, the greatest concern is that people grow lax and neglect their duties. That is why the poem ends by saying, ‘They remain diligent in their duties, and enable the people to live in peace.’”

The Hongdao lu says: “In times of peace, laxity and neglect are not the only causes for concern. Of greatest concern is that people presume to be clever and disrupt established institutions; use artful argument to upset established government; disregard the views of elder worthies and appoint newcomers; or abandon the opinions of ordinary people and summon those who covet favor and profit. All of these damage bright and excellent Virtue, and corrupt the orderly and worthy words that express it.

“This poem repeatedly says, ‘He commits no transgression, does not forget the old statutes, and follows the established laws of his forebears.’ It also says, ‘He provokes neither resentment nor discord, and relies on the support of his worthy ministers.’ To follow the old statutes is to have established institutions to rely on and settled laws to observe. To rely on worthy ministers is to have mature and steady people to appoint, and Virtue on which one can place one’s trust. If, after doing these things, the people still could not live in peace, Heaven’s blessings could not endure, the state’s governing bonds could not hold, and the good name of the present age could not be passed down to later generations, I would not believe it. For the Lord of the Corpse to have spoken in this way, surely he must have been a worthy minister of the kind of the Duke of Zhou, the Duke of Shao, the Duke of Bi, or the Duke of Rong.”

In the Spring and Autumn period, on the Dingmao day of the eighth month in the second year of Duke Wen of Lu, the state of Lu held a sacrifice in the Grand Temple and raised Duke Xi’s spirit tablet to a more honored position…

公  錄曰愚觀春秋之世其悖亂僣差各有所  自其始也莊公可禘則哀姜亦可致也哀  姜可致則僖公亦可躋也是以古先聖王  愼而重之如不得已一失則入于夷狄再  失則入於禽獸可不愼歟若夏公弗忌之  論夷狄禽獸之道也故曰是可忍也孰不  可忍也 左傳晋侯使鞏朔獻齊捷于周王弗見使單 襄公辭焉曰蠻夷戎狄不式王命淫湎毁常 王命伐之則有獻捷王親受而勞之所以懲 不敬勸有功也兄弟甥舅侵敗王畧王命伐 之告事而已不獻其功所以敬親暱禁淫慝 也今叔父克遂有功于齊而不使命卿所來 撫余一人余雖欲於鞏伯未有職司於王又 奸先王之禮其敢廢舊典以忝叔父士莊伯 不能對王使委於三吏禮之如侯伯克敵使 大夫告慶之禮降於卿一等  録曰晋侯之使鞏朔鞏朔之爲齊捷獻利  也王之使單襄單襄之爲晋侯命義也伐  齊貪利故責晋以義王之不見莊伯有由  然矣而又何以宴而私賄爲哉以爲若孩  提焉本欲其正而投之乎梨栗棗柿是未  可知也以爲若戲術焉本與之嬉而加以  正顔作色亦未可知也何爲而有此哉是  時單襄公在廷王孫滿在位定雖欲如兒  戲其如二臣何哉雖然王孫蘇之復難劉  康公之徼戎定之本心喪矣欲不如兒戲  不可得也
Interpretation

The Hongdao lu says: In my view, the acts of rebellion and usurpation in the Spring and Autumn period each had their beginnings. Once Duke Zhuang was permitted to perform the Di sacrifice—a grand rite in which the Son of Heaven or a feudal lord offered sacrifice to his ancestors—Ai Jiang could also be welcomed into the ancestral temple. Once Ai Jiang could be welcomed into the temple, Duke Xi could in turn be raised to a higher place in the sacrificial order. For this reason, the sage kings of antiquity treated ritual institutions with great care, making changes only when they had no choice. Once ritual order is lost, people fall into the ways of the Yi and Di; lose it further, and they sink to the level of beasts. How could one fail to be cautious? Xia Gong Fuji cited the ways of the Yi and Di and of beasts as his argument, saying: “If people can bring themselves to do such a thing, what is there they cannot bring themselves to do?”

The Zuo zhuan records: The Marquis of Jin sent Gong Shuo to present the spoils of victory over Qi to the King of Zhou. The king refused to receive him and sent Shan Xianggong to decline on his behalf, saying: “The Man, Yi, Rong, and Di do not obey the royal commands, indulge themselves without restraint, and disrupt the established order. When the king commands an expedition against them and the feudal lords present the spoils, the king personally receives and commends them. This is meant to punish disrespect and encourage meritorious service. But when a brother state or a state bound to the royal house by marriage encroaches on the royal domain, after the king commands an expedition against it, the campaign need only be reported; the spoils need not be presented. This is meant to honor states bound to us by close ties and to prevent excessive aggression. Now, Uncle, you have defeated Qi and won merit, but instead of sending an appointed senior officer to bring me the report, you have sent Count Gong to present the spoils. I would like to receive Count Gong, but he holds no office at the Zhou court. This would also violate the rites established by the former kings. How would I dare abandon the old precedents and bring shame upon you, Uncle?” Shi Zhuangbo had no answer. The king then ordered him to hand the spoils over to three officials for disposition. He received him according to the rite for a feudal lord who had defeated an enemy state and sent an officer to report the victory, but with honors one rank below those given to a minister.

The Hongdao lu also says: The Marquis of Jin sent Gong Shuo, who presented the spoils from Qi in order to claim credit and seek advantage. The King of Zhou sent Shan Xianggong to respond in order to uphold the Way of righteousness. Jin’s campaign against Qi carried the suspicion that it had been undertaken for the sake of the spoils, so the king reproached Jin in the name of righteousness. The king had good reason to refuse to receive Shi Zhuangbo. But why, afterward, did he host a banquet for him and privately give him gifts?

This is like dealing with a young child: one means to correct him, yet hands him pears, chestnuts, jujubes, and persimmons. Or it is like joining someone in a magic trick: one is playing along together, then suddenly puts on a solemn face and begins lecturing about what is proper. The consequences of such behavior are hard to predict. At the time, Shan Xianggong was at court, and Wangsun Man was also in office. Even if the King of Zhou wanted to treat the matter as a game, he had to take these two ministers into account. But later, Wangsun Su again fomented disorder, and Liu Kangong seized the opportunity to send troops against the Rong. King Ding of Zhou had already lost sight of his original purpose; even if he had not wanted to treat the matter as a game, he could no longer have done otherwise.

後漢書光武以東海王疆廢不以過去就有 禮故優以大封兼食魯郡二十九縣賜虎賁 旄頭宫殿設鐘虛之懸擬於乘輿疆臨之國 數上書讓還東海又因皇太子固辭帝不許 深嘉嘆之以疆章宣示公卿初魯恭王好宫 室起靈光殿甚壯麗是時猶存故詔疆都魯 宫室禮樂事事殊異至永平元年王病明帝 遣中常侍將太醫視疾又詔沛濟南淮陽王 詣魯絡繹不絶及薨上悲慟從太后出幸津 門亭發哀使大司空持節護喪大鴻臚副宗 正將作大匠視喪事贈以殊禮升龍旄頭鸞 輅龍旂虎賁百人詔楚王英趙王栩北海王 興館陶宫主及京師親戚四姓夫人小侯皆 會葬帝追惟王深執謙儉不欲厚塟以違其 意於是特詔中常侍杜岑及東海傅相曰王 恭儉好禮以德自終遺送之物務從約省以 彰王卓爾獨行之志  録曰損之初九曰已事遄徃無咎六五曰  或益之十朋之龜弗克違元吉王以冢器  當陽帝以次嫡易位猶損頼初之益者也  旣讓于尊尤能損己而不自以爲功帝復  居尊得正追惟王執謙約務從儉損深得  虚中善應與唐世稱讓皇帝者不可同曰  語也此其大善之吉蔑以加矣 及肅宗尊禮東平王踰於前世諸王亦莫與 比建初七年來朝帝許之特賜裝錢千五百 萬復以王冒涉寒露遣謁者賜貂裘及大官
Interpretation

The Book of the Later Han records that Emperor Guangwu removed Liu Jiang, Prince of Donghai, from the position of crown prince through no fault of his own. He continued to treat him with the honors prescribed by ritual, granting him extensive lands and the tax revenues of twenty-nine counties in Lu Commandery as an additional fief. He also bestowed on him a guard of elite imperial soldiers, ceremonial banners topped with yak-tail plumes, a palace, and stands for hanging bells and stone chimes. The honors he received nearly matched the formalities of an imperial procession. While governing his princedom, Liu Jiang repeatedly submitted memorials asking to return his Donghai lands. Later, citing the fact that Crown Prince Liu Zhuang had already been appointed, he firmly declined them. Emperor Guangwu refused his request, deeply praised and admired his character, and showed Liu Jiang’s memorials to the high ministers.

In the past, Liu Yu, Prince Gong of Lu, had loved building palaces and had constructed the magnificent Lingguang Hall, which was still standing at the time. Emperor Guangwu therefore ordered Liu Jiang to establish his capital in Lu. In all matters, including palaces and ritual music, his arrangements were to differ from those of the other princes.

In the first year of Yongping, Liu Jiang became gravely ill. Emperor Ming sent a palace attendant and imperial physicians to treat him, then ordered the Princes of Pei, Jinan, and Huaiyang to visit him in Lu. Visitors came and went without interruption. When Liu Jiang died, Emperor Ming was overcome with grief. He accompanied the Empress Dowager to Jinmen Pavilion to mourn, then sent the Grand Minister of Works, bearing the imperial tally, to preside over the funeral. The Grand Herald assisted the Director of the Imperial Clan and the Director of Construction in making the arrangements. The court bestowed funeral items according to special rites, including a dragon standard, ceremonial banners topped with yak-tail plumes, a phoenix carriage, dragon flags, and a hundred elite imperial guards. Emperor Ming also decreed that Liu Ying, Prince of Chu; Liu Xu, Prince of Zhao; Liu Xing, Prince of Beihai; the Lady of the Guantao Palace; and relatives in the capital, the ladies of the Four Surnames, and the junior marquises should all attend the funeral.

Emperor Ming remembered that Liu Jiang had always been respectful and frugal, and did not want to arrange an excessively lavish funeral that would go against his wishes. He therefore issued a special decree to the palace attendant Du Cen and to the tutor and chancellor of the Kingdom of Donghai, officials who assisted the prince, saying: “Liu Jiang was respectful and frugal, cherished ritual, and completed his life through virtuous conduct. The funeral arrangements must be kept simple, to make clear his outstanding and independent purpose.”

The Hongdao lu comments: The Book of Changes, in the first line of the Decrease hexagram, says, “Once the task is complete, go quickly; there will be no misfortune.” The fifth line says, “Someone presents a tortoise worth ten strings of cash. Do not refuse it; great good fortune.” Liu Jiang was the eldest legitimate son, yet lost his position as heir when the emperor appointed a different crown prince. His later act of yielding was like the first line’s teaching: by diminishing himself, he received help. Having yielded the honored position, he continued to restrain himself and did not claim credit. After Emperor Ming had taken his place in the position of honor, he still remembered Liu Jiang’s humility and frugality, and sought to keep the funeral modest. This fully embodied the virtue of meeting others with humility and responding well to them. Liu Jiang cannot be compared with the person in the Tang dynasty known as the “Emperor Who Yielded the Throne”; no one has surpassed Liu Jiang’s goodness and good fortune.

Later, Emperor Suzong treated the Prince of Dongping with honors exceeding those given to princes in earlier generations, and the other princes could not compare. In the seventh year of Jianchu, the Prince of Dongping came to court, and Emperor Suzong received him, specially granting him fifteen million coins. Because the prince had traveled through cold dew, the emperor also sent an usher to present him with a sable fur coat and food from the Imperial Kitchens. The original text ends here, unfinished.

食物珍果使大鴻臚竇固持節郊迎帝乃親 自循行邸第豫設帷床其錢帛器物無不充 備下詔曰詩云叔父建爾元子敬之至也昔 蕭相國加以不名優忠賢也况兼親尊者乎 其沛濟南東平中山四王讚皆不名蒼既至 升殿乃拜天子親答之其後諸王入宫之以 輦迎至省閣乃下蒼以受恩過禮情不自寧 上踈辭謝帝省覽愈褒貴焉及車駕祖送流 涕而訣復賜乘輿服御珍寳輿馬錢帛以億 萬計  録曰范曄論曰孔子稱貧而樂富而好禮  若東平憲王可謂好禮者也其辭至戚去  母后豈欲苟立名行而忘親遺義哉盖眩  疑則隙生累近則喪大斯蓋明哲之所爲  嘆息嗚呼遠隙以全忠釋累以成孝固憲  王之志哉録之 魏書楊播家世純厚並敦義讓昆季相事有 如父子椿津恭謙忠義坐於廳堂終日相對 未嘗人内有一𦎟一飯而聚食廳堂間徃徃 幃幔隔幛爲寢息之所各就休偃還共談笑 年過六十並登台鼎嘗旦暮叅問椿他䖏醉 歸津扶持還室假寢閣前承候安否子姪羅 列階下不命之坐不敢坐也毎出或曰斜不 至不敢先飯還然後共食則親授匙箸味皆 先嘗津爲四州椿在京每四時嘉味輙因使 附之若或未寄不先入口一家之内男女百 口緦服同爨庭無間言  録曰史稱楊播兄弟俱以忠毅謙謹荷内
Interpretation

The emperor sent the Grand Herald Dou Gu, bearing the tally of authority, to welcome Prince Xian of Dongping, Liu Cang, in the suburbs. He personally inspected the residence arranged for him, and had curtains, tents, and a couch prepared in advance. Money, silk, vessels, and every other necessity were also made ready.

The emperor issued an edict saying, “The Book of Songs says that an uncle established a great undertaking for you. Such respect for an uncle shows just how deep one’s reverence can be. In the past, when Xiao He served as chancellor, the emperor permitted people not to address him by name. This was a special honor for a loyal and worthy minister. How much more does this apply to Liu Cang, who is both a kinsman and an elder?” Accordingly, in the ceremonial words of praise for the four kings of Pei, Jinan, Dongping, and Zhongshan, Liu Cang’s name was never spoken directly.

When Liu Cang arrived, he entered the hall and performed the formal rites; the emperor personally returned his salute. Later, when the princes came to the palace, the emperor ordered that they be conveyed by carriage to the provincial pavilion, a place in the palace used for handling affairs of state and resting. They did not dismount until they reached it. Liu Cang felt uneasy, believing that the favor shown him exceeded what the rites allowed, so he submitted a memorial declining the honors and expressing his thanks. After reading it, the emperor admired and respected him all the more.

When the emperor saw Liu Cang off on his departure, Liu Cang took his leave in tears. The emperor also bestowed on him imperial robes, precious objects, carriages and horses, and money and silk, together worth as much as one hundred million.

The Hongdao lu comments: Fan Ye wrote that Confucius said, “Though poor, one can remain content in the Dao; though wealthy, one can still delight in ritual.” Prince Xian of Dongping may be called a man who delighted in ritual. In declining such deep family affection and leaving the empress dowager, was he merely seeking an empty reputation, forgetting kinship and duty? Perhaps, when doubts arise in the heart, estrangement follows; and excessive closeness can also damage what is right. This is precisely what makes the wise sigh. Alas, to keep clear of suspicion and preserve loyalty and righteousness, to set aside personal attachments and fulfill filial duty—these must have been Prince Xian of Dongping’s aims. That is why this account has been recorded.

The Book of Wei records that the Yang Bo family had been honest and generous for generations. The brothers valued righteousness and yielded to one another, treating one another as father and son. Yang Chun and Yang Jin were respectful and humble, loyal and principled. They sat together in the main hall throughout the day and never retired separately to their rooms. Even when the household had only a bowl of soup and a serving of rice, they always ate together in the hall. Curtains and screens were often set up around it to create resting spaces. Each would go there to rest, then return to talk and laugh together.

Both brothers were over sixty when they successively rose to high office. Even so, morning and evening each day they continued to inquire after one another. Sometimes Yang Chun would return drunk from drinking elsewhere. Yang Jin would help him back to his room, then wait by the pavilion, checking that he was well. Their sons and nephews stood in rows below the steps. None was permitted to sit, and no one dared take a seat.

When the brothers were about to go out, one of them might say, “There is still time.” Everyone would then wait, not daring to eat first. They would dine together only after he returned, with the elder personally handing spoons and chopsticks to the younger ones. At every dish, everyone first let the eldest brother taste it. When Yang Jin served as governor of four provinces, Yang Chun remained in the capital. Whenever seasonal delicacies were available, Yang Jin would send them to his elder brother by messenger. If they had not yet arrived, Yang Chun would not eat them. The household had more than a hundred men and women. They all wore mourning clothes of the same kind and cooked their meals together, and there was never an argument in the courtyard.

The Hongdao lu comments that the histories praised the brothers of the Yang Bo family for their loyalty, steadfastness, humility, and care, which earned them the court’s esteem…

 外之任公卿牧守榮赫累朝而言色恂恂  出于至誠恭德愼行爲世師範後魏以來  一門而已諸子秀立青紫盈庭積善之慶  蓋有憑也及逆胡擅朝淫刑肆毒以斯族  而遇斯禍何報施之反哉佘曰不然孔子  曰邦有道貧且賤焉耻也邦無道福且貴  焉耻也古之人所以不恃其遺慶而果於  遺安者非無意也以播之家世當元魏盛  時行義致身奉公結主夫誰曰不然至孝  文以後君日以冲政日以廢女主擅權賊  臣竊柄四海囂然魏已不國矣播於斯時  脩然遠覽覺積慶之不足憑而遺危之有  可痛並辭台鼎之貴若漢之廣受誰能奪  之乎迨至尒朱氏興弑君沉母扇毒萬類  蓋已不可免矣故椿津之禍不獨慘於世  隆誣搆之時而大著於元顯入洛之日不  獨危於節閔詔下之後而並肇於孝莊侍  中之前然則恭德愼行徒貽楷範之名而  席權世寵深爲明哲之戒乎 愽陵崔挺三世同居門有禮讓與弟振推讓 田宅怡然不釋子孝芬孝暐孝演孝直孝政 兄弟孝義慈厚孝演孝政先亡孝芬等哭泣 哀慟絶内蔬食容貌損瘠見者傷之孝暐等 奉孝芬盡恭順之禮坐食進退孝芬不命則 不敢也鷄鳴而起旦叅顔色一錢尺帛不入 私房吉凶有須聚對分給諸婦亦相親愛有 無共之叔振既亡奉承叔母李氏若事所生
Interpretation

He held high offices at court and served as a local governor, enjoying great prestige through several dynasties. Yet his manner and expression remained humble and respectful. With wholehearted sincerity, he upheld Virtue reverently and acted with care, becoming a model for the people of his time. Since the Northern Wei, there had been no other family like his. His sons and grandsons were all outstanding, and many members of the household rose to high office. The blessings and honors that came from accumulated good deeds, it seems, were indeed well founded.

Yet rebellious Hu rulers seized control of the government, imposed cruel punishments without restraint, and inflicted suffering at will. This family, too, met with such calamity. Why did the rewards for good and evil seem so completely reversed? I believe they were not. Confucius said, “When a state is governed by the Dao, it is shameful to live in poverty and low station; when a state is without the Dao, it is shameful to enjoy good fortune and high rank.” The ancients did not rely on the blessings left by their ancestors. Instead, they resolved to leave their descendants secure circumstances, and they had good reason for doing so.

Cui Bo belonged to a family of great distinction and lived during the flourishing years of the Yuan-Wei (Northern Wei). He established himself through virtue, served the public, and associated with the ruler. Who could say that this was out of step with the times? But after Emperor Xiaowen, the rulers grew ever younger and the government ever more lax. Women at court seized power, corrupt ministers usurped authority, and the realm fell into turmoil; the Wei state was already in grave danger. Seeing far ahead, Cui Bo understood that the blessings accumulated by his ancestors could not be relied upon, and that leaving danger to his descendants would be lamentable. He therefore resigned from his high post as chief minister. Like the uncle and nephew Shu Guang and Shu Shou of the Han dynasty, who willingly withdrew from prominent office, who could take this wise choice away from them?

By the time the Erzhu clan rose to power, they had murdered the ruler, drowned the Empress Dowager, and slaughtered the people; calamity had likely become impossible to avoid. Thus the disaster that befell the household of Cui Chun and Cui Jin did not become severe only when Shilong falsely accused them; it was already evident when Yuan Xian entered Luoyang. Nor did they fall into danger only after the edict of Emperor Jiemin was issued: the crisis had begun before Emperor Xiaozhuang appointed them as Attendants-in-Ordinary. Seen in this light, the Cui family’s reverence for Virtue and careful conduct left behind only an exemplary reputation. The honors they had enjoyed for generations through their power, by contrast, became a warning to those who came after.

Cui Ting of Boling lived with three generations under one roof, and courtesy and mutual deference prevailed throughout the household. He gave his fields and residence to his younger brother, Cui Zhen, with complete ease and not the slightest reluctance. Cui Ting’s sons—Cui Xiaofen, Cui Xiaowei, Cui Xiaoyan, Cui Xiaozhi, and Cui Xiaozheng—were devoted to their parents and affectionate toward one another, displaying kindness, generosity, and forbearance. When Xiaoyan and Xiaozheng died in turn, Xiaofen and the others wept bitterly. They gave up meat and ate only vegetables, growing thin and haggard with grief; all who saw them were moved to sorrow.

Xiaowei and the others served Xiaofen with the utmost respect and obedience. Whether sitting, eating, or going about their affairs, they waited for his instructions before doing anything. They rose at daybreak, paid their respects to Xiaofen each morning, and watched his expression. They kept not so much as a coin or a foot of cloth for their private use. Whenever money or goods were needed for weddings, funerals, or other affairs, the brothers gathered to discuss how to allocate them. The wives of the different households were also affectionate toward one another, and shared household goods whether there was plenty or not enough. After their uncle Cui Zhen died, they cared for their aunt, Lady Li, just as they would have cared for their own mother.

旦夕温清出入啓覲家事巨細一以諮决每 兄弟出行有獲財物尺寸已上皆内李氏之 庫四時分賚李自裁之如此者二十餘歲撫 從弟宣伯子朗如同氣焉  録曰楊播之敦讓然而不有其家者以其  世席權寵也崔挺之慈厚然而率保其宗  者以其世乏津要也故曰可畏不可恃也  君子何幸而遇邦有道士大夫有禮則風  操高亮重於朝野若能以士大夫之禮反  正無道之邦又何忠諒弼直之不足賴哉  觀者各適其當而已 隋書王凝常居慄如也子弟非公服不見閨 門之内若朝廷然通嘆曰賢哉凝也御家以 四教文行忠信正家以四禮冠婚喪祭非禮 不動殆終身焉聖人之書必備及公服禮噐 不假垣屋什物必堅朴曰毋苟費也門巷果 木必方列曰毋苟亂也與人不受遺非其力 不食饗食之禮無加物焉曰及禮可矣唐貞 觀初太宗精脩治具房杜魏王之徒播厥師 施文中子之制作將以大行凝嘆曰大哉兄 之述乎以言乎皇綱帝道則大明矣以言乎 天地之間則無不至焉天下有道聖人推而 行之天下無道聖人述而藏之所謂流之斯 爲川焉塞之斯爲淵焉升則雲施則雨潜則 潤何徃而不利焉  録曰凝之所見其逹於通之所擬乎何以  知其然也夫龍門顯矣太平十二策之獻  未能盡如吾意則不若守禮終身之爲高
Interpretation

He attended to his parents’ comfort in the morning and evening, and whenever he went out or came home, he went to greet them. For every matter in the household, great or small, he first sought Lady Li’s advice. Whenever his brothers went out and gained anything, even a small sum of money, they handed it over to Lady Li’s storeroom. When household goods were distributed each season, Lady Li decided how to divide them. They kept up this practice for more than twenty years. He treated Lang, the son of his cousin Xuanbo, just as he would his own younger brother.

The Hongdao Lu comments: Yang Bo, a high official of the Northern Wei, was honest and modest, yet could not preserve his family’s estate. This was because his family had relied for generations on power and imperial favor. Cui Ting, also a high official of the Northern Wei, was kind and generous, yet managed to preserve his clan. This was because his family had for generations lacked important paths to official advancement. Thus, power may inspire awe, but it cannot be relied upon. How fortunate the gentleman who lives in an age when the state is well governed and the scholar-officials observe ritual: in such times, people’s integrity and moral courage naturally win esteem at court and among the people. If ritual and righteousness among the scholar-officials can be used to set an unruly state back on course, then what kind of person—loyal, trustworthy, able to assist in government, and upright—could not be relied upon? Readers should judge appropriately according to their own circumstances.

The Book of Sui records that Wang Ning was always cautious and dignified. If his sons and younger relatives were not wearing court dress, he would not receive them in the inner quarters. Ritual in his household was as strict as at court. Wang Tong, styled Zhongyan and known as Master Wenzhong, praised him, saying: “Wang Ning truly is a man of virtue! He governs his family by teaching the four qualities of refinement, conduct, loyalty, and trustworthiness, and sets its customs in order through the four rites of capping, marriage, mourning, and sacrifice. He never does anything contrary to ritual.”

He always kept a complete collection of the sages’ classics, and never lent his court robes or ritual vessels to anyone. He made sure the courtyard walls and household implements were sturdy and plain, saying, “Do not waste things carelessly.” The fruit trees along the lanes and paths were always planted in orderly rows; he said, “Do not throw things into disorder.” He accepted none of the gifts people sent him, and would not eat food he had not earned through his own labor. When entertaining guests, he bought no extra provisions, saying, “What accords with ritual is enough.”

In the early years of the Zhenguan reign of Tang Taizong, the emperor diligently put the affairs of government in order, while Fang Xuanling, Du Ruhui, Wei Zheng, and others each displayed their abilities in assisting him. When Wang Ning heard that the writings of his elder brother Wang Tong, Master Wenzhong, were about to be widely put into practice, he exclaimed: “My brother’s writings are truly profound! As for the principles of statecraft and the way of rulers, they have already been explained with complete clarity. As for the principles of all things between Heaven and Earth, there is nothing they fail to address. When the world follows the Dao, the sage puts the Dao into practice; when the world departs from the Dao, the sage writes it down and keeps it in reserve. It is like water: when channeled, it becomes rivers; when dammed, it becomes deep pools. Rising, it forms clouds; spreading, it falls as rain. Even when hidden below, it can nourish all things. Wherever it is, it can serve its purpose.”

The Hongdao Lu comments: Wang Ning’s insight seems to have reached the very realm Wang Tong envisioned. Why say this? Wang Tong’s talent and learning were outstanding. Yet if his Twelve Proposals for Great Peace, which set out twelve recommendations for governing the realm, could not be carried out entirely as he wished, then perhaps the higher course was to observe ritual and law throughout his life.

 續經賢矣致治不世出之主未能悉用吾  言則不若述而藏之之爲得此其所以房  杜諸公並尊而不足長孫一人尼之而有  餘固不若升則雲施則雨潜則潤與無徃  不利之爲逹也 唐史玄宗開元二十九年太尉寧王憲薨上 哀惋特甚曰天下兄之天下也固讓於我爲 唐太伯常名不足以處之乃謚曰讓皇帝其 子汝陽王璡表述先志固讓不許  録曰陸贄有言道合天謂之皇德配地謂  之帝皆至尊之殊號極大之美名不可以  虚拘矧可以餙讓乎帝廣因心之愛禁中  拜跪如家人禮此天叙天秩之不可亂由  之可也至以遜位之私情而輕無上之大  號受之者惶恐而不安加之者悖理而可  笑非所以爲重實所以爲褻未可爲後世  法也 宋傳李柬之肅之承之及之皆丞相迪子承 之生而孤肅之鞠育誨導至於成人遂相繼 爲侍從及遷龍圖直學士懇辭乞以授兄曰 臣少鞠於兄且其爲待制十稔矣帝曰卿兄 弟禮愛足厲風俗肅之亦當遷也即並命焉 及之吏事精明所居官稱職嘗撰次唐史有 益治體者爲君臣龜鑑柬之自少受知於㓂 凖英宗即位富弼薦其學行帝勞之曰卿通 議耆儒方咨訪以輔不逮豈止經術而已兼 東宫侍讀賜穎王生日禮物故事王拜賜即 退英宗諭王令留柬之食冀其從容以禮開
Interpretation

Continuing and completing the classics is a wise course of action. Even when one encounters a ruler capable of governing the world, far beyond the ordinary, he may not accept all of my words. Rather than that, it is better to record them and preserve them in books. This is precisely why Fang Xuanling, Du Ruhui, and others all respected Zhangsun Wuji but could not help him improve, while Zhangsun Wuji alone had more than enough power to refuse them. Better, then, to be like clouds that bring rain when they rise and continue to nourish all things even when hidden: wherever one may be and whatever means one may use, one can remain responsive and beneficial.

The histories of the Tang say that in the twenty-ninth year of the Kaiyuan era, Grand Marshal Prince Ning, Li Xian, died. Emperor Xuanzong was deeply grieved and said, “The empire was originally my elder brother’s; it was only because he steadfastly yielded it to me that I received it. To the Tang, my brother is like Taibo of antiquity. An ordinary posthumous title is not enough to express his virtue.” Xuanzong therefore posthumously titled Li Xian “Emperor Who Yielded the Throne.” His son, Prince of Ruyang Li Jin, submitted a memorial stating that his father’s final wish had been to remain steadfastly humble and decline an imperial title, but Xuanzong did not grant the request.

The Hongdao lu comments: Lu Zhi once said, “When the Dao accords with Heaven, it is called ‘huang’; when De accords with Earth, it is called ‘di.’” Both “huang” and “di” are supreme and exceptional titles, names of the highest distinction. They cannot be used casually, much less to adorn an act of humility.

Out of familial affection, Xuanzong paid his respects to his elder brother in the palace, bowing and kneeling according to the rites between family members. This accords with the proper order of family bonds and social roles, and is understandable. But to grant his brother the supreme imperial title lightly, out of private feeling, left the recipient apprehensive and the giver in violation of principle—a ludicrous outcome. This did not honor the imperial title; it profaned it. It should not become a practice for later generations to imitate.

A Song dynasty biography records that Li Jianzi, Li Suzi, Li Chengzhi, and Li Jizhi were all sons of the chancellor Li Di. Li Chengzhi was orphaned soon after birth and was raised and educated by Li Suzi until he came of age. Later, the two brothers in turn served as attendants at court. When Li Chengzhi was promoted to Academician of the Dragon Diagram Pavilion, he earnestly declined the post and asked that it be given to his elder brother. He said, “My elder brother raised me when I was a child, and he has served as a Hanlin academician for ten years.” The emperor replied, “The courtesy, affection, and mutual regard between you brothers are enough to encourage good conduct in the world. Li Suzi should also be promoted.” He therefore ordered both men to be promoted together.

Li Jizhi was skilled in government affairs and performed his duties well. He once compiled accounts of Tang history, selecting from them material useful for governing the state and writing the book A Mirror for Rulers and Ministers. Li Jianzi was admired by Kou Zhun from a young age. After Emperor Yingzong of Song took the throne, Fu Bi recommended him for his learning and character. Yingzong encouraged him, saying, “You are a Confucian scholar of broad learning and distinguished virtue. I am hoping to consult you to make up for my own shortcomings. Your expertise extends far beyond the Confucian classics, does it not?” Li Jianzi was appointed concurrently as a reader to the Eastern Palace.

The emperor gave Prince Ying birthday gifts. According to the old custom, after receiving the gifts and paying his respects, the prince would withdraw. But Yingzong instructed him to stay and dine with Li Jianzi, hoping that Li Jianzi would have the opportunity to guide the prince in proper conduct.

導甫神宗登祚柬之即日請老自工部尚書 拜太子太保致仕舊無閤門謝辭式特賜對 延和命之坐仍置宴資善堂令講讀官皆賦 詩勸勞甚渥又勑王珪叙其事子孝基亦位 宫僚以親須養求監崇福宫凡就閑十年與 父同謝事纔年五十士大夫稱美以比漢廷 二䟽弟孝達進對神宗問起居狀並嘆以爲 度越常人遠矣  録曰胡明仲以二䟽之去知太子之不足  恃未可以爲然也至於柬之父子豈非誠  然乎哉神宗殉意自好甫臨大政即納安  石之說恣變亂之謀而通曉國典之君子  寧無措意乎哉厥後孝壽孝稱同一昆季  未免爲章惇起獄京卞任權有媿於禮愛  多矣此帝所以嘆其度越常人也 吕大防兄大忠弟大鈎大臨同居相切磋論 道考禮一本於古關中言禮學者推之嘗爲 鄕約曰德業相勸過失相規禮俗相交患難 相恤謝良佐教授秦州大忠每過之聼講論 語必正襟歛容曰聖人言行在焉吾不敢不 肅大鈎居諫議憂自始喪至於襄事一倣古 儀所得爲者而居喪之節鉅細䂓矩于禮又 推之祭祀冠婚飮酒相見慶弔之事皆不混 於習俗粲然有文以相接人咸安而習之大 臨通六經尤邃於禮每欲掇習三代遺文舊 制令可施行不爲空言以拂世駭俗富弼致 政于家爲佛氏之學大臨與之書曰古者三
Interpretation

On the very day Emperor Shenzong ascended the throne, Daofu submitted a memorial requesting retirement. At the time he was Minister of Works and was appointed Grand Guardian of the Heir Apparent; he then retired from office. The court originally had no ceremony for officials to go to the Ge Gate to express their thanks, but he was specially granted entry into the palace to have an audience with the emperor.

Emperor Shenzong summoned him at Yanhe Hall, ordered him to be seated, and held a banquet at Zishan Hall, having all the imperial lecturers and readers compose poems to encourage and comfort him; his gracious treatment was very generous. Shenzong also ordered Wang Gui to record the matter. Daofu’s son Xiaoji also held a palace office; because he wished to support his father, he requested to serve as supervisor of Chongfu Palace. For ten years father and son, one after the other, held only idle posts, and then they resigned together; Xiaoji was only fifty at the time. Scholar-officials praised them and compared them to the Han dynasty brothers Shu Guang and Shu Shou. When Xiaoji’s younger brother Xiaoda entered the palace to report and answer questions, Shenzong asked after Daofu’s recent circumstances and sighed that father and son far surpassed ordinary people.

The Record comments: Hu Mingzhong believed that the brothers Shu Guang and Shu Shou resigned because they saw that the heir apparent was not worth relying on. This view is not necessarily apt. As for Daofu and his son, was their situation not exactly like this? Shenzong acted willfully and liked to make his own decisions; as soon as he took charge of government he adopted Wang Anshi’s proposals and allowed the reforms to proceed in confusion. How could gentlemen versed in the state’s institutions and regulations not worry about this? Later, the brothers Xiaoshou and Xiaocheng also could not escape having charges fabricated against them by Zhang Dun and prison cases launched; and when Zhang Dun and Cai Jing held power, the courtesy and protection they received were far from sufficient. This was why the emperor sighed that they far surpassed ordinary people.

Lü Dafang’s elder brother Dazhong and younger brothers Dagou and Dalin lived together. They compared and refined learning and discussed principles with one another, and when they examined ritual institutions they based themselves on ancient systems. Ritual scholars in Guanzhong held them in high esteem. The Lü brothers once drew up a Village Compact, which included: encouraging one another in virtue and undertakings, admonishing one another when at fault, observing ritual customs in social dealings, and helping one another in hardship.

When Xie Liangzuo lectured in Qinzhou, each time Dazhong went to hear him lecture on the Analects, he would straighten his lapels and compose his expression, saying: “The sage’s words and deeds are right here in these sayings; I dare not be disrespectful.”

When Dagou served as a remonstrance official, from the time of his father’s death until the funeral was completed, he followed those parts of the ancient rites that could be put into practice; during mourning, whether matters were great or small, he handled them according to ritual rules. He also extended these practices to sacrifices, capping ceremonies, weddings, drinking ceremonies, meetings, congratulations, and condolences, not allowing ritual to be conflated with ordinary customs. The various ceremonies were arranged clearly and comprehensively; people felt at ease in their dealings and gradually grew accustomed to the practice.

Dalin understood the Six Classics and was especially proficient in ritual studies. He often wanted to collect and arrange the writings and old institutions left by the Three Dynasties so that they could be actually implemented; he was unwilling merely to talk emptily about ancient systems while proposing ideas that went against current customs and startled the world. After Fu Bi retired to his home, he studied Buddhism. Dalin once wrote to him, saying: “The ancients…”

(The original text breaks off here; the following content is missing.)

公内則論道於朝外則主教于鄕豈以爵位 進退體力盛衰爲之變哉今大道未明人趨 異學疑聖人爲未盡善輕禮義爲不足學此 老成大人惻隱存心之時振起頽俗在公之 力若夫移精變氣務求長年此山谷避世獨 善其身之所爲豈以望於公哉弼深謝之  録曰中庸曰君子之道造端乎夫婦藍田  之社約至今猶有耿光者以蕡爲之父也  其曰德業相勸過失相規者莫過於戒淺  薄也而禮俗相交患難相恤可以相因而  舉苟於帷簿之間行有所虧則凡鄉閭之  内言皆罔信雖欲正五尺之童且猶不得  何况堂堂之元宰乎抑關中之俗自周以  來號爲篴古而橫渠之教頗亦有聞吕氏  數公殆門墻之巨擘也其於禮學乎何有  此又不可不知 天順日録景泰辛未值 上皇回鑾 廷議迎復之禮率以虜人變詐 不測爲辭祗欲遣一車兩馬迎之時給事中 林聦上言今者虜酋也先畏天悔過祗奉鑾 輿迎復之禮當用 鹵簿大駕會禮部尚書 胡濙出一簡與侍郞葉盛言内閣高學士穀 所示大率皆懇切而言 皇上之於 太上誼則君臣親則兄弟迎復皆宜從厚欲 以簡進庶知人心崇重之意靡間朝野吏部 尚書王直亦賛曰此禮失而求諸野者宜以 上 聞獨王文以爲此匿名文書類耳事將 寢聰毅然上奏王直胡濙皆腹心大臣事關
Interpretation

When you served at court, you upheld the principles of the Dao; in your home district, you promoted education and moral cultivation. Would any of this change because your rank rose or fell, your career advanced or stalled, or your body was strong or weak? Today, the Great Dao has yet to be made clear. People pursue deviant teachings, doubt that the sages’ instruction is complete, and dismiss ritual and righteousness as unworthy of study. This is precisely the time for someone of advanced years, deep De, and a compassionate heart to revive declining customs. That task depends on you. As for cultivating the spirit, transforming the breath, and devoting oneself to longevity, these are pursuits of those who withdraw to the mountains, shun the world, and seek their own perfection. How could anyone expect a person like you to take them up? Bi thanked him profusely.

The Record comments: The Doctrine of the Mean says that the Dao of the noble person begins in the everyday lives of husband and wife. The covenant of the Lantian Community Compact has been passed down to the present and still shines brightly because Lü Fen was the father of its author. The compact’s call to “encourage one another in virtuous conduct and worthy endeavors, and correct one another’s faults” is especially effective at curbing shallowness and impatience. Its customs of ritual exchange and mutual aid in times of hardship can also spur people to act together and put these principles into practice.

But if one’s conduct in private and family life is flawed, the people of the community will not believe what one says. If one cannot even set a five-foot-tall child on the right path, how much less can one guide the grand minister of state? Moreover, the customs of the Guanzhong region have been renowned for their simplicity and honest character since the Zhou dynasty, and Zhang Zai, styled Hengqu, also had a considerable influence there through his teaching. The several gentlemen of the Lü family were among his outstanding disciples. How could they have been unfamiliar with the study of ritual? This, too, should be borne in mind.

The Tianshun Daily Record states: In the xinhai year of Jingtai (1451), when the former emperor returned to the capital, the court officials discussed the ceremonies for welcoming him and restoring him to the throne. Because the Oirat leader Esen was considered cunning and unpredictable, most wanted to send only one carriage and two horses to receive him. At the time, Supervising Secretary Lin Cong submitted a memorial stating that Esen now revered Heaven’s mandate, had repented, and had submitted. The former emperor’s return to court should therefore be marked with the highest ceremonial honors, the full imperial guard of honor.

Hu Ying, Minister of Rites, showed Vice Minister Ye Sheng a note, saying that the views put forward by Grand Secretary Gao Gu were, for the most part, sincere and well judged. In formal status, the emperor and the Retired Emperor were sovereign and subject; in family ties, they were brothers. The ceremonies for welcoming him and restoring him to the throne should both be conducted with the greatest generosity. This would show the people the court’s respect for the Retired Emperor and make its intentions clear throughout the realm. Wang Zhi, Minister of Personnel, agreed as well, saying that since this ceremony had fallen into disuse, it was right to seek guidance from the people and submit the matter to the emperor.

Only Wang Wen argued that it was merely an anonymous document, and the matter was nearly shelved as a result. Lin Cong remained firm and submitted another memorial. Wang Zhi and Hu Ying were both ministers trusted by the emperor; the matter was of great consequence…

大體當公論不宜私言於是以其簡進而 上皇迎復之禮率得如儀皆聦之力云  録曰周子云天下勢而已此重則彼輕自  然之理也聖人治天下必使彼此無偏重  之勢人己無向背之情聰惟有此議而後  儲議隨之向使在廷人人若此必不如南  内之錮 東駕之更於是正監國之權明  攝位之誼既可免他日奪門之患亦可逭  異時郕戾之辜矣其於君臣兄弟何待禮  失而求諸野哉
Interpretation

When handling major affairs, one should uphold impartial judgment and not let private interests intrude. For this reason, Nie Cong submitted this proposal.

The rites for welcoming the retired emperor back to court were, for the most part, carried out according to established regulations. This was all thanks to Nie Cong.

The Hongdao lu comments: Zhouzi said that the balance of power in the world is simply a matter of one side waxing as the other wanes. When one side gains strength, the other naturally loses it; this is only to be expected. A sage governing the world must prevent power from tilting to one side, and must not show greater or lesser affection or favoritism toward different people.

Nie Cong put forward this proposal first; only afterward did discussion of the heir apparent arise. If everyone at court had argued their case as he did, the Southern Palace would not have been used to imprison the emperor, nor would the Eastern Progress have seen a change of ruler. This would have upheld the regent’s authority and made clear the legitimacy of his acting in the ruler’s place. It would also have prevented the later Coup at the Gate and spared Prince Cheng the blame he subsequently suffered. Why should relations among ruler and ministers, or between brothers, have had to wait until ritual order was broken before impartial judgment was sought among the people?

弘道録卷之三十四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0033); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 26 Vol. 28 →